#dnd-discussion
1 messages · Page 216 of 1
Not "here" here, but LFGs are here #find-a-game
Yeah not to be pessimistic but if you set out to change a system you don't know how to run you're gonna have a mess.
A change I thought about for new players able to win their fights a little easier
Don't really need to change any rules for that, just run easy encounters
Yeah
Tho the players might not enjoy being babied
If you have enemies fight dumber, have less health points etc, it gets easier
Changing rules is rarely needed i think
What would be easy encounters
Encounters that qualify as "easy" on the calculator.
Enemies acting like idiots even if they aren't
Depends on the specifics of the game. You cant blanket answer that
Keep in mind I'd ask the players first
Can you change the enemies health points for new players
If the players come in expecting consequences to matter and for combat to be a threat, then you potentially not so subtly protecting them above table it might lead to some issues.
So talking to players is a pretty core part of the game even before the game starts
If the players are new, its completely fine to do some tryout fights imo
But you might wanna let them know youll take it easy at first, so they dont get the wrong idea about combat
Or feel coddled too much
Yeah.
Babying new players too much can likely lead to issues down the line.
Are goblins a good enemy for new players
yeah
Goblins are probably one of the best people enemies for new players
They're low level enemies, they're recognizable, and you can easily introduce non-lethal consequences for being beaten.
Also really fun to roleplay as a DM, lil chaotic things 😏
Oh how many goblins are good to go against new players
Could start with 1 to 1 ratio of players to test out, then add a second wave if necessary
DMG?
Heavily depeds on the party level too
Question!! Fun animals that are at most one half in CR!! (I'm working on setting up a list for my new Druid)
If you're gonna use goblins then probably run Lost Mines of Phandelver
It's a starter adventure which is for new players/dms
Dungeon Master's Guide
I have a Bear, a Giant Frog, and a Giant Spider!!
So far, but since that game hasn't started yet, I may swap them out
Thanks, I don't have list mines of planhandler probably can't afford it
It was free there for a minute.
Wait... Dire wolf...
Before the expansion came out.
My setup at druid 4 is something like; Cat, Octopus, Dolphin, Giant Badger, Deer, Warhorse
Cool!
octopus or dolphin could also be lizard for spider climb
giant centipede is also nice
Bear and Dire Wolf are both CR 1 so if you're looking for 1/2 CR, you've gone a bit over 😛
I forgot that I'm a moon druid
How can I get a free copy of the lost mines
I looked at it, and it's hit points seemed lackluster
oh, forgot to ask, 2014 or 2024?
2014
yep, disregard everything then 
Oh sorry
Hm, backwards compatibility tho
The only thing that's not PHB is Hexblood, so I think I could try it
2024 wild shape gives hp based on class level instead of the stablock, and it doesn't drop when you run out of hp
Oh thats cool!!
lets you basically just focus on picking good forms for their traits and abilities
Scales better methinks, does it also use ur spell dc?
the point of it is it has a climb speed and blindsight in 2024
which together are a rather nice combination for scouting in like caverns and stuff before you can access bat
Oh oki
https://www.dndbeyond.com/sources/dnd/br-2024/character-classes#Level2WildShape like here's the info on it in 2024, they also made Wild Companion from tasha's a core feature 
Oh cool!!
my favorite change was that they basically made it so you prepare forms; makes it so people have incentive to curate a smaller list of stat blocks that they're more familiar with so there's less choice parallasys
4 forms of cr 1/4 or less at level 2
6 forms of cr 1/2 or less at level 4
8 forms of cr 1 or less at level 8, also unlocking flying
also swim speed is no longer level gated, just flying
Wish there was a channel where we can share our mini/character art
I don't see any
Any others you recommend
what do u mean
u might have to take it as a role to see them
As a moon druid at level 8, the CR forms would be 2, I think? But yea
that's the progression for standard druid, not moon druid 
I play Circle of Preservation c:
Ohhh
Ya, no i don't have any of those channels
moon druid is like 1/3 class level
Cool!!
check out id:customize , they're called dnd-arts-n-crafts & dnd-minis
they also get 3x class level temp hp and they can cast their circle subclass spells while in wildshape c:
and they get like one of the better offensive druid cantrips as a class spell as well specifically so they can use it while transformed in 2024 c:
More of a warlock or paladin
haha...
I main druid/lock c:
paladins are cool idk anything about warlocks
it's a mess but it's fun 
Thanks that helped
we have a warlock in our party rn actually
Time for a Cowzlock then
I love Druids, but I just can't enjoy them in high level games 😔
Evening ticktock
not too many decent higher level spells sadly >.>
I feel Druid struggles high levels
good for multiclassing though 
Indeed, especially on Rangers because they have a crap capstone
I mean you don’t really get that many high level spells even at high levels
Like slots 6th level and higher are usually only once a day until level 19 and 20
Most of your spells in a game are 5th level and lower
true, but classes like wizards are way too strong even if they can only cast a few high-level spells
*without dm nerf/ban
love this idea
This isn’t a recruiting channel.
#find-a-game is where you go for that.
Ok I couldn’t find that channel
Just click or press the highlighted part in the message.
If you don't have certain things in id:customize selected, the channels are hidden.
finally got my dice took about 2 weeks and 2 days to get them
Ive obtained an idea. A warforged stuffed with straw and dressed in lions pelt. An amalgamation of the tin man, the scarecrow and the cowardly lion. But what class??
Beast Master Ranger to add in Dorothy
Genius
Eh not really if you aren't ignoring key balance stuff. High level spells are met with serious resistances, high costs, and high saves.
welp going to make 12 chaotic evil characters
And situational uses
RAI yes, with so many common homebrew nerf on the various spell combos. RAW, no, there's many spell combo that's design to buff characters instead of just trying to hit as hard a possible.
Nah. People who nerf spells are often overreacting imo.
Unless we're talking 2014 Forcecage then yeah the '24 change acknowledged it was a mistake and that nerfs were correct
Spell combos and stuff like that can fall apart outside of hypotheticals
What were the changes?
I’m only familiar with the 2024 version
The ruby material component is consumed after the spell is casted
its also Concentration now iirc
It wasn’t consumed before?!
And also wasn’t concentration?
no
not when u have patience, giving everyone in (standard 4p party) the party resistance to every damage type seem to be pretty strong, or trapping enemies forever in a double save combo... etc.
Well I’ll be damned
I’d argue that in practice, if the party has enough time to give every member resistance at that level, the threat wasn’t strong enough
Also fairly sure simulacrum wish was patched
The former is a ninth level spell, and each time you cast it to do that, there's a 33% chance of losing the ability to cast wish.
Yeah, once players reach a certain level in my games, their enemies start scrying them if they're known to their enemies.
not officially
2024 Simulacrum's can't cast Simulacrum
Powerful Wizards yelling at each other to get the heck off their crystal ball network.
They really dont unless there's a homebrew ruling barring them from doing what the spell is intended to do
Resistances, RNG, LRs, not a white room arena, multiple enemies, monster abiliities
Whiteroom scenarios tend to fail to hold up when your Concentrating Caster gets punched in the face.
really hard
You hold monster the Death Knight? Good job.
The Ghoul just hit you and autoparalyzed you so you drop concentration
And now the Death Knight auto crit smites you into the next life
Cloud Giant hits you with Thunderclap, auto incapacitate
You don't engage with Legendary Resistances
RNG fair but you should have high to hit chance atp
Fullcasters will generally have a versatile spell list that isn't confined to just one damage type and most of it will be for control anyway
Monster abilities and white room elaborate?
That one Sherlock Holmes scene. "Discombobulate."
White room is "this will always work" but never considers reality
They should be CR20 for this dawg
No you cannot fly 120ft in the air shooting the goblin, you're in a dungeon and the ceiling is 10ft up is an example
nah
It is a ranged attack so all you gotta do is get in melee and you might be fine
fog cloud to cancel it out
but u can
Its a +12 to hit
It doesn't, it only gives it disadvantage
And if you cast it again, the old one disappears
How come?
also gives you advantage because they cant see you
Fog cloud (assuming neither can see each other) cancels out all disadvantage and advantage
enough for the old one to use a 9th level slot to cast wish
Simulacrums can't cast Simulacrum
Move backwards 120ft in the hallway unless that one is somehow blocked too which at that point its just moving the goalpost
Wish replicated spells still follow the spell rules. It just removes the casting time and components
bold to assume theres 120 ft of space in most dungeon hallways
So its a flat roll
Looking at official dungeons literally only giant sized dungeons will have that much space
Yes
the 120 ft long cave passage of doooom.
hence cancel out
no, u make one, it cast wish, u make another, it cast wish, repeat
Nope
Doesn't change the fact that its a +12 to hit and could do it again
A Wish replication is just casting the spell as if you cast the spell but as an action and without components and because your casting Simulacrum, a Simulacrum can't simulacrum.
yeah, double chance to incap you in a turn, or incap two party members. Finally hitting its CR 9
Fee Fie Foe Fuuuu-
They mean to use the simulacrum to cast wish for, say, resistances
Not for more simulacrums
no, u cast it, and then it cast wish to grant one party member res in 1 damage type
Imo its just a better statblock than most high CR creatures
It’s to avoid Wish Fatigue
They mentioned wish simulacrum chaining before
Did they?
a lot of 2024 monsters hit that level. Lich and Empyrean can paralyze/stun on a hit respectively, no save too
#dnd-discussion message
ah this
Lich has to do it melee (which they shouldn't be doing) and fair enough for the empyrean since even if they choose to not be stunned they take extra 21 unavoidable damage
Liches can teleport, they can afford to melee
Especially for that juicy 16d12 crit damage on the Wizard who thinks he's invincible
My Druid has the same Ac as plate armor (only plate armor)
Okay, I’m looking for elder nerds here. I know I’ve seen player housing before. But I don’t know where I’ve seen it.
Can anyone recall what book or magazine I could find player housing in and what edition?
One of my Sunday groups players wants to a contractor eventually. An we were hoping there way a direction to go in with housing that isn’t bastion rules.
Wait nvm
There's no official "housing rules" other than Bastions.
There are very few elder edition players here, so I’d recommend asking in #dnd-elder-editions if you haven’t already
Not even in previous editions? I could swear I’ve seen something over the years
Older editions maybe but not in 5e
Homebrew there's definitely something somewhere
I’m new to my hunts of previous editions
Google says 1e/2e had some Dragon mags that had such info in them
My dm said we'd play the campaign from levels 4 to around 16, and as a druid I'd get one level 9 spell slots at 17. I'm excited to get shapechange eventually
Through a small room
Shapechange into an adult dragon for true maleficent vibes
Enemy stays out of the doorway
For no reason whatsoever, ask your DM to have all four elemental genies appear at some point in the campaign (doesnt have to be all of them at once) :)))))
Whiterooms are a common issue among "this is broken!" Talks
Cause math can't account for everything in an RNG game ran by a human being.
What do you guys usually do when you can’t think of an idea for a new game?
Ponder then give up. Repeat
Define idea, do you mean characters or
Optimization discourse, and anything optimization deems broken (for good reason)
Well my One Piece game is about to end so I’m trying to figure out what I should run next
Naruto game
The assumption is that your situation will always be in your full control in these talks and thats what causes the whiteroom argument
Star Wars Saga Edition
They assume that theyll always be able to sit outside places wish chaining for resistance on all damage
Or that theyll always be able to sit hundreds of feet away with a bow
Nah they mean sitting outside the enemy lair doingit
Its mostly why its a guide rather than something people must follow
Make assumptions based on RAW but be ready to adapt accordingly depending on how much your DM is willing to entertain you
Personally id just have the bad guy meteor swarm the PCs hometown while theyre screwing around at home
Good luck getting to him
Not every adventure is gonna give players the time to cast wish 10+ times. You also have a 33% chance each time to permanently lose access to wish.
Maybe every wish cast a city gets meteor swarmed and the bad guy pins it on the party so now theyre pariah's and adventurers are hunting them down to save the land
Or shapechange into a genie
That’s an incredibly solvable issue as a DM
Hello Oberoni, long time no see
i still think its crazy that a dnd character with an 8 in strength can still left 240 pounds without needing to make a strength check
I don't understand how this wasn't an issue every day of the adventurers getting all the way to this level
Well its just storytelling in general, very rarely do stories have a true time limit on solving issues
He respected them for getting stronger but now that theyre being cowards so hes trying to get them to be respectable again
A game with the majority of the rules being "Ask your DM" makes it really easy to move goalposts
Sounds like a terrible strategist who'll fold without anyone bothering to plan
True but thats the point of it all
I’m not trying to say there’s not an issue at all with what players can do with downtime, I’m just pointing out that by not giving players that downtime, which is easily done especially at high levels, you can bypass a lot of these theoretical design issues in a practical way
DnD isnt being ran by an AI that bends to the players whims, sure you get pushover dms, but not all dms are unwilling to make players have to work for their victory
Putting time limits on stuff isnt homebrew
Even if there is a time limit, can't one just stretch out the time frame
The bad guy is gonna do X bad thing in three days, we have three days to stop him before that bad thing happens
You get 3 ingame days to get through 10 levels of a dungeon full of disintegration traps and amf fields that destroy your simulacrums, good luck cause Orcus will be summoned and he can cast PWK at will, not to mention all the lich's hes gonna have at his side, and his demons
After two short rests its not like the time has to be at sunset for example
So until a literal long rest happens (and even then, considering they're 8 hours), a day hasn't passed
black room in a nutshell lul
As the DM you don't need to assume, you can make that a thing
nice leomunds, lich sent a cultist to dispel
Eh I'm sure high op guys can figure something out, if they can take down three ||Zariels|| in Descent Into Avernus
A demon lord is gonna be summoned, this is a heroic game you signed up for. If you dont wanna participate, the games over
So let it be over
I've heard five Zariels is doable too
Probably yes
dont see that here
just that 3rd or lower cant go into the hut itself or pass through it
but dispel is just poof
At some point you have to ask, unless this is a challenge run or brainstorming, if you're actively making a campaign to kill off the party
We could simply just not play
Leomunds is a magical effect, and thus is susceptible to dispelling
Leomund's tiny hut is the magical effect that is being targeted
it's just like dispelling a simulacrum or a wall of force
this argument was about how DnD won't always be in your favor and so Wizards arent unstoppable cause theres no 300ft in the air to hide, you're in a 40ft room, and the balor can catch you everywhere with its 70ft flight speed, big reach and teleport
I mean sure there's no strictly enforced rules
the strictly enforced rules are the rules a DM chooses to strictly enforce
A DM doesn't have to let you be invincible cause "my math says so"
If a campaign wants us to start at 1 in all stats there's nothing anyone can do about it
A DM can and some will put you in tight dungeons where you can't get out of the range of enemies
Huh?
they can and will have more than 1 enemy
They don't have to but they could
Hi I’m new to dnd
PCs mess up a lot ime
Tbf, your game is pretty easy if you can avoid those types of situations.
The crux of the issue seems to be that optimization assumes RAW when advising people, but most people's tables don't run on RAW 100%
#dnd-newcomers and #optimization if you want to adjust something power wise with your character/making it functional if its a martial
Its part of being an rng game ran by humans.
Not everyone can or will make the best decisions always
"optimization" sometimes assumes bad faith rulings and a large empty plain battlefield which is where a lot of arguments stem from
I’m looking for items like figures to use in my maches
Which is why even optimization assumes auto bans on certain rulings
Not necessarily, no. That just means the DM pulled punches.
my last game shouldve erupted into a bloody hellish war but i gave them one additional round to stop a ritual cause I ashamedly pulled a punch
It's almost like the DM is playing the game to have fun with the players too...? It's a conspiracy!!
It's exceedingly easy, to the point that it's guaranteed, that the DM can make those types of challenges that the players can't resolve with skill. If anything, it really comes to play culture clash, considering that OSR (Old School Renaissance) resolves this issue by being almost purely skill-based and being exceedingly lethal.
It's all about procedures within dungeons, such as dungeon turns, that makes this even an issue in the first place.
3-party
I think Urizts approach is probably best
Dispel magic the simulacrum then send the caster to the forever box
You can always just eat your player
We're writing a hate letter to optimizers, duh /s
Resolving it with partial luck, obviously. That's why it's a dice game.
Villifying optimizers is kinda cringe
Wait wait wait… you want to resolve outcomes with randomness? In my randomness-based game?
not pulling punches doesn't mean dropping 300 sul khateshes, it's things like not attacking downed players and spreading damage out arbitrarily to prevent players from going down.
There's actually a great recent video on this exact subject: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zyl73XLJWhE
TL;DR: The exact play you're describing comes down to the breakdown in the play pattern that is required for dungeons to work, which also is influenced by the roleplaying aspect of the game.
or rolling open so you cant fudge crits
It's not that player skill is irrelevant, but that player skill only goes so far.
how do i recieve a mods help
Unfortunately the DMG encourages it
I have a write-up on why fudging rolls as a DM is good
my friend had a few characters for campaigns and he lost his characters and are not shown in character list
the DMG encourages DMs to look at both options and choose what's better for them and their group
I can fudge ACs and HPs too
In which case, I would implore you to watch the video I linked. This is a symptom of a breakdown in the play patterns of the game.
I just had the best idea for a future druid
No, it's a play pattern issue.
Circus themed
DM has full control to tweak difficulty in a multitude of ways at any time
Circle of a Wildfire, kinda themed after the Grimm Troupe?
- Does the roll need a certain result to fit the story? If yes, fudge the roll.
- Would the result of the roll make the game unfun for anyone at the table? If yes, don’t fudge the roll.
- Are you fudging the roll in the favor of the players? If no, don’t fudge the roll.
- If you still are unsure, trust your gut.
There are situations where fudging rolls makes the story better
I'll never fudge
As a DM, oh no the rolls didn't go my way today... Time to figure out how to roll with it or correct the ship next time.
It can ruin a game for me if i find out the dms fudging so i dont wanna do that for others that feel the same way
Honestly, what you're describing yourself. "I can bring my full knowledge of all the detailed rules into the game and utilize that, while minimizing the DM's ability to veto things, as my leverage within play." The inverse is that the DM can bring their full knowledge into the game and veto the things you are proposing, because that can be degenerate to play otherwise.
Can someone say that dumber?
If a player can learn all the exploits within dnd's rules, the DM can also do the same to thwart a player's attempts of exploiting the game
Then what's the point of investing into player skill?
2024 dmg just outright states trying to exploit the system with bad faith rulings is bad player behavior
All flying hit-squad bowmen for your land bound fighter squad.
A DM can say no we're not enforcing that rule.
do unto others as you would want them to do unto you
Not exactly, no. It's just that you are ascribing issues to the system when issues can exist within the playerbase having differing expectations from the game than the designers.
When I was a lil baby DM I was not as good at balancing encounters. My own poor encounter design led to encounters which were way too strong, which would have killed the players unfairly. In cases like that, I do not think I was unjustified in pretending some hits were misses. I see them as training wheels for when you as a DM get something really wrong. These days, I'm better at encounter design, and am way more confident running combats, to where I more often roll openly (sometimes even accidentally rolling publicly on my VTT).
Perhaps we stick to logical arguments rather than ad hominems?
Peasant railgun makes no sense
see, the attitude on display here is exactly why discussions about optimisation are always so hostile
Another buzzword to dismiss actual mathematical analysis
Yes because bad faith rulings is one of the more common issues that can occur at the table
Could you elaborate on this from a neutral perspective?
More often than not due to poor understanding of the rules or mistakes rather than malice tho
I think if anyone ever tells their DM that the DM is wrong during a game they’re evil and bad
I've seen a lot of discourse (and been a part of it) on both the pros and the cons of the play cultures being put into those buckets, but I will admit that people who only really are familiar with modern play often struggle to understand the attitudes that used to exist as part of TTRPG culture, so have a very limited perspective.
*Unintended rules interactions that may cause a kneejerk response from people who aren't into optimisation
I want to roleplay in my roleplaying game, I don't want to just optimise
I think it's perfectly fine to gently correct a mistaken rule or something that was misremebered during a game. If the DM continues to roll with it anyway, that's fine as well.
There is no game if the mechanics are optional, you may want a different ttrpg since 5e doesn't support it at all
Or just ttrpg without the tt and g
That is not what I said at all
Or freeform roleplay lul
This is the mindset I like
This very clearly misunderstands what cultures of play are actually meant to represent. Said play cultures represent shared attitudes and values that are in the background of how people engage with the game. NT/modern play is often indicated by a heavy reliance on RAW, and that the DM's ability to tweak rules as necessary for the overall play experience is minimized, being seen as a detriment to the experience. At the same time, that same value system is basically the foundation of what TTRPGs were based on, considering that any codifications of rules were based on shared values of what people tweaked and decided was fun.
There is also no game without the roleplay. At that point your not playing 5e, you're playing algebra
I mean that's kind of basically games in general
I've personally criticized the fact that 5e is significantly worse at actually providing play guidance than it should be, and that's probably the biggest flaw with the system.
Tbh I never liked people telling others to find a new system just because they prefer roleplay over the mathematics part of the game
What is a game if not a bunch of neatly tidied algebra
D&D in fact has zero algebra in it
There is, how much emphasis is placed on it is another story
Its really just basic math :>
I'm still bad at basic math :<
Dnd is a mix of theatre, math and English.
English is the story writers and character creators who want to create life and express creativity through dnd.
Theatre is the role playing centric players who want to immerse themselves in the world.
Math is those who want to push the mathematics of dnd to the limit, to try to empower their characters by creating intricate designs of efficiency and power.
Anyone who likes any of those things can try out and enjoy dnd, as long as their fantasies can be met by the system.
relies on the GM to provide a story structure
a car typically relies on its engine to move
Exactly
Chuckled at this, damn you
Yes, but dnd facilitates roleplay plenty well
"usually relies on the GM to provide a story structure" It is quite literally the first article in the 2024 DMG that one of the roles of a DM is "Storyteller. The DM crafts adventures, setting situations in front of the characters that entice them to explore and interact with the game world."
this implies there is something wrong with how 5e approaches social encounters/interaction, but its working exactly as most people want it to
I can't wait until 8th level where I can wildshape into a giant eagle and use the royalty free hawk sound effect
Heck yeah
To be devil's advocate we are in the official dnd server, hard pressed to find people actively campaigning against it
I can't tell you folks how many times I've had to pull out a calculator for simple addition because math was never my strongsuit
It was always reading and writing, though, admittedly I'm rusty on the latter lmao
Back when I whipped out a criticism a pf2e acquaintance of mines pointed out against 5e, and suddenly the server was all "filthy pf2e players, of course they'd think 5e is bad"
(... what is neotrad?)
As someone who plays Pf2e and D&D 5e, I absloutely hate both.
/joking
pathfinder sounds cool, but im not really sold on it
and it also sounds a lot more complex
Stupid math games making me do math. mutter mutter
Bah humbug
Awh, Phooey!
There's a lot of trap options, Paizo loves restricting players and caster gameplay is being a magic cheerleader
Funny thing about this, there's generally no issue taken by many with tweaking rules for the benefit of the players, which is what modern play cares so much about. This is why NT works for these podcast games. In the same vein, NT isn't indicative of optimization, but optimization with how it's being used in this manner is indicative of NT, because it would largely be shot down in older cultures as bad manners.
Oh I can do math (not that I want to) but I just find pathfinder to be too much
That does not work in the rules
also rolling lower on the die is better? what type of weird shenanigans is that
@burnt valley by any chance is it just me or do you feel like 5e's community is eerily similar to tf2 in that regard
In what sense?
Casuals wanting to burn down 6s/comp players if they have a chance to
Like friendlies vs tryhards?
DnD ain’t a physics simulator anywho
But replace 6s with optimization and you have dnd 
Creationist bards beg to differ
Slander!
I simply play a giant barbarian and turn the peasant into the AMMO for the railgun... I'm the railgun, by the way
(Hurls random pedestrains at a Tarrasque)
Yea, you don't get more damage for projectiles moving quicker
Yes this is a perfect parallel lol, and the root cause are the companies that made them
I'm going to paste the entire section on neo-trad in another message because of how long it is. Mods, feel free to delete it if it's too chunky. I just think it's helpful to have in the server as opposed to forcing people to follow a link.
We need more options for throwing people at other people
OC / Neo-trad
This is the only one of the terms that isn't fully an autonym, tho' "OC" can be appended to a "looking for game" post online to recruit people from this culture consistently, so it's closer. I also call it "neo-trad", firstly because the OC RPG culture shares a lot of the same norms as trad, secondly because I think people who belong to this culture believe they are part of trad. You also see this style sometimes called "the modern style" when being contrasted to the OSR. Here's an example of someone who calls it "neo-trad" elaborating a very pure vision of the style (tho' I disagree with the list of games provided as examples of neo-trad at the end of the article). On Reddit, "OC" is often called "modern" as in "the modern way to play" or "modern games".
OC basically agrees with trad that the goal of the game is to tell a story, but it deprioritises the authority of the DM as the creator of that story and elevates the players' roles as contributors and creators. The DM becomes a curator and facilitator who primarily works with material derived from other sources - publishers and players, in practice. OC culture has a different sense of what a "story" is, one that focuses on player aspirations and interests and their realisation as the best way to produce "fun" for the players.
This focus on realising player aspirations is what allows both the Wizard 20 casting Meteor Swarm to annihilate a foe and the people who are using D&D 5e to play out running their own restaurant to be part of a shared culture of play. This culture is sometimes pejoratively called the "Tyranny of Fun" (a term coined in the OSR) because of its focus on relatively rapid gratification compared to other styles.
The term "OC" means "original character" and comes from online freeform fandom roleplaying that was popular on Livejournal and similar platforms back in the early 2000s. "OC" is when you bring an original character into a roleplaying game set in the Harry Potter universe, rather than playing as Harold the Cop himself. Despite being "freeform" (meaning no die rolls and no Dungeon Master) these games often had extensive rulesets around the kinds of statements one could introduce to play, with players appealing to the ruleset itself against one another to settle disputes. For the younger generations of roleplayers, these kinds of games were often their introduction to the hobby.
I think OC RPG emerges during the 3.x era (2000-2008), probably with the growth of Living Greyhawk Core Adventures and the apparatus of "organised play" and online play with strangers more generally. Organised play ended up diminishing the power of the DM to shift authority onto rules texts, publishers, administrators, and really, to players. Since DMs may change from adventure to adventure but player characters endure, they become more important, with standard rules texts providing compatibility between game. DM discretion and invention become things that interfere with this intercompatibility, and thus depreciated. This is where the emphases on "RAW" and using only official material (but also the idea that if it's published it must be available at the table) come from - it undermines DM power and places that power in the hands of the PCs.
These norms were reinforced and spread by "character optimization" forums that relied solely on text and rhetorically deprecated "DM fiat", and by official character builders in D&D and other games. Modules, which importantly limit the DM's discretion to provide a consistent set of conditions for players, are another important textual support for this style. OC styles are also particularly popular with online streaming games like Critical Role since when done well they produce games that are fairly easy to watch as television shows. The characters in the stream become aspirational figures that a fanbase develops parasocial relationships with and cheers on as they realise their "arcs".
I think as a barbarian you should be ammo for the railgun as you are probably the most likely to survive it considering your hp
But I like throwing innocent people at incomprehensible beasts....
I hate when people bring peasant railgun up when discussing raw. It shows that they have no idea what they are talking about
Well that's why they bring it up here instead of the rules channel I suppose
way to ruin the fun by telling people that their parasocial relationships with famous dnd characters are weird
This is a sentence you sent
One time a problem player brought it up and for some reason I thought it would be a rustic crossbow. I was disappointed
Turns out, in a community of nerds, some people like to be nerds about the community itself 
I'm gonna bring up Peasant Railgun in the rules channel so I can watch them riot, brb /silly
You can be better
And there are the people who don't even know what it is. And call 3k commoners vs Tarrasque or Magic Stone "peasant railgun"
No my intern sent that sentence, sorry i'm now in full control
YOU of all people have faith in ME?
No but I feel like I need to say it
man...
I'm not naming my Pugilists Dog after you anymore
Ok don’t
who needs a peasant railgun when you can turn them into ballista ammunition!
No, it's not optimization as a whole. It's the specific style of optimization you are referring to.
Turns out, optimization is not a monolith, and has been around for a very very long time.
In the same vein, I know people who also describe themselves as optimizers and largely decry the exact behavior you are espousing.
Optimization in 1e was taking fireball
For sure, in which case we actually have evidence that optimization is not a monolith. Different people engage in it differently.
Okay
I usually just call optimization an above average way to build your character
its funny you say stuff like this and have the gall to use "redditor" as an insult.
If your'e not pre-covering every single tile in a potential encounter with ball bearings or spikes, are you Truly Optimizing? 
Based on the article, it's referring to a much broader category, specifically based on this:
These norms were reinforced and spread by "character optimization" forums that relied solely on text and rhetorically deprecated "DM fiat", and by official character builders in D&D and other games. Modules, which importantly limit the DM's discretion to provide a consistent set of conditions for players, are another important textual support for this style.
If you are not standing ontop of one another in a party and making the barbarian drop a stone on the individual below 40 feet in the air you are you truly optimizing?
I'm a bit confused what you mean by this. Do you assert that optimization is itself a monolith?
Anybody willing to share some popcorn for this nerd brawl?
Naturally. I have this as my quick react
I'm assuming that you aren't trying to specifically qualify only certain optimization as "actual" optimization.
I don't understand the current argument. Is there a hair that's being split on a subatomic level?
I stopped understanding a while ago too, which is why I’m just spectating now
The Optimal Definition of an Optimal Optomizer is being Optimized.
Were an atom of hydrogen on the surface of the sun right now...and too be honest...I have no idea what they are talking about
Some optimization is bad. Some is good. Where does that line be drawn, or perhaps does that line even exist? That’s the discussion
Well that's obviously subjective, as anything regarding play style is.
@limber trail please leave the server for the 6-7 stunt you have just pulled
Knome is our beloved goober
if he gets to optimeower, I get to do that
Why does this remind of of "dweomer" which is a word I learned from D&D?
I'm only spectating because I draw the line between expressing myself and caught up in astroturfing
"There are two wolves inside of me"
I thought you were supposed to be the goofy one
Owoptimizuwur
Not to be confused with the Dwemer I presume?
Not the damn dwarves...
No, but both are related to dwarves I think?
Symbul’s Synostodwoemer is my favorite spell name
There's nothing inherently wrong with it
I just had a thought...
something about... digging a hole
and eating rocks
Dweomercraft being the kind of enchantment dwarves didn't hate in Faerun lore.
Unless we're using dnd's version of the Rocket Jumper, we're all metagaming
I mean theoretically you could be putting others at risk for making your con score low
not just yourself
Apperently it's got ties to Old English and more strongly to Old Norse (Which loosely translates to Dwarf Talk, in, apperently?)
Freedom of expression and personal desire >>> social etiquette
True story! A friend once dumped con in a game I was in
But it's not for everyone. I've played with enough people who do not care about this and have fun in other ways.
She had twenty-something hit points at level 6
That reminds me, I hate the Jumping rules.
Optimizing is one valid play style. But it's not everyone's play style.
Lowkey cooking
there is a difference between trying to get good at a game and trying to break it
To be fair, she was a druid, so it was kinda okay
there is no game if you dont house rule away the "exploits"
*Moon druid
Or play with people who just don't care to exploit anything.
See ya myowwa
USER ERROR:
ERROR REASON: This individual has just lied
The key is that an individual doesn't necessarily get neatly slotted into an individual bucket, and they can actually be part of multiple. (The article touches on this.)
On that note, people can have different tolerances and even definitions of what constitutes DM fiat. Especially when we consider that how people actually run RAW is entirely different from each other. In that vein, I know optimizers who consider trying to engage in the game with the intent to utilize "loopholes" that are used as part of chargen as bad form and not in the beneficial spirit of optimization.
Cya
Regardless of how you all play
Make sure to optimize drinking water and eating food everyday 🧐
So… constructs, amirite?
So true, optimize hitting the gym at least three times a week as well
Ooh we should do a monster creation challenge where people suggest different parts of the monster.
love constructs. My level 16s are up against a Colossus this week. Hope I kill them.
I want 5 legendary resistances!
I don't think this would go very well
Like this:
Monster Creation Challenge! A different person suggest one of each of the
following!
Creature Type: Monstrosity
Preferred Combat Tactic: Grab and run using environment
Theme 1: shark with tentacle legs
Theme 2: revenge
Monster ability: Whenever they are hit with an attack roll, the attacker takes 20 flat Force damage per hit
Creature Type: Monstrosity
Theme: Shark creature with squid tentacles for legs
Theme: Revenge
Combat tactic: Grab & run / use environmental effects to do the work for them
That's not one of the things I ask?
Theme: gravitational pull
Or just gravity
too late, the themes are all filled up
Shame
I need better initiative
thank you for your helpful contribution to this discussion
Wow that was fast, hol'up gotta cook.
So a vengeful shark creature with tentacles for legs that abducts its victims before eating them and is a monstrosity
I already have a picture in mind and it's a nightmare.
Has anyone else seen the sharktopus movies? (obviously they are bad)
Wait, revenge got in before gravity
Yes
I was outsped
Has anyone ever heard of the Dark Lord (Dread of Domain Lord)
Draga Salt-Biter?
He's pretty cool, he's a Wereshark and worshipper of Umberlee
It would be cool, given everything, if this monster specifically tries to drag creatures underwater and drown them
Is part 2 of this "Everybody pitch this monster"?
I'm calling it the Megalodoctopus
You get to name the creature as a sign of good will
I an going to create my version, but everyone else is free to do one if they want
No I'm gonna name it!
Wrong
But feel free to make your own version
Whenever you use this creature btw, you must let us know how it went
Maybe it deals more damage to the creature that damaged it last as part of the revenge theme, idk lmao
I'm too tired to be really creative
Maybe it gets advantage on the attack?
Advantage AND more damage >:))
I like the idea of biting and dragging as well as tentacle-grabbing for this monster
Also this creature should solo a astral dreadnought
Normal attacks would require the enemy to make a saving throw, failed saving throws would debuff the enemy with Bane
if hit by the sharktopus tentacle the creature takes its hit point maximum worth of piercing damage
Creature Type: Monstrosity @cerulean monolith
Preferred Combat Tactic: Grab and run using environment @limber trail
Theme 1: shark with tentacle legs @prime basin
Theme 2: revenge @woven flint
"Mr. Nibbles"
When Dr Octavia Moreau of the Simic Combine was killed in a raid by a rival faction, no one expected that her escaped pet would stay to defend her lab, but the monstrous combination of shark and octopus uses its ability to squeeze into the various tubes of the abandoned laboratory to ambush looters, punishing all who would desecrate his beloved master's sanctum.
hehe, Octavia Moreau. thats fun
YEAHHH
one of the creatures made in the existence of dnd
Grabbing at reach and pulling into flooded tunnels is scary.
Imagine being abducted and drowned by a half-shark half-octopus named Mr. Nibbles
Give it blind sight so it can see in dark water.
Pennywise has killed someone with this exact fear exactly like this at some point
make sure it gets advantage on perception checks
What’s everyone thoughts on Foundry VTT? Is it worth investing in as a DM or should I stick to R20?
Yall are free to use my format to play this game
I prefer foundry more but roll 20 works fine imo
I crave violence could someone share a war hammer with me and point at something I promise I'll bring it back- just...mostly broken
Guys question: how boring is land druid really?
It gets the job done
You're going Land Druid for Web anyways which is like the best level 2 spell
Which druid has the best witch flavor? (Besides spores, I tried it and was not a fan)
Wildfire maybe, reflavor the fire spirit as a will o the wisp
Cooking!!
I like wildfire, I was thinking up a future character concept inspired by the grimm troupe
I find it to be boring and meh
I find druid subclasses as a whole to be meh which is why i think i'd only play a homebrew subclass
Should I give spore druid another try?
Spores is one of the best ones from what i've heard so you could. I also have a homebrew subclass I made if you wanna try that out
Shepherd is dead with the loss of conjure animals
I'll give it another try
Give it a proper burial
can always summon elementals
Witch is very broad, any druid works, can you narrow the flavor down?
i wanna join a party
Which is more interesting spore or moon?
I'm leaning towards spore
Also i figured out what I was doing wrong
I wasn't using wildshape
Like at all
I didn't even pick out animals
I actually don't really know... I'll work it out as I go
Wait I can use this cool lizardfolk art I have!!
Lizard wizard (druid)
I like spore more, it’s my fav
Yo where’s 3rd party talk
Do monsters get lair actions anymore?
Question: what playstyle benefits the druid the most?
Spore
Well spores likes melee a lil more, but usually hang back and blast, while supporting as needed
Between the two, definitely PAM
Did you not use Symbiotic Entity?
I didn't get a chance
I mean if you were using all your wildshapes on Symbiotic Entity you'd very rarely actually use wildshape for wildshape
?!?! You just use it at the start of a fight
Symbiotic feels even more versatile than Wild Shaping to an animal to the point where I'd only actually Wild Shape to an animal if I need to fly or scuttle down a narrow space
No I mean the one where you get a ton of temp hp + increased melee damage
At this point wildshape might as well be a moon druid subclass feature
Yea its cool. I was level 10 so 40 thp
Ngl yes, I think I Wild Shaped into an animal no more than 5 times in a T2 campaign as Spores Druid
How to play a shepherd druid without just making the game a massive slog?
Asking for a friend (his boyfriend is also playing as a devotion paladin)
Know your summons, have your statblocks and tokens ready, don't get fancy. Setting up complex nets of potential OAs will get the table rolling their eyes halfway through. Summon, attack. Or summon, bodyguard.
what's an OA?
Opportunity attack
Our table coincidentally (we have no real playing experience, we just chose based on flavour) ended up choosing all casters except the rogue who still can't decide between phantom and arcane trickster
I feel like I’m in another world reading alr from not understanding anything
drop by #dnd-newcomers !
Gotcha
Bum megumi is truly cursed
Yall yesterday me and my players decided to play, one of my players didn't have a portrait ready so we gave him an image of megumi as a temp as a joke
He didn't get anything ABOVE 5
He somehow made 2 identical pigeon nests, Next to each other!
He wanted to make a tent!
He only started getting good rolls once he stopped using the megumi portrait
can i use empowered metamagic after i roll? or does it have to be before i roll
That bum is a living curse
he truly is... a curse
Anyway, how is everyone doing this fine evening?
I believe my existence is satisfactory
Ooh you're on my side of the globe, then!
Mine too
Wait that makes sense. We're the only ones up to chat.
theoretically, what would a 20th level spell look like, since it only goes up to 9th level, and we know that 12th level was enough to fundamentally change the rules of reality
It is well beyond theory
Nuke ig
Nukes are well below 20th level
Arguably meteor swarm is approaching nuke power levels
Honestly it's a bit meaningless.
What would it look like if a god were double omnipotent!?
we theorized that a 20th level fireball would be the equivilant of the big bang
It doesn't really mean anything, just trying to put numbers beyond where numbers apply.
I think not a modern 1 megaton warhead is far more destructive than any meteor swarm. And such indiscriminate weapons are unlikely to be used by "Heroic" adventurers.
At certain levels of power what do you want to do? Rewrite reality to add a fourth spatial dimension?
Reverse the relationship of causality and time?
How are Dragonborn's?
What's the context?
true. at one point, it becomes kind of pointless.
Yes, the question doesn't mean anything.
there's a reason why it only goes up to 9th level. and even then the 9th level spells are terrifyingly powerful
Idk when the campaign has to end for shits and giggles
Might as well ask what happens when you reach Warp 10.
I don't have player handbook in front of me what are Dragonborn's
maybe you can cast wish without the chance to lose it
Humanoids with draconic characteristics such as scales, fangs, sometimes horns and tails, and the ability to project a breath weapon style attack depending on their specific heritage.
Asking what a 20th level spell would do is the same as asking what a 100th level spell would do.
I cast wish, i wish for more fireball
human but more zuckerberg
Here's some more about them: https://www.dndbeyond.com/sources/dnd/br-2024/character-origins#Dragonborn
you can never have enough fireball.
I feel like a 20th level spell would be “I cast Disable Collisions”
fall through the floor
Well, a floor would struggle to exist when it’s struggling to collide with itself
Oh so everything clips into everything else and you reverse the Big Bang?
Sounds bout right
If you make a tortle an artificer with the artillery subclass, you could have potentially made blastoise in pokemon
Subatomic soup.
I feel it would be interesting to cast "Reverse Causality" so that effects came before causes in time.
Red Dwarf did it.
Or “Anti-Entropy”, so all things move towards order rather than disorder?
But alas, the 20th level spell isn’t omnipotent
As the spell “Fix Scheduling” is, unfortunately, far too powerful to exist
Easier to make a pocket timeline where time only advances when everyone is in it and ready to game. Only issue is you'll have one person who is suddenly geriatric at the second session and then they're gone.
Ah, play by post?
-# this has gone over the computing capabilities of Nugget.
Sadly, yes.
Does pbp even have sessions
They can, kinda.
It runs by scenes and chapters.
I think some pbp games have sort of session times where everyone is expected to be online and available to participate in a scene?
Ok so I’ve learned that wizard, and even more so scribe wizard, is the most expensive class to play in the game 😭
A 4th level spell costs me 300 gold to buy and 200 to copy into my book, and scribe’s need a ton of extra spells for damage types to swap around 💀
It’s to make up for not buying equipment, I heard
Like, other classes (are supposed to) spend money on armour, weapons, etc, but wizards don’t need to buy any of that
So the cost for copying spells should make up for it. Although I’ve rarely had a wizard in my party so I’m not certain if it does
Well my current shopping list of spells up to 4th level will run me about 2000ish gold to buy and copy into my book, and each level of spell costs a LOT more than the last so idk
Don’t need weapons, but I have a level in cleric for shield + armor profs so I’ll be getting those too, or hopefully just finding some at some point lol
Tho instead of a magical weapon, I need an arcane grimoire for +1,2,3
Anyhow basically yeah wizards guzzle gold 🤣
Oh lord I have severely underestimated the cost for higher level spells
3rd costs me 300 to buy and copy into my book, 4th coats 500, and im not excited for 5th 😭
Dayum
Do you think there is abyssal fried chicken in sigil ?
i just rolled a nat 20 on my first ever combat roll W
And then rolled max damage
And then next turn rolled max damage without crit
hell yeah, that's awesome
Why need a gun when eldritch blast exists
I know in 5 edition there not a actual knight class but in your own campaign can you have one
I mean a fighter with a noble background kind of hits typical knight vibes
And that's from official D&D materials
Paladin too, also hits a sorta knightly vibe in a slightly different way
Is that the tin man from the wizard of Oz?
....I would be lying if I said it wasn't
Didn’t tin man have a gun?
Did he?
I swear I saw a screenshot from the original film that had tin man with a gun
I might be tripping
What type of daragon would be good ally of the adventurers
I say any metallic one
Any of the metallic ones
And here's the sugar on the cream I now have a glock 19
But out of the metallics, I’d say silver or gold
Probably depends on the setting, the location where the party meets this ally, and then whatever the story purpose of having this ally is.
I heard copper dragons are quite brazen at times
Chromatic dragons are the ones who follow Tiamat and therefore all mostly evil
so he doesn't but funnily enough, scarecrow does
Aha, I knew it was at least one of them
Ok think I'll check my monster guide book
How do I get into d&d! 
Visit #learn-to-play for everything you need to get started!
- [What is D&D?](#learn-to-play message)
- [How does it work?](#learn-to-play message)
- [Where do I join?](#learn-to-play message)
- [Frequently Asked Questions](#learn-to-play message)
Does thirsting blade / another double attack feature stack?
How would you imprision a spellcaster without being inhumane using only RAW (0 homebrew)
Without being inhumane means no being gagged 24/7 and no being in manacles 24/7
Marry them and force them to live with their mother in law
Put them in an anti magic zone
it's concentration and 1 hour gng
not a permanent prision solution
even with circle magic you gotta chose between keeping concentration on or big area
just noticed outlander background isn't available in 2024 rules. but now I have no idea what background to use cuz the character's whole thing is she's an outsider in an unknown world. we're talking from an isolated nation of warrior women (amazonians) where the mainland is in the 1960's in terms of tech while my character's island is basically still in the classic fantasy, and also has no idea how to act around men. ideas on backgrounds that fit an outsider character in 2024? really sucks they removed the outsider background outlander. I know backgrounds don't need to have anything to do with your backstory but I prefer when they fit
With this additional information which you didn't provide at first, then you can't do it without gags/binding.
Short of being able to put and keep them in an area with a permanant anti magic field, you're left with gags and binding.
And removing focuses and components (but removing those doesn't absolutely prevent casting).
Extra attack features do not stack generally, far as I know.
Fair.
Bro, they said without being inhumane
Two options:
Pick one that has the features you want. Remember it doesn't matter which bit of your character grants a proficiency, only if you have it or not.
Use the custom background and stitch it together yourself.
I am a pleasure to be around, thank you very much
This is already becoming torture-
I am considering soldier out from the description of it and a society of warriors train since birth
Who wouldn't like a bardic spouse
I figured it out
In a bit more modern / sci-fi setting you can just put them in a coma till their sentence is over
Add anti spell/magic weapons to the sessions
Its time of him to face npc that makes him powerless😤
I am looking for more permanent solutions
I thought you said without being inhumane? Being put into a coma could be considered inhumane.
I think being put into an anti-magic zone is more humane then that.
If you have the resources for it, I could see prisons built in dead magic zones
Athletics, Intimidation, Savage Attacker and bumps for your physical stats. That work for you?
Anti magic prisons
Brother
- I should've mentioned this but the entire world's level cap is 14 (including NPCs and PCs)
- Even if there was no Cap the state will go broke keeping that maintained for all spellcasters
Least inhumane way I can think of
Dead Magic Zones can exist regardless of level, they’re a world feature
she is a glaive focused barbarian so pretty good
Where do I find source material on them 🙏
DMG 24 mentions them as an environmental effect
I will read it - thank you
It’s pretty simple - an area where magic doesn’t function, as if under the effects of the antimagic field spell (although it’s not a spell)
Actually I may worldbuild a magical prison like this
A comet from the Astral, a blasted crater of black glass where nothing grows and the ground itself is a hazard, and huddled in the center a squat and forbidding fortress.
Named my kenku Bowstring Flick hows that sound
Are they a ranger?
Rogue but they were an archer in a war
And have a shortbow
awesome
I hope the name is a John Wick reference
It is now
"That Nobody..... is Bow Flick"
"I saw him stab a guy, with a stick"
Hes gonna be a morally grey character, he needs money after his home was destroyed from the war but hes not exactly evil
I have doomed an entire campaign with a single comment, fear me for I am the bard
(A note when portraying morally grey: It's generally not an issue to play but remember to stick with the party's alignment broadly.)
Advocate for morally grey actions of course, play to your heart's content, just when push comes to shove, you're part of the group, make a character who can work with them
Which I only say because it's a trapping some morally grey characters can fall into
Of course, i dont want to ruin anything for the party
The man's after money to rebuild his life. He's not going to steal the charity box, but what's the harm in exaggerating the expense report a little, asking for a little extra?
He hears they need a guy who can sneak, he joins. He gets allies and money
I saw him stab a guy with a feather
The party needs money, he needs money
He joins them and he has help to get said money
Yeahhh like that
More of a #rules question, but no. It should say that in the feature itself.
And kenkus can be great for distraction since they can mimic voices
Or have a parrot familiar
Actually, is that even an option?
Because I could imagine a wizard or sorcerer from Calimshan or some other places dressed in extravagant colourful dresses with a parrot familiar.
i just bought ALL the divinity games
How many sets of dice do you have for the game?
there's not necessarily a stat block for it. I doubt it'd be hard to homebrew mind you, but nothing exists as of now
Yeah, I guess mechanically there is no difference between a parrot and a raven
Like, which stat would you even change?
How do I get stats? I need a character sheet made desperately an idk how to do it
You just follow the instructions on character creation in the PHB.
Generally, your GM should be able to help you make your character sheet, especially if it's your first time making a character
You could use D&D Beyond, but I have many ethical reasons to avoid this website personally.
I’m using a character sheet app. What dice do I roll for all 6 stats. I’m an eladrin artificer i think
I think you should stick to standard array or point buy unless you're in a rolled stats campaign
What does standard array mean (I can just google that)
You build your character's stats based on the following numbers:
15, 14, 13, 12, 10, 8
So for each stat, you wanna roll Four d6s (6 sided dice). Then, you take the three highest rolls, add them up, and that's a stat. You repeat this six times, and those are your stats. You can assign them to abilities in any order
Oooh okay
For point buy you'd start with 27 points (which adds up to the same stats as standard array, except you have more freedom in choosing the exact numbers you want)
If you're using the standard array for an artificer, your stat priority should be intelligence, constitution, dexterity, wisdom, strength charisma. Maybe.
It's not the only option, just the simplest one.
Guys I have literally never struggled this hard for a character backstory / personality!!! What kind of person do you imagine would be a sniper build warlock?
Start with something more basic. "sniper build" tells you nothing. It's a warlock, alright. So someone who sought a pact.
Which species? Which background? Which culture?
I did my character and I got introduced as a lump that fell out a dead monster and I’m now naked in a coffin 😭
Want to go on over to #character-discussion and workshop it?
Best introduction ever
Iconic
....before anyone asks idk why my thing says potential spammer, im not and i got reported by discord only a few days go, i'm trying to fix it but idk what to do
Reminds me of that avantris clip, "hi everybody with dnd beyond you too can stumble around for 5 minutes to make a simple ability check"
Really? I should recalibrate my expectations, huh.
Discord moderation has gotten weird tbh. I’ve seen other people complain about being labeled potential spammers as well. Not sure what causes it
joined a campaign 15 minutes before it started and made a quick halfling rogue, right now I am using a poor png of Chilchuck as a substitute for a token.
With dnd beyond youll be just as unprepared for your turn as you are with pencil and paper
Whats the best website to use?
For?
For dnd
That doesn’t narrow it down.
Whats a good way of running horror where the players are just like normal scared, not scared for there lives
(Or maybe a mix?)
That’s still very vague. It’s a matter of what entails in that campaign.
I’m just wondering because people are saying dndbeyond is bad
Depends on what you mean, combat , general dnd, or roleplay/maps
I personally use roll20 if it's battles you mean
Yeah dnd really is just a character sheet, talking, and sometimes dice
don't even need dice, get yourself a big ol' wheel, and that'll do the trick
You could probably just flip a coin too. Just something for a random answer.
I think the 2014 DMG even had rules to remove dice all together
I wonder if there are any roleplaying systems that remove dice
that would be interesting
Yeah plenty.
Remove? There are some that don't use dice at all, if that's what you mean.
Hundreds probably
Many! Recentlly, I played Good Society which has no dice
Yeah that’s what I mean since DND was the first popular one and heavily uses dice
Hunt is a pretty good one too
Dice aren't intrinsically included in order for something to count as a TTRPG.
Does it play better with no dice or is it the same but different?
Amber is a diceless system.
This is moving more towards #non-dnd-topics
It's complicated. I'd advise googling it. It's a game set in phases meant to mimic a Jane Austen novel
Oh that’s sounds really cool. Ty
Going back to DND, has anyone tried playing DND without dice?
Yeah it’s alright
It’s basically a “check if your passive stat passes to DC” method
also cause im saying this cause i have no idea who messaged me back about the discord thing, all it says is i broke "Discords rule for spam" which i have 0 idea what that's from or how to get it off my account
So you work on ways to boost it.
Advantage and Disadvantage give +5/-5 to the passive check too
When it comes to any dice roll it’s just “use the average”
Contact Discord and work with them to deal with the situation
That makes sense
It’s a neat way to play, I’ll give it that.
You lose the randomness but it’s probably less work
It mainly becomes “how can we get advantage or give disadvantage”
But where are the critical fumbles? /j
i've sent my request but so far nothing and that was back when this all started, it's still here tho so idk what to do with it now
Or the classic “I’m gonna make sure I get the highest roll possible with all kinds of buffs- oh I rolled a nat 20…”
How can I change character level in creating characters in dnd beyond app
No one but Discord can help you resolve it so you'll just need to be patient and work with Discord to address it. I'd recommend not direct messaging folks that are not in your friend list as that certainly won't help the situation.
Anyway back to D&D
It's on the class screen, pretty sure.
Cant wait to use my kenku rogue
Thank you John Paladin for your Rogue /jk
Don’t worry soldier is just a background
it's very fighter coded
What is a good class for a Dragonborn
... Whatever you want to play! Once again: RACES ARE JUST MODIFIERS.
All classes work with all species, pick the one you think is fun.
Looking for some suggestions
Try a barbarian!
Commonly Fighter and Paladin was their association on release.
Of course many like to tie them to anything Draconic.
So a Cleric or Warlock of powerful dragons and dragon gods.
Druids and Rangers to match the natural magics of draconic power.
Monk and Rogue because they are awesome design wise with Dragonborn frequently.
So on and so forth.
The big obvious one being Draconic Sorcerer.
My personal strategy is look at the PHB art and say "Ok I want to build that guy as a PC"
What is draconic sorcerer part of
Part of?
And what rules are better to use for character creation
Sorcerer and the Draconic Sorcerer are both core rules in 2014 and 2024.
Personally I think 2024 is a lot better as a player. But that can depend on your group.
Ok
Don't go on a rant about why you hate sorcerer class design, don't go on a rant, don't go on a rant. Have some willpower Incubus buddy
I love Halflings.
I rolled two nat 1s which were then invalidated by the "Luck" feat
then, I rolled two TWENTIES (dirty)
RIP Stone Sorcerer
RIP Phoenix Sorcerer
RIP Sea Sorcerer
RIP Strixhaven Sorcerers
has anyone here played PBP? How is it
So very slow
Very, very slow
In the amount of time it took 3 adventuring days I ran the campaign book twice
The immortal snail will catch up with them
well looks like im not going to be trying that then
I love the concept because I like writing, but the pacing really bothers my brain.
Was gonna start my Dalelands game next Saturday but I ended up noticing that’s Valentine’s Day
Reading Adventures of Faerun got me excited for DMing something new.
I love how much guides it gives for different adventure and campaign ideas
I remember seeing a german cop wearing like chainmail and wielding a staff irl and that makes me want to see modern medieval fantasy game where guards use riot shields and heavy armor combined with mail
That would be an interesting discussion for me. As I think the opposite.
Hey guys, do you think the " Staff of Powers " is great for a Sorcerer? My DM is being nice and is blessing us all with a very rare item
Id choose a Bloodwell Vial +3 imo, if they have Tashas. But Staff of Power is nice too.
My personal strategy is look at the PHB art and say "Ok I want to build that guy as a PC"
it is very good
So here's something I've noticed: D&D bards are nothing like real life bards. Historically bards (and any other name they went by, depending on the region) were travelling musicians who made songs, many of which became famous from their songs. They were celebrated more so as poets than singers or performers. Meanwhile in D&D bards are loud, charismatic and expressive "theater kids" who flirt with everything that moves. I know what this is a stereotype, and it doesn't apply to all bards. And I'm not saying I dislike the stereotype either, I actually quite like it. I just find the difference interesting.
I think the stereotype is farther away from the title than the fantasy the game actually presents
What do y'all think of a section of a campaign being like the sweetheart area in Omori?
The assumption is that all the characters will be traveling, and bards are the "performer" class, so outside of the game saying those performances are so good they give you magic, the position is technically the "traveling musician" role. You go from place to place, performing ballads and plays of your team's heroic deeds to make your group famous
I woulddd but my DM don't allow 2014 things
The line " DM, I'd like to persuade the Dragon " is the equivalent of a Warlock's eldritch blast
The idea of being a charismatic face and some history I'm probably just not familiar with got bards the "seduce the dragon" stereotype so people focus more on that, but what the game says bards do is as much of a bard thing as a paladin is a knight or a cleric is a clergyman
That is a stereotype.. Not everyone plays a bard the same way, and more times than not the stereotype of Bard is horribly wrong.
Which was established in the original statement mind you
Yeesh. Then you dont have many options at all.. Bloodwell Vials were never reprinted so they should be viable. Or else many classes have no access to any way to buff their spell save dc or spell attack rolls unless its staff of power, archmagi robes and I guess wand of the war mage?
Only warlock got their rod 🙁
Yeah I now see how dumb my comment was. Although many medieval travelling musicians are still known by their names to this day, we really don't know what their personalities were like for 99% of them. By the way, I can only speak for medieval Europe, since it's the only part of the world I have any experience with.
I don't think what you said was dumb necessarily. It could be interesting to think about how the historical thing differs from the big pop culture zeitgeist thing
I just think that the thing that makes it seem like dnd bards differ from historical ones isn't actually the dnd aspect, but the flattened tiktok stereotype of what the dnd characters are
What we know about the most famous ones I can name off the top of my head are their names, where they were from, the songs they wrote, where they went, sometimes if they were married or had kids. And of course the songs they wrote. And that's it. Most of the times the sources don't mention anything about their personal lives.
Yeah what I'm saying is we don't really know that much about the historical ones on the first place
That's what in retrospect makes my statement dumb
Even then I'd kinda say that applies to most historical things.
We could know what a crusader knight's armor and gear looked like, but we most likely won't know his favorite food or what kind of jokes made him laugh
Just cause that's not really a level that gets written down for the history books
You kinda gotta fill the nuances into the gaps left by the broad strokes
Do any of yall have like an emotion based gimmick for a boss?
So im in a campaign as a path of wild magic barbarian. And rolled a d100 on a d100. Which my dm had his own table for it. I now have permanent rage until I roll a d100 again. Which may never happen. I was originally going to go wild magic sorc at lvl 7. But now its quite literally useless. What other multiclasses do you all think would greatly benefit from a permanent raging barbarian? I was thinking fighter. Maybe champion
But I feel like it's better thst way for a game that tells people they can role play as practically anyone
That seems like... Broken don't it?
Anyways druid
can somebody teach me artificer please
Not really. You might find some more useful help building boss fights in #dm-discussion or if you wanna make a monster that's not from a book #homebrew but I'm not sure if emotional gimmicks translate super well into the mechanics. At least, not from anything I've personally encountered
Sort of. Path of wild magic isnt really an optimal barbarian subclass to begin with. And its up to my dm
We actually do know a lot about many notable crusaders. You need to remember that these are orders, and have hierarchy. And the higher-ups of that hierarchy had quite a lot written about them.
Fair.
But why specifically druid? All of its spellcssting is well useless. All spellcasting is now useless as I cant do it
Because you keep rage while transformed ;3
Rage Bear is only super viable lower levels
Or else literally just like fighter
We must remember, D&D isn't a videogame where you must constantly optimize your build to deal the most damage. It's about fun and creativity and working together with your party.
It's the best I can offer in this case
Maybe like fighter for action surge ig?
And even then Rage Bear doesnt work in 2024 anymore.
Since bears do not make a strength based attack with a weapon or unarmed strike. Its just a melee attack.
Ah, well a bad example from me then I guess. I think overall though the idea of a personal assessment of a historic individual is more of a rarity. I think you'd be more likely to get an idea of the impact they left behind or items they owned rather than the kind of specifics that would really let you build something around replicating who they were as an individual.
I know. Which is why i went wild magic. And why i was going to go wild magic sorc for utility. I was already planning on stopping at 6/7 for barbarian and multiclassing. I just cant multiclass into what I can now. Literally would be useless levels
So ive been debating on other classes. Which im now severely limited too
why not stick to mono barb?
With permanent rage brutal critical would be crazy to pick up now
Dc 10 con check to stay at 1 hp with a +5 to con
Hm, brutal strike you mean? Cause brutal critical isnt in 2024.
I dont remember 2014 barbs having the CON save to stay alive yeah
According to dnd beyond 9th level I still get brutal critical
If you have that, youre not using the 2024 barb
which means you dnt get the DC 10 ( +5 for subsequent)
Historian here (probably should have mentioned that from the beginning) we tend to get information from someone's personal life when they were really important. Usually a leader or a noble who did something important enough for it to be written down. Historical records were very commonly held, and you can conclude a lot about someone's personality based on their actions and words in a specific event. In the case of bards, we don't really know much about them because their actions didn't really have an impact on important historical events.
Ahhh then the link i went too just simply was wrong. I went straight to dnd beyond barbarian
dndbeyond has both 2014 and 2024
Is your group playing 2014 or 2024?
A mix but mainly 2014
Always ask the DM if you can implement something
Ok, in that case
Im more or less looking at options now that sorc is no longer available lol
I could stick with barbarian. Survivability during rage is much better it seems. Or I was also thinking fighter. A 3 level dip.
battlemaster fighter is a common build with barb
“Dark Sun is coming!” I scream as they lock me in the asylum as another month past with no release schedule
Battlemaster was also one i was highly debating
I want this as well we should've got one by now
Friendly reminder that you don't need official material to run a campaign, you just need creativity
If I go fighter subclass what split do you all think i should take? Currently level 5. Would instinctively think taking 3 levels in fighter now would be the most beneficial
You can write stuff yourself and just use the basic rules
And there's also nothing wrong about using outdated rules, many people do that
Not a historian here. I do think it’s important to acknowledge that the production of manuscripts or any historical record is not the act of recording someone’s life but a literary genre. The idea that someone did something and because it was important enough to be written it was written elides the fact that these records and manuscripts were produced for a reason. Crusader tales follow hagiographic tropes of the time and often talks about temptation and sacrifice. The stories of lords and kings followed conventions of the genre from faith tales espousing someone’s virtue to courtly love where two men have more romantic tension than the woman they fight over. The idea that you know a person or group by stating they have historical texts about them simply means you knew how the person who made the tale wanted the figure to work. I think you need to establish a stronger historiographic premise in which you acknowledges either the lens you deploy to examine your sources or the work of someone else. Just saying we know a lot about them is misleading. But as Foucault said, “I am not a professional historian; nobody’s is perfect.”
Okay congratulations on calling me out for being a bad historian. And you were right. I am not a historian. I am an archaeologist. But I did have to study history so I thought I could still call myself that.
You are also absolutely right, the lives of historical leaders do tend to be idealized usually based on religious virtues
Echo knight also sounds fun. And since echos are spellcasting base. Just magic base it would work
Echoes are spellcasting base you say?
Aren't* my bad
You magically create an echo but it doesn't count as spellcasting. Which means you can do it while raging
Atleast from my understanding
can somebody help me learn artificer
Sorry I wasn’t calling you out for saying you’re a historian. Call yourself a historian or an archaeologist or whatever you want. I just find that when people make an appeal to authority they do need to specify positioning because without that it assumes a consensus which subsumes all others.
My take on the original question you responded to as someone who i not a historian or an archaeologist is that trying to play a historically accurate version of a thing is pointless because it assumes a stable definition that does not exist. Defining the bard as a traveling musician ignores the troubadour and trouvere of Occitan and northern France or William Shakespeare who is the bard.
Qq, what class would fit artificial intelligence and what would fit authentic stupidity
Artificer, and then... uhh... Barbarian?
^sounds about right lol
Nah artificer wouldn't be artificial
They smart fr
a lot of classes dumb stat inteligence
They don't pretend
intelligence is essentially the wizardry stat
artificial intelligence... Sorcerer?
Lore bard seems artifical inteligence
Nah I don't think so (0 bias)
Or Knowledge Cleric
Well a lore bard doesnt need high inteligence
but what is artifical inteligence?
like AI like a warforged?
Warforged are a bit beyond AI
I also hate the term historically accurate and think that it’s pointless standard
Lore bard could be very chatgpt coded with the way it used persuasion
what is Arcane Armor and what is a long range
Arcane Armor is a special feature of the Armorer artificer. Long Range is the range where a weapon attack will have a harder time hitting an opponent without automatically missing
is the forgotten realms heroes book good for non forgotten realms games? been wondering that since it came out.
since i’m sure some of them aren’t like, super setting specific
I mean it has the stuff like the subclasses and feats if you want that
Banneret, Knowledge Domain, Cold Walker, theyre all pretty setting neutral
yea
My opinion is that the subs are on average not very good, and I wouldn’t say it’s worth the price if you’re just trying to get a few subclasses, but whether a book is worth the price is entirely subjective
Real I am desperate for a 2026 roadmap
i doubt we’ll get one tbh
i think with their two lead designers gone they’re kinda in shambles tbh but that’s just my own speculation
for major expansion books i mean.
i've just had the least fun session of my life 
I could go without Dark Sun personally
their two lead designers left in April of last year. There's no way they haven't filled the slot with other people
that’s totally valid
i enjoy the setting and how aggressively political it is, but i know it’s not everyone cup of tea and tbh im worried how they’d do it given their rough track record with bringing back old settings for the most part
WOTC’s replaced them with one new lead designer (looks they may have consolidated both roles into one), but I think the transition hasn’t fully settled yet
Hence why we haven’t heard any sort of news as to what they’re planning for this year yet
I’d like to see Psion printed but im not sure if I want to see dark sun tbh
i think dark sun's probably gonna happen. Hasbro wants setting book money and darksun is the last relevant setting leftmreally
I figure Psion+Apocalypse Subclasses basically gurantees Dark Sun
id be interested to hear why, i think im on the same page but its always interesting to hear other takes
Based off the UA we’ve gotten yeah. Dark Sun is all but confirmed imo
i love the sorcerer king dragon stuff personally.
I’m just saying I could go without it
can you elaborate?
I’m not looking forward to the Internet reaction if they do reprint dark Sun
with the bastion rules being such a big thing now, i think birthright would be an awesome one to bring back in some capacity. recently read it and quite liked it
i think that dark sun has a fan perception of it as "the gritty 90s edge slavery setting" which has made wotc hesitant in the past
Agreed. I honestly want a Bastion-like system for Nations in a Birthright product
It’s just tough to tell, because when Perkins and Crawford were in charge, they relatively recently said there were 0 plans to bring back Dark Sun. But now that there’s a new sheriff in town, who’s to say?
it very much is not that, i think it does a decent job at depicting those things as inherently evil but ive only read the core box set
Dark sun isn’t really what the Internet thinks it is but that perception, what it actually is, and how WOTC will inevitably change it makes it ehhhh