#dnd-discussion
1 messages · Page 178 of 1
This is def something I adore doing when I'm player! Noted
Honestly, that's maybe the best general advice: Run a combat for your players that you'd have fun being a player in. And keep taking feedback, obviously. Don't forget that the DM is playing the game, too.
Any ideas on this?
My first version was just one type of enemy that was weak, then I added more variation and pact tactics (to try to encourage them to kill the enemies before the main one to not make them get stronger), and that still slowed down the game
This snow storm is gonna kill me chat if the roads are too icy my party’s wont be able to do our session 2
That's unlucky
Forced, mb
Spells that give them debuffs and make them do rolls for save
Ooooh
So instead of attacking to damage use attacks for alternate reasons that still involve the player?
yep, call it make them float and them slam on the ground, call it polymorph, even blind//deaf can work
Make a character be deaf and ask him to deaf himself in the call if you all are using Discord or ask him to mute his allies until he break the deafness
or make X kind of enemy attack X player forcing them to either the other allies to protect him or others stuff
Even can use Assassins hidden in the scenario
Oh! I think I'm getting something else your implying. I force team synergy?
As in I force them to coordinate and defend each other so it doesnt feel like. I'm having a a1 on 1 with everyone?
yep, this and other many stuff.
Make them to understand that every encounter must be taken in some way.
The martials go forward, then they get attacked and focused by everyone because they isolated themselves
The team stay too close with each other and there is a caster, make it have some AOE spell and force them to scatter, etc. etc.
Guys I am new to the game and I don't know how to join a campaign I have learned about it a lot though can anyone invite me to a campaign i am a sorcerer
So I reward smart behavior punish bad decisions/boring ones?
This server has a join campaign thing
Here bud, youll have the info needed right here
oh thank you
Very
Did you reach it in time?
Cause me specifically I can’t see alot of my friends that go to other school besides these session😭
Yep, if they go full monkey do bonk they get punished, but not always.
With certain enemies//levels
Oh?
Yeah, with animals you can expect them to go wild and savage
With some tribal group kinda
But with some professional bandits you expect some strategy
One last thing I believe!
How do you deal with multiple attacks from minions
being a player or a Dm?
It seems to me when i have so many minions I try to be smart and seperate my attacks but it takes a billion years
DM. Like with necromancers or just a bunch go enemies
im tempted to run a bunch of Easy Campaigns for new players. like Phandelver , Icespire Peak, Storm Lords....I miss the Easy ones... ahh the memories
welp, make them basic attacks easy to track or a special condition attack, if 3 to 5 enemies are around a player they do a group attack and do lots of damage to that player.
My dm normally do that if its too much enemies of one kind, he do a group initiative of them and move them 1 time and do 1 attack or action with them in that turn, not everyone of them but with some
+4 skeletons, roll their initiative and when its their turn he move some or all of them.
now if its less enemies or some special enemy give them their own initiative.
Call it a heavy skeleton or a ghoul
at the end try things out and finally see which your players and you enjoy and understand more
go slowly adding the difficulty, not instantly because will be a train crash on them
can i make dndbeyond dark theme?
on your character sheet yeah
Necromancers are super cool, I just wished instead of having lots of undead that you just got a couple of really strong undead instead that level with you. Having an army of skeletons is cool and all but not for the rest of the party 
teh economy action is obliterated
Cannon fodder vs Solo Necromancy type generals
I forgot the exact name of the channel but its something Pointy Hat (I think) that did a really good video on changing Necromancers.
The idea isnt bad, the thing is that most of time the undeads ate your bonus actions or actions.
Dont they have their own turn orders?
and lets be honest, most setting dont like seeing undead people walking in the place
So, In the oneshot I'm currently in we're testing out the UA's for
New Storm Herlad Barbarian
Vestige Warlock
Mystic Monk
And
Spellguard Paladin....
And we are royally MURDERING everything lmao
"I dress them up with my disguise kit!
"
oh wait, might be mistaking it with summons or other stuff
Yeah as far as I understand, animate undead spell has your undead have their own action economy. Thats what really bogs down the game, because you go through each skeletons attack.
It doesn't really scale well either. A skeleton at the end of the day is still just a skeleton.
make them a group and attack with all of them at the same time, less hassle but more risky//reward becuase if they miss all miss but if one land all land
add them magic items or strats, strap magic bombs on them or smt like the breachers from clash royale or smt
Yeah thats how I'd do it too, lots of DMs do it this way. Makes it so much simpler. Id also dangle the carrot of instead of "quantity" of undead, Id ask them if they would rather have a couple "quality" undead. That way it at least scales to something potentially scary for enemies.
dang twenty +2 to hit Skeleton missing everything
4 normal skeletons = 2 upgraded skeletons
Unless you want to do like an ant swarm and suffocate the enemies
and then harvest their skeletons from their dead bodies for frighten them.
Lets hope your party get used to it.
What's better with the spell, summon shadow spawn, fury or despair?
How to optimize an ancients paladin to be the tank of the party? (24 rules)
You'll wanna head to #optimization!
Probably Fury
If you can use the scream thing to frighten something, then it has advantage on attack rolls against the creature
What’s the consensus on UA Hexblade currently? I’m really into the idea of a melee character dishing out curses so I’m really excited for its (probably) eventual release but seems like they really don’t want you to have medium armor >.>
I never group my enemies up
Anyone ever play a swarm keeper?
I played a 2014 Circle of Spores Druid / Swarmkeeper Ranger in CoS
Played a [Swarmkeeper](#dnd-arts-and-crafts message) once in Curse of Strahd, one of my favourite characters I've played 😎
Sadly left the game for various DM related reasons, but really wanna use him again at some point 😭
Swarmkeeper is just such a nice vibe for a CoS campaign 
So many fun flavor options for so many different situations and settings~
I’m probably going to play a gloomstalker for my DnD club group and the ranger sux jokes were already flying in the meeting 😭 I don’t feel discouraged though idk why but gloomstalker in particular just seems so cool
It’s a meme, and an overused one
and the death toll for this months games goes up to 9, Prismatic Spray violet rays go brrrrrrrr
sup
The sky!
lolll
i’m pretty excited because i’ve always loved the idea of being a tracker/scout and it’s probably good to play something other than warlock once in a while
see, I play a Druid/Warlock who is basically a tracker/scout with healing and utility spells XD
Ranger sucking tends to be about the original one in the PHB, which got a lot of features most DMs tended to not use, like being good at traveling in specific terrains. Since Tasha's they are actually a great and fun class 😎
and the 2024 ruleset was very kind to base ranger (except for all the stuff surrounding hunter's mark
)
Something something "the major problem with ranger is most people opted to not deal with one of the 3 pillars of the game"
Holy Crap, Folks
Used my Ring of Amity to make my Paladin friends attack a Crit
Holy Avenger +5th level divine smite + The passive smite damage and Holy weapon...
And we did over 140 damage to a Lich >:p
It was peak
Any utc+12 friendly games ?
I recommend looking in #looking-for-players and just wait until you find one
Thanks appreciate that
And people kept choosing Hunter's Mark
hunters mark is pretty good as ranger....what was their subclass usually?
my first time i chose beastmaster
im using hunter for the damage upgrades mostly.
The idea in my character is hit harder and the most further away from the enemies and mostly using long range weapons
I will put hunters mark or any other offensive spell in mine
is 2014 so i have those explorer and foe thingy, sadly
right makes sense then i expiriment alot with different classes still gettin the groove on what i like... its been awhile since i last played dnd
i will kinda do the same, for now i will see how it goes and how the campaign go.
The chances that i will have to kill a betrayer in the team arent low so... will see
ah a duel to the best man winn i say
Its a sorcerer, he betrayed me in a point and i wont let it slide, its even siding with the giga bad guys.
He will only last 2 shoots.
seems legit hehe
Beast Master is really really fun! I'm currently playing one.
Hunter's Mark gets outcompeted by other things pretty fast, but it's good at lower levels.
i think it was ranger that had this but i tryed gloomwalker at one point and i thought it was pretty cool
let me double check
gloom stalker thats the one
Gloomstalker is popular.
Gloomstalker ranges from 'solid pick' to 'campaign breaking' depending on what campaign / module it's picked for
i think what i was going for was a corrupted deal where as time went on my ranger got more and more corrupted as time went on
back in 5e14 days I played one in dungoen of the mad mage... being effectively insivble permanently against 80% of enemies is an interesting game mechanic...
Part of me wishes there were higher and higher level "Mark" spells like how there's many different Smites
1st - 1d6, 3rd - 2d6, 5th - 3d6 would have been nice scaling for ranger
but ranger always got the shot end of the stick in dnd
that also bein said im also kinda a cliche when playin ranger and go some form of elf...but usually im either wood elf or half elf
I'd also want range increases and greater benefits to tracking a creature with a higher Mark on them
i tried to recreate a character my first dm made to honor it but i made him a bit different than he did
I mean .. I feel like my Ranger is pretty good.
he was an orc but rather than being totally brutish and melee based i kinda made him delve a slight bit into necromancy
Granted I mostly ignore Hunters Mark and get by fine.
you playing 5e24? i have no idea how they play in that... base phb 2014 ranger was pretty dog (but had a few good niche builds). Later they buffed the heck out of it and it ended up being a weird class that had a lot of useless features, combined with extremely overtuned features
yeah idk. in 2024 the Ranger consistently did... everything the best
they were the most skilled/expertised PC, they output the most damage, they excelled in adventuring in a variety of environments
i loved the fact i made my ranger skiled in forests...and never ever was put in a forest XD
this was one of the core issues with 2014 ranger
you picked certain senarios and if you were in them, the benefits were so great that you deleted an entire pillar of play (such as having to find food, water, and avoid random encounters) and if you weren't in that scenario, the class feature didn't exist
then as a secondary later down the line i found i was always in the plains so i made him skilled in plans...then never was in plains XD
yeah seems about right lmao
Hey Chat
yeah. the new Exploration stuff involves Skill Checks, and Ranger now gets Expertise (commonly in Survival) and they are just the best explorers for that reason
i have made some pretty over powered characters just based on luck without even needing the extra buffs
I'm looking to do some experimentation with using Google's Notebook LM to act as a DM/GM for some upcoming test runs. Has anyone here had any experience in that?
Ranger really shines with travel mechanics to bad it's overlooked
it needs long and complex prompts to function at all, and the context window is small which essentially means the game's rules / continuity will break down within about 10 - 20 responses... I have run lots of local LLMs and none of them are good unless you want to run very short scnearios in vacuum
That's actually incorrect - the context window for chatgpt was indeed small small but when it comes to googles Notebook LM you're able to upload around 50 source documents, with each having a 500,000 word capacity.
yes but it cannot load all of these into memory... when you request information from these documents the LLM does an API call to an interpreter and key-word searches for information related to your query. This is then added to the model's context window, bloating the chat even further and degrading further responses
Trust me LLMs do not make good DMs, even flagship cloud models like GPT 5.2 will slowly degrade, no matter how many reference documents you provide them with
TLDR you still need friends to have a good experience playing D&D
But people are scarry 🤣
hehe yeah but its rewarding
Ranger is still good even without that emphasis.
Chatgpt is no longer the leader in LLMs it's Google. Have you tried Google llm specifically?
That's why I got into DMing, I am socially awkward and am shy around people and have no self confidence and because I got into DMing I'm improving
I've followed Gemini closely and found it to consistently disappoint. It's worth noting that even though these models boast 500k, 1m, 2m token context windows, their responses will break down much before they get anywhere near their 'limit'.
But honestly this isn't D&D talk. Feel free to do what you want but from my experience there is simply no LLM, local or commercial, which can effectively DM any D&D campaign for longer than a one-shot's worth of content.
I freakin' love travel. I use an 8 mile hexgrid and have a big table for how far you can travel in given times based on ur Speed
Better overall class Wizard or Sorcerer? (in both 2014 and 2024 rules)
I love it. It makes time pass in the game, people feel like they've been adventuring for a while because the distances add up
in 2014 Wizard was a clear winner, Sorcerer simply gets too few spells
They feel like a wizard but missing most of the versatility that makes wizard great
for 2024 i'm gonna have to say Wizard cuz swiss army caster
My wizard is a spell gremlin I collect spell scrolls like Pokemon
I just recently pilfered a necromancer's spellbook!!! I'm an Evoker so I got a ton of new spells to toy with
hope you have the money to scribe all those spells 👀
My wizard has a spell book they are studying with arcana checks for RP
The party does! I just gotta convince them to let me break the bank
Respectfully, I disagree, you seem very "traditional" in your mindset on this, and while there are many people that don't want the game to change from its traditional form, there are many people experimenting with this concept to great success.
https://www.reddit.com/r/rpg/s/LFR2WeT0yG
As I said this is an experiment and im looking for other players that are interested in that experiment
bro if you're "experimenting" and not playing "traditional" D&D, that's not D&D, that's fantasy calvinball in which case it definitely does not belong in this chat 🤣
My party is terrified of my necromancer I kinda just yoink spell scrolls 🤣 I'm only level 3 with like 30 spells rn
So you speak for the entirety of this discord then?
I don't think it's much of a stretch to say that this particular discord server would probably be biased against AI in general, given it's destroying the livelyhoods of artists and writers
Technology has changed all arts over the years, and the ones that thrived were those that adapted to that change... Your statement is as old as time "tv killed the radio star"
OK now this chat definitely doesn't belong in the D&D general discussion
Ai just praises you like your some kind of god with no bad ideas
It's not that great for DMing it doesn't and will never be a good representation for peoples reactions in a real world sinario
Ok, it was ok before when you wanted to discuss your opinion but when I make a point you don't like you insist on moderation. Got it.
I was happy to engage when it was on topic, and I shared my thoughts (that it's a feeble imitation of an actual D&D game and no technology exists currently to improve on that). You can't just say "i disagree" 🤣 that's a total non-sequitur.
Surely you can find discord servers dedicated to solo play RPGs using LLMs?
There are communities for everything, but text-based roleplay with an LLM is not D&D, never will be, and honestly doesn't really make much sense to talk about in a D&D server
LLM?
ai like chatgpt and google gemini
I see
Using AI to play d&d isn't the same as actually playing d&d. I'm lucky enough to have an irl group to play with at our LGS and honestly 80% of the fun is from the social aspect of it. Infact I even met my girlfriend there lol
Now im not gonna lie, I did use AI to play a lil bit of d&d (everweave app) but that's because I got ads for it and was curious to try it. And yeah it's fun but it's by no means a replacement. Just a filler
Hi not gonna lie, I’m Nugget
I set myself up for that one 😭
Ah so this server is anti AI so at best you probably won't get the discourse you're looking for, at worst mods will come in and put a stop to it
as it should be
AI is cringe
Just to clarify what Sublime is saying, there is an explicit rule in this server not to post AI generated material.
That rule: #1133105533553999995 message
I just dont know why youd want a computer to dm for you
Convenience, as most things AI
Yeah but even ignoring the whole “doorman problem”
Its a social game
Removing social aspects seems weird
It’s completely fine to discuss (within the bounds of the other rules)
Noone would call it "D&D" though (as in refer to it as if it were equivelant to the TTRPG), even though it's an absolutely brilliant game
$60, platform limitations, and limited replayability
Great game ofc
“Limited replay-ability” is something i disagree with, unless youre saying there IS a limit
Plenty of people call it D&D. I call it D&D. It's not the D&D tabletop RPG but it's still absolutely D&D.
It only has one main story (with quite a bit of variation in dialogue and in game options)
D&D is more than the TTRPG and has been for decades.
I find something new about it every single time
D&D novels, video games, tv shows, movies, etc ... all of them D&D without necessarily being the TTRPG.
I should clarify sorry, it's definitely D&D as in part of the same intellectual property / franchise, but noone would ever talk about BG3 interchangeably with the TTRPG becuase one can't ever reasonably replace the other
Still a great game, and imo a great intro to anyone looking to learn tabletop
Id argue that replay ability doesnt mean the story has multiple main stories
Eh it’s basically the same thing lol. That’s such a semantical thing. It’s dnd adjacent which is clearly the point all the same
Otherwise roguelikes wouldnt have such high replay ability
I don't find that any more accurate, in fact I find it confusingly less accurate.
Well its built off the 5E ruleset
It’s definitely possible to enjoy multiple playthroughs. I don’t believe it’ll be nearly as enjoyable for many on the tenth playthrough (or even the third or fourth)
But anyways
BG3 is an RPG, in the costume of DND5e
idk its more accurate in my head, probably not but it makes sense to me
Sure, but in the context of people who want to do D&D without playing with actual other people I'm saying the video games are right there.
BG3 is shockingly replayable, I will agree with that. I'm on a 3rd playthough and I keep finding massive areas or encounters I never experienced before
Im on my 5th and i still keep finding new stuff
I didnt know there was a second djinn in this game
And I think the video games are much more ethical than trying to use AI.
Yeah look I'm getting into semantics at this point. But to me when someone goes "do you want to play D&D with me / join my D&D campaign" I ain't thinking of BG3 ahah
I think I found mostly everything within 3 playthroughs
But anyways, BG3 isnt a TTRPG, but it is DND as a system
Once I realized I had the BG3 character creator I was set. No need to use AI ever. Although sometimes I still comm artists
Why? Do you think videogame companies are bastions of good lol? You think they also don’t use ai or ai adjacent things
That’s a crazy line to say and someone to heart. A lot of video game if not all do a lot of bad stuff
I think in this case, of Larion studios? yeah. actually... they are well regarded as 'good guys' and have a very anti-AI stance
Larian does use it but not in the generative aspect from what I read. They're probably specifically talking about genAI and stuff
A number of them avoid AI, and popular ones which do use AI still don’t use it in any key way
Larion recently delcared that they had expunged AI in its entirety from any stage of development. They had previously been using it for concept-arting
Sure they don’t use ai I bet they do a lot of other stuff it’s a corporation they want money lol. Saying anything like tha has some weird moral high ground is dumb
And I think larian has used ai before
I think they used it for baldurs gate art? Still a great game lol
They have, but not in the normal way that everyone hates
And to be very honest I don't think AI is inherently unethical, either. AI is being developed and used to do stuff like detect cancer and sequence genes. But that's not the use of AI that's being pumped out and causing harm to both the artists community and the environment.
Larion aren't publically traded which means thankfully they can prioritise morals over quarterly profits- no shareholders to please. And honestly they made a MOTZA with BG3 so they're set and under no financial pressure
The tech isn't inherently bad, its the people using it
I'm sure they're not squeaky clean but lets be honest the competition is .... EA? Ubisoft? ugh.
They used it for placeholder assets, not for any of the final products
Sure they maybe aren’t as bad I promise you no company is thinking ya let me not make money that’s still the big thing not saying they are devils or anything but I’m not gonna ever say a company if all tbings has morality on it
So they use ai?
And people just using ChatGPT to try and DM D&D for them are kind of just contributing to the problem of scummy AI.
Non-generative AI isn’t really relevant to the discussion
Hence my "that's not the kind of AI that's causing the problem."
If you think using placeholder assets made by ai in development is morally corrupt, i fundamentally cannot agree with your disdain for AI
tbh as long as Larian doesn't use gen AI to do an aActivision idrc if they use it. The greasebags putting it in are the bad part not the inherent tech
They did cancel their planned BG3 expansion becuase their employees "hearts just weren't in it" (despite it being guranteed to be a massive financial success)
So clearly management at least somewhat cares about the wellbeing of their staff and honestly I respect that moral integrity
I bet you the rich company using it is doing WAYYY more for ai lol then some random discord user. Idk if I agree with their system but eh
I plan on doing a durge evil route next
Im not excited tbh, but i do want to experience it
Yes, probably, but we should also not contribute to the demand while also feeding all our ideas to the scummy AI.
I don’t disagree it’s corrupt idc for ai use at all. My point was to in reference to someone claiming a videogame has a moral hogh ground to ai use
Kind of crazy to me that durge was supposed to be paladin, but I can see it
There’s a lot of scummy things ppl use. Do you use Amazon? Or anything super big corporate? I’m not a big ai guy I don’t rlly care way for it
Pretty sure playing BG3 is not contributing to the use of scummy AI, but if I'm proven wrong I can change my opinion.
It does, yes. Morally speaking, using AI in its production as a placeholder asset is a lot more moral in my eyes than using it in a final product to be sold to people
It was used for some stuff I’m not saying it’s a crazy or even substance amount I’m saying even that is more then some random dude on discord lol
Trying to do even a little better is not and should not be denigrated for being high horsey.
Its weird but also fits, i think the sorcerer angle is better tho for mass appeal
Especially since youre forced to kill
It is high horsey ppl don’t do it for other things of equal or even worse value. It’s just ai. If you have hate for one horrible thing and then are actively using others well ya your being a hypocrite
I'm pretty sure way more people would be questioning why paladin if they stuck with that lol
Then it’s a battle of hey my bad thing is less bad then your bad thing
Thats… not what hypocrisy means
Made the most sense to me ngl
You're making perfect the enemy of good. One cannot know everything, but one can try to be better with what they do know.
Name checks out
Feel free to correct me on the stance instead of saying just I’m wrong lol. Saying I’m wrong and then not expanding moves nothing forward
It's not about judging who is doing better, it's about just trying to do better yourself.
so to me video games are more moral than AI because
video games create jobs - AI destroys them
AI datacenters are polluting and consuming huge amounts of drinking water, driving people's water prices up, contaminating it, and driving electricity costs up (video games do none of this?)
And AI companies are singlehandedly responsible for the entire current consumer hardware price gauging crisis - for GPUs, RAM, and solid state storage... they are taking collossal amounts of resources and screwing over the little guy
so they can... what? generate endless slop in youtube shorts? 🤣 yeah idk not sure I like it
Hypocrisy is saying and condemning someone for doing an action then doing that action yourself
You just described someone condemning someone for doing a specific action, then doing something “just as bad”
Which ppl don’t do as was my point. If they did they wouldn’t use half of those other bad things also it’s easy.
You think most ppl here who prob use Amazon NEED to use it? Or is it just easy to do so
Thats not hypocrisy thats a difference in moral judgments
Yes the hypocrisy being in doing a same lvl of bad action. Someone is condemning for doing bad while they are als doing bad stuff
“Bad” I’m not demonizing any random person for contributing to that the affect the have is minisual
Probably a mix of both. There's only so much energy a person can devote to doing the right thing, at a certain point you run out of mental energy to even make decisions and just end up doing the convenient thing. This does not make you a hypocrite, it makes you human.
Again, youre the one deciding its the same level when its completely different topics
That isn’t hypocrisy
Do you think all those companies are wonderful bastions of good?
But we can try again when we have more energy.
I can claim murder is bad, then steal something from a poor begger. Both are morally bad, but im not a hypocrite
They are probably worse lol. Amazon is on a TEAR
It doesn't have to be black and white like that. You sometimes have to settle for what you can get and try and do a little bit better later.
Sure don’t use hypocrite then I don’t think my point at all changes
We're all just trying here.
It does, actually
I mean there's questionably "evil" (Larian) and there's straight up evil (gen AI)
Just because gen AI is bad doesn't make Larian the second coming of Ao
A lot of ppl view ai as black and white. That’s my reference
Because the difference lies in accessibility
I don't think I am one of those.
I think capitalism is bad. But i still participate because realistically, i have no choice
Then my argument wouldn’t apply to you
And yet you keep directing it to me.
You have no choice but to use Amazon? lol
I don't even understand what "evil" Larion has done though? They treat their employees well, create great games and charge reasonable prices for them... paying for an excellent product isn't even "greedy" or anything... They even publish their games on GOG.com so you can "own" it (download a DRM-free copy...)
Again youre ignoring my point and focusing on amazon
You’re respond I’m not going to keep fully track of who’s saying what. I’m now alerting you then my argument wouldn’t apply. Like that is the new information
But on that point…. I have no choice but to shop at walmart. Its the cheapest store in the area and i dont make enough money to support local grocery stores
As you are focusing on ai yes I’m giving an example. I think ppl reach hard to make other things besides ai seem less bad then they are
But walmart is def evil to me
I don't think it's unreasonable in the same conversation to ask that of you, it's not like this has carried on over days or something, but okay.
AI on the other hand has absolutely no excuse besides convenience
If a guy wants to use ai for his dnd game I think there’s way bigger stuff then 10 ppl in a row telling him ai sucks
Accusing people of trying to do better with what knowledge they have as being on a high horse seems unproductive, to me.
Sorry lost mr here ask me what?
There isnt a large premade system they were born in to use something that has notable detrimental effects to cognitive ability and the environment
Ahh but see this is like the "shopping cart test." If it's a rather easy task and no one is currently looking at you, do you do the more ethical thing or not?
^
Let's have a pallet cleanser and move on yeah? This discussion is a little bit to heated if you ask me. So... What are your D&D Plans for this weekend?
To keep track of whether or not your point applies specifically to me when you're replying specifically to me.
going to use my brain and creativity to write stuff for my new character!
but also paint some minis
i just finished a session as a dm where i made my players steal stories from the fae wild to get abilities
Unfortunately, none this weekend 😥 . Planning a very cinematic next session though!
Picking up on our campaign from before the holidays! Which is great.
Hoping to play my wizard to get him to level 4 so I can pick up warcaster
They had some absolutely awesome ways of dealing with fae trickery
I have 2 dnd campaigns I am dming for. Finished making maps for it
One is leaving a sewers system of a bombed castle the other is entering a Druidic bank
I was looking forward to playing tomorrow but my body today says "Hold your horses there buddy"
So my attendance is hanging in the balance
You can't weak-out! The party needs their.. uh... (what are you playing)
Health comes first
Now, my players must fight one of the vampire head of bloodlines (basically liches but instead of phylacteries they can place their hearts into concepts/objects/people)
I feel so bad for what happened today in my dnd grouo
Oh?
Where for once im not dming
Basically, we sailing on a boat, im a human paladin
Wizard innate n allat
Either I am playing my Celestial Warlock, Thief Rogue Dragonborn or I am playing the UA Oathbreaker Paladin Celestial Warlock Kobold. Unsure What it is going to be yet
oho, session 1?
No but we have 2 Sessions running in my friend group xD
That's a mouthful
What can I say? I love Multiclassing!
Me when I play a ranger 5 / monk 3 / rogue 12 👀
The dm tells us the boat catches fire during a thunderstorm.. we put out the fire but it turned out I made my poor fish friend (custom like sea serpent dnd race stuff) did all the work when I had shape water and couldve helped
Oh no the M word is spoken 
I feel so bad ;-;
I'm playing a necromancer wizard death claric warforged so I guess I also play a mouthful
Well, that is something that can happen of all time
(The joke is that for a time, there was anti multiclass sentiments in general)
Ik, it happened in our last campaign but I didn’t think I’d ever made the mistake 😭
wait, when ?? where ??
Only issue I have with multiclassing is that newbies immediately turn to it without knowing it weakens them without knowing their alternatives
And that there ain’t enough decent monk multiclass options (I main monk)
How does multiclassing even work? I've only seen subclasses
I wanted to multi class for spooky themed character
I've been Multiclassing since I started playing Fifth Edition
First character was a GoO Lock Ancients Paladin XD
When you level up, instead of taking another level in your class, you take a level in another class
Yeah I think I've alway just flat-out said "no, just trust me on this one bro" whenever ive DM'd for newbs. never had a problem and it stops them from hamgstringing themselves
Oh, thx for the explanation
I say “run the multiclass by me first, and have a good reason for it”
I love multiclassiny
I like doing it too, sometimes. As mentioned I main monk, who sadly don’t multiclass the best.
Oh no that was a while ago, you'd ask on #character-discussion about multiclassing and get grilled over the morality of multiclassing in general so the best place to ask for multiclassing advice ended up being #optimization (which would not go in tangents about why multiclassing is bad)
Maybe that’s why I love Paladin so much…. My hexblade OfV with sorc…
yeah fair enough, its mostly a non-issue for me as a few years back i settled into a group of vets but also haven't even played that much since
Just don’t do, like, paladin monks please if you’re new
but but, hexablade one-dip - for story reasons, of course
What level do you pick up multi at usually @timid anvil
Even if you’re not new, just…don’t. Unless it’s for a one shot or smt
*unless you want to
*unless you want to ... hamstring yourself 🤣 (there finished it)
You're right. Paladin-Ranger
I picked up my claric multi at 2nd it's been going well
SLIGHTLY better. Not by much
From what I'm reading it's better to get multiclass after your main class hits level 5 in guessing, and you need good synergy with the class you want to multiclass
Depends on the Character Concept I want to play. I am someone who doesn't play a class fantasy but a character fantasy so I try and pick my multiclasses in a way that fits the character concept I have and then try to make them somewhat synergistic. I have an Armorer Artificer with Swarmkeeper Ranger Multiclass that weirdly works for example or my Faerunian Superhero Multiclass that is Sun Soul Monk, Star Druid and Soul Knife Rogue that also works very weirdly
Personally as a rule of thumb, if you need a lot in more than three classes, you need a damn good reason to multiclass
Shameful
not level 5 so much as you get all the class features you specifically want. level 5 just happens to be 3rd level spells / multiattack, making it a good rule of thumb
Depends on the class, but 5 is when most get their power spike
Have you seen my BM fighter gloomranger assassin with war cleric mutliclass 
That needs 3
good morning, I'm like very very new to d&d and I wanted to learn how to play
wait whats the newbie command, someone send it
or how to even be a proper dungeon master
Visit #learn-to-play for everything you need to get started!
- [What is D&D?](#learn-to-play message)
- [How does it work?](#learn-to-play message)
- [Where do I join?](#learn-to-play message)
- [Frequently Asked Questions](#learn-to-play message)
alright..
#learn-to-play is a good place to start and we also have #dnd-newcomers where you can ask questions about the game :)
tpm ❤️
ping me in #dnd-newcomers , I'd be happy to help with questions
I saw some dice I wanted that are made from real T-Rex bones that I want but I'm not rich so maybe in another life
yeah we kinda new so, we appreciate it :]
Maybe they got'm in Chicken Bones
The only Mono Class character I ever ade I think was my Armorer Artificer Kessan which I have played ever since the Armorer had its first UA. Played him till lvl 17 too
Nah I want un-evolved dice
I think the paladin I'm going to run won't be multi, She's all about protecting her king but she doesn't know who her king is so anyone with a crown becomes her king
I hope nobody casts crown of madness in her vicinity XD
She will be definitely running forward into doors yelling for the king at every opportunity
She will be like 😮 crown and bow to them
Mayors are just kings in training to her
What if the crown is in the forbidden Shell City?
Would it be better to buy IRL dice before joining a DND campaign online?
Most online games will use the dice apps of whatever platform they're on.
irl dice have a slightly biased rolling thingy
So you can buy prety dice for yourself, but you might not be allowed to use them for an online game.
Alr
Some tables may allow you if you use a dice cam
How would I go about playing a skeleton in dnd
Reborn as a race, go ham really after, skeletons could be any class
Or finding homebrew that your DM would accept.
Since there is no official skeleton race.
def talk with your DM. being a skeleton would probably draw a lot of attention in most settings, and not every game can accomodate that kind of attention on one character
Am I the only one here that will just make a character on the spot if they have an idea pop in their head with no planned game coming up
Nope
I have like 6 characters that were born that way lol
Two I refined the best I could, rest are either stuck in rewrite hell or WIP hell
The Tiefling Warlock went through at least 4 rewrites 
Yes.
Oh my poor poor Drow Paladin, you shall never find a campaign to smite in.
absolutely
i made a character based off a biblically accurate angel whos completely hooked up on red bull
(its an aasimar cleric who drinks an elixir called crimson ox to keep herself awake in most cases) for some reason in that moment i made extensive lore for em
i am debating on changing th race tho
Make it a minotaur
Have it be red too for whatever reason, now your whole character is basically a walking red bull ad
a literal Red Bull
Give it strong knockback because red bull gives you wings
oo ask the DM so you make a snow board with a peice of bark and start shredding going down a mountain
or keep it an angel so that it can fly up and sky dive
make an Aasimar Minotaur
You can take the stats of a Minotaur a large, hulking bull-headed humanoid with white feathers, glowing eyes, or small celestial wings
yesu i amu heido kojima creationu
(shits on the floor becuase that was epic)
i took laxatives it wont stop comming out
c what i did there
no then ill loose a limb and get phantom pain
see what I did there
c what i did there
i see
Level 3 Warlock or Fighter for horror one shot?
we can REVOLVER around this ocelloting cycle all day
c what i did there
Cowardly Warlock that prays everytime a slight inconvenience happens
Hahaha. Tbf, her backstory is that she's been called to the woods by the Fiend. Not sure if it makes more sense for her to already be a warlock or still a fighter
maybe their patron god wants them to do something 👀
That's the plan lol. But does it make sense to be a full Warlock or a fighter...for now?
Depends on what you want to do with your character mate, personally I'd go full warlock
Imagine said Warlock keeps summoning his Patron at every minor inconvenience
That's what I was thinking too. Any build ideas? Like fully PoTB? Orrrr
Session is in an hour lmao
I just usually theme my warlock with their patron god
Charecters should really be solidified well before sessions even get close to beginning, yikes.
My 2014 Warlock's patron god is a primordial snake so they have spells like Poison Spray, Hex, etc.
hihi wassup guys
Nothing much ,just waiting
for?
Campaign in 3 hours, but it looks like 2/5 people won't be making it
What rules do you guys prefer to play in? 2014 or 2024?
Personally I prefer 2024
2024
- I can play either, I just hope the table knows the rules
A lot of quality of life changes that make it run more smoothly. A lot of the more broken bits got fixed and maybe one or two annoying things got introduced, but overall it's way better.
I play 2024
Yeah, I know. Usually I'm better lol. Just go so busy the last couple of weeks
I can only think of one thing that annoys me.
Huh, I should try it then
Nystul's got upgraded from DM fiat to RAI
I could think of several but the QoL changes outweigh it...
After a minute I thought of a second thing.
Oh?
First was Backgrounds locking you into only three Ability Scores, easily fixed if you use Custom Backgrounds from the Free Rules as default, and the second was Hiding and Invisibility, which I think seriously needs clarification.
Yup. The 'Invisibility' tag to Hiding felt like an odd way to make it work.
One thing I didn't like the nerf to: Medium Armor Master.
Feels like a side grade, to me. Lost the Stealth, but gained a half ASI.
I'd take the Stealth because it was at least made some medium armors function differently. 
Can there be animal sorcerer's? Like pigs that can cast lightning if they think about it?
I'm not gonna lie, I still think 2014 Sharpshooter is better than 2024 version.
What an odd question. I suppose a DM could just make these up, they'd be magical creatures rather than "sorcerers."
It skewed what was considered powerful or not in martial builds and I'm glad it got changed.
I understand why it got changed, I just like the 2014 version because for example that extra 3 damage at level 4 for a feat to me just dont seem worth it
Hey have you taken a look at the actual Gunslinger class from Valda Spire of Secrets?
I have not.
Hi
I feel like awakened animals should have as much chance of becoming an adventurer as humans. Although never quite explained what their lifespan is like. And having opposable thumbs does help a lot.
Dang, im working on a character and trying to plan some things out for them, i already got 3d6 at level 3 per attack (concentrating on hex)
So, playing my next session in a few hours
Anything I should take note of aside from traveling at night?
You got a Bullseye Lantern?
Generally avoid priests/clerics
I sense some pretty bad conflict
Umm, and don’t die again. And kill stuff until they die.
And be nice
Both in and out of character.
As a Gloomstalker vampire not just traveling, but fighting from the shadows, putting out torches and any other light source as a preliminary thing just wherever you go.
Darkness is your friend, your shield, your weapon.
No. Probably best we don't
Familiarize yourself with the rules about light: https://www.dndbeyond.com/sources/dnd/basic-rules-2014/adventuring#VisionandLight
I'm getting the basics down
Also, I'm starting to come around on heavy crossbows. Did not know they were like that tbh
A Torch for example sheds a 20ft radius Bright Light and a further 20ft of Dim Light, you want to stay out of both.
Until you get CBE it will reduce your three attacks in the first round to one, though.
Loading is annoying like that
Pretty sure Gunner also works
So you have to be over 40ft away from a regular torch to benefit from your Gloomstalker ability.
Next level up. And technically, I can reload as a bonus action
I don't remember that being a rule.
I believe the Loading property states
“Because of the time required to load this weapon, you can fire only one piece of ammunition from it when you use an action, bonus action, or reaction to fire it, regardless of the number of attacks you can normally make.”
There isn't such a rule as loading with a bonus action, unless that's homebrew. What would that even let you do?
Was trying to come back to say that
Reloading being it's own action would be a pathfinder or homebrew thing.
yeah you can't reload as a BA.
Does anyone know why I can’t add my monk homebrew subclass
I forgot that you probably can't go attack > BA > attack
On dnd beyond?
2024's modern firearms are reloaded as an action / bonus action
Yea
Idk, try #ddb-support if you haven’t already
No, you can't. The Loading tag just means that you can make one attack with your Action, no matter hwo many attacks you get.
So, what action would it be to reload?
Huh. I personally ignore those so didn't realize.
none. You just make one attack per action.
There usually is none
You just attack again next round
Ah
If you want to benefit from extra attack you'll need something that bypasses the loading property
or CBE, as has been previously mentioned
Maybe a bonus action
Such as CBE or gunner
Well, I still have some ways to work well in spite of this for level 5
As mentioned earlier, it's not a bonus action to reload
Does CBE work with firearms? I thought Gunner was made partially cause it doesn't
No action economy, it's just assumed to happen and you're ready to fire again the next turn.
Note: Bloodline is playing in the 2014 rule set.
Lemme double check
CBE is Crossbows only
nah it specifically mentions it ignores the loading properties of crosssbows only
Yeah so no you need Gunner, oh wait
for firearms yeah
I was speaking purely firearms I didn't realize you meant in general
Which I'm mostly giving up on Gunner unless taking it becomes unbelievably necessary
I don’t imagine the cost is gonna do you any favours
CBE and Sharpshooter with Heavy Crossbow is plenty
I might be confused, why are you taking gunner? aren't you using a crossbow?
Apparently, firearms do exist, but few know any larger details
Iirc he was planning to transitioning to guns later
I wouldn't take crossbow expert if you plan on using firearms later
No, I'm saying I'm taking CBE and would only take/swap to Gunner unless there is an extremely powerful firearm thrown into the mix. Odds are low, probably not zero
Ooo, gun
I'm adding guns to my next campaign.
It'll be the first one I've ran with firearms in the world
Besides, firearms will be considerably weaker due to both their terrible range and the fact that a 40/120 is a joke when you only get a 1 point average increase
I run my games with firearms
I adjust depending on settings
||I'm gonna introduce firearms partway through my campaign||
I've always allowed them.
Eh. You have sharpshooter. Most of the time it won’t matter too much: I’m just more concerned about their price and availability
Some settings i lean more pre-firearm weapons, but this one I'm going a little more in depth, with submachine guns and shotguns as well
Oh, closer to 20th century?
In mine it's just the usual pistol and musket
Availability is slim. Like I said, only a few Vishtani know about it, as they actually come into and out of Barovia
damage dice on weapons really don't matter as much as I think people put emphasis on.
The setting is based around 1920s Chicago, so yeah, 20th century, post WW1 technology
But there's people who are making more "modern" things that are completely crude, and fall apart after little use.
Which is why I gave up on muskets. Most of my damage will come from Sharpshooter and eventually sneak attacks anyways
I plan on following the modern firearm rules honestly. They're noticably stronger, but they're not mundane adventuring equipment, they're equal to rare+ magic items. I think it makes them more distinct in the world. More fun than their main DnD implementation where they're basically the same as the other ranged weapons, with some slight property switches.
Idk depends on the weapon, I use to use a whip on a fighter... got much better once I switched to a greatsword.
I have most of my world on muskets, but a few areas have been advanced to much more modern, either by mixing tech and magic or through centuries of cultivation
Wait, why am I being advised to avoid clerics again?
My more "modern" things are a subclass of the Gunslinger I made for my world.
Basically gets an underbarrel shotgun, grenade launcher that fall apart after a few uses, then at higher levels they get a gatling and a shoulder mounted launcher, but those are once per LR and you have to choose one or the other after an LR and I designed them around the kind of fantasy of the place the subclass originates from.
Aside from the obvious of radiant damage
See I let my players go up to revolver and lever actions for my campaign if you want more than that, you better be an Artificer
Going from the absolute lowest damage weapon to the absolute highest damage weapon will do that, but that's a rather extreme case - a lot of the time people agonize over 1d8 vs 1d10, or 1d10 vs 2d6, where really your average damage is increasing by maybe two points
I will say, my campaign has a possible storyline the players could go down which would involve them having to fight a prototype tank
especially because bloodline is a ranger, a class which typically has at least a few spells that increase that damage, which makes the base weapon damage a little less important
Yeah the difference is minium between each stage, I do wish more things did 1d12 of damage just because I like the feeling of the d12 in my hand.
A less extreme case would be a Cleric going from a Mace to a Warhammer.
Warhammer Clerics go hard
Crossbows are kinda weird imo
I played a lvl 20 Artificer Battlesmith where my defender was a tortiuse and my dnd let me get inside of them and basically use it as a tank
I don't fully understand the appeal of a proper, actual crossbow outside of a few specific situations, such as for a rogue
They're a dex weapon, but they require pretty significant strength investment which can make anyone who uses one become MAD or MADder
also yeah all of that too
Crossbow cool
I like crossbows. They cool
the council has spoken
Impeccable reasoning!
Sometimes you need to take on Vecna while being definitely not the fantasy rip off of Daryl Dixon /j
But yeah crossbows are just cool
Which is why their MADness sucks imo
Do all crossbows have that MAD weakness?
Nah just heavy I was misremembering and thinking light did too
But I'm gladly wrong.
Seems that Heavy Crossbows heavy trait is offset by Dex
Specifically "Heavy Ranged are fine with 13 or higher dex"
yeah I was just checking that lol
I was remembering it being strength only and 15
I was thinking, I don’t remember crossbows being MAD
it surprised me for sure
I just remembered them being annoying cuz Loading
Cuz it kinda forces your first feat to be CBE
(For most classes)
But nothing about being MAD
it's where they're just a weapon that's rarely that worth using imo
I’ve seen many a rogue grab them
that feat to gain competency could be a different feat to gain a power buff
that's the case where it is worth it
Yeah it's just better to take a Longbow
Also seen very few martial Druids get them, aka ONE, but yeah they’re not too common
Well I’ve seen a fighter grab a hand crossbow too
But they replaced that with a longbow cuz it was a +1
It's really only worth it to not use a Bow if your DM allows guns and you can get a Musket down the line
Even then, muskets are loud
MAD?
A rogue of mine purposely didn’t take them cuz I said firing one shot would reveal their location to a lot of people
I use a pistol as a Kensei monk, and don't plan on the gunner feat, but that's because in the long run I don't need more than one gun attack in a turn.
Multiple ability score dependent
It's funny.
My Tuesday dm gave us a shotgun but no one can use it I think
...huh?
boomstick
guns are surprisingly unusable in DnD
When you need a lot of stats in different places to make work
Like, a paladin monk for example
Oh. It needs things like feats to really use it ti the best potential
Gotcha
You're level 5? So you don't get another Feat for 3 levels, also consider you're taking a whole Feat to change from a d8 to a d10, which is an avg change of 1 point of damage, when you could stick with the longbow and take Poisoner instead, which potentially adds 2d8 damage to each hit, which is an avg increase of 9 points of damage.
Well, crossbows aren’t MAD, but yes they’re do
It's just not worth it for most of us lol
They have homebrew rules. Next feats at level 6.
My Ranger PC I dm’ed for used a rifle and pistol before he burned to death
It has been a significant mechanical expenditure on my part to make a gun even remotely viable let alone beneficial as a monk, including a subclass, a feat, and likely a multiclass down the track
1 level
And I already have Poisoner
Ultimately martial weapons often boil down to whatever you wanna use the most
Shaprshooter, Piercer, and Poisoner?
Masteries helped in this regard a bit.
Yes
That's a heck of a lot of Feats for level 5.
Next level id grab either an ASI or a quality of life feat
Lucky, observant, skulker.
Skulker could be nice
I think their DM gives them feats at level 1 & 3 on top of their level 4 feat
2 were from a homebrew rule
It would have been 4, but I made the terrible decision in hindsight to use Human in 2014 instead of Variant Human
Pistol's Vex mastery is most of my justification for even remotely trying to make gun monk work
I don't even think I need anything for ASIs
Ye I ran a Rogue that used a Pistol and scimitar and it was fun.
it's fun to play a lot of battlefield control
It's a much more ranged PC than I'd usually play for a monk
I wanna play a controller sometime.
But I'm too passive to stake my claim on the Wizard class which is the kind I wanna play whenever I do play
My old Paladin PC had a ton of great stuff in that regard. Spells like compel duel, push weapon mastery, and a great AC & HP pool
Most ranged I’d ever monk is throwing as many weapons as I can then running in and beating people up.
Or running away while going random bs go
Or using a build with hella long punch range
Lowkey, a class i want to play eventually is Bard
Bards are great
Once I get more comfortable talking in DnD, could be great for roleplay
I'm basically a Bard main.
My current PC ideas are
Diviner/Illusionist Wizard or complete blood hungry vengeance paladin
Hi basically a Bard main, I’m Nugget
Sorry had to-
Wanted to do it
Anyways, so to summarize before I sleep for a bit
I wanna properly play a wizard one day. I've still not fully delved into the realm of full spellcasters
Divination wizards are insane
Portent does go hard
My first PC was an Evocation Wizard and that was a lot of fun
Hwllow every one
greetings of peace
Gasp, individuals! Plural!
My most recent character was a divination wizard with the lucky feat.
It was... quite a bizarre situation
I firmly sit in the martial space of things. They're my wheelhouse through and through
Avoid Clerics, put out light sources as i go, invest in CBE next level, stay invisible in combat
hihi
Anything I'm missing?
I did play a very very strong druid in a recent runthrough of Stormwreck Island and had a ton of fun with it as a utility caster
You forgot about not dying, and killing stuff until they die
Morning
all sounds like good advice (I have no idea what's with the anti cleric advice but I trust that someone had a good context for it)
How is everything going with the app?
gn nugget
aww goodnight
It fortunately is easier to avoid that first part thanks to the light health regen
Glad to hear it’s still alive!
I'm probably coming back as some form of undead
Goodnight
...which my paladin was talking my ear off OOC about it >_>
My emphasis was more stay in the dark rather than putting out torches, but doing so creates more darkness for you to stay in.
i kinda only joined the server because i deeply miss playing dnd and i hope to find a party to play with ,,, the players in my school are not that- friendly 
also i made a terrible mistake of making my final capstone project dnd based so i kind of resented playing for a while 😭
Feeling really happy today, guys Everything’s just awesome 💖
hell yeah twin
That is the general plan. I'm just a little worried about how the DM handles this. Or how the Paladin will handle this because seems like she will not happy in character
Part of me wants to ask what specifically. Dms open?
Why for both of those?
The former because it could just be a change of plan or an unknown monkey paw
Latter because Paladin keeps insisting that my Ranger would not want to be an undead
I mean the Paladin can complain all they want but its not like they are gonna Divine Smite you behind your back
Arcane trickster Rogue- Can i use booming blade to make the first attack, and then use nick for offhand weapon?
So when you said "this" you mean the vampirism, not the Gloomstalker invisibility.
Yeah, more or less
Also .. maybe Paladin player should stay in their lane? This is your character, after all.
As for the Paladin, I'll just copy paste 2 messages. It's cool
Yes my DMs are open .
"Sorry for acting so aggressive towards your resurrected character, but I'm compelled to by my Oath of Devotion to protect the living from the predations of the undead."
No they aren't
"Plus I honestly think that living Gideon wouldn't want to be doomed for eternity. He'd want someone to put him out of his misery."
That's not how undead works otherwise they'll start having beef with all Spore Druids
Necromancy is just a means to an end
Do you all have a Session 0 agreement for No PVP?
Because not being a jerk and ruining the game for other people takes priority over "what my character would do" Oath or no Oath.
Session 0 was basically agreeing on a campaign to do and making characters
I presume PvP is not allowed, but even if it is, everyone is good willed enough to not be at each other's throats
I'm 90% certain your Devotion Paladin is confusing their oaths for Ancient Paladins
Presumption is not great policy. And this Paladin thing sounds potentially PVP and at your throat.
Honesty. Don't lie or cheat. Let your word be your promise.
Courage. Never fear to act, though caution is wise.
Compassion. Aid others, protect the weak, and punish those who threaten them. Show mercy to your foes, but temper it with wisdom.
Honor. Treat others with fairness, and let your honorable deeds be an example to them. Do as much good as possible while causing the least amount of harm.
Duty. Be responsible for your actions and their consequences, protect those entrusted to your care, and obey those who have just authority over you.
Nowhere does it mention "treat undead as an enemy"
Nice, glad to hear PvP drama isn’t gonna be a thing Loving the good vibes for the campaign
Ancients however does have this line:
Shelter the Light. Where there is good, beauty, love, and laughter in the world, stand against the wickedness that would swallow it. Where life flourishes, stand against the forces that would render it barren.
Either way, I can just talk to them before, during, or after the session
By the way, message in dms couldn't be delivered
And that's a stretch because, just bc you're revived as a vampire, it doesn't mean that you're now shooting to extinguish life
I vote "before."
I vote "respond to that message and say that philosophical disagreement is fine, but do not attack my character, that would ruin my fun."
Ey Quick question whats a False Hydra?
For now, she seems a little adamant that letting me live would risk her becoming an Oathbreaker
Currently an overused meme monster that steals creatures memories and requires a lot of player buy-in and metagaming to actually make it work "well"
So she thinks she needs to kill your character, this is PVP and a red flag.
This is not all cool.
Or probably misguided. She is prone to making assumptions often
This is still a big red flag and something you should put a stop to OOC.
With all due respect, what do you think I'm doing right now?
Seeking advice on how exactly to do what you already planned on doing, which is a good thing
I'm saying that I'm talking to her as we speak
Nice! I hope it goes well, and that your table can reach a mutual understanding before returning to play
This is mostly between Paladin and I
Druid is largely not invested, Wizard is invested only in the sense of indirectly killing off my character and sincerely apologized for it already
So this chat is the last stop on the train, basically
I was worried that your comment [HERE](#dnd-discussion message) meant that you were just going to assume that everything was going to be okay without doing anything about it.
I can see how you came to that conclusion
My general stance is "I presume everyone at the table is smart and lawful enough to not try to kill each other. But I will still talk it out to Paladin"
My concern about her assumptions are becoming more true, it seems. Safe to say she thinks that "dealing with certain enemies easier = obligations to eliminate said certain enemies at all costs"
Youre a player, just controlling a lot of characters
You also get to decide how difficult or doable a skill check is and pick stats of them unless you use official statblocks
Which i explained to her that it just means you have tools to protect you and the party against certain dangers and little more
yea its a bit intimdating but i think i got it
Dming is mostly just normal dnd, but youre involved in everything and are king
Where did the talk begin, I want to know the context
right now im making offical flags for the continets and kingdoms of this world im doing
Here
Basically the Devotion Paladin in his table is getting trigger happy about assassinating Bloodline's Vampire Ranger
Because the Paladin doesn't want to risk an oath break
Ah classic good old lawful stupid paladin, man it's refreshing
The best part is that the Paladin's quoting the wrong oaths
Being anti undead is an Ancients Paladin thing not Devotion
You are always allowed to make it easier on yourself and use a pre-published setting tbh. Worldbuilding off the cuff is v e r y hard, and has led to burnout for me before.
I settle for a midpoint of taking a chunk of an existing setting that doesn't have much canon detail, and filling in the gaps myself.
hm... fair, ill take ur advice
Worldbuilding is fun! But it's a lot, and for a first time DM, usually secondary to Running the Game.
Isn't devotion the most likely one to actually ignore the undead party member if it aligns with their interests?
not necessarily. depends on the paladin since their oaths arent mandating it
Okay, I'm back from the DMs
Welp, DM has to explain to paladin the bees and the birds and where the paladin oaths come from
From how she is talking to me, it's safe to say it went pretty well
It seems like she will not PvP at all, but all things considered, a figurative slam to the wall and explanation demand is understandable
I would make the joke about when a character and a deity really love each other
But that's Warlock's thing tbh
Warlock is purely business, Paladins say oaths, Warlocks pay
Its not even that its like, nowhere does a Devotion Paladin's oath explicitly say that they're anti undead
Nah Warlock patrons arent deities
Why is someone becoming a vampire in a game with a character who cant work with vampires?
That sounds like the actual mistake here
Ppl seem to think the paladin has to back down
But isnt it kinda rude to let a vampire happen when the paladin was there first
Is this setting different?
Both can exist in one party, consensual drama is the best part of dnd
Im not too wellversed in vamp lore but arent they evil
Statblocks are evil
Vampirism was the DM's idea to bring back a character that was killed by friendly fire.
I meant lorewise too
Irrelevant for the player character
Is it?
Not really
This DM was playing with so many houserules anyway, what's one more?
True but then that needs to be shared with the paladin
Oh you mean that thing, well if you go by that rules, player would lose control over their character the moment they became a vampire and DM would take over their character
Right?
Yea ergo we ignore that rule because it's not a very good rule
Anyway i feel like this mess is on the dm and maybe the revived player if they egged the idea on
They can fix it in multiple ways
The rule is there to block players from wanting to intentionally become lycanthropes and vampires
Like telling the paladin "vamps arent evil in this world"
The rule is good as is.
Okay, we don't actually know how the DM will bring me back. This is just me trying to come to the best conclusion with what little I am given
Tbh I'd rather it be Dhampir instead of Vampire but hey if someone's constantly rolling d2s and complaining about it they may as well get a boss class monster as a PC
@remote wadi is your character stoked for that vampire fate or do they want to find a cure
The player had no clue this was going to happen, in fact they were making a different character.
Why is bringing your body to a temple for revival not an option?
But you already quoted the paladin. This already happened right?
Wait hold up couldn't vampires create vampire spawn?
any 5e source material on Innistrad? going to make an Eldrazi my bbeg
Then just the dm
Go Bloodline, bite your whole team and infect them, make them into your spawn
You quoted 2 responses by the paladin that seem to be after your char came back
From what would happen if i am to be brought back
From both Paladin and my PoV, we know I will be brought back, idk what form it will be
But from what the DM tells me I will gain, I'm making the presumption it will be vampire spawn
Foul play, we were cheated, we were betrayed
So none of this has happened yet?
I reiterate. Why is it not an option to bring you back to a temple and pay a hefty fee for raise dead?
It would be funnier to find a way to steal Strahd's powers
Well hoorah you can prevent any trouble by talking
Boooooring
What was the point of the paladin quotes?
I don't think you can steal another vampire's powers, you can however do the Rite of Profane Ascension
Dracula stole powers. But he's built different
I have a quick question
As a land druid if I am always carrying a flower/plant with myself can I cast Plant Growth in ares without any plants? Like a stone dungeon with no flora etc.
Dunno if that's actually a canon thing, but I don't think CoS has the resources for you to pull it off
DM offered me a way to be resurrected. I took this offer, DM gave me cague details
Like drop the flower in the ground and cast plant growth on it, surrounding the entire area with plant growth
If this is in Curse of Strahd then the module already should have a method to revive a character without vampurism. There's the Dark Powers/Boons with their own powerups+flaws for that.
Where is the source for the paladin quotes?
Because the player knows I will be resurrected, likely as some form of undead
From what it sounded like ATM, she was under the assumption that she would have to kill me again or risk being an Oathbreaker. Talked it through with her it isn't how that works
Leave the table on the spot if she divine smite sneak attacks you
Nah thats a keeper
I trust her enough not to do that
The only weird thing will be turn unholy from devotion oath specifically targetting all undead
But yeah the oath only speaks of protecting the weak
Which isnt true until youre evil
session in 20 minutes and some members can't make it, hopefully it still turns out good
Either way, she definitely might treat me to a wall slam or 2 while demanding an explanation
And honestly, is far more preferred than genuine PvP
Yeah that's basically the non lethal version of a divine smite
im in session now
Just to make it clear, resurrection is fine in dnd and nothing against devotion
Are you sure you absolutely cannot just convert this Paladin into a vampire spawn
Pay attention, mind flayer spawn!
its being a chaos now, we were sneaking around and now we are running away trying to save one of the allies that helped us to escape at first
A devo paladin slamming you into a wall for being alive again is more an oathbreaker than one travelling with a vampire
They are kind, merciful and wise
Not bad cop routine with unwarranted brutality
Unless you look like a lich or zombie
Trying to would be... Definitely not a good idea
And idek if that's possible
Or if this Paladin just wants to roleplay as a cop that worships Bane or something
Devotion
Its probably possible if you're a vampire
It just doesnt work since they seem to care about the oath
Devotion is literally boyscout pally
Not a good idea, though. Why would I want to do that?
True, well, up until we found out the Paladin is actually illiterate and is playing a Devotion Paladin like an Ancients Paladin
Turning someone into a vampire spawn stops them from being able to meaningfully contest you, and now they get to suffer with you too
Not illiterate
D&D players can't read after all
Just very VERY quick to assume
Yeah that sounds like illiteracy to me
you know what they say about assuming
Maybe devote some time to reading the rules
That's a good one
Oh my god, a random person joined our DnD discord channel a week ago and we thought someone invited them, turns out none of us knew them and we have just now kicked them out
Ouch. Dial it back on the d6 psychic damage, will ya?
How did they join then
We don't know, we're so confused
Maybe it was a discord spy bot
a spy... for DnD?
See its funny cuz on the one hand we have people here who hate optimizers, but on the other hand we have people like Bloodline's table which sounds more insufferable than even the worst optimizers that boss around people
No for discord. Stealing art, checking tos breaks etc
Its a mix of account banning and ai training
optimization in 5e isn't even that bad. The scale ofnumbers and effects are very small. Optimizing is usually just +1 or +2 more over not being that
But those are usually invisible and dont talk
I think people tend to confuse optimizers with power gamers.
The kind of people who brag about making their DM break the table rule of not killing PCs because they broke the game, who take pleasure and joy from being so powerful that it annoys and irritates everyone else
It's a nearly circular venn diagram is why
I thought the kind of optimizers people hate here are the ones that tell others what to do in a smug way
I mind prio of power over flavour
Some of us just have ocd and hate uselessly uneven numbers and wasted effects. Standard Array my beloathed
There's a lot of overlap between them and the kind of player I mentioned
But I'd rather someone be smug than someone who is really into the idea of body slamming my PC into a wall, fantasizes about divine smiting me in their sleep and generally talking about having the easy way out of just downing themselves without needing to force them to waste a spell slot divine smiting them
What are you on about
Referring to Bloodline's Paladin 
But they didnt say any of that
none of what you described isnt a power gamer/optimizer specific trait. That's just being problematic
The one powergamer I met tried DMing and couldnt get a group together because he kept trying to control how the players made their characters and it just annoyed them until they found it no longer fun
Thats all bloodline inventing stuff from what we know so far
No quotes indicate the pally fantasises about smiting a teammate
They're not going to legitimately do that word for word. It was mostly an expression that she will be confused, suspicious, and a little angry
Even if it does happen, it stays in character and controlled. I made sure of it
I swear they did:
#dnd-discussion message
#dnd-discussion message
#dnd-discussion message
Bloodline is the one who brought wallslam into this
no swearing this server is pg-13
session is in 5 minutes and a party member's electricity went out...
Thats very different from what you said
This paladin is getting way too much heat
If i was told a vampire is joining my party as i pick a classic paladin fantasy, id be taken aback too
You then talk it out and find its all good
Agreed. They're not a terrible person or player by any means. They're just misguided and enthusiastic, albeit a bit inexperienced in some areas
But dont slam this pally so hard. They misinterpreted their oath and were there first
Vampire is joining after the party was established
Honestly even without the oath, anyone should have the right to just nay that
vampire is also a former party member already iirc
I know yeah
The vampire part is new though and a shocking development if you dont expect it
Wondering why people are lawyering a person's play in such a public forum without knowing the person, the circumstances, the table, etc. Seems... insensitive at best. Like why are you dragging this person through the town square, so to speak? Is it helpful in any way?
Exactly
i was told that in my party we are getting a bloodhunter lycan, so my party is
A dhampir (Temu vampire), a werewolf, a humanoid hipo, a goblin and finally me, a half orc Walk into a bar, how is called the show?
A few jabs at them not reading their oath is fine and funny but dont slam them
They brought the situation here to the public forum by their choice first and even asked for input and opionios yesterday
Regardless, this seems like an inappropriate venue for it, no?
It reads more like an interpersonal dispute rather than a matter of rules/gameplay, ymmv
Correct
I constantly make new characters, now I got like 20 and I only ever got to use 4. I call it suffering from success.
So the paladin was in here?
Saying that threatening PVP is a red flag isn't dragging someone, it's just generally a red flag unless that is specifically consented to in Session 0.
the wall slam things sounds like good RP. Idk why people have a problem. Even non-Ancients good aligned paladins might not be happy to hear their party member is now undead
Before "wall slam" was brought up as the concession, "I don't think I can let your character live or I risk breaking my Oath" was the only impression we had.
yes that was too far
Wall slam was not said by the paladin
but I think a rather tense conversation is a good compromise
Bloodline is hypothesizing with that one is what i read
But "I can't your character live" was a direct quote of the Paladin player.
True
but we moved past that already
"Wall slam" is basically a non-PVP argument.
I ended up my session, we managed the arti and me (ranger) to save an ally but it seems that one of the players got caught and idk what happened, we took the opportunity and run.
I feel like pointing that out before the fact is different from threatening it though
If i say "hey ill play a torturing murderer when i join you" and i told them id have to kill them, thats not me threatening pvp
Thats me telling them about a problem with our party matching
In a threatening way? There are ways you can say that without it being threatening.
Don't forget the part where the Paladin was basically coercing Bloodline to end himself again
"Do you really think your PC would have wanted to be revived, huh?! Just let him rest in peace, as a Paladin I won't tolerate the undead!"
Thats not threatening. Thats a simple statement
That really sounds like the Paladin doesn't want to get their hands dirty
In the server, not in the conversations
(can i maybe...)
"I don't think my character would be comfortable with a vampire party member" is very different from "I would attack your character."
Now I wanna make a new character... a tall high elf or a tall drow. Or wait maybe Shadar Kai but aren't all Shadar Kai short?
Both are fine
I mean it's gonna start like RIGHT now
can i join tho? :3
It communicates just how much of an issue this would be
I'll have to check with the DM
Please keep game organizing to private message or the LFG channels - it's off-topic outside the LFG channels
Attacking one another is generally breaking that social contract, one should actively be trying to find different justifications and also actively altering their "this is what my character would do" to avoid breaking the social contract of the game.
I think canonically all Forgottem realms elves are shorter than humans? but regardless, no one will be mad at you for playing a tall elf
It communicates why to a point as well
Disagreed
Anyway we're starting with two people and one DM... yay
But my feeling about it are why I called it a red flag and urged Bloodline to talk to the ohter player OOC posthaste.
Attacking is different from pointing out that you feel like yourcharacter would have to be hostile to a new member
You may think it's fine, but I do not. We may have to disagree about this because I can't be bothered to try and convince you.
I did the same. Bringing up the worry of pvp is ooc talk too
I think its fair to say that some characters dont work with every party, and pointing out that PvP is the only solution that would preserve any sense of immersion is not wrong. in that case the offending character(s) have to change
Exactly
You can phrase it differently though
I just find it overly sensitive to say you must
Its not like you want to ruin the game. Thats why youre alerting people to it by "threatening" pvp
Was it clear it was the player characters and not players?
It definitely needs ooc talk but thats literally what that is. The talk already began
Are you asking if a player threatened murder?
yeah basically, saying "My goody good guy would kill John Murderman rather than to travel with him" is not bad behaviour imo
No. I'm saying if it is, in anyway, the feelings of a player vs a the feelings of a player character
dnd party got distracted by a dc to open 30 door for half an hour during VERY important lore events
Typical
My god, Thaumaturgy that door
Russian Nesting Doors?
Why did you put a dc30 door with nothing behind it in an important lore event
i didnt my dm did
Thaumaturgy cant open locked doors, I'm assuming these are locked
we use minecraft with mods as battlefield etc and there was door we tried opening, dm didnt intend us to make a dc30 str check
Guys, are all Shadar Kai short?
My god, Firebolt that door
no, Shadar Kai are elf-adjecent from memory, which are typically average height iirc
Medium sized creatures and everything
Fire bolt is too kind for it, I'd Disintegrate that door
In promotional art they look short to me for some reason. Idk maybe I am delulu.
i would storm of vengeance but we are only level 5 so far
Could just be the angle of the "camera" they're drawn in front of
Interesting, a lot of the art I see is relatively humanoid sized
When depicting Shadar-Kai I have seen the art having them slouching or crouching/sneaking I suspect that’s why sometimes it may seem they are on the shorter side
anyone plays a hexblade warlock that isn't just a minmax dip?
Elves in Faerun tend toward shorter than humans.
no because the lv 6 feature is weird and off theme because Shadow Sorcerer stole the hound of ill omen for some reason
I have just discovered the Mother of Sorrows warlock and I'm internally screaming about a completely fleshed out undead warlock I was about to properly make a sheet for... what do you mean there was a patron specifically for this kind of stuff?
There wasn't. That's 3rd party
So do shadar Kai have gray skin or white skin? White as in the actual color not as in white person. And do they have entirely black eyes or not? I've looked at images and they're not consistent at all.
Usually best to refer to the official art. MotM portrays playable shadar-kai as having pretty white skin, and normal eyes
Bear in mind, a lot of art of these species that exists out there is art of people's PCs that they've comissioned, and so is subject to headcanons
Okay one more question: would a drow or a shadar Kai better for a character that is blatantly based on Gambit from Marvel?
neither would be more or less fitting really
What are you curious about, generally? Emulating them on a mechanics perspective, or more on a vibes perspective, or with regards to lore, or anything else?
With how they typically appear, neither would be especially gambit-y in terms of vibes
Okay all things considered what are you thinking?
I honestly think something more like a tiefling would be the closest to gambit as far as vibes
In the 2024 PHB, tieflings are actually depicted gambling & drinking in the species art
Gambit is a thief from Louisiana, so we're looking for someone from a port town who likes to hang out with the underbelly, I'm thinking maybe Skullport?
To be honest, the closest I can think of to Gambit in Faerun is Jarlaxle Baenre, so go with Drow.
Species doesn't dictate personality.
Why is poison 100gp when it does 1d4 poison damage?
At best it does this 3 times if you apply it to ammunition... But if you apply it to a weapon it does it once!!
Acid is 25gp and does 2d6.
Or Alchemist fire for 50gp and gives the burning condition + 1d4
Poison doesn't even play the poisoned condition... Really feels like a mistake
WotC doesnt like poison
A frikin level 1 spell scroll is only 50gp
Poisoner feat is probably the one solid chunk for poison
1 hour and 50gp for 1 batch of potent poisons. Batch size is proficiency bonus
DC 14 Con save for 2d8 poison damage and Poisoned condition
Basic poison should be the same poison from the feat.
Only applies to the arrow or weapon once. But does damage worth 100gp and gives the condition
Without necessarily saying 100 is good, poison is way more useful for the disadvantage than d4 poison
Hello, I was just wondering if there is anywhere to advertise art commissions here or not?
Wait it doesnt give the condition?
It doesn't apply the condition. No disadvantage whatsoever
Usual reminder that D&D is not a reality simulator, that includes pricing and economy.
