#dnd-discussion
1 messages · Page 120 of 1
If it move 10ft from where you cast the spell the glyph is broken and the spell ended, so the clip isn’t accurate
Stop sucking the magic out of life 
sorcadin is fine.
Said like the true Black Sun enjoyer
Or we can just interpret 'spell ended' as 'KABOOM' 
Then their base should have gone kaboom
Yes, let me apply that rule to all healing spells and buffs
Yes, that would've been reasonable. Also hilarious. There's also something you're ignoring by enforcing the RAW in this case. Players accidentally nuking a whole town is a GREAT setup for a new campaign and another party to figure out what happened, why, etc.
I mean, just circle cast a Delayed Blast Fireball for the maximum extension of 1 day and do 14422d6 damage c:
Contingency Storm of Vengeance
the tricky part is to get enemies to be in the right place for this
Tbh, I don’t really like multi classing anyway, only in bg3 because it’s video game mechanics
see, you first cast 1 day duration banishment on them
then next turn 1 day duration DBF on another caster
multiclassing is fun
Hmm, should I start applying contingency spells to my NPC? Something like an earthquake upon death?
Even tho exclusive runes are 20ft radius sphere?
Anyway, in this case, I'd totally allow the 'book of warding', because even if we ignore the RAW and let it happen, it builds a great event for both the current and next campaign.
Multiclassing exists so that you have the ability to cover ground the existing classes don't cover mechanically on their own c:
The dual wielder as they make 4 attacks at level 5 and still barely keep up dmg wise with PAM
Cleric Sorcerer
No character should be able to cover everything though
tempest cleric is awesome with sorc, yeah
Then why does 2024 bard exist 
Eh, i just like playing a class as is. I’ll get around to it eventually but not currently
They are weak to dying
Also, I'd totally count a whole book full of GoW to be Circle Magic, where each additional cast makes the affected area bigger or the damage higher.
Why does cleric exist 
cleric has way more weak spots than bard
Can Clerics do skill checks very well?
They have every spell list, are a skill class with expertise, have multiple martial subclasses, and can generally do most everything in the game on one character
The problem I have with it is the video not saying rule of cool
Yes. The Thaumaturge could
generalists are fine
They are weak to... Eh... I'm sure there is something they can't do
They get guidance cantrip
and bless
Because people (particularly newer players) could assume that how the spell, when it not
and the cleric version of Primal Order - Magician which adds their WIS mod to Religion and Arcana checks
cleric spell list is not very impressive past level 4 spells or so, and much less versatile than bards. worse skill checks too
It's not even about rule of cool in this case, but worldbuilding and roleplay. "Oops, the heroes just became accidental BBEG NPCs and are now infamous villains being hunted down by the next party for their accidental massacre."
see, I prefer WIS checks to CHA checks, mostly because I'm not huge into RP 
And I am explaining my problem with the video
Let's hear it
I hear ya
but bards are better at wis checks too
Which can be covered if you actually plan out a party, it’s like Druids, they don’t truly have weaknesses outside of magic immune creatures
Guidance + peace bond. Bless doesn't relate to skill checks
give me survival, medicine, and perception with some arcana, stealth, and nature thrown in and I'm hapy 
sure parties cover weaknesses. the point is that a bard can pretty much do it all
Scroll up
To that extent, a rogue can also just do it all lmao, and better than bards can
rogues are not full casters
What do you mean by “need you”?
Bard, Rogue, and Ranger are the skills classes
only bard is goes way harder with it than the other two in most cases 
The druid is the most versatile class. I do like bards i just dont think they can be called the "do it all class"
Sure I can help
But yeah, I'm totally fine with making strong items, stacked spells, rule of cool, etc.... because anything too far-out will become a plot device that needs resolution by the current or next party. 
They also are basically non reliant on any form of rest and can do entire days without ever worrying about resources
Idk, spellcasting alone gives you the ability to do so much
I think Druid can do a few things better than bards, but bards are still good at those (or can be). Meanwhile Druids are pretty bad at social interaction stuff
If you have a party of all rogues, you can just skip the problem instead of using magic to solve it
Who needs to fight bosses when you avoid them and loot their lair instead
Isn’t the same able to be said with bards? Except they also have the option?
That only works til the door only opens once they smash the adamantine golem
Yep, do everything a bit better (guidance, bardic inspiration, bless, etc.), do lots of effects//AOE damage
Yes, but you forget that you have a limited resource of spell slots and time
Our peers are different. Bards go talk to civilization. Druids go talk to the animals around civilization and the flora inside of it.
do you need help or do you want to help with something?
but bards can also go and talk to animals and plants if they want to
Bards don’t do skill checks that much worse than rogues, and they have the option for spellcasting
I’d say yes, but rogues can theoretically just avoid every fight if they want, and they don’t have to burn resources to do it
Spell slots are only as limited a resource as the DM allows them to be, which in many cases ends up with them basicly being unlimited because you'll have like 1~2 combats before a long rest, and only burn 2~3 slots outside of that if any
If a DM wants you to get into a specific fight, no class can avoid that
Bards also don’t have to expend very much either. They also get access to expertise
Plus Jack of all trades
Rogues get reliable talent, which means they functionally can’t fail skill checks
That they’re proficient in
Yes with expertise, cloak and boots of elvenkind.... your rogues will be rolling 33-43 averages of stealth....nothing is finding that unless they set traps
can always change the peace of some battles and add new hordes of enemies, more combats or just harder ones until burning every spellslot
You have a party of rogues, you’ll have every skill covered lol
Tsk tsk tsk you forget not all DMs are alike, and it sound like you are more experienced with those kind of DMs
PWT can maybe get you out of some stuff, but that's about it >.>
Your bards also do plenty fine with that
A bard ain't outstealthing the rogue
That's gonna be a while if you're trying to exhaust primary concentration casters without that many good instantanious damage options
Sure, but Expertise in stealth is +12 already. That’s plenty good.
Please point me to the attrititive DMs because that is my prefered style of play 
The druid can sneak better then any class but thats a different topic entirely lol.
like, idk about your games, but enemies dont tend to just wait around in random locations that are easily telegraphed and avoided in my games.
either enemies attack the PCs or PCs need to fight enemies to get to the plot item at lot of times
Bards aren’t specialised in stealth as rogues, but they also can do stealth quite well. Hence, versatile.
-# though yeah wildshape is super good for stealth
there are ways obviously, poison and Dots (damage over time) are good
Multiple mini hits taht even if they deal 1 damage x 3 to 6 times, its the concentration breaking the point
And the number of combat encounter can change, or they include encounters that force you to use more of your spell slots like have to use vortex warp to get people across a big gap
Sleet storm
Depend for me what kind of caster too, if its a warlock//celeric//bard i would like them to save those spells
Now if its an arti//wizard or druid i wont mind them using some
sleet storm is so nice 
especially paired with plant growth
Had a krampus encounter that had a lair action every round with a d4. It was either sleet storm in the dungeon that round. Or ice storm, or cone of cold blast. Or darkness.
Nah
How spellcasters get equal treatment in my book
Where would I go if I need help with a homebrew feature in dnd beyond?
Imma say something blasphemous (I dislike Druids)
#ddb-support if you’re having technical difficulties
Plus it up to them
What part?
that is fair,, about what they want to do with theirs spells too
I just make them face deadly encounters that make them twice about saving their spells
I was a dm running that session. It was a pretty fun krampus encounter
Honestly what's to dislike about them?
I have a bard that even using offensive spells, he cant land nothing or the enemies dodge the attacks and get half damage.
One time the enemies didnt dodged it and he got like 2 or 3 dices with 1
Unlucky
So, for consequence of his luck he decided being more healer//supportish giving heals and haste (the dm gave him that spell because it feel fitting for the bard, no isnt in their spell list in RAW)
Is it because you play sorcerer with like no versatility outside your few spells. To the class that can change it up daily with tons of options. Is the reason too much availability?
Yes, he is a forced pacifist, he cant kill entities. That is where i enter, with haste and bardic inspiration and do Doom glory kills to the enemies
Dont bards get synaptic static?
the rest of the team do the Killing part for him
Yes, I like limiting things inherently typically
I also just don’t like nature that much, much less changing into animals
The debuff is on attacks rolls and ability checks not saving throws
2014 and idk if that is a spell or feature
Most of it tbh, but even flavor wise it’s not really for me
Concentration saves also
see, I like naturey classes, and more martial casters so it's basicly tailored to me 
I’m not a fan of most nature classes
we like the idea of him being a pacifist and the rest of the team having to do the dirty work.
His character roleplay kinda dummy so some stuff we have to explain it, hide it or just "lie" about it to him
Tho I am playing a moon Druid for a new campaign I’m in or I will be playing one
Just not a nature person, I hate touching grass
Im a waterfall nerd in real life hahah. So yeah im a huge nature person also
Druid and ranger and some subclasses, What about them?
tbf, sorc and paladin are very close to the bottom of my list as well 
Also why I’m not a big Ranger fan either
I get it, nobody wants to play a nepo baby or a magic cop
Just don’t like any of them. Ranger is just mid
Nah paladin top 5. Aura for the W
meh
I love Paladin. Top 1 ngl
I like monks
Druid, Monk, Bard, Wizard, and Rogue
That aura has saved me so many times. In a perfect party you want that +5 aura.
Aura is like the most optimal reason to play paladin, but it’s not even close to my favorite features of theirs
right? they are just neat
Ikr
Artificer and Monk are my fav classes
Monk, bard, cleric, paladin, sorcerer
For my top 5
aura is good, but like, just not the flavor I like in characters
do like auras though
I like the flavour of paladins personally
im giving it a try, Ranger hunter, but the whole favored enemy and natural explorer dont feel... "nice" that is only 1, 2, 3, etc. kinds
Would feel nice its just advantages in some ways for X kind of things.
More general and useful at least
- Wizard (op)
- Druid (shapechange
- Cleric (best healers
- Paladin (aura
- Bard (face and access to shapechange.
Wizards are my personal least fav full caster
Hunter get good stuff and features, mostly offensive ones. I enjoy the extra 1d8 damage and further things.
But ngl, will see how i make it work in some things.
The idea is a sniper and the whole ranger stuff make it work
ranger is nice flavor wise, but the away I do druids is basicly ranger but better so 
just merge it with druid and give us the cool mobility feats c:
can leave hunter's mark though, spell is bad 
I like all classes (though Cleric is my least favorite)
Yeah favored terrain would be a nice druid feature
For flavor
I am a avid wizard appreciator.
2014, important to remark and i might use or Hunters mark or Zephyr strike, both seems useful for me and more considerating i aim for the important//big enemies
Can't remotely even close heal like we can over here at the wisdom table. But yeah "best class" yall got it. Just not a question
also
- cleric should be a CHA caster
- Sorcerer should be a WIS caster
- and Warlock should be an INT caster
thank you for coming to my TED talk
Idk I kinda like wisdom for clerics
Their God giving them wisdom
WIS for sorcerers? Elaborate
Sorcerers should be using con for casting.
Warlock is the only one I semi-agree with here
More like, being in touch with yourself rather than force of personality
That feels like it would be super MAD though.
Con for casting Just to be broken hahaha.
cleric should be more Proselytizing and like managing communities of followers and those that approach them for aid
Clerics have wisdom as their primary ability because they historically represented the gods.
warlocks are supposed to be forbidden knowledge obsessed, damn the concequences; yet are CHA instead of INT which just kinda feels weird
I just think sorcerer should be "the best" but wizards are. Sorcerers ya could argue wisdom, charisma, or intelligence. Just thought con because they are supposed to be born from magic. So their blood should be more powerful and how they get their magic.
in one of the playtests I think they did try and change warlock to int, people did not like it
Fair enough.
I interpret wisdom in dnd as taking power from a higher source, either natural or divine. Conversely, charisma is a force of self that stems from an internal power (warlock doesn’t make sense too much, maybe they’re using the internal influence of the patron?)
heck, just make it so Sorcerer picks their main stat when you roll the character/take up the class 
Yeah now thats a idea
Paladin should be wisdom
Fighter is already the flex stat martial, let there be a flex stat caster 
You pick a stat. You pick a stat. Everyone pick their own stats!!
Bloodhunter (not raw) but they get wisdom or intelligence too for martial based stuff.
yo
Sorcerers being Versatile would be cool
warlock would probs be the better flex stat class though, due to their more limited engagement with casting in general and highly customizable setup
I would like having const proficiency
I see them more like, they adapt the spells
con + dex save proficiency for everyone 
Na, my dex isnt nice, would like const + str or widsom on me
Dex is prolly most common save in the game. Along with con and wisdom
like sorcerer being CHA or WIS
Warlock being CHA or INT
Cleric could be WIS or CHA as well
Druid WIS or INT
Wizard gets all three because wizard
Dex is too op
Give ac, initiative, dodge a lot of spells, etc.
Druid wis or int
I could see wizard being wiz or int or charisma lol
Charisma for telling the stories from the books they read.
i mean, they have to be the best caster class, so why not 
Why stop at picking in your own primary stats? Let's go further and let you choose your highest stat to save, regardless of what the description calls for. Need a Charisma save, pffgh. Use your Strength if your a fighter.
That's fair. Tbf, the amount of creativity some Spells do have are based on two metrics: yours & the DM's.
Wizard being int is for the idea of learning spells and how they work
Cha for warlock and cleric for being under a deity would work for me
Yes some spells get thrown out the window based on your enemy.
Some things cant be blinded. Some things cant be hurt by damage types.
Some things cant be restrained.
Some things can see right through illusions etc.
wis could be for intuiting spells and cha could be for bumming spells off colleagues or whatever 
nepo baby wizard
yeah the super grapple barbarian got sad when he couldent suplex a air elemental once upon a time
Yes the party tried to grab my sand elemental.... had to let them know how sandy his hands were after that
ahhhhhhhh sand is the worst
That's what prestidigitation is for c:
or elementalism to wash em off 
Saw that spell. Is that like a dumbed down version of gust, control flames, mold earth, shape water?
It’s one of the “Look! I’m Magic!” Spells
I think I've used mold earth like every session when I have it lol
the water portion gives you access to fresh, potable water so long as you drink it within a minute or freeze it with shape water or something c:
Mold earth is great. Idk how elementalism works but for mold earth. I took the dirt from underneath a enemy before round 1. Round 2 i buried him alive lol
also lets your fishy friends be damp all the time 
- Beckon Air is mini gust
- Beckon Earth lets you leave quick messages in the dirt or make places look dusty
- Beckon Fire lets you light things, make tiny fireworks, and scented smoke
- Beckon Water gives you a cup of clean, drinkable water or lets you make things moist
- Sculpt Element is mini, generic [shape water, control fire, etc)
It’s hilarious how much WotC hates survival and exploration
what makes you say that?
That one spell eliminates the need for water entirely
What?
Cause they applied such simple ways to nullify survival campaigns
elementalism, goodberry, and leomunds tiny hut together fully cover the three main corners of wilderness survival
"Hey guys my cantrip gets fresh water." Used to be a leveled spell for it. Now its just a cantrip
prestidigitation also lets you warm or cool your clothing/food, clean up, and reflavor things
the water from elementalism dissapears after a minut, you drink it and it un drinks from you
-# There’s also “being a warforged”, which eliminates two
that reading is entirely against the intention of the spell 
and anyway, create/destroy water is first level
i disagree that that is the intention of the spell entirely
That’s not how drinking water works
thats how the spell is worded
Ive had a character with shape water and mold earth to remove all the dirt from dirty water sources. He was walking around making clean drinking water in the rivers essentially.
the water in your stomach can evaporate all it wants, it's still in your stomach 
so mist burps, gotcha
it's not just making air, it's diffusing into what is already there
yo
"Beckon Water. You create a spray of cool mist that lightly dampens creatures and objects in a 5-foot Cube. Alternatively, you create 1 cup of clean water either in an open container or on a surface, and the water evaporates in 1 minute."
@blissful ibex so charisma had a little different meaning in its Greek roots, presumably why it’s the main casting focus on sorcerers and such
And clerics originally weren’t big speakers, they were conduits of gods and possessed their wisdom
thing is though, the connotations of the classes evolve over time; and the rules they're bound to should evolve with them
played, like 1~2 if you don't count CRPGs and interacting with non TTRPG media based around it
if you do, more like ~18?
3 and a half, and I've already been in too many damn games lmao
i only just created my character today
Probably around 7-8 now.
My most played classes are Monk and Cleric (around 5 each lol)
You’re not wrong, but it does feel easier to just stick with what we have now
Hey, I’m getting Eberron forge or the articfer and am wondering if I also need to get Eberon rising from the last war to be able to use all of the included stuff?
Playing weekly since 2019
My most played are monk at 2, then bard and cleric at 2
just the most recent printing, unless you need something explicitly written in the old one that is not included in the new one, or want to use the old version for whatever reason
I’ve played for about 3 years now, and currently I’ve done 6 campaigns
no the book stands alone, but it dosent have nearly so much info about the world
I've been in a few D&D games and a singular Starfinder 2e game, Monster of the Week, Call of Cthulu and Mutants & Masterminds
i have been a player in 5 different short campaigns and Ran and finished 18 campaigns in the last 4 years, currently running 9 campaigns
Charisma originally meant a gift of grace in Ancient Greek
Wow. Impressive.
Monster of the Week was pretty fun,
I played a swamp Ghost fella named Bog.
He could phase through walls and attacked by draining life essence with roots entangled in his body
So it makes sense that someone born with latent power (a gift) would be a charisma caster for what it’s worth
see, I would have had a campaign like 10+ years ago but the dm flaked >.>
and just otherwise was never around people interested in playing it 
But I’ll take it my grave that warlocks should not be cha casters
They should be int casters through and through
i wanted to play dnd years ago, i bought my first players handbook in 2021 but never actualy played for 20 years
played a tonne of the video games and read hundreds of the novels in that time though
And clerics should be given the choice of cha or Wis, much like blood hunters do
In Call of Cthulu I played an 18 year old British Journalist named Maxwell Pax, he grew up as a street ruffian, but had a passion for storytelling
Are there signs a DM would be better as a writer than a DM?
Oh man, I love my silly boys
yeah, if they spend more time worldbuilding and prepping then running games
Intelligence has already been taken by Wizards, which have been the core spell caster since D&D began as a Magic User. Warlocks and Sorcerers are new and should accept their place. 🙂
Psion being an up and coming Intelligence caster:
Bards:
Like I said, I do think warlocks should be int casters, but it makes sense that bards and sorcerers are cha casters for different reasons
Artificers, Wizard, Psion
The holy trinity of intellect lmao
Don’t forget blood hunters
They're not official.
i try very hard too, they are so bad
Psion technically isn't "Official" right now either, but it's an actual class being worked on by WOTC
I mean, it’s on dnd beyond
It's still not official.
It's partnered content.
W
Warlocks, Sorcerers, Bards, and Paladins
Bloodhunter isn't a part of anything outside of being partnered.
Tbf, int centric characters are slim pickings
4 classes on 1 caster stat is heavily weighted
Which is why i can't wait for Psion
what do you mean?
I’m not overtly excited for Psion, but hopefully it’s fun for folks
all four classes share CHA as their primary stat
and WIS which has 3
vs int which just has 2, (2 now with artificer)
Pathfinder has multiple Intelligence classes:
Investigator, Witch, Wizard, Alchemist, Inventor, Psychic (Depending on which you pick) and Commander.
But WOTC has been sleeping on INT >:[
If we include artificer it’s 2
yup, caught it and edited 
They regretted making wizards and decided not to make another broken class
We all know int is the best stat in the game after all
It’s definitely NOT the one I dump almost every time
Eh, just change Wizards to 1d2 HD
Coin flip per level 
We could go back to 1d4 hit dice, problem solved I say
I know its a joke, but if they regretted making Wizards they wouldn't have given them decent buffs in 2024 rules
And remove Toughness feat and Con HP bonuses from them, too 
Oh yeah, I just think WOTC doesn’t wanna make more int classes because they wanna give the himbos things to play
In terms of interesting things, Wizard overall has been pretty stale as a class
Doesn't make sense at all, since Himbos are literally "Stupid Handsome Men" but, go off?
guys what lvl is for violet prismatic spray and what class is that from
yo
Sure it does, we have more cha casters than anything, and people like dumping int
whats your class and race
Not saying Int characters can't be handsome, the whole point of a Himbo is being kinda dumb but in an endearing way
Yeah? I wasn’t insulting himbos 
I know you weren't
Hm, you know more than me then. Sometimes I feel like I don’t know myself
whats your class and race
Uh, aasimar hexblade in one campaign, dusk elf light cleric in another, and a variant human celestial warlock in my last one
nice
The variant human has a bit of oni blood mixed into his family tree
most recently i used a dhampir monk way of shadow
My current characters are
Harengon Bladesinger Wizard
Centaur Barbarian
Yuan-Ti Alchemist Artificer
Tortle Knowledge Cleric
Dark Elf/Drow Celestial Warlocj
before that i used a simic hybrid fighter echo knight carapace manta glide
nice
hey guys
yo
i’m new here
whats your class and race
5?! I need your luck so I can get into more campaigns
no idea lol. Just trying out something new. idk the first thing about dnd ngl
himbos have to be 3 things. Sweet, dumb as a bag of rocks and built like a barn.
alright
want some help if so then dm me
My mercy monk is a himbo
will do rn i’m just looking around
it's fun. But he is also kind and is like paddington the bear
ok
btw in dnd you pre make a character so ill tell you all the official raw character classes and races
6 if you count my Starfinder campaign
Playing a Ratfolk/Ysoki Mechanic there
Invite me, I need more things
I need something to play a genie paladin in
All those games are full lmao
Darn
But yes, I have many creatures
Genie? You mean genasi?
I've noticed they call it Genie on here
Oath of the noble genie
I had an Earth Genasi Noble Genies Paladin
He perished in Glorious combat.
Oh homebrew
That's official lol
No it's new subclass heroes of faerun
Oh that's why I didn't know
2024 stuff
I only have base and asterion from 2024 stuff
Just not core classes, only optional classes
College of the Moon bard and Spellfire Sorcerer are really nice from that also 
though the level 6 ability on college of the moon was a massive wiff mechanically 
I actually like the scion of three rogue. But it's a little "teleports behind you nothing personal kiiiid" coded
balances the level 3 one kinda though so fair 
My Genies Paladin was struck down by a Lich, at level 11 lol
2 sessions into the campaign.
It was an encounter to run away from, he took Honor and Death and it took all 4 of the Liches attacks to take him completely out lol
The party escaped with his sacrifice though 🧐
incredibly so, it's very fun
I like playing rogues for short campaigns
I'm glad bladesinger is back and now you can hit with your inteligence
i'm cursed with 'only ever wants to play the one character' q_q
does anyone know of a web site and or app were i can add multiple dice and spells effects to calculate damage?
I will play everything except ranger
I'm cursed with the 'Too many character ideas, but my characters are still alive.." curse
OH! wait!
I forgot one character
I'm actually in 7 campaigns lol
I forgot my Dragonborn Cavalier Fighter
I just wish they redid divine soul insead
I’m stuck with the “Too many character ideas, but I’m the DM of my group” curse
I hope we will soon get to know the 2026 book plans
I know this feeling
I love all of my characters greatly, but they need to die before I lose my patience /j
Tell your DM, that problem can be solved
My dms are aware that I'm ready to die /lh
Or they can just retire
Are you crazy? That's too unrealistic
Alas, my characters are, for the most part, at points in their career where they've got a bit too much on the line to just retire
They moved to another city to open up a inn
i had a pc early in a recent campaign that got hired on as a full time blacksmith, and im like cool, let me know who your new adventurer is
Retire the pc and make them an npc down the line
My Celestial Warlock is a Drow from Menzoberrenzen and he seek to foil lolths plans
My Dragonborn Cavalier Fighters teammate got Dojon'd and his horse is Dead.. also his boyfriend is a party member
My Harengon Bladesinger has an Artifact that gave him 30 intelligence and has a dragon daughter
My Yuan-Ti Alchemist just started, but he's got.. plots and ideas.
Ect ect.
Players who activly make their backstories derail the campaign is my pet peeve. Don'twrite your PC has to go do x thing if it's not something they can do during the actual campaigns
My favorite is my dusk half elf light cleric whose dad ran away from Barovia, just for this lackadaisical idiot to walk right back into it lol
oh the trick to that is if one pc goes off on their own is to look at the rest of the party and say "and Sergey was never seen again"
Yeah my DM one time didn't know what to do with that player. But it's because they were not sure if they could say no
The most easy to retire character pf mine would be Bucket, my Starfinder Gangster/Mobster Rat Mechanic fellow, but he still needs to find out who murdered his dad and also give true sentience to his robot Son, S.A.K.R (Super Ass-Kicking Robot)
they can allways say no
I know. But he just didn't want to
It ended with us having to do a session 0 and start a new campaign
Secretly, my pc wants to kill Strahd though, and knows exactly where he is and what he’s doing
those sort of experiences hopefully shape a DM that knows how to enforce boundaries
Then I had to say during session 0 as a player, "Hey make your adventures want to do the adventure presented. Don't let the DM have to force you to do the adventure"
"Why does my PC care about x thing" Well thats your job you made the pc
"Why should my PC Care?"
Should be an instant red flag, imo
i had someone show up to a one shot with objectives of their own, i was like no, welcome to the bone orchard roll for initative
Like, YOU joined the campaign, your PC SHOULD care, dummy!
I think sometimes if the campaign derails you sometimes as a player just have to go along
Love your terminal montage Entei pfp btw lmao
Like some modules start one place and end up a whole other place in the middle so the best you can do it just say "oh my pc is now invested"
It's a good pfp
Barp.
Explosions
I like https://dice.clockworkmod.com/ but you need to manually enter your numbers
Mine just wants to maybe eventually get strong enough to do a little aboleth hunting but not really as a super pressing thing 
Thank you
as a multiclass player you do aactually have to be cognizant of damage averages for your MC vs a single class character to make sure you stay within bounds and don't get left in the dust 
Just don’t multiclass. Easy
Yeah most multiclass players fall behind pretty bad
Especially after 2024 every class is better to stay single class than ever before and most themes don’t actually require Multiclassing
Many things people multiclass for can in fact be covered by just roleplay or taking a specific thematic feat along the way
feats make so much possible
Yea. I wish we got more honestly.
Back in 3.5 feat slots were explicitly separate from ability increase slots
Is there a place to talk about a book or ask questions regarding a novel?
I think #dnd-media is the place for novel talk tbh
Oh yeah I suppose #dnd-media would be for D&D novels, like Drizzt and Dragonlance, if you're just aksing about a novel it might be #non-dnd-topics
Okay my question is asking if I can read a certain book without have read any other dnd novels
Which one?
Either ravenloft heir of strahd or spelljammer memory’s wake
Just wondering if I can read any of those without having read previous books
any DMs that are knowledgeable about CR ratings around? I wanted to share a map I made with the enemies I have on it and im trying to decide the proper levels reqs for it
Ever heard of xp budget? Better measure of difficulty then cr
I haven't. i can check it out, but since I already kinda built the encounter I was hoping for someone's idea of what I should run it for. my first go round was 5 level 5s and it was way too easy for them.
Youd have to look up the exact numbers but basically it boils down to
-a player character decided the budget based on level, e.g. lvl 1 is 500xp lvl 5 is 3000xp
-multiply that by the amount of players you have for your total budget
-within this budget pick enemies, higher cr enemies have higher xp so youll be able to use less of them
-depending on how much youre over or under the budget makes the difficulty
does anyone have a campaign with an open party spot playing within the next 2 hours
*actually i believe the budget per character is given in several tiers between easy and deadly already so your encounter xp will fall somewhere there
Alright I think spelljammer memory’s wake is not apart of a series so thanks everyone who helped out
What’s the difference between magician and wizard/sorcerer?
Magician isnt an actual class in the game but a wizard learns their magic, sorcerers are born with it
Sorcerers are too cool for books 😎
sorcerers r nepo babies
Mechanically wizards have access to a lot more spells (then any class not just sorcerers) but sorcerers can modify their magic with metamagic
Gasp, true
and wizards are nerds
nah sorcerers are theatre kids
Nothing solves a problem like good ol fire ball
???
Low hp and low ac, they die quickly
Druid?
they’re both really easy to kill in early levels
thats a meme
What’s ac?
Armor class
Ah I see, I’m excited to play, got super addicted to baldurs gate 😭
whats up
at early levels wizards/sorcerers can have like 5 hp
Nah you start with 6+con, for both you want atleast +2 in con anyways
Do they at least get good after leveling up?
I meant if you dump con for some reason lol
No.
Survival? No. But yes they are good classes
They get more hp but it’s still low compared to the other classes
I guess I just need a big strong paladin to protect me
Nah, just cast Elemental Swarm 
What’s that? 😭
Kill them before they get to you
Elemental Swarm? 9th tier spell, summons a whole lot of elementals over time 
I got a lot to learn, exciting
When the spell is complete, 2d4 Large elementals appear. Ten minutes later, 1d4 Huge elementals appear. Ten minutes after that, one greater elemental appears. Each elemental has maximum hit points per HD. Once these creatures appear, they serve you for the duration of the spell.
At 9th level who needs hitpoints when you got the power of a minor deity
*9th level spells
whats a good starter class for someone whos only played like three times
What have you played those 3 sessions?
Is the 2d4 their health? What’s HD?
Hit Dice....? Their LEVEL?
fighter
How did you like it?
i liked it, i kinda want something where i can use magic tho
I’m like super new, I’m sorry
Wanna go all the way magic or get a mix between martial and casting?
Anybody playing a run on dnd?
Paladin
Smite foes and shield allies with divine and martial might
Paladins are united by their oaths to stand against the forces of annihilation and corruption. Whether sworn before a god’s altar, in a sacred glade before nature spirits, or in a moment of desperation and grief with the dead as the only witnesses, a Paladin’s oath is a powerful bond. It is a source of power that turns a devout warrior into a blessed champion.
-# Suggested Standard Array assignment
Str. 15
Dex. 10
Con. 13
Int. 8
Wis. 12
Cha. 14
Likes: Defense
Complexity: Average
Starting HP: 10 + Con. modifier
Has the melee aspects of a fighter but also access to magic and spells
?tag new ranger
Ranger
Weave together martial prowess, nature magic, and survival skills
Far from bustling cities, amid the trees of trackless forests and across wide plains, Rangers keep their unending watch in the wilderness. Rangers learn to track their quarry as a predator does, moving stealthily through the wilds and hiding themselves in brush and rubble.
-# Suggested Standard Array assignment
Str. 12
Dex. 15
Con. 13
Int. 8
Wis. 14
Cha. 10
Likes: Survival
Complexity: Average
Starting HP: 10 + Con. modifier
^the other half-caster
what's a good recommendation for a dnd build similar to Shadow or Springtrap?
Shadow from Sonic? Best you're getting is Monk (Warrior of Shadow). Springtrap mostly seems to sneak around and stab people, so most Rogues seem to fit
anything else to help build my character
I might be a Halfling or maybe a Shifter for Shadow and a Harengon for Springtrap. Thats really it tho. These will not really feel like the character's they're based off of tho
Dragonborn draconic sorcerer that had their hatchling shell mended and enchanted to use as an arcane focus
Heya dnd peeps
Hello
I wrote this message many times. Thank god it finally got through
Discord crashed on my PC.
Springtrap with at-will Magic Jar
Huh
Shadow? The undead monster?
Does anyone know what a holy symbol would look like? specifically for Tyr, I know he has the warhammer with scales on top but how would that translate to a holy symbol? Also, can you put a holy symbol as a crest on a shield instead (even then I would prefer to use 2 handed weapons so not preferable)
Shadow the Hedgehog, the character in their profile picture
A Holy Symbol can be an Emblem on a shield or banner, yes. The Holy Symbol would be some depiction of a warhammer with scales on top
what part of shadow or springtrap do you actually want to embody as a part of your character? if its a combat thing then its different but if its the personality you like then i dont think there is anything stopping you from just roleplaying whatever build you would like that way
Oh I don't know anything about that cartoon
if it is a seperately held object, would the holy symbol just be like a ring or something with a depiction the symbol on it? i just cant visualise how that works. like in my head, if you were a cleric and had the christian god as your deity you could hold a crucifix or something but i cant see the same with like a small warhammer with scales on top
Yes
The fact that idk how to play
guess im playing a jawa in my next campaign
OMG
I didnt know it had so many dnd communites.
Where have I been all this time!!!
🤯
what im asking is like, what part of them do you like that makes you want a built to be like them. is it about how they fight and you want to fight like those characters do?
also this makes no sense as a response to my question
Utini! 
the embody of the character
im playing a rock gnome artificer, when i get top level 3 im gonna choose battle master so i can have a gonk droid
and instead of a rock gnome hes a jawa
his name is Vik Kreez
like what? in dungeons and dragons there is basically 3 main things, roleplaying, combat and exploration. you can have the most personalisation when it comes to how they fight and how their personality. when you are asking what build to use, that basically only applies to combat since that will be affected by your class and other choices you make on the character, but roleplay - actually embodying the character's personality - that is just something you can do without any limits, but it will make no mechanical difference.
i just want to know, when you play, are you interested in actually fighting like shadow the hedgehog or springtrap? i dont know much about either but i know shadow the hedgehog is really fast like sonic so maybe choose the monk class as they can go a lot faster than other classes but the other things like super strength and immortality are not possible so just pick the aspect you liek the most or is more defining to their character like super speed so monk would be a good choice for that. I dont know how springtrap fights or really anything about him other than what he looks like
How does a reborn race sound for springtrap?
Hellooo! I hope everyone is having a great time.
I'm looking for someone that's interested in roleplaying with a small group. Just a casual fantasy rpg with 2-3 others; would anyone like to join?1
Along with his class being a artificer
for who? springtrap? i dont know what he actually does, i know they are like animatronic robots that kill people
you'll wan't to post in #looking-for-players
what is it about springtrap that you like and that you want to emulate when you are playing dnd?
I have my idea saved into a Google doc, it be better if id showed
dm it to me alright
Ight
can a player attack with other weapond when they attack with a flame blade as it is stated that the flame blade looks like a scimitar
2014btw
You would hold the small warhammer-scales statuette and cast spells with it like a priest holds a crucifix. Maybe you grab an amulet, maybe you hold up a symbol, maybe the symbol can be pointed, but you hold a small icon in your hands if its another object.
like the spell?
yes
the statuette is cool and i had it in mind but like, i didnt say it explicitly, but what i meant is that the idea of a warhammer with scales statuette seems flimsy in the way that a crucifix doesnt, what is a holy symbol usually represented as?
If you have like a dagger in one hand and the spell Flame Blade occupying the other, you could still attack with the dagger
It would just be a regular Attack action while ur concentrating on the spell
If you mean with Extra Attack with Flame Blade, no. As the attack from the Flame Blade Spell is an Action. But not the Attack action
The scales don't have to be functional. There doesn't need to be any slack in them. This could be an entirely metal or wooden holy symbol. Holy Symbols look like whatever the god they're connected to decides
So like... Asmodeus' holy symbol is 3 triangles, and its commonly affixed to a branding iron. If you worship Asmodeus, you likely carry around a cooled branding iron as your Holy Symbol.
i jsut mean like, scales on top would just break, like a stone depiction of scales would have to be very intricate and thing and then it could break easily (i know its kind of a stupid thing to worry about its just for my own satisfaction i dont think any dm would ever care)
No, because Flame blade is a Spell Attack and not a regular attack
i mean, i was planning on using a warhammer as my weapon so could i have scales affixed to my warhammer or like embossed onto the metal and have that warhammer also act as my holy symbol or does it need to be a seperate item?
For game mechanics, it needs to be either a seperate item or something affixed to a Shield
There's balancing involving being a caster and having weapons. Your hands can only hold so much
so here's a question
2014 or 2024?
Well it's official yall the party has survived long enough to get some minis!
would y'all say that it's reasonable to say someone with a high ac but low dexterity absorbed the blow instead of dodging it?
could have deflected or redirected the blow as well
What would happen if a Aasimar had a child with a Sharrd kai?
got called an idiot for saying that in another discord and it's bothering me
Are play by post games common at all I want to find a group but I’m introverted so that’s what I’m looking for
when you find one let me know
fairly common, yes; could also see if you could join a normal voice chat game, be in call muted, and write your responseds in the VTT/Discord if the DM is okay with that
Excellent, give them some Falling Rock minis. TPK for everyone!
🎉
Thanks
either, my dm doesnt care which edition. why?
A lion does not concern itself with the opinions of SHEEP. 
thanks but that is not helpful
That's because you don't have the lion mindset 
for 2024; Could take the Eldritch Adept feat, grab the Pact of the Blade invocation, and either summon or bind a magical warhammer which has/gains the property to act as a universal spellcasting focus
it can also be manifested/summoned into your hand as a bonus action
the portion of the feature that replaces attack/damage bonuses with your CHA mod is optional so you can ignore that if you have lower CHA than the addtribute you're currently using, but you still get the benefit of optionally replacing the damage type with Radiant, Necrotic, Or Psychic damage if you'd prefer even if you don't
A lion does not concern itself with the pains in his chest, for it is the heart begging for more energy drinks
Mmmm, holy caffeine 
They live happily ever after.
Get a place to settle down in.
Bring their kid to school.
And then all three get chopped up for wizard spell components.
The end 
nahh
What happened to a happy ending story?
It was a happy ending. For the wizard. 
Damn I respect it
Volo
If an Aasimar has a child with a Shadar-Kai the child would probably be a normal Shadar-Kai from my understanding
Ah yes, Volo 'icepick in the eye' Geddarm....
I'm unsure if plane touched can produce plane touched children.
oh
itll overwrite the celestial dna?
Volo's real nome de plume be "trust me bro"
I always see it as the same reason Percy Jackson can date annabeth
There just becomes a chance your kid's gonna be a sorcerer now
I dropped the show, whats the reason for those that dont know?
Traits and attributes of the children of PC's aren't addressed in 5e.
Your son has wild magic now
Oh I meant from the books basically the godly side is icher not real DNA
actually makes sense.
ohhh
What if they become a bard instead?
That's just my take on it
Everyone is different like Thor in my worlds usually only has magni and modi
IIRC, I liked the bit towards the end of one of the earlier books where they're (minor spoilers for a non plot relevant bit)||flying back from whatever it was they were doing and one of the characters is just casually shooting arrows into the bullseye of the sign of every Target store they fly by|| 
Then they populate the earth with children mixed with both good and misfortune.
I think that was luke
the son of a wizard and a druid would fit for this honestly
Being an Aasimar isn't really a genetic thing.
Or terrible music
"yeah, my parents were the biggest adventurers of the century and there i am, dont being able to even control the magic that is inside of me"
Neither is being a tiefling, truly
Then I will remove them myself, no son of mine is gonna be a bard when there's options like cleric and barbarian
Cleric Barbarian?
I did that it's broken
couldnt it be from multiple reasons/sources?
Clerbarian
Yes, but it's typically not genetic
You can rage tank alot of hits then just heal yourself after
Barbabarian
Makes sense
It's called being Plane Touched for a reason.
Bardbarian
There's a lot of utility for clerbarians
Artbarian
Show me on the interplanar aura where the plane touched you
Being born doesn't really make you touched by a plane of existence unless you're born there.
You can also become an Aasimar at any point in your life
I know the worst combo it's called the coffee lock it's a sorcerer warlock
Slaughter is an art all its own
tis isnt ban? I actually dont know
my bard is fey touched... the lore is he got lost one time and the feys kicked him out for being annoying and dumb....Its... my bard
Suddenly a family of barbarians, but each with a multiclass
A group of all fighters in a roleplay heavy campaign
Nice backstory. Its so good I can immediately read the character and his personality without actually reading them.
Barbarians benefit from spellcasting when melee isn't an option
How about an all villager party
Or when your cleric is down because shenanigans
I mean I have a cleric with 18 ac without armor granted he's like level 12
There's nothing in the Aasimar's description that says they were "touched by a plane". It says they were either descended from an angelic being (born that way) or infused with celestial power (presuming a gift).
Everyone laughs at you for taking levels in cleric until you pull them out of the fire with your big muscles and your healing magic
Never laugh at a cleric
Imagine opening a tiny gift and you now have wings
see, you just run a small autognome barbarian so the party wizard can cast catapult and yeet you at your foes when you're too far away
/j
A war domain cleric can break all your fingers while naming the joints
The fast ball special
Trickster goddess bestows you with aasimar status when you step out of a sauna
Technically you could kill strahd with a humidifier and holy water
Or a sauna and holy water
This reminds me of the dungeon soup video
how does holy water kill strahd in a humidifier or sauna?
holy water requires the attack action to damage undead and fiends
Through "emotional damage".
Yeah.... its...at least in combat he kinda locks in and give me haste and heal but you must add too that he is a forced pacifist. (Any attack roll he do will miss or get dodged//half damage)
ohhh thats what that meant, I feel dum, sorry!.
no worries!
Oh damn, whats his reason for fighting?
im asking him now, but i doubt would be something specific, can be easily "i need a work and in this one they didnt kicked me after the first mission"
Hi guys!
"I will not tolerate the forces of evil"
Hello gkn
Yet he's a "pacifist", I guess hes becoming the very thing he dosent want to tolerate. AOT Eren vibes
I may not be violent, but these guys are, and ye shall get your yer wages in the afterlife
Genuine question: I just thought of.
Does enforcing your world views on individual(s) make you, evil, good, or neutral?
Honest question.
It ain't honest, but it's much work
Depends on the views
I would say it depends on what you mean by enforcing your world views
If you live in a world where eating babies is the default, then forcing your views of non-baby eating is good
Why would the persons views make any difference? Specifically is the act of enforcing your world views bad, good, or neutral?
say I'm a lawmaker, and I put into effect a law that says "don't kill people"
The act of enforcement depends on the methodology and the idea, making it neutral
Interesting question, actually maybe I should as chat pt... 😉 Im curious.
that's forcing my world view onto people. is that good, bad, or neutral?
ew, why would you waste water and power on a bad answer from a garbage tool
Idk : (
I got my answer from you all tho, thanks.
Conquering evil is inherently good and requires evil influence to become evil
This makes a lot of sense to me. Anyone has a different argument?
oof
Has anyone played Baldurs Gate: Descent into Avernus? If so, how was it? How much roleplay was there compared to combat?
It is certainly a module for 5e
Too vague to tell. Honestly Alignment is a terrible system to describe personality or psychology anyway, ignore it and just write a thorough character personality.
Any specific things about it?
i just got a circlet of blasting (scorching ray, +5 to hit!!!) for a new year's gift from my DM
hm, never heard this one before. So take Alignments as a grain of salt?
This is more a description of your ontological views than the function of alignment
I'm not sure what that means, but if it means ignore it, then yes.
no it's more that alignments dont take into account for moral grey scenarios and can't account for how your character acts the entire campaign
Moral grey is an overused trope
but it's true
jist saying apply the phrase ("dont judge a book by its cover") to alignments.
If a lawful good character suddenly turns evil then it's bad writing
actually i think it's kind of fun
And one bad action doesn't immediately indicate an alignment change
I meannnnn....eh, if theres little to no reasoning.
Ehh .. but all of the Alignmentd are just entirely cover.
grey morality isn’t inherently bad but a lot of writers nowadays do it poorly imo
Hence "suddenly"
Alignment is so badly explained in 5E that new players have to go online to find out how to actually use the system. Online they find that there is a different opinion for each "veteran" player out there. Leading the new player to have to basically do a mini research paper sifting through the various essays online to hammer out their own
understanding. This time would be better spent playing. Furthermore, Alignment has led to so many game breaking and table ending fights that its value as a system is in the negative in my opinion. I think it's actively harmful to the hobby.
Grey morality is an overused trope, and furthermore it is sufficiently hard to do well to a point that it's best avoided
"do"
that's not what i'm saying i'm just saying that the alignment section of character making is basically pointless because your character should react more ways than just being the savior all the time
it's kind of weird that having complex / multifaceted characters that aren't aligned to a 3x3 grid is an overused trope
A sudden horrific event could happen thats so horrific it change ones life forever. I think ik what your trying to say tho
Alignment is officially not even meant to guide your characters actions at all. It simply describes your post decisions and actions.
Straw man, but go off
I just think sudden wasnt the best word
I wouldn’t say it’s overused: it’s only been the norm in writing in the past like thirty years. the problem with it is similar to the problem with plot twists and red herrings in modern media: bad writers see that it’s popular nowadays and just mindlessly copy it
That's contextualized development
Really?
Yep, lemme find the section of the book...
Sudden could just as well be replaced with random
that word to big for me : (
but thanks ill learn a new word today.
hmmm
A random horrific world view changing event could happen
If a character is poorly roleplayed by the player sufficient to have random developments without any thought for context, then that's up to the player
100% correct. The book literally says this
Being good aligned doesn't necessarily mean you're a savior to all
look having a lawful good character suddenly turn evil can work as long as they do it right
Do I hear "heel turn"?
That's called a plot twist, and it's usually terrible for party cohesion if it's a PC
"contextualized; contextualizing
transitive verb:
Meaning: to place (something, such as a word or activity) in a context."
I feel dum for not knowing this, the word legit told me what it means. 😭
look i just think alignment is pretty much meaningless
Then ignore it.
https://www.dndbeyond.com/sources/dnd/br-2024/creating-a-character#TheNineAlignments
"Broadly describes" is what the book says.
I think not using alignment removes a lot of meaning
Oh i thought we was talking about writing in general across all media.
That's fine.
Come to think of it, I think Fallout was onto something by making your character do a mini personality test when starting out
maybe, nothing is stagnate tho, things can change with the passage of time.
we were talking about alignment within 5E raw
If you think it's meaningless, ignore it. But that doesn't mean it is meaningless.
Moral grey, yes. Both in the context of D&D and at large. See: "my edgy rogue"
I prefer using PBIF (Personality, Bonds, Ideals, Flaws) instead of alignment.
mmmm
Vs RAI
lol
It's literally the same in this regard.
How people implement it often is against the intent.
honestly i think that works better
That's... Part of the alignment selection...
Write yourself a thorough personality instead.
yeah
morally grey doesn't have to be "Edgy" whatever it is you think "Edgy" is
morally grey can simply be "not as committed as someone who is an extremist"
honestly I write my character’s personality and values first and base the alignment on that. alignment only factors into their personality if they’re a cleric or something
i think he's saying write PBIF instead of using lawful good or chaotic evil alignment etc
Moral grey is the progenitor of the edgy side of the hobby
Morally grey is best left to late 90s early 2000s media, in my opinion.
i used it as an example
I think people are confusing “grey morality” with edgelord media like Spawn or something
Hear me out. What if said character views themselves as an alignment that they are not. very interesting idea right.
grey morality can be as simple as nobody is pure good or pure evil
Just saying, taking 2 minutes to answer a few hypothetical questions could change quite a bit
yes hit the nail on the head
When "moral grey" can be described as "tragic backstory" with that being a lesser reduction, there's a problem
yeah, the allergy to pathos is such a wierd antidramatic/ bland narrative mindset
Which is, in my opinion, boring.
Maybe, In a world where everyone is honest.
the fallout games (well, the west coast ones) do grey morality very well imo
"your character has trauma or pain from their past? pshhh edgy"
Self delusion about one's own actions and decisions is an interesting Flaw, yes.
Love to hear it
Doesn't have to do anything with alignment still.
When the focus of the character on trauma or pain becomes a whitewashing for the rest of their story, that's boring
Im aware 😭
exactly being morally grey can also just be not choosing a side when there is good and evil defined
You really dislike alignment huh.
I encourage everyone to try making deeper characters than the 3x3 grid. "grey" if you like but "complex" and "driven by motivations rather than a bingo card"
depend how you do it and your approach and what ways to see the world
The "only the strong must lead" can be seeing in many ways, a good and a bad one
meanwhile something like (at the risk of kicking a dead horse) the recent Star Wars movies try to do “grey morality” but it doesnt really work
I don't dislike alignment. I simply don't care about it. it's an extremely limited tool that we have kind of transcended as a hobby
Grey isn't intrinsically bad, but it is done to death and hard to do well. It is also often held as a stand-in for complexity
"only the strong must take the lead" can be taken like, the strong know more because for reaching that point they had to face a lot of problems
Anotehr way can be that the weaks dont must have voice, seeing it like some tyrant
can you define "done to death"
I agree.
But also alignment is an after the fact thing, based on how the character acts in game, in a generalized way.
Instead of a vague 9x9 grid, why not try using a self written roleplay guide:
Personality - The default emotional “stance” of your character or their standing animation at the character select screen, if you will. This is how your character generally behaves when nothing else is going on.
Bonds - The people, places, and things that are important to your character, either good or bad. These are the connection points between your character and the game world, very important for integrating the character and the plot.
Ideals - These are your character’s ethics. This is where you state how your character believes people should behave.
Flaws - These are your character’s blind spots or things that plague your character in a way that drives the story forward and makes the plot more interesting, a built-in conflict generator. Usually they will be a kind of weakness in your mindset, but it can be anything else that consistently obstructs your character’s life
I was going to say something ][][ but rather hold my tongue, thanks for the insight tho.
All popular media nowadays tried to do “grey morality” and even IPs that it doesn’t work with are bent to fit that mould
Very deep convo already
It's a simplified descriptor. That's all it is.
yeah, dont most do that already?
Pop culture is drowning in "tragic villains" and "morally dubious heroes"
Sadly no. They didn't include this system in the 2024 update.
Also bad writers have a tendency to not realise that they themselves have moral codes that bleeds into their writing regardless of how “morally grey” they try to be
drowning... any recent examples?
💯 agree
I do love me a good sympathetic villain.
A sympathetic villain is not equivalent to morally grey.
I'll always be more interested in a villain or hero who has motivations
Another commonly beaten on example: The gamr of thrones show took the whole “the heroes never win” thing to ridiculous extremes with villains winning ridiculous outnumbered fighs and good characters suddenly turning evil
than a villain or hero who is bad or good because that's what's written down
I dont think they were imply that it was.
again, can be seeing in many, that is what i would put if it was a talk between idk, the BBEG and some of the party.
The BBEG talking with the fighter of the party, the only one without magical powers, without a religious attachment or some naturalist attachment for their class, etc. etc. Is something i would do in some campaign if i could.
Ahem: invincible, the boys, the non-paroical superhero genre (seemingly as a whole), much of recent star wars (such as it is).
If not, that was an incorrect understanding of mine.
Villains who are just cackling cartoons with no logical reason for doing what they're doing is a bit silly for me.
Wont deny one thing, sometimes a bad guy that want to just be bad, is easier to take.
If the campaign is more light just having a bad guy because is just bad would be okey
The last Jedi is a great example of this yeah
It's not, but it is an example of moral grey executed poorly
I once made the bbeg a mirrored version of the party
I mean sympathetic villains arent inherently bad
YO I JUST REACHED LEVEL 1😎
Nice
I don't think they're bad at all?
I don't see it as a problem, necessarily, to not understand the reasoning behind what the evil being is doing. Sometimes that's why it's evil - because it defies all reason.
Ik
Not inherently bad, but often poorly written
Sympathy isn't empathy. I think that's the misunderstanding here.
Another example of bad grey morality is trying to “redeem” a villainous character with a twagic backstory (cough Harry Potter)
Yeah sometimes they're not people, they're forces or the elements or something, but if they are people, I prefer a fully developed person.
You don't need to empathize with the villain to sympathize with them.
I would if i can, make the BBEG have like his own party. Make a fighter BBEG with a rogue, wizard and someone else and make the protagonist party in some moment have duels with them and find a way to overcome it
I had to look up bbeg (Big Bad Evil Guy) to understand this. My apologies. yeah seems like a good approach. Would also prevent any religous character from losing their gods blessings/powers.
I think people are very very uuuh media illiterate - providing a reason for the villain to be compelling doesn't equate to redeeming them
Oh I legit meant a big bad evel group
The two aren't related. Sympathetic or not, villains can be well or poorly written.
Evil
like thanos had a whole reason he wanted to do what he did. it didn't make him right, it didn't even make him clever. it made him fun to listen to as a villain
Yes, but volume has relegated the sympathetic villain to a caustic trope
OFC not, but whats a villain without a reason?
Vecna (ST) ||Had a tragic backstory and yet he didn't get "redeemed". you can feel sympathy or even empathy for a villain, but that does not provide a redemption, only interest.||
ye
Even if it's a person, their reasons can be incomprehensible.
Hmm, maybe I haven't had the kind of exposure you have, because I don't feel this way.
Plenty of real life evil people are that way.
Real life Evil is often bad storytelling.
Hay I am sorry to bother you all but I am new here and I have a couple questions where do I go
"Perspective" So ye
Na, its more like, for me fighter is the most neutral and open class that you can do lots of things for it.
Like i wrote, the only one without magical powers directly, dont have any connection to a deity, good or bad, nature powers, etc. etc.
Its in some way, the most "powerless" and i like that, the BBEG approaching to it and talk with the fighter, someone that is and will be the bad guy of the story having a civilized talk with him, one of the heroes is something i find poetic.
It's possible you haven't been looking for it, but once you see the tropes and writing patterns, they stick out like a sore thumb
What????
#dnd-newcomers is a good place
:v fair enough lol
Ok thanks
having "a tragic backstory" isn't bad. and it isn't a button you press to "Redeem" someone. it's simply a way to provide motivation
This feels subjective, but I'm glad to have gotten your perspective.
Real world evil is often either too banal or way too traumatic for me to be including in D&D.
It is that button when you're bad at writing, that same bad author's desk has a button next to it that says "pity the villain pwease"
really? well idk so cant so anything.
It's not inherently bad, but it's been done poorly enough and frequently enough to earn its spot at the caustic trope table
I would disagree. bad writing will be bad writing. that's like saying punctuation is bad writing because bad writers use it
It's the "my parents are dead" of rogues but for villains. It can be done well but usually it's garbage
or the “my wife died” of tough guy protagonists
there's nothing wrong with a character's parents being dead. just like nothing wrong with them being alive
I always prefer a good simple well made backstory than some complicated one.
Right maybe some things are just overused and misused and get a bad rep.
something that someone else overuses has no bearing on a game with my players
You look me in the username and tell me you've not experienced the canon event of DM-ing for the edgy rogue who uses the "I'm an orphan" line at every opportunity
Making something like "yeah, i need money for paying a tavern i want to make and the fastest way to get it is doing adventures" is good enough
A complicated one can possibly be a good well.
anyone can pick any name they want
Yep, wont deny it, but in my preference, simple sometimes is better, Less is more
It wouldn't make any more sense to say "look me in the eye" in this context
I don't care if your games have bad players, my players are great, and if one of them has a tragic backstory, they're going to use it for better play and narrative
Absolutely true tho.
lol rhats not even dnd exclusive. I used to roleplay for other fandoms a lot and i cannot tell you how many edgy characters with dead parents I’ve seen
get better players
Wont hold back a player to get a big backstory "yeah i was sold by my parents and with other kids were subjects to experiments and had to yara yara yara" stuff, anything can work if its made properly
not speaking at you right now, just the people who have bad players
My players started out new, and they grew as roleplayers and people over time. I've also seen that trope so many times it causes me to roll my eyes when I hear the line
responding to the "my players are bad with tragic backstories" stuff
I’m going to start playing dnd when I get back to school. We play once a week. It’s a dnd club
My players are great, but they started out with kinda trash stories like everyone else
so now that they're great, are they still unable to do pathos?
Only if they dont put in their backstory "yeah, i killed tiamat alone" or smt liek that, im good
They can do it quite well without leaning on overdone tropes and moral grey
In fact, most of them can use alignment to generate pathos in a story
a friend happened that... literally said to that player that wont work and the player quitted
Some are still learning how to do that
so would you say they are incapable of playing a character who has experienced tragedy?
*I think one main factor is that dnd players have to write a half finished story, definitely should get some lee way. Basically, their backstory, personality, etc, is an introduction to their character. They can change and evolve as the campaign or story progresses. *
or just that tragedy ina backstory is something you dislike, and would rather your players don't write with?
IMO if you’re going to do a tragic backstory, think of ideas for it that arent being done by everyone else, for creativity if nothing else
It's not inherently difficult to play characters with some tragedy, it depends on the character imo
Tragic backstory is okay as long as it doesn't become a narrative black hole
why not think of the backstory that fits the character you're writing and don't worry about what other people have done in nebulous other games that we aren't involved in?
I mean you need some sort of narrative conflict to drive an interesting character. It doesn't always need to be tragedy, but it's a fairly easy one to use.
why would your capable players turn it into a narrative black hole - your players are great so that shouldn't be a problem
Is it just me, or is it very annoying that out of all the types of polearm weapons that are very similar, not one of them is a finesse weapon?
**Nail on the head. **
It is easy, but I do enjoy seeing variety. Narrative conflict is fairly easy to generate even without tragedy
But it's not inherently bad or good, being overdone merely means that it's probably best avoided because the saturation takes the novelty out of it
I just feel like having a finesse polearm would be quite likely. Surely there are long reaching weapons that are actually lightweight and not totally dependent on Strength
💯
jist very overused
can you please clarify
That’s another thing: conflict doesnt always have to be about a tragic backstory. Your backstory can be “I’m interested in learning about x” or “I felt trapped/bored in my childhood and going on this adventure is exciting”
A sword also isn’t that reliant on strength, but dnd just doesn’t really work like that for some reason
Lol maybe it wasnt supposed to be understood.
it doesn't. but it can be
How would y'all stat riptide
Conflict as "I'm growing past my difficulties with other people" works as long as the character actually grows past it
I figure if one is trying to add to a conversation they should be clear about what they're saying
lol, alr, Back to orginal topic shall we?
Well, yeah, but like... that felt like a really missed opportunity
Maybe I could make a minor homebrewed weapon for that
Yeah but people should think about story ideas and backstories that haven’t been done 10000000 times. I agree with Master of Dungeons that, for example, jumping to “I’m an orphan” is often something people think up to create tragedy without thinking deeper about the specific aboht how that tragedy shapes a person
I mean at this point I'm very curious, I would really like it if this fella could be clear about what they're trying to say
if it's a sign they agree, that's awesome!
Right even a spin on a popular and overused trope is alr.
that's what I've been saying. good players can take any sort of story, tragic or not, and weave a compelling narrative
so can good DMs
Absolutely True.
The corollary is that bad players will take any story and form a boring or stupid narrative
sure, but we aren't dealing with bad players here
exactly
everyone involved has said their players are great, and I believe that
Certainly, I just like corollaries.
I'm okay q_q, wouldn't say great
what are we talking about here again?
That’s what master of dungeons was talking about though: bad players. theyre not always avoidable. when I was joining random roleplays on (I apologise in advance) the warrior cats forums I wasn’t picking who I was playing with
lol
don't engage enough with the RP pillar 
bad players that arent willing to learn from their mistakes or wrong doings and fix them.
what, why? 😭
damn, idk if it pinged or not, sorry
But that
There's also the issue of familiarity for new players
Wait, no, that's not a corollary. That's a contrapositive, isn't it?
Omg legit every time I think the same thing.
I mean the DMs involved here have said they have great players. yes bad players exist, bad writers, bad DMs, etc, but they will be bad regardless of tropes or pathos
There's an important difference between bad players and new players
I'm bad at it and get selfconcious >.>
like I do intereact and I'm working on it, but could do more 
Yes but bad players tend to latch onto certain tropes. that’s the point
and then seals started appearing and the thing went off the narrative deep end, which I suppose is what they were trying to avoid
New players latch on to them but learn to abandon them for new ideas
Also this. everyone’s first characters are a bit cringeworthy. bad players stick with them. good players think beyond those tropes
I'm fairly sure we were talking about existing great players though
at least in talking games
am much better via text but that's different 
saw a new player summoning Vecna and a god being lv 2....bad thing from the player for doing that
Bad thing for the dm giving them a monkey paw and dont giving them limits
Wait what? How would you even summon Vecna?
eh, I think any trope can be good or done well if written well. In this written well and played out well.
that's my opinion too
And it was aaaall just a baaad dreeaaam 
tropes aren't good or bad, they simply are - writing can be good or bad. playing can be good or bad. but a trope is just like a color it is dependent on who is holding the brush
monkey paw
By “think beyond” I mean not just writing a generic character
Hi :))
no, it wasnt. The dm had to modify all his campaign for that, idk what happened after that
hi Eli, welcome!
Exactly.
I would went for the "then everyone, at the singing of a roast, woke up. All dreamed the same thing, must be a signal of dont playing with powers one dont understand"
nope! just an old man with no class levels!
literally just have Vecna refuse to show up 
Is a generic character bad? Can a generic character be written/played good?
wish wasted, try again later
Gooood morning afternoon evening!
By “generic” I mean a character rhats very basic and has little interesting going on. Like the generic good guy fighter character
I think there were even people saying generic was better and pathos is bad. I think that as long as a player is playing the character that makes them happy, they're in a good spot and we can build a great narrative together with the rest of the table
What’s the best multi class for fighter
again, bad for both side, would asked for a 30 minutes break, added a npc that stopped the wish and gave them a lesson about dont playing with such dangerous things
Guy Dudeson, Human, Level 1 Fighter
Farm kid who got bored of farmin and decided to ply his trade at pest removal instead
So question, im having this talk with my dm and would like some more input, we are currently playing Drakkenheim setting, and im playing a class specific from that setting, we are talking about spells and he says he would rather me discover the spells before being able to use them. Now my subclass and class immediately get access to these spells because im a prepared caster. This is almost like the equivilent of a Cleric having to find a spell before they can cast it. I see both sides of it and just wanna get more opinions.
heya, can you transfer some of your shiny username sparkles to me?
No, I was talking about the gestalt concept of players and even DMs. My specific players are fine. My points were more conceptual and less localized
like luke skywalker!
Go to channels and roles, then select Both for being a DM and player
Sincerely, depend of what you want to add.
This is misrepresenting the points
Most damage?
Magic? Wizard is your best go. Lots of spell slots, int requirement only
More damage in general? Barbarian
Utility and more, cleric or bard
I like seals
crab eater seals have wacky teeth, have you seen those things?
Barbarian and fighter need the same requirement for multiclassing, strength so you have that for free without having to add points to stats that you wont use directly
What subclass would work with barbarian
I forgot what i was going to say. damn
If you want that try #optimization
wont know too much, i dont play too much barbarians
there's nothing wrong at all with generic "boring" characters. like I mentioned with luke skywalker - he doesn't even farm plants, he farms water. that's only a step above dirt farming! his character growth happened through the story
exactly
barbarian is one of the classes that isn't super keen on multiclassing
ah (sht mb for the ping bro)
Berserker!
I only know some of fighter 
The class that dont give you a disengage because you arent disengaging.
You are standing your ground, or you drop dead the enemy or the enemy run away from you.
Don't you have other people to sealion?
Tbh I wouldn’t call luke skywalker the pinnacle of masterful character writing
but by the same token you can look at someone like Chewbacca, who had a tragic backstory - enslaved by the empire after fighting a war on kashyyk
Every pillar is RP. RP =/= Social.
I wouldn't either. I'm saying that generic can still be compelling.
I merely said "nothing wrong with".
star was in general isnt good written for me, but that is off topic thing to talk
I think another issue here is that good and bad writing is subjective. I personally think the grand theft auto games are cringeworthy but a lot of people love them, for example
Definity
not really? Combat and exploration are kinda RP but way less intense
if it involves charisma rolls, I'm likely not super comfortable being put on the spot with it >.>
kinda going afield from the point here - I'm just saying that "generic" or "tragic" both have value and can both be done in a compelling way
I love Star Wars but the character writing in the old movies is very simple. you’re right though
Take the VtM version of RP as compared to D&D
brb
it's fine to love , hate, or not think about star wars. the point was more that luke and chewie have two drastically different backstories (simple/generic vs tragic) and they can both be compelling
Again "RP" doesn't mean social. It means acting in character, which you can do by describing your fighting style or how you prep for the wilderness.
Cant it mean both
Narration=/= RP
but there is social RP and there is that sort of RP, They're both RP but very different sorts of in character play
Social is one of the pillars, along with combat and exploration, but ALL of them are Roleplay.
ahh ok i see what your gettting at. Basically yea just being in character.
see, that's what I needed to be told; thankyou
Roleplaying is not exclusively "the act of speaking to another character in-character" is the main point. You roleplay by expressing your character at all times
Kratos roleplays in combat differently than Master Chief, for example
socal, I have issues with the social pillar
I have issues with exploration, though primarily designing exploration as a DM
people have the same problem in real life. Experience is your best friend.
brb
Yeah.... something that happened me already some times... some players dont roleplay too much and are mostly shy.... that its okey, i get it in some ways but that.. doesnt help to make it fun
Less if after more than 5 sessions is still the same level of shyness
Yes, it is a skill like any other. You can start out inexperienced and get better with practice.
Exploration is funny in some ways, you can either kill everyone by accident or it's basically irrelevant by class selection
combat is a form of conversation. unless you're albert wesker then it's just a bonkers screaming match with fists
See, I play one of those 'irrelevant by class selection' classes but I still want it to be there because being able to do cool stuff the class was literally designed around is nice\
I've been trying to do something about that. Perhaps have'm roll on the Random Magic item tables.
Man, I wanna be a player in my main dnd group (we’re friends).
I can’t waitttt
As a DM I want my players to succeed. But I still want them to have to burn a revivify every now and then
but like
- make random encounter tables
- don't bring them to the immediate area of whatever objective and have them need to look around a bit
- chase sequences
- tracking sequences
- obsticles like rivers that have overflowed their banks, weather, hazards, etc
- use the Extreme heat/cold rules
- actually keep track of rations/water/feed and have the druid/ranger burn slots on goodberry and create/destroy water if that's the plan
Yeah I have had a player bring up that it feels like there isn’t enough in-between for my plot points