#dnd-discussion
1 messages · Page 53 of 1
Drizzt do'Urden is the main characrter in the 40 Book Series, the Legend of Drizzt.
sure, go check out youtube
Fighters can be just as effective with Bows.
samurai sharpshooter fighter
From what I’m getting fighter= more versitile
with elven accuracy
Historically accurate samurai lmao
Rangers are also just as effective with melee combat, they are not locked to ranged only combat.
it's also doing stupid dmg
With rangers I expected that last time I played a ranger I had them as a more up close fighter
Take Minsc from the Baldur's Gate games, a Rashemaar Berserker with a big sword.
He is a Ranger.
hey im just curious, i'd like to make a mounted fighter type character that isn't a Paladin. Are there any items that could allow me to keep charges of Find steed or any other reliable way to recieve a mount?
you can buy a mount from a stable. Prices are in the PHB.
This is heavily DM-dependent
If your DM is so handwavey to not allow the purchase of mounts tbh I would run.
yeah that i know of, and i am part of the Lords alliance meaning i can get a free steed when i get to town according to the 2024 background or feat. was just curious if there was a reliable way get one back or have a scaling one
That is a level of loosey gooseyness that I don't wanna partake in
What if there’s not a stable nearby? Also not all DMs use the prices from the PHB
Think I’m gonna go with fighter cause I feel going more dps than tank
Then go to town? And pay the price your DM wants.
And that is the last I am engaging with you Poker for you have publicly admited to argue for fun.
Roles like “DPS” and “tank” and “healer” aren’t really much of a thing in D&D
what would you take to round out a party that so far contains bard and barb?
Cleric would be a good choice.
Cleric, Druid, Wizard
You know what I mean
Bard and Barb honestly are a great foundation for a party that you can really do literally anything to round it out
Maybe druid and rogue?
thanks for the tip, i was concidering the eberron dragonmark feat to get the spell find steed but i believe it would be stuck at level one and as such wouldn't scale. Ill just have to have a Horse replacement sized budget ready at all times
Make sure your DM allows cross setting stuff if you are playing in an established one.
oh yeah he's good with it, aslong as its official material and in some cases unearthed arcana (was playing a psion earlier as an example) he's good with it. Thankfully he's a great dm
aight
but thanks for the help ill make sure to look up the prices for horses aswell so i can keep it in mind haha
i'll stick to wiz then
I’m playing a STRanger rn!
Bow: the LARGE way.
It’s good fun! You end up being closer to a quarter caster imo. My magic mostly comes on enhancing myself and others. Using Hunters mark and taking shots with my bow before closing the distance and using Zephyr Strike
Zooming around the battlefield being a nuisance
and always remember: Great Weapon Master's damage bump applies to longbows too!
*on your turn during the attack action
Me when Rangers don't always have to use bows or do ranged combat
anyone that has played a fighter champion tortle before?
Probably
random question, do sorcerers get healing spells of any kind?
Wish
Wish
Some subclasses get healing abilities.
Like Divine Soul, Spellfire, Clockwork, and I think Lunar?
does that work for allies?
Nope. Just to themselves
aw
Yeah you'll have to rely on certain subclasses or feats for healing spells
Hmm I should try a forest gnome arcane trickster
@trail mirage
uhh
What's going on
This is literally the only thing Mr.Forest does ever since he said he was interested in a game by Leo.
He apparently DMed Leo who did not answer and every few hours or so he just pings Leo.
You would think after a while he would give up but no.
that seems like borderline harassment.
There is indeed a fine line between persistence and harassment. And I can't quite see on which side of the border Mr.Forest stands.
Could you make an item in DND like an estus flask or is that too overpowered
What is an estus flask?
Are the feats Telepathic, Shadow Touched, and Mark of Shadow worth it for a Soulknife Rogue? It gets abilities that grant it telepathy and invisibility later on anyways.
Probably not then
It's the health potion in elden ring that lets you regenerate health and it has so many charges before you have to refill it
Sure, that could be a magic item. Depending on the numbers it wouldn’t be all too strong
Hello!
Hi
In the Dark Souls games, Estus flasks are your healing items. Consider it like a... renewable health potion. Every time you rest it refills, and the more you upgrade it the more uses you get out of it before it needs a refill and the more it heals in a single use
Now I hate to umm actually but 😭- Estus Flasks are only in the dark souls trilogy, it’s the crimson tears flask in Elden ring.
Oh yah
Oh, yeah, I know what that is
Good point
Estus Flask is how it's named in Dark Souls. In Elden Ring it's the Flask of Crimson Tears. In Sekiro it's the healing gourd. It's always the same mechanic
I think it’s possible.
I'm new to DND so I'm here to hopefully make some friends and find a group<3
Hope you guys are having a good day/night!
#homebrew would be the right spot to work out the particulars of a flask of endless health.
To answer the actual question: No, I would not recommend implementing such an item.
I think it could work
Why not? It sounds fun if your party doesn’t have a lot of healing spells
I agree
Gonna have to agree. Infinite free healing doesn't sound fun
Estus flasks aren’t infinite
If your party doesn't have a lot of healing spells, use potions. Though how the hell would you get into that situation? Do you mean to tell me it's a party with no paladin, no bard, no divine soul sorcerer, no cleric, no celestial warlock, no druid, no ranger?
Maybe...
Oops all barbarians!
At that point you guys deserve what you'll get
Bardbarian rock troupe
DM should ideally be providing ways to get healing pots
Sounds like a good time for an Estus
Now thing is, is there really a difference between an estus flask and a staff of healing?
Not really
I’d just make the item like a rare wondrous or something instead of given for free
Taste /j
but fr you have a point
Refilling health pot expensive
The last bits of cereal milk.
Glad you asked. The answer is yes. A staff of healing requires attunement and a staff of healing requires you to hold it with a hand. And a staff of healing can disappear if you use its last charge
The nectar of the gods
Who did
Truly
A favourite among hollows
And a staff of healing casts a spell, which comes with the usual spellcasting rules rather than the drinking potions rules. And a staff of healing can only be attuned by a bard, cleric or druid
Pass de potion pon de left hand side
So an Estus Flask is... Essentially just a staff of healing but just flat out better in every conceivable way.
I don’t think that’s an issue
Upgrades people upgrades
Which is why I don't recommend implementing it.
doesn't seem like a big deal, imo
Estus is actually literally made of fire.
So it probably tastes like fire
It is indeed not a big deal.
That might burn my tongue
if you want it at your table, run it. if you don't, don't.
When you bite the fresh pizza
I dunno, blame the Furtive Pygmy ig
there are definitely more unbalanced things out there
Yeah I mean one time we basically got an artifact at lvl 5 xD
Actually the estus flask is indeed probably made of liquid fire, the word comes from latin "aestus" meaning fire or heat. It is upgraded using fire keeper souls.
-# sounds like a fancy way to say it's just alcohol
Fire keeper souls can also give you Humanity. Humanity in that setting is the stuff made from the darkness that appeared after the first flame created a dichotomy between light and dark. And all human souls also contain a ring of fire put around it by the sun god to prevent it from growing. So yes, it is most likely liquid fire.
Fire water
gonna have to agree.
Yup.
I like the idea of a lower level party having to protect an artifact from some external force. They are gifted Amulets of Proof against Detection and Location by some sundered noble house they are allied with, to hide them from magical view, and sent off to make a long journey to some place that could safely hold said artifact
Me downing magic whiskey after getting exploded by a giant butterfly
Fireball!
That is a fun idea
And some fire keepers (actually one) are witches. Witches are not humans but their souls also come from the first flame, and are associated with life and heat. So yes, it's just straight up fire.
I might base a campaign off of it ngl, ive been struggling to think up of an interesting campaign
Yeah I mean escorting the great holy artifact or the dimensional lock or the stone of (whatever) is important , you don’t want your enemies having it when you’re the good guys
Did they fix the problem with spells like revivify? Where corpses are objects and thus cant be targeted by revifify or other similar spells?
In the 2024 rules corpses are objects and creatures
I don’t think that was ever an issue
It never was a problem
It was only a problem is a psychopath was willing to disregard logic and use RAW /lhj
Corpse are objects but the spell targets 'dead creatures'. It's not an issue.
corpses are objects, and thus my improvised weapon
Now I wanna hear that at a table
heh, start out unarmed until at least 1 enemy is downed, then equip them
I think people reduced 'a creature that has died within X' too much to 'A creature' and then debated the 'Well ackshully, a corpse is an object 🤔 '
But the 'a creature that has died within X' still does indeed describe a corpse.
a hotdog is a sandwich
The perfect sandwich debate returns yet again.
Yeah I mean at best you could try using resurrection on your leather armor
Everything weaker than that is generally a stretch tho
Suddenly you own a cow
Expensive cow
i don't think treated leather would be enough material to make a whole cow.
I mean, the spell does say it restores any missing body parts
2 baked goods with tasty between them
i understand where you're coming from, but i have to draw the line somewhere. and apparently cake is on the other side of the line, for me.
That might also maim whoever was wearing it
The old joke used to be that back when people would message Jeremy Crawford on Twitter about D&D rules, if there was a spell that summoned a sandwich, people would be chasing him to ask what counts as a sandwich by the rules.
Checks in on dnd-discussion
Ah, yes. Everything is in order here. "What is a sandwich?" Very good. 👍
There is actually very little in the rules that isn't explained in the rules. Corpse is one of the grey areas but just talk to your dm if you really want to try to prevent yourself from casting revify
Which is funny until people start deciding that only what's defined by him or wotc is ever acceptable
There's actually so very much not defined in the rules.
Which is a good thing.
Duality. I treat rules as guidelines for making an adventure for friends.
Most of the stuff a player will want to do is handily covered. Edge cases are best to be discussed with your dm
I sometimes and maybe often blur the lines on the rules for fun factor
Oh certainly
At my tables we'll bend or change rules often
RAW is fine especially at events/AL
I remember a player of mine said he wanted to play RAW, I said “no… you don’t” and that was the end of it
I think this is a direct callout @crimson gulch
I agree and will add on to this with "It's good to stick to RAW to keep things on the rails, but knowing when to use flare helps bunches."
Kinda rude tbh
It's quite literally impossible to do when the system itself calls for rulings to be made during play.
RAW is fine especially for rules discussions
Example: What spells and abilities look like.
A level of interpretation is always necessary.
If undefined, I let my players flavor away
And for things like running a game at a store with strangers
I’m just saying, I don’t think anybody would want to play a game where see invisibility doesn’t bypass the benefits of invisibility
Ok
Hi I have a techincal question please. I am rolling a Mark of Warding Dwarf, according to the rule books they have access to Armor of 'Armor of Agathys' if they are a Spellcasting cast (one would think a wizard would fall into this class) I can not find the spell to add to my spell list. Can some one enlighten me on this please?
Or the other really strange technical issues that come from RAW, including the “corpse is an object not a creature” thing that people can interpret as not being able to resurrect people
OK 🙂
Is this perhaps on D&D Beyond?
Did you actually think I was serious and trying to be rude?
You are corect
Seeing as that got fixed in '24, I agree
I have to make a new campaign by spring. 😭
It would need the attention over at #ddb-support
Thank you !
I feel like the rules were generally written to be understandable by normal people and not rule lawyers
Huh what did I miss?
Exactly.
Discussion on playing RAW
Lol what? He literally doesn't play RAW
I made a joke about RAW and Dave here thought I was dissing you /lh /silly
Waiting for upcoming Eberron and Artificer content to get started on shooty-shoot "Dragon Badlands" adventures. Huzzah
I'm lawful raw
Heyyy have you seen frontiers of eberron: quickstone?
The updated ebberon book is great
Even with See Invisibility able to see Invisible creatures, the invisible creatures still benefit with Advantage in Initiative Roll.
Because that is a perfect book to accompany a badlands / westerny eberron campaign
I sure do my best too
Not too much. I am what one might call a lazy DM. I just know I can get my hands on soon and get to work
You use a combination of what works as you see fit - which isn't blindly playing RAW.
Well if a rootin' tootin' wand gun shootin' adventure is on your plate I definitely recommend quickstone
Oooh, noted. Writing that down, thank you
In addition to having some more eberron species it has rules for wand duels (adaptable for pistols of course)
HI, superr new, dont know where to start ut I'd love to, any tips?
You haven't played in my games as far as I can recall, I go as raw as can be, because I run so many games I don't change things as I go I just accept the system as is
"Guns," and such are the entry level that my players will be starting off with, but eventually I have to start up more complex things. Like "power armor," or airships with very fancy guns.
Maybe check out #learn-to-play
Air ships and power armor and guns are fun in dnd
thank you
Hey and welcome! Best to check #dnd-newcomers and #learn-to-play !
Ty Ty ❤️
I'm going off of the conversations we've had in here about how you dm and how you tweak things if necessary. We've had multiple discussions about it.
I'm doing a very risky thing by looking into the Bastion system to perhaps give them a HQ early on. A busted down, large airship they may possibly get back in the sky.
As a reminder, it's literally the entire context behind the "Oberoni Fallacy"
Sounds like fun- maybe for some early fun do it final fantasy style where it can function as a sea ship until fully restored?
Custom monsters and plot lines and pacing of sessions is perfectly in line with raw to engage with as I see fit as a dm
Yoho, yahoo, all I can say is "Thank you!"
Great idea.
This is you literally saying you make changes as you see fit...
Which is not following RAW blindly.
Making customized monsters and plots is something that the dmg tells you how and why to do
There are virtues in playing full RAW too.
There is no wrong answer here. Playing full RAW is not worse or better
No problem! If you are super ambitious, you can even make some support staff/crew using the sidekicks system. Having nocs that the party can get to know the a great place to put plot hooks
The point is it's literally not possible.
Content =/= rules
Speak for yourself.
Making a custom adventure and a custom monster is something you can do and stay to raw 100% actually so I don't know what your on about
I dont think anyone plays 100% pure RAW.
Maybe I am! If I am, I just passed the Turing text. Which means that I am the best computer ever
The rules as written allow us to create and breath life into so much for our games
I stick to the rules, I’m just referring to RAW as in, taking the exact words as gospel and not using logic with it. For example, stabilising a creature doesn’t specify a range, so RAW it can be almost any range since it doesn’t limit it
I just know RAW is where scary things outside of my control as a DM live, and I am a petty god
I should probably have a different word for it if I’m talking about this
I heard that one before but wasn't there a thing in the wording that prevents this interpretation?
Joking, of course. In reality it's my guideline, of course
Hello. Also new. (No need to help , I will look around)
I haven’t been able to find it. I checked in #dnd-rules with others and they can’t find it either
That’s when one of my players starting begging me to play RAW (not the good kind of RAW)
I just know sometimes I encounter RAW that doesn't sit with me. S'all. Then I discuss with the player(s). I am not perfect
The rules are a good place to start.
They're not always the right place to end.
The rules are how we resolve actions that the players attempt
Well put
But yeah RAI is how I always do it
I disregard the rules when it’s fun to do so
Like how I need to prevent a group of absolute trolls from blowing up a city or the moon or something in my upcoming game
Ofc I’m not saying the rules are bad (most of the time) because they’d obviously rely on basic logical interpretations using how the world works. Like how they don’t have to specify you can’t speak underwater
Want to use shocking grasp to electrcute a bunch of enemies in water! Ok, go ahead, split the damage between them
I am a simple guy. I write in safari:dnd discord. Now , I am here
Sounds good send in the heros to stop the moon trolls
I just know. They asked me for a game with magic/technology, I said "Yes." I just know they're going to attempt to blow up something or crash an economy
Trolls on the moon... Could be an idea!
We do this via rulings. Which often begin by looking at the rules. Many times that is where that ends - but not always.
Let's see... Maybe someone attempted to get rid of a troll group by teleporting them to the moon. They died from the lack of atmosphere and pressure, then regenerated into new forms adapted to the moon.
Whats next?
Heaven Orcs?!
What would it look like?...
I’m thinking orange and black
Maybe more gaunt and lizardy
The moon bears were scary enough, not to mention the saturn bears.
Actually, all Orcs go to heaven is my barbarians book that he's writing..
Mostly to justify his guilt of killing orcs.
Don't need to breathe? Taller and thinner?
but moon trolls?
I am for rule of law. Not code of law.
I wouldn't want to go to heaven personally
Seems like a horrible place. Especially for orcs.
One of the players wants to be evil aligned from jump, multiple others are neutral, and I might have 1 or 2 good aligned players. I am preparing for large scale destruction
thats a pretty nice solution to the trolls. could have had them suffer a fate like that one character in the old guard
That was a lie, My barbarian wouldn't feel guilty about killing Orcs
But I sure do, I had an Orc mercy monk that I absolutely adored
I was gonna say something about RAW but apparently we're talking about moon trolls now so 🤷♂️
I have no clue what you're referencing
I just wanted a fun game with some dungeons, and some dragons. "Fireball!" Then everyone laughs. Now it's all guns, airships, psionic dragons, and guerilla warfare
she is immortal and trapped under water basically
They have a much higher survival rate than sun trolls.
funny, suns dont do fire damage in 5e
-# I mean... that's good. Because the sun isn't on fire.
its all radiant damage according to spell jammer
They probably can?
But there's an elemental plane of fire, so most probably originate from there
My joke was about sunlight turning trolls into stone.
The sun is the fire, this raises many philosophical questions.
Folks, we should go to the City of Brass, trust me
Bargain and deal with the fire elementals
but yeah, fire elementals cant survive on 5e suns. instant death. but trolls can
well
okay maybe not quite. I think the trolls might die from too much damage at once?
Nah. I was making a lotr joke because I've been playing a lot of shadow of war recently
hmmmm, now..the massive damage rules specifically say "character" and not creature, implying that monsters dont get massive damage ?
Our group uses massive damage for monsters
yeah I meant strictly RAW
It’s pretty fun
NPCs are still characters
I dont think that is true in terms of DnD terminology
I don’t think they are. They’re creatures, though
If it said player character then I could see your point.
character specifically references the creatures made and controlled by the non-DM players
I don't believe that's true.
The city of brass is actually quite nice. Best marketplace in the multiverse
Especially when monster only means npc's that are or can be opposed to the player characters
Character by itself is agnostic
Hell yeah, its where I can get my gucci stuff in the forgottem realms, homie
And yeah, I think Azerick's right. Natural language wins here. If it doesn't say "player character" that means character.
And everyone is a character
Monster means any non-player character
fair enough. NPC is a frequently used term
I hate that they decided to add the glossary at times:
https://www.dndbeyond.com/sources/dnd/phb-2024/rules-glossary#NonplayerCharacter
But at least it proves me right while proving me wrong.
But all trolls have names.
Me, about to make a new character: I'll play-
Everyone: A drow or a tiefling
Darn it. I just think my misunderstood lil peeps are neat ok 
Cannon fodder trolls are strongk
There's a troll language. Any creature that has a language has a name that is used to refer to them in that language
There is no such thing as being nameless. Even "the nameless one" is technically a name
There are entire cultures that didn't name their children until a certain age irl
If no one knows of your existence, you can be nameless
Something not having a name isn't inconceivable
Like Shrek before he met Donkey
@fossil hollow
Fine. If a creature has a language but has never had any interaction with any other creature, it can be nameless
-# that creature is probably dead
Yeah they don't get an official name, but what's a name? It's the thing used to refer to you. So even if the baby hasn't been named yet, it still has the "name" of "Greg's baby"
There's old firbolg lore about them not having names, just like the wild beasts and trees of the land
I wouldn't consider a title a name
I think the distinction between title and name only starts existing after the etymology of the name has been lost
If you're called "Gregory" now, it's a name. But in ancient Greece, it's a title meaning "vigilant" or "awake"
All names start as titles in the culture. Then the meaning gets lost. The name becomes perceived as its own thing rather than as referring to something.
If two firbolgs talk about a third one, how do they refer to the third one?
Even something like "The one with the scar" becomes the name for the purposes of the conversation. And indeed plenty of real life names refer to physical attributes.
Dunno I never thought to hard about it
just because you are a character doesnt mean you have character
I gave my firbolgs names
”You may be bad guy, but that does not make you a BAD guy” /ref
Why?
they describe i guess. just like what you just did. thats not a name though it can be one if chosen
"the one with the scar" isnt a name until you determine it is
“I want to open the door”
“Sorry, can’t, there’s no rules for opening doors”
considering the description may change depending on the context and who is possibly being talked about it would be even less like a name
because
a) the rules dont cover everythin
b) the rules are not always clearly written
c) the rules are really bad sometimes
d) there is weird "tech" and rules interpretations that straight up break the game
what?
See invisibility doesn’t allow you to negate invisibility in 100% RAW
I was giving an example of what playing by 100% RAW looks like
Yeah See Invisibility doesn't let you actually see invisible people while also seeing invisible people
did they fix that in 2024?
The game wasn’t meant to be played 100% raw, because the game expects people to use logic and know how the world works
Not entirely sure, I’ll have to check
Don't think so
I completely disagree. I think that the vast majority of problems comes from overthinking or in other cases, bad rule lawyering.
For the duration, you see creatures and objects that have the Invisible condition as if they were visible, and you can see into the Ethereal Plane. Creatures and objects there appear ghostly.
But that's just me. We all have our opinions. I was just curious, why they said that
Yeah but I think you still have disadvantage
if you dont "overthink" or consider a rules laywer's argument, I guarantee that you havent always followed RAW
Cause even tho you see them they look weird so you dun know what to do /hj
I mean that's your opinion.You have no way of reading mind to know this.
Concealed. You aren’t affected by any effect that requires its target to be seen unless the effect’s creator can somehow see you. Any equipment you are wearing or carrying is also concealed.
Attacks Affected. Attack rolls against you have Disadvantage, and your attack rolls have Advantage. If a creature can somehow see you, you don’t gain this benefit against that creature.
Ah aight
Oh wow they actually fixed it! /notsarc
I dont have to read minds. no one every gets all rules perfect, not to mention that some rules are just not clear, so any interpretation will be seen by someone as not RAW (with legit reasoning)
Anybody else dislike how invisibility works in BG3?
Okay moving on
What’s wrong with it?
Whats up with it? Isn't it just the usual Invisibility?
nah its pretty heavily homebrewed
Like, no hitting or casting spells unless you want to lose it. How have they altered it?
Isn't that how it is in actual dnd too? Unless you use greater invisibility?
Admittedly, I only ever got the Invisible condition from a class feature or magic item or something (idk) in that game. I never casted Invisibility the spell, so idk whats up with it
I think it's cause enemies can just reveal you for free
wat
Nah I just think it’s incredibly annoying to go up against, as the creature is not only invisible, but cannot be targeted by anything, cannot be perceived at all, and some enemies that have it just spam it
They'll pivot around then go "ahhh" and reveal you
Oh yeah this too
Not even a perception check?
And it somehow is never as good when you use it as a player
Tbh, fighting invisible enemies never felt difficult to me
Iirc nope
It wasn’t difficult, just annoying
I was abusing the shit out of "you can't enter their token space, so by finding a sufficiently large space you can't walk into, you can find the invis enemy" tho
I ended up doing that too
I think they do but the DC is so low I'd only see them fail like once in a bluemoon
It’s like the only way to counter it without just see invisibility
though that was also sometimes a crapshoot, as the terrain that prevents you from traversing is mostly unclear
Who is "you" here? Most people do not choose their names. They are imposed. And plenty of people have more than one name. If "that jerk" is enough for the person I'm talking to to know who I am talking about, then during this conversation "that jerk" is their name.
i dont think thats how names work
Names do not need to be forever. Plenty of people change their names. Even in D&D, elves change names when reaching adulthood.
i think a phrase needs to become synonymous with your person, at least in that circle, for it to be a name
temporary? sure
but there is a limit to that
if i say "the gentleman in red" as a waiter, is that the name of that customer? no
I can advocate for this
now if that guy comes in every week, and we call him "red" that is a name
And "that jerk" is synonymous with the person we are talking about if we both agree he's a jerk
its a descriptor. its not a name
Names can be descriptors.
unless you call the same guy that thing every week and it becomes synonymous with his identity
So someone I only meet once has no name?
Regularity of encounters and reference does not seem like a good standard
no
they tell you the phrase they are referred to by others, or wish to be
i think that "wish to be" is an important detail there
Babies can't do that. Do babies not have names?
"or wish to be"
its optional to like your name
names can be given from the outside
I feel like this is getting a bit off topic
true
Babies can't tell you anything except general nonsense. Or they scratch the eye of their dad who therefore can't DM tonight's session.
Oh yeah. Got carried away.
Damn babies. Greatest enemies in D&D
Guys do u use 4d6 as like 4 separate rolls or just roll at the same time digitally when u only have one set of each dice
It is mathematically identical, so it doesn’t matter
I have 4 d6 dice, so I just do that, but as Sam said it doesn’t actually matter
Physical I do 4 separate rolls, digitally I do simultaneously
Except in my case. Each time I roll the singular 1d6, my tears hit one side of the die and make it more likely to be face down.
Sometimes I wish I had loaded dice.
Does anybody actually edit PDFs to use as character sheets? It seems like it could have advantages in theory, but I struggle to actually work them out over just putting things in a doc or spreadsheet
For D&D, no. But for other TTRPGs, yeah. The biggest advantage is I can save it and then send it to myself on Discord as a jank kind of cloud storage.
Sometimes I feel like I have prank dice that only go up to like 8 on a d20
My experience with D&D PDF character sheets is VERY hit or miss, mostly misses. It just behaves... weirdly.
Dont we all
I’m planning a campaign with a fair bit of homebrew features that make it no longer worth my time to use the DDB homebrew system, in this instance. But I want to have an alternative ready to provide to the players
Uhm, kinda on topic. I'm making a Monk, how would I determine "Saving Throw" and other stuff under like Dex and Wis
Read the feature
The what
Have you read the basic rules yet
Yes I'm still confused
character creation questions will probably be more quickly answered in #dnd-newcomers or #dnd-rules
These books are all over the place.
Specifically #dnd-newcomers
But they’re your stat modifier, and if you’re proficient in the save you add your proficiency bonus
Are you talking about saving throw dcs of monk features? Stuff like for stunning strike as an example?
So like
My Monk has a +4 in Dex, but that's his proficient stat, I can't seem to find the specific for where to find the proficiency bonus for stats
I played 3.5e for a few years like 6 years ago I'm very lost
You don’t add your proficiency bonuses to stats, and you cannot be proficient in stats
You’re proficient in dexterity saving throws
as your a monk, your Dex saving throw bonus is Dex mod. + Proficiency bonus
Where is that bonus
level based
His proficiency is +2
What level are you
3
its +2 then
make sure to reference your class features, there is usually a table there that shows level by level what you get
np
no worries, if you have other questions throw them in the newcomers channel, lots of people answer questions there
Little trick to win any investigation session quickly: It's always whoever you suspect the least. Therefore make a list of every character and just kill the person at the bottom.
Unethical life hack: kill everyone
/j
That also works
no one can do anything bad if there is no one to do anything at all!
Impeccable logic
I think I'm currently in two completely opposite campaigns and playing two completely opposite characters
“I can’t believe it, it was me the whole time!”
That’s a good way to stretch your RP skills
It is located in both the "At Higher Levels/Past Level 1" sections, and on your Class Table for your Class. Every few levels (approx every 5) it increases by 1, going from a +2 at level 1 to a +6 at level 17.
We already answered it. He thanked us and left
What's the best way to get into a rp heavy game that you're joining mid game? Like how to come up with character interactions and discuss it with your dm?
I once was in a game where a character tried to teach a demon to be good. One exchange went a bit like this:
"So you see, we must strive to prevent suffering."
"The most efficient way seems to be to kill every living being and destroy their souls."
Then "But we try to respect their autonomy"
"By using charm spells to get them to agree to being killed?"
you're having a conversation as that character. one of the best bits of advice i've gotten for improv and roleplay is to hone in on those little reactions that you or the character have and make them bigger.
you're still you, you're just being filtered thru the lens of this character
just have fun and "yes and" your party, set others up to look good
i guess i would ask the DM where you're coming in and what your character would know/what you would need to know as a player
Alrighty, thanks!@minor lake
ya!
also dont be afraid to leave your character a bit open. when you try and force something in RP it can feel stilted
an example i think of is im playing a really sweet good hearted elf who sees a bunch of elves being persecuted and he's kind of drifting towards a rebel/dark type. I didn't anticipate that but i just reacted to what he saw and how i thought he might feel and the character is already way more interesting than when i started.
tbh so much of roleplay is listening and going off of what others say
Why is slowmode enabled?
To prevent spam, and keep chat readable I imagine
There's almost 300,000 ppl in the server. While the chats aren't usually super busy, they can get real busy
And not to mention it removes the propensity for people to send a new message with each... individual.... line of their message.
i only use pdfs. you click the things and write
what do you mean by editing pdfs?
I gave my players homework to do over the last couple weeks because we had a big break between sessions. Only one player did it, so I'm rewarding them with a floating 15 for next session, just one time they can choose to have rolled a 15 on the die instead of rolling. What are some other ways that between session play can be encouraged?
i think while its funny to give out a little thing like that, the main reward for doing "inbetween session effort" should be the actual purpose of what they were doing
this isnt studying for physics, this is a game
if you had them doing something between sessions, it must have had a purpose
write a backstory? wow look at how much interaction the player who did it gets out of their backstory. maybe i should write mine too?
come up with tinkering choices? wow look at all these cool things the player is allowed to make. maybe i should actually work on my list too?
what kind of "homework" is it?
It's a newish campaign, the purpose of the homework was just to maintain momentum between a larger than usual break between sessions and get them to know their characters a little better. Last session they arrived in a new city, so between session I asked them to write someone elsewhere a message or letter. Could be family, a work associate, anyone. Didn't have to be a long message, just some form of communication
One player wrote out 3 lengthy letters to a couple different people. One player chatted with me about what they were thinking about writing, but didn't actually do it. The other three didn't do any of it
That's cool, and it's not like an immensely overpowered gift, its a one time token
I’d enjoy doing something like that tbh
Question
Answer
What LVL does your character have to be to have…
to have?!?
To have what
643HP
I don’t think that’s possible
Oddly specific
hm, well
At most you can get 440, more with the tough feat or boons
I’m finishing up at the gym but I’ll come back to this.
Basically I’m gonna grab some references about intrinsic vs extrinsic motivation - and how extrinsic motivators (rewards) can de-motivate people.
Hiii
I mean. I’m thinking LVL 20
Even with lvl 20 + d12 hitdice + 30 con + Tough + Fortitude Epic Boon you would still be quite a ways away from 600ish
dwarves get an extra hp per level right?
even with that, but yeah
oh yeah, that still doesnt get you to 600..i was just trying to remember
That’d be…
(12+2+10+1)x20+40
So…540?
if you rolled 12 on each hitdice yeah
Yeah, this is just theory
not sure if there are magic items that give flat HP
Might be
Exciting! Thanks Steve
Well, from what I understand asking players to use PDFs would require them to figure out a program or something to use
not at all
pdfs are very very easy to use. its almost as simple as picking up a pen and writing into a box on paper
Form fillable pdfs have been around for decades
you leftclick the space on the sheet, and then type letters or numbers into it
you just need to download something that can open PDFs like adobe
its not "figuring out a program" at all
There's a thing a DM I know does. Writes down your max potential HP. Basically what your HP would be if you always rolled the max on your die when levelling up.
Then during training or as a special reward, he allows players to get more max HP and get closer to their maximum potential HP. I'm thinking of implementing this idea. Pros and cons?
Having hp up there with boss monsters sure would be something
Oh, the pathfinder 1e way
ive been thinking about doing something similar
Pros, more hp for the players
Cons, more hp for the players
I'd say keep it to downtime only
You know...
I think druids deserve more love
Yeah it's simple. Don't know what I was expecting
Youd be able to do slightly harder encounters then youd normally would. Which higher cr usually is more interesring stat blocks
I have a question: how can I create my character? I want it to be a Dragonborn paladin.
?
Ask in #dnd-newcomers , lots of people are willing to help with things like character creation there
I'd also recommend reading the character creation section of the basic rules
assuming your playing using the 2024 rules
Write down dragonborn paladin. Pick your stats. Pick your background. Pick your starting equipment.
Done
I would think rolling your HP after leveling up is something like the benefit of training and hard work . I'm not against giving players additional HP, but it already implies they have earned what they rolled. Besides there are Feats you can take to increase your HP.
I've done rolled hp a few times
There is no earning in rolling, its random chance.
Nothing on your character sheet can prevent you from rolling a one on your hit die
dice tell how things go. thats not necessarily pure chance in-universe
it can be flavoured as such but doesnt have to be
imagine what that would mean for skillchecks
Thanks
Wall of text, sorry!
So yes, like I was saying: intrinsic vs extrinsic motivation. Here's a 10 minute video of an RSA lecture from 15 years ago. It's old - but also intrinsic and extrinsic motivation is something that has been studied since (arguably) since at least the 1920s in the western world. If you wanted to get very academic about it, here's a paper (literary review) from PubMed from 2022. I wouldn't say you need to read this, but dropping this to just say scientists and educators have been talking about this for a long time.
In short, extrinsic motivators - like rewards - often de-motivate people to do a behaviour. That is, if you reward someone for a behaviour (e.g. giving a bonus for doing homework), they are less likely to do it in the future (in general). It sounds really unintuitive, and I realize that. After all, if you want someone to do something, you should reward them.
But studies show that when people are intrinsically motivated, they are more likely to do a certain behaviour.
Examples: You ever wonder why countries (except the US) don't pay for blood donations? You ever wonder why we don't pay students to go to school or to do their homework? You ever wonder why some people just go and learn new skills, like playing guitar, even though it likely won't get them any benefit in the end?
For more info on intrinsic motivators, I often recommend looking at self-efficacy. This is the idea that one can succeed. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-efficacy When someone feels a high sense of self-efficacy, usually experience intrinsic motivation (but not always).
That's not to say that extrinsic motivation is "always bad" or harmful or anything. It can be really, really helpful to "hook" someone, and then later they may find their intrinsic motivators. For example, someone may try to extrinsically motivate someone to donate blood by offering a special cookie at the end. But the hope is that the experience is positive enough, and the donor feels good about it, that they keep doing it even if the reward is gone.
So to your group, I bet there was a really high chance that the one player who did the homework? Probably would do the homework even if there was no prize. Indeed, I would actually caution to be careful that you don't reward the behaviour TOO much, otherwise you might actually donate them. (Here's a paper that talks about paying blood donors.)
Again, this isn't a knock or dunk on what you decided on - and I truly do hope it works out! But wanted to give some more info to both you and others. Maybe we can come back to this at some point in the future and I'll need to type less lol.
-# woah jump scare
thats pretty much what i meant
There's the thing about homework too where it's like, people are just busy or have other things to do in the timeslot if they aren't playing for the week
put into academic terms. interesting
can someone be ever so kind to inform me why my favorite subclass of druid (wildfire) doesnt get fireball as a spell
or can we all agree that it just should generally get fireball
I don't see why druids in general don't get fireball
me neither, but more specifically wildfire druids
Probably to give offensive distinction between arcane and divine casters
not sure why wildfire doesnt get it, 2014 light cleric does after all
Because the wizard and sorcerer modify memory the Druid, because they became to powerful to keep until control/jk
i know right?!
so is druid a divine caster?
spirits so kinda?
druid is generally considered part of the divine casters, not sure if that changed for 2024
Are paladins?
yep
are rangers?
druid spell list so id say seudo yes/no
also yeah
but more of if i play wildfire druid should i just ask if i can have fireball or is their a way to get fireball using magic initiate feat
So does a divine soul sorcerer and celestial warlock count?
not with magic initiate, but you could always just ask
I actually dont remember, but I think its still considered arcane for them
yeah i looked its a no go (only lv1)
Its a very arbitrary distinction
ill probably just ask if so, as i really do love the subclass of summoning flaming creatures
What is consider divine to be a divine caster
praying to gods (or what i just think)
im backkkkkk
I left for a bit cuz I wasnt able to find games n stuff bleh but now im back :3
Generally arcane casters cast magic by manipulating the Weave, while Divine casters sort of work as a medium for some other force
Yet a paladin and Druid don’t need one to have their powers
at least to my understanding
that might be more of a #dnd-lore question
it comes from the official settings of d&d
paladins do need a "god" druid's i dont consider as they pray to the spirits of the land rather than the gods of the land (which i guess could be interpreted as gods of the land aka. yokai)
Paladins need their oaths not a god
Iirc in dnd lore Oaths are sort of overseered by powerful beings
thats what i thought or am i just wrong in this case?
honestly probably just ask in the lore channel, I only know a little bit
Paladins originally served a god, like a cleric
Then, somebody decided they'd serve an oath, an ideal
You're free to choose either
(as a DM)
Yeah the power of being DM lets you interpret it however you wish
I would always play a Paladin as religious for every subclass but Vengeance and Oathbreaker
I don’t, because honestly I find promises you keep to yourself is more important than to a god
That’s fair, i guess the question for me would be where does the power come from then?
Your oath
Your immense conviction and will channeled through your oath
honestly that sounds right but i originally thought that oaths were more towards a concept that then falls into the category of religion to a god of some kind
Its mainly the question of what sort of conditions would need to be met for a promise you make to yourself to be recognized by reality itself as a binding vow that grants you power
Yeah exactly, i mean i guess it i was being silly i would say then does strict devotion to veganism in whatever setting then grant you powers?
You could swear to never eat meat or animal products and really believe in it, but it doesn’t grant powers
Think of it like a contract you made with yourself and if you break your conviction you have powers be out of sync with yourself
Like plenty of people feel vengeful, but not everyone gets to make an Oath of Vengeance
Veganism isn’t a difficult or profound enough concept for an oath to channel power
Same reason why your oath to survival isn’t enough to give power
Plus you have to continue to follow the oath
I would play an Oath of Vengeance paladin coming from a source of power opposed to the same thing you are.
Kamen rider
But I would also play that character as losing power once the thing they’ve sworn vengeance against is defeated
Steve! This is fantastic, thank you so much. You always have such incredibly intelligent advice and information
Thats mainly why it is considered Divine. This power is not intrinsic to you or learned, but it is derived from some sort of concept that the world grants you some small dominion over due to you having intense enough convictions
Like for an example, there's an anime/game character named Shiro Emiya who devotes himself to an ideal image of a "Hero" to the point it literally decides his life for good and bad at no consideration for his own self so that could be an example of a Devotion Paladin
In your opinion, what would be the difference between someone that holds those ideals but isnt a paladin, vs someone who holds those ideals and is one
can anyone explain to me how i can start playing? im new but have nbo idea how to get started.
Someone who holds those ideals but isn't a paladin likely only holds them as long as it's convenient
hello
with this all being said then someone explain to me why paladins are cha casters and not wis casters
Read up on the first few chapters of the free basic rules on #learn-to-play , and feel free to ask any questions you might have.
hi
A paladin would be one that sees those ideals through to the end, regardless what that end may be.
Yeah, thats probably a good way to conceptualize it
I guess my biggest sticking point to that is then what’s holding them to that oath? Using your example as long as the Person is convinced what they’re doing is heroic then they could never break their oath.
My interpretation is that Charisma often refers to the will, influence and sense of self an individual has, and paladins embody that perfectly
That's actually part of his character.
He becomes a "hero" but said hero killed a million people to save billions so whether he's actually a hero is up for debate
I wonder what monster tastes the best in D&D
My interpretation is: nothing.
As long as what they believe what they’re is adhering to their oath to the highest degree, nothing breaks.
mimics cannonically taste like savory and good tasting wagu cotton candy
At some point in dnd paladins used to be Will casters iirc lol
Probably you
Why else would you be in so much danger all the time
That's cause in older editions saves were more condensed
but i think its a lobster like monster from the sea that tastes the best (forgot its name rn)
I mean it’s definitely an interesting concept but i don’t think i’d ever be past Paladins essentially being tools of higher powers
My DM throwing 2 CR17 frost worms at me… The humble force cage:
In 5e, Charisma is what represents force of Will, tho in older editions, Wisdom and Intelligence were part of Will
And that’s fine! Everyone has their own preferences, perspectives and play styles.
I think its reasonable to allow a paladin to achieve their oath in either case, whether through sheer conviction or through some divine mission set upon them by some being
also owlbears are like top 10 best tasting monsters in dnd weirdly
Oh absolutely! No ones right at all! just interesting to see different people’s interpretations!
What would happen if we just combine all 3 magic stat
can yall tell me how to create a character
My character has stolen 3 drake eggs, 3 frost worm eggs, and he plans on stealing more
Icl, i bet Kuo-Toa sushi would slap
It'd be better if you read the players handbook or the basic rules on DnD beyond
Ask around in #dnd-newcomers
well then that would be absurd (enters absurd the lv20 character)
I mostly said oaths because of how it read under the paladin section for it doesn’t actually say you need a god
In one post? Choose a class, choose a background, choose a species, choose your skill proficiencies, make your stats from one of the three main official methods and write a backstory.
Here’s a guide;
https://www.dndbeyond.com/sources/dnd/br-2024/creating-a-character
It is kind of interesting that the paladin class allows for a change in perspective to absolutely gut a character of their abilities
Yeah absolutely! I guess i was just sharing my viewpoint of Paladins
I will never have any of my characters follow a god, it’s so annoying dealing with a god back seat adventuring you
“Go save the village!” I was gonna do that already but now I’m not going too
Because they are nature lovers. Can't be a nature lover and want to torch everything
I mean do they actually back seat adventure? That’s only if the DM does that.
wildfire druid
A Sorcerer's spell save dc is 8+(CHA)+Proficiency correct?
I mean, druids represent the force of nature, they hardly have to like all of it
This sounds more like a warlock patron than a god
overall, i'd say to just ask your dm if you can have fireball
So I’m currently playing a Paladin of Torm (kinda) but Torm has like basically no involvement. Why does be care what a Level 5 Paladin is doing as long as it’s following the tenets of their oath
Maybe you can unlock it in character via some spiritual mission
Yeah I’d agree
Somehow my party wizard convinced the DM to let him make a sword that can cast a level 7 fireball three times a day
If you're playing a pious character, they would seek out their god. But if you aren't, the god is unlikely to come down and have a chat with you
oh boy
pretty strong for the level i'd say, but not too outlandish
what level is this?
Even if they are pious, until you’re uber high level and playing with ultra big stakes why would the god takw the time of day?
Guess who just left the campaign, and guess who gets the sword
I would be okay with that if on the 3rd attempt there was a 20% chance it explodes for the same amount of damage. Destroying the sword in the process.
Tier 4 Campaign (17-20)
oh ok
Oh wait, cast a lvl 7 fireball
oh at that level, its a decent weapon
3 free lvl 7 fireballs is quite good
“That was a pretty strong spell!” The humble arcane cannon sitting in my pocket and charging up:
And I got a sword named “Tiamat” which is basically like 5 dancing swords in one
"thats a cool cannon" the humble shatter spell
i like artificers as i like to use spells but actually decent in close quarts combat
I don’t get why you think they backseat adventuring?
What exactly made you think that?
I mean if anything Gods should actually be really hands off (if set in the Forgotten Realms)
not if its baal
The upcasted Shatter in question:
Ummmm actuallyyy….Bhaal is a quasi-deity.,,,,.
Well with D&D being a game where every campaign is different, in the 3 games where I have followed a god it has been quite direct
Not much to say outside of it being personal experience with dealing with gods
It might depend on the dm
ehh he still keeps telling me to rip peoples heads off
Yeah, three DM’s in a row did that so just coincidence probably
Yeah Greater gods rarely get directly involved, it is mostly the lesser gods and Quasi-deities who get involved in mundane things in the realms. Not saying a Greater God won't manifest for some reason.
I always have found it a bit weird when low level characters basically have free access to chat with the god they follow
if your lv10< thats when id gave god push you the right path otherwise nah
I mean it’s DM dependent for sure, but if we’re being strict to lore i would think most gods are antsy about being perceived as getting too involved lest they risk the wrath of Ao
Are you playing a cleric in any of those times or your character just follows the god and isn't a cleric
It's not a terrible thing, but its a bit offputting for me personally
I…haven’t really ever back seated with a god. They’ve got better things to be dealing with, they’ll only intervene if you do something horribly wrong.
Cleric twice, paladin once
You should be upfront to the dm that you don't actually want to talk to your god
Although from memory, none of them were linked to a greater god
It shouldn't be weird for Clerics, since that's sort of their thing to talk to deities. Some of their class abilities depend on them.
Like eat their pet gold fish
“That’s a whole lot of 9th level magic missiles coming right at me!” - the humble level 1 shield spell.
the not so humble counterspell
I mean is it? Their powers come from their god true but communing with them?
“That’s some crazy melee attacks” - The humble force cage:
Lets be real, if the wizard is spending their 9th level spell slot to cast magic missiles, something has gone really poorly
It’s the same way all Wizards use the weave which comes from Mystra
Forcebreaker Weapon goes brrrrr
You leave magic missile alone, it’s valid
Very good point error
Use your 6th or 7th level spell for it, not 9th!
We never EVER tell my DM about this weapon
i cast wish to cast magic missle
If I lose force cage it’s all over
Insane
But more missiles!
Only if you are facing super saiyan Displacer Beast
hey no magic missile is great
Gigachad 8th level magic missile with a 9th level slot
You survive with your other spells
My character is currently 1v1ing some war forged and he has force cage, wall of gloom, and blade barrier stacked on him
If he fails the teleport save, it’s gg
The snork mimimimimi spell:
Dispel Magic
"I wished these missiles into existence you simpleton, what say you!?"
Pvp?
Oh yeah, disintegrate
Nah just 1v1ing a past dragon contractor, it’s like gojo vs sukuna
Everyone’s gangster until i use the crown of Karsus to replace Mystra with the sole purpose of allowing Magic Missile to be cast at level 12
No other spell
Oh nice, did you win?
oh shit karsus what did you do
Nothing, cuz he did nothing wrong
I wish for the next cast of magic missle to hit your heart directly
Its all Mystra's fault
mmm i see, now lets see here wild magic surge table (going all in for the antimagic zone, and i rolled fireball on self)
karsus did nothing wrong indeed
Mid-fight session ended
Ah
Nah it the DMs fault
I have a high chance of winning since wall of gloom will most likely incapacitate him alot
And then blade barrier will chip his health
Lmao, so you could default kill him
also guys what is better swashbuckler rogue/wild magic sorcerer or swashbuckler rogue / any other sorcerer subclass
Ye, he’s lucky he’s a warforged because he would be getting exhaustion checks too
I don’t know but Swashbuckler is mental on it’s own
But the millisecond he gets downed, it’s wraps
Rogues don’t need multiclass tbh
i wanna cast thats why, (and no not arcane trickster)
But they can just hit and then runaway
It’s insane, like Zephyr Strike but constantly
Nice
Then why not make a sneaky sorcerer instead
There was a swash bucker rogue (he went out in the goofiest way possible) and he would melt everything
because im not just making a sorcerer, im making a rogue that can use magic, aka 1 lv in sorcerer (maybe 2 for meta magic)
Clockwork Soul
Take booming blade (or any other weapon attack cantrip), and use innate sorcery for free advan- oh you’re playing 2014
I mean i lowkey don’t like playing with Rogues but it’s hard to deny swashbucklers are insane
also i get silvery barbs (i would not do that to my dm)
I rather play solo class as rogue
I’ve always wanted to try a rogue sorc
ehh i like multiclassing its fun
I’m playing a 2014 ranger in a CoS campaign and they generously gave us an extra feat so i took feytouched to get misty step and silvery barbs
Magic isn’t everything imo
i cast magic missle apon this opinion
I just have qualms with multiclassing
completely fair
My only qualms with multiclassing is when beginners who don’t know what they’re doing try to make an effing monk paladin
How you gonna cast it when you can’t see me
I’ve never multiclassed but i’m tempted to do a Cleric/Sorcerer multiclass
The ability scores are gonna be iffy there
who said i cant, my wild magic table says i can
At that point why not divine soul
I would only choose multiclass if it was a fact we wouldn't reach level 20. The Monk's capstone is just too good to Multiclass away
What happens if I hit something that's flying and reduce its speed to 0? Does it just fall?
valid i love divine soul sorcerers as they get so much magic options
I haven’t worked through the mechanics but it was more a character idea
yes
If they don’t have hover, yes
Poor Fisticus the fist of justice you aren’t so divine as you should be
Unless it can hover
I like unorthodox multiclass builds when you have the stat lineup to spare
I…only like them if you have a synergy in mind
Tho paladin monk could work if you use combat buffs
But that still be mad
The ability scores…
Best class for making double glazed apple fritters?
Chef feat!
For making or acquiring them?
Creation bard
Bards definitely could sweet talk a kindly old person into making them
Wizard’s strike me as good cooks
Making
cooking does use int
D&D discord is so peak 
"Here try this pastry. The glaze is made from the distilled remains of a Black Ooze, nice and acidic!"
My character recently bought a lot of D&D drugs to make a super drug, he’s going to lace the apple fritters
Then send it to his worst enemies
Inconspicuous package of apple fritters arrives at your door
would Purify Food and Water get rid of it?
Please mind the server rules (including appropriate content)
appreciate it, no one likes applefritters anyways
"Poison & Rot..."
Probably not.
I've been thinking on this a bit more, and why I want this between session play to happen. I guess I was hoping that the messages homework would encourage that kind of individual thinking. "What do I want to get out of this letter?"
When I think of between-session play, I think of what I used to do as a 1e player. Tracking down and purchasing some rare good between sessions so the rest of the party doesn't know, or letters of correspondence to nearby lords, or arranging some awful plot with the DM to screw over some other player or help me out in some way. I remember getting together with half the party between session one time to come up with an assassination plan to off an evil PC in our party that we wanted to get rid of. The big thing I want to do as a DM for between session play is encouraging personal goals, not just party ones. Things these PCs want individually and what their plans are to get that
Apple fritters are so good! The chunky bits and the goofy shape makes it left alone.
Ah, I don't do this, between games we chat and post memes, but if it's not happining in the session It dident happen
Depends on what this "homework is" as most people don't care to have their D&D game interfere with their personal lives more than it probably is.
Oh great. This talk about apple fritters now makes me want some. I wonder if Walmart or Kroger has any
Isn't that a pretty new attitude, like 4e and later? I never played 3e ir 3.5e, but in my AD&D game there was a fair bit of between session play
anyways so as im making this rogue/sorcerer i just realized i need a race, any ideas
im thinking goblin or halfling
I have only played 5e
Gotcha
sorry what
I'm not talking about scheduling some additional 6 hour one on one session for each player, just taking a little bit of time each week to shoot a couple texts or emails
I'm thinking HEB, Kroger, or Walmart should have some, yeah. Buc-cee's maybe too
Heylo everyone
I get clarifying questions from players in between sessions a lot, but time and accomplishment only passes in game
"Hey, I know we'll be headed to The Cliffs of Insanity soon. I don't trust Lord Shin not to betray us once we get there, but I don't want to freak out the party. Before next session, can I have hired 150 of The Black Arrows to meet us there with their ships, that way we're in a better position? I don't have the gold, but I can hand over those magic items we got from the mummy tomb. I haven't been using them anyway, and I think they're worth a lot"
Or even "Hey DM, you know how Lord Shin hired us to take him to The Cliffs of Insanity? I still have that letter saying he plans to turn us over to the Lichlord. I want to just go ahead and assassinate Shin in his bed before next session. Jack said his wizard Filthrum will cast Greater Invisibility on me before I go, but I don't want the rest of the party to know. Can I make some rolls on camera?"
They mentioned shrek
speaking of which, gotta ask about the magic item shop later 
of course, it only makes sense
It's specifically a reference to ti not liking a specific fact about shrek. Namely, the year it came out.
If you stuff the caster mouth with food or smt, they wont be able to cast the spell.
Throw perfectly a bread bun inside of his mouth at high speed and you will be able to cut his spellcasting and for not being a spell or smt it cant cast counterspell back
Hey, it’s the yeast you could do to help right
Returning Trident is a Terrifying magic item.
oh yeah, if the caster is allergic to something on it then you managed to incapacitate him. Remember to use Restoration on him or he will die.
which category it is?
Weapons. Uncommon.
Tridents have the topple property, making enemies prone if they fail a save. they can also be thrown. Since flying enemies fall apon becoming prone, a single hit with a returning trident will send like a dragon chasing your ship hundreds of feet down
Just saw a warhammer called sunforger and it made me click in my brain with a fantasy i have about a forgemaster character.
Damn, sending "like a dragon" sound dangerous
you tryna call out the grammar of that sentence or something? that sentence is fine
por que
Dont, im saying that a phrase with "like a dragon" on it make "sound" the weapon like its capable of big things
Que so
Because it is.
weird that is only uncommon
Tridents can Topple as their mastery anyway tho
thats part of the idea
the magic item thing is so it comes back to you, not to topple
i LOVE PBP games
peanut butter peanut
Agreed, which is why I think uncommon is fitting
they're so fun and you can put in a reply anytime
i swear to god i am going to start with you first...
Pork barbecue and Pears?
good luck, ive already given you a peanut allergy and am covering all doorhandles in it
I'M COMING FOR YOU NEXT
You cant read my mind and know where i am, i dont even know where i am too
franco is in a demiplane
Hi Coming For You Next, I’m Nugget
i just went to the kitchen for my coffee and end up in the 4th realm of the feys.....idk how
okay i give up. you guys are clearly just going to mock and belittle me
Suprisinly there is wifi too
Nah I love PBP too, I’m in one rn and gonna join one soon
I just like dad jokes
I'm gonna chill here, it's been a while
NEW TO DND? NEW?
I've been in this server for 2 years, such BS.
im kinda new
Hello kinda new, I'm Nugget StarOfTheLight
does it really matter
Not really, I just love complaining
i wonder why its showing that
you can change your role in id:customize
Maybe lurking doesn't count for Discord's "new" thing
that would make sense if kan hadnt talked in 2024
I literally, just joined because my friends irl don't have time for D&D
Hello
hello to you too
Hello!!
Greetings, Zenith
Check out #find-a-game for information on how to look for a game online
Ty i just noticed it too!
I hope you all are doing well
How are you?
Doin’ well
Hello, how goes it?
That's great to hear!
how long have you guys been playing?
2 years starting…in around a month
Less than a month
Its going well
Actually playing? A bit over a year. Interested in dnd? A decent bit longer lmao
I have only played 2 sessions and one was a one shot
My third which I did yesterday I was dm
Oh neat!
I kind of bit off more than I can chew suddenly switching to dm
I've always been interested in the idea, I just never did it outside of watching shows like the legend of vox machina or playing baldurs gate.
But my players seem to enjoy it
i have played since 2021 but there were many months between sessions
with weekly sessions, and no cancelled campaigns, youd be where im at within about 6 months
For me you’d be where I’m at in…3-4? Maybe a lil less
then again i guess the past year was continuous dnd playing, though i wasnt a big fan of it. different campaign and group
Getting started as a player is great fun. There are a bunch of resources in this server to try to find a group to play with, so have fun!
I've mentioned this before, and not to single you out, but I remain impressed at how much you've absorbed in just 2 years, which ought to encourage any newbies reading this: you don't need to have played this game for 40 years to get a firm grasp on how everything works.
Fake it till ya make it~
Funny, but you can't fool me
How do people do the group rolled standard array thing?
you can fool me!
I was kinda forced to learn the rules quickly because I started as a DM, and I made a TON of mistakes (my players never got to find out) but those helped me learn and here I am.
Ah, so that explains it, partially
have everyone roll, then they pick one set
I think everyone rolls stats, and the table decides on which array they like best
do I use AI for world building?
I started as a DM too, it does make you pay attention to the details
I don’t like using AI for worldbuilding
for map making maybe, i wont recommend it. There is lots of maps and stuff, even for worldbuilding
Sometimes you dont need a whole world
I've been playing for... oh jeez, 11 years
nah u just use your brain and put the shit you like into D&D
Well put
To also be fair, two years is a long time
And there are some basic stuff I still don’t know or forget
I like to say that I woke up one day with a set of dice in my hand… but I’ve been playing for between 4 and 7 years
little did you know, im the second coming of oda
not if you use AI no
Hi the second coming of oda, I’m Nugget
I imagine Oda using Ai sometimes
or if you need, i can give ideas. I already gave in hte past some in this chat and i hope someone used them for their campaign and stuff
I've played for like total maybe 1 and a half year
abominable intelligence....
I think comparing someone who actively participates in conversations about the game is different than just playing for 15 months
-# Should’ve also mentioned, this server ain’t the friendliest to AI
AI isn't ever the option
I grinded 0 dnd hours
as it should U-U
Hate to be the guy to randomly interupt flow, but any tips on running Curse of Strahd? I already have a 4 player party put together, and was told to toy with them using magical items and such from the shop I bought ti from, but I am looking for any other form of tips
ah, igu
this is a server full of people who recreationally write and draw. you will not find sympathy for the theft machine here
We take human creativity pretty seriously here 😉
I’ll stay neutral in this front, though I will say that if I’m to make a setting it a game, I’d rather it be mine.
i'd rather draw up the most shakey line, badly shoved together map than make AI vomit smth out
AI can be good in other parts of technology, but for the creative minds here it’s just not very valuable to us. And if it’s not valuable, it’s downsides become more apparent
(also don't post single character posts as it's disruptive to chat and to our screenreader/text to speech users)
You might want to ask in #dm-discussion but I'll give you one: Strahd is a very fun villian to play, study how he should be presented and your efforts will be rewarded
This is so real
I just realised I put this in the wrong spot lol
[forgot that swearing is banned here and would rather not be seen as trying to bypass automod-]
Hello?
Welcome!
Oda would use anything that gets him ahead
Thx. How's it going?
One piece rant incoming
Oda is onepiece? I meant history
Is it D&D related though? If not, better use #non-dnd-topics
Hey, so I’m really new to DnD and I was wondering if someone could help me with making a character and how everything works overall? it’s much easier for me to have someone explain it to me
Oda is the pseudonym the author of One Piece works under
Ohh thanks lmao
I wish we could like
choose 2 different class tags bleh
Check out #learn-to-play and the free basic rules pinned in the message in #dnd-newcomers
Will do 🫡
wow, it really was... directly underneath this chat
I recommend youtube as its a recording of someone explaining it to you
and you can pause to take notes
Mate, I’m having a huge headache from trying to understand it from wikis and official sources, my brain is barely functioning rn 
Talked through explanation or written?
Always take notes, they can save entire sessions sometimes
So my bad for not seeing it at first
Bet, I’ll do that
For folks new to the server, #channel-guide can help you find the right channel for a specific topic
Discord likes to be "helpful' and hide channels
Both work tbh, I just tend to understand much better when someone uses their own words
bwaaaaabbbb...
honestly, I'm at that stage where I'd just watch what the DM and other players are going to do'
then why would you be the one worldbuilding?
idk i was just asking to see if thats what anyone actually did.
as a player, you're not really expected to do any of the worldbuilding
so don't worry about it for now
Just build your own world lol (no AI) or use official modules
Im gonna spam tragic backstories
please don't spam
uh...
I don’t think they literally meant spam
the game is a constant back-and-forth between the DM and players. Usually your DM presents you with a scenenario and the players ask questions or state they want to do things. Usually then the DM informs them of what happens due to their actions.
but I get can make a creative choice outside of that to shake up the story right? (maybe)?
The Basic Rules document has sections that is basically dialogue at a D&D table. The opening chapters are really good about being and opener to the game.
The creative choice is "stating what they want to do"
Ah
hows dnd
To give an idea, yesterday, while investigating a enemy hideout, my group got spotted by an enemy through a window. When the DM asked what we wanted to do, we sorta panicked and floundered around for a moment. We started asking things like "did we see any symbols on the person" and we learned some actionable info (we recognized the symbol and knew their capabilities). Our Druid turned our Ranger into a ball of gas to be discrete, the Druid then turned themself into a snake and hid in a nearby drain. I turned myself and our Barbarian invisible, and we just hightailed it outta there.
Wild Shape (turning into a snake) and Gaseous Form aren't like... written to be stealth abilities, they're general utility stuff. We made do with what we had though.
Thats the juice of D&D
i wouldve waved
So like, I can take an ability already in a game, and put my own spin to it for the sake of my character's lore
The Ranger did, but then they became oxygen
oppressed by mages, typical