#server-feedback
1 messages · Page 20 of 1
I think it will stay free for students, but I'm not sure
it will
but I refer you to this
If unreal-relevant questions for rider (or visual studio, or whatever other ide) started to overwhelm #cpp then you might have a point
but they don't
yeah thats fair
A channel for Rider doesn't seem like a great for us. The JetBrains server seems to have it covered.
Everyone knows of and is on Unreal Slackers, but not everyone knows of their discord, hence a channel here might be more helpful for some people. But I get what you say, and to repeat myself, as long as there is not even an Visual Studio channel its not of relevancy anyways.
their forum is pretty inactive, their discord & reddit is too, Unreal Slackers on the other hand is very active almost all the time
but not everyone knows of their discord
Perhaps we should start a list of related servers that people should know, to raise awareness.
that would be an idea
But maybe there are just too few Rider users in general that it wouldnt matter
I dont know, I dont have the data
Perhaps. It's still in early preview, after all.
You could make such an list now, or when Rider officially releases, that's open for deliberation. Also, which would those servers be that people "should know of", what do you have in mind?
Probably Quixel, Substance, things like that.
Microsoft does.
oh ok
It's a general community server for Windows, Xbox, VS, etc.
There are some general programming servers out there, though. Community-run ones.
yeah many of them, some big, some small ones
Such as Coding Den, Programmer's Hangout, etc.
If i join all of them my discord list gets messy at some point
I try to keep a small amount of them
Same. I have a very small server list. I prune any servers I can go 2 weeks without talking.
me too^^
That's what I like about Unreal Slackers, its active and has a wide range of people with a wide range of competencies.
Its evolved to a place thats almost a must-have for game devs, especially indies.
Out of curiosity, who is the (original) founder of Unreal Slackers, is that you?
Yes.
not bad 😎
Indeed. Things have changed.
Also, that list thing is on you, you're the boss here. 😄
Certainly worth thinking about. It could be useful.
Indeed.
I'll try to keep you guys posted, and if we do it we'll probably ask the community for recommendations.
okay 👍
It's not a bad idea, and would result in directly pulling from that list to direct folks to a more dedicated community. I stop myself linking to the appropriate discords semi frequently but if there would be a list it would feel more like a supported thing. Obvious example being standard C++ discussion (TPH, say)
to put an end to "add xyz channel!" requests, how about a #miscellaneous?
I don't see off topic as covering unreal-related
Then #ue4-general
fair
Looks like Discord finally came around to making threads a thing. Not sure if this server is a community server, but if it is, supposedly you can opt-in this feature early.
https://blog.discord.com/connect-the-conversation-with-threads-on-discord-3f5fa8b0f6b
Threads are pretty terrible on fast moving channels
it'll mean conversations bouncing back and forth with frustrating frequency
if threads are separated from the main window, it might not be so bad
but looking at this, it's terrible, lol
it basically creates a private pseudo-channel, so nobody can jump in at any time
also that private threads channel is so going to be abused to harass people who don't allow DMs
I imagine "Use Private Threads" is going to be a rare permission (maybe mods only) for communities of almost any size
aye, it just seems like a bad idea in general
if you want a private group message.... use DMs?
Actually moderation is like the only use case I can think of outside of like work stuff
but that's what channels are for
the short lived nature limits the utility as well
I disagree about the thoughts with threads. I think they're great personally. And the way they're doing it, it can be on the side window. Threads are especially helpful for help scenarios.
I think public threads seem pretty nice
Hopefully one can link to an archived thread as well
They're temporary if I'm reading that correctly
there is a variable archive after inactivity which is defaulted to 24 hours, you get more by boosting lol
Yeah - archive != delete though. So if we can still link to an archived thread, that'd be great.
archived probably means deleted for us, archived for admins
it's looking like us users will only see active public threads in the threads directory, and the private ones we have access too. Once it's inactive for 24 hours nobody will be able to link to it
Guess we'll just have to wait n' see
Deleting and archiving threads are separate operations.
Is archiving what has happened when i see people linking to seemingly "deleted" messages? Edit; guess they've actually been deleted. Can't find a single example atm.
no, archiving does not exist without the context of Threads
just got threads on my small server - the current conclusion seems to be that they could be great for stuff like announcements and such but should be disabled for normal channels
also thread creation spam - it's rate-limited but that doesn't mean you can't cause some chaos with a few bots
Based on this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GPDFQM6tsUM - looks pretty useful for help stuff. And it looks like you can see archived threads.
yeah they even show up in search
We can certainly see some benefits to them. However we can also see some major problems. We will let you guys know what we decide to do and how to handle them when we come to a conclusion on the way we would like them to be used here.
Indeed. We're currently evaluating them and deciding on how/if we will utilize them.
they would really fit for the helping channels tbh
as soon as there are two or more persons helping different persons it gets messy
Moderation would be challenging if we enabled them in every support channel, though.
that is true, but do they really need moderation?
Well yes. They're still conversations happening on our server.
they get archived anyways, and I don't think you get messages anyways unless you've joined a threat
Yes, they get auto-archived after a certain period of inactivity.
And I believe only mods can unarchive them.
but I definitely understand your point
There's just a lot to consider before we enable them. Not something we just want to flip on for every channel. 🙂
Understandable 👍
perhaps, then, a single help channel within which threads reside
We're thinking of starting with this channel.
It's a shame they get auto archived, although that makes sense from a maintenance point of view. Where threads would be useful imo, is for holding lots of info for a particular topic which guides or instructs. Essentially the main page being a list of topics, with the threads giving the meat of the subject. This would allow users to very quickly skim the topic titles etc to find what they are looking for. However since threads don't last long and probably aren't really designed for that sort of thing, it's a no go.
Plus this still relies on users reading thread titles, searching for threads etc given the number of users who currently do little or no searching with tools like Google let alone within Discord channels themselves. It may become more work for less productivity.
Are you going to enable the thread feature that just got released? 😄
Read the previous messages, its a discussion about it
ah yeah, seeing it now Oo
This is why we can't have nice things.
Threads would be useful when helping someone and there is a lot of back and forth cluttering up the chat as a result. I prefer to only help people directly in the channels since that means it is visible for others who might run into the same issues as opposed to using DMs that perpetuate the old "DMd you the solution" posts that you run across on the internet while looking for answers.
but threads have titles. its more clear. everybody has acceessss and can join
I guess I should have been more clear. I prefer to help people in the channels directly, so threads sound like a great idea. Just like slack. So I'm pro threads. 😛
ah ya its literally like a forum inside a huuuge chat. oh wait. right. just like slack lol... forgot about SLACk
so u prefer channels being full with stuff and nobody knows what is happening...
at least with thread system peoples questions wont be forgotten as easily.
Replies exists
nobody replies to a question 2 meters scrolling up
yes. cause very few use c++
ofc its easily readable
u scroll up 2 meters in cpp to look if you can answer a questin?
0.0
not in CPP FILE. i mean in the channel
Sometimes other channels if I feel like it lmao
y<eah but c'mon. so much clearer with threads u cant deny zis
what.... just channels literally fragment everything
And this isn't official forums anyway so yeah
so? relevancy?
@silent kiteHELP ME im being granaded
dont understand that
It would only be bloody beneficial if people used the search bar, checked the pinned message, or messages appearing in Google search results.
gotta test it out
i mean if i create a thread in cpp the thread stays there
it wont go somewhere else
@open radish
#cpp threads are not visible on other channels
It's more manageable if the server isn't crowded tho.
Hence why Slack had it.
Well, doesn't really matter if it's crowded, but at least could be useful for private channels only.
no idea what u mean with manageable
You'll get the gist once you're actually running a team.
opinion: threads add more clutter.
have a good day!
*except for private staff only channels
I love Slack Threads. Exclusively using those to keep stuff more organized and channels small/clean. To a point where we only use Threads.
But... The Discord threads are not like Slack threads... I haven't looked much into it but if you can't disable them showing up in the the channel list then I'm not the biggest fan personally
Ive expressed the same concern. They have no option to disable the ability of them appearing in the channel list unless you "unsub" from the thread directly.
I dont like the whole feeling of them being thrown in your face.
Seems like they are trying to push them to hard as though they are so revolutionary and need to be there at all times so you dont forget it.
They only show up in the channel list if you’ve joined one, which is either because you chose to, or someone pinged you from inside the thread
Yeah, i don't like that
Just have them in a proper list where I can find them if I want to.
Slack also manages to do this without pushing them into the channel list
It would be good to have an option to not show them in the channel list. The icon still changes when there are threads in a channel, and there’s a way to list them all in a channel
I don't fully understand why they even need to be linked so heavily to the channels.
In a perfect scenario, people would post a question, and you would answer in a thread. If you help a lot on this platform it would cause your channel list on the left to blow up, unless you actively leave or the auto archive catches up.
I don't get why though. I can just scroll through the channel and see the questions to enter the threads.
And if someone answers in a thread, it can just ping me and open the thread when pressing the notification.
A separated list of threads I'm in, e.g. on the right side where the unneeded User List is, would be enough if you forget the thread you were in.
And there they can be sorted by channel for example.
It escapes me why this was implemented like this
they'll probably notice the issue once it gets used more
You mean the next 26 versions? :<
They haven't fixed the issues with the "reply" button at all fwiw
But yeah 100% agree with this
All of it
Didn't even know there was one
I.e. the tag being on by default
Ah
😄



well thread feature could be a way to "fix" the reply thing
At least replies are more manageable for crowded channels than threads.
IMO threads are more suited for staff only channels as opposed to public channels.
Threads would be great for that if they wouldn't clutter the sidebar, but had their own place
Stupid idea, but what about giving people that are very active with helping in certain channels a thread role. Where they can create and manage threads
I think a good argument for threads has appeared in the #animation channel. A discussion regarding blender is quite active and in the middle of it someone asked for help but it sort of vanished in the conversation. If someone could make a blender thread the discussion would be contained in that without disrupting the flow of the main channel. So people can still ask for help while we can still get into deeper discussions in topics that are interesting. I'm all for discussing pros and cons of tools in the animation channel since it is relevant, but with threads it would be more self contained and still allow the animation channel to serve its real purpose.
Well, I can't really answer that question at this moment, so instead of misleading people with wrong answers...
Sure, I dont think people shouldnt be allowed to discuss adjacent topics. I even participated myself. I just think if we could have had a temporary blender thread then the question wouldn't have got pushed up as much as it did.
From what i understood up till now it would be really hard to moderate user created threads and there would be either lots of unmoderated threads what would lead to the mods removing it from users or they would need a lot of new mods. Even if your question does get pushed by other conversations, they can just wait untill its finished and come back later to ask the question
The argument you propose from #animation is basically the main thing why I (we?) would use it.
It's the UX that is shit
Let's assume the UX is not shit, then peeps could post a question "Hey I need help with my Crash Log: <file>" and those who want to answer can open a thread on that question or join the existing one. That means nothing would happen on the outside of the thread and the next question would be visible
That's perfect in my eyes
I don't think it's that dramatic. Most problems are reported by users that ping us.
I'm relatively sure you can ping a moderator into a channel. Not sure about private channels though.
Also FYI: Discord still paywalling the feature behind server boosts for the threads to last more than a day. That's a bit of insult to the injury that is crappy UX, even though this server is secure in Level 3 for 2 more months, from the free Nitro promo.
Archival doesn't actually really seem to do... anything ...
Just takes it out of the channel list
Is all it seems to be
My main concern would be untill someone calls a mod, people could just create random threads and start pinging random people to try and scam them
You can reopen an archived channel by sending a message in it, and they just remain visible in the chat
I'm relatively sure you can ping a moderator into a channel
And yeah, you can ping people that aren't in a thread yet and that'll just work
Private ones should be the same
Moderators can see private threads
You can already try to scam people everywhere else
Threads would be less of a problem as we can be pinged into it
DMs are way more shitty
Can we not just all scream at Discord staff to fix the UX
;_;
Just make a threads icon up here
Show them instead of the member list
@deft raft
Sure wish discord put some actually useful features in and not gimmicks you pay for
😄
Also deleting that pic again because there's stuff in there
Thought I'd managed to get a clean one but no
Ah I didn't look at it very closely, dw
The benefits of threads outweigh any UI nuisances. At least for me personally. But ultimately up to the people in charge to decide on what to do.
I hate slack threads, but I could see how pushing question responses into a thread would make sense. On the other hand, it's less likely to help others because they'd have no reason to go into that thread if the premise isn't their own, yet sometimes the answer to a question sparks understanding for others lurking
People who want to help will probably enter the threads. Just a matter of getting used to.
I almost certainly will
Just take a quick skim through anything but the least interesting threads
Yeah I got told about it.
The way we're talking about doin' it over in Godot land is to just not allow private threads. Even though with private threads, mods/admins still have access to them.
Not in this channel. #automation
big thank mr fist
we've been trying them out on another server, and to be honest, they're just terrible
the problem is the conversation just disappears instantly, making it difficult for anyone to interject
there's a little icon in the channel list, but when you have a zillion channels like here, it's eh
I would really only use them on specific channels like Announcements and News
I see value in them under a specific threads-only dedicated support channel, but...
This is something we've discussed as well. Looking at maybe adding them to #unreal-news and #announcements, and perhaps this channel as well. Very unlikely we'll turn them on for all the support channels, at least in their current iteration.
perhaps a new dedicated prolonged support channel with them for long problems?
that bump there from the appropriate main channel
use case:
"Ok, that didn't work either, this is going to be a long tough one. Let's avoid the clutter and head to a thread so we keep everything clean and organized while working on this over a few days."
it's a nice idea in theory, but in practice it's hard enough to get people to post in relevant channels to begin with, let alone anything more complicated :/
good point
can we make a DMX channel? i think it would be very helpful for many people (or is it just me?). (Wouldn't be the first time.LOL)
What on earth is DMX?
digital multiplex - common protocol to control lighting and other stage equipment in theater and other live venues. There's an epic-supported plugin to let unreal communicate with DMX equipment. Seems a bit too specific of a topic for its own channel, though - wouldn't it sort of fit into #virtual-production ?
Yes, for now #virtual-production is the best place.
:no_entry_sign: Angel The Boss#6410 was banned.
k thanks
@gray gulch Please use #umg . This channel here is for feedback about the Discord Server and not a UE4 support channel.
add a YouTube Bot
Why?
You want notifications every time Epic uploads a new video?
yeah
you just posted it to in #unreal-news thanks
Turn on notifications for the epic youtube channel, you'll get a notification every time they upload a new video
i was just saying this sever is a good place to post them in
Is it possible to have some kind of "gameplay-design" channel in content creation category for people who struggling with designing gameplay features in general?
The questions with pattern "how to implement X gameplay system" are popping quite often and none of existing content creation channels seems to fit while programming section is too specific for them and longe/ue-general doesn't fit for them.
that is similar to game design, but that channel lost its focus at some point
we had a channel like that and it was a complete and utter waste of time
it would go weeks without an actual design question, which would usually get buried by the piles of generic 'How do I X?' questions
in the end the best solution to the frustration was to just get rid of it
IMO questions like "how to implement X gameplay system" should stay under programming, since its not game design because you are not designing something or balancing a feature you are just asking how to make this thing with this specific tool
I could see another angle there, kinda a "how do I redesign this mechanic to be simpler to implement".
But just straight up discussing implementation should be #blueprint / #cpp
looks like an update to 4.27 preview just dropped today. I can't remember if its going from preview 3 to preview 4, or if it's just some hotfixes. Also I can't find the changelog
but whatever it is it's a 5 gig update
Looks like it's preview 4. The changelog can be found here: https://forums.unrealengine.com/t/unreal-engine-4-27-preview/234295
Preview 1 of the upcoming 4.27 release is available now on the Launcher and GitHub. We are making this Preview available so you can try our new features and help us catch issues before the final release. As fixes are implemented, we will release updated previews throughout the development cycle. Please be aware that preview releases are not ful...
Scroll to the bottom of the OP.
cheers! how did you find that? sounds silly but I searched and couldn't find it, did results in the past 24 hours, and the "release notes" page takes you to 4.26 with no option for 4.27 lol
They only share release notes for preview builds on the forums.
Only stable release notes are published to the docs.
They always pin preview announcements/notes on the forum under the Announcements & Releases category.
Ah yeah I see, just surprised it didn't show up in google, especially since searching for "Unreal Engine 4.27 Preview" and filtered last 24 hours and didn't show up.
Thanks for that heads up, good to know where to look next time 🍻
For what it's worth, Duck Duck Go shows the relevant results right away.
Actually I get similar results in Google, too. But Google differs from person to person. Maybe yours is mad at you. 😄
Haha actually I got those links, but I was only looking at the date because I didn't realize that preview builds were only in the forums AND I didn't read through the whole thing and see they updated the bottom section of the post with the fixes in preview 4. I was looking at the date of the post which was jun 8th of this year. For some reason I was looking for a separate preview 4 post, whoopsy!
I've tried a few times to switch to Duck Duck Go, but unfortunately google just knows how to find the right stack overflow post or whatever else I'm looking for, they already know too much about me 😁
A fellow man of culture, I see 🦆 🦆 🏃
Over past wee while I've noticed several people having issues with Quixel Bridge, in one form or another. While I've been giving them a url to go to, sometimes it's easier to give them the discord link. However this would probably fall foul of #rules which is the point of this post. Seeing as Quixel is part of Epic would it be allowed to share their discord to users with issues relating to Quixel related things?
I see no issues in that
Though it might be worth having a separate read only channel to list recommended servers, like Quixel's.
Maybe set up a form for people to submit to an admin or mod to allow early streaming, because people who do need help and such that just joined have a really hard time getting that help with just a sreenshot
Giving some people special treatment would defeat the purpose of having the waiting period. Besides, I can't imagine what criteria we'd use to decide who can bypass the waiting period.
Well Yall have it because of trolls right
Make extra steps and so on to be able to allow people that want to learn that opportunity
im still having problems and I cant even show what they are due to this rule
Maybe we can discuss reducing the waiting period at some point, but I don't think allowing people to apply to bypass it altogether is a good approach.
But I understand the work that would go into thats all the feedback I have thank you for looking at it
I appreciate you bringing it up.
:no_entry_sign: Nikolaaa#1000 was banned.
hey i dont really know where to message someone about this so ill put it here. ive message the bot (manny) to try open a ticket and it gives me a response saying i cannot message the user
Make sure you accept DMs from server members.
I see legal questions being asked a lot in #career-chat
Is that really covered under the topic of it?
The discussion about contracts?
Just kind of curious if dealing with hiring people is career related
Yeah and if they should be paid etc
Yes. Hiring and contracts pertain to working in the industry.
Hard to talk about hiring and contracts without bringing up legal stuff, so it's bound to come up.
Yeah I can see that just kinda odd to talk about discrepancies and advice on what is uhh acceptable to expect etc. that mixing in with stuff like portfolio questions and what not
Makes sense if it’s just a wide blanket of things though
And I’d never suggest a legal advice channel 
Yeah. For now #career-chat is a catch-all for working in the industry and all that pertains to.
Maybe in the future we should consider splitting it into "running a business" and "portfolio advice" channels.
If there's interest in giving those topics their own space.
You'd recommend avoiding discussion of portfolio advice?
Oh, yeah I agreed with you on that.
A legal advice channel would be silly.
If I made that, it would be a read-only channel that said "Ask your lawyer."
Ye it’s just people use career chat for that
People have asked questions about stuff like petitions against them etc
We can't prevent people from giving legal advice.
Yeah
The best we can do is avoid encouraging it, by not having a channel for it and by not mentioning it in any channel topics.
Cool
it may be a slow moving channel with low interest, but I vote for a pixel streaming channel. I think that there will be the occasional times where extremely valuable information would be exchanged, and at the very least, may provide a good outlet to possibly monitor what people are experiencing and trying to overcome with their pixel streaming projects. cheers!
I feel like there is something wrong with Manny the job bot, seems to crash when I get to the end of the process before it spits out the summary
This channel is for giving us feedback.
Can you please elaborate or send a screenshot? What exactly is happening?
basically it just stops responding
when I get to the final question about "how can they contact you"
I respond and it just hangs
there is a screenshot of the end of my last interaction if that's helpful
Thanks! Does it always hang on this same question?
yesterday it worked a couple of times and then hung (was fine tuning it so you can't edit mistakes). Today it hung first time
OK, thanks for the feedback. I'll look into why this might be happening.
We got it thanks.
Very interesting. Thanks for the insight @primal ocean!
Damn, thanks fellas !
Divivor, The tiny malware buster
:no_entry_sign: Aman#5737 was banned.
Dude looked normal... tc tc tc
Can I please have a little clarification on how to use Manny for job postings? It's not clear to me if I use the $ commands in one of the JOB BOARDS channels or somewhere else.
You send the $ commands in a direct message to @leaden karma.
Would it be more clear if the #instructions said "send a DM to Manny" instead of "send a message to Manny"?
That would have cleared it up for me, yes. However, if I send a DM to Manny, then Clyde tells me I can't, because Manny and I aren't friends. If that's because I don't have enough cred with this server, I was unaware of that, too.
you have to enable DMs with members of this server, or with anyone
oof...thank you, I was misinterpreting the error, silly mistake on my part
you could have the Mann(y) auto accept friend invites, wouldn't need to change anything else. Then people could choose keep their public DM setting on or off and still access. If the friend request for some reason fails, then the user could still just change their DM settings
You cannot.
thats interesting, you think they would expose that for bots
I don't think it's necessary to do to much here. I got what I needed from you helpful folks, and clearly others have reasoned through this better than I have in the past.
having a few channels with mandatory push to talk would be awesome
I wish there was a mandatory Krisp option instead, but sadly u cant im pretty sure😢
Forcing Krisp would not be good. It's not compatible with every audio setup.
oh thats true, my bad
It's OK. I understand where you're coming from.
Is this the place for server suggestion?
Yes.
I think it would be really cool if there was a list of games completed by people who got together in #volunteer-projects. Would also be super interested just to see, how often does it actually come to fruition...
Where can I find the document to register the group and play?
I think it's fair to say, that during this influx of people who don't read either the rules, guides, or channel descriptions that I really really feel for the moderators and admin at this trying time. 🙂
just received this dm from soneone in here
Discord should really auto-detect those shitty spam links and automatically delete them + ban the account
This server should have a shitposting/memes channel 👍
There are as many other discord servers as there are stars in the sky where you can do that
I meant for only unreal shitposting and memes.
We wont be doing that. We want the Server to have as professional an atmosphere as possible (within reason).
too difficult
false positives
but yeah this is a bit sad
funny how 99% of the bots spamming these messages are actually normal accounts that have been stolen
I mean, that's not a false positive, that's a compromised account, and Discord should ban it
if the original account holder wants it unbanned, they'll have to talk to Discord
you dont get fucked by clicking a link
they make you download token grabbers
nobody in this server is stupid enough?
?
because it was in this server? and this is where you report it?
ah yes
sending a screenshot and labelling it as fake
"spreading"
no
imagine if discord deleted your account just because someone grabbed your token
ban != delete, and bans are easily reversed
you can easily change your token and lock the scammer out by changing your password
no they arent
discord support times are measured in days
they dont thousands of extra shit to deal with
easy & fast are two different things, but this argument is clearly pointless and not in good faith, so I'm not going to continue it
yeah bc you dont know what youre talking about but whatever
I agree discord should do more with compromised accounts, and there should be a way to easily report compromised accounts to discord. Automated systems may work but false positives is the main issue here, and they will always work around them.
Also, please keep it civil.
Manny's delete command doesn't work. Can I get my contract-jobs post deleted? Has a typo
this one?
Yes
Removed it 👍
👌 Thanks.
What problems did you have using the $remove command?
Did $delete {discordMessageId} and it didn't work
The command is $remove {message ID}
It didn't work because you entered the whole command again when Manny was just asking for the ID.
It's OK. You're not the first person to get confused by that.
The experience will be improved soon. Thanks for letting me know!
I have a suggestion. Wouldn't it be better to have a dedicated channel for "Game Design"?
There used to be one, it was removed because 99% of messages in it were along the lines of "how do I model a tree"
Really? What a shame. Maybe another channel right next to it called "3d-design" or something like that? I'm really having hard time to picking a channel for my game design questions 😅
There should be an art channel and a game design channel! 🤘
Ppl don't know what is game design, it was proven.
We tried for so long, it didn't work. Just adding Game Design back won't work
It's like not giving up on your shitty relationship that ended for a reason

sus
Because the server needs a channel for art, dcc or feedback, like ue specific. That would clear any off topic on game design
The method of elimination? I dunno whether it was tried and will it work.
Isn't that basically what this whole server is? Just split into more specific channels?
but people would also ask about implementing #multiplayer concepts in #blueprint because they thought that designing the architecture of the systems fit the game design channel. Despite that being more or less unrelated to the design of their game (which had either been decided or didn't actually exist).
No amount of channels will stop people using a dedicated design channel for implementation questions, so long as people refuse to read.
there was a game design channel - it was an absolute disaster
half of the content creation channels are art channels
I guess you could gate access behind a role, and have a pretty simple process to unlock it but which required actually reading stuff
Could be in the channel guide. The game design channel is listed along with a description, but you cannot post until you read the channel guide more closely and hypothetically are aware of the other channels. Could be something like "DM Manny with !designer"
Make a thing where users have to send "Game design is the theory of how game mechanics work on a psychological level" to Manny to get the channel 😄
I have low confidence it'd work
be cool if it would cycle periodically, to reduce the chance of someone redirecting from other channels. "Hey go ask how to paint textures in game design. You gotta DM Manny this phrase tho"
Could be removed as well, for continually off topic folks
That was specific to the game design channel - a lot of questions on dcc to UE or people asking for feedback on whatever art they were doing. My point is there was a pool of people that would ask art and design and feedback questions and would not be all off topic on the dedicated game design if there was also an art channel (dcc or general)
Ok? So was my example. So it clearly doesn't actually work that way.
Despite dedicated channels existing, they'd still ask in the wrong chat.
If you aren't going to bother reading what I write then I'm not going to bother responding
Wow ok
Its different because there is no dedicated channel for what I was saying. Maybe you havent noticed it but I feel a lot of those off topic art questions would fit right in
Like there arent 2 or 3 or more channels for those set of questions, no channels for it and plenty of questions to be asked. Anyway
Control Rig stuff is fine in #animation
FAQ commands are on the way soon!
Great, might be fun to be connected with Many in a way. Like dropping the reference directly.
Curious to see the rest.
I've seen them work well on other developer-centric servers, so I think it will be a hit here.
For bits of common wisdom, FAQ commands seem to be more effective than pinned messages in my experience.
Can see it. I mean it is so rare people to check out pinned. Once you know that what you search for is referenced there, it's fine.
Actually, I haven't seen faq commands being implemented, nice you have seen that.
Yep. Here's an example from the discord.js server.
When new members of the community ask questions that lots of people know the answer to, they tend to be turned into an FAQ command so veteran members can use them to reply quickly and consistently.
I definitely want to implement this here.
Planning on the first ones to come in Manny v2.
Hmm... I see, so we will be able to narrow down the reply from the bot?
The commands would come from community suggestions and then turned into pre-programmed responses.
Nice 👍
<@&213101288538374145>

:no_entry_sign: ᴺᵒᵗKINGYORCH.#9917 was banned.
I think it would be awesome if we had some channels that require push to talk
that's not a thing?
The VC channels arent PTT because i believe the prevailing opinion at the time of their creation from the community was that "PTT is annoying"
It is a nuisance to use, but it's also basically a necessity in public voice chat due to the sheer amount of people with horrible mics and copious amounts of background noise
It has grown significantly in popularity so perhaps it does need to be turned on.
(The VC channels I mean, they are more popular now than earlier in their lifetime)
It was probably less necessary earlier.
is PTT a community server thing?
Its not required if thats what your asking?
no I mean as a setting you can enforce
because it isn't normally
none of the servers I'm admin of have that option
@gritty lotus afaik all servers have it, it's this perm:
aha, it's hidden in permissions, not in overview - if you have it synced with another channel it's hidden of course
PTT is annoying, but it is more annoying to be in VC and someone's mic is picking up every noise that could possibly happen in their area.
Last 2 times I was in VC, I left specifically because people's mics were overbearing and they weren't talking.
You can lower and mute others in VC though
That's right. Krisp is built in to Discord.
User Settings → Voice & Video → Advanced
There are valid arguments on both sides of this discussion. But until it's clear the majority of our community is willing to put up with forced PTT, I'd rather leave it as is.
Discord gives users a lot of control over their voice chat experience, and I generally prefer not to interfere with that.
You can set personal volumes and mutes for specific users in a way that doesn't affect others.
Interesting. That sounds like a compromise that is worth considering.
Not going to take action just yet (I think it's too early), but definitely keeping it in mind.
I appreciate the suggestion nonetheless.
Two concerns I have: too many voice channels to choose from, and the potential for complaints such as "this guy is annoying, can you boot him to a PTT channel?" When really, I think the solution there is to boot them to AFK if they don't go there automatically.
Or mute them, etc.
Just two gut concerns I have. Still going to consider it.
Krisp built into discord takes out your background noise, Krisp App on the PC and Mobile takes out your and their background noise. Works with everything
unless the suppression icon you have there does work both ways, I don't think it does. For some reason mine gets turned off multiple times in a voice session
Same. Because noise.
And it seems ppl use it as replacement of their YouTube/Twitch/Whatever.
I think it would be awesome if we had channel about open world / world partition / world composition / level streaming etc. There are a lot questions about it and how this systems intersect with others systems
Sounds familiar, hmm... 🤔
hmm indeed
That’s part of the intended purpose of #level-design
A lot of people post there, but how many actually about #level-design .. not one in ten did..........😝
what we really need is #memes, it's been hours since it was last suggested (I'll see myself out)
what we really need is #name-and-shame, it's been hours since it was last suggested (I'll see myself out)
I mean, nobody reads the pinned messages either
What we really need is #udk channel, it's been years since it was lastly suggested.
Any chance we can get a feedback channel for projects? like someone posts it and we can critique it?
Oh that sounds like to me advertisement and not specific to asking for feedback, going by other indie groups, I've given feedback and got blasted on games that are 'released' because they never asked for it, that's all.
Rename #ue4-general to #UE4-General
I suspect when UE5 becomes more prevalent, that would happen
I think UE5 will just be "merged" into the Server
Don't think we need to make even more channels
And the #work-in-progress is for feedback. No reason to make yet another one
I think it would eliminate the tons of people asking for UE5 stuff there, and being told off, when it says unreal engine, nothing specific, I think #work-in-progress should have & feedback at the end, just for clarity.
Honestly doesn't matter what you name the channel, there are always going to be people who don't know which channel they're in. For example, if they did, they'd see #ue5-general right above #ue4-general
I remember seeing the topic come up about a month ago or so, but are there any plans for threads in the near future?
Iirc, if at all only in very specific cases for very specific channels.
Would have loved them if they weren't implemented so shitty
'Tis the Discord way though
Not sure if doable, but maybe it's not a bad idea to have a more private channel where you can ask for a more dedicated help, paid of course.
How to implement it, who would be part of that, etc, no idea .
Enabling Discord Threads support for the server makes sense?
Being able to discuss specific stuff in threads and getting them archived for future reference would be good.
That exact thing was discussed less than ten messages above
I'm just coming up with a valid reason for enabling them, instead of just asking. Archive feature is nice in my opinion, they help categorizing useful specific discussions together. For example, people discussing a specific topic about DFAO in #graphics channel may be archived as a thread, so everyone can read that conversation without being lost in the channel. This also keeps the discussion clean from pop-in questions inside the channel.
Also since server has lvl 3 boost, they can stay active for longer time, which means we'll be able to use threads with their full potential.
The feature may make the moderation of the server harder though, if that's the case, can't say anything about that unfortunately.
I'm not sure a one week archive is particularly useful as an actual archive - but also threads are pretty shite. Most people don't even realise they are there, preventing people from actually joining discourse :/
Discord is a chat, not an archive for knowledge. If you want to create that, you should add your knowledge to a wiki or similar.
Threads are just not nicely implemented. They clutter the channel list if you are part of them and if you can search for a thread then you can search for the discussion itself anyway.
If threads would have a Slack-like implementation I would be all for it.
But mainly only to make sure that questions aren't spammed away. I would personally enforce questions to be answered and discussed in threads only then, but well
E.g. here, we could have an everlasting thread that discusses this topic (as an example), instead of spamming other discussions away.
That way people that want to help can easier spot ongoing discussions and probably see 10+ questions at once.
But not for the sake of archiving them
I would want this feature to be helpful in terms of organization
Usually, in the Slack Servers I was in, specifically The Ascent's, we enforced Threads.
You post a question into the main channel and the answers and discussions went into the thread. Kept things soooo clean
The cluttering aside, I don't see what stops the same benefits being possible. You can leave threads your aren't interested in.
But it's a moderation nightmare, I imagine, and probably isn't supported with Manny yet. So while I think the feature works at a smaller scale, it probably doesn't work well on servers like this
As it stands you have replies, and that can clarify "threads" of conversation. They need bidirectional navigation and jump to top IMO. But otherwise they're serviceable
one might argue that would even be more "discord" versus a whole pane for thread navigation and them all being separated from the main convo
Just re-noting the topic of having some form of public reason when users are warned
You mean when we Strike them?
Users who receive a strike get a DM with the reason.
And we do already show that the user received a Strike publically.
I think the Moderation team agreed this was enough.
Others who see a Strike message of another User should take that as enough of a warning to not break the #rules themselves i would imagine.
Asserting dominance.
Thats on them i guess. They can always contact a Moderator if they are unsure as to what happened and/or why.
We've previously had this discussion, I fundamentally disagree. Nevertheless, I was solely bringing this up again because the conclusion of the previous discussion was "We'll talk about it internally", and no final thoughts were ever shared here
I also think this
I know you may want to catch up on the latest drama but thats not what this server is about
Is a bold and somewhat offensive assumption to be making, as that is not why I would like for there to be some measure of clarification on what people have done
All good, I just read it in a way that pushed some buttons for me. No hard feelings
I think it would be awesome if we had some channels with forced Push to Talk.
Agreed
I've been insta IP banned yesterday for something that I believe was mostly a misunderstanding.
Later the server owner reached out to me and we talked it out, resulting in me getting a strike instead of a permanent good bye.
I believe that the harshest punishments should be carefully considered, and mostly used for obvious transgressors, like spammers, people with a history of constant harassment, and the likes.
For everything else a strike or temporarily revoking posting privileges should be enough.
In any case, I talked about this with pfist and Luos, but wanted to post it here for everyone to share their opinion.
@hidden zephyr Discussing Moderation actions is against our #rules. If you have an issue, discuss it privately with a Moderator. As you stated you already have, it seems to me there maybe a mix up here.
If you are unhappy with a Moderators decision you are more than welcome to discuss that with another Moderator.
I was under the impression server feedback would include moderation rules
after all it affects the users here
You are welcome to provide feedback on our #rules
But not on actions taken by a Moderator.
oh OK, Ill do that then
right, but my feedback wasn't about my particular case though
Im just using it as an example
my incident is solved
Sure, but in your specific instance you clearly see that discussing it privately with the Moderation team resulted in your ban being revoked.
Which tells you that our process for which i just outlined is appropriate and does work.
We review on a case by case basis.
I honestly think there should be a place where we can discuss these kind of things
Hence why we do not discuss them publically.
if its not here not sure where
Isn't that kind of what I did though
I guess, it comes down to the fact that the ban was considered carefully and was the result of a misunderstanding which got cleared up.
Not sure what to say.
If I understand you correctly then your point is this part:
I believe that the harshest punishments should be carefully considered, and mostly used for obvious transgressors, like spammers, people with a history of constant harassment, and the likes.
Which we already try, but misunderstandings can happen. So not sure where to go with this.
You make it sound as if we would just hand out bans all the time, which is not true.
Ignoring all the Nitro Scammers, bans are very rare here.
I dont have enough time on this server to know how quickly people are to ban users here. So I can only extrapolate from my experience
Yeah, that's not helpful though
Its feedback, of some kind.
We have over 60k users. We ban a few, really rarely. Most of them are CS GO or Nitro scammers. From all of those bans, one (yours) was now a misunderstanding.
extrapolating from this would still be a tiny amount, so yeah, we will try to be even more careful, but that's kinda it.
If I understand correctly, Maru is requesting that instant bans be more carefully considered. His was a case of overreach on our part, so I think that's fair feedback.
Yop
@hidden zephyr Just so it's clear: our "don't discuss mod decisions in public channels" policy is primarily in place to prevent people from disrupting chat by arguing with us about our decisions. I recognize you're not doing that here, but I wanted to make sure you understood where DevilsD was coming from.
Yeah, no problem.
@obtuse raft might be under 14
I'm not.
In the future, please raise these concerns with a moderator in private. We discourage public shaming.
?
In some countries it is against Discord policy for Users under the age of 14 to participate in the platform.
#server-feedback Is not for reporting potentially problematic members of the community to the Moderation team.
Hence the direction to contact a Moderator in private.
In my country, it is 13 and i am not under 13
I was not accusing you of being under any age.
Simply pointing out Discord policy.
@obtuse raft You are not in trouble, do not misunderstand 🙂
Here is a question, on another discord, there was the ability to join a particular channel, which would then create a new channel for you. Would there be able way to include that functionality along with giving you the ability for limited mod ability in your own channel?
What would be the purpose of this?
To allow for some slightly more controlled channels (i.e. wanting to keep conversation Unreal related, or people on push to talk) as well as self-moderation
Why would you need self moderation? The Moderators exist for a reason.
For example, I love this community for the sake of meeting new Unreal developers and getting perspectives (and even helping to mentor others), but occasionally some conspiracy types sneak in and I would have to migrate to other channels, or leave for a different server entirely
^ same
I don't understand how your request relates to the occasional bad actor. And also, what D said. We're here to help.
so what about push to talk? or other issues like that?
If someone is creating excessive noise in VC channels, ping a Moderator and we can have a word with them.
Like for example: Someone was talking about the new Final Fantasy game and some one completely derailed the conversation by talking about right wing fashy crap
So why wasnt a Moderator contacted?
This was yesterday I think
how do we prove it? and what happens if they never talk about it after the event?
no action is taken unless a mod is actively there
I can't record 24/7
Thats fine, but that doesnt mean you dont contact us.
I agree with Nord, just within the past 2 days there have been 4 separate occasions of things happening.
We cant read the chat channels 24/7
Sounds like we need a limited mod status
No it doesnt.
It sounds like you need to ping Moderators more.
When issues arise.
What type of ratio should we expect for pings / action?
There's no predefined ratio. We handle reports on a case by case basis. We regularly respond to pings within seconds.
If I understand correctly: the issue here is that sometimes people derail conversations in voice chat.
We have rules for this:
- Voice chat is not a free-for-all. All of the above rules still apply. Additionally: Try to avoid dominating the conversation. When new people join, give them an opportunity to introduce themselves. If you need one-on-one support, consider moving to a private chat.
More so political stuff, but yes
Sure, will ping. Hopefully some of the bad actors get actioned against.
We don't ban political conversations. If someone says something political that you don't like, handle it. If they break a rule, contact us for assistance.
ok
But off topic conversations are bad
Which is against the rules
That would be breaking a rule, so I refer you again to my previous statement.
So contact a Moderator
Maybe take a pass at the rules and ensure that there is as little gray area there as possible, because I feel like you are setting yourself up for failure by creating case-by-case gray areas
also maybe recruit some more VC mods
Give me an example of how our rules set us up for failure.
If one mod enforces problem A, and another mod allows problem A, you've just created an organization dysfunction
I'd have to agree, while political conversations are not against the rules, on multiple occasions right wing people break into conversation with things that are offensive.
That would be a problem with enforcement, not the rules themselves.
That's pretty simple, as it came up little just above (we don't ban political conversation versus no off topic conversation)
We arent robots. If this happens to occur, contact another Moderator.
We do take these things seriously.
Hey, all I can do is give advice. Its your server.
But again, more VC mods might help
Yes, but you can also contact Moderators for help.
passive presence would go a long way
We cannot watch every channel 24/7. That's not what moderators do.
VC, just VC, which is primarily 1 to 3 channels.
As Nick mentioned earlier, we react to pings within seconds, it takes you seconds to type @ Moderators
We have caught multiple bad actors in voice chat before thanks to pings from users. It really does help, and we do take them seriously.
But we gave a few ideas for potential improvement, please consider them as we do like to be here. That's all.
I am going to be honest - The reason I do not really want to come here anymore is that it feels un-moderated. Especially in the Voice chats. When I do report via DM or otherwise. I just get lip service and no action. It sucks and it makes me feel unsafe. It is also the reason I do not ping a mod anymore. Because when a mod comes online to deal with a problem it is too late. I do not want to record people because of GDPR and being fined. I cannot afford that.
My 2 cents
I'm sorry to hear that. It's always nice to have you here.
It is unrealistic to have VC be Moderated 24/7
I'd love to hear why you feel this server feels unmoderated. You can bring it up here, or if you want to discuss privately my DMs are always open.
he... he... listed it above
And while it may be unrealistic, it would be nice to have some presence
which leads to my previous point of recruiting some more VC specific mods
I will bring it up in DM
If we need to be specific, personally I've ran into anti-trans talk and right wing extreme talk the past couple of instances.
We do have some presence (thanks Will, Mippi, and Luos). I will be sure to bring up voice chat specifically next time we recruit more moderators, though. Thanks.
Mippi and Will, unfortunately, have been pretty busy with work
Will due to the move and what not, Mippi has a bunch of incoming
And Luos has been taking a break
Not to mention only one of them is on EU time
Yeah that's fair.
If you need mods. I am more than willing to volunteer if needs be. I put my money where my mouth is so to speak
Again, we aren't trying to say the mods are bad or aren't doing their job, we just want to see more (particularly in VC). I second Square
We cant "do our job" if you dont ping us dude.
Same here
We rarely get pings from VC channels.
Will do, and will document. We'll give you a chance to succeed
<@&213101288538374145> @thorn river is trolling us
voice will always be a wild-west unfortunately - everything that happens in there would be more or less 'live' and there's no record of anything after-the-fact. I don't think it's reasonable to expect a moderator to be actively listening to each of the (potentially six) active voice channels 24/7
I seem to recall inability to moderate voice was one of the stronger reasons why there was a reluctance to implement them in the first place
I think these VC are chaotic, so even if mods drop from time to time there, ultimately actions can be taken only on signal basis. Moderating communication, even in big corporate environments is hard task and many pitfalls are awaiting. Considering this is also a volunteer based work, I understand the difficulties.
Personally, I think VC should be peer-to-peer and only few selected members should be able to stream on the server to wide audience. At the end, if it can't be moderated it better be removed so it does not turn into an infection.
I had my reservations about VC before we implemented them. But on the whole I would say they have been rather well received and for the most part people have respected their purpose and conducted themselves well.
While there have been a few outlying incidents I do hope that they continue to be useful and people follow the #rules while using them.
This includes helping us to help the community by contacting a Moderator should an issue come up.
and dont be afraid to dm me or another moderator in private if you feel the need to do so.
The problem of not being able to properly moderate them was indeed one of the biggest concerns. People like using them and stream in them, which is fine.
But I have no idea how to properly mod them. I don't have the time to sit in them, even less so since I don't care about them at all.
We can't record people and we can't make sure that someone with mod rights is constantly in them.
At that point it might only be possible to self-moderate what YOU as a user, don't want to deal with in VCs.
Means, block and mute people that annoy you. If everyone mutes the troll, then the problem goes away by itself (for example).
The only other way is some sort of mini mod or trusted member that, if they report someone, should be taken without further recording as a proof.
But man, that also sounds like a pita.
Wouldn't it be nice if peeps could just freaking behave?
Out of curiosity, what is the process for becoming a moderator? Is it open for people to apply?
We usually run an open application when we feel that we need more Moderators to help around the server.
Are applications open at the moment?
@open radish keeps spamming messages about his server <@&213101288538374145>
@vernal spoke
- Please don't ping people out of context. 2) This channel is for giving us feedback on the server.
Feels like moderation in #fab is too aggressive - when ppl post a release post by mistake there (which is very easy to do when you're not familiar with the server), there should be a warning before a strike
Strikes are essentially warnings, thats why you get 3.
How so? Strikes send a personal DM to the user who received it.
🙂
Might be nice to put the message in the public chat as well?
so like instead of a mysterious XXX was muted, XXX was muted: Spam
We had this discussion earlier this week. We dont feel that its appropriate to publically shame someone in that way. We feel that showing someone received a Strike should be enough to give others a second glance at what they want to post.
makes sense
If you read and follow the #rules then you should be fine. And yes, I appreciate that people make mistakes, which is why Strikes also expire.
Yeah I ain't gonna pretend I read rules on all servers I'm in 😄
We refactored the #rules to be less lengthy in the hopes that it would encourage people to read them when they join.
For sure
Strikes can always be appealed, we do from time to time revoke them.
That all sound very sane to me hehehehe
Glad to hear it 🙂
Yea I have had one revoked before🙃
👍
I muted them for 1minute just as a warning that they posted in the wrong channel, a mute doesn't have any negative consequences after that 1 minute unlike a strike
Yep thats true and if the user wants to know they can always ask a Mod as we log everything.
Users can always ask a Mod for clarification on the #rules or something they may want to post.
We are here to help.
Just to be clear as well. Moderators can apply a Strike to someone in any channel, so given that, where it appears may have zero context to the Strike reason itself.
Part of why we decided not to show publically what the Strike reason was is to avoid potentially further derailing the channel with unnecessary pushback or questioning on the Strike reason within that channel (which is also against the #rules, for that exact reason and why we ask that it be brought to a Moderator in a DM where it can be discussed with the user involved)
For what it's worth, that's also a policy I disagree with, because while I understand the intent, I think it smothers feedback on moderation by increasing the barrier to actually providing your thoughts and keeping other people who might share your thoughts out of the discussion
But I've reconciled myself with that; the moderation style of this server isn't the same as how I handle my own large communities, and that's fine, to each their own
To clarify. We have no problem with people discussing Moderation in general and our practices here in this channel. Im specifically saying we dont allow it on a case by case basis. As usually it just turns into nothing but arguments.
I personally think that if fellow users disagree with a specific action being taken, there's something to be said for listening to that chorus of users, rather than telling them they can't voice their opinions on said instance unless they do so in private where it won't ever be a constructive and equal conversation
I don't quite understand why "Bystanders" need to know why we striked.
I've rambled about it before, put it down to a difference in life philosophy ¯_(ツ)_/¯
Shouldn't it be enough if we, once, state that we don't want to provide the details to anyone but the user who violated the rules?
If it's just about life philosophy then that's really no argument, is it
The only slight argument I now read was that users could discuss our actions taken and give their own thoughts to it
And the result is always "Well, we disagree"
So repeating the discussion isn't very valuable
Hence why I'm summarizing it as "different philosophies"
Yeah then let's leave it at that
This specifically was a somewhat separate point I haven't brought up before (nor do I think I recall others doing so)
But, of course, it's related due to there not being much ability to start a debate on how situations are handled if you have no way of knowing what actually happened
Basically the tldr of this entire topic from my point of view comes down to this:
Moderation on this server is run as a completely opaque process where users on the server have no way of knowing what happened and why such things happen, and as such they can't provide any meaningful feedback on the system. I vastly prefer transparent systems where users can see, follow and comment on basically any component of the process
Yeah that's completely the opposite of what I would want to happen
I don't think anyone who isn't part of the problem should need to know about it.
I don't want bystanders to cause even more drama
I believe the community should be community-owned and as such should be able to easily comment on any part of its operations
If people can't discuss it cause they don't know what happened, then great, it#s working
Slackers as a whole is largely operated on a pretty vastly different premise, and is run incredibly top-down, which I think goes against the grain of being a true community
(Which is a large part of why I've turned down offers to join the moderation team)
That's all fine. You don't have to agree with it or join the mod team.
At some point some of the decisions we make and how we handle things should just be accepted.
There are 60k members or so on this servers. There will always be unhappy people.
If we open this up, the next one comes in and says "can we not"
Tada
I don't think anyone will ever really complain about more transparent server operations, frankly
Other than potentially the moderation team, because it's more work; can't just chug along according to the default mode
I'm specifically talking about discussing why someone got striked
Someone breaks a rule, gets striked. I don't need person xyz to then come in and be like "Hey i have time on my hands, let's open this up to even more drama."
I think that can easily be resolved by restricting it to constructive conversation
Someone comes in and goes "well that's dumb fuck off", warn them as well
Someone comes in "I don't believe that's a warranted warning because this channel is X/Y so if that's against the policy the description needs to be changed" (just as an example), that's entirely valid imo, but the way Slackers is run stifles that sort of feedback
Sure, but that's totally possible for everyone who was witnessing the issue
I'm mostly against the users that are just searching for drama
But you have basically turned 1 issue into the potential for multiple issues
Running a 20k member server with the policies I'm describing, I don't personally experience the issues. It's quite straight-forward to deal with the people looking for drama
Sure and thats yours to decide on. We have gone a different route and it seems to be working fine.
You say that, but the server does bleed regulars (not solely attributing that issue to what we're discussing here, but I definitely think it's a factor)
If they are leaving because of a Moderator then we would like to know so we can try and resolve those issues. But i find it hard to believe they are leaving because they cant discuss individual Strikes.
It isn't about the individual strikes, it's about the mode of server operation
The server is run top-down and highly opaquely
My point is however that others don't need to know. There is no reason for them to know.
The feeling of actually making a difference to the community is near-zero, which makes it very frustrating to be a regular who tries to help change this place for the better
(Which I suspect all of the regulars do want)
The only reason I can read here is that people might think it's "unfair and irrational", but they shouldn't wonder about this to begin with.
Egh, wellp, I'm done with this discussion. It's a circular premise. We say "Transparency is good", you say "You shouldn't think about the things you want us to be transparent about". Pretty much illustrates the entire problem, in my opinion, but clearly that isn't seen as a problem
Different opinions. Totally normal. We want to run the server like this. We don't want to share strike reasons. The arguments that were presented aren't convincing.
That's all there is
Of course we run in circles then
Matt already explained why we decided to add the message
At least I think he did
FYI, this is fundamental to any kind of justice system, otherwise from an observer's perspective it's nothing but a random punitive system
Not sure about that. That would mean I should just go to any police person on the street, asking what's going on, why that person is handcuffed and what not
police don't punish people, they are not part of the justice system
Generally speaking, this here isn't a huge justice system. We have rules. If someone got striked they violated them.
that's a really poor comparison
Yeah well it's also not really something to compare
if you want to see the results of any conviction in your jurisdiction, it will however be available to the public
because without it, you do not have a justice system
That's fine, then we don't have a justice system.
Pretty sure you can't see why someone is banned on AnswerHUB and UE4 Forum either
Or if they have a strike
Twitch for example doesn't tell you why they banned their members
There are probably tons of communities and systems that won't tell you why their members were banned
I'm not sure how it is in the current forum software (because it's terrible) - but on the old forums there used to be a line of text where a moderator would leave a reason for why an infraction was given
That reason was visible to other users? Cause from my vBulletin times I can't recall that being visible
it was always visible
I dont ever recall seeing any mod actions visible on the old forums.
You sure it wasnt because you were a Mod?
And could see it yourself?
Either way, not all communities show why their users got infracted/banned.
And that's what we choose to do. We could fully remove the chat message, but I think that was mostly to inform that a user is muted now caused by the strike, so they don't randomly stop answering. Something something. Nick can probably answer that
Just to be clear. We see every Mod action here internally. Infact we comment on them frequently as well
Yeah let's not compare it like this then, as ambershee pointed out it's a bad comparison.
Specifically cause whatever you believe they were at the police for is non of your business basically
Even if you saw them before
I agree on this, when someone breaks the rules, letting people know what happened is useful for everyone.
Partially true, when a mod deletes the messages they're not accessible anymore.
they have a bot that they do their moderation through, so they can see what they are doing
No dog in the race - but what if you link the rule that was broken? Would that be an acceptable compromise? (btw, I help mod the Godot Discord)
In our server, we do public warning/bans. I don't know how Manny is set up, but we have a command "ban/warn" and type the message out.
And what happens is what Ced talks about - sometimes bystanders do want to get involved, but it really isn't too often.
A better compromise would be an itemization of rules broken in a period. Maybe it can be slightly edited down to show particularly vague reasons why an action was taken. It's a bit detached from the actual incident/people involved, and shows that the specific rule is being enforced. But it takes significant extra effort from the mod team compared to making the reason immediately public at the time action was taken
I largely don't see the point. People should just assume the rules are enforced but do not specifically guide you in terms of how much of fool you can act before consequences occur.
I mean, I can live with just being a Rule #3 post
Or so
But I guess even that does what I wouldn't want to deal with
We shall see. We will discuss
can you add commands to the bot? would be nice if it could print this out:
```cpp
// code goes here
```
Noted. Thanks for the suggestion. I'll try to get this in for Manny v2.
a game ideas channel would be pretty cool
where people can interact with manny
to post a game idea
for anyone to use or base off of
as kinda a big repo of game ideas lol
😂
@primal ocean, :8ball: Most likely.
!8ball are you lying?
@tough dirge, :8ball: Cannot predict now.
See manny gets it
Similar to the job board btw
Why can't I stream in one of the channels?
Send a DM to @leaden karma with the !stream command.
tyvm boss
the virtual production discord link is expired in the pinned messages, could we have a new one? cheers
Can we talk about turning off external emotes? Seeing alt-right pepe stuff appear here is pretty disappointing
You always have the option to block people who post content you dont agree with.
God knows how many people hate me because of anime profile picture and using anime external emotes.
Also, in the event of crosspost that happened in #graphics and #umg:
Maybe it would be nice if the rules have a brief explanation on why crossposting without prior redirect from someone is not tolerated.
In that case, I got confused when I encounter one question that seems unanswered, just to find out that the same question already resolved on the other channel.
The Cross Posting thing isnt just about Questions though.
Its kinda all together with the whole "No Spam" stuff.
If I post "Hello" in all the channels, its not a question, but its still spam as its cross post and repeated message.
The #rules are intentionally left broad reaching so that they are better condensed and thus have a greater chance for people to read them as they aren't as massive a wall of text as they could be.
There are pros and cons to this approach, one of them being the issue you just mentioned.
Its difficult to relay full intention in such a brief context.
doesn't work for emote reactions. got a handy reminder of that just now 🤣
so the external emote reactions can't be blocked. Now, whether all external emotes ought be blocked over the frog (which not everyone knows was coopted by right wingers), I'd say no.
<- two useful to this community external emotes
but only your own
Can you link me to that happenstance? You sure it wasn't someone just trying to be funny ?
I think it's safe to assume more people worldwide know Pepe emojis as harmless Twitch emojis as opposed to American political propaganda.
I believe his question came about from a message in #cpp where another user posted the green frog with a sad face to express their disappointment in some result of their code or an answer to a question that was not what he wanted to hear.
It had nothing to do with any political agenda
To be clear, I think its very selfish to want to ban all external emojis for everyone because of how you choose to interpret some of them. People need to take personal responsibility for how they engage with people and the content they see in online platforms. Use the block and/or mute features as a first point of call for avoiding content/people you disagree with.
Removing everything is not always the answer.
I thought it was pretty well-understood that pepe==nazi stuff. I guess it's only in certain circles. I withdraw my request.
It's not just you; it's a pretty global association. Those memes are pretty closely associated with the far right and have been for quite some time. I don't like seeing them either, and will judge people who use them accordingly - but there are limits to what server administration can realistically police.
I'm not an American, so I still a bad person for it even if what I know was from Twitch?
Like this is the very first time I heard Pepe is associated with American politics, but I'm not shocked either because everything can be political if thought hard enough, including Mio Honda memes.
it's not American politics, it's global. Pepe was appropriated as a hate symbol by neo-nazis about a decade ago, and it makes a lot of people uncomfortable
I guess the "global" only extends to some major countries.
But I can only agree or shot myself in the foot in this case, so...
I mean, there was a blip in time where Mio Honda memes were misconstrued as political, so that's that.
it is?
Most people who use Pepe emotes are not doing so in a bigoted fashion. The hateful people who have co-opted it over the years are in the minority. The original creator of Pepe didn't capitulate to hate — he teamed up with ADL in 2016 on a campaign to reclaim it — so I don't see why we should.
Context is important.
Indeed. If someone uses Pepe emotes, examine the context surrounding it. Use common sense and exercise your critical faculties.
That seems to not have ended well, as he did officially kill off the character specifically to rebuke it's co-option.
And again, there was a time Mio Honda memes misconstrued as political because bad actors outside the Idolmaster fanbase used it to create political memes.
I think that in general, literally anything, even the most mundane crap, can be political and spew hatred in certain perspective and context.
I wasn't even aware that there was the time Pepe was being a far right crap, I only know the emojis in context of harmless Twitch chat banters.
But I'm in the limits of shooting my own head here, so I'll stop here.
I don't think having external emotes is really necessary for a community that is mostly a technical support network.
Well, guess I'm pleading guilty for using Idomaster emojis at times in this server.
Be that as it may, Pepe was more recently used by Hong Kong protestors as a symbol of liberty and democracy. Again, it comes down to context.
Right, which means it's going to come down to who you want to include in your community.
Who is going to feel safe and who is going to feel threatened. Removing external emotes is the one that's probably going to result in the fewest people feeling unwelcome for any number of reasons.
I haven't seen any evidence to suggest that disabling external emoji will make this a more welcoming community.
I don't see how disabling external emoji makes any sense
I mean, people like me, Snowie, and few others have bring in some external anime emojis into this server, and used them in good faith. Even though I know some people don't like anime and some would find the genre offensive for whatever reason.
I would argue that we would see more complaints that they are disabled than we would get for individual emojis not being liked by someone.
You have had someone complain about the presence of specific emoji, so there is at least some evidence.
The server has 62k+ members, 1 complaint is hardly a representation of the "community"
It doesn't have to be a representation to be 'some evidence', though I admit that's being pedantic.
So does some people might found anime emojis to be offensive, whatever the reason it may be.
Again, I believe that anything can be political and spew hatred within some perspective and context.
Discord provides tools to people for controlling the type of content and individuals they see and hear from. Blocking and or muting (for VC) should be the first thing someone uses when they dont want to engage with something/someone in an online platform.
I think removing something for the entire server is a kneejerk reaction in this instance.
Adopting the attitude that all meaning is subjective isn't very helpful when it comes to community standards.
Otherwise it would be impossible to impose any standards of decorum at all.
Again, it depends on who you want to make comfortable. Regardless of whether they're allowed or forbidden, only a minority of discord users who have discord premium even have the option of using them.
To be fair, I believe it's been pointed out that blocking someone doesn't prevent you from seeing their reactions to other people's messages.
I must have missed that.
I'm not necessarily advocating that certain Discord features be removed - but I don't think it's unreasonable to talk to users about the public perception of what they post in this server
Some examples in action, Epic gave away 3 months free Nitro last June, and external emojis popped out in this server for the 3 months. But aside from people like me using anime emojis, there's barely any huge events going on.
there will be people coming from a position of ignorance - but I would also like to stress that being ignorant doesn't stop the effects of said ignorance
How does exactly a dumb green frog make you feel unsafe?
You must be able to sympathize with our position here. We cant always please everyone. If we do something to please one group of people its going to upset another group. From my point of view, i see there being more pushback from their removal as a whole than from what we might see coming from the group that finds they should be removed.
Trying really hard to wrap my head around that
Adding on your side: people still can use Pepe imageries as their avatars.
ten years of seeing that 'dumb green frog' say "gas the jews" on the Internet is probably a decent starting point
and that's not an exagerration
Given that Discord has features to help control what content you see, it seems to me that it would be ideal that those people who find them distasteful use those features to their advantage instead of advocating for the entire removal of it from the server.
It's a symbol that is commonly used by nazis and the alt-right. In a similar way to having people posting swastikas, people targeted by the violence done by those groups naturally feel uncomfortable by their symbols being used in a technical support forum.
But you'd ban someone who had, say, hard core pornography as their avatar, or a swastica, or the words 'kill all black people'.
This completely misses context. The user that prompted this initial discussion did not use it in anywhere near that context.
Sure, but the symbol itself carries meaning.
You attributed the meaning you wanted to it.
No, it's a commonly attributed meaning based on association for many years.
The user who posted it with intention of a completely different meaning.
context is important when discussing how to deal with it, but it doesn't change the fact that a symbol has been used that widely appears in hate symbol databases
I take your point that hateful people use the symbol, but Pepe is not equivalent to any of those.
it fucking is
It really is.
it's right up there with clan hoods etc
(which honestly sucks, because I was very fond of pepe before he was coopted)
all I think when I see that frog is Jordan Peterson xD
And then people send hate on me for using anime profile picture, and they're offended by anything anime.
I think we are losing sight of the issue here.
Its not so much about that specific emoji, its about whether or not we disable external emojis entirely.
Since i dont think we can ban individual emojis.
Fair, but the complaint was specifically about someone being uncomfortable because they saw a Pepe emoji.
Yes but the request was to remove all external emojis.
So while it's not the larger issue, it is the motivation behind this complaint.
The pepe emoji was just the instigator of that request
external emojis aren't the problem
anyone can post images, words etc
it's content, and context, and the actions you might want to take versus certain types of content appearing in the server
Then there's nothing else to discuss here. The request was to disable external emojis, and we rejected it.
It's a global toggle for all external emojis, and I don't think disabling them is a net benefit.
in the cases of far right symbols like Pepe, I don't think it's unreasonable for admin/moderation staff to step in and quickly talk to the people in question about the associations of those images
Im not going to do that, im not an encyclopedia of bad symbols man.
I can only address the things I know about.
And it also comes down to personal biases as well.
it's your role as a moderator - and when people raise complaints about them, I invite you to educate yourself about why those complaints are being made
When people do make a complaint for sure. But you were advocating for us to always be vigilant and always step in for every symbol.
I absolutely was not
Unless that was not your intention
Assume good faith until it proven bad faith in situ.
pretty much
That is in our #1 rule.
Context is super important, symbols can have many meanings. The symbol in question was not used in bad faith.
The user who posted it probably has no clue this conversation is happening.
HIs intentions were innocent. He cant control someone elses reaction, especially if he doesnt know all meanings of a symbol.
The user who posted it is getting traumatized probably
I think a #video-games or similar channel would be a great fit under Social category
Video games are being talked a lot of in #lounge but we have specific channels for food and hardware too
It would be good to unite inside #video-games too like food channel
Video games talks divert more easily and IMO a broader subject than food or hardware, should be kept in lounge as it is.
First time I ever see someone claiming that goofy frog being a status of anti-whatever. It is currently widely used across servers as any other emoji. Depending on the context any emoji can be interpreted as disrespectful. Same can be said about words. The sanskrit swastikas became corrupted, however it was used for thousand of years across the world as good wish. Context matter.
The creator of Pepe had to sue Infowars, the notorious right-wing conspiracy theorists website and publication lead by Alex Jones specifically to get them to stop using Pepe.
You can easily find a dozen articles from major newspapers talking about his legal battles with various far-right and nazi publications trying to get them to stop using it.
Heck - they made a documentary about it:
Check out the new Trailer for Feels Good Man! Let us know what you think in the comments below.
► Visit FandangoNOW: http://www.fandangonow.com/?cmp=Indie_YouTube_Desc
Want to be notified of all the latest indie movies? Subscribe to the channel and click the bell icon to stay up to date.
US Release Date: September 4, 2020
Directed By: Arthur J...
Personally, I hope that Pepe can be reclaimed, but for the moment - he functions as a dog whistle.
It's a scapegoat for a small community of people. As we said, its widely used as any other emoji.
I don't think it can be done much about it until it gather some friction. Then I hope someone don't decide to start claiming that the yellow color of the common emojis 😄 is offending the non-yellow people.
'Scapegoat' is an odd way of describing an internationally recognized hate symbol.
People didn't decide to hate Pepe. Nazi's decided to use him on their signs during nazi rallies, and in nazi propaganda. Lots of nazi propaganda. That's how he became associated with nazi's, it's because they used him, a lot, while they were out doing nazi shit.
Hush, you're going to give people ideas 👀
"Internationally recognized hate symbol" - is a stretch. If you want to fund that idea, go convince ppl around it might take root and something be done with it.
It's not a stretch. This is the BBC:
This is the new york times:
Ta da!
Internationally recognized hate symbol.
Ah, and have a Canadian paper too, just for fun:
News hunters are not source of proof how many people use it. Just go around ask ppl in the servers what they know about it, but don't say what it is. I bet you will be surprised.
Ah yes, of course. "Ask people on discord" being the gold standard as far as truth seeking goes.
Well, you are telling everyone around to stop using that. So, that's your public to convince.
Ignore major publications. They don't know what's going on. But ryobg, some random guy on a discord server? He knows the truth.
I will repeat my truth, ppl around, the ppl who you are telling to stop using emojis does not seem familiar with the idea your propagating.
Yea, kinda agree. Looks like just baiting.
They've already made their decision. They're not banning it. Which is an active choice to make the people who want to post pepe memes comfortable, while making the people who feel threatened by them feel unsafe.
That is a choice the admin team has made.
I posted here specifically to refute your points, which were that 'only a small community' understand Pepe to be associated with the alt-right.
That's wrong and not true. Multiple international newspapers have covered stories on it, and there's a professional documentary about it.
You can still think he's harmless, that's up to you, but that doesn't change the fact that other people don't.
Nothing to add further.
You don't understand how discord embeds work do you?
Neat. Thanks for informing me.
REEE
This is from 4chan innit? Same as Pepe?
Pepe is whatever you say he is, and I, the creator, say that Pepe is love. nah, its a frog. For years I thought its from the Sesame street btw.
Not sure if that x was intentional or a typo, but props.
no-one has a pepe emoji to react with 😦
You all are sure giving the mods something nice to wake up to! I think it’s time to accept the decision and move on to watching some Rammstein videos
They need to earn their zero-based salaries somehow.
PSA: #server-feedback is now the backup lounge.
Defs time to move on guys.
every channel is a support channel
Maybe they meant support as in Epic support 🤔
If you mean Epic official support, then no.
See #rules no. 2
Despite Unreal Slackers being promoted in some official capacities, and while we do have some Epic employees hanging around, any questions posted here is not going to be logged in official capacities.
Ok
Wait... is this Epic's official stance on the matter?
😆
Yes. This is an unofficial, community-run server. Instead of running their own server, Epic chooses to be present here and work with us in an unofficial capacity.
@chilly ivy Forgot about the monthly free assets? Haven't seen it yet in #unreal-news
Twitch has had a massive leak. Almost all data through their services has been compromised. Advise changing passwords and enabling 2FA.
This has been confirmed by Twitch as well.
I did forget. Thanks for the reminder. Writing up a post now.
<@&213101288538374145>
:no_entry_sign: Onyx#9110 was banned.
:no_entry_sign: 3enab#5044 was banned.
Are their any updates on applications for signing up to be a moderator?
You will know when we are ready as we will announce it in the #announcements. Do not hold your breath.
could we add a channel for all of epics new stuff like quixel, cesium, etc....?
would awesome
yeah, but there are a lot more things under unreal name now, so i think having a channel that is dedicated to that might be bnenfical
