#dnd-discussion
1 messages · Page 462 of 1
Yes
thats amazing
On top of being able to cast it with a +60ft increased range, no Verbal components, and as a Bonus Action.
the perfect world exists
Oh it didn't have Verbal components anyway.
yeah illusionist wizard makes minor illusion pretty sick
plus the 17th level ability is just
augh
i was already thinking about illusionist or evoker
evoker is a big one
big damage, players like big numbers, but you don't have nearly as much room for creativity
hey I'm new to DND and making my first char was wondering if any one is willing to help a brother out
im was considering illusionist since it would work well with backstory
#character-discussion is always open. Why not pop over and share what you have in mind.
Are echo knight and wildfire druid the only ways to get unlimited teleports
Shadow monks and cartographer artificers also have short range teleports.
Trickery cleric with the duplicity too
when some one tells you not to min/max wat does that mean ?
Min/maxing is extreme optimization
Well normally I find that the standards of people who use that phrase are much lower than optimizers but yeah 
like making the best of ur character futures ?
Basically maximizing your efficiency in one way by minimizing it in others
Like, using point-buy to load 15 in Strength, Constitution and Charisma and 8 in everything else to make the Ultimate Paladin.
yea but we use standart aray
Then don't worry about it.
A dragon is just…
I don’t want to die by a dragon 👁️👅
Rejoice! Your death shall be iconic.
Means very different things depending on who you ask, so unless you really care about the opinion of the person who said that, I wouldn't think about it much.
optimising to the detriment of fun and cooperation
but its a varied term. stands for minimum input, maximum output
At this point the term has become meaningless. But you could say that "don't minmax" is short for saying "if you make a character too well-optimized compared to the rest of the group, you may negatively affect the enjoyment of others who will feel their character has become useless in comparison"
If we take it as meaning this, there are a few hidden assumptions that need to be adressed:
The first is that the rest of the group would need to be meaningfully less optimized.
The second is that it is expected that having a party member more powerful negatively affects your enjoyment.
None of those things go without saying
And this is a very generous interpretation of "don't minmax". The non-generous interpretation would be that "don't minmax" means "people who optimize their characters do not roleplay correctly" which is, obviously, utter nonsense.
to me its the idea of prioritising winning and optimisation over enjoyment and integrity of the game, to the point of arguing and misinterpreting rules even
of course such as with most buzzwords, its original meaning has been diluted and become more of a general application of a certain playstyle which isnt inherently negative
We have an undead warlock for my Curse Of Strahd game
Super excited to see what my other players are playing
oooh, might I ask who the patron is?
They're thinking a lich. The lich approached them the day their parent died offering to let them feel nothing instead, so now they're an aspiring lich
oooh la la
D&D Question of the Day (D&D Beyond: Playing the Game):
The DM says a monster is Bloodied. What does that communicate?
A) It’s frightened.
B) It has half its hit points or fewer.
C) It’s immune to healing.
B
B!
B
I love when my players deal insane damage to an enemy and I say "not bloodied"
B. I believe in older editions it also gained new abilities when bloodied
Yeah in 5.5E I think that only applies to some PCs specifically based on class
Would the gods think it's still cannibalism I'd you eat something like a dwarf as a human?
Like if a monster is Bloodied, certain PCs may get additional benefits against it
I’d say so
They may be different “species”, but they’re still people regardless
Yes
generally humanoids eating another humanoid is cannibalism, I think
Of course, the rules of the game don’t cover that sort of granular stuff, so ask your DM for their final say
Monkeys are humanoids you can still eat those
there is no "Monkey" in D&D but Flying Monkeys are considered "Beasts" and not "Humanoid". Also that is a dumb argument.
They probably meant humanoids as in the creature category. Monkeys are beasts.
Also I'm sure there are evil gods who wouldn't care
Also no, you cannot eat monkeys.
Eating Awakened animals would also technically be cannibalism because they've human-esque intelligence
Humanoid mean something that resembles a human and monkeys do resemble us
I'd like to stop this conversation because you clearly do not know what you are talking about despite others correcting you.
Furthermore I am becoming more uncomfortable as this topic goes on.
The word was literally made to describe fossils of ape bones
Suffice to say the idea of cannibalism in a world where there are multiple nonhuman types of people would have to be redefined.
Humanoid as a game tag in D&D is obviously different in meaning than in paleontology.
The point i was literally going to bring up ^ thank you, Ophid lol
Even if its not humanoid, if its sentient and sapient and able to think, act, and speak like a person, eating of other human-like intelligence creatures probably would get you weird looks.
We do not live in a world where we regard nonhumans as people. This is different in D&D settings where there are many many species of nonhuman people. So the idea of cannibalism, eating people, would be different. Also this is a fairly uncomfortable subject, so maybe treat it carefully.
I’d argue in the case of D&D, it’s a lot more of a sociological taboo than a biological one
Like it’s taboo because you’re eating fellow sapient creatures, not because you’re eating creatures of the same species
Ive been thinking about this for a while. Is there any way to "counter" counterspell? Lets say ur a mage fighting 10 monsters with at will counterspell. Are you just screwed?
Possibly taking away line of sight could work, but if theyre spread out it'll be difficult withour spells
Counterspell can be countered with another counterspell
Spell
Aha
But the better Counterspell will Counterspell the counterspell that's counterspelling said spell.
Oooo yknow what, if yoy somehow have burrow speed and silent spell, you could do that
Lmao
Silent Spell? you mean Subtle?
Oh right that
with Subtle spell you cannot be counterspelled.
Oh wait fr
Huh ur right
Guess i just needed to have a conversation about it, this is very good info thanks!
So you can count but can you spell
Yeah, just know Subtle Spell can only be taken by Sorcerers afaik
I can only count to four /ref
5
Theres a item called a mind crystal that kets you use it as a non sorcerer i believe
echo has no idea what that says
Tho its only one time use
Oh that too
yeah I forgot MMA also gives metamagic options
I'll ask here, if anyone can give advice or opinions in general.
If you'll be running a major enemy/boss, do you state any of their passives/resistances? Or do you just let the players find out.
Let em find out is my opinion
I give my players the option to use their bonus action to "scan" the enemy, make a check, and go from there
Yeah unless they take an action to investigate the enemy
Do the players see if the boss has a legendary resistance or not?
i usually describe the legendary resistances diegetically, like they have bands of energy around them that burst as they use them
Not unless they've fought one before
Also most cr 20+ monsters have legendary resistance
Noted, thanks!
I don't think they'll run into a cr20+ monster, tbh
Maybe one as the final battle, but if it'll end up being that way then I'll look at what could fit the adventure
You could also always just add abilities to a monster if you wanna have it have legendary resistance. Ur the dm after all
Most Legendary Creatures have legendary resistances /silly
A Unicorn is only CR 5
but it has a legendary resistance!
Unicorn is pretty awesome, especially cause players could summon it with some spells
Don't.... put legendary resistances on everything though lol
I think there’s a CR3 giant crocodile that has at least one legendary resistance too
Nope, that's an awesome idea
They’re okay to put on any boss/solo monster regardless of tier imo, but not every monster needs legendary resistances
Giving your players hell is a dm canon event
Yes, but also making sure they have a good time is also a canon event
In the book Bugbear Boss who is CR4 has legendary resistance
No body wants to play a game that isnt fun
counterpoint dark souls
A dm isn't supposed to really ONLY be antagonistic towards the players
Pffff
someone must like getting punched in the gut repeatedly since they keep making those
Also, would it be crazy to "disable" PVP for my party, because I have a trio that would rather kill each other than hit a goblin
Level 1 goblin gets legendary resistances
No.
It wouldn't
The DM shouldn’t be antagonistic towards their players at all, imo. The DM should be the party’s biggest fan and ally, even if part of their job is to present them with challenges to overcome.
Goblins are actually dieties in disguise, every one of them weirdly enough
You see, GENERALLY every table has a no PvP clause
At least fighting wise
You can have Roleplay and ideals pvp, but don't kill eachother unless everyone is okay with consequences
That's what I plan on being, just seeing them struggling to beat a challenging fight or almost losing is just thrilling for them
Thank you 🙏 This is just a worry of mine because I know my friends lol, every game that has friendly fire, we kill each other before anything else can
I would basically always disallow pvp as a rule. I generally go on the rule of, PvP is not allowed, there is no expectation it will ever be allowed, it should never be allowed save for very specific circumstances (some one-shots may be designed with it in mind)
In my game its an unwritten rule, but sometimes there's no other option. As long as your players are reasonable people, they should know when to pvp and when not to. Tho, for new players or so called "unreasonable" ones, it would be good to have have a rule saying no pvp
Just ask them to be respectful of eachother and the game they agreed to play in
If something is an unwritten rule, sometimes it's worth making it a written rule
While I doubt that, a for a trickster god that seems very in character
The system isn’t designed for PVP, so it’s generally a rule of thumb that most tables won’t allow it. It’s something a table can opt into, not necessarily opt out of.
Been trying, but I've pretty much made it clear with plenty of "if you try to fight each other, I'll simply ignore you and move on" 🤷♂️
Oh absolutely
Your players don't sound the most mature, admittedly
You'd be right lol
Kick them out then
Nah, they'll learn^^ this is their first time
They're making it clear they don't care about you 
This seems reasonable
Picking a fight with a goblin is all fun and games until the DM says they burn a legendary resistance
"You guys fight. Anyways, once that's done what do you want to do next?"
We haven't started yet so, if we start and they clearly don't care or barely listen?
Then yeah, all is cancelled
Even if its their first time, they should generally have respect for
Your time, the other players time and their own time too.
"Everyone make a dc 30 charisma saving throw"
Hm, today I learnt a new word
Iam really wishing you goodluck
aww man XD
You're not funny.
I type too fast. >_> /joking
Your typing hands are far too advanced for this era
Clearly, the lord of goofy is built different
From last time I spoke to them, they seem to be more understanding, the more I talk to them--the more understanding they get.
As I said, I am willing to go through it and help them get the hang of things. But, if every minute is "I want to hit x" "I try to sneak and steal Y's loot" "I slap Z's weapon off" "I throw X at Z" then, no.
Do they not know what a "team game" is?
Well, you see
Imma be real
Even with my first time playing D&D i didn't try to attack or steal from other players lol
I just have 3 actual goblins for players lol
I was actually the most morally responsible person in the group
True, was too timid to try
And i was playing with experienced players lol
I do allow pvp. Not with the sole reason of haha funny or similar but solely if 2 characters actually have a narrative reason to fight
anyways, that'll be all for this for me
I don't mind going through it with them as they're my close friends.
Nah, I was playing a kind monk fellow
I wasn't shy either
I kinda snapped right in playing my first time, D&D at its heart, is a role-playing game and i loved doing voices and roleplaying anyway
Another question:
What do you think about a very insane encounter at level 1 to get the adventure rolling? Like, a cr10+ pulling up at the party and making them run into a village or somewhere else.
I was playing a Ranger, unfortunately was playing with the type of players Night described
What is the theme of the story you're trying to convey?
I would say a simple Undead Shambling Mound is enough
It can be done but you need to telegraph that it's not a winnable fight.
Have a Boneclaw show up /half-joking
I started an adventure something like that
Amalgamation of humans into a single entity, using all of their hands to slowly crawl to the party
It'll be a very simple DND story, but with a major that includes the Astral Plane lateeer, like near the end of the game.
I've been debating ot throw one of the beasts from the astral plane, without even telling them that it came from there, as they wouldn't know themselves.
Boneclaws are menacing as hell
Large skeletal intelligent creatures that are the product of a failed lich transformation, they serve the most evil beings they can find
but I reckon for level 1 you can throw in a group of ghouls and get the same effect
you can make any enemy terrifying if you try hard enough
They can also just teleport through shadows
A lot of stuff comes from there without you knowing
You also generally don't want the creature to be too high CR for the inevitable attempting to fight it just to be met by an instant kill attack
Yup! I've seen many of the creatures and they're very interest/fun; And plenty of them look "normal" enough that the party wouldn't go "that doesn't belong here!"
I had a rather horrific idea for my first campaign when i get to it regarding boneclaws
First night after doing a job for a village, the party goes to sleep in an inn, late at night, one of them hears a light tapping, they open their eyes and see a skeletal figure as tall as the Inn tapping on their window, but it backs away because it doesn't have the right person and it melds into the shadows
Make it all seem like a simple cozy game up until that point lol
"This isnt the rusty barrel?" "No this is the old keg inn!" "My mistake"
Nah, I'll have it do the ghost girl from Pokémon:
"No, you're not the one."
Then back away and disappear into shadow
"Its hard to haunt people in this town with all these inns"
yup, like after a festival with fun mini games
and then have it never return again
You see, you're going for a comedic effect, I'm going for shit your pants
Oh, it'll keep returning.
Afterall, it's still looking.
Comedy is a good gateway to horror
But my go to horror is just making the players be suspicous
Yes, but not every horrific event needs a comedic build up.
Or any build up, really
(Most effective scares do)
But setting the tone as comfy and then that night switching it on is head is also.. pretty effective
Then that player keeps seeing that figure outside their window doing things every night
And you make it real careful so the other characters don't see it
It's funny because boneclaws are large creatures, so you think they'd be easy to spot, but they've got a +7 to stealth! Lol
just hangs on the ceiling
Well its probably because they can act lile a pile of bones
I mean according to Paleontologist a T-Rex was a very stealthy creature too and those guys are BIG
^ All creatures have had False Appearance traits abstracted into Expertise in Stealth
Would hiding in plain sight in a wax museum be a Deception check, Performance check, or Stealth check?
By pretending to be a wax statue of course
I’d say Stealth, but I’d allow the player to make an argument for Deception or Performance too
Disguising yourself is a Deception check, after all. I could see either Deception or Stealth. Performance is used to change a room's Attitude.
I’d say Performance is the least likely of the three I’d allow, but I’m open to listening to how my player may justify using it
But I’m also generally open to hearing my players out and why they think another roll might work better
I don’t always agree with them, but they don’t know if they don’t ask
Now my brain got into a fantasy of getting against some god and it say "impressive for a mortal" so i could reply "Disappointing for a God."
Smites the player for their hubris
BG3 be like
Slay the gods for their weakness.
I have questions regarding multiclassing been playing for a decent bit never seriously but I’m looking into the artificer class and I want to try a multi class of it and warlock with the artificer being the main class
ngl that does make me think, asides from Karsus. Have their been any other FR mortals that actually terrified the gods
that sound dope
What's the purpose of the multiclass. Generally you don't want to multiclass unless you have a specific and mechanical synergy you're going after.
but whole "killing gods" is hard so i would go for a "winning above one"
There is performance art of people acting like statues
That’s why I thought of it.
I’m reading on the artificer and saw the artillerist sub class and thought it would be really fun to create a character who’s a artificer who can have the eldrich cannons and Ive always wanted a destructive character so a character that can have the whole aspect of the eldrich cannons in addition to eldrich blast and maybe sum other warlock spells seems dope to me
And I can agree with that. That said, living statue performers aren’t typically hiding.
Charisma (Stealth) imo
Pretending to be a statue amongst statues feels like it would count
Artillerist by themselves basically has the blasting power without needing to multiclass Warlock. And that multiclass uses different ability scores for their spells so you'd be cutting into your effectiveness.
If it helps in any way battle prowess isn’t really important too much for this campaign it’s more puzzly and brainy
Honestly I just love the spamming of eldrich blast every now and then for the fun of it
Ok sure, but what about the blasty type stuff Artillerist can do? In my experience the game is more fun when you're actually good at the things you want to do.
Puzzly and brainy is exactly why you would want to focus on Intelligence and Artificer only. Trying to minor in the Charisma stuff is only going to make you less good in everything.
Now for the hardest part of starting a campaign.
You right
Artillerist, especially 2024 Artillerist is all about using your cannon and your actual gun.
Magically enhanced gunfire!
The recruitment process. screams of horror
2024 Artillerist even gets proficiencies in actual guns
And they can make an arcane firearm out of one of they wanted to
Filtering out the time wasters, the ones who love the idea but shirk at actually playing, and those who just don't read. Yeah.
I was thinking of playing one in the weird west campaign I joined, but I went with a Battle Master instead cuz I haven’t played a non-caster in years
And its gonna be a doozy
Cause it's a horror campaign with the forbidden technique in recruiting process being used.
Actually being transparent about your CWs.
Thought you were going to say class restrictions there.
Human fighters only lol
Don't tempt me.
Nah I wanna run Strahd in a way I feel would be satisfying at some point so I'm trying to build up my ability to run horror and handle dark games.
I arrive with my half orc barbarian character. The dm is confused, until I try to fight every human npc I see
Well, while writing for a dnd campaign, never thought a song from Iggy Pop made for a cult classic would inspire one of my campaigns lol
That’s honestly how the best ideas hit
Iggy Pop has that raw, chaotic vibe, perfect fuel for a D&D plot
What about Iggwilv Pop
omg lol
Hi
Make a Charisma saving throw.
Hey guys, does it make sense that, after saving his life, an apprentice mage (like Presto) would join a knight on his adventures while he hones his skills?
ye, classic setup
What’s the alignment
I mean it really depends on the PC's personality but I'd say yeah
honnestly works with any allignment; even evil ones
motives might be different but it's workable regardless >:3
Makes it slightly harder tho
My dad hates the idea because he thinks a magelet would never be able to learn under a knight.
Not really. NE and LE could be compelled or be opportunistic while CE coud just thrive from it
They absolutely could!
But the idea is that the magelet is learning on their own
Evil char might plan to have the knight be a patsy/fall guy or use them as a shield to look outwardly law abiding and 'good' while persuing their true intentions during downtime or while away from the party
I mean they could probably learn patience, determination, resilience
Learning magic isn't the only thing valuable to a mage
Alignment is one of the most misunderstood things in DnD.
Its one of those things that makes Planescape great. Planescape is the Danny Divito "I get it" GIF for Alignment
Money is also valuable.
The knight provides a different set of difficulties for the mage to think on how to solve and in a combat situation provides more space for the mage to expirament with spells as they will act as a bulwark to an extent
A Wizard is always broke.
Student Debt THE class
So much gold spent on adding spells, and buying components.
and twiggy mage + beefy muscle is a classic pairing 
Even more if you're a wizard who crafts things
I get a mini version of the same by bringing Book of Ancient Secrets forward into 5.5e 
Tracking down spell scrolls and learniong them is one of my favorite "minigames" within DnD XD
Well Eldritch knights are a thing
Knights who use wizard magic
Introduce them to the concept of Battle Mages (In general, not related to DND), Spellblades, and the like.
A Knight also doesn't have to be specifically a fighter or class you'd typically associate with the knight fantasy
Its a title, afterall.
Perhaps your knight is a Bladesinger Wizard 🧐
A knight can also teach chivalry, honor, when to choose defense vs offense.
yeahm, there's loads of gish (spellblade) subclasses in dnd
A sufficiently proficient Wizard is just a less glowy Paladin at the end of the day.
valor bard, bladesinger wizard, arcane trickster, eldritch knight, war cleric, mystic warrior monk (ua), battle smith artificer, etc.
A wizard thinks they should charm person their way through talks with nobility. A knight smacks the wizard up side the head.
also bladelock
any warlock can be a gish
also the whole point of an adventuring group is to cover eachother's weaknesses
A knight also..
Doesn't specifically have to be a gish either!
It's a title, not a preferred way of combat!
Your knight could be a Sorcerer
I asked more about the mage and knight thing in #homebrew since I didn't wanna clog this chat with homebrew stuff lol
Sorry knights are only Triple Sorcadinlock pact of the blade with literally the devil, Oath of vengeance and a divine soul sorcerer /j
"Not every knight needs swords, bows or even armor, you know!"
Considering many knights these days are actors bards are a good one to pull from.
Valor Bard 🧐
Valor bard is best bard 
I'm indifferent about bard as a whole
Valor bard is fun because you can give it 2 levels of warlock and then do a pact weapon attack and an EBARB eldritch blast in the same attack action at level 8+ c:
I have one put aside for her >:3
I think it has the Guardian property too >:3
That sounds third party
nope, it's AL so all RAW
Minor properties are just incredibly rarely used by DMs 
The what property?
Oh you mean the Artifact Properties?
Eh, I don't care for adventures league, but I remember what you're talking about now!
Its all in magic item crafting for 2024
ye
Wait I see it now
they can be applied to standard magic items as well
I forgot some of the generic magic item properties gave stat boosts
Yeah I’ve used those a few times
Mainly the one that makes attunement only take 1 minute.
AL allows for the minor propery collumn and the ones that impact mood which I forget the name for to be put on item wawards by module writers
Harmonious
Hallooo i wanted to ask how do yall know how to price stuff Cuz i got many many things and i dont even play this Game 😣
you see a lot of Sentinel (glows or otherwise tells you when a creature of a certain creature type is within 120 feet)
also beacon (can light up for 10~20 ft bright and 10~20 ft dim light, toggled with a BA)
https://www.dndbeyond.com/sources/dnd/br-2024/equipment#AdventuringGear
https://www.dndbeyond.com/sources/dnd/br-2024/equipment#ArmorTable
https://www.dndbeyond.com/sources/dnd/br-2024/equipment#WeaponsTable
https://www.dndbeyond.com/sources/dnd/br-2024/magic-items#MagicItemRaritiesandValues (consumable magic items other than scrolls cost half)
https://www.dndbeyond.com/sources/dnd/br-2024/equipment#SpellScrollCosts (scrolls cost twice the number listed here, plus the cost of any consumed material components)
https://www.dndbeyond.com/sources/dnd/br-2024/equipment#ArtisansTools
https://www.dndbeyond.com/sources/dnd/br-2024/equipment#OtherTools
https://www.dndbeyond.com/sources/dnd/br-2024/equipment#MountsandVehicles
https://www.dndbeyond.com/sources/dnd/br-2024/equipment#FoodDrinkandLodging
https://www.dndbeyond.com/sources/dnd/br-2024/equipment#TravelTable
https://www.dndbeyond.com/sources/dnd/br-2024/equipment#HirelingsTable
https://www.dndbeyond.com/sources/dnd/br-2024/equipment#SpellcastingServices
I just use the books' price for stuff, as shown above with all them links
thats what I am worried about in my next campaign- the last one my cleric took levels of togue to get us through traps and sneak easier
This next one we have a ranger, probably a druid, a sorcerer, and my swashbuckler rogue. No front line fighter, and more spellcasters than any before. The last 2 , my characters adapted to fill holes ( My sneaky barbarian/fighter, then cleric/rogue who was a light cleric as we had no blasters ) But I don't want to adapt..just play a social skill monkey
Druid and Ranger can be fronliners
especially moon druid
but any druid in practice
Shops have become much easier for me to run ever since I started using the listed prices for items
It’s not worth the effort to make a whole economy with a new currency
if you want variation, just roll a d10 + a percentile and then add +/- 50% to the price based on the roll
probably going to try to push it, I have done the support and carry. I just want to be a 'star' - the face that defuses situations but if it comes to combat the hit and run stabbings
otherwise, just use the listed numbers 
makes everything much easier as stated
Now that’s got my attention. I was looking for a way to add price variation
Anyone can be a Frontliner if you're not a coward
Ranger should cover your Tanky bases (assuming they don't hide behind the spellcasters for some reason)
she has hinted at bring ranged build
Also Druid can be a ridiculously good tank
True
Life is too short. Put the sorcerer and wizard on the front line
-# Not talking about bladesinger
Lack of gish sorcerer subclass saddens me :(
@woven flint I guess Errol is a dodgy tank?
possibly let them haggle as well if they want to RP it a bit 
yep, might there be one in some book but that i know, there is none
I loved frontlining with my wizard i rolled up for a one shot where i never rolled above average for hit dice while leveling him up
Oooh yes! Good idea
rare honestly
I have seen the subclass content of most official books, so far, none :(
my warlock in the one shot went front lines
Tasha charmed it (plasmoid) into attacking the party
My Celestial Warlock is level 18
He has
18 AC
and he's the only Frontliner
And he pulls up and rocks shit anyway
and if they do a big quest for the shopkeeper or for the town/region/kingdom in general, you can give them like a bonus to the roll to check price
i got a 9 ;w;
You're Banished.
nooooooooo :<
Noooo Tokii bring them back
Hmmm, say please 🧐
How- how did we hear them while they were banished
My druidlock has 20 at level 16 in AL c:
also at level 8 in another campaign due to getting a lucky +2 shield c:
Please
It was a slow and painful banishment
then fr, weird
Alright, you're unbanished
but if ranger is archery build the druid as tank tank and rogue as dodge tank may be what we have
Not bad fr thats like 22 with the shield spell
but i guess its okey, we have berserk who cant use magic perce so, sorc not being able to use it is okey
Ranger is actually really good at dual wielding
I would make my own but there’s no flavour and theming I can think of that doesn’t step on the shoes of my homebrew sorcerer half caster class
rogue dos have an ac of 17 at level 3
Warlocks don't get it naturally.
I think she mentioned gloomstalker? I havent played that one
Oh damn i didnt know that
ooh, that's a fun one
very sneaky/assassin vibes
basically as close to rogue as Ranger gets
Also, using a Warlock spellslot for shield would be kinda meh
I got Eldritch Smites to throw out
I like getting hit as the warlock im playing rn (hellish rebuke) so i didnt bother looking for shield
the thing i would say is, how you would make it "special"
Warlock get a whole armor upgrade and weapon upgrades with other many stuff
Wizard get a smart Rage
Arti and druid are their own thing too
@vernal owlI wanted to hit Tasha with hellish rebuke but she charmed me with the kiss
easy to grab off of MI: WIzard though
Hmmm… blood
Weapons or items made out of your body and blood
Fair enough 5th level slot on a shield isnt exactly worth it lol
I would say, leave it like it happen with Barbarian
Bloody versions of spells, etc
Sad
Now that’s a good idea, I’ll save that for later
Hellish rebuke also kinda sucks imho
I'd prefer concentration or more value for the entire party (Eldritch Smite prones)
makes more sense in a multiclass where you've got some level 1 and 2 spell slots outside of your pact slots you can burn 
Every warlock should hellish rebuke at least once in their lifetime
Nah, I'd win.
You wanted to hit… who…? 👁️ 👁️
Mine never has
None of mine have
its a little iconic though
I think this will work then. We have the druid, me, and ranger if crap hits the fan, but try to sneak as a group maybe.. avoid minor combats
Tsk tsk tsk
the only thing it really has going for it is that it lets you hit things with your reaction
Tasha, from Tasha's Madhouse
I really love hellish rebuke it's one of my favorite spells lol
Druid and Ranger both have access to Pass Without Trace and no one should be in heavy armor so should be able to get group sneak checks rather nicely
I know full well who Tasha is. ⬆️
Leave my wife alone >:( /j
well we have Madhouse Tasha and Tasha's cauldron Tasha
My favorite spell as a Warlock is uh...
Blade of Disaster.
Jamjiggle never got a single blow on her
I like Plant Growth, Tidal Wave, Maelstrom, Fog Cloud, Sleet Storm, and Find Familiar c:
Yay. I am happy now
also rituals, lots and lots of rituals
Blood manipulation, but would need some features for heal yourself so you dont dry yourself.
My Celestial Warlock bodied a drow matron mother before she could even take a single turn with a Pact Weapon and Blade of Disaster
i like rituals but like what are our characters even doing for 10 straight minutes
just chanting over and over??? for 10 minutes??????
mumbling to them selves, maybe drawing a spell cirlce, makion g arcane gestrues, playing music, reciting poetry
I can add lifesteal abilities and HP increase like draconic sorcerer does
@reef tundra my warlock was.. oddly the one with the most hp. And we had a paladin. But 10d6 fall damage took them down
Mine are hellish rebuke, phantasmal force, spirit guardians (i flavor them as snakes chomping down on the enemies), haste and chromatic orb
at least their imp familiar Bubble ate a few souls
My Warlock is in a rough place because it's hard for him to fall back and sling spells even though he's got a staff of the magi because he's the only Frontliner in that party and i want to kinda be a barrier lol
I really like 5.5e Conjure Animals because it's just Spirit guardians that you can move seperate from your cahracter 
Slashing instead of Necrotic/Radiant and no damage on save but still really nice
The thrill of gambling with chromatic orb..
Missing after dumping in my last 3rd level slot in it
That's whn you grab spell sniper 
Sorcerous burst is also a fun gambling spell with its exploding dice c:
No, its not a range issue.
also you can make it a swarm of whatever you want
it could be wolves or birds or 1000 frogs
then you have a kinda way to it
He has plenty of range
Spell sniper deletes the disadvantage for making ranged spell attacks while threatened
the extra range is just a bonus
Fair enough! I just love to picture my character jogging around the battlefield trying to get as many guys chomped down by his snake spirits
has anyone else grabbed spells from the wrong list recently? Jam had Primal savagery rethemed as Melting Touch because it was an ooze
sup
Again, that's not the problem.
He's a bladelock anyway lol
is it concentration, or is it AoE placements then? 
The problem is nobody can switch places with my warlock so i can drop back.
Because nobody else is even remotely buikt for the frontlines
Hmmm is anyone else in the party capable of frontline? Like maybe theres a ranger or a dex based fighter?
Oh nvm
frontline warlock sounds fun at least :3
aah, took that as a "I can't sling spells from the frontline."issue rather than a "I'd like to not be on the frontline for a bit." issue 
1 level of fighter into 19 levels of warlock is a really nice way to do that c:
it does
We have
Cartographer Artificer, Celestial Warlock, Glamour Bard (who potentially could with charm tanking) and Scion of the Three Rogue who likes her crossbow
But i don't wanna be like
"Hey, bard, stand here so i can sling spells for a bit!"
gets you Con save prof, heavy armor, shields, second wind, martial prof (though Pact of the Blade fixes this), second wind again, action surge (if you go to 2), weapon mastery, and a fighting style 
Ive been looking online for some fun multiclasses with 2014 trickery cleric but i cant find any ;-;;
this is a good idea
the issue with frontline @woven flint seems to me something that just asking the other players may solve. They may not know how you feel
Might have to cook up some bullshit at home
Nah, i don't feel bad about it
I just have a bit of a tougher time justifying slinging spells over doing melee lol
Well, not particularly that
It's one of the simpler multiclasses that adds a good deal to a martial Warlock with minimal investment as you're likely to have ~14 dex or so anyway
ive kinda been wanted to do pact of the blade archfey
very fun setup c:
could take defensive fighting style as well
but the one time i have already played warlock i didn't like it very much :<
having only 2 spell slots stinks
its kinda made me hesitant to play it again
I'm very partial to blindfighting; that 10ft of blindsight is just really useful in all pillars of play
warlock has my favorite flavor! but my least favorite mechanics
it has my favorite mechanics 
Druid is my favorite flavor
thus did I stick them together >:3
My Warlock does have plenty of spells he can cast for free though
Species related (Drow spells)
Fey AND Shadowtouched feats
Arcane Eye invocation
Staff of the Archmagi
So he's not worried about spell slots lol
when you play a warlock though you face small number of skills, small number of spell slots. They are really geared for cantrips and customization
thats what I took on my barb/fight
^ @shut lance
Take the Skilled origin feat on your warlock; bumps you up to 7
could also then go Lessons of the First Ones to take it again to bump to 10 proficiencies if you really want to 
my warlock had lots of free spells too she was a hexblood and had fey touched i think
hello guys how is everyone
how open is this channel?
like about what can I talk here or stuff?
@blissful ibextrue. Also planned skilled on my rogue at level 4
I run Circle of Preservation Druid (UA) (Wildfire if unavilable) / Fathomless Warlock c:
only free spell I get that isn't a ritual is lesser/greater restoration
But Tentacle of the Deeps and Preserved Land may as well be free spells 
Yeah, this is like the "general" channel for D&D. For non-D&D topics, there's also #non-dnd-topics . ✌️
me as well
Having to sass my dnd players for their complete inability to coordinate schedules. Had to say "as much as I enjoy hosting this campaign it's been going for 2 years and I'd prefer it not require another 10 to finish"
but for one shots I get the chance to play silly characters
next one going to pilot a low intelligence monk based on Wimp-Lo
that's what AL is for >:3
can literally rebuild your character after every session
really good for trying out new spells, classes, subclasses, feats, items, and abilities
in a live game
That's funny, but also, sorry..
You're fighting the true BBEG
Scheduling
may try that, AL
?al
The D&D Adventurers League is an ongoing official campaign for Dungeons & Dragons. It uses the fifth edition Dungeons & Dragons rules, and features the Forgotten Realms setting. You can play D&D Adventurers League games literally anywhere. Players use the fifth edition rules to create a character and bring that character to games anywhere D&D Adventurers League play is happening.
[Find out more](#al-rules-compendium message)
Are you interested in the Adventurers League?
We have several channels to discuss Adventurers League play:
• #al-admin-questions — Ask the AL Admins questions
• #1309594376275759104 — Find the latest AL documentation here
• #adventurers-league — Chat about AL games, events, how to get started, AL characters, or other general AL chatter.
• #1050206875079155742 — Adventurers League rules discussion and questions. General D&D rules discussion belongs in #dnd-rules
• #al-dm-discussion — [SPOILER WARNING] A place for AL Dungeon Masters of all levels of experience to discuss their games, share tips, or share constructive feedback.
• #al-dungeoncraft — [SPOILER WARNING] A place for fledgling or experienced AL authors to discuss the Dungeoncraft program, ask questions, offer tips, or share constructive feedback.
I didn't like how mt warlock played in mechanics
It's a 1 to 20, they're level 10 as t this point. And im like "oh my god can we lock I still have half a book to make you losers go on"
Makes me upset that even when we DO play I can only host for like 3 hours because thats all the one player has the attention span for
War-Lock the fudge in.
https://www.adventurersleague.info/discord has a list of the more active servers; it's a community run resource website that has the rules and quick references as well
also a lot of LGSs play AL, or you can find it at conventions
There's also a recurring virtual convention that they advertise in the events page on here for paid AL games IIRC
What options does one have for virtual tabletops for hosting dnd?
I built one and idk I was just annoyed that roll20 had some features locked behind the subscription (the walls blocking vision is premium, and so the dm needs to reveal areas by hand whenever the payers want to move)
anyway so I built something simmilar
can I post a small wall of text with what features are in it and like I have some questions to ask
(note, this is not advertisement if I do this I might just use it personally or probably put it on github for the public, im just looking for some honest feedback)
roll20 is the best IMO, there's alsso dndbeyond and a few others I can't remember the name of off the top of my head
owlbear rodeo is great
and you can self-host owlbear legacy
I suppose all of them are paid
Only Foundry is
what does qualify a vtt as good? can you give me some key features?
Easy to use, and can fit a lot of groups is my criteria
groups as in different tabletops?
I've enjoyed Foundry, and it can get really fancy with sound effects and special/spell effects and junk. This is a one-time fee (versus Roll20 which is subscription).
Owlbear Rodeo gets a lot of praise for being so simple and quick to setup. This one is free, with a paid version to unlock more storage space.
And of course, there's always just using theatre of the mind, but given we're talking about VTTs, probably not worth more than a footnote.
self-hostable and open-source
Players and tabletops yeah
If people double up on control spells, everyone can be ranged.
Roll20 has the best support for most tabletop systems i believe
Tho Roll20 itself can be a huge pain, or at least it was
No team really needs a melee member at all.
hmm... thanks for the feedback folks (idk whats a good gender neutral term for plural)
We're at such a high level that CC is often a very difficulty choice because legendary resistances are rampant
ddb maps is also good if you have ddb content
I think folks works
Double or even triple down on control spells and you can trivialize a bunch of enemies.
Teamwork makes the dream work, as we learned in the lich fight.
We also have
Significantly less party members than in titanic in this party.
I used roll20 for a long time and it's god awful compared to Foundry
right so I built a vtt and heres some features and questions if yall want to answer i'd appreciate
features:
Map & tokens — upload a battle map, add tokens (with images or colored circles), drag them around
Walls & fog of war — draw free-form walls for blocking vision/movement, otherwise reveal/hide areas with fog
Combat tracking — initiative tracker that syncs to all players, shows who's up, HP bars
Dice rolling — quick buttons (d4-d20, advantage/disadvantage), custom formulas, rolls sync to chat
Character sheets — basic sheet system (ability scores, AC, HP, etc.) linked to tokens
Ambient audio — DM can play background music/ambience with volume control for players
Chat — in-game chat with roll-in-line syntax (/r 1d20+5), whispers to individual players
Area of Effect — place circles, cones, lines for spell ranges (just for visualization, not mechanics)
Condition markers — tokenize conditions (prone, poisoned, etc.) on tokens
Monster spawning — pull monsters directly from D&D 5e API (stats, images, everything)
Save/load — snapshot the entire session (map, tokens, fog, everything) and reload later
and the questions
What features are missing that would make this actually useful vs. Roll20/Foundry?
For a self-hosted tool, what's the minimum viable feature set you'd want?
Any pain points with other VTTs that I could avoid?
fellas i have written 17 pages of theories in the past 3 days for the campaign im in. time to write more
Probably not being d&d specific. Also I’d bet legal issues with the api
knome is going to wake up to 13 pages
That and also we had 3 artifacts.
The tactic would have worked without them. It was solid teamwork and tactics.
honestly my main thing would be to avoid bloat, most vtts only need the basics and adding too much just makes it hard to use
Honestly I didnt think of that, I just used the api a bit personally rn but like its open without any key or rate limits, but i guess some people might hog it. Ill read on it tho it surely has some limits tho, thanks for the feedback
This is certainly an issue, though.
i think that for a self-hosted tool just having basically a whiteboard where different "types" of pictures can be uploaded that behave differently, like "tokens" being movable by players, while "maps" are not for instance, the ability to order how the images are layered, and the ability to have fog of war are all the things you need for a minimum viable self-hosted tabletop. if it has all the features you listed then it would be good to go i feel like
6 party members and 3 artifacts is much more different than
4 party members that are, yes, higher tier but, only one of them have a legendary atm
And DPR just matters a lot more than CC for them
thanks
Because barely any of us can take a hit
I might be analyzing this as if it’s an actual product I may or may not have to spend money on. That’s why I mentioned every statblock and all that being on the api might be hard to do legally
Or I could meet in person 💀 but nah I js had to have friends far af
No offense to our wonderful dm, but you're comparing a game where the players are handed a ton of stuff and allowed to do things that really shouldn't be possible in normal gameplay vs a game where there is an actual challenge and proper item distribution and cost in getting said items.
In the game being talked about, we have far more cost to attempting to lock down an enemy by spamming resources that will most likely be resisted. It's just best to support our allies and deal damage rather than attempt hard CC of any kind, unless we're fighting obvious fodder.
It's better for us to outright destroy the problem tgen to waste our time
"Will it or will it not be crowd controlled?"
yep yep yep I appreciate a lot the comment idk I thought a little bit of doing it commercially but theres a whole other set of problems that would come with it and idk if im ready for that
I'm pretty sure well applied control can make things a lot easier than just trying to out damage everything. Prevent hits, by tying enemies up. Bards, Warlocks, and Artificers to a lesser degree are great at control. Rogues .. have good DC's for nets and stuff?
I guess if that draw steel vtt is any good there might be a market for vtts that can only do one system, but I think Mcdm just has an extremely loyal fan base
MCDM does foster a pretty loyal fanbase
don't rogues get new cc in 5.5e with the trading sneak attack dice for other effects?
Crowd Control is also less effective when your crowd is almost all legendary monsters
They make good content, and Matt Colville is probably been one of the most influential in a good way figures in tabletop content creation.
Is their stuff good? I was considering it. Feel free to tag me in #third-party if that's not a good question to ask here
Either way parties still don't need to have a melee member at all.
Flee Mortals is probably one of the best third party bestiaries
yeah someone in my steam family bought tabletop simulator and it was like 40 dollars and idk that seemed a bit very greedy and annoying
anyway i digress. thanks for the feedback. until now I only thought to add add add more features but the key might be in the simplicity of it
I think draw steel is a cool game I’d like to check out, but man that vtt seems like it’s only for die hard fans of the game
As a new DM his videos were a God send.
I think the nice thing is that Draw Steel works well on other VTTs too
Going on the buy list then woo
But no one can just be a stationary turret and nothing else, you have to be aware of your own positioning and have ways to defend yourself.
just rolled two natural twos to attack, never playing a martial ever again /j
maybe make it plugin extensible, that way you can continue to develop for it if you want to but the addons can be loaded as the user sees fit?
Like Draw Steel on Foundry runs pretty good.
And its already gotten a few good free QoL modules
Like there's one for art for the statblocks.
I like foundry. I think it’s definitely worth the 50 dollars if you’re playing a game more complex than d&d and want to actively use all the plugins
50 bucks one time for a year long campaign is more cost effective than a subscription
Where its a group of artists I believe handdrawing each token for free.
Yeah if you're a PF2e GM for example, you ain't getting a better VTT than Foundry
As Pf2e was the 1st system designed for it alongside 5e so it's got the most support.
also uhh I have a little question
whats the best way to male my dm as miserable as possible (not quite seriously but I wanna complicate the campaign for him, as a practical joke)
I was thinking of using real world math like in the peasant cannon thing but all around
yall got any other suggestions?
I am not too sure, but I heard that racial increases got removed in the recent player handbook, or am I misunderstanding it
If you still want to be on friendly terms and still play with the group, don’t do that.
ASIs are tied to backgrounds now
start attacking walls and floors and whatnot. they probably do not know the item damage rules offhand and also there is probably not a world planned in those directions
I love it
Is there a place to see all of those?
acually? dont do that and actually have fun
now if we are making suggestions
eat everything you find
There's the ones in the free rules then rest are in the PHB and 5.5 splatbooks
key? thats a snack
monster? new flavour
magic item? more like magic mustard
So they're pay walled
head towards crowds and introduce yourself to each person in the crowd and demand they rp each npc
This is dnd.
You get free stuff, but rest is paid.
Like most games some things require payment
Tho I think they're reintroducing ways to buy stuff on ddb without the full book.
I keep hearing about something like that
Yeah even Pathfinder gets expensive if you actually want the books.
just make everything out of cardboard and dont use any rules. easy
Like the Tian Xia World Guide for PF2e book is 70 bucks off sale.
you can always use the SRD and then build anything missing from there
DnD is pay for content
PF is pay for art and convenience.
I mean you can play D&D just with the free rules and homebrew whatever else you need. Or save up and buy the books you want as needed.
ooh r we shilling pathfinder today
That's true. You don't need all the content.
I already did that, the DM is a big fan of ww2 history and he just took a wiki page or something of all the russian generals in ww2 so every npc I try to talk to will be a russian general 💀
he came prepared
It can be as free or as expensive as you like
LOL
You only really need the corebooks if you want paid stuff.
I put my barbarian in attack position and activate rage, attacking your life points directly
now im not suggesting anything but I saw a reel or something on that the dnd books were among the most cracked single books or something around that
what are DM fixes for minmaxxing?
session zero
i might ask in #dm-discussion but i usually just give more stuff to other players to catch them up powerwise so i can still make encounters for the whole party
minmaxxing is not something that needs fixing anyway, nor is it an invalid way to play 5e
oh ya, if you don't want powergaming at your table session 0 is the time to let them know
Let me introduce you to something called meteor swarm. Have fun
ope sorry.
well yeah but it kinda makes the game hard for everyone,
other players that youre more powerful
and hard for the dm that he needs to balance it somehow
like either make the encounters more puzzle or homebrew a lot around the minmax
best not to have players with conflicts of interest then
Just say: "I don't want min maxing at this table"
So by default your characters can go like up to 17, with origin bonuses is it able to go to 19? Or is it the same as the old system, just a different way to disturb the points?
I responded at 2 people in the same message mb
they are only more powerful if the dm does not fix that, and if you as dm don't want to do the work of balancing the power of the rest of the party out, then that is valid, it is just something that you need to communicate to them
He’s gotta have a dump stat. Focus your damage around that. Always add a caster that has spells that attack that weakness if you want the to keep the issue in game
Also heard some people do "reverse AC" enemies, that you need to hit LESS than a certain range
If you want to address the issue with the player, pull em aside and let them know that play style is acceptable with the current game.
99% of the time any issue I’ve ever had at D&D has been solved with a simple conversation
from what im hearing so far, this is an above table issue, not an in-game issue
i just think you can't really have powergamers in the same party as non-powergamers since there is conflict of interest between the two groups
i have not had problems with having powergamers and non-powergamers not working out together in 5e (tho earlier in my dming in 3.5 i did)
Minmaxing isn’t something that needs to be “countered” necessarily. Any build can be challenged, there is always a weakness that can provide opportunities for more tailored encounters.
I understand. I guess my players just needed to grow up a bit then
What even is a minmax in this case? Like that's so vague and not the same as optimization.
Someone minimizing stats they don't use and maximizing stats they will isn't powergaming.
It's literally just.. making a character lol
If a player is choosing to dedicate their resources towards a certain build they should be rewarded. If you just start only targeting their weaknesses then you’ve defeated the point of their investment. And I agree, minmaxing is an incredibly large spectrum of build theory
idk I considered powergaming taking builds off the internet rather than making them up yourself. but I guess with a bit of effort anyone can mixman
Min/Max is maximizing strengths and minimizing weaknesses; not necessarily stats
MIXMAN LOL
my brain isnt braining
minmaxxx
just had another major revelation whilst writing knome is gonna kill me i love torturing this man with my insanity
That's also true, but also it's not always a bad thing
Your class is gonna have weaknesses regardless
OKAY, so the old stats and new ones remain the same; Just instead of being tied to the race--they're tied to the origins, I thought you get even more stats now lmao
It's a multi layered approach to character building that's done on top of standard optimization
Knome!
Ah, yes, my Knemesis
Are they good In rp?
dw ive been kneeping him busy
eeeeh.....
"can I seduce the slime"
level of rp
Powergaming isnt minmaxing. That's akin to optimization. Taking meme youtube builds off the internet isn't really playing the game imo, it's just doing something silly.
So I'd recommend talking to the player and asking them if they don't mind toning down the cheese, because no one else is doing it. If it's truly ruining the encounters for all others, including yourself.
I find I have the most fun in DND when I lean into those weaknesses. If I'm playing a wizard, I feel pretty wizardlike if I don't take all the defensive spells, maybe just 1 or 2
Though I think it helps that I'm in a group of like-minded people
Exactly
🫢 ooof sorry bud hit them with a meteor swarm a couple times and move on lol
idk once I played a campaign with roll stats and my dump stat was 15 and I was a wizard and I ended up as an AC 20 wizard at level 5 💀
:)))
Yeah but you still have like 8 hit points. So your not much of a threat
i remember people in my party thinking I was a minmaxer for just playing a fighter with great weapon master. I guess it's not fully untrue when other members of the party included a bard/rogue multiclass with enough levels to get subclasses in both, as well as a monk that just forgot to put in his subclass features, but someone else in the party liked that I made combats end really quick when it was needed, now more saying "i just know what feats to pick and what to do on my turn"
ya when i was a teen playing 3.5 i didn't understand the compelling narrative that weaknesses can create and didn't get why i would want to have weaknesses
.....
idk who did the math but I had like 35 hp
anyway
and as a result my characters were not compelling in the least
In my own perception:
Optimizing is just a concept on its own, not "good or bad." Most players do it at least a little bit
Powergaming is optimizing in a way to fulfill a power fantasy you have, and can be very obstructive depending on the table you're at
i guess in a way i build mostly optimized characters, but i also hate multiclassing and ive recently been playing kinda one note martials, so its not hard to get the best output with my builds
Personal opinion, I absolutely refuse to make a character that isn’t good or exceptional in at least one aspect of his build.
If I wanted to be a Joeshmo that isn’t fun to play I’ll be a commoner, if your an adventurer you should be exceptional
are all your characters laios
Yeah, the way I see it, optimizing is doing things like making sure your CHA is your highest score as a Bard, Sorcerer or Warlock. That’s not a harmful thing to do.
I played a blood hunter for a while that was really strong based on how he was built, and had few mechanical weaknesses to compare. So I amped up on the narrative weaknesses, and introduced a character trait that made for some of the most fun Ive ever had in combat; my character is distractible and easy to ragebait
now where would you get that idea from kobold
Does being exceptional at being a jack of all trades count under your metric or is that too joeshmo for you
but no the fighter im playing is a teenage girl who really wants to be a witch
Is Orc Fighter 6 with Polearm Master + Great Weapon Master feats already really powerful? Tbh, I don't worry about my West Marches bookings thanks to the combo
Jack of all trades but master of none. Jack of all trades is a fun concept. The party multi tool
and uhh the tpk for most people, but irl.... How does one arrange sessions? what happens when someone doesnt come? with the lore i mean
and also what should one do when the players are asking "when session" but when I post a poll like "sunday X o'clock; Y o'clock; etc" no one answers?
do I need other players 😭
Like, something as banal as a wizard taking fireball could technically be 'optimization', people blow the issue Way out of proportion
It's like being athletic. Nothing bad on its own, probably good in most cases. But we've all encountered the people who make athleticism their entire personality and craps on everything else they disagree with. Optimizing is the same way
I've met some insufferable self-proclaimed "optimization experts"
not really, no
HOW DARE YOU TAKE FIREBALL! YOU SON OF A GNOLL
certain people who optimize are like this, not not optimization as a whole
i wonder if draw steel fixes this
like, what if you just force players to have their highest scores be in their main stat, so we don't get Borg the Orc wizard with 8 INT
PbtA playbooks type shit
that's more an issue with the player than that they're optimized
Check my previous message and you'll see that that's the exact point I'm making
theres a guy in a party im in who is kinda annoying about being anti optimization. I remember them complaining about paladins sucking and intentionally not using divine smite/using the other smites in a really dumb way where they cast it at the end of their turn and hold the entire concentration
"im having too much fun and whimsy in my game about doing fun and whimsy things"
That’s more detrimental than the guy who has a YouTuber cheese build
Yeah my personal issue with optimization/powergaming isn’t the practice itself, it’s the people who suggest that if you’re not optimizing/powergaming, you’re “playing the game wrong”.
It's the people who view optimization as a 2d line spectrum of 'youre good at it or you're not," treating it like an objective metric when it's just as subjective as it is objective
I'd much rather have fun with my character then play an ultra meta optimized build
100% agreeing with this one. believe me the dm has stuff to match the power of optimized characters
you can do both
I’m also of the mindsight that if someone wants to optimize/power game at the table, that should be something everybody at the table agrees to. In my experience, I’ve had players who power game and none of the other players at the table do, and it ends up feeling like main character syndrome.
Well trueeee but it's much more fun if you make a character how you want it to be instead of picking a certain race, class, subclass, background etc etc because it's "meta"
As long as you build your character smart there no issue with how you play.
I’ve played with a warlock who dumped charisma and constitution because they didn’t read they didn’t read how warlocks work lol
The moment someone brings up a "meta" in DND I immediately stop listening.
ABDC, always be dumping con. it's the optimal way to get to play the most characters per campaign 
idk about older rules but in 5e the races dont really matter and (most) subclasses have their strong suits. you can play pretty much anything you would like
There’s a meta in D&D? My Halfling gunslinger gambler would say other wise. Do you know how emasculating to climb on the bar stool like a toddler every time you want an ale?
A Glengarry Glen Ross reference in the year 2026, what a time to be alive
if a party is optimized the dm should just optimize as well
there was a point when they made a level 10 fighter with 40 hp and only one attack because they forgot crossbow expert (it was meant to be a tag along NPC they controlled and they built her rather quickly)
I remember feeling really weird when they said that they probably would have an actual panic attack if that character died (in response to a multiattack that definitely wouldve one hit killed that NPC) but that seems like a different topic more on the person themselves that i dont wanna go into here
I just pick the coolest looking monster what ever happens happens
The DM's job it to literally modulate the difficulty of the encounter based on the story /party; so yes XD
exactly and it can aboslutely be towards the weaknesses of the party
Dm: “I cast fireball, I’m gonna need Boblin the goblin to make a dex saving throw”
Everyone blame Tony for this
enemies can be smart too,, and the BBEG might just hire minions that pressure certain weaknesses if they're aware of them 
would test the party's creativity and if they can find a unique way to get out of that situation it would be fun
Optimizing past a certain point is kinda pointless, and is generally counterproductive to the game. Best case scenario it vastly limits the amount of possible builds, makes your dm work much harder, and makes some kinds of encounters impossible to run.
A better goal should be to have an enjoyable and interesting build that compliments your character. Bonus points if it’s roughly at the same power level as the rest of the party.
yeah as a DM i dont wanna only use monsters with teleportation if the party is just using wall of force all the time
i just realized tomorrow's session might be the perfect time to deploy a tarrasque
I support this, update us after the session
"i've seen enough. 20 tarrasques"
As I say a lot, people in this hobby have a tendency to miss the forest for the trees
I go full tilt optimization into a MAD MC utility/support caster 
that way she's basically always at the same Combat Power as the party
Thank you!!
I get the appeal of making a strong character or trying to win by being more efficient or smarter than other players. In video games and some other stuff it’s fun. DnD just isn’t really that kind of game.
Guys I’ve spent the last 20 sessions putting my 3 foot gunslinger in situations to get him self killed and I haven’t died yet.
This has done numbers for the image he has of himself and his gambling addiction
thats alot of feet to sling around
It’s one more than usual, I don’t see it as “ALOT” and he’s hurt you would judge him for his differences
are you playing 2024phb
Yeah with the valdas gunslinger class
and your character has a gambling addiction
Hell yeah! (High roller subclass)
Can someone answer a warlock specific question about eldritch smite? It states 1d8 PLUS another 1d8 per level of the spell slot. But it says at the top to expend a slot. Does this mean a 1st level spell slot gives 2d8?
what does this mean
I’m confused on your confusion.
Google says it is in fact 2d8 base
idk i can't find anything about any gunslinger subclass, tbh i didn't know gunslinger was a thing until like a couple days ago when my friend said he'd want to play it
Neat
hypothetically itd be 2d8 but eldritch smite couldnt be used with a 1st level pact slot since you get it at level 5
Oh the gambling addiction isn’t an actual thing. It’s just a self imposed flaw I’ve placed on my self for giggles. The high roller subclass is built around gambling so that’s the one I took for my character
The gunslinger class I’m playing is in “Gunslinger class Valdas spire of secrets” the book by mage hand press.
Arent all spell slots pact slots? Im confused
I would imagine it’s 2d8
pact slots are warlock specific. Warlocks only get spell slots of the highest level available up to 5th level
eldritch smite specifies pact magic slot. so a wizard with warlock levels couldnt use their wizard spell slots on it
so if im only a warlock I can?
Wdym we only get our highest spell slots?
Like you cant use 1st level spells anymore?
you can, but you have to upcast them
Eldritch smite is interesting to me because it means warlocks are just better at smiting than paladins in 2024. It doesn’t take a bonus action, progresses faster, works at range, and does a better damage type. Pretty much only downside is they can’t do it as often
where a 5th level wizard would have 1st, 2nd, and 3rd slots, a 5th level warlock just has a few 3rd level slots, but they get those slots back at a short rest
not really, eldritch smite is not that good
Warlocks always cast their levelled apells at the highest level they have available. A level 9 Warlock always casts all of their levelled spells using a 5th level slot, even their 1st and 2nd level spells.
wait all in is kinda broken
Didnt know this.... So spells that cant be upslotted cant be used anymore like shield?
You can, all spells can be upcasted
you can use them, they just dont have an extra effect for the slot
It doesn’t have to be good, an individual eldritch smite is still superior to an individual paladin smite
The thing is paladins have more smites which makes up for it
Im dizzy... extra efect?
not really. a 3rd level eldritch smite and 2nd level divine smite are equal in damage. Also just general warlock opportunity cost brings it down
i always play bard so this warloclk stuff is new to me
But the eldritch smite has all the other advantages i listed
as in the extra damage from upcasting and stuff
Some spells get an extra benefit when you use a higher level slot for them. Fireball does more dice of damage when you use a higher slot, Polymorph can target an extra target when you use a higher slot. Shield doesn't get any extra benefits from being cast using a higher slot, but you can still use a higher slot for it.
it does. but i realize were arguing about different things.
I am aware of upcasting
I'm just lost on how it impacts eldritch smite and why i wouldnt be able to use a 1st level spell slot for it
at 5th level
Sorry for the confusion :<
Because Warlocks don't have 1st level spell slots from 3rd level onwards
it's fine, it just took me a minute to understand you werent arguing for eldritch smite being a better ability, instead it just having a couple of extra things
so at 5th level how many spell slots do i get o.o
Two pact slots
idk how i missed this but thank you
Yeah they're always upcasted to max
You can use lower level spells that don’t get extra effective from being upcast with a higher level spell slot, it’s just at a higher cost
So you can totally cast shield with a 5th level spell slot, you just might not want to
In the case of eldritch smite, you don’t have and 1st level spell slots so you can only do it at 5th level (which is better than doing it at 1st level anyways)
no wonder yall are always eldritch blastin
I understand now I just missed that spell slots get removed as you level
Which one is that
yeah the class encourages you to use your spell slots on long effect stuff unless you know youre gonna get a short rest right after
not removed, upgraded
Personally I’m really sad that warlock has so few spell slots :<
I'm not
Do I ever get more at high level
It makes it unique
Can I get a short rest?
or is it always 2
oh nvm i misread, but it's adding your risk die to any ability check or saving throw or attack roll if you don't roll a 1
at level 10 or so you get three
But I think full spell progression might be too powerful with invocations on the side
Third at 11, fourth at level 17 iirc?
Cleric, can you cast that short rest spell pls
Yeah but you get limited dice and they’re more useful in combat than rp
It is unique, but its unique in a way that makes it so you have less things you can do
Not really, no
Invocations.
i take it back liar's dice is broken and hilarious
It's why the invocations are "you can cast x spell for free"
just lie to the DM for fun
back in my day, those invocations needed you to use a spell slot
yeah a lot of invocations just, were not that good
it was always like "at level 14 you can use a warlock spell slot to cast a third level spell with no upcast benefit once per long rest"
But invocations don’t really solve my problem with it! Especially when some of them are geared specifically towards doing the same thing over and over again (specifically the ones that buff one cantrip)
And a lot of the invocations are very fun but just aren’t enough for me
You regain pact slots on a short rest, unless your DM is cruel you'll be fine
It probably didn’t help that most of my DnD experience is at a game store where most adventures are unconnected one shots where its assumed you get a long rest between
Also, yeah, Eldritch Blast is getting used over and over because it's the best cantrip
Probably, yeah
in the end the party should be the one controlling when to short rest. But I do get it if your DM just decides you get one combat a day its not gonna seem as effective
I’m trying a 8 hour short rest 1 week long rest system at the table I’m running
Only been to session 0 so far so it remains to be seen if we like it or not
oh god
It’s really fun if the DM calls you out but if they don’t it gets kinda boring
that rule is mostly good if your campaign involves a lot of travel, so wilderness encounters actually matter
that's when you just gotta be like "i got a nat 20" every time bc then it starts making them check, right?
Negative you don’t bluff if you hit. You bluff your damage
it says attack roll, ability check or saving throw tho so i think it is if you hit?
or is that a rule you have with your DM
That’s risk dice.
Liars dice is specifically a damage roll
I'm sorry what are we talking about?
gunslinger subclass apparently
is that third party?
"LIAR'S DICE
Also at 3rd level, when you make an ability check, attack roll, or saving throw, you can roll the d20 in secret and declare any result you wish. If the GM chooses to call your bluff, reveal the number rolled on the d20. If you were telling the truth, treat the result as if you rolled a 20. If you were telling a lie, roll the d20 again and use the lower of the two rolls. If the GM chooses not to call your bluff, you use the result you declared regardless of what you rolled.
You can choose to roll in secret a number of times equal to 1 + your Charisma modifier (a minimum of once), and you regain all expended uses when you finish a long rest."
it does not specify damage roll
Yee
Level 3: Liar’s Dice [Maneuver]
When you make a damage roll with a Ranged weapon, you can expend one Risk Die as a Bonus Action and declare it to be a hidden roll. Roll the damage in secret and declare any total you wish. The GM has the option to call your bluff, in which case you reveal the damage dice you rolled. This has different consequences based on whether or not you lied.
The GM Calls Your Bluff; You Lied. The damage you deal is halved.
The GM Calls Your Bluff; You Told the Truth. The damage you deal is doubled.
The GM Doesn’t Call Your Bluff. Use the total damage you declared, even if you rolled a different total.
where do you find this
I’m not seeing that on D&D beyond hmm
In the book I bought
I dont think so it came out in the Valdas spire of secrets
Not sure when the book dropped
can i dm you
Yeah go ahead
This is #third-party party but I own the book and I don't think that d20 liars dice exists. I don't see it anywhere. Could be wrong
I only see it for damage
like it seems fun on paper but would slow down the game too much one would think
Idk if anybody’s mentioned this but there are two “Gunslingers” in DDB. One of a fighter subclass designed by Critical Role which I believe is free, the other is a full third party class that’s available in Valda’s Spires of Secrets and is not free
Oh I did not know that
Maybe that's what the confusion is ?
So if you’re talking about the full class which isn’t free and you only have access to the CR subclass, you’re looking at two completely different beasts
Mage Hand Press
nah i'm definitely looking at valda's spires of secrets. i think i'm just looking at the outdated version
I’m thinking it’s the original drop but they have updated since
seems that is the case
Had no idea there was an old version! Good to know just in case
It's the high-roller's 3rd level ability
Yeah,
sorry for the confusion
It happens! This channel doesn't talk #third-party much ever. I'm sure had this conversation happened in that channel it'll have been cleared up easier
I really wish it was Proficiency Bonus scaling
Infront of you. You see a door
I check for traps
You are almost confident that there’s no traps
i let the barbarian go first
The warlock asks for a short rest before going in
The barbarian pulls the handle and it doesn’t open
"try pushing" i shout encouragingly
The rogue rolls a 27 sleight of hand roll. He's only lvl 4
i mage hand open the door from afar
He pushes the door and it opens, revealing the one thing you were looking for
The end of this scenario
I cast a 9th level fireball
son 😭😭😭
But…this is a level 3 one shot checks notes frantically
A party with no scheduling conflicts that also rps well?
oh hey, I have that
Ummm actually In my back story I was given an unlimited 9th level spell scroll by my father who’s the greatest wizard of all time who married a goddess. Also that’s 906.5 damage.
Everyone make a dex save
.5 😭
That’s a fail my save is 56
What did you get on your dex save
roll for initiative, but the three in the front give me dexterity saving throws
Ima evocation wizard I sculpted it around my self
Smart!
The mimic you guys walked into casts counterspell at 17th level
Umm actually DM my backstory says my spells can’t be counter-spelled because my mom is the goddess of magic
You’re forgetting something
Im stupid
Did you even read my backstory that said I’m the most handsome, strongest wizard to ever exist and I can’t be killed ever
Okay the scenario should probably stop because this is just rp at this point
the sorcerer casts uses tides of chaos to get advantage, fails the save anyway
That’s it I’m posting this one R/rpghorrorstories
You die of 1d4 backstory damage
Mommy help 😭
Take 2 damage
What’s sad is we’ve all probably met someone like the wizard I have portrayed
Luckily i havent been in enough games to play with someone like that but i wanna play more campaigns with people
same. i hear a ton of horror stories on like reddit/YT about it but never seen one irl
Mostly because i only play dnd games with my close friends
I did an online game one time and someone was basically a god that forgot her memories but had all her power and the dm approved it. Letting her use all the abilities lol
My only argument was “How did she remember she could do that?” LOL
I want to get in a game so i can play my dwarf cleric
He casts inflict wounds by pulling out alcohol or salt and rubbing it in the persons wounds
are you IRL only player
Lemon Juice
Yes but thats only because im antisocial and too scared to ask in the lfg thing
Why didnt i think of that. Thanks echo
can i dm u
Sure
Hey guys, I want to start a new dnd based on "Dead Space" but I dont know how to start.
Can you guys help me?
I dunno what dead space is
the videogame
Art the clown approved
Buddy had a crush lol
So I got my stats and skills and saving. Throws done now I don't know what to do next I'm making a level 6 champion fighter
How do I know what kind of talents and traits to pick
Your class table will tell you the features you get at each level. #character-discussion is a great place to ask for help deciding where a feature has multiple options (e.g. fighting style)
What are the multiple options?
It depends on the class. Fighter, for example, will give you a choice of Fighting Style feat and weapon masteries at level 1
Oh, OK. So the more level you move up the more options you’ll have.
Generally yes. As you level up you’ll acquire the features listed on your class table
okay when is the hexhaven sourcebook?
and armor too if im not wrong
Fighters already get proficiency in all armor, it’s not a “choice” in the same way you’d select a fighting style
Its only a choice regarding what armor you wanna wear
Some classes do get the option of getting more armor proficiencies at level one. Namely cleric and druid
The urge to run a star wars themed one shot is growing
The modest 37gp in my pocket: "Yeah, your choice chump ;P"
Medium Armor wearing fighters are strange to me
Either go all in (Heavy)
Or
Take it down a notch (Light)
Or, the Chad route
Don't wear armor
I had a medium armor wearing cleric (half plate)
im using some splint armor, look good and feel good but i was mostly using medium before, a scale shirt
So, I've played around in D&D a lot, and I would like to hear yall's thoughts on the gp system and how much an average yearly salary would be for a farmer, a knight (cavalry of the lord of the land), and some other jobs
Well, yeah, that makes sense for Cleric
But not for Fighter imo
true true for fighter medium armor is a compromise. Pick a side
If you want to do a Dex invested fighter, just use light armor and get bang for your buck, same with heavy armor and strength
Smh.
If there was more factors for the armors.
Like extra speed or higher STR requirements
Medium armor can be okay for dex fighters with the Medium Armor Master feat, but why bother wasting a feat on that.
figter already get some extas ASI so its okey spending some on stuff like that
the thing is, picking something that work now and later
like if i pick dual wielder would close my options in some ways
Heavy Armor master is the only armor master feat I'd consider, personally
depends on how high your dex is, halfplate with 14 dex is 17AC, studded leather with 18 dex is 16 AC.
Yeah, but with heavy or light armor you don't NEED to invest a feat
I'm kinda just being silly about it, really lol
Hey I just started dnd as a player any one shots I can participate in
plus you want to invest in your damage feats as a fighter
Wear what armor you want, but I'll be disappointed in you if you wear medium armor /joking
or survival, or utility, or other many
I would probably put a farmer at modest or poor, which requires 1 gp and 2 sp per day. So about 365 gp per year or 73 gp per year. This tracks generally with how I run my games: if you offer a farmer 100 gp, that's a huge amount of money, but probably not enough for them to risk their lives (though it might be for some).
https://www.dndbeyond.com/sources/dnd/phb-2024/equipment#Services
Knights I would have at comfortable or wealthy: 2 gp and 4 gp a day respectively.
better saves of a kind
Higher tolerance to some stuff
etc. etc.
usually I'd recommend taking those later on, fighter needs some of their feats just to function first
any of the options is good at the end
mostly see what you lack and what your team cant give
or what you can upgrade for your team too
you can take sentinel to stop the feets of the enemies
Tough to take more damage and make your allies take care of themselves more
Any movement related feat for get closer to the enemies and obliterate them
Quick question is dnd now more popular in like playing it online? Or sum ppl are still interested in Classic Game?😣
Ooo thank you!
Even the people who play mostly online say in person is still better me :(
Yup, though I'll say that I think online play has gotten more popular than it has in the past. I don't think it's a stretch to say that online games are more accessible to a lot of people compared to in-person.
I am the guy. Hello I'm new
Cuz i got so many ,,books” and card and i really dont know if ppl would buy
Ahh trying to sell your old books? Maybe #dnd-advertisements
Not sure if you can do that here but worth a shot
Well Dunno yet what to do w them Cuz i got them from a friend who was working w the like whole business yk?
I assume players are exceptional and their income level is out of whack in comparison to a farmer. A farmer doesn’t pay to stay at an inn every night, they have stocks of food and cook for themselves. I consider players similar to tourists in that they spend way more money per day than locals.
Farmers are not historically paid with salary, so I could not give you an answer beyond "however much they made from their harvest." To actually answer your question, I assume farmers get 5-10 gp per year of crops. I assume they save money and only spend when in need.
Knights tended to have fiefs so I would add that onto the knight salary. They would need enough to maintain their horse, armor, any squires or pages, and lifestyle (including servants). I usually put it at 100-300 gp per year. A knight probably has to travel a few times a year which is why it’s so high. They need to be able to stay at an inn or eat food.
Huh.
And he just got many stuff and gave them to me + MTG stuff too
What is confusing?
Everything.
What do you mean? Would you mind being specific, I’d like my answer to be clear so it’ll be helpful if you can be specific.
Idk I literally just joined. Don't even have a character I don't know how stuff works
Oh. You interjected onto a conversation. Nothing wrong with that of course. That's why you're confused.
have you checked out #learn-to-play or #dnd-newcomers ?
Hermes posted a question and Calico answered
I am answering a question someone asked on money npcs have. My answer was assuming the asked had read the dmg and player guide. My answer was not player facing so I wouldn’t worry about it at all.
Oh mb
Online play is really nice, but there is nothing that will replace being in a room with my friends and having a good time.
Np! You're allowed to participate in conversations!
I recommend looking through the resources listed in the server and googling for resources for anything you don’t understand. I also recommend buying the player’s guide if you can afford it. Don’t worry about interjecting. I love to answer questions!
You know, it's probably been done ad infinitum
But I really wanna play a Yuan-Ti Enchantment Wizard one day 🧐
I JUST realized how fun the idea would actually be lmao
Don't forget the basic rules. They're free - and you can totally play a game (or even a campaign) using just them!
The urge to play a monk is now overtaking my body
do it.
Totally! DnD doesn’t have to cost anything
The urge to play literally anything consumes me. New player struggles 
Thank you for answer 🙂↕️ i lit know nothing abt all of that lmao, also how is secret liar connected to dnd? Cuz i have some card boxes that say ,,secret liar x dnd honor among thieves „
I've played every class at least once, some a bit more than others, so now I have ideas brewing 🧐
My favorite class is definitely cleric. I love the diversity of play
Cleric is my second favorite under Monk
I'm a sucker for punching things as much as I love Cleric lol
Although I play any class, as I’m often the dm and will take anything lol
I've played a bit of cleric and like 2 sessions of arti. I wanna play Druid soooo bad
Druids are awesome! I bet you’ll love it
Loved it in BG3 so I'm sure I'll love it in dnd
I loved bg3. I actually played it with my dad lmao
is Mercy Monk fun?
I'm the classic "Hey I like bg3 so I wanted to try dnd" player
My next Druid might be a Stars or Sea Druid.
That depends on if my Cleric dies or retires... Waterdeep Shenanigans
My idea is a Sahuagin flavored as a Kuo-Toa whomst was a part of the Xanathars Guild
It's why im here lol
One of my favorite Monk subclasses, but the only way it really plays differently from normal monk is healing capabilities
Really? That’s amazing! I love how many players were inspired. Have you played DnD before, or just bg3?
Monks are awesome
I love every class except warlock
Mercy Monk is also more fun if you play a "Turn the other cheek" type of character.
Don't be a Pacifist, but be willing to forgive and forget
Just bg3. I started 3 months ago as the DM for my friend group until I found a westmarch group here using #find-a-game
Yes!! It’s great for my character who was a very loud and willing to throw down but also very forgiving.
I'm a DM/Player for the westmarch. Different DMs at different times and what not
Currently giving my warlock Mage Slayer and Crusher
Do you prefer west march or standard play?
I had an Orc Mercy Monk
His name was Yurukarth.
He refused to kill people, but he'd kick your ass to try and see eye-to-eye with you, but he'd never kill you, even if others say you deserve it.
I’ve always liked standard play. I enjoy the chaos of it
As a DM I prefer normal campaign. As a player I can't compare since it's the only way I've played so far.
Those characters are so fun. The dynamic with the party is always cool.
Mhm! I love dming normal campaigns
I am hoping to one day be a player in a campaign. For now this westmarch is fun!
Honestly I hate talking in this server because I always want to try a campaign with the people here lmao
Secret lair is the Magic the Gathering thing, right? They've done MTG × D&D crossovers before, as both MTG and D&D are owned by Wizards of the Coast. There's a few D&D books that detail MtG worlds as D&D settings for use in ur game.
When I'm ready I will make another #find-a-game post but this will be likely months from now. Maybe many months
I have a Warforged Pugilist that doesn't like killing people
Not because it goes against any morality he has, but it goes more against his training as a former member of Eberrons Martial Sentinels, he was a lawbringer at some point in his life lol
Fr!
What group is Martial Sentinels from????
House Denith in Eberron
I DM eberron so I'm curious