#dnd-discussion
1 messages · Page 453 of 1
Ah Xenk. The DMPC of the movie
So she's an NPC.
DMPC's can be detrimental if players aren't allowed to learn from their mistakes imo
Wait : there's a DND movie.
A couple
what I've been doing is having my pc (as DM because I like DnD but the rest of the people I play with can't dm at all...) stick back and not influence any decisions. I'm effectively just there for combat.
Yup! It’s great imo!
not just one
Where is it.
Honor Among Thieves is the generally good one.
there are a couple!
It's on Netflix.
and a show!
there's like 4, the one from 2023 is the only one worth watching
It’s worth noting that Xenk was designed to poke fun at how DMPCs can be disruptive in a D&D campaign. Like… he’s “too good” and “too well-informed”.
I did a DMPC once recently because my players and I did a one shot as bad guys in Hell.
After the fact a player brought up the characters as possible big bads in the campaign. So I made those characters the level 20 bosses.
What's it calldd
The DnD movie from the early 2000s I think is on Tubi.
The boss fights before Tiamat
Which that one iirc is pretty bad but it's there
Dungeons and Dragons: Honor Amongst Thieves is on Paramount+ apparently.
Honor Among Thieves is the good one
Dungeons & Dragons: Honor Among Thieves
It's on Netflix too
Are there any in the feywild
DMPC havers when they realize that every NPC by technicality is their pc
No
An NPC with a character sheet; the second they go a separate way from her I’m using the Priest statblock
nah, Feywild is a relatively new concept for D&D
One of my groups enjoy and encourage me to have a DMPC for my campaigns for them, they say it’s like I’m playing alongside them, like they wish they could, but we can’t find a DM that suits us so this is the closest I can get. And even then I do my utmost to avoid doing all the bad things that DMPCs do
DnD movies are also pretty sparse compared to other media
Why not just do that from the start?
I believe the Feywild was a 4e thing like the Shadowfell right?
I mean, you could say those Tim Burton Alice in Wonderland movies are Feywild movies
Mmm yeah, I don't like it.
I believe so
It’s also why he wasn’t in the movie for very long
It took over the Plane of Faerie and Plane of Shadow I think.
Xenk was pretty funny
I’m mainly leaning toward the comedic aspect of her being the only Lawful Good character in the entire party
Feywild is a 4e-ism that is also in 5e
You know my party is meeting with a bunch of artificers in the next couple sessions
I loved Xenk
Fair enough
It’s not my paladin bias I promise
Favourite Plane?
Billy Joe the Kobold Artificer from SPACE!!! .. (supposedly)
Plane of Air it’s so sick
Hell
Material plane
Feywild personally.
Because the Material plane is where majority of the lore and plots show up
BoRiNg
Yikes
My team said the same but I had to explain that my char would have no agency since I know all the puzzles and encounter. Might as well just have am npc at that point lol
I'm a fan of the Abyss.
I enjoy me a Primordial Moshpit.
Me omw to Baphomets layer to do a silly
(I will seduce him.)
my party finally completed their spelljammer after 2+ years and i think they are heading to the feywild next
Spelljammer for 2 years? You're a legend
More like a madman
Imagine having a Moshpit in the Abyss
And now imagine the number of casualties
My next online campaign will be spelljammer, I’m still just making notes
Eberron's Lamannia, The Twilight Forest is my favorite. Its a nature plane (with megafauna/flora at that), but every description they had for it in Exploring Eberron had me hooked. There was text comparing an airship stuck in a massive tree to a child's toy having been discarded by wind. It was very evocative to me, so I love that plane.
Since spelljammer 5e was specifically design just to make you go run an FR adventure. They fear the power to run a Spelljammer game regardless.
I hope I get to use some of those planes from EE
I have an important question for everyone...
Devils, Yugolotha or Demons
Which group is your favorite? 🧐
And why is it Demons?
Yugoloths my beloved
Demodands not even included :'(
I like the material plane mainly for the dragons and it’s way easier to explain why every creature is there.
Devils
Nope, I'm talking the main 3
They have a lot of roleplay beyond “I tear people apart”
Devils because they sound cooler
Each devil having a unique method of trying to make someone a worse person
I'm doing my first campaign soon (as a DM) I am an experienced pc
Devils
Yugoloths
Demons can have that too!
It's just hard for them to resist destruction!
It's a carnal desire to them, you know!
Yugoloths don’t get enough love
I always thought Yugoloths were really interesting because they were a kind of evil that I just wouldn't anticipate from an extraplanar evil entity
Raphael from BG3 made Devils my favorite.
Me, defending Demons when one of my characters hates demons so much he wants to eradicate all of them
One of my favorite NPCs in a D&D campaign was an arcanoloth
It is a thing of if I find lawful evil way more interesting than chaotic evil too
He is peak devil
i still have not gotten BG3, it sounds great tho
Tips for a new DM?
Don’t tell me it’s that one in sigil…
Like with Devils their method of their evil is more clear to me.
Love that man in Sigil.
--
I think Chaotic Evil is interesting
People just devolve it into Murderhobodom
It's cause it usually is murderhoboism.
Yep
Nope, a custom made one before the Planescape books even came out. He was bound by a magic university who was a “Professor of Planar Theory”
I agree. I’d describe the joker from the dark knight as chaotic evil, yet he’s one of the most famous and beloved villains in film
Then be a chad, don't be a murderhobo!
Ask #dm-discussion ?
For higher ranked demons it means intelligent murderhoboing.
well i would also ask in #dm-discussion but i think my biggest tip is communication is the most powerful tool you have, so things that aid it like a session 0 or a campaign pitch deck or safety tools help a lot
Amen
Should I do a session playing out back stories?
He was also the stand-in in that campaign for the “mage ally”
Hey! That's a Pal of my Warlocks, you leave them alone >:[
I know what kind of people like that arcanaloth…
Well there is two of them
i would ask your table honestly, did each one come up with a backstory that they want to play out for instance? i like starting in media res, but you could all talk about backstories in session 0
Akin the Friendly Fiend is the one you met Tokii
a much more well known one is Shemeshka
Akin is a dope fella
Owner of the Fortune's Wheel casino
I can imagine Sovis dapping Akin up everytime he enters his shop
Also Shemeshka burned down Akin's house from time to time
I like him.
They were dating, things have not turned out well for Akin
He's a cool dude.
It's okay to be friends with a fiend so long as you don't allow their manipulation to grasp you!
Best class for DMPC??? I don't like them I just want your thoughts.
Cleric. If there’s gonna be a person constantly tagging along with the party they might as well heal and buff
hmmm, maybe a cleric or something that can res? i'm really not sure tho
Time for Sovis to give Shemeshka a visit. /joking
She could probably beat the Eve of Ruin party
She's an Arcanaloth, she can't be that-
She herself is like Cr13 but she basically pays off a stupid amount of powerful entites.
Oh. Right
Having the biggest casino in Sigil makes you stupid rich and a lot of people on your payroll.
We should visit her casino anyway, I dunno if Sovis or the party has met her
More of a political enemy than a combat enemy.
Fun fact her outfits are all based on the Lady of Pain too
Suck up.
Less of a suck up and more "I am that important in the city"
I'm gonna dress like the Lady of Pain so I can run a Casino in her joint
Sounds like suck up behavior to me
There are higher CR guys in Sigil of course above Shemeshka, she just has way better connections and control in the city.
So Akins shop IS called the friendly fiend, right?
Or is that his own moniker
Like Factol Skall, the lich who runs the city morturary.
He named himself and shop that.
I love the book describing him.
"Is he evil and planning something?"
"Idk"
whats everyones favorite type of fey :3
There's a Raksasha private detective in Waterdeep
My party is close to him somewhat and we revealed we knew he was a fiend last session to have transparency between us, he was appreciative of us keeping his secret and he was very game to help us kill Manshoon one day.
favorite fey is a dead fey
so im looking for another player for my campaign that is not dnd, can i post it here? (its very similar to dnd only that its less about epic fights and more about survival)
Couldnt find anything about it in the rules
Nope not here
#find-a-game
Should help!
no
D&D only here
Try Roll20 or Reddit?
thats not very nice D:
the fey are friends
Oh wait
Yea this place is only for DnD. You can't even search for 5e total conversions like SW5e, or ME5e
thank you
Yeah the official D&D server only allows promoting D&D games. And only in the appropriate channels
thank you
You, friend :]
Give me Baatezu, or Tanar'ri over fey any day.
yay thank you :3
At least they'll kill you straight up lol
Hags
Erm, but what about night hags? They're not fey 🤓 👆 /silly /joking
That’s their own fault!
And at least Baatezu can be reasoned with.
Fey you are playing an intricate game where you are not told the rules and in most best case scenarios you lose your autonomy. Horrifying.
Changeling
changelings and hags are fun
Centaur are probably my favorite Fey as I feel they just .. don't play the same bullshit games
Man, Telekinetic is so goated
Yea when I talk Fey I mean like full fey not like a fey related species
Mhhh...
Centaur and Saytr are alright in my book
Boggles are a fun one too. They’re just greasy little guys
Quicklings are hilarious to me
Changelings and centaurs are full fey. Although my definition is literally just fey creature type
Reading it right now, doesn't sound good
It's pretty solid, all things considered
Quicklings are just Thing 1 and Thing 2 from Cat in the Hat. Its great.
It's a bonus action if you don't have many bonus actions for one
It is solid, I just don't know what build it could be used for
Thing 1 and Thing 2 if they were homicidal maniacs
A centaur on the prime is far less likely and to my knowledge unable to do feyish things like stealing a name. Trap people, and transform them into animals and or objects.
Push builds, maybe
I miss one of my players.
quicklings are indeed funny
they be zoomin
That is to say if thing 1 and thing 2 weren't potentially homicidal maniacs already
Thing 1 and Thing 2 if they werent bound by children book rules
If I had to deal with fey in my day to day troubles I would probably pick goblinoids or nixies, they are some of the more reasonable ones along with Centaur.
Admitttedly I am not too interested in Fey.
i think fey are pretty neat
I like humanoids
Like I get why the Fey are in D&D but that haven't grabbed my interest much.
For me personally I am not big on boiling a creature type down to a single descriptor. And it feels like in the DND and broader TTRPG community fey have gotten boiled down to pure ✨ Whimsy. ✨
i like weird alien fey the most
I personally look at Fey in D&D as less “whimsical” and more… unpredictable
Which whimsy has its place. Don't get me wrong. But singular attributes aren't as interesting to me.
I think people overall have a weird idea of what Fey are in D&D
thats because they're a lot of things
A green hag is whimsy?
this is clearly not Kas' opinion
Probably because WOTC barely puts any focus onto the fey.
I think Kas might tell you about the various whimsies to be found amongst Skeletons and Zombies
Emeralda Splitleafe sure was, that was a fun NPC
There is whimse in all creatures if you have a heart to find it
When the game basically ingores Fey on the whole...of course people are going to fill in the blanks themselves.
Would have should have bug antenna as eyebrows
The whimsy opinion comes from something I call "just a wittle guy" syndrome. Where there is a propensity to defang a lot of the scary or potentially frightening things because of whimsy and or cuteness. Its just not a thing I personally vibe with. Some whimsy? Good. All whimsy? not a fan.
How shall I play my paladin today...
I try to think of Fey the way they’re portrayed in Celtic and Welsh mythology. They can be deceptively “cute” or “beautiful”, but deception is their game. And that’s what actually makes them scary.
Yeah. I'd love a Heroes of the Feywild (4e) book for 5e. I'd love if they gave us a map to use too, like how we have a map of (a section of) Avernus in BGDIA.
I just want a Fey deep-dive for 5e, I want to get entrenched in the Courts and what Centaur-Goblin relations are like.
Hello
i have been running a super fey heavy camapaign in the moonshae islands with the forgotten realms adventure guide, that was great so far
ooh cool! Have you gotten to toy around with the Rust stuff from the Adventures book?
That is precisely how I view them as well.
yes, thats the main issue the players are facing
The work that Baldman Games put into the Moonshaes is nothing short of astounding I am happy WotC canonized most of their AL stuff.
In my D&D campaigns, I tend to blend Celtic/Welsh mythology with Slavic mythology and a touch of animism. They’re essentially just physical embodiments of the natural world around them, and humanoids can never fully get a read on them
oh i have never heard of that, did any thing they do make it into the New Fr book?
Baldman games updated the Moonshaes for AL as a Premiere Organizer. They even had Doug Niles write a setting guide with them as they worked on their Moonshae campaigns, many of the major players in the Moonshaes, the conflicts between the peoples of the islands were all updated in their adventures.
From what I gather WotC did not work with them at all nor consult them while updating the Moonshaes for FR AiF. But the guys at Baldman were very surprised with how compatible it was and what was included as a node to those popular adventures.
I fully recommend the Rising Shadows Campaign from Moonshaes.com it goes from 1-14 IIRC
ah neat, yeah this vibes with what i have been runnning with
polluted moonwells, Norlanders cursed, but i did not do anything with the kendrick family
hello everyone
A Feywild book would be nice.
just having a massive book of cool fey creatures would be great
a bunch of really weird stuff
Might be possible with the current wotc
I won't hold my breath
if they keep up this roadmap thing they might do a season of fey or just the other planes (shadowfell, hells, fey)
Along with fey, how do you guys handle bargains with them? Or have seen bargains be handled with them. That's a big aspect of them that only really gets shown off with hags.
True, but with old WotC it would never happen.
Because a Feywild book would be a setting guide and they were allergic to those.
Most likely a fey book would be like a fizbans
depends on the fey, but i tend to make them low stakes. The whole "say your name and you lose everything" is boring.
very vain and mischievous, they make deals they feel would be fun or would provide them something cool
If they weren't so allergic to such things, maybe Spelljammer could have been an actual thing instead of a wet fart and a monster splat.
i also tend to make them have weird rules, like 3 or so seemingly pointless rules that dont make sense but everything they do is based around them. their deals tend to be built around those
thatd be awesome, expanding on each court and archfey
Yeah Perkins and Crawford, if you ever had to defeat them in combat you could use their anathema to disable their legendary actions (a Setting Guide)
If you opened it in front of them they'd go "Ahhhh!" And take 20d12 damage
It kind of sucks because there's Wild Beyond the Witchlight, which could be analagous to Curse of Strahd, but there's no Guide to Ravenloft equivelant that tells you about the setting itself
Domains of delight are such a nothing concept.
Opening a setting guide on a 5e dev is like Yugi using Exodia on Kaiba.
An autowin that renders them inert
I gotta wonder what kind of dirt Keith Baker had for them to make their one good setting guide of an old setting the Eberron one.
Low stakes works pretty well for smaller fey yeah. I had a fey librarian that would ask for collateral from players that they'd keep in case they damaged a book. The players would offer up collateral themselves. Some would offer their weapons, some would offer things inadvertently.
One said
"I give you my word I will harm no book"
So the fey took their voice as collateral
Well he was just a writer that cared about the setting
He might have more control of the IP too
"You wanna have eberron in 5e you need to make an actual setting guide"
The 5e team: "God! Noooo!"
eh that still follows the "haha you said a common word you lose" type of bargain
They are as much as one as of dread they just hardly used them
Even the Domains of Dread until here soon wasn't utilized well.
I mean at least domains of dread have lore. The dark powers are pretty cool
Domain of Dread Enjoyers
vs
Domain of Delight Enthusiast
The original ravenloft book for 5e wasn't a bad book by 5e 2020s standard, but wasn't too good either.
Fey understand things very literally in my view because they don't have turns of phrase that humans use. So to them you're actively offering something up. Lesser fey see it as literal, older and stronger fey know better but they also have less of a reason to trick people
Pretty good by Post Tashas standards tho
Cause Post Tashas books were a lot of hard hit or some of the biggest 5e screwups.
fair
Idk what you’re on about with the “wotc couldn’t make good setting books before 2024” when theros, ravnica, and wildemount exist
Two of those were MTG so MTG being the moneymaker means they had to do them well
True, the exploreres guide to wildmount was the best setting book for 5e till the new forgotten realms one dropped
And Wildemount was CR
Still is imo
Lord Mercer had the power to will it to be good.
I think there’s a recurring theme that setting books are more likely to be good when the writers care about the setting
A company can’t mandate a product to be well written, but they can get good writers
Yeah 5e didn't care about FR all that much it was more just convenient to put every adventure into
Considering there's not much of a guide to make domains of delight do you think its wise to use the domains of dread formula to make one just, turn it on its head? Instead of keeping something trapped in a continuous cycle of misery instead its joy, or some other emotion?
Domains of delight are just the realm of an archfey
They’re not an opposite to domains of dread despite their name
keeping things consistant was a good move overall i feel
I think it was mixed
I think having to spend a few hundred dollars on adventure books just to get the lore for a few cities is outrageous
And SCAG of course being just the biggest reason WotC had to start working in house
Am I tripping or would a hexadin oath of vengeance subclass with war caster just be ridiculously op cause they’ve got almost unbreakable haste?
Personally I just don't like the "we don't need settings, just adventures" approach
Cause if the adventure sucks, but people wanna keep playing in FR they gotta buy old edition guides or use the FR wiki to help
Or try and segue into an adventure that doesn't suck.
Ig we gotta be thankful that they didn't do to Planescape like they did to Spelljammer
Must have taken a lot of restraint.
I don’t think any writers are intentionally trying to make bad books.
I think the "don't mistake incompetence for malice" sometimes does a little too heavy lifting when it came to 5e books that were bad.
But yeah I theorize it's just often a combination of bad direction, laziness, and probably internal conflict.
I do think Spelljammer teetered the line of incompetence vs malice.
Did 5.5e add some new hand to hand combat magic items ?
Also if I never played official story as DM, are magical items predetermined in things like Curse of Strahd or is everything up to DM ?
I think they just did not wanna make that box set and made it quite clear they were only releasing it to likely get people to shut up.
I feel like they wanted it to be way more epic in scale, but then they realized all the actual lore had to be in like, a fragment of a 64 page book
a published adventure has a lot of treasure predetermined and the dm is allways free to change that
I know that Dark Sun was supposed to initially involved
But the producer at the time ordered it cut
and yes they added magic handwraps and the potion of pugilisem
I do remember the spelljammer interviews and jcraw and Perkins seemed very excited and inspired when teasing stuff. I was hyped from those interviews until I realized they talked about literally everything in the book
What’s the deal with spelljammer? I have the book and I thought it was alright, if a bit short on content and vague on how things actually work. But everyone seems to dislike it. Was it better in previous editions or something?
Nice, that should make things easier for DM.
Basically they don't want you to actually use spelljammer
They just wanted you to go to Forgotten Realms
Please elaborate
They practically scrapped old edition spelljammer and started over, and kinda made it just a highway to connect different published settings instead of its own setting with its own adventures in space
Ah
I see how that is troublesome
Spelljammer used to have a whole star system basically. But in 5e it's just "here's some ship statblocks with no rules to use them and here's the Forgotten Realms solar system go there.
Consider that in old editions the solar systems all had multiple planets listed with their own unique stuff
Dragonlance used to be accessible via spelljammer for example
Yeah I see it now
I also didn’t like how they connected all the settings like that but I never knew it used to be better
But they didn't want Dragonlance to be a thing anymore aside from the adventure and a board game so that was scrapped too.
dragonlance is still a thing though.....?
Where could I put like a
Question, like a, would I be the A-hole if I did this question
With the new people they do, but with old it was just something to sell an adventure and a board game
I suspect here if you were a player, #dm-discussion if this would be as a DM.
would i be the A-hole if i put my foot down and left a campaign with friends? The thing is, one friend so far has:
Refused all other options the other players wanted to do, and will only do one specific campaign, the reason given because “my character won’t feel special”
Refuses to do more than 3 players and a dm, for a difficult campaign, where we start at level 1, which, 3 players seems odd right?
ah well im not worried about who was in charge when things were Waffling, things look better now
Yeah I'm specifically talking about 2022
Three PCs would be my minimum, personally, but it does feel odd to not try compromising in an explicitly social game.
Which was when they released Spelljammer and Dragonlance
And were gearing up for the OGL takeover
I do have to question this line of thinking on who “they” is. Because the same people writing the books aren’t the same people approving the company’s licenses
Talk to the dm about it first, or with the friend in question
Their “compromise” was threatening to leave
The they of that time behind those decisions aren't in the company anymore I believe
We’ve tried in the group chat we are all in, so far our only solution is just doing the campaign she wanted to, but if this player thing is set I’m putting my foot down
I agree with rats: if talking doesn't work out and letting it go is going to be unfun, then walking away is a good move. I refer you to The Chart: https://www.reddit.com/r/Pathfinder_RPG/comments/3aw84m/resolving_basic_behavioral_problems_a_flowchart/
Like Perkins was behind why Spelljammer didn't have any rules for it
He wanted Spelljammer to be more vibes and presentation rather than rules and stuff.
It'd be the responsibility of the dm to ensure that everyone gets some spotlight now and again. if someone is shifting focus onto what they want to do and their things only, and the dm isn't doing anything to dissuade that then you're in the right not wanting to play in the campaign
And Dragonlance was made without the creators involvement due to legal tension between the creators and then then WotC
The tension caused by old WotC canceling a Dragonlance Trilogy after approving it initially in 2020 causing the creators financial problems.
Remote group? You can always get more players.
We rolled survival, a nat 1, a nat 2, two natural 3's and a 13 😭
fantastic you find a berry bush filled with Big purple fruits that look so tasty, none of you can reacall the name and you are so very hungry
Purple fruits are almost never dangerous. The ones you should worry about are the black ones.
yes you are quite confidnet they are safe
Congratulations! You just ate deadly nightshade! The whole party is dead! I hope you have new characters ready!
opens TPK envalope
welcome to Wildmount!
Exandria is a pretty fun setting. Wildemount especially.
Guys I want to make my own original setting complete with its own history, cultures and religions. Please help me.
Right up there with Ravenloft and Eberron
I'm about to ruin my life over here
I love this setting, we're having to discuss having to eat poisonous mushrooms for ration and then I just cure them of poison using lay on hands
There was a lot of love put into Exandria I feel like you can tell
#dm-world-building would be the place to go 🙂
The urge to play another Monk grows stronger in me every day
Okay. This might be a bit of a big task, i dont really know. I want to make a half-tabaxi half-human rogue but i cant access D&D beyond at all. Can somebody help me?
I know I'm just pointing put the fact that I'm gonna really want to make my own setting until I lose interest and slowly drop it. This happens with everything I try to make. I cannot make long-time investments.
Ah yeah.
Good ole ADHD
You can dm me I'll help
Why not just flavor a Tabaxi as being half human?
The trick is to make just enough to start running it and build it as you go
One thing I've found for my worldbuilding is that by doing it in the form of a setting guide on Homebrewery has made it more fun and easy to stick to cause it looks awesome seeing your world look official.
Because i dont know what im doing
what’s the downside of multi classing
Making a few things relevant to the story every week > trying to make all of the setting, characters, places, beforehand
Understandable 🧐
Losing out on features related to your main class.
You don’t get high level features, and multiclass spellcasters get high level spell slots but not the spells
Thank you, dm sent
Also stuff isn’t gonna scale automatically, so one level in rogue giving you a 1d6 damage bonus isn’t gonna be all that useful
I've played
4 Tabaxi in my D&D career
A Grave Cleric
A Rune Knight Fighter
An Elements Monk
And
A Thief Rogue
Also it can force you to spread out your stats to get into different classes or to just be useful depending on what multiclass you’re looking at.
Very large but very shallow pool of abilities vs strength. You get alot of things but they won't be very strong compared to what you can do later on if you just stick with the class.
I played one Tabaxi
It can still be worth it in some cases, but often isn’t.
Barry Catlen, the fastest mercy monk alive
I am new to dnd, i wonder how am i supposed to get started?
My Thief Rogue Tabaxi was named...
Lockpick.
See the pinned info in #dnd-newcomers!
My Elements Monk Tabaxi was named Sumatra
Grave Cleric was Nokiin
And
The Rune Knight was Gentle Waves
Believe it or not!
None of them acted like house cats!!!!
Because i hate that stereotype associated with them. >_>
Lockpick did speak with a Jersey accent though!
That was fun.
Mercy Monk is dope
My Tabaxi Elements Monk was neigh untouchable lol
I played once with a player who was a mercy monk that was roleplaying kenshiro from Fist of the north star
I hated how i dint think of that before💀
Sorry about disappearing, I had to do irl things. Just wanted to say that I think the best solution here might just be to let them leave! Especially if the rest of the table is unhappy with how they’re behaving
You sure it was Kenshiro, and not the other guy? Toki IIRC.
Nah honestly I’ve left the game
I also talked about the dm for adding content from my books (extra spells, subclasses, that’s it)
They said no to not “confuse the new players”
In a homebrew campaign, with homebrew races
Should have seen my friend 3 eldricht blast beams all 3 natural 1s
We never let him live it down
That is incredibly unlucky 
We just got a random encounter before our long rest finished! 😭
Good
Ah well
Hopefully you’ll find another group that fits better :3
thats 1/8000 odds
Hey guys, is anyone planning to go to the official expo in London?
Party member just rolled a 4 on a d100
Yup
It's fun
I liked the hellknight warrior class
I usually play a Silver Draconic Bloodline Sorcerer, but that's just my preference.
Fair enough
I'm also a 2014 player/DM
I like abberant
I'm not a big fan of the 2024 ruleset. I was taught using 2014 so 2024 feels weird to me.
Not sure on that part.
thats the easiest way
Thinking of having a petrified Marid in my dungeon who can grant the party a wish if they cure him
But I'm not gonna add any ways to free him they'll have to have pre-prepared Greater Restoration
Greater Resto is quickly becoming my favorite 5th level spell
cause of all the max hp drain in my Tuesday game.
Max hp drain is scary.
My favorite spell in all of DnD is Chill Touch.
A CANTRIP that lets you block healing for a full round of combat? Broken as h*ll.
My favourite has to be ride the lighting. It's just so cool
Is that in the standard rules for 5 or 5.5e? I’ve never heard of it
i did that to a downed PC that had one failed death save allready,
the whole party was like ANXIETY ++
But it's still awesome
Oooh casting Chill Touch on a downed PC is spicy
Not to rules lawyer but doesn't that just kill em cause of the auto crit?
LMFAO
Only when it's within 5ft
For actual real spells then Ashardalon's stride
oh its only an auto crit on a melee attack, this happened with the 2014 rules at the time
Ah I see yeah 2014 rules, makes sense
Chill touch is now a touch spell, which is good, except for the folks that remembered that it wasn't, despite the name.
overall a good change but a source of confusion
My party has all become kinda like time gods now
If standing within 5 feet, that's advantage, so it disadv and adv would cancel each other out to a normal roll. 
Also any successful attack on a unconscious target within 5 feet is an auto crit, not just melee.
straight rolls because the disadvantage is canceled out by Unconscious Attacks Affected. Attack rolls against you have Advantage.
What kind of look is it to use a character in more than one campaign
if your community or dm has an issue they will let you know. Idealy each campaign is going to have its own criteria for charicter creation and if you can make the concept fit a new campaign it should be fine, but dont expect to bring in a high level PC to a new campaign that starts at a lower level
Correct , thats why i said a straight roll
Roleplayed so amazingly I gave everybody inspiration in my party
Hey friends,if i want to find a game. Where do i do it?
My character was fighting with himself about what they know and the situation they were currently in
idk if the homebrew rules of a campaign I'm potentially going to play in are unbalanced or if I'm overreacting
What are they?
I can overreact to them for you if you like
"In terms of magic casting
Caster has to roll to cast magic
They add their wisdom (or other depending on class) and any spell/bardic proficiency bonus
Nat 1 - wild magic backlash, damage equal to spell level plus 1 (1 for cantrips, 2 for level 1, based on what level spell slot it’s supposed to use)
2-5 - sparks/fizzles out, does exactly nothing useful
6-9 - sparks out but does something wild magic that could be vaguely useful
10 - works at a low level (half all numbers in the spell description)
11-12 - works but at least 1 stat in the spell description is halved
13+ - works at full strength
Nat 20 - a little bit extra (+1 to every number in the spell description)"
That's already bad
Having to roll to cast magic is a bad idea
I'd be gone
bro didn’t sugar coat it whatsoever
Also vanilla humans get 0 magical abilities and an immediate -4 to arcana
This reeks of DM thinks magic is OP
i wouldn’t know, i’m always too afraid to do homebrew
No, people jsut want to be able to play their classes.
maybe a homebrewed weapon here or there but that’s it for me. i can’t make full mechanics
And not, you know, be entirely at the mercy of "Cool, it doesn't work. Again. That's my turn."
This would be this DM's first ever campaign (she was a newbie player in the campaign I just handed off)
Hohohoho, no. Just no.
Yeah that's terrible
it would completely kill all caster classes or subclasses
There's no way around making that good or fun
Correct.
so be constructive but firm about how the ruleset just isn’t good
I'm fine with wackey magic (like making us roll on wild magic every once in a while) but this feels like punishment
It's like if a fighter had to make saving throws to use the Attack action.
It's obvious to everybody why it's not good
You're cutting their legs off before the proverbial race begins
I plan to, I'm writing down questions and suggestions for the dm
My campaign has officially fully ended. We just all talked about what happened after our final fight and what our characters did and everything and it's over
neither do I, I assume its like the time/dc/damage is halved
such a bittersweet feeling, ending a campaign. does your group plan to stick around and start another one?
Scribbles: "Dear...DM... please use the basic rules. Thank you."
i can see it being somewhat neat for magic ability checks, but i think that would just be arcana anyway?
You're free to dead wrong on this.
… what
Well we ran this campaign through the D&D club at the college we all go to, and the dm is graduating after the summer, and someone else is not gonna be on campus next semester, so we won't be doing anything at school anymore, but all but one said they'd be down to try to do something outside of school again together so I'm happy about that
People are entitled for… wanting to play this heroic fantasy game? And get annoyed when the heroic fantasy game is turned into not a heroic fantasy game?
First spin as DM and they want to kick off with house rules that considerably upset the balance of the product that has been continuously revised for how many years?
Yeah, you're not interested in an honest discusion here bud.
Hey, I'm looking for a text based party, I was wondering if there were some openings? as a player by the way.
“you’re free to not use any spells with my homebrewed moveset. go ahead and pick human fighter, would you?”
So you’re saying people are entitled because… they want their abilities to work
That they… want to play the game they enjoy, the way they want to enjoy?
This is just gonna make people not play casters
Again, I point to the example of this being the equivalant of asking a Fighter...to have to make saving throws...to be able to attack in the first place.
It's an inherently stupid idea.
This is just gonna make people not play the damn game because two thirds of the classes are spellcasters
i totally think you should be polite about it to the DM, i think if they’re a first timer they wouldn’t understand the balance of the game and how it can be messed up with even small variations. i don’t think the DM is necessarily “WRONG” here, i’d say mistaken is the right word
Hey, everyone.
there are definetly ways to pass on criticism to the DM without insulting their intelligence
you give me redditor vibes as a redditor lmao
Hi Cremini. You came in at a wonderful time
I'm actually fine with a out of control magic system, but I think this one is unbalanced. I also think its a big swing for a newbie DM to try out, which is why I want to give my own criticisms/critiques
Why’s it wonderful?
“roll an intelligence saving throw”
Natural 1
It was sarcasm I beleive.
Yes it was
The question was if the house rule was bad and if they were overreacting
The house rule was bad and everybody reacted
This is a new DM not some seasoned DM trying something new
This brand new DM is likely not going to run this in a way that is fun and engaging for the casters
Meh. Honestly, it's their game, and it's the players choice to take part in it. I honestly wouldn't, but that's because I'm a strong believer in the Rule of Cool.
The constructive feedback is leave the game or tell the DM not to do it
Is casters needing to roll a check to not take damage when they use magic a cool ruling to you?
this is some freaky fish paste here, man. if a little kid is messing around with a sharp object, are you going to tell them not to do it? or are you going to let them have fun? you can’t just encourage someone to go through with a bad idea because they like it
You weren't paying attention to the original question. They weren't asking how to improve the houserule they were asking if they were overreacting to it or if it was actually bad
That's the answer they got
Luckily it’s not that harsh lol it’s just for magic
The fact that it was bad
i’m actually with this guy here. telling them “no” or leaving isn’t constructive. in my opinion it’s the responsibility of the more experienced player to help out the newbies
again, purely opinion. saying “no” and not explaining why it’s not a good rule is just not constructive
Put the rule on the NPCs first, see how they like it!
It isn't, but it's also not my campaign. I'm not gonna get upset over a stranger's opinion on the internet. I'm just here for a good time ;P
does anybody have the crooked moon book?
if so how many creatures use tremor sense or true sight?
there’s a book?
Yeah I’m also friends with her, it’s her first ever game. I want her to take big swings, but I also want to help her refine her rules based on my own experience (and another dm who’s planning on playing). I’m not going to bounce out of the game randomly
I expect someone to know, that making the Core function of a class, rely on a dice roll, to be even possible to perform, is an inherently bad idea. It is not rocket science.
no idea
Okay if I ruled that a martial who rolls a nat 1 on an attack has his head exploded and dies, is that something I should actually try and test out first? Or is it obvious that it's a bad idea?
Oh my god I had an amazing roleplay session
i would test out any homebrewed rules in a combat scenario on my own personally. make a boss and a quick character and see if the rule makes it more or less fun
Uhh ask in #third-party (I assume you mean the third party book)
ooh, tell us about it!
New dms should stick to RAW to get started, and hopefully they decide to keep it that way
This reeks of this new DM feeling that casters are OP
Actually, yeah, maybe I did speak harshly. But calling everyone entitled for wanting their abilities to work and then throwing out insults at everyone isn’t good either
did you fr just copy and paste your message
I think her setting had a magical dead/wacky zone which is why magic is like that
great response
So I don’t think it’s a caster thing (otherwise I’d feel targeted lol)
My farmer paladin kept on fighting with themself with what they knew and the situation they were in, I had to (with consent of all parties) deceive my party members by using themauturgy and pretending I was using channel divinity to find out if the muscle squirrels were demons
Hello everyone! I created an app for DMs to give their tables a fun and unique experience. Is there a section here for self promotion or something where I can ask for volunteers to help test?
Rule numbero uno of spellcasting...!
Always keep a dagger on you just in case
I would say that if this gimmick was indeed only in a few zones, it could actually be somewhat interesting. It provides a layer of tactic in combat as the party needs to stop casters from being knocked in, and gives enemies a goal in the form of doing that, or spreading the zone
April’s Fool
"I place a hand on Chauntea's holy symbol and you see an aura around me glow, though it's only themauturgy pretending to channel the divine powers of Chauntea"
Most of my casters LOVE getting up and close
Or the casters take the risk and enter the zone in order to be in range of an enemy at the risk of the spell failing
Or wear a magic collar from a Demon that gives you a bite attack and a greater taste for the flesh of the living.
So they consistently have a 5% chance to die? That seems a bit overkill. The rolling should be on how well their attack went
If you wanna try and spin the narrative that way then do whatever it takes to make you feel better
Trying to call everyone else out isn’t helping your argument
i always see nat 1’s critical fails. i thought that was an official thing? maybe its like stacking +4 in unk
My bladesinger harengon wizard was a menace.
There was one time he got a Triple Crit Steel Wind Strike
I would actually be on your side of the argument of us maybe reacting a little harshly to a new DM’s homebrew if you hadn’t started being rude to everyone
He was feeling...
Motivated 🧐
I don't know if you've noticed, but plenty of people complain about crit fumbles sucking as a concept in general. Heck there was a discussion on it here a couple days ago IIRC.
amity’s right, yknow. as hard as it tends to be on the internet, there’s no point in being rude. being polite is the most consistent way to get your point across
There was
yeah Crit fumbles are bad in 5e, when you have some players makking many rolls a turn and many never rolling on their turn its going to cause issues
honestly crit fumbling is such a horrible idea, at best you can maybe use it for like tools, carpenter's tools, caligraphy, etc. and even then you can fix it with mending
I didn't participate afair but I remember that convo in general. It doesn't sound great
I like it as a concept when the DM isn't "Lol you die now." My DM has been them for 3 years and I've enjoyed every crit fumble I've made.
I don't particularly believe having a spell go haywire randomly or not function at all is a good thing permanently within a campaign and from the way it's phrased you need to make 2 rolls for spells one the spell effect and 2 the attack roll/saving throw
I've even taken optional crit fumbles because it makes things more interesting and amusing
I don't like crit fumbles.
Punishes players for something they generally can't control when rolling nat 1's can already feel incredibly punishing
i’m not sure what crit fumbles usually are, but i just make them funny ways of failing, usually with no extra detriment other than looking like a dummy in front of dnd npcs
I think crit fumbles are good for incredibly chill, comedy tables, where you just wanna have a fun time with friends and have silly stuff happen. Some of my best early dnd memories came from silly things that happened from crit fumbles. But I agree they can be too harsh and punishing sometimes
Crit fumbles are. Silly (derogatory). To say the least
They work best when used as an actual narative tool and minor mishaps, rather then as blatant punishments for rolling bad
And they shouldn’t be used in more serious games, I believe
They also punish martial characters a lot more if they have mechanical consequence
Thank you!
i always thought silly was the point of critical failure. i thought “haha you
got a nat one, you slip on a conveniently placed banana peel”
shoutout to the world’s slowest typer
I’m not even playing a full caster in this, I’m a barbarian with a magic subclass
does nobody else call em critical s(swear word)ts?
That was the point of my example, an obviously terrible house rule that shouldn't be entertained
That's me! 😉
Oooh which one?
Oh okay sorry. I can’t read lol
Probably Wild Magic
Average D&D player
The custom critical role one, path of fundamental chaos
Reading the Thing Explains The Thing, But The Comunnity Cant Read. 
Oooh now that’s some critical role content I haven’t heard of! I’ll have to take a look at it
i think calling any house rule “obviously terrible” is sort of a misstep. it all comes down to preference, and there are no objective preferences
I also need to ask the dm about any rules for undead for,,, reasons
My Knowledge Cleric is in a party of 5
2 of which can't read
He's a Librarian, so he's been trying to teach them how to read
maybe i’m misunderstanding what you’re saying, but that’s what i got from it
It’s the subclass for Talesin’s campaign 3 character, Ashton Greymoore
I agree. While they can be very unfun at times, it can make for some very funny moments at a very chill table. Like I mentioned earlier
Alright I'm gonna houserule that if somebody takes damage at my IRL game they need to let me smack their hand on the table with a ball peen hammer.
I wish I thought of this
crit fumbles are good if you want your player characters to be incompetent
Let's be honest
Who wouldn't love a nice grandpa-vibes old turtle man librarian trying to teach you how to read? 🧐
Ah, never got to campaign 3, that explains it. But I do often love Talesin’s characters
thank you for misunderstanding and making a joke about your own misinterpretation instead of just asking what i meant
Aur naur
A house rule can be obviously bad is the sole point I was making
Me going to take damage on purpose:
And there is no "Every house rule has merit and should be respected" because you can have obviously bad house rules
If a player nat 1s an attack against an enemy with an ally close by that enemy, I have them hit their ally instead
Like the take a hit, take a shot crowd?
very good
Double nat 1s are damage onto oneself
that’s not a dnd rule, though. your example just kind of… redundant?
maybe that’s the wrong word
Like AOE saving throws doing critical damage on a nat 1 failed save..
Not just by the players, but by enemies too.
That's a houserule I've seen.
How did my simple question on if I was overreacting turn into such a long fight
Well, that’s because everyone has differing opinions, if you collected the opinions of everyone and tried to add it all together as a unified collective, then… it’s gonna be very contradicting
at least with a double nat 1, that's very very unlikely
A nat 1 is a 5% chance. it's gonna happen more the more you roll
That's... certainly a house rule
This is the Dungeons & Dragons server
Arguments are commonplace
I run my games as close to RAW as I possibly can with very little house rules
Not always in a bad way, it's typically civil
Because somebody who isn't you decided to attack people who didn't like the house rule
What is RAW?
🤩 passion
It's not your fault
I think you could explain the downsides of fumbles on attacks in a lot of ways, like it penalizing fighters and classes who make more attacks, or how it hurts melee characters more, or just doesn't make your characters feel like they know what theyre doing, but of course fun is very subjective. I just don't know if it often adds fun for anyone
Isn't that an actual PF rule?
Rules as Written
Rules as written
i love house rules. i don’t know why you replied to me, i use em all the time and ill admit it
Rules as Written. Following the games rules exactly by the words
It happens more often that you'd think
i thought raw just meant like raw meat. unchanged, uncooked
I mean, it's a new argument, and I've checked off nearly a third bingo now
most players dont need more help there
We have bingo cards here now?
At least it's something new that we're arguing about and not the usual stuff
Send me the card lol
yeah pf2 has crit fails, but pf2's crits are not on solely a 1 or a 20, its 10 under or over the DC as well, so it can be more common especially when you add your level to every single d20 roll in pf2
I love playing loosey goosey with rules. My only rule is being consistent with my rulings
I mean I do
Faxxxx
there's the AI talk, the "Martials are worse than casters", "Ranger is bad", etc.
something i hate about this server is how short fused it is. someone asking if their DM’s rules weren’t very good started this whole fiasco is something i wish i was surprised by
But I believe that some of us here should just calm down and stop speaking as if their words are the definitive, objective truth. We are allowed to have differing opinions and viewpoints
You can pick and choose the rules. I have a group that has been playing together almost 30 years that still plays 3.5.
What's the free space, Alignment?
I think failures are also good for storytelling reasons
Hey! My characters are pretty competent!
My Dragonborn Fighter has helped the party flee combats twice because his friends ran the risk of dying even if he could keep fighting
That didn't start it, somebody else attacking people for not liking the house rule started it
Indeed it is
That’s actually really cool genuinely
touché
this wasent even bad, no moderaters had to get involved no modron lines
Yeah yeah I know. What I'm saying is, it's not the most outlandish rule
The free space should be "Ranger Bad"
I do my best to try calm it, but I myself sometimes get riled up too and join in
It doesn't come up as much as alignment I don't think
I agree with that statement, but I do have to ask to what degree. in my opinion, failures are good when they move the story forward, and for something like an attack, missing usually does not do that.
i think you did a pretty good job
of course, i just wanted to say its context dependant
Search up Ranger in the server.
blasphemy keep my bowen a. row and other pun named rangers out of your mouth
Ty. I do my best
Thanks.
A house rule can be obviously terrible and there's no way anybody can change my mind on that
I think a majority of it is gonna land you in #optimization
It's why I put it in quotations.
I quoted it, not that I believe it
most house rules are Terrible
I’ve never played a barbarian before so I’m pretty excited about that
House rules are fine as long as everyone at the table agrees.
this is the point i’ve been trying to make this whole time
I never,,, get to play
I've been at plenty of tables where people agreed at first and then abandoned the house rule after it made the game worse
My condolences. At least we are in the same boat
theres a chance they can be, but it makes things shaky if things keep changing.
it’s like that one cartoon trope where everyone’s fighting and then one dude just yells “STOPPPPP” and everyone stops
i think its easy to add house rules, but it's hard to add ones that actually make the game more fun.
so if it’s not good just drop it
86k results, Alignment has 25k results, I stand corrected, though Ranger is a class and that's why it gets talked more often, not all mentions of Ranger is about it being "bad"

New house rule
If I kill your pets in the game
I get to kill them in real life 👺
And some people have the eye to know a houserule is bad before it even gets to that point
That's one of the great things about the game IMO. You can try different things. If they work, great! If not, you can toss them.
kind of how trying stuff out works? if you try it and don’t like it, then don’t use it
I don't need to try jumping off a cliff to know it's bad
Basically some ppl house rule of you take damage you have to drink a shot of alcohol.
It's not all the mentions, no.
But Ranger is probably the most talked about class in this damned game!
Everyone, let’s talk a little more civil, don’t try to exaggerate their words
Content Farming /silly
I believe we have made our points here I don't see this going any further
Attention seeking /j
In my experience everyone can tell a rule is bad the first time you try and actually enforce it. It's all about what makes the game more fun.
ok what if we all just stop fighting and instead work together to slay the dragon
Modern day DMs will do anything to nerf casters except actually run the game in a way that doesn't enable them to be OP
No, you'll steal the gold.
And then we all kissed under the moonlight or something
Pink I am on your side for most things but this is a slightly childish response to someone trying to be positive about house rules that they like. While you may dislike house rules and play RAW, that doesn’t mean that their way of playing is wrong
As a DM you have to adjust your play style for your table.
i love this reply
You can run the game perfectly RAW and casters won't be OP, casters are only OP when people ignore or handwave important rules
@severe rampart you gotta let me know when you get your bingo
amity with another slam dunk of correct-ness
Chat, clip this!
Watch someone bring out the steel chair on that random take somewhere up there
I already got two bingos
jt sounds like i’m glazing but bro just makes some good points
Don't sit there and try to malign me because you misunderstood my point in saying that
Not everything needs to be tried to know if it's bad
Some things can be spotted as being bad without trying them
you gotta take a chill pill my dude
Some players like role play, some like combat, some like puzzles, etc. As a DM you can adjust rules to fit the players at the table to make it more fun.
It's not some grand stance against house rules
she was being as polite as possible and you’re acting like she just told you that you’re a pos or something
This has gotta be one of the worst ways to calm someone down.
Some players like Jazz 🎷🐝
not everyone has the eye for that. I think thats why these house rules become common. People think they make the game for fun and random when it really doesnt make the game any more fun, possibly less fun and don't realize
I am literally perfectly calm and you guys keep telling me to calm down because you are perceiving me as being angry
fully aware, just thought it would be funny
Read the room better
Alright this is just turning into ragebait
You called everyone hypocritical and entitled
IMO the mistake is what a DM makes a house rule because they like it, not because the players like it.
Pink, I think at this point you're talking to a wall trying to troll you
Which was a genuine question like I actually wasn’t sure I thought I could turn to the people here for like,,, 3 replies of guidance and then be done
i think we oughtta move on from this conversation, it's been going on and nobody is getting anything new or good out of it
And cowards 😅
Time to start Aura Farming in the corner and look cool and mysterious to get everyone's mind off the argument /silly
If you feel it's not a good house rule you should talk about that with your DM and possibly ask them why they feel the need to implement it
The worst DMs make house rules because that is how they think the game "should be."
I think thats an issue too, but they can definitely coexist
a lot of times people dont know what they want
quick, diverting question! what's y'alls favorite ways to get into character before a game?
@idle oar will you help pretty please everyone is fighting and it’s like a repeat of my parents when i was a kid
Paladin spotted- oh wait not that kind of Aura.
I don't
Okay wth
Copious amounts of alcohol. /joking
little ahh dude getting found in a mug of ale
Bathroom voices time (vocal warmup in the shower before going to session)
I don't think undying needs to get involved in this
One liner practice and evil laughs
Think about their motivations
I am a slight theatre kid, I normally just close my eyes for a mo and try to get into their shoes
I like to practice the voice. It's never good unfortunately
Though for me it was mainly remembering what voices I was doing for npcs lol
we could put the modron up, but i think things are shifting away
i like comical entrances tho. like falling from the sky
I’m so bad at voices
I wish I could show you guys my voice I use for my Tortle Cleric, it's one of my proudest voice acting voices lol
music is a big one for me, it helps me get more into the headspace of my characters, which helps me put on a more authentic act
Oh the pain of forgetting what voice I gave the NPC 😭
Do you make playlists for your characters?
Worse is knowing the accent but not being able to replicate it
That's why you gotta give your NPCs your own voice
Meee I do. I love it
much more than i care to admit 
voices are hard for a lot of people, yeah. couldn’t be me tho, i’m a voice actor 😎
He's a southern sounding old man with a bit of rasp in his voice, but also Librarian Gentleness 🧐
If only I could
sometimes i'll listen to a song for the first time and my first go-to thought is "i bet i could make a banger character with this as the theme"
When I am a player, I like to base my characters on archetypes. To get into character I watch, read, play, etc whatever inspired that character. For example, watch Conan to get ready to play a barbarian.
I need to come up with a voice for my undead half orc barbarian
bold to assume i can afford any music platforms
totally thought you were talking about Conan the little detective
i feel like ime done with gaming conventions, i have to cancel to many sessions to go to one
can't you make playlists for free on youtube?
I like using my acting capabilities
Can you give me some
If you play them with enough character, you don’t need voices imo
when i played a character with a french accent, i'd try and quietly sing the french anthem to get the accent up. Now I'm trying a rather scottish charactr and i need to figure out something like that
At least it wasn't Conan O'Brien
I'm compensating for my lack of range in my voice with details and descriptions
i love doing any voice but my own because my voice sounds like a really angry medium sized dog
Ofc they’re always fun
Sure let me just
Telepathically gives you 12 years of acting experience
I actually find that my Tortle Clerics voice kinda sounds like my favorite gay old man Wainwright Jakobs from Borderlands
Dude give it a rest
Oh god... what is this... what is life...
give him a second he’s like 10 minutes behind in the convo
Hey we’ve moved topic now.
The entire convo has moved on
he’s got no clue we are done. he literally is 10 minutes in the past
i've got 2 different characters rn, one with a softspoken irish accent and one with a loudspoken southern accent. sometimes i accidently slip between the two when i don't mean to
like i don’t even think this is their fault, poor guy just doesn’t know what’s happening lmao
I had a PC who played with a ridiculous Russian accent, it was great
Not everyone has the same acting skills as a DM.
yeah im struggling to do scottish. I know french so its easy to do a french accent but I cant do scottish to save my life
they're trying to get out of the host's body.
Ah maybe I accidentally gave you more memories than just my acting experience. Whoops
My Warforged Pugilist is monotone, but has a very considerate and contemplative tone
That's why I always liked playing with the theater kids when I was in college.
dude i love tortles but they need a lore change
why do they only live to like 60??
Ooh I don’t know tortle lore
I never consciously think about what accent to give characters I just throw out what feels right in the moment they're introduced
That was like half of my npcs lol
Theater kids make the best DMs, in my experience.
because their whole motto is to live fast and die young
Same
When I played in high school we all were in theatre, I think that helped rping
they’re just too small and die way too soon imo. that’s my only hang up
I don't read up on lore I hear about it in this server, and I don't hear about it I don't know it
Tortles don't have much lore.
My dm cranked up their lifespan to 120 in his world, my Tortle is about 75-80
why would the turt be doing that??
I dislike the insinuation of this
I was literally just saying this the other day, it should reflect how they live old in real life
I make my own lore, homebrew setting. But official lore is very gripping sometimes
why not? I mean, the ninja turtles seem like those kinds of guys
maybe i just like that its kinda subversive
i treat campaign settings like i treat legos: pour the contents into my big bin and only use the instructions for inspiration
I made up Tortle lore for a player at my table and invented the ancient rivalry between Harengons and Tortles.
Ahaha same
Wait that's how you're supposed to play with legos?
Now it's a whole thing.
My Tortle is a Knowledge Cleric
He has no idea what the hell martial arts are ... well, he knows, but he doesn't like doing allat lol
He walks with a Quarterstaff as a Cane and stuff
He ain't gonna be doing flips anytime soon lol
my DM cranked their age up too, i’m unsure to what but my tortle is 250 and still able to fight fine. he IS an old man, but he’s still kickin. they also let me have a large tortle. 250 years old, 12 feet tall, 3600 pounds. and he is my beautiful, old boy
his size doesn’t affect gameplay much besides making him suck at being stealthy
also, more importantly, he’s SCOTTISHHHH
Mines Southern
Wainwright Jakobs as mentioned for an idea of what his voice is like lol
I find it difficult to do accents
accents are fun but they're definetly not a requirement for good roleplaying
as do most, they are tough. i find them easier to learn when consuming media containing em
batteries included
Kill people and drink their blood to get in character for Strahd
Perhaps I shall take inspiration from sinanis and create a playlist for my character
I had a fun time roleplaying them this session
poor them, they are such a gullible little paladin
one day someone will spell my username correct 😔
My Celestial Warlock beat Strahd in a chess match
And was also the one to get the final blow on him lol
"Checkmate"
I totally did
This wasn't in CoS but EoR
I feel so proud of myself, I gained advantage on deception because I used themautugy to make aura radiate from me, pretending I was using my channel divinity
then roleplayed my paladin fighting with themself so hard that the DM gave inspiration to everyone in the party
I killed him with a 5th level guiding bolt :p
Darn, Strahd is that weak? 😭
No, we fought him for quite a bit
But Guiding Bolt is pretty strong.
I JUST did enough damage to kill him before he escaped
when i ran him i gave him a dragon transformation
it was relevant to a player's backstory, i didn't just do it cause dragons are cool, i SWEAR
He suffers from the most powerful debuff a villain can have
Ego
He doesn't think he can be threatened until hes already being defeated
Strahd is intelligent
His Ego just outweighs it sometimes...
All the time.
in my mind the most important part of strahd as a character is that he's an incel deep down
like, of course he's hot and superficially charming. IMO, if you're running him as anything more than surface-level attractive, you're running him wrong
My dm just underestimated how determined I was to kill him
I jumped down a stairwell
Took fall damage, got up from being prone and sniped his ass with a guiding bolt
his antisociality and perspective on people (especially women) directly influences how he got to where he is
I think people overestimate the lethality of falling
Ye running strahd in CoS definitely requires some finesse. As well as some good above table understanding
After a certain level you can kinda just fall and be likely to survive most falls unless you're already at low HP
He also specifically targets Charismatic and Intellectual individuals if you play him well in his encounters before he actually fights the party.
He'll try to seduce, read you, compliment, etc
after the party i ran read his tome the first thing someone said is "oh god, he's a redditor"
He's manipulative, he's better than everyone else in his eyes, but he has a carnal YEARNING for someone who might be as smart or beautiful as he is
He's not as swag as Kas though
5.5e conjure animals is so nice 
Kas is the vampire Strahd WISHES he could be
A seperate ramming aura that moves when you move is just such a nice setup c:
Warforged sorcerers are only as weird as you make them. You could have dragon bones be used in a draconic sorcerers creation, wild magic sorcerers could go full infinite probability drive, ect.
tho he uses heel boots to make himself taller
Does Strahd have a kickass sword with his name? No, he’s got an awesome sword he’s weak to and a generic sword
Whoever designed "Spirit Guardians, but at a distance" needs a raise 
Yep, its funny in many ways. Clockwork is easy to make it fit
That reminds me, I shape-changed into a Solar Dragon and ate an Alternate Universe version of my Wizard once, and then she broke free like a year later...only to be immediately clapped by Planeshift to the Moooooon
Don't eat Fairies, they're apperently too tough to digest. Or rather, don't eat Evil Fairy Monks.
guys hear me out. a spell that lets you cast another spell. so basically you use it for free and then cast a spell
almost would say the same for warlock and warforged, why a machine would try to negotiate with such entities?
Until i thought, what if the machine is the deity//demon//patron itself playing and while he have more fun his power scale
surely they’ll realize that’s satire
No it’s genius
Welp.... if you make it be a "You can cast an extra spell in the same turn without any limit of lvl//components//class" would be too broken
obviously, would be limited By your spell list level, you wont be able to cast just wish instantly at lvl lets say 4 or 5 of which that spell would be avaible
No voice component, no material component so giga expensive ones wont be holding you back and would need to be X specific class spell, i would say wizard
If not warlock
so, wish
nah, wish does stuff
you can use this spell and THEN use wish
but you’ll have to use the “use an extra spell” spell
and it takes up a spell slot
nope. you do this and then a spell
it doesn’t do anything except let you cast a spell
yep, but its the version i would make it be
If not a Feature of some of those classes
imagine having good ideas
or subclass
Any idea is good if worked out properly
what a chump. dudes being creative and resourceful with very limited knowledge given to work with
imagine. couldn’t be me
anyone can cook buddy 
tho i just thought, ti can be just once per long rest or short rest that spell, so isnt that GIGA broken to spam just your highest lvl spell for free
And would need to be in warlock, because if its a lvl 3, 4 or 5 would be available for Eldritch knight and Arcane trickster.
I would like it to be more "exclusive".
So apparently D&D made an announcement they aren't taking international orders through their international store any longer. They are folding it into the main D&D beyond site.
Nvm, the whole idea its a feature of Lore Bard.
Lvl 6 feature.
Still would try to make such thing like an item or smt like that
Hey guys quick question
Can i use 5.5e monster manual for a 5e campaign?
Does it have considerable stats change or is it just more monsters as ive seen on youtube?
The monsters are a little stronger but it should still work
They rebalanced a lot of monsters in 5.5e monster manual
They mainly changed them to suit their CR better, so some got nerfed and some got buffed
Im DMin Avernus, and cant find the 5eMM in my language, so i was thinking about getin the 5.5e. What do u think?
they nerfed the 400 baboons strat?
400 baboons and one type writer
5e MM has a lot more flavour text and lore explained in it, but I prefer the actual stat blocks of 5.5e. I still enjoy both, but it’s a trade-off
Ye the 5e MM isn't very good for play but lore is decent, where as the 5.5e MM is good for play, not as good for lore.
That's annoying
Yep thats why it's a good thing they got updated.
What other spells give a bonus action usage like expeditious retreat?
The lore in the 5e MM was also very FR centric iirc
what i mean is a spell that gives recurring usage of bonus action, not that the spell it self is bonus action.
like how expeditious retreat give use of bonus action every turn, or hunter's mark to move the target, etc...
i really wish wall of ice was a druid spell
Witch bolt? 🤔 I honestly have no clue what spells have reoccurring BA usage
How to I play DND online with other people but only chat and no vc
Ask #find-a-game and specify you want PBP games(Play By Post)
AHHHH hello!!
also, some VC games will allow text chat; you'd be muted in VC so you can hear everyone but would respond via text in the VTT or Discord depending
but ye, PBP is the tradtional text only format 
Embrassing, im not actually a player yet, never got around to it but i really want to
^^ my westmarch games allow chat only play
you wouldnt be the first, nor the last. Check out #dnd-newcomers
As long as you state that you may get invited to a mixed party
Did they.. leave?
We were to friendly and to helpful 
Rolled a nat 20 on intimidation
Did Shadows get properly ranked this time around?
Same as last time
PWK doesnt increase or affect CR (aside from potentially dealing 12d12)
sidegrade
Also the new encounter rules now accounts to not have a ton of them there higher level the players go
With the rule being “don’t have more than double your player count in monsters”
Good, that was the biggest pitfall of them.
Is it reasonable to stop inviting one of my players to any of my games because they didn't want to play in one of my games because I wanted to try and track carry capacity
seeing how that tends to be a big part of campaigns that include them, yes
It's a reason to stop inviting them to games you intend to use Carrying Capacity, yes. Not as a wholesale thing.
Let me try another question: Is it ever unreasonable to not invite someone?
I would say no.
It depends entirely on the reason.
You have no obligation to invite anyone.
And a reason not to invite is uneeded. A reason to invite is more needed
Well he wanted to play in my game and almost had his character made but when I said we would be trying to track carry capacity for this one game he backed out
Just as an experiment to try tracking it
It's only ever unreasonable if it's say, Racially motivated, or because of their gender.
Oh yeah, of course
I think there's plenty of unreasonable reasons to remove somebody from a game beyond those two things
Yeah, kinda forgot about that being a possibility. But it does not apply in this case, thankfully
Like if I kicked my player because he beat me in MTG on a day we weren't playing D&D
I think that would be unreasonable
There is a difference between removing someone and not inviting them
wild
Alright well imagine I said not invite rather than kicked in that statement
If I host a party at my house, not inviting a given person and kicking them out in the middle of the party will be received very differently
But at the end of the day it is still my house. I get the final say on who is allowed inside. Unless they have a warrant, but that feels like a different issue
And I don't think you can get a warrant forcing someone to run a D&D game for you
that sounds like holding someone against their will
Uh... Imagine being kidnapped by people who force you to run D&D.
unreasonableness depends entirely on the context
Anyways yeah, to go back to the original point: I don't think it's unreasonable. And, to add, I think dropping out of a game because the DM decided one of the rules of the game, not even an optional one, would be respected during that game, is a bit disrespectful.
Inventory management is not an optional rule. It should be considered to be part of the basics of the game, and expected in every game until the DM says otherwise
I'd love it if my dm did carry capacity. I don't do it cause my players didn't want it. I do bring it up tho if they try carrying large heavy objects tho
lol yea me too, like idr if they are carrying 1 sword too many but i'll tell them if they're trying to carry like say 100 swords
Also I'm certainly not gonna do this just wanted to see what y'all would say
I believe Melfs Minute Meteors does
explain everything in session 0 man
Debating if I should take Heavily Armored on my artificer so I can wear heavy armor and just dump dex to push my other mental stats up higher
Cartographer Artificer gets so much stuff at level 3 it's kinda wild
i just realized you can add your wisdom twice on arcana checks with 1 cleric level and 1 druid level.
Yeah it's great for mizzium
u can try but beware of enemies who's atk doesn't use ac for hits
... You mean saving throw effects?
Should I make a helldivers artificer
what would be the gimmick? stratagems?
No, because such things don't really work in 5E.
yea, i said that because idk if there's anything else
How much is too much for a dnd backstory page wise using google doc ??
half page
Make it easy but good, let it explain well your character ways
Looking for at least one more for a group to run tonight. 18+ story is called How Do I Look? Quest to find amulets.
dang i got too much
one whole page is too much and more if you need to kinda explain how your character works
Already have a post. Need one more
Can't recruit out of that channel in this server. A mod may bop your post here real soon.
or in other places of your town (other channels like #find-a-game )
I already have a post in that channel. I'm not spamming. Just seeing if anyone here is down to hop in on the spot
Even a single post asking for players gets deleted when not in that channel. Idc who asks for players in other channels. Not my server not my rules. Just letting ya know is all. Good luck finding that last one. Hope you get someone.
important question , say i have a cr 1 creature that can cast darkness , how much would their cr increase if i gave them the ability to see in magical darkness , making them unaffected by the blinded condition while everything in the darkness still suffers from it , nothing else is changing about the creature
Devil's Sight does not increase CR
Neither does Blindsight, Tremorsense, and Truesight
oh , i forgot devils sight was a thing , what creatures have that again?
Devils
should've guessed lol
probably fey
A Devil's magical sight.
And a devil thing
And a Warlock Invocation
Warlock invoc that gives you 120ft of vision that let's you see through natural and magical darkness.
ok
I’m trying to make a homebrew gambler class, since the one I found online and have been using is… bad
Would anyone be willing to help review it once I have the framework down?
Oh, thank you
sounds good, its worth of it?
wait, its like dark vision