#dnd-discussion
1 messages · Page 393 of 1
because space is nature, it just isn't what we typically consider "nature"
I know if they did a proper Spelljammer 2, the niche spelljammer playerbase would probably be overjoyed.
The spelljammer was just such a punch in the face to old fans and didn't even do much for the new people it supposedly wanted to bring in
All it says is just "don't fight on the spelljammers, go to forgotten realms"
I feel the new direction of basically legitimizing Third Party content lets them kind of have their cake and eat it, too. They can let third parties take risks while they stay safe and bland.
So I honestly don't expect any brave content to come out. I just hope that means they can concentrate on making it quality content at least. In terms of formatting and rules and such. If they can at least make a baseline that works while third parties branch out and do interesting stuff, I'd be okay.
I can see it.
I think Dark Sun and Book of Vile Darkness will probably be the "bravest" so they can earn a lot of old community points.
I'm personally fine with bland as long as it's good.
Problem with content before was it was bland and good if you're dm made it good
I personally don't care if they try to earn "old community" points or not. And if it means bringing back the bad old days of highly problematic content for the shock factor I don't want it.
I mean I feel like the new subclasses in the Villianous UA are brave
I think that having a grimdark setting is fine as long as it's not TSRs way of doing it.
Villainous Paths are certainly an interesting idea.
And adaptable to any other kind of "path" as well.
they have added a some brave subclasses to UA they just aren't really a lot of them
Like for Dark Sun 5e, I want it to be "this world sucks, but you guys can change it or die trying."
Kinda like how they did Dark Sun 4e
And then if someone else wants to delve deeper into Dark Sun with a third party book, kind of like Exploring Eberron, they can let them try some wackier mechanics.
Which generally gives DMs an excuse to allow or disallow stuff.
Which is smart from a business standpoint too
Right, I think the Exploring Eberron thing was a great idea.
Cause if someone makes something screwed up, it's not the companies fault.
As much as people online would wanna say so
Cause saying Dark Sun 5es existence would make that kind of bad stuff happen would be like saying video games cause violence.
WoTC screws up anyway
Like nah. Bad DMs and players have inserted that stuff into games in every system to bother people since the dawn of tabletop
My critique of Dark Sun is more to do with writing that basically says "yeah this horrible thing is officially Neutral on the spectrum" which was pretty awful.
So as long as they don't do that again.
Kinda like the direction it was going with the 4e one
Where the one Sorcerer-King wanted to change and made his city a free city, and trying to gather allies to end his former comrades tyranny
That'll paint a target on a person.
Where it was not "oh this is normal here it's not bad" but "it was bad that it was normal here and even this evil a hole agreed and wants to change it"
He's kinda like Paarthunax from ES
Does anyone use dnd beyond
He's kinda got a little something going for him
One of the Sorcerer-Kings was cursed to sleep and dragged into the domains of dread so he's out
And a couple of the other sorcerer-kings mostly keep to themselves
I do, it's great! It's better as an assistant for people who know the rules, though. Using the character builder is not a good way to learn the rules.
Course they're like Darkseid to their subjects
"Yall are worms but my worms" type stuff
I just made my character on it and it helped a lot
Then the rest of the SK's are sadistically evil and should be who you target first
Oh good! I know they revamped the builder to assist more, I'm glad that's turning out well.
One of the more "passive" ones only cares about keeping the last forest on Athas alive.
By any means necessary of course.
That character sheet is set on private, so I can't see it.
I'm playing as a rogue
Maybe change that (it's under Manage Character) and share it again in #character-discussion ?
Try now
In the setting magic actively kills life and the ecology, right?
Yep
It's why Athas looks like a nuke went off everywhere
you should get pircing resistance
its the most common damage type
Ok thanks I am new to DnD
The Druids of Athas basically keep the forest in sort of a stasis iirc
You don't have to ping me twice about it. I'm looking now.
Ok
Magic kills some stuff, they regrow it
Arcane Magic is what kills the world btw
Druid magic and Psionics are fine.
I'll make comments over in #character-discussion
my mind is fried looking at this character sheet
So if you see your bard casting faerie fire. Stop him, he's burning trees with that strum of his lute
He's heating up the planet
Still not as hot as a Drow
Death Knight Aspirant
Spellcasting. The aspirant casts one of the following spells, using Charisma as the spellcasting ability (spell save DC 15):
At Will: Phantom Steed
1/Day Each: Destructive Wave (Necrotic), Dispel Magic
The Phantom steed still takes 1 minute to cast, right?
Yep
At-Will just means they can cast it as much as they want.
Like a Lich has at will 5th level fireball so if they wanted they could just use fireball every round at 5th level.
Gotcha. I'm still looking for a good monster for our team to fight. The beholder is a nono. This Knight thing seems more reasonable.
Most of the guys are melee so we cant have a flying orange 120 ft up in the sky 😂
Knight cr 11 so 2 less than the BH
Du you have another suggetion too? We can choose whatever monster and will get better rewards for higher CR.
I think CR 11 is reasonable for a team of five lvl 8 players?
It's gonna get wrecked
That's fine. If I remember correctly CR 11-13 is one reward and CR 14-17 is a higher reward. Thatts why I'm aiming at 11.
Ah i didn't understand the context
We can do CR 8-10 too but that is probbly too easy
Oh yeah
np. I didnt spell it out properly before
To give an idea.
I'd throw an Aspirant with some minions at my level 6 party of 4 as a boss encounter
And they'd probably make it out fine.
How optimized is that party?
Not much. Fighter keeps forgetting he has magic weapons.
Bards had bad luck with enemies that have popped up being immune to a lot of his spells.
I see. I got nervous when we fought a CR 13 creature and it walked up to my chracter and bonked her down in one turn.
A lot of their power comes from me having given them too many good magic items due to them clearing out an old Wizard Tower.
But even with normal magic item allotage I'd still use that encounter.
Would you go all in and play the knight as hard as possible or be a little soft if they roll bad?
This fight is going to be full contact. That's why I'm a little nervous.
Level 8s vs a CR 11, play to win.
I run enemies in character I guess
What does play to win mean? (english is my second language)
Like last weeks Monday session I Circle of Death'd a downed PC with a Necromancer cause she got tired of her underlings doing nothing to the party. It was also to hit the rogue.
It just means, you play that enemy like it wants to tpk the party.
When my party was level 7 we fought a full on Death Knight. We had prep time and hirelings, but it was still definitely very rough. It was only partway through the fight when I noticed it saying something odd that I had the thought of trying to redeem the Death Knight instead of killing it.
Ye I threw a slightlh nerfed Blackguard (CR8) at my level 3 Wednesday party last week.
I'm tossing up a fight for my own level 7s (4 of them) atm. I'm trying to decide if I want them to fight one gray render, or two. Really all I want is some rampaging monstrosities to loosely challenge them. Gray Renders just feel like the right CR for that.
She had a blood mages curse on her that made her attack Arcane casters indiscriminately
The DM intended that we run from that fight, but after fighting it to a standstill and getting a 32 on a Persuasion roll, haha yeah Bard, we turned it against itself and brought it back to its original god.
They managed to partially get through to her and find out so they knocked her out and blindfolded her and it seemed to prevent her from going berserk
I also technically threw a Purple Worm at them
These two games I'm pretty much just going hogwild
Thanks for the input. I will suggest the Death Knight Aspirant, and see what the team thinks about that 🙂
Hi guys, im new to the server!
welcome welcome
I got a question
Have any of you guys ever heard of Dungeons and Dragons? its a table top roleplaying game, its super fun
-# ... "Sir, this is a Wendy's."
hi new to the server
nice one lmao
Hi new to the server, I'm not nugget
Hi not nugget, wsg
opp of bad tbh
Dm offered me a paladin dip for my wizard (we are level 2). I was planning on taking rogue levels down the road for this bladesinger (I have this idea of a powerful archmage that also is a great thief).
I am struggling because power level wise this free paladin dip would arguably make the character significantly stronger. But it would go against what I wanted this character to be.
I'm guessing this paladin level would come with an oath. This is what we would call strings attached.
Yes. One of the tenants is upholding the law. Which is kinda opposed to what I envisioned as I want him to be a petty thief who finds a reason to instead help people.
Go with your Heart
What would you Want?
What would fit your Character?
Now Think
Paladin fits better than Rogue ok, If Rogue's Better, Thats Fine as well
Sounds like a no to paladin, then.
I am feeling like I should not take it (even if it would help the character be much stronger down the line with smites and healing). But that it may lead to him guilt tripping himself earlier into not being so cavalier.
Rogue fits Better to what im thinking
Hmmm
What would FIT your Character Lorewise?
The rogue dip.
Well thief subclass dip around level 8
-# Stupid Slowmode
Anyways
Huh
We also have #character-discussion and #optimization for discussing character builds
Ngl i think it'd be pretty cool if necromancy wizards when upcasting animate dead could instead of making more undead minions make stronger undead minions
Like raising a weaker version of a big bad they took down at the cost of a higher level spell slot every day to maintain control over the undead
This is something I allow actually although the Initial animate also costs some extra materials
There is another spell that raises stronger undead. Create Undead.
Sounds great tbh!
Iirc it only lasts 1 hour though and costs concentration
You're thinking Summon Undead.
Create undead works with flavor is free very much
What do you mean? How are you reflavoring it?
Ok this is pretty sick. I'm personally not the biggest fan of ghouls but reflavouring exists ig. I'll definitely use this when i finally get to playing a neckromancer
And you get different undead if you upcast!
Absolutely goated
So yeah, sometimes it pays ot check if it already exists before you start homebrewing a solution.
Then my next campaign I'll either play this or the changeling duelist with battlemaster and sword bard
Course it's a 6th level spell, which means you get access at level 11.
If you monoclass Wizard.
I still think that using like a 5th level spell slot to instead of raising like 5 or so skeletons to raise like 1 skeleton knight with good armour and a big sword could be cool, but this spell will definitely do it for higher levels
Well again you do get Summon Undead in the meantime. So have your weak horde of zombies and have them led by your 1hr long concentration beefy zombo.
Yeah that'd probably do it, though having the undead be permanent would be nice
But that'd require a lot of work on balancing most likely
Thanks a lot for the help!
If I had a Nickel for Every Spellcaster in my Upcoming Campaign, I would have Six Nickels which isn't a Lot, but its weird that everyone is a Spellcaster...
-# Sorcerer[Me], Wizard, Druid, Two Artificiers and a Bard
-# Shadow Magic, School of Conjuration, Circle of Underdark[Homebrew], Alchemist, Artillerist and College of Glamour-
Not really. It's D&D.
Yeah my current party is Ranger (me), Artificer, Eldritch Knight, Celestial Warlock, Aberrant Sorcerer, Ancients Paladin so yeah all casters as well.
Damn
-# The Thing is, Collectively, we each fill in a Role
-# I worry for our DM
-# He wont know what's Coming
:)
We're not Evil
But we somehow made Evil
DMs have their ways.
Spellcasters tend to be the norm tbh, I usually get more surprised if someone ends up something like a barbarian or a fighter. Even then some subclasses can give you access to magic anyway ^^;
They do, I dont know what to expect from the Campaign
Suspicion is so terrifying
If my Sorcerer dies, Im just going Martial Lmao
-# Gunslinger Fighter Go Boom :)
A challenge!
Name six non-caster subclasses.
Thief, Mastermind, Mercy, Open Hand, Astral Self, Berserker?
Hmmm
You missed battlemaster and champion.
I stopped at six!
Right, hardcore mode. How many non-magical (including focus, so monk is just out) subs could you name?
Path of the Beast, Samurai Fighter, Long Death and Shadow Monk, Battlemaster Fighter, Path of the Giants, Scout, Theif, Mastermind, Assasin Rogues, I think Echo Knight? Path of the Berserker, Totem Warrior
Exciting! But also .. you don't know what the campaign is about at all? How does our DM expect you to build a character that will fit into their setting?
Beast, Samurai, Battlemaster, Echo Knight Maybe? Berserker, Totem Warrior, Giants, then Mastermind, Assasin
No Like we KNOW the Setting
Just gotta see what our DM has in prep for us
Then Thief, Scout Rogues
Inquisitive, Soulknife, Phantom, Samurai, Champion, Battle Master, Banneret, Berserker, Giant, Beast, World Tree
Add Swashbuckler, My Irl Friend is playing that
Does Echo Knight Count?
And I stopped, there are plenty.
I am more in favor of martials over spellcasters but my favorites are gishes
Yeah
So Bladesingers, Pact of Blade Warlocks?
Honestly Valid, They're Cool
Well my first character im playing right now is eldritch knight
Oh Cool!!!
Veto soulknife.
Beast, Samurai, Battlemaster, Echo Knight Maybe? Berserker, Totem Warrior, Giants, then Mastermind, Assasin
I'll be playing Shadow Sorcerer
-# I alr have the Character ready, Im waiting for Sat
Totem Warrior can actually cast spells.
Ditto echo knight. We're looking for the mundane here, no magic, no supernatural powers.
Battle Master Fighter blessed be the battlefield commander.
Inquisitive, Mastermind, Assasin, Cavalier, Samurai, Berserker, Beast, Giants, Battlemaster
I was saying ones that don't cast anything that would be affected by antimagic.
Although I have only just gotten to lvl 3 but my plan is to juggle in as many different weapons attacks as I can in one battle because of war bond
Ahh.
Scout, Swashbuckler, Ancestral Guardian if it Counts
Soulknife isn't doing any magic, but you specifically want stuff that don't look supernatural at all?
^^
War Bond?
Can an Earth-man do what soulknife does?
Ancestral Guardian isn't doing magic, but they are doing supernatural stuff.
Depends on how you flavor it, sure, but yeah if you frame the question as no supernatural stuff by default then that's a slightly different question.
Yeah, EK can bond to a weapon and summon it into their hands as a bonus action
Oh COOL!!!
So I can essentially juggle between two-handed weapons
If THATS what you mean
Inquisitive, Mastermind, Assasin, Cavalier, Samurai, Berserker, Battlemaster
Basically EVERY Rogue and Fighter except Soulknife, Arcane Trickster, Echo and Eldritch Knight, Arcane Archer and Psi Warrior
Berserker Counts as its Rage, Beast and Giant maybe, but more with Berserker
D3 Rogue is out as well.
D3?
Dead 3, Scion of the Dead Three Rogue.
Oh Remove that As Well
-# I was saying 2014
A Normal Human can be Gunslinger Fighter as well lmao
Yo uh
The point being it's a short list when you strike out anything magical, sorcerous, spiritually empowered, psychic, psionic or otherwise extra.
What class allows me to binding vows or deal with the devil's type beat
Damn
Warlock
I got inspired by Chaotic Good Barbarian
Thats the Whole Class
Like, how many subs are there, a hundred?
No...
@sturdy tusk 10 DEX and 16 STR, also planning to go beast master
...
I'm playing a Beast Master, they're really fun!
10 Dex means you cannot multiclass, just fyi.
-# Yeah
Proficient in what?
Are you talking about Saving Throws?
Uhh Yes
It's Str and Dex.
Gotta ask
Oh wait I was also thinking of summon undead
Well I want them to fight more up-close and melee weapons have better options if you are going strength
I am So stupid-
For Warlock can I alter vows on vows themselves
Hmm, Valid ngl
Like layer them
-# I was confused sorry
None of that negative self talk!
It isnt an optimal build at all but they’re also a dwarf with tough feat and +1 CON
-# Damn
Oh Cool
Didn’t plan to but I just learned that in #dnd-rules so its good to know for future reference
Hmm
-# Does your DM allow Rolling Stats?
Nah, its point buy
Cuz my DM Did
I rolled Three Nines...
TWO Fourteens
and one 16
:)
My Character's a bit balanced ngl
What weapons are you planning on using? Also what's your Wisdom?
Atleast Warforged Increased FOurteen to 16[Con] and 9 to 10[Int]
That's pretty much right on the mark for total stat points according to standard array, so that tracks 😄
Mind you I rolled them...
17 WIS
I think flail because of sap
And also shield
The Dice Gods wanted a Balanced Character Lmao
They really did
^^
-# Im pretty Sure that I wont be worshippin any Gods soon tho [I mean my Character]
I don't usually find rolling for stats all that great for longer campaigns, because if you don't roll great and others do that may lead to some pretty long lasting bad vibes.
But for one-shots, roll away
Bud saw the Horrors of the Shadowfell and became Better
It isn't a Oneshot
But we all rolled some balanced Stats I would say
That's good to hear!
For the campaign my fighter is in I rolled for stats and dm had homebrew rule of rerolling 1s
My stats are 15 in both strength and int
17 in constitution
And 6 wisdom
I forget dex and charisma but they’re average
6 wis 😭
yeah but still those saves are gonna hurt
-# Tho the Saves will hurt a LOT
Damn, Stole the Words from my Hands mate
When did you become a Rogue?
one wis save and its over
see assuming i need to be a rogue to steal your stuff was your first mistake >:3
Damn
Agreed
-# Still 6 Wis or 9, Both will Hurt
Sounds fun, I’ve yet to be put against a wis save so overall my character is doing great
Low wis and high int is also really fun to roleplay
Lmao
Honestly?
Make a Low Wis, High Dex, High Cha, and Avg Int Bard :)
-# Str Idc, Con yeah Sure
And Rp as him
-# Make him an Aetherborn as well Lmao
What’s aetherborn?
third party i assume
From Plane Shift
Huh
It is Official I thin
Plane Shift Kaladesh is Third Party?
If yes, then do a Warforged
So Yeah Here
ua iirc
Does anyone actually use initiative scores instead of rolling for initiative?
Ability Score Increase. Your Charisma score increases by 2, and two other ability scores of your choice increase by 1.
Age. Aetherborn come into being as adults and live no more than a few years.
Alignment. As a rule, aetherborn are driven by hedonism and self-interest, making them neutral at best and thoroughly evil at worst. Neutral aetherborn might devote much of their time (and wealth) to parties and social activity, while evil aetherborn are usually involved in the criminal underworld.
Size. Aetherborn are about the same size as humans, ranging from 5 to 6 feet tall. They are quite light—only about 100 pounds—and their weight diminishes as they age and more and more of their substance returns to the aethersphere. Your size is Medium.
Speed. Your base walking speed is 30 feet.
Darkvision. Accustomed to the night, you have superior vision in dark and dim conditions. You can see in dim light within 60 feet of you as if it were bright light, and in darkness as if it were dim light. You can’t discern color in darkness, only shades of gray.
Born of Aether. You have resistance to necrotic damage.
Menacing. You gain proficiency in the Intimidation skill.
Languages. You can speak, read, and write Common and two other languages of your choice.
if i remember correctly
Aetherborn come into being spontaneously as part of the aether refinement process. Their bodies and minds are apparently formed out of some interaction between the volatile elements of aether that are removed during refinement and the psychic impressions created by the people involved in the process. But each aetherborn is a unique individual, not a mere copy of some other person’s mind and shape. This race is little understood, and few aetherborn are willing to waste any of their short lives allowing vedalken scholars to study their biological and psychological characteristics.
Aetherborn are a strange living by-product of the process of aether refinement, cast in humanoid form but lacking any of the biological qualities of other races.
They are actively Decaying I think, Very short lifespans as their bodies go back to Aether
Oh wow few year lifespan is crazy
It is...
Still
They ARE Very Short Lifespanned because their Bodies slowly are dissolving and dissipating into Aether
what's with these super nothing racial traits
probably means: cool explanations, but what are the mechanical benefits?
For the Stats?
Paladin, Warlock, Sorcerer and Bards can Benefit from the +2 Increase in CHa
The Other 2 can be Con/Dex
Int or Wis even
Only Darkvision, a resistance and a proeficiency is a bit poor for a species
-# Actually yes...
-# It does sound cool, If Wizards of the Coast make Aetherborn into 2024, They gotta implement more stuff
Hmm
Would be funny to give them insane racial traits and shorten their lifespan to a few months
Prob, But they have mostly 10 Years to 6 Months to Live
I love the idea of making a character who’s grappling with that short a lifespan- it could lead to a lot of fun hooks and Storylines
Also do they need to sleep?
maybe sth like mediation time to keep their body together
Honestly if they had such a short lifespan I would make them not need to sleep, eat, or drink
No Actually
yeah but in the system of dnd, how would they benefit from a "long rest", its a bit weird having a cloud just standing around camp for 8 hours
They dont need to Eat, Sleep nor Drink
ah, thats fun then
Its moreso a Statue
fair
A Moving Statue slowly dissipating into Aether over the Course of 6 months to 10 years
They have VERY short Lifespans, so an Idea I made was and Aetherborn Oath of Devotion Paladin, who was the Psychic Impression of a General who died far from home. The Aetherborn remembers his memories, and wishes to devote the few years of its life to fulfill this General's Dying Wish. To give a book, His Diary to his Daughter. The Diary is the general's Life, the Problems he faced and how much he missed his Daughter, because she believed that her father was a Barbaric Warrior who only liked Killing :)
@silk hare what should be a general rule of thumb for holding combat as a dm
Why does that text look darker
i am confused as heck for the first time
Then a Space
cool!
Please don’t misuse formatting folks
Ok Mate, Dw
-# I'll control myself
It’s disruptive to chat and can be an accessibility problem for folks
my eyes hurt now
Damn Ok
I'll be careful :)
there is no textbook answer really
as long as everyone enjoys themselves, its all good
adhere to the rules (combat) and go off off there
If you accidentally kill the party on the first combat just capture them instead
Don't TPK first round
theres tons of narrative ways to "undo" a TPK
Or make a New Campaign where they are going through hell!
Like they all died, are now in hell and have to get back to defeat the Villain who was OP at Level 1, Balanced at Level 15 :)
Yeah
Oh i know im just saying
bro i accidentally tpk'd my players because the idiots found a very secret quest line and decided to enrage a shapeshifting dragon
should i just get them the return by death ability at this point 😭
Should've made it clear to them that going there was dangerous
also some lenience from said dragon, bc they cant even scratch it
dragon should make like a tree and leaf
bruh the thing is they decided to roll either way and the monk is a self righteous catholic who wanted to evangelise the said dragon... pain in the back i tell you and he decided to throw a massive rock at him
I never heard anyone say that irl before, got an unexpected chuckle from me
How did they manage to enrage a shapeshifting dragon
Besides if its shapeshifted wouldnt the point is it wants to keep its identity hidden
Any reason that the dragon might spare them from death and instead either toy with them or perhaps send them on a side quest?
@errant whale
the dragon was in a very discreet mansion (fighting in its basement to be precise)
actually now that i think about it, I'll do that. thanks!
A deserved death then.
Bro the entire party is chaotic
What's a cool secondary effect for an uncommon magic weapon 
1 Satanist , 2 Catholics, A Mormon, A Buddhist and then an Athiest
Best not to mention real religions here
they made their own spinoffs of it
Why are they a bunch of real religions in D&D? Sounds like a weird group
irl or their characters
characters
-# Their Characters
They-... they know there's other gods in DnD right?
they do 😭
-# WDYM SATANIST IRL-
Lmao
one was an ex satanist
And a bit of a murder-hobo-y one given they're attacking random people after insulting them.
...
i love my friend group
Nope I quit
yeah I love it and idk why but had to think of it soooo
oh and to tell you they all are drug addicted
except the catholic because of course
It is quite fun to say silly things
bro wanted to be Heisenberg
Oh Ok
Yeah, but we should tread lightly, and hopefully move on
depends on the school, yes
Hear me out, Make one of them make a Nuke in DND
Sounds like a bad group.
Anyway, re-asking it, What's a fun secondary effect for an uncommon magical weapon?
1 asked for a bag of holding.... i wonder why
yup yup indeed
Swaps Ability Scores
My favorite is to say "I thunk" and not "I thought"
It you hold it, 11 and Below are 11 to 20, 11 to 20 is 11 and below
Uncommon
mhh I also like "I forgor" instead of "I forgot"
oh i like that one
Moves you and the target you attacked each 5ft in a random direction?
I assume it's a +1 weapon already?
what about everything it touches makes it sing or illuminate so if you're fighting someone in a darkened place, if you hit the target the place is illuminated and the target is well brighter
Radiating light is a fun one. Maybe a charge which you can use for some small effect once a day? Players like that. A second wind of some kind perhaps?
for a Halberd stolen from a fallen skeleton general, I'm thinking clashing it against hard metal creates an irritating shriek that deal 2d6 damage or frightens creatures who fail a DC 15 Wisdom Save. but that might be a bit too much
any lvl 1 spell ingrained, returning weapon (or other artificer infusions)
"stunning strike" but its a % chance that u get stunned instead
it glows when danger is near, but well, the edges are sharp soooo
artificers are so hard to play
Taking an action once a day to attempt to scare creatures in a radius... it's cool, maybe a touch strong for an uncommon which has a +1?
not really, just require a lot of dm cooperation imo
They are just a pretty complex class
for noises and such it's thunder damage correct?
There's a lot of jank but setting that aside they're just pretty complex too
generally yeah.
For extremely loud sound based damage, it is indeed thunder
Ya know, it doesn't have to make sense nvm, it's from a skeleton general, just make it necrotic
Tarrasque's Roar for example
also why do some people say 3e is better than 5e?
depends how u define it, could also be "piercing" as in a high pitched noise "piercing" your eardrums
oh, thanks Echo
cos people like different things
some people prefer the crunch of 3e
there's not really a good basis for better or worse. some prefer 3e, some prefer 5e
If it's purely exploding eardrums, it's Thunder, if it's a magic shrieking wail of a ghost, it's Necrotic.
preference is subjective
can you elaborate?
Because some people enjoy the more complex and feature rich nature of 3E (Or rather 3.5) over the relatively shallow pool that is 5e.
Nails on chalkboard would do psychic damage
some stuff is jsut way stronger, lot of customizability iirc, a few things are a bit different such as druid and monk lvling iirc
And crafting and construction rules are just...a thousand times more engaging and detailed.
also that
I'm still thinking about that time I rolled a 15 for fireball damage
8D6 be like
That's how the dice are
indeed haha
I mean to be fair thats like 30% of max damage
so bit below average but yeah
can i try playing 3.5e (customisation & monsters) but with 5e rules
you certainly can
also i heard in 6e, ranger will be assimilated into fighter?
The huh
If you have the books, yes. You don't exactly need strangers permission to try a system
thats the great thing about dnd, if you are willing to put in the work you can customize a bunch of stuff
my friend said
That sounds... wrong
Nothing about 6e has been announced yet, there's not even confirmation it's being worked on (or ever will be)
would it be recommended i meant
5e has a design principle called "bounded accuracy" that they sometimes actually adhere to, which basically makes numbers go from like 5-30 for the most part. 3e had tons of things that if it took an expert to perform them, they would be drastically far out of the reach of other people. in 5e typically your bonus to a skill check might be like +12 or something at level 20, in 3e it might be like +30
I dont think sth like that was announced tbh
some people would like that but there is absolutely no announcements out about a potential 6th edition
Not really, but it might be fun to give it a bash.
It'd be terrible if that happened
yeah they should just bfuf ranger a bit imo instead of abandoning the concept and making them fighters ngl
They'd be incredibly stupid to announce a 6E litteraly barely two years after launching 5.5
I mean not like it hasnt happened
also there were a lot more rules that made the game feel like a physics simulator to some folks
Any rumours about 6E are pure trolling
3.5e works differently to 5e, you would need some hefty reworking to port some of the content over to 6e
oh can confirm, we're still on an iteration of 5e in 3030
5.75e?
5.5.5e
heck.
so what you're saying is that some monsters have like ac40?
5E will stick around until it's well and truly not making WOTC Money
not necessarily, but theres e.g. I think CR30 creatures iirc
i think my friend is gaslighting me then 😞
I vaguelly recall someone mentioning a Monster with like and ac of 80 once.
yes. Or your friend has been gaslit
Buffing ranger would reduce their profits /j
i need to see some videos of it i think
80 AC? Saving Throws here I come
in 5e? That would be someone's bad homebrew.
Or you friend just beleives whatever rumor they've heard from some random, untrustworthy idiot they came across online.
skill checks got way more out of hand than attack bonuses and AC, but ya basically
tbh AC over 30 doesnt matter, its only crits atp anyways
No, in older Editions
Not sure if it was 3E or 2E TBH, it months ago when it came up
An AC 30 at level 20, is still being hit often enough. Martials would usually have a +14 to hit, so a 16 or higher on the dice hits, not including things like bless and BIs and whatnot.
Think it was during some Tarresque discussion
my players were asking to fight a God when they turned level 20 in the following months, let's make them play 3.5e instead
just a random example i remember, i had a splat book that told me what rules effect putting honey on paper and putting it on a window would have on my attempt to break it silently
yeah fair, I usually think in a max of lvl 17
but yeah AC 40 at lvl 20
what. the. heck
AC 40 is far beyond the bounds of what 5e is designed for
The gods have nothing against ranger’s 1d10 hunter’s mark
what was 1e like then? 😭
If you're using an enemy who has an AC of 40 it's on you as a DM
true true, but AC 80 is also unheard of, + it wouldnt really matter after a certain point
3.5 had the epic level handbook, with progression past 20. includes DCs for balancing on the surface of a cloud, escaping through a silid wall or wall of force, and other wild checks
oh for sure. I just think both are bad design
i think i should just give up on reading those handbooks then, sounds way too complicated but fun at the same time
huh the WoF is the first time I heard about that lmao
nice spell ya got there, imma just roll a checkk
I think the only thing that can hit AC 40,barring saving throws and magic missile, is a level 20 monk with bardic inspiration
with bardic inspiration most martials can
Champion fighter could also hit slightly more consistently
Oh, yeah, never tried champion before though
Especially if they have advantage
19 on the dice, +12 from bardic, +14 to hit.
Ohh, the monk I have has a +16 to hit, but yeah, that works too
That’s with magic weapons
yeah, just realised xD
With, yeah
Love monks and their ridiculous to hit bonuses
can divine intervention summon God
I had a +10 at level 5
Which one
dm discression
In 2014 it’s up to the DM
what about warlock trying the same.... is it still DM discretion
Yes
i had a silly scenario then
Warlocks also don’t have much of a mechanical basis for it
D&D Question of the Day (D&D Beyond: Playing the Game):
Which is the target number for an attack roll?
A) DC
B) AC
C) PB
Crying is a free action
B. Armor Class
I would not expect anything for warlocks because there’s not even really an ability that does that
B
but personally Id say AC/DC
what if they both fight instead of the threat it was in front of them, how would that combat work
AC
Unless It's Rules As Written, it's Entirely, Utterly, Solely up to your DM.
love these quizzes
G) ATTACA
Ok quick everyone change your answer to PB to mess with them
doxxed part of his genetic sequence huh
Using it as means for me to get up to date on 5e myself.
oop
lovely
thats nice
got a question for you: Can a barbarian use their "danger sense" on a breath weapon attack?
A: yes
B: No
C: Yes, but only if its in line of sight
D: Sometimes, but up to the dm
So if cleric summons God and warlock summons Patron/God but said Gods fight each other, how would that combat work?
Wait there’s a newcomers channel
no rules ,up to the dm
i am trying to do that ngl
set a scenario like that
yeah, sadly if its not written in the rules, its not ironclad and cannot be answered
bc it goes case by case/ depending on the dm
I still struggle knowing how to propperly balance using the CR system...is there a hard and fast calculation that makes sense? Like, if i have 7 players, all level 4, then I should have a combination of 12 between all CR encoutners? or, 1 player can fight 1 creature one half their own CR?
Ask your DM about that first
because if you're deliberately trying to get two godlike beings to fight, that could seriously derail the campaign/session
i am the dm trying to do something stupid
Imo CR doesnt work as well bc theres a lot of other factors
alr then, go ahead with it
I mean, good luck then 
find a statblock u like for them, go by turn order and give your players control over them e.g.
theres a bunhc of "god"/ "avatar"/ "demigod" statblocks out there
customize as needed
ok so i'm not crazy, it just really is an...'attempt' at a system (that falls a little flat) right?
thank you guys 
yeah, its ok to guestimate, rule of thumb is CR X is for 5 players of lvl X
that doesnt really take into account stuff you gave your players, chances, stun effects etc etc
- XP budget is also a good way too look at those encounters
and balance more
- CR of a total encounter is also vastly different than a CR of a creature, bc dnd combat is highly dependent on action economy
also guys do you guys got some good playlists for the sessions?
is it not per 4? for some reason i thought it was for 4?
ah! interesting. It's good to have a rough rule of thumb that i can start FROM and move toward what feels better. ok i'll go with that. and thank you!
XP budget. ok i'll check that out too
I mgiht be tripping too
but the PHB accounts for like... 5-7 encounter days no?
yeah true that xD
I hate CR so much
frfr
i've never understood this. but maybe i've just set the wrong pacing in my games
i like milestone levelling
i got a bunch of good music from humble bundle for tabletops, and i hoover up the free tracks from tabletop audio as well
No, no one does 5-7 encounters per day
me when my lvl 1 players get bashed in by 3 needle blights (CR 1/4) (on hit 2D6 dmg) at lvl 1
does anyone know any good virtual tabletops i could use until im able to get foundry? im dm'ing my first campaign soon and i'm scrambling to figure out what to use
C. Yes, but only in LOS...and not incapacitated for blinded. Correct?
oh thank god lol. i was feeling like i screwed up somewhere
owlbear rodeo
Owlbear is very nice
roll 20 is easy to use and free
I quite dislike the storage limit, and I am at my limits
They are fighting on incomprehensible past-3d dimensions so no one can sense or understand whats happening
But you could have it run any way you see fit tbh, like avatars brawling it out or smth
is there ways to upload player icons and stuff as well in those?
ya
okay perfect! i rlly wanna do this right cause ive always loved planescape and im introducing my friends to it
I onyl use roll20, but yeah u can make tokens, upload player icons, use a compendium (free rules are free there too)
correct!
I just realized turning the pacts into invocations boosted Eldritch Adept from tasha's
indeed it did
Paladins would enjoy that pact of the blade…
I was thinking the same
tbh most pally builds (that are somehwat opimized) multiclass sooner or later, so they just get the invocations one way or another
hey so im making a hombrew subclass as a story reward for one of my players and i was hoping i could get some feed back and suggestions on it
If you pick a legacy "full feat", do you still get a +1 stat increase, since half-feats are the new norm?
oh thanks you
unless the feat specifies it gives u a stat boost, then no, u dont get an increase
at least Id say so
Also please don’t post the same question across multiple channels - it’s considered spam here. Try and find the best channel for a topic and use that channel - see #channel-guide to find the best channel for a topic. Thanks!
yeah, if the Feat didn't get updated, then it didnt get an update
Ah, my apologies
I'm playing a melee character in one of my DnD games and I recently obtained the Feywrought Armor. Which lets me use Compulsion on other creatures. Could I use the spell to force enemies to walk towards me and if not what else could I do with the spell?
The compulsion spell is very specific about what it can do. If you mean "walk" towards you, its possible per the spell
I cast belly full of lead
Yeah that's what I meant. Sorry for the confusion.
Hi, I wanted to know if it's possible to advertise for a friend who draws and does commissions?
Okay thanks
#looking-for-players - read #find-a-game carefully as it explains how to use the bot to post there
(assuming you mean you’re advertising a game that needs players)
Anything interesting going on in chat
Or is it just redirection of players
Some actual D&D topics happening 
Scroll up? Check other channels?
Ok cool ty
We're talking ludonarrative dissonance in #dm-discussion.
One idea I had poking around my head was What if Netheril was a Domain of Dread.
Previously or currently?
The idea is it’s their last week or two before the fall.
The Dark Powers trapping them in a loop
Admittedly the idea of running such a Super Magic city would be wild
Would be interesting if Karsus was made a Dark Lord
The way to “escape” is the stop the ritual from happening. Problem is Karsus wasn’t the only one making it work, it was the entire empire.
Hah. And he's the only one who realises, and he spends his days in an alcoholic stupor, surrounded by the notes of all his failed attempts to break the loop.
Could also be a “ok so what did I do wrong last time?”
And he keeps editing the plan to make it successful.
Like a guy playing the same part of a video game. Groundhog Day style.
Exactly. Except he can't do it alone and nobody there can help. Until the party show up, he's stuck in a personal hell.
Then he becomes the threat of “given enough loops he is going to win” is my thought process
Ahh, the twist.
He is the Dark Lord so he is the primary antagonist
Plus a guy so smart would take advantage of repeating his failure experiment
It happens.
yeah aha damn
Sorry to hear that!
yeah :[ It's surprising because they went soooo far
Happened to me as well while go
they blocked me, left the server, left THIS server, left the discord server she found my campaign on and disabled friend requests from all accounts haha
Literally at the start of the session “I’ll be right back” then left and blocked everyone
oh yeah it's crazy
I think he just didn’t like I wasn’t making guns exclusive to his own character and no one else.
i wonder why people do that 😭
I don't know though there was just 0 indication but yeah it sucks
Someone call the mods on #dnd-arts-and-crafts message
Poor communication skills
#moderator-support or use the integrations in the right click menu to report it
yeah I guess so
they can't just say "I'm sorry, this campaign isn't for me" and talk
I dunno, presenting him as an initially sympathetic figure feels like it has legs.
Good luck on your campaign though, hopefully you still have enough players
so you know i went and used the integrations to alert the mods
i only learned about that way of doing it yesterday
So most Dark Lords again
I want one more aha
could always post an LFG in this server
well it was a paid game so I think this server's much less receptive to that so I won't ^^
Could also ask your players if they have a friend that wants to join.
Ohh I see, well good luck!
That's what #moderator-support is for, for future reference.
Hi
#paid-looking-for-game is a thing. Take you a couple of minutes to write up the form.
Ya. There isn't anything wrong with a paid game. If cooks can be paid for making a meal at a privately owned restaurant for their cooking skills, a DM should be able to get payed for their DMing if he offers it as a paid game. There are people who get payed to clean. People should be able to get payed for DMing. You don't have to do something only for the love of it. If you put the time into it and hard work into it, you should be getting paid for it. 🙂
Should?
Not in money but you can certainly!
I view paid games as a different experience and that is perfectly fine.
I DM because I want to spend time with friends in another world. Both parties get something out of it.
If my friends paid me, it would no longer feel like a reciprocative friend hangout and rather a service.
This does not include stuff like paying for the campaign book or snacks as pitching in.
Has anyone here played with Plot Points?
A DM should be paid to run D&D, if they offer it as a service, because they invest significant time and resources into preparation, storytelling, and creating an engaging experience for players. The costs can vary based on the DM's experience and the quality of the game, but players often find that paying ensures commitment and a higher quality of play. And let's be honest, buying content, and stuff for VTTs does get expenive after a while, and in some cases for DMing, years of training in collage to do so (Not in most cases, but ya, some professional DMs that do have collage experiance in acting/voice acting).
If it's for friends, and is offered for free, that's fine.
I had one professional DM, and everyone stayed commited to the game, because there was money involved. People stayed and we finished the campaign multiple times, in multiple systems. D&D 5e, and D&D 5.5e being two of them, as well as a couple of others. The professional DM was highly skilled at what he did, and only charged $10.00 per player per game, and even threw in a few free games or two. We got to do cool stuff too, like being a part of a Kickstarter project. 🙂
The one where a player can spend the point to replace the DM?
Woah wall of text moment
Nevr heard of it. 🙂
It’s in the 2014 DMG.
U mean instead of xp?
No?
Ah sry didn't see the second message
I said nothing about XP.
You mean Milestones?
No I said nothing involving level ups
Not in D&D, no.
Yup sty, again didn't read the last message
I was refering to Neal.
I mean since it was a message comprised of 3 words just being " has anyone ever used x", could have been
Meant I didn't read that one
Okay. 🙂
If I wanted to say Milestone I would have said it.
I mean the Plot Points rules.
Sure, but for a lot of folks English isn't their first language + milestones are part of "plot points"
Hence my confusion since I didn't read the DM replacement message, but alas
And no, never used it
Well, that has the potential for some daftness. Definite Session Zero discussion if it's in play.
Indeed
(So, Fate. You can spend a Fate Point from your stash to declare a detail. My guy says, does this place have a gun on the roof? I say, what, this convent turned hospice for wounded soldiers? It's 40k, of course there is - and because that makes so much sense, your FP pays for it to be operational without mucking about.)
Ya. Always do a session 0 when adding in an optional rule. Because well, they are optional.
I was asking if people had experience in it.
I told my players that if they do some research on their own, and find a rule they feel would add to the campaign (like disarming strikes etc) we can still implement them from that point on if everyone agrees session 0, but yeah should definitely be talked about
Seems like no one that is currently online
Reply hazy, ask again later.
Usually, the DM wants to control things sometimes. And most DMs will say "No." to certain things. Sometimes, new players or players that don't know any better will do stuff that's toxic for the game, and the DM will have to have to put their foot down. It's only good if you got a more experienced group. There is a simular mechanic to this in other tabletop RPGs, but in my experiance, it's a bit more fleshed out to prevent toxic behavior and puts out some guidlines to facilitate non-toxic behavior at the gaming table.
Not what I asked.
You asked what my experiance was with it. I gave you an answer.
No experience with them, but the plot points thing seem like a way to either really stress your dm out or in the case of dm switch completely break your game
I asked about if people used it, not questioning the nature of using optional rules
The first one seems reasonable enough. A handy clue or item? Sure, keep the game moving.
Cool, this is still a discussion channel, so people will be discussing
- it helps others that weren't present at the time still see your message and give their input later
Except it’s specifically replying my messages
Rather than an abrupt topic change that drowns out your question
Yes, because u brought up the topic of a system that a lot of people are unfamiliar with, thats how conversations work
It’s replying to a question without answering the question
Anyway, any particular reason behind the ask, or just curious?
Option 3: The Gods Must Be Crazy
This wild card of an option allows for swapping the Dungeon Master with another person. This will create sessions filled with unexpected results to the benefit or dismay of the group.
Your basically asking me this rule from the Plot Points optional rules. That's my experiance with it. I had a whole campaigns with it, just DMs switching out every couple of sessions. Thing is, every DM has what they want to happen and want control of how the campaign works. If you have multiple DMs doing what they want to do, the campaign usually falls apart.
It’s a niche rule that I wanted to hear how groups played around with it
Gotcha. Yeah, can't say I have or would want to.
Its reacting to something you said and giving their thoughts on the matter, as you asked
Agreed
Tbh i think the first 2 are fine, switching up the DM role seems a bit iffy tho
"The Candyland is saved! Mr. Toffy has had his cane fields restored. The queen's guard welcome you with their sharpened candy sticks aimed down. Ready to give the reward, she presents-- oh... different DM time..."
"Wassail upon the onerous callous wen of courtship disguised willowy wool gathering worsted by wizened thyself remembrance. Opprobrium irascible memories feckless in consonance"
Even with a very low prep table with a table full of people who want to be a dm I think it would be an issue.
Not in D&D no, but similar mechanics in other games, yes.
Still can't find a campaign.....bleh
Option 1: What a Twist!
With this option, the player can summon a reasonable physical object or element that can assist the group in moving forward, such as a merchant selling the exact item the group needs or a distinct marking on a floor leading to a trap door.
Option 2: The Plot Thickens
This builds on our first option. When a player spends a plot point for an effect, the player to their right adds a complication. Perhaps you spend a plot point to have your bitter rival appear at the same tavern. The player to your right may determine that the rival is best friends with the tavern owner, and is therefore in a position of power.
These two are pretty fun. I will say that, be careful with Option 1: What a Twist! Sometimes, the players will get Magic Items that can unbalance the game for the party as a whole. If you group is okay with being unbalnced, or knows how to optimize (By that I mean making a character's persona and then giving that character mechanical benfits to roleplay that character mechanically, without powerplaying or munckining) it can be fun.
Fiasco does co-DMing (Co-GMing) rather well. I haven't played it personally, but I have heard a lot of good things from it. You could homebrew game mechanics based around Fiasco.
Considering a lot of optional rules in the 2014 dmg was rules from older editions I wonder if that rule was inspired by those systems.
Holy hell what's with the text walls? What's going on?
Does it look like a wall of text on mobil?
Yeah
Oh. XD
It's a good chunk of the screen
Covers more than the entire screen usually
How much is your phone? 😮
These days I just wait for my 5 campaign weekend to start, on the weekdays I plan oneshots, but never actually do them, and then I get out of my daze and it's the weekend again
Anyone here willing to help me test something in owlbear rodeo, I need to make sure something is working for a one shot that I am running tomorrow
Uhhh I think it was about 100? Something like....well no it was technically free as a trade up
Ah. 😛
It's about 3 years old by now
Ok so I’m about to run a one shot or small campaign, it’s my first time dming and I was hoping for some advice
Make sure you kill all your players
try to make it linear
DM me! I will do what I can to help you out
But yeah been struggling to find a campaign, all the ones that sound fun use a VTT which I can't do
What do you mean?
Most VTTs, if not all, are free
100%. But go to #dm-discussion and you will get more help.
Phone....
You could just theatre of the mind it
How to DM for your first time
- Relax. Your players are there to have fun with you.
- Sometimes you need to put your foot down. It's rare, but it does happen sometimes. Sometimes, some players won't work out.
Roll 20 works for free on phones.
sigh
It's a part of Discord as an activity.
I'm saying the campaigns list it as something they use
Roll20 works for free on phones, so does Owlbear
Then go to a PbP?
Yeah but it's always foundry
Owlbear does too? Nice! 😄
iirc it does, yep
Ew no
Foundry can be played for free on phones, if your a player.
At that point just join a RP server lol
or go play DnD in person?
Running a game on roll20 on a phone would be pretty painful id think. It’s aggravating even on a pc sometimes.
I hate Roll20, Owlbear the goat
It 'technically' works but it's a pain
the only thing I dislike about Owlbear is the storage limit
Foundry VTT on phones is pretty good on mobil, if you got the moduels for it (modifictions).
And often freezes my phone and stuff
Recently been trying foundry and I really like it now that I have some necessary mods. I have heard a lot of good stuff about owlbear rodeo though.
I've used foundry way back in the day when it was still new and it was sick
Foundry VTT is the goat. 🙂
I want Foundry, but I do live in a third world country, so, gotta decide very carefully
Also as for in person, not easy to find open groups around here
Fair. Haha!
And I'm uh...very uncomfortable having to RP around other people
Online removes the shyness I deal with
Oh how I wish my currency had more purchasing power, but alas
Plus with the part of the country I live in ....
Yes ttrpg groups tend to be less bigoted but theres no certainty there
I mean even online I've found some really rancid groups
Down here, finding a tabletop RPG group is hard. I went to the library to find a group. I use to be reaaaaally shy, (Like I literally wouldn't talk at all). but luckily I found some cool friends that helped me get out of my shell.
The library group is teens
So uh.....no.
D&D maps on Dndbeyond works decently as a mobile VTT
Ya. You can make your own group for adults, a private group. You post a flier, and people come in droves most of the time.
Yeah but like....what DM is doing that
I've done it a few times
id imagine a good majority of online DM's do that, but i haven't played in an online game so I can't say for sure
I mean if I was looking to dm, sure
No most dm use owlbear, foundry, or roll20
It’s not a popular choice for vtt, owlbear rodeo, foundry, and roll20 are the big ones
And foundry is the most popular pick
Ahhh okay 😅
Fair enough. I think there are a few online web sites to find groups in real life too.
i'm shocked foundry is more popular than the free options
foundry is amazing though
Having seen and used it, I understand why
i don't mean because of quality, just because money is a barrier to entry
If it's leagues above the rest then it makes sense
Tbh after using it I get it. It’s a lot of work to customize it and get it how you want, but once you get it there it’s just very good.
i have heard nothing but good things about it
It's because it's feature rich. I didn't like Roll20 compaired to Foundry. I found Roll20 to be more confusing for me to set up than Roll20. At least for me. Making tokens for everything for roll20 was a bit of a hassle for some tabletop RPG systems. Other tabletop RPG systems where easier to set up in roll20.
honestly it's
Foundry>Owlbear>Roll20
The main pros I have for it is once it’s setup properly it majorly speeds up turns, and it has some deep functionalities that other vtt just don’t afaik.
ya big fan of owlbear rodeo here
I just dislike Owlbear Rodeo's storage limits
What's that one VTT that acts like a 32-Bit video game?
Also another point for foundry
I remember one of the constant annoyances in roll20 was the inability to use the in platform sound due to the storage limits
Isn't it for that one JRPG ttrpg system?
I've seen screenshots and it looks badass
No. It's for a bunch of 'em.
I think there is a YouTuber that compaired VTTs that has the video, but I'm not sure. Bald animated guy he is.
But yeah it's weirdly hard to find a traditional fantasy adventure campaign
It's all politics or ultra grimdark or something that's not even related to fantasy
Where the hell did everyone's whimsy go
there are still whimsical campaigns
Politics and grimdark are not antithetical to fantasy.
Onemore Multiverse is the name of the pixleart VTT I was thinking of.
You can have fantasy that is either or both.
No but the politics ones never let you go on whimsical adventures and dungeon crawls ;-;
High fantasy isn’t the only kind of game around anymore, but tbh I think that’s good. There’s still a good amount classic high fantasy hero simulator campaigns I think.
And grimdark is usually hyper objective focused on my experience
Also less flexible for character making
Mind you I'm not saying I don't want any depth to the story and stuff
Ya. I like me some Grimdark. I do think AD&D, B/X D&D, and White Box D&D does it better game mechanics wise. D&D 5e and D&D 5e tend to be better for high fantasy, game mechanics wise. Grimdark tends to be low magic. In D&D 5e and D&D 5.5e, magic is almost everywhere.
I just think the dark elements have more impact when interposed onto a lighter setting
When everything is terrible it's like "is this dude even really that bad?"
I mean, I think thats kind of the point of darker toned settings
I like grimdark to some degree, having that feeling of carrying the flame in a dark world is nice. I do think grimdark can easily become grimderp, or pointlessly edgy though.
i like dark fantasy but seems like soulsborne inspired worlds and grimdark are in fashion at the moment and it can be done like really poorly or superficially, where depth is eschewed for just surface level edge
It requires a fine touch to write well, like most fantasy.
I think this is more the issue I have
And I say this with no malice, but the average DM isn't gonna stick the landing for grimdark I feel
Soulsborne inspired worlds are a bit harder to pull off tbh
I do enjoy the aspects of being defiant to the world's darkness by bringing joy even if it's only a facade to help others
In grimdark, heros fall into morally gray areas most of the time. It's the reason why I like it. The heros don't always win. I don't like winning all the time myself for tabletop RPG games. I had a DM and that's all we did was win, even in situations where we shouldn't. It was boring. In grimdark games I've been a part of, every choice has a consequence, good or bad. And there is a lot of morally ambiguous choices ya got'a make. I like conflict in my games. It drives the game forward, and makes things interesting for me as a player.
I love abysmal hopelessness admittedly
Thats kinda why I like Menzoberranzan as a place in the forgotten relams
But with high fantasy it going from casual RPG antics to the veil being pulled back and things suddenly taking a darker turn as the story really gets going
I love that rug pull
That moment of everyone realizing how deep into it they are
I hate "ACKSHUALLY it was a facade all along!" rugpulls personally
I like blunt straightforwardness lol
"You're gonna die."
No no not what I mean
And no, I'm not trying to play contratian or anything
I mean the turning point in the story where the stakes are upped and the realization of your burden
I do love a good dark fantasy setting with consequences and grit but I like it when it comes from a place of reason, compassion and respect for the inhabitants of that world, which is honestly what I kind of expect from a good dark setting
I genuinely enjoy when a world is straight up buisness, no sugarcoating needed
The moment you go from being adventurers to realizing you have to be heros
Does that make sense?
It's not about sugar coating and more just the tonal shift as things start happening
I mean.. most adventurers have aspirations of being great and doing great things for the most part anyway from the start
One thing I like about Grimdark is: when choices have severe repercussions, player agency feels weightier. Players invest more in long-term strategy, character development, and alliances.
The consequences make victories earned, not assumed in grimdark.
And those dreams are great until you have the weight of the world on your shoulders
It's a impossible burden
Nah, I'd win
I hate that feeling, me no like those games
Also high fantasy can have these elements still, in fact it's weird to not be like this
"Put the weight of the world on my shoulders, I'll hold it up just as if I were Atlas!"
At least trying to immerse myself into it, ingesting it through other ways is preferable for me
I think people often forget when writing grimdark that people don’t just be evil for the fun of it, at least most people. People be evil when circumstances require it, or when it’s easier than the alternative.
I’ve seen some grimdark where everyone is just cartoonishly bad for no other reason than the world is dark.
Yes, but it's kind'a the point of grimdark.
I agree.
I like the things that are the step above grim dark worlds
Me either. That's not the point of grimdark. Grimdark characters are morally gray.
Agreed, I like it when a world isn’t always fair but not always unreasonable either, and represents the many faces of human interactions, it’s just more interesting than grimderp
I don't like grimderp myself. I do love me some Berserk. That's a masterclass in grimdark (At least in later chapters).
Grimderp?
Depends for me. I don’t mind morally clear villains here and there. Just as there are some people who naturally act as heroes, there are natural villains.
There’s some value in having someone that you have absolutely zero doubts it’s the right thing to stop sometimes.
Ya. Surron is considered a great villian now that I think about it.
I like goblin slayer, the split between oh it's a fantasy world and oh my god the monsters are horrific and vile and the fights actually having a bit of real brutality to it
I don't think everything has to be morally grey, people can just be heroes or villains. I like the exception
Goblin Slayer is dark fantasy, which is a bit closer to grimdark. It's kind'a the inbetween, but it leans more into grimdark.
A true villain like pure evil isn't the same as mustache twirling
Mustache twirling is when the bad guy is just doing stuff cause....idk le evil
Yeah for sure. One of the strengths of darker worlds is that they feel more like ours where everything isn’t clear and is more grey. If you make everything just super evil, all you’ve done is turned the dial too far the other way. You’ve created false narrative clarity again, just an evil version of it this time.
Which is what Surron does from Lord of the Rings.
Oh Sauron.
But a villain can be absolutely a heartless monster, but there's a greater ambition to their actions
Ya. Him. 😛
Not really, he has a goal
D&D unfortunately has plenty of mustache twirling villains
Some are interesting, but a lot are just evil because they're ass-hats
One thing that I always hold for myself is that just because I love dark fantasy and sometimes grimdark it doesn’t mean that they’re the only modes of compelling or complex storytelling, I think fantasy is a genre that is big enough to fit a multitude of tones
And stories ranging from colorful high fantasy to bleak darkness are all equally appealing in my eyes
I think for your truly evil characters, the narrative pull comes from your character having the guts to risk themselves to stop them, or being the only one with the ability to.
Stopping a mustache twirler from robbing a bank is boring.
Stopping a mustache twirler who runs a massive criminal empire that intimidates or kills anyone who speaks out against them, who you get to see how their actions have effected the lives of people around them, that’s something. You’re a hero because you’re risking your life, and stopping someone truly bad.
Also, there is a character that Sauron follows that wanted to go against stuff because things where good. To fight against all that is good for the sake of going against all that is good. His name is Morgoth.
And Lord of the Rings is epic high fantasy.
For sure, an apt statement. Awesome how much variety you can get from one genre
Has everyone here played borderlands 2?
You can have characters that are evil for evil's sake and it still be fun, as you can have chacters who are morally gray, or serve good for the cause of good, however no one's fun is right or wrong. As long as real people don't get hurt, emotionally or physically, it's all goody. 🙂
A little bit, but not much. I'm not to big into loot shooters.
one of my favorite games of all times
Cause I wanna use handsome Jack as a example for what I mean between a morally grey and mustache twirling villain
He's objectively a absolutely vile wretched evil man who's deluded himself into thinking he's the hero
But everything he does has a meaning behind it
He's neither grey nor comically evil
I mean Handsome Jack is an absolutely high standard, memorable and multi-faceted even when he's being corny
Oh absolutely
I'm just saying he's the best example that comes to mind for the middle ground
Anyone ever watch Die Hard? Hans Gruber is one of the most memoriable twirl his mustache villians in cinema history.
i feel you can argue he was a charaacter thats started more a i do what i have to then more and more slided towards mustache twirling villain even if he himself cant see this decent
like the road to hell and motive decay and all that
Indeed. 😄
Overall, play D&D how you want too. If you like grimdark, that's fine. If you like high fantasy that's fine. If you like dark fantasy, that's fine. If you like high powered dark fantasy (Which leans more into the high fantasy sort of power scaling in terms of it's magic) that's fine too. 🙂
A part of me feels bad for Jack even though he brought every bit of misfortune from his own actions
The pre sequel did a lot for his character
Yeah, the road to hell is paved with good intentions.
I understand at each point why he does what he does even if I think he always chose the worst option
To him he's a evil of necessity for a greater good
Him killing the AI was the point of no return I think
That was genuinely evil
makes me want to replay the game again, to experience the goat. I think he broken the second his daughter was born
Yeah that's when he went over the deep end and it was no longer about some vision of a greater future
Killing the AI is the right thing to do.
No????
Angelus from buffy the Vampire Slayer is a cerial killer and is considered the best villian in TV history in a fantasy setting oddly enough.
Nashira Sarga from The Bone Season is considered the best villian in fantasy books.
Eh, he’s been too brainwashed by Helldivers.
i feel its more their was always darkness in jack but over time and a few betrayal later he stopped trying to supress or hide then just let it take the wheel and grow
I have somehow heard of neither.
I was actually referencing the anti AI sentiment pushed to the extreme in this server.
To clarify, nothing against you as an insult. I meant that prior comment as a joke.
I’ve played the game, I know you fight sentient AI robots
Well for what was being talked about it was a fully thinking and feeling AI that Jack did the equivalent of lobotomizing to turn into a weapon
I am also clarifying my joke, unless the Borderlands AI also was trained off copyrighted twitter artists without compensation.
might be best to move borderland talk to off topic
True! 😄
Handsome Jack is an actual character from somewhere? Huh ... and here I thought my DM made him up as a memorable NPC.
Tomorrow is the start of my BBEG fight that is going to take us 3 sessions
We're fighting an alien God
Yeah primary villain of a game called Borderlands 2.
He's peak
He yaps to the player the entire game. I can see why people would use him as inspiration.
how does one get started?
Reading the basic rules
Hi I just joined
Welcome! On D&DBeyond there is a Basic rule set on how to work the mechanics and build a character (or campaign) called the Basic Rules!
hello
If you want to join a game or have people join your own as a DM #find-a-game has instructions how!
also #dnd-newcomers
Cool I love dnd so I am very excited to be here
Hello I’m a new dm does anyone have any advice?
#dnd-newcomers does