#dnd-discussion
1 messages · Page 350 of 1
mainly cause it can just turn into this https://www.dndbeyond.com/monsters/3731044-scion-of-stronmaus
depends on the party
Both my Friday groups would murder both Sul Khatesh and Rak Khatesh at the same time, it would be sick to do one shot to do.
which would wash a level 10 party
I wonder what's the most spells you can cast in one turn, because Fey Touched, Fiendish Legacy, etc. exists so you wouldn't be expending a spell slot (5.5e)
ive done 4
lets say i got a party of 4 balanced sqaud all new/newish. best guess on lvl.
the true best spellcaster, a bard with a (literal) silver tongue
let's see, Cantrip, Magic Action, then what?
Reaction spell from a magic item
Eldritch Knight level 15 (I think) action surge for Two
Thief rogue or Fey touch Misty step for a bonus action
So 4 spells I’d say.
Cartomancer too yeah?
nah hold person into slivery barbs into divite smite into scorthing ray
Mainly because action surge in 5.5e cannot use the Magic action
But Eldritch knight can cast a spell with the Attack action bypassing that.
meh im doing a thing rn where a guy has like 400 dpr (including hit chance) so with good initiative this thing would die before its first turn
mmm Dissonant Whispers Eldritch Blasting someone
lone monsters in general are very easy to beat just through sheer action economy
also it doesnt have anything with big range
been thinking of in the future giving my battlemaster elf (player) a magic item that can transform into any melee weapon
Conjuration, Divination, Evocation, Necromancy, or Transmutation school of magic. The weapon has 6 charges and regains 1d6 expended charges daily at dawn. While holding the weapon, you can expend 1 charge to cast its spell.
divivne smite is an evocation! and its also a proper spell now
Yep! Did this for my Paladin in one of my games and he gets to smite way more often a day
I'm 5% sure this already exists
i feel like there should be an epic boon for bypassing immunity to damage
Eh
im at school rn
we can bypass resistance but not immuntity
rip
lol im at my recognition
i dont think i would recognise you
before you go on, please don't give out any personal information on the internet
Any way, how is everyone doing today?
no im very truthworthy and you can tell me everything /j
ahem, please mind the User Safety rules folks
Trench coat... no... it can't be... two kobolds in disguise
youre right it isnt
I am very confused. Why is Favored Enemy showing up as an amalgamation between its 2014 version and its newest version on DnD Beyond?
its... weird...
Is that supposed to be a thing?
it depend, in 2014 was something that most people said it was a waste of feature
in 2024 it kinda dont exist at all
So why is it still showing on DnD Beyond for 2024 rangers?
might be a #ddb-feedback that, if not i dont have any idea
could be bugged, it happen too
Can be you have 2014 rules enabled
etc.e tc.
Yeah, I have posted this same question there. I'd like some clarification.
Good Night everyone. One question, If a have a paladin with 8 Dexterity, and I want to use a Heavy Crossbow without Disadvantage, I could use the cantrip of True Strike to attack with Charisma, this Will allow me to bypass my low Dexterity and shoot the Heavy Crossbow without Disadvantage
Heavy property is still there
Lets say I have 13 Strength
Still there
Changing your attacking stat doesn’t change how the Heavy property work
u need Dex for a heavy ranged weapon
Lets say I use the 2024 versión of True Strike, and Attack with Charisma
True strike does nothing to the Heavy Property
true strike doesn't bypass heavy
Just like how Pact of the Blade doesn’t either
That I did know
You could technically bypass it by having Advantage since they cancel out, but otherwise you're outta luck til you have better Dex.
Or don’t use a heavy ranged weapon
I find weird to see a paladin using a Longbow but i feel it would fit him a H.Crossbow ngl
A H.Crossbow with symbols and stuff on it
Besides consumables and enspelled items, are there any items in either 2014 or 2024 that cast haste? Preferably a staff
Enspelled Staff is literally that sorry
Blackrazor
Look for Spell Scrolls. If You have the spell, You only need Arcana to make them
Is an alternative
I mean you could just homebrew an item
Eh, I'm playing a thief/wiz and was looking for more ways to get off turn sneak attacks when true strike Scrolls are scarce. Lol
if scrolls for a cantrip are scarce, anything else would likely be harder. but this feels more a conversation for you and the DM
The campaign will likely end around 12. So very rare and beyond will be pretty tough. And Attunement slots will likely be a pain
Yeah you're right. They're a new DM. They still figuring out how to handle stuff. And I didn't want to burn through like 60-120 gp of Scrolls every combat if I can help it. Lol
I would instead recommend against trying to minmax for a new DM but thats not a topic for this channel anymore. good luck
One question. How in 2024 DnD How often players use or make spells scrolls? I started to look how to make them, and I did find it amazing thing to do as roleplay and as a combat bonus
not a rules question. but entirely up to the DM
Lol. They're a player in my pf2e game. I helped them optimize there. They knew what to expect when they invited me so they could learn. Plus.... it's a Rogue, likely the weakest class in the game.
i would use the rules that a wizard has for copying spells into their spellbook but modified in some way
as a rogue i am offende... oops i died
That isnt what they asked and scrolls have existing rules for creation
It seems there's a ton of conflicting info. If you have down time to craft, extra gold, or a stronghold. Pretty often DM permitting. If you have a GM that is stingy with items and counts them as one of the 100 you're suppose to get by lvl 20. They'll be tough
Any character with spells and Arcana can make spells scrolls
Monday game hit level 6
Yeah we did, we're gonna die
Now they got divine duties
holding a d20 in school
never played dnd before, is dnd fun?
on a scale from 1-10 how fun
uhh idk how to find campaign
infinite ofc
When it's fun, 10
where do i find one
i so love dnd
Sometimes you'll have unfun moments.
nah even tho i havent been in a campaign dnd is somehow fun
so how do i find a campaign whatever its called
#looking-for-players and other places with LFGs like r/LFG subreddit, other dnd discords, discords for virtual tabletops that dnd is played on.
Lots of places
like how do i find one thats right now
You don't
shucks
Finding a game as a player can take days, weeks, even longer, it depends on luck
its the most fun you can have with your mind
Cause you're competing with loads of other people also applying for games
For DnD, for example the common ratio mentioned is 10 players per 1 dm.
Personally I believe it's more 100 players per 1 dm.
A DM is who runs the game.
And not all DMs are currently running games, or need players for their games.
i did 7p 1dm in rr and 9p 1dm in mc okay..?/ref
Huh?
Quick question for you guys, do you guys think that 10 feet of blindsight is too much for a subclass feature? I know the blindsight fighting style exists but this is just one of the three subclass features for a subclass I'm making
depends
Its okey, only useful if using Reach weapons or some specific Range weapons.
on it's own it's fine
Ranger gets 30ft of blindsight so no, it's not too much for a class feature.
It depend of the rest of content too.
If its some sort of "gloomstalker" first features, if you know what i mean. Would need some lil balance in other parts
Yeah Ranger has fog cloud so they can bully people with the combo for example
Will this subclass have something with it?
Funny that you mention that because that was the class this subclass was for
I forgot about the 18th level ability
Oh and depend for what class it is too.
If its for fighter i would say its okey like feature
or the whole concept of the subclass
It is for ranger
10ft of blindsight in a class that can access to fogcloud and other stuff
What is the idea//concept of it?
In a class that already gets blind sight too (although pretty late unless it’s the fighting style)
Blind Fighting is also a fighting style.
I'm making a snake themed subclass and one of the primary attributes about how they hunt is through there senses so I was thinking of adding blindsight or tremor sense
There are multiple layers of redundancy.
Indeed
Tremorsense could work well
It can, snakes use vibrations to detect prey but I find tremorsense to be kinda weak
Good for dealing with underground things and I think through walls?
at least in a 10 ft radius
Dwarf moment
How about letting the subclass have an extra fighting style (Blind Fighting being an option) with the ability to swap that fighting style every level up?
Then you can have your blind fighting style and then swap it out when you get blindsight naturally from Ranger?
Okey, so smelling or thermosensitivity would fit, resistance to fire damage (?)
Apply poison in an attack that could be unharmed would too or spit venom or lure enemies//apply some status doing a sound like a rattlesnakes.
Nah, just seems extra
I know but it was simply a question about one thing
if not graple have advantage too
An extra fighting style doesn't really fit to me. It's an ability based on sense not necessairly better fighting
I'm just thinking of an ability for sense for now
Then make it the Blind Fighting Style only?
Yeah but then it becomes redundant at level 18
Because Champion is a pretty boring "Fighter, but with Extra Fighter."
Then allow it to swap out?
Which is why i suggested tremorsense, but what would a good radius for that be?
I'm not doing a fighting style, period
Ok 🤷🏽♂️
anyway do you guys think 10 or 15 is better?
10 is basically the standard for such senses
WOTC generally ignores exotic senses that are not Darkvision. With the only ways to get acces to them is through things like Polymorph and the like, generally.
Back to tremorsense, I think it's STRONGER than blindsight honestly, because it can go through to a certain radius in other rooms you're not in
You can detect things without even having to see them or be within sight of them
It's kind of dissapointing that Earth Gensasi didn't get some kind of Tremorsense
Makes me want to try a Dwarf
ya thats fair
Maybe if they get updated they will
I kind of doubt it
We can hope, right?
Since Dwarves can get temporary tremor sense
WOTC seems allerigc to exotic senses being easy to a PC to access
if their blind i think they have it outright
Limited to a Minute, and to being on Stone. it is at least, 60 feet
60ft is pretty big
yeah but unless you're in a stone building, on bare rock undeground (because above ground,... your eyeballs are vastly more useful), it does basically nothing.
Stone is also a VERY common building material
So, kind of niche and situatuional
Especially for let's say....
Dungeons
For dungeons, but wood floors are the most common.
I think it's more up to dm fiat what the floors are made of in some places, don'tcha think?
Shrugs
Hmm thinking about it, the module I’m running Tokii. How many maps didnt have stone floors?
All floors are now plastic by DM fiat
Literally only the ship we've been on
Which was partially in stone
I'm just not a fan of "Only works in X scenarios" Abilities because that's so terribly easy to get early 2014 Ranger Syndrome
Ok now I’m realizing every map in that module does…. As does…… ok I think Tyyranny of Dragons had a wooden floor map twice
Yeah thinking of all the modules I have ran, stone floors is crazy common.
I had a homebrew’d game that was a lot of desert and overland travel so that one would be a good “very little stone” game
That's the thing though
It's WAY less situational than something like favored terrain/enemy
I need to check Phandelvar I know at least 1 map that has none, I need to check if there is a 2nd map that has no stone floors
Nope I’m wrong! Even the inside of buildings are stone!
It’s all stone! How is there so many stone floors and I have never noticed?
It's not specifically something always looked for lol
Oops all stones
So I guess that tremor sense is pretty common?
Ok this is gonna be a counter in all my campaigns moving on
Tremor Sense is also an incredibly valuable tool because it's not a visible way of detection or something you have to cast like a spell
The unfortunate downside of this is kinda what we're seeing with "oops, all THP" and "oops, all teleportation."
The game arguably reversed too hard.
Even CoS??? How much stone floors are there?
I guess the reason could be “what if players try to burn it down”
Or “what if they cast fireball”
Delvers Claws giving Blindsight over tremor sense annoys me greatly
I get that they're like
Moleclaw shaped gloves, but c'mon!
Calling all adventurers! I made a D&D-style game—still rough and the combat system isn’t fully built yet. Can you try it and tell me if it’s fun and worth continuing the quest?
ok
“in a stone building with bare rock floors underground” is like half the game in many, many adventures
that’s basically Default Dungeon™
All this is making me want to play a worm again, damn it
Dwarves are awesome dungeon crawlers in ‘24
Hellooooo everyone!
wsp somebody
wsg guys
Having a nice day thus far
Peace cleric should have kept the name of Unity Cleric. Emboldening Bond is NOT peace...
Peace through violence obviously
If you achieve peace through violence are you any better than those tyrants who you dethroned to get there?
yes
Just another face wielding the mace
I do not agree at all, if you topple a tyrant with violence you aren’t as bad as a tyrant
If you enforce the peace you created with violence was there any change to begin with?
If they only listen because of violence
oh that’s a different thing
There is 100% so much room for change
Let’s say you start a revolution to kill a tyrant who was executing people in the town square. Did you use violence to topple them? Yes. Is that technically enforcing peace? Yes. Does that make you as bad as them? No.
Violence isn’t a yes/no binary, it’s a tool, there can be evil pacifists and noble warriors
Hi guys,I am new and does anyone want to talk?
I don't really know about this server but I came to play dnd because it seemed fun
It is more quiet here than usual
I guess wait like 1 hour and most of eu will be awake to chat
Shure, will go more or less whenever i have to so might randomly disappear. But have a few minutes atleast
Okay so I am like new new to dnd and want to know that what is bare, wizard, fighter etc? And you know the basic stuff
I love introducing people to ”a crap guide to dnd” for a class breakdown. But for dnd you can approach it more or less however you want. You have all from low magic tribalism stories to magic scifi.
Dnd is a game where all players basically are protagonists in a book and the dm is the worldbuilding and all the side characters
Dice introduce the random aspect to make the game a bit unpredictable and arbitrarily add extra layers of stakes
I recommend that your first character is somewhat based on a character you like so you have an idea on how the character would react on a lot of things. Or that you basically make a self insert that have abilities you find would be interesting to have
I came to this server after seeing a short where person who I think was bard decided to dance with the whole to distract enemies. I love random chaos
*Bar
Should I check dnd new comers? I am done talking and you can talk if you want
Yeah but those are mainly meant for engagement and etc. And does not reflect the real game, unless the table/campaign is like that
Yeah any popular dnd podcasts tend to lean more towards roleplay and improv over mechanics, since its the former one that most watchers are gonna care about, and have higher production costs especially if popular, so a game you're gonna play in yourself is likely gonna feel lot different
podcasts are made to be fun for viewers, dnd is made to be fun for players
Also bc podcasts are made by entertainers
Most of the community isn't as professional as that and are just here for a good time
It's why my favourite podcasts are less popular ones, and I enjoy them because of more balanced focus on the game part of roleplaying game 😌
What's a creative way using True Polymorph?
Cast Simulacrum, Cast Magic Jar, have simulacrum true polymorph the original body into an Amethyst Dragon. End magic jar. Wizard with a dragon body.
using Atropals to print nigh-infinite wraiths
Are there any dragon mounts that aren't small
I mean a dragon can be a mount, you just gotta convince it to be one
(or force it)
Gl forcing a dragon to let you ride into a battle 
Well .. unless you're Tiny sized you can't use any mount that's Small anyway, so just about anything you would be able to mount has to be Medium at the smallest.
Dragonnels are dragons that are known for being mounts.
The book that showed them off (Fizbans) suggests that they could be a valid mount for Find Greater Steed
Man, I love multiclassing with warlock, It's truly a fantastic class that allows you to create so many interesting combinations
it's a shame that they're all less strong than relying on eldritch blast and its invocations
really?
yep cus they have the least reliance on stats so you dont have to worry about being MAD
like i was trying to find good synergies between pact of the blade and the arcane archer subclass, but it ends up being a downgrade to just using eb
interesting
You could always just flavor eldritch blast as your warlock using some sort of shadow bow
yeah average martial experience 
now that you mention a couple of players in my main campaign have dipped or play druid
that's what my dm said as well lol
for how much i love playing warlock i usually avoid using eb
Ah, fair enough. I think it got quite a bit easier with the more flexible approach to invocations in 2024 to do that.
You have so many good options when building the class, but you'll always do better if you invest all your invocations into a single cantrip
the fact that eb scales with character level instead of class is also wild
I think that's what truly makes it busted. I think they should have just made it a warlock feature
well thats all cantrips
tbh they shouldve made extra attack the same
I mean they did make it less accessible to non warlocks in 2024.
instead of relegating it to this weird limbo
they made everything warlock inaccessible to warlocks as if they didn't make warlocks alluring enough to play
And without some decently heavy investment into invocations, it's not really that much better than Fire Bolt.
I did EB-less warlock once. Pact weapon was a bow and I ran 1 fighter 5 warlock. Had 14 sharpshooter so it was more damage than EB.
yeah, but it's so easy to just put two to three invocations on it
two levels into warlock as an otherwise non-warlock is a heavy investment
Bladepact in '24 also does three attacks, so that's nice, too.
It's not close to compensating for old SS' loss though
yeah but Eb scales with tot level so you already EB as well as a full warlock, isn't that crazy
Old SS was too much, and skewed the balance. It's good that it's toned down.
Like how it's good that Surprise was toned down.
I completely disagree with any nerfs to martials
I mean also, old SS was surprisingly bad sometimes.
imagine you could dip 2 into figher and get multi attack based on character level
what's ss
yeah they buffed a lot of stuff but the strongest martials got worse
so the divide is bigger now
It's kinda wonky because if you're not already a charisma caster you either have wonky stats or you barely benefit from it
Overall I don't even think it was a martial nerf, it was a rebalancing to make more martial builds viable. And I think it worked, personally.
I have to say at my table it feels a lot more even all around.
I don't agree, not for most tables.
Yeah, that's how I feel, too.
And if you are a charisma caster besides warlock
you're either delaying magical secrets, the best thing about bard, by two levels
or you're unable to benefit from innate sorcery since it's not a sorcerer cantrip
I also have no idea tbh
Having SS and GWM be must have Feats to even be considered viable as a martial was toxic. Now more martial builds are viable.
Sharpshooter
oooh
well it is table dependent yeah but generally the more optimized you go the bigger the divide is, and its to the extent where some tables that arent consciously optimizing at all can still feel its effects
It's more along the lines of the ceiling was lowered for all martials
Gotta say, being in the latter category, that's news to me.
It's not that it made the power feat-less martials good, you just gutted their one lifeline.
Same. It doesn't feel like the divide is bigger, it feels like it's smaller. The divide was never about damage, in the first place, it was about Utility options.
yeah they needed to buff the other options not nerf the only good one
Not how it feels to me.
Okay.
i mean unless you're about to get magical secrets then it's a great trade off
same as ranger, they gutted gloomstalker when it was really that the other subs needed a buff
True, and utility has since increased in 2024, with everyone getting more options.
New GWM is nice. Sad is only for melee, HCrossbow or longbow
I totally disagree about Ranger '24. I'm playing one and it's great!
yeah warlock is arguably the best class in the game for dips
cleric being its competition
They might've destroyed the ceiling, but the floor is higher, and the bar to feel good in D&D and succeed in typical encounters is not high enough to warrant optimization.
sorc is fantastic too, i wonder what all these classes have in common 
If you're never getting to magical secrets I'd just not play a bard personally. A bard without magical secrets is missing something essential.
bards are such a nothing class they will forever be my least favourite
The know-everything caster takes a bit too long to know everything and is stuck with a worse wizard/cleric spell list until then.
I'm even playing in a campaign where the DM is not taking it totally easy on us and I'm not only keeping up, I'm giving some fairly crucial contributions to the party.
I mean, you have spike growth. Ignore every other ranger feature and that will still allow you to contribute greatly.
I consider myself a Bard main. Last timeI played a Support/Control heavy Lore Bard was great!
I have literally never used that.
You should give it a try, it's fun and strong at once.
spike growth is so peak its probably my second favourite spell (behind of course plant growth)
Bane/vicious Mockery/Cutting words was such a great combo to make enemies look like total fools.
Especially if the party cooperates with it and uses synergizing spells in tandem.
I favor Entangle and Summon Beast/Fey.
Command in 24 to make people walk across it works now
My summoned Fey hits pretty decently. I am a Wis maxed Ranger, Shillelagh baby!
yeah control is much more important than damage
still, give lego bricks a try, you won't regret it
I asked my DM whether he would allow Conjure Barrage to be duplicated from my companion once I hit Beast Master 15 and he said yes, so .. can't wait til I can do that.
conjure barrage is one of 24 ranger's better features
Pretty sure Ranger '14 had it too?
ranger 14 had conjure airstrike too though
Oh they increased the damage.
But that one isn't a Self spell, so it can't be duplicated from the companion.
true
Yeah I don't have a lot of partymates that push/pull.
even on its own spike growth is fantastic
well if we're doing low level play you aint getting it anyway
yeah exactly
I just recently played a level 5 Lore Bard and it was awesome!
Hobgoblin Harper Agent, I packed a lot into the Help Action.
not even one cleric or paladin?
One Paladin who just joined.
ah, they can command
that's potentially 6d4 damage + however many oppurtunity attacks, an entire wasted opponent turn
I really like divine favor, its a decent spell that i always pick up
it sure is a spell
that's true!
Its pretty good tbh for a level 1 spell
2014, it certainly exists
idk you could've blessed with this
it's just hex but without a target and less damage
You can do both
oh they at least removed concentration on it
thats nice, its not entirely useless maybe
they're both concentration spells
oh right i forgot
much needed buff
I certainly can stack damage with it, play a guardian aasimar, they get a racial ability to do more damage, stack that with divine favor and then smite
Well true strike also existed in 2014
That is what i said, teah
Hey lich, I assume you are here for a while. Can you tell me how to look for players to play dnd with and if I do gather the player where we can play?
Visit #find-a-game for everything you need to start your search, including:
- Instructions for finding a game here on the server (including how to post in our #looking-for channels).
- Suggestions for finding a game outside of this server.
- Basic advice to help you in your hunt.
Getting a group together can be one of the first big hurdles for sure.
For online. I recommend looking out for newbie friendly games, oneshots (short games that last one session or so), and Adventure League (Organised play al-general ), or westmarches (large servers where people run spontaneous games for players).
For in person, check out local gamestores, libraries and so on. Advertise a D&D game.
Or... kidnap some existing friends and run a quick oneshot for them, see how they like it >.>
I have tried but somehow they always escape.
More chains
Nah I will just use more steel strings. They are much effective trust
Must have good Dexterity stats then. Def check out #find-a-game here (and other platforms) if considering online play. If can take a li'l bit to put together a forever group.
The above are all ways of meeting people quickly and playing with them, to see if you get along- think of it a little bit like speed dating. You want to know you all click before committing to a full game together for ages.
Thanks lich.
Good morrow
yo where u i tell ppl my ideas and like advertisments??
im trying to collect ppl to make like a multi month/yr camp to civilization
If you want players for a game check out #find-a-game
Check out #find-a-game
Can a Yuan-Ti blink?
I know snakes can’t, but humans can, and Yuan-Ti are part human part snake
I forgot about those little lads, i should make one
Definitely, revamped my Warlock with a Snake Primordial as a patron using a Yuan Ti instead of an Eladrin
u da goat man
Ohhhh cool
tysm
No I'm the snake man
u da snake man
Up to the DM/campaign probably
Too bad poison damage is crap
Reminds me of ninjago now, with all the serpentines
Hey people, I jst polymorphed to a Giant Ape
What if i jst crush my enemy? It has to deal damage, right? I'm big 💔
Am a sneeeeek
I wonder how much damage someone could potentially do with a full poison build
Unfortunately it's one of the most resisted/immune damages.
not much, Poison Spray is nice though, d12
True that's pretty nice
if I were to play this character into a campaign I'd definitely lean more into collecting poisons from creatures and coating it in my weapons, or just eldritch blasting my way with flavor
Heck, Periapt of Proof against poison in 2014 didn't even need attunement. All other items that gave even resistance was, but that gave full immunity for nothing.
2024 at least gave it attunement, but it's still full immunity.
iirc there's something to bypass resistance, but not immunity
I mean you'd think there's some really good poison build that they felt the need to make so many enemies immune to it
But no it's buns...
poisoner feat eats resistance IIRC
I'm pretty sure there are PCs that are immune to poison too, or at least resistant
Had to start giving ancient greens homebrew elemental bane to treat immunity as resistance and reistance as normal so on for them to be even a bit scary.
several playable species are resistant to it by default 
Just eat heroes feast for breakfast and bully all poison based dragons.
They should have a class of monsters vulnerable to poison to balance things out. Maybe insects since they have to breath through their skin.
lmao would you look at that, not even the unique species either, dwarves are resistant to being poisoned iirc?
yep!
yeah but realistically, those are never gonna be used 💔
I have always felt that giving out blanket, resistances and immunities on a species level is a bit too much
Hey guys so what is this server for? Like just discussing what?
Discussing and finding games, yeah
Pretty much. We discuss D&D and it's various topics, and have a space for finding a game, but don't host games here.
I don't think any species has an immunity do they?
We are the official D&D discord, so also a good place for getting official news in the announcement channels.
yuan Ti is immune to poison no?
I don't think so no
ah, the poisoned condition, not poison
Ah in Volo's they do
The original pure blood was immune to both the condition and the damage type
On top of the magic resistance they had
In Motm they're resistant to both
Magic resistance is WILD compared to some of the other species in those books imo
I just think that there's a much better way to give species a flavor rather than having the damage of something being cut in half or giving them advantage on a saving throw.
I'd much rather those resistances or abilities come through either class features or backgrounds or feats. Because we can say that we're moving away from the one species is just better than all the others all we want. But if we still give them those kinds of things, those comparisons will inevitably continue.
Wow this is a cool place
I am worried for when my owlbear free storage runs out, would be a pain to re-organize everything
Check out the #channel-guide for a real overview of what goes on here. Folk talk about their characters, their worlds, share art and maps, discuss the lore, collaborate on homebrew and much more!
Like yuan ti get magic resistance, poison resistance and spellcasting and Minotaur get to make a BA unarmed Strike every Tuesday at 5:30
I'm already at the halfway point but I'll cross that bridge when I get to it
Protip: use folders to organise your resources. It's easier to clear the deck and do a batch upload than go through all your files one by one.
does any1 even visit #find-a-game ?
a lot of people do
Yes, folk looking to advertise a game, community, or themselves as players. Posts are raised by a bot. Type
/looking
And pick the option you need. I believe you're looking for players, right? Select that, hit Send, and fill in the form.
You can even do that to see what the form looks like, cancel out and assemble your answers, and do /looking again when you're ready.
Remember you only get to raise one post in each of the looking channels per week, so make it a good one.
It's not you just keep organized in your local files on your computer and delete what's not nessisary from owlbear
thx man u da smith
daps
Hm... Battlemaster on a monk maybe?...
That's a tough question
Conjuration Sorc
DSS1 dip but we instead take Minor Conjuration
What do you guys think is the best lvl 4 feat for a fighter in dnd
Is no one online
Idk, wait like 10 more minutes for a reasponse instead of 2s and you might get answers
Depends completely on your build tbh
My sig weapon is a Greta axe
What does slasher do
I think they're the same, but, 2014 or 2024 rules?
I’ve been considering the great weapon master but the cost seems to be too great
Great weapon master rules but does blow pretty hard if you miss, which is way more likely
#optimization would certainly have some opinions. Personally the regular ASI feels like a good pick, given fighter's additional feats.
Ah, so, 2014 rules?
Its very much an "all in"
And in 14 20 str is kinda mandatory to really get the most outta gwm imo
What asi
+2 to stats instead of feats
So great weapon master or slasher
great weapon master
its by far the best in 2014, if youre playing 5.5 something like mage slayer would give it competition
Does mage slayer do more damage to casters
no it lets you succeed on mental saves
i forget how often but i remember its very good
Is the nerf on great weapon master a permanent thing
Once per short/long rest
yeah unless you switch back to 2014 rules like a lot of people did
Sp what happens in 2014 rules
Art thou winging it?
you can take a -5 penalty to your attack roll in exchange for +10 to damage
always
Nice.
I thought of a fun fact. That Clerics and Paladin's lost the ability to create Holy Water (without Tasha's Ceremony Spell)
Mhhh, yes 🧐
2024 rules doesn’t have a nerf in it - it removed the penalty and added another bonus in its place
yea which overall is worse
The player wasn’t asking about the quality of the feat in the two editions. They were asking if the -5 is permanent
Eh, you hit more which does more damge
You consistently hit slightly less hard vs you hit less but way harder
the maths has been done many times, old gwm was much better
I haven't crunched the numbers but I'd believe that
It varies and I don’t think it really is as simple as this one is always better than that one. But that’s a topic for the optimization channel which I made a concerted effort to avoid
Hey @turbid vessel @humble cairn @still plover - A few days ago I was talking about how I view D&D's genre as (my term) "colonialist fantasy".
Link here: #dnd-discussion message
Y'all reacted that you wanted to talk about it more in detail. Not sure if now is a good time or not. 👀 (Actually, this is one of those situations where a thread would actually be super helpful lol.)
hello
Looks like I'm the only one online right now, but I can give a headline take: killing the Other and take their things is very much a default mode of play. I know the game is moving away from certain folks being always CE, but I'd like to see more. Let's have more conflict than combat.
Yeah, I definitely agree it's the default mode of play. What do you mean you want to see more CE, though? Like the game should be designed more around this default rather than move away from it? Not a judgemental or "set up" question or anything. I honestly just want to make sure I'm understanding.
Not the server for this I don't think
I personally try to run more of a survival/trial based campaign instead of CE
My favorite thing to do is to put Dungeons in the world as something meant to be cleared
The loot being a reward
Maybe a god creates small pocket planes as tests and trials, if you die they get your soul
More movement away from treating certain folks as always the baddies. Anyone can be the opposition.
What does ce mean here?
chaotic evil
But actually colonialist expansion makes more sense
Amoral power-fantasy might be a better way of putting it imo. Colonialism has some other implications that I would argue arent really present in most DnD games. Theres definitely some where it is, but thats a different can of worms.
As for why many players just play like murder hobos, it’s a many faced problem. One of the issues is that a majority of DnD’s rules revolve around what you can do in combat. If you give a person a toolbox with only a hammer in it, you can expect things that shouldn’t be hammered to get hammered.
There’s also the issue of setting. Generally DnD doesn’t offer any real way for civilized society to keep super powerful adventurers in check. The dm usually has to come up with and improvise them. If there’s no in game reason not to just murder hobo, it becomes more likely, just like in real life.
I think the final big problem is running nuanced social conflict that doesn’t just fall apart at the first hurdle is really hard. It’s much easier to just slap a big monster on a grid and roll a loot table.
Either way, the answer does lie in the basis of colonialism
People like easy answers to problems
Its just easier to say goblins are all evil creatures we gotta murder and take the stuff of
Personally i think that’s a lazy writing choice, but it’s also effective in getting your players to do stuff
Yeah, it's tough... There is a non-zero amount of community members in D&D who are just wildly loud bigots. The classic advice is of course, to ignore them. But I can empathize with the frustration of having to see this kind of stuff come up. Yeah, you can report and all that stuff and try to take away their platforms - but it's not really a satisfactory action IMO (especially because they rarely get deplatformed).
The next thing someone could do is try to convince them that they're wrong.
But that takes so much time and effort, and it's usually doesn't even make any difference unless you're already a trusted person. So... yeah. Not sure where I was going with this other than "I'm sorry. It sucks."
I do agree that at its' core, the concept of dungeon delving and taking long lost treasures and artifacts from ancient tombs does have a lot of colonialism undertones. I would also say that it's not always a facet of the game that DMs engage with to the extent they used to, especially as the game continues to evolve
One of the biggest questions also being- on what level is a sentient creature ALLOWED to be naturally evil?
This too. The players are here to feel like they’re doing something good or memorable (usually). The easiest way to make that happen is give them someone unequivocally bad to fight, usually.
Drow arent all evil, its a culture thing
Same with bugbears, goblins, etc
Thats where dnd is heading, somewhat
In Menzobarrenzen ✨
But what about beholders?
I typically reserve the label of being biologically evil to mainly just Devils, Demons, Celestials, and other beings tied to the upper and lower planes, because they're in a way manifestations of the alignment system themselves
What about Vampires?
Beholders predisposed to being incredibly paranoid
What about like, plenty of pretty evil sentient creatures
But that's in my games and not necessarily even true for other campaigns or settings
Well not all vampires are willingly turned into them no?
But thats sorta my point
Putting real life morals into dnd is kinda tough
Same as making real life connections to the underlying subtext
I think many people come to dnd to escape real life moral quandaries too. Not all, but a fair chunk. People come here to be the hero with the moral high ground and do things in that light.
It should prob be thought about, but sometimes i want my escapist fantasy game
Imo people who willingly Turm themselves into vampires would usually be evil but unwillingly most likely not
Predisposed
Well yeah, they've got two simultaneous personalities that deliberately lie to each other.
Gotcha, this is what I thought you meant - glad I checked!
Yeah, if I can even extend that, I think D&D is moving even further away from "opposition is conquered through violence". The rules and this sentiment are a bit at odds with each other (to Dooterino's point that the majority of mechanics are centered around combat/violence), but I agree that I think this is the direction it's moving.
Sometimes we talk about 6E or whatever, and I think this is probably the next place D&D would try to emphasize. Would it warrant a new edition? Eh, not sure. But it is something that I think the game wants to cover, but does a poor job at the moment.
I saw the word vampires in chat, and now my brain is thinking about how I would love to play in a vampire themed game
siigh… one day maybe
I've got vampires joining the arena with all of the other types of baddies in my campaign shortly
Bc my answer to the moral complexities of “is it ok to write an entire species as evil” is
Dont think about it, vampirism is a curse that makes you evil
More rules and suggestions for social interaction and that side of the game would help. As would limiting spells like charm. It’s really hard to have convincing social problems when the party can just spell or violence their way through a problem much easier.
Mind flayer type stuff
I've got:
- Tons of Humanoids
- Demons
- Devils
- Celestials
- Dragons
All in some decently substantial capacity
I do love vampires, but I’m less the type to kill them and more fraternize with vampires for the plot 
I love my pure evil creatures with intelligence
I'm running an elemental focused game. Cause I think they haven't gotten enough love to be important
And vampires joining the fray real soon
I love complicated NPCs… I want to work their brains more than kill for the sake of killing 
I do like complicated npcs, i just dont find vampires that complicated
Theyre parasites by nature
it is impeccably hard to avoid murdering people in DND.
I mean more of morals in the sense of “is it ok to write an entire species to be biologically primed for evil”
The writers morals.
oh, yea that's hard
Reminds me of when one of my groups recently were about to fight goblins and got absolutely flabbergasted that they could speak common
There are some interesting conflicts to be found in the concept of a creature that is a parasite, that recognizes itself as a parasite. An idea I always like is the vampire who wants to kill other vampires and believes their own existence to be a stain on the world.
Absolutely, but that sorta makes the answer of vampires specifically real simple
They should not exist in a world
You want a morally complex parasite, Mind Flayers
I don't mind angels and devils. Cosmological constants, metaphysically wrapped around their own concepts. And still there's room for nuance, variations, exceptions.
That one follower of Lathander, Jander Sunstar
I mean one could argue mosquitoes are parasites yet they serve a role too
Not an argument, they are parasites
That’s where I don’t consider vampires to be an all encompassing faction. Different characters are vampires, they have varying feelings on their own vampirism and the vampirism of their species. Some want to end vampires, some want to leave them alive. Conflict. Tons of positions a character can have on the issue
But vampires are a very specific type of parasite that actively self destructs the original species, then themselves
In the games I run, I always have a very grey morality setting, and I avoid just creating enemies for the sake of “you get to just kill these guys” — I will humanize enemies
even vampires. They’re bloodsuckers for sure, but they’ll do things out of love and even for protecting those that need it…
a way to make this even more fun is a vampire who sees the operations of their kind as corrupt, wicked, and parasitic, but also doesn't agree with genocide, and keeps searching for solutions to the blood thing and getting caught in the dilemma of trying to prevent a vampiric genocide and also not trying to side with people like Strahd
He's an Elvish Vampire, but still follows Lathander because he retained his humanity after his undeath and seeks to kill other vampires
I don’t really see a problem with it as long as they aren’t making real life parallels or arguing that it represents real life tbh. It’s when people start equating fiction and real life or trying to emulate fiction that it’s an issue.
So a vampire turning a humanoid into a vampire is objectively an evil action
Exactly, I think there’s so many fun perspectives a character can have for a campaign like this
I have a vampire in a player backstory who turned their player while they were on deaths door, as a last ditch effort to preserve their life. Morally grey sure but that’s a (very niche) situation where there’s an argument of morality there
Unlike mind flayers, which are an entirely new parasitic species completely seperate from humanoids
Yeah, but being a vampire is also not typically a biological thing
Yea, i mostly speak on the pure stance of logistics, its a negative action that will eventually cause problems
Dhampir exists, but they don't have to FEED like Vampires do, they just have a mental compulsion to do so, but can indeed control it
Dhampirs are bs
They are, but that's just how it is
I love alucard but that stuff is all bs
Its bs in the world of dnd too >:(
I just use them conceptually as a playable Vampire race
What do you mean youre HALF undead
That’s such a fun decision
I love the conflict of a vampire wanting to preserve somebody’s life, and having to choose the vampire scenario for them… I hope your player enjoyed that story decision
Don't you need to do dark rituals to become a vampire outside of being bitten
They're not half undead though, thats the thing
When this comes up, I like to also tack on that sometimes "making real life parallels" isn't a conscious choice. For example, if you give your Evil Fantasy Creature a long hooked nose and warts, you may not realize that this evokes a specific kind of imagery for some people - and that it might actually be rooted in racist depictions of their ethnic group (edit: when combined with other signifiers you might have included, like their clothes or language). It also doesn't mean you're some kind of bigot for having done that.
It's further complicated because having Evil Fantasy Creatures like this in a home game has way less impact than, say, WOTC publishing it in a book.
Drow were considered an evil race. The dark skinned elves were considered the cruel and evil ones
Assuming we had a sentient mosquito for a moment, and assuming the mosquito doesn’t have any biological dispositions to evil. You could be an ethical mosquito.
There’s been a lot of takes on the ethical non evil vampire as well. Ones that feed on animals, blood donations, etc. Being a parasite doesn’t make you evil or mean that any “good” person needs to kill you just bc you’re a parasite.
what did gygax mean by this?
Absolutely, but the main issue comes with turning others into vampires
Youre actively increasing a need for parasitism without any benefits other than personal gain
A mosquito cant turn you into a mosquito
It’s been a ton of fun and I’m very keen for some Vampires to come into play and really start to test this PC
And even if it did, it wouldnt be immoral if thats just how the species grew- its why mind flayers arent evil to me, just objectively different
And im not saying that vampires cant be good
Illithids are a hivemind
There's very few that break free from it
But like.
If you're part of a hivemind and the main mind is evil.. you're... kinda evil?
But the existence of a vampire can be categorized as an evil existence
Hmmm
have you ever considered that it would just be cool to be a vampire? And just because something is in your nature, doesn’t mean all vampires are nurtured that way
In most fantasy turning people is a choice made by the vampire. As long as it’s only choosing to turn people willingly, and the blood consumption remains ethical, Is that still evil? Maybe if the entire world decided to become vampires, but then it becomes a food source issues rather than a parasitism issue I think. Vampires killing people for blood isn’t really different from people killing people over a lack of food.
I mean the main mind is all about achieving the grand design
Purely in the sense that it is a parasitic action that permanently damages the world/species the vampire comes from, yeah. I try to base morals on a sense of what fits in the biological imperative of the species
Most humanoids in dnd, and humans irl have the express interest to be social and kind to one another
Its better tho i suppose to move away from words like “morality” and go more into “negative” and “positive”
Vampires can be kind and normal people too though?
Looks at Jander Sunstar again
I wish you all the best!!
and god speed to your player who will be tested…
Jander actively hates his vampirism, and when he feeds on others he doesn't try to change them or take more than the little that is needed.
I think the problem of Vampires isn't inherent evilness, but losing humanity typically when you become an undead in general
They’ll have such a cool and normal time, nothing bad is gonna happen to them, they’ll be so fine
I mean morality and ethics becomes complicated in a world where there's flying eyeballs shooting lasers
I think we can all agree that the true evil in D&D is Volo.
He's incredibly bigoted and his guides show as much
Leave my silly bard Impostor alone
anyone do camapaign?
I think if we’re going so far as to say that unintended associations that other people make about your words are your responsibility, it would become almost impossible to communicate serious or complicated ideas morally. Anything you say that isn’t perfectly clear might be misinterpreted in a bad way and then that is on you morally. I think that does way more harm than good.
To maybe +1, I think it's important to think about as a DM so you're better prepared to present interesting challenges to players/characters. Like as a DM, I don't actually care about the answer to ethical questions (in general) just like I don't care about how someone might cross a chasm.
My main focus is to make sure the challenge is fun and/or satisfying.
I mean, to be fair, Volo's guides are SUPPOSED to be false representations from an individual who has little to no experience with most species they write about.
Volo haters rise up
That beautiful moment on Friday when we were all united in hatred….
I don’t know who Volo is because I play mostly homebrew games, but I will rise nonetheless
A level 1 Wizard bum who Spreads misinformation in the realms
He’s a deeply annoying little guy who needs to leave my pc and his party alone for their own good and also stop asking for money
Although I think it's a person's responsibility to be as sensitive as possible with their fiction, I'm by no means saying people have to be perfect like this. Like I said, just because someone makes an insensitive foible, it doesn't mean they're a bigot.
I do think good writers can learn and grow with time. And they should be open to feedback (which doesn't say anything about whether the feedback should be accepted wholesale or even if it's valid).
Check the listings in #looking-for-players for games that want people, read the details, respond as appropriate and cross your fingers.
Type /looking and select the option for #looking-for-dm to advertise yourself as a new player in search of a group. Be sure to include your regular availability!
There are other Discord servers where people gather for games. You can find them in #looking-for-community .
Aside from here, you could also try LFG areas in sites like Reddit, Roll20 or the D&D Beyond forums to get started.
I still can't believe I gave him 1000 gold 😭
It was mostly for our expedition, though
Tokii let’s forget Manshoon and Xanathar, let’s help Waterdeep the real way and kill a real enemy
We did get 1000gp worth of value tbf
You can make him more annoying by asking people to pay him for his silence
a walking AD, who goes away if you give him 12gp a month
Why does it ipso facto damage the world? There are symbiotic parasites, and assuming the vampire is getting his blood morally, he’s doing no moral harm. It’s no more damaging than a person having a child, no? There are vampires who don’t follow these rules, but I’m mostly just saying, propagating parasitism doesn’t directly have to be evil.
10 healing potions
Thing is, I think killing Volo would have more negative effects than killing Xanathar and Manshoon tbh lol
I just wanna try, we can revive him, I wanna see him die
Between you and me, if we kill Xanathar I have an interesting plan to put in action
Ooh, tell more?
One of the things was if we kill him, we fearmonger his men into helping us find Manshoon
I also will say, I can get us allies for that mission if we’re interested
Above table, Jarlaxle mentioned he would be willing to help us with our project in a private chat with Hokrun
Too many big names in this campaign, I swear
Bigby and Mordenkainen are just gonna appear outta nowhere next lol
We’ve stuck to the big three
I don’t know if Waterdeep even usually features all four groups though, or if that’s Ti being Ti
Just kill Jarlaxle.
Creating an immortal life sucking creature out of a mortal one will eventually destroy the world
He has a lot of info, so kill him and then enslave his ghost
He gave me a gun, I would die for that drow
Jarlaxle already works with us anyway lol
Parasitism has a cycle where it grows and dies, vampirism just grows
He’s also one of my PC’s three friends who don’t actively live with him so
Realistically vampires arent actually parasites
He’s protecting our inn
Counterpoint. Romance him.
This sounds more fun, anyways. 🫦
Of course they aren't. A parasite is a living organism, vampires are undead. And parasites live inside or on another living organism
Similar arguments could be made about the propagation of humanity. Eventually we are going to use all resources, assuming humanity doesn’t end first.
Creating more humans will eventually destroy the world.
Wait, there's another definition of parasitism that actually fits vampires...
"A predator that eats the prey in units less than one". Meaning, that it feeds on the prey but leaves it alive, allowing it to recover for next meal
The closest thing to a “parasite-based” vampire I think I’ve ever seen in fiction is in The Strain, but that’s very different from D&D vampires
Wait, no. That would make me the parasite of the plants of my garden
We arent immortal , we eventually die off as part of a natural life cycle
The Necroscope series has parasitic vampires. Sort of
The Strain mostly just tried to bridge the gap between science and folklore in an overembellished way, but in D&D they’re just… undead
Parasitism is the relationship between two organisms in which one species benefits and propagates itself by causing another harm
Living within or inside another is part of the definition iirc from my parasite research job
Yeah but there are multiple definitions. The one I cited was the one used by Edward Osborne Wilson, apparently an important entomologist
Yeah but i speak on an ecological standpoint, parasitism is specifically the relationship between the two creatures
That is true
( 🤓 uhm achtually, some parasites engage with commensalism, where the host experiences no damage. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7149714/. /lh obviously we're talking about something specific here and this specific example doesn't add anything to our conversation.)
Yep, but thats why i say parasitism is its own thing
A parasite is a creature who mainly uses parasitism to survive
If I remember correctly, which is arguable, I think the rule is that relationship between two species is symbiosis. And then there are multiple types of symbiosis.
Mutualism for when both parties benefit
Commensalism when one party benefits, the other neither benefits nor is harmed
Parasitism is when one benefits, the other is harmed
Amensalism is when one party does not benefit, and the other is harmed
Competition is when they are both harmed
Neutralism is when they neither benefit nor are harmed
People as individuals, humanity as a whole persists. Also there’s nothing saying vampires can’t choose to die, or die through things other than old age or disease.
A little wrong, but close enough (competition is a little tough)
What are we even actually discussing here? It's not like vampirism is natural even in dnd. The first vampires literally had to engage in dark magic to become vampires
Im saying being a vampire is by nature, a negative force on the world
Whether or not propagating a parasitic organism is de facto an evil act
So yeah if we use that standard, vampires are parasites. Wait, do we consider vampires to be a "species"? That can't be right
Vampires arent a species so the discussion regarding symbiosis doesnt apply
That’s also the problem lol
Vampirism is much more analogous to a disease than a species
Its a mix
A disease primarily harms the host. Vampires harm other people a lot more than they are harmed
The original legends about vampires in the real world likely came from both fears of the undead “coming back”, and certain terminal illnesses that, at the time, may have made people look more dead than alive
Depends on what fiction you’re drawing from kinda. But even if it were a disease, we can just shift the parasitism label from the vampire to whatever pathogen causes the vampire.
I’m referring to something like rabies
There can be symbiotic bacteria, viruses, etc.
Do you consider a zombie as part of a species?
Rabies is a lot worse for the rabid animal than for the people in the way of the rabid animal. First off, it doesn't necessarily cause frenzied hostility in everyone
That is true but rabies spread via bite
Well it's not a pathogen, it's a magical thingy
The problem about vampires being a disease is that it doesn’t really fit in their ecological impact
Well, it does
Bc all diseases are parasites
I wouldn’t even call it a disease, it’s a curse. A disease would imply there may or may not be some sort of scientific basis to it.
I’m just saying that it doesn’t matter. If it is a pathogen, we’re discussing the pathogen, if it’s magic we’re discussing the thing that magic creates.
Do they really have that much of an ecological impact? They can leave their feeding victim alive without transforming them, the result would just be a few temporarily anemic people.
I mean at the end of the day vampirism is a fictional and magical condition, but I’m saying that it likely came about from people without access to modern scientific knowledge trying to explain terminal illnesses
Either way the overall argument of whether or not it’s moral to allow such a thing to propagate is unchanged.
Since their immortal, yes actually
They eventually need to consume too much
Hi sorry, I am busy seeing TV stars!
What do you mean?
Their consumption of resource remains relatively constant. I don't think an older vampire needs to feed more than a young one
Can’t ethically consume blood forever if theres only 3 humans left
Or if theres 8 trillion vampires who all want to live
Assuming many more vampires are being created than destroyed. Also, the same arguments can still be made about humans, that we are consuming far too much and ruining our own environment.
If there are only 3 humans left, you consume elves.
Or gnomes
Or dwarves
Humans return back resources to the ecosystem by dying
Or kobolds
If we're talking about that kind of "returning resources back", most of the resources you give back will be returned by your bodily waste, not by your corpse
It’s all the things we do in between here and there that’s the issue. Vampires presumably do the same, just at a slower rate as well.
I think if there is only very few humanoids left then there is a very different problem than the vampires
But vampires are undead. In theory they neither defecate nor urinate nor sweat. Which means the blood they consume might just... Disappear. Like, be annihilated. In the physics definition of annihilation
Normally an organism gets energy by transforming something into something else. But undead? Where does that energy actually come from?
Well that’s where it becomes tricky to apply science to magical creatures
Having too little food is an issue of planning for food resources. I’d argue that this is a problem both vampires and humans share. If vampires are evil for this, so are humans since there are currently many starving humans.
Oh wait, are we talking ecology or morality?
I may have misunderstood the conversation
The original discussion was about whether or not vampires are de facto evil morally because they are parasites that don’t die.
That is completely irrelevant and nonsensical though?
Whether or not something is parasitic and immortal has no bearing on their morality
Mosquitoes have no alignment, even an immortal mosquito is still unaligned
on the morality of someone allowing them to exist
Now whether or not they are harmful is another matter entirely
Which is why i said earlier to move it to negative and positive
Knowing what they are and will eventually do
Negative being harmful to the planet/original species
But even "harmful", as a concept? Everything harms other things. There is not a single organism whose survival does not require harming another
In ecology, it is! Mostly bc there are objectively bad plays that wipe out species
It is harmful for a disease to immediately kill its host most of the time
OK so strictly speaking, we are talking about ecological harm, meaning systemic, not towards individuals?
Yeah it's fine, it's a good way to define the basics of this conversation.
Oh yeah that makes sense. As a whole it’s harmful, but individual basis is its own thing 
You know what I wish were more interesting in D&D than vampires? Werewolves
REAL
So then we must consider: Are vampires, taken as a group, so harmful ecologically/on a systemic level/holistically that it is immoral for an individual with the opportunity to kill a vampire not to take it? Is that the question posed here?
I wish werewolves got more attention in general
I just wish they weren’t sapient
I like the classical vibe of werewolves who have no control over their actions when they shift
I want more writing about other types of were creatures
I mean dnd has a few
OK so if we consider this question like that, we would first need to define the level of systemic harm brought on by vampires, and compare it to their potential systemic benefits. Then we would need to consider which moral system we are using, and only then would we need to weigh those two together.
I have a friend who always complains about how there’s no good Dog races (like tabaxi, but dog)
Dogbaxi
Yeah but they’re kind of ignored. Wererats have some stuff but they’re just, like, a different flavour of sewer bandits
We would also have to consider a basis on vampires
I like your thinking….
Does anyone have any idea how often a vampire needs to feed and the quantity required to feel satiated? Without this information, the question is simply impossible to answer
I don’t think DND has a consistent answer to that question
Do they change the mentals of a person, and do they require specific blood is the main points that are issues
Otherwise they are just problematic immortals
Technically what requirements does a creature need to have to get a version of lycanthropy after them
Weremoonrat. He shifts most of the time into a stupid rat but sometimes he shifts into a genius rat.
In Baldur’s Gate 3, ||Astarion is chill with snacking on the player enough to make them “woozy”||. I’m not sure if any more official DND media defines it
A vampire doesn't have to kill, control or alter an individual in any way to feed besides consuming their blood.
They could just wait for someone to fall asleep
Jander Sunstar, which I'll keep bringing up
Fed enough on people to be satiated but never killed them while feeding
Good example!
For example are there were dinos? There's werewyverns clearly
If they require humanoid blood at all, it immediately becomes harmful to the humanoid species no matter what and causes it to be negative
If they get by on livestock, it doesnt matter that much
My assumption as to WHY vampires need blood is probably because their state of undeath still leave them with living complexion and probably still need blood circulation or whatever
Hello guys
hello blab
They can indeed feed on livestock
Jander Sunstar did mostly, but humanoid blood DOES work better for them.
There’s also a distinction between humanoid and livestock blood. They can live off of the latter in a weakened state
I don't get it. Are we moving from systemic ecological reasoning to anthropocentric reasoning?
Being immortal is still negative by nature, and we prob shouldnt allow vampires to create more vampires
Because from a systemic ecological reasoning, feeding on people is no different than feeding on cattle. In fact it could be argued to be less harmful
Yesnt, its about the limitation
Most immortal beings that AREN'T undead in 5e typically don't HAVE to feed.
But consider this: maybe a vampire just needs immortal companionship :((
If people blood is a requirement, its bad
Who is "we" here?
Me. Im killing all vampires 😎
Its not a requirement, but it does work better for them.
If its cattle blood, vampires are still a negative but more so bc theyre immortal
I mean, at the end of the day, people will do what they want to do, and their moral justifications will only be created after the fact, if at all.
Ended up on dnd Twitter for 5 minutes. I need a lesser restoration cast on me.
Vampires don't have to FEED enough on beings for them to DIE, though, unless they're out of control.
But thing is... They're not immortal. They're killed by sunlight, they're killed by running water, they're killed by vampire hunters.
And also the whole undead thing but thats magic bs that I won’t even try to argue for or against
Most things in nature do not die of old age either.
They are simply unaging and... Nope, not even immune to diseases and poisons.
So thats where we get into the fun and also depressing part of ecology
We only care about humans
It's hilarious to me that any time I engage with the community outside of here its always the same
"DnD dun have danger anymore, damn you Matt Mercer!"
More specifically the human species
Peach, no offense, but your only point for vampires being amoral and horrible are that
They're potentially immortal and typically feed on people.
Vampires are definitely more difficult to balance ecologically than just humans, but it’s definitely possible to create a system that does so ethically.
*negative, not immoral
How bad can it possibly be
Just the usual "dnd dun have danger, it's Matt Mercers fault"
Made a post a while ago specifically to move it toward that
"Dnd don't have danger" meanwhile utzi the dm is on his what.. 70th pc kill of the year? 
Because it’s possible, it would mean that allowing vampires to exist and propagate is not always evil or negative, although it still could be situationally.
And that everything in dnd must be comfy and safe cause Matt Mercer and CR said so.
I swear, fans of Matt Mercer and CR are less obsessed with him and CR than miserable "dnd players"
I wanna get into my reasoning but gotta do work stuff unfortunately so itll end up completely fractured
So sorry gotta dip from the convo
My points as to why they're not inherently negative are
They don't have to kill things they feed on, they can feed on things that aren't human
And vampires can feed on different things depending on type, such as Psychic energy and Dreams.
Mercer is a great dm, I get why people want to emulate him. I wish that people would emulate him a bit less and be more comfortable doing their own style, or not use him as a benchmark or standard other people need to live up to.
What truly makes vampires “evil” doesn’t necessarily have to do with their feeding habits, it’s the lack of empathy for anything and the methods they historically go through to get what they want.
An immortal parasite isn't bad so long as they're not completely ravaging a population and killing everything they see.
It's just a nuisance.
It depends on if that vampire can hold onto their humanity, which is rare from my understanding
For our argument we were using vampires that don’t undergo psychological changes, and considering the group as a whole rather than individually.
Their feeding habits are unorthodox, but what makes them evil is their tendency to become power hungry megalomaniacs who would rather enslave everybody around them than try to find an ethical way to coexist. Because by their very nature, they’re incapable of empathizing.
That's the thing though
You CAN'T consider vampires as a group because there are vastly different people that become vampires to really put a scope on one specific kind.
ANY person can become a vampire.
But there is often a psychological change too. In a lot of vampire media, when someone becomes a vampire, they’re internally dead too. It’s not just physically becoming undead that makes them scary, it’s the death of their humanity that makes them horrifying.
In fact, since vampires can feed without killing, one could argue that, on that regard, they are less environmentally harmful than... Well, anything
You've got your Strahds, Your Kas' your Jander Sunstar's.
They're all functionally different types of people, the main similarity is Strahd and Kas were ALWAYS terrible people in life anyway!
There are some philosophers who would argue that the death of someone's humanity actually would make them more moral, not less
Depends on the fiction you’re drawing from. If there are psychological changes that obligate them to act immorally, then they are de facto evil. But the ones we were considering in our argument do not have psychological changes.
Oh no by obsessed I mean they blame him for anything they don't like in dnd.
Bad roll? Matt Mercer must have been involved
One could argue a vampire feeding on human blood is little to no different than humans who milk cows
If your "in this case" vampires don't change psychologically, then there are going to be terrible people who are vampires and good people who are vampires.
It's up to THEM to decide how they effect others.
Truthfully
Overall, losing a LITTLE bit of blood isn't harming anyone
Still working but not true technically
That is true.
Replace the "anything" part with "a lot of things"
Mosquitos
Well losing a lot of blood definitely can be. So I guess it comes down to just how much self-control a vampire has.
Yes, vampires are immortal, but that doesn't mean that they're overall negatively impactful just because of how they feed.
Their INFLUENCE really determines the negativity of their existence.
So we come back to this: Without knowing how much blood a vampire needs, we are at an impasse.
3.5e tells us how much iirc
Ah, if you do know please share
Also, a vampire could just.. feed on multiple different people in a night if they REALLY needed to drink enough blood to kill someone
Is a D20 really even or higher chance for a number then a other?
I think we just gotta agree to disagree on whether vampires are bad, because it keeps going back and forth
I'm just in favor that they add a little bit of spice to a campaign and I would personally love to play a vampire themed campaign that isn't just "Bleh blood death and violence", but rather getting to know how complicated a vampire could be as an individual
A balanced die has equal chances to land on any given result. In the case of the D20, it's 5%.
3.5e info would be - feed once per day (energy drain), once per three days (blood drain) to avoid negative effects
Okay
Libris Mortis page 10
That does not seem too bad.
With a large enough prey pool, like a big city, it would be completely unnoticeable
Indeed to what Star Said
I've also brought up Jander Sunstar a few times and he's incredibly fun because he's an example of how a vampire can try to cause as least harm as they can
He's also like.. painfully actually tragic because he's still a genuinely good person
Also bringing it back to classic vampire folklore tho (which I understand doesn’t necessarily apply to D&D specifically), vampires are known for being creatures of overindulgence.
So in my mind they always go as far as they can
Jander Sunstar is also the star of the novel Vampire in the Mists, where the narration from his point of view calls a young girl given to him by Strahd as "ripe yet maidenly"
That would vary individually though
Oh. That's.. weird.
But still!
I think we gotta kill this guy tokii
Last I checked becoming a full vampire also rots all the good qualities about you too right?
Kill who?
This guy
It's entirely possible for a vampire to be a functioning member of society - that said, the transformation itself does come with an alignment shift in both 5e and 3.5e
Yeah, there’s generally a death of their humanity
Jander Sunstar?
I mean, he's an Elvish individual, I dunno what they mean in those terms 😭
guards , kill jander sunstar 
It's just not a very good novel
It's also probably not a good representation of said Character
That opens up a whole other can of worms. What's a "good" quality as opposed to a "bad" or "neutral" quality?
hallo everyone
Hello
There is of course a huge difference between "your alignment becomes evil" and "you literally always cause maximum destruction", vampires being evil doesn't mean they'll kill everyone
Considering that he was invented for that novel...
how you doing?
Hello oinkers and luuk and welcome to vampire hour (i think it's been 2 hours)
Ok back to killing that guy
ohhh yay i love vampire hour
Damn they still on that 
Yes but spoilers.
Overall, being a vampire is awesome because dying sucks
OH
“Love turns into hungry obsession, while friendship becomes bitter jealousy.”
These are the examples it gives so that can give examples on what it means.
that's just me without meds
Could also just.. use the Clone spell to achieve immortality
just make that BREAD
Yikes
please laugh
Vampirism has advantages over Clone
Sure, I guess
laugh track
Damn wizards trying to cheat death in the 30th way
It's more concerning than it is funny 😔
I hope you're doing alright
I can name a dozen people for whom vampirism would change nothing, then.
There is likely other books with stuff but I’m a tad busy to look it up now
Yeah, like, I already eat people
Why do I need to be a vampire?
My homebrew world , i make it so specifically a vampires most shameful traits are expanded on
Basically ego death
Vampirism is cool but there are also other cool paths worth considering like lichdom
But anything that changes my personality is a no
You joke but... We kinda do eat people.
If my immortality comes at the cost of mass suffering, I think I'd rather remain mortal.
Or not becoming immortal and just move on
Who said I was joking?
Not being immortal is cringe
Whenever we buy food grown by people who are barely better than slaves, starving and exploited, some of whom end up dying from those conditions, are we not feeding on their death?
You’re crying (get it)
Eating millions of souls just to be immortal is.. also kinda cringe as there are other ways to get it lol
Especially since people actually know for a fact there is an after life too that is judging you.
If a product we buy is only available because a war opened up the trade, are we not feeding on the death of everyone who died in that war?
Afterlives in the D&D multiverse tend to suck a lot
In a sense, we are already cannibals.
Just be a follower of Lathander, doy
Any experienced dnd masters or players? I need some feedback on the dnd project, could you have a look to see if it's a good or a bad idea???? I'm 100% new this will be my first time attending a D&D I got excited after helping my girlypop with the D&D project, making me want to join kind of as a side dish character!! O_O
I actually dislike Lathander
that's why i make the afterlife a second life in the celestial realm, and then once they die in said afterlife (can be a choice), they rebirth back into the material realm
At the bare minimum, you're losing every single class feature you gained, all your power etc., to become an insignificant being wandering an Outer Plane that could at any point just be blown up by any planar traveler who encounters you
The afterlife in D&D is a fail state, in past editions you would also literally merge with your deity or the plane eventually
You're decomposing, that's all it is
Remember the wall of death and torture for atheists?
Good and evil deities are two sides of the same coin, the only way to win is apotheosis beyond mortality
Oh myrkul, you silly guy
Anybody? ;( 
To be fair, in a realm where deities give some people power and their existence is widely proven...
Being an Athiest would be the dumbest thing ever in the FR
Absolutely, but also i dont want to crucify flat earthers
Being an atheist does not necessarily mean denying the gods exist
Not a lot of my characters actively worship God's, but they don't deny their existence
Atheism in FR isn't about not believing gods exist. It's in acknowledging them or not as beings worthy of worship.
In forgotten realms lore, to the torture wall you go 😎
In Ancient Greece, for example, it was understood as being someone who had contempt or disregarded the gods, participating in no religious festival
In order to go to the wall you need to be rejected by all deities, so that nobody collects your soul when you die
Ilmater, the GOAT coming to accept me because nobody else would
Just hope Ghaunadaur doesn't accept your soul first 😔
There's rules even gods have to follow about who they can claim
It was technically created by Myrkul for anyone “who claimed no patron god”
If I was a tortle barb with a con and dex of 18 what is my armour class?
Ilmater or evil gods can't just be like 'He's for the wall? I'm taking him, even though I've got no claim'
Notably, demons do tend to rip souls out of the wall sometimes and run off with them
Because it doesn't stack with your natural defense, you can choose one over the other
Damn
And you can make pacts with devils while on the Fugue Plane
Notably, there's an entire rebellion movement by goodly forces dedicated to that, as well.
Sorry, I got pulled into a meeting. Not sure if the conversation is still here, but in case it helps, Libris Morits from 3.5E (Book of the Dead) has specific rules on this.
Vampires are diet dependent (meaning they have to feed to remain mobile; some undead like zombies and mummies exist purely on negative energy). Unless they feed, their link to the Negative Energy Plane grows weaker until they become immobile or lose their abilities. Undead cannot be starved to "destruction". The book says most diet undead can go 3d6 months without feeding before losing all mobility.
Hunger, however, is also listed. This sidebar says after 3 days for diet dependent undead (like vampires), they start making "will saves" (Wisdom saves). If the undead fails the save, they take wisdom damage and when reduced to zero, typically goes into a frenzy (unable to use judgement).
This is on Page 10 of the book itself.
Ah, the good ol' Libris Mortis, one of my favorite tomes.
Hello, newcomer, would you like to go on the wall of pain death and torture with me?
It's just a bunch of wizards casting
"FULL BODY WAX!!!" Over and over again
That’s not true
It is now!
Half of them cast that, the other cast “HAIR GROWTH”
Ah, yes!
Its my night job tokii, gotta get it right
Sorry, my princess, won't happen again /silly
To the wall you go
I'm already there, waiting for you 🧐
what on earth is going on......
This random lady with a weird name really sold her goddess to me and im convinced this is a good investment
Shar might not be the greatest deity, but she's an opposing force to Mystra so I support her
Anyone that hates Mystra is a good person in my books
Ive said it before, ill say it again
I feel mildly bad for mystra
I'm asking Ti to kick you from his server even though I'm the one who asked to invite you there in the first place
LET ME EXPLAIN
Isn't there like a farming God? Can I just choose that one instead of shar or mystra
You can choose ANY Deity
I feel bad specifically for Midnight, the mystra before the current mystra
Shar backed Netheril 2.0, I like the Netherese
Oh, the actually based one?
The current mystra is an amalgamation of mystras that midnight created bc she knew shed die
Yeah
And i feel bad for the midnight parts of that amalgamation
I consider Mystra and Midnight two incredibly different beings still
Midnight is incredibly tragic
While
Mystra is incredibly SHIT
I blame mystrl for all of mystras shortcomings
Mystrl was also incredibly shit
And the mystra after that sucked
And midnights tragic and sad
Mystrl.. the Wizard god that's head over heels for Mystra?
And current mystra sucks but like, theyre made of 2 shitty versions of themselves
What exactly did current Mystra do to be considered to "suck"?
Being Mystra 🔥
Daurgothoth is a potential Really Big Problem that she's actively cultivating
Sure, it fits her portfolio, but that's still a huge threat
That too
Daurgothoth is a threat to EVERYONE but she favors him because of his Devotion to magic, yeah?
Also upholding the ban on 10th+ level spells is dumb and petty
Especially since epic spells exist anyway
Its debatable whether or not thats a good idea
Theres also some things you could say about original mystra, specifically that some sources
Make her out to literally be a child
Previous Mystra’s were more neutral than good right?
But i dont really know if that child was mystras literal reincarnation or just a child who became mystra
Honestly?
Mystras children are typically way better people than her as well lol
Alustriel doing her best
I think she was one of the earliest people to invite Orcs into polite society even during their war with them.
Karsus really ruined everything
If mystra 2 was infact just a child who became a god, i feel mildly bad
But she was infact the worst mystra
I am amused Alustriel did a Tokyo drift on a bunch of trolls with a flaming chariot tho.
