#dnd-discussion
1 messages · Page 75 of 1
Just saying, there's a reason Frieza from Dragon Ball went from his obsession of becoming immortal to "You know what? Actually, make me taller by 5 centimeters"
I really don’t think being immortal is that bad, dragons and elves do it and they seem fine
i feel like pain impacts our psyche differently if immortal
That is longevity
The most outlandish fellow I have is a Centaur Berserker Barbarian who joined the Zhentarim because he hears the roar of an audience in his head when he kills people 🤔
That's long life, not immortality
the big problem with pain in my experience is connected to the fact that im running out of time
Not the same as immortality
It's great right up until you're left in a situation you'd rather die of.
Elves wish they were immortal
and i may die as well
Immortality means you can quite literally never die
ok but would you? eventually it will end
🙄 forgot what chat I’m in and I can’t say dragons are immortal
true you cant
Being forever serving to a fae family would be horrible
(This is a main plot point of Old Guard. It is very, very scary to think about.)
There are various types of immortality. Some you can live forever unless you are killed. Others you are impervious to any kind of harm.
Like what was his name, Kangaxx? Torn into separate pieces scattered across a city but couldn't die? Just left sealed and in endless boredom?
Ty
meditate
Just be an Elf Druid and live for a couple thousands of years
that is also assuming that you can be dismembered
i just think suffering would hit differently if youre not how we are all
Feel like it’s a skill issue if you’re 1000 years old and get ripped apart, you had so much time to train
If you want another example, Porky from Earthbound 3 was another example. Entered in the "Absolutely Safe Capsule", which was as the name suggests... but didn't have a way to open it back up
just win
Even if you can't be dismembered, you can be dumped into a molden slag of metal, then cooled until hardened, then chucked down a deep hole. Now you can't move at all, stuck fast until basically forever.
This is just how cursed swords are made
what is earthbound?
Exactly. Immortality by itself is not great at all. People keep forgetting you would need to pair it up with supernatural resistances or regeneration
The Futurama brains in the jars kinda freak me out because..
They're still alive..
But they're brains just sitting on shelves in a room
That'd be your existence, yeah. A brain trapped in rock.
i think floating in nothingness after the heat death would be cool
Sorry I just thought it was assumed and I didn’t need to add a bunch of qualifiers like I’m arguing with a contract devil
nvm
Never played it?
Smaller Nintendo franchise of a kid with psychic powers trying to stop an alien from conquering the world. Summary doesn't do it justice, look into it sometime
"Yo, Angelo!"
-Some Delinquent with really cool hair
when googling it i only find "mother" not earthbound
ah earthbound is specifically mother 2, and the english localisation title
Or, you know, you could get teleported into the heart of the sun, or just to somewhere SUUUUPER inconvenient to immortality. Like the Negative Energy Plane.
suffering builds character
That is the same franchise. It's one of those tricky titles that have 2 official names. Similar to one of my favorite movies "Edge of Tomorrow" aka "Live, Die, Repeat"
Sure, it can't KILL you, but you'll definitely wish it could
This is the hell afterlife but with more hoops
Real heroes know the true way to be immortal is just to die and ascend to the celestial planes because you were a good boy
i think earthbound is only specifically that one game, not the franchise
Ever see the end of "I Have No Mouth and I Must Scream"?
lets go
id be fine
- ur dog is there too
Okay, in that case, to the Positive Energy Plane, where, since you can't DIE, you just super-cancer from over-influx of Positive Energy forever, becoming an ever-expanding blob of fleshy bits.
Ghoul "immortality" from Fallout also sucks
Well, yes and no. The franchise is relatively connected with some key characters. But it is very interesting for it's time
"Hey, Smoothskin!"
Also liches are kinda wack, why would you wanna be some bone guy when you could commit to evil and become a demon, I feel like that’s an upgrade compared to skeleton
though i dont think ive ever heard of cancer in dnd
id like being a skeleton
Most diseases don’t exist in dnd and aren’t listed anywhere
exactly so im safe
Positive Energy Plane infuses visitors with Positive Energy until they're healed.... then OVERHEALS them until they explode. But if said visitor was IMMORTAL....
I wouldn’t like being a skeleton I like having fleshy behaviors
Well, yes and no. A lot of media does tend to throw in other things alongside immortality, but oftentimes it is only the fact that you cannot die
Such is the problem behind the fallacy of affirming the converse
Counterpoint, never poop again.
What
I think I'd rather be a ghost or something over being a bag of bones
Counterpoint, prestidigitation lets you wipe instantly
Still doesn't solve the whole problem of troublesome organs
Oh nooooo how terrible I hate drinking and eating and feeling soft pillows oh nooo
You’re immortal go learn some weak healing magic
i would like being a skeleton because its cool
It is cool
a fine trade for your indulgences
Your food is now nutrition cubes that taste like regret, water that's like liquid despair, and a cursed pillow that LOOKS amazing but is always hard as a rock AND WARM ON BOTH SIDES.
being a ghost would be cool too
"I was never going to feel the touch of a Man/Woman anyway! It's SKELETON time!"
Now ur just making up curses
is that what they mean by turning into a wizard?
are liches just guys who made it to 30?
Affirming the consequent aka fallacy of the converse is the common assumption of an antecedent being true because the consequent in a "If X, then Y" is true
An example would be
"If it rains, the street will be wet
The street is wet, therefore, it rained" (someone could have spilled a drink or used a hose)
I feel like wizards get enough, magic is attractive after all
yes but youre not a wizard until then
Yeah kind of adjacent to that is the Romantic view of Vampires and werewolves. Their immortality is supposed to be a curse of being evil and suffering from an unquenchable blood lust. Yet now they can relationships, go to church and live like a normal person surviving off of blood banks or grocery store raw meat juices. lol
its how you get the magic!
Okay, I curse your taste buds to cease functioning.
echo hates fun
Echo shall go to the abyss for these hexes
our fun, specifically
they like cursing us for their own
which is counter to her avatar pic. lol
Relatively close, yes. It's why merely being immortal isn't always a good thing
I think the vampire curse was always overblown. You’re telling me a vampire wouldn’t get a goth harem to get blood from? Cmon, easiest solution ever
Yeah, I mean, imagine if someone cursed you with the experience of all your food burning on the way out.
Sure, it wouldn't KILL you, but now you're suffering just for eating. And if you don't eat, you still won't die, you'll just be endlessly starving.
There's all kinds of things that could happen to turn immortality into a fate worse than death real quick.
Thus, why some form of torture is one of the most consistent ways to talk someone out of immortality
It sounds like all the things are curses or being defeated in battle
So really you should spend your immortality becoming a mage or be a dragon
Or just being in the wrong place when a sun goes supernova 
You’re 5000 years old and didn’t learn plane shift? Smh
To be fair though. Whatever immortality is usually shown, the owner is pretty badass. So trying to dismember it or stuff it in molten iron case and dump it in the ocean is no easy task
Which only proves the point more. This is only immortality. Great when paired with other things, terrible when it's all you have (left)
Ok it would be cool to put like fragments of a balor or marilith demon into a bunch of cursed swords and spread them across the globe
Exactly, immortality without power is just infinite suffering.
And like a cult collects them and boom the boss gets remade
We already knew that, it’s called being a lemure in hell
Your definition of immortal is strange and changes with the circumstances
A demon / devil isn't immortal, just enduring. They can still be killed, just not by aging.
Though it might take doing it in their home plane to actually stick without them reforming.
Hmm
The literal definition is "living forever, never dying or decaying"
why is decaying specified here
Because even a demilich eventually becomes sentient, malevolent bone dust? 
so dying?
i dont see why decaying is specified
unless this means that a decayed but sentient corpse isnt immortal somehow
if youre still aware, even just as a cloud of sentience, why would that make you not immortal?
Half-serious question: Is it true that violating a rule during a session will result in 2 guards from Wizards of the Coast just taking you away and forcing you to sit through a session full of the most problomatic players known to dnd?
where is that from
The more I’m reading immortality semantics the more I think I just wanna die, go to heaven, reincarnate, repeat
ah problematic
Half serious answer: no, unless you organise it
Yeah totally of course mhm for sure I was the room
i dont think you should subject anyone to "the most problematic players"
they get up to some very bad stuff
But that's what the gods want you to think! Don't play into their nonsensical game of soul recycling, just to fuel their power! Embrace the greater knowledge, become the contradiction in their world of conformity!
It would be interesting to watch a table of the most problematic players and see what happens
Why would I not want to fuel my gods power? She’s cool
i mean i dont exactly wanna spell it out here but it would be very bad and i dont think this chats community is really up for watching that
But you're a literal slave sent to the furnace to burn as fuel
??? Worship a good god, L evildoer
the talk here tends to be rather sensitive towards certain topics so you definitely dont wanna watch that game
I’ll be fine
i wonder if the game would happen at all though
thats the one out you get here tbh. can they make the session happen?
I want to know if they can
If you're not at least giving your soul to Eldritch Abominations, you're only supporting a stilted, biased cycle made to keep mortals oppressed 
that sounds like heresy to me
Heretic trying to turn me away from Sarenrae be like
The real heresy is being made to suffer and die just to give a god their 'fix' with my soul
Wall of Faithless can go leap into Pandemonium 
Lay off the forbidden tomes
NO. Now excuse me while I go fire up another round of Cultist Simulator, by Weather Factory on Steam.
whats up with dnd?
Too many gods, not enough mortal overthrow of the heavens.
Only the GOOs can save us now.
are warlocks a good class to try?
Always! Take the Road less travelled, see the Colors behind the world, and open the Paths that will let the elder things in!
Or just blow up everything you meet with Eldritch Blast. Same thing, really.
Im playing in a party with a warlock. I'm the ranger
I think Warlock isn't for beginners? It's sort of an intermediate level class?
(I believe warlocks are one of the most traveled paths)
All the classes are for beginners
I blame that on eldritch tentacles, tbh
The one shot included the warlock, me the ranger, a druid, an artificer, and a wizard.
Also, am I crazy, or is there just no necro/undead subclasses for Sorc in D&D Beyond? 
Also, I'm still angry that subclasses now only get chosen / kick in at level 3.
I think it was for balance, but I don’t love what it entails for clerics and warlocks
Obligatory WotC balance commentary here
“Balance this” I say as I buff fighter significantly
Me: buff the ranger
Warlock has higher complexity/more choices, but all classes can be made to be more complex.
Incorrect, Fighter is Bonk. Only Bonk. Always Bonk. Many Bonks.
You only have to understand the class you choose as a player, so all classes are beginner-friendly in that regard.
12 APR dual-wield goes BRRRR
Yes, making fighter inherently beginner-friendly, but not by design.
I'm not familiar with the acronym APR. Could you define that one?
Attacks per round 
Made my first character for a campaign today a level 3 Goliath Barbarian primal path of wild magic with 44 hit points and 18 armor class how much is my dm gonna hate me 😭
That sounds fun. I don't see why the DM would have an issue with that. You're a bonk stick with extra steps.
Not at all, one Grease spell and you're doomed 
Okay I was just worried the hit point and armor class would be an issue
Oh you rolled HIGH
Yeah 3 seventeens and I'm gonna use the unarmored defense bonus
I'm at level 4 in a campaign I'm in, but I'm scared of low hit die rolls, so I took average. I'm at 39 hp
AC shouldn’t be much of an issue, some classes are able to get 22 by this level
Fighter goes bippidty bop on your noggin'
(Scroll up here or in #dnd-rules if you wish to know about my PC, but that's neither here nor there for talking about your character)
As Jolteon said though, you’re just a bonk stick with extra steps
It's been a long time since I rolled a fighter in any edition where they were simple.
I really want to try a ranger one day I've heard they are extremely useful but really under utilized
They are thankfully less mindnumbing in 24
Your new life now consists solely of two questions: what terrain is this, what enemy type is this.
I played a dwarf ranger from 1-10, this is big true
I most recently rolled a fighter in 4e, as far as one that acted like a fighter, and before that was in 3.5 where I took 2 levels of fighter for the bonus feats.
It's a team game. So what if you're "less optimized"
I was the toughest person in the party and the most versatile and got to determine how we started most fights and got to scout
Is it ridiculous to say I want to try every class not every subclass cause that'd be impossible but at least the main classes
No
Play enough one-shots and you'll be able to make that dream a reality.
Specifically, one-shots that occur at level 2, becuase then you've tried all the subclasses 🙂
Might I recommend just making it on DNDbeyond? It'll make your sheet way more digestable
I would use Crawford's term, "co-op". In most cases PC's are assembled for their own reasons and goals, not necessarily a borg mind
Ranger is not suboptimal, you’re a terrific bruiser and terrific recon, you could make a fully functioning party with a ranger, a cleric, and a wizard
"I need a bonus-action. Better click the bonus actions portion of my sheet"
DND beyond is a lifesaver
I think we're describing the same thing here.
I'm going to agree to disagree there, as I'm not really here for the optimization. That's something I'd relegate to JRPGs anyway. I'm for a TTRPG, so I don't really feel the need to optimize that hard in the first place
You think picking a class is optimizing?
The best defense is not allowing the enemy to play the game.
Nope, I think the options you pick within that class causes a level of optimization
Tbf I feel like working around anything statistically in D&D to some extent is optimizing, isn't it? Not that it's bad or anything, just technically what it is.
I didn’t even list anything within the class but ok
Its so easy to only want to go for big damage. Big damage is nice but things that gurantee stun, knockdowns, control, banishment. Now thats the good stuff.
Heck, the fact the enemy targets your familar or echo? Thats the enemy not attacking you or friends. Thats big.
What this also means is that theres plenty of ways to be useful in DnD.
It's the good stuff but after a certain level they are easily saved against
No good saves against bippity bops
Ah yeah I’ve heard of that monster
At this point when our party goes into a town I just don't want to talk to anyone, because the DM might introduce the character and force me to save them or get kicked out of another town for like the third time in a row. I just want to buy some gear and leave
Has your group tried telling said NPCs to leave?
Or talking to the DM about it?
Entirely reasonable
The DM is good but forcing alignment too much is getting to be an issue
Our party is good. But there's sub alignments. Neutral good, chaotic good, lawful good etc
Ah hello!
How do you get kicked out of a town for not saving someone?
DM required me to save the NPC or else I would have to retire my character for not being good enough. So I save the NPC. our party got kicked out and now we have bounties on our head as well.
Wow. And I thought my dm was bad-
Imagine being punished for doing what the dm wants you to do
I’d just leave at that point
Railroaded. You're in the dm's magical land, now.
For the most part I just want to at least talk with my party before I do the things
I'd leave that table ngl
I think just say something polite but direct about it like “hey I’m cool with doing heroic stuff but I feel like I’m damned if I do, damned if I don’t, I just want something to go smoothly and be able to sell my gear”
I only really have the issue now because we changed to a week-long long rest system. And I'm the only full caster
Oh dear
And XP
So do you sleep for a week or what
It's basically we have to do a week of downtime inside of a town or city
That sounds miserable
But none of the fighting or criminal ones
"Week long rest system". This sounds like one of the DM's who brags about the stuff he/she can do, and his/her players are "totally cool with it". Why? Usually because they don't want to complain or try to find another DM. 🤷🏿♂️
Week long rests are good for wilderness campaigns. Means you can’t just sleep off every attack when you’re on a days long trek
You can get a similar effect by only allowing long rests in towns
Honestly? Aside from having ideas for homebrew campaigns, the only thing that could push me towards also being a DM are people like this being a thing
This sounds like the dm is trying to make the game feel “hardcore” or beacons-of-lightish but this is not how i would do it
I would not play this
I just make Long Rests in unsafe areas count as Short Rests
Nah. Weeklong rests are never good. imo
I’ll just say I disagree since it’s good for certain games, not all of course just in situations where you might want to stretch a string of fights over multiple days rather than one
But yeah if a GM is only using it because it’s called “gritty realism” it’s a little misguided
Weeklong rests have been a great restriction in the game I'm playing in, but the table had a pretty extensive session zero where we voted that this is what we wanted.
Note that the weeklong rests were something we all decided together was how we wanted things to work though, so no one got blindsided.
The more I research dnd the deeper it gets. There was one professor who has had the same campaign for over 40 years. There vid of him showing it. Its impressive
Yeah, it's like 43 years now, still going
Thats awesome .
Yeah definitely one of the OG's of D&D.
What is a week long rest
Long Rests take a week to complete
An optional rule called gritty realizizm where it takes a week of rest to get a long rest
Thats awesome. Dnd is awesome. The lore is what fascinates me the most.
8 hours
I could be persuaded to run week long rests if also there were shorter short rests, but I'm a warlock main as a player and have ideas about pacing as a DM.
I think baulder gate 3 really has open the door for people who wanna learn and get into dnd . And just learn about it
8 hours
Is the rest of the resources rebalanced or no?
i think i do like the longer rests for certain games, and I feel like narratively I dislike the 1 hour short rests. Feels a little jarring I think for a 1 hour break in the middle of a dungeon
nah, it doesn't really need to be if you're running it right
Being a warlock sounds rough
if youre doing something like a wilderness exploration over a couple days, it's not too different if you just replace an hour of time with a day of time
Wizards really do well with arcane recovery
i have question?
Yeah. Take a breath, wipe your sword, tighten your armour and check your hair: short rest.
have you played dnd as a player urizt?
Yes
Not quite but we have to go through the desert slow in between cities. Mostly walking so far but I bought an elephant so at least I'm not on the ground
are rangers balanced in your opinion?
yeah I'd probably prefer 10 minute short rests to 1 hour if anything. Seems like a much more reasonable timeframe
Rangers are amazing, all the classes are
Whats your favorite class to dm

"Balance" is a discussion I typically don't like to have as it's a co-op story/team game. Can you contribute something someone else in the party can't, that doesn't fundamentally break expectations? If yes, it's probably fine
What class the players pick is irrelevant to My enjoyment, but I do want to try a Oops all one class game sometime
does this include multiclasses?
Oops all Bards, and we're the Beatles?
yeah i think if those desert treks had a bandit raid/monster attack nearly every single day, it'd probably be more justified for 1 week long rests so you couldnt just shake off all the damage done so easily
AC/DC
but again, i think the "long rests only work in towns" rule is an alternate thats just as good for that purpose IMO
I think for our week-long long rest party. We have a mercy monk, champion fighter, lore bard, vengeance paladin, wild heart barbarian , and arcane trickster rogue.
Yeah, MC charicters don't impact my fun, just their own
I'll meet you in the middle and go for Iron Maiden?
I am running 9 awesome campaigns filled with awesome players
Can you imagine a Heavy Metal band going back into the D&D era (whatever yours is)? it would be like that movie "Back to the Future", in the guitar scene talent show
how would they plug in their amps
Magic
Idk i think you can do a long rest anywhere but you just run risks of doing so.
Can we play Bill and Ted in D&D? Bill and Ted plus the girls, and if we get a 5th player maybe Rufus
normally yeah, just the goal of these rules would be to sort of "stretch out" an adventuring day into something like an adventuring week
for those who want a game like that ofc
I get that to make it more realistic, Idc for it personally. Seems kinda arbitrary
I just have time gaps occur in travel and down time
I used to love those movies. Keanu Reeves
it's not really for realism is what i'm trying to say, just to have travel combat be at the same feeling pace as something like dungeon combat
It's also a callback to how was more so in adnd
more or less yeah, having wilderness travel be part of the adventure rather than something you skip over to get to the adventure
Real
How would I play with people
My ruling is "if it doesnt add to the fun of the game, dont have it"
Full on hex crawl games with loads of exploration are fine to do with normal 5e rest rules in my experience, I have done several
AD&D was worse. You only healed 1 HP per day and after the 30th day it was 5 HP per day.
But you got your spells back overnight
Armor class/difficulty class
Yep, adnd is wild, I'm learning how to run it
And their hit song, highway to avernus
i think what helps this a lot is actually traveling with more people than just your party
your party can easily recover from combat (typically) but if the band of merry men gets injured, your healing resources might stretch thin or you might suffer deaths, so it incentivizes the same behaviors
would you let me play that minotaur bard idea in one of your games if i joined?
I do sometimes allow the monsters of the multiverse options, but not allways
Depends on the specific campaign
the Quest of the infinite staircase
Ah, yes. Baby's First Shephard's Tone
I swear every time I see "Quest of the Infinite Stair case", I always think of the high level Basic D&D module, "The Endless Stair". If you never heard of it and need inspiration for a mid to high-level adventure, check it out.
, how do I look for a free game to play
For me, i immediately think of Super Mario 64
And Payday Cloakers
I just realised that Bladesinger doesn't actually require the use of a melee weapon, as long as you don't use a two handed weapon...
It's Gun Wizard Time 😎
What subclasses are in SCAG?
Have I gone crazy, or am I just missing something obvious? It seems like BAB isn't listed in each class.
Battlerager Barbarian, Arcana cleric, Shepherd Druid, Sun Soul monk, Inquisitive Swashbuckler and Mastermind Rogue, Bladesinger Wizard, Undying warlock
Might be missing a few
Bab as in base attack bonus, that's not a thing in 5e
Stat plus proficiency is your attack bonus
Okay.... and I assume Proficiency increases over time...?
Yes
Is it the same for everyone?
Yes proficiency goes up based on total charicter level at the same rate for each class
Oh, okay.... so now there's no difference in to hit between a wizard and a fighter if they both have the same level and Strength? 
No, because of ability score modifiers.
On top of that, the wizard only adds prof bonus if the wizard is proficient in that weapon.
But a 14 str wizard and a 14 str fighter both using a simple melee weapon at level 1, yes, do have the same to hit.
tf you mean, ability score modifiers? If th- oh. So yes.
A fighter likely has alot of other features to increase their weapon attacks . And a wizard has spells but both are effected by the bounded accuracy od 5e
what about a swarmkeeper ranger/stars druid/life cleric?
And a wizard is not actually proficient with most weapons
So they would just roll based off their strength if they grabbed a Longsword
i m thinking yes if i do multiclass bc ranger.
would ranger be more dex based by design?

undying
still ages to death and can be killed normally
Clearly not undying. WotC naming fail.
Urizt, whats your least favorite part about dming?
Table management, that is to say enforcing boundaries and etiquette rules and possibly removing players, it takes a toll when folks don't play nice but is very important
A Dex ranger is significantly easier to build effectively compared to a Str Ranger, though the latter can still be fun and effective
My last Ranger was a Lance-wielding Drakewarden
Could a player survive getting infected by an lycanthrope and a vampire?
Drakewarden is one of the few subclasses that yield a more dragon per dungeon average rate then most other subclasses
Gotta live out my dragoon dreams 😎
Assuming they don't
- get killed by the vampire bite
- fail the werewolf bite saving throw and don't drop to 0 HP
Then yeah
Interesting
Huh?
What class would make for the best campaign if everyone was the same class?
To clarify, this is just a narrative way to surviving a bite. There's not really an "infection phase" since they're both not diseases. I guess you could consider the period between failing the saving throw on a werewolf bite and dropping to 0 HP with the curse active an "infection phase" though
More dragons per dungeon
Fighter
Fighter
Jynx
what class y'all think Mrs Rachel would be
Bard
oh yeah duh
Class? Imo she would be considered a deity in my opinion with the amount of followers she has
100%
are there werewolf race
No
She has 18 million followers
Yes, shifter
Oh yeah
Dire wolf that has had an awaken spell cast on it?
who has that many followeres? ginny di?
Mrs. Rachel
i think its ms rachel actually
You right
is she dnd related?
Yes because someone was asking kindly what her class would be, and I said she would be a deity atp because she has many followers
What do you guys think is a criminally underrated subclass and why?
ooooh I know one. this subclass has crowd control, extra damage, and a prepared spell list to augment the class. Plus its very much an awesome subclass for my special weapons homebrew.
I still gotta find the best sub-class for being a tank
Psi warrior is pretty cool in my opinion and I don't see alot of people talk about it, in my experience
I see what you did there
is it the bees knees?
yes haha
I could easily take a werewolf and a vampire.
Why would they not?
A player character who becomes a vampire or werewolf traditionally becomes an npc.
A player who becomes one of those two things needs to come speak with me personally, as I would love to speak to them about their lived experience with the supernatural.
stares in Deimos
i run lycanthropy RAW, so its essentially charicter death
I'm not entirely certain that text is part of '24. I remember it being in '14. '14 did also have an optional rule that allowed the PC to not become an NPC but still be a werewolf.
I am unsure if such an optional rule existed for vampirism. I don't think so.
The 24 version makes you an NPC under DM's control, and you come back as that statblock with 10 hit points
Yeah, its baked directly into their statblock instead of being a sidebar
So the '14 optional rule is gone?
Correct. There’s no optional rule saying you can play a werewolf or a vampire etc anymore. If a target is cursed and drops to 0, it becomes a werewolf (or whatever other were creature cursed it) under the DM’s control
Which honestly makes them even scarier (thankfully). They don’t have to kill the cursed creature. If the target is cursed (and they’re cursed if they fail a CON save when bitten) and drops to 0, they become a werewolf creature.
it also removes the powergamer incentive to intentionally contract lycanthropy
Yep
yeah, if you go to zero hp after failing the save to lycantrhopy thats game over
In a fight, right? 😉
i would need a blessed weapon or silver weapon, but yeah, i guess i can kill both of them in less of 5 turns
my paladin is a dhampir so i guess i can get some tips from him
Steve, putting fists up at Strahd: “Can you fight?!”
Strahd deserves all the hate, that incel
The incentive was removed by them no longer having the same damage resistances and immunities
would like to see a Druid being able to cast that without the drawback
like, would make sense for me in some way
Thats just another way it was removed. But also preventing you from getting anything as a free buff is the main reason
There is no "Free buffs" for me, i like the risk//Reward things
I can fix him.
Not sure how it would be a "free buff"
You have to willingly fight a thing that could probably kill you
unless you find one alone and use it for infect all the party
or with just one of the party being infected all of them can turn into a werewolf's party
stares at Deimos the were-shiba
Now you're just making up a contrived situation and pretending like the dm doesn't control what monsters will be present.
Yeah. And? I still almost killed him.
Yeah. 'Cause I'm not dumb lol
True, but would be funny or epic, depending of how its managed.
I would still be careful and kill them all. I have enough with my bad luck
should have been Wild Heart to help
Decapitation still work against werewolfs true?
welp, some creatures regenerate or are just too hard to kill
Nothing in the werewolf statblock would suggest so
Called shots aren’t a thing in 5E, aside from a couple of specific situations like the aforementioned vorpal sword
You can’t really choose to just go for the head
Unless you use the rule of cool
Yeah, but we can’t account for the rule of cool or any other sort of DM fiat in a server like this
i mean that's just reducing them to 0 til they die functionally
at that point though anything goes
I usually save mutilation, decapitation, and etc for "How do you wanna do this?"
Yeah, if I’m gonna fall on the rule of cool, instead of dying when I fail my last death save, I could come back as a powerful celestial instead
Well that's not very cool
To me that is
I think it is
It's cool for them.
For glory kill i mean mostly, homebrew rule in a campaign i am.
Or could just say if i can try that against a prone werewolf try with a roll (high roll) to decapitate it.
Hence my point
You die of cancer with your family surrounding you and you come back as a celestial?
which is the point we're trying to make about RoC
If the party goes through the effort of hunting, binding the werewolf down, and saving a family of 20 goblins, I will let them decapitate it.
cant rely on it
obviously, would be that the werewolf is idk, 1/4hp
Rule of cool only applies if it makes sense in context
Yee, and there wasnt much in that context to use it
Which is entirely subjective.
Cool, so we agree
Yup, just out of nowhere decapitate an enemy is just... kinda pointless and boring. That is why i gave the situation and all of it
unless idk, i roll a lot of damage in one turn and the DM want to let me have a moment
Exactly like this message
My point is that the rule of cool doesn’t lead to constructive discussion in a server like this. Because per the rule of cool, anybody could potentially do anything. So it’s safer to discuss from the shared base assumption of rules as written.
Again, mentioning RoC is a bit like saying "Not unless you homebrew" (which it is)
im in a session and one of the players got hit twice with one hit causing him to go down and the other causing him to fail 2 death saves, the dm is having us do a 30 second pause before he rolls his death saves for suspense reminding him that any fail will cause him to die. I know this player is not in danger from that because rolls physical dice at his desk on a voice call and he has magically never failed a death save throughout this entire campaign.
this campaign has been running for a year
I’m not saying I don’t like the rule of cool, just that it doesn’t help when discussing things that may or may not be done at someone else’s table.
You are right, let's go back to the conversation of what goku's class would be if he was in D&D
easy, monk.
Monk
I've heard people say sun soul monk
I wonder what level he would be considered, beyond level 20 atp
I feel like people wouldn’t enjoy playing Goku (or any shonen anime character for that matter) in D&D
Not doubt at all monk, he dont use any weapon properly, armor, the only "magic" he would classify would be the teleport and some "healing"
Dead.
Maybe multiclass with a spellcaster for the dbz ki attacks
5E doesn’t mesh with the power fantasy that a lot of anime lovers are looking for imo
But that's Sun Soul Monk.
oh whoops 😅
Goku would be able to fight gods 1 on 1 correct?
No
Goku as a PC and Goku as an NPC are different considerations.
He has in the anime
As an NPC, I think he could win
Like at a glance, he’d probably be a Sun Soul monk, but in practice, it probably wouldn’t feel like how Goku runs in the Dragonball franchise.
He has fought beerus which is a god of destruction, but could he run the hands with mystra?
okey, going for one more "soft", Goblin slayer is a fighter?
Gods in that universe aren't as powerful as dnd deities lol
Nope
As a PC I might make him a 2024 Elements Monk because you still get blasts, but now you also get flight.
True
reflavor the flight to be on a cloud?
Reflavor giant fly familiar to be the cloud?
No, that's unnecessary.
A flying monk is faster than the Giant Fly anyway
Tbf tho, Is there anything that's faster than a monk with all it's abilities? 🤔
Phantom Steed
Probably a Thief Rogue.
Teleport technically
Teleportation would count?
mmmmmm...... it use a medium armor most of the time and many kind of weapons
Mmmm 50/50 because there's some spells that can go like 1,000+ feet 😅
-# ugh here comes powerscaling conversation
Easy. Fighter dip
Thanks for the thoughts azerick
yeah, no magic, strong with weapons in general. Sometimes the "second wind" scenes
And mains STR over DEX. Medium Armor range of DEX
low charisma but high wisdom. Medium int
Y'all talking about goku still right?
nope, goblin slayer and what he would be
Ah
Oh. This for Goblin Slayer.
Maybe he would be a monster hunter if we use official third party?
no no, goku have 50 of dex, str, etc.
10 int....
Isen't the max player dex in D&D like 30?
Usually only with items.
For goku? maybe, depend of which you pick honestly, If you pick like the Piccolo Vs goku in the martial tournament. Where goku fought against Piccolo jr.
yeah, 20, no doubt. After that the thing go wild
or buffs from allies too
I'm assuming the intent is to still have it be in the system of 5e.
Do PC's get tired while climbing?
Like if they had a climbing speed of 30 feet, and there was a mountain that's 1000 feet tall
It's at the dm's discretion to determine if levels of exhaustion would be appropriate
Hi
anyway, i guess Goblin slayer would be a Fighter, Battle master. Mostly around some of his maneuvers, proficiency with tools when he build his own stuff like bombs and other many things and finally how he learn his enemies
There's no rules covering this, but a DM could use the rules for exhaustion theoretically.
Im kinda new here. How is everyone?
5E is, by defaut, considered to be the Heroic Fantasy genre, which means a lot of "realistic" things don't happen because it's not meant to be realistic.
The world is fantastical and the player characters are meant to be heroes.
Whatcha talkin about?
Base assumptions about the genre of 5E D&D.
I love it when DM's see their players acting like heroes then throwing crazy stuff at them to "humble" them
Happened to me 4 times in different campaigns, still angered by it
Idk what that is… sorry.
Did I hear Goblin Slayer, because that guy is clearly a Vengeance Paladin
Depend of how your Dm want to make it honestly
he did use any spells?
5th edition dungeons and dragons
Oh, that "love" there is sarcastic, isn't it.
Idk but his whole schtick/vibe screams Vengeance Paladin
Oh how did you know!
Oh. Well, I’m kinda new to dnd… I have some questions if anyone can help
is there anywhere i could join an online dnd group
Let us move over to #dnd-newcomers
I didn't at first, until I read your next sentence.
"Guys I'm literally an emperor, people will respect me!" The shopkeeper looks at you and says that you are but a foolish jester
level 17 character btw
That would fit more for guts at some point. The Mf is driven by pure Vengeance
hi
I lack context. Was this character actually the emperor?
And a shopkeep from that empire didn't recognize them?
Married to the empress of dragons, daughter of tiamat
[Not canon daughter, and yes my character was bard]
Is it bad that I was thinking of a certain renegade illithid when you said emperor
+2ac for a week, congrats
So you were married into royalty, duly announced and recognized publicly?
Mhm
And my character is a well known merchant
and his family is well known too
And the shopkeep was under the rule of that royalty? Huh .. seems the Dm forgot their own world building.
That's why the campaign imploded
Based on what he’s shown he’s more of a fighter (maybe rogue), plus one level in ranger
Hell of a split
Why Ranger though
And definitely not a Rogue, no Rogue runs around with full armor and a sword
... I don't like the way you play bard then
It was accidental
so wait
your bard accidentally seduced the equivalent of a demigod?
ok that's kinda funny ngl
Bit by vampire, needed a vampires help or become thrall, went to vampire, turned out to be vampiric dragon empress, married
Better written character than the new reason I'm not playing DnD
(a Mary Sue that is being allowed by the DM with the most unfun unserious backstory ever)
do you want to hear the one part that made me realize "yeah no screw this"?
I'm listening
Im deaf, could you explain in braille
The part about her being the only survivor of a multiverse dying
... that's not how multiverses work in general, especially in DnD
So you decided to just drop the campaign?
Not blaming you, just curious what the status is
There's also the DM allowing the character to be immortal
Unkillable or unaging?
That was the real nail in the unused coffin
Immortal, so unkillable
Both.
Oh. Welp...
Does he atleast get like a massive nerf whenever he dies?
They said both
No they just can't die apparently.
Name a more infamous duo of a Mary (or Marty) Sue and an enabling DM. I'll wait
Immortal characters aren't well written player characters.
This is the best advice ever.
Problem players and bards
DM and their signifigant other trying D&D for the first time
I wasn't being literal, but yeah
Anyways, I prefer characters who realize what they're pursuing is actually not that great in the end
If someone makes an immortal character, go the Touhou route if it
In other words, neverending boredom.
To give a basic example and remain spoiler free, "Finally acquiring the Holy Grail and realizing it's just an empty cup"
Touhou?
The funny bullet hell game
There's an immortal character in it but the immortality just leaves her being bored out of her mind, so every hundred years she just does everything differently
Ah. Gotcha
I.E, 300 years, she befriends everyone. Next 300, she kills everyone that goes near her. Another 300, isolation
Its a good way to make an immortal character well written honestly
Part of me does somewhat want to get into one of those campaigns and proceed to pull the most insane stunts imaginable you hear Youtubers talk about
Don't know if you saw this one, but an example is the golden boy paladin and an enabling DM, but proceeded to get blown to pieces because he was in the middle of an explosion from gunpowder barrels he was hoarding
You wanna be Kor, the orc who invented rage carpentry basically
Took several thousand points of fire damage, but the other person walked out without a scratch because ability for fire damage immunity
Enabling dms can be good, but only if it's funny good strats
Or if it leads to a hilarious situation
I.E, the horse eater from a friends campaign (it's as weird as it sounds)
maybe im built diff but i think i could handle immortality for at least like 5000 years before i get bored
Orcs are more my older brother's thing (would not be surprised if goblins were too, given his personality and choices irl)
Also, it's often better if the problem player isn't in cahoots with the DM
...or using 2 bags of holding to make a nuclear bomb by practically multiplying infinity by infinity due to a bag of holding being in a bag of holding
...turns out a small city is equal to nearly 15 levels
There's actually rules for what happens when you do that and it's not that powerful.
Oh
Now, my question is how exactly would immortality interact with physical stats like Constitution
I mean
Nuclear bomb the tiny village is still a funny story just from stupidity
If it's unaging
Nothing.
I think you and I have a different sense of "funny."
To be fair, that friends group was just playing a one shot for fun
But if she's immortal, how would she have a definitive HP stat?
Is she just above death saving throws?
Undying meaning no hp number.
They technically could be reduced to a paste, but that paste can very very slowly mold back into a human probably
Or, it could be immortality by infinite revivals
A La JoJo death loop
Undying does not mean no HP number 😭
It doesn't because the game isn't meant to have unkillable player characters and the rules for character sheets only work for certain assumptions. So you're in deep #homebrew territory.
Yeah, looking at this campaign and what my problems were for my campaign, they don't seem that bad now
Cant drop under 1 i guess
Unless some special rules disable that
vague example that i might be wrong, vampires Vs blessed weapons
Or Tarrasque with his immortal regeneration that you need a wish to stop it
My dnd party has a player who always rolls his things with physical dice on a vc campaign
I have rarely ever seen him roll below a 15 over the last year but he got downed and hit with 2 failed death saves so i called him out of his rolling method and told him to roll publicly where he immedietly died
Tbf I like rolling physical 😭 I also fall under this because I'm playing a wild magic sorcerer and I almost always have advantage 😅

Damn
We have been playing this campaign for over a year and he never failed a death save before today
Yikes.
I called him out on his rolling and he died immediately
I got a group of friends looking to get into DnD and wondering what is best way to find a game to join and learn
Yeah thats a huge yikes.
I, as the DM, occasionally roll "real" dice for secret checks, but I can't imagine letting the players roll real dice at home for an online/voice campaign.
Grab a starter set
I, as the player, have officially indirectly caused the first death of the campaign that wasnt me.
I have lost 5 characters in this campaign.
What even is this campaign
Read the rules. They're free.
Cost INT investment
You signed up for the nerd game, get those ASIs sir
A lot to deal with.
I've been running my game for seven months, and I haven't killed a PC yet. Almost did several times (which is ideal), but we haven't had any deaths.
The dm is mostly a drunk and doesnt balance encounters
But atleast i have made myself very difficult to kill
Sounds familiar...
I'm sorry, your DM is drunk?
Periapts of wound closure and remarkable recovery with 23 ac and a cloak of displacement
The majority of the time
I tried to play with a DM like that. I politely excused myself mid-way through the second session.
Does anyone know if the warlock can pick the agonizing blast invocation twice? Im trying to put it for both my eldritch blast and word of radiance. (1 level fighter and 12 warlock)
Been in a Curse of Strahd group so far and only my character has managed to “die” (got revived twice, saved from getting his soul taken once by Strahd) and this has happened to nobody else
No
Maybe ask in #dnd-rules ?
All 5 of my character deaths were before third level spells so no revivify
oops thank you
Crazy
No, you can't
It says that the invocation can be picked again. So im not sure if its technical thing from dnd beyond or rules
Anyways, even if you have the spell slots and prepared revivify, you may not have the material components. Those things are pricey
Oh I'm sorry, 2024 rules? Then yes you can.
DDB is just bugged. Its a known issue
ahhh i see. thank you all
Wait... It needs to be a warlock cantrip. Is word of radiance a warlock cantrip?
If you get it through Pact of the Tome yes
Hi is there a server that I would post a campaign idea that I cant figure out what to do with it
Then it's fine
Thx
Gottem ggs
I’m saying I want to find someone else’s game that is for beginners where do we do that at
AH! Then you want one of the other channels.... #looking-for-players
whats shackin bacon my non-gang affiliated buddys
i don't know what to say to that
this is the first time Ive seen welcoming words that work as a conversation ender
lol
im so extremely new to d&d
the only time i did anything with it was dnd club in 5th grade
Welcome then, you want the list of topics that will start a war? number 7 will shock you
Id like number 12 please
For some reason the book describes Demiplanes as Extraplanar spaces but it doesn't describe what are Extraplanar spaces in the rules
Isn't that because there are multiple ongoing theories, and they like keeping it open ended
in game theories do not matter for the rules
rules are supposed to be clear in what they describe, otherwise they might as well not exist
how do you join a guild thingu
You mean a game, or a server?
the what?
A game. Read #find-a-game
I just realized whenever I roleplay its always arrogant/rude characters and now im concerned that is my like innate personality...
Sorry to tell ya, but characters are often a reflection or extension of the player /hj
But you’ve been chill enough in conversation tbf
Yea that seems about right 😭 I just wanna be nice
No real harm in stepping back and examining yourself
Seems like a natural language situation. Extraplanar, meaning outside this plane.
Agreed, you will always have a little bit of you in your character. Intended or not.
I have found it, an engine that allows you to make custom swords and weapons; is there a channel I can safe post the link where it won't be taken down?
Humans did kind of get the reputation of self inserts
Help voices in my head are trying to convince me to turn wizard from "Wizard with a gun" into a separate dnd class
That just sounds like artillerist artificer
Artilerist has turrets, wizard with a gun has a bunch of guns with magical bullets
You can even multiclass into wizard to get more spell slots lol
It would be funny to do a Lizardfolk Artificier. Could make for some interesting inventions
Artilierist has a damage gun and a healing gun. If you want magic effects, arcane archer or rune knight might be the way to go
The voices are telling me to make it into a separate homebrew class
I've done it once before, it did get much when I play tested it
You do you boo
Well, making it based off of a video game character is probably one of the few times were a joke character would be fitting
Especially for a one shot
Like chips in the Corona virus vaccines?
You know, those insane theories that lizard people created the vaccines and those vaccines don't actually prevent any illnesses and they just contain chips made to control us
Like belly armor, helicopter backpacks, and a blunderbuss that shoots giant cannonballs that doubles as a vacuum that can pull people in
Just play inspector gadget at this point
I was literally trying to make a King K Rool reference and it still took a sharp turn off the politics cliff...
Conspiracy theory moreso.
Crazy anti-vacs theories are not politics
Well, you get the point
Yeah I had an idea for this, constructs made of bone and sinew.
Hey everyone, i dont talk here often but i need advice asap... Im having a dnd session in a few days, i'll be dming and i will have 7 to 8 players give or take... Any advice? 
That's 2-3 more players than I would take in a game.
Any way to split them up into two tables?
I thought the same, im not sure what i should do... But we cant do a split. I thought of maybe having a co-dm with me but im not sure how that would go..
I feel like that many players and people aren't going to get time devoted to them. Combat rounds wil also take a very long time and people will get bored waiting.
With that amount of players you'll probably get a very little amount of roleplay. You can try making the campaign more focused on combat
Don’t throw single enemies, they die in one or two turns. Learnt the hard way.
I also DM for 7-8 players
That ik, i planned to up the difficulty, but idk how i could manage so many players alone.. Never done it before. The most i dmed for was 6..
Oh, and always have a backup plan in combat, usually involving ambushes or reinforcements. Balancing encounters is a nightmare
Having the spotlight on all the players is also rlly difficult, so just try your best but don’t force it to fit else it’ll feel messy
unless they are really strong, btw, 7 to 8 players... ouchy
Even if they are really strong
if already a party of 3 to 5 is dangerous, 7 to 8 its criminal for you
If you make something that strong, they’ll kill multiple players. Maybe even one shot them. Basically, fatality is inconsistent
Yep, its hard to adapt only 1 to 3 enemies to 8 players.
Well idk, guess i will throw multiple dragons at em. The campaign i came up with is very dragon themed anyway so.
Even at lower levels (3 to 9) its a pain because they have too much resources
and even if they go the fruit salad (1 each class) its just too much
Luckly its a friend group of mine so im sure that helps a lot... But still so many players in never dealt with yet
i will find if my dm let me have a pseudodragon like mascot
Idk, i like it when my players come up with their own species or try to adapt other species into dnd from different franchises
or familiar better said, would love it
I usually allow it as long as i get to take a look at it beforehand
That’s…a preference. I have the lil hollow knight in my world, tbf
i have some ideas but i know some are too hard to adapt, like one i would try in a future is a Living armor (construct reflavored) that would be an artificer using all the time (consuming 2 of my infusion slots permanently) arcane propulsion armor.
One of my players had a Renamon from digimon, as a bard at some point 
a dispel magic would stun me and a countermagic make me have 0 speed
but sadly, that need to do some numbers and im not good with those
Oh fr? I would have expected monk.
I just realised something.
Dragons that can't breathe water, if they use their breath weapon underwater, stop holding their breath and start drowning
Oooh, a good way to take out a wyrmling or young dragon
Those dragons that are typically encountered near or underwater (green and bronze dragons off the top of my head) are indeed amphibious and thus can breather underwater.
I’m still very happy that in 2024 the amphibious trait isn’t the only ability that differentiates some dragons
Stats and element changes not included
You mean because the older ones have spellcasting included now?
Tbh yeah, spells and unique legendary actions were all they needed to make me like the dragon stat blocks far more
they have gills¿
that, or they are just so cool
gills mean a weakspot, hope its teh scenario
I definitely welcome the change yeah. It gives them more flexibility.
Eh, weakspot targeting isn't a thing anyways.
It’s up to the DM’s interpretation. But it would be cool
true, but doing some actions into them kinda are, aka, throwing a firebomb inside of it
or a caltrops bomb on it, something i need to see if my dm let me make
RAW would like to have a word with you /j
mh? what?
Rules wise that's still not a thing, but yeah if you ask your DM and they allow it, go for it.
Rules as Written
oh that, yeah, i dont expect it to have a real rule for it, but its into the DM decision of letting me do it or not
Amen for DM freedom and expression
and most importantly, getting close to the gills from such creature wont be easy
(Once a DM of mine let us instakill an archmage by dropping rocks on him)
Agreed
The ones that are amphibious, though, can do stuff like swim in dark water (fully obscured, but they don't care because of blind sight) and strike at PCs with their reach, with advantage, or breathe from under the water.
and for such action i would expect a high dc in something, aka, athletics or just dext and if failed i get punished
Or absolutely insane stealth
I feel like we need a Clerics just for the elements, like I've been building clerics recently, and those guys are actually super cool (pun intended), but I feel like they need more elemental diversity maybe make a Clerics whos god is of the the land allowing them to cast spells that shape the earth at a heightened level mold earth for instance. or give a bonus to the DC of ice spells for ice Clerics. maybe these seasonal Clerics are more exclusive to different environments an ice Clerics keeping to snowy tundra's, and praying to the gods of that land to help them find shelter from the storms, ok maybe I'm a bit bias I love me my Ice mages but come on these could all be cool and super lore pacted.
this is called a land druid
Well we have tempest clerics, but I elemental clerics would be cool
or a sneaky mage hand moving at one side of the creature and sneaking 2 black powder bombs inside of the gills, there is lots of options
But at the time time, I agree with musicrobolution, Druid can work for it. Druids already get their magic from nature and to am extend, a god of nature
I'm pretty sure druids get their powers from the lands, not gods.
I feel like a creature would feel someone putting something in their gills
I've never made a druid in my entire life, so I could be wrong.
at that moment it would just explode
Yep, druids get their powers from nature.
Actually both are true
the thing is WOTC would have to actually write cohesive lore for their deities to expand this since there arent many nature deities, and counting on WOTC to write something is like counting on a cat to listen to you
How would they time it to go off as soon as it’s inside the gills?
Hello everyone, I hope you are doing well. I have a question: isn't there a group for French speakers? Because I have only a basic level of English. Anyway, I will try my best to chat and understand you given my level of English.
True
it does exist in older editions tho so you could probably poach things from there for homebrew inspiration
Druids and ranger = Nature
Artificer and Wizard = Knowledge
Sorc = Himself or some outside source (normally heritage)
Paladin and cleric from gods
Warlock from deities or demons
Bards use their charisma to manipulate reality
Idk if i left some caster class outside
There are, but they’ll likely be hard to find through this server
the fun thing about playing druids and rangers is you get to make up weird background npcs like talking trees or king trilobites
Paladins don’t inherently get their power from a god, and warlocks can have patrons that are neither deity nor fiend (namely, genie)
its called a summary
Fair point
Yes and no, you just need one little justification for it,
"i was always more of the kind of people that play outside instead of reading" kind of stuff
while you were a nerd reading math books i was talking to giant lobsters
" Whether sworn before a god's altar and the witness of a priest, in a sacred glade before nature spirits and fey beings, or in a moment of desperation and grief with the dead as the only witness, a paladin's oath is a powerful bond. "
They’re commonly followers of deities, but their power comes from conviction, not a blessing of a deity
I’d say sorcerers get it from an inside source
Tomate tomato 
oh btw, the subclasses of classes that dont have spellcasting at first always go for int. Meaning they learn how to do magic, like Wizards
Paladins also get their power from their mystical oaths
No
Tell me one that doesnt
Don’t 4 element monks?
Oh wait you meant Eldritch knight and arcane trickster
i have 2 examples, "Arcane trickster" and "Eldritch knight" do
I thought you meant 2014 Ranger and paladin who don’t get Spellcasting until level 2
That it is, Fish reacting you
That is why i said "Subclasses".
Yes I noticed after I sent the message
But yes, Eldritch knights and arcane tricksters are wizard coded
…
We don’t talk about four elements monk
that use Ki
No no no
his own stat, with that Ki he cant age.
Hey it’s the ONE monk subclass i dislike, but if it helps in a convo ill use it
Guys how does this villain idea sound. It’s a cleric he is the head priest in a secret village deep in the jungle everyone sees the cleric as a savior but actually it’s a head leader of a cult that plans to summon an evil god that will destroy all beings that doesn’t join there cult.
He’s talking about the modifier used
Still uses wisdom, even if it’s ki
Or she, or they
Or it
Classic
Noice
and cleric too, cleric being part of the Religious pack of classes
If a priest is in charge in a place, 90% of the time I don’t trust them
Ah, but clerics get spellcasting without subclasses
I don’t know what point you’re trying to make
But Monks have their own thing, KI.
Everything can be solved with KI, no wait, that is a slander to the live action mulan.
Anyway, 100 baboons is too much for a party?
That is true
Still uses wisdom
Depends on the party.
100 baboons is a lot to keep track of. How are they gonna feed them all? Having one pet is hard enough.
It’s like saying “but spellcasters use spell slots” which is true, but it’s not their Spellcasting ability
anyone got any ideas for a social focused infiltrator/manipulator?
My first thought was slaying them all
Changeling bard/rogue
Thanks im planning that ima have them do a task to steal am amulet for the cleric before they find out he’s evil and when they bring the amulet back the cleric reveals that he is the main villain all along
It’s most people’s first thoughts too, tbf
You have whispers bard, too
A warlock acting like a Cleric that is with a cult behind him? yeah, make it work
It’s a nice, easy to handle plot. I’m sure your players will love it
i was looking at bard eloquence, sorcerer aberrant and rogue mastermind
idk im all over the place with this onee
Aberrant mind is solid, but it’s not as specialised for infiltration
God i forgot the amount of features that Monk have, its a literally wall of text that class
yeah but the idea of subtle spell casting and telepathy seemed different i guess
Great old one warlock, too
I am partial to gaining the ability to summon an imp as a friend, so Warlock ends up being a favorite
and for rogue i was torn between mastermind and inquisitive
thats my second choice fr
Wait why has no one said Ranger
Im scared of making a Wild magic sorc and get the 6 flumphs around me screaming of fear
Pass without Trace and Stealth Expertise and a decent Dex stat gets you >+20 to stealth rolls
A gloomstalker also can just not be seen with darkvision
loved gloomstalker ranger in bg3
Consider soul knife
You’re gonna love gloomstalker in 2024 dnd
im not familiar with soul knife?
First of all, you have the ultimate concealed weapon
Second, you have telepathy with a range of a mile
im trying to avoid stealth since i did that alot in my last campaign i was in, trying to see if i can focus more on the identity deception aspect, taking courtier to kinda mix into the noble royalty theme my DM has going
what would u combo soul knife with?
Wdym? I’d just go straight soul knife
oh rlly its that good?
No multiclass really needed. Maybe a level or two in bard or ranger for more expertise, but you really want Reliable Talent
Which is 7th level
Here's a spicy take: all straight classes are good 
I agree, except Ranger capstone is horrendous
u right, i just like multiclassing alot tho
Other than that, I agree
Have you tried straight classing?
Or have you only multiclassed? Only asking cuz I see some newbies do it.
Okay I can agree with that
i did once in my first playthrough of dnd, i just did a rogue thief
Eh, haven't tried it, I suspect the fact that it's extra damage actually makes a big difference.
but tbh i didnt really know what was going on
I see it all the time
I bet you also think straight artificer sucks, and you should only take it for the first level for con save prof /j
Its not too much damage increase for a capstone
I can agree with that too but I just feel like it isn’t worth of being the capstone
Maybe, but at least on paper it looks extremely underwhelming
I haven’t had the opportunity to play many classes tbf
Hey I don’t think it sucks… I just hate its subclasses
What’s wrong with my copper golem autognome riding his copper robodog
Only played monk and bard, if I recall
Then that PC doesnt exist? 🙁
I am recalling incorrectly! That one got blown up by a holy hand grenade.
Didn’t stand a chance
Not by itself, but considering elevated crit chance from the level 17 feature and multiattack, I can see some shenanigans.
but its not a level 20 capstone feature
I’ve been updating a lot of my old characters to 2024 and in so many cases I’m dropping multiclassing on them because I was using it to address failures in core class competencies that they’ve fixed
Need to find a holy hand grenade for my Curse of Strahd group..
Remember: thou shalt count to three, no more, no less. Three shall be the number thou shalt count, and the number of the counting shall be three. Four shalt thou not count, neither count thou two, excepting that thou then proceed to three.
Basically, don’t blow yourself up.
And preferably not an ally either
2024 kinda made multiclassing both less needed and in some ways weaker
i really wanna play curse of strahd ive only heard good things about it
I’ve heard good reviews, except for one review that complained it was too lethal/gave no way out of situations (smt about the death house)
i also dont get whyd you want to play full ranger
Ah, Death house my beloved
It’s not bad
Capstone is just kinda weak imo
The rest is relatively fine tho
I’ve never played death house but it’s so funny to think that there’s this one section that is just hyperlethal
Most campaigns don't get to the point where Full Ranger feels middling I suppose
multiclass i can understand but its just too much of a one trick pony for my liking
I’d argue that Ranger (at least 2024) is fairly versatile
I dunno is Ranger that much of a one trick pony compared to the likes of Barb
what is the death house
A part of CoS (Curse of Strahd). Smt about a house that’s really deadly.
Haven’t played it tho, so idk
atleast with barb it fits with what its trying to be with ranger its like they have a vague idea of what they want
People overexaggerate ranger. Is it worse than some other classes????? …sure
Is it unplayable? Not even remotely
Hyperbole? In my D&D discord? Say it ain't so!
its very playable and is strong but for me it relies to much on hunters mark for me to play
it's more likely then you think
Ranger can do skill checks, support, stealth, some damage, utility…
unless its 2014 ill play 2014 ranger
I had set out to play a monoclass Ranger in full faith, but after awhile even I decided to dip into another class for extra spell slots and a few other things that seemed better to me than the Ranger capstone. I don't really even use Hunter's Mark very much. I think Ranger does just fine without it.
imagine a house that is evil
Hi, I’m brand new. Where should I begins..
make a character!
Read up on the first few chapters of the free basic rules on #learn-to-play , and feel free to ask any questions you might have.
Then make a practice character and get it reviewed.
Once you’re ready and got the fundamentals down, you can check out #find-a-game for information on how to find a group online. To make a post, type the appropriate command in any chat channel.
im just saying i wouldnt play ranger i understand why other people would
I just made one on the beyond app!
Ranger is like the opposite of a one trick pony?
A Goliath cleric 🙂
Surely with Tasha's upgrades?
They said “is Ranger) not “Ranger is”
now check out local game shops or our local discord recruitment for games to play that character. https://discord.com/channels/516367331358801950/750813601358676008
i love tashas ranger
How do I get my character reviewed?
its just 2024 that i hate
Guys the Masque of Red Death is amazing. Read it please (my party is doing a horror campaign and it got me thinking about it)
Send the link to the character sheet to #character-discussion
Uhh, but 2024 Ranger is basically Tasha's Ranger streamlined.
i just like tashas more
I played 2014 Ranger and 2024 Ranger and for the most part 2024 Ranger feels good.
I’m unfamiliar with 2014 Ranger so i can’t give much input here
Now that I think about it, it would make a great oneshot
(The story would, I mean)
2014 Ranger is stronger as a whole
2024 is in favor of casters even further + Gloom Stalker getting nerfed
Ranger may feel nicer but they are overall worse in some way
How do you figure?
You think all of 2024 favors casters more than 2014 did?
I dunno if I agree with that, but how do you figure?
The martials vs casters gap is wider at least, not really well versed in it but I put my faith in whatever #optimization has concluded
Is that the conclusion that channel reached? Weird, I would think it was the opposite.
Beastmaster Ranger with a giant toad, while illegal in RAW (animal companions must be medium sized) sounds absolutely baller
You can make your Primal Companion a giant toad if you want.
Any conclusion you can link?
I have a giant crab in my game :D
Also, a toad the size of a medium creature is definitely giant
Giant Frog is considered medium and can use a Swallow attack against anything Small or lower, while a Giant Toad is Large and can do the same for medium and lower

The mini I made for it is right here actually
#dnd-minis message
does a water elemental freze it if you hit it with a frost spell?
Ahh thank you for that. After scanning it, it seems to fundamentally be a discussion about damage, which is never what the martial/caster divide was fundamentally about.
It was also because spells kind of just do everything at once
The essence of the martial/caster divide, such as it is, is that spellcasting is the biggest toolkit in the entire game, yes.
But that many times also depends on DMs not running Skills very well. See Skills are also a very versatile toolkit, they are just broad tools, in contrast to the usually very specific tools that are spells.
But since the divide is about Utility and not Damage, the gap is actually smaller in 2024, because non caster classes got enhanced for Utility in various ways.
Didn’t they nerf a few of the standout spells?
It does not fully freeze, but it gets slower when hit with cold damage.
Anyone have creative ideas for magic mouth commands for undead?