#dnd-discussion
1 messages · Page 61 of 1
go unfair
If battle master is taken, what's the most fun big damage martial in your opinion?
make your paladin a demi god kekw
Paladin is taken too
I think the best way to describe my character is a Warlock/Sorcerer/ Bladesinger
Ranger
MONK
Monk sounds perfect
Which subclass for eich?
Hmmm
Drakewarden, swarmkeeper, gloomstalker for ranger.
So... how often does a DM let you murder your party member?
VERY rarely
For monk, open hand, kensei, shadow.
Drunken master is pretty neat
Don't need the DM's permission!
I’d add elemental Warrior on that
Music to my ears.
My dm told me if I make him mad he will cast "Rock falls, your dead"
2024 btw
No 2014 subclasses?
Nope
Then I recommend shadow, open hand or elemental Warrior for monk
To answer the question seriously: Killing party members depends on the circumstances. You can't be blamed for killing a mind controlled PC if breaking the mind control was not an option at the time.
Actually mercy is bonkers too
Literally any if the 2024 ones
Hi
In the same way, a betrayal storyline or a "fellowship breaking" story justifies the party turning against each other
Mercy is the healing one correct?
Well, hands of harm too, but yes they can heal
If someone doesn't allow 2014 that are also in 2024 5e into there games they should have tomatoes thrown at them
You mean the unearthed arcana 2024 ones?
Yeah
I see. And the open hand is the most punchy one?
Do you guys do DND campaigns here??
They're not playtested so there could be some issues stemming from playing them no?
No campaigns are hosted on this server but there is #find-a-game
All monks punch a lot, open hand just buffs all your focus features and monk stuff.
The most punchy one is arguably Astral Self tbh
Open hand basically just takes the basic monk and cranks it up.
It does not really change the playstyle.
I see, so they're the monk monk? Like the hunter being the ranger ranger?
Yup!
Is that the jojo monk?
Yup
A term sometimes used for subclasses is "class +" and "anti-class"
Is it decent?
Alrighty
Yup!
A class+ is a subclass that does not change the mechanics or the playstyle. Just takes the same playstyle as the basic class and cranks it up. An anti-class is a subclass that goes against the design of the basic class
Way of whipass
I'll ask my dm if they'd allow it then. Playing a jojo character sounds like absolute cinema
Kensei is kind of the default
Oki
@old sluice thanks for explaining!
Class + is like
Hunter, Eloquence Bard, Open Hand
Anti-class would be Kensei…
What about beastmaster?
It is of course a spectrum, not categories.
But monk is generally an unarmed combattant that does not rely on magical weapons. And then there's kensei.
Kensei sounds badass
Sorcerer is generally a controlled caster all about using a limited selection of spells but tweaking them for precision. And then there's wild magic
Wild magic my beloved
Oki, i think i get it
If I give myself a major weakness but the plan is to have my build have a major payoff... A dm got me right?
That's the one I'm playing right now
I think a classic anti-class is oathbreaker
Depends on the dm
Actually? No
Flavor wise yeah, but in play style ehhhhh sorta
Is there a more fitting one?
dang
Maybe noble genie cuz they can go unarmoured? Idk tbh
Feywanderer are pretty anti-class i think
Halfway through my first ever campaign and it's been an absolute blast I've had so much fun and I'm glad I tried it out
To know if something is an anti-class or a class +, there is a simple formula.
Say what the class is usually about. And see if the subclass clashes or enhances it.
Ranger gotta be one of the hardest to balance simply because of the features it gives are so specific but that's what makes it special and we don't wanna take that away
how many funny gremlin creatures are there you can play
“Yes”
None
Goblin of course
I only know kobold and goblin
Be an evil gnome
Anything can be a funny gremlin depending on how you play it
but gremlin definition is a small monster right?
Paladin with the oath of the Ashen Base would be pretty much un-paladin in behaviour. but that's 3rd party. and a walking warcrime(s).
Everyone is small compared to someone else
Gremlins are mostly mischievous beings.
Anyone can be a mischievous being
Hence why anyone can be a gremlin
Are you a gremlin?
It's not something I'm willing to argue or be pedantic about, to be completely honest
There's such thing as "Gremlin energy"
Perhaps...
Something I don't like is when someone takes a race and throws out the culture of the race for their own idea. As much as I love creativity it sucks when an entire race culture gets ignored because they want the appearance of the race and not the things that come along
Well, I think it’s fine if they can justify it
I hate when people play tabaxi like housecats /lh
Like no Becky Goliaths are usually not chaotic
THIS
thats why i really like Kobold Press' Lineage and Heritage system. combine that with Background and you have nature-nurture-past choices.
but it detaches where a character grew up from their biology
Maybe they dislike the societal shackles that their kin put on them, and go out into the world to carve a path that is truly their’s
Maybe they were raised in isolation, and so aren’t familiar with their species’ customs
I also hate that when I play Tabaxi, that's the instant assumption of how it'll be played people make when I wanna play one
Most of my tabaxi are normal people that are just anthropomorphic felines, just very nature connected and spiritual
Then that's a part of there character and it justifies it
Hence my statement
What urks me is when they want a human with a different face plastered on it
But anyone raised by humans could be that...
this is true
Hello, Goblin creature
Then it's a part of their character and it justifies it
Oi! 
Gremlins are legit 2e and 4e creatures. 🙂
You're my friend now
2e mentioned
Any creature is friend shaped
Well that was fast
Shout out wizards of the coast for throwing out badass dragons ideas in favor of the 5e chromatic and metallic system (and gem)
Indeed, I'm a very friendly fellow!
Most of the time
How is the 5e dragon system different?
Throwing away cool stuff that added onto those systems like obsidian dragon and hag dragons and vampire dragons.
A) thats not a 5e thing B) 5e... has plenty of non metallic/chromatic/gem dragons
What edition are those from?
Orium Dragons were pretty cool
Platinum Dragons, Steel Dragons, Electrum Dragons, Mercury Dragons
Yellow Dragons, Orange Dragons, Pink Dragons, Original Purple Dragons
Obsidian Dragons, Jacinth Dragons, Amber Dragons, Pearl Dragons
All the Lung Dragons
All the Ferrous Dragons: Iron Dragons, Chromium Dragons, Titanium Dragons, Cobalt Dragons, Nickle Dragons
All the Planar Dragons: Adamantine Dragons, Battle Dragons, Radiant Dragons, Styx Dragons, Oceanus Dragons , Howling Dragons, Mirage Dragons, Pyroclastic Dragons
Force Dragons and Prismatic Dragons
The Catastrophic Dragons: Blizzard Dragons, Earthquake Dragons and Volcanic Dragons
Draconomicon is such a pretty book. 🙂
Deep Dragons!
Don't forget them!!!
I'm not sure what point you are trying to claim with that list
Dragons that got left out
hasn't there been like 5 draconomicons
Ah
I am still mad that metallic dragons contain both dragons named after pure metals and dragons named after alloys.
They weren't "thrown out" - they just haven't been (re)printed in 5e
Not to mention a few of them have been mentioned in 5e (like Steel)
5e does have a Blueberry Dragon.
Also I'll be honest a lot of them... never really had much if any information about them anyways even in older editions.
not exactly.
Theres an extra-life thing made by kids that has a blueberry dragon
And hey, we have plenty of dragons that are outside the metallic-gem-chromatic system
Like Moonstone, which is basically the feywilds dragon.
But yea, not thrown out like the original claim.
Moreover the idea developped in Fizban's is that dragons are of the material plane. Therefore dragons from outside it are descended from dragons that have been warped beyond their original form
DnD has always centered around the concept of Metallic and Chromatic (and a close secondary of Gem) dragons first and foremost. That is also not a 5e thing, also unlike the original claim.
It's a clean-up that still allows for variety but keeps true that the original forms of dragons are metallic, gems and chromatics. And that every dragon outside those categories is the product of something warping an original
Especially when half the dragons you say they ""threw out"" are literally chromatic, metallic, and gem dragons
rawr
Durngnz n Dergons
pick a monster and run a mock combat between your character and the monster
you can do that with dice and a piece of paper
There's a section of channels called "Find a Game". Scroll to the bottom of the channel list, and you'll find them.
Styx Dragons look kinda cool
People getting needlessly mad WOTC didn’t reprint 1000+ books worth of content and claim “they threw them out!!” Again I see.
Stranger things brought me here :/
Damn
I'm watchin X-Files at the moment. 😉
I have bad news
Cool
Damn it
Who knew you could make so many friends by just being a plain old goblin
It never fails, every time a new season of Stranger Things come out, the player base increases
At this point WOTC should be paying Netflix.
I almost finished my Fey Wanderer Ranger, just to look back through Rangers in 2014 and see their spellcasting differs from Paladin, and they aren't rest casters?!
What?
Wdym they aren't rest casters? You can rest cast with rangers
2014 nope, you are locked in
Paladins 2014 can switch out spells on a LR
And they didnt get a spellcasting focus until Tasha's
Thats not the usual thing people are referring to when they say rest casting, the term you want is prep caster
Ah, my mistake
Oh you mean swapping spells
Rest Casting is where a spellcaster uses any leftover spell slots from the previous day to cast long-duration spells (like Mage Armor, Aid, or Death Ward)
Ah, ok
But yes, I was under the assumption that they were prep casters like Paladins
And they only learn 11 spells X_X
Which is a shame considering how good their spell list is
that seems a bit bloated, but feel free to use those old options too, i put a yellow dragon in the abyyss once
Should I homebrew some breath of the wild statblocks just for funsies?
Well, I have just finished laying out all the maps and tokens for the adventure I'm running. Yay.
Are familiars able to be any type of creature or animal
There's a list of examples, and any cr 0 beast could be suitable with dm appeoval
Any CR 0 beast
Thank you I've been trying to make something resembling the shikigami from jjk and this should work.
bro, new dnd game got announced
"wait is that Pact of the Blade"
Warlocks of the coast let's go
Tricia Helfer might sell me on it
Wonder what setting it will use.
I'd figure faerun due to it being so popular with stuff like BG3
WARLOCK is an original, third-person, single-player action-adventure game. It takes place in a dark fantasy open world inspired by DUNGEONS & DRAGONS. Developed by Invoke Studios, the game places players in the role of Kaatri, a veteran warrior who makes a pact to wield otherworldly magic against dark powers. WARLOCK is currently in development for PC, PlayStation 5 and Xbox.
Might be its own thing. WotC has teased a new setting lightly for a long time
New DnD video game, wonder what its gameplay is gonna be like
lmao
Are we gonna get one for each class?
for sure
See you all in 35 years
Fighter isn't as strong a title tbf
Make it 40
Rogue kinda already exists
Neither is “Monk” tbh
And calling a game "Barbarian" is just begging for a lawsuit
i remember a streamer i watched play a game by former Sierra Entertainment people called Hero U rogue redemption where the mc the premise was their is university where adventurers learn to be their arch type and the main char is put in the rogue track after being given a offer of go to uni or jail by the headmaster
we'll have all the classes by D&D's 100th anniversary 😛
not sure if their ever did but i heard they planned to do a paladin and some other class of hero for follow up games
going for subclass names could help some of them tbf
Oath of Devotion, Warrior of the Open Hand
Thief and Assassin are kinda taken
okay so which subclasses would make good video game titles
Eldritch Knight ain’t bad
Every paladin oath
path of the muscle wizard
Heck, oathbreaker could be very cool if done right
could be a comdey film
Drakewarden is an easy one. But with that title I expect a cheap Drakenguard clone but without the disturbing plot
Open Hand is easy. Mercy could be a title too.
Thief, ez
Scribes, its a learn to type program
"Circle of the Moon"... I could imagine some sort of immersive sim with an intricate magic system and a mystery plot
Divine Soul, tempest rage, totem warrior, drunken master, gloomstalker, the list goes on
Gloomstalker would likely have a very edgy 90s antihero main character
ngl I thought the divinity game was going to be a dnd game
Cartographer
I personally just like Gloomstalker both for the possible ascetics and because getting Wisdom modifier on initiative is really good
Which Divinity game?
Larian is making a new Divinity game
WHAT
Combine it with alert, and that means it's really easy to get 14 or 15 bare minimum for initiative
Divinity Trailer went hard. Glad they dropped Original Sin subtitle though.
general TGA talk can happen in #non-dnd-topics, just a heads up
To the earlier question though, Oath of Conquest
If I see "Oath of Conquest", I'm expecting a strategy game. Either more like a Total War or more like an RTS.
But probably closer to a Total War game.
I could see it
Castlevaiia had this in a titel before
Oh oh,how bout this one,
Thief 
Too late, that joke was already done
Oathbreaker would make for a killer D&D Doomlike title
I’d play it
Just remembered... Some time ago I remember coming across rules for torture and other methods of interrogations that had a trick in it. It gave the victim a bonus on their deception check to fool the interrogator.
The idea being that those rules were made with the knowledge that "enhanced interrogation" does not work and the belief that they do actually helps the victim lie credibly
I should try to find those rules
Oathbreaker is a nice doomlike dnd game
Two people said that before you Enid…
A d&d campaign with cute animals as the characters
redwall
Do we think its warlock of a Raven Queen? Hexblade subclass maybe?
What? they did?
great minds think alike ig. Dnd is awesome
One of them was me (I just said it’d be a cool name) one was Anoth True Strike Enjoyer #dnd-discussion message
Glad we can agree!
like... Oathbreaker: One Man's glory!
it could be a great way to introduce dnd to a lot of video games
Oathbreaker: Apostate Rising
Idk, not good at naming stuff
So what would the plot be?
A paladin who broke their oath in order to summon demons and take over the country is currently being imprisoned. The game starts when you're given an opportunity to escape from prison by a demon you had made a deal with during the whole "conquer the world" phase...
Escape the prison, your goal is to get your stuff back and start conquering again... At the end you either die stopping the demon who had manipulated you or you are imprisoned again, this time in the abyss?...
press R2 to Eldritch Blast
I wonder if Pact of the Blade will be forced on you based on the trailer/look or if you'll be able to choose invocations etc
I love that tbh. both sound great
I'll be honest I don't think the trailer is really indicative of much if any game mechanics
Trying to start a character at level 3 is wack I keep thinking I'm forgetting to add something
Race race subtype class class subtype fighting style and/or spells character background
Probably the most thorough way is to make a level 1 character and then add levels.
What’s the upper size limit on the for medium creatures and the lower size limit of large creatures? I know they overlap a little bit
I dont think they actually overlap
Medium is 5ft square
Large 10ft square
Height i dont think has specified limits
pretty sure you're meant to do it this way
otherwise you have more level 2 spells than intended
(doesn't really matter if you're Cleric or Druid)
Might be a dumb question but are yellow tieflings not raw? A friend invited me to play in a campaign and I made a yellow tiefling, and the DM told me that he’s not allowing homebrew (which is fine) and that I have to change my tiefling to be red or purple. Which isn’t a big deal but I find a little strange?
Been playing dnd for a hot minute and I’ve never heard that one before
Yellow should be fine. There's many colors. Even the movie had a normal looking Tiefling.
does anybody know where i can find artificer stats and stuff
The new Eberron book.
without buying anything?
Bummed that there wasn't a bg4 announcement at the game awards
The new Eberron book, if they happen to have it at your local library.
ok thx
I'm currently in a impasse right now (and I'm at session Dm'ing) idk how to explain what my party is saying to me as of now
I would think there wouldn't need to be a BG4 since BG3 has concluded. It would make more sense to start on another D&D saga.
what's an Eberron book?
Solasta 2 was announced, at least
One of the newest D&D books. Eberron: Forge of the Artificer.
It has the Artificer, new magic items, and details the Eberron setting.
Why are you typing here while DMing? On break?
so that's where the new stats for the Artificer class?
Yes
are there books for the other class?
The Player's Handbook has every other official class.
and if you mean The Psion, it isn't finalized yet
is that a mage class?
It is, yes, but it is not yet an official class.
so there is also no new stats for the other class as well?
Yeah on break
And I need a quick help
Well damn ask!
In there maybe true
Solasta 2 looks fun
What other class are you talking about?
why would they introduce a new stat for a class at this point
fighter's, mage,barbarians etc.
Idk if its possible
but somehow at this point my party has terrible persuasion stats but has good Deception stats
(Essentially negative modifiers for persuasion and positive modifiers for deception)
So the obvious problem is that if they try and tell the truth or something that isn't a lie they have to get a -4 to persuasion
But they get a +4 for deception
So they have to use deception to tell the truth by making a lie
Deception is generally harder because you can prove the truth
"Mage" is not one of the D&D classes, but a few classes can be described that way: Wizard, Sorcerer, Warlock, even Bard maybe. There are 13 official classes, Artificer is in the Eberron book, every other official class is in the Player's Handbook, like I said.
But yeah if theyre bad at persuasion it will be tough to persuade sometimes
So have them depend on proof instead
That is not how the rules work. Persuasion is not for "telling the truth", it's for:
A) Convincing someone to do something
B) Making someone friendlier to you
There is no problem here that you have to fix
Which in a way works as convincing them of truth
"To do something" can be "to trust"
No. Because it's about convincing someone to do a "task", an actual concrete action.
That would be the "makign someone friendlier to you" (trust, that is).
What you are describing "to trust" is more akin to influencing their disposition. Making them friendlier
What roll would you call for if the party tries to convince a guard that they killed the dragon after they actually did?
Id call for persuasion if necessary
None. Did they bring proof that they killed the dragon? Were they seen killing the dragon?
What if not
If the answer is no to both, the guard does not believe them, no roll.
Well that just seems bad
Yes, it's bad. Bring proof.
In the past, you could use Diplomacy to improve the attitude of NPCs.
Of course other things can change the situation. Does the guard know the PCs personally or are they famous?
It really depends. Why do they need the guard to believe that they killed the dragon?
Charisma (Persuasion) allows you to honestly and graciously convince someone of something.
key word honestly
Source?
Ohh....
Hmmmm well dang I think I messed up
BR, 2024 i would assume
If they want to get past the guard using the fact thay they killed a dragon, I would say irs persuasion because they are trying to convince the guard of doing a concrete action
Dont jump the gun emps
2024 PHB
the keyword is honestly
The keyword is "honestly" but also "convince of something"
Which would mean you can use it for making someone believe you,if reasonable
its and
As i run it myself
it would just probably have a high DC without Proof
not or
Agree with tiamat. If you're lying, it's deception.
wait, tiamat?
where is this coming from?
i think you misread this talk. noone is saying persuasion works for lies
am i tiamat?
the discussion is whether you can use persuasion to make someone believe something or only to make someone take an action
the honesty part was never in doubt by anyone i think
The wording of "make someone believe you" implies you're not telling the truth.
it doesnt really but if you had read the context first, youd know thats not what i meant anyway
To me, which is why I mentioned that.
anyway not the point
im confused, am i tiamat? I swear im a ti moth
yes they meant you
no idea why they said that, maybe a joke, but youre the only one here with a ti in your name
does work with process of elimination
but as you pointed out jujulion, even if a DM doesnt allow persuasion for convincing someone of a truth, you can still roll persuasion because there would most likely be a reason you are trying to convince them
get paid for the kill, get trust for future favours, get a discount on an item, make peace etc
Paying you for the kill is not really the guard's job
so even if you couldnt make someone trust you on something, it would effectively not matter i guess
oh yeah, DM can say there are scenarios where a roll is not possible
What exactly is the guard doing in that situation?
if it's a big job like that the Guard can probably just take you to someone that knows Zone of Truth too
that is true but that is true for any roll, not just persuasion, so not really relevant here
it doesnt seem to matter as you apparently can use persuasion for convincing people of a truth too
ok, i think i need to scroll up past 10 minutes
the phb quote reads like that to me at least
I mean that's the definition of persuasion really
it was to me but praetor says otherwise and since i never actually looked it up i wasnt sure
It does not really read like that to me to be honest
"convince of something" does not mean it has to be a quantifiable action in the physical world
But like any skill, it's a matter of circumstances, I suppose
you can homebrew and houserule but that sentence seems very clear
but again even without that ruling, you could still basically use persuasion for "it" because "it" will have a reason
if you go to the guard of the town that asked you to kill the dragon, you want them to believe you so they let you see the person who will pay you maybe?
then the persuasion is to make them escort you there and not think youre tricking them
obviously without some backing evidence the DC for a lot of Persuasion might be high
oh definitely, or even impossible
just because you believe it doesn't mean it's easy to make John Commoner believe you met God
See the person? Sure. You don't need to roll to get an appointment with someone whose job involves appointments
thats completely DMs discretion. i did pick a rather big example with a dead dragon
the DC is probably just lower than the Deception one is
alright ill just use another example
But then again, who kills a dragon without bringing proof? There is just no way anyone will believe you didn't cut a scale or a horn.
then make it a goblin i dont care
Another example would be nice, yes.
make it something fairly realistic. this is about principle, not actual numbers
the easy example for Persuasion is Haggling honestly
"I'll have an easier time dealing with these Goblins if I can afford your Healing Potions"
a circumstance where the guard might believe you but is doubtful
if a druid threatens to kill a villager unless you return a flower to its grove or something like that, you do that and then come back without the flower, the druid might not be sure if youre lying
maybe you could have had proof but didnt find it or didnt think of it and now hes not sure if youre being truthful so you can try to persuade him of having done the deed
What are we trying to determine here? Whether or not Persuasion can be used to convince someone to believe something?
Assuming the druid is not in the grove... The druid will just go to the grove to check, and destroy the town if the flower isn't there
yes
No roll involved.
you can involve a roll there though
for example, the party could try to persuade him that they did it without checking so they can return the villager now and not later
And maybe the druid will ask you a question about what the flower and the grove look like to make sure you're not lying. And if you fail to give the right answer, he just destroys the town.
Whether or not a roll is called for is up to the DM. But as for the purpose of the Skill "Honestly and graciously convince someone of something" sounds like it's about making someone believe something, to me.
this works for every single social interaction out there
Oh, kill a villager, not destroy a village. Sorry, I need my glass
you can always circumvent social rolls as DM
that doesnt mean its the wrong skill. that just means you in that scenario decided against having a roll
this is impossible
you can always worm your way out of allowing a roll if you want to which you seem very determined to do
persuasion is still the right one if it ever comes to it
Thing is, there is no need for a roll. I would have the druid ask the PCs who alledgedly returned the flower to the grove. A question like "Tell me, the flower, what does it smell like?" and "The grove... Was the old oak in the middle still dealing with that fungal infestation?". If the PCs' answer betrays that they don't know the smell of the flower or that they didn't go to the grove, kill the guy
the dice are for uncertainty
if a player says something that works, or RPs well, no roll needed
knowing what the grove looks like doesnt prove you returnt the flower though
In that situation, the druid has a very easy way to be certain that you're not lying to him without any roll being involved
If the task is possible but not guaranteed, that's when you roll.
what if they kept it for themselves or sold it? you dont know that just because they recognise the grove
what if the druid cant travel to the grove for some reason
At the very least answering both those questions correctly proved that you got the flower and went to the grove.
Sure, but that doesn't change that Persuasion is the Skill to convince people of things.
They send a little helper.
yeah but it doesnt prove you left it there
like, i had a paladin have a meeting with a high ranking demon because she asked for "something sweet" I did not know that it was a keyword for back table dealings
they dont have one in this scenario
i didnt need to roll in that scenario
its an example to show that persuasion rolls exist
Indeed, it doesn't prove you left it there. But it seems a little silly that you would have gone to the grove, then come back without leaving the flower in the grove. Why go to the grove at all?
At least that would be the druid's reasoning
Shows up with a cookie 🍪
to be better at telling the druid you did it
Why is this relevant to the question of whether or not Persuasion is used to convince people of things?
In that case, sure. I'd let the PCs lie to the druid without a roll then
if you get to pull out a thousand whatifs, i just have to do the same
she did get the sweets she craved afterwards 😄
Yayyy
I don't know, it's an example.
Finding no Sci-Fi campaigns.
but they did do it. the druid just doesnt know that for sure
otherwise its deception
at this point i also would like to point out it seems to be a never ending conveyor belt of moving goalposts
So you agree that Persuasion as a Skill can be used to convince people to believe something based on the "Honestly and graciously convince someone of something" wording?
Oh but the druid is sure. The druid is sure that nobody would have gone to the grove with the flower without putting the flower back. The druid may or may not be wrong.
If the druid had no reasonable way of knowing "for sure"... why would they have left the job up to someone else in the first place?
yes it does that was my point earlier
the DM has written it so
Was there ever any doubt?
maybe they dont have anyone around to help them? there are infinite reasons you could come up
That seemed to be the question in question.
you said thats not possible
No. I said persuasion is not a skill you use to "tell someone the truth".
You can stop debating useless examples, Praetor agreed that Persuasion can be used to convince someone to believe something.
"We put the flower in the grove like you said"
"Why should I believe you?"
"Why ask us to do it in the first place if you weren't going to believe us?"
here you said its for doing something
i then said believing is doing something
you then said "No. Because it's about convincing someone to do a "task", an actual concrete action."
Refer to use B please.
because in this scenario they were his only chance i guess
more moving gooooalpooosts
believing you doesnt mean "being friendlier to you"
If you're trying to convince someone of something that you believe is the truth, which is what the "honestly" part requires, then you're trying to convince someone of the truth.
I would put convincing someone of your honesty as being the second use of the skill. I think
this is insane, im going to bed. im glad you agree now though that persuasion works for that
Hi going to bed, I’m Nugget
Hi Nugget. Did I mention I have a rooster named Nugget?
whose Ben nugget
minor spelling error detected, im haise!
Damn ittttt
Moreover, this whole thing was started by this message #dnd-discussion message
Friend of mine, great lad. Plays the guitar
RaW we can all agree on states
"Charisma (Persuasion) allows you to honestly and graciously convince someone of something."
I remember you mentioned it was a chicken!
Whether or not they believe you about the truth, that is what you're trying to do. There are plenty of times in adventuring when proof of your deeds is impossible to get or has been taken away from you, but you might still need to convince someone you're telling the truth and Persuasion is the skill that helps you convey your honesty and sincerity.
Got the ebberon mini book today. Dragon mark feats are really cool and good and the generic improved mark feat is insanely good
yeah, convincing them that you could be working off misinformation or wrong info is a thing
Didn’t Praetor say that here tho? #dnd-discussion message
Idk got here late, no idea what the original question was
Players don't get to decide what Skill they are using, if they are being truthful and honest, you as the DM get to decide that they will roll their Persuasion rather than Deception.
So does the 2024 phb trump everything else? Trying to make an aasimar but the Phb hasn't different descriptions of their transformation abilities
your group/dm decides what versions youre using
Me either but RaW persuasion is convincing someone of something with the added terms being honestly and graciously
So if its the latest one than the 2024 phb trumps all?
and you can flavor them however you want. you dont need to be angelic specifically
ok, what do yo mean by trumps all
If you are playing 2024 yes but its up to dm
They also said this: #dnd-discussion message
and this: #dnd-discussion message
Mmm. I just created a half-celestial of lillend heritage.
played an aasimar who was from Kirin lineage
I am the dm, sorta, I'm doing a one shot as a player. I assume she still wants to use the 2024 rules. we're all fairly new.
then you ask them
And I agree. Persuasion isn’t telling the truth, it’s convincing someone of the truth (or your truth, or your argument). Telling the truth wouldn’t require a roll.
To be precise:
Whether or not someone believes you first depends on the situation, context and your relationship with the person. If they doubt you, then maybe there is a roll.
Me agree
yes, just like with any other skill check in the game
anyway, what are your favorite artic monsters yall
Haven’t a clue
frost giants
Polar bears?
need some crowd sourcing
i love frost giants so much i love them i love frost giants
Try an Immoth
Remorhazes are nice. But if you're looking for something more niche... Pathfinder had adlets, which can easily be converted to D&D 5e
goodnight
Remorhaz or however you spell it.
Immoth?
:D im always a fan of them
Immoth is a cold/air/water elemental with a tail.
ok, frost giants, polar bears, remorhaz... immoths. Frost Giant hunting party it is
cant wait for session
I should name one of the Immoths a T-Immoth
They're usually found alone.
Yes, you moth
could be the target of teh raid
or hunting party
Frost Salamander should work maybe
Immoths can be good quest-givers.
noq i gotta look up their actual lore and statblock. 3e monster i take it
I gave a character an Immoth as a warlock patron. Sadly, the player didn't work out.
Yes, it's in MMII.
Rime Sprite is another thing you might want to look up. Or you could use an ice mephit. Small, annoying pests.
i love kamikaze ice mephits
Yuki Onna is also thematic, not sure how to do that in D&D.
id probably use a Banshee or Annis Hag and give them more cold spells
Succubus i guess
Wouldn't it just be a snow banshee?
Dont yuki onna seduce and lure?
A snow banshee with a charm spell
i think so? Cant recall specifics
They trick you out into the snow and then freeze you.
Eh true enough and make the shriek freeze
Or sometimes just pretend to be human and then melt in bathwater.
Bathwater you say
its funny to me when they make a yuki onna based character run hot springs
ive seen two anime/games that do that
They like to live dangerously?
Yuki-On-Na appears in Oriental Adventures (3e)
And Frostburn, apparently.
Yeah it's an uncomfortable book.
I think its moreso that yuki onna are based on hostess women
that also tracks
There is a 3.5e version in Frostburn!
A pretty yikes book yeah
Promise of company and shelter and comfort while travelling
Thats probably how the whole thing came to be
i can see succubus with cold immunity and damage instead of psychic now yeah
-# Concubus!
... oh yeah, im using this soon
what am i
now to find art of a yuki onna that wont get me in trouble
I feel like more thematic than challenging.
Getting philosophical, eh?
Just use the art from the book. The 3.5e era adventures encourage folks to use art from the books.
im not touching Oriental Adventures with a 3 foot long pole
Old books are weird islay
I said it was also in Frostburn.
i dont know 3e
Frostburn would be the 3.5e version.
¯_(ツ)_/¯
I'd show you the art, but apparently no pictures in here.
Incubbi art actually can work ithinks
now i just need to make the dungeon itself the terror
Incubi are male right?
not much for actual combat herself
It has the creature as a fey, not an outsider.
not in 2024. Theyre alternate forms of each other
Succubi being more physical, Incubbi being more Dream based
still two statblocks, just not limited to one gender
Hot springs neutral zone, where a ceasefire is in force for all factions?
hey guys could any kind soul please help me out
could be yeah... although not a lot of factions in the place you guys are going to except for one...
Maybe blanketed by a Calm Emotions?
better to ask than ask to ask
What kind of help do you require?
Oh no, is this for my game? Am I giving you ideas for my destruction?
😅 dont worry, this should be a more chill encounter... pun intended
... are hot springs counted as running water
emerges from my hole in dm discussion
Icy what you did there
Natural ones do tend to be slow running, I think.
hmmmm good enough for a vamp
You .. are clever in a way I cannot be.
Depends on the spring
think stereotypical japanese hot spring
I’ll…take that as a compliment
Is anyone else waiting with baited breath to find out what kind of help this person wants?
If its a basin in a brook, yes.
If its a pond with a jet going in from below, id say no
Basically is there an actual flow of water or not
What would be the definition of running water for the purposes of a vampire?
i always imagined it was flowing water
River, brook, channel, ocean maybe
Is it water moving towards a direction with a flow? In that case hot springs do not count. But if it's "non-stagnant water", hot springs count
or something with a current
Lakes, ponds and baths do not count imo
There is no current in most hot springs.
ocean i feel is fine for vamps as long as its not a whirlpool or current
Hot springs can be brook or pond
I did say maybe because i feel that way too kinda
Oceans have currents tho
Oceans are basically nothing but currents.
yeah, but not all of ocean is current
Yeah but oceans dont look like one flow going in a direction
nevermind
Its like a very big pond
thought proccess too
yo i heard dnd peopek are super nice, can someone help me i have no friends to play with
Dnd isnt science, its about the essence of things
If you are in the ocean, the water where you are may not be part of a given major current but it is certainly influenced by its flow
To me, the essence of ocean is not flowing from a to b
Oh btw, what happens if you throw a vampire into a river? Can they still move? I know they still take damage, but what exactly can they do?
id say influenced doesnt count
I dont care about science
in dnd, they just take acid damage
I have no friends to play with, either, so I search for random Internet strangers to play with. It's always an adventure.
Can they still cross the water in dnd?
And it also messes with a few of their other abilities
in most vamp lore irl, they cant cross it
If you throw a vampire into a river, they get wet.
Not by swimming
no, they can cross it as long as theyre not touching it.
Well, they can certainly try by swimming but it will hurt
bridges, logs to jump on, mounts
I personally prefer them not being able to even cross a bridge
So I have a question is fifth edition character sheet a good thing to help build a character for dnd
Hmmmmm…
I think I’ll stick with the folklore weaknesses for my games
After you read the rules, sure.
dndbeyond, paper and pencil
I never bothered to learn dnd’s vampires and werewolves
I let them in my campaign but if i made an actual vampire focussed campaign, id make them unable to cross in any manner themselves
oh youre not asking about where to make em
In that case, sunlight won't be a problem for them
Plus, I think it’s more fun this way
Huh?
iirc, sunlight in Bram Stoker just turned off their supernatural powers
didnt kill them. Just supressed their abilities
Sunlight being more or less horrid for vampires is very common in things though
If I recall they just don’t like it, correct?
Yeah, the whole "vampires are killed by the sun" thing? Not folklore, not even part of the classic vampire novels.
Yeah that’s 20th century fiction iirc
Oh he did say folklore true
In Bram Stocker's Dracula, it's just that he can't shapeshift during the day.
only reason why i remember this is because of a Dracula + Sherlock Holmes crossover
And yet, it does appear in the vampire episode of X-Files.
Id definitely keep the sunlight thing in
I think the sunlight thing is too ingrained to remove yeah
I think it was invented for Nosferatu by Murnau.
For Bram Stoker Drac? Supression. FOr Nosferatu? Deadly
Eh. Coppola's Dracula was having pleasant summer strolls in London during the movie and nobody was shocked. But then again, it's London, it doesn't really count as sunlight
theres no sun in the UK
Maybe that's why he wanted to move there yeah
I’m not familiar with the specifics, so thanks for the fun fact! I deadn’t know that
London is a pretty good place for vamps yeah
And werewolves!
Oh god, American Werewolf in London?
Pretty sure the titular american werewolf in London ended up dying
For a Mananangal it just forces them back into human form, right?
I'm not in London yet
i think so yeah. If they cant attach back, theyre dead
Hi not in London yet, I’m Nugget
hi Nugget, I'm J4ck
Pleased to meet ya
yee
But yeah, London is the perfect place for evil creatures.
They already get Relentless Slashers
that's where the royal family is, so that checks out
-# Let’s not go there
i submitted a form
-# Really resisting the urge to go there.
but yeah, sunlight turns them back, so if they cant stick back, theyre a dead half of a human
Indeed, that counts as political discussion for some of us.
GUYS IM GOING TO START DUNGEONS AND DRAGONS I submitted a form!!!!!!!!!!!!
I'll leave it there
usually use garlic to stop a mananangal from attaching back
Awkward!
is it like Shaggy with the hiccups? can't quite keep in one form or the other
If we are going there, please give me a minute to find my Robespierre costume I wore at last year's Halloween party
hm? What about shaggy?
oh, old Scoobie Doo movie
unfotunately ive only watched some of scooby doo as a kid
darn
didnt get much cable back in the philippines
ah...
Same with me, but in Vietnam
Wait have I told this server I’m Viet yet
dont think so. (so thats why the trees are speaking)
No I thought you were an Aussie 
That is also a trick used by vampires in VTM. Since vampires don't have a heartbeat and don't need to breathe, they just... Lie down and pretend they're corpses. Nobody can tell the difference between an ordinary corpse and a vampire waiting to strike.
I thought you were a chicken.
I live in Australia, but I have Viet heritage
what's funny is that there's a restaurant in my state called Pho King
Vietnamese and chicken aren’t mutually exclusive
A Polymorphed Nugget
I was the one that brought up chickens. You're welcome.
I just had Vietnamese food yesterday, found a place in Bangkok that's decent. Still need to find a place for bun bo hue, though.
I…disagree. The chicken in Vietnam is often a bit tougher, and the traditional boiling can get boring for my palate.
I actually was gonna reflect this in one of my characters. Also, hi hungry, I’m Nugget.
I need to try a proper ca phe sua da
That just translates to iced latte
i kinda like it like that though, and i dont usually have it that way 
I don't speak Vietnamese
Jolibee and KFC is usually the style i have, if my dad aint making wings
turns out, one of my cultural holiday dishes translates to "birds" in Russian
This is making me hungry
god im hungry now
It’s fine, it’s just not mind blowing to me.
Ah so your first name is hungry and your last name is now!
now it is
there aren't even any birds in said holiday dish
Oh and btw, I’ve had it and it’s good (for coffee, personally I hate coffee), but it is horrible for you
I need to make a character that specialises in Viet food
I like coffee, and we Americans seem to be obsessed with eating things that are horrible for us, so it works out perfectly!
one day ill make a springroll wizard
Story idea: Down on his luck restaurateur in .. let's say Neverwinter, opens a tiny portal to the Abyss in his kitchen to summon Abyssal Chickens because it's an exotic flavor.
gotta make sure the blood is pumping
I allow myself a coffee a day.
I drink too much coffee
i dont drink any
hey sir
I…can’t expresso how much that makes sense. A fair few Americans I’ve talked to like it, and I’ve bean confused about that, but idk how I didn’t realise till now. Well, better latte than never.
Ok that was wayyy too many puns
ugh, i wanna run another food based oneshot
also, hm? what ya need Gael?
noo im not gael hahaha its coincidence
lmao
i need you to type in !roll 3d6, and do it 6 times
if you take me in or help me i will like honor you for every board game i play, like ill sya your name and say its for your sake. im super new and i dont understan anything and my friends dont play this
Pay me in cookies, and I’ll consider it (this is literally just my character Reuben)
oh, i dont think im recruiting right now unfortunately. feel free to check out #dnd-newcomers and #learn-to-play to get oriented though
Abyssal Fried Chickens!
Well, I’m willing to help you too! Check out #dnd-newcomers tho, they’re better at this
oathmeal cookies good for you?
Hm, better than nothing
you think they come with built in Cajun seasoning?
okay ill take you for sure
depends, is the hells in the south?
Read up on the first few chapters of the free basic rules on #learn-to-play , and feel free to ask any questions you might have.
Once you’re ready and got the fundamentals down, you can check out #find-a-game for information on how to find a group online. To make a post, type the appropriate command in any chat channel.
snort
...yes?
then its cajun
so i cant follow you and be your appretice in yor group or nahh??
South of the alignment chart certainly
That burning is the demon ichor!
naaaah, thats the built in buffalo dressing
Don't you think food from the Abyss would be abyssmally bland?
no?
Hmmmm…
Gooooood morning
that actually would make sense
seeing how grazzt is literally one layer, and he loves any sensation or pleasure
I think it would be spicy and incite violence.
food in thanatos? sure. undead got no tastbuds.
boiled chicken with rice sprinkled on it that forms a crust sounds like food given to a sinner in hell
demogorgon, baphomet, yeenoghu, grazzt, they all love seasoning
Several more hours til next session 🥳
I think that depending on the layer it would be so spicy as to tear a hole in your stomach, so rotten as to infest you with maggots, so slimy as to choke you as you're trying to eat it, or relatively pleasant.
I do have a server, but I don’t know you well enough to add ya yet
If I find you’re nice, feel free to join
Nah, if you’re nice when I see you around here
im tots down okay
No rush. Now go read
I don't know if I'll have a next session. Two of the players had a spat, and I genuinely don't know how to resolve it. I'm inclined to tell them to sort it out themselves.
YES SIR 🫡
I imagine that’d be devilishly delicious
ok, next oneshot idea,
Burying the Light
the party finds themselves in a layer of the abyss filled with shadow... but where they leave their shadows, it instead glows with light... and the noises are getting closer and closer...
Was one out of line? The group should talk to them.
Do they refuse to fix things? Play without them.
Did both cause it and there is no right side? Talk to both of them.
Good luck though
welcome to layer 67
67? M67 hand grenade?
Why those numbers
brainrot
thats the effects of the actual 67th layer of the abyss btw, good aligned creatures dont cast shadows, they cast light. which makes them easir for demons to hunt in the sheer darkness
Oh very cool
Makes me want to bring Adamos back.
reflavoring the demons to be brainrotted children
67 being a mark that makes it easier to spot you as an enemy is highly topical
Oh ... oh gods, that's terrible.
I’m not even gonna make a pun, that’s genuinely terrifying
maybe ill have my younger sister voice act for them
as if they aren't already
What do you think of taking a level of cleric as a lev 5 rogue?
Not great
Hmmm
True strike spam is fun
Trickery Cleric perhaps, synergy is kinda eh
pelt them with zoomer lingo in a kid's voice
So: not great, could be worse
Not synergy but fun if its for your rp i guess
You get to pick up cantrips and spells
Yeah it's for rp, I'm playing a rogue aasimar that's trying to return to their goddess
hmmm... what cr fiend would a certain toilet be
NO
You could use a feat instead though but that was at lvl 4 not 6
Oh yeah I remember that one. Long story short, I was told a story about how a group of PCs ended up trapped in the Abyss and, while trying to make their way back, had to choose between this layer and another on the way to their destination
Missed the opportunity
The players were basically traumatized.
Could ask the DM to replace what you picked at 4 with the feat
But I don't remember which of the two layers they chose
did it include shortcuts
wynaut
Don't quite recall, why?
Some DMs would be very willing to do this
I'll miss out on 20 dex and 16 const so it might be worse. We're playing rolled stats 2014
And asking them for it will also make them maybe engage more with that aspect of your char
Youre actively including the dm in your char, always good
Now im gonna have to find a counter
had another player retell me a story about how they were also stuck in the abyss, and they took a shortcut. which led to thir tiefling being banished, wizard enfeebld, and gave that player ptsd for shortcuts
I think they were trapped because... If I remember correctly, one of them cast banishment on another to save them from danger, but the one who got banished was the one who had the tuning forks for planeshift
wait, do you play with Incubus
Sounds great but iirc the 2014 feats don't give you asi correct?
oh god, thats the exact story
Oh?
yeah, Incubus told the story here once
Wait hang on... Oh yeah, one of the friends we have in common is the person who told me that story. They probably played that together
Some do
Seriously though. Banish the guy who had the tuning forks?
Not that much ASI for the most part but its something
Not dex or con though if you pick a spellcasting one....
yeah, evil move
I see, oof
It would give you a mental stat
Tbh i might wait for level 8 hopefully then
Like +1 str or +1 con for example, enough to be an even number on a stat
Or ask the dm when will the adventure end
Worth mentioning that some DMs are fine sith giving storybased feats
I apologize if this is the wrong place to ask. When playing a strixhaven game, do you have to choose one of the 5 strixhaven backgrounds?
What would i miss out on from 6th level anyway if i take a cleric level
Thats iirc the origin of feats before they were made level up stuff
not unless your dm tells you you have to
Up to DM
I see. I do think getting it at level 4 would be too early though
I would maybe recommend doing so though. Most things imo are most fun when you lean into it fully. Consider them
Ideally DM should let you do what you want, backgrounds are easy to reflavor
Could come at the cost of you not getting any big magic items to balance it
Thats what i do
If you want proficiency in history and persuasion, the DM shouldn't stop you
1 player is getting feats, 1 is getting items, 1 can craft items
I mean early storywise
I really do like the witherbloom school for a haunted sorcerer (grim hollow subclass)
Then why are you trying to multiclass?
You seem to think the time is nigh
Change of heart?
I'm level 4 rn, I'll be level 5 in a session or two and then i feel like it'll be the right time at level 6
I do agree that you don't have to be a Cleric to be related to godly stuff
Rogues could worship gods too
I did that as barbarian. Went cleric
It wasnt good but it was nice to have the stuff clerics can do
But its not always the best choice
That's a very weird jump ngl, Barb/Cleric that is
had a barbarian who just dedicated his kills to bahamut and iuz
With my char it was because i received a piece of a gods soul and i really wanted to express that
Send it into the world in shape of his divine light
I felt going cleric was the best way of doing that
But if you just wanna worship, any class works
Druids and Paladins fall under the priest category of classes too
Multiclassing is an rp choice, never an rp must
Not that Rogue Paladin or Rogue Druid sounds any more appealing
You can almost always avoid multiclassing for rp
Actually wait nvm Rogue Paladin works
But it can still be the best way of doing what you want
Swash Rogue + Paladin probably works
Ah, i picked arcane trickster and dumped char
Dex paladin just lacks heavy armour but thats it o think
Thanks for the help!
Oh i got it. I have the solution
?
Youre already a spellcaster then
Actually nvm Rogue Paladin is also v MAD, you need 13 strength
All you need from your dm is some spells added to your list that are divine
I dont hold ppl to these as dm but fair
O! Actually, thanks a lot! I'll ask my dm if they'd allow it
For me I would probably still enforce it but in Paladin's case I might just make it 13 con + 13 cha instead
As a house rule, cuz Dexadins > Paladins
And charisma and dex. And if you don't have at least 13 constitution, how did you even survive long enough to multiclass?
I do sometimes just forbid a build though if it is not done well so that counterbalances the intended power control
I just dont like blanket banning a multiclass because of someones stats
Ill look at it and if it doesnt seem like a problem, youre good to go
You could start off with Paladin first and then multiclass into Rogue I suppose, which means you just need 13 dex
Rogue to Paladin is way harder
No, you also need 13 charisma and 13 strength to multiclass out of paladin, not just into it
True and then use a finesse weapon with str rolls anyway so it works
The multiclass restrictions apply to your starting class too.
Oh right that's silly
Yeah this build would focus on str and con, then have some dex and charisma
Oh you didnt know? I thought you included that
you need 13 in STR, CHA, and DEX to have that multiclass
18 str, 16 con, 14 cha, 13 dex
Get 16 cha later i guess
So to be a rogue paladin multiclass you need 13 strength, 13 dex, 13 cha. And you probably needed 13 con to survive until your multiclass
level progression is a real [redacted]
i think i just created the greatest character flaw it brings a tear to my eye 🥹
the flaw is:
the character believes every bird is a person that got turned into a bird
Oh nah having 13 on four stats is really MAD
Standard array won't allow it, neither will point buy. You need a campaign where you rolled and you rolled well. Or you need to wait for a few asis until you can multiclass
eh, relying on rolls is not great
Sure you wont be good at sneaking or picking locks but thats why youre swashbuckler
Something something I still like my house rule of 13 con/13 cha for Paladin
Yeah thats accurate
Not crazy though
I like my houserule of
If i like your idea you can ignore the minimums
Watch me multiclass into every class possible by level 13
Im not gonna force pally to be strength eh
So I'm just 1/1/1/1... in everything
I doubt i will like it and therefore wouldnt allow
Oh you meant with RAW
Aw damn I was gonna just take ASI feats and have the stats for it
I mean i guess id allow that
Id just let you know youll be useless
Ive played a pretty weak char before. He died. I was ready for it
It's a meme build, already been made. The original was called "Abserd". Because the character is absurd
Yeah it is designed to be weak, I can't see how a 1/1/1/1... in 13 classes would even work out
I guess one could kind of make it work by stacking cha towards the end and spamming Eldritch Blast
Like a terrible Warlock
nah, discard the common thought and pointbuy 20 CON 20 CHA paladin and have a 9 in 3 other stats and an 8 on int
Enjoy having low damage and general incompetence outside of combat
See I wanted to try out a 14 dex 14 con 17 cha once which is kind of similar but god does the Paladin hit like a wet noodle unless I use divine smite
basically an aura/spell bot paladin
i just came to an extremely funny concept of 20 DEX 20 CON barbarian, actually
As nice as having a bunch of cha is, only standing there menancingly doing nothing is boring
terrible at everything but very wiggly and generally hard to murder
is there a way to unconscious someone with a mental save?
Rapier + Shield may be the way to go here
oh yea that'll work
hold person them, charm them, its pretty easy to turn a barb into a shield for your enemies
yea a shield and no armor is like 22AC
also is that like, impactful tho? i've never been hit with a Hold Person
you are paralyzed
Wanna know a little trick I learned for tactics as a DM? Imagine you're playing an illithid and his minions in front of a stereotypical party of adventurers. There's a melee fighter, a ranged rogue, a wizard... Who do you use your dominate monster on?
I mean, if you're paralyzed, every successful instance of physical dmg is a crit (iirc)
incapacitated, and all melee attacks that hit you are automatic crits
Paralyzed, close range attacks are auto crits
Paralyzed is one of the worst conditions of the game.
no i mean is that a normal thing for a DM to be doing
you fail all strength and dex saves
I mean if they wanna be cruel sure
lots of clerics and cultist statblocks have it
Hold Person on one of your teammates and have the enemy focus fire on the paralyzed ally
They drop fast no matter their HP or AC
i also dont need spells as a dm to paralyze you
Generally you should almost always focus fire
ghouls, liches, they get paralyzed as part of their attacks
Ghasts are p nasty for lower level parties
fun to use
huh, see i've never actually had a Paralyze effect used on me
i like my shadows
Shadows are a huge problem for low strength characters
Greater Zombies and Mummies are also nasty lol
Fighter or Rogue, because logistically, a Illithid might understand they have weaker mental fortitudes
(Unless you're me and always give your characters something in wisdom)
Excellent
maybe not a 9th level fighter or level 15 rogue, but a mind flayer has no idea what "level" a party is
Now can you pick which one between fighter and rogue?
It'd probably be more beneficial to dominate monster the Rogue so they can't get off sneak attacks because those can be huge.
id take the fighter
more attacks, second wind to regen, typically hits harder with every attack and decent ac
Also, you gotta consider that rogues can be pretty slippery, if they have places to hide from you, they're definitely going to
The rogue is generally the better choice actually. Remember, you have minions that can keep the fighter busy. You have levitate to get out of the fighter's reach. You have advantage on save against spells. You have no defence against a sneak attack from a longbow
a rogue i feel would struggle to help in a fight against a wizard and fighter still though
What?
We're talking about a Fighter, Wizard and Rogue against an Illithid, Ti, lmao
and you dominate the fighter and send them against the other two
Once the rogue is dominated, the rogue sneak attacks the wizard from behind. Now the tides of battle have turned. The PCs have enemies in front and behind
Dominate the Rogue, Attempt to eat the fighters brain
Kill the wizard, profit
If you dominate the fighter, you gain a powerful ally, yes. But the party is still focusing in your direction
nah, fighter brain is junk food
the tastiest morsel is the one that is harder to acquire
And mostly: You want to dominate someone farther away from you so that you can blast the ones near you without blasting your dominated minion
A good mind flayer ALWAYS has some pet intellect devourers with them
speaking of which... you killed nihiloor's favorite boy
no, toby did, but by association you did
Hey, man, I'm just a Cleric
...
Which the party is clearly ungrateful for!
oh yeah, what you think is the survival rate of a party with xanathar's fish