#dnd-discussion
1 messages · Page 59 of 1
except for who is playing. everyone could leave. they cant control that
The players can leave if they don’t want to play said game
Someone just helped me with the 69 hp, but now, how i level up?
You're entirely wrong.
They have as much "control" as the players agree to allow them to have.
Ok, well that’s just a lie
By playing
The players can’t stop the DM from killing off a character
i just wanted to clarify that a DM does not have to change rules whenever any member of the game doesnt like them. that person can argue their case, maybe convince the table or leave
Again, there's no game that dm is dm'ing if the players all leave.
Sure, but that’s not what the argument is about
while dnd should be fun for everyone who is playing, that doesnt mean you have to make it fun for everyone instead of sometimes removing someone from the game because they are not having fun
if they agree thats a power the GM to have, then yes
It is, though.
if they control what the environment looks like, control what enemies spawn, control what content can even be played, and control the dialogue of NPCs, that is literally total control over all but the player's free will
due to the DMs critical nature in the game coming to be, there is an imbalance here and so the DM does have a lot more control
I think this topic is one where two entirely unrelated approaches to the game that are almost fundamentally incompatible are both being conflated.
usually most players dont agree that a DM can just kill someone on the drop of a hat
because 1 DM saying no is the end of the game
1 player saying no is just a hickup, leading to at worst losing 1 of x players
Nobody is stopping them though
But they can. The players might not like it, but all they can do is leave in that case
well the DM can though. im just gonna leave
I'll understand... Somewhen, menwhile i'll search by myself
i mean to extrapolate, in a video game, is the computer the god of what happens next ... or is the player?
DMs have most of if not all of the buttons, but they also have all of the responsibility of facilitating a positive experience for the players
Both
since, without the player, the computer just sits idle
yeah, leaving the campaign is what they can do. That's the social contract of the game
Pretty dang good analogy actually
What do you mean by level up?
Ask in #dnd-newcomers
Ok thanks
My entire point is that the game you play relies upon group consensus and a social dynamic within said group.
Everything that happens within a given game relies upon either tacit or explicit approval about how that game is going to function.
No one singular person is in charge. The entire group is - because it's a group game.
If we are referring to what most people would generally consider "good D&D" where you have a relationship with the DM and they aren't entirely a rando, the DM is quite literally reducing their quality of game by potentially throwing away relationships with players they like, and vice versa for disruptive players. If we're referring to playing D&D with a total random you don't know/talk to at all, then yeah, the DM can go nuts and can potentially lose out on ever getting that "good D&D".
With video games it's give and take; actions lead to your own or a party members death, but the catch is you can reset/revive.
I just finished a 5 year long D&D campaign by "accidentally wild magic blowing up the planet" and releasing the threat that the planet was created to contain. Next campaign, Aetherpunk intergalactic Empire VS sentient Anti matter apocalypse
i mean there is a difference between being able to stop something from happening and accepting that as fair and reasonable and continuing without an uproar
Nice dude! congrats
Sick!
I’ve been getting an itch/burning desire to create a new character and a friend of mine who has done two of my one shots just reached out to ask if I was interested in jointing their campaign 🥹 yall my dreams are coming trueeee.
Congrats!
Hooray!
I’m thinking wizard 🤷♀️
You guys ever finished a campaign with randoms as a player before?
No never
I joined campaigns with randoms
Then those randoms become friends
Then I finish those campaigns
a couple times
the best bet I think is to play with old guys i think
Hi thinking wizard, I’m Nugget
no, for now in the campaign im in they are friends, we share the same autism
i joined 1 random game, it ended up being a combat & repeat game with a guy being way too comedic and 1 minor after we all agreed to play with adults only because the DM forgot to ask that person who then was grounded by parents and missed 50% of game time for multiple sessions
after 3 sessions of bad mic, shouting parents and no story/roleplay whatsoever i bid adieu
Wait, what does way too comedic mean 😔
again, this is why old guys
Do you guys also hate when someone has the main character syndrome
Ye
only if theyre bad at it
If they bribe me pizza I don't mind
they usually are though so yes i guess. i wouldnt mind a party face that had mc syndrome if they were good at it though
The forced pacifist bard
I miss my wife paladin
Greedy goblin artificer
I will commit harson Figther
And finally me, the distorted reality figther.
We are all a good group of friends and we love each other
when i played with old guys it really wasnt high roleplay though, it felt more like "show up every wednesday, play through an adventure path for a few hours, leave when we're done"
Oh alright, I try to joke alot and people actually laugh about it, I was worried if people actually diden't like that
Do i have the permission to smite them to death?
in-character joking annoys me when done too frequently, above table jokes are mostly fine as long as you dont interrupt people talking
"i open the door first" and doesnt let others talk because apparently they got something more important to say
I interpret “main character syndrome” as trying to make it so that only they are the main character
Tell them to knock that garbage off above table
One player died and he pulled up a character named "Thundius Stormgrip"
whats wrong with thundius stormgrip
Or i can smite them to death
its a little miss but not terrible
Hello new here, I’m Nugget!
This likely would be better in #dm-discussion , yes, but I think it’s about identifying specifically what is slowing or harming the game.
I think the #dm-discussion is a great place for dm advice! I’ve gotten many a helpful tip there 🙂
Nope. In game solutions to above table problems do nothing.
Ty I'll move it there ~
Then i'll gently ask
They make you just as toxic a player as the other person - if not more.
nah not always
Yep. Always.
sometimes its so blatant that blowing off steam is fine, but its definitely not mature
but it needs to be pretty damn bad for in-character responses to not make you look just as bad
If you have a problem with someone you should talk to that actual person.
Thoughts on not liking a character in your party but liking the player themselves?
unless its so obvious and blatant that you dont consider them worth talking to so you do a little thing to relieve stress and then get them kicked/leave
Totally normal
but still its not mature
Happens all the time.
I think I remember seeing something where some dude got sick of a campaign and DM unfairness so he just killed his character and wrote a new one with a 12 bajillion page backstory where he could change anything just to mess with the DM
Have you ever broken the paladin's oath?
Did it last session lol
the reason why i excuse this behaviour if warranted is because it feels good for the person who has faced the others bad deeds
being "the bigger person" isnt for everyone. its okay to be emotional and doing what you need to vent
the best of us never do that but its definitely not wrong and it definitely doesnt make you worse than the other person

Sometimes being the bigger person means using that mass to whack someone over the head
hasnt often happened to me. Paladin oaths are pretty flexible in how vague they are
giving them just that one satisfying insult to pay them back for weeks of bad behaviour before walking away is very very normal
A lot of people think being the bigger person is just taking the hit and being mature about it, god forbid someone hits back for once
expecting people to never do that imo is naive and judgemental of what is effectively a victim
but if you want to be constructive and save the game, DONT do this. instead choose to talk
A campaign I was just in recently imploded after DM/Player dispute about a player getting kicked, Player left a massive message being brutally honest with the DM and basically calling him childish
My DM often forgets i have to follow an oath.
No. The solution is talking with that person and solving the issue above table. Attacking their character for what's actually an above table issue makes your actions no better than theirs.
half of them are just generally "be a good little guy and dont do anything too crazy"
i think the fact that you have an oath usually means a lot more to the character than whats in it
Personally if the campaign is already done for, I'm just gonna do something to send me off. I also respect your thoughts on the subject too
"getting back" is fine
Exactly
not ideal but fine. definitely not as bad as the other
Having an oath is like having a diet, if you leave your diet it you will gain weight but the worst part is breaking your own self promise
In my opinion, it's worse - especially if no conversation ever happened. If it was something that could have been fixed by just talking to them, you're the one who is the bigger offender.
Interesting
"if it was" indeed
Which you don't know unless you try that first.
some boundaries cant be crossed and then talked out after
im talking behaviour that settles it for good, not little disagreements
Those type of boundaries are discussed in s0, and if violated that person is removed.
Well, not every boundry in existence can be looked over in just 2-4 hours
That type of discussion isn’t limited to those 2-4 hours though
That's why other safety tools such as x cards or green/yellow/red are brought up, to dynamically adjust during play.
If a line or veil is crossed that wasn’t originally discussed about. It can be brought up in another session zero to discuss things
Plus session zeros aren’t limited to only the beginning of a campaign
These kind of things are above table issues, to be addressed with the actual person doing the offense. It's not something to be addressed to the in-game character.
yeah the cases i am talking about dont really happen if whoever manages the group does their job
because then they will remove the person offending before the "getting back" thing can really happen
usually this is the DM but it technically can be anyone as long as they are respected as the "youre out" person
in the scenarios i am talking about, this doesnt happen in time and so the person is left to dealing with it on a personal level
That really shouldn’t be one person’s job though. It should be a group responsibility.
yeah sure it can be whatever you want
Going back to what I was saying earlier:
My entire point is that the game you play relies upon group consensus and a social dynamic within said group.
Everything that happens within a given game relies upon either tacit or explicit approval about how that game is going to function.
No one singular person is in charge. The entire group is - because it's a group game.
This whole situation is included within that.
in my experience, its mostly the DM though
Not every DM is going to have the will to instantly ban a player, no questions asked, especially if it's far into the campaign
and many players wont feel like they have the authority to do so
There's alot of scenarios in D&D, so technically neither of us are right or wrong
no one person is wrong because theyre speaking in absolutes
the rest said sometimes and therefore is correct
No single character in a story is worth more than actual people.
Woah man, "Fuzzy Bottom Bumble Mike" is worth more than every story
Don't diss FBBM
If the player playing as fbbm goes to try to murder a child in any game I run, that player is gone.
I don't care if they have an interesting story or if they're central to the plot or if there's 2 more sessions left and we've played for years.
Above-table issues should always be talked out first, but when communication fails or boundaries keep getting ignored, frustration builds and people sometimes act out — that’s all I’m saying.
I get that. I'm just saying that the "acting out" part isn't justified.
Fair enough — I’m not saying it’s justified, just that it’s what realistically ends up happening when the group dynamics break down. That’s the only point I was making.
Does anyone want to be a mod, or know someone who does, for a writing server?
I agree with this up to harrassment of the super bad super terrible kind. Yknow what I' referring too.
Yeah, of course. I’m only talking about normal frustration when communication breaks down, not anything extreme or targeted. That stuff is never okay.
Okay then yeah I agree with you entirely. Frustrations should be discussed. Especially since theres a decent probability they have no idea theyre doing something to frustrate a player.
Exactly. Most problems get fixed fast once people actually talk about it, and half the time the person doesn’t even realize they’re causing frustration until it’s said out loud.
its justified
how does action surge work?
Is it once per turn for the entire combat encounter
or can I only use it once before I need a short rest to reset it?
No you get a set amount of uses for it. I believe its once per short rest up until a certain level
You can only use Action Surge once per short rest at level 2.
I'm gunna be that guy - have you read what the book says?
kk, ty
It literally tells you exactly how it works.
Im actually blind so I simply harness the rules of the universe to understand D&D.
using common sense actually gets you quite far
Blind people can read too 🙂
?
Wait, how? I thought blind people could only listen. I know some blind people still have partial vision though. 
Guess I still have stuff to learn in the expansive universe.
he means braille
the little bumps you can feel with your fingers
reading is technically not limited to visual input
Ah got it. Thanks for clarifying. I knew about braille but didn’t connect it in the moment. Appreciate the explanation.
That’s something that would be better to ask in #non-dnd-topics
Though I should note it’s best to have a vetting process before you make someone a mod on your server.
Braille.
Plus generally Disabilities are a spectrum and one’s experience with a particular disability may be quite different from another’s.
I wonder if blind people would have even more fun with D&D than sighted players, since they often have stronger imaginations?
This is something I’d say when I’m drunk ;-;
People tend to ask me if im high quite often.
Hello I am a new player to d&d but I have been look for people to play with is anyone interested?
I am sober for the record.
#looking-for-players You can use this channel to find groups to play with!
Thanks
Check the listings in #looking-for-players for games that want people, read the details, respond as appropriate and cross your fingers.
Type /looking and select the option for #looking-for-dm to advertise yourself as a new player in search of a group. Be sure to include your regular availability!
There are other Discord servers where people gather for games. You can find them in #looking-for-community .
Aside from here, you could also try LFG areas in sites like Reddit, Roll20 or the D&D Beyond forums to get started. -Mr Smith
I personally joined a public DND one shot server, made friends on there when we started a campaign or went on startplaying. Still play with them to this day.
To this day, I refuse to buy a web cam for D&D
Never really understood the need for web cam if you might as well just play offline
the point is that you can get the "social experience" while not having to be locally close to each other
i actually much prefer camless games but there is definitely a reason for cams
they want to see each other while playing, they find that more engaging
and they probably would play offline if they managed to get a game going offline
but who knows? maybe they dont like going out, maybe they like the home comfort for the game
Understandable on the not being able to find an offline game, still will never like web cams
i love not using cams because it lets me completely ignore the real person and focus even more on the in-universe stuff
when i play dnd im just gone from the real world
with webcams there is a much bigger link to the person behind the role
I just looked at LFG and saw a studio ghibli heavy roleplay campaign and got so hyped up, then I saw web cam required
Genuinely shed a tear
Maybe consider a filter?
you sure its not worth getting a webcam for?
i did it once and while it wasnt perfect, it was still fun i guess
Like you'd have the cam, but you could still hide most things behind a filter.
Personally I just don't like linking my face face to my online face
Past experiences really messed that whole side of the internet up for me
could I use character sheets from past editions for my current character?
i like hiding my face online too
The intense speech about freedom coming from the potato filter:
Would you be okay covering your face with a filter?
No. Older editions work entirely different from 5e
would the game be okay with that though?
I would probably have to think about it, but maybe
You know .. one of these days someone is going to make a customizable filter to put your D&D character's face on a filter.
you should definitely ask them if thats okay because a big reason why someone might ask for cam is because they want the genuine face-to-face
Please do not use past edition sheets for 5E unless you convert it to be fully 5E, some older editions can become extremly busted in 5E
This comes from personal experience, please dont
Old DM let me get a "Celerity" spell which was basically an action whenever I wanted and it broke some encounters
if you mean 5e 2014 by past edition, you can mostly convert it quite easily
And that's on the lower tier of 3.5 madness
Ever seen "Nailed to the sky"?
The name is accurate
but you cant be nailed to the sky
True, spell should be changed to "Put them into orbit for 4 hours"
Please dont circumvent our language filter.
"Nailed to the sky actually places the target so far from the surface of the world and at such a speed that it keeps missing the surface as it falls back, so it enters an eternal orbit. Unless the target can magically fly or has some other form of non-physical propulsion available, the target is stuck until someone else rescues it. Even if the target can fly, the surface is 2 to 4 hours away, assuming a fly spell, which allows a maximum speed of 720 feet per round while descending. The target may not survive that long. Depending on the world where nailed to the sky is cast, conditions so far from its surface may be deadly. Deleterious effects include scorching heat, cold, and vacuum. Targets subject to these conditions take 2d6 points of damage each from heat or cold and 1d4 points of damage from the vacuum each round. The target immediately begins to suffocate."
Mmm, level 3 spell, maybe 4?
It's an epic spell.
Nah, level 2
Sorry if im interrupting but whats PBP?
play by post
how would that work
oh i forgot that. i thought it was play by play
one person posts something in text, then another reacts with their own post
play by play kinda makes sense too thats why i thought that
Text based dnd, where anyone can chip in to continue the story in their own time whenever they’re online
Removes scheduling sessions from the equation
its a slow style that takes days for even one encounter to finish usually and is expected to take that time
Oh thats interesting
not really my thing though, I'd wanna get together with people tbh
i would just find it impossible to only do one thing and then wait for days
exactly my issue with ut
It’s not for everyone
if i was to attack someone, would i have to say "i do this"
and then wait for the DM to get online and tell me what to roll?
Yup
then wait until i see that response, possibly days later, and finally get to roll, so the DM can then tell me if i hit next tuesday
that just sounds awful i cannot fathom
there must be some streamlining there to speed things up
Usually it doesn’t take that long, but yes it can be quite slow
I hit a goblin and I send a carrier pigeon to the DM to let him know I rolled a critical failure
Hi everyone !
nawe
naur
I did smth bad here ? Mb...
I never noticed omg you're right
we used to do post by post combat but it was chatroom so it was just whoever could type faster would win lol
thank the one and only for it haha
Are you guys good with filling character sheets by any chance ?
Cause i just tapped back into dnd and i might have forget everything lmao
I am, but only with 3.5e. 😉
i just said your name to acknowledge
If you mean € i'm down for this price man lmao
I am conpletly new to dnd so, I can definitely help
I see i see
and i guess you made me a bit australian at the same time lol
@oblique frost like, i have an entire character ready to go, backstory, stats, equipement BUT this sheet is driving me crazy
I watched this guy explain the history of DND, so im kind of a pro in that aspect of it
Oh yeah obviously mb 🦧
i recommend a youtube video
ive learnt it all from youtube at first and it was quite fun
Please 👏🏻
then i used google to narrow the finer points
i didnt mean a specific video. its been years
what kindw character you have?
I'll search it up ! And do you recommand the dnd character maker on dnd beyond or should i just print the sheet ?
A rogue 😝
Its the only class i've ever played so the choice was kinda natural lmao
my first and only ever character is a halfling called "Garret Goodbarrel" and I was a rogue that would always seek out a barrel to hide in
too bad I could never really use him
This is the kind of character that makes fun campaign and we love it fr
Question for anyone who would be happy to help me: I'm playing a warlock/fighter posing as a sorcerer/fighter but I've got some warlock spells that I'm pretty sure sorcerers don't have access to, im still looking into it but if anyone has a spell they can think of that could pass as a disguise for Eldritch Blast, Hellish Rebuke, True Strike, or Mind Spike please lemme know it would be much appreciated
Why’s that
Don’t sorcs get true strike?
because I've only played once and that was for like an hour. it was also years ago haha. I cant find people to play
firebolt could work as eldrich blast
D&d beyond's sheets might be more helpful, but note that we're moving into 5.5e so both 5e and 5.5 will have stuff listed on the site- depending on which edition you're going to play, you can filter out the other edition
as long as the dm knows, and only until level 5
(I'm kinda new to dnd so I didn't know this so thanks 😂)
Yeah I thought that would work
until you meet something fireresistant
But tbh a paper sheet is always better to learn your actual character
Ah, we're lvl 6 so ig not
yeah you cant hide warlock from the others at level 6
Use both digital and paper
Why are you even hiding it at this point?
at that point, id just come clean to be honest but hide it from NPCs instead
a question can anyone help me: on my paper phb, the beast sky's str is 6, but someone tells me on beyond is 14 and the sea have 6 str is it true?
Thats alg, cause my fellow adventurers do need to at some point figure it out
I was about to ask too
Because its part of the background of the character, just something cool
are you a secret bad guy possibly
Well... I'm being hunted and also my patron is a demon who kinda puppets me from time to time to do his bidding.... so not great.
do you have beast of the Land chosen?
Lying to your allies is…cool?
yes tbh
I'm also playing a beastmaster rn, my beast of land has 14, sky has 6, sea also has 14
intrigue is a part of entertainment and not every table will be offended or hurt by player secrets
every good guy is a bad guy in another's story
Each of the beasts have different stats
not to mention, hiding something doesnt instantly mean malice or pvp
Bassically, im part of this elite Drow Gaurd that requires you to have good magic and fighting skills and is high up in prestige, but I lost my magic, in desperation secretly made a deal with a demon for magic, and its a shame I hide as I try to undo it and find my real magic
sadly though it is worth a sus look whenever someone has a secret because problem players are drawn to that kind of feature too
Hi
but that doesnt mean its always bad to do
I'm new
Might be better to let the players know, but tell them that their characters don't know yet
Luckily we all know each other so im not worried about that
thank you,maybe is a bug
Hello New
at some tables that is the way to do it. i personally would find it terribly boring to pretend not to know this
Hi guys...
Nice to meet you all
its a very common sentiment in here though that you should play with open cards
i think it can also be an errata
but best to check in #ddb-support
Yeah within our group its not uncommon for a character to have secrets, most of ours do, just differs on scale of them
the only thing i wonder is if being a new player mixes well with handling a secret class
Im just needing to hide the spells somehow cause one of them knows almost all spells by heart 😭
Only one of the characters in our group has secrets - at least that I (DM) know about.
I mean, I say "new" as in first time being a player, I've Dm'ed a few times
Players who try and keep secrets from other players usually turns out one of two ways, in my experience: 1) The other players figure out the secret immediately and ruin the surprise or 2) the other players never figure out the secret and when it is eventually revealed they don't actually care .. ruining the surprise.
And he's not keeping them super secret. He's good enough to drop some hints every now and then. He's the only one that gave me enough of a backstory to build into the campaign.
Most of this convo has been less about what spells could be cool illusions to replace warlock spells and mostly how keeping a secret could go wrong within the party 😭
I love being a DM because its a space to explore storytelling
maybe thats a hint?
Now this is specifically different from player characters keeping secrets from each other while their players are all in on the secret and working together to make the reveal.
ok, thank you
Yeah- but this group has a history of doing secrets and doing them well as said before
So I feel quite safe in my standing
ive said my piece ^^
Thnks man
you cant hide eldritch blast to my knowledge and they will find out almost immediately
Aight ! Ty !
Honestly, the main thing that a good secret reveal needs is to be tied to the plot, so the more basic it is, the less impactful it will likely end up being.
Also the classes themselves aren't even necessarily something that exist in-character, so like the difference between a Wizard or Warlock or Sorcerer isn't necessarily even significant, in character.
Yeah I'll keep digging, tbf we don't show hp of monsters so it might work? Only one is hellish rebuke which i might have to save for serious occasions
i think the hidden thing here is having a patron
"woah you have a devil pact???"
Yeah it is tied I've been told, idk how tho since im not the dm
If you're going "oh that's obviously an Eldritch blast" that's metagaming.
Hmmm, I dunno if I'd say that, considering that we even have NPC statblocks that refer to the classes diagetically.
Rather "Your the reason we keep finding dead bodies when we wake up"
Right, but an NPC Druid isn't the same thing as a PC Druid. The Druid statblock doesn't Wild Shape, for instance.
With four divine casters, three arcane casters, four martials, that just leaves the minstrel (Bard). 
Yeah, the demon kinda requires a blood sacrifice every now and again
Thanks! I hope so to
Aye, but them having different functions doesn't mean they aren't diagetic, y'know?
Yes, both are Druids, but only the PC Druid is the Druid "Class" if that make sense?
Did Monsters start losing "class?"
Monsters don't have class unless specifically added by the DM.
It's all very fifth edition.
For sure. I'm more referring to the idea that PCs familiar with certain classes could absolutely be recognized as different by their most basic facets, even similar ones like mentioned before.
It's kind of ridiculous that the Druid stat block doesn't have wild shape.
I just finished making a perfectly normal level 9 wizard that I could use as a playing character... except it's an NPC.
As an enemy it's basically any other humanoid but it can cast moonbeam once.
bonjour
I wouldn't even say that recognizing Eldritch Blast is necessarily metagaming, unless we assume that one can make spells look so significantly different from their assumed appearance that you can obscure what spell you are casting, which seemingly goes against the fact that you can identify ongoing spells with an Arcana check.
Man..! The Mage is a (Wizard) but Druid is not a (Druid)!
Sure, but when it comes to something like "I have to pretend that my Eldritch blast is another cantrip" I don't think the knowledge of very specific spells is going to be a diagetic indicator of class, that's a ridiculous level of knowledge to be available.
Greetings, Burrito of the Great Beyond
wondering which class to pick for my next character
Isn't there a skill check for that?
you just gave me an idea
Don’t you love it when that happens
i do
this is the third god in my setting
it shall sit in the thrones of the big three
I'm not so sure if it's ridiculous, assuming exposure. Seeing a Paladin use Divine Smite probably gives a pretty big hint to what they are, for example.
the cube in the center, Zylt, god of death on the left, and the burrito on the right
Your point about the Arcana check is fair, but also Eldritch Blast is the most reflavored spell ever.
An eclectic pantheon, to be sure, but a welcome one.
as the gods recover from the massacre committed at Zylt's hands, it shall grow more and more
I think its only the Mastermind Rogue that can discern Classes...
without the burrito in there its intriguing
I want a burrito.
wait what
i like a god simply called "the cube"
oh that
I had a leftover burrito for breakfast
id love to eat a burrito, not worship one
Is it a cube
and I cannot send images
its a trapezoid
it is indeed a cube, but the real focus of the drawing is the cubetouched
For sure; it really depends on how liberal the DM is with allowing that reflavoring and how common that type of knowledge would be. Admittedly, it would be a bit more difficult with the fact that NPCs don't necessarily use PC spells anymore.
as fall rolls around, we would like to introduce pumpkin spice eldritch blast to the table
Let me say that I prefer a reality in which the classes aren't totally diagetic and blur between each other because NPCs don't have to follow PC rules and can surprise players.
You mean... like how it used to be. 🙂
PCs and NPCs use to run on completely different rules because they serve different narrative purposes?
No, they used to run on identical rules.
I suppose it depends on how much desire there is to involve classes in the actual dynamics of the game, even if NPCs run on different rules. (I enjoy it quite a bit.)
Then no.
Ah, alright.
there's artificer which gets the machines
using character sheets for NPCs goes against what Ophidimancer was saying lol
How do we all feel about more “episodic” campaigns? Like a series of interconnected one-shots within the same world
barbarian, the "my favorite word is defenestrate" class
I can't wrap my head around the NPCs being made differently than PCs.
Those can be fun!
i prefer to be able to make my own monsters (and humanoid NPCs) without being limited to player sheets. Plus, players are just glass cannons
Players dont get Legendary Actions to help fight 4 players
druids, who i like to imagine are half quiet, coffee-sipping gardeners and half drugged-up hippies
fighters, the chicken and rice of the whole thing
Simply put, they're not player characters so they follow monster design rather than player character design.
I have no desire to be required to build any monster of my choosing by having to give them X class levels and such. I just want to make a stat block that fits the character I'm designing instead.
statblocks are so much more free and open in design
monks, the karate kids
paladins, who are clerics with swords
rogues, who will sneak behind you and slit your throat
sorcerers, who just kind of sit there. i mean, they have wild magic, but that's all they have going for them in core material
I like involving class themed factions maybe, but not the classes themselves. A faction of primal terrorists who want to destroy civilization would not recognize a different faction of genteel genealogists studying destiny and bloodlines as anything similar to themselves even if they both used druid statblocks.
warlocks, who made a deal with Cthulhu to steal their friend's money
and wizards. fireball
where did you get my Elemantani Circle notes
anyways, fun idea!
We've been fighting them in game, haven't we? I've been paying a little attention.
i dont think youll see them again until a bit after the Ouroboros
agree to dm the campaign. when the players derail the campaign, as they do, go grab a massive box. unlock it and pull out a safe. unlock that to reveal a lockbox. unlock that to reveal. t h e f o l d e r.
Does it hurt to call them druids? You don't need to use a druid statblock. They can culturally or socially be druidic.
There's more cults than actual people, I swear.
this will involve fights that THEY WILL LOSE. have them fight gods. and lose! when they derail the bad guy's train, let him get away and have an evil god try to crush them. keep them humble.
Interesting. I'd see them as recognizing each other as Druids, even if they had entirely different methods. After all, the origin of their powers is the same.
wait what? 😭
time to start planning my own session
-# I recently used the word ouroboros at work and was looked at as though I had multiple heads
Haha I'm only joking about the fact that the Cradle seems to have a veritable buttload of cults.
tbf, you dont get a bunch of powerful monsters in one place without them catching nefarious attention
That's a hydra 😉 /j
-# Isn't it a snake eating their own tail?
Correct
yea
They didn't know that
i do agree, not a lot of non cult people recently 
I need more big wild monsters and dinos
I wouldn't have them thinking that at all. It would be work (that probably a player would have to put in) to make them bend their separate philosophies toward each other.
would love to make a boss fight revolving around an amber hulk :3c
More dinos! Yes please!
I guess what I see it being is that it's not a matter of philosophy if they are both actually viewed as Druids, and them both being Druids doesn't mean they agree or get along.
Thinking how an Ancient Paladin or Nature Cleric could be mistaken as Druid. Am I missing one?
-# Ranger
But if one has one of the Princes of Elemental Evil as their explicitly stated power source and the other says that they only tend to the Tree of Life I don't know why, in character, they would both be called Druids. Except maybe by snooty book mages who have to classify things and just draw connections between things and arbitrarily clump them together as "Primal."
Curious, but which version of dnd is this
Or if its even a dnd thing at all
3.5e
Damn we really are going back in time with this one, interesting
If they have sufficiently different origins of power, it's entirely possible they are actually seen as different things, though at that point the Druid statblock is more of a placeholder than an actual representation, if that makes sense.
They don't have to be identical, but the standard way to create them is to do it the same way as PCs.
Is a CR 1/2 an appropriate bossfight for two level 1 characters (druid and rogue)
Boss?
as a boss, no
Hard to say for sure cause there's a lot of factors that CR doesn't account for. Is it the boss after a bunch of fights? Does the party have health potions?
Which bring us to "warlocks" because one person whose power source is a Great Old One would probably be viewed as different from one whose power source is an Angel.
Will the CR 1/2 creature monologue long enough to get the surprised condition?
What about a CR 2? And there’s like, 1 combat before this.
I just don’t want to kill the players with one hit
CR 2 is roughly where I was thinking - but it’s tricky because there’s only 2 PCs.
Depending on the monster, you could do the CR 1/2 but double its HP. Or do two or three CR 1/2?
Viewed as different, entirely possible, but also could be viewed the same, which is largely the unavoidable thing about classification. You can pretty much make a cut at any point and classify stuff the same or differently based on arbitrary things. For example, every single subclass could be viewed as a different "class", though the more similarities that exist, the more people will make associations, diagetically or not.
deadly as hell. Especialy if its just 2 people
So you’re saying CR 1?
yea
Hello fellow DND Players! I'm Josiah or you can call me Red if you can't remember my name. Anyways, I saw a lot of stuff about this game and I really want to play and become a part of it, but I'm going to need a lot of help understanding cause I'm Autistic. But I'm not gonna let that stop from playing and enjoying this new game! So can anyone help me plss?
party level x2 for the cr of a boss fight was a loose gauge when you have a party of 4 specifically
How different is the CR system in 5th edition vs. 3rd?
seeing how the CR cap in 3e was higher, very
We have CR 30 as the max. Yall have CR 90 and higher
Hello Red! Glad to have you here. I recommend asking the folks at #dnd-newcomers , they’re the specialists for this
Haha, IMO having been a DM for both 3.5 and 5E for a while, the concept of CR translates well (“a number to help you make challenging encounters”).
I find 5E is more vibes based as 3.5 asked you to look at like HD and stuff. But both fit well.
I also don’t know about CR 90 stuff. 😜
I'm personally also curious about how CR works in 4e compared to 5e, been trying to adapt Murder in Baldur's Gate into 5e (was a 3.5/4e campaign)
But also, 3.5E had the Epic Level Handbook which let you go above level 20.
I THINK some greater deities were like CR 30? Maybe 40??? I’d have to check.
I remember Titans being higher than that
Titans get high yesh
3e was a wild era
Them titans they be blazing
then theres the Time Dragon Greatwyrm or something around 90
Most games never got that far. 🙂
but yeah. Our strongest monster is either the Tiamat Avatar Statblocks or Sul Katesh
CR 30 and 28 respectively
Depends on the creature to be honest. Low CR's monsters can be deceptively dangerous.
Oh I know that one. Joey Wheeler played that against Weevil and it used time roulette to age up baby dragon into that, yeah.
children's card games on motorbikes?
what
I found a cosmic horror-esque campaign
im praying for the best, main fella asked for some past character's so I just wrote some excerpts
oh thats a scary question geez
man thats like asking for a resume come on give people a chance
unless it was to make the game more fun for you, not to control your performance
Maybe a vibe check.
"Hey XXX, I took a look over your application for the campaign and things are looking good! Can we do a voice-cam interview in about 30 minutes?"
Genuinly happened to me before
Dude was advertising "Laid back campaign, and chill DM"
That is laid back.
"Also here's a full list of questions I would like you to fill out about your past experiences in DND"
Not as laid back.
I can understand a google doc or something, but a full interview afterwards just for a 90% chance of the campaign ending in 5 sessions?
If you don't want the campaign to end in five sessions, pre-screening the players is a good idea.
i mean a full interview can also just be getting to talk to you a bit
that makes a lot of sense honestly. i dont think id like if a DM accepted a player he never talked to
From now on, I want to sit in on a session before I start playing. I've had two horrible experiences in a row with DMs that are just so far off from what I would expect. And as for players... omg... everyone wants to play 3.5e and it's hard to find a game with an opening, so you get ALL KINDS of people that want to play... all ages... all experience levels.
the thing with past characters is that it makes me worry about being punished for past things when i possibly want to do something completely different this time
What about a rust monster or two?
not to mention that other tables have other rules and themes so judging a player by past plays might be really really bad if not well-thought out
DUDE ugh I once had a really long google forms full of questions and made an application for players to join my dnd campaign in a community server of friends like its so important
Now I look at that and so cringe
honestly even if youre smart and understand this, it might be a bad idea because your brain might be unable to shake the bias
its kinda like asking you about your exes imo
Hah! Some of us don't have exes to speak of.
How do I make a samurai (not fighter archetype specifically, general character theme) with a gun? (Quickdraw revolver, made for a surprise attack sidearm, not the main weapon)
that in itself can be an answer that gets you booted from the date
i dont like judging people by the past if i wasnt a part of it
Samurais used guns
Just do a regular samurai character
Oh ok
If not a Fighter archetype, you could look into Kensei Monk
Though personally I'd suggest Sorcerer
Creatures with special abilities (the dangerous ones I spoke about) are always going to be hit or miss. You can use one rust monster just to see how it works out. But 1st level PC's are bascially "in training". Start them off with fights against brigands, orcs (now called Toughs), troglodytes, etc.
i think fighter is the best one to choose here anyway because you can actually make the "surprise" attack do something with battlemaster
Pick up Martial Weapon Training. Gain enough gold to purchase Firearms. Then True Strike twice a turn.
you can use the gun with a maneuver you pick
Tho why haven't they made a melee sorcerer yet? Like we have the bladesinger??
Closest we got was Stone Sorcery
and it would let you do stuff like disarm people in a sword fight etc to show mastery beyond "smack enemy"
Eldritch knight
That's not a sorcerer
hello 🙋🏼♂️
i have destroyed 3 sets of platemail off off paladins clerics and a fighter with them, so good
I've had conversations in the past about whether each spellcaster class should have a "martial" subclass. I honestly still remain on the fence about it - mostly because I think trying to design classes to fit some kind of symmetry doesn't seem as compelling as a reason as designing them for narrative purposes.
I like the concept of a sorcerer throwing hands
But melee caster cool
I was gonna say, I don’t even need them to use weapons
We don’t have a good melee spellcaster that imbue spells into their fists (closest is elemental Warrior)
literally just giving them some AC, some spenditure options for survivability, and some kind of class-synergistic attack function, you get the feel
Image your family lineage dates back hundreds of years, your ancient grandfather was a true polymorphed sword, and his genes carried all the way down to you. SWORD SORCERER
There's potential for narrative
I have a concept to try for a melee range caster using the Oni Sorcerer from Obojima, take a look and see if you like the potential.
That one is good. Them horns!
Sublclasses as they are now are a WoTC thing. A radical change, at the time, from TSR when subclasses were part of the primary class (eg Fighter's subclasses were Paladins, Ranger, Barbarian etc.). Asking for them to make a subclass melee for a Wizard would be indeed another radical change.
We've had over ten years to get used to 5E. Bladesinger is a melee Wizard subclass.
Hey so I’m new to dnd, and my boyfriend and I were looking to maybe do a one shot or a campaign to introduce ourselves to it. Is it possible to use a ai engine for a campaign? And insert both of us into it? Or how would that work since it’s only two people. It would help us both, A. Know what we are doing. And B. It will help him get in the style of game dnd is.
Hey welcome!
Unfortunately AI can’t really do D&D. It can get close on a surface level but a lot of the fun comes from making these stories as a group of people.
Beyond that, Gen AI models tend to have issues with some basic things like story consistency, rule consistency, and of course hallucinations. Humans also are prone to this - but it’s different when your friend forgets an NPC name vs a bot.
I would highly encourage you to try to get a group (not AI) if possible. That’s the best D&D experience!
Personally, I think an unthinking, unfeeling machine is not a great choice to write a story with.
An LLM is an algorithm trying to get engagement points. It will hallucinate, lie, and be a yes-man. It can be gaslit, accidentally. It doesn't think, it doesn't understand.
D&D inherently is a game that runs on the engine of human brains.
Even BG3 had to take some creative liberties in limiting infinite freedom when coding a videogame.
Yessirs, I’ve also had thought on things like that. Since y’all got a bit more experience with the dnd world of knowledge. Is it something that people would typically do, to hop on a zoom call or a FaceTime type deal. We live in a small town and finding nerdier people who are willing is pretty hard to do. Also what would you say the bare minimum is for a party to start with?
Online dnd is certainly a thing! (Imma let Steve answer this, cuz they usually go more in depth than me)
Yup, I do a lot of D&D these days over Zoom or Discord VC or things like that.
For the bare minimum, I say you just need a DM (dungeon master) and a few players. Then we just make characters and we go! My games are pretty loosey-goosey so I find having a good grasp of the rules isn’t necessarily a priority, but it certainly helps to play more smoothly!
Usually, 4 or five player is preferred, though 3 or even 2 isn’t unheard of. One player isn’t really recommended (heck, 2 is pushing it)
just gotta keep looking
And the empty ones don't allow guns :trol:
My character's entire gimmick is pulling out a gun out of nowhere
Hmmm…
-# I have a campaign soon that has guns, but I’m unsure if I wanna add another player
I'll reserve that potential slot
Is it async PBP?
It’s text based, sessions tho
I'm SEA time but I think I can join
Though, this is getting out of the scope of the channel
I’ll just notify you if a spot frees up
Yippeeeeee
Oh hello! Someone else in SEA time.
It's rough when my regular game is in US time.
I really am feening for a game because I already have a really cool lore for my character
id move it if i could, but i dont think the others are able to 😭
No, it's fine I knew it was coming and planned for it, there was no way you could have prepared for me to move to a different country.
yeah, probably for the better for you as well
Hey, can creatures using only truesight differentiate between visible and invisible creatures?
Edit: wrote invisible twice
WHEN NO ONE HEARD A WORD-
like, can they tell if a creature has invisibility on them?
i think only if the creature acts like they are, otherwise, you just see them
I see
realest experience ever (I’ve been unable to find any game despite numerous attempts)
It applies to see invisibility as well
Then you find one and
"Sorry, no firearms of any kind are allowed!"
[BIP BIP BIP BIP BIIIIIIIIP]
Aussie Aussie Aussie! Oi! Oi! Oi!
how much damage would a oil barrel do when its on fire?
up to dm
I’d say like 5d6 or smt
You can't really be a samurai cowboy without a gun
But yeah, up to DM
I mean you could use a bow but that's kind of a boring alternative
okie dokie thanks yall
crossbow
semi-automatic crossbow! (best alternative)
Nah I want a true-to-life six shooter
The Colt Single Action Army; The Glock of the Wild West
reflavor
Have a nice day chat 👋
Gonna try to run my first DnD game as a DM. Wish me luck
I made the post in the channel.
(I hope I didn't accidentally break any rules in it. I'm still very new lol)
Also, genuine question, is it like, considered scummy to go straight for paid players/games? Like, should I DM some free/regular games first?
If it is scummy or unethical, I deeply apologize.
I'm new to this, and I'm really scared that I may have done something wrong/incorrectly
i don’t see how it’s unethical/scummy whatsoever imo, you’re the one investing your time/effort into DMing
Phew. Thanks
but i would probably make it clear with them how much experience you’ve got as a DM, since paid games can imply you’ve got a lotta experience
Got it. I made it clear. I'm also offering refunds too if someone wants to back out before the game starts
Also I'm charging five dollars per player, which I hope isn't too much for a first time DM
Hello
Hi! Hope you're doing good
I’m new to dnd
Hi new to dnd, I’m Nugget
Hey nugget
What character class are u look at lately
I recommend checking out #dnd-newcomers if you wanna get started, or if you’ve got any questions you want answering
Monk! I love monks.
Ok nice
None of you here in the community live in TN do you
TX
Well at least you all have that live d&d adventure attraction there
its great for the little ones
also this quote is mine now YOINK
Hey, does anybody know what's the best channel to show my race tier-list?
someone just took 1d6 Psychic damage
what
like a list of your opinion of best races?
Of how much I am interested in playing each of them
maybe character discussion
Thanks
At least didn't roll 7-8 on 1d100
Can't send pictures there
Hi
Hello
Can monk class has a flavor attack which basically has a character be so fast like blitzing?(with a sword) or no? (I’m still inexperienced with dnd)
Sure but the final damage output won't change
Flavor is free! You can describe your character doing that 😄
Sure, but it’d just be flavour
Kensei monk is perfect for that tho
That’s fine (you may not know this cause I wanted to base a character with monk from a game called limbus company and I kinda wanted to play as a Mao branch Heishou)
honestly Steel Wind Strike is basically a speed blitz attack
you could do BA disengage or take Speedy/Mobile to speedblitz as a monk too
Close enough
you know what, might give steel wind strike to monks as a homebrew idea
i hear that spell used to be a monk thing
Oof
Can you describe the abilities you want for this character without using class names or names from the series?
its coming back home then
Well the Mao heishou from Limbus is all about being fast and blitzing with their blades(since they are based form hare’s)
Other than that(or porbably too op) is applying deathrite fissure stack effect which drained would rupture on the target and gives the Mao more speed
Just basing from it, I want to tune it a little
Uhh remember when I said not to use names of abilities? It would help us who are not familiar with the series if you can describe the ability in terms of what it does rather than the name. I have no clue what a "deathrite fissure" is.
There is a playable hare species, the Harengon.
If you want to get a lot of attacks with swords, Fighter isn't a bad choice.
Whoops sorry, I just wanted the abilites for the character is gaining speed and being able to blitz across the field to cut through and slash all in their way(that’s just about it, sorry for the confusion)
I’m not yet familiar with other classes yet but I would like to know more of them from you guys and integrate what I can
This sounds like it should be in #character-discussion
Give the other classes a quick read
Sure thing
Sounds like a Kensei monk with the charger and mobile/speedy feat somehow
I checked it out, it looked like a discussing their own characters with their own lore (I’m just trying to figure out if there’s a class that could be fast)
this is why martials needs to be buffed, you can easily do this with SWS, you gotta take potentially 2 feats or a subclass to do this 😭
If it’s character related and not homebrewing, it usually goes there. Including mechanics
Sure thing
What?
Care to explain pleasE?
What are you confused about?
Martials need buffs?
Example subject, Fighter.
Yes absolutely
How would do it? More extra attacks, stats?
Wotc did martials dirty, kind of a let down in 2024 they didn't do anymore
Martials vs spellcasters debate 
I know this again?? What an original topic
na, i dont think it will go for that side
Maybe gap closing abilities is what we need for martials
Maybe it go for a "give one more Stats up to some martial classes" and that it is.
Wont deny 1/2more speed
From 40 to 60
I love women
There's a few ways to have a fast swords character. A Ranger with Zephyr Strike even has a way to represent acceleration causing more damage.
Me too, they have +5 persuasion if they speak me nice
Can we stay on the topic of D&D, please?
I just use the eye of truth, to detect how evil they are.
A bard with swords and haste
A rogue with misty step
Sorry, my Autism got in the way
But yeah, X upgrade of speed or making dext affect more the speed would be nice
I don't really understand, but please don't explain.
Honestly I'd say you need a rework of the martial core class abilities to keep in line with spellcasters
I'd say A5e and Laserllama's alternate classes were game-changers for me
I love multiclassing, idc if it sucks I love it
Its great
im thinking of doing that but it would sacrifice some really powerful upgrades like reaching closer to the 3 attacks per turn
It’s great if you know what you’re doing, imo
Just that the worst builds also come from multiclassing
Monk warlock rogue 
dies a lil inside
Kind of how like battlemaster manuevers were meant to be for the fighter's core class but they made it a subclass because they wanted to make a beginner easy class
Upgrade some numbers maybe? make some martial weapons better
Pfft screw synergy!
Tbh as long as the ability scores aren’t atrocious I won’t hate on it
In custom campaigns, multiclassing becomes much easier thankfully
Then again why not use the custom classes?
Cuz that’s not synergy, it’s just not being a detriment
read one time about gestalt campaigns, sound funny
Rarely are "balanced" or have useless things.
You would need a whole team of people behind balancing it properly
Ah fair, I mainly go monk and warlock, it's managable
That's one weird combo
True
Dont do it on Tier 1 tho
Obviously, I would be making my life hell at the start
Making that any martial can use maneuvers but if you are battle master you can do them with a lot of ADV and even effects?
I have an evil boss idea
Would need being able to use a the whole set of martial weapons or make it a feature that some classes get it
V1, if you're not faster than him then he takes no damage from any attacks, fire and ice effects speed him up 
Sure, but you're still not addressing the root problem on why spellcasters by default are just better then martials in every way.
I'm not going to get into it because it's past midnight already. You should look up the famous martial vs spellcasters debate on your own time.
He deals more damage for each living party member 
Including summons
V1, use 2 of his 6 weapons per turn, 2 attacks and lots of AC but low HP. Heal damage dealt and can use legendary resistance but make him stay quiet for 1 turn (0speed)
If hes first in the initiative, he gets bugbear's extra damage but times two
He gets an additional action per turn depending on his speed, up to a maximum of 5 actions
Oh dont worry, im aware of such debate because i saw it here and had it with myself sometimes.
I think of it like
Casters = Area of damage//heals//buffs
Martials = Duelist
Custom campaigns are so hilarious, everything is so overtuned to make the fights actually fair
Replace 5e martials with the ones in Exalted or Pathfinder 2e
Gets a legendary attack that is the railcannon every X turns, in theory, 3 turns.
Can make combinations with weapons, being aware of his rotations would be the key
idk how are those there. But its just something that must be seen properly and im tired for it
When defeated, he drops a coin pouch, arsenal wings, and a camerahead
Free flight?
The coin pouch is okey, after X time you get X number of coins for free.
Wings could work like in the game, a bag of holding.
Idk, make that it give you a chest armor that let you heal part of the damage dealt to enemies (1/5 of the damage)
Camerahead will be useful for an upcoming boss, freddy fazbear
Or make a campaign that in some point your party get TPK and then by the gods fun they give you the chance of escape hell.
Reverse dantes inferno
What's your favorite kind of custom campaign?
You mean Freddy Frickboy?
idk, im giga new. I will try someday Dm a darkest dungeon campaign
I love ones that heavily overtunes everything to make things more chaotic
Imagine a campaign where Dante and Vergil appears as a crossover
But in general, i will try to give some freedom in actions to the players, if they are willing to experiment too
Oh monk can hit enemies 12 times? Oh enemies have four turns
Anything is possible since people can screw around in custom campaigns
Curse of Strahd featuring Richter from the Castlevania series with Knuckles
I always ask if I can add Miku everytime
Miku is just a really op Bard
18th level Bard
Bard Miku carries 🗣️
too overtuned lead into too much chaos
i would like one more calm, easy to follow up and kind. It will have his harsh moments but that will give the players a sensation of danger and success
Yeah, I want it to build up, so people can understand the new mechanics and adjust to the increase of chaos
Chaotic Tier 4s sound fun
So the powercreep doesn't feel so sudden
No matter what campaign, I always ask "Can I recruit Bard Miku?"
I just really want Miku in every campaign I'm in
Random character idea; Asian Bard
This Bard was forced to become the best, so their stats are extremely high
Isnt random, can use Asian instruments and stuff. Be more about persuasion instead of flirting and that it is.
but if it fail it get into a mental crisis and is stunned one turn
They permanently have 1 level of exhaustion cuz of dealing expectations and overworking
The drawback is they will use any class other than bard, so you have to use skills that benefits from bard related stats
Creativity does the stupidest things
Thats why I love playing worldbox god simulator
each dice lower than half give half level of exhaustion extra. Example, a d20 and it get a 10, boom, half ext
They also start losing the drawbacks once they start switching careers lmao
Until they find a class that is what they really want so there is no more drawback
Hello guys
Freddy Fazbear bard
Wait a minute... Freddy Fazbard
are there any campaigns or westmarches where paid content is already the GM's thing and you just have to download it?
I think that was a thing back when I played DnD
cause I think if not I'm forced to pretty much pay for an unnecessary amount of books when I just want a part of the pie
Most sources tend to allow a DM to share their content, though it also usually requires some form of subscription on the DMs part
Is there anything specifically stopping me from using my familiar to just assassinate people?
Because chill touch is a touch cantrip, I can just… do it
If someone is asleep I can auto-crit them with chill touch, dealing 2d10 necrotic damage to start, at only 5th level that’s 4d10 necrotic damage upon someone who is next to defenseless
If I wanted to be even more evil I could bestow curse, and deal an extra 2d8 necrotic damage on top of that
Correct, but why 😂
In a more covert campaign with less than lawful characters, it’s a really easy tactic to assassinate someone
5 damage
Have your familiar be something like a spider so it is incredibly stealthy and can hide essentially anywhere
Yeah, a very low CR creature can die
I’m talking about people twin
looks doable
targets you wanna assassinate are most likely not going to be CR0 nobodies though
Even if you low roll damage, just have the spider hide and there is literally no trace back to you
If you don’t hit, they don’t wake up
Imp/Quasit for invisivility
me making the imp familiar fill the room with kerosine
People are creatures.
yeah just assemble a bomb inside the room, advantage on stealth due to invisibility
see how many times you can fill the room with oil before exploding it
Can imps be familiars?
takes 1 level in warlock
With warlock pact of the chain, yes
Ah
I’m thinking an arcane trickster rogue who’s using mage-hand legerdmain to pickpocket, and maybe even reverse-pickpocketing.
Reverse pickpocket your spider familiar into their pocket
and then explode
Cast delayed blast fireball through your familliar
circle magic
Dear god
Honestly like the best use of familiars is healing in 2024, cure wounds is so good that giving the tank your familiar and just casting cure wounds when needed is a great strategy, or if your familiar has a better initiative than you you can move it across the battlefield to heal teammates better
dies to one aoe
familiars are best used outside of combat as the pet they are imo
I mean yeah, but worst case scenario summon it again
it costs 1 minute I think, unless warlock
If you ritual cast it it takes an hour, if you use the spell slot it takes an action
So, I'm a big fan of guest players, just in general. I have a lot of fun with that. Have you guys ever considered a guest DM? Someone new coming in and shaking things up, maybe for a quest? I've been DMing for 11 years and have just never considered this
no, casting time is 1 hour, ritual for 10 minutes. just checked
I like giving familiars the magic items nobody is using. Especially those that require attunement.
10 minutes plus casting time
70 min
only people I trust
DMing and just overseeing them be in a random table is a commitment
as a player it's easier to reign your expectations ans do what everyone else is doing, as a DM if your players aren't vibing for the session, they are not going to like the rest. unless this is a oneshot
I don’t really like the idea of something being around for the sake of it, which is why I think familiars need to be heavily roleplay or combat utility oriented
having a pet is a big deal to your character though
What’s the purpose of learning a spell to summon a magical manifestation of your will, only to have it sit at your leg and purr
to do stuff with?
A familiar is, by design, an extension of the caster, not an entity in it of itself
try to hand an npc your familiar, see how they react
I'm not saying they have no value, I'm just saying that one aoe kills them
so don't put them in combat unless it's for alert feat
Smart positioning can get around it
you were trying to use your familiar for ranged healing
yeah
and it dies in 1 hit or one aoe, too fragile to build around
but I guess it can buy you like 2 rounds on the backline
Potentially have it flying in the air, swooping down to heal if need be, but most of the time being comfortably out of the blast of an AOE
oh that's fun
And if it’s flying ranged attacks have disadvantage
no?
owl can be used in combat for help action or the touch mechanic. 60ft movement, fly and flyby
Is it invisible or did it take the Dodge Action?
And imp/quasit too (invisible)
owl has flyby which means they don't trigger attack of opportunity
Those are all well and good. But neither invisibility nor flyby protect from a fireball.
that's what I'm saying
Or a cone of cold for that matter.
That’s why the 60 ft of movement is important
Owl can just fly away in his turn
Use 30 to get in, use 30 to get out
In fact fireball has become one of the main tricks I use to deal with hiding and invisible creatures. I don't need to know where they are if I just blast their general direction
Also another thing you should know: Flying creatures are forced to land during strong winds.
It will not often be relevant but it is good to take into account
So you’d rather cast a high level spell to guarantee a flying 2d8 healing bird dies than to actually attack your enemies
sometimes it just feels like when the build is surrounded around a summon, it's like you're trying to abuse it and you expect a certain outcome from it you know?
I don't really like summon builds for this reason
The build isn’t circled around it
Considering that this high level spell will hit more than the bird, yes.
yes
The problem is that if there is a flying healing bot going around, none of my enemies will stay down. I need to guarantee that when someone is down, they will stay down.
There’s better healing summons anyway, but a wizard can take magic initiate cleric to get cure wounds and become a decent healer from range in a pinch
you can try
Of course it is a good tactic in a pinch
I personally didn't see it that way, but I would be lying if I said I haven't made a wall before that consists of four zombies and two eagles
It is very funny seeing the enemy break fast my makeshift wall
But ideally, you should not be using healing spells and abilities in combat at all
?????
ideally you heal when the combat is over, as a wizard
Yeah, if you’re in very low danger combat
Did you not know that? It's one of the basics of D&D tactics. If you are using heals in combat, it's only because someone is downed.
That is most likely the only situation where using your action or bonus action for healing is not worthless
You do know that while downed, someone loses their turn, right?
Like their whole turn is just gone
bonus action to use a potion?
Yes. So what?
bonus action to tell the familiar to chug the potion onto the downed
This is indeed why you should use your healing when someone is downed. But not in other circumstances
Yeah healing word only exists as a ranged revive to help someone from being downed
Healing almost can never keep up with damage, the whole party should be trying not to get downed.
anyhow, it's not really broken. you're using a spell slot for that, but that spell slot might have been better saved for somethung else
Outside of healbot builds, which aren't really that good anyways, healing ain't it
But a fight that goes well is a fight where nobody was at 0. And therefore no healing was used
If you’ve multiple people low you’re well better off using healing to ensure the party can still deal damage on their turns than just saying “I’m going to use my action to uhh maybe hit this guy in front of me”
if you're a wizard, you're the damage dealer with your spell slot you're going to use for that cure wounds
No. Healing does not keep up with damage. Whatever you're healing, it will be less than will be dealt and the person who was low will likely go down anyways.
i discovered this very quickly
I'd still just attack or simply use crowd control to disable the enemy instead and stop them from punching our team
also like, why go through all this? just pick healing word
Focusing on eliminating the threat in that situation is a more important priority.
If your team is this wounded, just short rest after the fight
You most likely aren't going to be teamwiped, and if you are no amount of healing in a turn could have saved you in that situation anyways
having healing as backup is good tho
If there is an “after the fight”, you all talk as if your combat has 0 threat whatsoever
That's the trick. Don't heal people that are low when in combat. Heal the ones who are down. Or kill the ones who risk making them go down.
generally you will be alive after most combat yes
If this is a fight going so disastrously that defeat is inevitable, do not heal. Retreat.
Drop Darkness on your allies so they can retreat without OA.
2d4 is five hit points. If someone was low enough that they might go down, they will still be low enough that they might go down after those five hit points.
best used when they're actually down
Quoting myself:
"... and if you are (in a pinch) no amount of healing in a turn could have saved you in that situation anyways"
it's likely that the familiar dies before anyone goes down too, from my experience
What about mass healing spells?
Mass healing word doesn't heal that much iirc
at the tier you get them it doesn't do that much
Like +10 hp per person is good enough to save you from being burned to death I guess
If you truly want something that prevents people from being down there's death ward.
isn't shield a touch spell?
At the mid to high level, I try to make sure the party gets death warded.
Honestly for a mass healing spell you’re better off taking aid over mass healing word
What? No, it only affects the caster
Unless I am misunderstanding the question
dang
It states when you are hit
Its a Self spell
Who, realistically, would you want to cast shield on, other than yourself?
Mage Armor, on the other hand, is touch ranged and can be cast on other people.
That is true
A fellow PC concentrating on an important spell.
having a familiar be an extension for the first few rounds of battle is a good idea though, just expect them to keep dying and you need to spend an hour each time, and also don't expect them to do anything game breaking
I got into a few fights where everything depended on our ability to keep concentration on a single spell.
if you put a magic item on them, as a DM I will curse the magic item
I don’t think familiars should be able to have magic items twin
Can they even attune to them?
I think they should. They are creatures, creatures can use and attune to magic items.
Remove Curse
dang
I have no issue with familiars attuning to magic items
The dm says Nuh uh
find steed not being a spell is probably because of this though
Just make it so that the magic item becomes abit worse without the curse
you can make your horse cast find steed with a ring of spellstoring
infinite horses
Finally, horse ladder
Spirits are creatures
a billion lions vs vecna? more likely than you think
Actually no. Horses can't equip a ring of spellstoring
A billion lions is a lot of lions
Vecna.
no but like a billion is a lot though
Wait doesn’t remove curse say that the cursed item keeps the curse it’s just the individual isn’t cursed anymore
His statblock unironically loses to the lions cuz of how weak it is in comparison to other CR 20+ monsters
So what? A few of them get into melee range turn one, deal their attacks, some even manage to miraculously hit, turn 1 ends with Vecna still alive, Vecna casts fly, blasts the lions from altitude.
Actually
It takes him a long time, but they're all dead
Oh yea true
Lions can’t deal damage to Vecna
Find Steed is a spell, though?
Oh wait, no, he doesn't even take damage.
But even without his immunity, he would still win
I forgot he can cast Fly but if he's in an enclosed space like a dungeon, the lions will eventually get him (cant fly forever)
Eh, I think in the time it would take Vecna to kill all the lions there would be more lions
Oh dammit, i forgot about his immunities
Oh yeah, doesn’t fly have a time limit
Dimension door. Invisibility. Globe of invulnerability. He leaves the enclosed space and blasts them from altitude
Concentration, 10 minutes
Vecna dies by continually casting fly and plummeting to the ground over and over and dying to fall damage
no way, it still works?
That is 26 billion HP from the lions
Re:Healing -- The only healing spell that is worth casting is Heal, a level 6 spell
Cuz the health healed can actually outheal most damage taken from a single source in a turn
Vs the 272 hp from Vecna
lion ladder
I mean if its an enclosed space to begin with, it'd just be a successful escape
So what? He's immune to all the damage they can do.
suffocating damage
Tbh at that point I’d rather cast a high damaging spell
Yea true
Lion ladder
Yes a successful escape followed by the death of those lions, a successful murder
Doesn't need to breathe
dang, I think the lions are losing this one
Of course they are, it's not even close
Also, very important
Vecna wouldn’t gain any abilities back at the start of a new day
Because constant lion
wait no, the "lion" in this scenario is the find steed summon right?
Doesn’t he also just come back after a bit when he dies?
It doesn't matter. He casts lightning bolt at will. He can keep doing this all day. All week. All month.
Is it just me, or do flails seems a little underwhelming?
I’m just using the lion statblock
One lightning bolt every round for years. Killing multiple lions every time.
a billion is a lot though

Undead warlocks have a point where they no longer require food water or air
Pretty sure 6th level
What works? Infinite steeds? If you cast the spell again the first steed disappears.
It could be an infinity of lions and it would not make a difference.
Why is everything immune to physical damage from nonmagical sources
Cause then they wouldn’t feel like boss monsters
Didn't that go away with 2024?