#dnd-discussion
1 messages · Page 14 of 1
Depends on the definition of short
4 for some. 30 for others.
I think a homebrew rule for this campaign is getting a feat to start off with, then another every third level
I'd only grab Gunner once you actually have a musket for the record
You can make do with stuff like Piercer in the meantime which also buffs musket damage anyways
Me and my friends want to try dnd with our making a huge commitment see we it can be very time consuming, so we were thinking try to have a large part of the campaign over winter break so that’s why I was asking
Hence why it will probably be at level 6 or 9. Sharpshooter is already chosen, then Piercer will be for even better damage. After that, things like Gunner, Chromatic, and Lucky will probably be chosen in order of importance
Link a few one-shots together and stop when you like. Instant campaign.
From what ik one shots take like 1-5 sessions usually right?
They're supposed to take one session, but yeah, they usually resolve in a handful.
One shots take one session, hence the name
Thanks, also how many people is good for a campaign?
I would say 4-5 players, 1 DM. More or less can get trickier.
Usually 4 is good, but yoy can always do fewer and substitute with DMPCs or more people
But yes. Usually, 4 Players and a DM is best to start off
Thanks
Almost forgot to ask: what is the Ranger perk that allows you to get an opportunity attack when someone enters your weapon range?
That's not a Ranger thing, that's a Feat. I think Sentinel.
I was wrong, it's Polearm Master.
I remember there being something for Ranger, though...
I knew Polearm Mastery was one of them, but I could have sworn a projectile equivalent existed
Oh yeah also can someone explain what exactly are skill slots
You mean feats? Or something else?
Idk I think they’re connected but I’m not sure
A projectile version? Nope, not that I've heard and that would be super powerful.
"Skill slots" are not a thing in D&D 5E.
Do you mean "Spell slots?"
Yeee that
If a character was cursed with the midas touch, could they use the fabricate spell to just constantly make items out of gold?
Here's the chapter of the rules on spells: https://www.dndbeyond.com/sources/dnd/br-2024/spells
Thanks
There is a Ranger spell, Cordon of Arrows, that kinda does this.
Think of it like this. Each class has a variety of spells available to them, called Known Spells (Not every magic user can cast every spell. For example, holy spells are usually cast by people who focus around divinity like Clerics and Paladins)
Spell slots are how many you can actually take with you and use, called Prepared Spells
As for how spells replenish, I believe it focuses around Short and Long rest. Not sure about replenishing them, but you need to finish a Long Rest to change which spells you have prepared
Is it a Short Rest that refills all your spells?
only a warlock
For everyone else, a Long Rest?
yea
yea cause even by level 20 Warlocks only get like 5 spell slots, right?
Not just that, they also cast much stronger spells
To trade off for their low slot count, they not only recover them all after a short rest, they also will always cast at the highest possible level
yea, Warlocks don't have a lot, but all of their spells are stronger and have decent upcasts, on top of like 4 Invocations that let them cast things for free
For example, if 7th level spells are your current maximum, then casting Eldritch Blast will be at the 7th level (if you so choose)
Yeah. If the wizard is your versatile rifle with figurative mags to spare, then warlocks are a sniper rifle that won't hesitate to make every shot count
yea they have four spell slots even at level 20, five if you count Magical Cunning, and six if you also count Mystic Arcanum
oh hold on Magical Cunning is actually a lot of math in 2024 hold on
1 level of fighter goes so far on a ranger
you regain expended Pact Magic spell slots but no more than a number equal to half your maximum (round up). Once you use this feature, you can’t do so again until you finish a Long Rest
But at that rate, you can have a wizard or Cleric focus on smaller spells for utility while you could load up on high level spells for damage, as you aren't limited by spell slots
How so?
If you are going for 1 level of fighter you might as well go for 2 levels and grab action surge
so like, if any way of casting a Warlock spell is counted you get 7 max (4 + 2MC + 1MA)
Don't you eventually get multiple attacks as a Ranger?
Additional fighting style, more weapon options, con save proficiency and heavy armour in case
Only 1 extra attack at 5. Also the ranger capstone is not real
Capstone?
yes, level 5
Level 20 ability
doesn't everyone only get up to one additional attack?
except Action Surge
Fighters get more
They get 4
wait they get more attacks per action??
I thought barbarians got more too
they can execute four attacks per action????????
Yup. Their capstone is literally one
Very balanced ik
that's a lot of dice
At the same time wizards be stopping time and casting meteor swarm
my cat keeps meowing at me and I don't know why
He's warning you
That's not how that spell works.
Cantrips scale with character level
Eldritch blast has zero interaction with spell levels
Oh. Sorry, I'm not the most knowledgeable yet
yea eldritch blast is a cantrip lmao i didn't even read that message
@humble cairn what do you think about going 1 level into fighter as shellilaugh ranger to get both defensive and dueling
Not a bad dip.
Wouldn't you want to get 2 levels for Action Surge?
Not always
Alrighty thanks!
You'd loose epic boon and some spell slots
when do Fighters get Second Wind?
1st
the self heal is also some good util
yea just stick with a 1 level dip then
How many spells slots? And what's Epic Boon?
Action surge is only 1 use per short rest, and in 2024 you can’t use it to use the Magic action unfortunately
Mb, you don't lose a spell slot, only the epic boon feat which is like a feat but way stronger
wait actually, could an EK Fighter burn all of their Extra Attacks on cantrips or is it only once per turn?
Still can do stuff like more attacks, help action, using magic items and stuff
Once per turn iirc
It’s still not as impactful as delaying extra attacks and/or higher level spells
This is kind of tactical mind and action surge or epic boon feat
If you’re taking a character to 20 a boon will be more widely useful imo since you will definitely be having more and more powerful encounters by then
Alrighty, then 1 level dip it is
Both are wrong. It's once per Attack Action.
oh okei
Is 4d10 per round damage without an attack roll or saving throw good at level 20?
most warlocks are shooting four 1d10+5 beams of force a turn at level 20 so ig it depends on how valuable you find not having to attack / force a saving throw.
Btw this costs a ba to activate and requires concentration but is additional damage from your attacks that you just do to another target
Hi. New. North Texas. Used to play but haven't in a long time. HOpe you're all well here.
Thanks, you too. This game is a blast
It sure used to be when I was around 15-18. I'd like to get back into it as an adult after a break. In person games vastly preferable
I'd change the entire ranger class so it wouldn't need to rely on it
Thing is good ranger builds don't even really use it
Your best bet is to look locally: hobby shops and game stores, libraries and the like. Facebook groups might help there too.
So it's more like it's just kinda there as a just in case option that takes up a bit too many character traits
HI
Hello
They already don’t
Last time I played dnd was almost 5 years ago when I was a kid so I don't remember anything at all
But I remember it being super fun
If you'd like to recall how to play it Ginny Di has a great play list
Ginny Di?
She's a youtuber
Oh okay awesome thank you
She has a whole playlist for newbies: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsmjZYZs1ps05jkN5u6yJ9j6G_8JLut6Z
Ginny Di is the best <3
It's especially great for role-playing and character personality building advice
thanks @still plover , that is what the other agents said as well
i gots matrix jokes ;). but srslsly
ask him if he's ever slapped chris rock or neo. that should narrow it down
but seriously, that is good advice, thank you @still plover . I have some lists that were put together for me because am in a metroplex rather than town or city, so the options are uh, diverse
Ironic considering the amount of races in the game lol
most of the sites are libraries, comic shops, universities. some bars.
what?
lmfao
You can prove nothing.
-.-
my friend once trolled me with like 1000 bots pretending to be people, Mr Smith.
Rough!
sometimes boys like to wrestle
So what kind of game are you looking forward to, Collabro? Dungeon delving, hexcrawl, narrative heavy, something else?
Tsk tsk tsk /j
Am I weird for saying 2024 ranger isn’t bad and they don’t have to use hunters mark all the time
probably narrative heavy. i like linguistics, and like stories and art that are created on the shared canvas. so. i like sharing canvas. ttrpg is canvas with the right people. 'crawling' tends to bog down into focus on rules and 'winning' instead of the story. the story is primary for me.
I just realized, the Artificer changes prevent the use of Arcane Lock and Continual Flame with Spell Storing Item now
Not weird. I am with you there
No. Rangers were even fine in 2014 but I think people's expectations didn't always align with how they mechanically played.
They called me a madwoman. I was there with Ranger from the start
I'm so confused how people think TCE Ranger is significantly better than the 2024 Ranger, Favored Foe also used concentration but for worse damage and being unable to swap targets
My kids love playing rangers - nice bag of skills for exploration, can do melee and range well, and with some nice spell casting tools as well.
I also just love being half magic half BONK
Yeah, and 2024 get free cast of hunters mark that get higher over time, and all the other features make you pretty great for combat and roleplay
I don't mind the short-haul crawl, but there is a sense of achievement in seeing your character and their relationships grow over time.
Honestly ranger 2024 is actually great the more I think about
Welcome to the ranger club
Guess people are just hung up on hunters mark
There are only 3 episodes so far, but Mighty Nein is good. critical role.
Ranger's capstone requiring the use of concentration was also a problem with TCE Ranger, only 2014 PHB Ranger didn't have that issue
I like warlock, because they have a complete magic bonk, with pact weapon
it would be cool if hunter's mark didn't exist. and if hexblade was a martial class like it used to be.
I do wonder how to describe psychic damage from being whacked on the knee
I don't mind a short crawl either, Smith, but 'crawl' does not always lend to story. So if I am to crawl, I like it to have underlying story elements and make sense in the larger context. We are contextual beings, after all, Smitty.
ranger is fine in 2024 it's just really limited by hunter's mark being it's main thing
What race has wings?
I'd guess aasimar does. Dragonborn has them for like, 10 minutes per day
imagine Hexblade as a Paladin subclass
For sure! There's nothing quite like going out and upsetting a status quo and having to deal with the consequences.
So a aasimar paladin would be a arch Angels?
No, but they could pretend.
I think the original non-warlock feel suits fighter subclass better
Samael
I personally think Hexblade's flavor of the patron being this weird shadowy entity could merge well with the Oathbreaker serving dark and evil powers
The accuser, seducer and destroyer, eh? Heavy. Or are you just lifting the name for the sound of it?
I mean hexblade never used to have a patron to begin with
Wha
it only became one when they completely changed the flavor
I ain't Christian all I know is the angel types and nanes
Always Google your names.
originally hexblades were debuff-focused martials with a little casting
Where csn i go to talk about something amazing my DM let me do?
Samael in Hebrew means "God's venom". It has certain villainous connotations
Something as a DM i will be implementing from here on out
If it's a story from a game we do have #tales-from-the-table
Ohhh
Yeah cuz that's lucifer
and David in hebrew means "beloved" but most people don't pick names based on a translation or original meaning
Might have clicked "answer" to the wrong message here
... I do. Am I weird?
You'd tell me if I was weird right?
Well, no. Not exactly. There is a complex history to that name and its connotations and history. Can't get into it, it's a religious subject. And a contentious one at that.
Okay, I guess this goes here. What decides good and evil in D&D? Everyone can't agree on what is good or evil. It's rare for even two people to mostly if not completely agree.
no. I'm only saying that most people don't.
I personally think it's hilarious when someone makes a fire mage named aidan or agni like their parents somehow predicted that they would be fire guys
The DM.
Mic drop!
I'm sure the rules have some guidance regarding alignment, if you need an opinion.
Hello from France.
I don't know if it's the right channel to ask, but is there some informations for a translations to French for Forgotten Realms - Adventures in Faerûn ?
I live
I'm pretty everyone can agree on what's good or evil on most things, absent those with sociopathical tendencies.
pillaging cities: good
harming goblins: evil
And that's not even bringing up how everyone has differing perspectives on things, or how ending a life is largely regarded as evil, but ending suffering is seen as good, so where would the "quality of your life" line be in regards to if letting your life end so your suffering ends would be good or evil? (Examples being end of life care, DNRs, ect)
it honestly depends a lot on the narrative pitch, since a lot of deadly conflicts in the dndverse has both sides being able to reasonably claim that the other side is evil
Found the hobgoblin
If an alien entity that was capable of things you couldn't imagine, or could bring you eternal happiness at the cost of your death, came across you, would it be good or evil for it to end what it perceives as your suffering? Not all of the creatures in D&D are humanoid, let alone human.
Yes. For now...
Does it ask for people's consent before doing that?
You can certainly try
That is the ethical metric
also, hows our favorite- strangled
Oh, Ti had an accident I had nothing to do with.
I had a idea where the first couple sessions they were a seraphim (just extra wings no extra powers aka flavor)
Appears he fell on his kitchen knife six times and accidentally strangled himself with his own belt. Clumsy Ti!
for example, at my table, it could be argued that, despite saving 3 cities, we're a criminal group who did wrongdoings in our latest combat
we killed a mercenary in a horrifying fashion when trying to interrogate him, then ended up being attacked by the rest of the group, who was concerned with the dude they sent to spy on us. The mercenaries were working for a pretty evil dude, but were mostly clueless, and doing so for the paycheck, but we knew better than they did and assumed worse. It's pretty tricky to pinpoint who's flat out good or evil, here
And then they start slipping up making mistakes and start sinning and then they turn in to a fallen angel and there 🙂
Would you ask for the consent of someone you believe needs urgent help, but isn't self aware enough to know that? Hospitals put people in 72 hour holds, people sign up others for rehab, but these people don't nessicarily consent to those things. Are those people evil for doing those things?
correction, it was a chain... from a de- screaming
You tortured someone. That's evil in my book, but what do you care?
People do not know their own alignment. They can't look at their character sheet
"Game of heroic fantasy roleplaying," he muttered.
Technically "heroic" in heroic fantasy does not refer to morality
isn't it funny that dead by daylight is just ravenloft
It's heroic in the sense that it is centered on the actions if exceptional individuals.
it was a mix of a painful accident + the group being trigger happy and in a tense situation
Seriously, is someone who seeks help on behalf of a loved one evil?
After all, there was no consent
Depends on the help and how it's administered
it can depend on how they seek help in my book
Hello
If you decide that life is a disease and death the cure, you are "helping" people by committing omnicide to destroy all life in the universe
like for example thanos thought he was helping the universe by snapping half of it away, he had a noble intention but was hellbent on the wrong solution
Someone too mentally ill to take caree of themselves. Is someone putting them somewhere to try and help them evil?
But why think so much about morality? Whether objective morality exists or not changes nothing. People are subjective beings, they are the ones who decide what is good and evil
Everyone decides for themselves what they consider moral. And then they fight for it. That's how it works. The strong get to decide at the end
Are we sure that's not an overgenerous interpretation?
I am not a fiend by the way. I don't know if you heard that.
That's kind of my point? An angel killing people so they go to heaven would be what? Good? Evil? No one can say objectively which. After all, they are going to go to heaven.
depends. what do you call a mental illness? what do you call taking care of yourself?
sorry WHAT
Angels are extensions of their god's will, theyre not really moral themselves
why did a dadgum chain devil walk into your room
Ask Incubus
i say this because there are genuine historical parallels of something being called a "mental illness" that gets people sent somewhere and that somewhere does immense and irreversible harm to their psyche
struggles not to bring up degree in literature
Okay SO ! Heroic originally is not a matter of morality. Heracles can kill and pillage, that doesn't change the fact that he is a hero, even when committing horrific actions that are considered immoral by the narrative. He is a hero because he is a son of Zeus imbued with inhuman strength, passion, skill and wit.
A villain is also a hero.
why did you send a chain devil into the one's room
Doesn't have a fly speed?
evil CAN be without intention, people can be evil on accident and people can be evil on purpose
It was me, I was the chain devil
I thought it'd be funny to walk into his Kitchen and scare him
No proof. Unsupported allegations. I have no chain devils among my close friends.
Oh, I'm very aware of that, which is kind of why I lie whenever talking to a mental health "professional" that isn't aware of my history.
Riiiiight...
Fiend.
i cast... greater polycule
I know you have a shark lawyer. Lemme speak to them
MOTH
I have the Urge to go full Bonk and play a Berserker Barbarian in Nealens campaign and just do a Morbillion damage
dnd people i need answers, what's the rarest playable race
dew eat, just hope you get good statrolls
I'm not rolling this time
good, dont make the mistake i did
rarest as in the least frequently covered and less seen
Why the hell do you think Jabal is dead? Huh?!
cuz you were being a chad to save our arses
official or homebrew?
If I am the DM? Evil. Violates their bodily autonomy and even worse is a waste of energy since they were eventually going to die. That angel wasted time accelerating the inevitable when he could have been doing productive things.
official
Like yeah, sure, you, someone who doesn't know anything about me is gonna determine if I'm okay? That's totally not stupid, and of course I'm not lying through my teeth that what happened will never ever happen again just so I don't end up having you make my life hell unintentionally through your stupidity.
Jabal truly was a Star Man...
With this said, how come you think enchantment isnt the most evil school of magic
from what i know Plasmoids, not a lick of lore, just lil slime molds
Congratulations Ti! You have birthed a new creature: star trolls.
These brutes have rocky skin imbued with meteoric metals, their favoured snack. This renders them both fireproof and immune to crits.
I hope you're happy!
yeah I've never ever seen an NPC plasmoid
speaking of NPCs who would you guys argue is the most infamous in-lore dnd character?
I am indeed happy, using this in my star struck red dragon's lair
Volo
Tasha
Because burning people alive violates their bodily autonomy more than temporarily putting them under control
Plasmoids are actually...
Amoeba people and not just slimes 🧐
Wrong discord?
amoeple :D
So, effectively slimes
thats something you ask a lawyer, and not random people on a DnD server
I throw a giant snake in your general direction
I would say that people like xanathar, strahd, vecna maybe, bhaal, asmodeus, zariel and a few others are pretty infamous too
Yeah but Tasha has her name on one of the most popular books
It's me
The Rules Lawyer /j
D:
xanathar, vecna, strahd and zariel are also on some of the most popular books
being XGTE, vecna eye of ruin, curse of strahd and baldur's gate descent into avernus
i really wanna play a plasmoid monk, that seems really fun
XGTE is a lot less popular than Tasha’s, though
Yall not mentioning Mordenkainen whose in two three books in 5e? really?
I'm gonna make a custom city and have the ruler be a really fat plasmoid crime boss
Was his name on the title
Three times yes
He's not really an Antagonistic figure though
oh yeah him too
Mordenkainen's:
- Fiendish Folio
- Tome of Foes
- Monsters of the Multiverse
Vecna, followed by Orcus, followed by Bhaal.
ehh 50/50, strahd is probably the most infamous dnd character irl
i had a build once, Eldritch Adept: Armor of Shadows on a Plasmoid Monk, so you could cast Mage Armor on you and keep a pretty good AC while traversing impossibly small spaces
Sort of a… slime boss?
indeed
the question was infamous though, no?
What about Lolth and Tiamat? Smh
(I'm not vouching, I'm just surprised they weren't brought up)
Strahd has a disadvantage: No mainstream appearances outside of the D&D adventures, a few poorly sold (and often poorly-written) novels.
the ones that reek of Twilight?
he's also got van richten's guide to ravenloft
Dududoodu duuu du duu doo uu mhm hm mmm hm mhmhmhm
not really. Hes mentioned in his section, but hes not the star
he's literally on the main cover 💔 🙏
"She was ripe yet maidenly and gleamed in the moonlight"
Guys, did you know that Vecna: Eve of Ruin is about the Eve of Ruin?
So, even though the angel is helping them in a way they aren't aware of, it's evil because they didn't, couldn't or wouldn't consent because they don't want the help either because they don't think they need it or aren't willing to consider that they might need help?
I threw up a little in my mouth 😔
WHAT
"Snowwy.. i frew up"
I want a ravenloft game so bad icl
"Ripe yet maidenly" is how the main character of the novel Vampire in the mists, Jander Sunstar, perceives the teenager that Strahd sends in his room as a late night snack.
have it NOT be an rpg either have it be a hack and slash or soulsborne game
JANDER?!
He deserved to be stuck in those trees then
Looks at Strahd
Hmmm, he's a vampire..
Let's just make his Novels Twilight.
Looks at the poor sales
Damn, maybe we should've write it like Nosferatu?
in my opinion strahd should be written like dracula from castlevania
nah, the incel does not deserve a redemption
Think about it
Nosferatu and Strahd both give Incel vibes!
To be fair, the novel was trying to do an Interview with the Vampire, with Strahd as the Lestat to Jander's Louis. A corrupting influence who revels in his vampirism while the other hates it.
Castlevanie Drac is just a suffering dad
what's your favorite dnd villain chat
Xanathar or Manshoon now
Wizards of the Coast
Used to be Orcus
Show Castlevania and games have very different Draculas
you aint funny 🥀
be fr cro no cornball answers in here
Mmh... I do like Strahd for how... Loathsome and pathetic he ends up being.
My genuine favorite villain is Baphomet even though I don't think he's got any moduels that feature him as a primary antagonist
I like his Beef (pun intended) with Yenoghu, because all the fight over is the title of Beast King lmao
B-Beef?
I think my favorite dnd villain is probably either vlakkith because she's a bum ass fraud or acererak because he's basically just a ragebaiter
I like sexy Minotaurs.
WHAT
I prefer Pathfinder's Baphomet I admit. Their take on him is magnificient. He was once imprisoned by Asmodeus and stole the prison to turn it into his palace
Few people ever get to humiliate Asmodeus and live
how powerful IS asmodeus?
Note how you're the only person to bat an eye at this remark
Hes a Greater Deity
Immensely. Not necessarily in statblock but he wields greater political power and influence than almost anyone.
Cr 30, like Tiamat and Baphomets aspects
does he own the other archdevils' souls or did I make that up
tbf, his statblock lets him summon any other archdevil
Do Devils have souls? 🤔
He could be CR 1 and he would still be among the most powerful creatures in the multiverse for that political power
Is Asmodeous the most powerful in hell?
extremely corrupted ones but yeah
yeah he's the ruler of all nine hells
Extraplanar have souls; they are the soul. No flesh, their being is the soul
No but it is a feudal system where they have sworn fealty to him
Hey dumb question, is the hells or the abyss more dangerous?
That's crazy..
So I want to seduce Baphomet
uhh depends on the layer
Theyre both dangerous... but I'll say the Abyss
is there a sourcebook on the hells?
The Abyss is basically super hell lmao
Aint that right Incubus? Something something shortcuts?
Devils are more likely to Hear you Out
Demons are throwing hands on sight
Oh, I see. I thought the Abyss is the wild west of hell
devils only hear you out so they can screw you over
... do we have a Wild West Layer? That sounds baller
should I make my own setting chat
All that plays there is the House Building theme from Red dead redemption
It's a dumb comparison, but the abyss just seems like the strong dominate
Yes.
But they're not as kill on sight.
thats very much how it works yeah, only the Strong survive
In the Hells, its beaucracy incarnate
In the Abyss there is no centralized authority. All demons are different, so if you're smart it may be more survivable depending on the layer and how well you can hide
Are there rulers of the abyss?
yes
Demons revel in murder just for the sake of evil, dey messed up in da branes!
chat should I just make my own setting
theres many demon lords, all vying for the title of Demon Prince, which Demogorgon currently holds the title of
The Nine Hells are a mix of theocracy, bureaucracy and militaristic feudalism, utterly totalitarian. But perhaps less immediately deadly
Just for the love of the game
Yup, the Demon Lords!
They all hate eachother though.
You can if you like, but the more you write, the less you'll play. Sketch enough to run around in, and find some players.
Would a beholder survive in the abyss?
I think... I think you can say that the abyss is deadlier but rewards competence and wit more, while the nine hells are less deadly but with no reward.
depends on which layer of the abyss and the beholder
Probably not, Demons hate everything, even fellow demons
I don't know the layers. I'll have to read more.
Devils will talk to you maybe and adhere to any contacts you make with them. Demons of the abyss are wild and won't negotiate at all. If you are weaker than them it's just kill kill kill
I could see a pretty powerful beholder MAYBE being able to pull some strings but never past that
fighting a devil in it's own realm is a surefire way to die
*demon
So do demons go to the hells and devils go to the abyss or not really?
no, devils inhabit the nine hells
The demons often clash with the devils in the first layer of hell, Avernus
they were talking about the Abyss, not the Hells
not often, they're in an eternal conflict known as the blood war
Avernus is a literal battlefield eternally
and this bum ass cambion raphael thought it would be a good place for his palace
hi
What would the consequences be if the demons took over hell?
The destruction of the multiverse.
that's not happening
The end of the Multiverse, probably
End of the world!
That's not the question
the Blood War in a deadlock is the only thing thats stopping the Demons and Devils from taking over the entire multiverse
Wait really?!
eh fair point but there's very little chance it would ever happen
Yeah, Demons seek to destroy ALL Life.
I'm interested in making characters :>
Still not what I asked
but your question is obsolite because there's no chance of it happening
they can still ask...
I saw that, Ti.
no point in questioning something you know isn't going to be a reality
You want #dnd-arts-and-crafts or likely #dnd-advertisements .
Why are you being so hostile, dude?
am I being that hostile?
You are fun at parties.
not everyone knows the lore. Its only reasonable to ask
Kinda, yeah, lol
sorry man I get caught up with this kind of stuff
Whats the likelihood of new erratas or variant options for the 2024 classes like it was on TCE?
Well. . . I guess the idea i had for my PC won't be happening then lol
Not much. Demons would then fight over who gets to exploit it and, instead of the blood war, you'd get a giant demonic war.
No more devil deals, no more pact primeval...
which then spreads
Hello
Interesting, they would just devolve into civil war
sure!
Things COULD happen, what happens in something is dependable on the writers that make it
Thats why when you ask
"Who would win this?" The real answer is whoever the writers want lol
the only reason why they arent winning against the devils is because theyre always in a civil war
Yeah, Demons can't get their shit together, but if they could...
Lordy if they could >~>
So demons are straight up stronger than devils
In numbers and perhaps individual strengths, yes
Devils have high political power
But
Demons gave high physical power
(Devils are still really strong, but the Abyss is quite literally survival of the fittest for a reason)
Well u just said they aren't winning cause of disunity. So, if you got the demons to fight as one group, it's ggs for the world.
You asked if the demons are stronger than devils, i answered
In theory. And they are numberless. But devils compensate with elite training and equipment.
On an individual and number level, yes the demons are stronger.
Interesting, now I understand why my DM said I can't be from the abyss as a lvl 4 character 😂
speaking of the abyss, is lolth the queen of the drow or the goddess of drow
usually a pretty hard ask for most DMs for a character to be from an extradimensional plane that usually isnt the Feywild or Elemental Planes
Both.
Main goddess of the drow pantheon
Well, you could but "ordinary" humans don't survive in the abyss unless they are under the protection of a very powerful demon
ah so she's like what zeus is to greek myth?
kinda? in terms of place in the pantheon
Technically both. The goddess and the only centralized authority, therefore making her the figurative queen in all but title. She does not rule directly
Its a Theocracy
Yeah! Adding onto Incubus' point, you could maybe have made a pact with a demon!
though chances are, that'd be an insanely difficult feat lmao
Not likely. It's already established who are the power players in the Abyss.
what other members are on the drow pantheon
whats the incubus point?
My PC has a demon dad somehow
Demon or Devil?
or Yuggoloth
wait what setting is vecna in again
Originally from Greyhawk. He's a god in some other settings
It is worth noting that the drow gods are still elven gods. Which means they value subtlety and discretion, same as the other gods
No, a demon. He is from the Abyss
Oh, and you call him sometimes?
No, he left
how smart can demons be
oh i didn't mean voluntarily
Summon Greater Demon is quite cool if you are holding the name of his
One character in a game I played was revealed to have a half-demon son. A youthful beautiful mistake with a certain demon lord
Going out to brunch with my Demon Dad (He killed everyone in the damn restaurant)
Oh, I didn't know that's a spell
do you have to still pay child support if you're from another plane
Quite. The average Marilith for example has an 18 intelligence.
Ha, nope, that's just for the mortals
it is quite hillarious, since its one of the 2 summoning spells with failure clause
if you fail the save, demon gets out of control and you can't send him back
Oh shoot 😭. That's dangerous
Summon Greater Demon is for Demons
Infernal Calling is for Devils
Overclock?
so yea, summon up that dad of yours and make him pay alimony
its a 4th level warlock/wizard spell
naturally upcasting yields more powerful fiend
I actually wrote that my demon dad is the cool one lol
aye summon him up and grab a beer while slaughtering cowards
*Summoning requires a vile of humanoid blood killed no further than 24 hours
But what is this for a cost in the face of family bonding
So in combat my BBEG just got stabbed through the spine, wth do I do 😭
Cuz I can't paralyze her, she's my BBEG
have them come back as undead
Demons are in general a lot more diverse than others. For the demon lords, you have Juiblex, who is essentially non-sapient, and then you have Dweirgus who might be among the smartest beings in the multiverse
She's not dead, just kinda paralyzed
Or she should be any way
maybe it was just a clone?
Let her get away and in the next encounter have her be paralyzed from the legs down but supported with 4 giant spider-like prostetics like Dr. Octo Octavius
I see
Family bonding
have her minions arrive in a flock to pit-stop a new spine into her body, cars style
in front of the players, even
Good point
I wouldn't cure her spine, let the players see the impact they left upon BBEG
just compensate for it with prostetics
she could even laugh and say "and they said I've got no spine" to double down on the cheese
her damaged spine, however, gets wrongly discarded and becomes a premium magic drop for the party
There are so many better options than just curing her and reverting the entire thing
let the players leave some impact
Have the BBEG's healer offer the BBEG a choice between standard regeneration spell or a procedure that would leave them in constant pain but with a prosthesis through the spine that would course magic through their body. Then decide what kind of person your BBEG is to decide the answer.
I know, I just wanna write a cheesy comeback
Make it a plot point. Have the PCs find a discarded laboratory where the healer tried a lesser version of the procedure on some poor victims
if I were to work around it, I'd have her summon some sort of boss that'd be her mount, like a gargantuan tarantula or something
or, idk, she hires a special mercenary to enact revenge and the mercenary is bane
If all fails, rip the soul out of her body and let her come back as a Raveger with full mental capabilities
No injury is that severe
Semi-Immortality in the worst way possible
I just think just having them come back cured the next time they see each others is just kind of... meh
Oh! Make the healer obsessed with symbiotic grafting! A procedure that healer has developped where symbiotic organisms are grafted on a person in order to give them greater power. And show the dire consequences of that practice!
... clearly you folks have been busy while I was taking out the trash.
Dragon organs harvested to be implanted in humans. Demon with amputated limbs kept alive. Angels who have been defeathered and kept in chains to have those wings sawn into someone's skin. Or turned into nails to pierce their muscles and give them angelic strength
don't think thats how this spell works
isn't it better to just use reincarnation, then
True Ressurection can revive any willing creature that died within 200 years
Quit reading my Hellraiser fanfic, you.
A dragon's decapitated head replacing someone's arm to breathe fire !
it's a much cheaper spell and can cause the consequence of the BBEG being unrecognizable
Surgically grafting 8 other souls onto her soul so she can bargain with the devil to return her to life
wait thats what happend in TF2 comics...
Wait, you were PinheadLover666?
Damn, it's an honour.
damn
Lawnmower
(For the young ones among you: Hellraiser is a horror franchise centered around body horror. The cenobites are a religious order of more or less demons that practice ceremonial mutilation, on themselves and others. Not for the faints of heart, but the first movie is rather beautiful. The rest are generally trash)
"that time the druid botched my reincarnation, turning me into a chimera"
She is paralyzed not dead
but she'd die and reincarnate to avoid remaining paralyzed
i still think she should stay Paralyzed and just compensate with magical items and prostetic
its cooler this way since players left a mark on the enemy
She could shave her head and start a school for superhumans
Full Metal Alchemist PTSD
thats not what isekai means....
What happens to a elemental when it dies?
"that time I tried to reincarnate in another world, but ended up becoming a dragonborn maid instead"
goes back to elemental plane they came from
usually gets sent back the Elemental Plane they originate from
again this is not applicable to the situation
also is this a reference to "Lusty Argonian Maid" from Skyrim?
deciding to die and reincarnate is still within the scope of what she could do to deal with her predicament
Like, as the same elemental?
question, im looking for a one shot game i think its called like a one time game thats starting soon where would i go to find one?
usually yes
But the "in another world" part is not applicable
this is just memeing with the mentions to isekai
first mention of isekai was also non applicable
What outliers are there?
hence the memeing
If for some reason they are prohibited from returning back; usually with powerful binding magic
I guess its pointless to discuss the situation if the interested party just dipped
Again, Spider Limb Prostetics
Nothing is cooler than 4 Giant Spider Legs sprouting from your back
that's horrifying, I like it
Important note if you're going for the prosthetics: Make the prosthetic-maker a character.
I love Giant Spider Legs sprouting from the back
I disagree. 8 giant spider limbs goes harder
that's a free bond
Especially if they are used as poisoned Spears on top of that
she can even use some as a seat, so her legs don't just flail around
Nah, let them flail, its even better like that
Giant insect parts on human body are always so cool
but having two legs cross to form a seat makes her look more elegant
is every campaign 18+
no
Screw Elegance, full on body horror please
Im new to dnd and every campaign says 18+
body horror can be elegant, and having both simultaneously imo makes it more unsettling
this server is only one place to find a game
People don't like playing with children, makes it safer for everyone involved
Could you help me find a group to play with it would be my first time play
Understandable, but i cant ever find a game in dnd
It's hard enough to find a good group as an adult. I can't imagine how it is for you youngsters.
would you know any good oce servers that host games alot?
oce?
Eh, try joining one of the #looking-for-community servers, if you are lucky you will join a West march and they are less picky about their players
That's a free boss fight!
I'd design something not unlike a drukhari haemonculi from 40K.
Im just imagining Ahtal-Ka from Monster Hunter. Small(ish) bug monster that pilots a mech
In the rogue trader RPG, the haemoniculus Tarvantias the Arch-Machinator has a rather interesting boss battle that involves him having split his soul into five different clone bodies.
That and the hordes of the products of his horrific experiments on the way to serve as the minions
A poor man's Fabulous Bill, if you ask me.
Ok, so a ballista would be considered a ranged weapon, right?
Yes. It certainly would not be a melee weapon
If you're asking what I think you are asking: Yes, a monk can catch a ballista bolt and return it to sender
yes OCE timezones or around there
I was gonna say would a rogue be able to use a ballista for sneak attack? It just has to be a light or ranged weapon
That too, yes
Good to know, my party is gonna have to fight an ancient orange dragon at some point soon
Orange dragon?
it's a dragon that's orange
They got rid of them after 3e, but they breath liquid sodium, exploding when it comes into contact with water
They also live in rivers
used to be yellow dragons too
So is it what happens when a red dragon and a yellow dragon have a baby ?
a young red dragon landed infront of our party last session
(BTW do 6 lvl 3 charicters have a chance in that fight or should we keep hiding)
I'd recommend hiding.
I don't know, I'm seeing references to it being an object and needing the Ballista Bolt action to fire it, rather than a regular weapon you attack with. #dnd-rules would know.
Not only is this a tough fight, tougher than you can handle, it is also an unrewarded fight
Oh yeah, you'll get barbequed for nothing.
There is no point in attacking something that, yeah, is probably evil, but mostly has done nothing to you
Hellooo
Howdy.
welcome to the server
oh, you've been here lol, you just haven't talked much
Some of us do that
The silent observers of the server.
Hingler
Idk if this is the chat to ask but I'm new at dnd, I've never played before and have only watched a few streams, friends of mine want me to make a campaign and I have absolutely no idea what to do, does anyone have any advice? TvT
They probably know a lot of embarassing stuff about all of us. But they stay silent and we respect them for that
Lurking 👀
Scheming 👹
The Lonkler
OK cool :3
The :3
Three short adventures, one common thread. Five Room Dungeon method for each. Start at level 2, level up after each one. Use average damage for monsters to start with while they figure how to play.
Start with a Delian Tomb type of deal. Something simple, a few rooms, it's the tomb of a paladin order, and there are goblins in it. A simple tutorial
Thanks!
What Smith said, for sure. And there's nothing saying you have to do everything from scratch. Modules are great. Even if you don't run them verbatim, cover-to-cover, they still usually have great stuff to steal
I honestly do not know what any of that means but I will figure it out! Thank you sm for the help I really appreciate it
The new forgotten realms campaign guide book has an amazing starter dungeon and loads of other good content
Google "Delian Tomb". Matthew Colville, perhaps the best D&D youtuber, created that dungeon for a video.
A very simple, level one dungeon, with a few rooms, one trap and ten goblins
Anyone here watched midwest angelica?
Just putting it out there, I think it'd be fire for the antagonist of a campaign slowly realizing the world is fake and his powers at the final fight are from him breaking the 4th wall.
I think this is one of the worst ideas one could ever try to implement.
It would be hard to do correctly but I think it'd be a fun thing if done correctly
The fun of TTRPGs comes from the fact that the universe is robust, that your character exists in a world that matters, at least to them, and that is coherent and has verisimilitude.
If you break that, you break everything and you create apathy. It is difficult enough to create engagement, but purposefully destroying the engagement you managed to make is the equivalent of shooting yourself in the foot
the problem then comes in the form of the dm needing to disassociate with his own creation. Like, fun story for a movie or TV series, but for a dnd session? How the hell do you portrait a guy that hates you as a person because you guide all their actions while also playing them reasonably, and dont give them unreasonable power because you are now allowed to do whatever? DM has unlimited power, either he hates the guy that has become aware of him (which is himself, oof) and gives him nothing, or he likes him and then the party just dies of pneumonia or whatever offscreen because what stopping dm from metagaming your characters?
I cannot emphazise this enough. Yes, perhaps it can be fun if done correctly. But doing it incorrectly destroys the game. And even doing it correctly is less fun than simply not doing it.
Random idea
are there whips in DnD, cause it would be sick to have a flying creature with the strategy to bind people and drag them high, dropping them at high ranges.
Just imagine the dm, as the bad guy going "actually its not realistic to be able to survive a fireball, you would be burned on at least 50% of your body and that is lethal" and then tell you your character is dead regardless of saves because 4th wall break
DnD is fun because it ISN'T realistic.
Like a roc?
No need for a whip, just grapple. It's actually a rather normal tactic for flying creatures. I do it all the time when I run a dragon
But for basic creatures that don't want to get close
Oh, missed a bit, my bad.
this particular point was about giving an enemy controlled by the dm the ability to break the 4th wall mechanically. Pointing out logical fallacies is a very common 4th wall break
Right.
Also whips do exist, but they slow, nto grapple
You can't grapple someone from range, in theory. You would need something custom
DnD is fun because no realism, though.
Why not write a three part campaign and find some players to test it?
Roper's got some reach.
... I am thinking of the hanging balloon from that Junji Ito story...
Yeah I just realized
No I mean't for the story, like in lore that's why he's a threat. It would still be a normal fight
(Giant balloons with someone's face on it. They hunt the person whose face they have to hang them.)
yup.
one of the best animation adaptations aswell.
I agree. Its not realistic to walk away from falling 200 ft without any major wound because "its an average of 70 damage, I have 110 HP", but it would suck to lose a character of level 12 or whatever due to just. Falling offscreen. Dnd is a battle simulator with narrative focus, so all the damage is abstract anyways, and it makes for a bad story for an epic hero that fights god to die from falling off a roof
It's D&D relevant I promise. TLDR an angelic/god-like eldritch entity that is able to see the future lands in the U.S. and starts assimilating almost all life in the U.S. NASA labels it AZ-001 partially due to the fact a man who was plagued with visions of the future AZ-001 was giving him, who said the entity was called "Azazel". The U.S. tried to fight it, but ended up just sort of doing as it already knew they would. It ends up defeating the organization in the U.S. made to fight it, absorbed almost all life in north america (not just the U.S. if memory serves me right), and then leaves our solar system at high speed. One of the main things it espoused was that it would give those it absorbed heaven, and even had access to a dimension called the "akashic plane" which connected everything it assimilated. It also kept the knowledge and experiences of all it assimilated. Long story short, I am wondering what seperates that being and D&D celestials. And if aberrations and celestials would be the best two creature types to represent something like that in D&D
(Probably an elaborate metaphor for how depression is contagious and can become an epidemic)
you literally said though "his powers in the final fight are from breaking the 4th wall" so how could it be a normal fight?
Like, would aberrations and celestials fit something like that best, or something else?
Seems like an aberration. That kind of eldritch horror is usually reserved for this creature type
Flavor text, it would still use normal game mechanics
Celestials do not absorb life. None of them do. Not a single one is about absorbing anything really, they usually radiate (see radiant damage) energy outwards, dont suck it in like black holes, so yes aberrations are more fitting for something that breaks the laws of nature and the universe
It left the solar system as a glowing, six eyed biblically accurate angel, made of flesh.
Ezekiel-accurate, first off. Regardless, such monsters are usually aberrations.
so im doing a character that has a sad backstory, but I'm not having it be revenge that drives him.
It also chose a guy named similarly to the author of the book of revelations to go to key west Florida to "witness what would pass"
listen, just because something looks like an angel doesnt mean it should be counted like one. Hell, Succubi are beautiful, pale skinned, winged women/men, should they be celestials based on their looks or should they stay demons based on the fact of how they behave and thats what they are?
Moreover, the book of revelations was never published on Faerûn. Nor was Ezekiel.
Please avoid bringing in real life religions into the topic on this note.
The fact that the creature you describe superficially ressembles real life mythological depictions of angels is meaningless. D&D monsters have their creature types attributed by behaviours and origins
If it comes from the upper planes, it's a celestial. That's it. What you describe has the behaviours and abilities of an aberration
It is an age old "twist" of narrative to make angels something horrible and evil and downright absurdly eldritch because "beyond mortal understanding" but thats not how dnd works. Yes, there can be weird morals in devas and solars and whatever, but they still play by alignment rules. A solar wouldnt eat a baby just because you shot it with an eldritch blast
It knows the future, made glowing apparitions, gave humans warnings, literally gave a human prophetic visions of the next decade of events, which he then managed to make a movie of and release it before the entity even got to earth.
You can discuss celestials as they're adapted in D&D and we're aware of their origins in real life mythologies and religions, but let's not dig too deeply into those origins and focus on the D&D interpretations.
In this case Solar, Deva and Planetar are the closest direct inspirations.
That sounds like an illithid. Mindflayers do all these things
In D&D, that is textbook aberration behaviour
also mindflayer are aberrations, too
Right, Noping this topic. We don't seem to be able to discuss it without risking derailing into religious debate or offense.
this is the kind of celestial I can get behind
Modrons are not celestials actually
(wait they are celestials right)
No. They are repugnant machine-creatures of the middle planes
darn it, well they should be. Cekestial constructs or whatever
A celestial is a thing from the upper planes. Those horrors are from the middle ones.
they are way too cute to not be worshipped is all Im saying
though their newer art is slightly concerning
why is there so much... lips in the newer art
Concerning? 👁️ 👄 👁️
Do not be fooled by their cuteness! They are horrors beyond the imagination and they should be exterminated to the last.
I wish modrons weren’t designed like that :(
why do I feel like Im talking to a wild magic sorcerer
I wish I could like Mechanus, everything about it is so cool except for how the modrons look
I'm a bit bummed ngl. I only got a discord account again to not have to try and get a chat gpt model made to comb through scientific documents and research papers to answer a question about D&D, cause the poor clanker just wasn't built for D&D lore.
I will not take this slander. I am simply a concerned citizen alerting others to the horrors of the modron.
Hi I’m new to dnd, I was wondering do wizards start with some spells when a campaign begins and how they get more spells as the campaign goes on?
If you were wondering about D&D lore you can ask in #dnd-lore . Otherwise you might want to check the celestials’ wiki pages for the setting(s) you’re interested in
Yup. Never try the Clanker for dnd stuff
alright, but could you clarify why you have singe marks on your pants and are carrying around 3 potted plants, also where did your friends from yesterday go?
No I typed in wrong and it autocorrected to something random
I mean the fellows issue is he was built for science.
Wizards get spells right at the start and as they level up they get so many more. Like dear god, a lot of spells
Can they get them from scrolls they find along the way too or something?
Cooking accident, gardening, holidays in Spain.
Not to comb through D&D lore. He just wasn't made for it.
They said no
Correct!
More specifically they directed me here.
For one sizzlers 
For two, I assume you mean sorcerer? The answer is yes Sorcerers start with 4 cantrips and 2 level 1 sorcerer spells from the sorcerer spell list. You get to add more of a level you can cast per their class table.
Check out the Sorcerer class table & Spellcasting feature here:
https://www.dndbeyond.com/sources/dnd/br-2024/character-classes#Level1SorcererSpellcasting
Ok, also do the spells have to be from the school of mqgic you specialize in like divination e.g.
you start with 6 level 1 spells, and automatically gain 2 spells per level you gain as wizard (but only spell levels you can cast on that level, so no pre-loading level 9 spells at level 2!). You get to add more spells if you find other wizards/spellbooks to learn from and spending gold in form of special magical ink to do so in addition to those automatic ones
Nope, but ones you specialise in are cheaper
Thanks
This isn't my first time in this server. Ya'll make this place harder to navigate than the Swindon's Magic Roundabout!
Oh yeah also I’m jus asking for a friend but would Vi ,from Aecane specifically not league, be a monk?
And once I think I've got it, you give me more whiplash than the euthanasia roller coaster ever could. But you guys are still pretty cool.
yes, actually you can put spell scrolls in your spellbook if they are wizard spell
Depends
Thanks
Which version of Vi?
Fighter also works. Monk is a bit too... Mystical for that character.
The ss1 grown up Vi
Monks are very magical in their abilities, they're not just "punch good" types of people
Oh
I looked up the relevant conversation. It seems you got your questions answered and then got redirected after the conversation left being about what the game says and entered an metaphysical (or just above table) debate on what constitutes good vs evil
Season 1 grown up Vi? Gloves or no gloves? It matters.
I’d say barbarian
Ik but I want to get more answers because she prefers not to play as a monk
Although, you’d have to get something to increase unarmed strike damage
fighter
Oh that was to Xulrif not you modest, you’re good
Errr give me both
Maybe a dip in Monk
I was trying to figure out how good and evil can be determined in D&D when such a thing is too nuanced to be universal
The gloves would just be some sort of item, they change nothing to the character
With gloves, barbarian
You have already been told: By the DM.
The DM is the one who determines good and evil, if it matters. And it almost never matters
More specifically I would suggest looking into something like beast barbarian. You can easily flavor claws as armored gauntlets
Ah! Very simple, remove the nuance because dnd isnt a realistic portrayal of real life and consequences. A good creature wont eat a baby, an evil creature will. Both creatures will kill goblins that attacked a village, either for justice or profit. Hope that helps!
And then also, D&D settings have creatures, planes & places of objective “good and “evil” as it pertains to alignment and the related mechanical interactions.
I had meant in regards to a lore based answer. Not the answer I got from this channel.
Now, non gloves is harder
D&D gives outlines for out it tries to define it within the setting and game, but each group, setting and game is going to have nuanced takes.
Specific situations will be debated.
More helpful ways to focus on it are asking questions like:
- Is this for a PC or a planar being?
- Is this about setting up a moral dilemma for players?
- Is this about how best to RP something that sticks to what you feel are your characters morals?
Partially because you have to kind of think what makes non-gloves Vi strong
Its collaborative storytelling, so playing morally grey is for neutral characters! And the dm has the final word on what the gods think! Because he plays them. So lathander would not ever classify a vampire as good just because "hes a tortured soul that just tries to cling to life" because that vampire eats people (specifically babies) to survive and thats evil, regardless out outside context
Her family
The lore based answer was given- it's just the text on what alignment is defined as in the books.
The further questions of 'Okay but how are we defining that particular word? How does it apply to X?' is for you to play around with in the game.
That too
hello
Hiii
Muscles. Specifically biceps. Triceps too. Good quadriceps. Also abdominals
someone speaks spanish
Hmm.. I'd need to take a closer look at the barbarian subclasses again, but I would say that the ancestry barbarian would fit the family aspect
this is an english only server unfortunately
Hello! Also sadly no spanish, no
I'm afraid the server is English language only, but there might be people who can speak Spanish in PMs or there might be Spanish speaking games in the LFG channels.
The spirits or memories of family helping her out. I may be off base here, but in terms of more embodying her strength, berserker would work pretty good. Although for the best of both worlds, do a zealot barbarian
thank´s
I'd simply go with a fighter.
The spirits and memories of her family helping her hold on, close to or even past death itself
Thaaaaanks
Just one more punch, one more kick, one more breath to remember those she lost. Yeah, for non gloves Vi, Zealot barbarian would fit best
Could also be a monk honestly
Hey, if it's okay, I'd appreciate some help with brainstorming potential with a character I've made.
I'm currently a lvl 3 Astral Monk Aarakocra, and while I'm doing pretty good in combat situations so far, I regularly struggle with creative thinking when it comes to problem solving/ or just using shenanigans to meet my goals. I have access to a small arsenal of spells too.
Anyone willing to just roll ideas around?
Hey! is it okay if I post a character build here?
Figuratively, perhaps. But in D&D, those things are not normally figurative, they're literal. If she doesn't actually have the spirits of her family helping her through death, she's just a fighter.
#character-discussion can help give some feedback or, if you wanna get extra crunchy, see what folks in #optimization think!
i never really liked the whole "flavor is free" thing
Got it! Like extra crunchy as in complicated?
its a shame I cannot watch arcane. Tried it once, realized only after being very confused about the episode that the streaming site started me out with the last episode. So I was entirely spoiled about the ending, and really disliked some essential characters because I didnt see how they reached that point, which stopped me from enjoying the actual first episode
Idk, Vi has always been aggressive. She fights with her fists sure, but whenever she does fight you can see the anger, the pain, the rage in her swings. And one of the few things that stops that rage? People who look like powder. The one person Vi truly regrets hurting when she needed her most.
My catchphrase
But also like… it is. Flavour is free
Crunchy in this case an in crunching those numbers to really get the most optimised version of your idea. However if it's more about the flavour and you're not so interested in really focusing on the numbers, #character-discussion might be better.
In truth, Arcane's Vi is nothing special. She's a street fighter with big muscles and good skills in a fight. She has not a shred of supernatural ability. That's a fighter
Thats a very weird take fora level 30 swordmage
I mean, swordmages dont exist, neither does level 30
But angy :(
No fr jokes aside yes I’d say fighter too
Thinking about it, she does fight more like a fighter than a barbarian
according to WOTC, nobody played 4e, so you playing 4e is in itself just flavour! /j
She's fought a person with a bionic arm, drugged up super soldiers, and has managed to fight right after getting shot
Fighters can do that too
How's it going?
Second wind, good recovering
for one, people often flavor the flavor out of a class/ancestry or whatever. in an effort to try to flavor something into something else, they ironically destroy flavor by handwaving pre-established setting and narrative truths
otoh, for all the flavor people assign to whatever it is they want their character to do or to be, it does not, in the end, have any mechanical nor narrative effect whatsoever. D&D isn't really that kind of game in the end
I feel like when you're adapting a character from another media into D&D, you don't have to stick to the literal too much and can go for the spirit of the character
Which can also be a monk thing as well, Rage isnt the only way to portray a character whose hurting inside
Yes. Ordinary D&D fighter
yeah i kinda hate directly using characters from outside media as pcs unless it's a one shot, like i don't need to see frieren in my games, but you can an old magic loving elf with similar qualities without straight up being that character
An unarmored, unarmed fighter going toe to toe with a drug fueled villainess with a bionic arm seems... plausible but not very survivable for a low level fighter to do solo, which Vi would have been in the beginning.
I mean, Prosthetic Arms are a common magic item
Tell me, how many hit points does that villainess with a bionic arm have? Armor Class? Damage? How many attacks a turn?
This is more like the arcane propulsion arm from ebberon
I had fun in a lvl 5 one shot as a wild heart barbarian, even finish off two enemies with my unarmed strikes ( one of them crit)
Let's say a level 2 fighter going up against a bandit captain alone
eh, flavor is free
I was about to say “would a low level barbarian be able to either?” But I know damn well a barbarian could do good
hi everybody I am new in the server and new at dnd as well, and i have a question about liches can i ask in this chat to find the answer?
I mean, even if they lost, they'd do better
You may! Although lore questions would be #dnd-lore but here would do fine for other things
Even without weapons
I am bored
Why level 2?
Actually I’d give that edge to fighter due to unarmed fighting style
She was fresh out of prison (aka her background)
The narrative aspect is only as deep as you, the group, make it. Sure, mechanically it doesnt do much. But what for example a World Tree Barbarians connection to the world tree actually is, now that is personal and narrativly important. Yggdrasil doesnt even exist in some settings, so going by base flavor would be doing it injustice. Is the barbarian maybe half-plant himself and its his roots hes sharing? Is he tapping into teh lifeforce of his ancestors, and its not roots but ghosts that show up to visualize his effects? Do you forgo effects altogether and just go "I give you 3d6 temp HP" because you hate fluff and just want the mechanical part out of the way? Thats up to yoru table
background and level dont have to correlate
What makes you think that's the background?
A barbarian would have to rely on tavern brawler, but it only does a d4 compared to unarmed fighting style’s d6 and d8 with empty hands
Her Background would simply be Criminal
So level 2 honestly seems fair if not slightly generous, considering she was constantly in solitary
Yeah, but hey knocking heads off of enemies is fun
What makes you think a character just out of their background is necessarily low level ?
also, Backstory =/= Background
I can agree with that
I did that today against a goblin with a upper cut
Yo im sorta new
How many opportunities to fight do you get locked alone in a cell?🤔
anyone can be angry. that does not make them a barbarian. rage is also not necessarily anger in the context of dnd barbarian. it can be anything from the primal manifestations of their emotions to communing with primal spirits of the natural world. Vi does neither of those. a barbarian would be more like Udyr
hello sorta new I'm Silas
Hey!
Really😑
Yeah
lol
Fighting is not the only way to get XP
First off, solitary confiment is for problem prisoners and should be abolished because its just torture. Secondly, what prison DOESNT have fights constantly?!
Laughs in milestone /lhj
My cousin taught me a bit but Im still trying to grasp the concept
What makes you think she was always locked alone, considering the show establishes that she trained heavily and kept herself fit and that she was in a fight with another prisoner? What makes you think there is a correlation between how many fights she would have been in and her level?
i really do like the idea of milestone lvls
Ah don’t worry, it’s a hobby you improve in time
and yeah, shes not always in solitary
I find it fits me way better
Oh sorry
i just don't wanna keep track of yet another number with xp lol
Discourages murder hobos, makes for more interesting level ups, makes it easier for me to manage, etc
plus milestone feels more significant i guess
I agree
Let's humor the fighter advocates for a second. What subclass would she get?
and yeah all of that too
I don't get it. Are you arguing in favour of another class or in favour of a higher level?
Why are we taking this as a more serious debate?
idk
Probably Battlemaster or Champion
Also, champion or battlemaster
I’d say champion
i kinda just got here tbh
First
I said barbarian. That seems to fit best to me.
Damn Ti you're fast sometimes
Vi isn’t the most tactical
near 60 wpm
ok I posted in homebrew sorry about forgetting about that chat for a moment
Battle master? Elaborate
Fastest type in the west
Thank you for the sympathy!^^ well i search about liches to see why are they so popular, and i found out that they can be ""created"" when making a ritual for a demon lord more specifically Orcus, and i was wondering if that is restricted only to him or any ritual to any demon lord
my brain read wpm as weapons per minute for a second there
Liches are way more than that
Maneuvers are her using certain moves and stances or boxing techniques she was taught
Their ritual can be entirely without Orcus or demons
lichdom is a whole process
Boxing isnt just punch punch
Wasn't she only taught as a kid?
I can see that actually
street fighting like what Vi does is definitely something you add some techniques to
if you become a lich do you essentially lose your soul? can you not still be good and be a lich?
man idk
No, it's in your jar. No, it requires killing and eating the souls of others
Lichdom kinda requires mass sacrifice a lot of the time and a huge desire for power. I can’t think of a single good or even neutral character who’d become a Lich
and? Those are the core techniques she got from Vander. Every other maneuver is a result of her adapting and improvising or new techniques she figured out afterwards
Experience is a very good teacher
it isn't a wholesome process nor is it quick
Isn't one of battle masters main thing with maneuvers disarming/slowing type things or giving allies things to do outside their turns?
Oh sorry
It's mostly disarming and other stuff like that
I have returned to the land of the living
Not the only thing.
And no lichdom was needed
huzzah
Not all Battlemasters will take Commander's Strike. BM is a build a bear subclass
battlemaster was a mistake
should have been base fighter, but thats long gone for that chance, thanks to the 5e testers
I said one of the main, not the only. Also, has Vi really been seen disarming people often?
there is no "main" maneuver
You got some real hot takes. I can respect that
theyre all options
I mean, I think she usually has flashbacks before or during fights doesn't she?
Riposte my beloved
Yo just got here, someone trying to make Vi?
So its okay to make a lich that their process of lichdom is with another demon lord like Graz'zt or Mephisto for example?
PTSD and flashbacks are not limited to one class
The other demon lords don’t excel in undead as much as Orcus
Vi from Arcane/League of Legends. The purple one with gauntlets
it's the roman numeral for 6
Your information has been invaluable
holy ping batman
Idk, every time it happens it seems to give her the push needed to get the W. Sounds kinda barbarian rage-esque to me.
Not having maneuvers baked into the base fighter class is the only real mistake.
First thought is armorer artificer
Agreed
Indomitable, Second Wind
Second thought is monk
Rally
GET THAT OUTA HERE /j
lol
Have you heard of the fighter class feature second wind?
Honestly, monk I do see
Ain’t nobody talking artificer in front of me /j /silly
already said it :P
Can’t beat the Ti-train
Damn
I like Vi more as an unarmed fighter, but that's just me
im like one of those momentum based machines, once i start, i cant be slowed
Reflavour her gauntlets as light hammers, or heck even as unarmed strikes. She’s fast (at least in the game), punches you to oblivion and last I checked she didn’t wear armor
my gripe with battlemaster is that its existence precludes the idea of maneuvers being a base fighter feature
Her gauntlets are definitely weapons, but that doesn’t stop monk yeah
Those typically tied to Rage/PTSD flashbacks of your beloved murdered family you currently are fighting to avenge?
Flavor is free. Rage never is at base either
You can certainly flavour them as that
Yeah I just don't see her doing all that much "monk stuff," if you know what I mean. She's more of a brawler. Throw hands first, think second.
Hol’up barbarian works no?
How the heck do you keep doing this /lhj
But you can always flavor a monk as a boxer so it's a style choice.
i casted Foresight
I can honestly see all of them working
There honestly isn’t a right answer here
Yeah, the arguement im making is that Barb is not the only one that fits, but does fit her better
anyone here play 2xko just curious
I can dig it
Tavern brawler. Also monks in dnd don’t need to be a monk. I don’t think I’ve made more than two actual monk monks, and I love monks.
true
Okay, mb. I misunderstood.
Last monk i made was a goliath who wanted to be the jailer of the titans
Metal af
Hekatoncheire coded
Last Monk I made was… Aaravos, a nutcase traitor of the ways who learned the power of rage
By "monk stuff" I more meant the really acrobatic shenanigans. She plants her feet like a boxer, not super mobile.
At least in the show. Idk how she is in the games cuz I wouldn't touch League with a 10 ft pole, hah
I had thought you guys were arguing the others fit better than barb. I miscommunicated. I see them all fitting reasonably well, just barb seems to fit better.
totally valid
Good choice, good choice… spare yourself from such a fate
oh i was arguing that fighter fits a bit better, but if you wanna play her as a barb, its a valid choice
only fun i had in league was player vs bots usually
Ah there’s no problem. That’s what makes this so interesting
people are so toxic there.
I just know that she can rush you down in the game, don’t play it much. Plus, boxers are light on the feet.
-# like a step of the wind. They also have a patient defence. And can make flurries of blows.
i mean i just play games with text chat off you don't even notice
fair
If i were to play Vi I’d definitely make her a monk tbh
monk does sound like a better choice
A friend of mine was helping me pick which classes arcane characters would be and I forbid them from saying artificer for Viktor and Jayce
lol
Even though I knew they were right and artificer would fit them best.
Yeah probably.
I think it's just me looking at PUNCH GIRL WITH BIG GOOFY ROBOT HANDS and I think a Str/Con character
I may be married to two wizards but I will keep up the slander forever
she has taken quite the beating over the years. And is also very ripped 
You definitely can still do barb
I just rlly rlly rlly like monks
Esp. since the new monk ROCKS
my favorite martials
-# I kind of wish they'd bring back Warlord
ive been starving for a commander/tactician class
For real. Doing a battle master with leader maneuvers is like... Warlord Lite. Diet Warlord.
It's just not the same 😿
you will have banneret and you will be happy
Commander's Strike is neat, but gimme moar
im a bit interested in playing it one day
Also, remember how Ranger was a full martial in 4e? Peppridge Farm remembers.
remember how ranger was one of the better/best (Striker) classes in 4e?
Absolutely. The ranger in our party was ridonculous.
yeah rangers were crazy in 4e
They have phased out leader classes as such, so warlord really cannot come back without some fundamental changes to make them more self-centered
todays session was fun
hon we have warlord at home.
(warlord at home is battlemaster fighter)
we had a hit squad of maids attack us like it was a call of duty mission