#dnd-lore
1 messages · Page 56 of 1
Thank you
Okay, there are several elder Brain’s. But they also say “The Elder Brain” is there one even bigger one or is it a thing of their being one per realm or city or something?
Think of them like a queen of a bee colony. There's only one per colony.
Oooh
Okay
That makes sense
How does an outcast mindflayer work, just like, mindflayers can be compared directly to wasps and outcast ones are like solitary species of wasps?
Mindflayers are hivemind. Outcast and renegade mindflayers are not part of a hivemind, and often fear being discovered and/or being dragged back into the hivemind and loosing their individuality.
Often they are outcast for said individuality- for having tics and traits inherited from their host, or just too much willfull independency that makes them danger to a colony's unity.
Sorry if my questions are getting annoying
So sometimes outcasts are from being kicked out of the hive and other times they choose to leave and hide?
I wouldn't say 'kicked' so much as those are the same options- submit, die or flee.
…would players ever be allowed inside a mindflayer city peacefully?
most times no, as they're seen as a threat to a colony
PCs would be considered food and/or threat to mind flayers.
most if not almost all living things view mind flayers akin to a virus. Rare exceptions include renegades
Renegades?
Rebel. Outcast.
Renegade Illithids:
Sometimes a mind flayer that's away from its colony breaks free from the elder brain. Perhaps it ran into a situation where its bonds of obedience were broken, or perhaps the colony was destroyed while it was away. In such a case, the mind flayer becomes free-willed for as long as it avoids contact with an elder brain.
- Volo's guide to Monsters p.72
Ooop, careful of potential module spoilers.
(and BG3 spoilers)
And these mindflayers act like people or?
I didn't think it was spoilers as he was in mtg as well as a figure of waterdeep, though my mistake
Unlike colonial mind flayers, rogue illithids develop a healthy respect for those not of their kind. They treat especially powerful creatures and individuals as equals, not adversaries, and seek to cooperate with them. A renegade mind flayer might become a trusted advisor or a powerful ally, so long as it is kept well fed
- Volo's guide to Monsters p.72
…mind flayers still eat peoples intelligence?
Or can they eat other things?
Brains.
the irony is renegade mind flayers drop the whole supremacy belief and actually can be good acquaintances with other people
Of intelligence creatures?
Or like, would they be fine with like… cow and pig?
Preferably.
I like that to, that they are described as friendly
They require humanoid brains.
I remember one Dungeon Magazine module exploring 'lab grown brains' (clones). But it didn't work- they needed to consume the brains of humanoids that have had experiences and thoughts. There was no nutritional psychic value to them otherwise.
not necessarily friendly
I recommned you read the FR wiki article:
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Mind_flayer#Diet
The sustenance of mind flayers were the brains of other creatures, mainly those of humanoids. Only brain tissue provided the required combination of the three essential components needed to sustain the mind flayer physiology: hormones, enzymes, and psychic energy. Mind flayers also ate other foods[18] (in addition to requiring water), most of which contained the critical enzymes and hormones they needed, with internal organs being good sources and high on the illithid menu.
While certain essential biochemicals and hormones could only be found in brain matter, illithids ate brains more so for the psychic quotient of sentient gray matter than the physical nutrients.[59] Their all-encompassing neurology granted them a unique digestive system, one that was, in a sense, cognitive and self-aware, allowing them to extract more than nourishment from their food
Wait, how do you inject your memories into clones? Would that count for a mindflayer?
Yes, thank you
Respect doesn’t mean they have a to be a good person right?
Respect has nothing to do with morality.
Like, could I have one be a leader of a branch of a criminal empire?
This is moving out of lore territory.
Yes, but “healthy respect” just makes me think they become like. Caring about other peoples and animals
They’re empaths lol
This is more #dnd-discussion than lore related.
They're not empaths, they're psionicists.
This is indeed beginning to move into 'speculative' questions that would be better for #dm-discussion (if planning on how to use this in a campaign plot somehow) or #dm-world-building if just wanting to figure out how to make the idea work as part of a general world lore. Or just #dnd-discussion if spitballing ideas in general on how Mindflayers can be as ethical as possible in their diets or manage criminal empires
Mind flayers are aberrations originally from the Far Realm (think Cthulhu). Their minds and brains are literally alien to mortals of the Material World. They don't empatheize with humanity.
Okay… but is vecna actually a Demi-god or just like referred to as one and how long was he a lich before he ascended?
Vecna was a lich before he ascended to godhood.
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Vecna
I might be dumb, but i don’t think it says anything about how he ascended
Are the Vistani able to come and go through the mists as they please? Also, what are the effects of one that doesn't travel constantly?
it's been left a myth with the exception of Critical roles version
Oh okay
(I don't think this is spoilers) but at least in barovia yes due to old connections with Strahd. Other domains I am unsure
What creatures does vecna canonically have in his armies?
Like, it says under Oni’s that they’ll severe masters in exchange for food and magic, white dragons will faithfully serve a master who has bested them in 1 on 1 combat, manticores serve masters as long as they don’t forget to feed them,
And like, clearly he has lots of undead but it implies a lot of them are not also
I'd assume mostly cultists or undead as you noted, as he's mostly trying to work in secret rather than conquer through a typical army. Though it's been noted he's worked with devils before as Asmodeus takes a liking to him
Vecna has been known to utilize unique constructs as well.
AFAIK, Vecna doesn't have an army. He's the god of secrets after all and an arch-lich who rather deal with research of magic than leading a horde of undead.
like any other god, he more so has favored creatures that he uses to carry out his will, very few gods have a formal army of any sort, only one i know of is tiamat
some of the lore documented on the forgotten realms wiki seems to imply he made use of devils
honestly, given he is a powerful lich and god, given he conducts himself still very much like a wizard, any evil creature that could be swayed under his control would likely fit the bill especially if they are associated with one of his domains, but unlike some gods does not seem he has a list of favored creatures or monsters
Thx
is there a color of metallic dragon that dwell in forests/swamps or are rather inclined with nature?
I don't think so at least in lore, as green dragons in the chromatic family were the most known for forest domains and black dragons for swamps
I'm Dming a spelljammer campaign and my party started in realm space(Toril to he specific) but is heading out soon. I wanted to ask, what planetary systems have higher technology level(IE things like advanced firearms, genuine technology/industry?)
No official campaign setting has modern firearms. Critical Role's Exandria has firearms but it's on the early stages. Toril has smokepowder that's tightly controlled by the church of Gond.
There are infinite number of systems in the Material Plane so you can create a world with advanced technology you want but this is #dm-discussion or #dm-world-building territory.
D&D has had "cameo" with advanced technologies, such as the crashed city-sized UFO in Expedition to the Barrier Peaks so that's the extent of it because D&D is focus on "medieval" level of technology.
Speaking about firearms, do you think a monk would be able to deflect bullets?
Not really a lore question
That's a gameplay mechanic question. Ask in #dnd-rules or #dnd-discussion
I see
Just askin' here in case there was any material that specified their speed
It wasn't for a campaign
Again, gameplay mechanic issue.
(And trying to add actual "realism" and physics to a game would not be the best)
Alright, thanks
That makes sense, i was just wanting to make sure there wernt any official spheres that had the tech level of something like shadowrun, meanwhile Toril and Grayhawk are medieval age.
(They (and most dnd settings) are more Renaissance than medieval)
Technically lore-wise Earth exists in the D&D multiverse. Humans from (an alternate) Earth travelled to Toril, for example.
Elminster regularly takes a pack of Dr. Pepper from time to time to his abode
God i love that tidbit of lore
Huh...I'm definitely putting this in the back pocket
I'll homebrew a world then where it's cut off but simmilar to shadow run but explains why Dnd is still early in tech lvl.
The Mulan people were originally from Earth (it was never overtly stated though...) and they brought their gods (aka the Egyptian deities) with them.
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Mulan
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Mulhorandi_pantheon
Chinese people?
Ancient Egyptians.
... NGL, that name has been confusing me since i first read about them in the PHB
Mulan is the name of the human ethnicity on Toril, not the Chinese heroine.
Yeah, but i keep correlating it to her, hence my confusion
the medieval thing is a misconception, largely do to potentially faerun in the forgotten realms buildings being modeled after medieval architecture
So… when mindflayers do practice arcane magic, what kind usually?
The mind flayer wiki entry:
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Mind_flayer#Magic
Oh it lists specific spells
Hi, I'm running a campaign and it's going very well - a player wants to become a Silverstar though (Forgotten Realms setting) but I can't find any preexisting lore about how this is actually achieved. Is there likely a ritual of some sort, is it up to a church leader, is it the Moonmaiden's own choice, etc?
Silverstar was a 2E specialty priest and 3.5E presitage class dedicated to Selune.
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Silverstar
What y’all know about Pale Night I’m retrofitting a campaign I had made last year which fits her pretty well for the BBEG slot I just didn’t know she (it?) existed yet
Do you have a question about her?
Otherwise #dm-discussion would be a better place to ask if you need help with your campaign.
basically i read that she is like this malevolent entity, one of the earliest types of demons called an obyrith, but i also read that ‘reality rejects her presence’ due to its utter wrongness so thats why she has her veil forced on her
ig my question would be do y’all think the veil surrounding pale night is reality manifesting itself around her like a containment bubble or something else entirely?
and why does she affect reality so strongly when, what i read about other obyrith, the didn’t have as nearly an impact on corrupting reality around themselves.
just curious what y’all think
In lore, how did they actually become them?
Dungeon Dad recently did a video on Pale Night
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SyD7gsgsBG0
Pale Night in the FR wiki
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Pale_Night
Gotcha, thank you!
the same can be said for many faiths honestly, just only some have such documents especially since on toril these days the gods have to often be a lot more indirect when involving themselves with mortals
the dead 3 being a bit of an exception cuz they did not listen to lord Ao's warning and paid the consequences
Whats the difference betweek halflings and gnomes typical personality lmao. They both seem like typical happy smurfs to me
They're two different humanod species.
https://www.dndbeyond.com/sources/basic-rules/races#Gnome
A constant hum of busy activity pervades the warrens and neighborhoods where gnomes form their close-knit communities. Louder sounds punctuate the hum: a crunch of grinding gears here, a minor explosion there, a yelp of surprise or triumph, and especially bursts of laughter. Gnomes take delight in life, enjoying every moment of invention, exploration, investigation, creation, and play.
https://www.dndbeyond.com/sources/basic-rules/races#Halfling
The comforts of home are the goals of most halflings’ lives: a place to settle in peace and quiet, far from marauding monsters and clashing armies; a blazing fire and a generous meal; fine drink and fine conversation. Though some halflings live out their days in remote agricultural communities, others form nomadic bands that travel constantly, lured by the open road and the wide horizon to discover the wonders of new lands and peoples. But even these wanderers love peace, food, hearth, and home, though home might be a wagon jostling along an dirt road or a raft floating downriver.
So halflings are more sensible of the two?
plus gnomes historically at least have a rather oddly shaped heads
not to mention gnomes often are more whimsical
D&D gnomes have moved towards being inventor types (probably influenced Dragonlance's tinkerer gnomes (which in turn influenced World of Warcraft gnomes...)).
especially rock gnomes in the case of the forgotten realms, who are most well known of the gnomes in the realms
Is tiamat Lawful evil or Chaotic evil? The PHB says she's lawful evil and most of her followers are lawful evil but both of her statblocks claim she's chaotic evil
last i checked she is both
partially do to her unique nature of being the embodiment of all evil dragon kind and her form of choice in 5e includes all 5 major chromatic dragon types
the current phb could have failed to take that into account and the statblocks could be do to creatures normally not having 2 alignments simultaneously, so could in that case be a result of the frame work for statblocks at the time of releases
Can't she just be neutral evil
She can be whatever you need her to be for your setting. I see her as LE since she lairs in Hell and not the Abyss, BUT 3 of her 5 heads are CE, so there's that. Make her whatever you need to make her fit your story.
I know, i am just asking the difference between "Neutral evil" and "Both chaotic and lawful evil"
It's like the difference between food tasting both salty and sweet, and just tasting plain
From Vecna: Eve of Ruin
Tiamat embodies the vices of evil dragons. She is vengeful and covets power and wealth above all else. However, Tiamat isn’t reckless in her quests to expand her hoard. The dragon queen exhibits shrewd battle tactics and beguiling charm, easily swaying mortals. Each of Tiamat’s five heads has its own voice and mannerisms, but they all share the same consciousness.
She's sweet and salty popcorn
a lot
personally i feel the forgotten realms wiki gives good examples of the ranges of each alignment combination https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Neutral_evil
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Chaotic_evil
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Lawful_evil
when i say she is basically the embodiment of all evil dragon kind i ment she more or less takes on many of the more evil or at least selfish traits of the chromatics, given each head's assigned norms for the dragon of that type and they all being her, having a shared consciousness despite being able to act or speak independently, makes her rather unique compared to other gods
but the forgotten realms wiki describes her personality as seen here https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Tiamat#Personality
though these are cited from prior editions to be fair
despite being between the two alignements being neutral evil would not mean you are both lawful evil and chaotic evil, it would mean you are neutral evil, it is not just some splitting of differences
honestly one could argue her alignment is as fluid as her mood in the moment
Or the other explanation is that the designers of Tyranny of Dragons screwed up and made her CE in her statblock and they never errata'ed it.
well they said both her statblocks, which i believe means they were reffering to the aspect of tiamat from fizban's too
She was an archdevil back in 1E
Well, my opinion of WotC editors isn't for his channel...
honestly alignment these days rarely comes up as a definitive factor as rarely if at all it happens mechanically, more so reflects their moral and world views and thus actions but can change over time, basically tiamat more or less often falls into either of the two alignments, honestly her unique situation of being one of the few gods these days that has multiple alignments simultaneously is what makes her so interesting to me
The Law-Chaos axis does make a quite substantial difference in her behaviour though. (Personally it never made sense to me she was fixated to LE when she's the goddess of all evil chromatic dragons).
and given her chosen form representing both, i like that it can throw one off, giving her a certain unpredictable edge that one might not expect should they find themselves in the hells
The only Lawful chromatic iirc is blue
green
I thought green was NE
greens are on average lawful evil
Waaa- i have been lying to myself
maybe some individuals, by as a norm, they are lawful evil
I guess their trickster nature made me think otherwise
well they often to my understanding more so manipulative than trickster
granted the two can overlap at times, but they have their nuances and differences
you may have been confusing them with their kin from 4e https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Mirage_dragon#Personality
What are the official months of Spring in the Forgotten Realms? I want to run Dragon Heist with a calendar system and am trying to figure out when to start it.
Interesting, i actually havent seen mirage dragons yet
So it starts in Ches, right? I was planning on starting on Ches 10th
It only appeared in the 4E Dragonomicon.
Yeah, havent dived that deep into older editions
Spring Equinox is Ches 19, Summer Solstice is Kythorn 20. So spring is roughly late Ches, Tarsakh, Mirtul, and early-mid Kythorn.
Thanks. I wanted to start on Ches 19 but there’s also this cool holiday on that day in Waterdeep that would be good for the campaign, so I pushed it a bit earlier.
remember, toril uses tendays instead of weeks, and as the name implies a tenday is 10 days
so things might get a bit wonky if you went in without that knowledge
and weekday names as we know them are not really a thing, which may be worth noting
Yeah, I know. I got confused because I assumed it was just three months like it is irl but the Spring Equinox was in Ches but Trolltide is mentioned in the spring section of the book.
Yeah, that sucks, but oh well.
this is described in this part https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Calendar_of_Harptos#Date_Conventions
so dates are more important than saying "oh it is X day" at least in terms of things like dates documented and planning
it is basically like IRL. Ches = 3rd month = March, spring equinox ~ March 20th like in real life. Kythorn = 6th month = June, summer solstice ~ June 20th like in real life.
though as i recall this is largely cuz there was no real agreed upon names for these days so it never really caught on, so the lore arguably gives you room to make up your own for your games that would mostly just be a local custom of sorts among people living in the same area, but nothing solidified or concrete in that regard
to keep track of campaign events I highly recommend https://app.fantasy-calendar.com/
It's free, has a built-in Calendar of Harptos complete with annual holidays and the phases of the moon.
remember, unless maybe you are playing AL, your games/your table is it's own continuity, so there is no problem with diverging, but when talking about what is factually described in the lore, like on this channel that is where we gotta go by the books and be objective as possible
Yeah, I’ll keep to what Dragon Heist has given me for holidays and the like. I’m not moving major story events to holidays, but it’s just fun side content for the players.
The book gives me so much fantastic lore, I wanna use it.
a funny detail about that is in waterdeep gold coins pieces are called "dragons" hence the name of the adventure XD
are there any enemies or monsters who had been said in lore, they could have even been heroes if things changed just slightly?
or maybe good guys who are very close to the brink of being corrupted or easily turned into bad guys
Ok? Maybe you can share a specific campaign with me?
I recommend you start with a Forgotten Realms wiki
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Main_Page
This is generally more for like specific in-world history and such of the different settings
Where can I ask about…creature lore and and world stuff???
It's like going to a historian and asking, "Tell me about the history of the universe!"
You have to be specific in your questions.
Ok ok I’ll go look at something and come back
There are a lot of D&D lore nerds here but you need to be more concise on what you want to ask about.
He's an archlich who became a deity. He's the god of secrets in the Greyhawk setting.
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Vecna
One of the most iconic villains in D&D
A lich becoming a god? Damn
He's left hand and left eye are powerful artifacts. They existed in 1E before Vecna the character finally appeared in 2E.
Ooooh
Well I know of “vecna” from stranger things (ik it’s not vecna) but this is pretty cool
Oh! Is there a big bad that’s a wraith??????
Yeah, there’s very little that actually connects the D&D monsters from the villains in Stranger Things.
It’s usually just a way the kids in ST attribute their knowledge of D&D to the powers and capabilities of the villains they encounter in the show.
Ik that but just hearing about the actual creatures is pretty cool
Stranger Things was about kids in the early/mid 1980s who played a lot of D&D so they called the "real" monsters they encountered based on the D&D monsters.
I think that’s cool they do that
Funny too
Did he die???
Vecna
He's a god
Wraiths are a type of undead
Oh ok
Srry I saw that it was in dnd but just wondering
What’s…the beholders deal???
Vecna is a lich.
Ik
Can you be more specific?
Theyre alien monsters from the Far Realm with many eyes
Thank you what I was looking for
Oh! Whats the most dreaded enemy in dnd that’s not a boss????
That's an opinion and not really something lore related. There's not really a "boss" in lore terms.
Dang it
Ok well I’m wondering this as I saw it in a video
Werebears are lawfully good
And Werewolves aren’t…
Why are werebears good???
Not really that much of a lore question
This is more #dnd-discussion territory.
Hmmm ok
Man I’m srry Im making you guys mad I just wanna be interested in dnd more and I just don’t know what to ask 😅
The short answer is that D&D is very creationist and creatures tend to be influenced by their creator deity. Balador is the patron deity of werebears.
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Balador
Creationist?????
Creationism is the religious belief that nature, and aspects such as the universe, Earth, life, and humans, originated with supernatural acts of divine creation.
A lot of D&D was influenced by Tolkien. In The Hobbit, the character Beorn was a "werebear" so Gary Gygax was probably inspired by this character and had werebears be LG.
You’re not making anybody mad, we just wanna make sure you know what channels to go to for what.
?! Dnd is influenced by Tolkien????
I love LOTR!
I didn’t know that
A lot of deities created species in their image. For example, Corellon Larethian is the chief deity of the elves and they created the elves in their image.
Gygax and co were fans of Tolkien. It’s why you’ll see a lot of Tolkien’s views of fantasy translated accordingly, like making elves historically pale and blonde, making dwarves stocky and big bushy bearded, etc.
Huh.
The history of D&D and its influence from Tolkien's work is best for #dnd-discussion
Ok thanks
Indeed, while we can discuss origins of specific lore (Like halflings from hobbits), the overall general connection between D&D and Tolkien and all the other influences is better for dnd-discussion as it could go indepth and never really be about specific in game lore, and focusing much more on the influences of.
Huh…cool ^^
hypotheticals and creating alternative versions of things is not really a part of what this channel talks about when being on topic
though some examples of such characters can be found in some novels and or other media, but those are often specific to those stories
only one i can think of off the top of my head is from bg3 and that has a cavoite or two anyways, with one being bg3 being it's own continuity
though technically i guess if willing to settle for ones that long since fell to the dark side Lord Soth of the dragonlance setting is one established character in the lore that more or less went from good to evil if wanting to put it simply
otherwise would be more so something to brainstorm with people in #dm-world-building
Trying to learn more about the FR lore. Can anyone please recommend me some resources like vids or wiki articles?
The wiki consists of pages for specific eras/places, but couldnt find an overview or a recap
I know Jorphdan and AJ Pickett on YouTube are fairly well-regarded, but I don't have specific videos to suggest.
a good source for forgotten realms specific lore would also be ed greenwood, the setting's creator, own youtube channel
as for wiki articles,
- a geographic overview of Faerûn with links to the various regions.
- recent world-shaking events: the Second Sundering
- the main pantheon of gods
- a series of articles detailing the history of Toril generally
why is tieflings a race? cant any race be a tieflings?
No? Tieflings are tieflings
They're fundamentally different from other species, even if their parents aren't tieflings
You just edited your question from tiefling to aasimar, but the answer is actually literally the same 
I can see what you mean and I think the question might be better reframed as 'Are tieflings/aasimar/genasi assumed to be from human lineage or can they come from any species?'
I think it's more "Why are they considered their own thing and not a variation on their parental species?"
So if two humans have a child that's an aasimar, why is that child an aasimar specifically and not just an aasimar human
Why is it a noun rather than an adjective is my interpretation
I feel WOTC is workig on what it means to be "planar touched" in 5E. Aasimar tend to be the "celestial touched" while tieflings tend to be the "infernal touched".
Ah looking at the PHB tieflings are specifically humans
That said, I’m pretty sure the 2024 PHB is set to give tieflings the same treatment as MotM aasimar. Where you have a base race that has been “plane touched”.
Yeah, the PHB tiefling is specific to Forgotten Realms lore
Fingers crossed, the 2024 PHB is gonna be more setting agnostic
The PHB tiefling isn't really meant to be FR tieflings, it just happens that FR tieflings are PHB tieflings if that makes sense.
Idk, the intent still seems like it’s there, but I guess that’s not really a topic for the channel?
plus tanarukks for orcs, which have actually appeared in 5e
FWIW, the tanarukk is officially a Fiend (Demon) and not an orc anymore
Tieflings have a odd history edition wise, due to 4e's influence. have become homogenised in 5e.
In 4e, they were specifically from Bael Turath and were homogenised for convenience of writing and art design:
All tieflings issue from the wicked root that was Bael Turath. They’re creatures descended from the devil-tainted rulers of that fallen empire, doomed to carry and pass on fiendish blood. In deciding on this single origin for tieflings in the world, we aimed to make them as easy to use as any other mainstream race.
A common origin meant we could give tieflings a unified appearance, and that look could be edgy instead of ugly. This cohesive origin allows players to imagine what their individual tiefling is like, as they would with a human, without worrying about a list of possible devilish traits. Further, knowing that every tiefling shares a similar body shape makes it easier to write new material for tieflings.
Wizards Presents Races and Classes, p. 48
Not yet associated with Asmodeus just yet, just 'Nine hells' pact. Although as Lord of Hell he became a prominent name and figure in tieflings that appeared in Dragon Magazines.
4e FR didn't really go into it in the books. The Campaign guides don't really explain why they're homogenous now in FR from what I saw, until a novel 'The Devil You Know' in 2016 introduced the lore that "the Toril thirteen performed a ritual that cursed most tiefling lineages—those of demons, devils, hags, and rakshasas, among others—with the "blood of Asmodeus", changing their original lineage with that of the archdevil himself" (Quoting the Wiki)
yeah. Fey'ri were outsiders in 3e too (as were aasimar and tieflings actually). They serve similar purposes in lore though.
Jumping to 5e, we're keeping the homogenised look and not really explaining it, and the PHB tieflings are hinted to be Asmodeus tieflings even before SCAG and MTOF.
Then in SCAG 4e lore is echoed.
5e PHB:
tieflings know that this is because a pact struck generations ago infused the essence of Asmodeus—overlord of the Nine Hells—into their bloodline. Their appearance and their nature are not their fault but the result of an ancient sin, for which they and their children and their children’s children will always be held accountable.
SCAG:
Asmodeus and a coven of warlocks, the toril thirteen, performed a rite wherein the archdevil claimed all tieflings in the world as his own, cursing them to bear the "blood of asmodeus". This act marked all tieflings as descendants of the Lord of the Nine hells, regardless of their true heritage, and changed them into creatures that resembled their supposed progenitor.
So yes, the PHB lore and SCAG lore seem very similar, which would imply that the PHB tieflings are based on FR tieflings.
But to me it's more that FR tieflings were made into PHB tieflings. With FR becoming the more standard to use setting, their lore was changed to be more standardised and in keeping with the PHB.
Yeah, 3E did what they did, I'm mostly speaking from what the most updated 5E lore says
So happy the 2024/2025 books are no longer FR specific, but I guess that's neither here nor there
The 2014 ones technically weren't either. FR was used as an example often, but the lore for the species wasn't meant to be FR dependent. Again, it's more that FR became more like the PHB.
also possible it's similar to the eladrin situation (humanoid player race, fey monster). If there were a tanarukk player race, it might be humanoid. Hard to draw lore conclusions from these things as they are somewhat fluid.
An example I'd give of the PHB being more neutral is things like Dragonborn origins:
Born of dragons, as their name proclaims, the dragonborn walk proudly through a world that greets them with fearful incomprehension. Shaped by draconic gods or the dragons themselves, dragonborn originally hatched from dragon eggs as a unique race, combining the best attributes of dragons and humanoids.
-PHB
Where as in SCAG it presents the 3 myths from 4e FR- Made from 'lesser draconic spirits', born from Io's spilt blood, or made as the first humanoid intentionally by Io:
As with all stories of the ancient past, tales of the origins of the dragonborn are hazy and sometimes contradictory. Each reveals something about the dragonborn in its telling, however.
One story relates that the dragonborn were shaped by the ancient dragon-god Io at the same time that Io created the dragons. In the beginning of days, Io fused brilliant astral spirits with the unchecked fury of the elements. The greater spirits became dragons—creatures so powerful, proud, and willful that they were lords of the newborn world.
(...)
SCAG p.112
yeah I don't know where this "PHB is FR specific" thing came from. The FR stuff is pretty much just examples
Also this article (Archived) from 2013, during D&D next:
Pretty early on, we agreed that the core rules for D&D Next had to acknowledge the existence of all the worlds of D&D—not just the Forgotten Realms we’ve been talking a lot about, but also Greyhawk, Eberron, Krynn, Athas, Mystara, Ravenloft—and, most importantly, the thousands and thousands of worlds created by DMs for their own games. So we’re writing from that perspective, and you’ve seen snippets of it in the playtest materials—for example, the inclusion of the kender and the warforged in the last races document, with explicit mention of the worlds they come from.
And like int he DMG, they never say FR is the default, but list it among others that use the DMG/MM/PHB as the basic foundation:
This book, the Player's Handbook, and the Monster Manual present the default assumptions for how the worlds of D&D work. Among the established settings of D&D, the Forgotten Realms, Greyhawk, Dragonlance, and Mystara don't stray very far from those assumptions. Settings such as Dark Sun, Eberron, Ravenloft, Spelljammer, and Planescape venture further away from that baseline. As you create your own world, it's up to you to decide where on the spectrum you want your world to fall.
DMG p.9
Certainly though FR is the favoured setting of 5e. But the PHB was never meant to be FR based.
Jeremy Crawford also tweeted this:
https://twitter.com/JeremyECrawford/status/558363349549711360
Crawford: Does the #dnd tabletop RPG have one official setting? The answer is yes. That setting is the multiverse, which includes all #dnd worlds.
(...)
The core books intentionally emphasize the multiverse. FR is the focus of OP and our first #dnd5e adventures.
OP= Organised Play.
From my knowledge though, Dragonborn are considered a core race in 5e, but they don’t exist in Mystara
Dragonborn were a race introduced in 4e. Settings not updated since then will appear not to have dragonborn.
When new material is written for that setting, explanations and retcons might occur to introduce them.
For example Dragonlance: Shadow of the Dragon Queen allows for non-krynn races (including Dragonborn and tieflings) to be playable:
Peoples who aren’t native to the world still might find their way to Krynn. It’s possible to find individual members—or even small enclaves—of folk like dragonborn, halflings, tieflings, or any other race in Ansalon. Perhaps such individuals stepped through a portal and found themselves on Krynn, or traded with one of Krynn’s great empires before the Cataclysm. Use such possibilities to play characters of any race you please in your adventures across Krynn.
Dragonborn weren't even in FR prior to 4e using the Abeir-Toril merge to explain their presence.
also, something can exist in the D&D "multiverse" but not be present in one of the settings.
Although for the sake of this channel, using officially printed info is best
I'm talking about a hypothetical setting book that says something like "X character option is not present in this setting"
Ah, misunderstood
Also, the statement is true. The PHB can contain an option that isn't present in one setting, without then becoming based on another setting. The PHB is meant to be D&D multiversal. But not all it's options and lore will apply to all settings.
Including FR even.
(I was also trying to clarify while that Dms and so can add whatever, that the channel is mostly for official printed lore, mb)
e.g. high elves vs. sun/moon elves
How many elves do we got now...
FR has lots 🙂
There seems to be one for every biome
elventy
dies of 1d4 pun damage
Oh, came here for a reason. What are some gods of disease in FR?
and what domain/portfolio are they?
Ok, thx, just wanted a official god to use for a death cleric boss.
The revision implies that Teiflings are going back to their older lore, which is they can be desceneded from any of the Fiendish Creatures.
Which revision?
So, pansexuality as a norm in the Forgotten Realms:
Ed Greenwood has made a few comments on how the culture of Faerun wasn't heteronormative. If we take all his comments together on that point, basically it can be inferred that gender is rarely considered an object in matters of attraction to another person.
At least, not culturally.
There's a difference between the cultural norm and the personal attractions.
I what cultures?
The culture doesn't take it into consideration, same way most cultures in our world don't take hair color into consideration on those matters. But a person is still perfectly capable of being exclusively attracted to one gender. Or a person might, without even noticing, have a history of only being attracted to a "type".
Are people who greatly take gender into consideration are discrkmated or seen as weird?
No they aren't.
Worst case scenario, it's considered a peculiarity. Same as we may consider a friend who is systematically attracted to redheads, or people taller than they are, to have a specific type.
Why is that?
I don't particularly like it.
Cuz I'm trans girl I prefer if my gender is given importante even if my partner is bi.
As a reminder folk, opinions on lore isn't actually on topic for this channel:
Opinions on lore - Opinions on changes to the lore, the availability of it, or any other similar topics are better suited to #dnd-discussion
As this is going to quickly stop being about the actual lore as written and more about general approaches to sexuality and gender. (Which might actually be a better topic for #non-dnd-topics
I think you are not quite understanding the kind of culture Ed Greenwood was trying to convey, perhaps a bit clumsily. Let's head to #non-dnd-topics to continue this conversation, if you don't mind.
Why do I keep getting ninja'd?
Thanks
is there an antagonist who is a lawyer related to the demons or whatever? I'm interested in how wotc does lore related to that
there is a lawyer like devil of sorts in dnd's history that dungeon dad did a video on
The 2024 books
Yeah I know, just saying that’s the implication of what the future will be
What is the general relationship between drows and wild elves? Is there any historical grudge or prejudice?
Depends a lot on which setting and probably also what region.
True, Forgotten Realms - Sword Coast
plenty, though usually is more so surface elves in general https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Drow#Relationships
also just a minor note, the plural of drow is still just "drow", at least last i checked
there aren't really many, or perhaps any wild elves on the Sword Coast. They live more in the interior of Faerûn, and Chult.
There are some in Misty Forest as of Tyranny of Dragons storyline, e.g. King Melandrach
I thought those were wood elves, not wild elves
wild elves do not appear to have appeared in 5e yet
but to be fair, you likely confusing wild elves and wood elves as they are both sylvan elves
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Melandrach
though wild elves a whole have not, seems we at least had gotten them via their king, at least out of those from the misty forest
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Misty_Forest#Government
huh, Melandrach is actually described as a wild elf in Tyranny of Dragons, TIL
Besides that, wild elves have appeared in 5e, in the Sword Coast Adventurer's Guide's "Rare Elf Subraces" sidebar. But no statistics.
Do paladins HAVE to have a god. If not where does their magic come from. Their “oath” isn’t very specific.
Paladins don’t need gods. Their powers come from their belief and conviction.
Same with clerics
Oh clerics don’t either?
That’s cool
So it’s just innate magic
Yep. It’s not deities that give them their powers and abilities, it’s their beliefs and conviction.
I thought so, but my DM doesn’t believe me no matter what I say (we’re talking forgotten realms not a homebrew world)
wheter or not clerics need a god is setting specific.
Kinda? Depending on the setting and DM, clerics and paladins can lose their abilities if they no longer stand for what they used to.
Sword coast - forgotten realms
So it’s not innate like a sorcerer, who just has magic.
Clerics do need a god in FR
Ok thought so
They don’t in FR either
they don't
I would like to see a quote on that
Did a little bit a googling, appears that paladins don’t, but clerics do.
paladins get their power from the oaths they swear themselves to, at least in 5e, they only required a god in some older editions as past editions often were much more strict
There’s a whole sidebar in Xanathar’s that explains that while the typical cleric serves a god, they don’t need to.
that sidebar specifically says that its setting specifc
It does not
Some clerics, especially in a world like Eberron, serve a whole pantheon, rather than a single deity. In certain campaigns, a cleric might instead serve a cosmic force, such as life or death, or a philosophy or concept, such as love, peace, or one of the nine alignments
“Especially in a world like Eberron” does not mean only in specific settings.
yes, that means that a cleric serves a deity by default, unless the setting says something else is okay
No, it says some clerics don’t serve a single deity. Eberron is only listed as an example because it’s a world where deities aren’t even confirmed to exist 100%.
It does say some before it mentions other settings
Although it’s ambiguous
Now if the sidebar said something along the lines of “in some settings, clerics don’t need to serve deities”, then yeah, I’d see the argument at hand
Ok but either way, the do serve SOMETHING
It’s not like a paladin where it doesn’t have to be attached to a specific entity
But it’s their belief in that something that powers them, not the something itself
Mmmm true
i woudl argue that contradicts the PHB and is only true for some settings at best
It does contradict the PHB. That said, Xanathar’s is newer, so it’s practically a revision.
I was about to say that
xanathars is optional content
Although it seems like their philosophy has always been nothing is “outdated” but rather supplementary.
It’s strange
If that sidebar was in the PHB and then Xanathar’s made a sidebar saying “never mind, clerics and paladins need a deity to serve”, then that would be the most recently updated lore
Maybe it would depend on if the dm allows the book
If so they don’t, if not they do.
Optional or not, it’s the most recent
It could be seen as a revision to the class itself
Everything outside of the Basic Rules is optional
This is true
also the xantathars sidebar doesnt say that the power of a cleric doesnt come from the thing they worship.
its still granted
Anyways, the only class that actually requires an interaction with a deific/near-deific being is the Warlock
Doesn’t Divine intervention mention it?
Yes, but again, what was mentioned in Xanathar’s is the most recent lore
I feel like that’s weird because ones gameplay ones not
Does divine intervention just not work now?
Since it’s not updated
So sure, the PHB might explicitly say Divine Intervention requires that you reach out to a deity, but since then, XGtE has made it different
Not to sound like I’m trying to bounce out of the convo, but that might be more of a #dnd-rules convo
(I also legitimately do have to step away, sorry)
It’s regarding the lore of the ability so I don’t see why, ability’s work as they are written and that’s the end of it. This is more regarding a lore contradiction.
Ight that’s fine
If someone else wants to jump in and help explain this that would be appreciated
Neither clerics nor paladins need deities/powers to grant them divine powers/spells. For clerics this has been the case since 3E and alluded to in 2E (clerics cut off from their deities, such as being on an Outer Plane opposite of their god's home plane lose access to higher level cleric spells except for 1st and 2nd level, which those are "self powered").
That doesn’t explain divine interventions wording though
from what i can recall, older editions as far back as like 2e or 1e, one could cast divine spells up to about 2nd or 3rd level without the aid of a god, which would be one reason why clerics would devote themselves to a god potentially
This is gameplay mechanic territory -- the spell makes the assumption that the cleric has a deity.
such assumtions i believe are usually made since that case is largely the norm
So hypothetically if a cleric doesn’t have a deity, they couldn’t do this in lore.
3E Deities & Demigods explains that clerics can believe in a force, ideal, or philosophy.
Never said that.
See the post above.
It makes the assumption, but since the assumption is wrong in this case what happens.
also if you want the most recent Forgotten Realms specifc lore regarding clerics and gods, then SCAG would be a more appropriate place to look rather than xanathars imo.
oh and Adventurer's league had a strict "FR clerics need to worship a god" requirement
Then you and your DM will have to handwave the explanation why that feature works without the cleric having a deity.
Had?
Is it still the case
I dont know
Mmmm I’ll have to look into that
It is still the case yes
I’ll defer to adventures league in that case
AL is a specific style of game tho
I wouldn’t say it’s the proper metric for what you can and can’t do outside of AL games
DMG says the same thing that Xanathars says, just in different words
Well, there's also the case that deities don't need to be directly worshipped to hand out divine spells/powers. In older editions, archdevils and demon lords weren't deities (although some demon lords were briefly lesser gods in 2E Monster Mythlogy...) but they could hand out to their cultists divine spells via an actual god working as a liaison.
to quote the dnd beyond lore included with the base class, which presumably is setting agnostic, lends to the idea that most cases a cleric does worship a god, in the section about creating a cleric is says this "the most important question to consider is which deity to serve and what principles you want your character to embody. The Gods of the Multiverse section includes lists of many of the gods of the multiverse. Check with your DM to learn which deities are in your campaign.
Once you’ve chosen a deity, consider your cleric’s relationship to that god. Did you enter this service willingly? Or did the god choose you, impelling you into service with no regard for your wishes? How do the temple priests of your faith regard you: as a champion or a troublemaker? What are your ultimate goals? Does your deity have a special task in mind for you? Or are you striving to prove yourself worthy of a great quest?" end quote
so at least seems the core class as listed on dnd beyond devoit of any specific setting makes the relationship with a god very important, but it really depends both on setting and the dm
Pretty the stuff in the core 3 isn’t setting agnostic btw
Like the PHB is written from a mostly FR perspective
well far as i know it is does not associate with a specific setting at least the stuff regarding the classes
This seems pretty cut and dry
the DMG, xanthars etc all say the same thing: clerics usually serve gods, but in some settings, this might work differently
They don’t say in some settings, they say some clerics
granted i could be wrong, but it seems that majority of settings, with some exceptions, like eberron, a god is an important part of what makes a cleric a cleric and not a mere priest
I don’t see anywhere in that section at least that leaves room for not having a god.
but the biggest deciding factor is honestly more so your DM as their take on an established setting could be very different from what is published
We’re talking sword coast
most godless clerics i have heard of are tied to either the eberron setting or the way the DM in question chooses to handle the concept for their game regardless of setting
The gods would have the monopoly on divine magic then because Ao is the one who grants which deity has control over which portoflio.
A cleric may be praying to the forces nature to grant her spells but indirectly she's indirectly praying to Chauntea.
like, some clerics not needing a god doesnt mean that there are these kind of clerics everywhere
Idk, I think you’re misreading what’s been presented
Forgotten Realms is setting specific and that setting pretty much requires clerics to be devoted one of the scores of gods, some very niche.
I don’t see anything that says that clerics don’t need gods in some/certain settings
I am just going by what is preestablished lore for FR.
Everything I see says some clerics (with no mention of it being setting specific) just don’t need gods
I've never read anything regarding FR where there are godless clerics (Ed Greenwood may have said/wrote something that would counter this)
the xanathar's sidebar only contradicts that lore if you insist that godless clerics existing somewhere means they must exist everywhere
We all know Greenwood’s lore isn’t official, so
well, we know his lore is not always the same as wizards of the coast's version
that is what official would mean yes
i would not say it isn't official, or if i did i would definitely put a bit of an asterisk
It isn’t official
.
Just like Keith Baker’s own canon of Eberron isn’t official
Sure but they have more authority and knowledge over settings they created than us here.
There’s no such thing as “sorta official”. It kinda is or isn’t.
what i mean is sometimes someone will view official a bit different if you are to simply say official full stop
That really doesn’t change much imo
plus may just be me but just saying the creator's lore is not official just does not sit well on my tongue or feel write coming out of my mouth, feels better and a bit more accurate to say it and the published lore are not always one in the same
sure, but thats your personal feelings
Yeah, how you feel about it doesn’t change things
as much as i like a lot of keith's lore, im aware a lot of it is only kanon, not canon
i'll just dip from the topic then, don't wanna accidently start something
well Ed signed away the rights to FR a long time ago. Its not his anymore. I respect his take on things a lot but if we have to decide what is offical, he doesnt have the final word
Anyway, I would say that the DM should decide how to handle a godless cleric in the FR setting since FR is a very deity-centric setting.
Official lore is anything officially published by WotC or TSR.
There is a weird space around Greenwood's notes that he believes his contract says anything he publishes is canon to FR. But not official, and there are conflicting notes on actually what he publishes is canon. In one of the more clearer posts I could find on that he states anything he already had publishes is considered canon for FR. But the common take among the forums and some of his tweets is any thing he posts is canon.
I can't actually make a statement on that.
obviously the DM decides these things in the end. I dont think that was the main issue here.
Yeah, if we’re just gonna chalk it up to “what the DM says goes”, it isn’t really gonna answer any questions. Cuz that’s pretty much the ultimate answer to any and everything.
That's like quoting rule 0 in #dnd-rules
this did feel a lot like discussions in that channel
I think this just comes down to, something like 99% of clerics and paladins are devoted to a god or gods in the FR. But there are exceptions. SCAG entry on paladins:
Most paladins in the Forgotten Realms, like clerics, are devoted to a particular deity.
Right. Most being the keyword
Maybe its because I am not a native speaker, but this reads to me as: Most paladins in the FR are devoted to a deity like clerics are devoted to a deity.
(in which case, you would also want what cleric says)
A typical cleric in Faerûn serves a single divine patron, but some individuals feel called to serve a group
and for the record, I think Ed Greenwood's stance on things like this has generally been "this is the way things usually are, but obviously PCs are exceptions and can break the rules in the Realms"
"typical and some" would have the same meaning of "most"
ie: not all of them
oh right, pantheon serving clerics are a thing in FR (which is not the same category as godless clerics)
and druids often serve a pantheon as well, as per SCAG
I think thats in the PHB too?
I think so, yeah
Pretty sure there are even godless cleric NPCs in some of the more recent adventure modules that take place in FR, but I admittedly don’t have citations atm.
I'll happily eat crow if you can find an example
As far as I'm aware, the difference between the two is now considered only cultural, otherwise they have the same rules
that doesn't appear to be what SCAG says.
Indeed, it does appear that both are referred to as "Sy'Tel-Quessir"
Strange.
interesting. The wiki has wood elves as "Or'tel-Quessir" so that must have changed at some point.
5E has high and wood elves in terms of game mechanics but not wild elves. Grugach (wild elves) were introduced back in 1E MM2 and were distinct from wood elves.
Yeah, but the SCAG refers to both as Sy'Tel-Quessir... Now, I'm wondering about the logic
one is called "Or-tel-quessir" the other "sy-tel-quessir"
Because in theory, they're similar enough that it's not worth creating two distinct subraces, same as with moon and high elves, who can be considered different ethnocultural groups rather truly different categories.
But the SCAG differentiates Wild Elves from Wood Elves, but Wild Elves only get a slight mention that just makes you think "isn't that just wood elves?" and they're both called Sy'Tel-Quessir.
they are both however under the kind of elf known as Sylvan elves
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Sylvan_elf
they're mentioned in SCAG but with no associated mechanics.
the fact is the two, while related, are factually seperate
I stand corrected, wild elves first appeared in Dragon Magazine #67 and were later added in 1E MM2.
SCAG calls both wood elves and wild elves "Sy'tel-Quessir," as mentioned above.
It is possible that the word "Sy'Tel-Quessir" simply refers to sylvan elves while the differences between Wild and Wood elves, this edition, are simply considered a very slight cultural deviations
this seems most plausible to me, yeah
Sy-tel-quessir is the term for sylvian elves, which is shown in the link i provided to them
Though it's interesting to note that the description of the wild elves in the SCAG seem to imply that they're simply considered to be a group of wood elves that went even further in their abandonment of modernity.
For a given definition of modernity, obviously
I understand, but we're just talking about the delineations in SCAG, which has no mention of "sylvan elves"
it is not nessissarily a formal term, more so a classification
such as various dark elves, aquatic elves, ect...
So, I think current lore is just that. Wild elves are just a subculture of wood elves that went further in their abandonment of modernity and embrace of a more primitive lifestyle.
It's what the SCAG implies at the very least
"Wild elf, a tribal and reclusive society opposed to civilization living in the deep heart of the forest, and
Wood elf, a society that had abandoned civilization, preferring the ancient elven forest as their home."
they are two similar yet seperate and distinct kinds of elves
Remember that in FR, moon and gold elves are mechanically "high elves" but in older editions moon elves were "grey elves" mechanically (and in 4E I believe they were referred to "eladrin" (but not the same eladrin in 3E)).
In AD&D, there were many playable sub-races of elves: grey, high, wood (sylvan), wild (grugach), and dark (drow).
Yeah, in 4e all "high elves" were called Eladrins. While in 3e "Eladrin" referred to the chaotic good celestials that were only superficially related to elves.
and in 5e, the eladrin we have current stats and lore on, are feywild elves
from the wiki article on wood elves, cited to 3e's Races of Faerûn:
The wood elves were actually native to Faerûn, the descendants of wild elves, moon elves, and sun elves who decided to retreat to their deepest woodland sanctuaries after the last of the Crown Wars.
We should pin Elgate's post on the various "eladrin"...
so wild elves actually came first, it would seem
But this edition, I think that's how it works. You've got the "high elves", which is a term that applies to all the elves that live in civilization on the surface in the material plane, including the distinct ethnocultural groups of Sun and Moon, you've got the "wood elves", which are all the elves that prefer a simpler life in tune with nature, and they have a more extreme subculture called Wild Elves, you've got the drows that nobody needs to explain, the sea elves that also don't need explaining, the Shadar-Kai which, like the Death Giants, are descendants/maybe reincarnations of elves that made some sort of pact with the Raven Queen, and the eladrins, which are the elves descended/maybe reincarnated from those who chose to stay in the feywilds.
Makes sense to me.
that's basically it, yeah. SCAG mentions a few more rare subraces too.
True. The Avariel, which are almost extinct so nobody cares, the Lythari, which spend most of their times shapeshifted into wolves, and Star Elves which I suppose would be in the high elf category and subrace, making them a small ethnocultural group.
sometimes i find the wiki helpful in terms of sorting things that are not always published into the books we get for any given edition
I suppose the term "elven diaspora" would not be inaccurate considering the lore
Can a very powerful mage to attain immortality with mere magic? Without turning into something like a lich or a vampire of course. I assume the answer is yes, but I would like to make sure.
Umm... Elminster has been around for quite some time, right?
Can't cite specific sources but I'm going to assume yes, given people like Tasha, Elminster, and Mordenkainen still being alive.
There's also the Astral Plane, which you don't age in.
This channel isn't for hypothetical discussions, more for discussions of what the lore actually says
Yes, and that's what I want. A lore accurate answer.
You're asking a hypothical
Is it possible for a very powerful mage to attain immortality with mere magic? Without turning into something like a lich or a vampire of course. I assume the answer is yes, but I would like to make sure.
Ok. I edited my post.
That's the same question....
"Can X" and "Is it possible for X" are asking the same hypothetical
Sorry. I do not know how else I should phrase this question. Could you help me out?
You're asking a question that isn't suitable for this channel
Per the pinned post I linked, there are other, more suitable channels
I just want to know if a very powerful mage in Faerun can fully stop their aging without resorting to stuff like undeath. Where should I ask this question?
I linked to the pinned post where suitable channels are listed...
I am seeing a notable overlap between two different oozes. I am curious if Ghaunadaur and the Demonlord Juiblix are the same or different. As I am a bit confused why the Godfather of oozes would be either an ex member of the Seldarine or associate with the Dark Seldarine?
Ghaunadaur is a god, Juiblix is a demon lord
They both have connections to oozes, but that doesn't meant they're the same
There's often overlap between entities across the various spheres of power
Evil gods can exercise control or influence over the same entites as are influenced by devils or demons or far realm beings
Though I noticed one of Ghanaduars aspects/aliases is Juiblex
I found the source being demihuman deities from 2nd edition
Yeah, that seems to be a dated source that is likely not accurate anymore
As I can't find anything else supporting it
Still strange and interesting
Ooh, they were hinted at being connected in earlier editions so you aren't wrong!
Another note I have is both Lolth and Juiblex having territory in the abyss. Which is interesting indeed. Though Lolth is confirmed to be a Goddess and not a Tana'ri or Obyrith. Something interesting to think about.
I went into a deep dive on Tharizdun/ EEG/ Ghaunadaur / Juiblex up here as at some points they have have been merged or seperated in the lore.
taking the relevant snippet:
And 2e Monster Mythology 1992 relates EEE/EEG to Ghaunadaur and Juiblex. It talks about Elder Elemental God describing it as 'a force of pure elemental energy' that was banished from the prime plane and takes a different form in each world.
Readers of FOR2, The Drow of the Underdark, will find a specific form for this god in the Forgotten Realms, that of Ghaunadaur. The version presented there is one which fuses the identity of the (EEG), with that of an entity which appears to be its servant in some manner, Juiblex. In this book (EEG) and Juiblex are separated and statistics for both are provided. In Most worlds, their followings have a very distinctive difference."
2e Demihuman deities 1998 reiterates this
Although Ghaunadaur is a distinct entity unrelated to the tana'ri lord Juiblex, the Faceless Lord, or the otherwise unnamed Elder Elemental God, neither of the latter two powers is active in the Realms, and Ghaunadaur has assumed both of their aspects within the Crystal Sphere of Realmspace. Gormauth Souldrinker may have once been the name of a seperate power, but if so, it has long been totally subsumed by That Which Lurks.
So they are seperate, but their similarities mean that they have overlapped or had aspects subsummed from each other
Juiblex in 4e is also very connected to the EEG and Tharizdun in lore and Elemental Evil, thus connecting to Ghaunadaur who was the FR version of EEG. (3.5 started merging Tharizdun and EEG, which is what 5e goes with. )
Interesting indeed, Tharizdun is the Primordial that attempted to merge himself with the shard of ultimate evil and darkness right?
That's the 4e lore if I recall yep, and what also results in Juiblex who is almost an manifestation of the 'infection' caused by the shard of ultimate evil infecting the elemental chaos.
Is 4th edition lore still regarded much?
I do know 4e has upheaved some fundamentals of lore and 5e has backpedaled much of the continuity. To a point similar to 3.5e
A lot of 4e cosmology was kept over, but it's a bit hard to say on this one. Haven't seen 5e delve too much into the planes quite yet, but I also don't recall that lore being repeated in 5e (I may have missed it though)
I do know the primordial Mual tar hasn't been acknowledged outside of 4e. Which is a shame since his inclusion wouldn't be to major or lore breaking to my knowledge.
Remember that contunuity of lore is generally contained to the edition it was printed within
Lore can be assumed to carry over between editions if it doesn't contradict that editions lore
So for example, if 1st edition lore says A = X and B = Y, and then second edition says B = Z, we can still assume A = X because it hasn't been directly contradicted
Alrighty, I do have a question on where I should start to learn the fundamentals of dnd lore. I am beginning my rabbithole down this setting and want to know what sources I should look into.
I do know a notable source for some information is the Dragon Magazine and existing sourcebooks. I just simply don't know where I can possibly start.
There isn't a 'start'
D&D lore isn't linear with a single origin point
Pick something that sounds interesting and then just branch out
Maybe you start with the Masked Lords of Waterdeep in the Forgotten Realms, or the origins of Warforged in Eberron, or the models of Spelljammers or the clash between Vecna and the Lady of Pain on Sigil
Asking where to start with D&D lore is akin to asking where to start with world history 
Settings like Eberron feel disconnect from the overall forgotten realms. Correct me if I am wrong though
Settings are generally disconnected from each other, yes
I do acknowledge your point though
Also, you never specified Forgotten Realms lore
Thats my bad apologies
But even then, there's no starting point other than one you make for yourself
If in doubt, pick something that sounds interesting and/or relevant
Is there some specific topic/aspect/facet of FR lore that's piqued your interest? That's a good starting point
I have had my interest piqued of Drow society, and I have explored much of their culture and their pantheon. Which had brought me to other Underdark races
I am confused of the Derro and if they are at all related to the Duergar at all. As their creation myth suggests of their relation to an extent.
Derro are an offshoot of dwarves, while duergar are dwarves mutated by illithids
There are legends that derro are duegar who didn't escape the illithids and were further tortured and corrupted
But this is just a duergar legend and isn't a certainty
Does anyone know what's directly south of Balic in Dark Sun/on Athas? South of the Deadland?
In the realms there are multiple rumors for Elminster's longevity. Some say its potions, other say its spells.
Part of the answer was given in the Novel Death Masks. ||He can take over other people's bodies and change them to match his preferred form||
But in reality even this strange power and most other explanations for him specifically do come down to being a Chosen of Mystra, the FR Goddess of Magic, and being her lover.
No matter what other young mage might get in the way Elminster has a special place in all versions of Mystra's heart particular for that and for helping raise her children.
I don’t know if this is a good place for lore question but does anyone know when the flaming fist was first created?
The wiki has it as 1345 DR. https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Flaming_Fist
I have a question, most lizardfolk worship Semuanya; and some Sess'inek. If a lizardfolk worships semuanya, will they be hostile (to the point of killing them) to sess'inek followers? (Sess'Inek followers kill semuanya clerics on sight).
What if a lizardfolk believing in Semuanya and a Yuan-Ti believing in Sess'Inek meet?
Do lizardfolm and Yuan-Ti get along?
@verbal cradle they're asking in the context of officially published lore. That is the discussion purpose of this channel, it's not #dm-world-building
If Sess'Inek followers kill Semuanya followers on sight, it's perfectly normal for the latters to be hostile, at least as a principle of self-defense.
As for Yuan-Tis, they rarely worship Sess'Inek. They have a lot of gods, but they are normally not interested in the worship of demon lords. They prefer old gods, snake gods.
And usually, Yuan-Ti have something of a superiority complex with the other scaled folks, but it is possible for anyone to get along with anyone
Lore question about wealth and value. Like if the players walk into a Throne room and a queen greets them with all her finery how much would all the jewels, gold and all that wealth be on that person? Like how much in value would she be wearing without digging into her coffers? 1k? 2k? 10k?
And lets say a player character goes into a couple shops and drops a grand on armors and potions.
How does one measure one to another? Like is the queen's ring enough to outfit someone completely?
That's more of a #dm-discussion question because the question isn't specific to a setting nor lore.
There is no universal floor on what wealth value is?
Again, that's more #dm-discussion oriented.
The DMG has sample of valuables.
https://www.dndbeyond.com/sources/dmg/treasure#TypesofTreasure
Youre also asking about how to run something for your games
hm ok thank! I will check the link 😄
Not really for DMing I was just curious as a player to learn the basics. My understanding of DND economics is solely videogame based.
Still not lore related unless you're asking about a specific nation in a specific campaign setting.
Where do Faerie Dragons come from? I thought they were dragons originally born in and adapted to the Feywild, but then Moonstone Dragons scooped up that lore for themselves, so what’s the proper origin for the little fellas?
Dragon family tree:
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Proto-dragon/Evolutionary_tree
that is not necessarily untrue, they evolved from proto dragons as oldman showed, anything beyond that seems to be left up to rational thought and or speculation, after all i am not aware of any lore that says they are not born in the feywild and either way they are still dragons
moonstone dragons in 5e just are the ones out of the true dragons who did that, presumably as well as those eodracos that would become faerie dragons
heck, technically the evolution theory that goes with the tree that oldman linked, is in universe more so a theory rather than just out right fact
Moonstone dragons firest appeared in 2E but faerie dragons have been around since 1E.
i know, i just don't recall if their prior lore was the same as their 5e lore, as sometimes lore can change drastically from one edition to another
point is, nothing i am aware of stops both species from being natives of the feywilds
quick question but has it ever been noted of what's inside Miska's prison or is it more akin to a blank void?
not sure, if anything there might be details in vecna eye of ruin, but far as i know it is left ambiguous
Moander is mentioned in the Sword Coast Adventurer's Guide, so would be canon to the current edition
nice thank u so much
seems apart from the fortress and the cocoon of law surrounding it, seems indeed is currently at least what i documented on the wiki is left ambiguous
What kind of forgotten realms creature/being would be the most likely to inflict a curse on someone if any at all? Preferably something that isn’t a god.
A lot
I’d assume Hags would be one
Hags, mummies, liches just to name a few
nothics too
Is there a canon organization of warlocks
Kinda like emerald enclave but warlocks
Would warlocks even work with each other?
Which setting?
The Venomous Demesne in Eberron is effectively run by warlocks
The Heralds of the Comet introduced in the Book of Many Things are also effectively a group of warlocks
I don’t think they’re identified as anything other than a doomsday cult, but two out of three of their statblocks are “Humanoid (Warlock)”
In general many cults (especially those of demons and devils, but some for gods as well) also contain a high amount of warlocks. Much like how not everyone who is a part of the emerald enclave isn't a druid or ranger.
What cleric domain would make sense for a cleric of Fenrir?
Fenrir isnt a god in 5e
Does the hound appear in any other edition?
Not from what i can see
Fenrir (Fenris wolf) appeared in the 1E Deities & Demigods. It is not a deity but just an unique monster.
Isnt a god or deity in the original mythos either
though fenrir is not a god and forgotten realm's equivalent is not one either, the norse pantheon does canonically exist, with one of their gods, Tyr, being a main member of the pantheon of faerun https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Norse_pantheon#Notable_Members
Hmm.. Idk if this is the right channel to ask as I think this is both a lore and a character discussion question but what cleric would you choose to worship Fenrir?
Again, Fenrir isn't a deity.
And your question would be #character-discussion territory.
(Albeit that doesn't prevent there being a cleric of fenrir)
That's fine but Fenrir (Fenris wolf) isn't a deity in 1E AD&D.
a cleric would not, that would more so be a being to make a warlock pact with, at least assuming he could do things similar to the being that is his forgotten realms equivalent https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Kezef
though some warlocks do conduct themselves similarly to and sometimes may even think they are clerics of what ever power they serve
So Fenrir wouldn't be powerful enough to be able to give powers to a cleric?
Since it's not a dirty
Diety*
It is not a deity so it wouldn't give divine powers to a cleric. However, 5E clerics don't need a deity to give themselves divine powers.
well is not all purely power, he factually is not a deity in terms of status, meaning he does not have enough beings in a world that worship him as a god, so is not like he has any sort of means of being a god
i know in the original myth fenrir is a child of loki, but i do not know if that is the same as with dnd's version of loki
Fenrir isn't in the 3E Deities & Demigods. Demi/quasi deities have Divine Rank 0 and not all creatures that have Divine Rank 0 are deities (the Valkyries and Asgardian giants have Divine Rank 0 but aren't "deities" per se so they can't grant clerics spells).
Could eillistraee give a cleric powers?
She's a goddess so yes.
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Eilistraee
She has many clerics in her church.
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Eilistraee#Worshipers
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Church_of_Eilistraee
though if you wanted to you and your dm could make fenrir a god in your setting or for your own games, but that would be more so something for you and your dm to work on or brainstorm in #dm-world-building
any god can do so, so long as they are a god and if in another setting other than their native one, be it though at a more limited scale depending on their following in that setting, has at least one devout follower, at least to my knowledge going based on questions i asked regarding forgotten realms and the dnd version of loki when i asked greenwood once
I'm the DM hehe, I'll visit that channel
out of curiosity do you know what book he appeared in, i am curious what dnd's fenrir is like
1E Deities & Demigods and 2E Legends & Lore.
Fr
Do all elves have a common ancestor? Or are drow and high elves totally different other than the pointy ears?
At least in the FR setting, elves were originally from the Feywild and thus the fey eladrin.
High elves are one of many elven sub-races (high, wood, wild, sea, dark, grey, valley, avariel (winged), snow, and astral).
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Elf#Subraces
Gotcha so they came from the same realm, not necessarily the same lineage
The elves who remain in the Feywild are eladrin.
The more I find out about Lolth, the more I miss my ignorance. It truly was bliss.
in forgotten realms they all supposedly came from the drops of Corellon's blood, the first elves, primal elves, including the who would one day become lolth
far as i know all elves eventually can, at least in the forgotten realms, trace their lineages back eventually to one of the primal elves, ie the first elves that largely would make up the rest of the elven pantheon along side corellon
i honestly found her more interesting the more i familiarized myself with her lore
from what i am aware of you technically have her to thank for there being different types of elves, as supposedly she convinced them there was power in restricting oneself to only one form, granted i could be wrong, but from what i can recall that is the case in at least the forgotten realms
Are they good
Or like cult-like evil
Would you say that Moander druids would want the destruction of world or just the return of Moander to Toril? Knowing full well that Moander's return is apocalypse?
i'd say more so the evil sort given a partial quote "The Heralds of the Comet is a secret organization with a sinister agenda. Believing the multiverse is a flawed creation, members of this cult look forward to the end of all worlds and planes of existence." end quote
Yeah, the problem with them is that their lower ranking members often don’t know the cult’s real agenda, so it’s very easy to have people in their ranks who aren’t evil.
The higher ranking decision makers are generally aware of the plans and are evil
no, to my knowledge they do not secretly rule the world, not every secretive orginization is like the illuminati
only real simularity is them both being secretive orginizations
Ooohhh oki
Cuz I am trying to connect evil druids and warlocks via their devotion to Moander. But then I don't see druids advocating for apocalypse
well you could argue it would be the most extreme version of the sort of view wild fire druids would have, but on the scale of the whole multiverse, good chance such individuals, probably are a few trees short of a forest if you know what i mean
ie, insane
So they use druidism to get to the ends, and they don't have to have regard to life and nature itself?
to quote in the case of wildfire druids "Druids within the Circle of Wildfire understand that destruction is sometimes the precursor of creation, such as when a forest fire promotes later growth." end quote
honestly lines up with tharzidun's mo, destroy the current multiverse, to make a new one, in his case one in his own twisted image
yeah the idea you are looking for is taking that idea basically to the most extreme ie multiversal scale and honestly is a bit insane, but there are some people that just either are crazy or wind up insane for any number of reasons, especially if someone like tharzidun is involved
Hello everyone. I will be running a level 20 campaign soon, which would entail the players trying to save the Greek Pantheon from an invading force of D&D gods. I have Vecna, Asmodeous, and Tiamat as some definite members of the invading force, but want to know what other gods would likely participate with them. I will be heavily homebrewing my setting to make it a separate multiverse from the D&D multiverse that the invaders are coming from, but I still want to get an idea about some gods that would participate with some of the ones that I already mentioned. Any thoughts?
The Basic Rules, PHB, and DMG have list of "generic" D&D gods
https://www.dndbeyond.com/sources/basic-rules/appendix-b-gods-of-the-multiverse
Otherwise this is more of a #dm-world-building question and not really a lore question
Fair enough.
Hey, which of the dnd gods does Asmodeus get along with best?
none really, he was always more of an idividual figure in the pantheon. He had respect for Vecna and has made deals with Gith, Ladeuger and Tiamat but he was never friends with any
if anything, more gods hated him than liked him
But given a the few that do actually get along with him, are there any 5 or so that he would actually work with?
not usually no for FR. Exandria he's tied with the betrayer gods so alliances with them could be a possibility. Though with FR, the only case I could see it is if Asmodeus had something those gods would want, then technically he could have an alliance with almost anyone. But that does delve into a more what if case rather than what is
Remember that Asmodeus is the prime devil and that devils are schemers and "fine print" lawyers of the multiverse. Devils are more trustworthy than demons in the grand scheme of things but they're still devis (they want something in return for doing something).
agreed
In one of his alleged origins he negotiated with the deities the Pact Primeval after falling from grace.
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Asmodeus#Origin_Story:_Pact_Primeval
now iirc, is this the same situation Asmeodus got involved in court with the angels or was this to negotiate where evil souls should go?
I mostly asking because, as previously mentioned, I want to ruin a campaign involving the Greek gods being invaded by D&D gods from another multiverse. I have already concluded that Vecna, Asmodeus, and Tiamat would likely work together at least somewhat effectively, but I hope that they would have three other partners because It feels odd for only 3 gods to solo the entire Greek mythos. I just want to see who these gods might trust to be apart of this invasion so that my group feels more united than the Greeks, as a main mission of the campaign will be uniting the Greek mythos.
Again, this is #dm-world-building as mentioned to you yesterday.
The Greek pantheon is mentioned in the 1E Deities & Demigods, 2E Legends & Lore, 3E Deities & Demigods, and 5E's PHB/DMG.
I tried asking # dm-world-building, but I keep ruining into issues where they could not help me because my setting was different than the normal D&D multiverse. I am just trying to ask what other three gods would Vecna, Tiamat, and Asmodeus most likely work with.
I answered already earlier. The Basic Rules, PHB, and DMG have list of "generic" D&D gods
https://www.dndbeyond.com/sources/basic-rules/appendix-b-gods-of-the-multiverse
That is just a list of dnd gods and it does not show alliances or any evidence that one god might be fine with another.
What he's trying to say when gods work together its not about who they are likely to work with. More like which gods have something to gain by working together. Mammon and asmodeos don't have any real ties to each other but if there was money to be gained from it mammon probably wouldn't hesitate to do it. Gods devils deities are selfish beings that prefer to operate alone.
Oh, so I am just supposed to pair them up based on if they do not have any conflicting motives?
Pretty much yeah.
or if they have mutual goals
So bane + Asmodeus is just not likely because they have a very similar motive?
Sorry I misread. It's more like will just said. Mutual goals like the goal of wanting a larger domain of Influence is a great reason for two gods to join together
So mutual, but not to similar?
if the two gods want the same thing, that could lead to them working together to achieve that goal, or to conflict if only one of them can reap the rewards.
it depends on the situation. Bane and Asmodeus might work well together because they have similar values, or decide that there can be only one supreme tyrant and see each other as rivals. It's kind of up to you on a case by case basis
Remember that God's and deities are scheming smart selfish so while yes they will work together they will almost always be willing to stab the other in the back if the situation presents itself. Remember this is your world as a dm you can make them do whatever you want. The lore is there if you wanna use it or not
You are building a world, which means you have to make decisions that others can't make for you because it's not their world.
for example, Shar and Talos want to see similar things happen (the destruction of civilization and order), so they often work together to achieve those ends
Azuth and Savras both serve Mystra, and so might be working towards similar goals, but come into conflict because of personal disagreements and the fact that they're competing for Mystra's favor
So here is what I am thinking so far: Vecna wants the secrets that the fates have, Asmodues wants a new domain to conquer, Tiamat is bord and kinda forced to come along by contract, and Bane, Myrkul, and Bhaal are coming to regain some of there former power following the Second Sundering by defeating various greek titans and giants (which indirectly helps the invasion).
This is #dm-world-building or #dm-discussion territory, not lore unless you want specific information about specific D&D deities.
Got it, but it still makes sense for these six to work together from a lore perspective, right?
yes, they're all evil deities who could conceivably work together, though such sprawling alliances tend to break down rather quickly
tiamat is arguably the one exception and one that he gets along with relatively well usually
He literally trapped her in Avernus. And she is constantly trying to get out. I highly doubt they are on good terms necessarily
to my knowledge at least prior to the events of tyranny of dragons, she was a willing ally of his and served him well
plus from my understanding her being trapped in avernus in at least some of the lore was not asmodeus' doing
especially with the dead 3 involved
but yeah, in modern terms, tiamat would likely be on bad terms with asmodeus far as i know
Unless a new alliance involved Tiamat being out of Avernus.
Otherwise, they are not on the best terms.
and to my knowledge at least in regards to going from avernus to toril tiamat can not do so, potentially extended to the rest of the prime material plane, but for sure at least toril, can not freely leave, hence the ritual in and the events of the plot of tyranny of dragons
I got a question, would tiamat ever forgive Bahamut or are they destined to be enemies forever?
far as i know tiamat probably does not have "forgive" in her vocabulary, they have not gotten along for a LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNGGGGGGG time
part of their whole dynamic is always being at odds with one another, bahamut always being there attempting to thwart tiamat's schemes
they are complete opposites in terms of personalities basically, there is nothing to forgive really, let alone anything bahamut would have done wrong to be forgiven
hi, I have a bit of a lore question, because I have been told I am wrong, and I would like to clear it up. Does Neverwinter ever actually have Winter -- as in, all snowy and cold, where those who can afford it might seek out the warms and comfort of a taverns merry atmosphere, and those who cant stay home snuggled around a fire?
I have been told that Neverwinter never gets like this, hence the name.
Is that actually the lore, or does it have a winter?
i mean offical lore of course, because I realise that I can make my own worlds lore pretty much whatever I want
It's just a name, it's not literal
Etymology
The city was originally named Eigersstor, which was an Illuskan word. The name "Neverwinter" was the Chondathan translation.[6][22][note 1]A number of legends explained where the city's name came from, but they contradicted each other. Some believed the city was founded by a sun elf named Halueth Never, who led the elves of Iliyanbruen against an Illuskan invasion in −10 DR. Surrounded by enemies, he chose the site where the river met the sea to make his last stand, naming the place "Never's Winter", believing he would die in the ensuing battle. However, human allies arrived just in time and together they defeated the Illuskans. Never founded the city, keeping the name, and over the years it was shortened to "Neverwinter".[23]
Others, such as Volo and Elminster, reported the name came from its gardens, for Neverwinter's gardeners were acclaimed throughout the Realms for keeping their gardens growing and flowers blooming even through winter snow. This was also the source of the city's moniker, "the City of Skilled Hands".[1][2][3][4] (In fact, they used hothouses.[3])
Others, however, believed the city was named for its unusually warm climate and how its harbor remained ice-free in the winters.
The city explicitly does get ice and snow, that's what makes it's gardens exceptional
this makes sense. Its a lot easier to just incorporate this official lore than have to come up with my own. But the person who told me I was wrong about the winters was pretty insistant that it was called Neverwinter because it never had a winter.
¯_(ツ)_/¯
seems the person was likely just taking the name of the city too literally and was not aware of any of the supposed origins for it's name
quick question, but is it considered taboo in FR for a dragon to be associated/worshipping a non draconian god? (Example, a crystal dragon worshipping lathander)
Dragons aren't really the worshipping type of creatures unlike most sentient creatures. It's more respect/reverance than actual worship.
ah, I see
When dragons are considered on of the oldest/ancient sentient species and if they survive long enough to reach the greatwrym age category they could be come "quasi powers" by having echoes across worlds.
in short no, is just, at least to my recollection rather rare, especially on toril since their gods largely doing nothing about the dracorage for so long, that all draconic gods save for bahamut and tiamat have lost their influence on toril and no longer have a presence
also is worth noting, at least i feel this is something worth noting, historically crystal dragons were known to act as servants of the following deities in the realms "Aerdrie Faenya", "Brandobaris", "Erevan Ilesere", "Gond", and "Vergadain"
this does not nessissarily mean they worshiped those gods though
at least to my knowledge, as crystal dragons like other gem dragons tend to usually be isolationists, living far from any others of their kind or civilization
favored monsters of his aspect Amaunator do include dragons, specifically those of the sapphire, emerald, and steel verity, so if you do want to involve a gem dragon, i'd personally suggest one of those https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Amaunator
what is documented on the forgotten realms wiki seems to support your idea though in a more broad sense https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Dragon#Religion
though seems they likely would not call them by their more well known name, not sure what they would call the Lathander if not his aspect or one of his titles
If Celestials can fall and become evil, can Fiends rise and become good?
It's winters are much less severe than others in the area however. "The heat given off by the river created a permanent warm climate in the immediate area"
that can vary depending on settings, as for FR, the odds of it happening are very rare depending on the fiend
It's rare but can happen.
demons being the most impossible as they are the embodiment of chaos.
had a brain fart for a moment XD
It's explicitly harder for a fiend to become good than an angel to become evil.
Cause being good is harder.
the only exception I've seen was a balor in wildemount that became chaotic good because of the feywild
Naviask my beloved
tbh I found that surprising, knowing that balors are one of the most powerful and in tuned with the abyss
it makes me wonder, have there been other fiends that have either been redeemed/influenced to become a more good/neutral alignment
yes, but is infinitely harder than it is for a mortal, unless extrodinary means are involved, partially why most such beings tend to dwell in sigil, especially if they were a devil and would likely be a fugitive from the bloodwar
especially since angels falling from grace, is do to actions that they genuinely believe are morally right and justified, most iconic case especially in the realms is Zariel
operating in the extreme morals of the outer planes, makes them not really able to handle moral grey areas that well, thus also why you will rarely see or hear of an angle being sent to the prime material plane
Mihr, a lawful good horned devil who turned their back on the Nine Hells long ago, sends his regards from the temple known as "Heart’s Fire" in sigil
conceptually i love Mihr, dude just wants to be a good boy
Yes, but they're very rare because they're often hunted down and destroyed by other fiends.
2E Planescape's Faces of Evil: The Fiends has a section on fiends that become good. It's possible but very rare.
in addition to the difficulty of going against their very being/nature
Sry for the late reply, but according to fizbans, they used to be allies, or siblings, or married or something, and then when the home of the dragons was invaded, Bahamut took the side of the good aligned gods and tiamat went crazy after sardior died.
especially those who are devils cuz of the bloodwar and hell having no mercy for what they would see as traitors i'd imagine
siblings
The elegy for the first world is kinda confusing tbh
in that version they have not really gotten along since
either way, they have been enemies for a long time and are unlikely to just work together shy of some sort of threat to both their existences, like when in older lore they were initially birthed from the cleaved corpse of Io
(Average sibling experience) 
If sardior were to somehow return would that bring them together for the love of their child or something, or is that just wishful thinking
wishful thinking
Dragon Magazine had a series called "Fight Club" where it introduced Eludecia, a lawful good succubus paladin. She appears in the short 3.5E adventure "Legend of the Silver Skeleton"
Wishful thinking (but i would love to se Mr. Ruby Dragon himself return nonetheless)
at best, Sardior could maybe, get them to work together again, but anything else would be a stretch to say the least
Hmm
Did her race actually change to be a devil or does she just hold the title of archdevil
his thanes last i checked are working on it, but is by no means happening any time soon, from what i recall reading in fizban's
Or at least did
she was an archdevil for a time, to my knowledge she is not actually devil, being neither of the prexisting types https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Devil#Types_of_devils
The lore of sardior is pretty old and from the research I did on him, there's a lot of potential for a story involving the thanes "putting him back together" and the obsidian dragon who was banished seeking revenge or at least something along those lines
he has lore in fizban's that is not old
Really? I thought he was mentioned at best
Like in old editions he had a ruby palace and would frequent the air plane
And stuff like that
to our knowledge the obsidian dragons do not exist in the 5e continuity, at least far as i can recall
yeah, but that is not his only lore, he does not get a formal and direct section like his siblings, tiamat and bahamut, but he has lore in 5e via that book none the less
anything that does not contradict with his newer lore directly, can be assumed to still be true in the 5e continuity until we are explicitly told otherwise
Okay, so I guess he had a sort of retcon or revamp to his lore in fizbans, or do they still acknowledge his lore from previous editions?
not as much lore as you would want, is still lore
I see
like i said, anything not mentioned in the current edition lore at the time can use prior editions to fill in the gaps for the time being so long as it does not contradict
And since obsidian dragons don't exist in the current continuity, they can be assumed to not apply to his lore either
basically his 5e lore is confirmed for 5e, older lore can be assumed to still be true if one wishes until we are told something that contradicts it
5E doesn't say outright they don't exist.
at least so far from what we know
There are a lot of monsters from older editions that aren't in 5E yet. Later 5E books may reintroduce them.
5e's life cycle is still on going, and not ending anytime soon far as we know, so the possibility for reintroducing older concepts and creatures can still happen, like with some of the things we are gunna be getting in the upcoming infinte staircase book
It took a long time for 5E to reintroduce a lot of the older campaign settings, such as Planescape and Spelljammer, so just because it isn't in 5E yet doesn't mean they don't exist.
Okay, but for the time being all we have to work with in terms of obsidian dragons would be homebrew :/
so until they blatantly say they don't exist or something in the lore that makes it impossible for them to exist, the possibility is still there
They only existed in 3E.
if you wish to use them outside of 3e, yes
I see, unfortunate
not really, homebrewing is kind of baked into dnd's dna
There's admittedly a lot of potential for something with his thanes, because they don't really explain why he banished her in the first place
The obsidian dragon, that is
is partially why you never get every last detail on anything, there is always gunna be elements for better or worse left unknown or up to interpretation
And are obsidian dragons considered gem dragons?
(Rember, every table does it differently, and theyre trying to keep it open for that reason)
historically, yes, though they are sort of outliers, the black sheep of the family tree so to speak
the short answer from what is known, back in 3e, murder
Sardior was described to be kind of roughish, but also very entertaining to those around him
So I can't imagine what his personal thane would have to do to illicit a reaction like that
nothing about him suggests he would condone murder, especially of another gem dragon
though rereading it, likely do to their evil nature
Evil nature? You mean dragons?
no, the obsidian dragons specifically
they were noted as neutral evil, at least back in 3e, so one could presume they like other neutral evil creatures are very selfish https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Neutral_evil
well trickery was one of his domains back then
Scalykind? Interesting
but being true neutral it is not likely he would do so in a way that is tricky like say some other gods like loki
Loki is CE iirc
I'd say probably chaotic neutral
well factually sardior is true netural
anything you rule for your own game, is for your game
tiamat is both lawful evil and chaotic evil, simultaneously
Tiamat is interesting, since- oh beaten to it
Really?
yes
at least that is what is listed
Do we know what the alignment planes look like?
(Her statblocks have listed both CE and LE before as well)
The Outer Planes.
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Outer_Planes
presumably is do in part to being the queen of all evil dragons, and having multiple heads, each able to act independently but are all still part of one consciousness
Like- the Abyss is the Chaotic Evil plane?
yes
Or am I misunderstanding
actually, is there a NE chromatic dragon?
Oh I thought they were different things, good to know
yes
Isint it white?
Yes, see the link it has an illustration of the Outer Planes and each corresponds with the nine alignments and the gradients inbetween.
but tiamat mainly chooses, at least in the forgotten realms and most other settings to represent the 5 major chromatic dragons
no
white dragons are chaotic evil on average
Tiamat has been LE since 1E and the 5E PHB/DMG lists her as LE. However, the Tyranny of Dragons' and Fizban's statblocks for her aspects lists her as CE.
Blue and Green are LE
Red, White, and Black are CE on average
Yeah, ig deep/purple
for NE
historically there is also brown, orange, and also there are 2 chromatics known for being chaotic neutral, gray and pink dragons
Keep forgetting there are more colors. We need the whole flag up in 'ere!
honestly given the way her and her many heads work, it makes sense that she could effectively be two or more alignments simaltaniously
at least far as i can tell, and would make for interesting explanation for those things in print contradicting since usually creatures are not listed with more than one alignment if they are not listed as "any"
All the chromatic dragons are guaranteed to be predisposed to evil, right?
It's that do in part to the influence of tiamat or just their nature?
not really
as i mentioned, there are some chromatic dragon types that are NOT of evil alginment
though they only really appeared in older editions and were not used in official published material since 2e or 3e depending on which chromatic, with the gray just being changed to out right evil in 4e, because well, 4e
With them being classified as chromatic, tiamat would have reign over them though, no?
but tiamat is the queen and goddess of all evil dragons, which largely includes chromatics
eh, well all chromatics aknowledge her as their queen
at least last i checked
well is wider than that, is why her avatar of choice, that you see in 5e, has a wyvern's stinger on her tail
she effectively claims them as hers
Okay, so it's not some godly influence or anything, the dragons simply acknowledge her power and choose to serve?
and wyverns were only evil in 1 and 2e, so some things just become status quo
her portfolio back in 3e, when such details were still commonly listed for the gods include "Chessenta, evil dragons, evil reptiles, greed"
for more context, i'd suggest reading this and maybe any of the sources cited https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Portfolio
Chromatic dragons tend to be evil so it's synonymous...
to my knowledge all chromatics tend to be greedy in some regard, so that presumably covers any that are not technically evil
heck even good aligned dragons are often greedy in a way
greed isnt really a evil/good thing
What would the odds be of a dragon growing up either differently or going through an experience that would change its alignment, if that's even possible?
its just there
All dragons hoard wealth regardless of their alignment. Fizban's expanded that their hoard actually empowers them.
though historically THE draconic god of greed is Task https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Task
D&D is very creationist in that creatures tend to be influenced by their creator gods. Nothing is absolute of course.
And since many humanoid races also covet or suffer from dragons razing areas to increase those hordes, theyve been especially called out as greedy by them
but he has not really been used in official materials on time, especially since like most of the other dragon gods, he lost most if not all his influence in the realms for not doing anything about the dracorage mythal that constantly was causing the dragon race to basically butcher itself
There arent much dragon gods even in Krynn
Ok, so with all this in mind, I have a plot I've been working on for some time and want thoughts on, but would I take that to #dm-world-building ?
Yeap
Ok, thanks.
well, running adventures would be more #dm-discussion
Worldbuilding is worldbuilding
well krynn is a different setting and honestly could be the other gods never bothered to get involved in that setting
I remember there being a god who looks like a minotaur
especially since to my knowledge that is one of the settings where both bahamut and tiamat, or their aspects in that setting are at their most powerful, so given they are always in conflict across many worlds, i could see them not even bothering to try to set up a faith there
would not only be bound to fail but potentially cause who knows what to happen with them being there in the front row so to speak for one of their fights, even if they did not fight directly
Baphomet is a demon lord.
No, it isnt Baphomet
i think he means Kiri-Jolith, who is the god of war on krynn
depicted like this in 5e https://media.dndbeyond.com/compendium-images/sotdq/kHXEUZ8D0saAJOvE/02-004.kiri-jolith.png
in the first chapter of shadow of the dragon queen
The Egyptian goddess Hathor?
Kiri-Jolith, krynn's god of war
The DL wiki says it's a he
https://dragonlance.fandom.com/wiki/Kiri-Jolith
odd, guess they changed that for the 5e continuity
¯_(ツ)_/¯
oh, wait, i misread the text, my bad
"KIRI-JOLITH, GOD OF WAR, IS ONE OF MANY DEITIES SEEKING FOLLOWERS TO CARRY THEIR FAITH BACK TO KRYNN" end quote
don't know why i read their as her, i blame this soar throat and seemingly cold or fever i have been dealing with since yesterday
Called a He for sure in Shadow of the Dragon Queen just checked
yeah, like i said after realizing it, i misread it initially
So... lorewise, how do demons enter into Avernus? I know sometimes portals, and that its connected so Crokek'toeck can traverse the river and spit out demons..., but what else? Do they have infernal war machines themselves that can come through the styx?
first part yes, and demons don't have infernal war machines, at least to my knowledge that is exlusively devils and not sure if it protects at all from the effects of the styx, though usually they have to pay the Merrenoloths for safe passage
this is the main way forces, to my understanding are transported from one plane to another for the blood war, especially in the case of demons going to attack avernus
hmm, thanks!
RIGHT
I need help getting grasp on Mystara
Is there any elder wizards that studies this archaic textd
What are you referring to "archaic text"?
I think it’s a joke about them struggling to understand Mystara lore
Mystara wiki:
https://wiki.mystara.net/mystara
I meant like
Character backstory and stuff
I got a campaign coming up and I managed to land Mystara as my character's homeworkd
Sure, check that wiki to learn about that campaign setting.
Character related stuff should be asked in #character-discussion
Who are the premiere gods of fire in the forgotten realms setting?
kossuth is the main one https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Kossuth
historically others include those listed here https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Category:Fire_domain_deities
Can surtur give powers to a cleric?
Surtur is a god so yes.
He's the same one as Norse Surtur, right?
Yes, based on that one.
Gotcha. With the prescence of Outsider and Interloper beings, it has always confused me
remember, aside from the names, dnd's version of gods and beings in mythology and religions in our own reality are not always 1 to 1
Surtur is one of the giant gods, which all are divine children of Annam the all father, from his various sired children from worlds other than toril, in dnd Surtur and Thrym being twin brothers
D&D has always been influenced/inspired by real worth folklore and myths but more often than not with broad strokes than 1:1.
partially from a meta side, do to a number of creatures that are separate in dnd, just happen to in our world often have the same name as an unrelated creature from another culture, so being a sort of melting pot and a work of fiction, it just makes more sense for dnd to often have their own versions of these beings rather than trying to make them 1 to 1, not to mention less chance of actually offending people or entire cultures
In European folklore creatures like goblins, hobgoblins, and trolls would be interchangeable but Gygax made them distinct creatures in D&D.
plus also makes it easier for there to be more interesting stories by not being bound to the letter of the source material
basically dnd's versions are inspired off their real world mythological counterparts rather than ment to be the same, they are only really one in the same in so far as how they relate to dnd's version of earth, as while it is not our reality, it is a canonical place in the dnd multiverse https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Earth
Well, sometimes they took the source literally and got sued — see Tolkien, Elric, and Cthulhu (technically the latter was already in public domain but the license was to Chaosium at the time). The 1E Deities & Demigods 2nd printing had removed the Cthulhu and Melnibonéan stuff.
yeah, is why in somecases older editions halflings as we know them as now, were called hobbits
so having their own spin on these creatures not only makes it easier to fit into their whole multiverse unless they wanna bind them to a specific setting, but saves them a number of pains of having to deal with in one way or another down the line
Are there divine giant gods equivalent for the storm, stone and cloud giant variants? Or are they the titans that appear on the new book BGG?
