#dnd-lore
1 messages · Page 55 of 1
Does the current dnd have a year we are in?
Yes forgotten Realms.
Is time travel a form of divination magic? Wouldn’t gods hate mortals using time travel? Ok I’ll stop asking silly questions. Have a great night.
Time travel isn't really a thing in D&D (there are cases it has happened and of course there's time dragons).
mystryl used to monitor the timeline and created a time conduit spell but she probably prohibited its use after she got rid of spells over 9th level
What eilistraee thinks of drider ? Did a sane drider can worship her?
A good question.
In 5e and pre 4e lore, being a Drider is a punishment for failing lolth, typically inflicted on those drow who were skilled enough to take her trails but failed to show either enough loyalty or impress her.
Elistraee might have sympathy for them, as some might be drow who were not supportive of lolth and punished for it- but others could be lolth fanatics made all the more dangerous by their increased urge to redeem themselves.
I can't recall anything off the top of my head official on her stance.
Thanks ^^
time travel is not really something known to be doable by mortals usually at least these days, as the main spell for doing so, in the forgotten realms at least, has not been used in published materials since 2e https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Time_travel
so to answer the first part of that question, no it is not a form of divination magic
Are there any 5e sources for the current state of neverwinter ?
I don't believe so
Just in case:
|https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Neverwinter
@versed hare yeah the wiki page for neverwinter cites SCAG, the rise of tiamat, storm kings thunder, and princes of the apocalypse
Ahh 3 campaigns I haven't read in case I get to play them
SCAG isn't a campaign, it's a setting book
Disregard, can't read
i listed 4 books lol
tbf people say storm king's thunder is a better version of SCAG
SCAG is largely the "player's guide to the Sword Coast." Not too much in the way of DM-only info for adventure hooks and whatnot. SKT has more of that.
ah i didnt know that
Hey everyone, can someone promptly explain to me the role of demons in D&D? Specifically their relationships with Gods
Varies depending on the setting.
But across a few of them there is a thing called the blood war, where demons and devils fight one another. The forces of the heavens generally stay uninvolved because the demons and devils keep each other at something of a stalemate, preventing them from doing anything worse.
There are also gods who directly control (or otherwise also are) demons, namely Lolth
And there is Asmodeus, who is also a god and the devil of all devils
Hmmmm, I see, thank you
Has Mystara been mentioned at all in any 5e sources? Even in passing?
in passing? Yes, in the first chapter of the Player's Handbook.
and the Dungeon Master's Guide as well
No specific information on it though? That’s sad
I believe the two Silverhand sisters that were mentioned as Mystra’s daughters
I’ll check those out, thanks
really only to the extent that the setting exists and not much more than that
I’m referring to Mystara the setting from older editions, not Mystra the God of Magic
Sorry, misread
All good
But no, otherwise I think Mystara was only mentioned in the DMG
There's a brief mention of its world in one of the adventures ||witchlight||, but it's literally just one mention. Akin to saying "the forgotten realms"
That’s really disappointing, from what I’ve read it sounds very interesting
Mystara is a neat setting. Worth noting that some monsters in 5e like nightwalkers and neh-thalggu originally appeared in Mystara, but nothing about this is mentioned in the newest materials due to being setting generic.
there's not that much of a relationship there
the gods mostly try to stay out of fiendish/blood war affairs
they tried getting more involved in the past but it didn't really go well
as someone else mentioned, Lolth is a demon and also a goddess
but it's not like she's the goddess of all demons, she only rules a single of the Abyss' (the place demons come from) endless layers
most demons don't serve any deity
The gods are happy with the status quo of the Blood War between the devils and demons because keeps the demons at bay from invading the rest of the multiverse.
Not trying to be pedantic, but she controls two layers: the 65th layer (Court of the Spider Queen) and the 66th layer (The Demonweb Pits).
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Layers_of_the_Abyss
didn't know that, thank you
I remember reading in some Planescape book that in the early days of the blood war (and the multiverse) the LE and CE gods did intervene in their alignment sides' favor
but it ended badly
IDR how exactly
so now they don't
How could a szarkai be a bhaalspawn and worship eilistraee? The 3 of those seem mutually exclusive.
"What if" situations isn't really a lore thing.
I asked in character discussion and got told to ask here.
The question is how it would be possible.
There are no more Bhaalspawns.
Viekang attacked Grand Duke Adrian while he was giving a speech to the Baldurian people, and the two got into a vicious battle. While it was unknown who killed who, only one of the Bhaalspawn remained. That one transformed into the Bhaalspawn Slayer and fulfilled the prophecy so long after Bhaal's mortal death. The Lord of Murder was reborn and returned to the Faerûnian pantheon
What about durge in bg3?
BG3 is its own lore.
There are second generation bhaalspawns that are children of the original bhaalspawns though.
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Bhaalspawn#Second-generation_Bhaalspawn
Whatever the case I just want to make what I said work.
Again, "what if" situations isn't really a lore thing. We can break down what is a szarkai, a bhaalspawn, and a worshipper of Eilistraee. But the "what if" a character is all three is more of a #character-discussion topic.
It can be happening when he's still alive idc
They told me to go here
Well, you want to create a character that is all three things than it would be a #character-discussion topic.
Szarkai are albino drow. They're not necessarily evil by nature.
Bhaalspawns aren't necessarily evil by nature.
Worshippers of Eilstraee are often good-aligned drows who have come to the surface.
None of those are mutually exclusive of each other.
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Szarkai
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Bhaalspawn
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Eilistraee#Worshipers
Szarkai are often connected to llolth, so the way I see it, there's bhaal, eilistraee and llolth all fighting for influence.
Well, you answered your own question then if you see that all drow are worshippers of Lolth (they've never been since their introduction in 1E Vault of the Drow... some drow worship other deities, such as the high priestess Eclavdra worshipping the Elder Elemental Eye (aka Tharizdun) and Iuz).
i didn't, because my question is how to resolve it.
Again, that would be a #character-discussion discussion.
Lore just tells you what those three factions are. How you the player mix them together into something narratively cohesive as a PC/NPC is up to you.
they honestly are not, only ones maybe in conflict would be lolth and eilistraee, bhaal usually is not involved with their deity in any way, at least not them specifically, if a bhaalspawn were to worship eilistraee, though basically the only thing likely certain is that bhaal's own bloodlust would lead those bhaalspawn to kill, as even in the lore that is a sort of universal trait that comes with being a bhaalspawn
so it would more so be the spawn fighting against the inherent influence the lord of murder would have on them, even if minor, more than anything
Again, not all drow worship Lolth. The commoners living in a drow city may pay lip service to the church of Lolth and its priestesses though for the sake of survival.
plus any individual, drow included, is able to defy their norms, drizzt is the most well known example of this in regards to drow
plus there are technically cities of the drow in the underdark that are dedicated to gods, usually of the dark seldarine, other than lolth and i believe, if memory servers one that is centered around none
in recent years they have basically been showing that lolth's grip on the drow is not as iron clad as she may wish them or others to believe
D&D is creationist where creator gods create races in their image but the individuals aren't obligated to follow their creator deities.
Yes, even in earlier editions other drow cities have patron gods who aren't Lolth, usually one of the other Dark Seldarine.
plus lolth did not create the drow, she corrupted dark elves over many generations to cause the drow that worship her at least to exist in the modern day that we are most familiar with, some drow cultures how ever have been revealed to have been untouched by her influence, presumably cuz of their secretiveness that makes them only recently known of and thus why we are just now getting info on them
she may have the drow in her portfolio, but that does not mean she can just bend all drow to her will
Worshippers of Eilistraee aren't that rare. She has a substantial number of followers in many Faerunian cities:
Eilistraee was most commonly worshiped in Cormanthor among the drow there, in the Dalelands among the half-elves, in Waterdeep and Skullport, and had a following among the Aevendrow of Callidae as well. She also had followers (mostly humans, elves, and half-elves) living in Silverymoon and its surroundings.
yeah and despite the bigotry of many people in the realms and on toril as a whole, over time her worship has become more well known and accepted over the years
Yeah, dark elves (Ilythiir) =/= drow. They're not mutually exclusive since the drow (at least of FR lore) are descended from the Ilythiir.
a good example of how despite the opinion of others, does not mean drow are all sinister is in the video Ed Greenwood himself put out about one of the major cities of the Eilistraee worshiping drow https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=70lCG3pUycM&t=706s
That's why Eilistraee is one of my favourite D&D deities. Greenwood created her to be a counterbalance to Lolth and having Eilistraee want to help the drow under her mother's influence.
and to my knowledge, some drow, all though to my knowledge very few at least in the grand scheme of how many drow there are in the realms regardless of faith, have even managed to reverse the curse that turned them into drow, one against becoming dark elves instead of drow
same, her goal also being a future where the drow can live peacefully alongside the other races, freedom and co-existance for the win
One of Elminster's apprentices is Susprina Arkhenneld, the daughter of the drow lich Calimar Arkhenneld. The lich loved his daughter and wanted to save his baby after his wife was murdered so he fled to the surface to give up his daughter to Elminster to adopt.
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Susprina_Arkhenneld
Ed Greenwood on Susprina Arkhenneld (apparently after his NDA on her was lifted):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MQBgqdEArYE
obviously a bit of an uphill battle given how the realms is quite a ways from not resorting to stereotypes more often than not for entire peoples and what not, but is cool that she does not let that fact discourage her or her faithful from her cause
touching and heart breaking given how undeath often twists the concept of love in one's mind, at least from the sort of things i have seen be the case or described as
He became a lich after his daughter was born (obviously...)
one thing i am curious is if he sent her away before or after his transformation into undead, which i don't believe Ed mentioned in his video
but if it was after, that speaks volumes to how much he cared for his daughter, since in undeath their nature would have been twisted towards a more evil nature if he turned into a typical lich rather than say an archlich
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Calimar_Arkhenneld
She was born in the Year of the Disfiguring Scar, 996 DR, the same year Calimar became a lich.
He's listed as CE but it seems that he cared more about his arcane studies than moustache-twirling plots:
Calimar had little interest in the everyday politics of the city and the Conclave. Instead, he concentrated on studying the mysteries of magic, devoting himself to the goddess Mystra
maybe i could make the argument that someone struggling with the dark impulses of a bhaalspawn and being raised under llolth would be a bigger target for eilistraee trying to help them
Even a CE character can love someone close to them. Characters aren't truly black-and-white. They may do evil things that they considered justified to protect their loved ones.
seems then his reason for undeath was the typical "i need more time to be the best mage i can be"
i know, is just to my knowledge often things like the concept of love, with undeath often twists it into something a lot less wholesome
Probably why he gave his daughter up for adoption...
indeed
cuz you can only remain sane so long as a lich, eventually you are bound to slip on feeding your phylactery i'd imagine, forever is a long time, you are bound to miss that at least once every 10 years feeding at some point, and obviously the longer she stayed with him the more danger she'd be in for any number of reasons, so smart and selfless move on his part
Baelnorn are good-align elven lich, who intentionally become undead to protect their communities rather than for selfish arcane power reasons.
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Baelnorn
Archlich (the creature not the title) is a good-aligned ilch.
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Archlich
though those i believe usually involve the gods don't they?
well she does not really target people, she offers aid to those who seek it, part of her doctrine as i recall is offer your help to those in need, so very much the kind of faith that would not seek out faithful, but those who's ideas and desires line up with the sort of better life she seeks for her people would seek out her and or her faithful
like her faithful may try to reach out to such drow, but that is about as far as it seems to go, but mainly if they see you trying to escape the dark nature of drow society under the likes of lolth https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Church_of_Eilistraee#Activities
besides, lolth's society really only has a problem with things like murder if you get caught or it can otherwise be traced back to you
a drow bhaalspawn born under such society would likely be encourage to hone and control this bloodlust rather than fight it entirely, probably being manipulated by a noble into some sort of personal assassin most likely, would largely come down to how they were raised and how that would influence who they would grow up to be as a person
though seems to be exclusive to the BG games continuity, apparentlly we do have at least one notable example of a drow bhaalspawn https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Sendai
though seems next to nothing is described about their early life
Where does a bards magic come from?
Through their art (music, song, dance).
Whether scholar, skald, or scoundrel, a bard weaves magic through words and music to inspire allies, demoralize foes, manipulate minds, create illusions, and even heal wounds.
In the worlds of D&D, words and music are not just vibrations of air, but vocalizations with power all their own. The bard is a master of song, speech, and the magic they contain. Bards say that the multiverse was spoken into existence, that the words of the gods gave it shape, and that echoes of these primordial Words of Creation still resound throughout the cosmos. The music of bards is an attempt to snatch and harness those echoes, subtly woven into their spells and powers.
I could’ve worded my question better. “How do bards learn spells? Do they just know the spells like sorcerers?”
That is a more gameplay oriented question. They know spells like sorcerers rather than learning new spells like wizards.
The narrative flavour answer is through college.
i feel AJ Pickett's video on bards in the forgotten realms details it rather well, even what kind of magic bardic magic is in other sort of terms https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mFzJAlcVYGM
so i'd suggest giving that a watch as it may give you a solid idea, certainly couldn't hurt
More #dnd-discussion
Did a mortal family who have the blood of a chromatic dragon but are against tiamat ( like, have fight her cult for century) can pray bahamuth or the fact they are decendent of a chroma dragon will make bahamuth hate them?
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Bahamut#Personality seldomly hates anyone, let alone for such a petty reason
he would definitely see their actions against his sister/rival, of more importance than any chromatic blood they may have
at least i am presuming you ment bahamut
Thanks you ^^ it for a familly i create, one of their son is a paladin, it was suppose to be one of lathandre but i guess bahamuth will make more sense given their history with tiamat
depends, both in terms of what breed and the individual, cuz while there are certain personality norms for them, any individual can stray from these behavioral norms
So i guess some will be cool with it and some will be not so accepting ?
more or less, but their good acts would likely do them only good in terms of the perception they have of that person
though i am assuming this person wiht draconic blood is not a half dragon as that is very different from say a draconic sorcerer or a dragonborn
No they are not half dragon. Great great grandpa was, but they are not, but a lot of them are draconic sorcere. Idk if that work that way, but it is their history
not sure if dragon blood in that regard would effect them the same way it would a half dragon, often the mental state of the person if they are a half dragon is influenced by the behavior norms of the kind of dragon their draconic heritage is from, so not sure if that would be a factor, if you find someone else that might know, could be worth checking, but otherwise it would not make them any more prone to any sort of evil acts than a typical non draconic humanoid
is a bit weird cuz sometimes things can get into the blood via non biological means, especially magic, is how it is at times with the likes of tieflings and genasi, presumably could be the same for draconic bloodline sorcerers but far as i know nothing prevents it from being biological, just not sure how the things like half dragon blood impact later generations as half-dragons normally are sterile and need to use magical or otherwise unnatural means to sire children
Yes, i know that they are suppose to be sterile but i kindda love their story, so he was build different. I like the idea of dragon blood affect their personaily though ^^ mayby not evil, but like shiny thing and being a little bit arrogant is working well for them
Thanks you ^^
well if the blood does still effect their mental state, presumably such personalities would be similar to half dragons of the same kind, to partially quote the current 5e monster manual lore on that topic "Half-dragons inherit personality traits common to their draconic heritage, so that half-gold dragons are often shy and secretive, while half-copper dragons are impish and playful. Half-green dragons are deceitful, while half-white dragons are often dim-witted brutes. These traits are tempered by a half-dragon’s other lineage, but greed, arrogance, and paranoia are qualities that even good-aligned half-dragons often possess." end quote
again, no idea what the official case is on the matter if one is decondensed from a half-dragon, as it potentially could be influenced by what ever means they used to allow themselves to halve a child, might not, but far as i know we got nothing official on the matter so that is largely gunna be more so the realms of speculation
Can people with souls born in a Domain of Dread leave? Asking because thinking of making a character who comes from a Domain
As far as I'm aware, nobody can leave a Domain of Dread without permission from it's Darklord, but I might be wrong on that. But, theoretically, if they were able to leave, yes they'd be perfectly fine once they left.
It's the Mists/Dark Powers that decide not necessarily the Darklord, who are prisoners as much as everyone else.
Vecna and Lord Soth managed to leave their Domains of Dread and escape the Mists.
The Vistani can voluntarily leave the Mists to other worlds.
no more than anyone else, but those without souls, far as i am aware, can't unless they wanna you know die
more so the dark powers, the darklord's influence of the mists if any is only what the dark powers allow
Vecna managed to in his case escape via a divine loophole of sorts, and Soth got let out cuz he became desensitized to the torment they were drawing from him, cuz Darklord is a role that also is basically a prisoner that the suffering of feeds the dark powers' power
no matter what way you slice it, according to the lore that getting out of the domains of dread is gunna be difficult
like most vistani you meet tend to not be willing to share their means of safely traveling, but some are willing to con you into buying something they claim with protect you from the mists or allow you to traverse them, usually those customers don't survive long enough to come back complaining it didn't work, if you catch my drift
So a pretty common fey theme is stealing babies. What do they do with the babies?
That's more hags, to my knowledge, than just general fey. The details of what they do with them aren't exactly appropriate for this server, but I recommend you read the 'Monstrous Motherhood' section on Hags in the Monster Manual.
Hags are based on European folklore -- they use children to reproduce (see Hexblood).
though more traditional hag reproduction involves them eating the baby whole, hexbloods are something else technically
hexbloods also are capable ove being created via means that do not involve hags at all
@sharp owl beep-beep
@smoky rover
Planets were always canon (although called 'bodies' like 'earth body' and 'water body') And now there are essentially 'bubbles' of material plane that overlap the astral plane creating wildspace.
You can spelljam out of one wildspace 'bubble' into the astral, and then into another wildspace section.
Yeah, the following aspects have been removed:
- Crystal spheres
- The phlogiston
Instead there's a "three-stage" system
- A world/body/planet - exists on the material plane/at the material plane level. The 'edge' of the atmosphere roughly represents the transition from the material plane to Wildspace
- Wildspace - this is the overlap between the material plane and the astral sea. Corresponds roughly to a solar/planetary system. Has a transitionary boundary at the edge into the Astral Sea
- Astral Sea - The region beyond a Wildspace system
- Astral Plane - Term encompassing Wildspace and the Astral Sea
All Wildspace systems exist in the material plane like bubbles floating in the Astral Sea. Like bubbles, they all contain air, but not the same air. Except the 'air' is the material plane
Wildspace functions a lot like normal space; no gravity, no air, various heavenly bodies. There's also a lot of "life" and threats
The Astral Sea is much more like magical hyperspace/warp space; you can travel faster by sheer power of thought, you don't age or grow hungry or thirst, less going on but it's generally more threatening. No asteroids or space whales, but instead astral dominons, corpses of dead gods, and astral dreadnoughts
Hey guys. I need help about the right book of the part of drizzt do‘urden leaves the underdark. Can somebody tell me the title of the book? Thanks in advance
Drizzt Do'Urden or is this an obscure parody character
If Drizzt, then you'll want Sojourn
How do Clerics of Shar behave? I'm playing one and Idk what I want him to do. He's supposed to be someone who was roped into this and only does it because he has nowhere else to go. And he's currently in a selune worshipping town.
I'd imagine something like Jedi and Sith where the Jedi meditate while Sith seethe
Etc etc
There is more info on the clergy of Shar (and other deities) in Ed Greenwood Presents Elminster's Forgotten Realms, but here is the creed of Shar from that book:
Darkness is your cloak and your spur to action. Strike down the moon and those who serve it, and work against laws and law keepers, rulers and the powerful, by corrupting them and sewing dissension. Weave discord through secrets and rumors and falsehoods, so that all that is now mighty shall in time be swept away, and all that will remain is the darkness of Shar. Work in secret when necessary, obey your superiors in the Night Church without question or defiance, and give your life when Shar deems it needful, for you will reap her Dark Reward.
The book has more info about Shar herself and the secular aims of her clergy. Highly suggest picking it up on the DM's Guild.
I'll have a glance, but basically very anti authoritarian and secret
Do they tend to be violent? Cunning? Calm? All of thd above?
another relevant quote:
Priests of the Night Church are encouraged to sow discord and weaken order and respect for laws. They do this by abetting rebels; murdering peacemakers, trade negotiators, and accomplished diplomats; goading those engaged in feuds into deeper bloodshed; and spreading hatred-of-outlander rumors. Those they kill should always know they are being slain in the name of Shar, not taken when asleep or unawares. Indeed, if these deaths aren’t intended to foment strife by being mistaken for the work of someone else, Martyrs write the name of Shar in the victim’s blood beside the body.
the disposition of a particular cleric would depend more on their personality than anything else. You'd also expect them to put on different faces as befits the situation.
Daaamnn I need to get Proficiency in Deception then
I'm sure that or Stealth or both would come in handy, yes
Are the planes the same for every world in the D&D universe?
Nope
There are different cosmologies, such as the Wheel Tree (used by the Forgotten Realms campaign setting from 1E to 4E) and the Great Wheel (used by Greyhawk and 5E FR), used by different campaign settings.
Each cosmology has a different set of planes.
though by default, at least last i checked, published materials share the same planes, with exceptions such as the selfcontained eberron setting, mainly cuz those settings share cosmologies, again eberron being one known exception
The Planescape campaign setting uses the Great Wheel, at least with the Outer Planes.
What about ravnica?
Krynn uses a different cosmology than the Great Wheel -- it's more like Minor Wheel...
https://dragonlance.fandom.com/wiki/Cosmology
Ravnica is MtG and isn't in D&D multiverse proper.
Its a bit complicated. Because for example, eberron has its own set of planes, but its possible, if difficult to travel from there to the lets say Faerun. So technically, the great wheel planes also exist for campaigns in ebberon, though they are almost unreachable
Ravnica and Theros are collaborations of MtG and DnD
completely different multiverse and kind of wonky at best via the adventure that specifically was made connecting it to toril in the forgotten realms, which is wonky cuz was made by the mtg team and not the dnd team
the mtg setting cross over books are not a part of the dnd multiverse proper
is more for like what if you wanted to play dnd in those specific mtg settings using dnd's systems
Just because an IP uses D&D rules doesn't necessarily mean it's part of D&D multiverse proper -- TSR/WotC had published 3rd party IPs in the past such as Diablo, Red Sonja, and Conan the Barbarian...
What about Theros? Same case?
That's a MtG IP.
plus mtg and dnd's multiverses work fundamentally different and terms are different as are many concepts
The power levels are different (see MtG's Planewalkers).
like in your own games you can connect them, but objectively in the lore of published material there is no confirmed connection
Look. I'm confused
closest thing you have is the free cross over adventure series i mentioned, but is wonky at best cuz it was made by the mtg team and NOT the dnd team
Do all worlds share the same planes or not?
No?
Excluding Mtg and Ebberon I mean
it depends, largely if is a selfcontained setting or not
Each plane is its own world, iirc
also world does not equal setting
some settings have MULTIPLE worlds
forgotten realms being one such setting
Toril has multiple campaign settings.
Each plane is an universe.
Oh, so even bigger scale, got it
so there are basically two sets of world.
those that share the same cosmology, like FR or greyhawk. Same planes for them
those with different cosmology, like Mtg settings or eberron. They are still part of the DnD multiverse, but separated.
Krynn (Dragonlance), Toril (Forgotten Realms) and Oerth (Greyhawk) are all separate worlds (aka planets) in the same Material Plane. Each of them reside in their own star system, much like our Earth is in the Solar System.
Are there undiscovered planes?
There probably are, but being undiscovered, probably not written down or recorded
The Far Realm.
Cosmologies are meta -- they can change with editions.
With the change doesn't mean the planes disappear but rather how they're organized are (see World Tree to Great Wheel cosmology in FR)
and in universe are more so a construct made by mortal scholars to try to understand the cosmos and it's structure
like given the way they connect and the ways one travels between them, the physical construct of how they connect is rarely even mentioned or something that matters
at least to my knowledge
All Crystal Spheres/Solar Systems exist in the Prime Material Plane.
Toril, Krynn, Oerth, Mystara, Earth, Athas, etc.
hey fam
i seek aid
i am going to be playing the new vecna module starting friday and im excited
Need some Vecna lore?
im gonna be playing a life cleric, and i chose Pelor as my deity cuz i read that he and vecna have emnity between each other
good choice?
¯_(ツ)_/¯
If the adventure starts in the Forgotten Realms, Pelor isn't a god in that setting.
like i see theres more lore between him and the raven queen, but my character isnt super raven queenish
#character-discussion might be a better place to ask about your character
Pelor is a god of the Greyhawk setting.
hmm
is there another like, god of life and light that is an enemy of vecna?
like, lathander?
ilmater?
my mom?
Vecna doesn't really have a presence in Forgotten Realms.
It's not unheard of that some people worship gods from other planets. Many of Earth's pantheons are worshiped on Toril.
i heard also that in the new vecna adventure ||its a multiverse thing|| so i feel like its fine?
But Ao controls who can be a deity in Realmspace.
but yeah, just wanted to like, ask for deity reccomendations
cuz i dunno if pelor is like, maximum lore juice
Again, #character-discussion would be a better place to ask.
I already told you that Pelor isn't a god in Realmspace and the adventure starts in FR.
mood, shifting over to #character-discussion , thank u
pelor does have some history in the realms, mainly within the dawn war pantheon https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Pelor
but that would be something to run by and along side your dm, as they may not want 4e lore being pulled in, and he has not really had any appearance in the realms published materials since 4e it seems
Only referenced, including BG3...
And much of 4E FR lore was retconned / reverted with 5E.
which is the closest thing to him being refferenced in the realms during 5e, but that is a specific continuity
though supposedly that shrine of his in sigil is still there and given the level the adventure starts at, a worshiper of his being toril would not be entirely impossible, else a god of the same domains could grant the power to the cleric on behalf of their actual god while in that setting, lest from what i am aware, but i learned of that via lore videos from the likes of AJ pickett so am not certain on if it holds true
as for what such gods exist in the realms according the forgotten realms wiki, across editions, https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Category:Life_domain_deities
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Category:Light_domain_deities
the main sun deity in the forgotten realms, especially faerun, though is Lathander https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Lathander
far as i can tell, Lathander would more than likely be willing to support a fight against vecna, given his view of the undead, and vecna was a lich before he became a god on top of that
if you decide to go with the morning lord, here is the link to his church's page info on the wiki https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Church_of_Lathander
I went dragon hunting, and i think it's kinda crazy how D&D doesn't fully utilize the collection of dragons it's had in its lifetime more into the rest of the lore.
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/789051798631088149/1245064852704202812/DND_True_Dragons.png?ex=66576481&is=66561301&hm=4bf443cb19b7630a019313a62a58aa8092e25e48d522168129a6aaccfb53405d&
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/789051798631088149/1245064853014446100/DND_Lesser_Dragons.png?ex=66576481&is=66561301&hm=41029ac95b941ad273c6298127f3821454f4daecc462f7f189c7529f22dd3ba3&
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/789051798631088149/1245065018337136640/Dragonkind_Related_Creatures.png?ex=665764a8&is=66561328&hm=a3726c8870831c0f87c53e9d4e8d8d5cb12cdf5aa2450d87661f09b31a3f2d71&
Yeah, my biggest complaint with Fizbans was not a lot of the cool dragons
Especially Lung
Older editions had more dragons and "lesser" dragons.
they have limitations with how much they can put in each book, fizban's was no exception, and some are setting specific of settings they are hesitant to touch for a number of reasons, and not everything can easily be made more setting agnostic even when adapting it for a new continuity
Fizban's went out of the way to retcon out older edition dragons such as steel and song dragons...
Dies in 1d4 cringe retcon damage
"Oh, they were just silver dragons..."
5e's life cycle is not over yet, so there is the chance to get more, plus there is things like the revealed artwork for the redesign of the 5e gold dragons, which balances both it's western and eastern designs from years gone by
ew. Yeah, my love for fizbans is going down from just hearing about the potential we chould have had...
personally i feel that was a throw away line rather than definitely saying they don't exist, it very much came off to me as more so a way some scholars may view things
Fizbans didn't explicitly retcon song dragons
Plus to save page number count they merged all greatwryms as one statblock for all of the metallic, chromatic, and gem dragons.
It just "suggested" they might be some other metallic.
It did a similar thing for Steel, despite there being a steel dragon existing in 5e already
It's one of the incredibly annoying things that comes from the "In universe" author comments in 5e books
Yeah, was not a fan of how they did Greatwyrms. THey dont even look that cool mechanically!
A lot of them are simply incorrect facts
one reason they likely did not commit to to it was partially cuz of they were probably already pressed for space of what they wanted in the book
In the world of the Forgotten Realms, stories speak of “weredragons” or “song dragons,” which are variously described as “beautiful humans transformed into dragons” or as a distinct variety of metallic dragon. The world of Greyhawk has legends of similar dragons, called either Greyhawk dragons or steel dragons, which are said to favor life among Humanoids in the hustle and bustle of great cities.
The creatures featured in these legends are almost certainly copper, silver, or other metallic dragons who simply favored that particular form. Some dragons even seem to prefer Humanoid form to their own and delight in surrounding themselves with companions who can answer their endless questions about Humanoid art, culture, history, and politics.
Yea
to each their own, but i personally disagree, besides why talk about that here if it is more so their mechanics
The mechanics was a passing comment
fair
conceptionally, i liked it, it made sense and kind of in a way consolidated cataclysm dragons from past editions in the way their power sort of starts spilling out of their body a bit
but as i said earlier, to each their own, such is the nature of opinions
Purple Dragons and Ectoplastic dragons of the past have the coolest breaths i've seen, and i would love to see them be canon again just because of that.
There was a pink dragon as an April Fool's issue of Dragon Magazine...
Dungeon Dad covered it in one of his videos:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f_cMG2klOzo
they still are, just not the way you know at least in the 5e continuity, there is not 1 definitive canon in dnd, there are multiple continuities, each just as valid
one of my personal favorites, cuz is basically not only pink, but weaponizes soap bubbles despite living in the underdark, least if my memory serves
is just so cool just by how outlandish it seems by comparison to most other well known dragons
I wouldn't say there's multiple continuties -- each succeeding editon often adds, overrides, or retcons previous editions' lore
but they are also separate from one another, especially with other forms of media, so saying there are multiple continuities seems pretty accurate to me, weather they build off of or borrow stuff that came before does not change that
The way that Fizbans both A) actually references them (something 5e books tend to not do when something is entirely removed) and B) uses incredibly light wording that doesn't even explicitly remove them suggests to me that they were wanting to give acknowledgement to them without feeling the pressure (from themselves) to include a new set of mechanics
Especially with the steel dragon thing, because 5e very explicitly has already featured them
far as i am aware each edition is as much it's own continuity as it is a continuation
I don't see why they're need to be different continuity. Again, each succeeding edition adds, overrides, or retcons.
Didnt we also get a blueberry dragon?
yeah, from an extra life thing, not sure if that is ment to slot into the lore or just be it's own things dms can do what they will with it
cuz each one is still used even if it is not the same edition, plenty of people still play older editions, and the lore of other editions has no effect on the lore for their edition even when just going by published stuff
they even went out of their way to point out there are multiple continuities when they came out and did that whole article on canon
Then it's like going back in time with the lore of that edition...
anyways, technically the blue berrydragon we got is a named individual, Sheldon
Edition rulesets is the game mechanic aspect of the game. I'm sure I can run a campaign using 3.5E rules but with the 5E timeline.
so no idea if there are ment to be other such dragons, for all we know could just be he is a blueberry dragon cuz sheldon certianly loves his blueberries
I miss the Bee Wyvern with the Bee breath attack
We had one of those?!
As a statblock. Not a lore thing. That set of statblocks were (short version of it), just monsters designed by kids given stats
we only got one, technically, Shelodon the Blueberry, from "Misplaced Monsters: Volume One"
again, no idea if there are supposidly other blueberry dragons or even what that means, just that there is one known for it, named sheldon
Again, it's not a lore thing
It's literally just them making statblocks from kids art
It says as much
Wherever that dragon came from, i'm just gonna call that crystal sphere "Kidspace"
well they do have their own bits of lore attached to them, but yeah far as i know they are not technically part of the lore proper and even if they are, they never describe the dragon beyond the individual
"Having lore" =/= "being a part of dnd lore"
The "lore" of them is just whatever the kids wrote
The source explains why these statblocks exist
https://youtu.be/t56Az0HNQXM?si=3bSyAOEcR_92DvYX - Halruaa Today from Ed Greenwood
@iron saffron
Thanks. Oh, I already saw this.
Which domain of dread is the oldest lore wise?
DND has lore?????
Yes
It has lore for the past 50 year since Greyhawk and Blackmoor (which were originally the personal campaigns of Gary Gygax and Dave Arneson, respectively).
What would be the environmental risks of traveling to the Elemental Plane of Earth?
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Elemental_Plane_of_Earth
The Elemental Plane of Earth was an infinite expanse of solid matter pockmarked by bubbles of other elements and riddled with fissures and tunnels created by burrowing creatures or the occasional small mining operation.[21][35] Ensconced in a few of these pockets were trading outposts and the rare hidden wizard fortress.[19] Solid does not imply stationary: the substances of this plane were constantly moving in a slow, grinding motion punctuated by earthquakes from small tremors to massively violent upheavals.[4][36] Open spaces were gradually filled by the relentless shifting[19][35] (or marauding earth elementals)[15] unless action was taken to prevent it. Air could be found in scattered pockets but unbreathable gasses were also present—unprepared travelers lucky enough to arrive in a cavern might slowly asphyxiate while the unlucky quickly suffocated by being buried alive.[35][36] Other pockets of magma, water, ooze, dust, or ash were particularly dangerous for miners if they accidentally breached one of these.[19]
I believe this plane also has high gravity. Am I right?
Yeap, the intense gravity ften caused cave ins
Mining operations tended to be small and short-lived because the movement of the substance of the plane and intense gravity caused cave-ins, and the native population defended their territory and/or food supply.
The elemental planes are not very hospitable to mortals from the Material Plane.
If someone had the habit of traversing through this plane what kind of magic items would they need to possess in order to survive here. This is not a PC so don't be afraid to give me something strong.
This leaning to #dnd-discussion territory.
if you're referring to Crawford's "editions before 5e aren't canon" statement, idk how much we can go by it
like, many people immediately pointed out how flawed it is when he said it, it didn't seem like a well thought out statement
iirc even Ed Greenwood said that the statement isn't valid as it violates the terms of the agreement he made with WotC when he sold them the setting (I guess that agreement has something about them not being able to de-canonize such large parts of the setting or something? idk the agreement myself as I'm not Ed Greenwood or WotC lol)
so maybe that "editions before 5e aren't canon" statement is valid for other settings but not for FR? idk
the planescape book "the inner planes" is a great source on the environmental effects of all the inner planes, try to look it up there! ☺️
'Isn't canon' isn't the same as 'isn't official'.
Different editions, media and settings are canon unto themselves.
BG3 is canon to itself, but what happens in BG3 might not be canon to the TTRPG as a whole.
What was canon in 4e may not be canon in 5e.
This doesn't change that this is still official lore, published/approved by WotC or TSR. But that it is not always applicable to other media or editions.
https://dnd.wizards.com/news/dnd-canon
I'm not sure what the terms of the agreement Ed has with WotC are so it's hard to comment on it
but yeah, I'm not sure they're allowed to declare so much of the setting non canon
I know Ed took an issue with this exact blog post
The only thing I know on Ed's contract is what he's said before:
Sending TSR a few dozen cardboard boxes stuffed with pencil notes and maps, he sold all rights to the Realms for a token fee. “It didn’t make me rich (no, I don’t own part of TSR, control the Realms, or get royalties on all Realms products), but I’ve never regretted it for a moment.
Dragon Magazine 244, p 112, 1998
But likewise I do not know what terms were actually on what had to remain canon and what could or couldn't be changed.
Or if 'canon' was used or another word but Ed feels they are interchangeable.
I also know that WotC has some pretty strict supervising on their FR video games to make sure they match with the canon of the setting, so idk if even they agree with the "every thing can have it's own continuity" thing
I think you're confusing different things
the developers of the Neverwinter MMO talked about this in the past
maybe, idk
What you're describing is IP management, WotC ensuring that third parties represent their IP appropriately
got it
This is not a matter of canon, which is about a continuity of events within fiction
Canon is saying "Officially A leads to B which leads to C which leads to D. E through G are not canon events"
That doesn't mean E through G aren't official, they're just not part of canon
And sometimes you can have multiple canons, so there might be the Alphabet canon of A>B>C>D and the Numerical canon of 1>2>3>4
This is equivilent to how different forms of D&D media have their own canon
can someone summarise Phandelver and below for me?
I just realized I accidentally completely skipped that module
thank you!
Ben Riggs (A D&D historian and wrote Slaying the Dragon) also seems to think Ed is mistaken about what the agreement actually entailed:
Ed Greenwood sold TSR the rights to the Forgotten Realms campaign setting in 1986 for $5,000 and an Apple computer (later negotiated up to include a hard disc drive).
And that's it. No contractual requirement for anything to be canon, no guarantee of writing novels and no reversion clause if TSR didn't publish an FR product once per year (another oft-quoted clause in the contract which seemingly never happened). Jeff Grubb made Ed an effective editor, writer and lore-checker on FR through TSR's tenure and he retained that into WotC's tenure but they did not have to do that.
so basically Ed and WotC disagree on this and Ben's saying WotC is likely correct? if I understood correctly?
No? WotC hasn't made any statement on what Ed's compensation or agreement was
Ed has, and then Ben has done research that suggests a contrary account to what Ed has said
understood
But it's all moot; the Forgotten Realms is the intellectual property of WotC by way of TSR
WotC has made no statement.
However I cannot legally say what the case actually is, nor do I know what the contract actually says.
I know that Greenwood claims that the contract says anything he writes is canon (including his tweets and 'So Sayeth Ed' posts- which the FR wiki supports up until Ed disagrees with officially published lore) and Riggs disagrees that's the case at all.
supporting the statements up until they disagree with officially published lore seems like the right call ig
Well it's neither right nor wrong, it's just a perspective of viewing the lore
Other people just factor what has been officially published by TSR/WotC (hence official lore)
yeah
Just while we're on it, dug up the one instance I can find of that cotnract being spoken about (By 'THO/The Hooded One' who is close friends with Greenwood and oftens speaks on behalf of him):
http://candlekeep.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=17833&whichpage=1#422069
The original Realms agreement between Ed and TSR, which is the means by which the wider world got to see the Realms at all (beyond passing references in The Dragon and elsewhere, such as the late, lamented Gameplay magazine), is, paraphrased, this:
Ed is the creator of the Realms. Everything Ed publicly says or writes is canon, by definition, unless or until superceded by later material published by the copyright holder (so, TSR/WotC, but not a computer game license holder, unless Ed has blessed that non-WotC material as "canon"). So Ed's utterances at a GenCon seminar are canon, Ed's website columns are canon, what he says about the Realms in media interviews is canon, and what he says at Candlekeep is canon. Period.
Participants in the FR wiki can of course hold any opinions about the Realms or its lore they please, but there should be one thing that isn't open to debate, and that's Ed's status as the font of canon.
However being paraphrased here doesn't exactly help. None of these folk (THO, Greenwood, Riggs) are lawyers as far as I know, and I doubt this will get properly resovled until the actual contract and a lawyer look over it, but there doesn't seem to be any incentive to do that.
Personally I treat Greenwood and any creator (Gygax, Keith Baker) of a setting's non-official statements as not 'Lore as Written' but 'Lore as intended', equivalents crawford tweets for rules. Helpful, but not 'official'.
However, this does directly contradict what WotC has said with regards to canon in their official article on the subject
that was not what i was referring to
It is an interesting gray area. Greenwood also constantly talks about how there are many topics in the setting that he is just not allowed to talk about due to various non-disclosure agreements. He signed with both TSR and Wizards of the Coast.
Typically these were around characters and or locations that were being planned to have products that around them and the vast majority of them never materialized. But he still will not talk about them unless he gets direct permission from the company that it's okay.
Here's a recent video he made, about a piece of content that was until very recently under a non-disclosure agreement.
https://youtu.be/MQBgqdEArYE?si=A2TueO26yzOMXVkA
While his original contract may not have included in a safeguards for him. The existence of these non-disclosure agreements means that there are other things that we are just not privy to. Such as the nature of business. What is and is not true In cases like this, it's best left to the people who are in the room where it happened. And until such documents are published, which I doubt they will be. The best thing to do is take both sides with a 5 gallon drum of salt.
Someone read Making of Original DnD?
It's not out yet (it slated to be released June 18th).
The subject would be better discussed in #dnd-elder-editions
quick question in regards to obyriths, was it ever noted if any more asides the named ones escaped their original plane or was it just them. trying to look up on the wikia but I'm not sure if it was only a small pack of them
Not much is known about them because the tanar'ri demons slaughtered most of them. Pale Night, Dagon, and Pazuzu being some of the few survivors.
Green Slaad are wizards or sorcerers?
Hmmm...
though they are closer to sorcerer in concept
They have innate spellcasting with no class spell associated with it.
CHA innate casting is almost a sorcerer everything but name
This is leaning towards #dnd-discussion territory...
Monsters have had innate (classless) spellcasting ability since 1E.
classes convey certain concepts, in case of the sorcerer someone who's magic comes from within. monsters dont need class levels to be based on the same idea
Again moving towards #dnd-discussion territory as we're discussing gameplay mechanics...
this isnt about the mechanics. its about how statblocks dont tell us fully what concept a creature is for lore purposes
Yeah, because I wanted to use the Slaad as like an evil wizard but it was unclear if if could learn or research spells. I guess it just likes magic.
Cool I guess.
Then #homebrew would be your best case. The DMG says you can give character classes to monsters.
a slaad could become a wizard or sorcerer like any other creature, but its innate spells are just innate magical powers that all slaadi of that type possess.
they are made from creatures capable of a certain degree of spellcasting https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Green_slaad#Ecology
Hence innate spellcasting.
indeed
and keep in mind any intelligent creature with enough intelligence to understand and practice it can become a user of the art, ie what they call practice of arcane spellcasting in the forgotten realms, though i personally doubt it would be common among most slaadi do to their chaotic nature, least the majority of them, cuz historically there were these odd balls https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Gormeel
well anything it would gain from class levels ie training or arcane study would be separate from it's innate abilities
What happens when a shar priest converts
that is what I was saying, yes
I see how it could've been taken differently, though. edited
Do giants have any specific gods they worship usually? If stone giants have one specific to them that would be even better
Yes, Skoraeus Stonebones is the intermediate god of stone and mountains. He had little interest in any giants but the stone giants.
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Giant_pantheon
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Skoraeus_Stonebones
I have a question I been looking around about the gods and there stuff the question I have who is the "main god" of each race like I know the elf and dwarf have there one but what about the rest?
depends on the setting
In D&D most non-human species tend to have a creator god and a pantheon.
For example, the surface elves has Corellon Laraethian as their creator god and the Seldarine as the elven pantheon. https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Seldarine
Humans don't have a creator god though..
I know of that but what about the Orc or the halfling, Tiefling etc
Orcs and halflings have creator gods and pantheons.
Orc pantheon:https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Orc_pantheon
Halfing pantheon: https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Yondalla's_Children
Gnome pantheon: https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Lords_of_the_Golden_Hills
Tieflings aren't considered a race onto themselves but rather descendants of those who have fiendish blood in them — so technically their "creator god" is Asmodeus (for those who have devil blood in them)
I see thank but speaking of Asmodeus i don't know how true that is but did he really could have ended the blood war?
that is the fun thing about asmodeus, he has covered his own origins in so much uncertainty and mystery, it very well could be true or false, nobody knows for sure, and obviously he is not gunna be so foolish as to admit to deliberately not doing everything in his power to defeat the demons
True on that but I still feel like it a bit false be careful hell have only have 9 layer and the Abyss is infenet as long as I know
Like there are way more demon the devil
given he is said to deliberately mislead his generals to keep things in a constant stalemate and encourages devilish society to try to overthrow him and is well known for his intelligence, would be hard to believe that he makes these moves and is actually trying to push for a final victory only to fail
yeah but basically what devils lack in number they make up for in skill and disipline, being lawful evil beings and all
most demons typically have the battle plan of just running in to murder things in their own way, very disorganized and chaotic, especially by comparison
trust me, if it all just came down solely to pure numbers, i doubt it would be as big of a deal as it actually is, let alone still be going on in the lore
Yea that the demon alright bet in older version there some demon what way older like the first demon before demogorgon
?
some of that does not make much sense, least to where i can tell clearly what you mean
obyrith demonor something like that
not nessissarily
older does not always = more powerful, that is more so a dragon thing than any given magical or powerful being
some of the surviving obyrith are very weak compared to the likes of demogorgon
cuz yeah, the tanari, of which demogorgon is one of and notably the first, those demons hunted down and murdered the vast majority of them, any survivors only did so by going into hiding, some of them simply opperating as more so demon lords than obyriths, keeping it a secret
cuz obviously if the tanari found out, they'd try to kill them
I see ok thank but another question like you say it more of dragon think then demon and I agree on that one but how does a demon become strong in the Abyss the don't need soul as this more of a devil thing
both need souls and can use them to become more powerful
demons basically get stronger most often by surviving, murdering and amassing power in the abyss, those that can do so an maintain control over a layer of the abyss for 30 days straight, being transformed into demon lords by the abyss itself, that 30 days strait thing to my knowledge going for any being in the abyss, mortal, demon, devil, god, ect..., the abyss is not picky
and while i could be wrong, usually, to my knowledge at least, becoming a demon lord comes with a power boost that usually puts you above the average demon, especially since it gives you a unique form and powers specific to you
like some are stronger than others, but more often than not the amount of power a demon lord has, by way of maintaining control of what is now their layer usually makes it so not just any run of the mill demon can just come and merk them
hey guys
im reading this "a guide to the astral plane"
and i saw this
w8 this channel doesnt allow pictures
gimme a sec
"Here's an important point, however. Just because it's a realm of the mind and physical things are really made of mental energies doesn't mean that whatever a berk thinks comes true. Not at all. Instead, physical things keep their perceived qualities, even in the astral form. Hard things feel hard, bitter things taste bitter, and so on. Perception is the key, but it is not the master. Just thinking about perceiving a sword does not make a sword appear. This isn't the plane of wishes. A berk's tiny mind just doesn't have that kind of power over the infinite Astral."
it does, just you need certain permissions, usually something moderators have i think
does this implies that the reason a mind cant create things on the astral is not because it isnt possible, but because the mind just isnt strong enough?
thats what i can understand from it
I see damn there is alot thank
If it is OK I will like to ask one last question this is more of a lore wise
Who is bigger theart to the matiriol plane Demon or Devil
idk, what edition is that from? as each edition's lore is specific to that edition and does not nessissarily apply to others
definitely demons, often devils, last i checked are usually only ever on there, aside from say imps, because some stupid mortal summoned them, pulling them away from their post in the bloodwar, or to counter act a demon incursion on the prime material plane
like if a demon murders something on the prime material plane it can potentially scar and warp the environment for hundreds of years, at least from what i can recall, but either way definitely demons, cuz devils usually don't get involved much with the prime material plane at least to where they are threat to it
Thank you
honestly questions like these are often answered in lore videos put out by AJ Pickett, who is a rather credible source in video form, so i would suggest giving those a watch perhaps as he likely makes mention of details i left out, mainly since i was going off memory and he tends to cite his sources if you wanna go digging for the exact text in the books, he also explains it rather well and does his best to when possible, stitch the lore across editions into a somewhat cohesive narrative, which sometimes makes understanding big chuncks of lore easier
but will also usually let you know when it is not the case in lore or is just is own speculation or what have you
i know he has done quite a few on the topics of and surrounding obyriths, demons, and devils
"a guide to the astral plane"- by monte cook
dont see any edition in here
searched on good, apparently that is part of the 2e planescape books
yes
its interesting because
it donest say that it is straight up impossible
it says that a tiny mind doesnt have that power over the astral
but it never say that that kind of power is physiclly impossible
well from what i know, though maybe not applicable to 2e, that is more so something done in the deep ethereal https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Ethereal_plane
ill give that a deep read and come back to you
i was breewing the idea that maybe elder brains could make things on the astral plane?
brb tho
if you feel you need more context, i'd suggest checking and hunting down the sources cited to read the full text, as the wiki can not always quote things word for word, do to legal reasons far as i am aware
ill do
far as i am aware they have no such power in any lore i am familiar with, but hey your game, your rules, but talk of such things would be better put in #dm-world-building
especially if brainstorming
yeah no, im just looking for the lore of it, not planning on doing anything with it any time soon
i just like lore-prospecting
sorry if that seemed rude
wasnt my intention
ok i found something interesting about this
"The proto-matter swirling about the Ethereal plane could be used to create demi-planes, either through natural fluctuations in the medium or by the actions of powerful beings. Some known demi-planes included the Demi-Plane of Shadow, the Demi-Plane of Time, the Demi-Plane of Electro-Magnetism, and the possibly legendary Demi-Plane of Imprisonment."
proto matter, and demiplanes
"The Deep Ethereal swirled with large blobs of protomatter which could form a demiplane when a critical size was reached. Powerful wizards, technologists, or demigods could also bend the proto-matter to their will and create a demiplane. These nascent planes might exhibit some of the characteristics of the Inner planes or the Prime, but with their own rules of gravity, material make-up, etc., and even support life. Most demiplanes eventually collapse into themselves and break up or merge with another Inner or Prime Material plane."
Thanks so much
What does Tiamat's lair look like?
The realm was a large cave system within a tall mountain, hidden in the hills of Avernus. It held the only known portal that led to the second layer, Dis.
The caves were littered with Tiamat's own treasure hoard, which lay scattered on the floor throughout the complex. Tiamat's Lair was patrolled from the sky by numerous flights of dragons. The portal to Dis was guarded by Tiamat herself. She only let those who offered a worthy sacrifice through
The lair was also inhabited by Tiamat's mates and their descendants. The realm was generally avoided by demons, who were aware of Tiamat's lack of interest in the Blood War. It was, however, occasionally visited by devils offering gifts, hoping to seal bargains with Tiamat.
Books to find more info
On Hallowed Ground By Colin McComb
Mordenkainen's Tome of Foes By Mike Merals and Jeremy Crawford
The Rise of Tiamat By Steven Winter, Alexander Winter, and Wolfgang Baur
I had a question about half elves
Which is?
Just ask the question, no need to ask about asking a questions.
Do they only speak common or what are the other languages they speak? I think what I’m trying to ask is if there is a specific elven language
https://www.dndbeyond.com/sources/basic-rules/races#HalfElfTraits
Languages. You can speak, read, and write Common, Elvish, and one extra language of your choice.
(It will say so in their features)
Depends on tue half elf individual
Is there an elvish alphabet somewhere I could reference
Its in the PHB
Yes, it's in the PHB
https://www.dndbeyond.com/sources/phb/personality-and-background#ElvishAlphabet
Ah ok, thanks so much
They speak whatever language or languages they learned based on where they grew up, just like any other person
The only exception to this afaik is Eberron, where all elves including half elves, have mystical access to elven language without learning it
On Demons or Devil's being bigger threats it really depends.
If Demons get to the Material Plane they tend to rampage and cause problems. Devils are less likley to do that, but if they are involved it's normally a big plan that will cause tons of issues.
except not, demons literally wanna slaughter the multiverse, basically burn it down to the ground, so easily bigger threat to the prime material plane, devils at worst wanna rule everything
Devils are at least predictable.
Demons are chaos incarnate.
The question of which is a bigger threat also includes who is more likely to be successful I think.
devils also can be reasoned with, being lawful beings
Sucking your entire city down into Hell and transforming your souls into devils is I think worse than simply being killed by a Demon.
that is 1 specific example that is rather rare in it of itself
like only 2 or 3 times, EVER has any devil tried to do with that a city or a world on the prime material plane
That's not really an 1:1 comparison...
It is arguable that Devils, by nature of being excellent planners are more likely to succeed than Demons, and their schemes are more likely to be large-scale impactful and more difficult to foil.
is not something normally done or even considered
Devil's also get involved in trying to exert control over nations and towns in order to make them puppet states that reinforce them.
Yeah, that was one time, and there were a lot of factors involved
not really, at least that is on the lower end of their priorities
No Soul Factories as they call them are a constant interest.
devils first and foremost are dedicated to the bloodwar and infernal society, and most of the tempting of souls is done after those souls pass on and are awaiting judgement
soul factors? there is no such thing to my knowledge in dnd lore
Never heard of it and I have the 3.5E Fiendish Codexes behind me.
and making the nation more likley to produce lawful evil souls, by having the mortal rulers make polcy and life changes for the residents.
It's from those books
neutral evil souls are more useful for making new devils though, is why the soul trade exists https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sxysJmif5XM
yet you are refusing to provide citation, seems more like you are going off memory and could accidently be citing homebrew
Gotta keep those books in pristine cindition
I'm eating and playing Overwatch 2. And it's not my job to do research to disprove someone who cites something without citing the source material.
yeah if it is indeed a thing in dnd, you should be able to cite the source to prove it exists
I am checking. I messed up the soul Factory name. They are just Territories
KRETOR: A SAMPLE TERRITORY
The city-state of Kretor serves as a textbook example of a soulharvesting territory. Home to an austere society of lawful evil
militarists, its dead citizens have gone reliably to Hell for more
than six generations. The fact that nine in ten of its people are
lawful evil at the time of death has earned it a place among its
world’s most lucrative soul-harvesting areas.
The territory is controlled by a paeliryon named Nimruku,
which received the assignment from its lord, Mephistopheles.
Nimruku is credited whenever a citizen of Kretor goes to hell.
Nimruku has divided the city into six sectors, each of which
is controlled by a horned devil loyal to it—and through it,
to Mephistopheles. Each of these horned devils gets partial
credit for every soul from its sector that arrives on the Shelves
of Despond.
In turn, each horned devil has assigned several lieutenants
to oversee the various neighborhoods in its section of Kretor.
Each of these underlings receives a share of the credit for the
appropriate souls when they arrive in Baator. The lieutenants
work mostly through human devil worshipers and sell-souls to
ensure that the laws of cruelty remain strong against the forces
of good, chaos, and neutrality. Their primary duty is to look
out for other devils attempting to horn in on their turf and take
credit for their damnations.
Page 15 of Fiendish Codex 2. With also mentions how Devil's try to influnce socities to make soul harvesting reliable.
that still is more harm to the mortal's life on the prime, than threat to the prime material plane itself
what is the average age of a fiend, or does it depend on the type
By age, im guessing you mean lifespan, right?
i don't think there's a way to answer that realistically. it'd depend a lot on the specific type of fiend; weaker types of fiends are unlikely to survive a long time, so their average age would be lower, and so on so forth
They're virtually immortal beings from timeless planes
I don't think the question would make sense to a fiend
the only possible argument i could see then, is that they're as old as the planes themselves.
devils are as old as the hells and so on
Theyd have to be "young" to remember their age
so after a certain point is there a term you could use, like eons?
i'd think it's more likely they might remember a particularly notable event from their mortal lifetime, but over the centuries they'd lose track of how long it's been since then. a character with enough History knowledge might be able to pin it down
and speaking of History, i have a question myself 😅 i have an Edutainer Bard with expertises in all the knowledge skills among others, who will be trying out Heroes' Feast for the first time, and i think she'd like to replicate famous feasts from history 😄 i know very little FR lore myself though 😅 of course there'd be plenty of chronicles of such on Toril, but have any of them been written down in our reality (doesn't have to be George RR Martin levels of detail 😆 )? or does anyone at least know of a major event that would include such a feast?
Demons aren't born like mortals are. They are often created by the Abyss itself. They lose their memories of their past mortal lives, like most petitioners in the Outer Planes.
This seems more of a #dm-discussion thing than a lore issue.
most fiends, unless newly formed, are likely beyond many mortal lifespans and is rarely if ever a factor, there at best is in relation to their peirs, superiors, and other beings who are effectively immortal so long as not slain on their home plane of existance, at least historically
to my knowledge, when a demon takes form, they are effectively "full grown" there is no infant stage, closest thing would be the soul larave used to create new ones independant of the ones constantly being created by the abyss itself
it largely is not relevant, at most you get the idea of how old an entity such as a fiend is by their relation to events they were either a part of or around to remember, like a fiend that was around during the early days or even the start of the blood war, would be untold millenia old, but be about as fit and healthy as any of their peirs, as the beings of the outerplanes are metaphysical in nature much like the planes themselves
and i mainly give that as just an example
heck, some beings, such as asmodeus, have been around since before time was even recorded
The only fiend that has an immature state are the nabassus, where the juvenile nabasu spend time on the Material Plane before become more powerful and returning to the Abyss.
Do a final supper
This going out of the scope of this channel...
i am so clueless on FR lore that i have no idea if you're referencing an actual event or just joking 😓 (not seeing anything for that search term on the wiki)
FR lore is detailed but not that detailed. There are still big enough gaps for DMs to fill.
Again, this is moving into #dm-discussion territory.
i had the feeling it might be like that, so i'll make something up. and i was asking this here for my character, as a player, for the purpose of not springing on a DM "it's a famous historical feast! tell me one from FR lore!" so this seemed like the most appropriate channel to ask, my apologies for getting the channel wrong
Work with your DM.
this is for AL, there's not just one DM to worry about. but anyway this cloud is appropriately chastened and will run away now goodbye
to my knowledge there is not any, but if they are they would be classified along with other major historical events, though to my knowledge there are none that are feasts https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Category:History
very easily, one has an eye on it, the other does not
the eye is very prominent, kind of hard to miss
plus Helm's is far more descriptive "An upright left gauntlet with a staring eye on it" vs Torm's as a "White right gauntlet"
so one is much more specific and they are opposite hands
what are sune's followers like
i'm interested in learning more than just what her religious traditions are, more about what the people would be like to talk to.
Look at the citations for the source books/novels cited. That'll be best you'll get short of asking Ed Greenwood directly (he has his own Discord server).
also has his own youtube and X/twitter profile where he shares realms lore either via posts or videos depending on the platform
Are demons and devils immune to the effects of the river styx?
Fiends don’t fear being momentarily exposed to the Styx, but — with the notable exception of hydroloths, merrenoloths, and amnizus — even they can’t retain their memories if they drink from the River Styx or swim for too long in its waters.
from Tome of foes
no, though there are sometimes exeptions
Are there any magic items or useful concoctions that you can make out of a slaad gem?
reading that is what inspired me to ask the question
basically can be used to control the slaad it belongs to, just gotta crack their head open and grab it before it can kill you, they can more or less regenerate or survive such a process
I understand that you can use it to cast spells but the player I'm asking this for specifically loves making items and potions out of monster parts
That seems more like #dm-discussion or #homebrew
not sure about being able to use it to cast spells, to my knowledge the main use for a slaad's gem is to control it
I always like to check if there is precedent before starting homebrewing
anything else to my knowledge would be homebrew but would be hard to make sense for given what the gem is, assuming you are keeping the lore of the gem in tact and just making up new uses for it
but in published material to my knowledge it had no use beyond controlling the slaad associated with the gem
which makes sense cuz it is not like the gem is some typical material component or biological part, it is litterally a small fragment of the spawning stone, at least according to the published lore
Question: according to the DM’s guide, Eberron uses a different cosmological model (and thus seemingly a different canon entirely!) than Sigil and the Outlands. However, I’m writing a campaign where I want travel between Sharn and Sigil. Is there an in-lore way for this to be possible, or do I have to BS it in my game to make it work?
I want to keep things in the D&D canon as much as possible
cosmology does not equal canon/continuity
eberron is a self contained setting, isolated and hidden within the deep ethereal plane
while sigil does not exist in the published continuity for eberron, nothing is stopping you from adding it to your campaign
fwiw, WotC are doing this themselves in certain recent publications. So I wouldn't worry about it too much. You could try to come up with any actual reason why this travel is possible, and you'd be putting more effort into rationalizing it than they did.
if you want to know how/if the creator of the setting would link the two, you could ask keith baker via twitter or the like
beings from eberron being able to travel to other settings or leave the self contained cosmology of eberron at all, is largely something specific to WoTC's version of the setting's continuity
so even if going by that, there is literally nothing stopping a door/portal from eberron appearing in sigil, though if i had to guess, likely is inactive the vast majority of the time, but that is assuming one already exists
which one? https://dnd.wizards.com/news/dnd-canon
I could write lore that has the portal be rediscovered after years of dormancy
not to mention there are different continuities between the settings by their creators and the versions wizards of the coast publish
5e
i have an idea, though would be more the realm of #dm-world-building
yeah, not that simple
if you want to move there I’d be more than welcome discussing it
cuz again, even in any one edition, there can be multiple continuities to any given setting
when most people talk about "canon" they usually mean "all existing official lore for the setting [in X edition], regardless of where it comes from." The WotC canon policy isn't super relevant for DMs running their own games.
I recall it’s deep and far in the Astral in 5e. And normally inaccessible for normal planer travellers
yeah which is kind of my point to a degree
in terms of official canon, you can reach Eberron from other settings and places
(deep ethereal, not astral)
last i checked it was the deep ethereal, there is no "deep astral"
Rechecking
the FR wiki page has a nice list of specific ways one can reach Eberron from elsewhere. None of them are from 5e though.
It is in the Ethereall
is a bit of lore i liked, cuz i actually theoized it to be the case as part of my theory of where in the multiverse the settiing was located in dnd's multiverse, before they actually, though in a less detailed manner, confirmed it in published materials for 5e, so it is a bit of lore that tends to make me grin :3
Anyway while you can’t like Spelljam over to Eberron, Sigil’s portals always bypass all of that
eberron has been in the deep ethereal since its introduction
Sigil has portals that lead everywhere, if you have the right key in the right place you can get there.
That’s how all Sigil portals work. You need to walk in the right place with the proper key. Lots of people there just keep track of them
but there is also nothing in the lore that explicitly connects the two, at least in published materials, they kind of dance around that
||The most recent book has you take a portal from Sigil to Eberron||
Speaking of travel with Eberron, woukd the... Thingymajiger that happened in Cyre be a possible explanation for going out or in of Eberron, or is this more up to DM due to the nature if the event
if you mean the new adventure, dude, #1029833015423143957
not all of us have access to, let alone read or are aware of it's contents
That’s part of the marketing and on the back of the book
adventures and sourcebooks are notably different things
Purely up to DM for the Mourning
It will never have an official explanation
1 no idea what you mean, but two, likely would not be something officially mentioned in the published continuity, as far as i know and can recall, the few characters that have traveled from the setting to others is not exactly detailed, honestly if you wanna connect have people from the setting and vice versa, outside of published adventures and storylines from novels and the like, you unlikely are gunna get something concrete and thus would be up to the dm and how they run their version of eberron
again no
well far as i know they seemed to, cuz i was not away of any offical connected ways between the two, apart from what kinen spoiled
like I said, its always been in the deep ethereal. with it possible (albeit, usually very difficult) to travel to and from
LESGO
also to anybody who hasn’t gotten their hands on Eve of Ruin, don’t read the comment I replied to
I was refferring to the Mourning. The beeg cataclysm at Cyre
well in a way, i guess it got you out of eberron, though maybe not the way you are thinking https://eberron.fandom.com/wiki/Day_of_Mourning
it is literally described as a "magical holocaust of unknown origins"
the kalashtar one one half human and one half quori from what i recall, is kind of a spiritual fusion, if memory serves, to begin with
i also recall most are the restulf of that fusion being 1 generation removed, thus stretching the quori half across those living relatives to the point their connection to the other half is weak at best
not quite
also from what i can find, seems the kalashtar were not really noted as being involved with the day of mourning https://eberron.fandom.com/wiki/Kalashtar#History
they aren't "half and half". they are descended from one of a (relatively small) number of "good" quori that hid inside humans in the past (with consent of the humans) and over time split themselves across all of their descendents. so each kalashtar has a tiny fragment of a connection to their quori spirit, shared with all other kalashtar of their type
yeah, is why i said "kind of" is not a literal fusion, but from what i recall, one way or another the souls of the quori and the mortals became intertwined, as they initially did not know and thus worried what would happen if their host were to die
that doesn't sound correct
granted i could be wrong or otherwise misinformed in some aspects of the details
Speaking of which, ive always been confused what the quori were
short answer: dream demons
(fiends, if you want to be pedantic about creature type. but thats not super relevant)
at least some of them anyway
from what i recall their home plane would basically change alignment or nature, so far as from good to evil under certain critera, the ones that fled basically defied the status quo of the at the time current reality of their realm and did not wish to be evil and were kind of hoping to wait till it eventually returned to good
again, i am largely going off memory here but to be safe i did link the eberron wiki page on them so you could check that for yourself if you want
would probably make more sense to quote from the page you are linking if you don't actually know
off the top of my head though i can't recall if it was from something i read, let alone where, or a lore video i had watched like several times
so if i am wrong, i am at least providing the wiki pages so could see if i am correct or not according to those or could just check for yourself rather than listen to me trying to summarize it
though despite the short answer being them as dream demons, they are not fiends, they are aberrations in terms of creature type in 5e, they are basically natives of eberron's plane of dreams Dal Quor/the Region of Dreams
What's a good resource to read if I'm making a dragonborn (forgotten realms) and I want some better inspiration on their culture? really not inspired by the flavor text presented alongside their player-option rules
Dragonborn are relatively new to Toril. Their home planet is Abeir.
In Greyhawk via 3e Lore they were originally other humanoids turned into Dragon People by Ritual of Bahamut. Though that could change.
Dragonborn weren't a playable race until 4E
3E had the dragonborn of Bahamut
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Dragonborn_of_Bahamut
and to my knowledge at least, though we don't know how, it is implied there is some unknown connection between the dragonborn of bahamut and the dragonborn that is a true race
Who is Ty-h Kadi, one of the players at my game is a tempest cleric of this guy, I can’t find much info on him, can you direct me to the best way to learn about him since this god/ archomental seems pretty cool and I might want to create a character around this dude (cleric or paladin)
quick question, but has it ever been noted in lore of if it's been frowed upon for mortals to do business with both devils and demons? I know the yugoloths have but from what I recall that usually related to them betraying one faction betraying the other
Generally it’s frowned upon for mortals to do business with either.
I mean in the case between the two
Ah, you mean would a mortal get in trouble for making business with both?
Still if they take the proper steps they should not have any issues working with both if they can get a dominant position
yeah
It depends on too many factors, there are plenty of ways dealing with two groups who are enemies can go
Sometimes you get killed, sometimes you get rich
Like if it’s an evil summoner, if they summon a devil and get their service, normally nothing would stop them from doing the same to a demon
Like the demon and devil might disapprove of this, but in many cases won’t have the power to act on it.
In that case it's not so much that they are dealing with both than the fact that they are enslaving them
People, whether they be fiends or not, tend to resent that
Ty-h'kadi is the arch-elemental of lightning (para-element)
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Archomental
Sorry if this is a dumb question. Do the colleges of bard subclasses actually mean anything in game? Or is it purely a game thing like hp?
bard colleges are loose organizations of likeminded bards in which they share stories and techniques
is there a book or something that encompasses all of the faerun lore? I know forgotten realms wiki exists and it is super helpful, but would be nice to have a book if one exists
All? No
Here are the 4 most comprehensive.
Forgotten Realms 3rd edition campaign setting (only goes up to 1372 DR)
Forgotten Realms 4th edition campaign guide (only goes up to 1479 DR)
Grand History of the Realms (only goes up to 1385 DR)
Ed Greenwood Presents Elminster s forgotten realms (timeline agnostic)
it funny that the only explicit FR book in 5e didnt make this list lol
Because it's sooooo weak. It'd be like if North America was a setting
SCAG would be A Guide to the state of Washington.
that's actually partially why I've ended up here asking the question
Sword Coast is so detailed for what is a miniscule section of the map. It's exhausting that the main adventures are so comprehensive for that one area of the map, but anywhere else I have to do extensive research online 
Of the four books. The 2 most useful for a DM is the 3rd d FRCS which is closer to how the world is after 5Es Second Sundering. Than 4Es spell plauge. But it's 125 years out of date
Elminsters Forgotten Realms is an excellent DM resource that is edition agnostic that goes into detail how the people of the realms live. From their vernacular to foods to worship
Elminsters Forgotten Realms sounds exactly like the type of thing I want. I predominantly want it as both for DMs and Players (for char backstory purposes) get a better understanding of areas, culture, food, worships, government, society etc without having to trawl through dozens of wiki pages
thanks!
Also check out Jorphdan on YouTube his bite sized FR Explained series is a godsend.
that sounds like a great idea for me personally; I learn much better from visuals and video formats!
Is there any official depiction of Aarakocra as having Wing-Arms or having Back-Wing (separate from their arms)
Aarakocra were depicted to have wing-arms from 1E to 3E. It was only in 5E that their wings were separate from their arms.
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Aarakocra
Art from 5th edition portrays aarakocra as having separate arms. This conflicts with all descriptions and art in earlier editions.
Kind of disturbing, the changes and retcons WOTC does for the sake of homology
Following the fall of their empires to the first Flight of Dragons around −30,000 DR, the surviving members of the avian creator race known as the aearee (primarily the subgroup known as the Aearee-Krocaa) fled to Anchorome, where their further exploits went largely undocumented by Faerûnian historians. The only thing known was that at some point after their arrival there, the aearee either created or devolved into the aarakocra, who then move south into Maztica.
I wonder if they could canonize this as the reason for the discrepancy
There's only about 100 years difference between 3E and 5E.
The easiest answer is "art direction."
Well, it doesn't have to be so linear
FR lore is linear.
Just because one was the only one known for a period of time doesn't mean that only 1 existed
There doesn't need to be a lore reason when WotC art director screws up.
is not that disturbing, plus again, do we need to reiterate the point of canon, this extends to art that goes with the lore
No but ignoring or dismissing it is a conscious decision
The art to the looks of monsters often change from edition, although this time is more drastic.
It's called WotC editors not doing their job.
Agreed. And I'm suggesting they do instead
its not necessarily a screw up
Perhaps. But a poor decision nonetheless.
to me their wings being the same as their arms or not is a very minor thing in terms of importance, it is easier to imagine how a flying race of humanoids would fight if they don't have to give up arms to have wings, is just a difference between editions and the 5e continuity versions always had them in addition to arms and legs rather than having to have the wings take the place of their arms
its very possible (and frankly, likely) that its intentional and just a retcon they don't care to try and qualify in lore. much to the chagrin of the fr wiki writers (similar to firbolg and many other things).
retcons happen. they aren't a big deal
I just hate patchwork lore and ad hoc retcons
thats always been how dnd works
well each edition is it's own continuity
If they cared, they could make changes make sense.
it is not all consistent or unified
it not making sense to you =/= them not caring
you are assuming they don't make sense to begin with
again, i personally feel the 5e incarnation's design makes a lot more sense for a race of humanoids that are winged and known for flying
It not making sense at all means they don't care
you are intitled to have a preference, but that is an opinion, not an objective fact
what part of it does not make sense?
I HAVE been stating my opinion. Where has not not been clear?
thats very much not a fact, and it not making sense to you =/= it not making sense
saying "it doesn't make sense at all" doesn't sound like you stating your opinion
when you state your opinion in a way that comes off as if you were stating an objective fact, that does not seem like stating your opinion, more so trying to pass it off as fact
and again, what is it that you are saying does not make sense? if it is the change in how they look from one edition to another, that is self imposed as again each edition is it's own continuity, that is why there are sometimes both minor and drastic differences between the depictions of the same creature between editions
When something changes in the lore (especially something so significant as body morphology)
and the only answer to why is "just because", that's poor design ad hoc retcons.
you are assuming that it all is ment to be a linear and connected continuity, factually that is just not what dnd's lore is
for all we know the arakocra of the 5e continuity have always looked the way they do
is body morphology so significant though?
I can think of a pretty good one that was changed. Definitely more famous than aarakocra too. Being Drow ofc
Why do you keep saying that?
cuz that has been something established by the dnd team themselves, when they made their statement on continuity/canon
Lore changes from edition to edition. Just accept it.
I'm not talking about just changing a creature's artwork, which is inherently subjective.
But we're talking about how a creature physically functions.
It irks me
it's literally just artwork though
but has the change in their appearance actually changed any of their lore?
Then at your table you can ignore it.
far as i am aware, it hasn't
Dragons, drow, etc. Many other things have had just as significant (if not moreso) appearance changes across editions
Yes, Body morphology is very significant.
Drow is in no way comparable (though no less problematic of a change)
heck, gold dragons recently just went to looking more like their 2e incarnations as we have seen via some of the reveals
tieflings? in multiple colours? 
Tieflings in 2E look nothing like their 4E/5E iteration. 2E tieflings had random fiendish body features.
frankly most people don't even know what anything looked like before 5e
hold up.
you think drow being changed from being incredibly racist caricatures is a bad thing?
No, the racist problems is what I have against it. but that's not what I was referring to
The changes to Drow were social/cultural. That's not comparable to changes to a race's physiology.
why did you bring up a completely different point about drow than what I was referring to when you responded to me
also what culturual changes
the fact is, 5e incarnation of the Aarakocra are not the same as the depictions in the previous editions, and is not like it is ignored it is very clearly noted, the 5e anatomy for the Aarokocra has been consistent in this new depiction, the depictions between the different editions are not one in the same, making the change not unexplained, it has obviously been implied that has simply been how they have always looked in the 5e continuity until they explicitly say otherwise in published materials
It's like suddenly retconning Orcs having a 3rd arm and "it's always been that way"
and that doesn't change the fact that dragons (among numerous other things) have also had massive physiology changes across editions
dude, YOU brought up the Drow.
they've had incredibly varied physiologies across different editions. often with very little in common
no, it's not, cuz that is not even what is going on with the Aarakocra, the 5e depiction has 0 effect on their depictions in prior editions
I suspect WotC made the changes to the aarokocra's wings / wing-arms is more of a gameplay mechanic reason — previously they couldn't attack with weapons while flying.
no where are they saying that they always had arms and wings in every edition, they are only saying that is how they look in 5e
Yes. And I was talking about in regards from drow being changed from being very literal irl caricatures of black people in their original conception to being the purple/dark tones they are currently. Because you (and I) were talking about morphology changes.
So I have no idea what aspect of drow culture you could be referring to
Dragons, for the most part, have remained mostly consistent
with their artwork, more or less, can be excused as artistic interpretation.
Like how Pre-renassance artwork drew Lions with long necks or Human-sized rabbits
no, they have not
dragons very much have not
orcs and kobolds have changed a lot since the early days. Not sure if there were ever any in-world justifications for that.
especially with their most recently revealed design basically merging the 2 main types of designs from across their various appearances in the different editiions, and just saying, it looks glorious
yep. Kobolds especially. Went from weird reptilian dog/rat people, to squat goblins, to lizardlike, and then to draconic lizarddogs
yeah kobolds originally had nothing to do with dragons, but have been closely tied to dragons since wizards of the coast took over in 3e and had changed their lore to be that way in those editions onwards
Primarily because they were attempts to be based on several different concepts of what a kobold is
Gygax didn't do his homework on what "Kobold" means.
so?
its a result of cultural shifts and depictions of the original dnd kobold in eastern and western media
1E orcs (they have very pig-like heads) look nothing like 5E orcs.
1E kobolds look more dog-like but with scales. They became more repitlian in 3E
there are times that dnd has just taken the name of a creature in folklore and everything else is their own stuff, like the Gnolls
the name is from a gnome and troll hybrid in folklore, but in dnd they have always been demonic hyena men
Speaking of something that needs a retcon
D&D is VERY loosely based on real world folklore and myths. In European folklore goblins, hobgoblins, and such were interchangeable but Gygax made them distinct monsters.
no, it does not
gorgon...
none of it NEEDS retconing, if you don't like it and want to change it, that is a YOU thing
I think humans should get removed tbh
This isn't the channel for such opinions. This channel is to discuss official D&D lore.
dnd has no obligation to be have 1 to 1 with their inspirations or anything that shares the same name of a creature they use in their game, that is just out right not how dnd lore works, be it meta or non meta wise
opinions if anything are something for #dnd-discussion
also, no way humans are being written out of dnd, that would be like the most obvious thing ever it would not land well
Jumping in here to remind folk to remain civil and remember there are nuances to these topics and not just absolutes, and in applying absolutes we end up talking past each other.
Previous lore at times has been harmful and did need retconning, which is something that has been acknowledged in TSR and WotC. There are also lore changes that are just to change to keep up with marketing, mechanics or just the opinions of the writers at the time.
While correct that this isn't the best channel to bring up simple opinions on lore (From things like 'gnomes don't feel unique enough' to 'I don't like how many different playable elves there are') and other channels would be better for that, and #dm-world-building for the 'what ifs', and proposed changes at times, there is a place in this channel for discussing older edition lore , the changes between them, and if there are any official statements on why that lore was changed at times.
And that yes, we can discuss the origins of concepts for D&D creatures too, be they based on plastic toys, an episode from an old tv series, or actual mythology. But that, as pointed out, D&D isn't obligated to stay 'true' to those origins.
And there can be some whacky conceptual origin stories for some D&D monsters.
Anyone know which fairly well known monster as it exists now in D&D seems to be based on a misreading/misspelling of it's first iteration in D&D?
I know the plastic toy one, but not that one.
Stumped
Huecuva (it was "heucuva" in 1E FF)
There’s the thoul, which was the product of a misprinted random encounter table.
Are there any known affiliations/smuggler groups in Faerun? Or would a smuggler primarily be an independent mercenary contractor?
I suppose smuggling would be the purview of thieves' guilds, pirates or the Zhentarim.
Besides the Zhents, these are mostly local organizations.
Excellent. I have a little freedom then. Zhents definitely not the ethical real estate for this character. Thanks!
Hey guys, I have a question. When Dwarves lose access to their names in circumstances that have brought shame to their clans, what do they usually do next? Do they usually come up with some non-dwarve-related origin name or do they simply choose to remain nameless?
I was thinking about running the dragonlance module for 5e, but I'd like to first get a grip on the lore. Any recomandations on what to read? I heard it's got a ton of stuff in terms of history.
Honestly the module provides you with just enough information for running the campaign. If you wanna do more reading up, you can always read the original Hickman/Weis Dragonlance trilogy, starting with Dragons of Autumn Twilight.
It's actually the Gibbering Mouther.
Originally the Gibbering Mother, a single unique creature from Lost Tomoachan: Hidden Shrine of Labatuum and is a reference to Tlazōlteōtl "She who eats sin/filth'"
No
Toril and Abeir were both worlds within the Forgotten Realms setting that both existed on the Material Plane
At some point they were merged into a single world
In fact, the timeline was more Abeir-Toril >split> Abeir and Toril >merged> Toril with parts of Abeir that didn't merge just mysteriously gone
It doesn't have anything to do with the wider multiverse
Material plane is the biggest?
The biggest what?
Plane
Or every plane is endless
Like x y z axes expand to infinity
And the planes are the α axis
The planes vary, but generally don't have a fixed size
Planes are best thought of like floors in a building, rather than specifically defined locations
Btw
It's like asking if the 1st floor is bigger than the 2nd floor; it depends on the building
So its like 4th dimensionp
The material plane is the "level" of existence that all material planes exist on
Right?
No
Whats the difference
I don't understand the question
No, it's not
Whats the difference
It not being the same
The difference is there are no similarities
The cosmology of D&D is not at all like higher dimensional mathematics
So if u go like far enough to the north u will eventually reach the upperplane?
There are theories about how the cosmosologies work and those change over time. It isn't fixed like math.
The upper planes are not literally above the lower planes, that's just a way to describe them
But we know that shadowfell is closer to material plane than let say Hades right?
It's "closer" in the sense that it is easier to access
It's not physically closer
Like, say from your house you can get a train that takes you 20 minutes to reach your friend Amanda 10 miles away, but in order to reach your friend Ben 5 miles away, you need to walk for an hour because there's no public transport
Amanda is 'closer' because it's easier to reach her than Ben
Now instead of it being a case of one friend being 10 miles away and the other 5, its the infinite distance between planes
The Shadowfell is easier to reach than the Outer Planes due to it's relationship with the material planes (as a mirror of the prime material plane) It takes less effort to reach. So it's described as closer
Is shadowfell the exact size of material plane
I did just mention that planes don't have rigidly defined sizes
Or its only the size of toril
Multiple worlds have a reflection in the Shadowfell
Not all, but many do
Also the Shadowfell isn't a 1:1 reflection of the world it mirrors, distance doesn't work that way
Is material plane also a reflection of shadowfell
No
Or its the one way thing
The feywild and the shadowfell are reflections of the prime material plane
All three of them count as the material plane
So its like a mirage effect
Mirage effect
Repeating it doesn't explain how you're using it
My familiarity of the term is meaning an illusion that isn't really there
No, it doesn't
And also no, that's not how they work
The Shadowfell and Feywild are physical places you can travel to
How is shadowfell and feywild created
So they're not mirages
What if u change photon to mirage
You don't need to ping me so frequently
And "change photon to mirage" doesn't make sense
Again, please do not ping me when I'm immediately present and active in the discussion
That still doesn't make sense
It's not a literal reflection
Will it change in the reflections
But changes in the material plane are generally reflected in the feywild and shadowfell, depending on the change
Like someone make a big explosion that change the landscape
Reflection means things in the prime have a counterpart in the feywild. But it’s not literally a mirror where only one side is physical
Will it carry over
For example, a bustling city in the prime material plane might appear as a giant tree in the feywild and a smouldering volcano in the shadowfell
A large fire in the prime might be relfected as the tree shedding leaves in the feywild and the volcano erupting in the shadowfell
It might
¯_(ツ)_/¯
This channel is not for speculating on the lore, but discussing what the lore actually says
Also no #baldurs-gate-3-spoilers please
You'd probably have a moniker as not having a way of people referring to you is bound to cause even more trouble, besides having lost your identity.
The Material Plane is essentially our universe.
Each plane of existence is an universe onto itself, hence the "multiverse."
Toril is a planet where the continent of Faerun is located (Faerun is the campaign setting of the Forgotten Realms).
Toril is one of nine planets in the system of Realmspace.
Realmspace is one of countless star systems in the Material Plane.
Think of the Shadowfell like the Upside Down World in Stranger Things.
Although the term used in D&D is wildspace system rather than star system
Does every elf mature in same speed as humans?
https://www.dndbeyond.com/sources/basic-rules/races#ElfTraits
Age. Although elves reach physical maturity at about the same age as humans, the elven understanding of adulthood goes beyond physical growth to encompass worldly experience. An elf typically claims adulthood and an adult name around the age of 100 and can live to be 750 years old.
no, cuz it is a reflection of the entire prime material plane, not just toril, there is no reason to believe either the shadowfell or feywild would disappear
to my knowledge, nothing, at least nothing of note, but if you wanna read what happened specifically regarding those planes and the events in the forgotten realms setting, i'd suggest reading their pages on the forgotten realms wiki, and if you feel you need more context, checking the cited sources
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Shadowfell
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Feywild
Can a devil be redeemed?
Sure because if a celestial can fall from grace a fiend can rise to grace. However, they're unlikely to survive in the Nine Hells. (see 2E Planescape's Faces of Evil: The Fiends, page 32).
thus likely why some non evil devils we see in 5e reside in sigil
Yes, it's a safe haven.
especially from gods, of which these days asmodeus is one of, so is not like the lord of the 9 can just force them to come back or grab them
Well, there's a chain of command. Someone down the line is going to get punished for AWOL devils...
true, such is the way of infernal society
though if memory serves there are some devils that also are particularly skilled at hunting down such devils, but within the walls of sigil, causing conflict is a risky thing to say the least
something i fell worth noting though, these changes in alignment after often drastically more difficult for these creatures to do as it is effectively going against their very nature, devils are beings who are lawful evil incarnate, and this is the same reason why often when a celestial falls from grace it is because the thing they do they are convinced is the morally right thing to do, regardless of if that is true or not, the most notable case of this is Zariel
basically just like the outerplanes are metaphysical, so to are the beings who dwell there, as for such beings their body and soul are one in the same, unlike us mortals
Qweschon about sorcerers....
Since they know magic by instinct and not because they studied it... does that mean they can cast spells without saying the magic formula like mages?
Like, for example, i'm a sorcerer and know how to talk with animals... do i need to say the magic words or do i just speak with them? 🤔 same for fireball, do i just cast it from my hands or do i have to say "fireball" or "Ignis" lol
They still require component to cast, but that's not so much a lore thing overall
That doesnt really seem like a lore question
That's gameplay mechanics territory — you still need to cast the spells according to their component types as per the spell descriptions.
it's kinda forgotten realms lore but yeah
No, it's class gameplay mechanic. Again, read the individual spell descriptions and which components are required.
even without going into mechanics, knowing how to do something innately does not change what you have to do to actually do it
the main difference between a wizard and a sorcerer is how they are able to use magic or learn to do it, effectively they are still doing the same sort of actions and using the same sort of incantations and what not to actually use cast the spells they use
With very rare exception, the actual somatic and verbal components of spells are left wide open for players to roleplay and can definitely vary by character. Two wizards can cast fireball with different gestures and words, for example. One exception spell would be burning hands which pretty explicitly states what the somatic component looks like.
That's flavour and not lore.
Yeahhh just saying I've seen it demonstrated in lore.
E.g. Catti-brie casting a fireball vs. Gromph Baenre.
They were asking about a gameplay mechanic and it was already explained to them.
How did merfolks come to be?
Eadro (at least in FR lore) created them.
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Eadro
does not seem their is any clear connection between their creation and their history in the realms, presumably happened sometime before -20000 DR
Lolth is me fr
since rune shaper has an enemy rune, are there "enemy giants"?
Fairly sure thats just the runic word for enemy
Yeah, the runes correspond to words, not giant types
Any giant can be an enemy if you pissed them off somehow
Theres also a drsgon rune, but theres no dragon gia- wait, can half dragons be giants?
Yep
"A beast, humanoid, giant, or monstrosity can become a half-dragon. It keeps its statistics, except as follow."
... new NPC idea
Are there any recorded half drsgon giants?
There was one in a 3.5 Dungeon Magazine/ Free to use oneshot called 'Crumbling Hall of the Frost Giant Jarl' that was rather unusual:
In his youth, Gungir dallied with a white dragon that had taken the form of a frost giant. The product of their union was a bizarre half-dragon centauroid creature, with the torso of a frost giant attached to the wingless body of a white dragon.
"Bonesplitter, the monstrous spawn of the green dragon Claugiyliamatar and an ettin."
Hey quick question for the experts here:
Is there a reason why a high level wizard's attempts to contact Mystra be declined/accepted?
That's not really a lore question
Probably more something for #dm-discussion or #dm-world-building depending on the specifics
Is this a lore topic?
The general rule of thumb for this channel is ‘Can this question be answered with a quote from an official book that isn't a game rule?’
Before redirecting a user to another channel clarify what they are asking about, consider if there is any lore at all to answer with, give that answer along with directing to a channel that might be of better help and explain why.
Lore Appropriate
- Origins & Design - Discussions of the ideas and concepts behind the lore, such as inspirations or products. Try to avoid tangents, or take them to #non-dnd-topics
- In-Game Grounding - Discussions of lore as it relates to the mechanics of the game. Keep in mind that questions about the rules are better suited to #dnd-discussion or #dnd-rules
Not Lore Appropriate
- Opinions on lore - Opinions on changes to the lore, the availability of it, or any other similar topics are better suited to #dnd-discussion
- Hypothetical questions - Speculative questions about published settings are better suited to #dm-discussion or #dm-world-building
Its important to note that Mystra as well as the other Faerunian Pantheon broke their near century long silence at the end of the Second Sundering. But they did not return to their public, boisterous personas that existed in the Time of Troubles, and the years of Netheril's Return.
The gods "commune" with mortals subtly unless with rare exception, like with Eilistraee who personally announced her return with an avatar appearing in the moonlight or the Mulhorandi Pantheon who ruled over their people like the Imaskari God-Kings of old.
With Mystra being... a particularly active god even she does not appear to everyday mortals even exceptional ones. You see her in offical material interacting with things often. But its very important to note those she interacts with are her Chosen, and Chosen get the special perks. Those being her daughters like Open Lord Larel of Waterdeep, or Lady Alustriel of the Wizards Three, and Elminster Aumar.
Sources Used:
Ed Greenwood (2016-06-07). Death Masks. (Wizards of the Coast). ISBN 0-7869-6593-2.
Steve Kenson, et al. (November 2015). Sword Coast Adventurer's Guide. Edited by Kim Mohan. (Wizards of the Coast), p. 14. ISBN 978-0-7869-6580-9.
Steve Kenson, et al. (November 2015). Sword Coast Adventurer's Guide. Edited by Kim Mohan. (Wizards of the Coast), p. 18. ISBN 978-0-7869-6580-9.
Larian Studios (October 2020). Designed by Swen Vincke, et al. Baldur's Gate III. Larian Studios.
Ed Greenwood, Erin M. Evans, Paul S. Kemp, R.A. Salvatore, Richard Lee Byers, Troy Denning, James Wyatt (August 21th, 2012). What is the Sundering? (Part 1). Link to Official DnD Video Discussion the Sundering at GenCon 2012
Thanks for this Elgate,
Clarification request, when it comes to supplemental lore derived from the creator of specific setting that covers topics that WOTC has not touched. Like Baker for Eberron, and Hickman for Dragonlance, and Greenwood for FR.
Are those acceptable to discuss here or to point users toward should questions be asked.
Those should still be acceptable- even though they're not official lore, they can still give insight into design choices. Saying where the source comes from should help indicate to a user if they want to give it weight or not.
Thank you much for the clarifications.
(They are the LAI to the LAW
)
Any one onow who are the current great wyrms that are tiamats husbands
itd be cool if in gnome culture they rode saddled dogs like horses
consort =/= husband
but seems we don't know if they are necessarily her current consorts, but known consorts include Apsu, Kingsu, Ephelomon, Etiol, and Dragotha, at least according the greyhawk wiki
Halfings (and possibly gnomes) did use large dogs, such as mastiffs, as mounts.
https://www.dndbeyond.com/monsters/16953-mastiff
Halflings and other Small humanoids ride them as mounts.
The definition of consort:
a wife, husband, or companion, in particular the spouse of a reigning monarch.
righteou
s
What color is each
idk, all i know is Ephelomon is her red dragon consort
yes but one is not always interchangeable with the other, given her consorts have been replaced and from what i am aware, she has even potentially killed some, and given the nature of her personality, i doubt there is any love between them, so companion is likely more accurate than husband
seems dragotha was a red dragon too, but has long since become a dracolich
and far as i can tell Etiol was also a red dragon, but can't find anything on Apsu or Kingsu
I thought she had one cosort per major chromatic dragon
Also tiamat is known to kill and eat there consorts when they get to old
She has 5 at a time usually, ine of each chromatic color
same, but seems most of the ones we actually know the names of at least were red dragons
What is the Evilest Faction you have joined?
That's a question for #dnd-discussion than lore.
A grung pacifist grung dreams to be a dragon, he can learn from the metallics, which metal should he go to? He a protective druidic boi
This is more of a #character-discussion question than [lore](#dnd-lore message).
Very well^^
Question: Are Githyanki mammals or reptiles
To be honest, my working theory is that Githyanki are monotremes like platypus
Mammals that lay eggs
Dnd doesn't do taxonomy for a reason
quick question, but have any survivors of the fall of the old netherese empire been noted that aren't liches?
Does vecna have mindflayers in his army? Or do mindflayers serve no one but themselves?
Or they will serve someone but only if it benefits them?
Mind flayers aren't fans of arcane magic. They prefer psionics.
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Mind_flayer#Magic
Mind flayers considered arcane magic an abomination. They viewed it as an inferior and corrupt form of psionic power that should disappear from the universe once the illithids regained control of it.
Ooh
Okay that actually makes sense, can mindflayers have free will or do they only really live to further the species? Like can a single mind flayer feel differently
They're individuals but tied to a collective colony via elder brain.
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Mind_flayer#Society
Mind flayers who toy with arcane magic are outcasts.
I thought elder brains were kinda like the halo flood, when they grow big enough they become elder brains, is there only one?