#help-13
428200 messages · Page 455 of 429
take the permutation group of {1, 2, 3} (which has cardinality 3! = 6) and calculate products of elements until you find one that doesn't commute.
@tired ravine Has your question been resolved?
I don't have. I know how to do what's on the list 15.3.1. But I don't know how to use it to prove those statements.
you just need to show that S_A is a group right ?
@tired ravine did you do this yet?
@tired ravine Has your question been resolved?
Channel closed
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Again ?

Wasn’t this the same question u posted earlier
Ok this is simple! Use synthetic division
Or long division
yes
Oof
You see the only thing that really matters about polynomials is their coefficients
TRU
I dont personally remember how to do synthetic division
If you actually asked me to do this problem rn I would multiply it out
thats what im sying
this is literally the exact same question he asked before
Oh really? Was it not answered
ok let me demonstrate... again
this time no mistakes
$$f(x) = 2x^3 - 24x^2 + 44x - 40$$
Shuri2060
ok
$$2x^3 - 24x^2 + 44x - 40 = (x - 10) (...$$
So I know it can be written like this
to start with
and I need to complete that right bracket
So in order to get 2x^3
What do I need for the 1st term?
Shuri2060
any clue?
nope
a cubic
will be a linear times a quadratic
In order to get an x^3 term
it has to be something times the x
$$2x^3 - 24x^2 + 44x - 40 = (x - 10) (2x^2+...$$
Shuri2060
you know what, i appreciate your help, but i think i just need to rewind and figure out what i need to do first.
.close
ok...
Channel closed
Closed by @leaden plover
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Lol
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How would I go about solving this? I have a formula that I think might work for this problem, however I am unsure of how I will find the derivative of V to help solve the question (if that’s needed).
It is in the photo, I can type it out if you can't see it
find r as a function of h using pythagoras theorem and differentiate wrt time
I think that should work
since you have dh/dt and h given
@crimson sedge Has your question been resolved?
@untold owlWhat would r as a function of h using pythagoras theorem look like in this case? Because I know I can substitute r and h for a and b, but what about c? is that just a constant or??
take the triangle above the water surface
it has sides (10-h), r and 10
the line segment from the centre to the end of the sphere is the radius
which is 10
and we remove h from it since we need the segment till the surface
Channel closed
Closed by @river furnace
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, I keep on getting 4.8 and not 10. Can I pls know where I went wrong?
how are you getting a = 4.8? @ripe valve
333+1/3
divide 1/3
cube root the answer
oh shoot i see where i went wrong
thank you thank you
.close
Channel closed
Closed by @ripe valve
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Challenge:
================
Find all real solutions to $\cos x\tan x - \cos x = 0$.
$(\forall x\in\bR)$
$$\cos x\tan x - \cos x = 0$$
$\implies$
$$\cos x(\tan x - 1) = 0$$
$\implies$
$$\cos x = 0\lor\tan x = 1$$
$\implies$
$$x\in\left{\frac{\pi}{4},\frac{\pi}{2}\right}+n\pi, n\in\bZ$$
================
Find what is wrong with this proof.
Shuri2060
i know nothing of proofs but tan(x) is undefined at pi/2 lol

Channel closed
Closed by @jaunty mural
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
This is a linear algebra problem. I need to find for S and T and then make the Matrix Consistent.
I have found that the determinant of the Matrix is 0. So I know that the System has either an infinite number of solutions or no solutions.
However, I've played around with a few methods but I am not confident in what I have done.
Attempt 1
Attempt 2
Attempt 3
It was at that point I thought that something wasn't right and I threw the matrix into Excel to find the determinant and it came back 0
So now I don't really know where to go from here to find S, T or make the matrix consistent
So any and all guidance and assistance would be appreciated.
#❓how-to-get-help :o This channel is occupied..
@opaque ridge #❓how-to-get-help
Perform two individual operations $R_2$ <- $R_2 + R_1$ and factor out 2, and $R_2$ <- $R_2 - R_1$ :o
Ansh
You'll directly get the values of s and t
😟
I have never seen the upside down !- operator before.
I'll look that up, read it, try your method - do you mind giving me a couple of minutes in case I have more questions, @fallen heath ?
Uhh it was "<-" the latex made it that way
Ahhh rock on.
Also... don't bother :o
Just look at your equations, no need of matrices
Add Eqn. 1 and 2 for s, and subtract 1 from 2 for t
That looks about right. Thanks for that! Couldn't see the forest through the trees.
Hey no >_< s should be 1 as x_1 + x_4 is s
t is right though
Aawwww man I suck. Thanks for the pick up!
I might go and have a cold shower or something. I'm 8 hours into trying to decipher my lecturers presentation. Thanks @fallen heath - You're a good egg!
!close
@south wren Has your question been resolved?
Channel closed
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello
Channel closed
Closed by @ocean wolf
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I believe (a) is true but (b) is false. But can we prove it mathematically?
Show that the limit of (f(x + h) - f(x))/h doesn't exist at x = 0
So basically show that limit of (f(h) - f(0))/h doesn't exist as h approaches 0
What about 2nd part? For f is integrable?
Oh wait lol I read the question wrong
Yea, limit exists.
Hm, not really sure how to do that
it's 0?
nvm
it's definitely differentiable
it is, indeed lazy solution: where else would the f' in b come from
also, maybe look up the (first, whatever) fundamental theorem of calculus
LOL
One would hope int f'(x) dx = f(x) wouldn't they?
that would be a nice property
Channel closed
Closed by @mellow phoenix
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
let’s say f(x) has a slant asymptote mx + b at +inf
why is it that lim_(x → ∞) (f(x)/x) = m?
this means lim_(x → ∞) (f(x) - mx - b) = 0 right
we can’t divide everything by x, so whats next
$\lim \limits_{x \to \infty} (f(x) - (mx+b) ) = 0$ is what actually is meant by slant asymptote at infty
yea
Ansh
so yeah, divide the L.H.S. by x :o
??
what's wrong with it?
how do we divide that into the limit
x is not infty... it's a number approaching infty
i know
we get limit/x = 0
how do we bring x into the limit?
or we divide by lim_(x → ∞) x instead
hmm... that wouldn't work
Yes
okay so if you divide by it instead...
you get
$\frac{\lim \limits_{x \to \infty} (f(x) - (mx+b) )}{\lim \limits_{x \to \infty} x} = 0$
Ansh
yea
we use limit properties to rid b and bring m to rhs
i guess that’s how that works?
idk, unsure
the only doubt is if this is valid or not
oh wait.. right 😂 it's valid but rewriting it as:
$\lim \limits_{x \to \infty} \frac{(f(x) - (mx+b) )}{x} = 0$ is invalid
Ansh
because... the quotient law won't allow it
wait i dont think dividing by this is well defined
you need to have a finite limit of the denominator in order to be able to write it
we can split and combine limits iff both limits exist
lim_(x → ∞) x apparently isn’t
Yes
so how do we do this
lemme repost the question:
If slant asymptote means: $\lim \limits_{x \to \infty} (f(x) - (mx+b) ) = 0$, then how do we get to $\lim \limits_{x \to \infty} \frac{f(x)}{x} = m$
Ansh
Oh right :o
@gentle lintel
maybe like how $\lim \limits_{x \to 0} \sin x - x = 0$ can also be given as $\lim \limits_{x \to 0} \frac{\sin x}{x} = 1$
Ansh
then we're allowed to do it right?
Do what?
Writing $\lim \limits_{x \to \infty} \frac{(f(x) - (mx+b) )}{x} = 0$
Ansh
?
given, $\lim \limits_{x \to \infty} (f(x) - (mx+b) ) = 0$
Ansh
wait lmfao 😂 why the heck not
huh
I mean 0/inf is always 0
Yeah
.
??
$\lim \limits_{x \to \infty} \frac{1}{x} = 0$
Ansh
:o
are we figuring out workarounds lol
Ansh
yea?
you can write $\lim \limits_{x \to \infty} \frac{(f(x) - (mx+b) )}{x} = 0$
Ansh
.
main concern is lhs
this
and this
0/inf is 0
agree?
that is all you need to use
you can't just divide by lim of a variable no
but no need to even do that
no.. screw that.. Just consider a separate function $g(x) = \frac{(f(x) - (mx+b) )}{x}$
Ansh
do you agree with this?
and evaluate it's limit at infty :o
yea
all you to agree with
its what i thought
then clearly it is equal to 0
Idk what the plan is with that but just saying that is valid
lol
please continue
chromium is confused about why is it valid
Is how I would do it
no
no?
you do?
not this
hmm
just this
i wanna see your g(x) approach
0/inf=?
So... what's the lim g(x) as x tends to infty?
depends on f
Ansh
0/inf is what?
alright so.
so clearly the limit is 0 like I have said 10 times now
we have this
Yes we have
0..?
i’m not sure
at least i cant mathematically prove it
why are you not sure
oh
but that doesnt work
???
lim (f/g) = (lim f)/(lim g) iff both limits are well defined
lim at inf of (x) is apparently not
Nooo ._. we're just trying to check if the limit even needs to be solved... It doesn't even have an indeterminate form
0 / inf is just 0...
but i cant prove it right here
so as x tends to infty... g(x) turns into 0/(BIG SHIT)
wdym you can't prove it?
you just said you agreed 0/inf=0
can you decide once and for all, do you agree with that YES or NO?
how do you show that it’s 0 with limit properties or something
i dont see it
denom approaches inf?
yes, but not clear to me
num approaches 0?
we can’t split it into num and denom with their respective limits
not clear that $\lim_{x \to \infty} x=\infty$?
ScapeProf
i dont think that’s well defined
∞
Yes it is
so we can’t have lim (0/x) = 0/(lim x) = 0
huh
what?
we won’t consider it an existent limit then
a limit exists if it approaches some real L
you do normally
∞ isn’t a real number
you might use a weird book that doesn't
can you show the steps that make lim (g(x)) = 0?
[\lim_{x\rightarrow\infty}=\frac{f\left(x\right)}{h\left(x\right)}]
Knowing that $\lim_{x\rightarrow\infty} f(x)=0$ and $\lim_{x\rightarrow\infty} h(x)=\infty$ then the limit is on the form "$\frac{0}{\infty}$". This is NOT AN INDETERMINATE FORM
For example consider rewriting it as
[\lim_{x\to\infty} f(x)\frac1{h(x)}]
where $\lim_{x\to\infty} f(x) = 0$ and $\lim_{x\to\infty} \frac1{h(x)}=0$
what is that first line???
for two arbitary functions where the condition on the next line is met
ScapeProf
.
Like I said
$\lim \limits_{x \to \infty} g(x) = \lim \limits_{x \to \infty} \frac{(f(x) - (mx+b) )}{x} = \lim \limits_{x \to \infty} ( f(x) - (mx+b) ) \cdot \lim \limits_{x \to \infty} \frac{1}{x} = 0 \cdot 0 = 0$
Ansh
seems like you really need to recheck your limit algebras (and what a limit even is)
oh
i constantly am
Do you get that?
yes
so do you agree with this now?
like I have said 15 times?
Lol
now how do we obtain m
Ansh
$\implies \lim \limits_{x \to \infty} \frac{f(x)}{x} - m = 0$
Ansh
oh
now ask me why $\lim \limits_{x \to \infty} \frac{f(x)}{x}$ is valid?
Ansh
i get that
so in general
mx + b can be a parabola
or any weird function
idk
in terms of asymptotes
mx+b can never be parabola (@_@;)
what are you on...
here, mx + b is an asymptote right
Yeah
said asymptote can be anything
parabola or something else
and we apply similar techniques
huh
oh
non-line asymptotes are too unimportant?
Yes
But you gotta be reasonable with each step (@_@;)
im about to start integrals and here i am failing simple limits lmfao
anyway, thanks for bearing me
.close
Channel closed
Closed by @gentle lintel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is there any formula for $\int \frac{dx}{\sqrt{x^2-a^2}}$?
!!!
Or do I have to solve these type of questions using substitution?
I mean you could derive the formula yourself using the substitution
Is this result true? $\int\frac{dx}{\sqrt{x^2-a^2}} = \ln(|x + \sqrt{x^2 - a^2}|) + c$
!!!
Yeah seems to be correct
Channel closed
Closed by @mellow phoenix
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@stable kelp Has your question been resolved?
Channel closed
Closed due to the original message being deleted
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
When changing a basis of matrix, when do we simply multiply the matrix by the change-of-basis matrix, and when do we use the formula ?
This formula:
If I have transformation T
Multiplying by the transformation matrix will send vectors in basis A to basis A, let's say.
$$M_{AA}x_A=T(x)_A$$
Shuri2060
Not standard notation by me.
If you want to input a vector in basis A but output the vector in basis B
or the other way round
I think this is what you're referring to?
$$M_{BA}x_A=T(x)_B$$
Shuri2060
Lets say we use this notation to represent that
Then you just need to transform basis once
to give more context to my question, my current exercise is asking me to express T from the canonical basis of B (start) into the basis of B (arrival) ? and here I only used the transform basis matrix
but in a previous exercise, expressing T in regards to a basis, I had to use a formula
I just don't see the difference between those questions
Can you show me the original french
yes okay
but i doubt it helps me
haha
Given T : R^3 -> R^3 the linear application defined by (...)
Given B_can the canonical basis of R^3 and B the canonical basis of R^3 given by (...)
Give the matrix that represents T in regards to the bases: (...)
départ : start / arrivée : arrival
Yes
What I did here: I expressed T in the canonical basis to get its associated matrix. Then I calculated the changing matrix from B (start) to the canonical basis. I originally wanted to use the formula, but we only multiply T and the changing basis matrix
$$M_{BA}x_A=T(x)_B$$
Shuri2060
So this is what you need
the starting vector is written in basis A
and then it needs to end in basis B
yes?
yes
So your original matrix
will transform x written in A to x written in A
Then you need to transform the final to x written in B
So you apply change of basis once
this makes sense to me, but then when do we need to use the formula?
In the previous exercise we did, they asked us to "express the linear application T in regards to the basis B". We also expressed T in the canonical basis there. Technically, doesn't that also mean T is in a basis (canonical) and needs to end in basis B ?
Before, we had matrix for x_A to (Tx)_A
We need to change the matrix so it is
x_B to (Tx)_B
We need to move x_B to x_A first
Then use our matrix for x_A to (Tx)_A
Then we need to move the result from (Tx)_A to (Tx)_B
x_B -> x_A -> (Tx)_A -> (Tx)_B
This is our process
We do this because our matrix is written in basis A
Thank you! this makes a lot of sense. I just don't think I will be able to recognize this pattern myself. How do I know when I need to move x_B to x_A ?
You need to think about what the starting basis and end basis
x_A -> (Tx)_A -> (Tx)_B
x_B -> x_A -> (Tx)_A
So these 2 cases are possible like in your question
You need to know which basis your matrix works in
okay maybe I'm wrong but I think this is also what you're saying... x_B -> x_A is when we express the vectors of the first basis depending on the vectors of the second matrix right?
no
x_B is expressed in basis B
x_A is expressed in basis A
or did i misunderstand u
i mean the transformation from x_B to x_A !
I guess yes actually but uhh
xB -> xA
You multiply by P_AB matrix
from your notes
so yes
You write the new vector as you said.
x_A -> (Tx)_A -> (Tx)_B
x_B -> x_A -> (Tx)_A
Then in the second one wouldn't we just have x_B -> x_A without needing (Tx)_A ?
Im giving different examples
If they tell you the transformation matrix in the new basis. And want you to give answer in new basis
But you need to start in old basis
That is the 2nd one
okay just a sec i'm wrapping my head around it 😆
okay i have a question. Is the canonical basis considered a basis like B or C or is it "neutral" ?
It is like any other basis
Right. So when we express T in canonical basis, aren't we moving T from a basis to another ?
to get the matrix
what do u mean
if we are given a linear transformation of T, and we use the canonical basis vectors to get the matrix of T
$$M_{EE}x_E=T(x)_E$$
Shuri2060
But this applies to any basis
To get the matrix of T in a basis A
you check where T sends the basis vectors
Yes, you can consider the transformation T to be 'moving basis' if T is bijective, I suppose.
But I'm not sure if this necessarily extends outside of R^n
T is a linear transformation
I would consider it different from changing basis? perhaps
Even if it is the same for vector spaces, it may not be the same for generalisations of vector spaces.
okay I see thank you! I think the thing I was confused by was what exactly do we do when we say x_B -> x_A and T(x)_B -> T(x)_A .
We have said x_B -> x_A is doing (x_B)*P_AB = x_A.
What is T(x)_B -> T(x)_A ?
sorry i will learn to use latex
You left multiply by P_{AB} to go from basis B to basis A
T(x) is just a vector
like x
$$P_{AB}[x]_B = [x]B$$
$$P{AB}[T(x)]_B = [T(x)]_B$$
Shuri2060
yes
you see the concept of vector x
exists outside of writing it down in coordinate form
When we write it down in coordinate form, we are using a basis to express it
$$x$$
this is a vector
Shuri2060
$$[x]_B$$
Shuri2060
This is vector x written in coordinates in basis B
ohh
when i say x = (1 2 3)
this is technically improper
i should be saying [x]_B = (1 2 3)_B
but obviously there is no need to do this all the time if it is clear
In other subjects everything is euclidean, so why bother.
yeah!! that's all very clear to me . but then I'm wondering why is there a need for this formula at all if the changing basis matrix alone does the job of changing a vector's basis ?
yes
Then I apply the matrix which is from basis C to C
why do we need the last one at all
Then I change the result from C to B
Because [T]_B
represents a matrix
such that you input a vector in basis B
and output a vector in basis B
okay
if we were only to multiply T_C by the changing basis matrix from C to B, we would get T_C expressed in basis B but it wouldn't give us an output in B ?
$$[T]{C}:=[T]{CC}$$
Shuri2060
Lets say we define this shorthand
Original:
T(bonjour) = T(au revoir)
Multiplying by the changing basis matrix
T(hello) = T(au revoir)
Using the formula
T(hello) = T(goodbye)
is that it ?
this is good analogy but ehhh haha
haha
yes
okay oh my god i get it thank you so much. So when they ask us to express T in another basis, they don't care about the output and that's the difference
$$[T]{C}P{CB}:=[T]_{CB}$$
ehhh no
Shuri2060
Shuri2060
or $$[T]_A$$
Shuri2060
same thing.
Your question is different
Your homework
it is telling you specifically
what inputs and outputs it expects
oh i understand this! i meant in general
In general when you write T in basis A it means this
(Sorry, T needs a basis. The matrix does not. The matrix represents T in a basis.)
okay !
but i understand now, i'm pretty sure
so thank you so much for taking the time
👌
.close
Channel closed
Closed by @steel ledge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is my book wrong here? in the third image i quote "Thus the cycles of theta are (1, 2), (3), (4, 5, 6)". i think the author confused cycles with equivalence classes. all the cycles of theta would infact be (1, 2), (2, 1), (3), (4, 5, 6), (5, 6, 4), (6, 4, 5) since while equivalence classes have to be disjoint from each other, to differentiate two cycles, the order simply has to be different (e.g (1, 2) ~= (2, 1))
fyi orbits are equivalence classes
cycles however i dont think so
@crimson sedge Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
what are equivalence classes in this context
k
S subscript n is a permutation group
i think its just lazy writing
ik that but what would the cycles of theta be
in this example
what???
{1, 2}, {3}, {4, 5, 6} are the classes
so the cycles are those in some permutation
.close
Channel closed
Closed by @woven heron
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
!help
If $R_1$ and $R_2$ are two irreps of $\mathrm{SU(N)}$ and $T^a_{R_j}$ the generators in a given rep, is the following true? How?
$$\mathrm{Tr} (T^a_{R_1 \oplus R_2}T^b_{R_1 \oplus R_2}) =\mathrm{Tr} (T^a_{R_1}T^b_{R_1} + T^a_{R_2}T^b_{R_2})$$
Siupa
maybe try #groups-rings-fields
Channel closed
Closed by @uneven epoch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
sketch it.
it explains?
I find it od how it takes it's lower limit -1
it figures out donain and range
and then subs into the same equation and call it interesected
but then how would you draw that graph?
okay and they align the inequality with the grraph gievn
yh
Channel closed
Closed by @smoky stump
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
learn on the interwebs
As I stated already.... discord isn't for lessons
Google, put some effort in if you want to learn tbh
Channel closed
Closed by @waxen reef
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, I am modelling a gun for a game, when I started to model the bullet of the gun, I didn't found a lot of blueprint for the bullet.
The only one I found is the following. The problem is that some distances that are missing.
I am wondering is it possible to calculate a distance between 2 point with only the data I have ?
I am sorry for my lack of knowledge. Thanks you in advance < 3
In short: How to find the length of the Green ? Please help < 3
What do you mean ?
Yes, otherwise I wouldn't have suggested.
Hooo, alright thanks ! I do not know anything abouts these, but I will try to solve it my myself then ty (way more easy than without knowing where to search) < 3 (Problem solved)
@echo fjord Has your question been resolved?
I can't manage to find a logical result, I don't understand what I did wrong. Somehow I only find value close to 0.27 (which is not okay.
If you look the blueprint, the height of the side of the angle (0.27) is not even visible because how small it is.
The result is most than probably more than 10x 0.27) (all result I found are not what the result that should be). I am confused.
c is what I am looking for, I have only A and a. I even tried to put the value in a calculator but I guess I am doing something fundamentally wrong.
I hardly imagine the length been 0.97
What am I doing wrong....
Am I misreading units ? And the result is 9.7 ?
I am so lost
Using this, I also got 0.97
What value are you getting?
I need to find the length of the green line
Basically I did 9.85 -9.58 (in red) to get 0.27 of difference
I have only 0.27 and 16.24°
as values
Can you mark exactly where 16.24 is in that picture? In this picture
I'll zoom that part, 1 sec
I mean in the part that has the rectangle around it
hum ?
basically the part i zoom is like this one (I suppose ? Maybe it's here I fkg up ?)
The black lines don't exist
it's to represent
You see the rectangle stuff here? Where does 16.24 point to?
with zoom the angle since it's very small
it's the slope ?
I guess
Is it not ?
I supposed it is
Because that gray line looks angled, so whatever triangle you tried to draw, in here, doesn't match with the rectangled stuff
I know how to read mechanical schematics but I learned it like 10 years ago, so....
So I am misreading the schematics ?
That would explain a lot of stuff
But that seems illogical too
tbh, omg my brain
Give me a few minutes and I'll circle the areas that I'm referring to
Thanks you so much !!! < 3
I am very lost lol
I got it
I am actually reatd as fuck
it's 0.27 / 2
that's why
because it's both side
=.=
but still the result is wrong, wtf
That line there looks sloped
So the black line on the left is 9.85mm and the black line on the right is 9.58mm?
yes
but it was 0.135 actually, since it was for both side
0.27 / 2 = 0.135
but still with this value it don't work
The drawing is an exaggerated view since the slope is so small, but now I am starting to doubt the angle
I think the schematics I have is a troll
It's not possible that the angle can ever be 16° with a height of 0.27
Don't worry, I am the one sorry
I think the schematics is wrong
16° angle is not possible with such light slope
math never lie
I just got trolled
Sorry, thanks you so much for the much tho !! < 3
Well, I tried
16.24° angle, lol
Why I didn't saw that from the start that it was not logical
My issue is solved
@echo fjord Has your question been resolved?
Channel closed
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
x² + 8c + ▭
so here ik you gotta order it so its
x² + ▭ + 8c
in the question it says u gotta find the number inside the rectangle to make it a trinomial perfect square
but i dont know what to do because the 8 doesnt have an exact square root
well we know that a square is in the form
(x+a)^2 = x^2 + 2xa + a^2
so if we let a^2 = 8c, then what would a be?
so like the square doesnt exist its just where the number to make it a trinomial perfect square be
but as i said in the question i cant manage to find it because 8 doesnt have a perfect root
8 doesn't need a perfect root?
you just need the x^2 + rectangle + 8c to be in the form of (x+a)^2
do we agree that:
$x^2 + 2\sqrt{2}x + 2$
is a perfect square?
Yottachad
yes it is a perfect square
okay so then just apply the same pricinple as i said before
2 doesn't have a perfect square root but it still works right
Channel closed
Closed by @ruby fulcrum
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
A teacher bought disposable masks to be distributed to students when they return to face-to-face activities. consider
there will be a total of N masks and K students. Also consider the following restrictions:
- Each student must receive at least A masks
- Each student must receive a maximum of B masks
- It is not necessary for all purchased masks to be distributed
Develop a mathematical expression that represents in how many ways such a distribution can be made, considering
as many restrictions as possible at the same time.
Channel closed
Closed by @steady wolf
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can we ask about physics on here? Or is there a better place
Physics discord has question channels too
Channel closed
Closed by @white barn
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what do I do after this?
expand abs u
ok am I on the right track? I simply can't see how I will get a vector
well theres some things to notice
There are 2 possible directions for u
u can be scaled by any (positive?) amount.
not sure if youre allowed to scale negatively
depending on what angle between means
Do you see the problem?
you have an infinite number of answers
Either set u_1 or u_2 to be 1
or continue what you're doing, but rearrange to find the ratio between the 2
@wheat silo Has your question been resolved?
Channel closed
Closed by @wheat silo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
doing this matrix multiplication

Channel closed
Closed by @lethal vale
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Could someone explain to me number 3? I'm really stuck on average rate of change
What have you gotten so far?
@kind stirrup Has your question been resolved?
So far so good!
Is this right????
Looks good, not sure about the "3(h+6x)" since it would be "3h+6x" or "3(h+2x)"
Channel closed
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
you dont - you need r and s which are the exponents of g and y
oh
oh
so i just do
243, g^10/3, y^5/2
after i simplify
and those are my answers
Looks like it
im thinking 4*2/7 because
the y in the numerator should cancel one y out
so instead of y * y * y* y * y
its just y * y * y * y
ye 8/7
Yes, but it asked what the exponents are
oh
what happens to the exponents then
they become 0?
4*0=0
and that for the rest
alr thanks for the help
@glossy zenith Has your question been resolved?
Channel closed
Closed by @glossy zenith
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i determine $58\sin \left(x\right)\cdot \cos \left(x\right)$ without calculator, if $2\sin \left(x\right)=5\cos \left(x\right)$
Theophania
we know that sin2x=2sinxcosx, but maybe that's not relevant here
$\frac{2\sin \left(x\right)}{5\cos \left(x\right)}=1$
Theophania
like this? i don't know how we can find it otherwise
that is a bit indirect but what you've just written amounts to $\frac{2}{5} \tan(x) = 1$
Ann
... I feel like you're supposed to use the Pythagorean identity...
$\frac{2}{5}\tan \left(x\right)=\sin ^2\left(x\right)+\cos ^2\left(x\right)$
i mean, yes, but there's nothing wrong with doing a little preparatory work here
Square the second equation and use sin^2 + cos^2=1
Theophania
I guess.
like this tsumiki?
this will do you no good.
nOT THERE
what i was going to suggest next if i wasn't interrupted
was to write $\sin(x) \cos(x)$ as $\frac{\sin(x)}{\cos(x)} \cdot \cos^2(x)$
Ann
$$58\sin \left(x\right)\cos \left(x\right)=58\frac{\sin \left(x\right)}{\cos \left(x\right)}\cdot \cos ^2\left(x\right)$$
Theophania
and $58 \frac{\sin(x)}{\cos(x)} \cdot \cos^2(x)$ is in turn equal to $58 \tan(x) \cdot \frac{1}{\tan^2(x) + 1}$, and the application of the pythagorean identity lies (somewhat indirectly) in transforming $\cos^2(x)$ into $\frac{1}{\tan^2(x) + 1}$
Ann
this is the identity im talking about: $\tan^2(x) + 1 = \frac{1}{\cos^2(x)}$
Ann
i'm not familiar with $\cos ^2\left(x\right)=\frac{1}{\tan ^2\left(x\right)+1}$ and $\tan ^2\left(x\right)+1=\frac{1}{\cos ^2\left(x\right)}$
Theophania
so i will try to see how we get them step by step
Ann
ah okay.
$$2\sin \left(x\right)=5\cos \left(x\right)$$
$$\frac{\sin \left(x\right)}{\cos \left(x\right)}=\tan \left(x\right)=\frac{5}{2}$$
Theophania
now that we know what tan(x) is, we should use it here, i assume?
no reason to assume anything
as i explained earlier you have $58 \sin(x) \cos(x) = \frac{58 \tan(x)}{\tan^2(x) + 1}$; you may reread what i've written to explain to yourself why this is true if you feel it's necessary, but said explanation need not (and in fact probably should not) rely on the known value of $\tan(x)$.
so you can (and should) insert the known value of tan(x) directly into the expression whose value you seek
Ann
$$58\sin \left(x\right)\cos \left(x\right)=58\frac{\sin \left(x\right)}{\cos \left(x\right)}\cdot \cos ^2\left(x\right)=58\tan \left(x\right)\cos ^2\left(x\right)$$
$$\cos ^2\left(x\right)=\frac{1}{\tan ^2\left(x\right)+1}$$
$$58\sin \left(x\right)\cos \left(x\right)=58\frac{\sin \left(x\right)}{\cos \left(x\right)}\cdot \cos ^2\left(x\right)=58\tan \left(x\right)\cdot \frac{1}{\tan ^2\left(x\right)+1}$$
Theophania
$= 58\cdot \frac{5}{2}\cdot \frac{1}{\left(\frac{5}{2}\right)^2+1}$
Theophania
$=29\cdot 5\cdot \frac{1}{\frac{25}{4}+\frac{4}{4}}$
Theophania
Channel closed
Closed by @gray vine
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Study the monotonicity of the sequence of partial sums for a series
with positive terms.
Isn't it always increasing because the terms are positive?
and so Sn+1 - Sn > 0
Partial sums?
@tender warren Has your question been resolved?
@crimson sedge
Channel closed
Closed by @tender warren
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed
Closed by @rich pier
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
lol
where did the u^2 on the denominator come from?

putting 2 things under one denom
could u show me an example pls?
I don't understand
it should be
(u^2 - 1)/u
sorry not u^2
u
honestly, if you rearrange the left side
its hard not to get the right side
they just distributed the square over the fraction
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What formula do I use to find part b?
I already found answers for part a.
Heron's formula would work
Also $Area = \frac{ab}{2} \sin \theta$ is a valid equation too
dldh06
Channel closed
Closed by @austere rapids
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Find the boundaries of the rows
<@&286206848099549185>
might not be the best translation of the instructions
I think rationalisation would work
Multiply both numerator and denominator with $\sqrt[4]{n^2+n+1} + \sqrt[4]{n^2-n+1}$
!!!
I think you need 2 additional terms
since its a 4th root not a 2nd
but yes a conjugaet should work, yielding an O(1.5) function in both the nominator and denominator
a^n-b^n=(a-b)(a^n-1+b^n-1+ba^n-2+ab^n-2 . . .)
wild guess I think the limit if 1/2
.close
Channel closed
Closed by @proven sail
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
60$ 30$ 17$
You can create linear equations out of the given information.
What do you mean?
Its just easy math
For the first case, assume car as c and ball as b. You can make a linear equation as 2c + 2b = 60. Now you can make linear equations from other two cases and solve for the variables.
It's fundamental method.
Perfect
You can verify it by just substituting back the variables in your equations.