#questions
1 messages · Page 8 of 1
and in normal context:
Ich habe ihn über den Sachverhalt aufgeklärt
and
Ich habe ihm den Sachverhalt erklärt
is not really the same
wie würdest du denn den unterschied beschreiben
Im ersten Fall ist es weniger erklären als feststellen, Tatsachen beschreiben ...
aufklären kann auch ein Substantiv sein: die Aufklärung -- Synonym für den Sexualkundeunterricht, oder Eltern erklären ihren Kindern wie es so geht mit dem Storch, klären kann auch bedeuten : wir klären ein Problem (lösen ein Problem oder eine Differenz in unseren Meinungen), klären kann man Flüssigkeiten zum Beispiel von Schwebstoffen / aufklären" can also be a noun: die Aufklärung — a synonym for sex education, or when parents explain to their children how things work with
the stork.
"klären" can also mean: we resolve a problem (solve a problem or a difference of opinion), and you can also clarify liquids, for example by
removing suspended particles
Die Aufklärung (The Enlightenment) - 1650-1800
aufklären kann KEIN Substantiv sein, denn das Substantiv lautet die Aufklärung ‼️
Hello I'm new here, I wanna learn German where do i start 😁
faq beginner
The simplest way to learn German is to find topics you don’t understand yet and search for explanations of them. This list provides you with a guide for which topics to learn if you are completely new to German. Type the topic into Google (or YouTube) and start learning!
1: Alphabet (especially ä, ü, ö and ß)
2: Basic greetings (hello, goodbye, etc.)
1: Noun gender & plurals
2: Nominative case (What are cases?)
3: Nominative pronouns (I, you, he, she, etc.)
4: Verbs in present tense
5: Definite/indefinite articles
6: Accusative case (for nouns)
7: Accusative pronouns
8: Word order of simple sentences
9: How to ask questions
See Part 2 on the next page.
- Always learn the gender of a noun when you learn a new noun
- Learn to use a translation dictionary (e.g. dict.cc, leo.org)
- Use
>faq resourcesto see our list of German learning resources - For listening and pronunciation practice, try watching movies or videos (incl. YouTube)
- You can listen to pronunciation for words on websites like dict.cc, forvo.com, and others
- Practice writing sentences every day (and asking people to correct them)
- Ask as many questions as possible
- Don’t be scared to make mistakes!!!! If you don’t let yourself make mistakes, you will never be able to learn German
Alr thnx
OK das war kein feiner deutsch , hier die Korrektur ---aufklären kann in Synonymen auch zum Substantiv werden
@astral yoke lernst du Spanisch
Nur Seeehr extensiv, aber ein bisschen verstehe und spreche ich...
Warum fragst du?
Weil ich Spanisch lerne
Ich hatte mich mal vor ca 35 Jahren damit beschäftigt und Parallelen zu Englisch, Französisch und Latein/Italienisch festgestellt, das waren meine Anfänge.
Kann jemand mir bitte erklären, wenn man Bescheid benutzt?
Ich habe ein paar Erklärung im Chatverlauf gefunden
faq resources
Bescheid geben -- über einen Sachverhalt informieren
Hier gibt es die Bedeutungsübersicht UND Beispiele:
https://www.dwds.de/wb/Bescheid
faq beginner
Please make sure to read Part 1 before starting Part 2!
1: Conjunctions (coordinating and subordinating)
2: Subordinate clause word order
3: Dative case
4: Dative verbs
5: Verbs with two objects (e.g. geben)
6: Prepositions (accusative, dative, and two-way)
7: Spoken past tense (Perfekt)
8: Written past tense (Präteritum)
9: Genitive case
10: Relative clauses
11: Adjective declension
- Make sure to practice writing and reading simple texts
- Some of these concepts are confusing to start with, so it’s a good idea to ask for help in #questions when you’re unsure
- You should use a declension chart to help with declension to start with, because you won’t be able to memorize it straight away
- After you feel confident with creating sentences, you can start learning the adjective declension properly by using the command >faq adjective declension and reading the guide provided
If you don't answer a question, pls use those 'links' in #botchannel 🙇♂️
Oh mb sorry I don’t know how to really use these things
Try the #botchannel with > explain all 😉
Sie räumen auf, nicht ab. Sie kochen ihren Schöpfern die Mahlzeiten, bauen Pflanzen an usw. Wobei, ich bin jetzt pingelig, "anbauen" ist eher auf einem Feld. Wenn sie Heilpflanzen in einem Blumentopf wachsen lassen, passt anbauen nicht so richtig.
Und: "Sie sind sanftmütige Leute", ohne "eine". Leute ist Plural. Es ginge aber auch: "Sie sind eine sanftmütige Art/Sippe/Rasse"
Danke noch einmal!
@green echo sag vallah du bist keiner verdammte salapipi ?
Arab?
Are there acronyms in German? Or contractions?
Well obviously there are contractions but
Are there acronyms
Yes, German has plenty of acronyms. Acronyms (Abkürzungen/Akronyme) Very common, just like in English:
- BRD — Bundesrepublik Deutschland
- GmbH — Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung (like "Ltd.")
- AG — Aktiengesellschaft (public company)
- PKW — Personenkraftwagen (car)
- LKW — Lastkraftwagen (truck)
German actually loves compound words, so acronyms often compress very long compound nouns into something manageable (GmbH being a classic example like Ldt.)
Aküfi = Abkürzungsfimmel 😉
HBF= hauptbahnhof (main train station)
Siehe "MFG - Mit freundlichen Grüßen" von 'Die Fantastischen Vier'
Die da?!?
⚠️ Neuaufnahme verfügbar: https://youtu.be/WIrzPXOMTak
Am 7. September 1992 wurde einer der größten Hits der Fantastischen Vier veröffentlicht.
Die erste Single-Auskopplung aus dem zweiten Studioalbum “4 gewinnt” war einer der ersten kommerziell erfolgreichen Deutschrap-Songs und erreichte am 28.11.1992 #2 der deutschen Single-Chart...
It's the only song I know from them, lol. Maybe I should listen to more recent songs....
🤯
it's from 1999, so not really recent... 😜
Whats the difference between zu and du?
zu is a dative preposition, it's general meaning is „to“ but it can change depending on context
Ich gehe zur Arbeit- I'm going to work
Ich gehe zu Fuß- I'm going on foot
Ich bin zu Hause- I'm at home
du is the 2nd personal informal personal pronoun in the nominative case
it means you
du bist so nett! - you're so nice!
glaubst du an mich?- do you believe in me?
hallo! ich habe eine Frage über Deutsch.
Ich habe diesen Satz geschrieben: "Meine Arbeit gibt mir sehr viele Geld nicht"
aber ChatGPT korriegiert mich und has gesagt "Meine Arbeit gibt mir nicht sehr viel Geld".
Meine Frage ist, mein Satz ist richtig oder nicht wie ChatGPT hat gesagt
Oh! Thank you
I misunderstood what zu was
I kept thinking people were using du and zu interchangeably since wherever "du" went
Zu would just randomly appear at times
#rules #8 AI chat related to language learning isn't allowed on this server
but yes, you need to place nicht before sehr and omit the e from viele
viele- many
viel- much / a lot
ohh Entschuldigung! Ich habe die Regeln nicht gelesen (wie sehen können)
Warrum diese Regel?
Danke, ich verstehe!
you might also encounter it in zu clauses
Wir haben versucht, dieses Lied mitzusingen. Ich habe vergessen, meine Hausaufgaben zu machen
or um,,,, zu clauses
Wir brauchen ein neues Gerät, um wichtige Nachrichten an unsere Freunde zu schicken
idk
just the rules of the server, ai can be misleading a lot of the time. The mods of this server don't want learners to absorb false knowledge
mmmm ok Ich würde sagen dass es meistens nützlich und richtig Information gibt. Jetzt benutze ich es um die Order des Wörter meine Satze zu korrigieren 👍 .
Beide sind falsches Deutsch und ergeben keinen Sinn.
(Und da ChatGPT das nicht begreift, nun, darum sind LLMs halt oft nutzlos.)
wie würdest du es sagen?
"Ich verdiene nicht gut."
[...in meinem Job]
Du kannst auch sagen, "Ich verdiene schlecht", aber ich weiß nicht, wie schlecht 🙂
verdienen ist das wichtige Verb hier
ahh danke! Nun, ich sage oft, dass das Wichtigste ist, dass die anderen meine Nachrichten verstehen können! 🙂 🙂 Aus Fehler lerne ich 👍
... aus Fehlern lerne ich -> look up the cases pls...
Das hat ein bisschen unhöflich geklungen aber danke!
Tat es.
that wasn't my intention 🤷♂️
Kasusfehler sind normal und nicht durch ein "learn the cases" zu korrigieren.
Keine sorge! 🙂
klar... Ich weiß die Kasus, aber ich brauche* noch sehr viel Praktik um sie zu "naturilizieren" (ich weiß nicht wie das sagen)
Was ist deine Muttersprache?
Spanisch
Ok, dann gibt es Englisch nicht XD
I speak english fluently :v
Aber Englisch wissen sehr hilft nicht um Deutsch zu lernen...
But would it help you more as a meta-language to talk about German than just speaking in German?
Es hilft bis zu einem gewissen Punkt.
Ich meinte, es gibt kein Englisch, weil Du halt zuerst Spanisch gelernt hast.
Also, kein Englisch, um Dir (!) Deutsch zu erklären 😄
ja, zum beispiel, alle videos die habe ich gesehen waren auf Deutsch. Außerdem, gibt es einige Wörter die sind änhliche
Hast Du schon Sprachprüfungen bestanden?
auf Englisch?
Für Deutsch!
nein, ich interessiert mich nicht. Ich lerne es nur weil mag ich diese Sprache
Dann solltest du die wundervolle Idee lernen, die Deutsche "Nebensatz" nennen
Yes of course, I'm just trying to speak all in german because I want to practice this language haha
"Ich lerne es nur weil mag ich diese Sprache" -> "Ich lerne es nur, weil ich diese Sprache mag."
important is where the comma is and how the word order is after the comma
ah ja! ich habe es schon gelernt! 🙂 ich brauche mehr Praktik 😄
Super! 😄 "Nebensatz" ist so wichtig.
ja! natürlich!
Aber ok, wir sprechen davon, dass dein Job scheiße ist? 😄
Hallo Leute, ich sehe ,dass sie über Arbeit sprechen.
Think about the cases - and conjugations - once more / Denke noch einmal über die Fälle - ach, alles - nach.
(I'll give you the correct version once you did give a ver. 2)
ist es nun richtig?
wer spricht?
ich
Aber in dem Satz, "Hallo Leute, ich sehe ,dass sie über Arbeit sprechen" ?
oh , ich meine du und jupy
Ja, aber ich meine Deutsch 😛
ich lerne noch, also es gibt wirklich viel fehler
Du brauchst Frieren, oder?
was bedeutet das
hahaha
ok, warum heißt du Himmel?
denn Himmel bedeutet sky. Und ich habe diese Name zufällig gewählt.
Sorry 🙂
"Hallo Leute, ich sehe, dass sie über Arbeit sprechen." <- your sentence
-> "Hallo Leute, ich sehe, dass ihr über Arbeit sprecht."
i just realised u meant the anime haha. sorry for confusion
so you know it? 😄
yeah i know it, u said frieren i thought it s a german verb
cause they all end with 'en'
I capitalized it, but I should have gone for italics* 😄
danke für die Hilfe
haha my bad
mich interessiert ja nur: verstehst du es? dann ok!
ja ich verstehe. hast du einige Tipps für mich so ich gut deutsch lernen ?
ah haha nein, ich erstelle zufällige Sätze um Deutsch zu uben. Man kann sagen dass ich allein spreche 😝
Struggling with doing questions that include Kennen and Werden
Like for example, " Ja, natürlich. Wo ist Bachs Geburtsort? (blank) ihr das?"
shouldn't it be 'Kennt'?
or no, Wisst?
Bei Kennt müsste der ganze Satz lauten:
Kenn ihr den (Geburtsort)?
ist es dann "Wo is Bachs Geburtsort? wisst ihr das?"
Ich lerne noch Deutsch, these are from my textbook, this is about as hard as English to me
If word order is flexible why can't I always put the verb before a noun and it be correct?
The verb just has to be in second position
word order is semi-flexible
some things are flexible, others are not
one of the things that is least flexible, is the position of the verb(s)
but for example, you can have the subject before or after the verb in a main clause, you can have the object after or before the verb in a main clause
Ich habe ihm geholfen.
Ihm habe ich geholfen.
Both valid.
Question is "Mein Geburtstag ist im Juni. Dann (blank) ich 23 Jahre alt." What am I meant to put after Dann?
Well if you were just going to say "I am 23 years old" by itself, how would you say it?
Ich bin 23 jahre alt?
Yes. Here it may sound better to use "werde" though, I'm not sure.
It has to be "Ich werde 23" based on the context of the sentences.
Es ist in der Zukunft.
Okay, I see. Even with "dann"?
Ja.
Present tense is very often used for future expressions in German though.
More often than not.
Ich würde "werde" vorziehen.
Ich weiß.
Aber hier würde ich das nicht tun.
Das "Ich habe Geburtstag" ist dabei etwas special
Sure, I'm not disputing your suggestion towards the sentence. Just the explanation "Es ist in der Zukunft."
"Ich werde nächste Woche 30" ist einfach, wie man darüber spricht, dass man in der Zukunft Geburtstag hat.
"Ich habe morgen Geburtstag [und werde 27]." = "Ich werde morgen 27".
isn’t that the same construction as in pretty much every european language
even in english you’d say „i’m turning 27 tomorrow“
you wouldn’t bat an eye at the fact that „i’m turning“ technically describes a continuous action in the present
literally it would be "I will be 27 tomorrow."
my thinking is that if another word covers the temporal aspect of what you’re implying, then tenses are not that important as it’s clear anway
like why say „ich werde morgen 27 werden“ or „ich werde morgen 27 sein“ when „morgen“ already tells you it’s in the future
ja
most languages do this (e.g., English)
(or, literally the only way in Japanese to talk about anything past now)
its also the reason why in languages where you can say future things it's usually weird to actually say them
there are a lot of languages that lack a future tense entirelly but it’s never a problem because, like pretty much every language, there are words that describe a place in time
Ja, wie auch auf Deutsch "Ich gehe morgen einkaufen"
yeah
i don’t think it’s weird just because, it’s moreso that using the future tense has a different connotation
we can debate what I meant with "weird"
(actually, please don't)
like saying „i WILL be turning 27 tomorrow“ sounds like there is weird emphasis on it, as if you are to say that it’s your personal choice and nothing can deter you from the path you’ve chosen
as opposed to just leaving it away
or someone else has decided it for you
but why is it not "I will turn 27"?
it’s just irrelevant to overstate it like that
(in English, that just becomes "I turn 27")
idk it sounds like it’s either a result of a causal link or like there’s some determination in it
or also like you’re stating something existential
but i think that has moreso to do with the word „will“ itself
kind of odd that the word that handles the constructed future „tense“ is a word that implies intent
which is another thing
it's also the point where I'd like to ask people grown up in an English environment
you said that thing about japanese just now
but really, are constructed tenses (those with auxiliary verbs) real tenses?
it’s just the present tense conjugation of „will“ with another verb
it’s just as much of a roundabout
ah I see where you may want to go
it semantically always implies the future but it doesn’t seem like a real tense either
I'd suggest that a real "future tense" (in German, this can only be said as "Ich werde gehen" etcpp.) would be a narrative mode (that doesn't make much sense, but its still possible)
ok I'll steal real haha
the verb cambiar (to chance) would in 3rd person singular future tense be cambiará
meaning „it will change“
or he or she
but that’s an actual future tense conjugation without an auxiliary verb in the present tense
can you use it to say "it will change tomorrow, in a minute" etc.?
not the problem though.
i think they would opt for „ir a“ + infinite verb for the immediate future
ir a means „go to“
Deutsch verstehe ich eher...
so „voy a cambiar“ would mean „i am going to change (momentarily)“
A sentence, that, without context, is just meaningless 😄
what i’m saying is though that it’s an incredibly common thing in language to just use the present tense and constructed formulas to imply the future
(not a critique btw, because I'd like to know what the hell the meaning is)
i just took any verb lmao
(or can be)
to form a simple sentence
oh absolutely that
(„Cambiará.“ is a complete sentence in spanish)
which raises the question of "...what is this future tense thing?"
Was bedeutet das?
in my opinion, constructed tenses that need auxiliary verbs aren’t real tenses to begin with
he/she/it will change
Wann sagst du das?
it doesn’t matter, you can do this with any verb, because spanish doesn’t need a subject (the verb implies the subject) and since it’s not a transitive verb, neither does it need an object, making it a complete sentence
but my focus was moreso on the fact that spanish has a morphological future tense that gets used as such while no matter how you express the future in german or english, it always involves a verb conjugated for the present
both in using a verb that isn’t „werden“ and using the „future tense,“ which conjugates „werden“ for the present
interesting take, why do you think this
hey, im looking for an A1 study buddy is anyone looking for one toooo?
im not sure where exactly to find the space to look for anyone
nevermind i found the community post :)
Teilen sich Deutsch und Englisch diesen Ausdruck?
Dies ist der Schlüsselmoment - this is the key moment
Dieses Thema ist der Schlüssel - this topic is key
Hello, can I get access to the study groups please?
spricht man der "n" in „Saiso__n__“ aus?
not from them, but from others 🤷♂️
No, cause it's French
aber manche Wörter werden auf Deutsch nicht wie Franzözisch ausgesprochen, nein?
wie interessant
First one yea, second one kinda depends. I think the way you use it in English is a bit different cause in German you use the article with it so it carries a bit of a different meaning
Ja das stimmt, manche sind etwas eingedeutscht
Das ist richtig, aber Saison gehört nicht dazu.
Saison aber eher nicht, aber gibt bestimmt auch Leute die das n aussprechen lol
Ich habe schon öfter gehört, dass es auch wie im englischen Wort 'song' ausgesprochen wird (denn im Französischen ist die Endung on ein Nasallaut, den manche so versuchen zu imitieren)
in Saison?
ach ja Wiktionary sagt dass /zɛˈzɔŋ/ geht
Hello, I can't join voice channels. Can I get access please?
@static tendon, please read the Roles section in #getting-started for info on how to join VC and more.
ja ich war verwirrt als ich erstmal "Pommes Frites" gehört habe, wie pom-frit, aber dann habe ich auch "Pomm__es__" gehört
Ja, Pommes ist die "eingedeutschte" Variante, aber nur solange man das ~~frites ~~dann weglässt.
wait why the hell
are they even called that
pommes = apples
frites = fried
???
pommes de terre
ohhh
Erdapfel
oder Plural -> Erdäpfel
... gebratenen
Aber auch hier im Plural (sonst bekommst du vllt nur eine(n) 😉 )
oder frittierte Erdäpfel
fritterte = gebratene?
Frittiert ist in Fett ausgebacken, gebraten ist in der Pfanne (auch mit Fett, aber deutlich weniger)
ach so
Das sind definitiv keine Pommes 😉 sondern Bratkartoffeln
kann man sagen tieffrittiert für 'deepfried'
oder bedeutet frittiert bereits 'deepfried'
bei uns gibt es den Begriff nicht 🤷♂️
Im Gegensatz zu tiefgefroren oder tiefgekühlt
macht sinn
thank you so much :D
Today I was chatting with somebody and i mentioned that I was in a DDR museum
they said "ich komme aus der ehemaligen DDR"
I would rather say "aus der damaligen DDR" and I was wondering why that would sound off
like vorherigen DDR sounds also good to my non native ears but probably wrong
could somebody help me understand what it would imply with other forms
I'd say it's like a fixed expression as of today, if you want to avoid the 'DDR' you can say
... aus den neuen Bundesländern ...
Hallo Zusammen, ich hätte eine Übung, die ich nicht ganz verstehe. Oder besser - ist mir nicht klar, ob die von mir angegebenen Versionen richtig wären
was ich eingegeben habe
die vom System erwartete Lösungen
die N1 ist 100% falsch, da wenigstens ,,mir´´ und die Verneinung umgetauscht werden sollen. Aber wäre das auch ggf. richtig?
Nein, es sollte so aussehen:
du musst mir nicht helfen. Oh, ich glaube das wir ja die Frage:
So kann man es jedenfalls formulieren.
Nr 6) die Verneinung kommt hinter Herrn Brehm:
du brauchst Herrn Brehm nicht ...abzuholen
verstehe. Dankeschön
Bitteschön, gern geschehen.
Gibt es noch Fragen zu den anderen Aufgaben?
Ich hab mir noch einmal das gelesen https://easy-deutsch.de/position-nicht/ und bin immer zweifelhaft darüber. Ich sehe ja ein, dass im Satz N.6 die Verneinung vor den Ergänzungen besser klingt. Was denn aber, falls ich den Namen des Herrn verhört habe und NICHT Herrn Brehm abholen muss, sondern jemanden anderen?
Du brauchst Herrn Brehm nicht abzuholen --> er braucht niemanden, der ihn abholt
Du brauchst nicht Herrn Brehm abzuholen --> Du solltest ihn nicht abholen, sondern David
... brauchst nicht Herrn Brehm abzuholen, sondern David
...du brauchst nicht Herrn Brehm sondern David abzuholen
also die Beiden sind tatsächlich richtig😬
im Beispiel wird halt verneint, vowon der Herr abgeholt werden muss
Man KANN natürlich auch so formulieren:
Du brauchst Herrn Brehm nicht abzuholen, sondern David.
Aber ich finde das klingt 'holprig'
how does the sentence "alle waren schwimmen" work
alle waren beim schwinnen sounds okay but
i heard the phrase in a cartoon
Have you seen that there's not only videos but sheets as well?
Natives, could you tell me on what occasions you start your sentence with a verb?
I sent a meme and said "what a wonderful goal" and I got
"muss ich zugeben ..." from a friend
I don't quite understand. I know so far only three cases in which a verb can be used in position one.
1- Conditional sentence
Werden Kühe müde, (so/dann) schlafen sie im stehen
2- Imperative
Sei ruhig
3- irreale Wunsch
hätte ich doch ein Auto
None of those explains this phenomenon
He also could have answered:
... meine ich auch -> (das) meine ich auch
But the das is omitted.
warum sagt man "gelbes haus" aber auch "das gelbe haus"
Hast du schon von
bestimmtem Artikel -> der/die/das
und unbestimmtem Artikel -> ein/eine/ein gehört?
FAQ not found. Try >explain all.
If you want to 'investigate' further just switch to #botchannel and type >explain all
to those who learn consistently, how many hours a day do you put in?
in my prime like 3-4
That's Absentiv, it's like C1+ level grammar.
You can read more about it here:
#questions message
But really, you shouldn't even worry about it until at least B2, if not later.
Because there's different rules for adjective endings depending on what's in front of the adjective:
Adjective declension is one of the most complicated things in German. Sometimes they are declined (there are three types of declensions) and other times not. But don’t worry; we will explain it so that you can understand easily
Qusstion
for me max 2 hrs, but I only realistically hit 1 hr most days 😔 I have a lot of Uni coursework as a computer science student
Hi guys! Which one is correct?
"Ich sehe meinen Flugzeug"
Or "Ich sehe mein Flugzeug" ?
It's the second one bc -> das Flugzeug - mein Flugzeug
ich you choose -> der Flieger - meinen Flieger
remember in German always learn the noun with it's gender ☺️
Yes I'm familiar with genders as I speak French and Arabic
I just assumed it's masculine 😂😂
But ye I'll pay more attention to genders
Thank you!!
Especially that French and Arabic don't have neutral one
So I gotta keep it in mind
tres bien ! 😉
what’s the difference between “ich habe…” and “habe ich…”
same thing for “du hast…” and “hast du…” and etc
this is abt word order in German, that is quite different to English word order...
What are you confused abt???
^^
"Habe ich" and "hast du" aren't always questions?
Any difference between sich umziehen and sich anziehen?
like why do you switch around the order? and when do you switch it around?
are “ich habe ein pizza” and “habe ich ein pizza” the same thing?
which one is used for questions vs statements i guess
The second is a yes/no question.
so the verb goes first when asking a question?
Two kinds of questions: w-questions and yes/no questions.
For yes/no questions, verb comes first.
For w-questions, it's W-word first, verb second then everything else.
Was habe ich?
W-word might be multiple words (Wie viel, or some others). But the gist is "question word first". (Maybe question-phrase first to cover the multi word scenario?)
OMG so for example “warum hast du die hausaufgaben?” would be proper to say and so would “hast du die hausaufgaben?” as well? only diff is that the second one is a yes/no
and “du hast die hausaufgaben” is just the simple statement
Yup, seems like you got it
bless u
i hope u find a $20 on the ground next time u leave ur home
This depends on what you are talking about
Yes, there is the thing where if the verb is in position 1, that may be a question
But there is also a thing that a lot of Germans do colloquially, where if the noun in position 1 is like, "ich, du, das, es", then Germans simply omit it
Wie sieht's aus mit deinen Hausaufgaben?
How does it look with your homework?
(das) Habe ich schon gemacht.
I've already done (it)
Was machst du heute?
What are you doing today?
(ich) Gehe zum Supermarkt, um Lebensmittel zu kaufen.
(I'm) going to the super market to buy groceries.
we do something similar in English
Note: This isn't done in formal situations or on tests, just when speaking casually
vielen dank for explaining
So yeah, sometimes it only looks like the verb is in position 1, when really, it's just that the noun in position 1 has been omitted
so how do i know if they’re asking a question vs just saying a statement with an omission?
i’m sure that it’s usually based off of context clues
and if i’m talking to someone, i can tell by the inflection in their voice when they ask a question
but what about if i’m texting a person
or should i not worry about that at an A1 lvl yet
Sometimes normal-looking statements can be turned into questions with the correct... inflection?
You probably just just be aware that A1 / A2 / B1 grammar is "stricter", mostly on behalf of our beginner minds. Real world German has a ton of colloqialisms and rules breaking. Just like any other language.
B1 is considered the first "conversational" level for a reason. It really does take a long time / a lot of study before you're ready for a typical back-and-forth discussion.
understood, danke
2 at minimum, 4-5 when possible
tho it's hard to get even an hour on some days, but mostly 2 minimum
choose quality over quantity and a valid time that that corresponds with both your current limit (how long you can study without burning out) and your work/school life :)
if your max is an hour, or even 30 minutes, that's perfectly fine. The important thing is remaining consistent throughout your learning
@spiral axle Do you have a grammar book with exercises? Its one thing to learn the theory, but it usually takes a few practice problems before I'm able to consistently apply a new German Grammar concept.
And even with practice exercises, I make mistakes and need tons of corrections.
Lets see... 30 minutes of driving (== 30 minutes of songs / German passive listening), around 30 minutes to 1 hour of Anki (I'm slow, +5 words/day. But I do lots of dictionary lookups as part of my daily Anki learning). Maybe 30 minutes Grammatik aktiv, daily. So ~1 hour minimum plus various extra tidbits (reading, listening, watching German Youtube) on top of that. But passive listening isn't much "work" for me.
1 hour minimum daily, if I'm being honest. I don't think I've gone any lower than that.
I recommend writing + speaking a lot on this server, or with anyone really. Grammar exercises are definitely good, but creating your own unique sentences is where most of the internalizing happens :)
Das stimmt. Ich schreibe manchmal ein Sätz. Ich soll mehrer oft (ofter??) schreiben.
einen Satz / Sätze
Ich sollte öfter schreiben
see, just like that
Aber ich habe Angst, es zu sprechen.
Ah, yes. Konjunctiv II
that makes sense.
accusative == einen, right?
Ich habe Angst, (mehr / mit Leuten) zu sprechen
yes, given that the noun is masculine
and just like that, you corrected 3 mistakes
don't be afraid, operating at the edge of your ability is exactly what you want for growth
okay i gtg
Thx!
but speak more! You are building very good sentences already and will improve much quicker with lots of output 👍
and input
Wenn du Angst hast, um hier mit Leuten zu sprechen, dann kannst du einfach irgendwelche Spielservern finden. Z.b. für CS 2, aber auf Deutsch 
Hoffenlich SC:BW. Wenn spielen ich CS:2, denn zwei (problems?) Probleme wir** haben.
Ich wurde (dizzy??) mit FPS.
die Probleme ist plural von das Problem
und bin nicht ganz sicher, aber vllt "wenn ich CS2 spiele, dann habe ich zwei Probleme"
Du kannst auch z.b. Peak Spiel spielen, oder andere Spiele, die haben Kooperative-Modus
Das erste Problem ist, das ich schlect Deutsch spreche*. Das zweite Problem ist, das ich schlect FPS spiele**!
(Note: I still haven't practiced** relative clauses yet lol. I'll... get there.....)
Es ist aber kein Problem. Du kannst immer sagen, dass dein Deutsch noch nicht gut ist, und andere Leute werden mit dir einfacher oder langsamer sprechen (wenn sie es natürlich wollten)
If you're talking about the sentence you just wrote, it wouldn't include any relative clauses.
Is it just a normal subordinate clause in this case?
ah now i no wat the clarity about the relative pronoun question
so for relative pronouns
is it like
das ist die Persone, die ich gesehen habe
or das ist die Persone, die von mir gesehen war
thats where i got confused with using dass as about the same meaning
das is die Persone, dass ich gesehen habe
i was wondering if relative pronouns had to be the subject still, or it can be changed into the object/indirect object
Relative pronouns are a subject or object. It plays the same role as a noun in the sentence.
But "dass" does not do that. Dass is just a conjunction. It's like a filler word with no meaning by itself, that's just there to make the sentence work.
So in your example:
Das ist die Person, die ich gesehen habe.
The "die" refers to a person, you can define exactly what it refers to.
Ich denke, dass Katzen süß sind.
Here, you can't identify that "dass" refers to any specific thing. It's just some meaningless word that provides a connection between the two clauses.
oh
anyone know a place i could refer to for internet slang/abbreviation in german
i see so many abbreviations that i just cant figure out
Abbreviations (Abkürzungen), pretty exhaustive list
but Abkürzungen aren't necessarily or even usually 'slang', so perhaps it doesn't answer your question.
Diese Seite listet eine Auswahl von Abkürzungen und Akronymen aus dem Netzjargon auf. Es handelt sich um Internetakronyme, die im deutschen Sprachraum häufig in Sozialen Medien, Chats, Instant Messengern, Diskussionsforen, E-Mails, SMS usw. verwendet werden oder wurden. Oft stammen sie aus dem Englischen. Alle Abkürzungen können in der Schre...
faq word order
FAQ not found. I found the following similar entries: Word Order for Verbs (1), Word order of verbs (2), Word Order for Nouns & Pronouns (3), Word order verbs (4)
Select one of the values in the brackets to directly open the suggested FAQ.
so you could go to #botchannel and look up those 4 topics if you need to learn more abt them ^^
how does the sentence "alle waren schwimmen" work
alle waren beim schwinnen sounds okay but i heard the phrase in a cartoon
This is an advanced grammar topic called Absentiv.
faq absentiv
Theo ist einkaufen
Absentiv (or absentive in english) is a grammatical aspect (like how konjunktiv ii is also an aspect) in German. It is used quite commonly in spoken / colloquial standard german, and almost never in formal / written german. As the name 'absentive' might suggest, it is used to express someone's absence in combination with an activity that is the reason for their absence. Key parts of this include the implication that the person will eventually return from their absence, and that the action they're partaking is is something that they do regularly. E.g. hobbies, occupations, etc.
Unlike the 'am-progress' Theo ist am einkaufen, the absentiv makes no comment on the state of progress or completion of the activity the subject is doing. It only states that they are not in the current location due to the mentioned activity: for all we know Theo might have already finished shopping and currently be on his way home, or he might only just have arrived at the store.
@scenic obsidian answered your question already yesterday 10:44 AM 🤷♂️
Beginners shouldn't worry about learning this.
Sorry i didnt notice that
Thanks as well
I know ie usually makes it say E name
What about EI? Did I just pronounce it by the sound of the letter or do I say I name
ei is similar to english "I"
The sound or name
im not surr what you mean by that but thr answer is probably the sound
I am a human
Like the way youd say that
Like bei does it sound like the English word? By
Yes it sounds like it
Practicing with some new words
Die Fledermaus sieht den Vogel und sitzt bei ihm.
Kann ich bei dir sitzen? (this was confusing to learn.)
Der Vogel sitzt beim Mann.
dankee
Was ist die beste App zum Deutschlernen?
Hello, can someone please teach me the difference of the cases? Dative, Nominative, Accusative, Genitive. I still can't understand them no matter how hard I try :(
What do you know so far?
I know that we have a Nominative case when there's a direct object, Accusative for an indirect one, Dative I think when we claim something is ours and Genitive for pretty much the reason as Dative I think. However, I still can't understand when do we have a direct object, an indirect one, etc.
And I know there's a certain article that applies to each individual combination of the case, gender, and number.
Only thing I know about that is if you see something it becomes a object
Der Mann sieht den Vogel.
What is the difference between Mein Name ist ~ and Ich Heiße ~ ?
It’s just how German normal talk. The other one is I am called.
I could be wrong though
They usually say things that sound the best
Hmmm I'm not sure
There is a differrence but I'm not sure what it's called
Like in German, you can say my favorite animal are, but they usually say it my beloved animal are
Mein Lieblingstier sind
How do you pronounce "Eisenhower"?
President #34, creator of the modern US Highway system?
German ei is identical to Eisenhower.
I gave you the ball. The English concept is that the "verb" has the property of what and when to use direct vs indirect objects. (In this case" give takes both a direct and indirect object).
German courses should be ordered to teach you "easier" verbs first in A1 where you don't have to worry about this as much... But if you are self studying you will have to make sure you memorize how to use verbs as you learn them.
German is actually very similar to English conceptually. But the exact properties need to be rememorized per verb.
Your typical day 1 of German has "Wie geht es Ihnen?", which is actually a Dativ example from the start. And you just have to memorize it
if it takes both a direct and indirect object doesn't that make it both Nominative and Accusative? And if it does, then how will I know which article to place from the table?
could you try build a sentence that contains both a direct and indirect object?
hold up I'll send a vid
or,
faq cases
Cases
German has four grammatical cases (der Fall or der Kasus in German): nominative, accusative, dative, and genitive. A case alters a noun, pronoun, adjective, etc., in some way to mark its grammatical function in a phrase, clause, or sentence. For example, the main function of the nominative (der Nominativ) case is to mark the subject in a sentence:
Ich liebe die deutsche Sprache!
In this sentence, the pronoun ich represents the first person subject and is in the nominative case. Every noun, pronoun, adjective, etc. has form in every case and it is very important to learn all of them. For example, the accusative form of ich is mich:
Die deutsche Sprache liebt mich!
See >explain adjective declension to get started on that. Don't get discouraged by how much there is, it takes some time master.
To see an explanation of the usages of every case, see their individual articles:
>explain nominative
>explain accusative
>explain dative
>explain genitive
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I7vsv8DN9EE&t=321s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fPKH95g_9cs&t=533s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G-dgLzu18EU&t=433s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94VLf1y7eyY&t=683s)
What is a German case? What is nominative? What's the nominative meaning? How do you determine the nominative? What are the German articles? For all these questions you will find answers in this video. German nominative case explained.
First I will tell you all the German cases, explain you what a case is and what's the meaning of nominative. ...
Was ist Akkusativ? What is actually the meaning of this German case called accusative? When do you have to use it? Was ist ein Akkusativobjekt?
These are all questions which very often come up for beginner students who learn the basics of the German language. With this video I try to solve the mysterious German grammar problem once and for all ...
Was ist Dativ? How do you explain the German dative case and which German verbs use dative and why? In this video you will hopefully find answers to the German problem Dativ.
It's the third case in German grammar and probably also the third one you come across when learning German. Dative is used after specific verbs and prepositions. About pre...
Let's analyze TOGETHER a German text in detail so you can understand the German grammar better.
I will take a day in my life and explain you word by word my diary. What is the subject, the verb and objects AND what CASES you need to use for each and WHY. This is an exercise I use already very successfully for many years with my students and in...
You have a mistake. If we use the 1:1 comparison, the German accusative is comparable to a direct object. And dative is comparable to an indirect object. Genitive objects of verbs are exceedingly rare and more of a C1 topic.
A few verbs take nominative: sein, werden, bleiben
Many verbs take accusative: haben, sehen, essen, usw.
Some verbs take dative: helfen, entgehen, folgen,...
And some verbs take both accusative and dative. These pretty much always involve an object (accusative) and a receiver (dative).
Ich gebe meinem Bruder einen Hund.
The brother receives (dative), the object being given is the dog (accusative)
Ich habe dir ein Brötchen gekauft.
You (indirect object, dative) receive the roll (direct object, accusative).
Nominative is "the subject". Like "I". In English, we have direct objects and indirect objects ("me"), there's a subtle difference but in most cases it doesn't matter.
That's why we have to work with specific (English) sentences (ex: "I gave my brother the dog", taking lolo's example), which sets up a direct object + indirect object situation in English.
danke schun 
I wanna learn how to differentiate the cases now in German sentences. My guess is that the first sentence (until the question mark) is genitive because it's used to identify whose the clock is and the second sentence is also Genitive
no, this is the nominative case
like lolo said, there's a few verbs that take the nominative, and one of them is sein
Ist > 3rd person singular of the verb sein
so in this field, you'd put die or eine
Ist das (die/eine) Uhr?
Ja, das ist (die/eine) Uhr
is sein a verb?
ohhhh
so sein only takes nominative?
like exclusively?
well, the verb has different functions
it's also used to form the past tense (haben also does this in some verbs)
Ich bin gegangen > I have gone
also the exercise is about possessive pronouns I forgot to mention that my bad
but for now, you don't need to learn this
Okay
So if it's in nominative then that means hmm..
hint: Uhr is a feminine noun
So..
According to this table
If Uhr is Feminine , in singular and first person (ich)
then i'm guessing mein?
refer to this table, the one you sent has some errors
👏
but,,, you should be careful with where you get your grammar tables from
I mean on exercise 1
yes
Yup
so it would be deine?
correct
Alrightt
First part of the sentence I think is in nominative here, on question 2 because it simply states the subject "_ Auto" which means it would be sein, because it's in singular form and also neuter.
I hope I got it correct 
good! Sein Auto is correct
Also, you should do all the work and send it at once :)
okayyy
It does in (older) English. In grade school I was taught "That person is I"
Colloquial / modern English doesn't seem to do this anymore though.
A change that happened within my lifetime....
damn the fact that I understand the cases pretty well in Greek but stomp when I see them in English or German ooif
I umm I had a question
Soo do people even use gern geschehen?
I've heard bitte schön alot
Is gern geschehen even used in real life or it's just a textbook stuff?
So here, I was wondering, isn't the second part of the sentence possessive, therefore in genitive? "My bicycle"?
It is actually just a possessive article. The case is still nominative.
Genitive would be like: Die Farbe meines Fahrrades
Or even: Die Farbe des Fahrrades (just to emphasize that genitive doesn't have to do with the article)
Oh my that's confusing
I think I still haven't grasped how the cases work
but I don't want to give up
dw, that's a different type of intuition you develop overtime :)
after getting the very basics of cases down
so pretty much what lolo said
I didn't understand what Lolo meant here
explain nominative
The nominative case (der Nominativ) is one of the four cases of the German language. A case affects how a noun or noun phrase is inflected, and indicates the role of the noun or noun phrase in a clause.
Definite articles: der, die, das
Indefinite articles: ein, eine, ein
Personal pronouns:
ich - I
du - you
er - he
es - it
sie - she/they
wir - we
ihr - you guys
Sie - (formal) you/you guys
For a full explanation, including adjectives, see >explain adjective declension
You should start by just understanding nominative and accusative, with simple common verbs. Then dative. Then genitive later on.
The accusative case (der Akkusativ) is one of the four cases of the German language. A case affects how a noun or noun phrase is inflected, and indicates the role of the noun or noun phrase in a clause.
Feminine and neuter nouns and adjectives are the same as nominative. Masculine determiners, adjectives, and weak nouns gain an -en ending::
Ich esse den/einen/keinen kleinen Apfel.
Personal pronouns differ for:
ich --> mich
du --> dich
er --> ihn
wir --> uns
ihr --> euch
For a full explanation see >explain adjective declension
Unfortunately, in your most recent example, there are several things going on that might make it confusing. First the fact that a possessive article like 'mein' doesn't equate to genitive. Second, the fact that in a comparative clause (the part with the 'wie....Fahrrad'), the case of the noun is determined by the case of what it's being compared to. In this case, you're comparing 'sein Auto' with 'mein Fahrrad.' Sein Auto is the subject of the sentence, and is in nominative. So 'mein Fahrrad' is also in nominative.
So if I'm comparing two things and one is in nominative then 100% the other is in nominative too?
Yes, as long as the thing outside of the wie/als clause is in nominative, the thing within it should also be in nominative. Some examples:
Du bist so groß wie ich.
Dein Fahrrad ist nicht halb so schön wie mein Fahrrad.
Meine Tochter wird eines Tages so groß wie ihre Mutter.
and what does wie/als mean?
So the case describes what role the noun plays in the sentence
Der Hund beißt den Mann.
The dog bites the man.
Der Hund = subject, it's in nominative
Den Mann = object (of the verb beißen), it's in accusative
We can change what's in front of the noun, without changing the case, because the role of the noun in the sentence hasn't changed.
Therefore:
Mein Hund beißt meinen Mann.
My dog bites my man (or rather, my husband).
It would only be in genitive case if the noun itself had a role requiring genitive
For example
Der Hund des Mannes
The dog of the man
Der Hund meines Mannes
The dog of my man (my husband)
Yes
Doesn't that make it a subject too?
What makes it different from "The dog"?
The difference is in the German itself
Ohhhh
I thought they were two small sentences. Der Hund and Dem Mann
Der Hund beißt den Mann.
The dog bites the man.
In English, we rely on word order to know which noun is the subject vs which is the object
In German, the thing before the noun shows this, through cases
So for example, you could write:
Den Mann beißt der Hund.
That also means "The dog bites the man"
Ich trinke mein Getränk.
Is funny to me
"der" = nominative = subject
"den" = accusative = object
Even if the word order is switched, it doesn't matter, the definite article shows which one is subject vs. Object
So in "Das Mädchen spielt mit ihrem Hund" the subject is the girl and the object is the dog? And it's in accusative?
The subject is the girl
Okayy
"mit" is a preposition
"her dog" is an object, but not an object of the verb, but an object of the preposition, the preposition "mit'
how do I know if it's an object of the preposition or of the verb?
A big hint is if there is a preposition right before the noun 😄
"mit ihrem Hund"
okay and what happens if it's an object of the preposition rather the verb?
Also, technically speaking, it should be "Das Mädchen spielt mit seinem Hund"
Because "Mädchen" is grammatically neuter, and the neuter possessive pronoun is "sein"
Literally: the girl plays with its dog
Then the preposition itself controls what case the noun needs
Ohhhh
"mit" Always requires its object of the preposition to be in dative case
Hence
"Mit seinem Hund"
The -em shows dative case
Alright, I gotta go
Okayy thank you
"Als Max bei der anschließenden Party Marie küsst, wendet sich der eifersüchtige Benjamin wutentbrannt von ihm ab. "
Dieser Satz ist unter der Beschreibung des Handlung des Films "Wo am I ? Kein System is sicher." auf Wikipedia gegeben.
folgende Sätz steht dort auch
"Dabei trifft er den charismatischen Max, der sofort auf eine Zusammenarbeit erpicht ist, als er von Benjamins Programmierfähigkeiten erfährt"
Meine Frage lautet warum benutzt man in den beiden Sätzen 'als' im Präsens. Dürfte man hier statt als auch wenn schreiben.
Könnte mir jemand den Grund klären.
"wenn" wäre eher "jedesmal wenn", als ob das öfter passiert
Eigentlich sollte es eher in der Vergangenheit stehen, aber bei solchen Filmbeschreibungen benutzen sie oft den Präsens.
good movie
Darf ich fragen, ob Sie ein Muttersprachler sind? @hollow umbra
Ja bin ich, habe eben endlich mal versucht, die Rolle zu bekommen
Vielen Dank. weil Sie Muttersprachler sind, macht Ihre Erklärung etwas aus. Deswegen habe ich gefragt
Some practice sentences with some new words how do you do?
Kann ich mein Getränk trinken?
Ich trinke mein Getränk.
Ich Möchte ein Getränk.
Ich Möchte eine Nummer eins.
Der Mann hat mein Getränk.
Du musst "möchte" klein schreiben 😊
"Ich möchte eine Nummer eins", soll das die Nummer des Gerichts auf der Karte sein?
Da sagt man z.B. "einmal die Eins, bitte"
Oh
Yeah, supposed to be like a menu number like if you go to McDonald’s and order the number one combo
"Eine Vierzehn mit wenig Sieben" 😁 https://youtu.be/ByTG1fexb_s
Hape Kerkeling - Italienisches Restaurant
Here's a whole sketch about this concept
I don’t know enough to understand it
"Pommes sind die Nummer Null Acht Fünfzehn" https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/08/15_(Redewendung)
08/15 ([nʊlʔaxtˈfʏnft͡seːn] ; berlinisch nullachtfuffzehn [nʊlʔaxtˈfʊft͡sn̩]) ist eine umgangssprachliche Redewendung, die oft abwertend benutzt wird.
Der Ausdruck ist im deutschsprachigen Raum gebräuchlich und kann wertfrei oder pejorativ (abwertend) gemeint bzw. verstanden werden. Benutzt wird der Ausdruck im Sinne von „ganz gew...
You can turn on the subtitles, they're not at all bad
Huh. That's how I play-ordered a train ticket in class. Cool to see that it's a fast food thing too.
Einmal nach Berlin, bitte.
For more tickets, is it a separated word btw?
Zweimal nach Berlin? Zwei mal die Eins. ???
Zweiten die Eins?
Assuming ex: I have friends or family with me and I'm ordering more things.
Wow, I'm realizing I haven't asked a grammar question in a while. But here's a new one for me....
Gott sei Dank
Wiktionary says it's either Konjunctiv I or Imperitive. So I'm thinking Konjunctiv I.
I realize this is a fixed expression ("Thank God") but I still feel like I want to learn the literal meaning too.
I guess my current literal understanding is roughly: "God could be thanked"
... rather shall be thanked -> Imperative
Oh, huh. Not what I was expecting.
Ja, wir hätten dann gerne zweimal das Menü Eins 😁
Is there a difference between sich anziehen and anziehen when talking abt clothes ?
sure there is:
Ich ziehe mich an. (I put {some/any} clothes on)
Was soll ich anziehen? (what should I wear?)
ngl i forgot the actual question i wanted to ask but it was related to ziehen with reflexive/seperable verbs
i dont think it was this one
idk
it had to do with umziehen
sich umziehen
and anziehen
Sich umziehen is changing clothes (from sports to leisure e.g.)
But umziehen (not reflexive) means to move
Maybe it is best if you look up the words you're curious abt in a dictionary
AND best would be a German one with examples -> you still have us to ask if you're not sure abt some meanings.
https://www.dwds.de/wb/umziehen
Alr ty
Wiktionary is easier for us English speakers. However, it's not as comprehensive as dwds.
@frigid tinselNo it is Konj I.
The great problem - as I see it - is, wiktionary SEEMS to have only the most important meanings listed.
Therefore you don't get the small details that could help you to get to the ground of nuances 🤷♂️
How do you come to this conclusion? 🤔
The last image is from https://germanstudiesdepartmenaluser.host.dartmouth.edu/Subjunctive/KonjunktivI.html
Hmm, then I might have misunderstood my late father who 'translated' Gott sei Dank into Gott sei ('/e)s getrommelt und gepfiffen which I identified as Imperative. 🤷♂️
The main difference is that imperative doesn't have any 3rd person forms and these sentences are in 3rd person.
OKAY, my understanding was the form comes from:
Gott sei es gedankt -> Gott sei Dank 🙇♂️
this is true it's just a conjunctive 1 in both cases
or like. this is not very different from being true
Isn't that still 3rd person or am I missing something?
it's formally identical to the imperative, and crucially both this use of the conjunctive 1 and the imperative express wishes
so its not very different in meaning, but grammatically 'es sei Gott Dank' (=es sei Dank bei Gott, er möge Dank empfangen, es möge Dank für ihn geben) is 3rd person
the lack of 3rd person imperative forms is also why a command to formal Sie is technically in the conjunctive 1
even though i certainly never think about this consciously
Legen Sie das da ab <- conjunctive 1, third person plural. but obviously has a (formal) second person imperative sense
(the actual plural of the imperative would be legt after all)
(and you can tell that it's conjunctive because it doesnt delete the subject pronoun!)
Yeah, I barely can read DWDS, A2ish just isn't enough for it to be understood. But the tidbits I can read are very good for detail. As I get better in German it hopefully becomes a better tool.
I feel you! When I was first inroduced in a English -English dictionary, I was confused also. But I can tell from experience, you get used to it with every word you look up. 🤯 🤷♂️
So I was reading a book, and it has written:
"Diese Schulaufführungen sind fast immer Musicals, und das Letyte, was ich bruache, ist es, vor der gesamten Schule solo singen zu müssen"
Why is there an "Es" in the "ist es" clause?
"Es" must be here a piece of music, that has been mentioned before.
Ah ok
Small question (sorry if this isn't the right place/type of question for here), but when talking about like a pretty sunset, would "schön" the be correct term? or is there a term that fits better/expresses the visual nature of it more?
You can use 'schön' here or some other adjectives that fit, like:
atemberaubend (breathtaking)
Wundervoll (wonderfull)
hinreissend (adorable)
golden/in Gold getaucht (golden/golden hued)
überwältigend (overwhelming)
spektakulär (spectacular)
phänomenal (phenomenal)
unbeschreiblich (undescribable)
faszinierend (fascinating)
märchenhaft (fabled)
erhaben (sublime/statly)
ehrfurchtgebietend (sublime)
verzaubernd (enchanting)
überwältigend (stunning)
ehrfurchtgebietend (awestriking)
ethereal (überirdisch)
majestätisch (majestic)
... pick your poison 🤷♂️
I hope that my selection is helpful 🙇♂️
Wiktionary has a lot of really cool, specific facts about words and word usage though. It's a great resource.
And since the discussion was about usefulness for beginners, it's worth considering that beginners only need the "most important meanings" most of the time.
You're right! for starters it's the first step(s), but I often see questions like
What's the difference beween
ziehen, umziehen, anziehen...
and then you must dig deeper 🤷♂️
Hmmmm, but I'm not sure a beginner could even get that info out of something like DWDS. It would be pretty confusing.
That's why I'm trying to get them to look there and after that ask here for clarification, if they need it. I think learning should be out of curiosity - it helps to get a maximum of the attention to a 'new' subject
Is this a reference to something?
personally i reccomend going from wiktionary (english) to wiktionary(deutsch) then DWDS
DWDS is a bit intimidating imo
its true it is more comprehensive but as a beginner you usually want the most general usage
"Benjamin gibt sich im Darknet als MRX aus und bekennt sich zu dessen Verrat an Krypton. Der erboste MRX fällt darauf herein und ermöglicht Benjamin so die Rückverfolgung seiner Spur."
Warum benutzt man hier dessen Verrät an Krypton . Ich verstehe diese Struktur nicht.
Ähnlicherweise hat man in den folgenden Satz deren Veranlagung zu benutzt. Könnte mir jemand den Grund dafür erklären (mit anderen Beispiel Sätzen bitte. )
"Lindberg, die nun rehabilitiert ist, erinnert sich inzwischen an einige Ungereimtheiten in Benjamins Erzählung...Vom Psychiater von Benjamins Mutter erfährt sie, dass Benjamin deren Veranlagung zu dissoziativer Identitätsstörung geerbt haben könnte."
Man Bites Dog (French: C'est arrivé près de chez vous, literally "It Happened Near Your Home") is a 1992 French-language Belgian black comedy crime mockumentary film written, produced and directed by Rémy Belvaux, André Bonzel and Benoît Poelvoorde, who are also the film's co-editor, cinematographer and lead actor respectively.
The film fol...
guys, this is the answer page of Schreiben Teil 1 & 2 of Goethe B2 official Modelsatz.
Can someone tell me why in teil 2, it's: "weil ich ein Problem mit meinen Kollegin habe"
shouldn't it be meiner Kollegin? or is there something I don't know yet?
and then in the next sentence the Kollegin is referred to using 'Er', are these obvious typos? I didn't excpect this from an official goethe modeltest
It's an example of what level of writing is expected of you and contains errors in basically every sentence
can i atleast pass if i write something similar to this?
it’s not an example for good german
what you’re looking at are examples for teachers to grade and assess L2 speakers’ german level
so don’t study this
it contains many mistakes
I don't mean exactly this, but something similar
Can I pass the exam?
i don’t know, you would have to ask an examiner that
"Benjamin gibt sich im Darknet als MRX aus und bekennt sich zu dessen Verrat an Krypton. Der erboste MRX fällt darauf herein und ermöglicht Benjamin so die Rückverfolgung seiner Spur."
Warum benutzt man hier dessen Verrät an Krypton . Ich verstehe diese Struktur nicht.
Ähnlicherweise hat man in den folgenden Satz deren Veranlagung zu benutzt. Könnte mir jemand den Grund dafür erklären (mit anderen Beispiel Sätzen bitte. )
"Lindberg, die nun rehabilitiert ist, erinnert sich inzwischen an einige Ungereimtheiten in Benjamins Erzählung...Vom Psychiater von Benjamins Mutter erfährt sie, dass Benjamin deren Veranlagung zu dissoziativer Identitätsstörung geerbt haben könnte."
it’s the declension of a relative pronoun
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/der#German (scroll down a bit)
genitive
so „dessen Verrat“ in that sentence means „MRX’ Verrat,“ it refers back to it
think of it like „its“ in english — „the company and its eagerness to turn a profit“
Ok thanks for replying 🙏 @sleek pebble
The verbs that take both Akkusativ and Dativ don't need to be learned as their usage is obvious with the direct and indirect object concept. Am I right?
Secondly, please correct my explanation:
There are 3 kinds of verbs:
-
Verbs mit nur Akkusativ - Here we have only 2 persons/things, the subject is nominativ and object is akkusativ.
-
Verbs mit nur Dativ - Here we also have only 2 persons/things. The subject is nominativ and object is dativ and these verbs are about 50 in total german and must be learned by heart.
-
Verben mit Dativ und Akkusativ - Here we have direct/indirect object and the case is clear according to that. No need to learn by heart.
too much info for a card?
I think I gotta split it up, at least for the sich version
would make sense, yes
Yes you should do the bare minimum but then also supplement it with reading and regular immersion to develop your own sense of meaning
Just relying on definitions solely violates a lot of how actual people speak, or simply said the language arts
Stfu
<@&305455824174710787>
Don't make comments like that please.
Is the sentence “He kissed his wife” nominative and accusative?
Yes, if you write the sentence in German, then "he" will be nominative and "his wife" will be accusative.
Perfect okay
Of course in English it's not, because English doesn't use those cases.
Im trynna understand it in English first and then German
Yep
I recommend the first 2 worksheets on this page: https://www.nthuleen.com/teach/grammar.html
Grammar worksheets for teaching German - Arbeitsblätter zum Thema Grammatik für den Deutschunterricht.
And also in the sentence “He loves the color of his car” is it in Nominative (He) and then Genitive (his car) if translated in German?
Besprenge dein Gesicht mit kaltem Wasser
Does this make snese? I want to say "splash your face with cold water"
I don't know if this is idiomatic
Yes.
he -> nom
the color -> akk
his car -> genitive
Danke!
This is a deepl translation. But dictionary says besprengen means sprinkle not splash
“My bag is full of your candies”
My - Nominative
your candies - Accusative
So that makes it:
“Mein Tosche ist von vull deine Süßigkeiten”?
I’m trying to get the hang of it until I can do some exercises
@indigo bear
Yes that's correct.
There are some other categories though.
Is this fine for A2 level? And please link me to those other categories
Other categories:
Copular verbs (e.g. sein, they take nominative only)
Genitive verbs (verbs with only a genitive object)
Lehren has 2 accusative objects
Beginners need the first one of those, but they don't need genitive verbs.
Can you please explain with an example about how lehren takes 2 akkusativ objects? and is this an exception?
Meine Großmutter lehrte mich das Stricken.
Yes, it's an exception.
There are only a few double accusative verbs.
ok, right
also I have another query that with liegen, which is the correct auxialiary for the perfekt. In the yourgermanteacher compiled list, I see it is sein but when deepL translates that same sentence, it uses haben.
From Wiktionary: "The most common auxiliary with liegen is haben: Ich habe gelegen. In northern and central Germany, this form is strongly predominant and in some regions exclusive. In southern Germany, Austria, and Switzerland, sein is usual in the vernacular and also, alternatively, in standard usage: Ich bin gelegen."
so let me just stick with haben then
note: this does not hold true for liegen in the sense of being situated somewhere when describing whereabouts
„Das Hotel ist südlich gelegen“
„Vor dem Wiederaufbau war das Postamt weiter nördlich gelegen.“
but i think there might be a nuance with more theoretical concepts like administrative units (cities, countries) and geographical descriptions, not very sure though, i will think about this later
. whenever somebody can plz!
not sure of the preposition but if it's von, then i think it should be:
Meine Tasche ist voll von deinen Süßigkeiten
No it's feminine. It's die Tasche
ohhh
Yeah
No the preposition von follows the Dativ case here
Ohhhh
How do I know it follows dative?
You have to learn the cases of the prepositions
The prepositions are either akkusativ only, dativ only or both
Yeahh that’s what I’m currently learning right now but how do I know if they’re in akkusativ only dativ only or both?
the one way prepositions are fixed they always follow the dativ/akkusativ but the two way prepositions depend on how they're used
prepositions
two way are two prepositions in a row right?
help prepositions
No command or module called prepositions found.
FAQ not found. I found the following similar entries: Prepositions of Place Part 1, Dual prepositions, Two-way prepositions, Verb prepositions, Two way prepositions, Verbs with prepositions.
Two-way prepositions (or dual prepositions) are prepositions that govern the accusative or dative case. Ten prepositions have this property, namely:
an auf entlang hinter in
neben über unter vor zwischen
Generally, these prepositions are used with the accusative if they express a direction or change of position. They are used with the dative if they express location.
For example, the verb etw. an etw. hängen can be used to express both meanings depending on the intention:
Ich hänge das Bild an die Wand. (I am hanging the picture on the wall.)
Das Bild hängt an der Wand. (The picture is hanging on the wall.)
It is important to note that the accusative should only be used if something has moved from one position to another. If movement has been indicated, but the location has not changed, then the dative should be used. For example,
Der Hund läuft in den Park. (The dog ran (from somewhere) into the park.)
Der Hund läuft im Park (herum). (The dog is running in the park.)
Even though these verbs indicate direction, they are still used with dative rather than accusative.
Sie kamen am Bahnhof an.
Sie landeten auf dem Mond.
Das Pferd verschwand hinter dem Berg.
@dusk umbra
whats the difference between gehen and kommen?
gehen means to go/walk
kommen means to come
Hallo, I'm learning some german basics, and I wanted to know how a german would pronunciate some sentences... For example I have this text below I want to say:
Guten abend, es tut mir leid. Wo bin ich? Wie komme ich nach Gernsbach? Ich bin verloren. Konnen sie mir helfen?
How would a native speaker ask these questions? Not the words itself, but the question mark intonation in a sentence
not really they're kinda opposite directions
I already watched some videos but they speak so fast that I can't understand how I could imitate using that sample text 😅
genau so wie im Englischen
First I would rephrase the sentences, I guess they are literally translated from english and that does not work well in all cases:
Guten Abend, entschuldigen Sie bitte. Wo bin ich? Ich habe mich verirrt. Wie komme ich nach Gernsbach? Können Sie mir helfen?
I can understand that probably is the same in English, but my main problem is for longer sentences I can't put the intonation because I lost many time trying to pronounce every word correctly that when I end up and the end of the sentence it just becomes weird to put the question intonation
I think it's just a lack of practice, but I was just wondering if you have any tips
Oh yeah, indeed, my bad! Danke
yes, I know what you mean. You're stumbling so much and it's very choppy, so it doesn't really "flow" naturally like a question. I wouldn't worry about it all too much. Just keep trying to practice, and eventually it will get less choppy and you'll naturally imitate what you hear.
I forget many of the words are upper case
Yeah exactly! It's a hard language to learn from beginning and I'm probably trying to jump faster than I can afford at this rate
I appreciate your help
No problem, it was my pleasure ☺️
maybe you already saw this, but I think it has some great examples (with english subtitles) of natives asking questions
GET EXERCISES FOR THIS VIDEO: https://www.easygerman.org/membership
LEARN GERMAN WITH OUR APP: https://www.seedlang.com
OUR WEEKLY PODCAST: http://www.easygerman.fm
SUBSCRIBE TO EASY GERMAN: https://goo.gl/sdP9nz
FACEBOOK: https://www.facebook.com/easygermanvideos
INSTAGRAM: https://www.instagram.com/easygermanvideos
WEBSITE: https://www.easyger...
All nouns are capitalized and if you're used to it, it makes reading faster 😉
Yeah, I like that channel, it helps a lot! I will watch it again, thanks
Yeah, the problem is that I need to get more vocabulary in order to say that the word X in german means a noun or not 😅
I have to practice more
Maybe just compare it for that issue with English, a noun is a noun like in German.
Oh, and while you learn new words, remember to memorize also the gender of each noun (der/die/das -> male/female/neuter)
Yeah that's funny too, some words in English have a male gender while in german it is female, and vice versa
Yeah, big 'machines' like ships for example are female in English while das Schiff is neuter.
Orange ones are two-way prepositions. Two-way means they can be either dative or accusative depending on which meaning you're using.
Bitte! - Is “ you’re welcome”?
Bitte. - Is “please”?
Bitte? - “what that?”
Is that correct?
partial, it always depends on the context and you can for example do the following:
Gib mir die Milch, bitte! -> give me the milk, please!
in what situation would "bitte" mean "thank you"? Do you mean "you're welcome"?
and just to be sure, with the third one you specifically mean "What's that?" as in "Could you repeat that?", yes?
So if we have a sentence with the red ones then it's exclusively in Accusative and if we have one sentence with the yellow ones then it's exclusively in Dative?
Ich habe den Deutschen begrüßt, und er hat mir statt „Hallo“ etwas wie „Lusty“ gesagt, was bedeutet das, ist das auch eine Begrüßung?
kann es sein, das er 'grüß dich'/'grüß Sie' oder 'grüezi' gesagt hat?
Grüß dich wahrscheinlich, weil es eher klingt
Danke!
Wann benutzt man "verwenden" und "benutzen"? Was ist der Unterschied zwischen?
Yes but it's not for the whole sentence. Cases only apply to individual nouns and pronouns. Every noun/pronoun has its own case, depending on if it's the subject or which type of object it is.
Verwenden und benutzen sind sehr ähnlich. An deiner Stelle würde ich mir keinen großen Kopf darüber machen 😉 verwenden ist vielleicht ein bisschen technischer.
Correct but if we happen to have a dative or accusative preposition right before a noun then we don't have to worry about finding if it's a direct object, indirect object, etc, right?
Yes, objects of prepositions cannot be direct or indirect objects. They are just objects of prepositions. They're their own category.
Okay so if I see for example bis before a noun then it's 100% in Akkusativ?
Im Französischen gibt es 3 Möglichkeiten, dieses Verb zu verwenden 
Yep, as long as it's being used as a preposition.
And one last thing, if it's the orange ones in the diagram you sent me then I have to decide whether or not the noun moved from one place to another or remained in one place. For instance, "Die Kinder laufen in den Garten" is accusative because the children ran into the garden from another place and "Die Kinder laufen im Garten" is dative because the children, despite their running remained in the garden and weren't coming from another area.
Die Kinder, das Kind.
But yeah, you got the idea of two-way prepositions.
Although what you described is just for real physical things. There's also abstract usages which you have to memorise as set phrases. But that's an advanced topic you can learn later once you're used to all the rest.
Hallo, I have been trying to learn German (A1) on my own and I am following Deutsche Welle Nicos Weg for it, Is it good or you guys can suggest some other precious free resources?
faq resources
Here's a link to our curated list of resources: https://bit.ly/gladresources. Check out #resources if you want to submit some yourself!
faq beginner
The simplest way to learn German is to find topics you don’t understand yet and search for explanations of them. This list provides you with a guide for which topics to learn if you are completely new to German. Type the topic into Google (or YouTube) and start learning!
1: Alphabet (especially ä, ü, ö and ß)
2: Basic greetings (hello, goodbye, etc.)
1: Noun gender & plurals
2: Nominative case (What are cases?)
3: Nominative pronouns (I, you, he, she, etc.)
4: Verbs in present tense
5: Definite/indefinite articles
6: Accusative case (for nouns)
7: Accusative pronouns
8: Word order of simple sentences
9: How to ask questions
See Part 2 on the next page.
- Always learn the gender of a noun when you learn a new noun
- Learn to use a translation dictionary (e.g. dict.cc, leo.org)
- Use
>faq resourcesto see our list of German learning resources - For listening and pronunciation practice, try watching movies or videos (incl. YouTube)
- You can listen to pronunciation for words on websites like dict.cc, forvo.com, and others
- Practice writing sentences every day (and asking people to correct them)
- Ask as many questions as possible
- Don’t be scared to make mistakes!!!! If you don’t let yourself make mistakes, you will never be able to learn German
What do you mean by "real physical things"?
Its pretty easy to learn the real-world uses of prepositions in German. Auf vs an (both translating to "on" in English) actually is "on top" vs "hangs on", for example.
The really hard thing about German is remembering that its "sprechen auf Deutsch" (ie: Speak "on" German), not "Speak with German" like in English. Or helfen bei Putzen (Help "by" cleaning, but it "actually means" help with cleaning).
English vs German has mixed up the prepositions on many "abstract" ideas (help, speaking, etc. etc.).
The solution to this is that by A2, B1 or so... you just start memorizing verb + preposition combinations (like "bei etwas helfen"). But at absolute beginner stages, just try to focus on the basic and most easiest uses of prepositions.
alrightt
what is the difference between nachschauen and anschauen?
I suggested a place to someone but they didn't realize it's an actual place you can visit. This is the context and I don't know which one fits better
schau mal [auf Google Maps] Berlin Story Bunker nach
schau dir [auf Google Maps] berlin story bunker an
or would you phrase it differently?
imho only anschauen works here, nachschauen is rather to look whether sth is there or to gain some information like from a manual
and if it's text to read then you can use nachlesen
Ich habe eine Hund
can I find a company to learn germany in here?
have a look at # find-study-partners
Hallo
is all groups are locked or just i don't have permission to join
I slightly disagree with @astral yoke, "nachschauen" is "look up", so if you just want to look up in Google Maps where that thing is, you can use nachschauen. "Anschauen" is look at something, so if you look at photos and reviews, this fits better
🤷♂️
For Wassermelone
Can you just say Melone to mean the same thing like you can in English?
You can but there is a big variety of Melons out there
Honigmelone, Galiamelone, Wassermelone, Netzmelone... and a hat
🤷♂️
If I had the watermelon in my hand, I said my Melone it would be recognizable right?
in the context of you holding a watermelon saying meine melone
Sure, if you don't have the hat on at the same time 😜
X3
or if youre a woman you shouldnt say the plural version
meine melonen
there could be misunderstandings
😭
Die Melone ist süß.
Hi, if someone could check out my question forum on how to get into TU Munich that'd be amazing. It's a bit of a read but I just want confirmation if I'm doing things right. I'm an American student, a highschool Sophomore (10th grade), and I'm going to be studying German intensely for the next year and a half, but I need to know what milestones to hit once I'm more fluent.
Now the question is the watermelon sweet or is the hat cute
lol
die melone cant be the hat
because of the article die
no wait
i might be trippin actually
the hat is called die Melone
yea i noticed aswell
never heard anyone call that thing melone 💀
der melonen hut would be a better match
Es gibt sogar einen Wikipedia-Eintrag, 1849 erfunden...
Now this makes me think. What will you call a watermelon hat like a hat that looks like a watermelon
Das ist das erste Mal, dass ich das sehe
why does dass work here?
should it be "in dem ich das sehe"
not really ^^ 🤷♂️
Wassermelonenmelone oder so
ja, Wassermelonen-Melone
dass introduces the clause that specifies the action, dass starts a subordinate clause, verb goes to end
basically sounds more natural to use dass
I mean like locations, like a garden. An abstract example would be like "auf jdn warten".
Ich warte auf dich. = I'm waiting for you.
Hello , can you enable my account ?
You could also say simpler: "Das sehe ich zum ersten Mal"
Have you studied subordinate clauses yet? The "dass" clause here is a subordinate clause, but there's many many ways of making those.
I wonder if the study material is trying to introduce subordinate clauses here...
i do know what they are
hinein or herein depending on your point of view
Was sind die großte unterschied zwischen Schweizer Deutsch und Deutsche Deutsch?
Schweiß Deutsch?
ja, ich meine ich weiß dass die Schweiße mit ein akzent spricht aber ich wollte wissen was andere unterschiede gibt
weil zu beispiel die leute von bayern haben seinem eigenes wörterbuch für das bayerisches Deutsch
Schweizer Deutsch meinst du ehr
ahhh
Wegen Schweiz das Land
Mein Fehler, danke für das korrektion
Schweiß ist das was dein Körper produziert
das Wasser zum abkühlen das dein Körper bei der Körpertemperatur bleibt
genau
jetzt "Schweiß Deutsch" hört sich lüstig aus
das ist das was passiert und schweiß ist das wasser
Die Aussprachen vor allem
Man versteht sich nicht
Do the endings go onto nouns or only on the articles
Ein, dein, ect
Übrigens lautet es Schweizerdeutsch
Wdym endings
Feminine masculine and plural
That doesn‘t really explain much
Do you mean indicators for plural
Der Mann die Männer
Die Frau die Frauen
Das Mädchen die Mädchen
Cause they have endings for articles
Einem, einer, deine
But does that carry over to nouns?
Everything I look up or see on German sites don't really explain this
Wdym carry over
It's mostly on the thing before the noun:
Definite article
der Hund
die Katze
Possessive pronoun
mein Hund
meine Katze
Indefinite article
ein Hund
eine Katze
But sometimes, the noun itself changes
Do you mean something like „mit einem Mannem“
Mit den kleinen Männern
Like
If I say
Kind
Would I also add an ending to it too
Kinde, kinder, ect
(Eine kinde)
Or
(Eine kind)
Generally, no.
But sometimes, yes
des Mannes
Also it‘s das Kind
That‘s genitive though
He‘s a beginner I don‘t think he knows what genitive is
I‘m just saying for him not for you
It's possession 😭
Yes but there are rules for it
No, not necessarily
@silent plover here, this should help:
Adjective declension is one of the most complicated things in German. Sometimes they are declined (there are three types of declensions) and other times not. But don’t worry; we will explain it so that you can understand easily
Wie kommst du drauf
?
Hab da gar nix mit kleinen Männern gesagt
Das Nomen selbst wird vom Kasus/Geschlecht bzw Plural beeinflusst. Die Frage war, "wird das Nomen je geändert bzw. kriegt das Nomen je eine Endung wegen Kasus/Geschlecht?"
Die Antwort ist, "meistens, nein, doch gelegentlich schon"
Das ist ein Beispiel dafür
I might as well start from scratch though and see where I go from there since my German Is twisted in a way where I would have to relearn everything I had learned T T
Unless that‘s another word that I am not knowing of
Did you check the charts on that website?
It shows you exactly how things change or don't change for the noun itself
Read a grammar book
I can give some recommendations
"that I am not knowing of" feels like a weird usage of continuous
Just say, "that I don't know of"
Lol I know
I just came back from 4 hours of titration 😭😭😭🙏
I’m so tired, I can’t even speak English properly haha
Who did you titrate? 😄
For some industrial process?
Nooo for a uni course
I am
Declensions is definitely a new one for me
Or maybe it isn't and it's just the first time I'm seeing it called that
It looks familiar but the way it's explained makes it seem like something I have never seen before
@silent plover if you’re genuinely serious about learning the language, I would highly recommend learning the grammar properly through a course or a grammar book. Especially because the pedagogical values are already applied for someone to properly learn the language.
Declension IS "endings on stuff that changes based on the gender of the noun/the case of the noun (i.e. nominative, accusative, dative, genitive)"
It seems like you’ve been learning it for a bit but things are slipping out
You said it's your 3rd year; how have you learnt so far? In a class or course?
Also declension can be on certain nouns, depending on the case
Ich sehe den kleinen Jungen
What does "the pedagogical values are already applied" mean?
Ich gebe dem großen Jungen ein Geschenk
It's embarrassing how things actually do slip out because half the stuff I don't know
I wrote it in my notes at least 5 times
While learning it in class and should know
But I forgot it
Yeah, that's what I was saying earlier
Well the books I’ve read pedagogists have properly designed the book to fit for a learner
Explanations, exercises, etc all contribute to the pedagogy
It takes practice, structure, and dedication
I don't think I know what the word "pedagogy" really means
Despite being a native English speaker
I mean I don’t know the word super well either, it’s just the way you learn simply said
And I'm like starting to seriously lock in and learn it and now while I'm understanding the language more
Along with the cases
There's so much I still have to relearn so I can actually commit to memory
Like education sort of
Try this channel
I mean I think if you have a book or something like a course to rely on then it can be nice to look back on
I have about 55 pages worth of German notes thats all words, grammar, sentences, endings and genders
Hmmmm, the false beginner problem. The bane of all language learners.
Oh yes!
Actually this could answer the question because
While of course we got the nominative "he"
Accusative "him"
Dative (reciever, like giving it to her and her would be the dative pronoun)
And genitive would be his
This question will probably be answered when I watch these
Okay I just remembered yeah there is more to just pronouns for cases
@silent plover have you heard of Grammatik aktiv?
That’s one way of seeing it but do realize that’s not the only way of seeing cases with verbs
85 lessons, from A1 through the end of B1. If you do a lesson per day, you can cover the whole of the beginner levels in just a few months.