#š¬āgeneral
1 messages Ā· Page 25 of 1
Mhm ok. Yea I tried it and it was okay but gpt4 was more thorough with answers
GPT-4 still king, but if we have full 200k context then itās a great addition
Lol no
Claude 3 blows gpt4 out of the water
Its crazy even in coding
What about using sonnet tho?
Benchmarks, or personal use testing?
The bit about less hallucinations than gpt is great
Then it may be the best tool for you, it sucked at some calculus and reasoning questions I gave it, and gpt 4 had no problem
Iām glad to see competition
Maybe so, I might just switch back if it starts flunking too many questions
Iām planing on running a more in depth test on a questions set I put together, itās hard to really compare models that have such broad use cases
Anyone using Claude 3 through Perplexity Pro while being from a country not on the list of supported countries by Anthropic?
it isn't lol, claude 3 opus is genuinely mind-blowingly better
particularly in programming tasks
Old benchmarks, also without Turbo
Iām kinda interested in how sonnet compares with gpt4 because I donāt think having 5 uses of opus is really practical.
I would take benchmarks with a grain of salt, from my experience GPT-4 is much smarter, but I also may have different use cases, and different models have pros and cons, plus I have used gpt-4 many times a day for a long time so I might know how to have gpt work for me, as I spend more time with both Claude 3 and gpt-4 I may change my mind, but I feel more impressed by gpt, but if you like Claude 3, itās probably the best tool for you
then what're your use cases
i definitely wouldn't say 'much smarter'
I have my default browser search set to perplexity, so I'd likely waste all five searching a website name
the only area where gpt-4 is noticably better is raw maths and some logic questions

creative & code = claude
i personally use a keyword shortcut in the firefox address bar since i don't always need to use perplexity for search
i think we've posted this image like 12 times since it was released. can we just get a bot command to summon it. lolol.
Again, I am saying from my uses I feel that way, I am making an objective statement, and you are fine with disagreeing, I feel itās smarter when I interact with it, I have only done limited testing, but calc 2 and hand made logic problems make be believe gpt is still the king
That's smart
So if you had to pick which model to use between gpt4 and Claude 3 sonnet for summarizing text in a concise simple way, which one would you choose and why?
Not seeing Claude 3 in the Perplexity iPhone app (on Pro)
Claude 2.1 = Claude 3 š
If it really long text where 200k context is needed prob going to use Claude 3, but if itās a few pages, gpt-4. Creative writing probably Claude 3. Math and logic GPT-4
Benchmarks have a big problem with data contamination, application to real life scenarios, and more. If you want to know the best one for your use case, use them side by side for a while
^ side by side comparisons are best done on chat.lmsys.org : )
Yes
Oops, I said objective instead of subjective
Yea im gonna test out both models more and compare. I use it usually to summarize lectures and articles into concise points with topics, along with analogies and examples. So far gpt4 was good with that but I havenāt tried it much with sonnet yet. Iām hoping sonnet requires less prompts to extract info I need
Sometimes gpt4 hallucinates and generates some info that slips pass by me then I gotta re-prompt
So if the other hallucinates less, thatās a plus
sonnet is very good in terms of recall from context
so at 200k context successful retrievals happen >90% of the time
although i think there are still some hallucination problems
Yeah, they talked about less hallucinations, if this is accurate than itās a great benefit!
I donāt often required more than 32k context, but the needle in a haystack looked good, and I could see this being useful for many applications
When I judge an LLM I think I put most of my weight on short term logical reasoning, word problems, math, technical analysis, explanations. But for context and other features I see it as a nice bonus. But I know context is becoming an increasingly important part of what makes a good model.
logical reasoning is the issue all the models have
Yeah it is, and why we see so much talk about mode 1 vs mode 2 thinking, how it differs from how we think and if we think AI will reach a plateau.
If it can explain/summarize a block of text I need without missing any key info and in a way that a 5 year old can understand, Iām cool with that.
Very curious to try opus but I really dislike only having 5 uses lol
Gemini 1.5 will be better for long context imo
Not as good as gemini 1.5 
Sorry to ask but other than marketing, whats the point of having 5 queries on Opus?
I think they said that Claude 3 was limiting usage and they have to wait on them
Ah, makes sense.
Another thing I really never understand is the exact context size for the models and the exact model in use. For example, is GPT 4 using 0125? I'm also pretty sure they limit the context to like 4k or something like that.
I feel like this could be more transparent.
I also wonder if the model used to search the web is their own model which then summarises things for the chosen model to then actually process and give an answer to rather than the chosen model being the one who goes through the web search.
Yes, and that's no problem. Claude Opus and sonnet will work in Perplexity Pro!
This is the most important part, we don't want models to misconstrue bits of code that were previously correct into something else
For gpt4 the recall drops significantly after the 64k token range
Before that it has 99% recall I think
I reported this issue as well
the problem with Opus is the outrageous pricing
Claude is better than GPT-4 at coding.
no support for images
Devs out of a job by the end of the decade
I tested it on LMSYS chat, it wasn't at all worth $15 dollars per million input tokens and $75 per million output
question, how do you use the 5 Opus cause whenever I just use it it uses sonnet
Also why am I getting more than 5 opus requests, I am on my 10th
You already reached the limit
oh really I don't remember using it at all
Whatās this in price and out price??? With examples please
yeah strange I heard other people talking about it
It might mean 5 opus requests per day and they rollover
Guys did you know image support is not there yet with claude 3
any proof besides the sketchy benchmarks? humaneval is very unreliable, like MMLU and benchmarks in general just aren't a good way to compare, they should do blind testing with 1000 people, and see who prefers claude 3 opus over GPT-4
Anthropic had to have used some different prompting methodology to get their benchmarks
been working with gpt-4 coding since it came out. the difference is palpable
it doesn't truncate code nearly as much
it doesnt try to get you to do work
I've tested some subjects across math, chemistry, physics, and stats but gpt 4 usually outperforms Claude in my experience
in the end the difference could be due to the fact that openai is trying to deal with scaling by getting gpt4 to output shorter responses
is it better at debugging tho? in my testing, it couldn't debug code nearly as well as GPT-4
better for python, can't speak for real programming languages
read the last sentence
I tested it in python, and it couldn't debug.

doing it rn and it's working. š¤·
I just chose problems on edabit's Python "expert" challenges
on lmsys or claude.ai?
on lmsys, where I tested it, it was garbage compared to GPT-4
api key š
btw anthropic ppl if ur reading this I am just pumping and dumping your bot. can't wait to move on to the next big thing after clod, I mean claude
I would prefer to use Claude 2.1. It's better than Claude Sonnet. So in essence, this change is for the worse. Unless you do only 5 queries/day. Please restore the Claude 2.1 option!
weird how claude 3's cutoff is august 2023 but it doesn't know about the open source Llama models, neither version 1 nor 2.
I think they are lying about the cutoff to some extent
Weāre sorry but the Perplexity Phone (2a) offer cannot be redeemed as you cannot purchase Nothing products via nothing.tech in your country. š
Yeah, seems like it is US/UK/India
I would love to bought that 2(a) if there's an autograph by Axwell or Ingrosso or Steve Angello
Hard agree from my experience today
Hi admin, I have been testing the Collections feature, I imagine it has been created with the intention of doing something similar to the GPTs. However, it is not possible to add documents for it to extract information from them. Is the incorporation of this function planned?
I would also like to know if it is planned in Perplexity's roadmap to open it up to the development of APIs specialized in various topics, just as it happens with the GPTs. Thank you in advance for your response. Regards."
I'm not an admin but I am curious what do you mean it is not possible to add documents and extract information from them?
Yes, in general search, but not inside Collections feature
You should be able to do it with each individual conversation/question, but I don't think there's a general option where you can upload the file to Collection so that it can reference it with each conversation in the Collection.
Also, when you refer to "open it up to the development of APIs", do you mean specifically opening up collections to APIs, or Perplexity being open to APIs in general?
I mean Perplexity in general. Something similar to GPT“s of OPEN AI
Perplexity does have apis, where you can prompt the service with an inquiry and a model.
Does anyone know how to get a higher token limit using the API? I got pro but it is still 4k
The more so becomes available if you have perplexity pro, but it does come with a few limitations monetarily.
You can't get a higher token limit for the API.
š¦
https://blog.perplexity.ai/technical-faq/what-is-a-token-and-how-many-tokens-can-perplexity-read-at-once this page should be updated to say that explicitly
Perplexity.ai and pplx-api are independent
so is perplexity experimental ai your own ai?
is it less offended by everything and more flexible in answering questions? cause i got it to make a violennt zombie gore scene which was really cool so i figured that its less restrictive
I believe that default/free tier is a finetuned GPT3.5Turbo model, while the experimental one, is a 70B finetuned llama model.
Perplexity and the pplx-api belong together but are two different products, one is the WebUI and the other is a set of LLM's including custom online and chat LLM's for developers via API.
The Nothing brand is pretty cool, but itāll be awhile before I pickup their phone
iPhones and Galaxies are simply unbeatable
There is the same offer for that rabbit device.
im so down for them releasing or putting a non restrictive model for users who like writing horror books and stuff i think elons ai allows that
i think im not sure havent tried his yet
And yes, the own models have a lower morale and don't refuse to answer often.
Iām even more skeptical of the rabbit device
Part of what makes phones so dominant is versatility
You can browse the internet, listen to music, snap photos, and play video games
All on one device
i just bought this yesterday im honeslty impressed im able to use all these ai models for 20$ a month its insane and i just found out you can just turn google off and use it like normal
why is this not more popular
Marketing
The product is great, but perplexity just isnāt very well known in mainstream circles
kinda good tho maybe allows us to have faster response times do to lower volume?
hmm 2a phone how much it cost??
349 dollars
what is a 2a phone?
Itās a phone from the startup nothing
i looked at it but what makes it special?
Nothing tries to make your phone less intrusive, basically
The phone is only black and white, both with the frame and with the software
woah
Their android skin makes all your apps black and white, and very pixel-esque
kinda cool i guess i thought it would have like ai built in or something
I think they have a lot of potential as a company, their CEO comes with a lot of experience from OnePlus
interesting
But for now, their products arenāt as good as a company like Samsung or Apple
yea i think samsung just released there new phone with ai
Yes, though their chatbot isnāt very good
It was moreso using AI to optimize existing phone features instead of creating a home grown chatbot
Itās an AI math model
is it good at math?
Yeah I would say so
No, it's not an AI model.
It's an API
From wolfram alpha
I love the fact that I can access different models and have them look at search results to supercharge their responses. But sometimes I just need to jump in and have a quick exchange with the AI to get ideas or help me shape ideas. However, I find having to switch to writing mode and disabling copilot a bit cumbersome. Is there a way to quickly go into āchat only modeā as it were? Good old ChatGPT style. How do you guys do it?
anyone bought rabbit recently / can verify still giving code? How can i tell if still <100k sold?
still need to think about it but might buy it if its still going on
They are still giving out codes during Batch 6 (current batch)
As a brand new Pro subscriber, I tend to agree, it could be less intricate to get to image generation. Perhaps it`s just me being a newb, perhaps some kind soul could point me to a streamlined method to get to image gen without wasting all my daily Claude 3 Opus prompts unknowingly...
Usually I say: Summarize the highlights of our conversation. Then I copy paste that into a new dialogue with write mode.
I continuously start new dialogues and reopen old ones etc.
As if you're working in a team with people and have to bring them up to date again before you can make use of them
ok, i bought a rabbit
lets see when i get the code
:)))
im part of the future now!!!!!
:DDDDDD
ok, got the code
anyone know if i can redeem the code and make it add it to the free trial?
for some reason i can't redeem, possibly due to free trial being acgtive?
Its good at basic math, but for harder tasks it really needs to have code interpreter integrated into perplexity
Right, please send us a message to support@perplexity.ai with all the relevant details, we'll help to apply it.
Hey, do you guys know how long it takes for Claude 3 to be added to the "LMSYS Chatbot Arena Leaderboard" I know its already available to chat with, but how long dose it take to get ranked and placed?
Thanku
Whatās a rabbit?
has anyone used claude opus? i heard its good
Rabbit M1 device with built in ai and it does stuff for u
Rabbit OS.
Perplexity has a deal with them where you get 1 year of perplexity if you buy one of the first 100,000 units
Pretty expensive for such a small plastic thing with a circuit board inside
I want one tho š
And despite my recent whinging over the loss of Poe 2.1 and not being crazy about Poe Sonata Perplexity is such a solid AI search and even more solid vision of how it will improve as the models continue to improve that ~-$240 for it is... I wouldn't say just subtract it from the price but take it into consideration if you were gonna do Perplexity usage anyway.
It could be cool or not, but i was about to buy perplexity for a year anyways, so I thought, hey free device
What if you open it up and there's no circuit board, just a paper coupon for Perplexity
In the very least it will be a fun little toy
I almost bought it before i saw the promo
Save money and buy better internet things, this thing isn't worth it. Buy prime for a year or Netflix whatever, you get more out of it.
I think the issue with Rabbit is that it's an exciting idea (multimodal AI for controlling other devices) that is only more than a novelty if it's really good. And that's a lot of faith on a preorder.
I didnāt buy it for the little device, i bought it for the year of perplexity, I use perplexity 100s of time a day, i think I will get more use out of it than netflix
But will it support Netflix-style Sora video by the end of 2024
(probably not)
(probably)
I want sora in apple vision pros so i can go full ready player one and enter the matrix
Ki isn't there yet, you can tell it's light years before when a video was created with Sora
For all of their ClosedAI flaws, OpenAI is such a leader in the field
by a lot
I find Gemini better, the free version of ChatGPT is unfortunately very crumbly
Even Sora's failures are fascinating, like the liquid bubbling up from the table on the spilled glass, etc.
Is it even true that it trained on a bunch of Unreal Engine interactions or is that just made up nonsense until OAI does a talk or a paper? I don't remember reading anything like that on the article that went up on the Sora site.
Yeah, free gpt-3.5 is very old now, gpt-4 is the cutting edge, and hopfuly not too long gpt-5
With Google you get better human answers, with ChatGPT it's always the same approach and you realize that it's superficial.
system prompt effect the style a lot, GPT-4 is very steerable from my experience
And costs money
GPT-4 has a focus on concise and accurate answers, not everyones favorite style
Claude 3 can be great for longer answers, gemini i think i will only use for the 1m to 10m tokens if i ever get to use it
All of the models have good use cases, but OpenAI has been the golden standard for a while, and only recently has competition started to give them pressure, I wonder if there will be a big gap when GPT 5 is here, we will see
Yeah, I mean the best free model is its own conversation
there are lots of pros and cons with free models i thinks its best to try a few and see which fits you use case the best
Is the Claude 3 Opus limit real? Iāve done like 15 messages back and forth and the UI still says Iām using Opus???
Is the UI not updating properly or there is no real limit?
I would guess it the UI not updating, I have heard from others that the name only changes when you start a new chat after already using up all of your messages
Wow if this is sonnet then Iām very impressed. I was impressed thinking it was Opus this whole time!
Itās nowhere near as lazy as GPT-4 for codingā¦no more annoying back and forth. Itās almost like the original gpt4
Thats good, I have only tested it a little, and i am really glad have it as an option!
from their Discord
Thank you! I look forward to seeing where it ranks
updated leaderboard btw - two main GPT4-t variants tied at the top; Mistral Large making a solid debut,
Nice, I donāt know about you, but I look to this leaderboard more than all of the benchmarks coming from the companyās.
totally
it still shows opus for new chats for me⦠weird
Maybe you have a good glitch then š
Yeah I tested it but I got bored.
I have tested opus, gemini advance, gpt4
pi by inflection ai
Here is my rating:
Image Generation:
Midjourney: 10/10
Music:
Suno: 6/10
Empathy:
Pi: 8/10
Conversation:
Pi: 7.5/10
Storytelling:
Gemini 4: 8/10
ChatGPT 4: 5/10
Claud Opus: 5.9/10
Eastern Philosophy:
Pi: 5/10
ChatGPT4: Better than Pi
Coding:
ChatGPT 4: 7/10
Gemini Advanced: I haven't tried it yet
Claud Opus: Haven't tried
I haven't really tried testing it on math.
anyone know when Rabbit M1 ships?
claude opus is only 2x the price of gpt-4 turbo. I feel like 5 per day is pretty low
I just want my 2.1 back. Opus and Sonnet's writing is repetitive garbage
At least we'd have a middle ground of Claude's better writing quality on 2.1 than Sonnet. Sonnet has good prose but comparatively poor logic, and I don't really have enough requests with Opus to compare.
I've tried with Opus using poe, and honestly I think 2.1's logic is better than Opus's too, in the writing arena at least
I still really think 2.1 has its place.
Any of you have experience with validating content, if it's written by AI or not?
Do you mean R1?
It's not possible unless there is a clear error.
The main way I do it is by looking at stuff a person has written in the past, and seeing if the vocab and sentence structure is similar or not.
But you can't paste it in a machine and get a Yes this is AI, and No this isn't
I didn't think it would be, with latest generations of LLM. Still, sites out there claim to be able to. I have this 2,000 word document I've knitted together with AI help (Perplexity, varying models), which https://gptzero.me/ is 88% confident is human written, 12% mixed, and 0% AI - but why should I trust that?
Oops, sorry, didn't intend to spam with that link :>
Yep, openai tried to make one when ChatGPT blew up, but they realised it was basically impossible.
Any site that says they can, is just straight up lying.
We are way beyond the Turing test...?
Thank you for confirming my suspicions - although, you could be a lying AI š
Take all the stuff you've written before and run it through the checker, lol.
If you are in uni, take stuff your lecturers have published and see what results they get...
You will quickly see how bad they are.
It's the first semester term paper, they don't have anything to compare with š
Besides, I am confident with my vocabulary, both in English and Danish.
Besides, it's not cheating if I actually understand and check references (AI still sucks at that, paraphrasing citations), is it?
Yep, and with the sources from perplexity in academic mode, it should look pretty legit....
I suffer from doing everything at the very last minute. Had a week to write 7-10 pages, it's due in ~6 hours. Still need one more page to reach the minimum, did everything since... yesterday.
I'm happy with my Perplexity Pro š
What's the paper on?
Psychology, Trait Theory, perspectivation, etc.
Well, it's my first paper on this level, first five days I went in circles trying to find an approach. Easy is relative, but...
No, that's true.
Yet... I can't just make up stuff š
Lol, if it's psychology, you normally have to reference the case studies.
Yeah, there is no case study in this one. It's a re-exam (mental breakdown first attempt), they changed it from case study to theoretical account. Is that the correct term in English?
Not sure if that's what you meant, there are experiments in the curriculum texts of course.
How come Gemini was removed?
I did prefer Bard to GPT-3.5, don't ask me why.
No idea, didn't use perplex when they still had them.
Same, but I just arrived a few days ago.
They said it wasn't being used that often as was generating too many bugs.
yeah
I tried to be accurate, it still effed up. Not a totally invalid answer, but some hallucination is going on.
lol
I find it's writing not the intriguing
can perplexity models do functions call?.
Technically just the one. But thatās all Iād trust an LLM to do at this point
I tried replacing GPT4 for Perplexity and it does not call the function
The function is the web search
I was making a play on words
Or a joke or something
But to actually answer your question, no, it doesnāt do functions
As far as i know LLM's donāt call functions, your code calls a function, its weird since OpenAI called it function calling, but really its simply GPT-4 returning valid json, then your code parses it and then uses the info to call a function, so really almost any llm can "function call" the question is what LLM is consistent at returning the valid format that the code will recognize and then call the function, but maybe someone else understands it better than me and can explain it or correct me
#š¢āannouncements this seems like a excellent deal
@languid nebula are you using the api, you have to have application logic to check if the message follows a certain format
hi
whats the experminetal wha
whats the difference

one is slower and the other is faster

https://www.perplexity.ai/search/The-Experimental-model-s..Jlk.hSqabGhlEz.YhNA
https://thenewstack.io/more-than-an-openai-wrapper-perplexity-pivots-to-open-source/
Perplexity AI offers an "Experimental" model that is optimized for conciseness and accuracy. This model is one of the options available to users who upgrade to Perplexity Pro, along with OpenAI's GPT-4 and Anthropic's Claude 2.1. According to the Perplexity blog, the Experimental model is "well tuned for being concise and accurate"[2]. The model...
thankyou sir
People
How do I add an anonymous thread to a collection
I have been using a thread since before I had an account
And now when I login to other devices, the thread doesnāt show up
Nor am I able to add it to a collection
@serene sand is there a support section in the server
Funny how the CEO of perplexity is the complete opposite of elon musk
He's open and honest
You can ask your questions here in #š¬āgeneral or #ā”āask-community.
That is currently not possible. If you kinda want to save that thread you could fork it with your account by asking a question while logged in on that thread from the anonymous user.
Has anyone had any success with eleminating code snippets from responses from GPT-4 unless being explicitly asked? I'm trying to fine tune AI prompt but no matter what I write it doesn't stop giving code examples.
Gpt 4 is lazy and dumb
Regarding the nothing 2a and perplexity pro subscription, I have already pre-purchased the Rabbit R1 which comes with a Perplexity Pro annual subscription. If i purchase the Nothing 2a phone can the $200 credit be used on for my year two perplexity subscription? Basically stack em up?
Perhaps this is a question for the Nothing marketing team whos budget I am sure this will come out off.
Just used Google Gemini Pro, ChatGPT Pro, and Perplexity Pro to answer a question from the same prompt. From the results of my tests. Perplexity Utilizing Mistral Large , or Google Gemini gave the best results from my consistent prompt. Interesting excercise but one that i dont fancy carrying out again. too much reading.
hi sir
Hey @cursive jacinth Ask your question. I know you have one
just mic testing sir.
Indian?
Lol, you could pass the results to a model to evaluate instead.
Hi, I do have only Cloude 2.1 available in my app on iPhone. I have no updates available in AppStore. Is Cloude 3 available only on desktop?
Yep, on web. The apps haven't been updated yet.
Not sure what technology they are using for their apps. If they are using react native, the update should be pretty quick. If they are using flutter or something similar, it will probably take a week or so. Since apple is really annoying with their vetting process.
What was your question?
It was a long and detailed question with specific information required. I will post the full prompt when I get back.
I could. Or I could get the wife to evaluate as she is the Subject Matter Expert
CLAUDE 3 OPUS is clearly superior to CLAUDE 3 SONNET... Can you put CLAUDE 3 OPUS back officially, 5 uses of CLAUDE 3 OPUS is too little
I assume anthropic has limited the opus API which is why it's currently limited to 5/day, unless you know the glitch.
bring back Claude 3 Haiku
I used Claude opus > 35 times yesterday.
It's pretty good at programming but still needs steering.
which better with gpt 4 turbo?
Yep, Turbo is too lazy IMO
Leaves a lot of code out with comments etc.
Lol, it was pretty easy to figure out. I'll test it again today, and see if it's still working.
Too busy with a birthday today, so don't know if I'll have enough time.
Here's my prompt - Any constructive criticism appreciated.
Question
Write a report based on the Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy (CIPFA) teachings, about carrying out the monthly outturn process.
The report should be written as a student studying the subject but who has 5 years of experiance in the area.
The audience is a CIPFA examinier
The report should adddress the deficiencies shown in the deficiancies section
Each deficancie is prefixed with a ##
Each deficancy has an index denoted by capital letter, a numeral, a period, and a numeral. Examples of these deficiancy indexes aere S1.1, B4.5,S2.3
Highlight in the answer where each of these index numbers are referenced.
Deficancies
BUSINESS INSIGHT - Influence the impact of business decisions on relevant and affected communities based on an appreciation of different organisations and the environments in which they operate.
S2.5 - Uses financial management expertise to generate clear strategic alternatives, based on data and evidence gathered from multiple sources.
S2.6 - Seeks out examples of best practice to inform business improvement processes.
COMMUNICATION - Communicate in a clear, articulate and appropriate manner. Adapt communications to suit different situations, individuals or teams.
S3.5 - Build networks to support ideas that strengthen financial knowledge and analysis across the organisation.
S3.6 - Deploy a range of communication skills to change perceptions or perspectives on strategic financial issues.
When will the 5/day limit of Opus be removed?
That means you were using Claude Sonnet... After 5 uses it automatically changes. The label says opus, but it's sonnet apparently
glitch??
Yep, you can check the network requests to see what models it's hitting.
fwiw I'd say that's asking a lot of the llm, in terms of the requirements for a single output. The way you have structured it actually shows it quite clearly - there are a lot of parts to it. To the extent possible (and just fwiw), if you could consolidate / simplify it, or execute it as flow in segments, I think that may yield better results (assuming that is that you want the output to be detailed / granular etc)
@austere kestrel Thanks. I was under the impression that you gave it enough to get it going. The report output from both Mistral and Google were both detailed and good. I could have promnpted further but I feelthat for my tests it was good enough
good to hear ā if it works, it works!
I just find the more tasks that are piled into a prompt, the quality of the output almost degrades proportionally
Best model to create dungeons and dragons characters portraits?
hmmm, from what I have seen and looked at more is sometime less. especially around prompting. Have you looked at github.com/danielmiessler/fabric. If you look at the prompts he uses in the patterns directory of say extract_wisdom, which is used to analyse a transcript from a video, his prompt is as follows
IDENTITY and PURPOSE
You extract surprising, insightful, and interesting information from text content.
Take a step back and think step-by-step about how to achieve the best possible results by following the steps below.
STEPS
Extract a summary of the content in 25 words or less, including who created it and the content being discussed into a section called SUMMARY.
Extract 20 to 50 of the most surprising, insightful, and/or interesting ideas from the input in a section called IDEAS:. If there are less than 50 then collect all of them. Make sure you extract at least 20.
Extract 15 to 30 of the most surprising, insightful, and/or interesting quotes from the input into a section called QUOTES:. Use the exact quote text from the input.
Extract 15 to 30 of the most surprising, insightful, and/or interesting valid facts about the greater world that were mentioned in the content into a section called FACTS:.
Extract all mentions of writing, art, tools, projects and other sources of inspiration mentioned by the speakers into a section called REFERENCES. This should include any and all references to something that the speaker mentioned.
Extract the 15 to 30 of the most surprising, insightful, and/or interesting recommendations that can be collected from the content into a section called RECOMMENDATIONS.
OUTPUT INSTRUCTIONS
Only output Markdown.
Extract at least 10 items for the other output sections.
Do not give warnings or notes; only output the requested sections.
You use bulleted lists for output, not numbered lists.
Do not repeat ideas, quotes, facts, or resources.
Do not start items with the same opening words.
INPUT
input:
I would say dall e 3
Interesting. This is long, but it has a pattern, and it is basically about retrieval (e.g. extract xx, extract xx); I think that's different than like (just for example) "do a SWOT analysis, then explore the Strengths and Weaknesses in depth; then propose solutions to xxx. etc etc"
good spot
Like extraction is more about retrieval than creation; if you're asking for analysis - the more focussed the beeter
nice. I can work with that
just my 2c ofc - I don't really have any clue ha
(but hopefully was constructive :))
definitly Constructive
hi sir, why i am experiencing failed message sir
With Claude?
hi sir, on discord sir. maybe just a bug sir. i am just mic testing sir.
what's with the sirs @cursive jacinth
idk sir but I kind of like that sir
I was raised well by my parents sir. Since birth sir, they told me to always say sir to every sentence sir. I am 33 now sir. Can you blame me to undo it sir?
sounds like an llm
Or a reespectful Indian
Im assuming. But then again if you make an assumption it makes an As out of you, and umption
I want to confirm again when I turn off the AI Data Usage option, none of the attachments or messages that I input and upload in each mode will be used to train the model, right?
just someone respectful ?
i mean who cares
rather that than the opposite lol
but that said for the females here, I'm not sure it works gooddawg - you might need to reassess that bit lol
pfft, it might work in the west, not necessarily in the east
i mean i find emojis generally annoying
but I use them myself, and try not to judge people who use them excsessively
Yes those are, but respect is tolerable, if not a little annoying, but we cant over ride anothers cultural leanings
I do hear ya
It's a global platform
people from all over the world here I assume
Yeah, im geting that vibe,
Loving the new Claude opus. Huge leap in coding competency
Hi sir, sound racist to me sir, i am half indian btw sir
Thats not what was intended. Racism has no part in a conversation. we all just need to chill
š
new claude answered all my coding questions wrong
Someone correct my if Iām wrong but when you use the slider perplexity will not use anything you input for product improvement/advertise, etc. however they do use API for some of there AI models, Like GPT-4, I know OpenAI has taken the stance that they will not use data from API usage, but I donāt know about Claude, Mistral, Gemini (When it comes back), etc
So I would check the privacy policy of whatever AI model API you are using along with any API tools, such as wolfram alpha. Itās also possible that perplexity might have enterprise API access and that might have different privacy policies
ok
The nothing .tech /perplexity link in #š¢āannouncements is giving me a 404 error.
Perplexity down right now? Cant get into the website or the android app
Does anybody know a good text to speech extension for claude on chrome one that sounds natural not robotic
don't know any extensions, but try out microsoft edge if you're using windows or mac. It has built in text to speech natural voices
Can't purchase the Nothing phone in Canada š¦
No issues here.
Yep, sorted itself shortly after my message š
Hello! Can I limit a search database scope? I want to get informations only from here: https://www.ableton.com/en/live-manual/12/welcome-to-live/
Are there any methods for this?
I have a trial. Do you want me to fill in a specific prompt and compare?
gotcha. writing mode or use perplexity search as well?
Here is the same question, ran through multiple models https://www.perplexity.ai/collections/GPT4-vs-35-e_xK7SZcRDqXJ2iCpZ80Dw
Canada is literally a 3rd world country.
If you click āProā (formerly Copilot) does it work with whatever model you have chosen, or does it revert to the Perplexity default model?
Guys, why does Perplexity (Android) sometimes not post ANY sources at all? (This list I mean) š³š¤Ø
Hi! I am new on this discord. I preordered the R1 few weeks back and was wondering how to get that free perplexity pro for a year?
Third world countries usually get access first
At least for google models
Because gdpr and studf
āProā still uses whatever model your have set is setting, it just helps in search and clarifying questions
Thereās so many questions I ask that donāt get a straight answer from perplexity. The app usually makes the call on ethics and safety. Is this happening for anyone else? I need more than just a ābasicā answer I already know
Yep, I think the copilot/pro toggle just makes the model ask you questions before responding, to refine your prompt.
Itās Opus for the first 5 messages, and then switches to sonnet, you will get your 5 back 24 h after you used it
Seems a lot of people don't realise how LLM's work...
Yep, unless you know the hidden method to get infinite Opus...
I forgot sometimes itās not common knowledge
Nice having Claude 3, good addition to perplexity
More extensive testing, do you find sonnet better at coding than opus?
Yep, i think the current limit is because of anthropic.
Opus is the GPT4 equivilent, so shouldn't be.
I have a mixed feeling bag that sometimes sonnet outperforms opus
You need to try the exact same prompts to both of them. Since it could just be bad prompts.
I'm testing it at 0.7 temp , will decrease temp
...
For code, you want low temp
Temp controls the amount of entropy.
Good for creative writing, bad for code.
I notice that sometimes Sonnet is more verbose than Opus, not sure if itās just a few examples that stood out.
there is a link in the mail that rabbit sent you click on that and follow thw directions
Awesome thanks
I'm aware, sonnet outputs are way more verbose
Opus tends to output just what you ask
No filler code so to speak
if you get to checkout and it dosent say $0.00 to pay, then dont continue or you will get debited and have to reclain. if its more than zero email pplx support. they fixed min out in a few hours. i already had a monthly pro account.
So would make sense to make it's outputs more concise.
That is a good theory
Thy makes sense
Claude 3 should actually be better than GPT4, it's basically GPT4 created with more modern techniques.
Which is why it's so good at needle in the haystack and other similar problems that GPT4 isn't.
Then again GPT4 is almost 2 years older, so...
So with sonnet being more verbose it would probably be a better option for creative writing and opus would be the programming/logic king
I am guessing the sources are cached.
Yep, you also have to remember that it is likely a system message telling it to be shorter or more concise. You could tell it to not be concise, by adding your own system messages in a collection.
Yep
There are two steps when you input your query.
Which AI language model is best for programming codes?
They probably do a search in their indexer and get a list of search results. And then they pass that to the model you chose with your prompt, and a system message telling it what it's job is, which in this case is to respond to your question by using the sources.
The first part of getting the sources is likely cached.
Claude Opus is pretty good from what I've seen.
Before that I used Mistral Large, since it would give me more verbose responses.
Claude sonnet / opus and gpt4 turbo
GPT4Turbo seems to have gotten lazier.
I would ask it to write the code, and literally all of it was just comments...
At work we have github copilot but honestly it gets so many things wrong
Here is what i found:
Github copilot is good for code you've already written in your code base. It's bad when it has to come up with stuff from scratch.
lol, all the times the researchs have said that there ai became alive is funny
Yes, indeed, its the early stage where we think its smarter than it is, but it will not be long before its not
Yep, especially when each model is 100X the compute of the last...
It is really quickly overtaking us.
Did you see the example where they did the needle in the haystack test, and claude pointed it out, and assumed it was being tested?
I know it performs very well and is very competent at so many tasks, but it lacks a certain level of understanding, Where the AI can explain complex topic but cant recognize when it is being tricked into doing something it previously refused, maybe this is a training data blindspot, maybe we need a less focused data set, I dont think i can quantify it, but its amazing until its not
Some people say this is the limits of mode 1 thinking, where we have mode 1 and mode 2 thinking
I don't think so. I just think the models are just too small.
The problem is just solved by scaling.
They are really small, and that is a big part, but we are there feedback loop, they can not engage with a though over a year, i do think the biggest factor will be scale, get it up to 100T parameters and it will be a whole new beast, but i think there will be a few changes the token feedack loop, i guess we will see
They said something about bugs etc
okay
I think CL more or less solves that.
The problem with current models is that they are static after training.
You are basically talking to a clone, and each prompt in your conversation has likely been give to a different clone too.
And the model doesn't remember your conversation at all.
CL (Continuous Learning) more or less solves that by having the model learn while talking to you (and everyone else).
We probably still need a way to distribute and update all the models though.
However that is currently too compute intensive.
Is there a way to interact with perplexity using just my voice and getting a live audio answer. I do know I can activate audio using the mic icon but would like a live audio response. Thx
Nope, as far as I know, they haven't got a voice to read the response to you, like 11 labs or the openai speech models.
Not sure if their model is called whisper, or if it's a different one. I think whisper it speech to text.
CT dose seem like like a important part
Thanks for the info
Np
Hello everyone
Perplexity AI unlocks the power of knowledge with information discovery and sharing.
Perplexity created a diagram
Didn't know it could do that
Anyone know best model to use that also doesn't censor like ChatGPT?
GPT4 and Claude 3 censor pretty heavily
Default = GPT 3.5 right? modified somehow though?
also what is the experimental one
Experimental is basicaly a fork of either LLaMa or Mistral 7B. And it's supposed to be less restrictive.
Try the experimental model
thx guys
Per https://blog.perplexity.ai/blog/introducing-pplx-online-llms: our PPLX models build on top of mistral-7b and llama2-70b base models.
Somehow it's both. 
I'm guessing they have one for each size.
Is the one on the site the 7B? Given how quickly it streams I guess it's still possible it's 70B, but unless they just have it running on extreme hardware it feels too fast not to be the 7B.
my claude 3 opus ran out for the day for perplexity, i went and subscribed to calude 3 opus on anthropology.
i feel like default is 7b sonar or something
and the āexperimentalā is probably mixtral based
because itās still fast too
well done
now in 2 weeks thereās gonna be some new model which beats it
š
maybe i will go back to gemini advanced ultra 1.5 when it comes out
1.5 pro is promising idk
i just use api on all of them
donāt feel like paying $20 each
well other than perplexity
Hey any technologists here
it's pretty ass don't get ur hopes up
Hi
I think it's worth it and I tell the creators that their chatgpts are pretty good
I'm buying it and I'm surprised that the pro has so many options
context and video input is promising
actual model is yeah worse
Yes
it's probably not even real context it's probably just a summarization model
I tried Claude and even videos he recommended he gave me what I wanted, he can interpret and do almost anything.
Search IDS music many things I found it I make it easier
Define technologists
I think the reason 1.5 is so trash right now is because google forced the temp to be 2. At least 1.0 pro seems significantly smarter in logical reasoning when I set it's temp to 0 compared to the default 0.9
if you have solved practical problems with existing tech(not just computer tech) or created a new technology
Ah gotcha, like network architecture related items or more deeper?
like people working on building perplexity
Ah not me. Sorry. Just a volunteer
@signal hamlet arigato gozaimasu (^.^)
discordęä¹ä½æēØ
English Lol
sorry sir
y only 5 queries for claude?
I've been using so far
Been very impressed
The only sad part is it's gonna launch at 128k Tokens or sumn...
it's expensive
pplx bugging fr:
asking it a code problem and it gives me the weather and treatement options
that's crazy
That's super interesting. I havent been using models in that way, but certainly that seems like the kind of framework I could follow if you're going to be populating a field of information. Do you have a background in accounting to be able to qualitatively evaluate the results?
for the opus , is it 5 chats or 5 to and fro questions only?
Five questions
then i guess gotta wait for them increasing the limit , 5 sounds too low
Definitely not trash when uploading a subject related textbook
Otherwise... results may vary
Sadly the cutoff of Claude is Aug 2023 so it can't access current info which is a real bummer
And perplexity's so called real time access leaves a lot to be desired. It misses a lot of stuff out. Lots of room for improvement
you .com api has url citatiton ı think anyone experiance it
Why is Claude 3 Opus limited to 5 times?
Is there an unlimited usage plan?
Currently it's really expensive so they had to limit it
I am ashamed. I can't get the photo generation to work. In the settings I found a choice of Playground v2.5, DALL-E 3, Stable Diffusion XL but I do not know how to start them.
Please have a look here #1194794305362071552 message
Unfortunately I have read the thread but the buttons as on the screenshots do not show me. I have purchased Ai mainly for the feature of correcting my images with the elements I need to apply and also to test Cloude 3 Opus which also cannot be enabled ? Can you indicate directly how to use the generation and how to use cloude 3 opus ? Thank you in advance š
Guys, tell me, what is Perplexity Discover? How it works?
click on interesting news, read, ask followup questions
I'm guessing someone writes the titles and AI researches/writes the story
So far I've been using it and enjoying it
theres a button below that says skip
opening perplexity app and then searching for stuff takes higher load time then it does while doing the same using its widget, that's super fast
Bro Claude 3 got faster and it's fast af now š
Quick question what is copilot exactly?
Please check https://blog.perplexity.ai/faq/what-is-copilot
fast and easy ššāš½
nice phone! š
its nothing phone 1 š
deep dive ā¤#š¬āgeneral message
please check tutorials in this thread
wait I wonder if gemini 1.5 would code more reliably if a relevant book/reference book for whatever language was uploaded to it
I think someone else asked here but it was a good question but when using Cluade or GPT-4 do you get the full context if you upload files like Claudes 200k context?
Kinda relevant
As for full context might have to test it out yourself
Yeah, I will have to test that
Hi, Im planning to swtich to perplexity pro, Is it better than chatgpt 3.5 and 4? Im a software dev, will be using it to boost productivity.
Gpt 4 is one of the options you can use on pro but doesn't have code interpreter if that's something you find important
I see. What's your experience wth perplexity pro? is it better or more or less the same as chatgpt?
Might be better to ask some of the people here who are on multiple paid plans for the different models š
Looks like it's GPT4 level release week...
yes, I tested the free one in detail, it took 7 -8 tries to get what I want vs 2 or 3 with chatgpt. Just wanted to confirm.
What differences are there between using ChatGPT or Claude 3 directly through their provider, versus using the writing mode in Perplexity? Is it mainly the prompt engineering that happens before the user prompt? I have seen people suggest that using ChatGPT through OpenAI provides a better multi-turn conversational experience than using Writing mode with the model set to GPT.
Pretty much. Could also be faster too.
Btw pretty sure pi2.5 is free too...
I mean it works fast
Donāt know any other reason you would use it for if you have other LLMās avaliable like ChatGPT or Claude
It has just under their performance for free...
Its fast and the voices are good, except the first 2 sound like they are almost from elmo
Its like its trying to be an assistant, but also a friend, haha. I wonder how it will do at coding
I remember trying it out while back
Thatās really good
Wait can you try it out now or is that release for later? (This)
Already released I believe.
Dunno if the one talking to right now is the 2.5 one or earlier
Ah i see, thatās impressive speed then
Is this free
?
I feel like "competitive with" indicates it's not actually as good š
Oh thatās really good
Geminiā¦.š
Even Claude 3 say they "outperform" on benchmarks but that's just thanks to their prompting smh
Interesting, they are taking a different approach, they have built in dating advice
š
I really like their approach, where a personal ai instead of an assistant for work and stuff
Wait til the dating becomes digital partners...
Already has happenedā¦
š

Will be insane, then sora + apple vision pro, we are doomed, haha
I know its already happened but It will one day be normalized š
š this is what the peak of humanity brings us to
Kinda crazy that Sora was actually built a year ago (I think?), kinda scared what they have in store for now
Definitely
Have they even fixed the MMLU yet or is it still messed up
Actually I think AR is kind of cool but thatās just my opinion, the apple vision pro is useless for normal people at this point of time
Yep, and the efficiency of the model is why it's so fast.
Lol I tried out a simple statistics question and failed
For now I'm just gonna think of pi.ai as a conversation ai still
Is there a way to use perplexity to make a news feed of a particular topic
Like the discovery feed, but for local news. Or video games, or movies, or whatever
Yep, if you look at the graph, that's where the biggest gap is compared to GPT4.
It got this calc problem wrong and wont be my GF, haha
but for most people i think this AI would be plenty, it looks to be solid but not for power users
I think Claude sonnet would provide more value though? Also free
Yeah, I just like to see new AI options, but yeah I think claude would be better, but it would be more than enough for things like this
It seems like a simple AI, not bad, pretty good, the only thing about it that is really different is its fast, but i think sonnet is too, and its super friendly, which I guess could be a selling point, haha. just not really worth it compared to all of the great options, Claude Sonnet, Mistral Large (Not Free but pretty cheap), Gemini, GPT-3.5
Oh, the voice it good tho, so if you want an AI to explain something out loud, this is good, i think you have to pay on chatGPT to get voice, and google might have voice, but i think its was just standard tts, sounds robotic
Voice is free on the ChatGPT app.
Thats good. I never use the app, but I guess gpt-3.5 with voice prob is solid for most
I am disappointed with gemini tbh
looks like it did better then mistral, a bit surprised
I tried it and I am fascinated of how my experience with it is much worse than with perplexity pro
Yeah, I hope 1.5 makes it worth it
I Think they rushed it
I think they felt like they had to release it asap or something
because it's quite unfinished
they even had to include free cloud storage in order to compensate, or at least this is what it feels to me
I think the whole vision they have with gemini is making it a whole ecosystem, that's what I assume they want to make, what would be better than the competitors
but as of now they do not have the ecosystem, 5 extensions only
You'd have to use the API and write some logic to query on a interval
I just treat it like Google search
The results were disappointing especially simple math explanations
Also no profiles, libraries, collections
The only nice feature is drafts
Also for me personally it took up to 4 seconds for simple prompts such as "explain asymptotes of functions"
But maybe my use case is wrong, maybe it's aimed at making stuff rather than explaining math concepts, like creating essays, texts and so on
No, pi
Hello Perplexity folks, which channel is appropriate for discussing sonar and the online API?
the font looks really cool
prob pplx api genral
Yeah, looks nice
thanks much
is it worth upgrading to nothing phone 2a
I reserved my R2!!

How many messages have you been sending? Lol
Or are you on the free tier?
opus
i used up 100 since yesterday
Did gemini 1.5 always have a pop up message for file uploads saying only text was converted and no images?
Or am I tripping
is everyone just using claude 3 now? how is gpt 4 turbo vs claude 3 sonnet
From my personal tests opus is not as accurate as gpt 4
Claude 3 sonnet sometimes better than opus
opus was more verbose/helpful? for coding questions, but yea hard to say with only 5 uses a day š
im testing sonnet over 4 turbo as a daily driver, jury is still out
Depends on the prompt really, sonnet was able to figure out a book by ballard, while opus mentioned said book was by stephen king
Chat.lmsys has a nice side by side view when testing prompts
Wish perplexity had it to compare model answers
Yeah that's how I was testing em out
Seems like I need to try out sonnet more
I just assumed opus would be better in all cases
just subbed to pro
opus results are more "human" and definitely parses your prompt better
welcome 
got my perplexity premium ššāš½āš½ enjoying it
what does pro discord mean lmfao
Pro support will give you access to live chat with the support of perplexity when they're online. And Pro Discord gives you access to the pro channels when you rejoin the server using that invite.
i didnt got it ????
how to get pro channels
pls give
cool
are everybody here only users of products?
I have other roles in my life...like eater of products
i have 100 messages available for claude opus 3 but idk what to do now
Anyone get trolled by perplexity before? I keep asking it to elaborate on somethinf specific but it keeps answering it in vague ways to avoid answering me completely. And no its not at all nsfw or anything bad
why perplexity can only do 3 messages for claude 3 opus
It keeps saying the same thing but in different ways. It refuses to get any more specific about the location
"Located in the realm where the events take place" lmfao ok
jerr bezos is here
You might have to change the default AI to something else sometimes. Some of the models have a tendency to do that. The small Gemini one had a really bad problem repeating itself or this type of behavior.
You can fix it by switching the default to GPT, asking the question, then switching it back. Or you can be more specific with your prompting. Giving it more context tends to stabilize the answers. This is true with all LLMs.
I didnt post the others but i asked that question in three different ways and got the same response
I was curious about tencent's stake in discord so I googled... this was the first article
Uses chatgpt 
Gemini Advanced Ultra 1.5 vs ChatGPT-5 vs Claude 3 Opus vs Copilot Pro (Github GPT-5 Turbo) vs Grok-1.5
Who will win?
what's the difference between using GPT4 on OpenAI website versus GPT4 on perplexity AI? Is there a noticeable difference between the answers?
Gpt 5
Whatever is the best model on Perplexity.
we need grok in perplexity!
I've heard so little about Grok, no benchmarks come to mind, I've only heard of one person using it recently.
according to hallucinated statistics, it performs better than chatgpt 3.5
It's only super useful for twitter real time search rn, and for that you gotta be a blue checky
Generally 3.5 hallucinated a ton for me.
wtf is this groq that has been trending very recently
It's INSANE how that was only a year ago
its so overwhelming to think of the fact that GPT-4 update is now lazy mode
sorry bill gates but i disputed my subscription
sorry sam almatn if ur in this discord too
I find myself not necessarily needing the best models, I don't code, and any medical advice is rejected anyways.
It's incredibly unremarkable. Has the feelings of a mid AI that is very X/Twitter centric, doesn't keep threads, doesn't seem bad but not worth using either. But it's also kind of inoffensive, I guess. Just not a contender.
That was me trying it only briefly maybe 6+ months ago, so it may have gotten an upgrade since, or I just didn't feel inspired to give it more time.
Beating 3.5 doesnāt cut it anymore tbh
Even Open Source AI beat 3.5 pretty frequently now
Having Grok would be pointless when we can use almost every major AI model to date
for me I'd like a model that was less censored, follow instructions better, and was snappy tier of fast.
I do not trust any information coming from Grok
So Perplexity give us up to 5 times for Opus, How do we use it? For now all responses are sonnet.
Based
Do I need to press the Pro button when I want to use Claude 3 Opus?
no that's for what was called "copilot" it just understands your question and doesn't change claude 3 models. you get 5 opus responses total, then change to sonet.
Is there any way to test the authenticity of Claude 3 Opus?
In general, you cannot check the models 100% for authenticity with any provider, but for the reasons mentioned in this thread, you would inevitably realize it at some point: #1198438847877480629
But don't worry, Perplexity always uses the real models.
i am a developer, but use the products to discover some of the code i write
Can we manually switch to Claude 2.1 please? For Certain tasks that was better than the Opus/Sonet
Why I use Claude 3 but the Q&A is Perplexity?
System prompt
I previously mentioned the thread š
claude 3 available in perplexity now?
When we give an AI prompt in a thread, does it modify the system prompt or just add some extra text as pre-prompt?
My guess is it appends to the system prompt
extra, pretty sure
The prompt is System Prompt (from Perplexity) + AI Profile
Claude 3 is available for all
users
Anyone know what model and what the actual context window is for perplexity? On my tests they donāt have the 100k context window the gpt 4 0125 model has.
please help!
I have a serious bug disturbing me
whenever I try to use the rewrite function and use probably mistral large or gpt 4, it doesnt work. instead it brings out this prompt telling me to subscribe to perplexity pro even when i use a Perplexity pro account already.
Hi, I assume you just recently subscribed to Pro?
no
The problem should be easily solved by deleting all browser data, cookies and so on. Then log in to Perplexity again with your account and everything should work.
i am a regular
let me try this thanks
no this doesn't solve the problem. i have perplexity on my IOS and on my android. i even signed in on another browser to try and it is still give the same bug.
Then please contact support@perplexity.ai
alright then
I'm a little bit disappointed that we get just 5 claude 3 opus requests per day
@halcyon coral Hey!
no reply from support, no response from the ticket submitted and no response from the messages i sent
this issue still persist
Please be patient, the response time is several business days, if you write several messages it just takes longer, thank you!
Guys I am wondering perplixity is 20 a month with 600 messages, chat gpt is the same but with 40, is there a catch?
Is anyone here?
Hey š
Hiš
There is no catch, you can see all the advantages of Pro here: https://www.perplexity.ai/hub/faq/what-is-perplexity-pro
Now Claude 3 instead of Claude 2.1 and a total of three different image generation models.
And also, Just wondering why does chatgpt have a higher user base if perplexity offers much better service and messages with the model?
Thanks!
Perplexity is not so well known yet, most people know ChatGPT because the well-known models like GPT 4 were developed by OpenAI š
So was GPT4 in perplexity released recently? And also which would you suggest for a student. Appreciate the answers.
Gpt 4 has always been part of perplexity as far as I remember lol
And way better for students imo
So perplexity is better for students than chatgpt plus , is that what you re saying.
Imo yes
GPT-4 has been available in Perplexity for some time, and it was recently upgraded to GPT-4 Turbo.
I would recommend Perplexity to any student, as a student you are dependent on up-to-date factually correct data. ChatGPT is usually unable to provide this.
Very True. Thanks guys im mostly upgrading to Pro instead of Plus just needed some research.
Goated research tool
Also smart? Like answers hard questions or writes essays like chatgpt with the Pro
Thanks guys, Hyped to access the power Perplexity can bring, Hope it flies in sucess.
is there a way one can increase the daily limit of 600?
If you decide to try Perplexity you can get the first month for only $10 instead of $20 with this link š
https://perplexity.ai/pro?referral_code=ST5556J2
600 is already a lot
600 uses should be more than enough
What, How thats amazing.
It it legit
sure 
is it legit?
š damn needing over 600 is crazy
fr
Do u have pro?
I did but not anymore
oh
didnt like?
No I just don't have a need at the moment for pro
Alright, if you wanted to would you rather get Gemini Advanced, Chatgpt plus or teams or perplexity?
Perplexity for sure
Just wish it had code interpreter 
hehehe
deep dive ā¤#š¬āgeneral message
I think 200$ per year overall is more then fair in terms of what you get. Perplexity has a value, for searching, even tho itās not the best search engine. But if you need answers that are backed by sources, you need perplexity.
I think the source gathering that perplexity does is really great and helps reinforce your result entirely
Yes.
if you sent your first response at 1:00PM, it would reset at 1:00PM the next day.
I have access to opus, but no in Claude.ai, it depends on the task, itās a bit better then gpt-4T
perplexity so much better than chatgpt, i hate openai so much
without OpenAI, Perplexity wouldnāt be able to access GPT4
and the development of LLMs as a whole would be much slower
therefore we wouldnāt have even seen most of the incredible AI advancements
OpenAI still needs to be competitive and ethical IMO.
(they aren't, which is why I don't support them)
Hey guys, I am actually curious how does Perplexity works? I mean it uses Bing APIs to search the web and then build a RAG???
I'm not sure if it's Bing. But I can say that their Pro Search also looks at Reddit and more...
It is Bing trust me. I saw the query responses on both platforms and itās definitely Bing. Nothing bad even ChatGPT uses it.
But I am curious does they build a RAG for answering questions or not?
Because building a RAG will get better responses but really really slowly
Idk what a RAG is
Retrieval Augmented Generation, itās a whole different beast but I am still learning about it.
They don't seem to say they do...
well im sure theyre using some form of RAG with their search results already
it cant in time:
- search 25 sources
- feed all into ai
- output
all in like 10s
searching is prob done in parallel and cached
most of the 25 sources are prob from a cached database, using RAG to find relevant ones
idk
but then yeah its using kinda rag on the pages?
bc its giving it snippets of each page
caching the internet is probably the first step
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3NN5L-f0cDo
What do you think?
Get on my daily AI newsletter š„
https://natural20.beehiiv.com/subscribe
[News, Research and Tutorials on AI]
See more at:
https://maggieappleton.com/forest-talk
00:00 dark forest hypothesis
01:09 dark forest internet
13:40 proof of humanness
22:42 my solution
My AI Playlist:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLb1th0f6y4XROkUAwkYhcHb7OY9y...
Define "ethical" in the context of AI, except not trying to make AI of course.
A likely scenario, except that by then gen AI quality is likely to be higher than the actual internet...
I dunno. It's more of a general thing, I guess. How they collect so much data, and the new plan that doesn't collect data requires you to get at least 1 other person to subscribe. And censoring.
Yah, that's what I thought, although I can't quite grasp what "higher than internet" would look like.
The Internet has high and low quality data. The difference is like a random YouTube video vs a Netflix video.
Censoring is now unethical? Not the threat of Skynet? Collecting data is happening... everywhere. We're beyond getting used to that.
What happens when all YouTube videos look like AAA movies.
With CGI better than current movies etc.
Censoring always has been unethical
There is also ethical censorship.
Idk what ur point is, I'd rather have less data collected than more
Ok, so there's a threat to creative content, but we've been through that before (video killed the radio store). In regards of quality, that's highly subjective.
The problem is when you are only censoring opinions you disagree with.
Since you end up in an echo chamber, and don't challenge your ideas.
Okay, don't expect AI builders to set the standard. You'd have to ask NSA to do the first steps :>
Wym?
Yep, the difference is likely to be that at one point, the human is only the client.
And not the producer.
I see this as pandering to politicians, we all know how to trick the AI into giving an answer anyway, right?
I agree, but what's different than it is now? Supply and demand?
As the agents get more intelligent, jailbreaks become more and more difficult.
I'm making my vote by financially supporting Perplexity and spreading the word
It's why I say the safest AI is the most intelligent.
Since it can actually follow your rules.
Perplexity subscribes to GPT, hence you indirectly support OpenAI.
I'm paying $20/month for perplexity. CHATGPT is only getting a portion of that...
True. I agree. There is reason for concern, I'm just too old for doomsday scenario speculation.
Also I'm not supporting OpenAI with my data now
You're right, you're only fractionally a hypocrite š
How?
Yep, imo the main danger is from making a tool instead of an agent.
Perplexity probably spends a crap ton to openai
My problem was with overpaying and data collection. I'm fully avoiding that now?
If you stand by your values, you'd refrain from touching anything OpenAI/ChatGPT is involved in.
Why?
I tried using the gpt4 api and just me alone in less than a month it was 15 dollars
I don't care, actually... never mind me.
Cause you're wrong that's why
pff ^^
Or better said, you're fractional correct
Well in the future if you want a good experience, there needs to be some sort of data collection.
Or you don't want the AI to know the past context of your conversations.
Why not live feed? Why does there have to be a cache?
That's how all these language models work
Because a cache is far cheaper, hardware and response time wise.
Counter-intuitive, the web is huge.
But so far you've earned my trust, I believe you.
Not really, if you look at what actually happens when you make a request.
It's mostly key value pair look ups.
url => DNS => html webpage
Not very compute expensive.
A search engine just adds embeddings and SEO as an extra step, for finding relevant urls.
Yeah, I think I see your point, but I actually don't know how search engines work. I used to work with SEO (15 years ago), everything has changed since.
The problem with current LLM's is that all compute is the same.
I mean, I understand the fundamentals of web crawling (spiders), just not in detail how it's processed.
You want to do 1+1 or differential equations, it uses the same compute...
Hmm, is that a problem for LLM or AGI, you mean?
You listened to the Yann podcast with Lex? :)
LLM's
Quantum computing will change that game, right?
No, that's not how quantum computers work.
What they will be useful for is for the AGI to make predictions and test them in an emulated environment.
Probability curves?
So it can expand its knowledge past the training data.
A few years away from AGI, so it looks like fun times ahead.
Yes, but the preliminary steps matter...
Of course that depends on the definition you use, lol.
This
Yep, the current problem models have is that they don't get to test their output.
Needs user feedback to verify, you mean?
So they probably create a lot of unneeded structures early in training, which makes them less efficient.
Well, babies don't walk perfectly when they begin exploring legwork š
Lol, yep. But what if you can make them learn faster?
Hmm, speed is relative.
Yes and no. In isolation that's true. But in an environment you are in competition.
I mean, you'd have to use quantum computing to "cheat" the learning curve, right?
Yeah, hence the citation marks.
Basically what we do, which is exploration.
Also, as I understand, quantum computing can test several models in parallel instead of serial.
That largely depends on the architecture.
I mean, that's the goal, also the challenge in actually achieving quantum computing.
I see... well, I don't, but that's where I lack knowledge and will leave it at that ^^
Yep, well having low decoherence.
Decoherence... lovely word.
Yep, states are very volatile at those scales
Cognitive dissonance is a human thing.
I mean, if we want it to think like us? š
I guess we don't...
I wonder if there's a future in AI psychology.
Can a user select when to use Claude 3 opus, since there's only 5 times it can be used per day?
they can't
Hello, is it normal to get very different results from the API & website? Using the API it hallucinates a lot, vs using the website it returns results that would be expected. I've tried online small & medium models
Which website? Perplexity?
If so, were you using search? Since search makes it hallucinate less.
Yes using search. How can I get it to use search through the online models in the API?
I've tried doing Search the internet for the answer using "${website}" as the primary source and it still comes back with hallucinations half the time..
What model were you making a request to?
I tried using sonar-small-online and sonar-medium-online.
Were you trying it on: https://labs.perplexity.ai/
Nope through the API requests. Thanks for trying to help me btw, much appreciated š
Hey @clear finch!
If you find the original message helpful, please consider reacting to it with the :star: emoji. If the post is appreciated by the community and receives 5 stars, it will go to the https://discord.com/channels/1047197230748151888/1082806833938436228 channel and the post author will get the <@&1082034222778302614> role on Perplexity.
Might just be because smaller models tend to be more prone to hallucinations.
i was logging into perplexity tonight and stumbled onto a new tab under Library labeled "Article" which took me here https://perplexity.ai/article/new.
This only happened once, but I found it interesting o.o
@agile jay do you think we can achieve agi with classical computers?
Yep
We are already not far off, just need to scale
At most, you use new chips, like photonics, to make quicker and more efficient hardware.
claude 3 opis is only like 5 for perplexity pro?
to my knowledge perplexity pro is the only service that offers internet search with claude 3 opis right now though right?
Wheres GPT4Turbo?
ohh nice, i'll check it out thx dude
what one gives better searches though?
Try the free version of both, and see.
Perplexity i have always been a bit disappointed on how limited it's searches are, and have been using phind pro because i have been getting better answers
