#📚|english-questions
1 messages · Page 21 of 1
Same as for modals, e.g. "I can walk", "I could walk", but never "I can/could walked"
Ohhhh I get it
So if I wanna use a past verb I only need to change with Ed or put the word in past
?
Like I knew that
I wanted that
You only need to make 1 verb past, right. You don't need to do it twice, the 1st verb already tells you
I knew that - I did know that
I wanted that - I did want that
You used auxiliary verb
Helping verbs are literally there to help shift the burden off of the main verb in regards to tense(past, present and future)
And subject-verb agreement(singular/plural).
It usually shows up for negative, interrogative and negative interrogative sentences.
But
Sometimes you use do and does to emphasize what you wanna say ex:
I practice violin everyday.
I do practice violin everyday.
I solved all the problems.
I did solve all the questions.
Felt the emphatic tone ?
Coming back to main question, nah we can't use i do knew that because auxiliary verb is there, put it on good use. Convert auxiliary verb to past form instead of main verb. Give the main verb some rest heh
Thanks so much
So why we need to say (the problem was you)bc when we use you we need to use were
?
And I searched in the traslater and he said it’s the problem was you
Subject is the problem that's singular
You is used here as an object.
You yours you
Ohhhh
When we use you as a singular we use were
?
Or plural
?
When we use you as a plural we use were?
No, you and i are always followed by the plural form subject verb agreement
I like it. You like it.
It's Never~ i likes it. You likes it. That's wrong, blasphemous hah!
I and you are exception to the rule. English phunny
There's another layer for I lmao
I was there.
Never~ i were there. It's incorrect
But you is next level bastard lol
You were there.
Never~ you was there. It's incorrect
Can't
You is not the subject in this sentence mate
the problem is the subject the above sentence
Thanks
The problem is singular in nature.
The problem was you(correct)
The problems is plural in nature.
The problems were you.
Wait imma send you a pic. You just sent me request right? I'll send you in DM
The colors of the sunbset were a ’mellow’ mix of pink and orange.
Does ’mellow’ imply ‘relaxed’ here? 🤔
Smooth ig
Or soft
What does collocations mean? For example „Find as many collocations as possible …“
Like combine different words?
Collocating is the act to put something in a specific place, in that case it could also mean finding something connected to other things
A person can be collocated to a specific role for a job
Someone or something is collocated between this area
‘Collocations’ in language are words that are put together (frequently) to make a specific meanings. You can have noun + verb, adjective + adverb etc.
Here are some examples.👇
Thank you 🙏
I think some of these are definitely confising for beginners😅
You better make some examples with these phrases! 👍
Don’t just memorize/remember them mindlessly without knowing how to use them
Anyone can help me with this?
This is so confusing
Please post your answers here
We'll discuss the answers and maybe point out if you go wrong
We shall not be doing this for you though
Not gonna complete your homework 
My question is :
Is there any pattern for this? Or specific rule
Yes
The article(determiner) A in most cases is used before a noun*
Another use of A is in place of any
It's indefinite article so used for a vague sense
Then hepatitis is a noun or not?
Another use of A is in its numerical sense of one
My question is why we don't use 'a' with hepatitis but we use it with headache
Or flue
Yeah good question
Maybe because headache is formation of 2 different words head+ache
Since there can be different kinds of aches so headache classifies as a countable noun so enjoys company of a.
Whereas hepatitis is uncountable.
Same with the flu. Flu can be of various types.
Who knew it meant repetitions
It's common when talking about workouts, and we have the context of bodybuilding here
Do Republicans have anything to do with repetitions?
They have the same short form.
Yes?
hallo everyone, can u help me with this question>.<
Question 28: "What time do you usually wake up?" asked my roommate.
A. My roommate asked me what time did I usually wake up.
B. My roommate asked me what time I usually woke up.
C. My roommate asked me what time I usually wake up.
D. My roommate asked me what time had I usually woken up.
is it b
No we just shorten both because they're easier to say and write but they're different
C sounds the most natural to me. Even though she already asked (past tense) when you quote what she says, its present tense.
You ask using wake instead of woke because past tense woke refers to a specific previous action and wake implies repetitive or continued action.
Also i might be wrong with grammar here but with auxiliary 'do' in the question you dont conjugate the main verb even in a question.
Do you run? Did you eat? Did he go?
Only did/do takes tense
thank u so muchh^.^
Anytime 
Confusion and certainty are the major characteristics of the permissible society according to the
conservative historians.
A. permissible B. conservative C. Confusion D. certainty
i think it is A but i dont know how to correct, help me >.<
What exactly needs to be done
please, correct it and can u give me the meaning of that 2 word (confusing word)
well first of all dictionaries still exist
can you insert spaces in the places where these words need to be put?
What does the task say
Mark the letter A, B, C, or D on your answer sheet to indicate the underlined part that needs correction in
each of the following questions.
so which word in correct
A is wrong
can you correct it
But look at 10
It will be like this
I've got pain in my foot
Right?
But you can have different kind of pains right?
A is wrong, it should be permissive
Grammatically, it is B.
But C sounds correct as well, in daily conversations.
Choose B.
We use backshifting in reported speech.
Wake up =》 Woke up
i am begineer english
Well pain literally means ache 
Maybe a native can help differentiate between pain and ache ?
Although Pain is a state. Hence abstract noun(uncountable)
Hello begineer English I'm little monster
@serene plinth by any chance did you use to play rok?
What's that?
Rise if kingdoms (war strategy game)
I mean better ask there
I'm sorry but I've never heard of that game
I still remember a person used to have same profile picture as the one you using rn
Or kinda similiar
Sorry to bother
It must be something similar to mine
It's me in my pfp with a filter so, it's not possible for someone else to have it
To me b sounds wrong lol but its probably right cause i forgot grammar
That's Reported Speech.
Is c grammatically correct too
It is not Grammatically correct. But in daily conversations we use it.
But in an exam, only B is Grammatically correct and the answer.
Damn
Reported Speech: Indirect Speech
That's the topic name.
B sounds better than C to you because for a significant number of natives, backshifting is just not a rule
I've posted before and I'll post again lol https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tense_confusion
Who decided that stuff was grammatically correct anyway
Usually exams expect you to use backshifting in all cases it's applicable
But exams are just exams, and to say "not backshifting is wrong" is seriously out of touch with how people actually speak English
Backshifting isn't the only rule speakers ignore when they are speaking.
I agree.
But, at least they need to pass their exams, don't they?
My point is that they're not ignoring the rule
You're not ignoring a rule if it doesn't exist in your speech to start with
You either forget or ignore it. What else then?
Of course, speaking as a native and speaking as an English learner/speaker is different. We had better not mix them with each other.
I mean, natives are taught English in a way that English learners (as a second language) never experience it.
I agree with that
Not having it to start with. Like how people who pronounce "marry" and "merry" the same haven't forgotten how to make them different, they aren't ignoring a pronunciation rule. It's just how it is for them
So we can realize they are natives, right? Because if you are learning English as a second language, you have to read and study to learn.
Besides, that's not how people learn and use English. Many students follow Grammar structures.
We cannot say they don't follow Grammar structures when sometimes they don't follow the Grammar structures (for any reason) when they are speaking.
I mean English learners as a second language.
I am not in hope that pronounce "marry" or "merry" like americans, but just worry if I hear wrong. it could be serious.
Because there is no need to make a Discord server, hire teachers, let students join just to teach English to natives. It would be nonsense, right?
The problem is some people believe that English learners (as a second language) think like natives. Which is absolutely wrong.
Imagine an American who wants to learn Japanese.
Them and also learners who learn English by talking to people and consuming media
For instance.
Many people learn English by watching movies, that's why they always struggle with their exams.
Not always, but often.
If someone's learned something from native English speakers, and they use it the way they've heard natives use it and are told they're wrong, that's not reasonable is it
Because it amounts to saying "the natives you learned from speak incorrect English"
I'm not denying that you need to learn the rules to do well in exams
Thats me
Lol
I don't think I've ever denied that
Not using Grammar in daily conversations isn't "incorrect"
But if a native doesn't teach his student proper Grammar and just say "Repeat whatever I say", they cannot call themselves "teachers"
True
Besides, we must not mimic natives.
What defines proper Grammar though?
Imagine you want to learn Japanese, do you mimic or do you learn the Grammar?
Im learning another language and i want to be able to sound native in it so i dont have teachers i just use comprehensible input like natives would have
Text books.
Unless you deny Grammar books written by dozens of professors.
Knowing how to speak like natives is good. But you need to know the Grammar and basics first.
Ion even know lol
That's my opinion, at least.
I can half agree cause u usually get forced to learn ur native language at school which influences how natives speak
How can a textbook define the "correct" rules if the vast majority of speakers of any given language haven't read one? What right does a textbook have to tell some random guy who's been speaking the language all his life whether he's doing it correctly or not?
The problem is you think natives and English learners (as a second language) they think, learn and use English in the same way.
That's not my point
If so, we can just simply end this conversation. Because I disagree.
Totally disagree.
That's missing what I'm trying to say there
Then why do we have many Grammar books?
You wanna say the education system is wrong?
I don't appreciate what you're saying.
Is it what you mean?
Ideally, what a grammar book does is describe the rules a language uses. Verbs get inflected this way, nouns are placed in this way, etc etc. This is helpful, people can learn how it works.
You seem to be looking at it the other way around. As if grammar books tell the language how to work
If a book gives you a rule, and it turns out that most English speakers don't actually follow this rule, what do you do?
We learn Grammar to speak the language.
i probably wouldnt follow it
well it would depend
it would depend if not following the rule made it more complicated
You might follow it to make some specific people happy, but there's minimal point actually using the rule for anything else
In such a case, the book has given you a bad description of the language

They were taught wrong.
Or maybe that's just natives who think it's bad.
What you're saying, is many Grammar books are useless and we should learn English based on how natives speak.
If the rule doesn't describe the language well then what can it possibly be but a bad description?
Yes, but how is it famous and verified then?
it honestly depends
imo
We are talking generally.
Not a specific book.
Yes, we may find some books useless. But all of them? No way.
Most of them? Still no way.
I mean famous Grammar books like Grammar in Use, American English Files, etc.
Not every Grammar book we find on the internet.
Don't get me wrong.
cause natives go through the process of learning the grammar (usually) and then maybe will stop using it as they get older and maybe lazier, and so if you're learning english and see everyone not using proper grammar then you might want to just not use proper grammar as well, however that is probably a bad idea as the natives know the grammar and they just dont use it, and it could also maybe make you sound less native as you haven't gone through the step of learning the grammar then forgetting it and just jumping straight into not knowing it
Exactly.
Learn the structures first, then decide whether or not use it and sound like "natives".
But learn the structures first.
ye
unfortunately i kinda forgot a lot of the grammar rules of english after speaking without them for so long
but its alr cause if i decide to relearn them it will be way quicker
Because you learned them once, so you have the overview about them.
That's different from learning English without even learning the basics. Just watching movies? No.
If I'm saying that it's news to me. Maybe there's a 2nd one of me somewhere out there telling people that...
However, what this me is saying is that grammar books are useful in as much as they correctly describe the language. For the most part they do! For the most part they're useful because they accurately tell you how people use English. People can learn from that usefully.
But they don't do this 100% of the time. It would be nice to believe they're 100% accurate but realistically that's impossible, not least because there isn't even such a thing as 1 correct English
Well, I wish I had time to continue this conversation, but I have a class now. So, we may talk later.
I think that there are plenty of cases where uncommon rules actually do make perfect sense despite not seeing widespread usage. I don't think that means they are not worth mentioning. Lots of analytical books regarding grammar look at how certain syntax can solve common problems. The "serial semicolon", for example, is very rare, but serves a very logical function (since most people don't even know about it, should it be disregarded?) Some books even propose a certain solution with the simple justification that "it feels better", and it most likely does to a native. Regardless, most of these grammar books are constantly evolving and releasing new volumes that keep up with how English is actually used.
This is me btw 😅
I think opposite of it is better.
When I talk with my friends ( most of them learned grammar first) they always trying to build grammatically right sentences and most of the time they stumble more than me.
I commit mistakes I know it. But at least I'm not translating farsi or Azeri into English.
I think students need to learn grammar when they reached intermediate level.
that's honestly the biggest joke i've seen this year
like I'm sorry, but that doesnt make any sense at all
Because in my opinion, brain can absorb language and find out the rules by itself, but as a second language it may have problems to do it, at this point brain will need another external resource like grammar to help creating habits and help brain to absorb the language better.
you mean students should mimic natives even though they don't know the grammar natives use?
That's the biggest joke, I guess.
Yes.
that's essentially how you learnt your own native language first.
Yes, but English isn't our mother tongue.
The same rule applies.
Learn the structures first, then try to speak like a native
You learnt your native language by listening and copying your parents
You must be hella smart if you understood grammar and sturcture at 4 years old
Having a milk bottle in one hand and a book of grammar in the other?
I think brain can absorb language in any age.
But the process time in kids is much lower than old ones.
Even natives follow Grammar structures in their writings like essays. If you don't know Grammar and just mimic them, when you want to write an article or an essay etc.. you will get confused.
Your whole sentence is a contradiction.
Natives only follow grammar structures when writing because their native.
Lots of people who write thesis don't think about grammar while writing a paper, it just comes naturally.
Think about you writing a paper in your native language.
you just know how to do it.
That's correct.
Because of that people should learn grammar when they are B1 or B2
That's my opinion, ofc😄
You don't make any sense at all and in fact, you should try to copy natives as much as you can
Ok
Hallo everyone
Hi.
Don’t copy me.
I get all my English from @boreal pewter.
Hello my name is Georgia , this is my first time here
I am little stupid
I am old woman
My name is chandra
I come from indonesia
This is my first time here too
There was a documentary about how brain learns new languages.
A professor was talking about his own experiences and how he managed to learn mandarin and get his fluency.
He was telling that he only knew about 100 words when he went to China and after 6 months
He suddenly realized that he knows most of the words that other's saying.
In that documentary he was suggesting to teachers to not try to teach grammar to beginner students as much as possible and just mimic what people use in their daily life.
With this technique brain learns faster and actually can understand language. Memorizing the rules isn't the key to learn a new language.
Hello chan
Yeah my first time here too my name is Maxence, i'm from france
If you really wanna sound like a native, learn the basics first, then mimic. That's my opinion.
i'm from paris
Anyways. Goodnight.
Welcome everyone!
Je parle aussi petit peu france I am from Brasil @Ni @plain salmon
Ravie de la savoir, and welcome in the server
Hallo Mam
@plain salmon je ne sais pas comment ça marche ça vraiment
Thanks 😊
Btw in indonesia, nkwis 3.00 am sir😆
My English is not very well
Me too i thinks it's just for chatting and speak engligh with native
@plain salmon moi aussi me too
Guys to chat, use #🫂|beginner-chat . This channel is for English questions only
Now I'm in a level that I can do that.
When I'm taking reading and listening tests, most of the times I get C1 and C2.
But as you can see
My writing isn't really good. Because I don't know anything about grammar.
It's time for me to learn the basic structures.
I second that. Actually literacy rate been really low through ages. Schooling system is a result of modern education but it did not hold back people from learning their own language.
When i see beginners being hard on themselves regarding grammar i just suggest them don't.
Putting pressure to learn rules may discourage.
It should be balanced.
I agree completely however it is nice to know the existence of some grammar rules beforehand and instead of memorizing them use comprehensible input instead like this
Can I say this?
' Sometimes we come around in my friend place'.
In my book come around means visit me in my home.
I was wondering how I can say we visit my friend in his home. @spare summit
Have you had any news about that ______ you applied for yet? "Job" or "Vacancy" please/
Vacancy
can I have an explanation?
Is this sentence correct?
"We have already had one like this"
Yeah.
Before selection it's vacancy means open for public (eligible people).
After selection it's (your) job that you suppose to do
That's what I can think of
We already have one like this (present)
We already had one like this(past)
We already have had one like this (present perfect)
Okie thx! 🥰
So which one is it 👀 past or present
Do the Americans don't use the word "weekend" often ?
Job
You don't apply for a vacancy, you apply for a job.
You get the job if there's a vacancy or a need.
The past one😄
Do Americans not use the word 'weekend' often? (double quotes can be used as well, I've used single quotes as I'm more comfortable using them)
Yes it is
Okay, thank you! 🥰
Sometimes we visit my friend
You can also say sometimes we come/go around my friends house
And you can also say place
However to me that sentence you made feels off, id recommend saying sometimes we go around to my friends place"
But still come around or go around are both fine
Thank you 
yeah thats right
No, that's wrong.
Why were you alone is correct.
Oh, yes.
@spare summit
I should use 'to' with
Come/go around, shouldn't I?
ye
Hello there!
Hey
Hello, guys! What is the difference between naughty and defiant?
defiant is like defying something and naughty is like being bad in general
Oke doke
...I saw opportunities to gain perspectives on policy-making in different periods of twentieth-century Japanese history, and to probe the distinctive Japanese practice of public non-accountability that protects high officials from liabilities under the law. If I had written the Showa emperor's story just a few years later, against the background of President George W. Bush's proclaimed “war on terrorism,”** the parallels with the 1930s and 1940s **would stand out more sharply.
What does the word "parallels" mean in this context? Can someone rephrase it for me
similarities with those time periods
hey, one of my friends asked me what "I lift her bridal type" means. Do you know?
i want to ask a question
is peopleS used? because i think it's just person and people but someone told me it is person people peopleS
i found that peopleS is only necessary when you refer to distinct ethnic groups but i never heard it
People for same group(nation, ethnicity, tribe etc)
Peoples for different groups(nations, ethnic backgrounds, tribes etc.)
I'm not sure what this means
Ya same lol
Hello, not sure if it's possible to ask that in that channel but I would like some help from an advanced/native speaker to get some words of the lyrics of that song : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=brMis5dd8H8
I write what I understand, leaving parts I don't understand with "?" (sometimes I have a more or less confident hypothesis, but I prefer to use "?" anyway, just in case)
The ??? fade away
The ??? away
Tell me on your ???, I'm alone
??? I'm alone
??? my mind ???
??? to delay, I'm alone
People cry and pray, I'm still trying
I'm not ???
[Same as before]
how i can learn english live ?
You can look up lyrics of a song online
These song lyrics are not available
Hi! I have a question that's been pondering me for days. I don't quite understand sentence adverbs. For example, in the sentence, "Later, the scientists rejected his idea," is "later" considered a sentence adverb?
What is a sentence adverb
The problem with being a native is that you can speak the language to a flawless extent, but don’t have a clue on the names of different English components. 
“What the fuck is a past participle” 
This is me
So me
So tell me what it is
😂
Also tell me what a past participle is
hello, i have a question, which one is correct, "why did you think i was japanese" or "why did you think i am japanese"
Both.
i think the "am" is right cause "did" here is auxiliary verb
Isnt vicinity some sort of cosmetic
No.
so... the second is more commonly used? it feels weird using was
Vicinity means nearby.
It depends on your sentence.
The area or region near or surrounding a particular place or thing.
"Why did you think I was Japanese" it implies that you're not Japanese but the listener thought you were.
And now you're asking him why he thought you were Japanese despite the fact that you are not Japanese.
Saying "Why did you think I was Japanese"
The use of the past tense "was" instead of the present tense "am" suggests that the speaker is not Japanese and is referring to a time in the past when the listener made an assumption about their nationality.
Ah i see, thabks for the clear answer!
Folks, wanna make sure
If a person says "you can take from them" about an amount of things, they mean that you can take as much as you want, but imply, that not everything?
Yes, it implies that there are limits on what you can take.
Similar words to busted and raided?
https://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus
Thesaurus is a great tool for finding synonyms
alot or a lot ?
Both
Grammar question. I would like to know if the following sentence is grammatically correct as it is or if I need to use the past participle. For example, should I say, "...the Diamond Boys HAD BEEN responsible" instead?
Sentence: We were investigating the robbery and found out that the Diamond Boys were the culprits.
Context: An officer talking about an old case.
Whats a sentence adverb and a past participle
please
I dont even know what a partaciple is on its own
This is what happens when you sleep through 6th grade english
i want to ask a question
is peopleS used? because i think it's just person and people but someone told me it is person people peopleS
i found that peopleS is only necessary when you refer to distinct ethnic groups but i never heard of it
people = plural of person
ive seen peoples before but im not sure if its grammatically correct and it definitely isnt plural of person
Pretty sure the second part is true, but i too have never really heard or used it
yea
lol true
can i say i had had my car fixed last month
transforming i had fixed my car last month into i had had my car fixed last month
and what happens if we change it to reported speech
Up
@fleet crown
I do remember i answered your same question earlier :/ hope you won't ask same question again xD
On the first sentence sounds like someone else had fixed your car while on the second one you fixed it by yourself.
you could just say,
"I had my car fixed last month"
assuming someone else fixed it
if you were the one that fixed it, it would then be
"I fixed my car last month"
I dont believe the second "had" is needed
He said that he had had his car fixed.
What spoil banana covering would be called?
spoil?
banana covering is called peel
Like the banana peel is looking fully riped?
spoil means ....ummm....like after a certain time a food item is not edible ( cant be eaten ) so we call it spoiled
riped means the final stage of maturity of the fruit
Yeah but what would the metaphor be?
hm?
In the UK a fruit can get mouldy even without mold or just being "off"
!
Also you are asking for synonyms not metaphors
ohh
tf
i was questioning
myself
over that
for a long time
cuz i couldnt understand what he/she meant
I think she's a woman
oh
done.!
Ik but you have begginer lvl and asia i want some americans and british ppl to answer
Yes, ‘peoples’ is a thing.
It’s refers to different nations/ groups.
‘The ancient peoples of the British Isles included the Anglo-Saxons, Picts and Celts.’
I believe it's a time connective!
Some people aren’t exactly on the same level as their role
so true
idk my level
so i selected intermediate
but i guess it shud be more than that
ok advanced matches better
is advanced < fluent?
no
it goes from begginer, intermediate, advanced, fluent then native
oo then how do you choose between fluent and advanced?
same q
i have the*
to me, the difference would be that fluent probs mean that you’re able to communicate without any sort of issue at all. You’d also know all the fundemental and core grammar, and you talk like a native
ahh i see! So it's up to us to decide which category we fall under?
yep!
sounds perfect
ooh alright, thanks sammy!
np
core grammar?
advanced stuff in grammar
not all fluent people need to know all their grammar
*what i mean is, like us natives you don’t need to remember the names of the rules
Tysm
True! But still they are important
Ik but i would rather hear it from advanced or more ppl
yeah
Bruhhh
Anyways)
Hello whats a past participle and a sentence adverb
Are you serious?
yes
@spare summit it's the 3rd form of verbs.
Go went gone
Gone is the past participle form of go
Got it?
Nope
so whats the perfect tense
You use past participle in perfect tenses
i have gone
thats perfect tense i thought
oh wait
so gone is the past participle
in that sentence
Perfect tenses are in this shape.
Present perfect : have + pp
Past perfect : had + pp
Future perfect :will have +pp
this is the pain pain of being a native i dont know these terms lol 😅
ohhh
ty
Pp == past participle
No worries 
the funny thing is i wouldnt even know what the perfect tense was if i wasnt learning another language rn lol
Hahaha
Same here.
I think comparing tenses in languages is the worst thing that a teacher can do
In Azeri there is about 44 tenses 
You can't match tenses between Azeri and English. 😄
o-o
Which language are you going to learn?
Iran, but my first native language is Azeri
ah
The second one is farsi
so northwest iran
Yep
How do you know that? That's strange 😄
i like linguistics
Ooh, great
I like scripts.
And I always wonder how they related to a language and sounds
ah nice
ن = n
I wonder what made people to create these shapes.
And why they sound same
well its just people interpreting a sound differently
@spare summit I remember when I was 5 yrs old, Idk how, but I found a way to relate sound and script by myself
And wrote my fathers name 😄 in farsi
o-o wow
No one thought me that, I just learned it.
But Idk how 😄
Because of that, I always wonder is there a relationship between scrips and how they sound or not.
It was just a coincidence
@spare summit and adverbs describe how/when/where things happened.
Like these Quickly, slowly, yesterday, last week, here, there, today, daily, never, rarely, extremely, annually
yeah ik adverbs but i didnt know if there was a difference between adverbs and sentence adverbs
As I know sentence adverbs, are kinda adverbs that can modify a clause or a sentence.
And they usually end with 'ly' and they usually come at the beginning of a sentence.
Actually Fortunately Regrettably
Apparently Hopefully Seriously
Basically Ideally Strangely
Briefly Incidentally Surprisingly
Certainly Indeed Thankfully
Clearly Interestingly Theoretically
Conceivably Ironically Truthfully
Confidentially Naturally Ultimately
Curiously Predictably Wisely
Evidently Presumably
These are sentence adverbs
@spare summit
Did you get it?
I see ty
They show what you think about the sentence as a whole, unlike normal adverbs that modify some specific verb
I did it ironically - not a sentence adverb (I did it for the purpose of irony)
I did it, ironically - a sentence adverb (the fact I did it was ironic)
Thanks for confusing us 😆
Are there any slang idioms to say "I'm very hungry"?
Or a very vernacular expression?
I am starving.
I could eat a horse.
Etc.
^
@spare summit are you from the US?
nah the uk
It's __their __house .
what does __their __refer to ?
context?
Their refers to a group of people.
what means “i’d”?
i would
but it’s only “would”?
thankss
tysmmm
Can you call a really small pebble a "pebblet"?
You can, but nobody would
It’s a made up word
I don't really understand the question, As you can see is not what you ask is How you ask it
Heres a better question: what are the similarities between "as" and "how"
(They are not interchangeable words most of the time)
oh tysmmm
Sounds like a pokemon
All words are, to be fair, made up. That said, most natives probably don't know the word.
Hi, guys. I am trying to get the part of the interview here https://youtu.be/ADXZHAYPhMI?t=212
The host asking something like “It is a part of main, i think? Or just a little unwell, milking for a as small role hit?”. I can’t get it. Please, help me. Thanks
the president got the congressional authority he needed to increase the American presence in Vietnam—the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, passed by an overwhelming margin in the Senate
what does "passed by an overwhelming margin" mean? can someone rephrase it for me
Heyo! I have a question regarding quantifiers. In my English exam a bit of time ago, I reached a weird sentence while solving my exam. It was
Can you give me _______ advice?
- any 2) many 3) much
The options were pretty inconvenient. Two answers (any, much) aren't that suitable to put in the blank, but there was only one ticket and one answer. No multiple choices, no unavailable options allowed. I was hesitated between any and much, and finally I chose to circle much, though both are considered correct even if by %1. Is my answer considered correct?
Note: There wasn't any additional context or clarification that tells what to do or pay attention to. It was just this sentence and there words
But there supposed to be one correct answer, and the others wrong, but much here can be correct
Yeah it's confusing
any/much can be used
hmmmmmmmmmmmm
Ex sentence
For solving
To solve
Right? 🙂
Yep
Any
"Much" and "many" sound off
but isn't much grammatically correct?
What's the difference between
"From 1965 through 1968"
And "From 1965 to 1968"
"Through" sounds like something active non stop from that period to that period, while "To" sounds like something that existed from that year to that year
Since is a question you are checking if "any" advice exist, if it was an answer you can politely demand for "many" question, "much" is like undefined amount but is not used in this context
Thanks, another question:
the president got the congressional authority he needed to increase the American presence in Vietnam—the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, passed by an overwhelming margin in the Senate
what does "passed by an overwhelming margin" mean? can someone rephrase it for me
Does it mean that the majority supported the passage with only a very small opposition
Seems to imply there was an election or a law proposal that has passed, maybe the phrase is incomplete
But yeah seems to be "people greatly approve that"
What does "Pulling your legs" mean?
When someone wishes you to break a leg, and you take it literally💀
How do i say the character is calm (idk how yo word it)
"boaz tries to become calm"?
I need help
Ty
How do i use "fateful"
What are you trying to say?
What does " all the wear and tear" mean in this sentence?
" luckily the car can take all the wear and tear. "
The car can handle some tearing by usage
So what does this mean then? 
Do it mean it's still usable?
Yes the car is strong and it will resist all the off road driving
https://media.tenor.com/NdAl3LyxRqQAAAAM/rally-wrc.gif wear and tear
The car can take it all
Now I got it
Thank you 
so "many"?
It's a question so "any"
I chose "much" though
You can't cause is a question
Our teacher says that "much" is only used with question and negative
Also a question is countable so you can have many questions but not much questions
The sentence is
Can you give me _____ advice?
not can you give me _____ question?
I'm explaining the grammar so you will arrive to the solution logically
Re read the first answer, the solution is there
It's the only sentence, so we actually don't know what's wanted
That's why I got confused
||Can you give me any advice?||
Oh sorry I noticed now @dense pulsar
You can demand many advices
Hi
Anybody knows the meaning of "camp in tone"?
Fallout games can be camp in tone
’Fallout games can be camp in tone.’
The person who wrote this believes that Fallout games are somewhat theatrical and ‘over the top’.
How do I stop talking in monotone
You can whisper or cry aloud
wdym
Try changing your pitch
Hi guys
Do we say
I need a pair of trousers
Or
i need trousers
Same question for "pants"
Like i see that this is one item as a whole unlike socks and shoes which are consistent of two items so is it right to say "pair" with it when i mean to talk about one item
You can just say "I need trousers." If you are in a store for example, you could tell someone "I need a pair of trousers." I prefer to say pants because it is a lot more common where I live.
Yes. A pair of socks, a pair of shoes, a pair of gloves, a pair of pants etc.
When you say "I need trousers", it means that you need one or more trousers, but it isn't specific about the quantity.
Can you give me some advice? is correct. Much is used for uncountable nouns.
Yes, advice is uncountable
But as I know in interrogation or negetive sentences we use 'any' instead of 'some'
Oh yes. That's right. My mistake..I didn't notice... Yes I also learned that any is used in negative and interrogative sentences and some in positive.
hello lovlies, anyone's got a good online dictionary suggestion for checking different forms of a word?
Like for example the gerund form of a word or the past tense of a word
Most dictionaries give you inf, past, past participle (e.g. merriam webster, collins, dictionary.com, wiktionary)
The gerund is always formed regularly so there's no need for a dictionary to give it
yea
but sometimes i wanna double check my pronunciation
for the purpose of further advancing my accent *
alrighty bestie
let me check them rq
For pronunciation, if dictionaries don't have it then forvo and youglish are good
I'll check those too, thank you bestie 😌
I have a question!
Where did he "came"
Or
Where did he "come"
Which one is correct?
I see so when i say "i need a pair of trousers" it means i need one right
You mean "when" ?
Where did he "came/come" from? is the full sentence.
Yes.
Which do you think is correct?
Come, Am I right?
i dont even know why tbh lol
It is the form of past simple tense, The question form. Wh question + did + Subj. + V.1
- obj.
Am I right?
It's a bit more simple than that, haha. You only conjugate one verb. Since the verb "did" is conjugated, everything else is going to be in the infinitive.
Yeah, I already know it for the first time, just wanna talk with you guys!
Is this sentence correct?
Sorry my bad, this gift is for Ryan but it’s for another Ryan, the name is repeated
I’m a bit nervous for the first time I post a question here🤣
No no! Don’t be afraid to ask anything English related!
Please put quotation marks around the sentence
So that we don’t get confused by reading it lol
But yeah it looks fine, but I’d replace the second comma with a full stop instead
How to use "according" in a sentence?
i think that it would sound like:
according to opinions, the game "cyberpunk" is a complete mess
or
according to recent data, app development jobs are paying very well
correct me if i'm wrong
haha thank u
🍪
Got it, I will put quotations around the sentence next time, tyvm mate😊
what's the difference between "photo of bil" and "photo of bil's"?
Assuming ‘Bil’ is a person:
- Photo of Bil ~ Bil is the subject of the photo. It’s a picture of Bil.
- Photo of Bil’s - Bil owns/ took the photo. It’s his possession. It could be a photo of any subject matter.
Sonic's "mum" looks well above Sonic's eyes when they are talking about being one family, hiding being a car wreck.
👆👆👆👆👆
This is a comment on a movie scene where they were driving a car and then it crashed,
Someone please explain the purpose of it?
Looks like an error
Probably should read “behind a car wreck”
Need more context
Looks written by a non native.
I see no purpose
It’s word salad.
Lol
Photo of bil is a complete sentence and makes sense. Just like above said, it's a picture of bil himself.
Photo of bil's is a phrase and doesn't make complete sense. You gotta add something to make a complete sense like photo of bil's car/wallet/wife/noodles.
Is this sentence: "Can you give me much advice?" grammatically correct? Don't judge by the "this sounds off" or "this is natural" please, I just want if this form of sentence with the use of "much" can be grammatically correct
Yes it’s correct.
Yes, hence much instead of many
:).
My teacher wants an evidence that it's correct grammatically from a verified/well-known source. He says that much can only be used with "how" -> "how much" lol. Where can I find an evidence about that so that he gives me the mark
He is definitely wrong
The only evidence you need is the definition of much
will I find it on cambridge for example?
@dense pulsar
ty!
Also you don’t say ‘an evidence’. Evidence is an uncountable noun so you just say ‘my teacher wants evidence’
Hopefully he doesn't persist in his mistake
Thanks for the info
Chatgpt says this
The sentence is grammatically correct, but it would be more natural to say "Can you give me some advice?" or "Can you give me a lot of advice?" instead of "much advice."
I take care of the grammatical side
Alr said that I want a straight answer
Hey, is there a difference between saying British and Britain.
For example :(the British colonization) or ( the Britain colonization)🥲
You still can say evidences
For some weird reason
No. Nobody would say that
I mean maybe in academic English
But it sounds very very strange in daily language
British is the adjective. Britain is the noun
It would be the British colonization
Colonisation
Umm ,I've been told that both are correct
No, you’d definitely say British colonisation
Okay, thanks
It’s the same reason you’d say British empire and not Britain empire
Thanks
Hello everyone 👋😄
@flat rune can I dm you?
Of course, there's a difference between "British" and "Britain"! "British" refers to the people or things related to the United Kingdom or Great Britain, while "Britain" refers to the country itself. So if you were talking about the colonization of the United Kingdom, you would use "British colonization," not "Britain colonization."
the difference between "photo of Bil" and "photo of Bil's" is that the first one refers to a photo of a person named Bil, while the second one refers to a photo that belongs to or is associated with someone named Bil. So if you're talking about a photo that belongs to Bil, you would say "photo of Bil's." But if you're talking about a photo of Bil himself, you would say "photo of Bil.
A more natural way to phrase the sentence would be "Can you give me a lot of advice?" or simply "Can you give me some advice?" So there you have it, champ. Don't try to overcomplicate things, just keep it simple and straightforward.
Ohh , thank u a lot
no problem
There was only this choice!!!
There wasn't a lot of or some!!
This
I have a question about nouns _cases.
Which noun case dose this sentence apply for.(you opened my eyes)
Oh nevermind it's in the vocative case.
can someone recommend me any video with tips or whatever of how to make sentences like a native speaker? i mean, formulate the phrases properly
i'd appreciate
This is an interesting request
Book your first lesson now 👉 https://bit.ly/book-your-first-lesson
In this video, we will show you lots of English phrases to sound like a native speaker. Why? Because using common English phrases can help you feel more confident in daily conversations with native speakers and increase your English vocabulary.
If you want to know how to speak ...
how is the best way to learn grammar guys?
Read a lot and practice often. Make sure you understand the fundamentals of grammar before being able to memorise them
like from books?
can u gimmie recommendation book for reading?
ok,
Im just practicing via Duolingo, rn
It depends on the level you’re reading at the moment
I hope the app is useful
A2 mybe
yea it works i guess
Im sorry i can’t really recommend anything because the novels I read would most likely be confusing. You can try looking at #🗃|resources to see if there’s anything to your liking
its ok thanks for the suggestion
No problem,I'm glad I could help
…?
Hey can you explain to me what the vocative case is?
Now I'm intrigued what novels you talking about) ^ ^
ive read 2 romance novels but they're a bit cheesy
Can you name them if you don't mind ? Well otherwise in DM?
Please help me clarify one point. When we talk about a particular software, what preposition should we use?
For example:
I work on various projects in Figma.
I work on various projects at Figma.
in
“It was a hard trip, especially when the closest town was within a several hours' walk through the darkness of the forest.”
Does this sentence support the idea that you need to walk several hours through the darkness of the forest to get to the town?
@mint seal
thank you
yup yup yup
you get a cookie for being correct
🍪
Thx for your help)
yes
hello
"I'm gonna put some dirt in your eye" what does the phrase mean?
(This , that and there)
What is her place in the party of speech?
This doesn’t make sense.
Re-write please.
Is it ok to say "Encircle the letter of the correct answer." or it should be "circle"?
Just circle
At
Sounds like a response, but it doesn't make any sense without context, so I assume this is Spiderman 3
Peter Parker is reacting to the name of the guy on the photo of Spiderman, I assume that "I'm going to behave dirty (above the rules probably violently) and you going to see me"
Yeah, it is Spiderman 3. Thanks for the help!
Hello! I'm thinking of writing a paper about aphantasia for my semantics class but I'm unsure how to go about it. I don't even know if it could be done.
Does anyone have any tips, good resources, or advice? If the theme isn't the best is there something similar I could do?
This is an English language study group, so I don't know what to say other than use Google?
I know, I just wanted to check if someone had any info. Sorry for bothering
Is there a specific way you need to write it, or are you just writing about it
And you dont know how to start?
Hello guys
I'm unsure whether the theme is good or not? Whether aphantasia could have something with semanthics and I just needed some advice
Google isn't really helping
Is the definition of figure: a drawing that represents something or something?
Kinda yeah but it could also mean different things like in the phrase "figure of speech"
An outline(composing a shape or an idea).
This can fit in most of the context
It was defined like this in out hieroglyphics lesson
In the exam there was a question "Syn of drawing:___"
and the answer was "figure"
I put hieroglyphics tho
today I found this sentence: I owe old man "a favor or two"
What does "a favor or two" mean ?
I have searched google but not thing was clear
A favor or two basically means gotta do something when asked by the old man(in return because old man may have helped speaker in the past)
Is this a idiom ?
Not really. An idiom has a meaning that's more separated from the words used. Like "it's raining cats and dogs"."A favor or two" is too literal to be an idiom.
This ^
Hello everyone, I have times where my english is not good and where I don't feel like it but there are also times where my english is good and I can speak properly
Why's that?
my level is c2 proficient
Maybe the comfort* level matters? Or the topic you choose? Maybe interest or wide knowledge in certain topics? Possibly formal informal settings have an impact?
Maybe your teacher can assess better whom you're in frequently in touch with or your practice buddy.
"I decided to take him under my wing"
what's the meaning of "take him under my wing"???
I'd conclude it means : decided to take care of him ?
did you draw this
Looks like it was drawn in an exercise book
Or took him as an apprentice kinda
is it offensive to ask people has the cat got your tongue guys?
also why the idiom its not over until the fat lady sings could someone give me hints on where it stems from?
yes.
Is not offensive, more like you are being too much informal, is fine if is a friend but a stranger could see it as being rude
nah its diary of a wimpy kid lol
Can the word reflexes be replaced with agility here?
What's the difference between "batch" and "consignment"?
Example of batch:
"A fly, i understand, seems insignificant, but trust me, the batch will be good for nothing if we don't clear the contaminant!"
Example of consignment:
"There's been a consignment of art dumped in the front... You'd better watch it!"
Consignment is like meant for someone
Meant for someone to what?
No i mean like
Its a batch which is meant for someone
According to google at least
But it also sounds right to me
So, like a special batch for a particular buyer?
Yeah i guess
Thanks
i think they both apply to this situation so you could
He forgets his backpack.
Is (His backpack) a possisseive pronoun or possisseive adjective?!
What I know that possisseive adjective always be like a (possisseive adjective_noun) but I want to make sure if I'm correct or not.
Whats a possessive pronoun and a possessive adjective
Well, pronouns relate to nouns. You can use a pronoun in the subject or an oblique (anything other than the nominative or vocative) argument. For instance, with English's default SVO word order, you can say, "I am me." Herein, "I" is a first person pronoun as the subject and "me" is a first person pronoun as the direct object. Now, possessive pronouns are words like "mine", "yours", "hers", etc. Why? Well, they can act in place of nouns (e.g., "that is mine", where "mine" is the object). Possessive adjectives cannot be used in place of nouns; instead, possessive adjectives act like adjectives. For instance, you can't really say, "That is my." Why? Well, "my" acts as an adjective. However, you can say, "That is my dog." Similarly, you can say "That is a good dog." Thus, words like "my", "your", "his", "their", "her", and "its" aren't pronouns at all.
Ohhh
Possessive adjective
What's the difference between "get bored" and "got bored"?
Well, "get" is in the present tense, and "got" is in the past tense.
Oh I see, I usually see many people using "got bored" in a present tense, thanks
In not expert but, with did (past simple) or was (past continuous) you are already indicating that it is past, so you have to use one, you cannot combine both.
Owner - Name of a person that owns property
Own - Claiming or possessing property
Thanksss
How can I learn English fast
?
I understand the sentences but idk how to make a correct sentences
I had made a guide in pinned messages but if you’re asking specifically, you need to revise your grammar rules in order to make sentences
Specifically correct ones
You also need to understand how they work
However, don’t be afraid to make a sentence and worry if it’s correct or not
You’ll learn through your mistakes
Can you send me the guide?
Thanks
As you were saying in that guide I just want to learn socially English
That’s my priority
Yes yes
You need it
What kind of grammar
Otherwise how are you going to speak English?
Bc Idk
Literally everything
Sometimes I know sometime i forgot the words
Speech, sentence structures, verbs, tenses etc.
You gotta be able to learn a lot of grammar to express what you want to say
But when you learn these rules and continuously practice them, you won’t need to remember how they work
I know how to use the present simple,future simple and past progressive
Though a lot of beginners know better grammar than others
That’s good then
Is it correct that I say it’s in this question
Or I need to say is it
?
Well, I’m a native speaker so I don’t remember anything about grammar. I think the most important part is learning the sentence structures. Basic ones like subject + verb
Ah yes I think the same
*Which grammar is most important
Your question was almost correct though
But some grammar has an estructure like after yo about with need to use a verb with ign
This is gerund
I think you can phrase it like “Which do you think is the most important grammar”
I’m assuming you’re right because I don’t even know what gerund is
Ohh that’s the problem idk how to make correct questions
😭😭
It’s ok, you were able to get your message across
It’s important for others to be able to understand you, but you also gotta type correctly
Or speak correctly
Then you can start messing around
It’s like learning the rules of anatomy before you can create whatever artistic chaos you want
Im trying that’s the reason why I’m here
That’s good
You’re doing great, honestly
Why so?
My friend requests are off, I’ll send you one instead
Ok
I will
Well they use it to describe they got bored in the past but they can still be bored in the present it just depends on context
You can say "what were you doing"
Flashcards and yt grammar vids for fast learning but if you cant be bothered to do all that just talk in english with people and over time youll just start to understand and be able to write your own sentences more
And in either method come here whenever you feel stuck on something and someone will help you out
Yeah I did that and after 2 yaers my weak point is still grammar
years
I literally do not know which sentence is the correct one here:
'Some natural disaster have been occuring lately.'
'Some natural disaster have occured lately.'
If i............ Closer to my office, i could walk to work
A)lived
B)would live
C)had lived
D)live
Which one is the right one?
I chose A
hi
D
Guys I need help in conversations
Like the native speakers can tell a lot of stuff
while me I'm just replying with basic messages
Is it because I'm not yet fluent
unlike in my native language, I can talk about a lot of stuff and things
which one do you think is correct?
wrong, try again
i was joking with u
It's either A or C
It’s A
But why should it be A and not C?
you were right
the sentence isn’t past perfect i guess, im not sure tho but its not C even tho its gramatically correct
Have a cookie for the right answer
🍪
I'm hungry so i will gladly accept the cookie
ah im re-reading it again and it makes sense with C more actually sorry sorry
it’s about context and tense here
well A was not correct but you are kind, so you deserve the cookie
it’s in past perfect so A wouldn’t be correct(I don’t know my tenses too well, feel free to correct me)
man I think I’m not braining
You mean your brain doesn't function well? 😆😆
yes
Welcome to the club 
thank u
Are you Australian?
Yeh you're right here.
There are Two events in the past dependent on/related to each other. So one needs to be written as past perfect (had+v3) and another event as past tense (v2).
@mint seal got ya back mate take rest 🤙
indeed I am lad!
thanks lad!
ehh?? I’m not that cool HAHA, you are tho!

but thank you for the kind words
Neither are correct lol
Some = plural so natural disasters
My bad I suck at English grammar
What really matters is my grade
Bro i accidentally wrote ja lol
Oh are you learning it in school
No, my English is self-taught
So then I can apply for a good school
Ohh
Nvm
Well if you have any questions about grammar that you see then just ask here
Yeah, when do you use has or have been, I studied this and forgot and the cycle continues
has/have, has been/have been
Grammar is taught in Vietnam very strictly so I need this
Pretty sure C is grammatically correct but you will even see natives use A, i originally thought it was correct until i read option C lol
Ah
Has is for 3rd person singular and have is for everything else
But in what usecase?
He has, she has
And then have for everything else
“I have been learning English”
“My friend has a new phone”
Oh sorry I meant the tenses
You have i have we have etc
Oh
as a native idk the names of the tenses but i would describe have been/has been as a continous action that started a while ago and still continues to the present
E.g i have been learning german for 10 months
Difference between
“I have been learning English”
"I am learning English"
I have been = you have been doing something continously in the past and present
I am learning = only at present
^
My English is dumb I meant clears


