#📚|english-questions
1 messages · Page 19 of 1
Here in Egypt we study british not american tho
And they don’t care about adjectives
what
I’ve never met an Egyptian
dam
But whatever
0_0
British and English are closely related in many ways
But listen
When you say quick and quickly it doesn’t really matter because at the end of the day they might be adverb or an adjective but they mean the same thing
👀
ah
Roaaar
meow
To Americans that’s just a sound a cat makes we don’t think of adverbs or adjectives
LOl
Just to make it easy to you, adverbs or adjectives don’t we really matter just think of the meaning of the word to get the understanding
so natives don't care and we Egyptian ministry of education care wow how messed up is that
For example
😆
@mint seal
Come back here
I’m being so for real
spam ping
We don’t think of adverbs or adjectives
😉
For example when we say, oh my god it’s a palm tree!!
even if formal thing ?
Oh
America is considered one of the most informal
Adverbs and adjectives still don’t matter
Which means In general
So I got scammed by education system
OH
OH
u can still study there
But I’m reality
I'll sui Egypt
American children and even American adults don’t even think of adverbs or adjectives
If we know the meaning of the word
We just speak it
“I am a man”
Basically
ok
Americans are very informal
We don’t care about formality
We just speak
English has fewer rules and it’s shorter
yes
its better than british
it's pretty village,but there's ......... anything to do here
do we use Hardly or nearly or Hard?
Hardly is right right ?
@silent flame
HARDLY AND HARD ARE THE SAME THINF BUDDY 😭
just because you add a ly to it doesn’t change its meaning
Nearly is basically almost
BRUHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
But i have to choose
lmao

You on a quiz
Hi. Does anybody know what kind of sentence is that and what grammar rule should I use to build such sentences? Are 1, 3 wrong and 2, 4 correct?
If I were you, I would be proud of myself when I finished.
If I were you, I would be proud of myself when I finish.
If I were you, I would be proud of myself when I have finished.
If I were you, I would be proud of myself when I'm finished.
?
1 and 4 are the same answers
What’s the context?
I saw some meme on Facebook and the structure of the sentence was the same as number 4. I was surprised as I have never seen such "conditional sentence + when" construction before.
If I were you, I would be proud of myself when I read this book.
Is it grammatically correct?
Yes
Nope
Transformation of sentences has one key rule. You can't change the meaning of the sentence
If that's so, why is 'hard' wrong in this sentence?
Hardly
Bro what in gods name
@silent flame this guy has no idea what he's talking about
More hard doesn’t make grammatical sense
Harder does
I said you before or
I said you earlier
I said to you earlier
Thanks
Hey I have a question, whether awe-inspiring means something splendid, Is awe-inspired an adjective for a person who is amazed ?
For example Can we change mind-boggling into mind-boggled for a person ?
Mind blowing?? Or mind boggling?
You have to change the meaning here though, that's the point of it
You negate it, so the meaning is the opposite of what it was before
It's just that what "opposite" means could go either way
Original meaning: There is a person who did it
Possible negation 1: There is not a person who did it
Possible negation 2: There is a person who did not do it
Based on whether you negate the quantity of people (someone -> no one) or the action (did it -> did not do it)
Hope that's clearer now
The object of "say" is the speech that comes out of your mouth, never the person
"I said you 'hello'" is wrong for example
You either want "I said <something> to you" or "I told you <something>", depending on exactly what you mean
E.g. "I stood on the mountain, awe-inspired by the view" yea using it like this sounds fine to me, even if I don't remember hearing something like that.
This one, not so much
Different meanings
1st is something incredible, surprising, you can barely believe it
"the number of chickens in the world is mind-blowing"
2nd means confusing, often in an overwhelming way
Ohhh 👍🏻
Anyways
Any English beginner books (pdf) ??
Thx for help @boreal pewter
For this one only boggled could be good instead of mind-boggled?
If anything that sounds ever weirder
That might be wrong actually
I would rather be taking french lessons
Julia claimed to be watching
Frank must be playing football
Hello guys, I've a question
if a person said to you "My name is Stevens with (B or V)" how can I know, what B or V is he refering? does the B and V have different pronunciation sounds? or not? or simply you cannot know what B or V is that persona refering
Nobody will say "My name is Steven(s) with a B" because Steven(s) can't possibly have a B in it lol
Steven and Stephen are 2 names that can be read the same way (with a V sound in the middle)
B and V make very different sounds
Completely unrelated
They're as different as T and S
alright
Number 6 has to be: you should have been protecting. Also, why aren't you writing full sentences? You're ending your answers with ... but I would imagine that your teacher wants you to actually finish the sentences 🙂
What does drippin means? Guys.
It’s a slang imo it’s similar to "cool" for instance: he’s got drip
This is a rule Alc
Grammar Question: Can you use "they" to refer to food?
For example: Some food went missing from the larder. I think they were stolen by the cook.
Since food is uncountable, using 'it' is better
The first moment I take my first sip of Starbucks Frappuccino, I'm transported into a world of rich and complex flavors. Is this a good hook for writing a descriptive essay about my favorite coffee?
This is good but you don’t need to say “first moment”, just “the moment” works better
Otherwise perfect though
thank you so much 🙏🏻
Hello, I'm new here! I want to learn english
From the moment I took a sip of my Starbucks frappucino, I was transported into a world of rich and complex flavors
thanks 
I have a dog called Fido, therefore all dogs are called Fido...
Yes, there are exercises where this is the goal. There are also exercises that just want you to negate a sentence. Why must the specific rule from the image you posted apply to every exercise about negation?
Even assuming it is that kind, there are still problems:
- You can't apply the same transformation to "someone did it" unless you're prepared to write "someone didn't not do it" (completely insane), or to change the sentence so much it barely resembles the original, e.g. "It is not true that no one did it" (calling this a simple "transformation" is pushing it)
- The example in that image doesn't even keep the meaning unchanged. If anything, the main reason for saying the latter is exactly because it doesn't mean they like her. Looking at that phrase, the first situation I think of is something like:
"What do they think of her?"
"Well, they don't dislike her..." (implied: but they don't like her either)
"Ah." (understands the implication, because if they liked her then the other person would've just said they like her)
In general you can. "They" works for anything plural, people or objects.
"I don't regret eating those 3 sandwiches. They were delicious."
(but as CO said, "food" isn't plural, so not in your sentence)
thanks for your input! 🙂
It is true that negation of such a sentence is odd, but it exists in English.
For the given sentence, 'None could but it was done'- is the closest negation I can think of.
This is similar to negation of sentences like 'He ate it' which would be 'None but he ate it'.
Sentence syntax question. Does the following sentence look weird to you?
Sentence: I did one less rep of curls than I was supposed to.
"None could but it was done" this doesn't make sense. "None could**,** but it was done" would be grammatical, but wouldn't have much to do with the original.
Do you mean "None could but do it"? That's also grammatical but means no one could help doing it i.e. everyone ended up doing it.
"None but he ate it" (or to make it more normal, "no one/nobody but him ate it") doesn't have the same meaning as "he ate it", it has the same meaning as "only he ate it" so again I don't really see how this would be a simple transformation
It looks completely fine to me
There's a faint chance that in an exam you might be marked down for using "less" instead of "fewer" if your examiner is exceptionally prescriptive (bc rep is countable), but in real life "less" is more natural here
why would someone mark it down for saying basically the same word
Bc there's this old """rule""" that with countable nouns you use "fewer" and with uncountable nouns, "less"
I was corrected for this a bunch of times in school by one of my English teachers
really? i never even heard of that
Yea you'd have to be incredibly unlucky to be done for that, but some people are still unjustifiably pedantic about it so I thought I'd mention it
lol okay
We would buy many sweets when we were young.
What does that mean?
it means that the speaker and the other person/people they're including with "we" bought sweets often while they were young
I mean would buy
= used to buy
Alr tyvm
"Used to buy" is definitely more common
Guys what does "someone is icy" means?
It means that they’re like basically fashionable
Specifically it’s usually used when a person is wearing a lot of jewelry
But mind you this is generally slang, its to be avoided in formal contexts
Cold, no?
Because icy is cold but ice is just to be cool
Strange English slang
Icy cold heart
Icy, as in just really cold person
The specific phrase they cited is generally American(I most often hear the term in AAVE) slang to mean a person looking good wearing jewelry(particularly diamonds in many contexts)
American slang is really odd
e.g. “you lookin icy with them chains on”
ed is past tense, like they’ve already done it
Like theres Adventurous, then theres adventured meaning the theoretical person has done this adventure in the past
Adventuriing is like they’re currently doing it
e.g. mark cooked food vs mark is cooking food
Iced out would be the "better" term? Might be a regionalized dialect
Iced out and icy are used interchangeably for that purpose at least where im from
Nobody uses icy where I'm from lol
@blazing smelt
I want to make a video call with someone who will be my frien
hi i have a question, is the sentence "I guess we'll have to agree to disagree" rude to say?>
Not really. It's an agreeable way to end a disagreement. If neither side wants to budge, there's really no other way around it.
I see, so the other person wont get offended right? Just making sure
Because for me that sentence feels like "lets not talk about this anymore"
That is what it's saying, but it's usually for the sake of both parties. It's not really rude to try and avoid strife.
Okay, thanks for the explanation!
what does “the Big P” means?
Any chance you can provide us a context?
Yeah that can have multiple meanings, some of which are very…
Interesting to say the least
hey folks
I got a quick question for top notch tryhard fluent english speakorz (unlike myself lol)
because I can't find an answer in the W I D E web
does the sentence "smth needs compensating" make sense?
to compensate --> infinitive
compensation --> noun
compensating --> present participle or gerund? and therefore functions as my substitute noun?
when I say "smth needs compensation" I personally think of the "compensation" as a payment but that meaning isn't the one I want to convey with my sentence... I guess
I feel like "smth needs compensating" has a different, larger(?), w i d e r , rather general meaning and describes the act of doing compensation instead of an undefined result, which is the compensation
I'm confused because I can't find anything on the topic of using "compensating" as a gerund
ok nvm
any verb can become a gerund if the corresponding requirements for using a gerund are given
i must've fckn googled hella wrong
just in case anybody else wants to know about gerunds'n'stuff:
Gerunds and infinitives can replace a noun in a sentence.
Gerund = the present participle (-ing) form of the verb, e.g., singing, dancing, running.
Infinitive = to + the base form of the verb, e.g., to sing, to dance, to run.
Whether you use a gerund or an infinitive depends on the main verb in the sentence.
I expect to have the results of the operation soon. (Infinitive)
I anticipate having the research completed eventually. (Gerund)
Gerunds can be used after certain verbs including enjoy, fancy, discuss, dislike, finish, mind, suggest, recommend, keep, and avoid.
-
After prepositions of place and time.
I made dinner before getting home.
He looked unhappy after seeing his work schedule. -
To replace the subject or object of a sentence
Lachlan likes eating coconut oil.
Jumping off a cliff is dangerous, but a real thrill.
Infinitives can be used after certain verbs including agree, ask, decide, help, plan, hope, learn, want, would like, and promise.
-
After many adjectives:
It is hard to make dinner this late.
I find it difficult to describe my feelings about writing research essays. -
To show purpose:
I left for Russia to study Russian.
I came to the office to solve the mystery of the missing keys.
....., with whom he had won a Nobel Prize in chemistry.
A) The French chemist Pierre Curie is less known than his wife
B) John B. Goodenough worked on how to improve lithium-ion batteries
C) George P. Smith and Gregory P. Winter worked together in 2018
D) Aziz Sancar, Tomas Lindahl and Paul Modrich studied DNA repair
E) Frances H. Arnold worked on the directed evolution of enzymes
I need help in this question mates 🙂
what are the questions
I need help to do a writing
those are statements
oh
its about grammar
.
not only relative clause
it includes most grammar rules in it
so it can be confusing a bit
so do I
but can you explain why?
because the clause ends with talking about a person
i think
it just feels the most right out of all of theml
because some dont mention another person
but with the ones that do it doesnt make sense still
ty my brother
I think its the correct answer
but I am going to write one more question
🙂
alr
Einstein's most famous formula is E=MC2, where .........
A) it is used to measure the energy a particular amount of mass has
B) changed the whole idea of space and time
C) C stands for the speed of light and M for mass
D) can be used to show that matter and energy are actually the same
E) he published it in 1905
@spare summit I thought it as D
thats a science question lol
its also relative clause 😄
Does C refer to place ?
no but it sounds the best out of all of them
Einstein's most famous formula is E=MC2, where he published it in 1905
doesnt sound right
Einstein's most famous formula is E=MC2, where, can be used to show that matter and energy are actually the same
definitely doesnt sound right
unless you did a typo or forgot to write something on question D in the discord message i think its C
yes I haven't chosen one yet
did you copy and paste them from your test or did you type them
I've typed
yes its true
ty
if its not C its A
i dont think it would be because "where can" doesn't make sense
if it was "where it can" then it would make a bit more sense
.
no problem 👍
In a way it does yes
Inside that formula, that's the place where c & m are here
The other options don't work
To say A or E you would have to change "where" to "which" and remove "it"
To say B or D, you'd need just to change "where" to "which"
Most of man's cultural roots lie in prehistory, of which we know very little.
A) We don't know much information about prehistory,where most of our cultural roots lie.
B)We don't know much about the prehistoric roots of our culture although We know prehistory well
C)Man spent most of his time in prehistory, when he had almost no culture at all.
D)All We have known so far about prehistory is that our cultural roots are there.
E)Other than the fact that its roots are in prehistory, We don't know anything about our culture
Which one has the closest meaning
We don't know much about our prehistoric ancestors, who hold cultural roots tying to us in the modern day
Which Option has the closest meaning (It is a relative Clause question)
It is not related with our ancestors it is grammar
Hey, i just wanted to know if this sentence was correct and if there was only Past unreal please :
"Had I not modernized the French army, it would not have become a formidable force across Europe."
thankyou !
Hi guys i have a strange question
What do you call a place where a vendor sells merchandise on the ground
Like... I know we call it a vendor booth or stall when he sells in a.... Booth or a small cabin... But what if he is selling on a mat on the ground is thre a name for that?
Guess this needs a native English speaker to answer
anyone can tell me, how i can learn english faster, and which english concepts are important to learn faster?
He was so short his chin would have been underwater
Why r we using have been n not had been?
"would have been" is in the conditional/hypothetical tense.
To clarify, it is known as the "third conditional" and is made up of "if + past perfect" or "would + have + past participle" and refers to past hypothetical events.
If we were expressing a present hypothetical (also possible in the context), we'd use "would be" but we'd never use "would had."
Got it thanks bro
Complicated grammar question.
At this point in time, this person is narrating past events.
The event in question took place last year. What was the event about? He built a statue for his late father.
But, in so doing, he neglected his mother's feelings. She hated her husband.
So this guy is narrating this past event right now to a 3rd party. He feels bad about neglecting his mother's feelings.
So the question is should he say, "I have neglected my mother's feelings..." or "I neglected my mother's feelings..."?
I know the present perfect tense is used to describe events that took place in the past but are still affecting the present. But in this case, the whole statue thing is a done thing. He built that statue last year, so the whole neglecting his mom's feelings thing should be over and done with already?
Hey, how is the use of "may I have?"
"may I" is more official
Since "He built a statue" and "her mother hated his father", we should say "He neglected".
Asking for permission
thanks for your input! 🙂
Use "neglected" if you're not making a connection between the neglect and the statue built. Use "had neglected" if you are making one. For example, "He had neglected her to build his deceased father a statue instead." is the appropriate tense here. "Unlike his father, he neglected her." is the appropriate tense here.
thanks u for the answer!
Thanks*
or Thank you*
or Thanks to you*
NOT thanks you
so, the correct way it's only "Thanks", not "thanks you for"?
No, you can say:
Thank you for....
Thanks for ...
etc...
NOT ~~thanks you ~~
Yep, "thanks" is a verb and a noun and the reason you might not know how to phrase that sentence is that "thanks" is being used as a noun. It's an idiomatic, shortened way of saying "I give thanks for..." or "I give thanks to you."
thank you, what do you recommend to me for practice the word/sentence?
There's no easy way to practice idioms. They are usually arbitrary and often have to be learned as an exception to the rule. Instead, consider using "thank" as a verb the way you normally would, but remember the exception for the idiomatic "I give thanks..." where "thanks" is in the noun form.
thank you so much!
what does "eked out" mean?
To make a small supply of something or making it long-lasting by using smaller amounts. Like money
How to use "as"?
The red marker is the same as the black one, it's just the colors are different
As well as the fact that the red marker and black marker are not the same, the green marker is not the same as the red or black
Which one is correct?
- She has the same personality as Jade
- She has the same personality as Jade's
Thank you for the answer! ❤️
1
Okay, thank you 😄
Hi, could anyone please help here...
What do you understand from the following (it's for a formal email)?
- (...) To which this entity approved my participation for the first time, applying an exceptionality to their age policy, based on the profile and portfolio demonstrated, and by multiple awards and recognitions in technical areas.
- This unique training is tutored by the Digital & Integration Champion in Data Science of the company, whose main headquarters (among its four) is located in the city of Houston, TX, being this is my second unique training.
Hello guys
So a friend asked me why do we say
- Would you mind helping me paint my house
And not : - would you mind helping me painting my house
I know very well that the first phrase is correct and the seond is wrong but whats the explanation
When you join "help" to another verb for this meaning, the 2nd verb has to be infinitive
There are other verbs that are like this, e.g. make (bare inf), cause (to-inf)
"He made me leave his house", not "He made me leaving his house"
But you could also say
"Would you mind helping me with painting my house" (like how you'd say "help me with my homework")
This is grammatical
Thank you
Academic?
Can I write this was because he used to eat 3 boiled chickens instead of this was because he ate 3 boiled chickens? Is there any diff?
Saying “used to be” would completely change the context to the sample you had sent
“Used to eat” means that this person had eaten 3 boiled chickens in the past but in the present, they don’t eat it anymore
Got it thank you
1
Which sentence is good :
She dedicate all her time reading
She dedicate all her time to read
pls
None
She dedicates all her time to reading
Dedicate + to + [Verb + ing]
👍
Who want to be friend with me?
What do you like talking about?what is the grammar?
For this question
?
Why they use talking with ign
?
I can
When we talk about our excitement/habits/entertainment etc... in any situation we can use like + [Verb + ing]
I like reading (No matter what book it is or what genre it has)
But when we talk about specific details, we use like + [To Infinitive]
For example, I like to walk in the rain (not in all situations, just when it is raining or rainy)
But generally, we use both forms for both reasons. Don't worry, it is not a big deal, mostly, in our daily and informal English.
If we wanna discuss the verb "Like" (to use gerund or ing after it), it is the Grammar "Main Verbs"
But if we wanna discuss the tense, it is the Grammar "Present Simple".
For this question, I'd say "Main Verbs"
The use of a verb as a noun with the the "-ing" form is a gerund.
- The past form of "may" is "might".
- "May" shows a "high possibility" while "Might" shows a "lower chance of possibility".
- We use "May" for permissions, suggestions and offers.
Etc...
thanks
👍 Any time.
Yes, will do.
I have a class now, I will do it as soon as my class ends.
What is it better learn English watching movies or practicing grammar?
-May I leave sooner?
-He might have failed, he didn't study at all.
-You might be right, I don't know.
-You may close your eyes during the surgery
etc....
If you watch movies, you will memorize phrases and you will repeat them in similar situations in real-life.
But if you learn Grammar, you'll know the structures etc...
Also note that in some cases, we tend to use either of those, no matter the difference between them.
-Might I sit? (The correct usage would be: may I sit?, although it is used to get permission to sit.)
-May/Might/Can I help you? (Are all correct.)
- May I help you? (Akin to am I able to help you?)
- How may I help you? (Also when asked like this, you cannot simply answer yes, you have to specify what you need help with, and how the person can help you.)
- Might I help you? (It's the same, only suggests a greater degree of possibility, as Nimafar explained to you above.)
- Can I help you? (The informal way, although it amounts to the same thing in terms of what you're trying to say.)
Additionally, it is crucial to note that Native speakers do not really care about the difference, as most of them generally do not know what it is. Hence, you can use either of them, depending on your preference and tone.
By the way, I must disagree with what Nimafar said above, might is not the past form of may by any means. They're both modal auxiliary verbs that suggest possibility or permission. The only difference being how good the chances of you can do something are.
In other words, and to sum it up:
May—present or future possibility.
Might—uncertain or hypothetical possibility.
The way we used might I sit? actually indicates that we're not sure if the person is going to let us sit down. They may be not a very nice person and not let us sit, if we're uncertain that they will—we would use might, not may. If we're certain or sure that the person will let us sit down, then we would say may I sit?. This is usually used like this, simply because many people would be very kind and nice to let someone sit down when asked to do so. I mean, who would say you may not/you might not!, as a response? That honestly entirely depends on the person you're asking the question to, and what you're asking. This matters especially when you're asking a question to which you might get a negative/positive response.
And there's always the informal way to put it, can, can be used in most scenarios instead of those two, but that is informal and does not always convey the meaning. Nevertheless, always try to just use one, as long as you're speaking and practicing using those words in a sentence—it's all good! You will get the subtle difference between them in time, or you will not, does not really matter. As I said, many Native speakers spend an entire lifespan not knowing the difference, and it is okay because people can understand them.
However, not in the usual sense of the term.
Could/would are always confused, too. But not in the usual sense of the term.
And in many scenarios, it is okay to just go with either. It will almost never change the meaning or intent.
But natives actually don't care and use both of them.
But Grammatically, we can say that Might is the past form of May.
Yes, exactly. As I said above. They will just use can instead of either of those and claim that it's okay to do so, and frankly, it is...
Indeed.
But the part you said might isn't the past form of may "by any means", is wrong.
Okay, but the relationship between may and might is complicated, as they're not like do/did, make/made. Not so easily explained. They're both auxiliary verbs that are meant to be used in different contexts, depending on what the speaker wants to say.
Of course. They are modal verbs and sometime we found them complicated.
Though, in this explanation, where we're explaining to them the difference between might and may, that is what I mean by by no means. Because here, it would do nothing but confuse people, they would try to use them, depending on the tense.
"He might get there in time, but I can't be sure" this does not express anything about the past. It's a statement of a future possibility
Although, a Native speaker's approach would be like this: use whichever is easier to pronounce depending on your sentence, dude.
Historically, might/may were different tense forms of the same verb, but they don't really work that way in current English
They haven't for some time
Yes. As I said, it is not for always.
But sometimes, we use might as the past form of may.
That is what I mean by complicated. You tell them, might is the past form, it would confuse people and they would learn it wrong. Because the usage we're talking about here has nothing to do with it being the past, present, or future tense.
You might be able to do it..., is this past tense? You haven't done it yet, but you might be able to. It's a future possibility, and the usage of the might, by any means, does not indicate that we're talking about something that has happened in the past.
If someone wanna learn Grammar, he should learn everything.
For example, in reported speech, we need to know the past form of may, is might.
By everything I mean important details.
I never said always might is the past form of may.
You mean, like, if we encounter this in an exam? I do not know, Sir. I think you would just give the right answer as there's just no other way the past form of may is anything else but might. That would be the common logic.
As I mentioned an example, in some situations..
But when someone asks you "what is the difference between may and might?", you are supposed to state important things, even though they are common sense/logic.
But generally, we are saying the same thing.
Yes. When you say did is the past form of do, everything's good, and it really is. No further discussion.
-I did my homework! (Not now, not in the future, but in the past I did my homework. It's all correct.)
You're probably correct grammar-wise. As it might be how it is mentioned in the book, but in real life, as I'm sure you've seen many examples of it, the way we use might usually has nothing to do with it being the past tense of may.
If you deny "Reported Speech"
But yes, there are many things we ignore in our daily conversations. But if we are talking about Grammar, we have to state and mention details.
For example, many native speakers in their daily conversations, they even omit "s" in some verbs for 3rd person singular.
She go
He play
As simple present.
I heard it many times.
This doesn't mean we can ignore the usage of "s" in verbs (works, plays, etc...).
Once again, if you wanna teach Grammar, make sure you mention important details, even if you think they are common logic.
Anyway, that was a nice discussion. 👍
Since you bring up backshifting, it's also worth saying that it isn't a hard rule you absolutely have to adhere to
Because quite often, the choice of tense in the reported clause makes a difference to the meaning
Yes, it isn't hard.
Hard as in, rigid, unbending
I wasn't saying it's not difficult
I was saying it's not a strict rule
If you follow backshifting 100% of the time, you lose contrasts in certain meanings
Of course.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tense_confusion standard link for this because it has a good example
Nice, thanks for sharing. 👍
😄
Something like "We were told that a new schedule may be necessary" is not wrong just because it has "may" instead of "might"
Let me note that once again
"Sometimes", we use might as the past form of may.
Yeae I did see you say that
Then what's wrong?
For example, in reported speech, we need to know the past form of may, is might.
It was a response to this
You don't actually need to know that for reported speech
Backshifting is necessary for reported speech.
Sometimes, we have other options or alternatives.
It's not, as in this sentence
I disagree. If we are talking about formal English.
Admittedly I made that sentence up, so you could say "what if you're wrong"
I wasn't saying you were wrong
I was asking for the problem.
So here is a report from the UK Parliament website
And an example it has
- We were told that it may be possible to develop the basic Statement Validity Analysis...
Searching for the exact phrase "we were told that it may" on google yields many similar results
I still disagree.
Backshifting is necessary.
In every book, you can see Backshifting for reported speech.
They wouldn't mention it if it were not necessary.
Anyway, I have a class now, I should go.
But that was a nice discussion.
They absolutely would, if it's established as part of ESL teaching. Similar to how textbooks that teach British English continue to teach several quite incorrect things about British English (such as /u:/ being a single long vowel, more examples if you want them but I don't want to drag the topic astray)
I put more value in the use of English by English speakers than I do in what books say is necessary without proof
As far as I know, we can rely more on books than people.
But I respect your opinion.
Can homie used to describe White and brown friend?
I agree. Thanks for the constructive discussion, Nimafar! By the way, since you said if you want to teach Grammar, I would like point out that I've been teaching people English, as well as Grammar, for years now. 🤗 Far from being a good instructor, maybe, but my students were quite happy with how I teach English so far! 
Depends what you want to do with English. If you want to be a teacher, you have to, as Nimafar said, know all the details in the book and try your best to teach people everything. But, especially in Turkey, I can see that most English teachers, as well as the education system itself, are failing to teach people anything, mainly because they themselves do not know English. They're A2 speakers at best and trying to teach students English. Which results in many Turks not being able to say a word in English. So, that is what you get if you entirely focus on learning all the grammar rules and academical English. They have absolutely zero practice, hence they cannot interact with Native speakers at all. And when they try to, they sound so cringe.
In theory, they know all the rules, they are perfect. They know English well enough to maximum-score all the inter/national exams. However... when it comes to the interview (speaking part). They get the worst score one could possibly get. Remember that meme, where it says my English when I write vs. my English when I speak? That's what you get for not practicing with Native speakers, and just speaking in general. Spoken English is all that matters, in my humble opinion, if you're not planning to be an academician—why even bother? I've lived in the U.S.A. my entire life and I've never seen a single person who spoke English as it was meant to be in the book. They all had their flaws, but when you spoke that formal, boring English, they'd separate you so easily from Native speakers, because they had this informal American English that they were rocking. So, I grew up speaking it, not the formal British English they teach students in Turkey. We can clearly see which one works better for students.
Hello
-he is the brightest and greatest writer in modern times
- he is the brightest and greatest writer in the modern era
So which is corrcet... I assume both?
If so whats the difference between times and era
I tried searching it on google but didn't really understand the difference
Yes, for that you should know these kinds of "rules". My last point wasn't that you shouldn't ever teach backshifting or that it never happens. It was simply that even in formal English people do not use backshifting 100% of the time. Not because they are failing to follow a rule, but because not using it actually often makes sense for the meaning.
The point before that was that might vs. may isn't really to do with tense, which I stand by.
They're both correct yea. "Modern times" is always going to be pretty vague. Someone might use "modern era" in a vague way too, but it suggests a clearer division between itself and some previous era (as in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_era, though an author can decide to define their own eras in a subject)
Thank you
Some experts estimate that sunlight ---- 10,000 times as much power as the Earth used at the turn of the 21st century if we ---- from solar energy in the near future.
A) has produced / will benefit
B) could have produced / had benefited
C) could produce / could benefit I think it's either B or C
Choose 1 answer and fate will call upon if it’s right or not
Hi everyone, is anyone there? I'm trying to solve a syntax confusion.
The following statement:The blitz was running hard at that time, and the night before, the raid on Bristol had been heavy.
Is "had been heavy" a past perfect sentence?
Then I would like to know more: In English, can the combination of "be+adj" be changed into past perfect tense?
"be+adj"
I was strong. (past tense)
I had been strong. (past perfect tense)
Did I write the above two sentences correctly?
🎉
@mint seal Thanks very much
I never actually learned English formally, so that means it's all based on what feels right and what doesn't.
This does leave unconventional/formal English a bit unclear, I suppose?
Usually we say "I think it is best that [...]", but I've also seen "I think it best [...]", what's up with that?
Howdy, folks!
This is an example of relative pronoun omission. It's quite common and is used when the meaning conveyed doesn't change from omission. You can omit a relative pronoun entirely when it doesn't serve as the subject of a restrictive relative clause.
"He knew the man that won the championship." Here, "that" is the subject of the relative clause. Thus, we cannot omit it. The meaning is entirely different if you choose to do so.
"He knew (that) the man won the championship." Though the meaning here is entirely different, the subject of the clause is no longer our relative pronoun. It may be omitted without changing the meaning.
Of course, this also applies to other relative pronouns.
"He found the man (whom) the boss needed."
Ah, cheers!
@digital sandal We were talking about ielts english words of variations (I hope i correctly got what you told me) for IELTS some hours ago. can you cast a light on that more here, please?
hey! I'd like to ask, how often do you hear someone say "in a jiffy"?
came across it in a book a while ago
I wouldn't say it commonly used , it's just used to describe something your going to do soon , like "I'll be there in a jiffy" but it not realy used
You can use any of those
"Is" can be removed because there's a special usage of "think" that works like "think <object> <description>":
At the time I thought [his adamant refusal to give in] [right].
I hope you won’t think [me] [stupid] if I ask you what that means.
Examples from https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/think#English (brackets added by me). Here both of the descriptions are adjectives, but they can also be nouns, e.g. "They thought him a fool until he proved them wrong" or prepositional phrases. Anything you can normally put after "is" can go in the <description> slot.
Ron's explained why "that" is often dropped.
Oops. I didn't even see the "is" bolded. Thanks for the explanation from myself as well.
👍 ** **
► Listen LIVE: http://power1051fm.com/
► Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Power1051NY/
► Twitter: https://twitter.com/power1051/
► Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/power1051/ #BreakfastClub
What is he saying from 8:27 to 8:30?
"And so Pac shot at more than 2 cops, Pac shot <?> dude that tried to run down on him?"
<?> I want to hear "at the" bc it would make sense but it sounds more like "it through", idk I'm not sure about that part
Yeah, sounds like some conglomeration of at a/the as well
Ok thanks
And so pac shot at more than two cops, pac shot at some dudes that tried to run down on him?
Where, Bliss?
can you say
"you're whetting my curiosity"
when someone isn't gonna tell me something that really interests me.
well, id like to get to know more about this moment (in the screenshot there is our dialogue in russian about ielts)
yeah , that's what i thought. thanks!
Hey mates
So I'm writing a paper for extra credit about how old English became modern English. My mom is an English major so I thought I would ask her thoughts. She ended up telling me that English is a romance and latinate language when, especially if you look at old English and the area/ people (anglo-saxons) English originated from is very clearly proto-germanic. This is also clear in the type of inflected language English uses through nominative, indicative, genitive and dative. I do not know it's all just very confusing.
When can you use the word "shitty" on someone?
Bro I’m Aussie and I do the same shit
hey guys, can somebody help me out with this jokeline ? : "If you are looking for douches, they are in aisle me. " (quote from parks and recreation) ^^
No
Douche/Douchebag is a derogatory "slur", and an aisle is, in this case, a row in a grocery store. So they're saying if you are shopping for douchebags, go look in aisle me (Calling himself a douche)
People do say it
I concur
I counter, British
what is the best way to learn and remember new words ?
Flashcards and practice. Consistent practice is really the only way
If someone could answer my question on reddit it would be greatly appreciated
also watching shows/movies in english, and listening to music can help! there’s an app called LingoClip that lets you study song lyrics!
He has been abused by his ex-wife before dating me or he had been abused by his ex-wife before dating me
Which one is correct?
he had been abused- since it’s past tense
Thanks
(When will our midterm result come out) is this grammatically correct?
yes!
it's in past
Past
hello everyone
Hi, what "tho" means and how we use it? 
tho means though. I attached a picture below for you to look at 😀
@bleak sun
Thank u 
Hello everyone
Hello
I won't be able to collect the form tomorrow how would I give it 2 u by tomorrow?
Is this dramatically correct?
What are you trying to say? The first half is correct, I'm just a little confsed on "How would I give it to you by tomorrow?"
I was asked to submit the form tomorrow but I won't be able to attend college due to some personal reason so I won't be able to submit it
So what should I say?
"I apologise, but I will be unable to submit the form tomorrow, due to personal reasons. Could we please reschedule the deadline?"
Does that make sense?
Thanks
有chinese?
Hi, I have a question about using apostrophes. When I want to talk about habits that a group of students has, do I say: The students habits, The students' habits or Habits of the students? I would also appreciate an explanation why it is correct in a certain way.
"students' habits" would be correct, reason being is when you're referring to a group that hold a possessive thing altogether(whether it's a physical item or a metaphorical thing), you'd use a plural of noun(a person or more etc.) + apostrophe + noun to indicate possession
"habits of students" is also correct(without the "the") but would be most suited in a sentence
how do you guys pronounce - ?
A hyphen ( - ) is grammatical, we don't pronounce it but treat it as a pause in the sentence
Farty farts made of oxygen chloride potassium oxide calcium carbonate and magnesium oxide and methylmaine and uranium oxide with silver chloride mixed with hydrogen chloride oxide oxide Farty farts made of oxygen chloride potassium oxide calcium carbonate and magnesium oxide and methylmaine and uranium oxide with silver chloride mixed with hydrogen chloride oxide oxide
It's not pronounced, it's can be used as a cut off of the sentence like " hey guys" but instead you dont finish the sentence so: " hey guy-" otherwise as someone said , as a pause in the sentence , can be used as both
Hi guys, which is correct
My friend is a gay
Or
My friend is gay
my friend is gay
Typically itd be "My friend is gay"
my friend is a gay would work if youre using gay as a noun
The 2nd one.
Hello, Im wonderring how we can say a french word in english but translators and dictionary are a bit confusing me...
In want to know how to say the french word "Figure" but it doesnt mean the same as "To figure"... Its maybe like "An acrobatic skill" for "une** figure** acrobatique" in french
Maybe figure is correct ?
do you mean figure as in the shape of something? as in how it looks?
Hmmm kind of
Like in gymnastic, when u do something with the bar, how can we call it ? A figure ? Or just a gymnastic movement
Maybe a skill
yes, I think 'skill' would be more fitting
So "figure" is totally incorrect ?
it's not something I've ever seen used, so I suppose so
Ok so I can say "a suite of skills" or "a chain of skills" ? Not sure for the 2nd
the phrase 'a set of skills' is what's typically used, you could use 'suite' as well, but 'set' is more colloquial
Like when dominos fall one fter one, its a set a fall ?
if- for example -a gymnast is going to to multiple skills, that would be a set
it is similar to dominos in a way
no worries!
It was hard to find cuz translators say "a series" or "a suite" and "figure" so its rlly not colloquial as u said
yes yes
'series' and 'suite' could be used, but they sound a bit odd in casual conversation lol.
Yes
What is correct and what is more proper? "Group name" or "Group names"?
it depends on what the context in
if, say, there was a group of people, or a team, it would be 'group name' singular, or 'team name' singular, since there is only one group being named
Sorry i meant "group names" vs "groups names"
it would be 'group names' !
Cool, thanks
no worries!!
How about "policy unique indetifiers" and "policies unique identifiers"?
policy* unique identifiers :]
I see such "assemblies" all over my work. Just to make sure. I want to say that there is a possibility to specify plenty unique identifiers from which every refers to some policy. For instace there might be plenty isbn numbers from which every refers to a single book, right?
Can someone tell me y the author has used 'used to' instead of just 'sang'?
How do u say "Vagabond", is it "Wagabon" or like from "Valorant" VA
Like valorant
Ok its what I thought
Because we use "used to" to talk about past habits that are no longer true, or actions in the past that do not happen in the present. That statement implies that children don't sing about that anymore.
He is talking about a routine (habit) in the past.
There's an easy trick to answer this sort of question:
V is never pronounced as W
4
Haha ok thx
In this page he used 'ate' instead of 'used to eat' y's that?
@olive parrot
it insinuates that he still eats that much for breakfast, but the piece is written in past tense
If he still eats then y did he use ate & not eat?
*eats
because the piece is written in past tense, so it’s recounting events/telling a story that already happened
with the assumption that Boggis would continue his eating habit even after the story is told
Oh got it thanks
Because he still eats it.
Because this context was written in the past and the author was mentioning a specific situation/time
What does “Problems of the couriers” mean? Its from an excerpt from a short story “The tachypomp” 1874.
You are fit for treason, stratagems, and spoils.--Shakespeare. Your narrow intellect cannot understand and appreciate a generous mind. There is all the difference between you and a Surd, if I may say it, which intervenes between an infinitesimal and an infinite. Why, I will even venture to say that you do not comprehend the Problem of the Couriers!"
I admitted that the Problem of the Couriers should be classed rather without my list of accomplishments than within it. I regretted this fault very deeply, and suggested amendment. I faintly hoped that my fortune would be such-
It's a reference to an algebra problem created by a French Mathematician in 1764. Basically two couriers are sent out at different times, walking at different speeds. The problem is to find when the second courier catches up to the first. In practice it helps to solve problems involving division by zero.
Thank you so much, now it puts things into perspective and makes the story clear!
Can we say "Currently" and "actually" in the same sentence ? It looks weird for me but idk
Like "Actually, I am currently..."
Ah yes I m dumb
What is difference between because and cause?
what is "nvm" means?
Thanks
Thank youu
How can I improve my English writing skill? if you have any suggestion that will help me. So, please share with me.
in half an hour, okay?
I'm ready when you are
OK, thx)
No problem
big text coming through

Improving your English in this server or elsewhere by a dumb native speaker
Ok so whoever is new to English, you’d always ask yourself “Oh, where do I start?” right? Because if you’re learning English all by yourself, it’s gonna be hard right?
English is split into 4 categorical skills: Speaking, Reading, Writing and Listening. You may choose the following to improve on first, or you can do them all in one go. Personally as a native speaker, if you’re using English as a use in everyday life(socially), I’d say put Speaking and Listening at the top of your priority list. Reading and writing if you want to get a job somewhere, or if this is school related stuff
1. Speaking
Here in this lovely server, there are plenty of VC’s for you to join! They are categorised into the corresponding levels Beginners, Intermediate, Advanced and Fluent(note that you don’t have to be that level to join the VC, e.g. natives can join beginners, intermediates can go to fluent etc. this is not restricted and its the matter of your preference of who you want to talk to). By speaking with other people you can develop two skills at the same time. Listening with others will allow you to get exposed with different accents, and speaking will improve the usage of vocabulary, intonation, and a more understandable accent etc. this will help you train your ears and get used to the environment, and also an easy way to make friends. If you’re a shy introvert(like me), you can hope into the shy vc and wait for someone to join. If you want someone to help you improve your accent, you may send it in #🗒|pronunciation -my-accent for some feedback!
Of course this isn’t restricted to discord, I highly suggest you to practice speaking English to people in real life too(maybe you can learn a thing or two!)
2. Listening
This was already mentioned above in speaking, but there are actually more ways for you to improve listening!
a. Songs: Songs are a great way to learn English, as often they include a lot of expressive words and meaningful sentences(well, most of them). Songs can help you memorise English words quicker, since there’s a melody that can stick to your brain.
b. Podcasts: Podcasts are also great because they can hold conversations about something you may be interested in. Listening to them also helps you get exposed to the language of English. I highly suggest you listen to them whilst reading the transcript at the same time. You can possibly jolt down some words you don’t know and look them up in a dictionary or something to improve vocab
c. Watching YouTube videos, movies, TV shows etc.: This one is self explanatory as to podcasts, if you’re learning English then it’s HIGHLY RECOMMENDED for you to watch the video with subtitles.
3. Reading
I cannot stress enough, books, articles etc. are simply a great way to get you into the habit of reading! Often any sort of text will include different sorts of vocabulary that you haven’t heard. You can write them down(as mentioned above)or use any sort of technique that helps you remember things(my personal favourite is sticking sticky notes on items or around the house so that you can read them everyday, or make flash cards).
4. Writing
Whether if you’re writing an essay, story, or a discursive, writing is a great way to test your skills. You can improve your writing by planning what you want to write first. Structure it, before writing the actual thing. Make sure to review your grammar rules before hand. If you want your text to be checked, simply post it in #📝|proofreading
Additional stuff
If you want to ask any questions about English, you may send it in this channel #📚|english-questions -questions #🗃|resources are here if you need it. (I HIGHLY SUGGEST CHECKING PINNED MESSAGES)
#🌄|word-of-the-day new vocabulary and #🌅|idiom-of-the-week ay for writing skills and metaphorical meanings.
Hope this helps!
ok i reached the limit, almost
If people wanna add to what i wrote you probs cant but you can ask to pin, ig
wait @queen thorn lemme fix the channels
where
Bro im braindead rn you gotta locate where
oh
LMAO
im stupid
i meant, it didnt do the #📚|english-questions thing
it just wrote eg “# english questions”
you can pin it now
i honestly didnt think i was gonna write that much-

😌

Thank you very much!!!
Can you do it now?
Oh sorry that was for Kiu.
But I think I could VC in a couple hours from now
Ok
@rigid barn
Judgement or judgment ?
judgement
The spelling is different in British and American English.
Judgment is the American English spelling, so use that if you intend to learn American English.
judgement
is "derelict" a common word to describe an 'abandoned building/house'? 🤔
Depends on whether you mean spoken ot written English. It's common in Literature, but you won't hear it a lot in spoken English.
👌 🙏

Yeah, in fact words and their synonyms have had popularity too through different era/periods/generations
Both are correct.
British/American
how can I fix my accent? its kind of goofy
Can we use english and american variation in the same sentence ? Like colour and judgment are from eng and the other from american
Yes, that's fine. We can use them in our sentences, but in exams like IELTS, it is much better to use one form. All in American or all in British, but in our daily conversations that's totally fine.
We need to take it easy; otherwise, we will get confused and bored.
So don't worry, Mimiquii.
hi
Oh, thanks a lot
Not rlly the good channel to start a convo x)
I was kind of confused at first when my discord underlined the word "color" in red cuz it is not UK english but US so it would be colour
Hello!
Each culture is unique with its own way of life and own perspectives of the world which would all be lost if there were only one language.
In this, I think, the "which would all be lost if there were only one language" is an adjective clause(or in other words relative clause), isn't it?
I'm not sure if I'm right so what do you think it is?
Hey guys! When Americans say "a fine university," do they mean that the university is excellent or it's average?
Usually they mean it's excellent but a lot of it depends on tone and context.
Cool, thanks!
typically when something is referred to as ‘a fine (item)’, it means the thing is excellent. if it was flipped, like saying ‘that (thing) is fine’, that typically means its average/okay
What does OGs mean?
OG used to mean "Original Gangster", although some people use OG as a quicker way of saying Original.
Thx
np
If you are confused about some words which are slang, you can use UrbanDictionary. Its a website btw.
Thanks!!
May I ask what is difference from "scare" and "afraid"?
“Scare” can mean to become frightened or frighten someone else. “Afraid” just means to be frightened
They both practically mean the same thing but the meaning can change depending on the context
Ah, I see, thx
Sorry but again what does sa'r mean????
Have we met before or did we meet before which one is dramatically correct? If both r correct then what is the difference between them
I believe both are grammatically correct but its better to say “have we met before”
i have no clue and ive never seen it before
‘have we met before?’ is a standalone, ‘did we meet before..’ could be used to cite a specific place you may recognize the person from, like saying ‘did we meet at Tim’s dinner party?’
Just my personal opinion.... But "have we met before" can sounds a little stand-offish or harsh. You would use this where you do not really know the person and want to confirm where you know them from. You are inviting them to clarify how you met. "Did we meet before (at Tim's party)" would be a more polite way to confirm where you know the person from, but you have an feeling that you have met before. Both imho are ok and fair ways of getting confirmation as to how you know the person, but I am always mindful how to use the question.
it depends on the tone of how you say it in my opinion
Agreed, adding an a "oh" and being pleasant can soften the way of asking 
" Ravi Singh's itchy head was equivalent of Pip's useless facts : armour and shield when the knight inside was squirming"
Someone please explain. Also is the highlighted sentence related to the above one ? If yes , how ?
This question appeared in my assignment: "Which of the following sentences from the reading is a fact, not personal opinion, not a fact?", what kind of sentence pattern is this?
do you hear 'purr' often? with cats/machine/cars?
when cats make that cute noises do you call it 'purr'?
Unsure about whether I should use "help" or "helps" in the following sentence:
"I do eat very "healthy" and take quite frequent SLOW walks between my study sessions tho, which I also belive HELP/HELPS [with upholding concentration while studying]"
Anyone who might help me?
It should be "was the equivalent of" or "was equivalent to"
Anyway, that's not 2 sentences, it's just 1, so yes they are related. "armour and shield when the knight inside was squirming" is an analogy for something that protects you.
It probably means Ravi Singh scratches his head as a distraction when he's uncomfortable. And I'd assume Pip starts telling people about random stuff as a similar reaction
"helps", there's no plural subject
healthy -> healthily, while we're here
Or you can add a noun after "healthy" like "food"
The sentence is fairly formal and then there's "tho" in the middle lol
Bad
Is the kind that it is
so its not a correct sentence?
It's meant to get you to separate the sentences into those 3 categories
(probably, you can see the exercise and I can't so you'd know)
the answer is "not a fact"
No that doesn't make any sense
The question asks "Which...?"
Which of the following sentences
The answer has to be about the following sentences
Which of the following sentences from the reading is a fact, not personal opinion, not a fact?
A: fact
B: fact
C: fact
D: not fact
the answer was D
yes
Yea
So it is this
It's just badly written
but the answer is just A "not fact", not > fact, not personal opinion and not fact
Hmm, but isn't the following sentence correct? (The two added words are capitalized)
I do eat very "healthily" and take quite frequent slow walks between my study sessions tho, BOTH OF which i belive HELP [with upholding concentration qhen studying]
didnt separate it
Yes, because now you have "both" which forces it to be plural
Separate them as in, put each sentence into its category
Honestly though, if something is a fact, it must also not be personal opinion, so those criteria don't make sense
Okay, but I refered to two things as helpful in my original sentence (the walks and the "healthy" food), which is why I felt that it woulf be logical to use "help", since that's the conjugation you're supposed to use when dealing with plural.
Oh well, thanks a lot for helping me out!
Adverbs are hard...
Sometimes they're the same as the adjective of the same lexeme, other times they are not....
Yea, I agree with your logic. Unfortunately the original just doesn't sound right with "help", for whatever reason
I still cannot understand why I cannot choose facts, isnt it asking for facts too?
Colloquially yes, but the sentence didn't look colloquial
I agree with this
It's asking, as far as I can tell, for you to write which one of the options each of those sentences is
A sentence can't be both fact and not fact so you can only pick 1
It's a select question, three of them are facts, one of them is not fact. The question appears like it's asking for a fact, but the answer was not a fact??
Is that question a correct sentence? or just my problem
I think you'll use 'help' here.
See above discussion between me and Alc
Didn't understand, why have we used helps and not help?
Bc the English language, just like most other languages, is weird xD. At least as far as I can tell - there might be a logical explanation behind it
I guess the two things I mentioned (the food and the walks) are clumped together in to one reason, just as you can say:
"I eat a lot of protein and work out, which IS [the reason as to] why I have a muscular body"
Yea, that's the best I can think of to justify it too
But it's not a great answer so I didn't say it
Subject-verb agreement.
Singular subjects followed by verb + s/es
Because you could equally write for example
"I eat a lot of protein and I work out, which ARE [the 2 main reasons] why I have a muscular body"
As an explanation of why "are" works (even though it doesn't)
plain "which" doesn't have plural agreement after multiple finite clauses
But that's not really an answer, it's just a re-statement of what you already know
There has to be a plural quantifier or a plural noun to trigger the plural verb agreement, basically 🤷
Hi guys
I need the best way to learn English
Im so tired and that’s stressful
I only wanna learn American English but I don’t know how or what can I do
Studying US music lyrics can help
I also have a question, just to be sure, "Hot" is never use to talk about weather or temperature right ?
Like, we say warm, not hot, it doesnt mean the same right ?
Americain series,movies or youtubers?
You can say "its hot today"
It is used to talk about weather and temperature
Warm means basically the same thing as hot but in my opinion warm describes a temperature slightly colder than hot does
Honestly just keep talking in english with people. I met a friend 1-2 years ago who barely spoke any english, and he gradually over time just learnt (spelled learned in american english) more and more english, without any stress over learning it, and now if i met him again he could convince me that hes a native speaker
Immerse yourself in the language
How to use the word purpin appropriately?
In English, is Male pronoun default?
no, not typically- if you're talking about someone you don't know the gender of, typically we use 'they' as a genderless/gender neutral pronoun, like saying 'someone left their jacket here,'
what's up?
Thanks
Ooooh ok, I was confused cuz ppl always use it to describe ppl like "Ur hot" and its not the same sense
Yes it can be used for that and the weather
It was written "was the equivalent of " in the book
Also ,Thank you 
Hey guys i have text that has to be in the passive voice and in correct tense, did i do it right?
And for some reason i cant send it great
Is it better to put aSpace or not after a word
Like:
Is this correct ?
Or this is correct?
@outer swift he posted it everywhere I think
the second one is correct :)
Question marks don't need space
Very similar to periods and exclamation marks, they do not need spaces either.
Yep yep question mark is itself an exclamation mark
What do you mean?
.
"Thank you for having me" Why does this sentence use having?
o
"Your name is not on the list" or "Your name is not in the list" Which is right?
On
Thank you.
Hi guys
I have a question
Why in this case he say(unfortunately I do find everything funny )why he use do?
Guys i want prove my english and im searching for friend who i can talk english
I can
To emphasize.
hey same here im searching it too
Just like the other guy said to emphasize
There're more ways to emphasize your wordings like using emphatic pronouns
E.x.:
I learnt English myself
He himself tackled the whole situation
Tomorrow/After 17 hours i can
I'd rather say: "What is the color you like the most?" Or. "What color do you like the most?"
Which color do you really like?
add me
What color do you like most?
@kindred oracle
Hi.
Is Children's home and Orphanage the same? Or... does the society split the kids if they lost parents, they have to get in their own "home" and don't have to "disturb" other kids who got parents? xD...
they’re about the same, but ‘orphanage’ is a bit outdated.
So Orphanage was more used in the past, mainly for the kids from all the war families, where the parents did die?
yes, I believe so. it’s a term that you see in older books for the most part.
Okay, thank you.
I don't think orphanage is outdated at all
Yeah neither I think it depends on where you’re from
it does depend- where I’m from, ‘children’s home’ is more widely used
Staying in a luxurious hotel with a swimming pool, gym, and helipad must have been quite an experience as well.Staying in a luxurious hotel with a swimming pool, gym, and helipad must have been quite an experience as well.
Y he used must have been and not must had been?
what is the difference?
why did he use something other than the exact same thing?
im not sure
what is your favorite color
Sorry I meant y he used must have been instead of must had been
Auto correction😅
@dire vessel
There is no word like must had been?
it's because after auxiliary verbs like must, you have to use the plain form of a word
have is the plain form
must have been also sounds more natural, flows better, and sounds better than had been
Oh
Is this grammatically correct?
Should I say y he used or y did he use?
either one is fine
did he use is more formal and longer
did he use is better to say though
Understood Thanks mate
np
"why he used" is ok, but it's not actually a question
It stands in for "(the reason) why he used"
So you could say "I don't know why he used it", that makes sense, but "Why he used it?" doesn't work as a normal question
This is a really common mistake, especially you see it with "how"
E.g. "How to pronounce this word?" instead of "How do I pronounce this word?", I see a lot
Have been is used for present perfect tense.
Had been is used for past perfect tense.
It depends on the context of wherever you read it
Could anyone explain to me the differences between these adjectives?:
Inner/outer
Inside/outside
Internal/external.
I can’t tell you the scientific/linguist understanding but I can tell you examples
You would use inner as in, the inner circle or inner workings of an object, similar to internal, same as outer, such as outer ring.
Inside is usually used for volume or capacity, such as, the egg is inside the fridge, or he is standing outside his house, kind of like a position
Internal I see as more of a uncommon use, as you would sometimes say the internal organs, or external heat, the heat that is being produced by something. Internal and external are much more uncommon.
Hopefully someone else can give a more linguistic view on it tho
Thanks a lot but when it comes to "inside" I meant meaning of this word as an anjective, e.g. inside information or inside beauty. When can use inside or inner in such cases?
hello there! what's the difference between "on the server" and "in the server"?
I think IN the server would be someone who's just part of it. ON the server would be someone who's currently online.
Who practice shadowing? Could u tellme the best actor's to shadow pls(american accent)
so, which one would be more correct: "there's so many troll IN this server" or "there's so many trolls ON this server". I've always used the latter, because it simply feels better but now I'm not so sure...@flat rune
hey! I'd recommend Neil Patrick Harris. he's very soft-spoken and easy to understand
he plays Barney Stinson in How I Met Your Mother
Oh I will check about Neil
Thanks, I appreciate it
I would say that both are equally correct. The term "server" is a bit abstract and open to interpretation in this context (you can't really be "in" or "on" a server in any logical aspect here) so it's fine either way.
Language is what people use, and I've seen both.
i'd say "in" if you're referring to a specific thing, and "on" for the general/overall thing.
So many trolls in this server.
So many trolls on discord.
How to develop my writing skills, I'd write business letters. Any tricks pls
There are some helpful videos on YouTube that can enhance your writing skills!
There's a technique to it. It takes practice as well.
Hi guys do we say
who gossips more women or men
Or
who gossip more women or men
Do we add s or not to the verb after "who" in this case?
I assume its the second one because we are talking about plural (women And men) right?
Or do we take them as one entity
Well, like the others say, both are right, but it really depends on context. It's really your choice :)
Question for natives here. What is the difference between the present perfect and the present perfect continuous, and in what situations would you use one over the other?
First one
can the literary device foreshadowing be in a song?
Is this phrase an example of it?
"I started to listen
And I found that there was more to this story"
whole intro of the song
"I started to listen
And I found that there was more to this story (Nah, nah, nah)
No more, no more struggling
No more, no more suffering
No more, no more struggling
No more, no more suffering"
How could you make the difference between present and past in this sentence "my grandmother couldn't speak French" ?
It's already in past tense but present tense would be "My Grandmother can't speak French"
It's still hard for me to understand because I think we can use "couldn't" in present tense, I mean if I say "I couldn't fix it" I can see the both tenses mix up.
well in that last example it was still entirely past tense because you have tried to fix something but you could not so maybe a minute later you would say to a person "I couldn't fix it" while it was not that long ago it would still be considered past tense
So do I have to always consider "couldn't" in the past tense ?
yes
Okay, thanks
also you dont add a space when adding punctuation you would say "tence?" not "tence ?"
If you say so, I mean it's not a real mistake cause the meaning doesn't change, and it's clearer for me
yes but its not proper when writing it's a common mistake for people but yeah
Anyways, thanks for your answers
happy to help
Hi guys do any one know chrome extension that can save any word I want so I can remember it again?
I found useful extension
https://lnkd.in/drRpsUtS
If any one need it
We use could/couldn't in the present & the future when we cannot say for sure.
It could rain tomorrow (We cannot guarantee that)
But for abilities, when we use could/couldn't, we actually mean a past ability.
I could run when I was a kid.
So, your sentence is in the past.
And of course, "Could" is more formal than "Can".
Am i able to get an englisch accent as a native german speaker?
Yes, it is possible. But might require a lot of practice and dedication. It also depends on your accent. Some people have a stronger accent than others. German has a distinctive pronunciation of certain English words like "th" and "r". I recommend watching English movies and stuff if you want to improve your accent. You should also decide what accent you aim towards. Since English have lots of different accents, like British, American, Australian, Welsh, Scottish, Irish etcetera.
You can get feedback on your accent in #🗒|pronunciation
Does anyone know how to correctly pronounce benzylamine with correct stress? I come here because I don't know where else to turn to as all the pronunciation sources I've listened to all pronounce it differently. I've heard it pronounced like BEN-zil-uh-meen, BEN-zil-AH-meen, ben-ZYE-luh-meen, and ben-ZILL-uh-meen.
Zye sounds wrong but all the other ones work
funny enough thats how google says its pronounced is ben-ZYE-luh-meen
It's a benzyl + an amine group, right
yes
So I'd say it the same way I say those 2 words in order
so my intuition wants to say it would be BEN-zil-AH-meen because benzyl is pronounced BEN-zil and amine is pronounced AH-meen, but it sseems to be wrong
or well i mean thats what common sense would suggest i think but ive heard it 3 or 4 other ways so now idk anymore
The guy on youglish https://youglish.com/pronounce/benzylamine/english? says it as benzyl + amine
It's just that he pronounces "amine" alone as a-MEEN
Which you can hear him do at the start of the video
oh right
Really the only thing that makes sense is to add together "benzyl" + "amine" for this word
People just have different ways of saying the 2 parts before they're combined
what makes sense to me is to say BEN-zil-AH-meen
Yea that's how I read it in my head when I read your question
Well, maybe
I'm not sure what "AH" represents
oh so ɛər
or what
ɛə
oh yeah you speak british english i speak american
how would you say phenolphthalein btw
/eɪ/ it's usually written as
because ive also heard this pronounced like 20 different ways idk what to believe anymroe
mainly the phthalein part of it
Usually I ignore the ph lol
I say "usually" I mean like, back when I was studying chem
the 2nd ph that is
I can say phth but why bother
yeah i figured that. most people do. but mainly what im wondering is how would you say the end? because ive heard it like THAL-ee-in but also THAL-een. so ive heard people add an extra syllable at the end for the -in part but then ive also just heard people combine that and make it one long ee sound
I've always said een at the end, so the whole word is 4 syllables for me
so youd say it like FEE-nawl-THAL-een
or something like that anyway
maybe some minor difference cause youre british but i mean thats about in the ballpark for how youd say it?
Same way this guy says it https://youglish.com/pronounce/phenolphthalein/english/uk?
oh yeah i guess that makes sense cause you pronounce amine with a long a
i say it with an a as in apple
so i feel inclined to pronounce phenolphthalein the same way she pronounces it https://youglish.com/pronounce/phenolphthalein/english/us?
or wait no not that guy
3:43
Is there an adjective "missed" in English?
Are a television and washing machine a furniture?
Usually TVs, washing machines etc are called appliances.
how do you use the word ''ick'' in a sentence
How do I know the difference between furniture and appliance?
Usually an appliance uses electricity.⚡️
Furniture is usually a resting(lay down, sit, etc) place for people and things(clothes, books, files, any stuff)
Missed itself being used as adjective
For example: missed call
"Ick" is said in disgust or some kind of disgusting substance
Like: "Ick! There's a cockroach!"
"There's some ick on the wall!"
or "There's something icky on the wall!"
It's gross
but like, people also say, ''he just gives me the ick''
what about that
it means he kinda creeps you out, or gives you weird feelings
I am a bit confused. Does the adjective "missed" in the phrase "missed call" describe the feeling or the emotion of a person, who has missed a phone call?
missed here is a participle
a participle is a verb which functions as an adjective
similar examples-
ironed dress
drinking water
burnt wood
No, it's a call that was missed
"I have 7 missed calls in my notifications"
It's not a participle in drinking water, unless you mean water which is drinking
Water fit for drinking. It's an adjective in that context. "There's not enough drinking water to go around."
Can someone rate my pronunciation ?
No, adjectives are supposed to elaborate nouns.
Call is a noun here that got missed.
Eg:- old tain/red train
Train is a noun that is old/red.
Eg:- junk food
Food is a noun here but of junk/unhealthy quality.
Eg:- black pen
Pen is noun here that is of black color
Adjectives are not restricted to emotions only. They are supposed to provide more information about nouns, pronouns
Bonus :- adverbs elaborate adjectives
Eg:- cheap black pen/ big black pen
Cheap/Big is an adverb,
black is an adjective
And the pen is a noun here.
Adverbs can be used like that, but the example you gave is wrong. Cheap/big do not modify "black." They modify the noun. "Black' is not big; the pen is big.
- Very young child
- old age home
Imma leave my mistake there.
I believe people learn from mistakes more
Oh! Btw adverbs modify meaning of noun as well
Imma learn the adverbs again later today
Adverbs cannot modify nouns. They can modify the meaning of nouns by modifying adjacent modifiers.
What is the meaning of company in the following paragraph
Here now, today, I am once again in academic groves——grove is, I believe, the right word——where knowledge is garnered, where learning is stimulated, where virtues are inculcated, and thought encouraged. Here, in the broad United States, with a respectable ocean on either side of us, we can look out upon the world in all its wonder and in all woe. But what is this that I discern as I pass through yours streets, as I look round this great company?
In accounts we were taught that Company is originated from Latin word com means together and panis means bread. Means people come together and open up a business to earn their bread(profit).
Here the company word means companionship. The people and environment around the speaker
@tidal lily your meaning is that "company" can mean a group of people?
Actually company literally means group of people
In corporate world as well. It's a group of people who commence a business
Collective word is company.
@tidal lily very good. No wonder some articles translate "company" into "people"
Yeah, it shows you're a keen reader
@tidal lily Thank you for your detailed explanation
Learnt multiple times in business studies, accounts, financial management, direct and indirect taxes etc so i can't mistake it 😂
@tidal lily Then you are right. I moved on to the next paragraph, and there's a sentence, "I see uniforms on every side."
You can also use it like
I got great company instead i got good friend circle.
They carry the same meaning 🙂
Or for just a bunch of strangers as well you met on a holiday
@tidal lily Your English is so good that you can understand the meaning of the company without the content of other paragraphs.
So I will continue to work hard to learn English.
No at all, gotta learn lot more 🙏
Thanks for your help, I have completed today's learning task.
Here now, today, I am once again in academic groves——grove is, I believe, the right word——where knowledge is garnered, where learning is stimulated, where virtues are inculcated, and thought encouraged. Here, in the broad United States, with a respectable ocean on either side of us, we can look out upon the world in all its wonder and in all woe. But what is this that I discern as I pass through yours streets, as I look round this great company?
此时此刻, 我又一次置身学术丛林, 我相信"丛林"一词描述是贴切的, 这里是获取知识, 激发求知欲望, 培养美德, 激发思想的地方. 在这里,在广阔的美国,我们的两边都是令人尊敬的海洋, 我们可以瞭望世界上的所有奇迹与苦难. 但当我穿梭于你们的街道,环顾这大群人时, 我看到了什么呢?