#Roast My Image™

1 messages · Page 5 of 1

obtuse trellis
#

@iron scarab the fact that Hubble needed 3 mirrors to correct for the badly ground primary, does that make it a TMA?monkaHmm

iron scarab
obtuse trellis
fleet plume
#

what.

#

Not true

#

They suffer from slight amounts of astigmatism and field curvature which is why such a thing as an RC corrector exists

frank chasm
#

and astigmatism is prolly cuz of collimation?

fleet plume
#

no its just how the optical system functions

frank chasm
fleet plume
#

i am speaking about a perfect RC in theory

#

Astigmatism and a curved field is just something they have on their own period.

fleet plume
obtuse trellis
#

What? That's actually a three mirror astigmat. There's nothing in common with a newtonian optical system😭

frank chasm
#

basically a better cassegrain

iron scarab
#

yeah despite me glazing RCs they are definitely not free of aberrations

#

What they are extremely good at is providing accurate star positions

#

because they have negligible distortion

bright root
iron scarab
#

The primary is an ellipsoid but it's very close to being a parabola (e = 0.99835, K = –0.9967027225)

lament minnow
#

CASSEGRAIN????

#

low neuron activation

#

you can reduce rct's well

nocturne harness
#

sup

obtuse trellis
#

Every reflector has easy access to IRAwkwardSmile

frank chasm
#

i like reflectors purely cuz of the aura

obtuse trellis
full spindle
obtuse trellis
#

@livid shale Reflectors are the kingspepeCool

obtuse trellis
full spindle
#

Toss some facts hahah

silver shoal
obtuse trellis
frank chasm
#

ur gon see the diff

frank chasm
#

cuz bigger aperture = more resolution

frank chasm
livid shale
#

Glass

frank chasm
#

newts have glass too AwkwardSmile

obtuse trellis
frank chasm
#

mirrors are glass

frank chasm
frank chasm
obtuse trellis
frank chasm
obtuse trellis
frank chasm
#

build ur own mirror AwkwardSmile

#

parabolics are kinda easy

#

IF

#

they aint fast

obtuse trellis
frank chasm
#

wait that looks kinda thin

#

u sure it wont bend under its own weight

obtuse trellis
obtuse trellis
frank chasm
#

i thought it was the glass

obtuse trellis
obtuse trellis
obtuse trellis
frank chasm
#

ohhh

#

don't u need like interferometries with radio telescopes to get a good image?

#

over like 10 kms or some

obtuse trellis
obtuse trellis
lament minnow
#

can you platesolve it AwkwardSmile

obtuse trellis
lament minnow
obtuse trellis
frank chasm
#

what is that?

#

will blurX help?

obtuse trellis
# frank chasm will blurX help?

In this domain you work backwards AwkwardSmile
Basically instead of deconvolution, you have to convolute the image to the PSF of the antennaAwkwardSmile

fossil spruce
#

Holy noisekekw

fleet plume
#

With a Harmer-Wynne you get:

  • No Chromatic Abberation (when focused)
  • Easy Access to infrared imaging (250 - 2600nm)
  • NO coma
  • NO distortion
  • Easy mosaic stitching
  • Completely Diffraction-Limited and Fast Cassegrain (allows for reduction to F/5!)
  • Greatest Aura
bright root
fleet plume
#

the primary is a parabolic F/4 and the secondary is spherical

#

making that cheaper than a class cass/ritchey chrétien

#

the corrector in the baffles is 200 bucks

#

(cyan is 2600nm SWIR)

iron scarab
fleet plume
#

but

#

theoretically you can take an RC and replace its optics with the superior harmer wynne optics and aura farm just as good

whole sequoia
#

Its too good to be true

north juniper
short goblet
#

what

frank chasm
silver shoal
keen blaze
gilded wasp
short goblet
#

do we have to roast it, or

tribal saffron
#

yes

meager bone
# gilded wasp

Oh wow such a terrible image i have so many roast for it but I'm not gonna type them out because it would be a waste of time

#

Everyone can see how bad the image is no need to spell it out

keen blaze
astral eagle
round quest
#

roast mine 😭

meager bone
frank chasm
#

what was the need of more convolution?

dusky lance
# gilded wasp

image is rather soft. you have alot of colour noise and well generally the faint stuff looks a bit mulchy and you went way to hard on the green noise removal so your spikes are pretty devoid of colour and your white balance seems off making the galaxies seem purple. could be a result of the green noise removal

gilded wasp
humble tiger
# round quest roast mine 😭

Oh wow, this is prob one of the worst images ive seen of this region, how does one mess this up so badly? And why does your background look like grey sweatpants mixed with puke? Did you even try to colour calibrate? I know a guy that sees NO COLOURS and he actually has WAYYYY BETTER COLOURS than whatever this is, im not even joking.

livid shale
round quest
silver shoal
full spindle
keen blaze
keen blaze
meager bone
meager bone
#

Also here is qick tip @round quest when doing background extraction avoid the actual nebula if you really have to, use a region that has a dark nebula in it don't just use the automatic squares it gives you especially on data that has poor quality you ideally want them every single agrea of you image from left to right while avoid any nebulocity that way you can fix those dark spots on the left and the lack of contrast on the right of your image

mystic drum
# gilded wasp

Looks like im looking through smeared glasses. Those two purple hot pixels or whatever they are really take away from what little good this image has. And those rotated star spikes... just not it man

mystic drum
dense leaf
obtuse trellis
dense leaf
lament minnow
full spindle
dense leaf
#

for the gear*

obtuse trellis
orchid talon
obtuse trellis
orchid talon
obtuse trellis
dense leaf
#

like

#

is it too good to be mine?

#

you can see my signature great dust spot (TM)

obtuse trellis
# dense leaf wdym?

I mean like, is this one of your first images in the astrophotography journey?

dense leaf
#

first tracked image

obtuse trellis
obtuse trellis
dense leaf
obtuse trellis
dense leaf
#

like

#

what am i supposed to know

obtuse trellis
# dense leaf wdym ''no clue what im doing''?

Like I had no clue how to process data, how to acquire good data, how to use the rig to its max. I always went on the principle of close enough is good enough right now I'm grinding my teeth if my guiding jumps over 0.5" RMS. Back then I didn't even guide

dense leaf
#

what am i at?

#

my processing has improved 10x

obtuse trellis
# dense leaf what am i at?

You're at the point where you're still understanding your rig. The better you get at using the rig, the better the data, good data will allow you to get better at processing.

dense leaf
#

its overloaded

#

simple as that

keen blaze
dense leaf
#

fingers crossed

keen blaze
#

I’m sure you’ll be able to get better results pepeLove2

dense leaf
#

tomorrow im going to b4/3

keen blaze
#

Ahhhh this is roast my image lmao

dense leaf
#

m16 is MINE

manic heath
#

Depending on how often you can shoot, improvements will come pretty quick

obtuse trellis
keen blaze
dense leaf
#

i look at it so often i see every flaw

keen blaze
#

That’s a good thing, it’ll help you learn more and improve

#

Imo training your eye is one of the most important aspects of this

dense leaf
#

same data btw

obtuse trellis
dense leaf
#

like now that i know what its supposed to look likee

#

all i see is blue

dense leaf
#

o shi

#

same telescope diff filter but alrkekw

keen blaze
#

What is going on with alnitak in the first one pepeCross

obtuse trellis
iron scarab
#

The stretching is different but the star shapes are way better now

#

Some of it is about just acquiring more data but I'm sure you'll make big steps forward in acquiring quality data too

full spindle
dense leaf
#

37 minutes

dense leaf
#

someone roast

lament minnow
#

you are getting there pepeLove2

dense leaf
#

hopefully gonna get 8 hours total next week

#

ts gonna be great

lament minnow
tepid berry
#

And contrast is missing

#

Also what is that noise

#

Just a bad imagine in general

dense leaf
dense leaf
# tepid berry Why is it yellow

oh it’s yellow because i didint wanna stretch it too much so the noise wouldn’t be too noticeable and since when you print you get higher contrast i figured i’d just keep the low noise

#

Nd it worked

#

i love ts

livid shale
#

How does ts look better printed than not

dense leaf
zenith fossil
#

Wtf

#

This is roast my image

#

You just roast

zenith fossil
#

See

#

There’s how you do it

zenith fossil
dense leaf
zenith fossil
#

its got balls contrast

#

in the printed too

#

you can take down the contrast without introducing much noise at all

dense leaf
zenith fossil
#

how did you regress

#

so much

dense leaf
#

i just denoised the hell out of that😭

tribal saffron
#

try again

dense leaf
zenith fossil
dense leaf
# zenith fossil 💀

im using a 15 year old camera, mount older than me, shattered scope and that is like my 3rd process

zenith fossil
meager bone
tribal saffron
tepid berry
meager bone
#

Probably something below 10

obtuse trellis
#

What the hell?shock

#

Naaa... I'm done here

viral helm
meager bone
north juniper
# gilded wasp

So let me get this straight, you decide to have an actually great image in this channel, but the audacity to use a format that compresses it and makes it look worse?