#🚀・dev-support
1 messages · Page 26 of 1
You need only 1 inj
Ahh great, what is the maximum number of active validators ?
25
OK so I need more tokens than the currently running 25th validator
No, you just need 1 inj
Also is it mandatory to run both validator & sentry nodes and do we have some reward calculator for the validators ?
Got it, Thanks !!
You can see details here https://chain.injective.network/
The Injective Chain is a fully-decentralized derivatives exchange protocol.
You get the commission that you set on the 5% APY for the people who decide to stake through your validator
its a variable
Sounds awesome !!
Will start provisioning the nodes.. is this right place to request tech support if I am stuck in the process of provisioning nodes ?
Sure
Thanks !!
You'd need that to be active participant in reaching consensus i.e proposing blocks. Only the top 25 can propose blocks right now.
Wall Street bulls
Hi, where can I find graphic resources (logo) for download?
From our website https://injectiveprotocol.com/ under media in the top menu
click on press kit
Great, thanks
@tall plover
yes?
seconded, this would be great
up to you
In case, refer to this #🧬︲helix-chat message
It may be wise to close all open orders for the moment
before the proposal is passed
and the update of the chain is initiated
No problem there
Band is 21st of November I think?
No. It is 11th of November
#💗︲suggestions-feedback can you please send it there
so wen canonical?
in a few hours
You kidding mate?
no
Check this https://hub.injective.network/proposals/65
Hey, I'm new here. Been invested in INJ for around about half a year. I read the blog article (https://blog.injectiveprotocol.com/road-to-canonical-chain-mainnet-release/) about the plans for the upgrade to the Canonical Chain and was wondering about the current state of decentralized oracle integration in order to deploy more derivative markets. Is there anyone who could pls give me an update about it? 🙂 thx in advance
Band themselves have a delay but they are on the right track as their update and clearing of a "bug" found by injecitve labs team is passing soon. We should see band live soon and by soon I mean this month.
Ok, ty for the answer 🙂 and what is the plan in terms of onboarding market makers with the intention of increasing liquidity?
There are ongoing and we have 2 market makers on-board. There will be sufficient liquidity on the dex.
Great!
Hi guys, on witch channel there are discussions about validators ?
Hey, your moniker is EarnX right?
Yes, please give up access to #mainnet-validators
Done
Hi, can you include my teammate jarbas#4214 ?
@hollow ginkgo
Done
I get ‘response closed without headers’ on the exchange as well as hub. Anyone else?
Already reported
Cool 👍🏻
Can you clarify please.
We have a limit of 25 validators put in place
Each validator is in a different geographic locations
and using different hardware
The limit can be increased through a governance vote
Nothing is set in stone
for speed
The more validators will slow the chain.
Don't know to be honest but we may see a significant impact on the speed if too many validators suddenly come up.
whats the eta for evm support
On Invective’s Twitter page it says “the cannonical chain is expected to be released next week” if the proposal passes.
This was yesterday. I’m confused.
Yesterday was last week
today is monday
when roadmap.... you said right after the canonical release. For me roadmap is the major , like to know the direction
Patience ven ser
Lets first finish the candi release and lead it to its full potential
maybe a roadmap to the roadmap release 🙂
Soon ser for sooner
still have issues on injective.exchange 'your country is restricted from trading...' EU-SI. Same problem was a month ago, then it vanished with an upgrade. Now its back..
Which country?
This should be fixed
https://injectiveprotocol.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/360056179952-Q-Is-Injective-EVM-compatible- evm support compatible soon, from 3 months ago
is this soon tm
There is no hard timeliness provided for it
is it not being prioritised
Canonical, full dex release is bring prioritized at the moment
what do you mean by full dex? i thought we had canonical as of today
Yes
you mean more trading pairs/markets
You were asking for evm and wondered why it was not here by now
no i mean is it next up on agenda
That's because the team prioritized canonical
Next up in the coming days and weeks is proposals for more trading pairs and proposal for inj ASTRO incentive program
ok cool
are multiple proposals for new trading pairs going to be happening at once? where can i follow these
You can follow https://gov.injective.network/ the forum and follow the governance page on inj hub https://hub.injective.network/governance
thanks
Any plans for injective to include a launchpad as well? in the hub? Thanks!
Thanks
Any plans to rename this tab? 😜
Good idea
congrats to the injective team! well done
exactly...one thing at a time...jeez
markets are hidden but they can be accessed by anyone as the trading pairs are recorded on the chain.
More proposals are coming in the coming days and weeks
no other relayers are available, end users usually cannot interact with api, so really not easy to access by anyone
for now but it will become easier with time when better infrastructure of relayers is build
marsx resolving issues currently, orderbook frozen and can't place orders -- #🧬︲helix-chat message
havent you read the latest article?
Not too long
Any idea when liquidity will be available?
MM will be live within this week
Yes that is correct
Canonical chain has been live now. Does this also mean that unlimited trading is allowed as I see that the trading volume is still very low ?
Yes the volume is low since MM are not fully active yet, incentive schemes are yet to be rolled, marketing initiatives are not launched, we need to switch oracle in the coming week or so.
Thanks Varun, very clear. Looking forward to this.
Yes good moves
Canonical chain has been live, but when rewards distribution for Fast track crypto Campaign ?
We will make an announcement very soon in this regards
Hi what can you help me with. I got a 50usdt award from injective spain to injective hub. I would like to change 50usdt to inj. How do I do this
you can do it on our DEX by transferring 50 USDT to the exchange
Fast to track campaign rewards are being distributed. We've distributed all quiz winners rewards and emailed to notify them. Have sent test to leaderboard winners and will send the rest when they confirm in email.
Thanks I have received it
The fee is set by the community
I know
The trading fee can be voted to be changed
So you can take it to governance forum and discuss and voala if all of us agree
we can change it
No, since it the proposal for inj/usdt was voted in
We did not change the trading fees (we - the community)
Nice!
Nice to see volume is starting to pick up. The DEX is nice and easy to use and the rewards are very generous at the moment. Do we have any updates on MMs?
Obviously there is liquidity
so there won't be any more MMs onboarding in the next say, 2 weeks?
There will be constant influx of more participants in market making
so why say this? There's liquidity but not enough for me to make proper trades at this point
lol the total volume over 24hrs is $1.7m
hey guys noticed on a few txs today that when i clicked “max” and tried to complete the order it gave me “insufficient balance.” believe your guys’ rounding is slightly off
Can you please give more details
not sure how much more details i can give, selecting max doesn’t maximize it but pushes my order to more than i can purchase, so i have to manually choose a number less than max
Ok, thanks
Hello sir, I believe the issue is that you executed a trade, the balance wasn't updated and then when you clicked "max" the UI picked up your old balance which was now decreased . We're working on streaming balances, orders trades and so on - can you check on your end if that's the case? If not let us know
That could be it. I noticed it directly after placing limit orders
So most likely the case, i’ll update if i see it again and it’s not what you said above
Sg


can you please refresh the webpage
Hey 🙂
Can you DM me?
Hmm okay, we're working on a related issue I think we'll check!
Any ideas?
Check now.. Works fine at my end
yeh works fine now, but an order i wanted to cancel filled bc of the downtime
if i could get a follow up as to why it went down & if we’ll see it again would be nice, markets were all untouchable across each relayer
Typically try hard refresh at such times.. We are looking into the problem further.
yes thanks tell me what you guys find
These are some early days 🧐
just want to say kudos and thanks to @tall plover for answering all our questions so quickly and with high quality!
and @plain echo as well
Thank you ser
I'm trying to bridge. The response says "error, ledger already knowm"
any thoughts
?
shucks. ok
Has this been resolved? I’m tryna stake.
Is there an exchange from which we can withdraw INJ directly to Injective canonical chain?
No currently, we cannot directly withdraw INJ directly to injective canonical chain from an exchange. This would be supported in the future once we have bridges with different ecosystems such as Binance Smart Chain.
I see only one BTC perp
strange, can you please clean your browser
which browser are you using
It’s an insurance fund with a different oracle quote (USD opposed to USDT) which was wrong and we left it visible for those who have underwritten it only so they can redeem 🙂
nope still hidden
at least i don't see it
the team is working on an issue
once it is fixed it will be back online
Do we know if the team is developing the BSC chain bridge ?
It is in the pipeline
Ok thanks … what about the burn token interface for biweekly burn
Burn will be weekly and the UI should be ready for the first burn that we should see very soon
It could be nice to have an updated roadmap asap so that we know what the team is working on …
I hope we can have atelast 100 pairs listed by the end of the month of December … seems to be already on a good path as the volume is picking up … do we have any numbers on the users ?
Love this Project ♥️
Updated roadmap is coming
The trading pairs depend mostly on the community and market makers
For users maybe taking a look at the smart contract of the ETH bridge can provide an estimate
👍🙏🏻
Ive been trting to bridge since last week. I am denied and it still says "Ledger; already known." I know you said you guys were working on this since the ledger update. Is there any update on your end?
"Error: Ledger already known" is what it says when I try to bridge.
This happens even now?
yes
can you please try to clear cache - https://support.ledger.com/hc/en-us/articles/4404381846929-Clear-cache-in-Ledger-Live?support=true
and try bridging again
just did. the response is the same
what is the version of the metamask?
I am only using ledger
do you have the desktop ledger app
yes
Will send you this just in case
Can you please try also cleaning your cache or try through incognito
I meant browser cache
ok we'll see. the circle is 'spinning" on the blue "set allowance
" tab so I assume something is processing?
This you approve the transaction?
yep
Yes, it is happening
After this transaction is processed you will be able to bridge
its one time only
let me know when you have successfully bridged to inj chain
Still waiting after I set the allowance and approved on my ledger.
Does this look right at this point?
This is an ETH transaction
Once it is confirmed you will be able to bridge
check the transaction on Ether scan
It appears nothing is happening on etherscan
thats because the transaction is not yet in a block
It just told me error because the transaction was not mined within 750 seconds....
ledger?
no injective
the ETH network is experiencing high activity at the moment
I'll try again later. I have to go. I've done this before so I don't think it's a user error.
open up your ledger live app and look through the activity then find the link to see the transaction on etherscan. it'll tell you if it's still pending or whether it was kicked out or failed for some reason. it could be that it'll get picked up when gas fees go down a bit (if ledger had set yours lower than the current costs), so you don't want to have that gas fee paid twice
hey guys. I am still unable to bridge my stuff over to injective chain. I am using ledger. Is anybody else having issues with this? This is not good.
Hey, have you tried from a private window (incognito)?
I have never done that. how do i do it?
DM me
@primal terrace any idea?
Yes, we're working on this
No ETA yet sorry

Yes
Can u say, now is the first epoch of Trade and Earn Rewards?
There are still 11 hours remaining https://injective.exchange/trade-and-earn you check here
No, I mean this round, I see that few hours remain. When rewards will be sent?
The rewards is real?
The rewards are real
I just readt that this is a test epoch, so I want be sure
When participants will receive rewards?
Rewards will be sended after each epoch or at the final?
at the end of each epoch
So tommorow we will receive rewards automatically?
yes
Okay, thanks
without some locks or others things?
no locks
once the epoch is over the rewards are distributed to your inj address
and you are free to do whatever you want with them
thanks !
any update? still pushing same issue and it’s been 9h
@winged maple
I have informed this to the team. We understand the urgency of the issue and we are trying to resolve it asap
Can you check now? At my end, the issue is resolved/
Still does not show up
Yes at my end also it showed for like 5 minutes and now it is gone again
Strong fundamentals. Strong use case. Decent launch yet strong signals of continued gradual adoption. Still early. Strong hold for the foreseeable. Killer tokenomicz. Future top of the class project. This is a very safe and comfort place. Even in bear market people trade and tokens burn. Let us all rest easy. And congratulations because if you’re here now you shall truly prosper, if you stay.
Market Rewards and Disqualified Markets aren’t displaying
Also no markets are showing up
Fixed
awesome
Rounding is still off when clicking "max," I have to manually change it so that I can place an order with all available funds and it is fairly annoying.
Also on both mobile and desktop, if you're on a market (lets say btc) and press market to bring the menu of markets, you can't just click the market you're currently on (lets say btc) to close to opened menu, you have to change markets or press off of the menu to close it. Also annoying and would like to be able to close the market menu by clicking the current market i'm on
- Still WiP, it's an open issue we'll fix
- I created an issue with the suggestion in the injective-dex repo
beauty boss 
Where did the eth perp go?
The market has been temporarly paused and it is not a bug, we are preparing an article to explain everything

It’s live by the way
it was a ninja listing...
There is a way to launch a spot/derivative market without governance, but there is a premium fee of 1000 INJ attached to it (https://chain.injective.network/modules/exchange/03_messages.html#msg-instantperpetualmarketlaunch).
This can be utilised by relayers who want to launch some exclusive markets on their dex and market them to the world without the need to wait for 2 days before launching the market. This premium fee goes to the community spend pool to be used for further growth of the protocol like incentivized programs, grants, etc.
Thats ancient info bro😂
no worries
The big differences here is this: This premium fee goes to the community spend pool to be used for further growth of the protocol like incentivized programs, grants, etc.
besides being ninja
you don't get tokens back
Yes, we can remove or pause markets through a vote, let me find more info on it. It was explained from the team long time ago
Hi. Any admin here? WHo can help me with fee rabate event?
Hey, I am here
i see that it is for new users, but I want to know if I can join now if i deposited only 2 INJ from eth chain 90 days ago
You are talking for gas free deposit program
If I deposit now usdt, can I join?
To qualify, you must:
Have no prior trading history on Injective
Have at least one deposit transaction of greater than 500 USDT (must be in USDT) from Ethereum
Make a trade where the notional value is at least 500 USDT in any market of your choice on Injective Pro
No, you must create a new account in order to get the bonus a.k.a log in with another address
I have already trading history, so I'm not eligible, yes?
Yes, with this account you are not
😦
Pool is not over at the moment?
It just started bro, it will take time to empty it
Thanks. The claim is take some time or immediately after click on button ?
and check please DM, there is probably an error on site
immediatelly
@kind flare I explain it to him in dm
Token burn—What if I bid in the beginning of auction window and the injective price doubles on bullish events over next couple days. Essentially I would be losing money on the deal because suddenly bid double what I intended.
Why would someone put in a serious bid today. Isn’t it too much volatility to trust pricing will be the same for INJ and whichever tokens are auctioned after 5 days?
The bid currently put is only a small fraction of the total fees available on auction.
There's still 7 days for the auction's end. So, we'll probably see a bidding war in the last day.
Do you have to unstake in order to bid?
Yep. Staked inj can't be used on bids.
Ok thanks
Why is Picasso volume different from injective pro?
There’s been on-going efforts to improve the database and API services, so the volume shown on Injective.exchange is lower than the on-chain volume since a lot of trades for the past day or two are not being properly captured. It’s currently being fixed!
Guys, currently what's the stake rewards APY?
5%
Thanks!
Guys, the network seems to be very centralized on few validators. At this moment, top #4 validators have 52% of all voting power. Is there any plan to minimize this effect ?
When you delegate and vote, your vote is considered separated. So 52 percent is not accurate.
For example I have delegation to the top validators. When they vote yes, their delegated tokens that they have, go to the vote that they want. But when I come and vote No with my tokens - the vote is considered independantly. This is how decentralization is kept to a higher level
ok, I understand what you say, but I was meaning vote power centralized to produce blocks as validator.
So some dude is gonna win 43,000 INJ at auction and his 3500 inj will get burnt, is that correct? (Assuming no one else bids)
He will not win inj, he will get a basket of usdt and usdc with the 3500 onj that is the highest bid at the moment
Of course that is if no one else bids by the end of the auction
I see thank you, so approx 360,000 usdt 😵
No. 😂 There will be more bids. People are just waiting to see what the price of INJ is going to be before they bid with it. Watch the last 15 minutes.
I am not able to bridge my tokens, is this down also? It says “ something happened, please refresh the page.”
From ethereum to INJ chain?
are there docs on how funding rate is calculated?
We're working on exchange docs that will have all the formulas including funding rate
Any idea how many people were bidding at the end, close to 40k INJ?
Like 10 wallet address in last 15 min
Did it come down to the last minute for someone to place final bid?
the last hour biddings started going up a lot
hey team, I tried to run a validator plus a peggo relayer according to the instruction here: https://chain.injective.network/guides/mainnet/join-network.html
I have tried twice. Each time I am stuck with Step 7. The error message is
ERRO[0103] failed init node error="error during handshake: error on replay: wrong Block.Header.AppHash. Expected A46CCBDCE9A5540A9A1FCA02718532A81CEC0071E6D58109F03A2E5D35423201, got CFE969288E344C6C9EAD071561A5C6A033D098CADF43B4317521AA421C00D10B"
Any idea on how to pass it? This is at the height when we made rc6 to rc7 breaking switch. Thanks in advance
@dim pendant can help you on this
Thanks for the response. As I hope this "wrong Block.Header.AppHash" can be resolved, I am trying a different tactic now. Rather than syncing the chain from Block 1 and incrementally update binary, I am using the snapshot provided here: https://docs.injective.network/docs/staking/mainnet/validate-on-mainnet/sync-from-snapshot
- By applying this snapshot, you trust Injective Labs provided blockchain history being genuine.
The snapshot is still being downloaded. I hope I have better luck in this route.
Hey @honest zodiac ,
The incremental upgrade is time taking. Pls upgrade using snapshot. It's much faster.
I assume I will just use the latest version of the injective node, right?
I have completed the snapshot download. Now I tried to catch up with the chain. However, I am not able to connect with any of the peers recommended in your doc. 2ee7586d8e5a4a2020dafddf68efdfdaa3606cc3@145.40.67.249:26656 7bb20f8e9fa73e34d0d21862528d5fba839eeb56@145.40.73.39:26656 de25916e19083d44d67e0c336199b215523f1578@145.40.68.223:26656 1a2ccd9c436eae54d6c767ad566c58dce78f8be2@145.40.68.125:26656
@dim pendant Is there an updated peers list? Thanks
Currently, my chain is at the snapshot height, but it is not progress because it cannot find a peer. ```curl localhost:26657/status | grep height
"latest_block_height": "5423544",
"earliest_block_height": "1",
@honest zodiac It takes some time to connect its not instantly.
We all use same peers ^
Make sure your port 26656 is opened , its p2p connection
Thanks. Looks like that the chain is syncing now.
Chain is fully synced to the current height. Thanks for the help! Next step: get peggo running and create a validator.
Okay. My validator is running now: https://hub.injective.network/validators/injvaloper125fkz3mq6qxxpkmphdl3ep92t0d3y9695mhclt
It is still inactive as expected, since I only have 1 inj at the moment. A few questions:
- Do I need to have any ETH in the ETH account? My related setting is ```PEGGO_RELAY_VALSETS=false
PEGGO_RELAY_BATCHES=false
- I got the following error. Since I am not in the active set, I assume that is expected: ```
time="2021-12-17T21:35:14-08:00" level=error msg="broadcasting MsgValsetUpdateClaim failed" error="failed to CalculateGas: rpc error: code = InvalidArgument desc = failed to execute message; message index: 0: validator not in acitve set: tx intended signer does not match the given signer: invalid request"
Any commands that I can run to check if my validator is correctly set up? I plan to put more self-stake on it to get into the active set, but I do not want to be slashed 😅 . Thanks.
Why does the winning bidder of last week’s auction have no transactions? https://explorer.injective.network/account/inj1tfrysu7tjd9snj5u5qvsqz3tzqe743nmy44jeq
I reported that, there are transactions but the explorer does not display them
you can confirm that by checking it with your address to which you have had previous transaction history
Cool thanks. Yeah noticed on my address after asking about that one
Anything about it reappearing?
Everything should be visible again
Hello @primal terrace @kind flare , we're spinning up a validator node could you add me and @buoyant stump to the validators channel please? Thanks 🙏
Hey, done 🙂
Cheers
Its static, it can be changed to reflect the market situation through voting in 2 days more or less
It would not be feasible to be automatic as your tier will change up and down
and many people will not like it
can you please forward this to the #💗︲suggestions-feedback channel in a more structured manner as an idea
Best to keep suggestions and ideas in the feedback channel. There is some merit to your suggestion as the market is volatile etc...
What are key features of new chain release?
The proposal will outline the details
60% of the fees will always go towards burning. The relayer can decide to send a portion of the other 40% to either the insurance funds or to burning. It will be up to them what they do with their 40% of the trading fees. This provides more flexibility especially towards the perp markets as they can choose which one to protect by adding more the insurance fund
Hi, I'm also getting the same error when I try to setup a local net. Can you please send me the same script to spawn a local net?
@wheat oak
Sure, please DM me
Sorry but i didnt get you, what are you trying to do? You can transfer erc-20 INJ but for IBC bridges you can transfer ATOM or Terra/UST
You need ETH only if you are going to execute transaction on the eth network
@amber ingot Where you about to resolve the issue? I am facing similar where I got stuck and can't go pass the set Allowance.
Depends on the eth network. Once the transaction is confirmed it will reflect
If you have INJ you can only transfer it through the eth peggy bridge
so you will need ETH to cover the gas fees
We also have IBC bridges for ATOM and TERRA
nope, not for now
only atom, luna and ust
Cannot provide an accurate timeline for this
Ignore them, members of the team will never message first
Need to say it just in case for other people to see 🙂
I dont know if the issue was resolved with ledger. I had to go strictly through my meta mask wallet. I connected my ledger with my metamask for added security.
Can you check plz again? I think the issue is resolved now.
@tall plover @plain echo Not sure why I still can't get it working for my ledger, here is what i experiencing so far:
- No any pending transaction on ethe account showed in etherscan
- Getting error right after a sign and approve for "Set Allowance"
- Getting this payload:
"events":[{"payloadVersion":"4","exceptions":[{"errorClass":"Error","errorMessage":"Ledger: already known","type":"browserjs"
thanks Tommy, do you know who is the best person to DM?
Hey,
Please write PM to me.
can i dm you with a question too?
Yes :)
seems like my message won't go through unless you're accept my friend request
You can ask me
I didn't get the same error today but back to the same behavior last week. Keep waiting see a non stop call to: https://eth-mainnet.alchemyapi.io/ and getting 200
actually the response is a bit more interesting:
{"message":"Method Not Allowed","logref":null,"path":null, ...........
"_embedded":{"errors":[{"message":"Method [GET] not allowed for URI [/v2/..........
This is the error you faced during what exactly?
@plain echo I tried to "Set Allowance" with my ledger in setting up the bridge.
do you have your ledger updated to the latest version?
Can you please check if you have this enabled - https://support.ledger.com/hc/en-us/articles/4405481324433-Enable-blind-signing-in-the-Ethereum-ETH-app?docs=true
@neat hedge
@tall plover Yes I was and make sure the setting and tried again. Didn't work.
I end up connect my ledger to via MetaMask and it worked.
Any plans to extend the active set beyond 25 validators?
This can be changed through a governance vote
So it is up to the community to discuss, evaluate and vote on it
okay
Here is a statement about that from Bojan from telegram a few weeks ago:
Even tho this is highly unlikely to happen, all that the hub does is providing the users an UI to interact with the Injective Chain. The Injective Chain will live forever and everyone can make their own hub and use that to fit their needs.
Basically, anyone can create a front-end hub to access the inj chain
Does anyone know where can I find more information about Bridge V2?
Info is not released for now, we will release onfo for it as we get closer to release
Hello, i am trying to setup full node, but cannot start "injectived start"
INFO[0000] claimed capability capability=1 module=transfer name=ports/transfer
panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference
[signal SIGSEGV: segmentation violation code=0x1 addr=0x10 pc=0x195b326]
goroutine 1 [running]:
math/big.(*Int).Sign(...)
any suggestions?
tried latest and previous releases from github
Hi. Does anyone know when we
When we'll be able to bhridge from bSC?
I bought some INJ on BSC, didn't realize I couldn't bridge it over, now I want to stake! Can't seem to bridge it over to Ethereum either, not like I wanna mess with those gas fees
We are looking into bridge with BSC. With regards to direct transfer from Binance to Injective chain, we expect that functionality to be up and running by the end of this quarter.
Thanks for your reply! When you say direct transfer from Binance, do you mean from a BSC wallet or Binance app? Is Ethereum the only network where I can purchase, then bridge and stake INJ right now?
No, we have a bridge with ATOM and TERRA as well besides Ethereum. So transferring assets directly from there to Injective chain is possible. You can move stable coins to the injective hub and then make a purchase on INj DEX if you wish.
With regards to Binance direct transfer, all relevant details would be made at a later date
Hello, can anyone send me 0.002 INJ. I need it to pay gas fees of withdrawing my 100atom
inj13zl7c4ea60jt05hxhl2dp443r7zrlz4phsj30j thanks a lot.
I was trying to trade, seems It's restricted in my country.
try https://unlimited.exchange/ - i think that injective relayer has no country restrictions
Can you send me 1 inj, I can send you 1 atom back.
What is the issue that you are facing?
I got an issue when I was depositing tokens
You can also see my post on injective hub channel.
@plain echo This is the issue:
You can trade from other relayers, sell some ATOM for USDT, USDT for INJ and then withdraw if you need gas. You can even buy the minimum tick size which is 0.001 INJ
I am having 0.1inj now, It is enough for gas. but i have issue on sending txs, unable to deposit to trading account or withdraw my atom back.😩
You get the same error?
Do you have the Ledger connected to MetaMask?
I think that’s a Ledger S issue and it will work through MetaMask
Let me try it
I got different address using the metamask with the same key😂
I tried all addresses, but not found inj13zl7c4ea60jt05hxhl2dp443r7zrlz4phsj30j again.
Thanks @primal terrace for helping, I have got my tokens back. thanks @tall plover for your fees.
Where do you recommend to swap some INJ ?
You can use any relayer, it's just a different UI - same orderbook and same liquidity
Do you mean these :
yes
Injective Pro has some restrictions but the rest don't
All have the same restriction.
I don't think they do, can you send a screenshot?
And you tried on Unlimited & Lunatics as well?
I remember I tried Lunatics
Hmm okay, please try Unlimited as well and let me know
Seems ulimited works. I am going to deposit some USDT.
Great
Connect through metamask in ledger
I don't have INJ in this address.
Where are you looking that? On the bridge?
Yes
Thats an issue on the bridge that we are looking into
It is displaying old transactions/deposits
That happens the first time you connect to the hub
There is a ETH transaction that requires ETH to pay the gas fee
I have eth.
Strange
confirmed.
-
If you open a private window (incognito) you should be able to sign with Ledger too, looks like there's something wrong with the cache here: #🚀・dev-support message
-
Here you're basically setting an allowance for a really huge amount (to be able to transfer any amount of INJ over to the Injective Chain). You don't need to have any INJ to set an approval for an ERC20 token, we're setting the approval to this huge number otherwise you'd have to constantly set it.
-
Here it looks like you're connected with a wrong account: #🚀・dev-support message
The account on the top left when you try to sign is different from the account we see here
Can you share a persistence peer? I need to sync my new node?
You're running a validator node or a relayer?
validator node.
You have to follow this guide: https://chain.injective.network/guides/mainnet/join-network.html and make sure to also run peggo - it's mandatory
ok, thanks.
@primal terrace Any Rewards or Grant for those Layers, wondering if I can add a Layer on Ping.pub
You mean a relayer, to provide a UI for trading?
Yeah
Hello! Looking to standup some full injective nodes. For installing injectived, is wget https://github.com/InjectiveLabs/injective-chain-releases/releases/download/v1.0.1-1630308393/linux-amd64.zipstill up to date, or should we be installing v1.4.0-1642928125 ?
Is this the official validator guide or is it https://docs.injective.network/docs/staking/mainnet/validate-on-mainnet/getting-started#getting-started ?
There are differences in hardware specs between these instructions
Getting Started
Hey @subtle magnet yes the release you mentioned above is the latest binary and please follow the guide I sent at https://chain.injective.network/guides/mainnet/join-network.html
Hello, could someone provide a dump from ~/.injectived/data to setup a faster mainnet ?
I'm currently downloading the sync, there is 1.1 TB ! i have just 1 TB available... will need a larger machine !
Is it because it's getting also the empty blocks ? what do you (validators) have setup for disk space ?
Hey, yes the chain is growing rapidly because we have a lot of transactions from traders. We're thinking of pruning the data and starting it from scratch like other projects do (such as cosmos) every once in a while, in our case it might happen more often and we'll have an archive for those looking to find historical transactions/proposals etc.
We're looking into this.
Hello can anyone tell my why INJ is pumping so hard today? What’s the news? Is it because of atom?
Please follow our #📰・announcements for the latest news and info
I am following but can’t see anything concrete. So it must be just the atom news?
I think i found the reason
What’s your opinion Kulppi?
No I haven’t have you got the link?
And why is that influencing INJ because it’s backed by binance?
https://twitter.com/cz_binance?ref_src=twsrc^tfw|twcamp^tweetembed|twterm^1491867149719445504|twgr^|twcon^s1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.bbc.com%2Fnews%2Fbusiness-60339561 second newest post
Tell me when rdy and i continue
?
I just saw very smart by binance will give them and their projects great exposure. Seems like INJ will benefit immensely from this progress and finally receive the respect it deserves
Eh ? how did u come to that conclusion?=
Binance has a huge stake in INJ. Forbes is mainstream and articles published will influence mainstream investors. I’m expecting an articles and exposure in Forbes for INJ in near future
So... out of every possible token there is in binance u thought that INJ is going to benefit A LOT more than others?
U gotta help me out here im not following
I still got my theory
So binance announced they will be investing in forbes, they did not name any specific Project they are investing into(crypto related) so people started Googling and found out that ´there is Pretty big LOGO of FORBES on Injective Protocols website and made assumptions that this project is owned by FORBES. The logo doesnt state the consep why its there, but the reason is that FORBES made once (months ago) an article about this website, because its a news site.
Not single update of INJ explains the sudden raise cos latest (important)update before the PUMP was 2 days prior
ALL OF THE ABOVE IS SPECULATION
Binance is Injective Protocol’s biggest investor and Injective was the first Binance Labs-incubated project to debut on the Binance Launchpad (public sale) platform.
Binance is also biggest investor of like idk 100 cryptos How INJ is suddenly priority of binance?
Everything else is going downward
But INJ who has the logo of forbes is going up?
Because it’s the only one that replicated what binance does but decentralised
And I doubt that the huge amount of money that’s come in is because Inj had a Forbes logo. The whales and smart money doesn’t invest in that way. Overall MC is down but INJ is pumping like it hasn’t for a long time out of nowhere! There is definitely something much bigger than just the Forbes logo
So you are assuming inside information 😏
There’s always insider information in absolutely everything before it goes public. Maybe that insider information never comes to fruition and it dumps again in near future but it seems people are willing to take big risks. Projects that have been around for this long and have a decent MC do not just pump out of nowhere for no or little reason.
IDK if 200m investment is a little reason
What you mean by that
binance invested 200m to forbes*
But you’ve already tried to write off that that’s a reason why Inj would pump! So what are you saying?
And it was 200mill 🤣
And as u said people do take risks, so the only crypto who has forbes logo on their website (which doesnt state they are not CO-OP) sounds like good risk to take jsut incase thats the coin binance ionvest
Man a logo without any credible information that there’s going to be a partnership there would not be enough to attract so much money into a project that’s been around for quite a while especially when overall market cap has decreased significantly in last 24hrs . It’s going totally against the grain. It seems as the partnership with binance and Forbes will definitely benefit INJ and there’s people out there that know this and feel confident and have therefore invested large amounts of money in last 24hrs. You can’t see that?
So you are still assuming inside information?
U still didnt explain that based on what they were willingly to take risk?
"taking risk" is gambling until its based on something
Man it’s just speculation. But I’m willing to speculate that there’s inside info and it seems like it has something to do with Forbes and possibly more! But I’m not on the inside so I can’t tell you why these risks are being taken and how big they are. But I can tell you that people with that much money don’t just gamble their money blindly into a project that’s not new without any credible information
based of assumptions isnt valid until it gets explained where those assumptions came based on something factual
Mate I’m convinced that you’re retarded now. I’ve told you numerous times that I don’t have any facts but that no smart person with that much money would invest in something without any credible information
You’re like a nagging kid at a supermarket
I still dont get what u mean by the phrase "people with that much money" binance daily trading volume is 74B according to coinmarketcap and INJ places at number 80 of them so u cant mean that, U also cant mean that the 200m got invested to this Token since thats what we are arguing.
Not liquididy is being added also
What money when where whom
Which makes me think Cos it got launched at binances launchpad u think they owns a bit off it so according to this logic binance owns part of 61 projects and which most of them have MUCH higher marketvalue than this.
Ye still not finding the connection how this is the most important coin for binance
Unless u can connect Binance AND INJ somehow which ranks INJ above other coins based on something than ur opinion that would be great
U can use other people opinions and assumptions tho!
Long as the opinion comes from source that is somehow trusted
👍
@sharp galleon Please stick to INJ mainnet related discussion.
Hi ak, was this problem solved? I am facing the same problem
@manic garnet responded in #🆘︲help-and-support-old
thanks Seranium, it must be confusing as I am asking two different questions at the same time (the second one here is regarding node setup)
No worries. Here is the documentation about running a node - https://chain.injective.network/run-a-node/run-node.html
fyi there are 2 documentation out there on node setup, from what I can tell, both are overlapping. Maybe combining the docs may help
the other one here - https://docs.injective.network/docs/staking/mainnet/validate-on-mainnet/getting-started
Getting Started
This is the correct one
@manic garnet
we updated it to show the correct data....
now it shows active sub accounts
That stat is wrong after a chain upgrade a while ago that broke it, there’s an active subaccount metric which is 2300 or so. We can replace it with that
Andreas, I suggest you don't rely on that command to check for stats for the protocol - rather try to extract them on your own from the API. It'll be more accurate and reliable, as the stats we provide can break and we don't update them often.
Yeah, we built it for fun not for excessive usage, it was never meant to be the source of truth for protocol stats. As we’ve seen recently it broke after the chain upgrade, so yeah keep that in mind
You can query the chain directly using this tool: https://lcd.injective.network/swagger/#/
Well, that's the point of a blockchain 😄
it is communicating with the inj chain
You are fetching the info directly from the chain
This includes all activity on all relayers
Hi there. We are working to run up validator node. Please, it is possible to add me on validator channel?🙏
@kind flare
done
Thanks you 👍
@kind flare Please add me as well.
panic: Invalid concurrent iterator construction! If you are using multiple iterators concurrently, there must be no writes after the firstconcurrent iterator's creations over data ranges you will iterate over. Writes over these data ranges can resume once all concurrent iterators have been created, or the iterators have been closed.
Done
thanks.
Hi all! Setting up a node. Could you add me to the validators channel @kind flare ?
Anyone can help with this please?
Hey, please see #⚽|new-validators
Feel free to ask any questions there
Thanks!
excuse me, why are there 69 IBC relayers to band protocol?
Because many projects use Band for their needs
what do you mean by projects?
building on top of injective you mean?
yeah, I'm asking about injective <> band relayers
there's 69 of them according to mintscan
I was wonderying why
We are constantly seeing more and more IBC compatible chains opening channels to INJ.
What you are speaking of are channels
Sorry now realized what you are asking for
Got confused
oh thank you
so I guess a better question is why are there 69 channels open between band and injective?
it just seems like a lot compared to say, injective <> osmosis
gotcha, thank you very much
that was the reasoning I was looking for 🙂
Band is one of our main Oracles for which prices for Perp markets are fetched from
I am double checking for my info
Will get back to you if there is a correction on what I explained
@vale osprey those channels were created by mistake thus the high number of 69
ahh I see, so injective only uses 1 channel?
no worries. thank you for the clarifications!
Hello everyone 👋
can you please ask in #💻︲api-support
Hi Team, Can you please share the list of working seed nodes. One mentioned in the documentation is not working
<@&739555074879258704>
Hi, peers for testnet or mainnet?
Please try this for mainnet persistent_peers = "2ee7586d8e5a4a2020dafddf68efdfdaa3606cc3@mainnet-sentry-us-0.injective.dev:26656,30e81e1b785eaf82d2260e932251c02c95787740@mainnet-sentry-us-1.injective.dev:26656,de25916e19083d44d67e0c336199b215523f1578@mainnet-sentry-eu-0.injective.dev:26656,1a2ccd9c436eae54d6c767ad566c58dce78f8be2@mainnet-sentry-eu-1.injective.dev:26656,8c39e67ea72458c5192c4653837e7c172a031a62@mainnet-sentry-eu-2.injective.dev:26656,9842eedb736a7a9bbdca4b1be2a5cdb14224a12a@mainnet-sentry-eu-3.injective.dev:26656,7bb20f8e9fa73e34d0d21862528d5fba839eeb56@mainnet-sentry-asia-0.injective.dev:26656,2ab91484b1504090b088465dc650d44311362bfa@mainnet-sentry-asia-1.injective.dev:26656"
let me try
stuck in constant loop of such error messages Apr 14 09:31:13 3TBStorage bash[3449285]: time="2022-04-14T09:31:13+02:00" level=info msg="notifying bugsnag: dialing failed (attempts: 1): auth failure: secret conn failed: read tcp 148.251.135.60:45142->154.53.54.244:26656: i/o timeout" Apr 14 09:31:13 3TBStorage bash[3449285]: time="2022-04-14T09:31:13+02:00" level=info msg="bugsnag.Notify: not notifying in local" Apr 14 09:31:13 3TBStorage bash[3449285]: time="2022-04-14T09:31:13+02:00" level=error msg="dialing failed (attempts: 1): auth failure: secret conn failed: read tcp 148.251.135.60:45142->154.53.54.244:26656: i/o timeout" addr="18dc7edfaa63ca928b4dd3d34e5a828b1259813f@154.53.54.244:26656" module=pex
Mainnet
Apr 14 09:46:10 3TBStorage bash[3449285]: time="2022-04-14T09:46:10+02:00" level=info msg="Dialing peer" address="22ef69d0e1946dca3ad9fb1a89cb23806c55df44@18.191.147.51:26656" module=p2p```
Hi @kind flare @primal terrace , my node has reached the halt height 2045752 but I lost the documentation link for upgrade after this. Could you please share the link with me.
Hey, you can find the instructions here: https://chain.injective.network/guides/mainnet/canonical-chain-upgrade.html but we didn't have an upgrade at that height. What's the error you're seeing?
Not sure which guide I followed but I had this halt-height mentioned in my systemd file
Hmm okay, do you want to sync from scratch? You could also use a snapshot and install the latest binary immediately.
If you sync from scratch you'd have to update a few times and restart with the respective binary
I was syncing from the scratch but given the time I have already spent on it.. it makes sense to sync from snapshot now. could you please share the link to latest reliable snapshot
rm -rf ~/.injectived/data/ aws s3 sync --delete --no-sign-request s3://injective-snapshots/mainnet/injectived/daily/data ~/.injectived/data
This should work
Thanks, let me try
Alternatively quicksync takes snapshots as well: https://quicksync.io/networks/injective.html
Latest binary can be found here: https://github.com/InjectiveLabs/injective-chain-releases/releases/tag/v1.5.0-1649280277
Hi, I have synced the node from AWS snapshot but getting following error ERRO[0178] failed init node error="error during handshake: error on replay: wrong Block.Header.AppHash. Expected 55D9AD78EF3DAD0BA8926E5FE76B79EC91B9C6123673016112992B409985A932, got 4C351A2FA154243055855B170BF9FA52A59A421BFC0FCBBB816E5016373E3448" Error: error during handshake: error on replay: wrong Block.Header.AppHash. Expected 55D9AD78EF3DAD0BA8926E5FE76B79EC91B9C6123673016112992B409985A932, got 4C351A2FA154243055855B170BF9FA52A59A421BFC0FCBBB816E5016373E3448
looks like snapshot I imported has a corrupt block or is it something else
What's your block height & binary version?
Version dev (568ce23)
Compiled at 20220406-2125 using Go go1.18 (amd64)```
last block height before node crashed "SyncInfo": { "latest_block_hash": "B014A8D3504D51853228B5E9F472DF04DBD37AEDF0B886475943959ACBC9906F", "latest_app_hash": "6D99310FE0111B527BB56469DA257870938C68FB615F3F5DB0176C4B3E4F610F", "latest_block_height": "9736183", "latest_block_time": "2022-04-15T06:09:54.145446122Z", "earliest_block_hash": "24C9714291A999B952859EE02EC9B233394FE743B07EA3578D432A4A2707B6AF", "earliest_app_hash": "E3B0C44298FC1C149AFBF4C8996FB92427AE41E4649B934CA495991B7852B855", "earliest_block_height": "1", "earliest_block_time": "2021-06-30T13:00:00Z", "catching_up": true },
Binary looks good, also this chain height is after the latest upgrade so normally it should work but if you synced from the daily snapshot you wouldn't be 15 days back. Did you use this snapshot? #🚀・dev-support message
yes followed this one only
@severe patio any ideas?
Corruption can happen for many reasons, I doubt that snapshot it self have corrupted data its taken daily and common used , but its possible in theory. Best would be if you can repeat sync or use quick sync snapshot where you can compare hashes and make sure data is correct
@hollow shadow ^
Thanks, initiated resync.
Node synced now, Thanks !!
is it mandatory to run a peggo relayer on a validator node ?
yes
ok
How much ETH is sufficient in account associated with Peggo ?
Hard to say depends on the activity, you can start with 0.5 ETH or 1 ETH and monitor it
OK, Thank.
Hi, I have cross checked my key path & passphrase but still getting this error, could you plz check & help peggo orchestrator Enter keyring passphrase: WARN[0001] failed to read keystore files error="invalid character 'A' looking for beginning of value" keystore=/home/ubuntu/.peggo Passphrase for Ethereum account: FATA[0002] failed to init Ethereum account error="failed to load key for 0xcEFE072a4CC9F061E54cE97eEE3xxxxxxxxx: no keystore path set for account 0xcEFE072a4CC9F061E54cE97eEE388xxxxxxxxx"
You can either set an explicit private key or address + keystore path. If you're using keystore you'd have used geth for the setup have you done that?
Is geth mandatory, I generated keystore via myetherwallet
with private key mentioned I am getting following error peggo orchestrator FATA[0000] failed to init Ethereum account error="failed to hex-decode Ethereum ECDSA Private Key: invalid hex character 'x' in private key"
Looks like you're providing a hex input there, are you sure you're setting your private key and not your address?
usually ETH private keys are hex only.. starts with 0x.
Tried importing private key to metamask and it worked
Can you try to export the private key from metamask and see if you get it with a 0x prefix?
could you please confirm if these are good ```INFO[0017] Oracle observed a valsetUpdate event. Sending MsgValsetUpdatedClaim EventNonce=1 ValsetNonce=0 _powers="[1073741824 1073741824 1073741824 1073741824]" _validators="[0xaf0Dd494474Eb0EB1Ba9E8641ea62Dab352F4a33 0x839dDa8d8Bf7F33424Bda9c43690022AcC36cfDC 0x480f0D4887eD4F16D2299031dffEc90782826269 0xDd14A1d791850Ae9fdaE9A29a0FE548B68f99116]" rewardAmount=0 rewardToken=0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000
ERRO[0017] failed to commit msg batch: null error="failed to CalculateGas: rpc error: code = InvalidArgument desc = failed to execute message; message index: 0: validator not in acitve set: tx intended signer does not match the given signer: invalid request" module=sdk-go size=1 svc=cosmosClient
ERRO[0017] broadcasting MsgValsetUpdatedClaim failed error="failed to CalculateGas: rpc error: code = InvalidArgument desc = failed to execute message; message index: 0: validator not in acitve set: tx intended signer does not match the given signer: invalid request"
ERRO[0017] broadcasting MsgValsetUpdateClaim failed error="failed to CalculateGas: rpc error: code = InvalidArgument desc = failed to execute message; message index: 0: validator not in acitve set: tx intended signer does not match the given signer: invalid request"
WARN[0017] error during Eth event checking, will retry (7) error="failed to send ethereum claims to Cosmos chain: failed to CalculateGas: rpc error: code = InvalidArgument desc = failed to execute message; message index: 0: validator not in acitve set: tx intended signer does not match the given signer: invalid request" loop=EthOracleMainLoop
So far so good, we'd have to verify if the logs are healthy when you join the active set.
Cool, Thanks a tonne for your support. Will delegate tokens tomorrow & check !!
Up to the people...
@pliant plume What happens if my peggo eth wallet runs out of balance and my node is still in active validator set ?
@primal terrace Plz suggest
You’d get slashed if you don’t sign the events
OK
@primal terrace could you plz check the logs & suggest if it normal or I need to change something in config
Sequence mismatch errors are not healthy.
- Restart injectived, verify that your node is synced up to the latest block (you can check that from the Explorer)
- Restart peggo
Let us know if you still see these errors.
{
"latest_block_hash": "4FCD15668BC2EDF1A24B4937434ABF6FFE755A1592E842D0F0A0CB71B4B9B314",
"latest_app_hash": "7578908EA86CDB3E0F0637E6368698CDF015F26130A641032E4841B44B19D380",
"latest_block_height": "10584077",
"latest_block_time": "2022-05-10T18:56:06.563613934Z",
"earliest_block_hash": "24C9714291A999B952859EE02EC9B233394FE743B07EA3578D432A4A2707B6AF",
"earliest_app_hash": "E3B0C44298FC1C149AFBF4C8996FB92427AE41E4649B934CA495991B7852B855",
"earliest_block_height": "1",
"earliest_block_time": "2021-06-30T13:00:00Z",
"catching_up": false
}
restarted both
May 11 12:05:53 3TBStorage bash[2999278]: time="2022-05-11T12:05:53+02:00" level=info msg="Using Ethereum address 0xcEFE072a4CC9F061E54cE97eEE3880CfXXXXXX"
May 11 12:05:53 3TBStorage bash[2999278]: time="2022-05-11T12:05:53+02:00" level=info msg="Waiting for injectived GRPC"
May 11 12:05:54 3TBStorage bash[2999308]: time="2022-05-11T12:05:54+02:00" level=info msg="Using Cosmos ValAddress inj15wa8094mdusx2n99s44xd8d0ee0xxxxxx"
May 11 12:05:54 3TBStorage bash[2999308]: time="2022-05-11T12:05:54+02:00" level=info msg="Using Ethereum address 0xcEFE072a4CC9F061E54cE97eEE3880XXXXXXX"
May 11 12:05:54 3TBStorage bash[2999308]: time="2022-05-11T12:05:54+02:00" level=info msg="Waiting for injectived GRPC"
May 11 12:05:55 3TBStorage bash[2999308]: time="2022-05-11T12:05:55+02:00" level=info msg="Connected to Ethereum RPC at http://195.201.160.XX:XXXX"
May 11 12:05:55 3TBStorage bash[2999308]: time="2022-05-11T12:05:55+02:00" level=info msg="Valset Relay Enabled. Starting to relay valsets to Ethereum" loop=RelayerMainLoop
May 11 12:05:55 3TBStorage bash[2999308]: time="2022-05-11T12:05:55+02:00" level=info msg="Batch Relay Enabled. Starting to relay batches to Ethereum" loop=RelayerMainLoop
May 11 12:05:55 3TBStorage bash[2999308]: time="2022-05-11T12:05:55+02:00" level=info msg="Start scanning for events" lastCheckedBlock=12744158 loop=EthOracleMainLoop```
@primal terrace getting same error even after restart.. I checked connectivity with GETH RPC server and its working
Do you use the key you have in peggo somewhere else and potentially try to broadcast txs at the same time?
No I created a separate wallet for peggo
And at the time you queried your local height you verified that you were fully synced with the chain?
yes it is { "latest_block_hash": "4FCD15668BC2EDF1A24B4937434ABF6FFE755A1592E842D0F0A0CB71B4B9B314", "latest_app_hash": "7578908EA86CDB3E0F0637E6368698CDF015F26130A641032E4841B44B19D380", "latest_block_height": "10584077", "latest_block_time": "2022-05-10T18:56:06.563613934Z", "earliest_block_hash": "24C9714291A999B952859EE02EC9B233394FE743B07EA3578D432A4A2707B6AF", "earliest_app_hash": "E3B0C44298FC1C149AFBF4C8996FB92427AE41E4649B934CA495991B7852B855", "earliest_block_height": "1", "earliest_block_time": "2021-06-30T13:00:00Z", "catching_up": false }
Doesn't look like you're fully synced here
it says "catching_up": false
yeah that can be false positive sometimes, make sure to check the explicit height and compare with the explorer as mentioned above. When your node is fully synced please restart peggo and see if it happens again.
let me check
@primal terrace node is synced now and restarted peggo but still getting same error ```May 11 14:04:47 3TBStorage bash[3064455]: time="2022-05-11T14:04:47+02:00" level=warning msg="error during Eth event checking, will retry (5)" error="failed to send ethereum claims to Cosmos chain: failed to CalculateGas: rpc error: code = InvalidArgument desc = failed to execute message; message index: 0: validator not in active set: tx intended signer does not match the given signer: invalid request" loop=EthOracleMainLoop
May 11 14:04:50 3TBStorage bash[3064455]: time="2022-05-11T14:04:50+02:00" level=info msg="Oracle observed a deposit event. Sending MsgDepositClaim" amount=335390000000000000000 destination=inj1455ynw3uruhjdtgfe9l42y046g9yflpjnnej96 event_nonce=182 sender=0xad2849Ba3C1F2f26ad09C97f5511F5D20a44FC32
May 11 14:04:50 3TBStorage bash[3064455]: time="2022-05-11T14:04:50+02:00" level=error msg="failed to commit msg batch: null" error="failed to CalculateGas: rpc error: code = InvalidArgument desc = failed to execute message; message index: 0: validator not in active set: tx intended signer does not match the given signer: invalid request" module=sdk-go size=1 svc=cosmosClient
May 11 14:04:50 3TBStorage bash[3064455]: time="2022-05-11T14:04:50+02:00" level=error msg="broadcasting MsgDepositClaim failed" error="failed to CalculateGas: rpc error: code = InvalidArgument desc = failed to execute message; message index: 0: validator not in active set: tx intended signer does not match the given signer: invalid request"
Well that's a different error, looks like you're not in the active set only validators in the active set would sign peggo events.
Damn, just checked.. its in unbonding status now.. can I run some command to bring it back to active set ?
injectived tx slashing unjail --from [Your validator key name] --chain-id=injective-1 --keyring-backend=file --yes --node=tcp://localhost:26657 --gas-prices=500000000inj
could you plz check & suggest why transaction is failing - https://explorer.injective.network/transaction/19087E4751FAE9F2A3C55DA6E6ADACB5063805682DA690495349AAA52BFAF9AE
1000000000000000000: validator''s self delegation less than minimum; cannot be unjailed'```
You need to self-delegate a tiny amount because it got reduced due to the slashes
Min amount is 1 INJ
looks good now ? May 11 14:21:25 3TBStorage bash[3073263]: time="2022-05-11T14:21:25+02:00" level=info msg="Oracle sent deposit event succesfully" event_nonce=182 txHash=84292BD1FBA07945D25F669A033600A56EB81FA2982C6D59D5B971CE6C3DAB57 May 11 14:21:28 3TBStorage bash[3073263]: time="2022-05-11T14:21:28+02:00" level=info msg="Oracle observed a deposit event. Sending MsgDepositClaim" amount=498350000000000000000 destination=inj1uw6m576xcejzhpfjsa9qexskln0a2335e0q9yk event_nonce=183 sender=0xe3B5Ba7b46c6642B8532874a0C9A16fcdFd54634 May 11 14:21:31 3TBStorage bash[3073263]: time="2022-05-11T14:21:31+02:00" level=info msg="Oracle sent deposit event succesfully" event_nonce=183 txHash=50037D67FEF682915790536D0782AA4E8A07D3ABD3B300A4A87C4DCEA776E542 May 11 14:21:34 3TBStorage bash[3073263]: time="2022-05-11T14:21:34+02:00" level=info msg="Oracle observed a deposit event. Sending MsgDepositClaim" amount=30000000000000000000 destination=inj1rajuyxmntm745wrjpa0suywkts08qn8yt7wjm8 event_nonce=184 sender=0x1f65c21B735efd5a38720F5f0E11d65c1e704ce4 May 11 14:21:36 3TBStorage bash[3073263]: time="2022-05-11T14:21:36+02:00" level=info msg="Oracle sent deposit event succesfully" event_nonce=184 txHash=640FC6FDD3E597CC7507E671A6E7EA0D81493E52F1BC2088AAC42AA879D71053
yeah
Thanks a tonne for your support !!
Anytime
@primal terrace what is the suggested value for this parameter in peggo's .env file PEGGO_ETH_GAS_PRICE_ADJUSTMENT=
and for this PEGGO_MIN_BATCH_FEE_USD=
This really depends, it's up to you to state what's the total USD you'd expect to relay a batch
Already checked but it has fee mentioned as 0
FYI you don't have to relay batches this is optional, what's mandatory is to run peggo and sign events relaying batches is not.
Yes but gas price is not 0: https://github.com/InjectiveLabs/mainnet-config/blob/master/10001/peggo-config.env#L28
what is the average gas cost for relaying a batch
Depends on ETH congestion, you can see some transactions here: https://etherscan.io/address/0xf955c57f9ea9dc8781965feae0b6a2ace2bad6f3
do you recommend enabling this parameter PEGGO_ETH_MAX_GAS_PRICE="500gwei"
You could to ensure you don't relay a batch if it exceeds a limit so you can make a profit.
Is it okay if I send you a DM, I wish to discuss the dynamic pricing for batch processing.
Sure but the best person to ask on this is @dim pendant you can outline the question here and he'll help provide more context.
Well I wish to continue relaying batches but without losing money. So what would be the ideal config for my .env file.
@primal terrace our node halts every 2 days and start falling behind the network. we are not able to find anything unusual in logs. could you suggest what could be possible reasons for this behaviour
What about peggo logs?
Peggo starts failing when the nodes falls behind. I restart it after syncing the node back
What’s your network bandwidth/instance? Maybe it’s low in specs and doesn’t catch up quickly
Bandwidth & server config not an issue.. investigating for conflicting services
hi! how i can check, that peggo relay work correct?
Hey, you can trace the peggo logs and see if you get any errors
Is there any way I can see the reason for jailing the validator?
Nope
@primal terrace What is the current disk requirement for validator node ? is these an option for pruning ?
Yes you can use pruning
What is the recommended pruning configuration ?
Would recommend proceeding with the default but up to you.
Where can I find the latest genesis.json file ?
@primal terrace I am migrating my node a bigger server and getting this error on injectived start
Could you please check & help
Could you DM me to send you the steps to migrate/see if you missed anything?
hi! this is normal for peggo?
yes
is this document current? https://chain.injective.network/guides/mainnet/join-network.html
it says build version of node is b174465
There are subsections with every upgrade after genesis: https://chain.injective.network/guides/mainnet/canonical-10005-rc1.html
The first steps with the --halt worked fine...
I'm following the document, at step7, last message in the log is this:
Jun 01 09:10:40 adam bash[2299526]: time="2022-06-01T09:10:40+01:00" level=info msg="Starting GRPC Web server on 0.0.0.0:9091"```
nothing since 20m ago, it is doing anything? doesn't look like it.
Can I just start at 10005-rc1 ?
You can download a snapshot and then start with the latest binary that will be the faster/easier avenue
I don't understand your release system, the "latest" is Staking-40021" which has a build version of v0.4.19 but then you have Mainnet-10005-rc1-1649280277 -- which is v1.5.0
This worked, at least it seems to be running... although almost every line in the log says "failed"
msg="failed to create spot limit
msg="failed to cancel derivative limit order etc
The Staking version is for testnet, Mainnet version is for mainnet.
What's your block height? Could you compare with: https://tm.injective.network/abci_info? ?
how to know?
Know what exactly?
If you want Testnet or Mainnet you can use the respective binary.
Sure - I get that thx... how to know block height?
curl localhost:26657/status
"latest_block_height": "7871766",```
4m behind, right
I took yesterdays from here https://quicksync.io/networks/injective.html
weird, thought it would have been closer
Quicksync takes daily snapshots, 4M blocks is a lot of time.
Maybe you didn't wait for the whole snapshot to download
i will try again
same thing
"latest_block_height": "7872045",```
is this an alternate way of the same? #🚀・dev-support message
trying the aws thang
Both AWS and Quicksync have daily snapshots.
the AWS method brought me straight in at 11m so i think there may be something wrong with your Quicksync snapshots (or maybe just that particular one).
Thanks for letting me know, these snapshots are not maintained by us - QuickSync is handling them but will have a look
I have some issues...
How can I transfer my EVMOS from Injective to Evmos mainnet
?
Use the bridge on the hub
Check here https://hub.injective.network/bridge
May I DM you again?
Yes
I also stuck with step 7. I have tried few times and the same. The error message is
msg="failed init node" error="error during handshake: error on replay: wrong Block.Header.AppHash. Expected A46CCBDCE9A5540A9A1FCA02718532A81CEC0071E6D58109F03A2E5D35423201, got CFE969288E344C6C9EAD071561A5C6A033D098CADF43B4317521AA421C00D10B"
@primal terrace
ask him?
That means you reached a block height with an incorrect binary, if you've installed the latest binary you should sync from a snapshot otherwise you have to apply each binary at each block we made the upgrade.
but it's fresh installation and I followed steps in manual. and I did it few times with same result. why? Also I cant download snapshot cause I dont have more 1TB available space for it
You can download the pruned one from ChainLayer.
What's your current block height?
Maybe you have to upgrade the binary
ok. I'll try pruned
I tried with pruned and nothing. The same error
msg="failed init node" error="error during handshake: error on replay: wrong Block.Header.AppHash. Expected 257C0F55FC4EB46617304550A8BAE9B62D959F7E08839C6DDFF4EBBCA7006107, got AE2A64B8E3EA4BC9634DA9C2DB67D4898618D9F6EBA07F88DD7322CBAD95F1B6"
https://github.com/InjectiveLabs/injective-chain-releases/releases/tag/v1.5.0-1649280277
Can you make sure you're on this binary and then restart injectived?
I can start the node after some manipulations)
What kind of manipulations?
I used the latest version of mainnet from git and initialized config with it. After that I created data from pruned snapshot and start node
I cant find in docs how can I connect to node with websocket?
@primal terrace @kind flare
You mean the port? Should be 26657 as per the default but that can be changed from the config.toml file
hi there, are there any public rpc nodes that are suitable to test with? i'm hoping to use injective via cosmjs in a dapp but the nodes that are listed in the chain registry are both cors limited
@primal terrace
Hi, try this: tm.injective.network
wound up enduring through and getting to /injective.types.v1beta1.EthAccount errors which i'll need to set aside some more focused time to push through.
my team is more than interested in potentially building more app level on injective (specifically the derivatives market) though in the near future. do you think you guys would be willing to schedule a call with us to see if it would be a good fit?
Sure, please DM me to discuss
hello I initiated a cross-chain transaction from EVMOS, but the address received is not mine. May I ask how to retrieve it
I have asked the team.. I will respond as soon as I get a reply
hi all! How many eth-requests should I expect? I'm trying to figure out if it would be cheaper to rent a node on infura than paying for a server with large SSDs
Yes that’d be cheaper, depends on the activity and transfers/withdrawals but generally Infura/Alchemy Pro plan would cover it
hmm, looks bad. its bad?
Jul 20 21:53:44 injective bash[1859725]: time="2022-07-20T21:53:44Z" level=warning msg="failed to relay Valsets, will retry (8)" error="insufficient funds for gas * price + value" loop=RelayerMainLoop
Jul 20 21:54:10 injective bash[1859725]: time="2022-07-20T21:54:10Z" level=error msg="Cosmos does not have a valset for nonce from Ethereum chain. Possible bridge hijacking!" eth_valset_nonce=12322873
Jul 20 21:54:10 injective bash[1859725]: time="2022-07-20T21:54:10Z" level=info msg="Detected latest cosmos valset nonce 12630433, but latest valset on Ethereum is 12322873. Sending update to Ethereum\n"
Jul 20 21:54:10 injective bash[1859725]: time="2022-07-20T21:54:10Z" level=info msg="Checking signatures and submitting validator set update to Ethereum" new_nonce=12630433 old_nonce=12322873
Jul 20 21:54:10 injective bash[1859725]: time="2022-07-20T21:54:10Z" level=warning msg="SendTransaction failed with error" error="insufficient funds for gas * price + value" txHash=0x32d3f06798bc4cdf39d24e2d4e0b7479d620f9695f1c0a18ce114a0167f801df txHashRet=0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
Jul 20 21:54:10 injective bash[1859725]: time="2022-07-20T21:54:10Z" level=error msg="Failed to sign and submit (Peggy updateValset) to EVM" error="insufficient funds for gas * price + value" tx_hash=0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 ```
orchestrator and eth balances >10$ usd
@opal copper I just gave you the validator role, you can ask related questions in the validator chat. How higher than 10$ is the balance? If it's slightly higher might not be enough, you can try transferring more ETH

