#ark-2
1 messages · Page 98 of 1
They dont even do what they are describing
and at worse monster hunter clones
When they say souls they are probably referring to their control scheme and layout
one way to screw your current players off
The dinosaur attack scheme is what should’ve already existed with other games but hasnt for some reason
i am used to the ARK layout to the point i change my keybinds to emulate ARK's layout
This is what makes it not a souls clone
How you control dinosaurs
Ark 1 had the first part down being you CAN tame dinosaurs
monster hunter clones
same failure rate as souls clones
Cant tame monsters
you can ride them momentarily
cant even control them really (except the dog i guess)
This games aesthetics are so vastly different from those games its impossible to tell without gameplay
But the dinosaur attack scheme is something surprisingly never done
The game also is supposed to have a lot more functions to it other than combat so it being a standard game clone doesnt make that much sense, doesnt mean it will be good though
Monster hunter is insanely successful but I think I see this point? Though only in monster hunter rise do you have any control over a mounted monster
(And that control is extremely minimal and temporary)
i am talking about the monster hunter clones not MH itself
If ark 2 introduced souls like attack systems to mounted combat it would be a major step forward in gaming - no other game really has managed to do that in the survival genre
i thought they given up that whole "survival" part
i way thinking they go for more MH clone
I mean surviving in the ark 2 ecosystem is “survival”
They’re dropping expansions to eating and drinking sure, but what separates survival from a monster hunter for example is that everything is persistent (the world operates in your absence, and doesn’t reset or really react much at all when you die)
shelters too id assume
the dinosaur combat would make every shitty be a dino game non existent
If the dinosaur mounted combat was souls like? Yes it would smoke most of the dinosaur content out there
But we have no explicit confirmation of that level of complexity
so "wild dinos take turns to "getting killed""
there is a reason why elden ring nerfed the duo boss
if they do that it would be an eye opener
Dinosaurs that actually function like… dinosaurs!?!? Instead of basic machines!
Crazy idea
hell even IRL animals can dog pile
There is a game design puzzle ark 2 has to figure out with how to manage horde combat
Though I’d also argue ark 1’s creature density is stupidly unrealistic and probably makes no sense to replicate in ark 2
i dont want the "barren ocean biome but in land" tho
and not even, with very limited species variety too
Dynamic creatures can easily compensate for lower populations
The ocean being a volume rather than an area helps magnify a lack of creature density
Especially if they can actually “hunt you” instead of walking in their relative vicinity
ocean should be dense with life realistically, just not with the most powerful predators xd
I’d expect and hope ark 2 would have local high density areas (say a watering hole) and have less spammed around creatures just bumbling in the environment
One unnecessary detail i really want is actual prey fish and have coelocanth be an actual coelocanth (also coel irl being one of the worst tasting fish ever)
I’m only open to prey fish insofar as they add meaningful gameplay
Otherwise I’m concerned they’ll just eat performance for a mild boost to immersion
Sure
id also like actual prey animals on land as well that give better food
(Herbivores usually being a better food source throughout history)
Ark 1 had a lot of coel too, but quickly overlooked because there were equally as many megalodons
I’d prefer it if a kill in general was worth more
I hate meat running…it just doesn’t feel right to clear all the wildlife for meat. It felt so much better as a Bob to savor every carcass for its materials
Age old decision. Pick for meat and live another day, or hatchet for hide and secure a respawn point 😂
Then you get one tame and oops that’s resolved
Just munch everything mindlessly - and it just feels so not right. Idk if it’s because I really like the idea of carefully respecting and choosing what I kill or what
I felt that way in monster hunter too…I really carefully picked what to slay versus capture because it felt wrong to waste taking a life. Until the immersion wore off many years into me playing ark and everything became a walking hide repository 😞
Early game far cry primal survival mode was sort of like that, i think the best at it in that mentality
Once you got 1 particular skill though it throws it out the window as one full pack of arrows killed all of the boss animals in 5 minutes
When you want to raise an army, everything is on the menu. It's just the way it is.
True though ark once you know what ur doing is industrialism simulator
There’s no reason for it to be that way
It IS that way in ark 1…because the cost of everything is jacked way up and that’s just how you meet your resource needs. But ark 2 doesn’t need to do that
shouldnt
Then how are you ever getting the exp you need? Changing lystrosaurus to give a flat amount of EXP based on its MD stat?
learn it like a realistic person
Oh sure. Ark 2 everything could be different. Who knows if dino stats are even still a thing? 🤣
Each kill could be harder and grant more exp
When ur fighting/something you should just learn it over time by repeatedly doing it
i mean that makes the most sense
Im good at hunting megaloceros because ive died to/killed a lot of them
It should be something that requires learning imo. Right now it’s all W + M1
If it’s faster than you, get your hitbox stuck in theirs -> see above. If it’s slower -> see above
can it by cc'd or bullied by knockback attacks -> bully it to death
Me (if its small enough you should be able to do finishers on it)
Not much true cc in ark 1…beyond every bite cone being planet sized lmao
Giga bite cone is galaxy sized lmao
Bites if they actually hold on and tear like they imply would possible fix that
or make it so much worse
from what that said you won't really model clip anymore while fighting
I largely have ignored this until I see gameplay
Fair
What it means tho is that as Flobs said perhaps models will actually stay separate which means you can’t trap smaller creatures within your neck or feet lol
Ye ik
we all know it's like rexes going into the stomach of another rex while fighting in Ark 1, let's hope it's a thing of the past with that change 😅
It does say they want bites to feel like bites though
Locational damage, etc
which is why the dino survival games like TI have absolutely no soul or charm
I dunno if there’s gonna be formal hitzones or not
The way hitboxes work suggests hitzones would be possible…but they are clearly two different promises imo
Ye
it all ties into what i would label as realistic combat
I cant think of any game that has that except i guess medieval fighting games
Chivalry or mordhau
But animals
So really no game i can think of off the top of my head has genuine animal combat
the animation will be done as if there are highly complex hitboxes
seems trivial to utilize that tech and use it for stats
Changeable stats would be a nightmare with that if thats what ur saying
?
Idk wdym
if they already have the animation dependent on the exact location damage was taken and in what form, then they can easily utilize that to make damage dealt far more complex than is the case now
yeah i agree
I was adding on that i think stat leveling as it is now would make that incredibly annoying and clunky
Idk if bites by default grabbed like they suggest it would be, quite annoying if we could simply boost all of the basic stats
Or i guess just rex in this case
idk basically can alter a dark souls boss so its even more insane than it already was
this week is the week for news hope is good news
Id assume the roadmap would cover the two main pieces of content plus their releases
Followed by a linear map of expected releases for said content
IE series seasons and major updates for ark2 that are significant
It's pretty basic.
Like, it really is truly Shifter, fucking basic as all fuck.
Cause I've made an AI in UE5 that does the exact same thing.
ARK-1's AI is literally what Epic-Games teaches you on "how to make an AI in UE5"
Its kinda crazy that people expect really advanced AI from an indie dev team with like.. 30 people?
30 people is standard for a AA-team
besides its not as easy as some people think it is even now
And Wildcard isn't indie anymore.
They're between AA and AAA
AA.0.50A
Nope.
But they have literal billions of dollars they can put into it.
If a 10-people team that made Sons-of-the-Forest that 'are' true indie teams can make compelling AI's, then Wildcard can.
Fr
Billions?
There are a lot of games that are much smaller then their competitors pushing out stuff better than the ppl that dominate said genre/subgenre
Sorry, I meant millions
"Ark has sold 16 million copies across PC and console, with ten million installs on mobile, and it's often one of the most played titles on Xbox Game Pass."
This was back in 2019, so they most likely have even more now.
Best example in terms of dinosaurs is bob
That I can agree with
Unfortunately it’s not just about how many millions they have but also about finding the right persons willing to join the team. They have job positions open for ages.
Money still
You can’t just throw money on the wall and the features will suddenly materialize
That doesn't mean they're not doing well.
All of those jobs are accepting 'at home' work, so as long as they have the money, a limit within their office isn't an issue.
I mean, you can, but that's not how you make a good game
When you offer more money you can draw more applicants
That's literally what Activision does with every CoD game
same shit different disk
Duh
Yep.
But it still materializes via money.
sadly it does
No shit.
Not like we haven't seen that for the past years
The job positions being open for so long mean they haven’t found the right person. I’m not saying they are doing bad, just pointing out the development process is more complex than just having money > developing good games.
Gaming is a growing industry
Talented game devs arent necessarily tied down to one company like most jobs
If that was true, Microsoft and Ubisoft would have the best games and they would be free of bugs 😂
Again, that doesn't mean that.
It could also mean that they have multiple positions in that role that they can hire multiple people of said jobs.
Ubisoft is like a mixed bag
Does all the right things but never in the same game
Incapable if making a good game
Why im scared theyll destroy the new avatar game they had to make an entire engine for
Well, the job positions being open for so long + a huge amount of news about the lack of qualified workers for tech positions makes me think they have an issue finding new devs.
Okay, the latter I didn't know.
It’s not just Wc
'Eh'
If it flops, it flops.
If Ubisoft flops, that's one less corporative company gone.
i like avatar 🤓
Never been one for Avatar, but I get your feeling with the worry.
At this point, I just emotionally don't care enough for major corporations.
Me too but shimmers of hope sometimes
Big companies can make good games except theyre so greedy they trash it once they figure out what works
What’s a good game? To me is a game that makes me enjoy it for a while. I like all the assassins creed and far cry games. I know they aren’t GoY material but still they give some entertainment for a while.
I think that, and being able to appeal to mass amounts of ppl
Plus this corporate journalistic standard the world has made when critiquing movies and games (i guess)
But ppl have different tastes so like, take what you will from youtube videos
Ark is like half of a good game in my opinion
I can find enough ppl in the real world and start a conversation but the average person usually will talk about its negatives more than its positives
Honestly, I never understood this mentality with them.
Cheaper
They want to be efficient in the money making because that has always came first
Far cry being the most obvious
Sure, a bad game with hype gets a LOT of money at first. But it'll die down a lot more quicker.
A objectively good game though, may not get a lot of money at first, but the long-term amount it'll make is more then what a shitty game will make.
Every game being the same game but with a different filter
Yeah
Same reason like how monster hunter handled it
Very small game for capcom relative to the other stuff they were making
Then they make world
Goes back to nintendo products. Bruh!
Not for this channel, try #ark-survival-ascended or #bobs-with-probs
Keep asking in the wrong channels, I'm sure you'll get the answer
Like idk world was such a fresh of breath air aside from its variety of bosses why the hell would you ever go back to nintendo
Rise was… fine i guess i thought it was too easy
Didn't like Rise, wirebugs and silkbind skills are so dumb, and didn't like how they handled mounting. And Rampages ... god what an awful idea
Fr
Plus they gutted Hunting Horn
True my friend was very mad about that xd
Idk i was just disappointed going from world to rise
They didn't?
Rise came out on consoles and PC later on.
It started out on swtich
Also, have they've been with Nintendo beforehand?
Cause I remember the older games being Playstation exclusive.
Yeah, as a 'launch' exclusive
The switch is the worst console rn in my opinion
Thankfully they have mobile dev teams vs console dev teams, so hopefully the next game is more like World's quality
And like zen said the game itself has more flaws
Rise and World were developed parallely
Ik the previous games were on nintendo i played them they were good too. Just such a big leap
Yes, I know. Thats why I said they had two separate dev teams
Hmm
World also raked in a lot of new ppl
Id say anywhere but japan the average person who played mh is gonna say they played world first, might be a stretch
I think they where 'on' Nintendo devices, not exclusive though.
Wait, you're totally right.
3 and 4 where Nintendo exclusive, and still are
To relate to ark 2 do you think ppl will buy next gen xboxes just for ark 2
Probably.
People bought next-gen console just to get more updates for GTA5.
they're gonna have to buy them soon regardless, less and less new games are still supporting old gen
I might have too my pc is getting old and with how everything is rn i dint wanna spend that money as a broke college sudent
Hmm from what i saw (never coded it myself) it seems the basic blueprint is super basic…but WC sorta stacked stuff on top of it?
1 month of work and i had enough saved to upgrade my rig, good that i did before i became jobless bc i still am
The taming system itself is solid in a technical view.
But no, even newer creatures from what I can see have the three basic tasks.
taming bootleg 101 her how first find him next trap him and then tame him there you got your self a one of a kind booleg pet lol
Where's the punchline?
taming you is the punchline your sow rare
Ahh, I see.
It's a slavery joke. 
i sad pet
"first find him next trap him and then tame him"
That sounds like slavery.
ark you trap the dino
Yep, and they're dinosaurs, not humans. 
what is that icon
Issac Clarke
that it was a drake
It's Issac Clarke from Dead-Space about to be consumed by a Rex.
ethere your sow rare no one can find you in ark
I'm a rare slave?
lol

boot leg mad now
very mand perhaps
Reality is a enigma, and everything I perceive is within my own mind.
To me, you're all just random flesh basics that I conjured up.
To you, everyone else has been conjured up.
the one who wins is the one who copes the most
Nah, I love fucking with others. 
Your thing is that you make no fucking sense, while my thing is to be an ass and fuck with others, since I'm a sadist and take entertainment from others.
power of copy a copy i win
nah copium
the drug of the mind
rejection of the weapons others use
the mind weapons
dopamine*
dopamine is just the motivation chemical
No, it's the happy chemical also
its only use is for me to break myself for rich people
"What is dopamine? Dopamine is a chemical released in the brain that makes you feel good. Having the right amount of dopamine is important both for your body and your brain. Dopamine helps nerve cells to send messages to each other."
happy is seratonin i think
nah most sites are dumb with the NTs
i took a intro psychology class i know slightly more than them
seratonin is what carries dopamine.
hay sigma i her boot leg has ark 2 news he ban holing out a reading it not giveing it to no one lol
they are separate NTs
Maybe neuroscience isn’t black and white and different chemicals can have a range if effects
"Serotonin is a chemical that carries messages between nerve cells in the brain and throughout your body. Serotonin plays a key role in such body functions as mood, sleep, digestion, nausea, wound healing, bone health, blood clotting and sexual desire."
dopamine is part of the process that gets you motivated
its closer to desire than happiness
And happy
dopamine will get you through shit even if youre not happy
Addiction is the process of producing too much dopamine from an act.
I had no idea Ark 2 was going to be so complicated
we have to manage our dopamine levels
ark2 is gonna hack these dope receptors to force you into metal farming again
Do you think they'll have tek that helps you control your dopamine levels?
no is just boot leg dos lol
soon we will no sigma soon
I'm looking through multiple websites right now, and every single one is disproving your point Bada
actually
ark produces cortisol.
people seem to work harder on evo because of how rare they are
lest work to do
most psychology online is complete garbage
les
id have failed my psych course if i used the internet
you suck at google then
theres good stuff but anyone claiming X is happiness chemical is wrong
did ark 2 come out?
happiness doesnt really exist as a singular chemical
Sure, but when multiple websites are saying the opposite of what one random person that is proclaiming to have took classes for this, I'd rather go with the former.
i know you would
😛
alternative facts are true facts
Alternative facts can also be false facts.
One would think it'd be the latest announcement in the #announcements tab if it did, right?
we can all was yous boot leg and sigma as fishing bait for a new tames in ark 2 lol
Or that you could also Google it
It’s called game design and yes 😂
If games don’t generate appropriate dopamine flow -> bad game
🍻
You know it true @tropic crag 😂
I use that as my fake surprised emoji, so uhhhh lol
We have seen no gameplay for a game that has been delayed twice and we are approaching the summer. I demand a free DQ Blizzard!
Delayed once but I’m down for a free blizzard
Indeed I think WC owes us a delicious DQ Blizzard
Hey Shifter, do you know anything about neuroscience?
A minor’s worth and no more 😂. Though I did major in traditional biology
What did you learn about dopamine?
It’s primarily the reward mechanism for the brain
Right, it's the happy sauce
Also the cause of addiction, since gaining too much happy sauce from an activity will make you dependent on it.
Eh it’s a bit trickier than “happy”
So 'happy'
The emotional response to dopamine varies based on how much over what time period
Right.
So I was more or less correct earlier that it's the "happy sauce" (in a simple term)
I mean colloquially yea it’s happy juice
However it’s not quite that simple in practice is what I’ll say haha
Cause I have no idea what Bada was talking about earlier, with dopamine not being a chemical that makes you happy/rewarding.
Right, nothing is.
I think Bada was referring to the valid reality that increased dopamine ≠ increased happiness (it’s not a 1:1 relationship, there’s other stuff involved in emotions like that)
But if the argument was about colloquial use then yea I think the point was lost
Right, which then goes back to addiction. (pretty sure a lot of addicted people aren't happy)
So if we stop playing ark will we go into convulsions and be super sad cause it was our reward mechanism? If so how long are the side effects?
Depends on the addiction but largely yes. If you Bork your dopamine system it’ll ruin your mood
I haven't touched ARK in two weeks, so that's not saying much about my own addiction
Some addicted folks? Yes. Servers go down for three seconds and you can see who most of them are
Gaming addiction is a serious act.
what if I just want something to do and am bored while playing it
Any addiction is. It’s why I worry about ark 1’s PvP hook of round the clock base defense
the gaming addiction clearly rots away what's left of their already small brain, it's clear with ark chatters especially
bold of you to assume i had a brain
Addicts are sad anywhere you see them
we have one among us
Very valid, but I personally take the more shamed addictions (like eating addictions, gaming, etc) more seriously then stuff like hard-drugs, since there's already people out there that take those extremely seriously.
I have played for 16,000 hours
spent countless nights and days defending bases
and ark 2 might be no different
Addiction isn’t measured by time committed: it’s measured by what happens if you’re forced to stop
Fair take, but addiction is at the core the same principle…so imo it’s about who you know that’s suffering and helping where you can
Which is why most recoveries ease you into having less and less of what you're addicted to, then stripping it away straight up, no?
Oh well I usually have to go and spend a lot of money, eat 4 double cheeseburgers, a large coke, 1 large onion rings, and a bag of kit kat
america moment
Depends big time on relapse. Some substances you can’t cold turkey because it leads to fatal physical withdrawal. Others like gaming that almost never have that you are supposed to cold cut
Right, since with drugs, you become physically dependent on it, so stripping it can kill you. Versus a gaming addiction where it's just the dopamine levels going out of control.
And other brain chemicals - but usually dopamine is the primary. The point is that you’re not introducing foreign substances that your brain and body become dependent on
Yeah like heroin addicts that require a drug to detox
Better example is people who quit smoking that need a nicotine patch or a vape
wait you can die from quitting nicotine
Good ark 2 discussion! You all have pea brains
Welcome to 🧠
Nicotine is a drug that you can become dependent on.
oh no Shifter, i was wondering how long it would take for some dummy to interupt our good convo again
Eh, it’s hardly an interruption
still counts in my book 
We can easily pivot into a nice chat about how we don’t want people addicted to ark 2 and explain what ark 1 addictive features we dislike
Is Ark 2 going to be PvP as well as PvE
yes
Someone said just PvE but i dont think that would be the case
Confirmed by WC!
Wildcard -__-
yhyh lol sorry its late
🔫
Hope they make it into ARK-2 to spite Shifter
Yea cheers bud
i will do a triple twister from the bridge if they return
Just hoping they give us a date friday
Don’t expect that lol
Can you record it?
🫣
Or atleast a month or some idea
At best expect a quarter or month for release
when the roadmap is shared we're officially moving into Q2
Yes
clearly, and it seems i was right
Nah, the Xbox showcase isn’t entirely making ark 2 release certain by June. It was just possible it came out June
gonna cry?
No :/
YEET
Let's not.
Back on topic and be nice
Hey!
Vent with kindness
How many times is he gonna disrespect me
Anyway, I hope ARK-2 doesn't encourage such a fucking shitty playstyle on PvP that it causes people to stay on for 24+ hours.
:/
So true
Wait, legit question.
How do you vent with kindness?
Yeah it became a job… crazy
Yhyh if they thought that was possible then they should be close but then again its wildcard
Drop the 24/7 play requirement, drop the “yeet people’s work while they sleep”…
Was gonna say but you already know lol
Online protection needs to be a heavy thing.
yh man dw im not a noob when it comes to ark
I mean, I don't see you interjecting any good points, leave them to their neuroscience ramblings, let the mods do their job, aka mind ya bidness
they take ages to release stuff
Or, better yet.
Have safe-zones that're PvE based, but at a minimal. So most of the map is still PvP.
Tbh they need to take longer. They tend to have a horrid habit of scope creeping and releasing things in a rushed state
You a mod? Na… anyways the zone pve thing would never work
That "safe zone" camping tho
And?
And?
Eh... I think that the tek update should of been delayed and never released that ruined it for me
havent really been on ark since they released it
I will still never understand why they have never put in a counter for tek.
🍻
Monkey but very underwhelming
That’s slightly different than for example releasing astros and velos with ranges greater than turrets
Like i say mate when tek was released i stopped playing so i wouldnt really know abt the new stuff
Are you? Point set, match. Anywho, PvPvE servers can and should be the norm, there can definitely be PvE only zones on a PvP server and it not be done poorly, just look at Rust.
Or when a whole bunch of stuff came out in a questionably finished state
Noglin bypass turrets unless velo or plant
😂
I remember the good old days with the old gui and you could fly so fast u wouldnt be shot at by turrets on a pt
Those where shit times
not if your in a big tribe
that part hence why it was removed lmfao
Flier nerf was the best ark patch of all time
ah yes, the ''good old times'' where you'd fly to the other side of the map in 5 seconds
I think everyone can agree flyer speed levelling is only good for PvE servers, if even then
Now we have gliders for that
anyways, flier and glider nerfs for ark 2
when the game couldn't even load in fast enough you clip through the mesh lmfao
Those where dark times
bahahha yes they were
Fun at the moment, but shit looking back at it
Ark in 2015 is not ark 2023, and you know who knows that lol
shit messing on a freinds pve server i gave my shadowman a 350 movement speed and yeah its not even fun anymore its just stupid lol
fliers should be endgame for ark 2 and even then heavily nerfed compared to their current versions
Shadowmanes can have a little bit of movement speed, as a treat
Shadowmane art wise is peak
i mean yeah but when your so fast you cant even control it specially whenn you add hydrate and this ^^
Cats are goated
I wanted cheetah but we cant have nice things all the time
If i could id make a mod for ark 2 for cheetah
Saber: 
I’m sure there are at least a few mods with cheetahs
Can we get a prehistoric cat?
Like an actual house-cat.
"Felis silvestris lybica"
Can we have those?
can we have actual smilodon?
I’d kinda not mind if fliers were mid game if their role was very clearly limited
Instead if this weak ass panther with goofy teeth?
pretty sure there’s a mod for that aswell 😂
True
Pts for example are…kinda not a big deal. Raise the mount/dismount animation time and they’re pretty gutted for most cheese
I dont want a mod though
Nah I like long tail sabers better
fair
I want saber to actually be scary like its supposed to be
Ark 2 needs to be primitive
true
No heavy turrets no tek
It is.... Primarily
I’m tired of all this machinery
I want thylacoleo to stay a tree assasin but make saber the brawler
Has scrap metal in concept art tho
Skill issue
they should at least make it way harder to get kind like the 190 tech sword skin if they do intend to add tech
😔
Can't wait till tek is reintroduced in the first dlc for ARK-2, and Wildcard says "technically, it isn't in ARK-2, it's in a dlc."
Megatribe gatekeeping intensifies
So proud of you, you can't even imagine
You need some way to defend your base, so basic turrets are ok or maybe even find a way to use the environment to defend your base like making traps n stuff but just no heavy turrets or anything
Dinosaurs that actually guard
Honestly, I wouldn't be mad.
I'd be fucking like "well played"
fr never got a proper guard dog dinosaur
We have a person of culture and quality here
Every thing is a "guard dinosaur" If you set on aggressive
Hyaenodon would like to know your location
Not that reliable
I think they need to take into consideration if ARK-1's mechanics that're never used.
Like purlovia's land-mine like approach.
I think that could work better if revamped.
And u log on the next day and someone has made it chase them to the other side of the map
Creatures in ark are limited by their ai
thalisaphobia be hitting different when playing ark idk i cant stand arks oceans
I agree. So much more it’s DLC worthy. #oceanDLC
It's not water though, so nothing to be afraid of
😤
That is why you set the distance for that and have them follow on a say passive small pet
Don't do that.
Give us an ocean update.
Cause last time we had an ocean DLC, we got ATLAS
Ik thats why you couldnt have a genuine guard dog
Guard dog dinosaurs would work better if they were bound to items and people instead of by just being in the same tribe
would be a funny way to catch thieves
That’s the most fair argument I’ve ever read
I think quality oceans is something that can be there from the start
It doesn't even have to be hand crafted either
They can be bound on a small pet in base
True.
I think shit like proper waves, and such should be focused on.
i mean they did a whole ocean biome so im sure they gonna really expand on it hopfully i think it really depends on the full way there trying to take ark 2 since its supposed to be heavily story based as well
This honestly would be epic.
Honestly, I think it'd be badass trying to cross the ocean to a new continent, and trying to survive fucking hurricanes.
Having actual ships would be so epic
But is it really worth going in ocean when it's safer to get resources on land
rafts were so dumb
Canoe was cooler
sounds more like atlas bahha
Like even just copy paste atlas ships would be fine
ATLAS intensifies
Treat the ocean as an extension to what we're already being given.
They want going to point A-to-B harder for land? Do it for oceans also.
atlas is fake he cant hurt you
I want to sail around with a parasuar on the prow of my ship
i mean take ark land pve and caves aff atlas oceans and what not with the storms and ships
Make megalodons try to destroy smaller boats/rafts, and rafts topple over with storms.
Requires the player to have proper preparation before sailing.
Yeeeessss
ARK Leeds and ATLAS Whales said hi and goodbye
How about no?
Can we just replace what ark 1 meg does with a regular sized shark xd
Basically Valheim but with more surpents
How about yes?
When I mean smaller boats, I mean canoes and shit.
But you're safe within actual sea-sailing ships, like galleons and stuff.
This is fine, I tolerate the idea
I want Polynesian style boats too though
Those are frikin epic
Me getting PTSD form constantly repairing the galleon
Only thing that'll attack bigger ships are Mosa's and Tuso's. 
But those could be rare encounters.
Like the delphis
Manta be like 😭
Bartonyx 😂
tuso= sea of thevies kraken fight lol
It constantly dies on land
All fish should be flopping out of the water, only have water stat = to oxy
i need a giant flying fish to ride (like avatar)
Any aquatic should have some ability to breach
Why?
Because sea creatures?
In a competition of useless explanations, this one wins lol
dont see why an icthy couldn’t jump out of the water
Do you think they’ll make compress ark 2 or just make it 5 terabytes
5 terabytes sounds reasonable
But seriously, it'll probably be less than ark1 because you don't need 3 types of lods
Don't need to bake lighting either
how marine animals works, sometimes they get a little silly and jump out of the water
Surprisingly whales dont die instantly when they breach
Or beach for that matter
Same reason flyers should be able to actually land in water, no matter how fucked they are
Except for those few in the game that have work arounds
No reason a dumby cant fly over the ocean with his ptera, and the pteranodon can actually drown (it should)
Some do some will die due to decompression like the blob fish and other very deep sea creatures for example
I doubt ark 2 will have that if you could tame deep sea ceatures
Unless you could recall creatures
Reverse-Basi depth damage 
That needs to be a thing though
Deep sea stuff should be worse the deeper it goes
Like not realistic levels of the bends, but it should have harsh effects on certain crestures
Tbh basi shouldn't have that depth damage being related to whales and all
The Tuso on the other hand should get that depth surface damage when tamed
Well, here's the thing.
Some companies have used the extra space to make higher-res meshes, making the size no different.
I mean, there is that too. I didn't think about thst
I'd say it's safe to say ARK-2 will be around 120-isg Gigs.
Since they could be using the extra space to either make higher-res stuff, or add more mechanics that're going to stack ontop of the storage.
Yeah that's kind of the range for a game as big as ark
all ocean creatures should be able to surface...like they do. But I agree ichy and a lot of other water mounts being able to leap from the water wouldn't be bad
though idiots beaching them and complaining I'm SURE will follow
Red-Dead 2 is like 150Gb if I recall, so since ARK-2 is hyping itself to be a immersive-ish game like Red-Dead 2, I think that's a good game to use as a benchmark.
Heeey, you're only an idiot if you do it more than 200x
Megalodon surface breach. short-range dismount/grab for anyone caught
Is it hyping to be immersiveish?
"Advanced character traversal mechanics like mantling, free-climbing, parkour, sliding, and swinging!"
"Explore a mysterious, chaotic world where native flora and fauna are being overrun by invasive primeval creatures from an extinct Earth!"
"Natural and unnatural occurrences are always happening across the game world, independent of your presence! Your choices in deciding whether to interact with these events will yield rewards or challenges."
"Hostile 'Aratai' hunt & attack you riding their own tamed creatures, as they seek to drive human interlopers from their world."
"No omnipresent radar -- animals now track and hunt by sight, sound, and smell! Hide from predators with visual camouflage and environmental obstructions, and learn to mask your scent! Dynamic pathfinding enables creatures to intelligently maneuver around obstacles and player-built structures."
Just me, but it does sound like it's trying to be immersive.
I feel like they are pushing less on immersion than games like sons of the forest, and more on quality movement and ai
I mean, I guess that take is right. With those changes it'll definitely feel more immersive I think
"Natural and unnatural occurrences are always happening across the game world, independent of your presence! Your choices in deciding whether to interact with these events will yield rewards or challenges"
This alone sounds like they're trying to mix immersion with gameplay
V i t a m i n S y s t e m
I mean sounds pretty immersive to me
Honestly, I love the idea of the new system in ATLAS
Actually does shit now then just kills you
I prefer the debuff tbh
Which is the new system
have to keep track of a dozen different meters. food, water, psyche, metabolism, sleep, etc.
Actually makes taking care of yourself rewarding in the game.
And not bypassing certain combat rules lol
Something I wished more survival games did, is give you debuffs throughout the process of your stats lowering, then just killing you.
Like, having a lack of food should start to lower your max stamina until you're well-fed.
That just sounds annoying lol
I want to survive against tricky animals not my belly
I like how Valheim did with the food system
More entertaining then just dying from having funny stat low
There's also the issue of food and water becoming more of a chore, due to how fast they drain.
I don't think it'll be as bad if they drained slower.
I don't mind making heat drains water and use of stam drains food tho
Your belly already is a tricky animal you need to keep fed 
Or, you know.
'Actually fucking drain like a normal human would'
A normal, healthy human takes 3-days to die from dehydration, and around 2-weeks to a month to fully starve to death.
In every fucking survival game, you 'have' to eat daily, but that's just objectively not true for real survival.
So if you're able to survive multiple in-game days without water or hunger, but you get debuffs as it goes on, I don't think that'd be as bad.
That is the point of "Plain Jane" Survival, not "Survival Horror"
The point of survival games like ARK, Conan, The-Forest, is to not only survive from AI's, but to survive from 'all' elements.
If you wanted to survive from just AI, then play Dead-Space.
Or any dino horror survival that is popping up
True
Nvm
...that'd be survival
It's still plain survival
I play survival games cause I wanna survive from all of the elements.
But hunger and thirst have always been the go-to for this genre. But it's never changed other then 'funny stat hurts when empty'
I saw you Bruise!!
Speak!!
Join into the conversation!!!!
I don't MIND hunger and thirst as environmental challenges
but if both food and water are readily available everywhere it just adds a chore to gameplay imo
Which is my issue with ARK's survival.
Infinite food from bushes, and infinite water from the ocean
Scorched is the closest I felt with survival in ARK, due to the lack of water.
Did the dear atleast taste good?

Why not put in a Zelda style of cooking and make berries quick to spoil
If animals where harder to hunt, berry bushes being harder to find, or have a 90/10 ratio of poison berries vs edible berries, and have water harder to find, or you need to actually filter it first would be nice.
But keep narcoberries edible for comedic relief moments
Or what ATLAS did to drinkable water
You have to find the 100% water spot to dig and not drinking the literal ocean water
There is a lot of ATLAS things that are a wasted potential
ab fertile zone away from the river with that instant water loss was true survival lmao
or just mandate that berries be prepped into an actual food item (similar to raw meat) to avoid health loss
Berry mush 
Nah, water mushrooms still gave enough water
Fish meat should be the "easy to eat food" because sushi
That....doesn't make sense for berries?
many plants need cooking or other prep to be edible
Strawberry bruh
I think you mean to be nutritious

I mean some do require cooking to be edible
some are toxic - like cassava
But not all of them, or even most of them
Yo you can't dunk on my fave kind of chips like that jk
technically potatoes require prep...raw potatoes have low levels of poisonous material
Many plants go thru stages of toxic and edible. It seems like we are getting seasons so maybe they will make plants die back in winter etc
"Raw potatoes contain solanine and lectins, two compounds that can cause gastric distress and potentially make you sick." (this is the flesh)
could be cool to see the landscape and resources change by season
Keyword being potentially, and that's mostly by way of them flooding your immune system and making what is on the skin get you sick
concentrations are key, but I'm reading it ain't the skin
I know my potato knowledge boiiii
Can't wait to have to wait for a season to roll up, and the resource to be blocked by a large tribe 😂
I want to clarify that I concede the more dangerous solanines are in the skin
Or a world event where big carnivores hang around berry bushes for easy pickings
i see that as a normal rather than world event occurance
But anywho, yeah, I think tier 2 fruits and veggies (what would essentially be crop tier in Ark 1) should maybe need to be cooked, I guess
Aratai just plant home alone traps around berry bushes every so often 
idk, I kinda think all food should need some prep. Call it shucking or peeling or whatever
it would just make for good balance to not be able to shovel berries
Id love to see migratory patterns where the herbivores eat all the foliage and move on. and the carnivores are right behind them.
But that goes dangerously into advanced survival mechanics, which they've already stated aren't going to go anywhere further than they already have, hence my apprehension
i don't see how that's advanced survival
it's still "food". WHAT you eat doesn't matter...you just can't eat raw gathered food
Anyways, we need aratai to setup booby traps. That's my last take for the night
pit traps where you cant get out but take days to die!!
Have them mimic pvp players and trap everything you need
Needing to peel the potato before you can eat it, else you get sick? I'd say that's a step up from Ark 1's "did you grow the potate? Ok go ahead an eat that shit fam"
But maybe I'm wrong
i mean...it's peel the "anything" to eat it. I wouldn't attach a buttload of specific tasks to each food type
"did you just pull that fruit out of the dirty ground? Perfectly fine to eat man"
Perfectly mimics pvp players
we already have cooking to decrease spoiling and increase value. shouldnt be too hard to make that have greater impact on the day. Im ok with Ark food now but it is rather stale
Back
What shit did Shifter try to say about needing to fucking cook berries to have them edible? @tropic crag
not just the aratai... let animals learn. You build a trap to get a rexes mother... now he uses it against you.
nothing i swear
Guess I'll fucking die from all the raw strawberries, blueberries, and every other edible berries sold at stores then. 🤷♂️
eating 400 blueberries like in ark would also kill you instead of restore 100 food 😂
Well yeah, but that's due to a ruptured stomach. Not poison
Atlas does have a debuff if you overeat. that would be fun
If I ate 20+ good sized steaks, I'm going to die not from overdosing on the nutrients.
But from my stomach fucking popping. 
I'm sorry
I wouldn't count on that, apparently they think that was a bad decision on Atlas and they've already stated they don't want to make those basic survival aspects more complex.
Didn't know it had an open beta.
Then tis fine.
Wasn't sure if you'd get scammed from a game hyping to be good, turning to shit
You don't need to peel like half the foods that appear in Ark 1 is all I'm saying, and I don't think that changing the requirements to eat and not die/get sick from it any more than maybe by just cooking it to make it better for you (which is already a thing) would stick to the rules they've set out about not furthering the survival aspects 🤷♂️
Which is fucking dumb if you ask me.
They should learn from these experiences, not remove it if it does bad.
I have.
It's B-tier.
Yeah, the opening
I like the food levels now. But it would be funny to have to change your armor cause you ate a bad date or too many berries!
Yeah, I guess they could improve on that. But their statement means, at least to me, they didn't think it's good to make it more complex than Ark 1.
Which is bullshit.
Especially during early-access, where it's all about experimenting.
Sure, but we don't know for sure why they've decided to go this way.
If hunting for food and water is harder, make the stat drains slow enough to survive a few days, and give buffs and debuffs to the stats throughout them draining or raising, then I think that'd be solid.
I mean, they have limited resources and time, they probably just decided to work on other aspects.
'Early access'
Yeah, this would definitely turn this feature from annoying to interesting
I wouldnt mind having food drain slower but harder to find. Shouldnt be too hard to make that happen.
The way it is in Atlas, is very annoying. You basically play thinking about vitamins, food and water.
Defiantly not, just calculate how long a in-game day is, and increase the decrease rate to how many days you want it to take till a player dies from starvation.
They changed it finally
Vitamins is a mistake in Atlas... they made it too hard to find each vitamin.
Now in ATLAS, you get debuffs throughout the process of your vitamins draining, and buffs if you keep it healthy. And the stats will carry over to your next life, so you can't cheese it.
Good to know. A few days ago I said exactly that. Instead of killing, vitamins should give buff/debuff.
That's good to know they changed it. But unfortunaly WC won't use it in Ark.
Would be interesting if berries, instead of filling you up. Temporarily stops your hunger from draining, so it gives you time to find real meat to feed yourself.
Since, you know. Berries are meant to keep you tidy over, not fully fill you up.
I think this kind of feature is way more interesting than just stats
What if your character is a vegetarian?
Skill issue.
Humans aren't meant to be vegetarians.
Yeah, it would be really nice.
We're an omnivorous species, which means we need a blend of both plants and meats.
I mean, they never really worked on the recipes. They might have a chance to work on that and connect food to buffs and debuffs.
Atlas was going to be really complex on that regard. Our characters aged it was planned to introduce babies, but they gave up on that.
About aging, my experience was sh*tty. LOL
that would fit in well when they said that different materials will do different things for crafting. makes exploring for that rare plant more enticing
They gave up the baby process due to drama.
Personally, I see no issues with it, as long as it's strictly with mature NPC's. (having it player side can easily get messy.)
back then I thought it was disappointing, but putting into perspective, it was better this way LOL
They had lots of issues without really expanding the complexity
Yeah, with the idea of having it player-based, that could've gotten messy
Especially when ARK has underaged kids.
Having player-on-player activity is a witch potion being brewed called a "lawsuit"
But many games have romance systems between player x NPC's, so 'that' I wouldn't mind/find it weird.
Wouldnt make much difference unless the baby had random starting stats.. .and doubt they'd introduce that now.
I mean... babies aren't really an issue with the age rates
Just don't put sexual stuff there
No, I meant the process of making babies.
Do just like the other creatures LOL
Issue is, if you have process of making babies, it already has the implications
we dont see tames getting frisky... dont have to do it for humans
Again, it's the implication
I don't really see the issue here, I believe they just weren't capable to finish it
My worry is if a 40+ year old man is trying to convince a 17 and under player on having a baby with them.
That's sus as all fuck
And a player x player mechanic like that can easily lead to situations like that.
But a NPC x player baby system, wouldn't.
It depends if it's graphical or not
but its ok for the 40 yr old man to kill the 17 yr old?
It's not about being graphic, it's the fucking implications of doing the baby-making.
Still don't see the issue here LOL
but sure, if it was problematic, just raise the age rate
Yeah, since that's how the game works, those are just fictional avatars.
But the implication of two age-gapped players getting it on to make a baby is fucking weird.
That's not an solution.
Man, just create a machine to create the baby
That would work.
how are we getting to the new world? I had assumed we spawned in. Just spawn a baby.
Like Hermes said, there are other questionable stuff on games and that's fine
Right? I don't get the issue here
A machine/NPC would be fine.
But you don't see the issue of a 40+ year old man trying to convince a child to have a in-game baby with them?
In a machine? No...
Unless it's something graphical, I don't see the problem
@tropic crag Please, either tell me I'm a idiot or what. Cause fucking going insane from these two.
It doesn't fucking matter if it's graphical.
Do you not get the point of what a 'implication' is?
No, I don't get what's the problem in combining avatars stats to produce a third avatar
If there's nothing sexual
AHHHH 
Fuck it, I'm done here.
End of discussion.
I really don't see the issue
as you said, they are avatars. i see two characters trying to max out a new characters stats. not a guy behind a computer. thats always a worry with online play but there are ways to keep it in the open and focused on the game.
This
There are a thousand other issues letting children play games with adults. The above isn't even by far the most worrisome
I dont see how it adds to the overall gameplay so it can stay out. Id rather they focus time and resources on making an ocean or better AI etc.
Yeah, that's probably why they are just putting those features out of the table. Focusing on more important stuff.
I'd rather see them putting more effort on the AI
The Aratai should work well
Maybe they have... we have very little real info on how the game will play out. Friday may get us all hyped up with surprises.
About that, 4 days to go
And there was much rejoicing!!
I'm catiously waiting. I'm not so sure there will be relevant information about Ark 2.
I prefer to live in my delusional world... there will be some significant news on Ark2. I still believe they havent really 'talked' about Ark 2 since saying they next time we 'talk' will be gameplay. And only evil people will shatter my illusion!!
Need a bovid esc creature
Only you would think of something like this LMAO
Okay, so I'm truly am the only one seeing the issue of Player x Player baby-making?
Literally anyone would think of that. The game would get a bad rep really fast
I mean, that's a pretty cool assumption you got there, but the last bit of this chat speaks otherwise
The isle
The last bit of this chat was not made by legal teams or general public opinion
It was made by people who want a feature in a game. The rest of the world isn't so lenient with the idea
Yeah, if I recall right, there was some controversy on that when that feature came out. But it died down since Dondy ignored it.
Yes but
Ppl do that in dino games already its just with eggs so no one cares which i find weird
The isle isn't hugely popular like ark
Anything ark does like that is going to hit mainstream media
Why do we need player baby making, at all? Stop it
Between players, it's not something that ever should come out. Even between player and npc in a game like ark shouldnt happen
Reapers are fine, they are aliens
We don't.
But I was stating earlier on my own opinion on it, and how I find it weird of player x player mating. But I'd be fine with player x NPC mating.
(Even then)
No, I understand the implication, I just don't have... child related thoughts on my mind, like some apparently do, when it comes to the subject matter
eh
Thin ice
Lack of awareness to potential issues isn't a good thing imo
Did you intentionally not read the first part, orrrr
I was taking into everyone's consideration of age.
And ARK has a decently large underage community. So that's why I thought of that, since in a community with a 50/50 split of 18+ and 18- players, situations like that could arise more often.
Yeah, it's something that should be avoided like the plague
Isn't Ark rated T? Or like M at this point lol
Rated-T
Adopting kids in games 👍
Pre established kids from the story of a game 👍
Having kids in games 
So The Sims is just off the table lmao
Oh true
Medieval dynasty does it fine, since it's a single-player game, and the screen fades out.
The Sims isn't a violent dinosaur war survival game
i guess ill say it can work if it fits
I dont think it fits here
Which is why I say player x NPC baby-creation is fine, personally.
It just gets a bit weird and convoluted if you allow player x player baby-making.
Hopefully that will never exist
It'll get shut down almost immediately if it does happen
Making children in games is not an issue, nor is it when it's between two players, as long as it isn't a game where the rating denotes that children are allowed
Even the mods doing that in ark1 got shut down
If the game has the rating of E or T, then sure, leave the baby making out
Anything past 18+ is fair game
Yeah, rating is important.
If Conan had that feature, it wont be horrible since it's Rated-M, and already got nudity.
But with ARK, a Rated-T game, that's a bit weird.
Ark isn't 18+,and I would vastly prefer it stay that way personally
A kid shouldn't be playing Conan anyways.
But a kid can't help play ARK when it's marketed to both kids and adults.
Ark is a great one to play with family. Make it 18+ and it loses that quality
I think ARK-2 may be Rated-M, only for the more gory shit. (the steam page warns about more gore.)
Hopefully not
"Mature Content, specifically violence, can occur against other players or creatures within the fantasy setting of our game at any time and is not gated. This would primarily be demonstrated when players use their fists, melee weapons, ranged weapons, or tamed creatures against other players and/or other creatures. Violence may also be demonstrated when wild npc creatures choose to attack player characters and/or other wild or tamed creatures within the game world. Depictions of and reactions to violence (by targeted player character or creature) are not realistically portrayed and the level of blood associated with these acts is mild and limited."
Yep, sounds like it'll be Rated-M
Oooh, I wonder if creatures/players will have layers, like the demons in DOOM-Eternal?
In a perfect world, all the gory and explicit games would be rated 18+ and there would be no kids of any age playing them, but we all know that kids play GTA 5 all the time, same with CoD
Are not realistically portrayed, and level of blood is mild and limited. Doesn't sound m to me
It sounds a lot like ark1
Whe
Anyway, yeah. I think ARK should steer away from baby-makin.
But if it 'did' have the feature, I think it should be player x NPC only.
Next topic
Hopefully lightning storms can actually fucking hit you in ARK-2
Rain making the ground wet and rivers stronger would be cool too
leave the diddling to adult mods
A flash flood would be epic
TRUE!
Honestly, I wouldn't mind if ARK-2's modding scene got the attention that Skyrim has. 
Being an old game?
Go on Skyrim's Nexus and you'll see what I mean
By the way, Bruise. What're your opinions on having the ocean more lethal?
I do think though Tuso's and Mosa's should still have the chance to agro on large ships.
on the one hand Leeds help keep people from turtling on big rafts. on the other hand Leeds are butts because I want to make a raft base
I feel like having raft bases is kind of a necessity really
But that's because I like to derp around and have mobility
and paracers/brontos are too slow
Yeah, and super vulnerable
hello paleo conan
Romping around on a Paracer base is a lot of fun though - totally not viable in PvP, and even PvE has its hardships since all wilds can attack straight through structures and destroy everything inside
Id rather have what platform saddles are now to be something designed around like 1 land creature and 1 sea creature
id rather have some lord of the rings elephant saddles instead honestly
Also paracers to not be ugly as hell, and to exist in the arid desert WHERE IT BELONGS
Not in the fricking swamps!!
Mammals in this game at least should be opting for speed over their dinosaur counterpart
Paracer especially
Racer tube op
I thought they lived in the savannah 🙈
Close enough
Distinctly different biomes but we ball
It’s also a requirement that something exist to clear said raft bases, lest they ruin the world like they did in ark 1
“More”? What’s not lethal in ark 1’s ocean other than coel
Megachelon and basi as well
Decay timer? Only one boat per tribe?
You don't exactly see oceans full of spammed boats in atlas, so just do what they did
Pretty sure ark 1 rafts have a timer like any tame/structure does?
They are easily made and easily spammed
And there was basically an unlimited number of them allowed
There are other ways to make sure the oceans aren't full of rafts that doesn't necessitate a creature that will destroy it when you are offline
I do think rafts in the shallows should be safe - issue with ark 1 was Leeds could chase you to shore
It would be challenging to have surf and waves in general. Make it so you have to choose where to beach your boat. Maybe even tidal waves created by weather events! Maybe allow breakwaters and marinas? It'd bring a whole new thing for Bobs to worry about!
dude this aint that movie ready player one, wildcard can barely make a roadmap in time and you want them to make ocean patterns whit weather behavior?
We have no idea when the roadmap was ready for release. Just that they chose to do it this week. And they already said weather and world events are in the game so it's not beyond their skill. I chose to believe in the 99% good and not dwell on the 1% bad.
damn you must have play other game and come here than 🤣 and they did say when roadmap was gonna be release which was this month but not the day so stop whit the excuses its a damn roadmap kids do that in history class at the very minimum and talk about bad did you notice dolie promise the "next thing you will see from us will be a gameplay" and not a damn roadmap that took a entire month just to be release on the last day if not on the next they so they can say it was april fool's day
the 31 is still march, so... if they release by friday they did on time
Huh? You've never heard of timing your release? As i said, the roadmap could have been done months ago and they chose to do it now. Could be a hundred reasons. You apparently choose to believe that people are incapable of doing well. And they haven't said no gameplay during roadmap so I'll wait till facts come out. Just cause they aren't doing what you want doesn't mean they aren't doing a decent job.
whit wildcard thats a big if 🤣
The gameplay, yeah, they changed that. But if they didn't do that we wouldn't have seen those concept arts or the roadmap
aint about what i want but what they promise just to go back on their word and a gameplay aint the worst they have done whit going back whit their word
I believe they will release it by them. Real question is: Will it contain relevant info about Ark 2?
I'm not so sure, but I hope it will.
They havent lied. Concept art is not talking about the game. The roadmap should fall under the category of talking so thats when i expect gameplay.
I'm sorry, but I have to disagree
concept art aint a gameplay, gameplay is you seeing someone else playing the game... like see they moving around doing stuff not pictures
They have even stated they had changed their minds about that and decided to release things before the gameplay
Despite anticipating our next showing of ARK 2 to be a gameplay showcase, we see the hunger and eagerness for more ARK 2 information, and we get it. We’ve decided to give you a peek behind the curtain and begin showcasing more ARK 2 tidbits regularly as we lead up to the first gameplay trailer. We hope you enjoy these appetizers, and we can’t wait for you to get your hands on the main course
blame the people whining for more stuff as the reason they didn't show gameplay next
Not once they became enforced under/by the tribe limit they didn't
They take 20 slots, iirc?
that was after dolie said about gameplay right?
yes -__-
AFAIK only when you build on them
Again, its an interpretation of talking. Gameplay is coming when they talk about the game.
Read the above by FLOBS
so i stand correct, they went back on their word, maybe when they record the gameplay a anky fall trought the map and they were like "shit we need more time, hey ced tell them you gonna showcase art pics of what is to come and delay more time whit a roadmap, that should do it" 🤣
I'll place one down in a moment to confirm
It's a quote from them. They recognized the community's appetite for new info and decided to change their minds
Above statement doesnt say... here is us talking about the game instead of gameplay. It says we aren't ready to talk so look at this in the meantime.
call that bullshit, concept art aint crap next to a gameplay i know you know everyone knows it
Wildcard has almost always shared concept for DLC's leading up to the gameplay and release
I didn't say that... I said they CHANGED THEIR MINDS about the gameplay and just started sharing other info
Obviously a gameplay would be better than concept arts. But concept arts are better than nothing
what??? i dont recall once they share concepts before release of dlc's at all, i do recall them showcase ab like a week before release and that was it
Maybe you don't watch their streams then
They have always did that
it's not always just concept arts, it was also the torn dossiers and recently renderd images like Gen 2 had leading up to release
I think another way to see this is they never said they wouldn't releaae concept art before gameplay. The community wants gameplay and any thing less is percieved as a deceitful.
Fox, you ok, bud? You need to take your meds or something?
shit they did more than trailers for gen 2 before releasing they said ark 2 was coming even before gen 2 was out but i dont remember anyone talking about gameplay of gen 2 at all, i was watching a chinese guy play gen2 so i could get a idea of the map to pick a spot to build, gameplay i only see for ab i dont even recall for extinction and for gen1 i was on a ark break
naa i just dont kiss their buts and make excuses for them
Whe
Wheft
They aren't excuses LMAO you are delusional
You read the quote above where they clearly stated they have changed their minds? It's not about how we read it, they recon the gameplay would take longer and changed their minds.
Here: Despite anticipating our next showing of ARK 2 to be a gameplay showcase, we see the hunger and eagerness for more ARK 2 information, and we get it. We’ve decided to give you a peek behind the curtain and begin showcasing more ARK 2 tidbits regularly as we lead up to the first gameplay trailer. We hope you enjoy these appetizers, and we can’t wait for you to get your hands on the main course
God this is entertaining
🚬
They simply changed their minds upon seeing the players whine 24/7 for info, and then when they did show the concepts, those same players are suddenly all "OMFG are you KIDDING me they LIED how dare they those bastards wtfffffff!!!!11!!!"
we're talking about ark players after all, the same people that threaten the devs when servers are down for 3 minutes
Sadly, yes
Just to be clear, Im happy they changed their minds. That's not my point. LOL
Yeah. It doesn't say they changed their mind about gameplay and talking. It says the realize the time untill they release gameplay is longer than people want so they filled the hole.
We would be on the dark if they didn't
Ok, man. 
Oh no I got ya, I'm happy they did too, was a minor misstep to make a promise like that and WC knows that now, I'd imagine 😅
this is a win until gameplay is shared, but i guess they would rather want radio silence for half a year instead? 🤣
FR thoooooough, like make up your minds, whiny ark community, do you want the fucking reveals or not goddamn
Quit flip flopping so gd much
and ya wonder why i want ark 2 to draw in new players to replace some of the old ones 
I honestly hope that portion of the fanbase dies off and is replaced with people who have half a brain
we need to up the standard of ark chatters having combined -31 iq
Would be a marked improvement for SURE
Sorry to seem argumentive. I am ok with how their progressing. I just get frustrated with the negativity of others.
My whole point is, like Bruising said, they did a wrong move back then and learned from that. But saying they stick to their word isn't right.
And not keeping their word on that was good
Nah, I'm hyped for ark 2. I don't have a negative view of it.
Just a bit frustrated with WC's erratic behavior when comes to PR

I mean, I dunno about that, they usually keep their word. The only reason they changed their tune on the gameplay footage thing was because of the whiners
But I'm fine with it actually. All devs are a bit messy when comes to PR.
We would've got nothing until the gameplay footage and been fine, if not for the whiny asshats that we call our equals, begrudgingly
In 7-8 years I can count on my fingers how many times they've kept their word. 😂
They don't have a good history, but I like their game.
''equal'' i would do a 1940s move on them if i could
I need more than just my fingers to count how many times they've kept their word, but I can easily count on one hand when they haven't
The only times I can remember them not keeping their word are as follows;
- When they said they'd add the carcharo waaaay back in 2015 (which eventually they did so I don't really count it anymore)
- When they said there'd be explosive shotgun ammo in the initial store page blurb for Aberration (which I am fine with now, seeing as how it probably would've been broken OP garbage anyways and abused)
- When they said they'd do another TLC after the Wyvern/Drake/invertebrate breeding TLC, which I'm still waiting on. Any day now. Pls
we got the Carchar giga tlc
But by all means, list me other examples, please.
List examples of WC not keeping their word challenge (impossible)
(I just want breedable basilisks and for reaper queens to be tamable/raiseable, perhaps with an extremely low chance of it being a queen when you get impregnated please that's all I ask 🙏 )
the mod ''no untameables'' we use on our servers has that for reaper queens
but i don't think those things will really happen anymore
I know, which is why I want it to be base as I know it can be done and then I can have it on my Xbox cluster
if you build it they will com
damn it reallly escape your mind when they go back on their word whit continue support to legacy servers 3 days before officials when live or legacy servers would not be deleted if they had continue players on them (i wasent play but still talking to those were on my legacy server, there was about 20 ppl on daily and they delete the server "due to low population") (this was on PS)
They never promised to keep legacy up, but ok
I'm not sure if this was pointed out later on as I don't have time to read all the responses lol, but the tweet actually said "the next time we talk about or share anything related to #ark-survival-ascended2, it will be gameplay (yay!)" so yes you are correct about the talking aspect, but concepts fall under 'sharing' ARK 2 stuff.
bullshit i was there, read the both posts, the one they said they would continue giving support to those servers and the next one when they said they would not continue support the legacy servers
I played on legacy The Center 805 and The Island 423, was alpha on both. Trust me, I read every single BIT of those posts regarding legacy, they never once said they were going to keep all the servers up forever. Go back and reread em, bud.
I was talking about postponements. Like (almost) every map/major update/TLC/DLC was postponed. Like I said, it's basic dev behavior: overpromisse and underdeliver. LOL
I just wanted them to keep quiet until they can release things
Shut, he played on single player and got wiped by pve forces? 
will ark 2 have some upscaling technology?
Probably DLSS, but we will have to wait confirmation
no fsr?
I say dlss because in 2018 Nvidia announced Ark as one of the tiles that would get dlss
BUT they never implemented, so... LOL
Well, that's not quite the same thing. I guess maybe somewhere in there, the term was mentioned and was picked up, which is understandable
hahahha 2018, thats so long ago, typical ark😂
I'm talking about messy PR. It doesnt bode well for the community, even more for a toxic one. LOL
Do you know who Spartans is? What about Azure? Or maybe PB&J?
We fought back then 
I was in MERCOSUL then BLDX LOL
I hated raisinblood
F*cking MF
Spartans were our beta tribe, Azure was my best bud lol. We did everything together, even transported his giga line (the 2nd best gigas on all of official at the time) across 805 in a train, from blue ob to the ice castle
Actually raisinblood was in BlackKnights LOL
But once official became legacy, he stopped playing like I did I think, all I remember hearing was that Spartans took over after they found our bases
But I remember joining some raids against spartans
Never heard about Azure
are you talking about pc?
or consoles?
Didn't think so, sit down 😤
Xbox
Wrong platform then LOL
There was an Spartans on PC, but they were alphas in some servers
Azure was his short name, not tryin to say his full GT for his privacy
But yeah it was the same Spartans, they played on both
Fair enough
Why tf is my G key getting all wacky now? I have to retype my Gs like four times 🥲
we are all king of ark2 till we be com big and do not die in game to much
March 31st yes. Seeing as that is still in the future
🍻 
ark to beer shape like this
for all
Friday
yes Friday
when ark 2 com out do not for get to say to there players welcome to your new home lol
I don't welcome players to my home, usually they try to steal my stuff lol
i play pve or they sleep in your bead lol
If anyone comes to my property, I'll fucking blast their ass.
PvE or PvP, get the fuck off my base.
If I played PvE and someone went afk in my base I'd box em lol
Just build them a thatch resort right by your house :)
Then when they go offline, blow them to hell
I heard tell that there was a guy on official who collected low level players who quit (obviously before the changed being able to drag logged off players in pve)
you can still drag logged off players, people still drag them anywhere
Oh, I thought that got patched awhile ago
I was gonna say, still drag people all the time lol
Obviously I am up to date with pve lol
Pve wars are the most interesting because people have no idea what theyre doing so they come up with the craziest shit
Wrong chat
This is for ARK 2 only
yes because im totally asking if i can kidnap people knowing thats already a feature in ark 1
Am ready!! For Friday. I can't wait for the news and get Pissed off at Ark 2 being pushed 5 years further from release
😆
Imagine the roadmap is delayed because it's April 1 in some countries

