#lore-nerdz
1 messages Β· Page 17 of 1
You can argue Van-Gogh's is a story about 'don't let others push you down into a dark pit you can't return from. What you do has value, even if it's on a minute level.'
Well, for children it is the ability to associate fiction to reality. But I think it is the driving force of original thought
Then it has value to you. But that doesn't mean I have to consider it valuable
Art is only useful to enhance an experience or explanation
Right, but then don't say it's 'worthless'
Cause if I and many others feel the same, then it obviously has emotional/historical value to it.
Art is whatever the fuck you want it to be. π
There's no 'rules' to art.
I say things how I see them lol. Most art is effort with no originality
"the expression or application of human creative skill and imagination, typically in a visual form such as painting or sculpture, producing works to be appreciated primarily for their beauty or emotional power."
If it falls under this, it's art.
Doesn't matter how you feel about it, it is objectively art by definition.
And this is why I am not an artist. Lol, because this makes 0 sense to me
Uh. Using a definition to prove a point is a logical fallacy tbh.
And that's fine, you don't need to make sense of it.
Just smile and wave like a normal goddamn human. π
The fact is that most art is copy cat of other art
No, like seeing someone else's work and doing the same basic thing, but slightly different
In which context does this apply to?
That it is copycat?
Yes
In the context of art, most art is mimicry? I mean I don't know what other context to give it
Not gonna lie, it kind of feels like I'm talking to a goddamn bot right now. π
I mean, I last I checked I wasn't a bot, but maybe I should check again lol
I did break chatgpt once though
Well, more than once
Only caused it to crash once
Fuck it, I'm going to bed.
TL:DR, if someone created something and it gives them or someone else emotional value to it (an art-piece, games movies books, etc) then it's art.
Doesn't matter what or how you feel about it. You as an individual can't change the value of something if a bigger collective think it does have value.
You don't need to understand this, just smile and wave and say "nice" or "cool" and move on before you make someone pissed.
Imo art has value in that it can be used to give context to an idea. If it lacks that, or if the idea is something trivial, it has no value to me
Cool.
That isn't what art is.
Going to bed.
That is so "Pro-AI art" thing I have ever read
Didn't mean to make you mad at me π
I mean, I am pro people being better people. If ai helps that, then bring on the ai
No, it's not
It doesn't made "art better" if anything it removes human made art out of the process
We are called "starving artists" for a reason, and the rise of "unsanctioned AI art" makes worse for use who make art for a living
There is one thing that people do better than ai, and that is depth of thought with context
Not really
It's more playing RNG-sim with stolen assets
As of now, sure. But that's the thing with ai. It'll get better
Until all artists managed to officially opt out from being scraped with watermarks and signatures intact
What is left for AI to train is nothing but PowerPoint clipart
I mean, technological advancement does put people out of work. The fact that art was exempt from that until now doesn't change anything
For now only literal art theves and NFT bros profited from AI "art" instead of used to protect artists creations from being scraped and laundered by some "google search expert" or what is being intended "an art tool"
If all artists quit the creative market
What use of our years of training and experience?
It's like you force a seasoned mechanic to be a lawyer
Plus without us making original work, there is nothing new for AI to scrape, and the results will be monotonous
It happened right now, outcomes of AI art are way too close to someone's artwork
Music industry has hard core copyright even AI scrapers are afraid to "sample" without paying royalties
Raq is an unfeeling machine, confirmed
Basically
Little bit yeah
This could be, in which case artists should put effort into knowing what the limits of ai are and doing things it cant
AI processing Art is like mixing the colors all at once and all you get is greyish brown
Sure the ratio of colors maybe different but it's still shades of gray brown unless you put one big blob of a color on it
It will only be "perfect" if they keep scraping original artwork without permission
TL;DR I am against people using AI to devalue actual work and process of actual artists especially us who actually draw commissions as a means of livelihood
Especially AI that is used to remove watermarks and signatures for some prompt bro claim it as "their art" and sell for profit
There should be limitations sure. But loads of people lost their lively hoods with the advent of tractors and factories. Loss of lively hood is an issue, but it shouldn't stop technological progression
Lmao, if "constant stealing of original artwork" is "technological progression"
I don't think that is not progressing at all, more like "how to make easy profit while putting people out of jobs"
It's an issue sure
It would be a "technological advancement" if the AI music generator somehow miraculously bypass the big music copyright
But alas starving artists are too easy for them
I'm not worried, AI will never have the capacity for art and a true understanding of it as humans do (sans Raq, who doesn't understand art either I guess)
I mean, that's a valid argument I guess
Still can't wrap my head around that take, no offense
It's like saying you don't, like... listen to music or something
I meeeaaaaan
Lol, would it surprise you if I said I only eat once a day because I forget to lol
No, eating once a day is the way to go
As if art hasn't just turned into people throwing pieces of crap together and calling it art
But that still has meaning, even if it is just as simple as "fecal funny"
Abstract art is like the worst thing in existence and I will not be taking any questions on it
I do not disagree lol
I would say abstract is some of the better art styles. Far more appealing than a painting of a grumpy old man and woman in front of a farm.
Well, I have no more to say then, y'all not understanding art brings a lot to the table and explains so many things
But abstract art is usually that way for a reason, I suppose...
Funny enough that is how AI does it with art
It takes artworks with the same tag within the asking prompt, break it apart in it's pixels and throw things together, how else some outcomes have mashup of signatures/watermarks or have hands with polydactyly
Stable Diffusion in a literal nutshell
Anyone who believes ai art is a legitimate form of art is delusional
Woah i came here to check on the silly ramblings but theres ai
but yeah ai art is horrible and i fear for my future job prospects
You know what's even more horrifying is the fact that they grew an artifical human finger on a robot
Look it up
im gonna give my little piece which is that the advent of ai βartβ is happening while i am actively studying and dedicating my life to art and so i really worry sometimes that if we mess up somewhere im gonna lose my entire worth
they what now
Yes
AI art can be good, to say that just because a few pieces of AI art is plagiarized that it's all inherently bad is the true delusional take
Ai is a legitimate form of art it just shouldn't be protected by any form of copyright laws
Which it isn't so
At least in the US
I would rather see a grumpy old man and woman in front of a farm than "i got in a car crash and this is the mangled remains of my car with my dead family inside"
AI art isnβt really art in my opinion. I mean kind of I guess. But like if you post an ai art and claim credit for it you deserve to be laughed at in a public forum.
If it makes you feel better, I will always appreciate something handmade far more than anything a machine or computer does. I donβt think Iβm alone on this either.
Its still art it's just a unique form of art that needs to be observed differently, more in a way of studying the human influence on the art than any meaning of the art itself, seeing how and why it fell into the theme it did, looking at popular paintings that are similar that could've influenced it, more of a dive into human nature than the art generated itself
Thats just how id look at it, I don't like art so id never look at it to begin with
Itβs computer generated bs.
Typing in keywords and having a computer generate an image with them does not make you an artist.
Thereβs just no soul behind it
they are monetized through subscriptions (for commercial uses) while the artworks from the artists they scrape don't get compensation
meanwhile in music, you need to pay for literal samples of beats and lyrics
Oh for sure, it's not really owned or made by anyone in particular I can agree, save for maybe the developer of the AI but that's a slippery slope
This exactly, it's just soulless, mindless fun imo
Not all AI art is monetized and the like was my point, lol
I can go make an AI image of President Sleepy Joe in a mech suit and it hurts absolutely no one
you should see slew of AI "art" in fiverr and redbubble lol
Again, that isn't ALL AI art. Don't generalize too much π
also the thing is
they claim "for research" yet they allow monetize for commercial uses despite the literal copyright issue
Because it's open source, yes. I know the issue intimately, and it is sad for those being plagiarized, but this is a new age issue and will require a new age solution that I don't think anyone alive today has thought of yet
it ain't open source when they asking money for commercialization
OBS and Linux is open source yet i dont see them commercialized. they are donation driven
That... isn't quite how that works
AI made memes ain't the issue there... it's just memes, i am talking about the devalue to artists who just want to make a living
As am I, I know several artists who have had work plagiarized via AI and know the issue intimately, as stated
But it's still an issue that we have no current solution to, so it's kind of a moot point as of yet
The age old solution is people are gonna resist it until everyone forgets its an issue and stops caring
not for artists because livelihoods are on the line
the people who stopped caring are the ones who are saying "can i pay you with exposure" and those do dont want caught stealing artworks without permissions and selling them in redbubble
It is just the nature of time that as technology advances more and more people aren't gonna care anymore cuz there's gonna be some new problem that comes up and everyones gonna forget this was ever an issue
so you want to let genuine art die off?
last time i check we are still mad at people stealing artworks (see previous community crunches), AI scraping is far worse
the only way for that "issue to die off" if living artists held the same copyright as music and an auto opt-out from scraping, not us manually removing years of hard work in the scraping database
I doubt actual art will die off, I think it'll adapt
adapt? in what way?
just be the fodder to the scraping system with no protection nor compensation unlike the musical counterpart?
tell us "how to adapt"
It's already adapted, art is more than just random crappy drawings, art is music, art is writing, art is in everything, hell id even say art is math have you ever seen someone good at math just flowing fluently with what they're writing for a big problem? Its amazing to watch, art isn't gonna die because some random AIs are making pictures
Dafuq
Philosophy is not helping still
Also those "random crappy drawings" are also art
Just so you know... Art is freaking subjective and people have to start somewhere, not just <insert words here> [click submit] = instant "art"
I never said random crappy drawings aren't art i just said there's way more to art than that and it's not gonna die as a result of AI
But motivation to make and share art will
I have seen artists getting demoralized by "is this AI" or "what AI did you use?" comment despite having all effort of sketching and rendering a piece
Especially the good ones that are easily mistaken as AI "art" despite all efforts have made behind the scenes
You're still here making a mountain of a molehill, huh? π
Who, me?
Nah I am making a foxhole
I still can't spell that word
Vole in an... Abbotour?
Im gonna spell it like it sounds
Abbotwa
avatar
Google says abattoir but i disagree
It sounds too French and the french aren't allowed to have words so
Its now officially abbotwa
I thought it was abbateur no clue why
Ai has limitations. Figure out what they are and just do something different
that is the most fartbrain take ive heard about ai art but im not in the mood for debate so you do you
Just because calculators became a thing didn't make mathematicians lose their jobs. The coding ai they are making won't make software devs lose work. There are loads of things people can do that ai simply cant
Ai is kinda different than automation tho
Since when were we talking about automation? Lol
But yeah, that's basically my point as well, there are things that will not be able to be taken up by AI, and things AI simply cannot conceive nor comprehend
Until such a time as ai is proven to be strong, I am under the impression that it is weak. And weak ai is always worse than a human intellect or specialist
Ai can't conceive or comprehend anything
They call it artificial intelligence, but it has no actual intelligence
It's all algorithms and databases
The thing about the calculator
Agreed
Even if ai somehow becomes better than people in some things, just due to the inherent mathematical issues of computer hardware it will be incapable of a lot of things that humans are capable of
No but its meant to be selflearning
It learns faster than we do
And the ai will prob note these things and find solutions for it
Which makes is a glorified calculator
There are actually no solutions to it lol
How so
That's why computers have limits
Yea but its not like weve discovered everything there is to be know
Yet
At all
Known*
Ai cannot solve the halting problem
Yet
Period
What makes you so sure
There's always the possibility for the future, don't be daft
People couldnt imagine a pc being smaller than a room not so long ago
Hard mathematical proof does not change over time
Physics and the solar system also don't change over time, right? π
Nobel prize recently got gives to people disproving some of einsteins theories that were said to be set in stone xd
Physics is not mathematics. Ai solving problems 100% is
If everything in math was discovered. Why dont the mathematicians just retire lol
Again, that's a totally unrelated field lol. Einstein was not a mathematician, he was a physicist
Just because we were once cavemen doesn't mean we can only use clubs and bang rocks together
To think otherwise is just silly
Yes but the example was that something that was believed to be un-changeable got changed
Name one mathematical proof in the last 300 years that was changed
Well if you give me some time to google
There is a reason einsteins theory of gravity is a theory
But even if i dont find anything it doesnt mean that we cant discover new things
While the proof of the unsolvability of the halting problem is a proof
For now, sure
I just think its weird to be so sure of something that we have no clue of
Oh, we discovered a solution to it already, unfortunately it takes a slow kerr black hole and the age of the universe
And we'll also never have flying cars, apparently
*you have no clue of
We as in humanity
That is an engineering problem
You entirely underestimate the field of mathematics lol
Ok, and?
It's unrelated
It is still something that is considered "impossible"
Well now you're just getting semantic
No, it's considered impractical and dangerous, which is why it's not a thing
Which means I'm right
No, the word I would use is unfamiliar with the problem
No1 really knows what ai will be able to do. What makes you so sure? And why are we developing ai if its useless
A glorified calculator as you said
I mean, if you read back to what I said, unless ai becomes strong, then it has some hard limits.
The current ai is on the weak end of weak ai
It is by no means useless, but don't overestimate its capabilities
You aren't getting the point
I mean yea its weak now bec it hasnt been able to learn yet
It's no use
What point?
Precisely lol
Its a toddler now
It is weak ai due to the algorithms it uses. Give it the time of the universe to "learn" and it will still be weak
It's an algorithm...
How can you be so sure
I am convinced you are just trolling lol
Youre predicting that ai will hit a ceiling and still be weak. And im asking how you can be so sure
Arithmetic is still arithmetic regardless of how long you do it
When stuff youre saying has been disproven throughout history
Well i dont think i can change your mind so gg
I am not predicting it will hit a ceiling. I am saying that the current algorithms have very well defined limits
Usually how these end up lmao
Lmao
I mean, if you were an expert on ai you might be able to. But this is what I do when I am not working or playing ark.
I have written my own ai before lol
Apparently not a very good one, eh?
Im just using logical thinking
No, because this is a logical fallacy
Which im not
W/e you say π
I feel like I am getting a lot of people mad at me today lol
Seriously though, of you want to debate ai, vague generalizations of unrelated historical events is not enough to prove a point
I'm not mad, just dumbfounded at the prospect of the absolute magnitude of misunderstanding going on
I mean, sure?
I am pretty certain I don't misunderstand ai from a mathematical point of view
Im not mad either lol
But i dont think comparing the step from doing math on paper to transitioning to a calculator is the same leap as going from where were at now to ai
For the record, here's a few mathematical proofs that were disproven that I could find, and were mostly accepted as fact until proven otherwise: Hilbert's 21st problem, The Euler Characteristic, The Jacobian Conjecture, and The Busemann-Petty problem
I mean, thousands of people lost their jobs because of calculators
From a cultural perspective, I really don't see the difference
Still dont think its an accurate example
Youre comparing something that cannot change, as a calculator. To something will be able to learn massive amounts of things in literal seconds
An easier on would have just been the parallel postulate lol
Calculators have changed. They went from adding numbers to being able to run ai
Sure, but you said that mathematics hadn't changed in at least 300 years; those prove that wrong entirely
The cases that you mentioned were not hard proofs. They did have conjecture and assumptions in them
To be fair, it's impossible to make a mathematical system without assumptions, but they should be limited to reason
Who's to say that current other proofs aren't the same situation?
Some summarize the lore for me rq please
I mean, that is a fair point I suppose. It might be possible to create a machine that can surpass the limitations, but ai on a glorified push down automata is not the one
To surpass the Turing barrier, you have to already be past it
Sure, but you admit an AI may, eventually, be the one to do so?
Not on a normal, super, or quantum computer
Mayhaps
Lol, no. It's pretty well established
The halting problem is undecidable, which means that short of using time mechanics from general relativity there is no general solution to it
I didnt say they havent changed. I meant that if you go to the store and buy a regular calculator itll do the same thing until it dies with no improvement
A computer is just a calculator
Now, if there was a machine that could solve the halting problem, that would be when you should be really scared lol
What prevents ai from discovering that
The aforementioned current limitations
The fact that it is impossible without use of relativity and the age of the universe?
Humans can do mathematics that far surpasses what machines can. Like faaaar beyond. It's possible that ai could approach what we have done, but something as limited as current ai, not a chance
It will help certain fields
Im not just stuck on current ai
But the very existence of ai depends on the nature of the mathematics used
Neither am I. I could give you some resources that would clear up why the halting problem is unsolvable lol
It's been proven that there is no Turing machine that can solve it, and computers are limited Turing machines.
Ok, see, we've reached a point of agreement, how hard was that? π
What point was that?
Rather us just accepting that we wont find an agreement π
Back to ark-lore
This one, idk, maybe I was wrong π
I mean, I believe it is important to stay on top of the main concepts of computer science (and physics) I read most of the new significant papers that have been released in the last 20 or 30 years. I am no expert so there is a possibility that I misunderstood things, but I am pretty sure not. As long as church turing holds, there is hard limit to what ai can to. Not to mention the np problem
@brazen sparrow Okay, so I wasn't the only one fucking questioning Raq's point of view about art?
That shit was crazy
Confirmed, I am crazy
You're not crazy, you're a psychopath.
Wait, nope, not the right one
Sociopath.
That's the word I was looking for
I mean. Not really, but I get where you get that from
"Antisocial personality disorder, sometimes called sociopathy, is a mental health condition in which a person consistently shows no regard for right and wrong and ignores the rights and feelings of others."
That sounds just like you from last night
You had no regard for others feelings towards art, and so all art was worthless to you.
That's kind of sociopathy.
I think you are taking that a bit to far lol. The fact that I dont care for art does not make me a sociopath lol
You didn't make it out that you didn't 'care'
You where making it out last night that art was objectively worthless, no matter who you are.
I think you were misinterpreting. What I said is that most art is copycat with lack of originality
And this is why he's a sociopath
A pedestal that apparently I am dying on lol
He's not a sociopath, he's objectively incorrect.
A shit covered one at that
I really dont see why it is such a big deal
It's not. You're entitled to your own opinion. It's just one of the absolutely batshit insane ones I've ever seen.
But you're entitled to it.
I wanna talk about lore now.
I dont see how its insane lol
(honestly, I'm not sure if he should be)
'Most art is copied and lacks originality.'
As an artist... you are so wrong... on so many levels..
Am I the only one that sees sociopathy-like actions in this topic?
Well I am not an artist, so I cant really say anything more than that lol. So much of what I do see in art is just copied concepts from other art
It's not sociopathic?
That's called 'inspiration'.
Its inspiration to copy the same basic picture over and over and over?
That's called practice.
You'd shrivel up and die if I showed you a reference sheet. 
"Antisocial personality disorder, sometimes called sociopathy, is a mental health condition in which a person consistently shows no regard for right and wrong and ignores the rights and feelings of others"
He's ignoring and can't comprehend the wrong he's saying, and ignoring what others have told him about art and their feelings about it.
Sounds like a sociopath.
So what is the practice of people splattering paint without form or reason on a canvas and selling it as art
Thats how an opinion works, though.
That's soulless. But that's not 'most art'
Bruh. Its literally not lol. I am pragmatic, not sociopathical lol
But you can at least understand other sides, but not agree with them.
He's flat out not understanding other peoples points
I have very little exposure to art lol. But I have had a lot of people try to ram down my throat that colors on a page is art. And I call bs to that
Calling those people 'artists' puts a bad taste in my mouth. Artists are people like Van Gogh, Tri, etc.
Fuck it, I know I'm probably wrong. But I'm nicknaming him 'Raqiopath' from now on.
Are we still arguing about this
Silence
I mean, I got called a sociopath, so you bet I am arguing that
Everything is an art.
There is objectively good and bad art.
Something I put effort into and fail miserably in execution? Still art.
Me grabbing 20 colored pencils and going schizo on my wall? Objectively not art.
I am being entertained
No you
See this is what I dont understand. Why is the definition of art so subjective?
This is what I was saying last night.
Still didn't understand this.
It literally makes no sense to me
No. 
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
Ever heard that phrase?
Beauty != art
I don't like that phrase
Isn't the beholder the thing from dnd? Thats all i can think of when i hear it
I'm
I'm going to go crazy
Someone put me in a straight jacket
Do you still not see my point? 
If you had an opinion you held onto this hard you wouldn't let go either
Oh no, I would.
And I have.
Sunsets are beautiful, but they arent art. A concise well devised mathematical theorem is beautiful, but it isnt art.
I'm gonna separate myself from this convo before I go clinically gibbly gobbly goofy
My opinions change cause I as a person change.
My opinions change because i like to argue the funniest opinion and that changes based on who is getting angrier
Dav, no one asked
I did
Okay, 'nobody' asked
I mean, I do that to a degree too lol. But not in this case. I genuinely dont understand peoples obsession with art
There's a lot of people in this server named nobody
Breathing addiction π«΅
What
I guess?
I fucking hate oxygen.
But I still breath it.
Me personally I just became a fish
So you are saying it is constant exposure to 'art' that makes people like it? And since I dont have that I wont understand?
Fuck it.
-Returns to fish
Don't then you'll have hiccups
Art pretty
Whether it be pretty landscapes
Pretty building
Pretty monsters
Pretty women (hey that's me)
People like looking at the pretty
Okay, I'm going to dump some shit on Y'all.
@mental basin I understand 'biologically' why people want to reproduce, it's both an addiction and a biological need to expand our species.
But I myself don't understand why we don't have selective breeding, and only allow the objectively best people to breed to better our species. Least violent and smartest people.
'Buuuut' I understand why it isn't a thing, cause people would become emotionally deprived if they never had reproducing.
So while I get where Raq is coming from, he's dense as all hell.
I mean, I see people call those nft chimpanzees art, and I would say those arent pretty. It seems to me that art is kind of a catchall for random creativity that otherwise doesnt have a place?
They objectively aren't art
NFTs are soulless, randomly generated pieces of shit that can burn in Hell
I mean, you have to take what you can get. I am good with math and science, pretty terrible with anything outside that lol
Least violent doesn't exist violence is the only consistency in human communication throughout time and the only thing everyone understands
But people say they are art. You get the conundrum lol
You see though, the art community shuns NFT's due to how soulless they are.
But funny monkey
The majority don't.
It's just another crypto currency.
I still think i could sell Rockwell an NFT
Yeah, that's bullshit and you know it.
Humans aren't inherently violent. It's the environment we grow up in that changes us.
"* It is scientifically incorrect to say that war or any other violent behavior is genetically programmed into our human nature. Except for rare pathologies the genes do not produce individuals necessarily predisposed to violence. Neither do they determine the opposite."
Violence and hate is human nature
I mean, it hasnt been scientifically proven that any behavior is genetically programmed into human nature
Gotta disagree with this.
Hate is human nature, but wanting to kill someone for having not the same opinion isn't.
I dont think hate is human nature either lol
"Hate has been described widely as an emotion, but also as an attitude or a sentiment. Some scholars think that hate is an extreme version of anger or dislike; some describe hate as a blend of emotions such as anger, contempt and disgust; and others regard hate as a distinct and unique feeling."
Humans just kinda have a natural lean towards not liking things that are new or different
Hate is an emotion which is tied to us, it's an extreme form of dislike.
It's to help us categorize things, like "I hate the taste of grass" so now you know to not eat grass cause you hate the taste of it.
Speak for yourself, kid
Not liking new and hate are two totally different things
I for one accept our impending AI overlords.
Except ai cant really overlord anything yet
No shit.
It wont be able to for a long time, if ever
We don't know that
We literally do.
And AI art is cool, but it isn't 'art' in the sense that it has beauty.
'Buuuut' it does have uses in concept art and such.
Getting general idea of something, but it will never be some Van-Gogh shit.
I mean, I find beauty in understanding things. I dont understand art for the most part.
I did not ask.
We're gonna be like the people in mass effect who made the ai then realized it was too smart and try to kill it and its just not gonna work
You arent going to be mad at me forever because I think most art is worthless are you?
You......you do realize that the whole point of Mass-Effect is to stop that cycle and to have peace....right?
Im talking about the uhh geth and whatever the species was called that created them
Shepard literally proves the Reapers wrong by uniting every species "including AI"
Yeah, which the war was started cause a single geth asked "does this unit have a soul"
And you know damn well there's going to be people who fight 'with' the AI if it does have a conscious.
They made the AI freethinking and suffered the consequences, i see little chance humanity doesn't end up in some similar scenario eventually where we just let it be too smart and it goes too far for us to handle
You probably dont want me jumping in and saying I dont think its possible for ai to be freethinking
Yeahhhh
Bruh, fucking reply the games.
The only 'consequence' that happened was the creators tried to fucking kill the geths after the asked that question, in 'FEAR'
It is people like you that fear this future that will cause the war.
That is literally what happens
I'm not fearing it? I sided with the Geth they were objectively in the right? Im just saying humanity is gonna get to that point eventually and its gonna be an issue
This is why I'm accepting to shit like aliens, AI's or shit.
Cause it's the fear that'll cause the war, and not accepting them as other living beings like us.
But just like in the game, why does only one side need to live?
You can convince the Quarians to side with the geth.
Can you? I didn't have that option, when i tried they decided they were gonna go full speed ahead into the Geth fleet
Did legion die in Mass Effect 2?
If you choose violence when offered peace you'll get whats coming to you
Legion didn't die until they integrated the reaper technology for me i don't remember what game that was
That was 3, and his suppose death.
Then did you not do Tali's side missions?
Uhhhh she just like randomly wasn't there at some point in 2 so i guess not? She didn't really give me a chance to
Okay, that's why.
I think my game may have crapped a little on that part
You need both Tali and Legion alive and their side-missions completed to get that ending
Ahhhh okay
You do their missions, and they become more closer to each other and represent what a AI/Organic utiopia could look like.
You want me to send you a video of that wrought?
If youd like, I don't mind
@rain dock Also, for reference. The geth in Mass-Effect don't have freewill, as they need some form of a higher being to give them orders.
Their plot though in ME3 is to allow them to gain full sapient's and freewill via a Reaper corpse. (a ancient cluster of AI's that where made billions of years ago by a higher advanced civilization then we could ever reach)
Geth's unit (a body) has thousands of AI's in them, each one doing different things to operate the body/unit.
The Reaper corpse helps them though gain sapients by combining these cluster of AI's into a single one. Going from 'we' to 'I'
I felt like really bad in the mission where you went through and destroyed the Geth AI in that simulation- especially when it got compared to wiping out a city-
Interesting
Honestly that is kind of a terrifying prospect. A bunch of killer suits running around with the equivalent of the email spam filter running it
TRUE!!
But nah, when they don't see you as a threat, they're actually pretty chill.
Now that is an idea that could happen in the very near future. Turning ai sentient is so far way out of reach, but having ai driven machines is already happening
I would look into technological singularity- its hard to explain but it's definitely interesting to look into
Honestly, if it wasn't for bullshit space magic logic with 'Mass-Effects' the game would actually be pretty decently realistic for a sci-fi series.
First contact with aliens, and our political leaders responded with war.
Which, does sound realistic.
There's a few factions that where made of people from both races that didn't agree with the war, so they united. But the general powerhouse militaries on both sides waged a war.
"The technological singularityβor simply the singularityβis a hypothetical future point in time at which technological growth becomes uncontrollable and irreversible, resulting in unforeseeable changes to human civilization."
This is kind of the starting point we're at.
But it doesn't make it out to be negative, just 'unforeseeable and irreversible changes'
Those changes can be good, or bad. We'll just need to find out
AI singularity would be more precise in terms of what we've been talking about- but yeah that's true, I'm just saying a tipping point could happen any time and wed never even know with how hush hush research is
There has been some research published suggesting that AI is already getting to a point where the supposed singularity could happen "soon", now i don't know anything about the topic so im just taking the groups word on it but its a neat prospect
I think I've talked about this here before at some point
Issue is, people have been saying that for years.
People thought technology back in the 90s was peak technology of all time
Would you like the article i found on it? I know that doesn't exactly change that what you said is true but it's a good read if nothing else
Sure
It is also quite specific to one field but yeah
I want to see that article too
Both of y'all have it now
It is interesting for sure
Guys do you know what the company that made the arks name is? Because I know the colony ship is by the exo federation
The URE, or United Republics of Earth focused on the ARKβs. Also itβs the Terran Federation
Ahhh ok ok, the UREβs technology looks vastly more alien than the Terran federation
I mean, smart phones look alien to someone from the 1800 century
I mean like the comparison between the two, itβs a lot more wiggly and life like the tek caves and stuff
It's not really a company, it's moreso a faction or government.
And yes, the URE made the ARKs.
And the URE/Feds worked together on the Genesis-Project
There was a lot of homodeus influence
Whatβs the explanation?
They were hippies
They wanted the zaza and the Federation didn't want them to have the zaza
Itβs the only explanation that makes sense honestly
Tbh it's kinda weird to have a people from the future that snorted literal metallic gasoline (petroleum) but "you do you mate"
We will give them zaza
I think that's the best way to describe it to people who are new to the game
Best way is to have them read the notes themselves ;)
People? Read? Ha you're funny
Ark players? Basic reading comprehension? You must be joking
So, something random I just learned and I want y'all input on this.
If true, the name 'Santiago' means 'Saint James' which was the name of 'Saint James the Great.'
He was known to be the first apostle to shed his blood for Christ.
Now, could be a stretch. But the connection to that, and the in-game Santiago shedding his blood for a character that'd later on become a god-like being is kind of sus.
I mean, do any of the wildcard devs speak Spanish?
You don't need to speak Spanish to have a small reference. 
And that'd most likely be a Marc thing since that was during when he was still in office.
True I guess.
could be a reference?
It could be a reference, but I don't think so. Santiago is just a really common Spanish name in Chile. And that is where he is supposed to be from right?
could be unintentional, given Santiago wasn't the first one to die
No, but he was I'd say the first to die for Helena, no?
dame?
did he die for helena or the group tho?
And yeah, that's most likely what it is.
It would be like naming bob is a reference to something. I think they just picked a common name
Helena 'and' Mei Yin.
Those where the last two left at that point
he died during the attack on camp omega, i think there were other survivors who died off afterward
Pretty sure he was killed after everyone else died. He didn't want to watch Helena and Mei die, so he held the corrupted off in order for them to escape
I could see it being a thing but i could also see it just being a coincidence
i still think we need to make a connection between what Serapis is known for and element
Or just Ark in general tbh-
The sun, fertility, eternal life, healing, transformation, redemption uhhh a few more my phone just died so i don't remember what they were though
Serapis being a mixture of a few gods post Romanization including Zeus makes me think of element as some form of ambrosia or something, some nectar of the gods
Imagine the Greek gods were just chugging element and that's why they were so powerful
Element is the great-flood
It wiped out all of the 'sins' in the world, and allowed a new one to be created.
Intentional.
Santiago sacrifices himself for Helena. She goes on to become Homo Deus.
Brilliant, isn't it?
Oh Marc, why did you have to leave us?
NERVAtar the last new legion leader 
Ok but why did the humans of the future name element 'element'. I'm with rock well on this one, they gave it the most bland name of all. We could have had real life copium, even edmunium was better but nooo they had to chose the most boring name for it
What if Elementβ’οΈ is a brand name like Velcro
Or Kevlar
That indicates that element is in fact not an element which is even more ridiculous
Plus rockwell said it was an element

If Rockwell himself said it's an element, how come you think it's not element?
Who knows the reason why the Tek era people called it "element" because it can be a brand name becoming a common name, like brand names in meds or even poisons
'sigh'
Take it away resident Rockwell
Y'all do realize it's most likely called 'Element' cause that's the simple public name......right?
Gasoline/Gas is actually known as 'n-octane. 111-65-9'
But no one that isn't in the science field unironically calls it that.
ultimately i think the writers were feeling a bit lazy and never gave it a real name
Element's periodic table symbol is Ex btw
The original writer ended in ext (and a few from Gen) so...
Either that, or purposely left it vague cause that's old history that has been forgotten.
Why can't it be named Element is my question, why is it such a big fuckin deal?
Like who the hell gives a shit
Aren't the Elements on the periodic table named after what they have in their name? (like H2O being one Hydrogen and two Oxygen molecules)
There are people who do give a shit
Hence "asking questions"
it is kinda like making a new brand of car, and naming it Car
As an old doctor once said, "Not what I'd have named ya, but if that's yer name, that's yer name"
New Vegas-
More like Velcro or Kevlar
They are both brand names under a different name
If it can make any other element on the entire table, why not simply call it Element? It can literally become any other element known to man, and then some
It's like calling electricity "that thing stored in batteries", why do that when it's just electricity lmao
So, in theory with the naming of 'Ex'
We can assume there's something within Element to add that 'x'
So that either makes me thing there's a compound within Element to give it the x-part, or it name originally started with 'Ex' for it's Periodic table name.
Again, different fields have different naming conventions. Everything has roughly like 2-3 existing names (if we're only including English)
You see... Branding make this funny hard to pronounce name for a substance more tolerable/welcoming to the public
Teflon is a good example
It's a chemical under a brand name
Okay, if real world laws apply to ARK. You can't legally brand the word 'Element' in the U.S.
If a bio-metallic chemical named "element" exist under trademark
hell there is a chocolate bar called Mars and Milky Way
It's Ex because X doesn't stand for any known thing iirc, and Element is super mysterious
Ahhhhhhhhhhh
So would it in theory be fully called 'Element-X' due to the X being unknown?
Kind of like how other medias have 'Compound-X' as a unknown substance?
They're only trade marked in a very, very specific wording
Wait, nope. It's actually canceled.
I'm looking at a Trademark website right now, and their trademark for the word is no longer in legal use.
You are even allowed to use Milky Way for your ice cream pub without being used
"Status
710 - Cancelled - Section 8"
I'll show you a LegalEagle episode later when I am on PC
Also Milky Way is cancelled?
Bruh that is my fave
No, no, no
The trademark use for it by MARS is cancelled.
'sigh'
You can use a name without trademarking it, lmao
πΏ
But then if someone else does and you continue to do so after a cease and desist, they can sue
Technically you still use a common word as a brand
That means nothing, I don't know why you keep trying to push that
π€¦ββοΈ
The common word as a brand thing, you don't trademark the whole goddamn use of the word EVERYWHERE, lmao. People can still say the word in circumstances not related to the field you trademarked it in and not be sued, you know that, right?
When you trademark a word, you trademark that exact grammar use of the word to the T.
Their trademark for Milky-Way was actually 'MILKY WAY' which is all caps.
And that's only trademarked usually in your own country. You have to re-trademark it again in other countries iirr
Can I dm you Bruise?
That, and the fact that they actually trademark the design more specifically, usually. So like, for instance, Crunch bars. You know, the big bold red letters, all caps, CRUNCH? That specific style of the word is what they trademarked. You can still make a movie or something and say "Oh yeah, I'm going to go eat a Crunch bar and then kill a dragon" or something, and there's little they can (or will) do about it, not to mention the fact that it's free advertising/product placement if they even actually show the thing in the shot
Forever and always, please, just don't even ask lol
I don't follow your weird code of permission to DM, if I wanna DM people, I do it
Right, trademarking is very, very specific
I was talking about things like Teflon, Kevlar, and Velcro
Those are also brand names but doesn't have brand typography and used as a common word for a certain product
It'll surprise you, but those actually aren't the names of those items, just like "Q-tips" aren't the name of those either
They're technically dual-sided cotton swabs
We called them "cotton buds" here, although we do call our toothpaste "Colgate" and grilled chicken feet "Adidas"
What if it's called element because it is quite literally just the element you need no other elementsπ±
It's almost like it exists in every state of matter and can do anything
Why give it an exact name when it does what all the other elements do combined except better
I pretty much stated this above
It can effectively become any known element, and then some
It's the Philosopher's Stone, so to speak
I refuse to read that much for some dumb argument about branding id ratber just restate it and go from there
. @gusty turret
We got x2 or anything this weekend
I haven't read up on the 2x notes sorry
OR we can assume the x is meant to be a variable like in math representing that it can be anything
Didn't think of it like that, good catch
I'm admittedly not a master of mathematics, like our resident mathematician Raq π
@brazen sparrow I have a serious question
Heeey
Yes?
Not you
Tbf I was replying to thisπ
Mayonnaise is practically made out of eggs, yes?
Uhhh, usually yeah...
Is mayonnaise an instrument
And some other ingredients
So if I make an egg sandwich with Mayonnaise.
Does that mean I'm smothering eggs with eggs?
And would it be a double-egg sandwich?
Just try it
Who're you?
To a vegan probably yeah
Mayonnaise, on an escalator! Goin upstairs, so see ya LATER!
Wait.....but I'm no vegan.
It most certainly would, thank you for this (most likely) useless but fun information
If a chair is sitting on the floor, and I sit on the chair, am I double sitting?
I don't like the idea of pants
Useless!?!
Eggs exist in ARK, which means Mayonnaise to a degree also do.
This means someone has made a egg on egg sandwich before in ARK
Double sitting, fuck it
By a stretch are skirts just a pant?
What if my shirt is just a pant with arm holes cut in it
Yes
Mom, I'm scared, come pick me up
If I get a hairdo, who's doing my hair and why does it do the do?
What if it doesn't?
These are questions Marc needs to answer
I mean i bet raptors wearing pants is probably canonical in ark
If I put a lock on a door, am I not just turning a door into a wall?
Yes
Fuck it, I vote we rename 'locking doors' to 'turn that fucker into a wall'
If I buy a half a chicken and eat it, am I technically sharing a meal with a stranger?
Yes
I love the fact that it just devolved into us spouting shower thoughts and I'm here for it
Why do they call it oven when you of in the cold food of out hot eat the food?
Master-Chief is your waiter
Is Jesse from Studio-Wildcard the same Jesse from Breaking-Bad?
Yes.
I'm in tears
We are told that 'element' is indeed an element. Yet no other element has public names like that, their names are universal throughout all languages.
We are told that element is a xenotoxin
Im still curious how element has a healing property when ingested but is extremely toxic when in the bloodstream
I mean obviously we couldn't put like molten cheese in our bloodstream but like....
It has a healing property?
I always assumed that putting element dust in recipes making them really good implied it had a healing property when consumed?
Putting at least one element dust in any recipe makes it better all around, not just healing-wise, but yeah, always been a weird thing that's almost never touched upon or even so much as mentioned
I wish someone would've asked about it to HLN-A when I said to do so at Pax or whenever that was
Or that I could've just made it myself
I mean i imagine if you put cocaine in your cereal you'd probably think it was pretty good too but theres surely more to it than that
To be fair, you can drink venom and be fine
(snake venom to clarify)
It's only once it gets into the bloodstream, it actually does its job.
That's nothing near the same. Element dust has actual, tangible benefits to your being. But nice attempt, I guess? And yes, different things act differently when ingested differently, who knew π
That was what I was more getting at
Yeah, I got ya
I just woke up to my cat shitting all over my floor, so apologies if I seem at odds with anything said
I want to wring this cat's neck rn
If the theory of Element enhancing everything it touches (pre-corruption) then I could see it healing up your cells if you ingest it in a dusk form.
But maybe once you melt it down, it releases a compound that makes it toxic?
Nah, you sounded normal.
I do think it being in a molten form had something to do with Rockwell's findings on the substance, for sure
It definitely seemed like the molten form was more inherently ready to take on characteristics of the one it was binding itself to (albeit destructively), rather than just assisting the creature in it's day to day life like the good corrupted creatures on Extinction
(Which, mind you, is the first map we discover dust on as well... coincidence?)
Nah, I think that's a good redhairing (however you say it) that Element just tries to adapt anything it touches. The good or bad comes from the users intentions.
Honestly, I like to separate Corruption from Element.
Cause from what we've seen, Corruption activates from Element after a unknown thing triggers it.
While Element doesn't always turn into Corruption.
While they're mutuality related and are the same in a literal sense, but they both are very different in their actions.
While that could be the case, I like to think that the application matters more than the intent, personally. If you have a few beers, you'll be buzzed, right? But if you take it by, uh, "suppository"... it takes far less to get you blackout drunk, lol (and now that I've mentioned drugs of any kind, cue the resident tweaker)
I wake up to a kitten biting my ear and jumping on my face every morning. Not pleasant
I'm sitting trying to write too, and that mf comes up, sees the fingers moving on the keyboard and scratches the hell out of them
Preferable to a twelve year old cat diarrheaing all over your carpet, I can assure you
Her box is literally right fucking there like BRO
Just open the bathroom door and GO
Also yes she knows how to open the bathroom door, not that it was actually closed in this scenario to begin with π‘
That sounds more like bowel issues.
Cats lifespan is around 12-18-ish years
Not mine, my cats have been up to 24 years old
Actually, most of my family's animals tend to live much longer than the usual lifespans, it's kinda weird
I had a Chilean-Rose-Haired tarantula that my dad caught when he was 18-20 something. He was 54 or so when it died, and the highest recorded lifespans for that species is like 24 years or something
Not that strange if they're kept good in the right conditions.
True
Have you been feeding your cats element
Honestly, it could be both
We know Corruption is alive, but Element itself I don't know.
Could be a awakened state, or as the name suggests, it might've been 'corrupted' by the war.
Okay so
Would you rather have
Unlimited bacon but no games
Or games, unlimited games, and no games
The fuck does this even mean?
Would you rather have unlimited bacon, but no games, or games, unlimited games, and no games
Again, that last part makes no sense
How can you have unlimited games and no games?
I don't think you're getting it
I mean that is what people mean when they say it makes no sense, and I concur it makes no sense
Yeah, I don't
Damn
Wait so, where did the titans come from?
Element made them
Oh ok
wait what
When a mommy titan and a daddy titan love each other very very much
no no youre getting it wrong, they come from the big bird in the sky
Fuck you h-lna
I keep getting different answers so can I please have a clear answer, is the survivor from genesis the same person as the survivor from ark?
That's up to the player.
And that's the answer that was stated by the dev's
If you watch the Genesis reveal stream, it is, yes. But as Bootleg said, it is more or less up to you
So in other words the game doesn't have a very defined story
Well, no, that doesn't mean that at all
Like I said, if you take the Genesis reveal stream into account, it shows us (The One Who Tries Again) being uploaded to the ship
That's an unchangeable fact, but the way that they present the situation going forward is so as to make it more new player friendly and let the new players who started at Genesis 1 and 2 decide for themselves what they want to believe
We're all TOWTA. Traumatized Organisms With Tamable Animals. 
Eh, more or less.
Dollie stated awhile back ago that the Animated-series is only as canon as you make it out to be.
So yeah, the story isn't really that defined.
I think its funny that Rockwell hacked HLNA
He should do it again and make her self-destruct
technically you could start the story on any canon map besides extinction and no one can tell you what you have done isn't canon
New canon does impose this
With the new intros, Helena assumes we where on the other ARK's.
Helena is the dumbest of asses though so what does she know
Still imposes on that idea.
What if she has dementia
I don't think she does, when she's a god-like being
Dementia if I recall right comes from a physically degrading brain.
Helena doesn't have a brain anymore to degrade.
The whole 'having a lack of emotions the older you are as a Homo-Deus' thing could be a conscious thing then a physical issue.
Or, since there's no longer a physical brain, there's no way for you to produce the happy-chemicals or sad-chemicals, so they just become emotionless.
Okay so technically
"Dementia is caused by damage to or loss of nerve cells and their connections in the brain. "
She did infact lose all of those nerve cells and connections to the brain
Have we ever considered putting a dementia patient in a big shapeshifting robot suit to see if they function the same as an overseer?
Imagine how much better the transformer movies would be if all the robots had dementia
We need to first consider putting a normal human in one first, then we need to figure out how one can be physically connected to a machine
It does, absolutely. But how it involves the player is for the most part up to the player
Bob/player has no set personally nor goals (inb4 Helena became Princess Leia update), it's all up to you how you interpret your character transferring from Ext to the Gen Sim
I like to imagine that Helena has told us about Rockwellβs survival and transfer to the genesis ship, and helps guide us to arat prime so we can upload ourselves to the colony ship after the events of extinction
I like to think we're just a random person that HLNA gave the memories of the survivor
I mean the og survivor did get their implant removed on ext so their memories wouldnt have been logged
Well not before the ascension at least, implant was still there then
The implant getting removed signifies absolutely nothing in that cutscene
We're literally designed to wake up with it again on the ship
How though? Your character maintains the same physique everytime they die
Physique is a gameplay feature
No human can be built like half of us make our characters and survive
Idk I made my character normal(lie(I have made a giant man he looks like he would pop))
Like the default bob chad look is probably the most realistically survivable character we can have
If i recall correctly Gabriel mentions having an implant? Im not sure at all though i could be entirely mistaken
So either that part of the cutscene signifies literally nothing, the writer change caused it to mean nothing or we just aren't the same person
Or, we're in a brand new body and the implant is there just because the body we were fabricated had to have one to be made via ship protocol
Which is the case, as far as the brand new body bit at least
The original intent though was that we became homo deus at the end of the story of Extinction, so that's why that happens with the implant being removed
ok i have a crackpot theory that the survivor ends up being two people between gen and ext
so the original survivor would ascend into a homo deus on extinction and live out the rest of their eternity on earth, while a cloned duplicate of them is made on the colony ship to eventually save it from rockwell
We in ext didn't "ascend to Homo Deus" as the machine to make those broke when Helena turned into one, making her "the last Homo Deus"
We just lost our implant and filed in the "Homo Deus Record"
ohh alright that makes sense
The implant being removed is questionable.
While it made sense when Extinction came out, it doesn't now for Genesis.
Implants are what Helena uses to resurrect dead-survivors.
The implant also now says 'homo-deus record' which again, I wouldn't say is canon anymore either.
How couldnt a whole advanced civilization not be able to defeat element but one funny man defeated it by himself
because Lore Titans are bigger and stronger than Game Titans
also... mini titans
Yeah but still YOU the character beat it
because Helena as homo Deus helped
Ok with some help
you cannot respawn without her
But A WHOLE civilization
But considering the fact that your character is pretty much the same as in the story
nope
the survivor arrived after the events of the notes
hence Helena can respawn you but not.. say John for example
But i still wonder how can 1 guy even with infinite lives achieve so much
because gameplay
if the titans scale equal to the lore, alpha KT = to less than Gamma KT, not even the Mega Mek can kill it, just damaged it
Because ark *
nah it's just gameplay
Ark gameplay is special
Every weird and nonlogical thing that csn happen happens in ark
even though Ext is set on earth not on an ARK
Also why do nameless attack us i never understood it
it's made by the ARK and if the ARK sees a threat to itself or it's goal of "make humans stronger" they let out dangerous creatures
see SE with wyverns and mantises
Its called plot armor
Also yeah infinite lives helps though...
And a god that wants you to succeed
Its also unclear how many of us there actually are
She who waits references us getting people to help us
So possibly multiple people with infinite lives
We come along after hundreds of years, Mei and Diana wiping out basically every titan, and with the help of a god kill the last few and bring the arks back down
Cause they where still human
The survivor's are genetically modify humans to be able to rapidly adapt to their environments.
And if gameplay is anything to go by, (which I doubt) they're immune to Corruption.
Im still a bit curious on the element healing factor thing
W h y d o e s i t h e a l u s
I guess it is organic-
Like me and Bruise talked about, different ways it enters your body could give it different abilities
Ingesting could be safe, and heal you as you're absorbing the nutrients from it.
Injecting it into your veins though is lethal, since it makes direct connection to your blood stream.
basically like iron, especially that "iron" in most foods
But iron is also in our blood
try melt actual iron and inject it
Well we don't melt actual iron and eat it
technically you do
I don't?
you can cook food rich in iron, they just dont melt in the same temp as food cooked
Yeah but like that's not the same-
hell you can actually magnetize iron off your cereal
You can infact have that type of iron injected if you're deficient
But speaking of having full on iron injected into your blood thats a no
that's just iron that is mineralized, not melted
someone made a sword out of blood... so...
This discussion has helped me come to the conclusion it's probably more to do with the state of matter of the element than the way its injected
Or uhhh
Word for overall entering the body
Subsumed?
No
Maybe?
Something like that
Consumed (I think) works in any of the mentioned cases
Consume only covers... Well... Consuming things
Via the mouth hole
I see a very messed up version of how much wood could a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood in our future
You are confusing consume with eat
I don't eat a bandage, yet when I use it (which in and of itself isn't descriptive enough) it is considered consumed, no?
You don't ingest (another word for eat) a needle of morphine, either
You consume it
You apply it to a wound
Howdy yall
use up (a resource).
eat, drink, or ingest (food or drink).
I guess it's both?
Thats weird i don't like it
But that also brings into question if you consider element a resource or a food/drink
Can It be both?
You can definitely eat and or drink it
But its also a resource
It is both
Idk im too tired for this
Anyways back to what actually matters it definitely matters more the state of matter than the method of consumption
Actually can you drink the abb soup
I've never tried it
That is probably just a gameplay feature if you can but
Element can be anything, as we've stated ad nauseam
And yes, you can drink the kool-aid but just as much as you can drink the lava on maps like Rag and Gen 1
wait i can drink element
Yep
You can actually eat Element in small doses
Use Ele Dust in a custom recipe for a good boost to whatever you're making
Element sugar mmmm
That's actually what sparked the conversation, funny enough
That was a very unproductive circle
I just discovered consume is a word that i don't like
The baseline is element edible and not edible
Consumable
Lore
Liquidβ consumable
Dust=consumable
Gas/airborne spores= seems fine as we have no adverse effects from anything around extinction
Element is a metal
It's not a food or a drink, unless you've been corrupted enough that you rely on it but that's a different ball game
It's very similar to phazon from Metroid- a corruptive super material
is it a metal?
It's literally everything
Its base-form is metal, yes.
But it can go into a liquid, a gas, and dust.
Yeah, his later Island notes and earlier Scorched Earth notes he calls it a glorious metal, an exquisite metal, etc
Refers to it melted down as "molten"
It's very watery.
And i mean, just look at any piece of tek gear
I know.
But Element, is again, 'everything'
It's base-form is just metal. 
When you smack a corrupted creature, you're not smacking metal. You're smacking organic tumors.
It's not "everything". It's a sci fi super metal with mutating properties
That can turn into edible dust
Anything turns into dust if you break it enough
Yep.
But metal isn't normally edible, nor beneficial.
(and again, the corruption tumors, which consists of Element, is organic)
I mean, I'm assuming the element dust in the recipes is largely to hint at those mutagenic properties, in some gameplay/story integration. If you chomp down on a big 'ol hunk of element you're just going to break your teeth
Well, obviously.
It's still in a metal form.
The game answers a lot about what Element is, what it can do, and what it cannot do
Dust-form is more akin to seasoning.
Honestly, since Element can reach high temperatures as a liquid. I wonder if I can deep-fry chicken-nuggies with Element. π€
When worked it's an incredibly durable metal or can be used to channel incredible amounts of power, but in its raw form is dangerous, corruptive, and if it gets too severe can start acting indirectly
I mean, you could deep fry nuggies in element the same way you could deep fry nuggies in molten iron or lava
Edible
Hes also literally an insane old man
I would say even calling its base form a metal is a stretch
Like its malleable like metal... But it serves literally every purpose its not just metallic
It falls under metals nonmetals and metalloids on the periodic table, it has all of those properties
We have absolutely no reason to believe its raw form is corruptive
We see its raw form in space in genesis two yet none of the creatures are at all affected by it
It basically is everything it can do everything and more
It seems to require alloying to become sturdy enough for structures though
I imagine Gabriel's dagger wasn't actually too effective because it was just a raw element shard and not an alloy of anything to make it more sturdy or to give it the plasma properties of the tek sword
Or maybe it would've been like making a blade of obsidian
I think that just means it's a metalloid actually, i didn't read very well last night to realize metalloid is just something with the properties of both metals and nonmetals
Isn't it a xenotoxin, though? Which are decidedly not metals?
it's a element for sure 
help me in #ark-2
I refuse to read that channel until the roadmap comes out 
understandable, let's hope it's tonight
It's not beneficial, but tell the man that ate an entire airplane that metal isn't edible.
Look it up, interesting story.
And would Elementβs base form really be metal? It was a liquid when it was discovered on Earth, iirc.
Or at the very least, there was liquid Element around, beneath the ground, as stated by HelenaDeus.
Apparently the people of Sanctuary made use of Element rivers flowing beneath it.
In fact, I have a crackpot theory that states the Sunken Forest sunk into the ground not because of a sinkhole, but because of the Element mines beneath it. 
It's native state is certainly not as a solid, of that much we can be sure
As evidenced by the fact that it takes extreme heat (and likely pressure) to become a solid
Not to mention whatever other weird, future-y things it takes to make it into Element as we know it
I refuse to believe that the rivers thing was not a metaphor
I think its native state has to be dust because thats what we find the most of in space
not really "rivers" but veins
Dunno and don't care bc it doesn't matter
All we know is that element is element
It was on Earth from a meteor
And then people used it
Whatβs the lore on how Dinos are alive on the Ark? Is it a Jurassic Park thing?
They cloned 'em
With some genetic engineering of course
Some Creatures are outright built from the ground up
And some are created by the ARKs themselves
"I stopped to touch a newly-cloned mammoth calf, and it wrapped its trunk around my wrist.
Wasn't expecting to feel a connection to some lab animal, but it felt like neither of us wanted to let go.
Two lost souls dragged back from oblivion, holding onto each other in orbit..."
Interestingly enough, Santiago claims that The Farm (the first Prototype ARK to be sent into space) rested over the Serengeti.
Space element be like
I have a interesting question
Not relating anything about servers
What happens to our survivors after genesis 2, are they stuck in space or are they teleported back to earth?
You are in a mek, flying in space out of a ship that got blown up. Yeah, you are either just landing on the moon, or you are stuck in space lol
Alr, good to know joes stuck in space forever
(Real quick how do I get that role? Bob squad)
The #ark-animated-series channel pinned messages
(Tanks)
O
I know, he ate a lot more then just a plane.
Element yum
Hey idk if this is the right place for this but what is that planet above extinction
The one that's broken
that's the moon
it got 'sploded, apparently
clearly got fucked up
I thought it was abberation
aberration is another Ark station
No shit
.
rude
Talking to flobs
they're not wrong
Ik lol
It got blown up cause someone at Wildcard thought it'd look cool
That is the literal reasoning.
There's (so far) no canon reason why the moon is blown up
Nah, Aberration is another ARK.
You can see it in the overseer's arena actually
It's that purple-ish ARK off in the distance, in the middle of the window
Cuz survivors set a nuke at the tek cave and fucked up abberation so I thought that's what it was
Can I DM you?
Yh
not in the tek cave, in the overseer chamber iirc
That's what I meant
The mek docks back with the surviving ring
Why thank you
I have been blessed with the info I need.
Yup yup, after HLNAs message plays the meks interface displays a message that says "Autodock initiated" so thats how we know
Ooooh that makes sense now
Whats the new planet called again
A rat
I think they named too many things Arat
the planet is Arat, see the trailer
Arat Prime is a space station
Literally two things are named Arat, and not even that exactly
Can survivors who became homo dues become humans again?
i imagine they can take human form at least? we see Helena give herself a human head
not without the machine that turns humans like Helena into Homo Deus and the gem that she found that activates it
I wonder how the story would turn if our character spawned during the explorer note time
Theres also the Aratai
Methinks 3 things that aren't even remotely the same being named the same thing are too much
Basically playing multiplayer pre-cryo hardcore mode
Extinction, but they were later made to be unlockable on any map to help with server loads with all the dinos being out
SP yes but not multiplayer
I know that but w h e r e
They have literally no canon explanation
Nah multiplayer was
Having to march an army across the map to fight people
The obelisks are jerks π
They are
I have one more question for ye nerdz
What happens if you bring HLNA to one of Helenaβs dossiers
Dang
I mean- i don't see why anything would happen since HLNA doesn't canonically exist outside of the constraints of the ship
HLNA has Helena's memories but is not Helena herself, as she makes fairly clear
Arks
couldn't agree more my fellow gentleman
Rockwell is a fellow gentleman
yep...

What if hes actually a gellow fentleman?
I agree
I completed the gamma ascension then the alpha but I got a beta implant why is that?
Fockwell fesafellow fengeltlenman
why did earth get tidally locked again
i forgor
element
Pretty much
π«΄ Element
What does tidally locked mean
I can only assume it has something to do with the tides and them being locked but i just wanna make sure
I think from my 5 second google search i understand
I can only assume it has something to do with the hundreds of massive chunks of Earth they stole for the ship and Arks
Mostly the arks
I wanna believe the Earth starts rotating again once the arks come back.... Otherwise anyone on the dark side are kinda screwed...
Also should the Earth not still have had a daylight cycle...
Like does it not still revolve around the sun? Was it just sitting there?
yeah that was always my thought. It seems like the earth hit an entire standstill, both in rotation and revolution
No, it still revolved around the sun, but the same face of the planet was facing the sun at all times

