#dnd-discussion
1 messages · Page 390 of 1
Id rather use variant human
Cause I usually have homebrewery races for characters but making a homebrew race isn't worth it when I can use custom lineage
It saves a lot of trouble
Prodigy is nice
I like playing some lesser played species
I don't see many Minotaurs, Firbolgs, Tortles, etc
Honestly a lot of species are lesser played
I feel like MInotaurs are probably more common then you'd think
Much more diverse than mine...
Changeling Lore Bard, Eladrin Fiend Warlock, Drow Devotion Paladin, Human Sorlock, Aasimar War Cleric, Halfling Swashbuckler, Gnome Elements Monk, Human Gloomstalker Ranger, Aasimar Stars Druid, Aasimar Twilight Cleric, Aasimar Valor Bard, Human Fighter Valor Bard
Lots of people just play humans or PHB contect
You start with a elf, then learn it's a sun elf. Then you learn he was an urchin, and is now a warlock. You roll his age and get 22 and he's barely an adult. You start to try and figure out how that happened. You roll and get fey lock. Then you roll an empty scabbard for a trinket and put together a story of how his patron gave it to him as a sign of her desires. You put together ideas of peter pan type patron, the idea of narrative going from boy to knight.
Firbolgs however, definitely rare because...honestly they're a super forgettable species.
Anyway are all of you professionals DND players here?
i humbly ask for someone to guide me
because i am still confused even after reading all those in session zero
I love my shadar kai rn
Again, personal experience
I haven't seen a single Minotaur in any game I've been in besides the minotaurs I've played
I play goblins and kobolds and such
I don't think there's such thing as a professional player.
Watching and observing, maybe watch a session or two?
There's not reall any such thing as a "Proffesional" DND Player.
I feel like that's disingenuous.
They get a lot of cool features and their lore is.. decent
boblin
Professional DMs are DMs who are paid. But players don't get paid.
Experience, but like...you're not playing D&D as a job.
ti played a goblin graviturgy wizard
New business model /j
It's also not a competitive game.
Lmao "Player-For-Hire" "I will play in your DnD game"
yeah, theres like the cast of critical role
i should add /j
i forgot
Are the well know Actual Play player professionals since they get paid? 🤔
Holy crap this is awesome
I wish we had more monster races
my bad
Sorry about being late replying but wendigos are kinda like manticores in this way they prefer humanoid meat but can eat any
However! You're looking for #learn-to-play and #dnd-newcomers !
Sorry for latching onto the first bit.
Yeah but that's more "Proffesional Actor" more then "Proffesional DND Player."
my main gripe about them is that they would either be very weak or very strong depending on where you threw them in
I promise ill be on my best behaviour, max 2 peeks at my phone and ill listen to your endless monologues
they built a media empire by being dnd players, it did more for them than their acting ever did
I wish Thri-Kreen were avaliable in more campaigns that I've played in
I've got a few fun ideas for them
cause again your not dealing with your run of the mill people your dealing with adventuers!
Well I will not diverge from the plot clearly set for us!
I love thri kreens so so much
It is still, their acting skills, rather then their knoweldge of D&D, that draw in the crowds?
he was fun
I can not however promise i wont convince the goblin rogue to steal from the friendly king
If you did a real wendigo it'd be strong either way seen as you have to burn it but a wendigo has extreme strength and speed
Thank you! Really glad with how he came out. First 5e character- I like random rolling for new systems to try and avoid that 'I have no idea where to even start and don't want to read every class'.
its a combination of factors certianly, but none of their roles before the critical one hit it off
stares at the countless amount of spells that do fire damage
Nobody's watching for "Oh my god look at how Expertly that dice roll was! Oh wow his knowledge of dah rulez is so amazing!" They're coming for the People.
I just realized
I've played two of the Four Genasi types so far 🤔
Perfect flick of the wrist to always roll a 20
You're like the avatar fr
Gotta do all of them now
i watch it to see their well practiced facade break as they engage in combat personally
Wait so you mean when my husband said I was the best player of all time he might have been fibbing? 
I've got an Idea for a Water Genasi Glamor Bard (deep sea punk rocker) just as a cool idea
Wendigo's seem impressive yes but again against a dnd party its just a slightly stronger werewolf
Do I get/make a sixth DnD group... 
Did you not hear extreme speed. It can go to 100 miles per hour so even if you managed to burn it it could dash to water
I'm contemplating with myself
The humble wall of force:
Time for the Immovable Rod™
Lock that thing in the thunderdome
What
Doesnt matter how fast you are the wall is immune to all damage
Aye
My first Genasi was an Earth Genasi Noble Genies Paladin named Jabal.
He died holding off a lich for the party to escape the Shadowfell
... on the second session of the campaign
And
I have an Air Genasi Artificer replacing my Harengon Bladesinger Wizard who retired to do fatherly buisness
so you can trap it inside and have your cleric cast cloudkill or something
THE GAS CHAMBER STRAT
A old group I was in did that to kill a dragon
I doubt it would be immune to posion damage is why
Cloudkill... trapped room... huh... My DM was tryna gas us!
I've yet to play one, but i'm in a party rn with a very kewl earth genasi :>
Even if it is meta magic the cloud from posion to fire!
Well that makes sense but that is if you find it before it kills you a wendigo is a shapeshifter and is silent will walking
That's why you upgrade to the classic Microwave
I also threw cloud of daggers in it
Dragons are not Immune ot Exhaustion IIRC
I'm playing my first ever genasi in one game, he's a fire genasi
It didn't do that much more damage
It's immune to all but fire
But eh, why not
Or a silver stake/bullet in the heart
that would be broken
Cast Bonfire in it, slowly watch it cook
its immune to pure magic?
Correct
nothing besides the huge dragon
My Earth Genasi died so valiantly that the party paid for a Gold Statue in his homeland in his likeness
And they only knew him for 2 sessions into the campaign lol
is in the 2024 rules
It's immune to everything that doesn't involve fire
Sounds like poorly thought out homebrew nonsense.
He took like 5 whole attacks from the lich before succumbing to his injuries 😔
Also again if a wendigo was ported into dnd it would be like CR 3-5
Its not all that strong
I love dying heroically 🔥
Too bad only two of my characters ever have died
Actually it's extremely strong fast and it can shape shift and posses the mind oh also it can turn others into wendigos so it's pretty strong
Medium monstrosity, chaotic evil
Armor Class 16 (natural armor)
Hit Points 52 (8d8 + 16)
Speed 40 ft.
STR DEX CON INT WIS CHA
15 (+2) 17 (+3) 14 (+2) 12 (+1) 18 (+4) 16 (+3)
Proficiency Bonus +2
Damage Vulnerabilities fire
Damage Resistances necrotic
Damage Immunities cold, poison
Condition Immunities charmed, exhaustion, poisoned
Senses darkvision 60 ft., passive Perception 14
Languages any one language (usually Common)
Challenge 3 (700 XP)
The question is
Is it Valiance or Martyrdom?
Who knows
Again thats in terms of a normal human/commoner
true. although it would be fun if there was a Prime wendigo, the original evil spirit that possessed people into cannibals.
probably a cr 8-9 then
In dnd a monk or barbarian can run just as fast if not faster then a wendigo
Hp would be higher immune to more also it doesn't speak any language it mimics people also did I mention it had a few hundred iq
and wendigo used to be normal people turned into that thing
Yes then they became practically immortal
It doesnt say that in the lore
What and in what lore
They can still be killed
Would someone be able to inform me of if an item exists that would give a player a better chance for persuasion? Even just like a potion
And things need to be condensed and simplified in order to port things into DnD
Barely
cast flesh to stone and lets see it come back from that 😭
The “lore” behind wendigos is questionable because iirc the cultures they come from don’t typically talk about them much
Also I said practically immortal not entirely immortal
Yeah in dnd parctically immortal doenst get you very far
It shape shifts into a fly and finds a gap
It would still be turning into stone
lfg channel lights up :)
It's a one shot :(
I don't know how people enjoy one shots, I can't bother to care about anything happening because it won't matter in a couple hours
Same with the flame tongued greatsword
Yes but when it shifts it is only it's original form that's stone so it turns into a worm and dogs out through the ground
Sometimes it's nice to watch a short movie and not sit down for a long series. ✌️
No
It will STILL be turning into stone
What are you talking about bro
that's pretty much precisely why. It's a self-contained story and you don't need to care further afterwards. It's great to experiment.
You can shapeshift all you like but flesh to stone will turn you into stone
I want a grand sprawling tale and adventure, something bite sized only serves to frustrate me
That's fine, but you asked why we enjoy it, so there
Oneshots are great for those little ideas you want to try out without risking full commitment to.
I get game time every sunday. I don't have time to run year long campaigns for every idea I have.
I musta read a different spell then ok it turns to stone
But try out one shots for a new system, or an idea like 'All dragons', or a short story survival game where it's all chill if everyone dies.
Can always leave it open ended if it turns out the group loves the idea and you want to commit.
If you maintain your Concentration on this spell for the entire possible duration, the target is Petrified until the condition is ended by Greater Restoration or similar magic.
I was in a 4 session omeshot
I had a Tiefling War Cleric named Karkas
He went through so much character development in that short time
Went from Rejecting his Infernal heritage to accepting it after his own Deity came to fight by his side (divine intervention simulacrum that the dm flavored as my Deity fighting along side me)
He fancies himself as a Devil of Retribution now lol
And so you have someone obliterate the statue before the spell ends
He was also easily one of the strongest characters I've played too lol
Granted dispell magic might work but i doubt it
Now I enjoy one shots as much as the next person, but I do get irked when people call adventures of more than 1 session oneshots. 
^
I still wonder can you target the armor on somene rather then the creature
That's no longer a one shot lol
Heat metal :3
I remember someone saying that and i was like no way
I mean, one shots for my group often become two shots.
Not that
Awwww
I mean with like an attack roll to break it
Oh, hmmm
Oneshots can be more than one session? Lol
twoshots!
Then it ceases to be a one shot 
threeshots?
I mean its a single dungeon usually
Not really
No matter how long it takes
Shots shots shots
I guess then we disagree on the definition. Ah well
In my mind, if it’s longer than a single session, it’s at least a “mini campaign”
Or just a short adventure
yea
A Oneshot isn't called a Oneshot specifically because it's ONE session.
It's called a Oneshot because it's a short story.
I can't stop my players from shopping for 4 hours
Real. Imo at some point it becomes a mini-campaign
Maybe just An Adventure
There's short campaigns, but oneshot to me is still anywhere between 1-3 sessions.
Isn't the Yawning Portal just a bunch of One-shots
3 sessions is not a campaign to me.
One shots are called that exactly because they're intended to be played within one session. That's part of the definition.
This is why when I run campaigns, I specify how many sessions I plan on it being. So I don't even say one-shot anymore. I say "one session" or "one session game". It's clunky but at least it removes ambiguity. 😅
I need to shorten my one shots ngl
I'm talking about Oneshots as an overall form of media.
Sort of ish. The intention of the adventures in there is that they hypothetically could be completed in a 4-6 hour session, but only if you're running them strict tournament style, go, go, go.
Oneshots, as I mentioned, are short stories.
Most take a few sessions if you're also RPing and exploring.
Its a collection of adventures from previous editions. In my experience, they will each last multiple sessions
Anyone know other places for LFG
I need the title messnger of long forgotten gods
I didn't see much on Reddit
Hirohiko Araki, Mangaka of JJBA made certain oneshots for his characters sometimes, but they were usually novel sized and had nothing to do with the actual continuity of JJBA.
In the context of D&D though, they’re an adventure that’s played in one session
It took 3 sessions for my players to get from the campaign hook in Daggerford, to Village of Barovia and now they are about to enter Vallaki with Ireena, chained up Doru and a Lucian Jarov.
I never expected to see a Jojo reference with my DnD today
I don't really care lol
I still consider it a oneshot.
Also I wish we had more simple adventure campaigns in general, I honestly love the simplicity of a group of people going on casual adventures and slowly as time goes on setting more stakes
But I feel like most campaigns drop you in the narrative deep end
they happen a lot
4 sessions can be a "Mini-Campaign" but what is a Mini-Campaign but not a oneshot?
What about 4
Short Adventures
An adventure
I think that's what they're called
less than 16 sessions is a mini campaign in my books
What
"Short Adventures", simple, straightforward, multiple sessions, usually single digits
I mean personally that's when I start considering it just a short module 
What...did that have to do with my message? I'm so confused
ANYWAY, the point was
You can still have Short stories, even as oneshots and still have developed characters.
Nothic.....
I've always thought of modules as presets. What does "module" actually mean?
i hate those things
a module is a term used to refer to a published campaign book
I think the new DMG actually refers to an adventure as a set of sessions that complete an arc, regardless of how many sessions they take
Whats an arc though
Even the basic rules outline it:
https://www.dndbeyond.com/sources/dnd/br-2024/playing-the-game#AnOngoingGame
Sometimes a session of D&D is a complete game in itself (often called a “one-shot”), where you play a short adventure that lasts for just one session.
A story arc
A module of a larger story. WotC uses adventure, TSR used module, but module stuck around in the community. I actually picked it up from Neverwinter Nights.
Yes, but how do you determine the start and the end of an arc
By the main focus of it being completed???
So adventure/module is 'a story' short or long that can take part in a longer campaign.
Ex: you need an artifact for some plot point, from the start of that task to when you retrieve it, is a arc
when the problem gets introduced and when it's solved/reached a conclusion
I know 4 seems like a specific number of sessions to ask about but one of my favorite pieces of dnd media was 4 sessions long so I just wanted to see what it'd be considered
sometimes you dont know till after the fact
So, you're saying, you could be half way into your third one shot before you realize you completed an arc last session
^
I'd personally still consider it a Oneshot, but that's just me personally, some people are more "stickler" about the definition but, it's a short term story, so
I generally think a campaign should consist of three major arcs, with smaller ones within
Rule of 3
Also note that 'one session' varies for groups. Is that 3 hours? 6? 8?
^4 for me, then 3 hours of spamming memes about what happened
The starting arc/chapter is establishing and usually more light. You let the players get bonded to each other and let them understand the overall premise
Yeah for sure. What I often notice with prewritten oneshots is that there is a lot of material that is intended to and that you can cut to fit it in the time available.
I tend to do pretty hefty trimming sometimes 
We should come up with a brand new term for campaigns that consist of a very short number of sessions but can't be considered a one-shot because it's more than one session
The middle arc is about upping the stakes and pushing more towards the narrative but still letting the players handle their own goals for their characters
SHort adventure, as has been mentioned, seems perfectly serviceable!
The third arc is the conclusion in which the main threat is dealt with and is pretty much all story and narrative with the party having done their development
You mean the setup, the crescendo and the finale 🤔
I want something cooler
So a oneshot is intended to be a short adventure designed to be a complete story and doable in a few sessions.
Some older ones also expected stricter rules and time management, especially the 'tournament' modules, but if your group wanted to explore, RP or be more cautious that was going to add time and probably sessions.
Yeah it's basic story structure
again... Short Adventures 😭
I like the 4 hour mark but sometimes it'll hit 5 cause stuff.
But what if the story structure is more freeform, like Curse of Strahd
Short adventures is not cooler than short adventures, it's the exact same
One could always just call it a “quest” too
I mean....premade is gonna be its own thing
I'm talking about when designing your own campaign
What? I'm merely saying the term that was said earlier
What if they were called Chapters?
3 major chapters with smaller arcs within is imo the best way to do it
Or Sagas?
This exact line of thought is precisely why we have a thousand different electrical connection cables.
usbc is best
Short Adventures>Chapters>Sagas>Acts (Chapters are composed of short adventures, Sagas composed of Chapters) perhaps
I will often use chapter for describing parts of my own campaign, but for premade adventures the issue with 'chapter' is it implies it will be part of a series and there will be more adventures written to follow on from it.
I enjoy Draw Steel's "Quest/Adventure/Campaign" system for talking about the length of a game
Hdmi the goat tho
"There's too many options, we need a standard!" Now we have even more than we had initially.
You are being the problem, stop.
/s
Perhaps something that implies it's meant to stand on its own then, like maybe a novella? (Or something based on the term like Novelite)
Its also good to build your adventure in mind for player levels. 1-5 dealing with a local problem, 6-10 dealing with a regions problem, 11-15 dealing with a world problem, 15+ gods died, everyone died at least 10 times by now, everything is fine
Yep yep
Though I don't do level 1 starts
I don't either
I just think this is a Quest if its especially short and an Adventure if its longer
3 is my minimum as a player or dm
I love level 1 starts
Not having any kind of build is annoying
same, I apmost exclusively do level 1 or 2 starts
Level 1 is wild, either everything misses you and you are a badass, or your Barbarian eats a spell crit and dies.
I only do level 1 starts if I have new players at the table, otherwise I start at 3
I dabble in level
5 starts, from time to time
Level 1 makes you the victim for a little bit but it's fun
At some point, you concern yourself less with peril and more with optimization
But at level 1, there is no optimization, just you, the guy with the sword, fighting 3 goblins. Can you do it?
I quite like lvl 1. But if my table wants a lvl 3 start I'll do it.
Obviously. Grab goblin, swing goblin into second goblin, kick third goblin aside, stab first goblin, stomp on second goblin's head, finally poke third goblin full of holes.
Thats a lotta actions for a level 1 joe-schmo
Lvl1 would be interesting enough
Well you can do one of those things, but then it's the goblins turn lol
Plus it helps with learning vlasses
I mean, they're goblins. If you're dying to goblins, you were never gonna make it as an adventurer, anyway.
HEY goblins have tactics
Exactly! Level 1 is the make or break of "am I cut out for this?" That your party needs to FEEL like adventurers
How many dudes does it take to beat 1 goblin
Probably just 1, but goblins move in hordes
Exactly! Now go follow my simple plan and learn whether you can do it.... or whether you're just a stepping stone for a new goblin hero 
this is a trick question, it was all a setup to get everyone to play as a goblin horde
Goblin horde only matters when no one has Fireball 
Everyone's got a goblin npc that the players fall in love with called Boblin or Blip-Blap, they don't just fall out of the sky! The first goblin they encounter (usually the lone guard watching the entrance of the camp) is the one they'll try to convince to fight with them, and then when he agrees, it turns out he's a murder machine!
This is how the magic happens ✨️
Plus that 10 hp removes the feeling of surviving with more skills
I wanted to befriend Droop, but he was too scared
Ackshually, the magic happens when you cast Magic Missile at the darkness. 
They're dying
I one time had a cultist in a campaign that the party tried to befriend, but he was a willing ritual sacrifice and wanted to be sacrificed once he came of age and they couldn't convince him to not want to be sacrificed
Level 1 is a bit stressful, but you learn to work with what you have and be strategic.
One bad crit and it's game over
That's why it's so fun
My players did the Durst Manor Level 3,though I adjusted the encounters
I always have backup plans to make sure it doesn't go off the rails TOO hard
Made it especially harder
And if the lv1 adventurers battle anything that generally does enough damage to take a pc down, its just downhill from there
Only sometimes. Besides, they're goblins. At best they've got rusty daggers -1 and a STR mod of -1 or -2 
Like the person they're doing the quest for is a powerful caster with the ability to revivify
Actually, goblins now have Scimitars and Shortbows, definitely enough to down in one hit if you're unlucky
Heresy 
It's the truth, Echo!
Gone are the days of level one gobwin
They pile dung into a sling and try to blind the wizard
The goblin wizard casts shitstorm!
Unfortunately, a level 1 fighter loses against 3 goblins most of the time
Well, depends on the AC, but you know what I mean
Depends on his armor....and their Str.... and his HP roll and Con mod
he is lv1, his hp is max
Let's say they have 19 AC
Gobbling*
Ew, max HP at level 1?
What happened to the good old days of 1 HP Wizards?
they all died to errant rocks
I don't think those were good days...
OR, they became liches
If your hands are tied together and you’re a Dragonborn, would you use your breath on your assailant? Or is that too risky
there is no in between with olden wizards
Nonsense, what could go wrong with 1 HP / HD? 9 HP at level 9?
I have a question, I am new to GM in P&P
So I try to make a game for here next week, and want to make some bandits plus some bosses, what is the best way to do this, do I make a full charter shed like my players have or what is a good way to do it?
How is the best way to do this?
Damn ya all are mean
19 AC, goblins have uhh... +5 to hit, so 30% to hit, there's 3 goblins, so 30% for each to hit, that's if the goblins are not strategic and just going head to head against the fighter
Usually goblins ambush
They set up traps too
They just sometimes forget they did and set them off themselves
So, let's say one of them fights head on, the other two are hiding for advantage on shortbow attacks
That's more kobold thinking than goblin
We already getting ambushed at level 1 damn
Goblins have 10 int now
kobolds are even more chaotic
How come people don’t like dming forgotten realms?
Goblins could 100% plan this out
I feel like it's one of the most popular settings. Might be some personal preferences though.
Check out other monster stat blocks for reference, you can ask for feedback/advice in #homebrew
I mean... In a certain popular 5e module you do, no spoilers though
Most of the time it seems like homebrew is the preference
DM gets sued for bullying/domestic abuse end of campaign /j
I think it's biggest strength and weakness is that it's a "kitchen sink" setting. You want multiverse stuff with our actual Earth, real-life space? It's got that. You want a nuclear submarine? Got that, too.
Some folk prefer their own homebrew settings, other folk prefer the vibes and aesthetics of other settings.
Homebrew has the benefit of being only want you want and not bogged down too much in having to read up on existing lore and events.
TBH, I think even when running a pre-made setting, it's going to end up changed and personalised to the group.
If your new players need knowledge checks to play in your setting homebrew or existing modules, then its your fail as a dm.
How do court trials work in DnD
Anti-Magic Zone or Zone of Truth
You bribe the judge
From my experience- very poorly and best to abstract or just go inaccurate and fun.
It's a spell
Do ya all have gold
Spell kinda does what it says it does
Tin on label
Its a zone in which you must speak the truth
😮 it's a lilipup that went into the forest
You don't say 🥁
The judge needs dirt on another judge, and we got that, for sure, right guys, we got something on the other judge?
Correct, i type
Baby leafeon
2nd level spell, i know its on the paladin list idk where else
Bard
To be exact: It prevents you from telling lies. But it does not mean you have to tell the truth
I have a lot of little tricks to cheat this thing
You could go up to Geas and have the target take damage for lying
Now I am NOT saying Actual Plays = Homegames. Just wanna say that first. But I watched a court session recently and it looks like fun! Not even disagreeing with you either. Just thought I'd mention it. Looked so fun.
Lmao, if they refuse to state it then obviously guilty
I know but that doesnt sound as fun to say
Uh... First off, the right to stay silent is a thing in real life in just about every legal system.
May i present to you, 'technically' the truth
You cannot be compelled to incriminate yourself
Moreover, you may be in a zone of truth not as a defendant but as a witness
Echo where do we get evidence from
Why would one choose to stay silent when a simple "No, I did not do it" Inside of the Zone of Truth would free them?
We plant it /j
Again: You might not be the accused, you might be the witness. And I was mostly refering to other ways to cheat the zone of truth.
My experience with this has been one or two people being able to RP, while everyone else at the table has to watch and wait. Witness can talk, the 'lawyer' people can talk.
You give evidence. A lot of talking for usually a preset decision, because not like the Jury isn't also the DM or players.
Now the real adventure behind a court trial is getting the evidence, the witnesses, forgery, bribery and intimidation.
I know we bring up JJK in general with kind of rolled eyes lol But there is a "courtroom domain expansion" that I think could work well in D&D.
Minor spoiler for season 3:
||In this "courtroom domain", the victim is put on trial. All they have to do is plead guilty or not guilty, and if they plead not guilty, one piece of evidence is shown. They then argue about the accusation and the "judge" declares who 'wins'. The loser gets a significant debuff for the fight that immediately starts after.||
One RPed court case I was in lasted a bout an hour as the defendent was accused of his list of crimes and ended with him syaing 'Ah, screw it, I'm going to eat the judge'.
Only correct decision
I was just thinking of this, thanks Steve
Here's my favourite trick: Telepathy.
Courtroom asks you a question, you want to lie. Have an accomplice telepathically ask you another question. Answer that question, truthfully. Ignore the first one
Imagine getting jailed and taking your punishment
The player getting bored and just being like 'welp. I'm bored.'
That's how you get the jury in pitchforks and torches
For example:
Judge: Did you or did you not kill the duke?
Telepathic accomplice: Did you eat the pudding I ate this morning?
Accused: Of course not.
Now im curious if anyone has ever retired a character because they went to jail. Usually whenever players get send to jail the idea is theyll get out some way
"Well i got sentenced to 40 years, time to roll up a new character"
Maybe make them say the full "No, I did not kill the Duke"
Another trick, if you don't have an accomplice? Magic mouth. Put magic mouths on your clothes and possession with your own voice, with triggers like scratching your palm or tapping your toe. The pre-recorded phrases should be "No", "Yes", "I am absolutely innocent", "I do not know anything about that"
That wouldn't work. Buuut:
Judge: Did you kill the duke?
Telepathic accomplice: Did you kill my brother?
Accused: No, I did not kill him
I'm watching Pointy Hat talk about 5.5e and he's saying Barbarians get something like combat maneuvers, but I can't find anything else talking about this mechanic. Does anyone know what he's talking about or is my GOAT washed?
I dunno, I really feel like if they have them say the full sentence it'd be easier
Judge: Are you being affected by any spell other than Zone of Truth right now?
The answer is obviously no. The telepathic accomplice is the one affected by a telepathy spell
It would be interesting to think on how a world with magic has to account for it in law.
Imo Entertainment/Performing is one of the rarer skill proficiency choices to see what do u guys think
Scrying eyes... everywhere
Bards do a lot of that?
... I always choose performance...
bro in a world full of magics that can peer into your brain, make you tell the truth, and make you do things against your will, the legal system around magic must be CRAZY
I've yet to see a bard player not take expertise into performance
They hear "roll for performance" Once a blue moon
You can even pre-record your magic mouths before the trial. Like "I am stating, in the strongest terms possible, that I am innocent of all possible wrongdoings. I did not kill the duke, nor anyone."
Wait now im wondering if you did kill the duke and the judge asks "repeat after me, I did not kill the duke" would you be able to say that
Is repeating somehow different from saying
I'd argue this would not count as a "deliberate lie".
But when they do, they capture the hearts of a tavern, a stage, a city. Its a big check.
... Hey, that's weird, when you talk your mouth doesn't move (Saiki K??)
Well apart from bards tho
Of course your lips are moving. You can mouth the words.
Nat 1
As long as you're not speaking a deliberate lie.
Then they get booed and shunned and its sad
Interesting, normally the words would be a deliberate lie but because its not an answer to a question its different?
Mouth it perfectly to the tone?
Roll performance id say
You were ordered to repeat. This is not a deliberate lie
Get proficiency in performance and you'll be fine
I feel like that'll fall apart once we account the multiple numerous jury watching
You can still very well fail
Another trick: Sign language. If you're mute and use sign language, you are not speaking. So you can lie as much as you want
Or writing actually!
You can write all the lies in the world
True. No plan is foolproof
Does the zone of truth make you unable to lie in movements? Like if you were asked to demonstrate how a murder played out physically?
"I know we just cast zone of truth but could you maybe write your response instead"
You can also homebrew in the moment of combat to roll for performance. The player is playing a theatrical/musical/carny bard. Its up to them to make charismatic moves.
Nope. You just can't speak deliberate lies.
I mean that you could be mute. Like... Honestly, worst comes to worst, you can have your tongue cut out
Zone of Truth users when I'm just straight up honest anyway
Regeneration babyyy
"Yeah, I did that. I'm not lying or tryna deny it."
A seventh level spell
Zone of truth is a second level one.
"Yeah, I'm guilty as * * * * judge. I did that shit for certain"
Darn, I don't think there are any prosthetic tongues
What if you’re telling the truth but you think it’s a lie?
Like a lack of self confidence
It's still considered a truthful statement
Truthful
Devotion paladins be like
It's like that pinoccio thing, "can't we just ask Pinoccio to state the secrets of the universe? And whether his nose grows it means true or false"
No, that is not how it works
Yeh its truth relative to the person speaking
My Minotaur Death Cleric:
"Yeah, I stomped his head instead of Healing him. Why? He called me a cow... so I turned his head into ground beef."
He doesn't explicitly know about the things he's saying, his nose wouldn't grow regardless
Its like that scene in Shrek, he was speaking the truth technically
I didnt not not not lie
I can absolutely deny that I may or may not have been involved that may or may not have absolutely been never created or made by a certain creature or otherwise, deceased or alive, in the moment that we are all living it right now
You could ask the evil henchman if his boss is evil and eventhough their boss might be vecna they still could say no if they believed it
They get free dental, free healthcare, a 401k, the boss isn't that evil
Obviously. Minions only betray or quit bad management, not jobs
A 2nd echo has joined the conversation
Which is what makes my Walmart employment so much better than my last four jobs combined.
Yeh vecna might be trying to [insert evil world domination plan] but the work is pretty chill
Well yeah, Vecna's one of the cool kids who actually read the Evil Overlord List.
Speaking of which, Frieza directly violates the list.
Like that time he killed an innocent, nameless minion as an example to Zarbon.
What do you mean? There's only one Echo
Yeah, obviously. I'm right here.
Ah, that, it's just Echoing in here
Brutal Strike and Improved Brutal Strike '24
I still think its very weird that dispell magic doesnt work on anything else besides spell unless it does
Speaking of echoes, though, my four BBQ bacon cheeseburgers from last night decided they wanted revengeance on their way out. 
Ah, I see
Thank you
Like it works on animated objects
Depends on how the animation magic works, really.
Like, if it's an imbued magical enchantment, dispel won't always do jack. But if it's just a normal casting of Animate Object, wham, back to being a normal pair of boots.
usually on the stat block it says dispell magic will incap the animated object
Animate armor for example
If targeted by dispel magic, the armor must succeed on a Constitution saving throw against the caster's spell save DC or fall unconscious for 1 minute.
I mean, a zombie is literally an animated object 
Its not
It really is. A lifeless body is just an organic object.
Its a creature
It's a corpse 
its an undead
Can you use Animate Objects on a Raise Dead target?
Ackshually, it's a target. For animation magic. 
yeah but the animated armor has this
Antimagic Susceptibility. The armor is incapacitated while in the area of an antimagic field. If targeted by dispel magic, the armor must succeed on a Constitution saving throw against the caster’s spell save DC or fall unconscious for 1 minute.
You can attempt anything you can fast-talk the DM into allowing 
Thats not untrue
a corpse is indeed an object and a creature at the same time
I am very fast-talkable
But if its already moving from Animate Dead, not Raise Dead, then?
The primary difference between Animate Object and Animate Dead is the method. Animation of an object uses Transmutation magic, whereas Animation of a corpse involves the mostly-permanent connection of a corpse to the Negative Energy Plane, which causes the corpse to become a conduit under the control of whoever's in charge of the flow.
Also directly why undead are considered so dangerous, because they're literal holes in reality through which Neg Energy comes through and the Prime bleeds out.
But whatever was casted first animated it first, no?
Also why they generate regions of cold.
I assume so 
So you wouldn't be able to hurl a bunch of undead away in a desperate attempt at survival?
Since they are no longer objects
I mean generally, I would use the rule of cool here and an epic moment
"Choose a number of nonmagical objects", since the undead were animated by a spell, then no.
In that case, I'd consider the use of Turn Undead to throw them away being potentially valid
Yeah, both skeletons and zombies were made by spells, so they can't be affected by Animate Objects
Actually, there's 'naturally-produced' undead, too. That's why graveyards and battlefields are often infested.
Anywhere there's enough Negative Energy buildup, corpses can begin moving and spirits can begin roaming.
Shadows are the only natural undead, though, far as I recall. Manifestations of the Negative Energy Plane itself.
As I am reading it from the Monster manual, both skeletons and zombies have to be Animated first.
Well, it'd depend on your setting and needs, too
But under normal conditions, anywhere with sufficient Negative Energy can cause a natural production of various undead. Ghouls, wraiths, skeletons, zombies....
Ok? I guess if you wanna homebrew how your undead come to be, we are talking about core rules undead.
Oh. OH, I see where you're coming from. Yes, they're technically animated.
Ghouls are demonic, though.
It's not created skeles and zombies, they're just dead bodies lying around that got naturally animated by saturated Neg Energy
The whole 'Animate Dead' spell is just a directed, intentional recreation of that same natural process
Ultimately, yes, skeles and zombies are 'animated'. It's just a question of whether it was by a person or by a natural buildup.
Generally, I would rule Animate Objects to only affect actual objects and not creatures.
Since how would you like it if Strahd could just hurl 5 pcs off Ravenloft down 1000ft
I mean, there's spells that specifically do that to living creatures.
Yeah, but Animate Objects just happens, now you control objects, there is no saves here.
I thought we were talking about Animate Objects specifically here.
I was mostly trolling, honestly. Corpses aren't generally Objects. 
I can see this being an actual in game interaction though xd
Like I said, it potentially could be. Anything you can fast talk a DM into. 
See, you got me thinking. So you succeded.
Here I am, looking at all undead in the Monster Manual and how they came to be
Theoretically, you could animate object a non-undead skeleton
Yes, for sure.
It's just a pile of bones at that point
Now, if it's a full corpse, that's more debatable
Now, would you need to pick specific bones?
Probably? Unless you wanna animate the whole skeleton as a singular object? 
Thats a lotta bones. Animate objects is limited to 5
If you're treating the whole skeleton as a singular item, I imagine it'd just coalesce into a floating bundle of bones with no shape.
Thats kinda cool so yes
If you wanted it to actually take its skeleton form, you'd probably need more than one casting. Maybe animate the legs as a set, the arms as a set, the ribs and skull as a set....
What if it's been wired together to keep it's shape and stil be articulated at the joints?
Ultimately, you'd be better off just casting Animate Dead, but this way, the clerics couldn't complain.
Now see, this would work.
I've seen actual examples of that, too
Taxidermy.
No, in terms of creating undead via unusual means.
Like ... taxidermy?
Like reinforcing what would otherwise be a zombie post-animation with various bits and bobbles.
No, that's the art of preserving an animal's skin and mounting it over a mannequin.
In this case, we're taking the entire corpse and adding bits to it.
I thought we were trying to use Animate Object.
Like augmenting it with additional connective cords, or armor plates, or ....
We were discussing both.
Now, if you were to Animate Objects a skeleton separated, then order them to cover your body in a sort of skele-armor
🤔
Okay, counterpoint, those bones obviously already failed to protect their previous meatbag.
BUT, with the Spell, they have ac and hp
Bones are terrible armor, unless they're magic monster bones.
and sort of provide cover/obscure yourself
Since they are medium objects at that point
Obligatory "A Wizard did it."
Ackshually, Negative Energy did it.
But a Wizard directed the Negative Energy to do it, so Nya.
Negative Energy can do it all on its own, no wizard needed. Nya.
I was merely thinking about how cool would a skeletal armor be using Animate Objects
Or are you going to argue in front of the Magister that you didn't commit that murder, your sword totally killed a guy all on it's own.
Obviously it was a cursed sword of animating that leapt out of your hands to frame you.
Therefore, I can't be held responsible for its actions.
If they ask why I knew that and brought it into town, I was looking for a cleric to destroy it
Improper storage of cursed objects, Jail-time Clacks Gavel
It wouldn't have been responsible to leave it lying around outside town where it might kill random passerby
and i couldn't get proper storage without coming into town
Checkmate, magister! 
I cast power word plank
"Say that again." casts Zone of Truth
Not the problem of the law that you came unprepared to deal with such an object
That only works if I don't believe my words are truth. The truth is that its cheaper to replace a sword than go to jail, so the reality is that I'm looking to destroy my sword. CHECKMATE
Not my problem the law wasn't prepared for storage of cursed objects at town entry point
And if they were prepared and didn't mention it as I entered town, that's still on them 
You could've taken it further away from town.
Seal it in a tomb, make golems to protect it.
Again, not the problem of the law. You brought a dangerous weapon into town, not knowing how and if they can help you destroy it.
It's the whole foundation of adventuring.
I couldn't know how and if it can be destroyed without entering town.
You could've left it outside of town while you learned this information.
And being a cursed sword of animating, it might've floated off to slaughter a village or some travelers! Clearly that would be incredibly irresponsible of me.
At least on me, I can deal with it if it starts acting up
Yet, in that slaughtered village, you wouldn't be on the scene of the crime
Yet, we are here, and you weren't able to deal with it
No, I'd just be the BBEG of the day who released a cursed weapon on the world 
I clearly was, it only killed a single person before I subdued it rather than entire villages.
1 is still more than 0
And now the sword will be dealt with by the law for breaking the law 
And i shall go free as the hero who stopped its evil reign
It came under your possession, you are responsible for its actions
The whole point of cursed possessions is that you are not, in fact, in control of their actions and therefore cannot be held responsible 
Whoever cursed the sword is the true culprit and must be held accountable
Again, why even take it into any town, just run away with it, to the highest heights.
Yes you can, the local noble said so
That's a noble who's asking for a sword in the ribs 
Oh no, its curse activated AGAIN!
thats probable cause, jail this man immediately
Threatening a noble? Death penalty
GAVEL SMACK
The cursed sword of stabbing anyone who suggests you're responsible for who it stabs 
The only known way to break the curse is to free the wielder of any responsibility 
And destroy the sword, of course
power word: kill, twinned spell
That's murder, death penalty for you 
"I think I just heard Power Word: Scrunch over there-" /ref
I was the magister judge once, dealing with a case of an insane man with an even more insane sword
Yet, for my hubris, I suffered excruciatingly
Good. 
Speak With Dead would like a word
The only thing the magister remembers is a sword breaking the sound barrier.
Guys, is being a jobber in the D&D campaign series bad?
Whats a jobber?
Being booked just to be the dummy for certain people
I guess you never watch pro wrestling
I don't
I need hours to find the word and I fumbled into someone who doesn't understand it
Those hours, I've been thinking that my character is just a jobber, not relevant to the main plot my DM has
Depends on the context I guess
You could use the term: my pc feels like an npc, in the future.
I've been thinking about joining the game here. Sleep is overrated
Sleep is pretty decent, I need 6-8 to function myself
I don't want to sleep, because I miss a lot of stuff when I do. I've been training to cut the need for 7-hour sleep.
Still have no idea on how to cut it from 4 to 1 hour a day
Also, really need context here. It could be that its another players arc currently?
We have these West Marches quests
Bunch of one-shots, but all of the one-shots have a connected storyline
Its the West Marches style though. You take jobs your character might find interesting.
Is the chance high if I just be an NPC?
Do you interact with the other PCs at all? Or the NPCs in the one-shot itself? Maybe you are also playing a less active character? Really need more context here on what actually happened.
Hello everyone. I am trying to create a warlock character. But I need to know what Hexblade Warlock works?
Not enough spotlight
Some players are really that....active
Consult the DM about this.
Too active if I have to say
And the players.
I have....they think they have shared the spotlight fairly
Nobody can help you if they don't know the context.
just ordered the '24 core rules in alt covers! woo!
But what I see is....they give too much spotlight to characters with high charisma and intelligence
All I have....is just brute
Because English is not my main language
Context is only explainable in Bahasa Indonesia
I mean, about what actually happened. We don't know how the session looked like.
🤷♂️
I think you just need to discuss this more with the DM and the players and voice your concerns about not having enough spotlight.
Dude why does this paladin have FOUR FREAKIN ATTACKS
IN ONE ACTION
Divine smite, DOWNED, divine smite, DEAD, divine smite DOWNED, divine smite, DEAD
Baldur's gate tactician mode is so evil
We have. I was also being open about my attention disorder and my sensitivity to loud noises
In the end, some DMs there say I may have less involvement in their campaigns
I think....it feels unfair
They also rarely have combat-heavy campaign
My character shines there
Nah please don't tell me the githyanki has 6 attacks in one action or something 🥀
But they rarely have it
They say everyone has a chance....but in reality they act like....TKO toward WWE
stares
What's a celeron
Discontinued Intel's CPU. Infamously slow
Hi toothy
Celeron was around 2ks
Never heard of it can't lie
It was before Pentium.
2ks?
2000's
Discontinued in 2023
Oki
Let’s get things back on topic please!
Oh, haha I missed it but yesterday was asexual visibility day!
So I've asked similar questions in the past, but tell me about an NPC/PC in your game that is aro/ace (aromantic/asexual)! 
Oke
Regarding party romance how does a group go about that?
I'm just wondering cuz it defo doesn't seem easy
I think you really need to know each other well to be able to act out a romance.
Hmmm. My battle master fighter seems pretty aro. The rest of the party characters has gotten more into romantic/sexual relationships while my fighter just doesn’t appear interested at all.
Learning how to if they want
Which is the greatest hurdle for a lot of people
Didn’t really explore that aspect of my character.
My first wizard may have been iirc
They're more interested in fighting 🔥
Fight for each others hearts!
He was adventuring part for power and moreso to get away from his father trying to set him up with a wife cause he found no appeal in romantic relations or anything with anyone
What does Kaelith change into that she can carry people
It looks like an eagle but I can't tell
Giant Eagle iirc
Birb
Depending on whether your 5 or 5.5 Giant versions of small animals are on or off the table
There was a magical contract for the mercenary company the fighter originally worked for which may have had some impact on my characters ability/willingness to create such personal relationships. So yeah “doing my job” was the characters focus to the expense of other things.
Certainly, I've got a Wandslinger in the Eberron setting who is ace, her name is Hope. She's a rootin' tootin' wand shootin' cowgirl. Her whole vibe is from a handful of Westerns (Lone Ranger and Hateful 8 mostly)
At least some anyway
My brain aint there yet, been forced to read for the last 4 hours
Hai toot
5.5e
Jerome Ra’saheroh
Sphinx Dungeon Master (He made a pact with Me) Warlock
Ah then Giant Eagles i think are Celestials now
Cool
Wait, really? Huh
Stares
Weird
... did you just fart what is that
It makes way more sense for them to be Beasts
Its cause they're beasts from a celestial realm
Shall I just refer to u as gwyn then
not actually originated in nature on the material plane
I was being called toot?
Thats hilarious, I'm getting the overwhelming urge to call you "toot" as well
of the two, i deff prefer gwyn
Giant Eagles, Owls and Elks are all celestials now due to lore
wuuut
Soon we'll be calling her Groot /j
cause ya know you dont find a 12ft tall Elk (on its four legs) in natural nature
No, because I am Groot
the new MM moved towards having creatures have the types that fit their nature
Druid got nerfed oofies
Oh that makes sense
Like Gnolls being Fiends
while I'm a lil sad they aren't Beasts for Polymorph/Wildshape reasons, these specific animals being Celestials makes sense to me. These are like... elegant revere-able animals to me
Giant Vultures are fiends now
I'm assuming Kaelyth uses wild shape cuz it doesn't look like she uses polymorph
Lmfao
Ye well Vox Machina campaign was in pf1e then very early 2014
CORRECTION...
Giant Vultures are monstrosities now
Which is why Trinket is always a background character
Since 2014 Beastmaster had to use a real animal and if it died they have to get a new one
Yeah Moon Druids losing Giant Eagle sucks
Pecky Pecky
Shouldn't that go to the wood pecker @woven flint /j
(monstrosity)
New Moon Druid is a wrecking crew imo
the teleporting, the always prepared spells that work in WS
Fount of Moonlight which makes their attacks do base smite damage on top of the regular damage
Wouldnt wanna be an Undead leader with one of them around
the highest cr flying creature that moon druids have now is like, the CR 1/2 giant bee.
Cause the radiant may be just normally dangerous for me, it means my minion zombies are dying instantly
in the 2025 monster manual*
Is this with or without polymorph
Because I heard u can turn into a mammoth with it
HAH
Well that stinks
note flying creature. i know mammoths are extinct and all but as far as i am aware of mammoths are not able to fly
ah wait im an idiot theyre 6
Well hello folks!
yeah the flying creature thing is so bizarre. It feels like an intentional nerfto me
I think part of the celestial changes was also to avoid moon druids becoming airships for free
it is weird how many restrictions there are on flight for druids despite some races having innate flying speeds
i dont think that was a problem. by level 8 i see no reason not to be a medium or large flying creature in combat
this is also just a base druid thing too
well the innate flying races are something they more or less regret doing
Owlin are there cause they were in an MTG book as a flying so had to happen and Faeries cause they had it from older 5e
you've never seen dumbo? they could do that too
aarakocra are quite popular from 2014, and iirc aasimar in 2024 get a flight speed
Cause a Giant Eagle like seen in Vox can transport a normal sized party
or an ability that grants flight
new flying speed on species is limited to once per LR
also one thing i didnt notice until like, just the other day is that druids have a limited amount of forms they can actually take. like i get the 2014 "animal you have seen" criteria was rather vague, but only being able to have, 8 different animals max seems kinda weird
Is killing a pseudodragon murder, since they have human level intelligence?
ohh right
its cause they wanted to stop people looking through the whole beast dialogue for something and to just choose ones they can use
I played a 1-15 (Tyranny of Dragons) and unironically the amount of times our Druid just cast Polymorph on themself to get around their wack Wild Shape restrictions made me question the class feature
like yeah you can change one form during a long rest, but its still just a strange restriction to me
Druid had a lot of stuff that made people slow down games, like old WS, and old Conjure Animals
And its not like you really needed all those forms
tbh i think any class can slow down a game if the player isn't familiar with their abilities
2024's druid still suffers from that, especially for newer players
Naturally but there was enough complaints
"wotc my player whose been playiong for 6 years spent 54 minutes looking through the MM just to change into a brown bear for the 60th time"
lol yeah it's helpful now that there are some beast statblocks at the back of the phb for druids
And a big complaint was really how trivial druids could just remove the exploration part of dnd entirely
yeah that's fair
Wait WHAT?!
That sucks so bad
It should be at least 15
You dont need that many tbh
a marriage of the two would be nice
Notably most druid players dont use more than 3 or 4 forms in majority based on my experiences
Its either bear, bird, or land creature that can scout like a cat or a rat
yeah both my druids very rarely used more than 1 or 2 animals
They wouldnt have actually put the limit on forms if people actually used that many, its mainly to avoid the whole case of decision paralysis i believe
i feel like yeah most animal blocks are relatively samey but id just think the only limit needs to be DM discression
like yeah i do get the time wasting thing but that just kind of reads as a skill issue to me. just start a turn timer or something '
Hear me out, a campaign set Post-BG3 where the party of that game are the BBEGs of the next
you get some hardass DMs who are like "well you haven't come across any Deer in this campaign, so you can't turn into one." having a guranteed number of forms helps this. I wish you could also just get more by seeing them
Well you can change one on LR
Oh
only so many ways to dress up "animals bite or scratch you"
can take that as learning a better animal so you toss aside the one you dont need anymore
What would you do if a teammate just transformed into an owl and stayed on top of u becoming part of ur outfit
Cause alter self does give you the general animal abilities
Animals really aren't that diverse in what they can do that matters within the context of a streamlined game
that is true, i just figure that is kinda the reason you shouldn't need to make a choice between scratchy animal #3 and scratchy animal #4 like youre preparing a spell
Like do you really need Alter Self: Bee to pollenate your garden during downtime? Sure it sounds cool but there'd likely be either too vague of rules or too many forms of alter self which would take up a lot of page room
prolly yelling in pain, owls have talons
well if you're a druid whose only ever been on land and needs to go underwater why wouldnt you pick scratchy animal 4 that has gills
Scenario qn:
What would you do if a teammate just transformed into an owl/bird and stayed on top of u becoming part of ur outfit
What if they do it gently
Its a 2nd level spell meant to handle niche challenges
well yeah, i think in the case where you need a specific speed i dont think decision paralysis will be an issue, you'd just turn into a fish
Yeah, I'm pretty generous with Wildshape forms. In 2014, Xanathars had a list of Beasts organized by Biome. I usually just let a Druid blanketly choose a biome or two to know every animal.
just turn into a goldfish, works every time
Cat supremacy best supremacy
I'm not really in the business of nickel and diming my Druids about whether or not they've seen a rat or weasel or elk, I say give them the forms
I like the change primarily cause i dont trust players to be able to make a decision from the whole bestiary
What about baby creatures like baby dragons
thats a different story
yeah the "you have seen" limitation in 2014 kinda just existed in case a DM didn't want a druid to become a dinosaur for flavor or tone reasons
if i'm not mistaken, the 2024 monster manual also sorts creatures by biome. it doesn't give specifically beasts though
Theres a section for creature type
Theres a lot of beasts
is it weird that I really like CR 0 Creatures that do literally 1 damage
like yes you go girl you whittle down that guy
No
how many rats would it take to take down a Tarrasque 
one REALLY lucky rat
Rat only does 1 damage
There's 92 Beasts in the '25 MM which is why I think the limited forms happened
D&D Question of the Day (D&D Beyond: Playing the Game):
(Short Answer): A rogue wants to sprint, vault a table, and slide into cover. Which single ability is most central to the check, and why?
It's big AF.
I assume level 1 adventurers have not seen like... Dragons or Giants or most Monstrosities with some exceptions. Owlbears are common enough imo that an adventurer might have seen one before adventuring, maybe Displacer Beasts are common enough too idk. I think Dragons is pushing it.
Dex
Dex cuz acrobatics
Sliding and jumping
Their Speed stat, their Strength score, and... their Speed stat again
Sounds just like flavored movement to me but if the table is an actual obstacle then jump rules
I can't believe I need strength to jump
10ft long jump over table, then rest of movement into cover
Waa
Naturally
Thats what I'm thinking. This just seems like decribed movement. If the table is an obstacle, ur Strength Score should tell u if u can clear it
People with legs that cant handle their own weight cant jump over a large table
What if their mid level
Least not cleanly
The jump is 10 ft?
Chase Rules have stuff about how many times you can Dash in a row (I think its Con Mod times before making Saves against Exhaust)
Are we jumping 10 ft
the 10ft is for the Long Jump
Isn't that just combining sprint n jump
sprint isnt an action
regular movement of adventurers is basically a constant sprint
Like 10? Sure, they've seen and fought Dragons and Devils and Demons and Giants and all that jazz. With some exceptions, they know about the wider world they live in.
Sprint and Slide are just flavors of movement speed
Jumping over an obstacle would be using movement speed with jump rules
Omfg... the gith does in fact have 4 attacks, ACTION SURGE MAKES IT 8 Tactician mode is soooo brutal 😭
Unless this is a chase scene then itd be an acrobatics
Well can jumping not fall under acrobatics technically
if its needed
It can, usually thats for "I want to jump further than my stats will allow"
such as swinging from pole to pole like Lara Croft
Can you get aooed if u dash or not really
Ye
yup
you gotta Disengage to avoid AoOs
Unless you have the speedy/mobile feat then they have disadvantage
Nah dashing just means your breaking into a full whole hog sprint away from them with your back turned which is when they hit you
Speedy/Mobile i assume means you're fast enough to make it harder
Disengage takes up ur movement right?
No, its an action
Oh
Unless you have an ability to do so as a Bonus Action
So it would take up ur attack
Like Rogues and Monks
to avoid AoOs if youre dm is the type to allow you to buy magic items buy some kind of robe that has an ability to dash without provoking AoOs
Interesting
I dont think theres a magic item that negates AoO
Cloak of Displacement would indirectly hinder them
To avoid aoos just grab an ability with push and run for ur life*
thats another way
even better is drunken monk +10 ft + 2 attacks + disengage or free dash
all with 1 Ki
thats just movement and i would not require a roll for that
Forced movement is a helpful tool if you need to run or wanna reposition
If an enemy is rooted/ensnared would they be able to aoo u?
you can take a push action anytime though
Logically Idts
at disadvantage
yes, blindness prevents attacks of opprotunity though
Never said you cant shove as an action
Shove
Why would we need an ability to do that though?
Because you cant just shove someone for free
Does DnD mess around with overpush and knock back damage or not really
Nah unless they fall off a high enough ledge
Why why
Because you're in a battle
So just fall damage
they're trying to kill you
So what would happen after the shove
fair
theyre knocked prone
U or them
or knocked away 5ft
may be able to use a grapple and athletics to push them into a rope trick lol
Attack, Shove, Grapple
Only if the specific mechanic says so
the attack action lets you strike with a weapon, or attack unarmed. and an unarmed strike can be a shove a grapple or a damaging attack
Theres also a disarm one but it was a 2014 variant rule
Knock away ur enemies weapon
OwO
Finally, I've reached 24 hours without sleeping and it feels great. Does it mean I'm ready to take any game from any time zone?
Definitely not
^ otherwise it’s a battlemaster exclusive
If I need more experiences, I think sleep isn't necessary
I was thinking of something and I just forgot it
I'm highkey considering adapting it for '24
Most of your games are at 12:00 AM UTC +7
Charger feat?
One thing technically in 2014
perhaps use a different race like a minotaur
Oh ye I'm playing fantasy age and there's a charge action lmao kinda forgot about that
Doesn’t steady aim technically do that kinda?
In 2014 you could render yourself and another target useless by action grapple then action restrain both of you with the 2014 grappler feat
I’m looking for a dnd master for a jjk dnd server. We have a couple maps done, everyone in the server ( 9 players and 2 dnd mods/masters) has their cursed techniques set and have some tech outside of just the cursed techniques. We have the spreadsheets all set with its own math aspects and stats laid out for everyone. We need a dnd master to run the sessions , please reach out to my DMs (should be open). Master should know a lot abt jjk and should not be a no mic. We’re pretty cool ppl
no, they are seperate, but you can break up your movement in your turn or break up your attacks if you have multiple
It's a bonus action
But yeah closest thing to it
Type /looking and select the option for #looking-for-dm to advertise yourself as a group in search of a DM. Be sure to include your regular availability!
Aside from here, you could also try LFG areas in sites like Reddit, Roll20 or the D&D Beyond forums to get started.
2024 charger my beloved
Ty
im starting to realize using third party books is not entirely too common
Not really
Third party is usually more powerful than official tp broken in some way
Hello!! Which channel is for general advice? I'm a new DM and I'm making a boss so I have a question about it!!!
#dm-discussion would be where to get advice for DMing specifically!
Thanks!!
i have a silly thought for everyone if you where to cast a moon beam on optimus prime what you think would happen ?
Personally, I consider anything being sold on the DNDB Marketplace to be fair game 
like would he transform from truck to robot since he is a shape changer?
Since he's originally a Robot over a vehicle, he'd turn back into a robot and possibly to his form before he scanned an earth vehicle
So naked optimus prime ?
I'm making it simple, I know Cybertronians aren't robots smh.
No, it'd be likely that he'd just take on his look before he left his planet
Which... is fairly similar.. at least in G1
2024 charger is so much nicer
Would he still retain the use of most of his body in the prime sense. Like he use to the way he was set up so would it hinder him at all going back to hhis original form ?
.... Yeah?
no, Sage Advice Compendium is pretty explicit that disarming is not exclusive to battlemasters.
Moonbeams effects are only temporary afterall, and, I assume, only while under moonbeam
moon beam last a short while after but not long term
anyone can try to do anything a real person might be able to do.
Yes, thats literally what I said
no matter if it’s explicitly described as its own action or not
oh sorry i was meaning i thought it you where forced out of shapeshifter form for a bit after a failed savve
ah never mind 2014 moon beam is only while under beam weird i thought it was a 10 min deal
ive been talking about magic items and all that but its just because my dm is a freak and has a bunch fo third party books lol
Anything on ddb is a dangerous game.
Cause you can lead to a party with a general of hell, aragorn, some random dude from Boston and a regular 5e pc
That's just a normal bunch of folks in Sigil's taverns 
Then two of them die in one hit from a goblin
That's also completely in line with D&D lore 
that make me remember the dougdoug dnd streams
Also, I'm the DM and I play solo, soooo....
Ye if it's solo then nothing really matters balance wise.
Playing solo?
D&D DM Yourselves
D&D The Solo Adventurer's Toolbox
D&D The Solo Adventurer's Toolbox Expanded
Among other things, I use those as tools and advice for solo DnD
Sometimes I use NWN as well and build battle maps, monsters, and my PC(s) in it
Aurora Toolset's very versatile
I’ve been trying to get into dnd I’m listening to some podcast of the lore I bought two boardgames and books to read up I’m trying to understand like what the tokens are for and what I’m fighting against cuz I don’t rlly understand this
Is this different than a one on one session?
Exactly. If WotC wants cash for content they're hosting and have integrated into DNDB, then I consider it open season to add to my campaigns if it seems interesting and can fit into what I'm doing.
Yeah for usual group tables it's a bad idea.
But when it comes to just solo play the only thing that matters is your own enjoyment.
Like I've got some adventure books specifically for my water sorc, but they aren't a good fit for my swampy, draconic warlock, who has her own adventure and mechanics books
I've been loving DNDB so far, since it largely eliminated my biggest issue with tabletop / pnp: cross-referencing so many damn books
DNDB books by and large have links between them so I don't need twelve screens to track each damn book
Ye only major thing that sucks about ddb is you won't own it forever.
How often do people use Tabletop Simulator for D&D?
It's one of the ones people use.
Not the most popular but it's known.
i would estimate like ~60% of games that happen use a VTT
