#dnd-discussion
1 messages · Page 359 of 1
Like crutch characters?
Not super familiar with the term, but probably. Stuff that is the bane of beginners.
Nah a crutch character is someone that's so powerful and easy to play it let's someone low skilled succeed too well for their skill level
Yeah, that's what I mean.
So any time they're forced off they're basically like lost children
I don't think that type of thing is inherently bad, but where I think it's bad is when applied to a game where the social element is very much at play.
One hour remaining until I get to roleplay my BBEG in disguise again... Mwahahah
Yeah I agree.
Crutch stuff exists so low skilled people can compete with high skilled players but something will happen at some point that forces you to change and they're probably gonna throw a tantrum about it and it just turns into a ball of rage and anger.
Aww man it’s so fun to rp a BBEG, and it must be so cool to play them in disguise
Like people who complain about PvP in Fromsoft games when their PvE easy mode trump card weapon doesn't work against actual people.
I have him as a "holy cleric" (he's a vampire) travelling with the party.
Real people require real strategies
do fake people require fake strategies
Yes
Like crutch stuff usually leads to bad results for the ones it's designed for in some way.
Like crutch characters in competitive games fall apart against actually high skilled players
pvp in dnd just comes down to whoever casts magic missile first
Crutch stuff in PvE falls apart the moment the game throws a skill check at you
Or they get buffed too much and everyone has to play the crutch character despite the low skill level
Talking to you Genichiro Ashina
In a game like D&D, the reason I dislike "crutch" stuff past a certain point is how it negatively affects the intra-party and player-DM relationships. It can simultaneously give the player zero real ability to modify their behavior to avoid those scenarios and breed resentment with a potentially low-skill DM, the two specific subsets of people that might not have the capability to resolve the issue on their own.
Twilight Cleric is another example of an option I would consider as a "crutch".
Oh yeah Mercy Meta in OW1 I remember.
My bae
is it a crutch or is it just really good
Over a year of being forced to play the same hold click healer.
Both, really. Nothing prevents both lol
I guess when it comes to dnd I don't really see much stuff as a crutch. Other than 2014 Stunning Strike.
And I do think 2024 did the good thing by making the simple subclasses actually good for Barb and Fighter
My view is that a Twilight Cleric player can totally unwittingly stumble into annoying a DM that has no capability to deal with it without potentially accidentally overtuning their encounters and then having the players complain about how the DM is appearing to not play fair.
All of that while just playing their class.
E.g. "Why is the DM mad at me for using Twilight Sanctuary if I'm just doing what my subclass allows me to do?"
Reality: the DM doesn't have the skill yet to deal with it, but you're gonna think he's targeting you.
Because in a game like dnd the last thing we do is talk to our players /hj
annoyed my Abjuration wizard in Foundry ~_~ couldn't have my shield and the temp hp at the same time
Part of the issue is that these things in a low-skill context often involve people who haven't cultivated attitudes that allow them to deal with things like this, thus they're truly in a bind.
I cant wait to use the improved true strike
Yeah they're not aware yet that the dm is allowed to ask for certain player options to be not used till they're more experienced.
nah, we get aura of protection, I'll never be jealous
I feel like a lot of dms try dming from a place of a lot of misunderstandings
...yeah
And its probably why we dont have more dms
oh i love twilight sanctuary, i have two twilight clerics in my Strahd game and their HP max drain on all the vampires is making them sweat so hard
Cause they're told by the internet that a "good dm doesnt say no" then some end up not saying no and get overwhelmed
IMO a good DM knows that there's a time and a place for no
As they say, no is a complete sentence.
Yeah part of the dm skill set is being able to just say flat out no, that doesn't happen, get out
Part of the eternal DM skillset, really.
yeah i corrected it cause its not like problem players are a 5e thing
they've existed since the first tabletop games
Lmao i just realized our party has 3 charisma casters and only 1 wisdom
Well, I don't necessarily think it's a problem player thing. I think mistakes being villified is one reason 5e is so unfriendly to new DMs.
I can agree there. "a good dm never says no, a good dm never makes a bad encounter, a good dm doesn't make mistakes, a good dm always says yes and"
So new dm ends up with his first TPK trying to adjust to a party thats optimizing hard and thinks its solely his fault
the first TPK is a learning experience for sure, but you need to takeaway the right lesson
My first tpk was learning that if players make stupid decisions they get the consequences
And if we allow villifying mistakes, then people aren't interested in engaging due to the potential for being villified.
Yep, and some of these people that vilify these mistakes will vilify famous dms cause they set the standard for a "dm never makes mistakes and always says yes"
I would say it's just an issue with villification itself.
Yeah, there's a lot of vilification in anything nowadays.
Loads of people desperate to feel like they're better and the greater internet community for dnd you can see alot as well
Being able to learn from your mistakes is a crucial life skill
One would say the most important too bad many neglect it
A grace we need to give ourselves, and others. My kid poured soup on the couch now he's learning how to clean a couch
Fortunately My dm when he do mistakes or make some... really big gaps in difficulty we talk it out with him and he is open to criticism, same us like players we do too
The reason I specifically say "low-skill" and "high-skill", as opposed to other terms, is to call out that skill in playing and running is something that exists, and it's not something that should be judged because it almost always comes with experience.
Ah cleaning a couch is rough
There is a level of people not even acknowledging their mistakes, differences in viewpoints, etc
True. Not every dm can be a great player and vice versa. And thats alright
Take a shot everytime a warlock says eldritch blast
I would die
Alcohol poisoning in the first 7 rounds
The real kicker is when the cleric starts slinging eldritch blast.
Oh boy that will be smth cuz we got a cleric
And i am a warlock
Hey, someone give me an artifact to think about
Hand of vecna
Thanks! Whoops, started thinking about the Head of Vecna
sword of zerial
The Demonomicon of Iggwilv
Hey yall I'm new to the server. Just saying hi, nice to meet yall
Welcome to hell!!!!
Which layer is this?
Not to get into heavy stuff right after joining but I'm going through some rough stuff and was hoping to feel better by finding a community with which I can share my interests
Hope I didn't kill the vibe
Not at all, vibes don't tend to stick around long anyway since it's a fast-paced server. Welcome in!
Vibes are Vibing
I'll try not to be a perpetual bummer lol
I am there with you, just not speaking of it.
I noticed there was a newcomers chat. Is there a protocol for that? Like introductions or something similar? Or is it more for people who are new to dnd in general?
The latter I believe
Yeah, it's for those beginner questions like what the difference between a check and a save is.
I have a declaration...
"Wonkus" shall be a new greeting among friends! /joking
Wonkus! Tokii
I'm kinda irked that 2024 bard does add JOAT to initiate anymore 😔
But I understand it was a little busted, I suppose
I don't even like playing bards, frankly, but I'm playing one soon lol
Wonkler, Oxy
kind of off topic, but how do i change my roles? i tried looking for a channel but i cant find it ack
id:customize is the place
ah tysm, it won’t let me change my roles weirdly enough
Maybe restart Discord? It breaks sometimes.
good idea!
there’s also a tornado watch near me, so maybe it’s messing with my internet
yay did it
it's definitely paladin
Nuh uh, the best is the one that fills the party's missing role
That kinda depends on the dm, when I dm for people I try to allow them to be whatever they wanna be. No healers? Potions are cheap. No spellcasters? Scrolls are abundant. Etc etc
Composition is definitely important of course. Not denying that.
from an optimization perspective wizard is the strongest class
But you can't play all wizards
Sure you can
I mean, you can. But the DM must be on board.
You can do anything in dnd
Ackshually! I used to solo with wizards and alchemists in PF1e. It was great
I guess my rogue take was a hot take lol
I mean, it is, but paladin does have the best ability in the game
PF1e wizards were so overpowered man.
Cute pfp btw :]
I did golem mancers and necro mancers
So much fun. Then alch was like something where I kept making friends PLUS had a billion clones of myself or some nonsense
You never know what conversation an innocent comment will start.
Oh my, the echoes are multiplying
If I see ONE more Echo...
I'm gonna buy a lottery ticket
we need Echo of Vinnath in here
Your name looks cooler than mine though.
She doesn't count!
She was before both of you smh
you could say it's a... Fantastical Echo?
Isn't the thing about echoes that they repeat themselves?
you can say that again
She's been off the last couple days
Isn't the thing about echoes that they repeat themselves?
It just writes itself
woah, there's an echo in here
Nah, I'm a Doppelganger, there's a difference
I find it interesting that Doppelgangers in D&D (The monster) aren't inherently evil like they typically are in real life 🤔
That's just Changelings
I think their evil counterpart would be rakshasas in dnd
Changlings and Doppelgangers are just.. Neutral shapechangers that wanna live life
Also not to nerd out but changelings are actually the offspring of doppelgangers with other races
Changeling and Doppelgangers are two different species
Changeling are Fey
And
Doppelgangers are Monstrosities
Channeling hm?
I thought doppelgangers were fey too
Nope!
They're Monstrosities... for some odd reason?
I'd think them Aberrations tbh
Like aliens?
Aberrations aren't as much aliens as they are very strange and unnatural creatures
A good majority of Aberrations ARE aliens, but not all of them
Aberrations are typically things that just flatout don't belong in the Material Plane
Think less Aliens and more Cthulu Light
Yeah^ this
What if I simulacra someone who has been replaced by a doppelganger
and then a changeling walks in
It wouldn't work because you'd be targeting a Monstrosity instead of a Humanoid or Beast
a doppelganger, a changeling, and a simulacrum walk into a bar- 🍅
And then the papa tomato says ketchup?
The Rakshasa bartender looking at them:
"Well, one of us is gonna have to change!"
Must have chosen Perform (Oratory)
Whoops, this is 5e. I need to go back to my elderly friends
I've only played two bards
About to play my third:
Owlin Glamor Bard (Caspian Goldengale)
Changeling Spirits Bard (Malochè the Fool)
And
Firbolg Moon Bard soon! (Unnamed rn)
I think you mean Charisma (Mouth)
Yeah I'm only 24 years old I don't get that joke
I really want to play a Bard/Cleric multiclass but it seems so hard to build out
Malochè was in a campaign where Changelings were monstrosities instead of Fey and people typically killed them on sight.
His 'Mask' was a Drow named Eadric Scarborough.
Eadric was an individual he met in his dreams
Probably play something like Tortle so I can dump STR and DEX, and just pump WIS, CHA and CON
ahh tysm!! i drew it! it was awhile ago haha, im drawing my DnD character i might use as a pfp :3
Oh hey Tokii, wanted to hear your opinion on this since I got the idea from you
I'm thinking of giving my battlemaster elf a rod that can transform into a list of +1 martial melee weapons
Malochè was considered "The Fool" of the group
In the sense that he was dealing with things that he was incredibly unfamiliar with (not that he was stupid)
would've loved to play in that setting as a changeling, backstory and flavor, mmm
I liked playing him
He was incredibly depressed but acted like a Diva anyway
I wish my coping mechanism was slaying
I think it's actually called "masking"? I'm not sure though
He was murdered by an Evil "Clone" of one of his party members, but when his "Mask" broke (his true form being revealed) they took him back to the BBEG because he was "One of his children" the "Monsters of the fog" and was revived and offered a deal.
Well acting happy when you're really sad is one thing, but being a girlboss when you're really sad is another
He spat in the BBEG'S face and Misty stepped away then ran for his life lol
"Thanks for reviving me loser"
Malochè was probably one of my favorite bards to play ever lmao
He wasn't happy to be alive again, but he'd rather go back to help his friend rsther than betray them
Twilight cleric 1 / any bard X 
Alas, I had to leave that campaign early because scheduling conflicts 😔
That's the way it goes
i finished the sketch of my dnd oc !!
Honestly? I'd personally just go all one or the other
hi chat hi sil
Oh word can we see?
ya! it’s in #dnd-arts-and-crafts
not finished yet, plus i wanna add more details possibly
You know what's funny?
I had an Elvish Valor Bard Character concept
And his name was also Vermillion
He had red hair!
and a beard (which are uncommon for Elvish individuals lol)
mmm Yuan Ti
Super cool! Love the Naga look they have. Yuan Ti that are part snake are called abominations right?
i was making my oc the other day with my friends and i didn’t know anything about what religion he should have, so i made him an atheist. which apparently is hilarious
I love Yuan Ti, I got a Warlock with a Primordial Snake patron who I'm reworking to be a Yuan Ti
yeah!! something like that
tysm!! but what is Naga?
i kind took inspo from the movie Rango and added my own twist on it
Yeah the reason I made my username Vermillion is because i used to try to make my profile have a certain aesthetic and red was the last one I chose before stopping altogether. Never changed the name after that lol
Snake people
oh oops
We should kiss /joking /silly
Nagas are snake people, specifically their lower half is that of a snake's body. I think they were popularized by World of Warcraft
ohhh ill share what the dndbeyond thing says in #dnd-media
or i guess not.. i don’t have pic perms there
On a real note, I probably should change the name. I prefer to go by Robin, but I never actually change the name. I just tell people to call me that, like I'm doing right now lol
Robin is a nice name :]
Themberchaud is getting way too fat from these GIFs 😔
I DIDNT KNOW I COULDNT SEND ANY :((((
it's okay, common mistake
Themberchud /jk
Themberchad
what is the difference between Yuan-ti and Naga?
I don't think Naga are a real thing in dnd
Kinda like how Hobbits aren't a thing but Halflings are
I could be wrong about that, I haven't actually checked
OH my bad
i know nothing about dnd, other than it’s a roleplay game and there’s mythical creatures and other things
idk the species, religions, etc
partly why i made my character just a fighter, simple enough
They are, there's Naga statblocks
ACTUALLY it looks like nagas in dnd are giant snakes with people faces. Which isn't what they are in any other form of fiction. It's kinda like how the dnd version of a Basilisk is a six legged lizard dog creature but historically they're chicken snake creatures
Spirit Naga and Gaurdian Naga are the only ones I can find right now, but yea
kind of like that one episode of atla where aang had to see that creature with the different faces?
if you know what i’m talking about ofc lol
EXACTLY LIKE THAT GOATED REFERENCE
OMG YAYAYAYA 🫶🫶
Did we just become best friends
yes!!
Geeks :p
well depends how old are you
24
isn’t everyone ? this IS a dnd server
then yes!!
Oh, don't share your ages in the server for safety reasons btw
I mean um I'm about that old but not EXACTLY that old
Just looking out for you fellas :p
just a rough estimate 
Sorry, unprofessional of me
Rakshasa are the one that bothers me the most that dnd completely changed and called a monster.
They're demons aren't they? It's like the coolest part of their lore
Rakshasa aren't Demons, Devils or Yugoloths, just Fiendish creatures :3
Not all fiends fall under those three categories, surprisingly
When one dies they reappear in the hells and undergo a several month long regeneration process that is EXTREMELY painful, and when they return to the Material they seek vengeance on those who killed them
fien
Or so I thought
Succubi, Inccubi, Night Hags and Rakshasa are all fiends, but none of them are Devil or Demons, etc
There's more, but those are the popular ones I can think of
I wrote a short story one time about a rakshasa who was killed over and over by a paladin, and sought vengeance against him and always failed to kill the paladin until he got old and couldn't defend himself anymore
that’s interesting!
Was the Paladin named Arthur Dent by any chance?
I don't know the reference I'm sorry :/
There's a Rakshasa that lives among the people of Waterdeep
He works as a private detective and genuinely cares about the citizens of Waterdeep
He's pretty cool
also i sent you a dm :P
The raksasha would be the bowl of petunias in The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy (in one iteration of the creature's life)
Detective Damien
Fiends CAN feel genuine compassion for others, believe it or not lol
Which, I genuinely like that it's not just always Black and White "Fiends are irrevocable Evil and emotionless"
His name is Victor Tigerclaw, I believe 🤔
Never played waterdeep
That's like me being named Robin Fingernail lol
He's a minor character, which is why I felt okay talking about him so openly lol
If he was more intertwined with the story I'd probably not have talked about him
That's not his REAL name, that's just his current human identities name
Detective Damien is also a reference to something btw
Invincible, I know
"Your dad sent me to come find you"

Anyway, always interesting to see some non-humanoid characters that actually care about humanoids
No, no, my mistake
It's Vincent Trench
His Rakshasa name is
"Valantajar"
Absolutely love that guy, genuinely a chill dude
I remember I homebrewed a feywild variant of vampires that absorb life force through needle-like fingers
You know?
My favorite vampires in the realms are the ones that feed on psychic energy
They had a weakness to sunlight like regular vampires but the lore explanation was that the sun had inherently holy energy that eradicated the negative energy that held them together
never heard of that
I dunno what they're called, but I think a Vampire that actively feeds on thoughts is 10x more terrifying
They faded in sunlight instead of burning
Vampires in D&D aren't JUST Bloodsuckers, they can feed on different things! :0
It's just up to preference/how they became a vampire, I suppose
Crazy idea
Players end up in a giant chess board with both sides trying to kill them
But both sides can only do 1 unit a round
A knight is a knight, a bishop is a priest, etc.
The Queen is probably a Drow Matron mother for maximum fear
I can’t wait to play test neon odyssey
Reminds me when my Celestial Warlock just BARELY beat Strahd In a chess match before our final confrontation with him
My Warlock beat him in chess and was the one to finish him off in combat later
It was pretty poetic lol
Mind you.
Flat Intelligence rolls vs strahds like.. what.. +3 Int?
Someone just did 882 million+ damage on a homebrew character ;-;
Do you want another crazy part?
It didn’t even kill
what
this is a 5e game?
5.5e
But there’s barely a difference
The funny thing is, we weren’t even supposed to be there yet
We basically speed ran the entire campaign just because the DM added 10th level spells and one of them was greater wish.
882 million damage and didn't even kill? sounds off
Sounds about right
And because of this, there was a character who is a descendent of a god, and technically is a god because one of the rules states that the wish cannot mess with God there could not be no drawback for using the wish
OK you've lost me
Because of that, they all knowing entity who created the universe of the campaign, decided to summon them and fight them
what?
So on the second session, when we were level seven, we fought the very final boss of the campaign
I assume, extreme exaggeration on their part.
I’m not even joking
We literally fought our DM’s interpretation of their main character
This the type of crazy you read on RPG reddit stories
sounds like a bad game
sounds like dm vs player
This reeks of "Obviously bad Homebrew and Newbie DM that doesn't know what they're doing"
The craziest part is the person who got teleported down there because they define the rules rage baited them so hard to the point that we got ourselves to level 20 for a temporary amount of time
I wouldn't jump to conclusions but it does sound crazy
what the hell
I’m not here to listen to opinions. I’m just giving what happened in the story.
If you want to tell the story about what happened at your table the correct channel is #tales-from-the-table
Then you'd want to to that in ^
Ok
Because you'll get Opinions here
still crazy tho
Very
no cuz whats the point of dnd if youre speed running the campaign
theres no fun to it.
depend, i was about to get into a campaign module of 3 sessions per week (Wednesday to Friday) and was a nice idea
got a job and couldnt anymore but was good idea
thats a good idea cuz you get 1 thing for 1 session
if the guy was rushing everything for 1 session?
no no, that its too much ngl
Unless you make a "oneshot" of like 16 hours straight without stopping
exactly, people be running nonsense nowadays
instead of doing an episode that would be a whole movie resuming a whole season of some show
see they completed a three month long of campaign in 3 days within 2 sessions, 2 SESSIONS
sound funny like challenge tho
"speedrunning nuke to strahd"
honestly its the dm fault ngl, adding a 10th level spell
that sound interesting for me, if lvl 9 spells are capable of flat a whole kingdom, what a lvl 10 would do
also bro 882 millions damage? dude thats not dnd
i bet the fighters only do like 50 damage
Yeah....one get used to it ngl
i stopped trying to see a way to make martials be in the total ground than casters so i now in day just compare martials between each other
.....why dont just say "its dead" and that it is?!
By the way, we weren’t trying to speed run
We did this on accident
Not even doing a 99% reduced damage something kinda normal survive it
you should leave ngl, its a bad dm
There’s only two and one of them is greater wish which is just a better version of wish where the downside is removed, but the drawback is greater and the DM didn’t want there to be a loophole so he challenged us to combat
i think its because the rule stated that wish cannot kill gods
No, we already completed the campaign in two sessions
We weren’t supposed to beat them
exactly why would your dm gave level 10th
Probably because it’s a one shot and in the very first 30 minutes of starting the first session I almost die
Considering the fact that we’re fighting blighted enemies
They’re basically undead but stronger and cannot be animated by a necromancer
u mean enemies that one shot or?
A singular drop of poison did 22 damage to me
oh my god
That’s why we’re OP
sounds like the dm couldnt calculate a balance encounter
Keep in mind I didn’t 1 tap with 882 million damage
Oh no anytime he miscalculates a balance encounter. He just makes the universe “work in our favor.”
It was from a evolved blight tho
Yeah: #dnd-discussion message
so the chosen one, i mean every dnd party is chosen one but this is widly interestingly different yet a stupidly move to make
Balancing on the fly go brrrr
I mean, we weren’t even supposed to know about cataclysm until we hit level 20
But one of our party members just had to try and find a loophole
And now the DM’s main character is dead
Sounds about right
get a better dm
seriously
Anyhow
The campaign is still going. I wanna see where this goes.
the hell
Today I send an iron golem at my party
Yeah, the campaign didn’t end after that
Hi
no please immediately leave, cuz the dm prob goin to have like another 3 - 2 month building another lore
There’s more lore after cataclysm
Like a DMPC or another player’s character who is the main character?
send them stat blocks
I should send a few at my players
Just search up iron golem
It’s like the DMS character and they made them overpowered as hell
It's an existing stat block
Yeah good riddance
oh god
I'm using the "fire elemental in an iron golem" trick
DM PC can go very brrr sometimes
This does not sound like a very good DM (with respect to the DM if they’re a friend)
NPCs use different rules anyway
I technically have one in my level 20 game. From my players’ request.
We did a one shot and they brought up making my Dragonborn Conquest paladin canon. So I did and he is gonna be a big problem for them very soon.
Turns out Conquest Paladins actually make great villains with their stats
If it’s at player request then it’s not a DMPC, it’s a hireling/ally
Oh he is very much a villain they are fighting
I have a modified genie paladin in mine
Well even better then
She's complicated, but she's also either an ally or enemy depending on how things go
In my eyes one of the key characteristics of a DMPC is that they’re subject to the expectations that are also true of the other party members - that you don’t get to just kick them out / PvP with them. If that’s not applicable, it’s not a DMPC
NPC go brrrr
i dont really get why people want to have a DMPC
some people want to experience the other seats of the car than just driving all the time
why would you want to drive then?
Because some make stories and instead of just telling them want to be part of it
That lead to a whole different problem, the DMPC must be giga nerfed
Or it will be "meta gaming" all the time
thats the thing
Can there be good DMPC's? yes, it would need to be well made to make it work
Most of time we heard bad stories from them? that too
A DMPC could be used to either help in some X moments the party and other stuff? yep, the story can even go around that DMPC and the party must protect him, but he have sooooo bad luck
why just dont make npcs
if youre want to be part of the stories
and act like you were that npc
that is the thing, one must separate what is a NPCs and what is a DMPC.
An NPCs is some random character taht you talk with 1 or 5 times max or doesnt matter in teh story in the end
A DMPC could be seen like one but have a lil bit more important role
yeah, that is a DMPC.
Like the players are npcs that are being used by them.
but making a DMPC relevant to the stories would not be fun, cuz the DM knows how the stories goes
i mean making a santa claus that gives player a ride doesnt seem a bad idea
The point is, there could be good DMPCs.
But would need to be made in many ways to "balance" it.
The wikipedia//guide character, it know everything but its a coward that hide himself in his pocket dimension when problems came and came back after everything happen
The healer non violent npc that will only follow the party and heal them//buff them
are examples i would like to remark
and the one i said before, the DMPC that is the objective to protect
i see
Like said before, it depends
the idea would be "i will be there to help you when you need it, but i wont change the tides too much"
yeah kinda, or just make a DMPC that is that, a healer so the party can go with a more offensive team and care a bit less about heals
Or the DM can implement some alternative ways to heal or give more Short rests, etc. etc. etc.
It all always depend of the approach and narrative for me
There is no perfect idea or narrative, but a simple story but well explained and narrated is peak
While a good story with a normal narrative and world its good too
How much does aura of vitality heal outside of combat?
20d6 total
for a level 3 spell
10 lots of 2d6
UK way of saying 20d6
My current campaign which has been my first ever campaign only has 4 sessions left, 3 of which will be our final boss fight😭
Lovely thank you both.
Makes sense.
I'm gonna bet now 1 turn of initiative will take 2 hours
Triple kill tonight
what level and classes were they?
i damn can't find a co-dm...
Level 8 party. Rogue, smashed by stone golem. Wizard executed by shadows.
Then thr rogue again to the donjon card after he caught a revivify
That's hilarious
He offered them to join him and become vampires, a player accepted.
So now the party has to travel at night to accommodate
Vampire BBEG had a ring that allowed him to travel at day, he sort of showed it off before inviting the party to his manor.
So that's a hook - get some type of that ring from vampire. But what would it cost?
A daywalker ring? That'd be like a Legendary at least imo
I'd argue an artifact, a one of a kind.
Cause if any vamp could get one, why are they hiding in the shadows and not openly ruling the world or trying.
I rolled 5 nat ones today
3 of em in a row 😍
You're charging up for next session
I stole your luck when I rolled a crit at disadvantage last night
my bad boss
King you lowkey have created a monster that my dm is gonna use against me now 😭. I rolled 3 nat ones on 3 separate survival checks in a row, and now my paladin has perma disadvantage on survival rolls 😍.
Dm also made an in world creature on the whim, that said that will hunt people if their luck is awful, and will play luck based games with them to make em die horribly, and steal their souls 🥹
...my bad boss
if its any consolation
I used those crits to also horrify my players
Honestly, periodt king 💖
What did ya do?
I had my players genuinely, actually, unironically shaking from fear
Caught on video
Damn 😭
Some backstory villains showed up and killed their allies, probably causing a war
It was a bloodbath, a pair of CR 16 paladins were killed and disintegrated in two rounds flat
i dont know if ive ever crit my players
HELLO HELLO
Jello
I have been crit and insta downed at least 4 timesin a year
Hallo!
I am particularly unlucky
I've gone down in every fight with my current DM. Including 1 character death.
I find it hilarious
the character death was a martyrdom though.
so it was totally worth it
I always crit my players never as a player
My luck fluctuates like that too 😭
I am on my 4th character, in a campaign I started playing in Feb 2025 😭
What are everyone's thoughts on normalising a DMPC in a party
Pros above Cons or naaah?
Sergal
Might repeat the question at more active times cuz i actually want more feedback on that concept
I actually like the idea
As a player, as long as it's clearly not an insert that's just clearly stronger than the party, a dmpc gives a clean opportunity to maybe push the party in the right direction
I hate the "D&D isn't a game" narrative. It definitely can feel like one and sometimes just having someone with the party to give hints doesn't hurt.
Personally I don't like DM PCs in general and don't like to have them in the party (I'm not even a fan of having NPCs as companions for longer periods of time)
I just think at bare minimum, it takes a very mature and experienced DM to make it work
if hes weaker, it might actually be a cool side-objective to protect him, aye?
and he wont steal any spotlight since hes weaker
additionally the DM can use him for lore drops and hints or just immersion
Possibly. Yeah. I can see that. The way I imagine a DMPC is like the handler in Monster Hunter
If they're not stealing the spotlight, then they're just an NPC rather than a DMPC, aren't they?
for spotlight reasons? Or bcs the people fighting the adventure are actually just the core party and having NPCs disturbes the "inner circle"?
I was pretty sure "DMPC" is always negative?
Can see the argument. I think that's just an issue with assigning defintions
Because if they're not being treated special, like a PC should be, then they're just NPCs.
Oh? I thought DMPC is just a NPC who follows the party as an established part of their group
might be me who got the wrong definition of the words, I mean that specific npc then who follows the party
You can have various NPCs follow the group: hirelings, advisors, patrons. But as long as they aren't being given special consideration in the story, like PCs are since they are supposed to be the main characters, then they're not a DMPC.
See, thats why i casually wanted to talk about this stuff. I get new opinions on the matter and aparantly i might have been using the wrong terms xD
generally DMPC means an actual player character played my the DM, at least from what i've seen
DMPC is an NPC that joins the group and takes up narrative focus because the DM really wants to actually have a Player Character rather than be the DM.
I understand it as an NPC the players can't just shove off. It's meant to stick with the players and partake in their shenanigans
nothing inherently wrong with having your own PC especially if youre a forever dm but obviously if youre a dm its very easy to give favouritism to yourself over other people and thats big no no
You can have these and not be DMPCs.
Yeah but I'm saying the distinction is like very vague, at least to me
Gotyaaaa, so DMPCs are viewed negatively because they steal spotlight, as they arent weaker than regular PCs and you now have a partymember which basically knows everything the DM does and could potentially metagame through every puzzle or mystery
Quest NPCs, like someone you have to escort or protect or advise etc.
Yeah because it's a subjective difference. "Is this NPC taking up narrative focus like a main character?" is a woobly question to answer sometimes.
I'd join the anti-dmpc faction on the topic then. I feel like the downsides outweight the advantages
unless its maybe the healer noone wanted to play in the first place? but even then just drop a healing magic item and you're good
Like, let's use the example of the party's pet kobold that always travels with them
If they are there as a service to the party and they don't have a main plot where they are The Protagonist, then they're not a DMPC.
To me that just becomes a dmpc
Pets aren't DMPCs, imo.
Also calling a person a pet, is kinda iffy.
What
I think there's a difference between pets and DMPCs
Kobolds are people, it's a bit weird to call them a pet.
pretty much yeah, obviously a really good dm could avoid those problems but theres not really any way to gauge whether or not they can so its better to just say boo dmpcs bad
Depends on the setting. I'm not implying anything like that though
yea, then screw DMPCs actually xD Then the type of NPCs i support are actually just NPCs in general and not DMPCs
It was an example lol
(pets as in characters the party decides to adopt not to call people pets)
Absolutely. Hirelings and friends and allies are all great types of NPCs.
i thought so too previously
My party has pet oozes.
I'm just saying the term NPC "non player character" and DMPC "DM player character" aren't very different out the gate
I thought NPC traveling with party -> DMPC and those i support having since the DM can utilize them in many ways to add to the story or combat tension
It's completely subjective
yeeeh, but I think no matter the term we assign to them, we all believe that the weaker or unique NPCs have potential to add while having a DM-partymember on equal level and story-weight just substracts
I find it more useful to differentiate NPC vs DMPC the way I've laid it out. The DM is responsible for playing all NPCs whether or not they accompany the party. That's almost a non-difference. I think it's more useful to say that DMPC = NPC that hogs narrative focus in a negative way.
Yeah but that's a subjective definition
As most things are, but it's more useful than the others I've heard and as such I would advocate using it, because the point of communicating using different terms in the first place is to have a useful difference for communication.
Fair, I do personally disagree with assigning that term to always a negative. I don't think a DMPC is always negative
interesting, you mean your definition from DMPCs or Ophindimancer's?
Well the very purpose of NPCs is to act as props and backdrop for PCs. All NPCs are there to make the PCs look cooler and have fun, whether by helping them or by opposing them and acting as obstacles.
I feel like thats a high skill challenger for the DM tho
i couldnt pull that off if i am honest
having an DMPC as to hextra's definition
my NPCs are always weaker than the players or an envoy which adds to the difficulty by setting boundaries
NPCs can be very important to the narrative, but the PCs are the main characters. If any NPC starts to horn in on that "I'm a main character" energy, it's kind of going against the purpose of what an NPC is for.
If they're the villain, that's great! you want a big energy villain for the PCs to oppose.
Exactly. There is no inherent difference between an NPC that travels with the party and a Patron or a recurring quest giver. There is an inherent differences though if the Character traveling with the party is taking away party agency, hogging the spotlight etc.
That second one deserves a different term, the first kind of NPC doesn’t
I think it's a slippery slope personally
To what, exactly?
Assigning a concrete term on a feeling
But .. this is precisely what we're doing when we use genre terms. "Fantasy" and "scifi" for example are basically just loose definitions of how a piece of media makes us feel.
Yeah but fantasy has a concrete and clear meaning
Oh boy ... you picked a very bad genre as an example to say that about.
Suffice it to say, I disagree.
Am I wrong? Websters literally defines it as unrealistic or improbable
So when does something stop being "Fiction" and start being "Fantasy?" and also how does definition not apply to "scifi?"
Fiction and fantasy are synonymous
Hey yall what's going on
Then why are they different sections in the library?
I don't think anyone would particularly pick at calling the hobbit a fiction novel
You have to realize that everything is already subjective and the only reason we use different terms for things to be helpful when communicating.
All fantasy is fiction but not all fiction is fantasy
Yeah like all oaks are trees but not all trees are oaks
I think my brain is just looking at this different than you
Who speaks Giant?
Giants and their related kin such as goliaths.
I usually translate from Icelandic when making Giant speech lol
me
I meant here
Yes yes ty
That's always going to be true for everybody. So yes.
I feel I'm taking the words at face value literally
hi chat
The drow in Eberron iirc
Ahem when you think of common like village names? What do you think of? In Giant tongue…. Kinda want to do a every species welcome village for backstory lore but like struggling
Hey wings
generally not a good way to play dnd considering how the rules are written 
Wsg wings
uhh nothing much :3
It's the role of a DM to play NPCs. It's the role of all the other players to play PCs. It isn't supposed to be the role of the DM to play a PC. Therefore DMPC is a DM not quite doing what they should.
i should keep working on one of the numerous dnd builds i was making
We can agree to disagree there
Steinvarðr seems dope
I thought thay was a language for a second
you dont think i should work on one of my builds? /silly
it is, i used this before in my campaign, its from icelandic
typa language
I know this isn't really my conversation but my pcs enjoy when there are dmpc's in my campaigns because of their plot relevance. They'll even try to petition some to journey with them when it wasn't my plan to include one. And if they're having fun, it can't be wrong
Yes, we can, but I just wonder if you think it's appropriate for a DM to be playing a PC.
:0 holy davidsonthethird ty
Yeah I stated my reasoning
np
We kinda went over this. Those aren't DMPCs, they're just NPCs that accompany the party: #dnd-discussion message
But the issues is what we view constitutes a "player character"
What do you view as the difference between what I think of as a PC and what you think?
Player characters make the decisions, drive the narrative etc. it THEIR story
A player character is a character a player plays. Pretty simple.
But you're defining it as an idea
Are you including the DM as a player?
They're a player in the larger picture but clearly they have their own role.
Respectfully, it's everyone's story, including the dm's is it not? The dm isn't just there as some servant, they take as much a part in the story as everyone else
So .. every NPC is also a player character?
The “DM as servant” is a rather questionable framing of their role
NPC means non "player" character
Yeah I was disagreeing with the idea
But you need someone to operate it
I never said that though
No one has said the DM is a servant.
If you presume that they have no role in the story being told, then they're effectively just there to entertain the players
with dmpc its kinda in the name, it's a dm player character
"non player" is the idea there and taking away the "non" is disingenuous.
normal characters the dm controls are characters, but not pcs
They have the role to make the story and play all the NPCs who are exist to act as props, backdrops, and obstacles in the PCs story.
The DM plays literally everything except the PCs. How could they not have a big role.
Morning
I'm not trying to be disingenuous, I don't see how me moving the specific quotes changes the meaning like that
The DM writes the story and throws problems and different situations at the player, it's the DM's world. However the players shape the story with how they choose to deal with the problems the DM presented them
In response to this
Because it's specifically not a player character by definition.
Ok let's be clear. If a DM is in charge of "NON PLAYER CHARACTERS" then logically they're not a player
Agree?
The DM ultimately sets up the challenges a party faces, and the rewards they gain for overcoming them. You framed that as service rather that an equal back and forth
It's only a service when you see yourself as outside of the equation for your role in the story. That's why i think that claiming that "it's the players' story" feels like a noninclusive claim
I'm not sure I can agree with that. Ultimately I feel the DM is a player as well, but their role is to play the world, with characters as a subset of that.
I was just trying to convey that a DMs role in the story is fundamentally different that that of the Other people at the table
Ok and that's fine, but then the name NON PLAYER CHARACTER is a bit muddled if a player (the DM) manages it
We can run around all the semantics we wish, but again I feel like it is all inherently subjective. The only difference is how useful any particular definition is.
I suppose I don't disagree with that but I did kinda disagree with how you worded it (I got a little defensive as a dm)
Sure, but it's a useful term since they are part of the world rather than being a main character.
Guh nevermind this is taking up too much of my time for a silly lexiconical debate xD
Fair enough
I think a famous dm presented it best by describing it as "the illusion of choice". You can give your players genuine choices that have consequences on the story, but sometimes, as the dm you make the executive decision that something in particular happens. For example, the king's royal advisor betrays him and launches a coup. This has substantial relevance on the story, equally so to that of the party's contributions
If the party finds out about the adviser's plans and works to put a stop to them, that effort should not go unrewarded. If your campaign's plot line revolves around the queen turning evil and scheming with the advisor, then you'll more than likely just have to find a way to make that happen or you don't have a campaign anymore
campaign of retired evil dooers who are brought out of retirement due to the heros screwed up and got wiped and now they have to step in and stop the new evil dooers before they ruin what the retired evil dooers managed to gain and survive till retirement
I personally care most about if everyone's having fun. If it's more fun for the party to subvert the big plot before it starts, that's okay. It'll be a bit on the shorter side as far as campaigns go lol but that's okay
i think im only playing dnd right if nobody except me is having fun /silly
Class checks out
what do you have against warlocks lol
Joking lol
so mean so mean :3
D&D is very humbling sometimes
Anyone know a good place to learn/read fantasy lore?
classics like Lord of the Rings, Narnia, Dragon Riders of Pern, any Discworld/Terry Prachet
More recent books like the Inheritance Cycle (Eragon, et al)
some more out there fantasy includes the Xanth novels by Piers Anthony. Actually just about anything by Piers Anthony.
Your local public library!
I was going to say Library too~
It for shut downnnnn
Book stores
And its um insanely small
Going back to read some of the Xanth stuff after I became an adult is kind of eye opening. It really doesn't age well.
Omg smart
🥹 ty ty
It doesn't, huh? I wouldn't know, I never actually got into Xanth. I preferred Incarnations of Immortality by a long shot.
That's a tragic shame. People need to support their local library.
Yes yes sadly um our area rlly rundown
Anyway i meant dnd lore dor like stuff 😭 ty for advice but yes
Maybe it's just me, but the "hur hur hur let's say naughty stuff in a roundabout way" just doesn't hit the same for an adult.
That's valid.
oh you can easily adapt quite a few things from other fantasies into DnD, but if you want DnD lore specifically, then you can read many of the sourcebooks (whether 5e or otherwise)
Thinking about that one time my PC got very excited to get launched by a device known as "The Gnome Flinger"
Lore of like species, dimensions, myths and morestuff like that
Just uh... keep in mind that some of the older stuff is really rough to modern sensibilities.
There's tons of D&D novels, maybe try ordering them online? you can probably get digital versions.
In Xan, I like seeing how many siblings I have, or if the parents are still alive.
-# Most of the time, they aren't...
Uh .. wut?
In XGE
oh, the backstory generator tables?
yeah
I forget those exist a lot of the time. I should crack XGtE open again and check them out
I’m someone who struggles to read books 😭
I’m good at like just things that explain in detail stuff like that but just alot of um amazing books i just cant read my brain just shuts off
Audiobooks?
Elves & Dwarves don't have too many siblings. Not sure if its a lore thing.
That works but its more like just story in general. It sounds crazy but just anything with like story or something compared to textbooks explaining like loads of stuff
I believe the Forgotten Realms Wiki is a source that, while not exactly sanctioned by WOTC, is at least not labeled piracy. If you just want an infodump, you can try there.
the only problem with the FR Wiki is that it treats all lore as canon even if it's been retconned by later books. Buuuuuut it's still a good place to start, if you prefer the infodump to the story
Wasn't the FR Wiki actually referenced in the latest FR supplement?
I only really use the wiki for quick information on niche things
so do I, but it's fascinating to see some old lore still archived without having to dig through it myself
Yis
Ah yep, I found it. Adventures in Faerun mentions the Forgotten Realms wiki directly: https://www.dndbeyond.com/sources/dnd/fraif/running-the-realms#RealmsResources
Guys... im... so normal about ismark
oh god you sound like one of my players
He's called Ismark the Lesser for a reason
don't settle for less
Hes not lesser to MEEEEEEE hes everything i got it SO BAD
I will throw hands at any npc that tries to bully him is2g
so i was thinking of taking a level in wizard once I hit level 10 and get divine intervention because I have pretty high INT
so Cleric 10 Wizard 1
Is that dumb?
Feel free to check with folks in #character-discussion or #optimization (depending on what you're focussing on with your character).
But I'm a big proponent of playing what's fun for you and fits at your table.
It fits with my character RP wise but I dont want a mechanical headache
I'll consider tbh
It's definitely going to make it a bit more complicated
I'd review the multiclassing rules carefully, especially when it comes to spellcasting. But as Undying said, if you think its going to be fun and it fits for the story, go ahead.
Yeah. Clerics are prepared and wizards have to learn
what is the reason you want the wizard level?
Kind of? Wizard is also prepared, but from their spellbook.
But aside from that, it'll require you to keep track of two different classes which you prepare spells from. You share spell slots, but you do not share spell lists of the same level.
if you are trying to level into wizard just because its called "wizard" but you dont have a specific feature in mind you want, i heavily recommend not doing that
Again please use #character-discussion or #optimization (depending on purpose) to discuss character builds
tagged you in optimization
The first time in 20 years the wiki has been officially acknowledged. The people over there do good work.
To the point that they once found straight copy pastes In Baldur's Gate 3's Early Access from item descriptions on the wiki.
I am thinking about an interesting one shot so that I can study DND 2024
Got any themes in mind?
Renaissance
Society and politics, art and culture, science and technology, something else?
Only Renaissance
I love jabot around my neck
I love dressing in fancy.
If you watch Fierien, you probably know a little bit.
Never seen it, but not to worry!
How about a situation in a location with active opposition and a complication?
5.5e moon druid: Polar Bear or Sabertooth?
I like the 2d6 damage with multi-attack attached to the sabertooth with a ba disengage/hide.
But I heard the polar bear is better and I'm not really sure how, looking at the stat blocks.
For context, we are in a desert so there isn't much water combat. But I have shapes for that. And I know Polar Bear has cold resis but that feels pretty niche to me. I rarely see cold damage used.
I like sabre tooth
The polar bear in a desert remembers me the meme "What da hell is a polar bear doing in Arlington Texas"
My PC, a scholarly Orc Warlock: "My liege I have finally found you! What is the answer to the cypher of the onyx beast? I am in dire need of that information-"
My Pc's Patron, a very childish eldritch horror: "Bannana muffin :P"
My Pc: "... do you want me to die?"
2 days till the pirate campaign im in starts
I want more Wizard subclasses that feel like they're important to the character. Wizard subclasses in particular feel like tacking on some extra abilities to an existing character and less like part of the character itself
They're all Reflavored forms, dw 🤣 She's a "dragon druid".
What would headphones for an Elf to wear look like?
Like normal?
Wireless earbuds
Just rosebuds stuck in.
No, I mean like headphones, not earbuds
I imagine it’d be a different shape because Elves have such large ears
Doesn't need to be- just needs to cover the... Bit of the ear that goes in.
I do not know ear anatomy, but you don't need to cover the entire ear.
i think the bigger question is: do elf ears get cold?
Don’t see why not
True they might need real big ear muffs.
they typically live in stable temperature environments where it doesn't get super cold, like the plains (high), forests (wood), and caves (drow), so i think that they would
i think migrating into colder climates made them evolve into humans
Well what about Sea Elves, Shadar-Kai, and Astral Elves? Would those be stable temperature locations?
Species don’t evolve into other species in D&D. Elves typically adjust to other forms of elves based on where they’ve settled.
or maybe halflings??
Are you assuming the underdark is JUST a cave? 🤔 /silly
big cave, but i don't think it snows there
yes sea, idk where the shadar-kai live, and... do astral elves live on the moon?
Shadar-kai come from the Shadowfell, astral elves come from the Astral Plane (space)
^ yea
Shadowfell. A world with no sun and in darkness and filled with undeath.
I did have one character who ended up making a 'tail sock' for his tiefling companion to keep it warm. We debated a lot on what it should be called.
Astral elves are way beyond the Moon.
A sleeve is my vote
The Shadowfell does have a sun (technically multiple due to the nature of the Domains of Dread)
It’s just usually gloomy
It’s not nighttime 24/7 in the Shadowfell
That said, my personal headcanon is that nights tend to be longer in the Shadowfell spaces between the Domains of Dread
It makes sense
Proper headphones, npt earbuds, need to go around the entire ear to avoid building up pressure on parts of it
Also to completely close off sound for clean sound
If the earpiece doesnt engulf the whole ear, sound will get through more
So yes elf earphones would be bigger
I find it so obnoxious that so many guys my age that were into D&D in the 80s whine about it being woke all the time. Like they are bothered by trying to expand the demographic and bring in more people rather than just catering to them. My youtube feed gets polluted by that nonsense. I do enjoy alot of the older adventures though as well and OSR stuff.
When you love to play wizards but wizard is a class who’s minimum intelligence requirement (for multiclassing into) is higher than your irl intelligence 😭🤣
Don’t stay stuff like that. My IRL Constitution is dog water and that wouldn’t keep me from playing a Paladin
Yeah but when you do dumb things as a wizard that has a 20 int score, it feels a little weird lol
Fr though, the physical and mental stats are weird like that
Sometimes very, very "smart" people do very, very "dumb" things. 👀
That's sometimes just the funniness of being a person.
Luckily I find having low wisdom on a high int character can help balance them out to make more sense with them doing dumb things at times lol
Intelligence does not often confer to Wisdom
I agree 🤣
The way I put it is that intelligence is the science of something and wisdom is the art of it
Hi I need help with something
Also, you don't have to roleplay your Stats perfectly.
A wizard could be purely intelligent when it comes to magical knowledge and not much else
I want to make a DnD character that’s a talking Spider monkey is their any thing I can do for that official or homebrewed I don’t care which
Diagnosing an ear infection vs getting a baby to take the antibiotic
"You can do magic, but you can't do math?"
"Yes, have you seen arithmetic?! Scandalous!"
guys i wanted to ask, i just joined a west march and it runned by 5 dms and 4 months of prepare for everything, but it doesnt have a downtime, its player picking for mission was bad, theyre prioritizing who they know the most and yeah it has no actual lore
is it still worth playing?
To maybe go even further, all ability scores are abstractions anyways. Like even things like strength and dexterity aren't very clearly defined things. Yes, strength will dictate how much you can pick up, but it doesn't (on its own) determine things like... can you toss a log end over end.
West March runner here. No.
For homebrew, you'll have to do a bit of searching. But I imagine there are "monkey" type species out there!
If I wanted to do this as easily as possible as your DM, I might just use Harengon and go from there. Good luck!
Ability scores do not dictate personality.
Thank you
Downtime is pretty important for a WM. Player picking for missions is a hard thing to manage. We personally use the RaidHelper Bot. Which is used by Gaming Guilds for Raid running in MMOs. It works well for our use.
but i also joined another west march with ONE solely dm, with more players but it actually optimized also has a downtime
I like the idea of playing as a talking animal little guy and monkeys are funny
they said they needed 1 month for downtime
like downtime is an under constriction feature
How many players in that one?
That's doable but very hard for one person to keep track of.
As for downtime I can understand it being hard to track. But realistically what we did was use Xanathar's Guide to Everything rules, and on Sundays everyone gets a week of downtime. Use it or lose it. And next Sunday a DM resolves it in a dedicated chat. Players are responsible for keeping track of their own stuff in terms of days needed after the initial count is given.
well the wm with 1 dm has a voice and also text while the 5 dm only do text
Yea they don't, though you can let them help you figure out a personality.
Iirc the new books have a little table of a couple of personality types for highs/lows of each score
WM get caught up trying to automate it.
My party decided to go full murderhobo and kill a shopkeeper and loot her shop. Now they will have a revenant and holy Paladin after them.
Downtime is great
Uh ohhhhhh
I'm also going to force alignment shifts, because wtf
It's Justicing time.
The way mine runs is.
Dedicated discord category for RP at the player's home base that moves in semi-realtime. From there they portal out to mission sites.
Downtime is tracked in its own chat and games are done in VC with a VTT. We have about 22 players active and 6 DMs.
There's a book that gave us the Hadozee, a kind of gliding ape person. That might be somewhere to start.
Make sure that Paladin is STACKED
10 spell slots for smites
Games are announced for the week on Sunday at 8 AM CT and posted at Noon CT that day. Players can sign up with last calls available for those who have to drop. Been running smooth for 3 years. Players get a set amount of money and XP per session played. Based on group average level.
NPC's don't use spellslots, they just have limited castings of spells
Then let em have 10 smites
And the revenant 😆 They are third levels that got cocky
Depends on how the dm builds em
Ah, then the Paladin and revenant don't need to be stacked, they just need to find them at the same time 👁️
As for shopping. We gave a blacksmith who can do all mundane items and a rotating magic item list from a curated selection of magic items. No legendaries for instance. They rotate on Sundays as well.
Ah found it. In the creating a character section in the 2024 phb. Little d4 tables for appearance/personality.
Ex: Strength
High Strength: Muscular, Sinewy, Protective, Direct
Low Strength: Weak, Slight, Self-conscious, Indirect
Or Charisma (i really like these examples because none of then have anything to do with appearance)
High Charisma: Charming, Commanding, Hilarious, Inspiring
Low Charisma: Pedantic, Humorless, Reserved, Tactless
My current WM has about 5-6 months left and I think when this one is wrapped I will be done running these kinds of games. I love them. But am getting too busy for the daily management it requires
Don't really want to massacre the party, but they made their bed
Whats a WM
Murdering innocent people? SMH
Make the Paladin give them a chance to surrender and repent/go to jail
West Marches. Like Critical Role Campaign 4
Paladin supremacy
It's one of my favourite additions to the book!
I also love that the example of "low" ability scores also sound like pretty savage insults.
"Look at this pedantic, humorless, tactless cleric."
And then the revenant busts in like a horror movie villain
Sounds like a cleric /jk
Phases through the jail wall
One of my long standing DMs has been primed to take over when this story is done. I am excited to see what he comes up with. Current plans are a West Marches centered around Dragonborn Culture and a retaking of Tymanther.
If only revenants could do that lol
"You bastards KILLED ME? and Robbed my SHOP? who's gonna feed my DOG?!"
Going to grapple the killer and toss him off a cliff
Yea its one of the better additions. Its a simple and straightforward, but highly effective manner of giving examples of how to RP as well, without the attitude of "you need to correlate your personality with ability scores"
Since revenants only care about the killer, correct?
(That is a bad attitude for the game)
Typically, yes, but if they're interfered with they might lash out
Or is the blame shared with the party for their plotting?
Perhaps, maybe she'd blame them for not stopping them
They focus on the one who dealt the killing blow, but also might declare vengance on those who helped commit the murder
I read something like revenants go after who killed them first in a scenario like that, then focus on the less guilty ones
The 2014 version of the lore is more clear about how it works
I see, looks like I remember it right. To be fair, there were two people who decided to do this
We met some Revenants recently in one of the games I'm in, they're chill people, they asked us for help avenging themselves after being slaughtered by a dragon
And we agreed
Warlock and Bard
Paladins about to go this close to breaking their oath lol
From the 2014 monster manual, "In cases where the revenant seeks revenge against more than one adversary, it pursues them one at a time, starting with the creature that dealt it the killing blow."
I'm fond of Sentient undead individuals, I always treat them with respect
I must teach a lesson
me too undead are chill
No murderhobo
Well this will be interesting since paladins and undead aint known for being buddies but perhaps said paladins cares more for justice?
I'm currently prepping a session where the party is hired to deal with someone else's revenant
Enemy of my enemy
The kind undead I've encountered include
Some Wraiths in a crashed airship, who we helped pass on by breaking their bond to that place.
A Skeleton Merchant who uses sign language (we met him on the road and he was thankful for us not attacking him right away)
And
The previously mentioned group of revenant adventurers
All very nice folks
You got a point there
I don't expect them to side with the noble who hires them after they find out he's a murderer
In my 2nd group i will play a warlock. But the thing is i dont know who my patron is (yet)
I like undead that keep their humanity, it's very sad and tragic, but also gives the party individuals to interact with that have been around for a long time (most likely)
I was granted powers by a mysterious voice, in exchange i do tasks for them
Weekly tasks
Shouldnt reborn count as undead?
Just kill that bastard
I wish they did but D&D doesn't like making non humanoid player characters
except fey, those are fine apparently
Reborn are being printed as Undead in 5.5
When they were in UA, WOTC played with the idea of making the gothic lineages “dual types” and Reborn were half Humanoid, half Undead or Construct
Much like how Warforged are Constructs and Kalashtar are Aberrations. They're just fully open to doing non-Humanoid PC species
Oh? In UA or is there a book coming out?
if so horray :D
We have fey constructs aberration and ooze now, undead soon
So the flavor is that they can be kinda undead or kinda construct, but mechanically they’re humanoid because of how a lot of the rules interact with undead and constructs. In recent years, WOTC decided not to shy away from making playable species of different non-Humanoid creature types.
Ravenloft: The Horrors Within is an upcoming book, its got all the Ravenloft species + a lycanthrope-flavored one (that isn't Shifter. its Lupin or something)
I guess that makes some sense
Likely why they did some changes to spell creature types
One example of those weird rules interaction was the fact that a lot of healing spells didn’t work on constructs. Without a species feature like Autognomes have that allows them to gain the benefit of certain healing spells, a playable construct wouldn’t be capable of healing from spells
have you told them this
I asked them very carefully if that was what they wanted to do, implying there would be serious consequences.
you seem to not like it
Oh it's fine. Just actions have subsequent consequences
alright then
Did you tell them at session 0 that you don’t like “murderhoboing” in your campaigns?
That’s the type of topic that I typically mention at session 0
Well this blows
"oh its fine" as in murderhoboing is fine
though i must say your eagerness to punish and calling it punishment by itself do indicate a certain level of emotional bias
It is, but when you have a revenant scourge after you...
Still hate the PC warforged being constructs
What's wrong, Penguin?
Same
How come? It seems like a good change to me
I don't really care about a random shopkeeper, I care about my players thinking they can do whatever with no consequences
I hate when the construct is a construct? 🤔 /teasing
Short version: Because its a worse fit for their lore
In the past they were a special category of thing called a Living Construct. Which is more like a humanoid in terms of 5e creature types
Also I called it punishment in part because that's how revenants see what they do lol
Oh I don't really know their lore :/
That's interesting
Yeah, in Eberron Warforged are categorically people. By making them Construct instead of Humanoid, it kinda gives people the illusion that they’re just robots.
good afternoon chaps
Part of their thing is that they are. Quite distinct from older forms of warforged (which are constructs), like the titan
The monster statblocks for Warforged are Constructs too, though?
Robots can be people too!
That doesnt change the issue? Thats just the same issue but again
I can kinda understand that, yeah, they're more than that, but they are constructed individuals
Chat
I don't know what to do. The party will have a revenant after them and they are level three.
How is one meant to respond to “roll for racism”
"Uh, no?"
Sorry?
Also notably, warforged are made in a pretty special manner.
They aren't generally just something anyone can make.
A quick and easy “no”
Tbf it was a joke and he didn’t mean it legitimately
tell the DM you dont find these jokes funny and decide if the two of you match as dnd group
plenty of people wouldnt have an issue with that joke, while plenty of others would
communicate
Nah is cool I was just like “huh”
Been trying to find different designs for shortsword flavorings. For the scimitar, I'm set:
- Falcata
- Kopis
- Makhaira
- Kukri
- Chukuri
- Kilij
- Shamshir
- Curved Saif
- Yatagan
- Sabre
- Cutlass
- Falchion
- Flyssa
- Nimcha
For shortsword, all i have are
- Xiphos
- Gladius
- Spatha
- Bastard Sword/Half sword
- Arming Sword
- Broadsword
Personally I think murder hoboing is basically never appropriate but I suppose some people would say otherwise
Murder is the Fun
But
Not heroic option /silly
What you want to do is introduce like guards that are very experienced and are like 14 levels higher than the party
So the murder hobo shenanigans are behind closed doors
add the chinese short sword maybe and the old old old pre-katana japanese sword like it
Falchion?
It ultimately depends on the style of the campaign. It can be fun if that’s what everybody’s on board with.
It’s like a machete but old
Machete? Kukri and Machetes are both tools and weapons (part of why I like them so much)
It's a European sword that widens towards the tip
falchion is already in scimitar
No I know but like I wouldn’t have called it a scimitar it’s closer to a short sword
Because they're for slashing and chopping
One could argue a falchion can just be a reskinned shortsword too
Need to have this revenant not completely destroy a party of level threes
Ohhh yeah slashing true
yes i know im telling fancy that falchion wont be added to shortswords and is already listed in your list of scimitars
That was my thought
check the Chinese dao or the Japanese tanto, which falls under the knife-so-big-it-might-as-well-be-a-sword category
anyway look up chinese Jian for shortswords
Also the party REALLY doesn't want to go get the anti undead weapon (sun blade) that they've been quested to get.
dao is another scimitar, not a shortsword
whoops
you mean the jian
That depends on the type of Falchion
as for the tanto, that is a dagger for sure
Try Wikipedia. All a shortsword needs is to be a one-handed stabbing weapon larger than a dagger. There are a great many varieties of such across the history of the world.
wakizashi are the ones that seem very long for a knife and short for a sword
Some Falchions are capable of thrusting and piercing, some aren't
You could add like a lantern shield as a very expensive option for a short sword
and while they are slightly curved, they can absolutely stab
I was going to bring those up next
wakizashi and jian are my takes for short sword
The clip point ones can
i meant wakizashi
Oh.
What’s the wiggly sword that doesn’t wiggle
(For what it's worth, a bastard sword would be considered a longsword in D&D terms)
That one
Flamberge
ye
Or Kris
hold on i thought we are on shortswords
We are
this would be better for shortswords
then it will be a kris yes
Flamberge ye
flamberges are big
Sword backwards is.. Drows.
Have you ever thought about that?
The Drow made swords!!!
They are the creators!!!! /joking
but drow is elven for traitor, so the elves made swords
then named drow that because they use the sword from the back
Flamberges tend to be either claymores or thick rapiers
backstab! that is why they use the word backwards
by big i meant not a shortsword
shortswords are almost like big knives
surely flamberges arent that small
There's always the option of simply drawing the blade shape you want and feeding it to Google Lens, see what matches.
What if it gives you a banana in return?
then you need to practice your penmanship
Then it's a bananablade.
Draw better 🔥
and maybe dont use yellow
Flamberge refers to like the wiggly part, it can mean any wiggly sword
Sword types don’t exactly have the most strict definitions
It refers to the blade style, really
Yhyh
Any blade that wiggles is a Flamberge
Even the Zweihander is a flamberge
Yup
if it has the blade
Although that's a longsword
but that is also one of the big examples of flamberges
I'd make a joke...
But the mods will smite me 🧐
i dont think the zweihänder is just a longsword
its tricky because in german it just means twohanded sword which includes common longswords
It is because it's in the name
but the coined term for international debate
refers i think to the very massive german mercenary greatsword no?
Zwei is German for two. It literally translates to "two-hander"
im german
Yeah that’s what I was gonna say