#dnd-discussion
1 messages · Page 268 of 1
i wanna make a dnd thing level 20 where they have to take down szass
or well actually no you can force a failure
actually no you cannot because you can't roll a 0 on a dice roll
until he just says nah with not 3 but his 5 LR
Innate counterspells are more of an issue I think
Did you look at bahamut's stat block? because he doesn't have counterspell I'm realizing
he can also just turn into any humanoid/beast as a bonus action
Uh which one?
the official one from Fizban's Treasury of Tragons
It's very probable the one I found was homebrew
What one are you using?
there isnt a actual bahamut stat block only the aspect
Idk one I found online which was probably homebrew
the strongest lich of today vs the strongest lich in history
What if you had a simulacrum for 2 convergent futures per turn?
Does that work? Maybe idk simulacrum that well
you can only have one simuacrum per creature
there's also another issue with this which is that you need to burn five legendary resistances and then get your combo off. I'm giving the win to him.
He just wins on time more likely than not - he can kill you before you can cause real problems for him
Theoretically you could hide in a wall of force though while burning through resistances by continuously casting tashas and forcing failures to burn them out.
i think your also forgetting that bahamut is often accompanied by seven ancient gold dragons who favor disguising themselves as canaries.
I guess that requires two concentration spells, you'd need to drop concentration on wall of force which uses your mote, and you wouldn't be able to make another kne for sickening radiance
which are the strongest of the anicent dragons besides there greatwyrm counter part
We're just talking about bahamut here
i still doubt the mircowave thing would work here
I think that's a great plan that relies on him rolling a lot of natural 1s
if it goes perfectly maybe you kill him
Saving Throws CON +18, INT +16, WIS +18, CHA +19
his worse save is a +10 that being strength
Convergent future is after modifiers though. You can make him roll 1 less than the dc required to save. If modifiers were applied after it'd be literally useless.
oh wait no its dex at +4
I guess you get two of those even with a simulacrum so he'd succeed the sickening radiance ones...
That's the issue
true
It's after modifiers and before success/failure is determined. Legendary Resistances are determined after success/failure is determined.
legendary resistance just kinda overrides everything
LRs override Convergent Failure and although yes you can eventually wear him down, you're skipping over a very big part of the game here which is dropping those LRs
Even if you wall of force for immunity, he can just leave
BAHAMUT LEAVING LMAO
You also can't concentrate on wall of force AND hideous laughter AND sickening radiance
Yeah I realized that
Nor can you make him fail all 3 saves
he can just turn into a humanoid that can teleport and teleport out
If you make yourself invincible he's not just gonna stand there and politely wait for you to die. He's gonna fly up, wait for you to stop, and then he's gonna go back and kill you
"Leaving" is maybe unfair wording. How it goes is he flies 300ft up, waits for you to drop your spells, and then uses his breath weapon and goes back into combat
Yeah I knew what you meant
At first I thought you meant like planar travel out of there but yeah he'd just wait.
After flying.
If only he wasn't so stupidly big, you could fit him in a microwave and just kill him that way
WAAAAAAIT POLYMORPH?!
Can you wall of force, then polymorph him, then recast wall of force on him, get a mote with sickening radiance and cook him as usual?!
Feels so difficult to join any decent games
Wait does he have shapechange
It’s a bit different then poly morph
Again, he just saves
And various concentration related issues
Yknow
Wait is polymorph concentration?
Otilukes resilient sphere right
Ew polymorph is concentration, gross
Then use psychic lance
it sorta has to be thats hard cc
Nah he's a gargantuan dragon, we need to polymorph him to a smaller size though so we can wall of force him or use the sphere, either should work
Use multiple wall of forces if possible
How big is gargantuan? How many would it take?
2 walls of force
Depends on the creature
By making 2 half-spheres with 2 instances of the spell, you can catch most gargantuan creatures unless the DM decides they’re bigger
20x20 or more
I have an idea. A ring of spell storing. With polymorph. Convergent future to make him fail the save, give it to a tiny servant, have them be the concentration target. Mote of sickening radiance, give it to another tiny servant, bypasses concentetion. Then, wall of force the bahamut. That's the plan once you burn through legendary resistance, the only problem is not dying while doing it.
Legendary resistance
I mentioned that was the problem, so how do we burn through it?
You usually dont, is the actual answer
man. learning that the 2024 Command spell sucks now is bad, but learning it whilst being digested by a mimic sucks even worse
You dont engage with it
It takes at least 3 rounds of 1 caster hitting them with save or sucks
In which you would usually just have won anyways if you did damage
It's 5, tashas hideous laughter was my idea and having a simulacrum for 2 convergent futures to force the resistances
Maybe rope trick for staying safe popping in and out but he can just ready an action to mess you up
This is why i ban chronurgy 😔
I mean simulacrum copies statistics, does that work?
It works yeah
LOL
But also, a smart dm could still screw you over
Or initiative, more accurately, will screw you over
And he's not immune to incapacitated so you could just beat him to death eventually 💀
wanna do something really funny with convergent future? shapechange into an exhaustion immune statblock like duergar despot
If he decides to not use a legendary resistance
spam convergent future for no drawbacks
You cant do that, no
That was the plan.
You cant use subclass abilities while shapechanged
You'd use Magic Jar
alert + gift of alacrity + int bonus should still add up
Not what i meant
Say you try and hit me with a save or suck
This is all assuming magic jar+convergent future combo
2024?
I auto failed, so i legend res to auto succeed
No thats just all rules, otherwise polymorph would be insane
We're ruling 2014 for the magic jar+convergent future combo
Then on my turn, i just make the saving throw normally and im fine
None of this works without it.
oh uhh magic jar became bad in 2024, it no longer carry over the creature's resistances n stuff only str,dex and con
After your other dude auto hits me
That is why I said 2014 ruleset
Meaning for the price of 1 legend res, i beat 2 auto fails
Sort of
Do any of the charcters exist on dnd?, i mean. Elminster is real and the rest, but i mean the party
The heroes of faerun book have canonised the party
I mean the events yes, but since BG3 has so many routes they would chose a linear path. Also this means Zariel stayed in Avernus as canon
They made a book about bg3 stuff, which is a game about forgotten realms
Karlach my beloved
So, bg3 isnt cannon
The book that uses bg3 stuff is
Alr now im SO confused
It’s canon lol
The specific stuff rhat the game breaks canon with isn’t canon but the events themselves broadly (and vaguely) are
Party formation > Deals with mindflayer threat basically just do that as canon until they confirm what they did
So it's canon but it's not canon but it's canon but it's not canon but it's-
Like if bg3 contradicts something in the PHB or something, rhats not canon
It also contradicts other adventure modules/lore, so thats also not cannon
I like to assume the oneshots that the Voice Actors did as canon
That group is chaotic without tav
Cherry picked canon events
If you think this is bad try being a Star Trek fan…lol
Basically
Bg3 is a video game, so it took liberties. Theres a lot of small things that dont fit the cannon of FR
so they retold the story in a different book to fit cannon better
OOOOOHHHH
Is the book worth it?
Ye i need that book, i also need the cookbook
The astarion book also tried to clear up some of the inconsistent dates
Gale becoming a god in his end? Not cannon
Although there’s stuff in the Astarion book which actively contradicts game canon…
Damn Astarion stealing all the show, and Wyll dead in a corner
(as it should cuz yk, Astarion)
Karlach and Astarion seem to be the fan favourites
The sad ones yeah
I’m not sad 😭
No, they are the sad characters
OHHH my bad!
I need more Shadowheart but she's voicing a lot of games now
They get tragic endings
But yeah, they have the saddest stories
I’m pretty sure they’re going to canonise the more bittersweet endings for them though
Will never forget seeing astarion cry in the darkness as the sun burns him, seperating him from the group
Astarion writer evil fr….
I wish we had a tavern scene at the end, kind of like the avengers ending where they eat schwarma
That’s the problem when six different people are writing the same ending lol
I've never ended a campaign where the PCs liked each other enough to go together to a tavern just to hang out
By the end there always was too much baggage, and PCs always ended up cutting ties, or at least setting some distance
Internal conflict within the party?
Spend years on the road with people in high-stakes situation, some conflict is bound to emerge
Larian said the game takes place over the course of like 6-8 months I believe
Still a lot
Especially for people who, once the threat is ended, have no real reason to be a group. Like, the only ones who really become friends are Karlach and Wyll.
I also find it fascinating 7 years after bg3 we get honor among thieves
Seven years?
Has it been that long?
its only been like... 3 years since BG3??
Been taking notes of Curse of Strahd, it's certainly very interesting, now, ||what the hell do the hags have to do with anything? it feels so random there's just an old bonegrinder in barovia filled with hags|| (Spoilers for CoS)
thats wild, my parties are allways forged in steel and blood by the end, Epiloge weddings are quite common in my games
A gargantuan takes up a 20x20ft space. So any spell that fits those dimension will affect them. If I am reading the PHB correctly
If the target is not bigger than about 45x45 feet, you require 6 blocks unless its so small you can lock it into a 4sided pyramid
If the target is bigger than 40x40ft, the target could slip through cracks between spells
That was force cage though, how big is wall of force in comparison?
no creature is larger than 20 x 20 on a map grid, even if they are by description.
Then they are bigger on the map grid to me
Im not letting people lock up a 80 by 80ft creature in a force cage cheese
Is this a 2024 thing
RAW, it always has been
This topic came up a while ago and i loosely remember there being a different text on it
That stated they dont have to be 20ft
Mine often end up killing each other in the epilogue.
They all have different political sensibilities and allegiences. Their bonds don't matter in the face of that.
Tbh I dislike there isn't optional rules for bigger enemies, but lots of 3rd party content makes it clear at that point multi targetable bosses are needed at that size
What instrument could a cow play?
Bell
the moote
It's cause ||Barovia sucks to live in||
(Magic cow using telekinesis and shi but nothing too complicated)
It's an option
Well said!
So i have a ruling question from yall i know eveyone handles this different but how to yall rule glyphs of warding in bags of holding?
CoS teaches a very important part of DMing
Ruthlessness is mercy upon ourselves? /reference
That the real Curse of Strahd was inside you all along (the desire to open a bakery in Barovia)
the real curse of strahd is remembering the layout of the castle.
Bold of you to assume you're getting there before the real curse gets you
Scheduling
Salt, Spice, and everything unwise
roll a d20 with disadvantage
for what? but I got 10
It is funny how difficult CoS is to run while not pertaining to the adventure itself
Durst Manor having to be nerfed to be more enjoyable
I'm of the believe it would fail, possibly disastrously. I think the extradimensional space still counts as moving the item, so it would just explode within the space. If someone were really trying to push the game, I might even make it destroy the Bag.
you tripped on a rock in the castle go ahead and take that 2 points of damage. that stone floor said hi
talking about using it as an introductory (level 1)
there's just a ||Spectre that deals 3d6, and immediately aggressive|| (Spoiler warning for CoS)
Well luckly that wpuld not explode it just says when they move 10 feet they are displed and no effect happends in im the opposite boat tho but I understand others opinion
You just deal damage and enemies die.
||Sacrifices, the mound, said spectre||
especially for level 1's it's especially deadly
Never seen it happen.
Really? have you only played with veterans/people who've already played Curse of Strahd?
Nope
Or well yes and no
Was same group cause DM lost the campaign then we restarted for a 2nd time around.
But 1st time around nobody died either
maybe your DM downgraded it a bit to be more fair?
Thought so at first, but as a DM myself and owning the book he didn't.
As a ||Mr. Shamby Enthusiast|| I know what my boy does
me neither, could be certain table homebrew stuff into play
cant believe we gotta wait til next year for the next dnd game
I think the kicker might be every time I've been in DH was with XP leveling
Pardon me, what
Yep
Funny enough there's some encounters we missed the 1st time. ||The Broom, notably||
Yall, I just bought 182 dice for my group, is that too much or too little? (Btw it was ~$40)
Probably too much but you'll never need more dice at least, probably so evens out.
Sick
But yeah I've never seen a PC death in death house
And I've actually only seen a level 1 PC die once that I can remember
Any other suggestions on what instrument could a cow play?
(Magic cow using telekinesis and shi but nothing too complicated)
Wrong
- a dice dragon
bagpipes?
there's this my little pony episode where the yaks are playing bagpipes
wouldn’t even need telekinesis to play drums or piano
No fingers, Just cow hooves
how can i even play drums?, Hittin his bloody head against the drums???
then you’d just need big drums or big piano
there’s also cowbell
I cant really see a cow playing a piano without telekinesis no matter if it is big or not.
A cowbell
Have like a whole farmers band with the jug and the washboard and the banjo
You could totally have a chicken play the banjo, just uses it's tiny little beak as a pick
you ever see those walking pianos?
oh yeah that still would be hard to play right
a lot of movement, and u can't bring one of those to a quest
How about a harmonica?
yeah but you have proficiency, also uhhh magic?
True..
But the giant piano doesn't fit the vibes of a Warlock Highland cow with a hat
(cool wizzard hat)
can the cow telekenetically hold a saxaphone while playing out of it with its mouth?
True
Ye i like that one
Ima pin it, i like it. that kinda fits the vibe idk why
Wait a second
Saxophones even exist in dnd?.....
- When have you ever heard a person playing a walking piano.
- you are limited to playing songs whit low complexity like twinkle star
Not really relevant. The rules dont state that a ton of stuff exists. If they have the technology for it go ahead i would say
I mean they have a lot of cool stuff, why no saxophones?
Are u tellin me the dwarves have invented enormus robots and shi but no saxophones?
Saxophones came in the 1800
Ye ima go for it
Ye but that doesn't matter cuz they have a lot of steam punk tech
Like weapons and robots and i think i saw a hot air balloon
Depends on setting but 5e kinda said all is cannon so
hey everyone
Question: what are thoughts on a PC who is actually an intellect devourer puppetting a real boyd via the Body Snatcher feater. They could be using the body after death or maybe something in their backstory kept it alive
Favourite UA subclass(es) that didn't make it out of testing? (Subclasses that got renamed with essentially the same features upon official publishing don't count, e.g. "Unity"/Peace Cleric)
If DnD can have the internet via magic mouth then it can have a saxophone
True. Plus you could just have an artificer or someone invent it in-lore
Easy:Fate Cleric
Truth
Stone Sorcerer, Phoenix Sorcerer, Theurgy Wizard, Quandrix Sorc/Wiz my beloved
Not a subclass, but I also love Glitchlings
Internet via magic mouth?
How does that work?
I REALLY wanted Glitchlings because I wanted to make a Seven of Nine from Star Trek-esque character
Question to players and dms
How often do you loot bodies (or how often do your players loot bodies after battle)
If they you (or your players) even know they can loot fallen enemies after battle
The former drone learning their humanity again
Id say going by canon, the intellect devourer is not able to really produce a proper credible humanoid identity
Or pick a class for that matter
But thats a part id be more willing to ignore
Temptation to spoil module...rising
It's true, this was a major inspo for the character
If your point is that there is a canon example of an intellect devourer piloting a credible humanoid, then i take back what i said
I didnt know that existed at all and thought their victims mostly seem like lobotomised or zombieish
Can you please say yes or no. Dont tell me the module name. Jusy say if its canon
I would say always give your players something if it's an encounter you want them to interact with. I was playing with some friends and my entire party is new so we looted one of the DMs encounters and we expected something but nah there was nothing to be looted and I could tell my PMs were super disappointed.
Yes
This is about established canon capability
It never hurts to just throw in some gold pieces or something
I only asked this question because I saw a comment that said their dnd party needs to be reminded to loot
in a video from the channel survive history... IIRC that's the channel name
I have reminded people to loot
Nah, I don't think so. But the 5e description is very interesting with the "Deadly Puppet Masters" section
Or apparently it is. But what's BEEG?
Big bad evil guy
Funny way of saying big
Oh beeg, not bbeg?
"BEEG spoilers"
Dms question
How do you usually make your towns unique In your world?
The tavern
The criminal local network
The architecture
The local common threat (dangerous woods nearby, old battlefield with ghosts nearby, aggressive neighbour state)
Is there a dnd item that lets a character crit on 19 and 20? And is there one that lets a character crit once per day like the Luck of the Far Realms feature in BG3?
A local trade. Usually some kind of narrative function. A couple NPC. I try feature towns of different sizes rather than similar sizes back to back. Geographical features.
My approach would be to make towns feel less like towns and more like locations. Instead of a town in the Feywilds, maybe a sort of village in the trees.
This
They phrased it much better than I did
A trade is a good one i should add more
If you want civilization in Hell you can do a rehabilitated fortress.
Narrative function is the big one. Why am I running any encounter in this town? What interests me about this town that makes me think I should run an adventure of some kind here?
Currently I'm designing a region that was destroyed back then
Now populated by small towns and cities using the supplies of the ruins of the land ushering a new age of Łăïrchă Făirįzz (Free markets/Profit in english)
I would say while absolutely true, thats not the same topic
The narrative function isnt really a part of the town
Just why this narrative ended up there
Its very important though
I’ve got a city coming up that I’m running because it’s right in the border of two nations that are dangerously close to war. A big political leader is passing through, tensions are high, scene is set. So to make it unique, I lean into that. Garrisons and checkpoints. A large walled city. Folks are on edge and distrustful. Soldiers are out late; there’s a curfew; and across the river, a war camp is set up
It’s how I heighten the features I care about
What happens if I fireball from both sides while shapechanging into each other?
Anyone have an idea to make this region more unique?
I've been at this for months trying to make a campaign that will last for years
Time to become a warmonger
In actuality, you would kickstart a fight but I think people would catch on quickly enough and once it’s clear that there’s a plot, you’ll be investigated heavily
Tbh I think it's easier to make multiple campaigns for the same characters than a campaign that will last for years.
I think one thing i couldnt resist is populate it with warforged-like race from the ruins
How would they figure it out if they don't trust each other?
Because smart people exist even on the edge
I should've specified it as world then
I would emphasize this in architecture. Cities and towns that have been built by repurposing ruins, filling them out with newer and less complete structures. A destroyed stone castle that’s been repaired, with missing sections of wall filled in with wood beams and all that
Isnt it normal for campaigns to last years?
Time to forge some notes then IG. I remember seeing something that let me do perfect forgeries somewhere.
Not the small ones but any large campaign takes years unless youre all weekly players who lock in
By talking. There would be a skirmish, they would retreat, negotiators would be sent out.
Oh hey thanks, that would fit the barbarian/Free/nomad lifestyle the people of the region
It could work. It could fail.
Now i wonder... What abt a Techno barbarian?, Barbarian artificer hybrid. Could that exist?
Zone of Truth is a pretty useful spell if both parties can agree on a mutual caster or find some way to get a magical handshake to verify its results
Barbarian arti is uh a weird one
Yeah but who are they going to use it on? I'd have shapechanged. How would they know?
I wouldn't even be a suspect
Barb wants str, arti wants int
Barb wants no armour, arti wants armour
Barb wants rage, arti wants cast
Unless I wasn't trusted from the beginning
Each other. They would talk amongst one another and figure out neither of them caused it. They don’t need to figure out it’s you, they need to figure out it’s not each other
Won't the negatives cancel each other out?
Also wandering mercenaries are a red flag
How would they?
They’re rival nations, both of which are run by competent and well minded generals and leaders who don’t necessarily want war. Neither are immediately jumping into war at the first sign of a skirmish
Every aspect of gameplay is a contradiction
Use armour, lose features
Use unarmoured, lose a subclass
Use rage, you lose most spells
Use spells, you cant rage much
Im sure there are builds that make it playable
Then why are they on the verge of war in the first place?
Being on the verge of war isn’t a result of two parties wanting war. It’s the result of two parties not wanting war. They’re on the verge because people are holding back as much as possible, because people will die if they go all out. If they wanted a fight they wouldn’t be waiting and sending diplomats.
I once tried to make an armourer beast arti barbarian
That didn't answer my question really though. What was the original conflict
Cool thought on that. Both exist though
If warmongers are causing it, the verge just doesnt last as long probably
Even if the leaders are reasonable what would the people think about the attacks?
A tense set of conflicts and rising tension with regards to magic & its place in the future, expansionist mindsets on the part of one nation, long histories of violence that in actuality predate the nations, and the work of some individuals to slowly push people to that brink
"Some individuals to slowly push people to that brink" 
It takes a lot more work than an illusory spell and a couple fireballs
So much more work than that
The people doing the manipulation are a lot smarter and a lot more careful than that
Like what
I’m being very vague here because I have players who look at these channels
And that’s a point of spoilers
Politician stuff, backroom dealings, stealthy stuff
Some fireballs and illusory spells maybe
What I’m saying is, I don’t think two fireballs from an unknown attacker would throw everyone into a full blown war. A conflict yes, a destabilising effect sure, but especially with the people around it won’t last and it’s not nearly enough to push them over the edge
Are you trying to reason that a single explosion should start a war or are you genuinely interested in what else is planned?
I mean. The war on terror...
I could just...
I wouldnt call that equal to a fireball
What if I upcast it to the 9th level
It’s also worth knowing that at the time the foremost A) Devotion and B) Redemption paladins, who are tremendously famous war heroes; will be passing through with the specific goal of stopping that war, so they’ll have a lot of power to de-escalate things too
And thats not war between 2 neighbour states
It takes a lot more to do that than to bomb underdeveloped foreign places half a world away
Fair
But it could be cool af
A lot of actual proper wars have years and years of buildup
I swear im forgetting the big problem. I just cant remember
Barbarians can’t cast spells while raging?
yeah neg int in barbarian, that would be hard to fix
There was one massive thing that made me scrap it all
Barbs dont lose int
i still want this as an official feat in dnd
Ability Score Increase. Increase your Strength score by 1, to a maximum of 20.
Heavy Duelist. You can wield a Melee weapon with the Two-Handed property in one hand.
Versatile Dual Wielder. While wielding a Melee weapon with the Versatile property in one hand, the weapon has the Light property for you.
But they always use only str and 0 points on int
and artificer is int
Thats not a rule and not true either
My barb had 14 int for tactics and knowledge checks
Alr im confused, how this could not work?
Charisma was my low stat
The features clash a lot
It could but it wouldn’t be very good
I was under the impression. Are you saying thats false?
No it’s true they can’t
I was wondering if that was the thing you were missing is all
Oh no no i think not
This ain't worth it I'm going to the next town
I can cause chaos elsewhere. These two are obviously not going to fight each other.
Some unsuspecting towns would be way better targets.
You'd think they'd be more paranoid like the South Korean border but nah
They very much are
The pfp should have given away your personal stake in this
The South Korean border is very famously at a standstill
What is that supposed to mean?
Chaos gremlin
Lol
It’s very well protected to avoid people messing around with it and causing a war
Moai anime girl who instantly wants to blow stuff up and ruin the world
I just see a jenga tower and my first instinct is to pull out the bottom piece.
Evidently
That doesn't make me a bad player: I just have different goals
Not at all
But it also means there are groups you just aren’t a good fit for which is okay because that’s true for everyone
Im watchin you

Honestly this one i can see in the right party and world
The reluctance to accept it wont work is what gets me more
I run my game with four people in mind and nobody else
But probably just the effect of a chat inviting rambling
Not a sign of how the no would go down in live play
Well it was hard to tell if they were saying "it won't work" or "you need to try harder".
So I had to figure that out first.
In actual gameplay it would be the second one
Theoretically I could just become one of the diplomats and have my natural ability to muck things up take the wheel 
But I also don’t love playing with people who want to destroy the world for the fun of it, so saying No is a way to just protect against bad actors
Im a hero kinda guy
If someone had a good reason for it that made sense with their goals and the world, and had a good plan, then sure
Id love that kind of thing used against villains though
100%.
I tend to emotionally take evil parties personal
You treat my imagination bad? It stings
Cant help it
Solasta 2 is lookin good, like realistic looking bg3
See, if I was a DM, and my party wanted to be evil, and it's the planned, scheming kind of evil, I'd go with it but I'd plan my campaign appropriately. You could just make a campaign that supports evil players, but that kinda defeats the purpose of playing an evil character in the first place imo. People wanting to destroy my world is a way of engaging with it imo, just in a different way. And that's what I care about. As long as they actually have a plan, it doesn't have to be the smartest one because I don't fully expect my players to be as good as their characters are.
hey, how strange of an idea would it be to have all my main PC’s part of the same family?
That’s the thing, I play with players who don’t want to be evil schemers and those aren’t the players I like engaging with as a dm
That's fair.
It's difficult to DM for that. Some people don't like that engagement with their world.
If all of the players are good with that, why not, sounds like a fun thing to try.
In one of my campaigns everyone played adoptive siblings.
It's hard to find players that are actually good schemers too. The thing is, it's hard to scheme in a world of magic where things like detect thoughts, alarm, zone of truth etc. exist. So much of war leans on distrust.
It is. It’s also hard to find players who make characters that suit that story
no like, the characters I play, cause currently I play two dragon/dragonborns that are husbands, and I was thinking of making their daughter another character I play, but I feel like that could be creatively stifling
Most (not all) players who want to play like that tends to play nonserious characters, caricatures, and Deadpool-likes. Not all of course, but I just haven’t enjoyed playing with players who try to play like that and none of my players generally do either.
Would a ontologically evil necromancer wizard be a caricature...
A game I was setting up had the PCs all part of a noble house. Time shenanigans aside, no family tree should loop back on itself.
It wouldn’t be a fitting character with the campaigns I like running
I'm still debating on how I want to run my character. I went with chaotic good alignment with the intent I was going to do questionable and bizarre magic, but for good purposes.
Like what?
The character is supposed to be optimization crazed, so bodysnatching an enemy with Magic Jar is one of them.
We're playing with a sort of mix of 2014 rules and 2024 rules
Maybe animating the dead in a town's graveyard
Committing war crimes against enemies
I mean that's basically lichdom
Maybe killing a deity or two
I want to come up with an evil endgoal but I haven't yet
That’s worth working with your DM to figure out
I'm still on the fence about it. This is going to be a long time character so it's really dependent on our adventures and the vibes I get from this party
Have you played evil characters before?
So far we are incredibly goofy and don't roleplay very much. Very much play more to the game aspect
No. Gotta start somewhere. I did quite a bit of research, generally you want to establish some kind of end goal or selfish goal but come up with a motivation for the character to work with the party and do what would normally be considered heroic things to achieve said goal.
Most of all I would disregard any and all notion of betraying the party
Yeah for sure.
It sucks for everyone, it’s a sour ending for your character
I would express your goals to your DM and ask for help with making your evil sides come through
They will help you make it work better than if you just pull it out of nowhere
Yeah for sure, like I said I haven't decided anything yet, just started considering how I'd play my character if I decided they were evil
Playing an evil character well is not easy
too many fall into the trap of thinking that doing evil actions is the way to go and they would be wrong
Evil characters across the board tend to be the most disliked in the campaigns I’ve been a player in
because majority of people who play evil characters doesn't really understand how to actually play a likeable evil character
they do all kind of stuff for the shock effect of it
They can be good. They often are not
Anyone here played a Pragmatic Evil character?
I played as a evil character, but my main goal is to make profit long term not short term
playing an evil character in a long term campaign you need a long term goal you are working towards, being chaotic evil and killing for the sake of killing isn't really the way to go
My party thinks that I'm a good guy reality I'm just greedy asf
But know when to stop being greedy if it means for longer term profit orrr the treasure is a curse and my character rarely takes chances
Both my warlocks. One was LE to start, but that was more leaning into the entitled nobility aspect. The other didn't get a written alignment. Left to her own devices, De Vor would probably have gone CE. Having trustworthy folk around helped ground her and rein in some of her excesses. Her goal was a form of spiritual ascension.
LE? I don't get some terms mb
Common abbreviations of alignments!
L= Lawful
C= Chaotic
G= Good
E= Evil
N = Neutral.
LE = Lawful Evil. One of the Nine Alignments, but the Alignment system is a terrible way to describe character psychology anyway, you should just write up a thorough personality. Pragmatic and Ruthless sound about good for your concept.
You may also see 'TN' occasionally for 'True Neutral' when someone is Neutral/Neutral on both axis ( Lawful-Chaotic, Good-Evil)
True Neutral is a community holdover from prior editions, it isn't in the current system.
My other character wants to be evil but is focuses on money but every action he makes is good Intentionally or unintentionally
I genuinely tried to be evil but not cartoonists evil but my dm is cursing me of good deeds
Why "wants to be evil?"
He enjoys the chaos of being evil, more so for the fun of the game
But not the cartoonist evil type, he wants to be evil but a genius long term evil that will bring him riches whilst having a luxurious spot free from conflict
Though he isn't a coward... its just fighting and planning all the time removes/chips away his personal time
So he thinks to himself that he wants to be evil?
Wanting to be evil is crazy
It's a rare person who tries to be evil. A lot of times people just enjoy doing things that cause harm to others and simply don't care about the consequences. Deliberately striving to be evil is not something people usually do. Like what does he think "evil" means?
Most evil people don't think of themselves as evil.
Yeah evil is subjective to ones case and situation
Yeah, to cause chaos and confusion, to let his name be heard across the criminal guilds
He's just in for the fun of the game
but he's not chaotic evil, he belives there should be lesser restrictions of society and some form of peace
Not eternal peace however, that would be terrible for his profit and the merchants he's allied with
He want's infamy then
So he wants to have fun, regardless of what society tells him to do and he doesn't care if that harms people? That is the definition of chaotic evil, you know.
Yeah
He want's infamy and riches despite the cost on his victims. That's chaotic evil sure, but wanting to be evil for the sake of being evil sounds weird
He doesn't care to the people he harmed MOST of the time
He picks his targets and enemies cautiously
Based on what criteria?
That sounds like Neutral evil then, or something along those lines
Long term threat, their current strength, intelligence, potential
According to the Alignment chart, he is Chaotic Evil. But that doesn't matter as much as having a good description which you can use to roleplay.
If you consider your own reasons for doing things before society's reasons, that's chaotic.
Playing a Chaotic Evil character in a campaign with other non evil characters is... Very difficult
He belives chosen one prophecies, but not paranoid about them
He knows there would be logical reasons as too why
Not really, CE doesn't mean a stupid rampager.
Oh, I didn't mention the party was good?
You can play a smart, cunning, and patient CE character.
I'm aware, but it's best to run your idea through the DM since. It really changes things
More like "yeah we will be good, just for the money, but we draw the line of being evil somewhere"
Does your character like the fact that laws and rules for behavior exist?
This is true, and can make for cool moments. But if not orchestrated correctly it can cause a couple issues and make life unnecessarily harder for the DM.
Laws and rules for behavior? Like lawa of countries/kingdoms?
This seems like a very flat character, especially presenting their alignment first
Laws of the country and rules for normal people's behavior, like politeness, etc.
ohhh yeah that’s a tough one 😬 gotta walk that fine line between staying in character and not ruining the party’s vibe lol
You think, "aha, I'll rob some folk at the market, that'll be a fun character note for me," next thing you know there's a bad roll and everything's spiralling when the party are trying to gear up to go after a wyvern roost.
He is usually fine with them, heck he want some form of politeness when someone is greeting him
And he's fine with most laws of nations
Even benefits his buisness partners
I have a character who considers laws a way for the rich to keep control over the poor to keep them weak and obedient, and she wants nothing more than to destroy the concept of law to rise up to the top to finally live the life she’s always wanted and has felt like she was denied of
This all sounds so much better and deeper than “I have a chaotic neutral character”
He also tends to stay AWAY from businesses that involve slavery
Followup question, do you need to have an Alignment for this character or would you be okay leaving that spot blank and just writing up a personality?
And cause uprisings For slaves
Exactly, someone did it as a player in my campaign. It went horribly, but I like the concept of a CE player character that's secretly the BBEG and works with the DM. Could make a cool one shot or short campaign with that idea.
I always think of character first, instead of alignment first
Nah, I just want his personality to match up with my own Ideals IRL
I just think of his personality as pragmatic chaotic evil
I have a character who considered laws a way for the rich to control the poor because they were weak and obedient, and that was the way of things.
She got better, honest!
Focused on long term profit
Ok so just stop referring to alignment and describe the personality then, there will be less debate and dickering over definitions.
Alignment doesn’t really dictate personality
I feel like Character Concept --> Backstory --> Class --> Alignment and then everything else is the way to go. Or at least what I see work fairly often.
ohhh yeah that’d be insane 😈 like secretly plotting behind the party’s back while still playing the game huge tension big payoff if done right perfect for a one shot or mini campaign lol
Alright, am I still free to discuss my character here?
Of course!
I always enjoy a backstory that dictates why a person is the class they are. Instead of a class that dictates someones backstory.
Alright, I only thought he was evil due to his personality
Also his current class is Artificer, Multiclass necromancer
Reading about how they got powers and initiated a pact with a devil or, how they got fighting prowess through experiences before just seeing "John Fighter #5" is a lot cooler.
do you wanna see this visually?
For anyone who was thinking of what my 2nd characters class was
Then again I'm more for roleplay than combat so, to each their own I suppose.
By the way, cool tip. Alignment is mostly to help the DM reward you for staying true to your character, and a tool for you to consider what actions your character would take in that situation
I've had one too many times where an evil player that worshipped Bhaal decided to "Pet a Kobold" because it was cute. It was, but it felt very out of character.
you can be evil and appreciate good things
You just need to set up your personality and backstory for it to fit
But character's drifting from their original alignment is also cool, it just has to be done over time. A person doesn't get evil over a day, nor does an evil-dooer become a righteous paladin after a single event. It creates dope roleplay too.
Idk if I want to use my 2nd character For this example
Yessir, my advice is to set up your entire backstory first. And then read through it a couple of times and think. "What in this persons life made them (Chaotic evil, Neutral Good, Lawful Neutral etc)"
Ok after thinking for a while
My character maybe a long term Realistic profiteer rather than being evil
So maybe chaotic neutral
Staying true to an evil character in a group of good adventurers is doable, just very hard on you. Since you'll be the black sheep, and it doesn't always feel good. It pays off if your a good roleplayer but, you really have to dedicate yourself to it
Chaotic Neutral is a great alignment, it gives you creative freedom to do whatever whenever.
I don't know, the Chaotic in there I see in opposition to Lawful. That reads to me more that they want to strike out at laws they see unjust. Break unfair systems and suchlike.
I always use Chaotic Neutral for character's I want to shape over a campaign.
Yeah definitely chaotic Neutral...
What else does my character have
Oh I didn't complete the fact on why he hates slavery
Lawful usually just means they stick to principle. Like Lawful Evil is like. "Okay, you told me to NOT kill your son. So I'll kill your daughter sine you weren't specific enough." (This is an exaggeration but ya get me.)
Yeah, I get you. Principles can be a good way to look at it. You have them and follow them, you have them but sometimes ignore them, you have none at all.
Lawful Evil really is the Jawbreaker of the DnD world
- Alignment never dictates your behaviour in the first place, it just describes your choices and actions
2)If there needs to be an alignment that let's you ignore the whole alignment system then I think the system is not helpful for guiding roleplay, which is what it ostensibly is there for.
All DnD rules are meant to be guidelines, we all use and interpret them different. I mostly see the alignment system used by DM's to reward suitable actions during roleplay
Alright, so my wnd characters name is Celethorn
I forgot to tell that in the beginning of the conversation
For me it's how I give out Inspiration points
By the rules, it's only a description of your choices and actions, a character's alignment can basically change whenever they make new decisions and actions.
If in doubt, Neutral Good is always there. You try to do good things! Sometimes that means breaking a law, but you don't consider yourself a criminal.
See what visually?
Rules in DnD are always do or don't. It changes from party to party. By definition you are correct but, we all use the systems differently depending on our needs.
That's the beauty of DnD babyyyy, it's all guidelines
Okay? But generally RAW is the basis of discussion here otherwise none of us would know what anyone else is talking about if we just refer to houserules all the time.
Fair, alignment is always subjective to what one considers to be good and evil though. So I usually find all the alignments to be up to personal interpretation
Talking Alignment is always a can of worms to battles of philosophies and morals
Exactly this yeah
I just left for one minute... and somehow Alignment is still continuing
Some debates can go on for a long time
Once an argument about monks raged in the homebrew channel for five to seven hours
People make it political often
Yeeaaah, it's like that with many topics I feel like
Yeah
Especially in current times, people seem to drag in stuff out of the blue and it spirals into oblivion
Anyway, let’s quickly shift topic before someone sees this as an invitation
Good call lol
So! Funniest NPC you've seen or created?
The duality of man I dare say
Styles MacLaine. -3 in every stat except charisma and dex. He found some ancient tech, but used it to build a hover board to do skateboard tricks
That's crazy based
He thinks he’s so cool but he’s just an idiot and I love him
One could wonder how he made it with a -3 in intelligence lol
Must have gotten a great roll
Yeah, likely
Take 20, old rules.
How broken would an eldritch knight with full spellcasting progression be ? Just a better swords bard ?
I remember there was like, a random npc villager that kept surviving grevious injuries. So everytime we met him he'd have another peg leg or arm
Eventually he just turned into Shamus from family guy
That’s no longer a fighter…
I’d say quite broken
That is the best of both worlds holy hell
Broken. Broken. A wizard with the HP, Armour, weapons, and abilities of a fighter, insanity
I would be very scared to see that
Self healing that doesn’t use spell slots, action surge allowing the casting of a spell then surging to take the attack action
4 attacks
Thats no longer a fighter, thats a god
Yeah, 4 attacks oh lord
Noted
Also
Don’t wizards get conjure minor elementals?
Iirc yeah
Combined with the amount of attacks fighter can get, you can save a good amount of spell slots.
Or hit like 50 trucks
Give my condolences to your dm 
Basically a bladesinger but their bladesinging ability is constantly on
Damn I said to my dm half jokingly that if I ever got Wish I’d use it to get full progression, but yeah, sounds like a bad idea. Half caster would be better at least…?
Much more balanced, but still very powerful.
Ig much more appropriate given that Wish is a powerful spell
half caster only nets a few extra spell slots and 5th level spells
Hmm should i pick the oath of glory
It’s certainly a subclass you can pick
it can be fun
What, is it bad
it's fine
No, just that we have no context nor knowledge of what you want
i don't think there's a lot of paladin subclasses that are much better or worse than the average
They’re all decent
they're all pretty solid for the most part, I don't think you can go super wrong
if glory sounds fun then by all means go glory
Oh right lol, yeah my oathbreaker paladin has redeemed himself and me and my dm are trynna figure out what new oath he can take
Generally good aligned oaths
Redemption sounds fitting then
Glory could work tho depending on the details
He was a redemption but idk it wasnt for me
I always see Devotion as the most stereotypical good guy paladin, so that's always a good fit, redemption is also a good pick for more of a narrative theme
It would become the best martial subclass (They get True Polymorph and Shapechange like Wizard)
Does he seem like the type to abide by the Oath of Glory tenants?
Eldritch knight is a martial class, it's not a martial subclass
it'd become the best caster subclass
I believe so yes, he wants to do heroism to recieve glory
Reminds me a bit of all might
Then sure, oath of glory for the win
What class is best for utility besides wizard and bard
Druid
druid and maybe artificer are the two best options
cleric isn't horrible but it usually is used for support and AOE type spells
if you want a non spellcasting utility class, go rogue
Cleric is nice for just picking any spell in the book per long rest
Very flexible, i think druid works the same though
What about ancient
I see them as good aligned for sure but not stereotypically so.
Ancient is not the stereotype, its aloof and has a nature spin
Stereotype definitely devotion and redemption
Crown if you serve a nice ruler
Crown paladins are definitely like, the Knight stereotype
Which is pretty much what a paladin comes from
it is, crown leans into it the most in its oath
Shiny, chivalry (which includes faith traditionally), loyal
But ddvotion is just so goodguy, it has to win
Devotion to me is just like
And crown risks serving a less moral civilisation so cant be #1
That's what a paladin is
How about redemption?
2nd place
Too focussed on one flavour of being good
The 1st place has to be the allrounder
I've worldbuilt a city based on paladins & the different paladin oaths. Crown Paladins in that city are very much the cops of it all. They uphold the law, for all the good and bad that can mean.
Crown paladins can serve blindly and sometimes not question their faith. But can be cool for a nice oathbreaker. Breaking their oath because of a corrupt government
I still feel like the text on the crown oath kinda disallows evil
But maybe a very pragmatic neutral
It disallows evil, but it still is a more lawful subclass
Yeah pretty much
I see it as like, upholding the order and the law of the land. There's a world where morality could get grey in some situations. Not that all crown paladins are grey
but to me, devotion paladins are just pure paladin-ness. Belief in people personified.
it was meant to trap you by design
what is there again
chaotic,neutral,good,evil?
im missing 2 allignments idk what tho
Lawful, if that’s what you mean
There needs to be a different term for paladins that drop their oaths. There's a difference between giving up, messing up, and going full Dark Side.
Mhm, the name Oathbreaker is kinda misleading
Should be called Oath of Evil lol
Oath of the Scorned?
Not that you have to play it evil
Oath of Sinners for those who did something unforgivable
(Subclasses are rules packets and flavour is optional, yes, but...)
Oath of the Damned. Get metal.
Thats good
At that point arent you just a normal person again. Maybe with some martial capabilities
[Exactly](#dnd-discussion message). Ex-paladin? Disavowed? Oathless?
What if Oathbreaker is just a Fighter subclass 
It wouldnt have features
Aura gone, smite gone, spells gone, heal hands gone
An oathless paladin be a lowlevel fighter
He would need to learn how to fight without powers
Lightning Caster
-# General Feat (Prerequisite: Level 4+, Spellcasting or Pact Magic Feature)
Your rapid-fire style of casting cantrips allows you to weave magic with uncanny speed. You gain the following benefits.
Ability Score Increase. Increase your Intelligence, Wisdom, or Charisma score by 1, to a maximum of 20.
Dual Target. When you cast a cantrip with a casting time of an action that targets a single creature, you can use a Bonus Action to target a second creature within the cantrip’s range.
Immediate Response. When you cast a spell as a Reaction, that spell doesn’t expend a spell slot. Once you use this benefit, you can’t use it again until you finish a Long Rest.
-# Grim Hollow: Player’s Guide
Hay guess so I just wanted to ask, would this feat, RAW give me the ability to cast 4 eldritch blast like I think it would?
Wait how good is this for a wiz
Starting to realize just how deadly and somewhat horrific Heat Metal can be
This would have no effect after level 5
not like very good, it's ok I guess I think theirs a better one for wizards that critical role made
Because lvl5 eb already lets you target more than 1
If it did work, id say it only lets you shoot one extra blast, not double
No, Up until level five, it's basically Twinned Spell form Sorceror metamagic. After level 5 it stops working because then you have two blasts, making it capable of targeting more then one creature.
You used to serve a great and noble purpose that empowered you. You failed. Although your martial skills remain, your enhanced abilities have faded to a flicker, barely within reach - but not gone entirely.
Homebrew aside, I'd make it a fighter with the Acolyte background.
I have to disagree, at that point using your bouns action would allow you to target a third creature, it's not worded like extra attack.
probably
It says second. You already can target a second one
noms naur
Wot
It doesn't matter if it's not worded like Extra attack?
You asked for RAW and im pretty sure thats the only RAW interpretation
this is for broken oath paladin?
The feat is designed for cantrips that dont already multitarget
"Dual Target. When you cast a cantrip with a casting time of an action that targets a single creature," Key words here. "Targets a single creature."
Yup that too
It functions Exactly like Twinned Spell. If it's capable of targeting more then one, it no worky.
so wait would if you used it on green flame blade? would that also just not work at all?
Sure.
Does green flame blade directly target an enemy or is it a buff on your attack?
It's a Melee attack cantrip.
what if it instead extended the range of a multi target attack as an alternative effect?
GFB is an attack that targets an enemy
Then that works as long as the 2nd target is in range
Thats a completely different effect
If you are hellbent on buffing eldritch blast, homebrew it if you want yeah
Actually sorry, green flame blade targets 2 creatures - one with the actual attack, a second with the additional damage
Booming Blade would work though
Huhhhh
I thought so.
GFB's damage jumps to a second creature of your choice on a hit, which means it targets two creatures
As I said though, booming blade works fine
Thats weird with this feat
It looks like you don't have your Discord account connected to your D&D Beyond account!
Linking your account means that you'll be able to use everything you own on D&D Beyond in Avrae for free - you can link your accounts here.
I feel like that feat is a poorly thoughtout homebrew
100%.
It interacts weird with more cantrips i assume
It's third party so basically is
I thought grimhollow was official
it's partnered with dndbeyond but still well and truly third party
Are there any completely broken features in Grim Hollow?
I mean you just looked at one. :V
But why would a DM restrict my vision of my character?
No spending a spell slot on Reaction spells is plenty busted.
Oh sorry I jus got up from bed. Reading...
Once a day though
Then again a free counterspell a day is pretty nice
yeah great for warlock (I feel like we should actually just have that as a baseline though just saying)
I'm imagining a level 5 caster being incredibly powerful with that feat. A free counterspell AND two cantrips a turn is great
Aberrant mind sorcerer can do smt like that if I recall
I swear I'm gonna post a Free Rules only campaign one day just to see how many folk fall at the first hurdle.
I just joined I’m new
I wouldnt fall, id jump
They can spend sorcery points to cast levelled spells from their psionic spells list but nothing else from what I see
I have to ask, what do you think follows after jumping?
Ah, there's Nugget.
Floating
Hello new, welcome
Not being in a game thats free rules only 
If you recruited from here, even odds on "All of them." And "None of them." I've seen...so many people with an inability and no desire to read.
reasonable
Good evening!
Eh maybe one day id welcome a basic rules game actually
Can I ask about items here?
Do we just join a call and play D&D?
Not on this server, no
Basically the average campaign of us too poor for books 💔
No you go to #find-a-game
Are you new to D&D as a whole?
Maybe not basic rules but as the days go by I get more and more tempted to limit people to the PHB and maybe like, tashas & xanathars
Just dont play on VTTs and you can play what you want
And no multiclassing!
My first campaign (and for most players first) was phb only. It works pretty well
I don't mind multiclassing in a long form campaign but I do think some people make some unwise multiclasses
I played one time
Though i must admit i like it more with tasha/xanathar/mtom
I've almost only played Monoclasses
If i let a DM restrict me by a large amount, i want the game to commit by only being phb and a basic classic module
I want a human, an elf, a dwarf and idk what else
If xan and tash are in, might as well allow all of it (selected exceptions fine ofc)
Most people don't really get that the majoriy of Multiclassing is just shooting themselves in the foot, and are surprised when majorly slowing down your overall progression...means you lag behind hard.
I did fine on my barb cleric
I was still decent in combat, but could up dead people and had neat utility
It was fun
But yeah if youre optimising....
Multiclasses: usually either some atrociously broken nonsense that lets you summon god at will at fourth level as a bonus action, or actively inhibiting your core mechanics
What brab?
One of my players has four different base classes. It's super annoying and not a very good build.
Misspelled Barb.
Berserker subclass and order cleric
Oh
I do enjoy a good multiclassed one shot, for the fun of it. But I do it as an outlet while saving the good stuff for a campaign
It was all flavour, zero broken
I finally tried out Hexsorcadin in a one shot not long ago. Was fun. Never need to do that again.
My soulless soldier barbarian got granted a soul by a god and to represent that piece given directly by that god, i wanted cleric stuff
what have they got going on?
Meanwhile I'm over here waiting until level 17 to bother possibly Multiclassing out of Wizard, if only because the high level wizard features are kinda meh.
It was better than i thought
This is a 3.5e game: Ranger 2, Fighter 2, Cleric 3, Rogue 1.
You might be best off checking out the #dnd-newcomers channel for starters. The #channel-guide can also be useful to get oriented. Good luck!
Can you tell me on which server?
that's quite a combination
Prolly one on #looking-for-community
Especially when you consider that Prestige Classes are a thing in 3.5. Yes, it's quite the combination.
Veanies bio called me stupidlooking. Hes mean
Honestly, if i were to run my own campaign, I'd probably limit characters to 1 MC only
Doing them a favour
I don’t think it’s worth limiting
I just have an honest conversation with players about what multiclassing means and what they’re losing
This is not a min/max build, so it's really just a personal choice to make a character that does everything but is good at nothing.
Multiclassing? I wouldn't ban it outright and I know they always trade off versatility for something very specific
It's difficult to have those conversations with people that have been playing even longer than I have.
That’s fair
But it still isn't worth MCing more than once most times
I guess I've been quiet about it with him because I'm not sure he'll be sticking around. I don't know if he's a good fit yet.
The multiclass i really wanna do one day is bloodhunter with a cleric dip
But thats just for RP, as are all my mc ideas
I have a few NPCs with multiclassing: a cleric with some levels in fighter because they need to be proficient with a gisarme for a PRC, a sorcerer/wizard/Ultimate Magus combo.
Most MC ideas I have mostly are no more than 2 classes total, and still are mostly for RP reasons
The biggest multi-class i ever did
Gloomstalker Assassin being a great one that blends good combat and good roleplay elements
Warlock sorcerer fighter
But otherwise, a good chunk of multi classes are also people who didn't know a certain subclass exists that could fill their idea even better
The dm used flanking rules and allowed me the UA feat close quarters shooter.
I melee eldritch blasted em all
With elven accuracy, was pretty brutal
If you select a message you can choose the option to alert the server's mods. Also you can ping them or go to #moderator-support.
Already took care of it though.
Its not that, I'm on an older version of discord on mobile
There's no alert mod option there
Haha, maybe don't ping them, but definitely use the alert mods option. I believe it gives them a gentle, highly visible notification.
Apps.
Done
I thought it pinged them
I’m not sure what it does but I think it certainly gets their attention
Idk tho, Tis was an assumption
You need to select the apps option.
Also maybe you should update Discord.
I’ve already reported it
Ditto
I like the older UI back in late 2024
Tag team
My best guess is that it does a "more accurate" @/here (so maybe it checks people who are actually online? and not away or whatever) or puts it in a special channel that the team puts at the top of their list and try to keep monitored (rather than try to monitor the dozens of channels we have when they get a single new message). I don't know for sure but that's kind of how I imagined things line up based on what I've seen. ✌️
The point was that the Apps option doesn't exist in that older version
Not that I don't know how to, ofc I do
I prefer to multiclass only when it would be thematically relevant. For example, Rumi from KPDH would be a valor bard for sure but she'd also have a few levels in Hexblade Warlock due to her connection to the Honmoon giving her a cool magic sword (and ||Jinu's soul in the sword||)
Btw, if yall could have one magic item (not something broken) just for everyday life what would it be?
Wand of fireballs.
Ring of Poison Resistance
Cleansing Stone. It just cleans all of your clothes as an action.
What sorta lives do yall have to want a wand of fireballs and poison resistance?
This I can get behind
I can now shove stuff into my mouth without having to worry about food poisoning
Um. A ring of three wishes? If that's not available, then ... a flying carpet.
Customer service.
Food poisoning isn't poison.
Y’know what I can respect it if that works
Sword of Kas
The ring cant save you from the poisoned condition
I think a ring of three wishes would go under “broken” lol
Resistance to it can at least make it less painful
Some other highlights IMO:
Chest of Preserving. A small chest that doesn't let food go bad.
Tankard of Plenty. Three charges that each give you a pint of a rich ale. Recharges to full every day.
Tankard of Plenty is exactly what I envision my Dwarf PC to carry around all the time
Bag of holding. Basic but omg it would be so useful
I might suggest to my DM (when I find one...) to give my chronurgy wizard a custom pocket watch arcane focus that gives extra uses of chronal shift
I could live with two wishes. I've thought about it a fair bit.
bag of holding, no more problems with carrying textbooks
Bag of holding could have made for the perfect suitcase
Just careful not to tear it
Bottle of Boundless Coffee. Need it for work
I was waiting for that one to show up
I personally don’t hide my distaste for coffee, so I would’ve ever get it for myself
Murders you
You know, a custom device that granted me the ability of 3.5e Prestidigitation at will would probably be better than a magic carpet.
Or Mending...
I just broke my iPad screen tonight.
What is the greatest magic of all? CHRONOMANCY!
Wish magic.
Should have learned the Mending Cantrip
Did anyone else get a dm from a member of this server inviting you into an interview on dnd and ai?
Mending doesn't actually work on Apple products. You need the special Apple version of it to work, iMending.
This is why i murders you
And it costs 4 spellslots to use it lol
Lowkey, would be a super underrated cantrip irl
Only 1 minute to cast, can repair any break or tear less than 1 foot wide or long, and the material component is ultra cheap and isn't consumed
And if we were to compare magic items and constructs to electronics, all it would need is to be recharged
once upon a witchlight is so funny idk why
that's too cheap for Apple
4 spell slots a week
also anyone using it would have to make a DC 18 Wisdom saving throw to not keep shilling the product despite the amount of unnecessary features and high price
Payment plan you see
Helloo
Hello
Perhaps I am a minority user but I have never had a positive experience with an apple product
I have an apple phone currently (hand me down from parents from highschool) and it works fine
But so does android
I have a dnd campaign concept can I share my pitch
That's a good thing. They're a bad company deliberately making things worse and requiring replacement. They can't sell in several european countries because programmed obscelecence is illegal in them
Tbf I bounced from iPhone at the iPhone 4 iPad from the first one. And Mac from the iMac.
The biggest thing that I've noticed in the workforce is that people who used exclusively Apple products who were like in their early to mid twenties have the same technological prowess as a 70 y/o who can't open a PDF
Sure!
That feels like an Int saving throw to not have Int fall down to 7
I'm building a world where the humanoid races have hunted nearly all animals into extinction, so the humanoids decide to enslave and turn the beastfolk races into their new food source.
This is the start of a long coming war....
This is a very hombrew campaign....some things include:
Dragon Tortles (WOW)
Vampire Varient (Cirque de Freak)
Vampaneze Varient (Cirque de Freak)
Elf Subrace Rebuild (Dragon Prince)
Dracotaur (Custom)
Gobbler (W101)
Grendel (W101)
Moonkin (WOW)
Kul Tiren Human (WOW)
Gelflings (Dark Crystal) [Work in Progress] Simic Hybrid (Custom) [Work in Progress]
That could work too for iMending
Still, what i would give to have some DnD spells irl. Not even super damaging ones
Find a way to cast silence on targets instead of an area
Then move forward into then denying the ability to speak online
As much as I would love to be able to use some spells from D&D, I've seen enough people abuse the enchantment School in game to never want magic in real life LMAO
Could be useful for some
We are a species that shan't be trusted
Ehh, would probably be a select few. Still, some people could really use a Silence spell irl iykyk
Gimme magic
Not that I advocate for violence in any sort of sense or way. My old man used to say and I use this in D&D all the time
"Some people run their mouth, like they haven't been popped in the mouth in a long time. That usually fixes it."
Or just cast Fly on myself and never worry about public transit or traffic again
i would want Mass Suggestion 🙂
^ this is why magic IRL is bad lmao
Unfortunately, that seldomly works. Or is possible.
Totally agree with your old man, though. Really wish people remembered that
It would be useful so gimme
I and maaaaaybe some other trusted people would be very close by with counterspell
See, THAT is a spell that would require a lot of trust or moderation
Im the only one getting magic, sorry
Another incentive to go to the gym (for Constitution maxxing)
You don't even have to go that high level.
Charm Person.
What even is consent.
I thought gym is more str maxxing
Its for str dex con charisma and wisdom
A politician with mass suggestion is a far bigger threat
Results may vary though
If readers could not tell, I have issues with the enchantment school as a whole
So everything but int and cha 
To counter counterspell? It doesn't rely on Constitution
its a con saving throw now
Soon you wont. You like enchanting. Its really not a problem at all. What were you worried about? Haha
Yes it does
at least DMs can no longer spam it
DMs can spam every spell that didn’t change
To be honest, that is better on counter spelling.
Especially when the wizard is the one usually counterspelling and they already have like a plus seven to their role
Either way, casting Silence on someone who very likely deserves it seems more beneficial and moral vs Mass Suggestion
Silence is an aoe that doesn’t move not a single target spell
Did my pitch sound ok?
We could probably find ways to evolve spells. Much like finding new ways to cast a spell
That’s homebrew territory then
DMs can spam anything O.O
We already found ways to evolve spells
Even spam. Delicious delicious spiced ham
Alternatively, Silence + place them in a time out box with no phones or social media
Its called running Sorc 
Bludgeoning damage has never been this convenient and affordable! SPAM!
Still funny metamagic became a sorcerer thing when 3.5 sorcerer was strictly mechanically worse at using metamagic feats than wizard originally
Tbf. IRL magic would go to Dragon Age levels of regulation so fast.
Depends how high magic and who has it but yes people in power will 100% try and heavily restrict its use outside of war
Choose something else specifically because I now take 1d4 psychic damage from hearing that franchise (how the mighty have fallen)
Just tank the damage
Just become the villain
Hey that guy can blow up a small restaurant with a low powered spell.
Off to the tower magic camp
I'd probably hope that a country becomes irl Netheril, i'd sign up for a citizenship asap
This is the dilemma of tanking. I would rather take out the thing damaging me vs just trying to tank and heal
Blowing up a building that large is actually not low level at all. With modern building scales that’s a 5th or 6th level well minimum
Netheril Suuuuuucks tho hahahah
Congrats on becoming a slave for magic experiments
Or requires a lot of alcohol
I love netheril
If you are unsuccessful on becoming an actually good mage then duh yea
You are loved, Ryunosuke. Don't worry about it. Have a wonderful day!
Imma be one of the ones that live on the floating cities
Friendly reminder that the Netherese are magic [1942 supremacists]
If you want a magic nation you want Aglarond. Halruaa, Rashemen. Or if you want older civs. You want Jhaamdath or Imaskar.
I want magic tutelage from Karsus
Karsus. The Ape that would Fly
Go ask him. He’s in the woods to this very day since he technically ain’t dead
Should have let him
magocracy bit aint that bad
Gods gatekeeping is so unfair
They didn't really gatekeep him. He just wasn't good enough
No it very much is because it’s oppressive to non mages
Let mortals cook
Oh so he got weavemogged fr?
Mystra literally didn’t do anything to stop him making that spell he just died trying to take the whole weave into himself