#dnd-discussion
1 messages · Page 263 of 1
Those who Can, do, those who can't, end up in charge of people who Can.
It annoys me because people will act like marketing people are infallible and every decision they make is a smart one, but it’s obvious looking at marketing misfires nowadays that this is not the case
Dude marketing people are usually not even in the same wealth class as the average person
It gets better. The Pale Skinned people that conquered the Not Fantasy Egyptians. Were the descendents of the People that enslaved them and brought them to the realms in the first place.
Holy crap fam
I'm sorry I just lost my eyesight and now I am vomiting acidic blood. An ambulance is not enough, call an exorcist
Remember when WOTC wrote a wizard creating evil monkey people
They weren't evil.
(Yes I know it was based off of The Wonderful Wizard of Oz. Still yikes)
Sorry, was it the Wizard who was evil? I tried to block it out
But the problem was that the wizard did not just enslave them. The problem is that the wizard uplifted them and gave them intelligence while enslaving them.
YES thank you
So this ends up saying that the slaves should be grateful that the slavers raised them from a subhuman, animal state to a civilisation.
It's the whole "we built roads and schools"
It’s even worse than I remembered
I introduced a "wild magic brew" at a tavern in my dnd campaign, players decided to stock up on wild magic surges. During combat the serial killer antagonist had gone invisible and was going to escape, so a party member drinks one of the brews. He turns into a sheep. I was laughing my ass off.
Yeah. For the realms the Imaskari came back and was like "Yo woah woah. Slavery is bad it is now banned!"
And the Mulhorandi were like:
"This whole operation was your idea."
The Imaskari banning slavery. Sure.
Honestly that could’ve been interesting if it were written in a more deconstructive way
Next you'll see the roman empire banning military conquest and France banning baguettes.
They did. High Imaskar when they took over Mulhorand. Banned Slavery. Because their new Empress was compassionate
I am sure many roman emperors were compassionate. Yet not one of them banned slavery.
Or Canada banning moose
Empress Ususi Manaallin's first imperial decree abolished the Imaskari tradition of slave-holding and outlawed slavery on pain of death.
She is basically Sultana Songal Draft 1
I dont know if thats something to be sure about tbh
or our precious maple syrup
And if this lore had been written by a competent writer, that empress would have been promptly deposed, forcefully married to the new emperor who would have cancelled that decree then had her killed after she had given birth to his heir.
Druids are weird
In what way?
It would have been right at home in previous editions.
I thought you hated elves
Well Ususi was a very competent wizard.
I do
Gouge out the eyes, tear out the tongue and break the fingers. That's generally enough to turn the most powerful wizard in the world harmless.
Or donairs
Not weird weird but like, curious. I still don't quite understand how they work.
Okay Atton Rand
Which mechanic?
Is it about wildshape?
like, what's stopping a druid to transform into a cool dragon?
Wildshape?
I think some Druids can turn into dragons
Beast's only
Yep
Different creature type
Dragon is not a beast creature type
Fr????
Oh my bad
KOTOR 2 reference. Good tastes
Dragons are dragons
They're the Dragon creature type lol
What abt gigant space hamsters?
Druid does have a dragon subclass though i think
Not beasts either
Those who know the existential dread of “Kreia +1 approval -1 Approval” know
or Wyrms (idk how to type it ngl)
If you want the simple rule: In D&D beasts are animals that either exist in the real world, have existed in the real world or could plausibly exist in the real world.
Druids can turn into beasts because of how a beasts form magically works and fits into the world
You're thinking of Ranger, Druid has nothing relating to Dragons.
Might be ua
Material plane body with soul in it
Dragons are weird
They dont have a soul from outside. Theyre all material plane
According to what we know Ususi was the only empress of High Imaskar. Being an young adult in 1363.
Becoming Empress in 1380s
And still ruling when the Mulhorandi took their land back in 1487.
Their existance is fully material
Though she was old and infirm in the end.
Not true, Fizban's explains Echoes
Whats echoes
What do you mean?
A Dragon's Alternate Universe's selves.
Why would that discredit what i said
Actually Fizban's explanation of draconic echoes agrees with Haise's point.
Ah, got it, I thought you were asking what constitutes an echo
Yeah alternate universe doesnt go against what i said i think
It can coexist peacefully
Those other worlds are still the material plane.
It's Planear, not just from different worlds
Except for when they're not.
You can have Echoes on the Plane of Fire for example
What abt Owlbears??
Oh
Monstrosities
Yes. Because that echo, from the world it was in, journeyed there.
Or that thing that's like a very ugly Bird whit Sickles by hands
Mutant monstrosities, not beasts.
Dragons can cast plane shift.
There’s one Material Plane, but multiple worlds that exist on that plane. Which is why echoes exist.
Hooked Horror
Yeah that, scary ngl
Do they strike you as something that could plausibly exist in the real world? If your answer is yes, I would be very concerned
Dragons are inherently tied to the Material Plane, which means they can exist across different worlds
OwlBearMan insists that Owlbears are Natural creatures and not his Mutant Army.
So.... a dragons individual being is 100% material though, regardless of whether or not other "it"s exist elsewhere
I have seen weirder animals.
Why not?
I'm sure there could be an Owlbear in this world. And they are cute af, why not???
Basically druids can only wildshape into creatures with the beast creature type
Have you seen harpy eagles
Alr, thx
And even then druids can't even turn into everything of that type
Some things look like beasts but arent
But only Beast creatures of certain Challenge Rating
Hot take but unicorns (minus the magic) could absolutely exist in the real world
And beasts are animals that exist or have existed in real life
They're some of the only normal things in the game
They are canonically escaped mutants, so not natural basically
Wait, something created Owlbears???
Nature does not care about whether or not something is cute, as evidenced by the existence of humans, aye ayes, naked mole rats and purple frogs
It depends on the book
A Wizard did it (like always)
like, lab and stuff?
Are there no beasts that are fantasy?
Well, duh? It's just a horse with a horn. That take is so hot, I'm using it to keep my drink cold.
Unicorns in old mythology are more likes goats eith horns
This can be an answer to a lot of things
That’s a good burn though
Unlike the take
Why I said, it's the TM'd answer lmao
No u
Unicorns could exist in this world. I mean, we have horses and rhinos. RIHNOS, BLOODY ENORMUS WAR HIPOS WHIT A HORN
Surprisingly not, unless you're a dinosaur denier lol
There's a Wizard that polymorphed into an Otter and decided to stay that way, but he wasn't an otter before
There's also a giant cat, but she's a normal cat enhanced by magic
Those are also named individuals in statblocks
Okay here’s a real hot take: intellect devourers are cute
Hippos are further proof that nature doesnt care about things being cute
Dinosaurs are obviously real. I had them in my room as a kid
So quick question... If I were to play a character who's missing a hand... How would that work?
I know the otter!! Traxigor 😌 otter is my favorite animal so I freaked out when I seen him lol
They're derpy. There's a difference imo
Such a body shape is simply impossible for birds to develop. If owlbears evolved from birds, they would not be shaped this way and would not have fur. If they evolved from mammals... Well, I guess maybe it wouldn't be impossible for a descendant of the platypus, given millions of years, to have a form like that.
You are a lovely person
I wish you happiness for eternity 🧐
Exactly. If the platypus can exist, owlbears can exist 😤
No they couldn't. The horn would serve no purpose for a equine.
Ok but bluewhales did come from a small land mammal though
And the same to you, lord of goofy 🙂↕️
So it is a hot take!!! 😌
In fact the horn would be a hindrance to the survival of a horse-like thing
I feel like saying its impossible is a stretch
Antlers existing period disproving that:
They would fight with the horn
Evolution is pretty complex
Antlers serve a purpose. A single horn in the forehead oriented to the front is not the same thing.
Why
I guess “unicorns could be real” isn’t a cold take after all
Why would a horse need a horn to fight if running has been a key strategy to their survival as a species for millions of years?
Lukewarm, take it or leave it
Lukewarm is fair
Those horns are not antlers. Antlers lock on to each other, allowing fights. A single straight horn does not lock. It simply stabs.
Mutations are the engine of evolution, after that the environment selects for or against it.
Mating Selection as I will call it has proven to be able to be so strong so as to override natural selection
Including a big ah horn on a horse. If females find it attractive, it'll be selected for
Okay what about mountain goats and animals like that?
Any tips on good talents for the Artillery Artificer? I already got fey touch
What I'm saying is that the horn is detrimental to survival.
No youre saying its impossible
Again. . . How much worse than Antlers do for Deer?
This is a better debate than the alignment debate tbh
Their horns are oriented towards the back. It's fine. They're not detrimental
Much, much worse.
It's alright in D&D of course. Because unicorns are not beasts, or even monstrosity. They're celestials.
Horses dont need horns
Horselike creatures probably wouldnt benefit from horns
But it could still happen
And it could also end up being useful in some way
Alright fair. Could a unicorn with a pointed back horn work?
Gawd, let the horses have a horn 😔🙏
So what I'm hearing is all it requires it to not be in an un-forested area.
It ain't impossible, just unlikely.
Yes. That would be fine.
Unicorns could exist confirmed
There is a vaguely horselike animal with straight horns already
Horselike, but nothing like horses
But its 2
Rhinos are punk hippos
The horn could literally just be display
Oh, ofc, I thought you meant it couldn't be on the front period lol. Curved backwards is what I assumed
Not every evolutionary trait is functional
If you look at a Gazelle and say
"That's just a different type of horse" you'd absolutely be fundamentally wrong
"Vaguely Equine" doesn't mean Equine
While i didnt say that, im still interested
What are the differences?
Gazelles are in a different evolutionary family
Actually rhinos are related to horses and tapirs, while hippos are related to whales and dolphins. That's about as far apart on the evolution tree as humans and cats.
gazelle is cervine not equine
I meant when it comes to evolutionary pressure
Not if theyre the same thing
I love facts like this.
Like how salmon are closer related to us than Sharks
Well, for starters, Gazelles are Bovids, therefore more related cows
Any tips on good talents for the Artillery Artificer? I already got fey touch
Hyenas are more related to felines than canines
Narwhals are unicorns
And bears are related to canines
Dnd question
Danger boof dog
That i cant answer
U sure know a lot of stuff mate
Ye?
More fun facts
- Bats arent rodents
- Foxes are canines
- Whales are mammals
- Dolphins are whales
I enter the dreams of scholars and scientists to eat their knowledge and intelligence, leaving them dumber as I grow smarter.
No like please stop offtopic since someone asked a dnd question
Wait, how is pizza a thing in dnd?. Who even created pizza?
I cant answer it because i dont know the answer
Nvm. I know the answer will be that a wizard invented it.
Even in the Forgotten Realms, making bread in a disk form and putting stuff on it is a simple concept
I mean, yeah, but also
Just because things seem "Vaguely Related" doesn't mean they're related at all
Hell, Hermit Crabs aren't considered TRUE Crabs
Many creatures have evolved and adapted like Crabs because it's a highly survivable adaptation, but just because something evolved to LOOK like something doesn't mean that IS something, it's a little thing called Convergent Evolution where animals adapt like other animals
A simple yet wonderful concept tho
That is thoroughly and entirely not at all what im saying
I wasn't referring to you
Oh
I second this opinion lmao.
Wait, actually, nah, let's say a halfling invented it by accident
So anyways in conclusion: Owlbears could only exist in the real world as mammals, monotremes related to the platypus.
Ye i like it
Actual birds would not be able to go that way. That's simply not how their muscles and skeletons work. It would take an incredible amount of time. While it comparatively wouldn't take too long for platypus
Owlbears are the production of a Mage crossbreeding an Owl and a bear..
Which brings up several questions
Now that i think abt it. They got cheese, tomato, ham and all dat. the existence of pizza makes sense
Who the hell to the what to the why?
Ye, HOW
did they enlarged the owl??
And why?. A FLYING BEAR, WHAT'S NEXT. A SHARK WITH LEGS?
I don't even want to know
Chat does he know
Well this is an odd topic to wake up to
Does he know????
A landshark, one could say
Most likely they would have used magic for genetic splicing.
The answer is Magic, and A Wizard Did It.
Having the bear and the owl actually physically reproduce would lead to nothing.
Bulettes..
Oh god the Bulette is a thing...
Bulettes are basically sharks with legs
Now in 2024 with pups!
I need more bulettes
At least the pups are cute
Even if they're low level party killers . . . Worse than Dire Wolves 😭
Adopt a Bulette pup and name them "Jimothy, Destroyer of Worlds, Becomer of Death"
. . . Okay, maybe that could be funny
Alr, Would u rather mount
A dwarven armored Warboar
A Bulette
Or a Demigryph?
Dwarvin Armored what?
I was unaware of the canonical hog rider
The most obvious and sane answer is the Warhog because it's still just a Boar
The real answer is Bulette because we've all imagined riding a shark into battle
Oh no, now I can't unsee a Duergar riding a hog while screaming with a high pitched voice
Im going all in whit the armored warboar
LMAOOO
Bullete my beloved
OR
That thing that's like a gigant lizard
Demigryph for sure
A majestic eagle mount and if thats the one with wings, i can now fly
Arcane Creation. Some sages believe the bulette is the result of a mad wizard’s experiments at crossbreeding snapping turtles and armadillos, with infusions of demon ichor.
So, decided to take another look, this is actually such a funny example of convergent evolution, forced or not.
And of course a Wizard did it.
I like bulettes because their name is "burger patty"
What vampire do you think would be the toughest to fight in DnD? like versions of vampires from various cultures
The great pale one?, forgot the name
I only know basic vampire from europe
Pale king something.. idk
Dracula
My mind immediately drifts to Guilty Gear lmao
I know china has those walking dead ones but apart from that i dont know any vampire variations
Might I throw in the Mananangal(The Severed), during the day they appear to be a regular human and are not affected by sunlight, by night, their torso separates from their lower half and sprouts gigantic wings, along with a very long tongue, The only way to kill it would be to find its lower half
The thin white duke?
You mean Strahd? He’s not that bad
Slayer
Never heard of it, what does it do?
No i meant thats the type i know, not my vote
Or Nagoryuki
Ive always felt most vampires are kinda the same thing
Poses in suggestively tight trousers.
-# I take it you're not a David Bowie fan?
The strongest vampire i know is the ancient one from witcher 3
Oh my lord, this is the "So come up to the lab, and see what's on the slab"
Totally different reference.
Ah darn. I'm not familiar with references from western media, unfortunately
Pointy Hat video looms in the background
?
I should watch that
Looked it up
My face when what was my original idea, vampire heads of bloodlines being represented by the 7 deadly sins, was done already
6 months before i thought of them
Hey, we should do an adventurer version of Labyrinth. The hook is obvious, the Goblin King is an archfey and there's a missing kid to save. Just need some encounters and challenges that aren't direct rips from the film. Ping me from #dm-discussion if you have an idea, I'm about to be otherwise busy.
Ive been working so hard…. Homebrewing…. Making them original… and someone ALREADY DID IT?!
Lmfao, I'm sorry vro, I'm sure it's still good!
I can't believe this turn of events
Eh mine are still original so i don’t mind too much
I made mine like liches, you gotta destroy the heart to kill them
And their hearts are in things represented by desires
. . .
Maybe look at his Lich videos.
Particularly Bard Lich
But i was having trouble making stat blocks
Don't feel bad, this happens every time I have a videogame idea too
Last campaign i made one about how traveling the multiverse destroyed the flow of fate, destroying the world
You know what came out 3 months alter?
Oh come on! I was planning to turn my Bard into a Lich!
Spiderverse
That's rough, buddy
It turns out its easy to get a party member to side with a villain. All you have to do is say that the villain "keeps the balance" and blame rebels for all the bad stuff the villains nation has done.
Not sure how or if all that stuff was believed, maybe warlock just wanted more power and made this second pact for that reason.
I mean hey, you could be optimistic and say Kirby Buckets did it first anyway . . . Or Penn Zero Part time Hero . . .
im raging
[Gets Resistance to Bludgeoning, Piercing and Slashing damage for 10 minutes]
Ok, i know what to co
I need to go back in time, to before pointyhat made these videos
Quick question
Nah give us a slow question
What’s the most damage you’ve taken from a single attack as a player before resistances
Instant death
I'm not in the demographic for that question. Only been at a table for like three months
Yesterday I took close to 200 fire damage
Around 78, from a Crit Krampus attack in a Christmas one shot.
From an attack? One?
Or like. A save?
I think i took like 50 from a boss crit
He was gonna finger of death me but dm felt it was unfair and didnt
strongest attack my character ever took and (barely) survived.... 50
Or wait maybe that was the finger of death, but not crit
Which book is Illusionsit Wizard in, for DND Beyond? If I were to try and find it
but that was the 6 con wizard
players handbook
Survived it though
who had barely over 30 hp by lvl 12
they get a cool new ability at level 6 :/
their "ultimate" ability sounds awesome at level 14 until you realize that you'll NEVER get there
and their level 10 abilities are kind of "meh" because by the time you get it.. you can only play with it for the next sesssion or two before the campaign ends
found a homebrew variant on the site 
Illusionary reality at lvl 2
Illusionary self at lvl 6
are u ACTUALLY running it?
Right now just looking at it, im a forever DM who wanted to make a character for fun tho
Technically it was on my turn for killing hundreds of tiny explosive bugs but I reduced it down to like less than a hundred so I was fine
i dont really like homebrews but if ur the DM, have a blast 😛
hi
Also Illusionists, heard its a hit or miss depending on the DM ://
well its cooler at level 6 bcause they get to summon beasts and fey
It's true. Good illusionists prepare some effects and have the DM's blessing in advance, that's the secret.
hi
How is there still no mmo of dnd
Starting at 6th level, when you cast an illusion spell that has a duration of 1 minute or longer, you can use your action to change the nature of that illusion (using the spell's normal parameters for the illusion), provided that you can see the illusion.
where does it state beasts and fey? or is that in the 2024 version?
Neverwinter is the most popular one
Level 6: Phantasmal Creatures
You always have the Summon Beast and Summon Fey spells prepared. Whenever you cast either spell, you can change its school to Illusion, which causes the summoned creature to appear spectral. You can cast the Illusion version of each spell without expending a spell slot, but casting it without a slot halves the creature’s Hit Points. Once you cast either spell without a spell slot, you must finish a Long Rest before you can cast the spell in that way again.
https://www.dndbeyond.com/sources/dnd/phb-2024/character-classes-continued#Illusionist
There is
It always happens that there's actually a cool game I didn't think existed, but it does.
Theres NO source of wtf neverwinter even looks like in the books 😭
ah 2024 version
so if the heroes decide to go to neverwinter from phandalin im just making stuff up
It doesn't look that bad, is it fun?. The graphics leave something to be desired, but it's from 2013 so I can't complain.
Is the game alive?
5e Sword Coast Adventurer's Guide?
I'm pretty sure there are half a dozen books where neverwinter is described
its not in the module that I BOUGHT though, :/
Well it's called never bloody winter, Obviously it's not going to be a tropical island innit?
Is that module set in Neverwinter?
Fr?
Phandalin. Shattered Obelisk
reason I homebrew often 
Neverwinter? It has its pros and cons but I'll just get to the important stuff
It's F2P to naturally it'll be ridden with microtransactions and it can get a bit pay to win at the late game, but you can also just grind it to get around the pay to win
But I LOVE the representation of the locations in the game
It looks pretty dead to me. Barely 1k players on Steamcharts
I said most popular besides Baldurs gate, didnt say it was at WoW's level 
True
Marid Genie Warlocks Genie Vessels should only be a fishbowl (/j ofc. But I'm definitely doing that for my Tabaxi Marid Warlock)
Hey guys... do you think a paladin-monk multiclass would work or would it be bad?
It’s arguably the worst in the game I’d say
i meaaaaann.... It's gonna be weird
Or at least one of the worst
Because you're supposed to use fists if you're a monk, but if you're a paladin you have to use a sword
What do you feel would be the benefits?
Yeah but hear me out... brass knuckles
when the abserd pulls up
It'd be kinda counter intuitive. You can't smite unarmed strikes and you'd have to balance between wisdom, charisma and strength
@jolly agate keep in mind most MMO for DND would involve Milestone leveling to keep to the source material, this is a big turn away for those who like to farm XP or have less time to complete quests, and finding the required quests becoming railroady which leads to a hard game design. Plus the Stat building may feel a bit hard to balance as well, not to mention Wizard of Coast Copyright issues
Fair enought
okay, still hella MAD built
Your stats are split between 5 important stats, armor and weapon proficiency does nothing, your bonus action to smite is already contested
A paladin that's punches stuff using the fury of a god would be pretty awesome ngl.
- not really a lot of benefits
im sobbing
about?
I admit it was a tad exaggerated, but I do think it sucks
But honestly I'd probably just do a monk/fighter that's super religous lol
Be a monk. Take an oath.
wrong server, but its in reference to this
why the fighter, u can just go monk...
I’d do Mercy or Astral Self monk for this
Action surge is nice
Not as nice as two monk levels
still not worth the fighter MC
I've made it work quite well.
I second this btw
Man... I saw a video and thought it would be dope
just bc it "works" doesnt mean its good
you can class into every class in the game, can you "make it work" and is it funny? absolutely!
is it a good idea? heck no
I dont even let ppl "travel manually" i just tell them they can go to the quest location that are "unlocked" from dialogue and if they decide to go, they just go... becuase otherwise there would be NOTHING to do
made it work as in it's probably one of the strongest character's I've made lol
or.. just make stuff up
ight, good for you!
but that just means you havent played a fullcaster ever (at least in a way that is optimized)
Good thing neither fighter or Monk is a full caster lol
I shoudl get into Curse of Strahd because i heard that thing truely lets you go "open world"
but its SOO MUCH PREPARATION
Monks are da GOAT
(In my totally objective and not biased belief)
as opposed to more linear adventures like Shattered Obelisk
Love what they did for 2024 monk
well yeah, still not a "good" build by opt standards (/a "good" multiclass, not counting that its fun ofc, do what you want :DDD )
I will sometimes take a ranger or rogue dip on my monks
Well I'm not saying it's optimal not sure what your deal is honestly.
Hunters mark+weapon mastery+spellcasting or sneak attack+weapon mastery+expertise
So I stay like 60ft away from my party during combat and I want a way to communicate with them in-game that doesn't require shouting.
Iirc there’s some ways to have telepathy
It's really hard to do my character's voice shouting
For a second, I had an idea for a ranger/warlock/rogue multiclass to do sneak attack+hunters mark+hex but I forgot that HM and hex are both concentration 😅
What if I made the internet with magic mouth
well it does say never winter, not alwayswinter
that could imply its always warm there
which is tropical
Would gauntlets work as a weapon if you used it to punch a dude?
There was a skill called like mind link or something could I take that somehow?
Like.... would u be able to smite using gauntlets
2014 or 2024?
if the gauntlets are just reflavoured light hammer? yes
What would be the answers for both?
if its armour on an unarmed attack?
uh i think not?
2014:
you need to reflavour a weapon
2024:
you can smite with unarmed strikes, so yes
I don’t believe you can smite with an improvised weapon
Are you a kalashtar?
No...
time to talk to the DM about it
if a kalashtar can have it, so can you! with the right writing
Agreed, or just a voice amplifier magic item
That I might be able to ask my DM about. I think I could argue having integrated voice amplification just by being a warforged, even though it's not on my character sheet.
Yeah that’s a great idea
So... if i wanted to do the whole "paladin that uses brass knuckles" as a thing i just... go full paladin?... or should I go like... palalock or fighter-paladin?
It would make sense that a warforged would have a feature like that
A sort of "volume setting"
Full paladin, I’d say.
Dual wielding reflavoured light hammers, grabbing the dual wielder feat
(Assuming 2024)
Huh... okay... what subclass?
Up to you. All work well
I personally like the vision of a vengeance paladin throwing hands and knocking the air out of someone when they try to retreat
There's also Oath of Glory
Also a good pick
Probably vengeance because I would want this man to be like... an exorcist type character
Wasn't there some kind of metal that burns demons?
Or Oath of Devotion (for Charm Immunity from Ghosts)
True... this is a hard choice
No thats a lie I still dont have a campaign
I bet I got you
I think for you, Vengeance and Devotion are the options, but there's also Oath of the Watcher if you want more Banishment stuff
Reminder
Vengeance also seeks to help victims, those they are avenging.
I am so excited for Phantom Steed. I am a huge MLP fan, and just generally know a lot of horses in general, so I can think of a billion ponies I could cast.
I REALLY hope my DM lets me ritual cast it in 10 minutes for 4 people, with the idea that I draw 4 ritual circles but I'm only casting it once
Yeah that's more of a DM fiat thing. Ritual cast Phantom Steed is already super busted
I think that's unreasonable on your end, but if they're fine with ig it could be fun
It's ok if he rules against it. I could ritual cast leomunds tiny hut in about 10 minutes, and then be protected for the 40 minutes for phantom steeds
So like... if we're going for the ghost idea, lets say a ghost is genuinely a good ghost but was made due to... idk she died because a bad guy killed her to hide his crimes... my paladin comes in, cracks his knuckles and says some cheesy line like "its time you confess your sins"
You do realize btw you can Ritual Cast during rests right?
I feel compelled to mention that my Fairy Wizard is currently primed to be transformed into Basically Daybreaker from MLP (But less Cartoonishly Evil).
44 minutes *
1 minute casting +10 minutes
And also, I like Galder's Tower more then Tiny Hut. I feel more like a Wizard conjuring up a furnished Tower to relax in, rather then a spherical dome on the dirt.
I was thinking of flavoring my dome as a yurt.
Or maybe a cabin or teepee.
My wizard is supposed to be a bit random.
Why I gonna test splitting Rests into being Lightly Sheltered and Heavily Sheltered.
Magnificent Mansion is what lets you take a Heavily Sheltered Long Rest in the somewhat dangerous area. You won't get max Long Rest benefits from being only Lightly Sheltered
Do yall have any character ideas for a tiefling in a pirate themed homebrew campaign
Yes. A tiefling who is a pirate.
Sounds like Rogue Fighter to me
Honestly depends on the kind of character you want to play lol
Swashbuckler Rogue. Fathomless Warlock. Battlemaster Fighter. Sea Druid. You can do anything
But seriously, #character-discussion is always open, why don't you announce your requirements and preferred play style there?
A character can be more than their species, unless you want the species to be specifically important?
Galder's Tower should definitely count as heavily sheltered, as it provides furnishings and sturdy walls. It even optionally comes with heated baths and bedrooms. God I love that spell.
Dam, lots of channels, didn't realize we had that lol
Exactly! And isn't a Ritual spell like Tiny Hut. So the resource burn is actually real
Yeah I know I don’t wanna play a bard. I’ve never played anything besides a bard so I wanna try something new.
Do you take the inferior Tiny Hut rest that's free? Or splurge a little for Galder's Tower?
Campaign idea: 8 players, 4 players in a good party and 4 players in an evil party who oppose each other
Not a good idea.
Generally a bad idea
Why
Players fighting other players would not be a good time. Not balanced.
DND is collaborative. And generally a heroic game
The two parties usually won't fight each other directly
But what if they meet each other?
Maybe if they were a party of allies that were divided by their strong ideals
I just dmed practically that yesterday but with 7 players. But it was more neutral and good. Never said roll sleight of hand more in my life
And constantly tugged eachother along. Forced to make compromises
But outright being opposed will get stale quickly
It's structured so that they usually don't meet each other
I've actually done this before, so I can totally understand why it sounds like a good idea but here are some issues:
- Timing. What are you going to do if one party gets ahead of the other party through time skips?
- Favourtism: I play favourites as a DM by which I mean, I'm always on the players' side (even if I do beat 'em up from time to time). But when I have two parties, that favouritism could feel wrong and unbalanced and unfair. And it's hard to keep that in check.
- Fighting: So you've said already that they won't actually encounter each other. But how are you going to ensure that happens? I think the only sure-fire way to do that is to tell the players they aren't allowed to do that... but at that point, I think the appeal evaporates.
Maybe. But how are both parties going to win the game though?
How would you plan to run the groups? Different times or different days? Or somehow at the same time?
What happens when they are in the same area at the same time?
Two problems with this:
-
each party group will likely have separate goals, and will act independently from each other. This will mean that story telling takes a LONG time and people will quickely get bored while waiting for "their group" to be up for some roleplay.
-
PvP in dnd is incredibly unfun if your party members arent used to it or are newer to the game. I would highly advise against it.
I give up, chat wins
in my mind, i feel like either they wont want to interact with each other, which could end up as just you running two seperate campaigns, or they really wanna shut each other down, meaning theyre gonna stop at nothing for that
it can work, but it seems like theres a lot of variables
This said, I did participate in a huge game at a convention where 4 dms ran four different groups into a labyrinth from different entrances. There were traps, treasures and enemies inside along with a minotaur.. if player groups got close to one another the DMs combined tables and the map and they could choose to work together or fight..
So it can work but I imagine it was a lot of work
yeah that sounds like a convention game deal
It was honestly super fun. But just for the one shot.
Longer term would be mounds more difficult..
Hey, I wanted to ask a basic question for a build that I am sure has already been discovered and ran 1000 times, but I wanted to see if anyone had a comprehensive sheet for the build.
I am pretty sure the highest "single target damage dealer" in 2024 dnd is a level 20 fighter with GWM but does anyone actually have that build sheet handy? Just wanted to see the damage scaling assuming you spec ONLY for more dpr and ignore all other benefits like making saves or higher AC scores.
Maybe pop by #optimization to see if folks there can give some direction.
In my particular situation, we had 2 DMs and 2 opposing parties. Both DMs (I was one) agreed on the general beats and our general plan, but obviously let each other DM it. The idea would be at the top of the volcano, the parties would clash and it would be great.
But yeah, logistics just weren't in our favour. I'm glad for the experience, but just trying to save you a bit of headache if possible. ✌️
ok thanks
Lol. I was about to enter the dice giveaway, but then I realized that the prize is a dice set I already have! (The Treasure Hoard Dice)
Galder isn't in the Core books, so most DM's likely haven't bought whatever book it came from. Also, Leomund's TH is practical, doesn't take up much space and guarantees undisturbed 8 hours rest. It can be cast as a ritual or 1 minute casting time.
hi
Yeah, but it does have weakness like monsters that dig or are smart enough to just wait until the dome goes down. Plus it's not exactly comfy, so I'd rule that only Lightly Sheltered with all that considered.
I think its silly that when people say "i want to hide" the dm tells them to "roll for stealth" right away
you should only roll for stealth when it makes a difference
I mean, get it out the way ig
"Where?"
What even is the point of Rogues?
They attack someone from behind, deal a lot of damage and then get one shot by the target on its turn
Which I'd assume it does if they are planning smth. Hiding after you do smth seems like a bad idea
they dont usually get 1 shot
Take a look at their features. Note: bonus action to disengage.
2 shot
They use the bonus action to walk away
They're skill monkeys. Not every class needs to be a combat class, although 2024e does lean that way, so they could use combat buffs since they're the weakest in that area. I'm making a homebrew one myself.
and a secondary martial will keep the monsters there
There's no requirement for the sneak attack to be from behind. I only knew that to be necessary in AD&D and Basic.
My point is that when the players say, "i want to be sneaky" its better to say "okay, you are being sneaky" then when they do something that are in danger of being "discovered" THATS when they roll for stealth. To see if they get discovered.
Its a bit awkward to roll for stealth ASAP because if they roll low, they it would be like "okay nevermind i dont stealth anymore"
or, they would try to "stealth" again
Except that isnt true?
#1. Doesn't have to be from behind. Need an ally within 5ft or advantage another way.
#2 they can wear armor and generally have okay health.. so can take more hits than say, a wizard.
#3. They can ba disengage and potentially avoid retaliation hits.
I don't want to draw this into a big argument like a few hours ago, but I'll add how I specifically run it. The idea here is that this is how it works for my table and we're happy with it. If there's feedback or clarification, that's when I'm happy to reply. Thanks!
When someone tries to "sneak", basically I don't call for a roll until there's a chance they could fail. That changes based on the PC and overall narrative. But once there's a chance, say, a guard could hear them. Then I'll get them to roll that stealth check (modified based on the scenario) and the guard's passive or active perception (again depending on the scenario).
I think this keeps the game moving forward and snappy and heightens overall drama.
you got weird players, mine just accept they rolled bad and continue
Sneak Attack just needs advantage, which they can give themselves as a BA btw if they don't move to far.
there is more to D&D than combat
Wizard dies of 1d4 overthinking damage that's not a fair comparison
All the people shouting X is Hyper Squishy has Never heard or seen older editions I bet. Looks at D4 Wizard
Dammit ma DM is going to kill me
Nope. Monks only care about the bibity bop
lol yeah, i dont like that at all.. because if they low roll, even though they are "sneaking" they'll act as if they arent because they know they failed
and acrobatics
It absolutely is tho? They're tankier with Shield than Rogues are.
OR its a bit awkward becausae they'll just "knowingly walk into being discovered"
What kind of Wizard holds a shield?
But it is fair because they can be targeted and one shot. Excluding other classes doesn't give the rogue a fair comparison for "usefulness"
have they tried.... roleplaying?
Shield spell. Aka the best level 1 spell
The Spell.
the spell
Bruh
sighhhhh 🤦♂️
Vro, come on dudes, y'all can't keep making points without knowing any context 😭
idk what to tell you man, my players role play the rolls
what's a vro, I'm old
I don't know which character to choose for the next session because my imagination is too cool sometimes. In one hand i got:
A Highland cow (but the race would be Minotaur whit some cosmetic changes) that is the offspring of a cow-headed centaur and a minotaur. who is also a warlock, and has a sister that's just a regular human, with shared custody between Patrons because What patron wouldn't want a cow as their warlock?. (His primary patron would obviously be The Archfey tho)
And in the other hand i got:
A cool af bard artificer dwarf whit an enormus electric lute
Who are you speaking to?
yeah for one round.
Pretty sure Shield doesn't increase your hitpoints so you're still dying from 1d4 overthinking damage
AC, like a shield
Has 6 hp 😎
Specifically Blast Master and Flying Pickle, both are 0-2 today for some of these points because they aren't rly applying general consensus for their takes . . .
That's if you have at least 14 constitution
Then bump con, and take Tough, and realize your many options for avoiding damage in the first place.
When you ask the players to roll, you're also asking for a chance of character's failing
And that's okay - the dice can help tell the story.
are you speaking of older editions?
nah 10
Wizards have D4 HP
I mean. Wizards just sit in the back and blast. They shouldn't be in the mix anyway
ANd if you're basing your argument off of Level 1... then brother, everyone is Squishy at level 1. Everyone Dies.
which edition are you talkin about?
While Rogues are melee attackers
Rogues can be ranged or melee
D6
cause rogues can often be great ranged attackers,, and wizards got d6 hp in 5th edition
By that logic Barbarians can use bows
D6
or... throw javelins
Yes, they can? What is the issue?
No . . . ? The objectively best rogue builds are Ranged?
uses arcane trickster rogue to range all my sleight of hand and use a magic ranged spell
why cant they use bows?
I'm playing a ranged rogue right now and it's great
too thinky
What
They use daggers
Debatable here
And they have more profficiencies then "Just Daggers" brother
Not my rogue, she uses a bow and is doing great
In both 5e and 2024e. They use Dex wepaons
arcane trickster/magic adept feat into booming blade is really good
Wizards have a d6 for their hp. What edition are you referencing for all these opinions?
I'm confused. Wizards used to have d4 hit point back in Basic and AD&D. What edition is being discussed here?
Hmm. I feel like there might be a misunderstanding. Like... we're all talking about 5E rogues, right? All of us?
shortsword rogue
It feels like you've got some preconceptions here that don't quite jive with actual play.
I had a player who had a rapier and crossbow
ive asked multiple times and they ignore the question
This smells like someone who hasn't actually looked at Rogue at all.
what year is it?
I wanna be a Centaur Rogue!!! XD
5E
Wizards die of 1d6 goblin damage then
Mask of Zorro is like one of the most iconic rouge like dudes and he has a rapier
Chatter in this channel should be 5e (2014/2024).
Other editions go to #dnd-elder-editions because otherwise its too confusing.
Is it the year Wizards have d4's for hit points?
and a sorceror dies of 1d6+2 goblin damage
Any class at level 1 can die to 1d6 of damage depending on the number of hits taken
I still think rogues are bad :/ too fidgetty
Yeah, why I said what I did earlier, while not tryna provoke anybody lol
Gun Rouges also sound fun
That's if max damage and the Sorcerer has less than 12 Constitution
I like magic, they aint for me ngl.
minor spelling mistake. everyone gets an opportunity attack.
/lh /jk
plays the song “Can’t touch this” while fighting goblins and monsters
But youre ignoring that with wizard?
Nope
Vro, Casters WANT lots of Con. Do you not know how important Concentration Checks are? It's even more than that at later levels lol.
It can be! Just hard to justify trying to hide when your weapon makes such a clearly distinct noise of "I am here" when used.
Can we all just agree That Artificer is obviously the best choice /hj (half joking)
Ninjas used guns, if they missed...well, run.
So the sorcerer doesn't die of 1d6+2 goblin damage
No, since also, level 1 HP is maxed out
If they miss, then it was just a warning shot 👀
Forget reloading, just have 2 guns.
Everyone knows switching guns is faster than reloading, afterall
Ykw I should get my druid a gun
The Reaper strategy 😂
Ill magically enchant my gun to sound like a “tree falling when no one around”
I do want to note that we should be a bit sensitive here with firearms as unfortunately some folks in our community have lived experience where firearms have caused untold grief and trauma.
Multiclass druid to get Druidcraft cantrip
And time it just right
I mean.
Silence spell exists
Just attack while inside it.
Better! I’ll be a Rogue Bard Gunslinger Combo!
Or have the party druid to do it. Or be a tiefling to get Thamaturgy
Wait we forgot abt the smoke and flash
You don't get silence spells at 1st level, assuming the discussion is still on the level 1 character. I know how things tend to wander somewhere else
If your rouge has a rifle at level one, his luck with pickpocket means he will be fine without it 
I mean in general people start at level 3, that level 1 thing was brought em when we were discussing how characters aren't as squishy as someone was implying they were.
I like start at level 2, end the session with a level up to 3
-# I think I'm saying "I mean" too much
Level 1 feels too squishy and lacks the background lore flexibility
Also as a druid main, wildshape is fun and u get it at level 2 
When a Warlock Cleric Aasimar goes adventuring because of a divorce between their demon parent and angel parent
Making every character get the subclass at the same time does seem like a difficult thing. The Paladin swearing an specific Oath, the Warlock making a Pact, Sorcerer discovering where their magic came from/awakening it, the Bard finding their magical inspiration.
Seems like a lot to fit in one session, but if you like weaving that all in session one I can see the appeal
a bit funny imo that a cleric warlock multiclass can have the same diety and patron
Ngl I dont understand why warlocks dont have their pact since level 1
The easiest way I think you can interpret it is that you're linked to the Deity personally, but also to a greater court related to them
Like you made the pact to become a warlock...you should know
They did in 5e.
Big discourse among the community on how that works.
Unlike earlier editions, DM's are no longer required to play the morality role of the Deities
I think I can justify it. Not cleanly, but I can.
The best way I can put that is that you find things that link you to your Patron, minor powers and/or relics that are basic arts they give out freely until you reach level 3 where you get to actually earn the powers directly attuned to your Patron
That is, the things you do appease someone mysterious helping you until they reveal themselves at level 3
Maybe obvious, or not so much
Why are dwarfs so damn cool?
"Look at what they need to mimic a fraction of my Darkvision"
They got giant beards, drink beer like it's water, badass accents and are usually warriors, that's a recipe for cool 👀
We got to level 6 yesterday after a dungeon and i joked a (young) dragon should come next. But as a paladin im kinda curious whats a melee class supposed to do against a dragon. I know cover and positioning (can still do the 2nd one to an extent) is a big thing against them but when youre next to the dragon its harder to just leave and find cover every turn
You do your best! 😤
In general, trying to draw the dragon's attention away from the rest of the party is a good strategy.You want to avoid a potentially devastating breath attack.
Tieflings are cool
i mean, warlocks are just clerics
Have a ranged weapon.
Seriously. Some enemies simply will not allow you to use melee
can a dark being have both clerics that worship him as well as pacts with warlocks?
Young red dragon has a 56 damage average breath attack, i dont wanna get hit by that either 😂
*with a failed save
another Eeveelution fan?
Definitally
Haha yeah, it's a bad situation no matter what. But I think having like 3+ party members all trying to dodge a single breath weapon is even worse than just one person having to grin and bear.
Tough it out, got it lol
I'm partial to Vaporeon, Espeon, and Glaceon and mad we never got a dragon type Eeveelution
can you multiclass as a cleric AND warlock to the same god?
Nothings stopping you
Warlocks technically have patrons, but yeah. It's absolutely a conversation you can have with your DM.
I definitely think there's merit to the idea of forming a pack with a god
Warlock cleric is an interesting multiclass thoufh
it just feels interesting, you worship the diety that you ALSO have a pact with
Not sure what youd get out of that
you'd get warlock spells AND cleric spells from the same diety
Yes but now you need both charisma and wisdom to get some proper spell attacks/saves
And youre delaying spell progression for either cleric or warlock compared to a solo class
I do have a ranged option, was just curious if there were better options for meleeing a dragon
There are ways. Essentially you want to prevent the dragon from using its flight speed. Reduce a creature's speed to zero, it falls if it flies. Strong winds prevent flying.
i know i just thought it was silly you get different set of powers from your same being
Absorb elements:
I guess it only gives you resistance not immunity
heck you can even swear an oath to the SAME DIETY and become a paladin 🤣
Dont think theres anything on the paladin spelllist to achieve that. And dont think im winning a grapple against a dragon either 
Indeed. It's a team game for a reason
Fair enough
i do see people confusing d&d to be a pvp game
Not just zero, flying creatures fall if they don't move half it's speed while flying. So if they have a way to knock the Dragon prone + the slow mastery from an ally, that should be enough to ground the dragon.
That or a simple Earthbind from an ally.
Knocking it prone also works.
hellz yeah! sleetstorm!
Now that i could do 
Not sure that would work while the dragon is flying
y not? its range is HUGE and it got a buff to the height at the cost of radius
As long as the dragon enters the area i dont see why not
Its area is not very high.
it went from 20ft height to 40 and it can be placed in mid air
Its gotta come down for non-breath attacks some day
Bold assumption
It says 'centered on a point you choose within range', is there any more general rule specifying it needs to be placed on somethinf
Because 150ft above me still is a point of my chosing withing range
Why? If it can keep flying around and wait for its breath attack to recharge, it will do so.
Aha, you think my dm is that tactical though
I just realized Umbrellas are canon to Forgotten Realms, since the material component of that spell is a mini umbrella.
I can have a tiny umbrella in my drink without breaking character
Especially if it can get underwater, or use its climbing speed, or use its burrowing speed
You could cast a control spell like Sleet Storm (40ft tall cylinder) or Web
Not too many enemies have restrained immunity
Let me reference my chart
cause it’s not smart to be flying around in the air doing “nothing” while you get pelted by firebolts. you’re giving free actions
Usually it's oozes/other incorporeal enemies, ye
Yeah there are no dargons with restrainment immunity
legendary resistance
They gotta make the save twice if you time it, tho. Since it happens when they enter the Cylinder and again when they start their turn.
Are they really going to fight a legendary dargon at level 6?
Basic Drake Dargon.
With web don't you have to have it connected to something stable? Ground. Wall etc?
i don’t think creatures in d&d have “momentum” and they can turn on a dime
Wdym?
That's only if you want it to be sustained. It collapses on your next turn.
If you were to say shoot webs at the dargon like spooderman
or just play a sharpshooter hexblade warlock and just smite it from 300ft and make it prone
I think most dms would rule as long as it doesn't specifically say it needs to be on a surface that a "point within range" includes vertical and diagonal positioning.
Because a spell like Vortex Warp specifically says it needs to be on a surface
I'm pretty sure yeah
depends on how liberal you want to define a “surface”
So if it needs to be specified it's on a surface, then we can assume there's free reign when it's not specified
could you vortex warp a party member on top of the dragon?
"You create a 5-foot-diameter Sphere of fire in an unoccupied space on the ground within range."
Like Flaming Sphere here
That specifies on the ground
Creatures don't count as surfaces I'm told
probably, i’m sure dms are liberal on their definition of a “surface”
You could probably vortex warp the dragon onto the ground though
truu vortex warp is a great spell
i always have it prepared, and it has never not been useful
I might ask my DM to switch out one of my spells for vortex warp
It seems fun
I wish I could vortex warp myself into the air.
you can cast “summon barbarian” and sick your barbarian on the enemy spellcaster
bonus points if you ready a spell action and do it right before the barbarians initative
so he can swing right after being teleported
My DM just gave me access to tiny servant. Time to do 3 1d6+4 attacks to an enemy every turn for a bonus action.
What if the Babarian was eating dinner with the wife and kids?
My DM has been wanting to see me stone an enemy to death
That would be rude to just summon him out of thin air
gross, sleet storm is a much better use of that spell slot
I'm already taking leomunds tiny hut, phantom steed, and hypnotic pattern. I'm running out of slots to prepare spells.
I have something super gross for control that my DM might just ban because of how evil and stupid it is.
sleet storm, fireball, animate dead, fly is good assortment of spells for 3rd level slot
You think tiny servant is gross and you're recommending animate dead?
animate dead is AWESOME what do u mean?
It's horrible to play with, it seriously bogs down combat and gets really stupid.
they don’t take up your bonus action and you drown them in action economy
depending on how many zombies u have
and u can dump them into the bag
Magic Stone takes my bonus action, tiny servant does not and I can hide them after they throw stones.
I can be like Soundwave from Transformers
"Deploy!"
tiny servant takes up your bonus actions
Not if you give them a general, lingering command
"Throw the stones I drop at an enemy"
it only does it for 1 turn
It doesn't specify that, it says "during it's next turn, or issue it a simple, general command"
just depends on how the DM rules the commands
hmm nvm it’s vague
on if it does the one thing, next turn, or if it does it on repeat
It uses stack some books as an example. That's a command that could take more than one turn.
but does it stack books for 1 turn? or multiple?
this just seems worse than like, spiritual weapon
interesting.. i still think animate dead is better
you can command an army of undead
What's cooler, Magic Warlock cow or Metal bard artificer dwarf?
a third level spell slot to do a single d6 damage per turn for 3 turns
You can upcast it to have 3 little dudes that all throw stones from magic stone
The duration is 8 hours
so using a fifth level spell and your BA every turn to deal 3d6 damage a turn?
So it's a 4rth level slot plus a BA cantrip for 3 dudes that do (1d6+int) x 3 every turn
It uses your int modifer for each stone
u can have more than 3 with animate dead
without upcasting
so thats 15 damage a turn-ish? assuming these things dont get hit by any stray AoE, in which case they are instantly dead
I mean, they can hide behind a creature two sizes larger
well, i think its fine,
I have an int of +4, x 3 that's minimum 12 damage per turn
They're tiny, they can hide in your armor.
minimum damage assuming they all hit*
10 hit points.
they're gonna die if they succeed the save
Yeah I have a +7 spell attack modifier, magic stone uses your stats when another creature throws the stone
it’s fine, just don’t animate brooms and give it some vague instruction then fall asleep
They also serve other utility, because "general command"
Spellcasters don't use their bonus action very much, they use reactions and actions a lot more. This is huge for my action economy
Average of 22.5, assuming they all hit, because of Int Mod.
depends 😭 i play a goblin and i use my bonus action all the time xD
unless ur a druid
also, misty step and blade song
wildshape moment
They have Evasion yk?
In 2024 at least
tiny servant isnt a spell in 2024, they do not
atleast grab sleet storm! 😭
We're playing with a hodge podge of rules, primarily the Rule of Cool
its such an effective spell for level 3
you cast it, then you sit back and it does all the work 4 u
I don't have the ability to prepare it. I'd rather have the utility of rituals.
I like the summon spells
Yes it is? In Ebberron they added it???
i prefer animate dead xD
summon elemental is fun
oh! but you can also just leave the zombies that you reanimated, just sitting there and let it become feral xD
once you finish your quest
What's your guys's favorite dice color combos?
youre thinking of homunculus servant
Black with yellow numbers for me honestly
you don’t need the zombies anymore, may as well just leave them there
. . . Yes I am, and was Abt to comment on my error
what’s the worst that can happen
Or you could just Awaken them
I'm going to make a bit out of Magic Mouth and it's ABSURD duration. Just casually mentioning "Magic Mouth is still there btw" like 3 months later
Doesn't animate dead also require bodies to be in range?
1000 gp? 😭
Tiny Servant is like a mini animate objects
upon casting the spell, yeah. but that doesnt mean your skeletons will die if they get too far away from you
Oh, right, I forgor, there's a magic item I usually see abused to get that off lol
they turn feral
NPC idea: You encounter Boblin the Goblin, a brave Goblin Fighter that charges into battle fearlessly, but then you kill him. Then, out of nowhere comes Coblin the goblin, a charismatic Goblin Bard that tries to persuade you to not attack him. Then you kill him too, Doblin the Goblin, a Daring Goblin Monk punches you in the balls. This continues until you kill Zoblin the Goblin, a zealous Goblin Paladin
I'd need to gradually build up bodies then though.
what’s it called?
you would have to yes
animate dead zombies don’t disappear when the spell “expires” the zombies just stick around and becomes feral
I'd argue animate dead is a good and cool spell because of the logistics it uses. I think it'd be kinda boring if you just summoned four skeletons for an hour
until you cast the spell again
yaa, but what if you don’t feel like it? 😛
Tiny Servant summoning 1+ (2 * level) magical dudes for 8 hours
Gimme a sec, finding it
what if you want to switch things up and unprepare animate dead
Technically you can rest cast it
and just leave the zombies in the barn
then you could probably put down the skeletons beforehand
xD maybe you can put up a sign “do not disturb!” before you leave on your adventuring day
cause you can u use them again later
Watch me get arrested for necromancy when I visit a town because of animate dead
Yeah. A "do not disturb sign" gets followed in D&D as it would in IRL
I'd get all the chicks with my adorable tiny servants 🗿 /j
@echo meteor Found it. Staff of the woodlands. Only a Rare and can cast Awaken.
Druid attuned only
Yo
brooo, that’s awesome!
Wait. You'll like this better
Pot of Awakening. It's only a Common and does only that, to Shrubs only.
Hello, do you have playlists that you would like to share? Or recommend some picks for danger moment when dragon is attacking city and players come to see it?
NieR: Automata's Soundtrack has some magical and mystical music that would fit that description.
Personally I keep going back to the Witcher 3 soundtrack.
There’s an official D&D soundtrack by Midnight Syndicate but I keep finding myself coming back to Geralt.
So does the Madoka Magica soundtrack, namely Magia by Kalafina.
For streams, I use royalty free music by Kevin McLeod. You’ve probably heard his music and just didn’t know it haha.
Loreena McKennit has good like calm or traveling music, or generic combat music, that also fits the sort of magical and mystical vibe I imagine for DnD, great for a setting like the feywilds.
eyy! i want my lawyer! its not my fault the random scoundrel trespassed onto my property!!!
if anything, it’s his fault for trespassing!!!
Aren't you technically graverobbing if you steal bodies from a town graveyard or something
also, it’s d&d… you can probably just store the zombies in one of the dungeons that you’ve cleared previously
You'd need ethically sourced bodies. Good luck with that
not if you reanimate the bandits that you killed
I think that'd be considered a warcrime...
you can actually take an off day hunting for bandits
is it?
I am just now realizing the irony of having a Tabaxi Marid Genie Warlock
necromancy is criminal now?
I'm going to make a 19 slide presentation explaining why Tiny Servant is good and it's going to be titled "The Moral Implications of Animate Dead" just because of you.
aren’t the bandits robbing caravans?
their bodies are better used as zombies
it’s “self defense”, they tried to rob me
You might have to get a necromancy permit
What's the best 2024 monk...
Isa cat who likes water
Which there's a waitlist for
i’m sure if you go out into wilderness you can track down bandits and other humanoids
to reanimate guilt free
It really depends on what you qualify as best and at what levels you're playing, but generally I've seen that most people really like the new elements monk
Yep. It's called Body Snatching. A felony in every state of the Union
random encounters have re quite a few
mostly because it's actually playable now and at later levels it's a monk that can fly
Yeah but it's not about the guilt, a bunch of guards in Faerun are going to ask where you got them and "I found them in the wild" does not sound like a good defence.
Warforged chair monk that shoots spells mhmhm...
so you can leave them in the local dungeon that you cleared
But then you need to make a trek to the dungeon every time you need them.
Or want to store more. And they only last like a day don't they?
if it’s too far, you can just leave them there
you can just get them when u need them and is convenient
you can put a sign that says “beware, zombies ahead”
so random passerbys don’t go in
Other best option is arguable between shadow monk and mercy monk, mostly because mercy monk can do an auto poison with no save, and shadow monk because so many spells and abilities require a "creature you can see" and with the 2024 shadow monk seeing in their own darkness, they can become pretty much immune to a lot of effects
Yeah I'll decide which I could choose ty
Animate dead sounds like the clunkiest "send dudes" spell I can imagine
the downside to shadow monk I should mention is that it can also screw over your party
It is, in fact, very clunky
No they will just notify the town magistrate and create a whole can of worms
Animating undead is usually illegal everywhere
well, i took precautions… it’s not my fault! i want my lawyer
is it actually?
Hey got a question. What do you all think Abt Cleric and Druid's 2024 option between an extra Caster feature or a somewhat martial feature early on? Do you think it makes the classes less focused or just better at fulfilling diverse fantasies?
i don’t remember reading that
Technically with tiny servant I can have them release motes with Arcane Abeyance and concentrate on spells to make super Microwaves 
I am already my DM's worst nightmare I might as well commit more crimes against the game
Oh gosh, this question again lmao. It isn't inherently evil, just usually is because of who does it in most settings. . .
It's what my character would do, they're chaotic good alignment
It's kinda disrespectful to the dead... imagine if I animated your grandma as a soldier for combat
Same here I've committed a war crime once or twice
A good example of the flip side: what if I pay to use your corpse when you die via Animate Dead?
It doesn't have to be evil
Yes let me go to the town graveyard and steal everyone's loved ones from the ground.
That's evil because you're breaking the law and not asking first
Not because you're raising the dead
Nothing would please dear old grandma more than to be reanimated to be used as a tool to destroy lives
Just get a necromancy permit and a Certificate of Ethical Animation and you're good to go
That's actually a good idea or you could like pay the family to use their loved ones body
Or literally go around and ask if someone has smth they wanna do but they'll die before they can do it
Literally just an easier way to get you to that distant Island you wanted to explore, even if you can't experience it yourself.
Or climb that mountain you never could bring yourself to trek
I think a big reason why necromancy is often seen as evil isnt actually the use of someones body
Its the soul you bring into the world
Most undead are horrifying evil creatures
Zombies and skeletons are souless.
But in forgotten realms it's canonically not the person brought back
Yes
I have probable cause to suspect a DM used AI to generate their campaign they invited me into. What should I do? (nothing comfirmed, but I have my suspisions)
so go search for bandits and other humanoid creatures that are roaming the lands in “random encounter table” that attack you and animate dead. it’s self defense
So what is moving the body you have under your control
But if you lose control of your zombies, they will attack and kill everything in sight
The spell.
Ah, sorry you're going through that. I think you need to do what you think is right. There's no magic answer to stuff like this. Just have to follow your gut. Good luck!
So it is just pure magic?
Pretty much
Define "pure magic"
There is no glimmer of a being in there?
Yup SAC explained in detail how it works.
it lives after spell expires though, u can also awaken it
I thought undead were aware, to a point
Which in that case might be evil (if you leave it to its devices after)
Abandon ship imo if a campaign is even remotely similar to AI that's a bad campaign. If a DM is using AI to help them run their game for like dice rules that's a different story. Even as a rules reference AI sucks.
Well, if you want something done right, do it yourself. Im making a campaign.
What's the difference between that and animating corpses you dig in the town graveyard?
They are.
Respect vro
Grazi
in one, corpses are those of loved ones, the other is bandits that attacked me to rob me
and probably an outlaw
Im already thinking of a letter to write
Ok then replace what i initially said about souls with consciousnesses
Necromancy brings evil creatures with it and that is bad
And the bandits don't have loved ones? The people who are buried in the graveyard are all people who never did anything wrong in their lives?
It doesnt matter if youre using only bad ppls bodies, or ask permission first
clearly they are outlaws
I mean. If you use them as tools what's the harm?
It's because AI can't tell the difference between different rulesets and games when using reddit threads as a reference. It also just frequently makes shit up blatantly. It's good at die rolls and math though, like calculating odds of die rolls.
Because if you lose control in any way, theyre free and evil
As long as you know how to check the math
its bad at math
So the law determines not only the legal status of a person, but their moral status as well? Not just their moral status, but the moral status of their corpse?
No matter who writes the law and who executes it?
yes, the law typically does do that
I literally wrote up a general layout of the campaign in like 3 days, people cant probably do that, and my thing needs polish and detail, but its better than AI still
No it does not. Law and morality are two different things.
Bandits that you fight as adventurers arent just against the law
Haise, I've seen you dive into this argument a few times with others.
One thing I think you allude to that I don't think you've ever said explictly but I think is worth while: for some (maybe yourself included), raising the dead causes a disgust response. When I say disgust, I mean something that can't be controlled; it's emotional and as such, it isn't always logical - but that doesn't make the feeling any less real.
I think in D&D, in general, writing populations to be generally disgusted by zombies, skeletons, and most other necromatic spells is totally valid.
but consequence is from law, if law says it’s okay, theres no consequence
And the graveyard has a high chance of the corpse you use being of someone who didnt roam the highway killing people for money
Of course zombies are disgusting. It's oozing liquid. It's infested with maggots...
So how many single enemy encounters do you have without charm immunity? 🗿
If you lose control you're not evil, you're just irresponsible.
which is why you get the corpses from bandits, goblins, random humanoids that attack you
Doing things with risks is just irresponsible, not evil
No i never alluded to that but its a fine point to make
I agree
Yet you are talking about a corpse. The corpse did not roam around the highway killing people for money, that's the person. The person is not the corpse. Once the person is dead, the corpse is just that. Dead meat. The person whose corpse it belonged to is irrelevant, because it now belongs to nobody
The main evidence is the person having a badge of AI Dungeon. IDK what he does on there, but it may be why his writing was bread stale.
But i still say that necromancy is seen as bad, partially, because you raise evil beings, that also may break free
The corpse of a bandit and the corpse of a priest are equal. They are exactly the same thing. Dead meat that once housed a person. That person is no longer there, there is only the meat
the person did
You know that isnt true to like everyone
Less if you give me a reason
Humans tend to care about emotion, symbolism and memories/legacy
depends on the religion and culture
It is true in D&D. Whether you believe it to be true or untrue in the real world does not matter. In the world of D&D, that is what the corpse is. The soul is departed, and nothing done to the corpse will change anything for the soul
So you think if i started spitting on ppls corpses in dnd, noone would ever care?
Tbf I think the average person in DND has been exposed to death more than, say, the average person in the modern world
So I guess general question to folks who keep getting drawn into this conversation: What's the goal of having this conversation?
Is it just to reach a general understanding? If so, maybe it's worth double checking that everyone is on the same page?
Is it to convince someone that their opinion on this is wrong? If so, that's a much, much higher bar to clear and probably would benefit from at least acknowledging that.
Suggestion as of 2024 is broken, you can simply tell enemies to leave RAW or tell them to let you cast spells on them. It completely destroys enemies without charm immunity. Charm in general ruins encounters like that.
They used to execute people for graverobbing in the old times in our world.
People dont like you messing with their dead, even when exposed to death
I was referring more to the disgust response of seeing a dead person
Some would care. But that is not the same thing. I was talking about the actual reality, not about the feelings of those people.
There are new people in the conversation. Points made can be made again
Oh I thought you were playing a bard kinda thing
I think you're editorializing a bit
feelings of the living matters more than the feelings of the dead
dead doesnt feel
The dead absolutely feel. What do you think ghosts are?
The feelings of the people are why necromancy is sometimes loathed though. You cant disregard peoples reaction to the necromancy when my point was about why people dont like necromancy
Nah, it's the powergaming Control wizards you have to worry about.