#dnd-discussion
1 messages · Page 259 of 1
Wel, and the Nick Mastery.
So you're admitting that there's double standards for humans and animals
I mean, yes?
Three answers!
First, there is the classic option: That a lion is not an "independant moral agent". This ties to the "animal machine" theory you will find in Descartes' philosophy, which is still hugely influential in the way we deal with other species.
Second: It is unaligned to hunt down other animals, therefore there is no double standard, the question is when you hunt your own species.
Third: Role-based morality. The lion is allowed to hunt others, humans are not. Morality therefore is a set of rules, and the rules are different depending on your nature
I WAS JOKING FOR GOSH'S SAKE
Yes and I spent a non-negligeable part of my teenage years reading philosophy and I decided to make everyone else pay for it.
lmao
Have you seen the Thomas the Tank Engine book where he wonders if he's the same after having all of his parts replaced?
Yes. It's a classic "ship of Theseus" question but with the added context of the problem of identity.
So, now let's apply the three answers to D&D and see how they hold up!
Slowly leaves
The first: The lion is unaligned no matter how much it kills because the lion is not an independant moral agent. I would say this doesn't work in D&D. D&D often presents the idea that fiends have "no choice" but to be evil. But if they have no choice, they are not independant moral agents, therefore should also be unaligned.
Fiends are naturally/inherently evil
Lions are just hunting for food
Yes. Since fiends are evil "inherently", they are not independant moral agents, yet they are evil. This disproves the moral agency theory.
I am sure if you raised a kid devil, good. He could be a good fiend
So lions are not unaligned because they lack moral agency. If that were the case, fiends would also be unaligned.
Here's a riddle
You are forced to go into one of three doors. In the first door is a killer. In the second door are two VERY hungry lions. In the third door is a fire. Which door do you go into to survive?
Fiends have agency, they're just evil
The frouth one
the second. lions are likely dead
If they have no choice than to commit evil, they have no agency.
Dead creatures are not hungry.
Wait a day to answer, and then pick the fire. It'll be out by then
Dead creatures are dead.
You open the door and see one well fed lion
this riddle has been re-worded.. but the idea is the lions are dead.
Can you revive an undead?
BlastMaster said "two very hungry lions", they are therefore alive in this riddle.
IT WAS THE LIONS
ONE OF THE LIONS ATE THE OTHER
Just wait a week and they will be dead already
You'll be dead too
Not if you have food
You're trapped in a room
I mean very hungry lions are still gonna be weak from hunger
You probably would have brought food in with you in your satchel
By that logic the killer can die too
Open door 1 and 2
Can we stop arguing?
The answer was that lion 1 ate lion 2 and isn't hungry anymore
Open all three doors and just accept your fate
Lions don't have to be hungry to attack you
They don't have a motive to hunt you down
Nope, too late now, we're discussing lions.
You’re the one who posed the question
If you just seem un threatening, they won’t attack you
And... ?
So just do animal handling
Also, not arguing so much as suggesting more and more absurd (but plausible?) suggestions
I'd take a strong human killer over two weakened lions any day
Is this door an approved fire door? How long till the fire breaks through?
I feel like it's my duty to evacuate the other doors.
Smart
Did the riddle say it was a human killer?
Fun fact: A monk can have up to 20 AC
Wait, what stores do you have? Can you like do something to the lions to like stopped them temporarily
He's a human yes
Fun fact it takes a long time for a monk to get 20 AC
The strongest human in the world is still weaker than a weak lion. Nevermind two weak lions.
If it’s a cleric, and they have a trans small, they can command the lions to back off
Only like two ASI's if you get lucky with the rolls
Neat, he can join the team to evacuate the last surviving lion and then find justice for the eaten one.
Exactly. A hungry lion no matter how weak will rip off an Olympic bodybuilders head in 2 seconds
Open door 1, back up a little, cast Fireball, then move on once the killer is dead
Smart
If you have the command spell, you can just make the lines back off or just leave
Ah I see the solution is make all doors have fire behind them.
How do we get out? >.>
Chat, there are two skeletons guarding two doors. One skeleton tells the truth and the other lies. One of the doors leads to instant death if you open and you can ask exactly one question to either skeleton. What do you do?
Actually, now that I think of it, the riddle has nothing to do with getting out, just surviving.
So… don’t open any of the doors
Also you don't know which is which
I put a mark on one of the doors and I asked one of the skeletons if the mark on the door is the right one or something like that
The classic answer is Ask one what the other would say if aske 'Is this door safe to go through'
That's correct
So clearly Elgate is on to your riddles, let's move on
But I'd just roll for Charisma to make one of them open its door
You've pointed at door X.
If you ask the liar what the honest one would say, the liar will say Y.
If you ask the honest one what the liar would say, the honest one will say Y.
So you know it's gotta be X.
Oh yeah, you can just ask one of them to go through the door
Nah just ask them "Are you two friends?"
Granted, you run out of questions
But then they beat each other to death
what kind of Charisma roll are you going to use against an undead?
I suddenly feel like rewatching Labyrinth
They both confusingly answer 'No'
I have a question can you revive an undead creature?
One of them looks at the other with despair
Depends on the undead creature you’re trying to roll against
Well we are talking about skeletons
Actually more like
Player: "Are you two friends?"
Skeleton 1: "No 🙄 "
Skeleton 2: Yes 😃 "
Skeletons are generally unintelligent, so there’s not much talking you can do
Hello everyone
Also, the CHA skill you might want to roll depends on how your character might want to approach that interaction.
Rule wise, if slain, some undead creatures can be brought back as their original living existence (an zombie as a human). Some undead say they cannot be, even if slain.
Lore wise, most don't have souls. Without a soul, they cannot be raised, even if the rules don't expressly rule it out. But then... the original being might have a soul.
So, depends on the undead.
Thx
So we randomly attacked her grandma in my Dnd session and apparently she has a flight distance of 80 feet pulse breath, claws and tail. Anyone have an idea of a creature that can look human but be like this.
Nope. Gonna have to try and figure it out in your game
Could be a homebrew creature. We wouldn’t know
Oh no, it’s a new GM so it’s definitely not home bro he used a preset
If you don’t mind me asking, why do you want to know what this creature is?
Most likely so they can defend against it
I want to know because I’m interested and also I wanna know if they’re dragons so I have so if I have a vantage on rizzing them up
I already tried. I rolled a 17 but it didn’t work somehow.
That’s what I’m assuming, but I just wanna make sure cuz I’m not gonna be the one to help them metagame
I only care about being funny and chaos in Dnd
Does anybody have an idea of what it could be? I really wanna know if I have an advantage on charismaing the grandma
I recommend just playing your campaign and not asking random strangers online for help on how to get a leg up
I want a rizz up the grandma because it’s funny
Then try it in your game
We don’t know what you’re up against, or what parameters your DM may or may not be setting for you
It isn’t an enemy we just randomly attacked it for some reason it wasn’t my original idea
It kind of slaughtered everyone
Then you may have to deal with the consequences of the party’s actions I guess
Yeah, we had to restart from before we attacked the grandma
Either way, nothing we can really do to help with what’s happening at your table
I’m just trying to figure out what race the grandma is
You and your party are just gonna have to figure it out on your own. We’re not playing in your campaign
yall ever just make characters for fun?
I'm not sure if it's okay to ask/if this is the right channel but is anyone running a game tonight over VC I can listen in on? I'm very very new to dnd and just want to get the gist of how turns are structured especially for combat.
YES
I literally just open roll 20 and see what fun combos i can make
I’d recommend checking out the #looking-for-players channel. This server isn’t designed to look for last-minute campaigns to join or listen into.
Yo, can I run an idea I made by you?
yeah whats up?
Yo, so interesting idea range artificer with a metal bat and they use like steel balls that they shoot but instead of leveling up normally the bat is sentient and takes half of their XP and the bat changes and become stronger every level up they get
oh I was thinking of just listening in rather than playing? So even if a game is at max players I'd just be lurking 😅
thats actually insane 😂
I know right you’d have to work with a DM a lot to make it happen but it’s a cool idea right I think like a half orc so they have more like strength
Either way, this is a server with like… 61k+ people in it. And in my experience, not a lot of people want a stranger just listening into their campaign at the last minute. That being said, there are plenty of actual plays online that you might wanna check out if you just want to get an idea of the flow of the game!
Oh, I suppose I didn't think of it like that
Random question, I made a fun custom character sheet, which channel would I post it in?
#dnd-arts-and-crafts I would think
I have a question why is there multiple discussion channels the character channel?
There’s a character channel
why is there multiple discussion channels the character channel?
okay thanks!
edit: nvm no attachments there
I was talking to someone, but I forgot to like separate it
there's multiple discussion channels because this server has almost 300,000 members so discussion needs to get broken into groups
Huh what are the channels are pretty active that was surprising me to be honest
To be honest, I have no idea. I basically only check this channel. Every time I've used another channel, I was joining into an ongoing conversation tho
I had a player who had to miss a session bc she was sick, but I'm trying to brainstorm some one-session single-player mission for her to explain what her character is up to that would separate her from the party until our next full session. She's playing a Wizard/Warlock and will be going for a Bladesinger build, and the setting is the Ravaged Beach in Baldur's Gate 3 (it's a BG3 campaign with my own tweaks) with the goal of getting her to sneak past the bandits at the Overgrown Ruins and sneak into the crypt to meet the party next session when they break into the crypt with the bandits she will be sneaking past (they're friends now :DD)
Does anyone have any advice to make such a one-player session interesting? I've thought about having some kind of backstory flashback that could tie into it, but I'm trying to figure out how I should configure this before I add the backstory stuff
To make it interesting yeah you definitely should add like a little bit of backstory or some interesting characters or events
I only make characters when they have a purpose
Boo
Fair
Like three seconds after you said it btw
There is always the option of her letting another player play her character, if she trusts them I guess. Another method is holding the player in your "pocket", which means they can be filled in what has been going on and where everyone is, but likely not get any XP or anything.
Hey, what’s the channel for trying to find a Dnd?
As a Player or DM?
Player
I'd make this solo adventure involve an NPC, preferably one that will return in the future.
#find-a-game but if you're super new, I'd hit up #learn-to-play first and then #dnd-newcomers for questions about how to play
I’m a bit experienced
It's only gonna be for one session, it's gonna be more like a mission than an adventure
Thats the same thing. Adventures are just a series of encounters. A mission would also just be a series of encounters. Regardless, I'd make it involve some NPC that can be called upon in the future for help, answers, or loot.
Valid
Gotta run a one shot tonight
Nice
Getting those pre-session "I don't wanna run" feelings like usual.
turns out it's 2 more weeks, not 1, until I get to try D&D for the first time :<
Damn
Sad
wait, we're allowed to curse here?
kinda
I mean, obviously not the F word
Well I've cast many curses while playing D&D.
Upon rolling a natural 1, I assume?
No, with spells.
Not really, but occasional light cursing isn't really condemned I don't believe.
you're no fun ;P
guys i have dnd later tonight and im the healer and we are fighting a boss we are out of potions and im running low on spell slots
are we cooked
Might be.
Probably
wtf is that avatar lol
The best part about dnd is that when you think you're screwed, something miraculous can happen.
I'm gonna guess a slothweasel
Like the boss constantly rolling too low to hit.
my friend made it for me in photoshop and tried to make it intentionally bad
A slothweasel. Obviously.
I think it’s a weasel eith a sloth head photoshopped
yes
I’m a tressym so I can’t judge lol
I noticed, and I think that makes it funnier
infinitely better than AI slop
i agree
PREACH!!!!!
The slothweasel has creative integrity
thank you fellow cleric
Hello, friends
In a game fighting two aspects of a Deity and we're kicking their asses
Yes! A fellow cleric appreciator!
i wish thats what was happening in my campaign
I don't wanna run my one shot tonight
so many people seem like they have time to chat while they're playing, I think I'm usualy too locked in to do that
One shots and me have a bad history.
I'm running session zero of Dragon Heist tonight, looking forward to it
We're fight a Lich, a Dracolich, a Scale lord and an Adult White Dragon
at the same time? RIP
at once?
Yup, we're destroying them lol
Last one shot I ran had a tpk on the first encounter
they must be nerfed as hell
Ahh is Tiamat your party leadeR?
Cause two of the PCs were useless
I almost TPKd my party with that Uni the Unicorn one shot haha
I almost accidentally TPK my party due to a fire snake
Mine was with Bandits
Surprisingly, no, we're just built different
They had a Strength Rogue with no finesse weapon on.
And a Cleric with 8 wisdom.
its AoE fire damage when ur next to is not fun when u have a lvl 1 barbarian, rouge, and paladin all next to it
they have several artifacts
You have no reason not to lol
Come to think of it, I've never ran a one shot that didn't have at least one troll PC
Also uhhhh, what's some good animals for wildshape?
Like I've had 2 tpks in one shots cause of troll pcs
im runnin a druid, whats the 4 yall druids keep on standby?
wall of force trapping the dracolich was a huge cut in dpr lmao
Depends on the druid but I like to have one main combat form, then rest be some kind of utility or stealth
Yup!
We planned it a week before the fight since we knew what we were up against
Rn I have Giant Wolf Spider, Wolf, Elk, and Crab
Like if I'm in an urban focused campaign, having a regular cat wildshape would be good for stealth cause whose gonna care about some stray cat enough to investigate it. They might wanna pet ya or shoo you off.
Gonna try and be a fun one shot tho
Honestly havent used the Wolf yet, Wolf Spider and Elk are goated
It's mostly gonna be a combat gaunlet
Why would a god of blood want even more blood
Cause there's never enough
More blood is always good
that's why i don't like Bhaal, all edgy and greedy af.
U Will never see ma boy Oghma wantin blood mate
Bhaal isn't just about blood.
It's about the beauty and art of a slaughter. The exquisite destruction of innocent life.
And a lot of blood accompanying it.
blood for the blood god
I wish dnd had more offical animal stats, have to find more homebrew ones
I don't get the other part, Why a throne of bones? How could a throne made of bones be comfortable?
Bhaals more about meaningful murder than just killing for the sake of killing.
Serial killer over mass murderer.
i mean bhaal's a god right? he can do whatever he wants
Nuh uh, Ao could beat his arse if he gets too silly
FR God's have rules they have to abide by
It's why the Dead Three always have their cults doing stuff.
Cause they can't directly do the stuff they want.
Even if not Ao, if Bhaal kills a cool enough bard. he's cooked
The most infamous god who actually did what he wanted to do is in prison.
Bhaal is not a god god, maybe half god?. Like that one Lich queen from the Giths
vlaakith?
Nah he's a deity
Demi-god?. Forgot the term
Vlaakith is a lich posing as a god moreso.
Ye but gifted power and shi
Ye
Gifted power or no, Bhaal is still a demigod rn
Clearly the Archfey solo
Vlaakith is more "I wanna be a god and it's not like anybody can tell me I'm not so I'm gonna call myself one."
Honestly i only like Oghma and Gond
The only gods worth being devoted to
(and the coolest ones)
the rest are just meh
Selune and Eilistraee for me
Same
Elistraee is cool as hell
Lathander and Helm are cool
Alley
Bahamut is a chill guy
Kelemvor is Neat
The Doombringer fought aside my War Cleric (Reflavoured self-simulacrum by the dm so i'm a bit biased)
Draconic Resilience Dragonborn Sorcerer just makes sense
Fizban is really cool
Pretty solid ngl
They're both pretty genuine by FR god standards which is why I like them
Nobody and nothing is worth being devoted to. Devotion is the denial of the self, it is the worst possible crime and all who are devout should be fed to the abyss.
Fizban and Bahamut are the same individual, of course he's cool
BTW, I'm not a fiend.
Selune wants you to choose your life so if you choose to not worship her anymore she's just like "Based."
Where as a lot of other "non-evil" FR gods would wanna smite you and might "nudge" one of their people to punish you
Yeah but if u go whit Oghma and u a cool guy he helps u and shi, Fortune favors the bard
😔🙏
That's why the bard never dies mate. Someone has to tell the story
Ah then you plan on getting his favours, milking him for all his worth, earn his trust and betray him? That is acceptable.
Faking devotion for the holy purpose of betrayal and killing is permissable.
And Eilistraee doesn't approve of inequality in her worshippers and actively tries to help former lolthites reconnect with themselves and learn to see each other as equals which is what she wants
A running theme being I like Gods that practice what they preach
is this including the devotion to a significant other?
Every other is significant. They are all rivals that you must crush to survive.
And yes, you should see everything that exists as your equal. That way you will neither underestimate nor overestimate them and be ready to destroy them
"BTW, I'm not a fiend."
-Incubus
LMAO
im sorry im new to the server (not dnd) and am a little anxious about finding the right channels for stuff (theres so much) and when i do find the right channel, im unsure if it really is right even after reading the descriptions. where can i ask these kind of questions? ><
Sounds like something a fiend would say 🤔
You can ask questions anywhere, there are specific channels for certain things, but if you're unsure you can just ask where to go in general
Tasha
where is the general? o.o
This chat
oooh
hat and staff length is important as well
Elminster is THE Elminster and he has a cool wizard beard
Idk abt the hat
The staff is important, a real cool wizard aint usin a little wand
in the sense that wizards don’t need hats, or that hats don’t need to be long?
very true
That wizards don't need hats
hmm, I agree, but I’d also say that IF they have a hat it must not be small
but if they do have them, they have to be long. Idk why. They just HAVE to be slightly pointed and long
u know ur stuff mate
u as well
Is there supposed to be a recommended limit on how many spells you can use in a battle?
isn’t that just spell slots?
Probably best not to use all your spell slots on the first encounter of the day
Oh in my last campaign (which is one of my first ones) the spell slots were a bit inconsistent to what I have played
So perhaps it was the DM being nice to me
Not a set recommendation though, some fights are harder and need more some are easier and use less
Spell slots are pretty easy to keep track of consitently. Write down how many you have at your current level, mark them off as you use spells, refresh after long rest (warlocks not included)
it can also depend on party comp, like if you got a fighter and barbarian drawing aggro and cleaning house, it’ll be easier to hold on to your slots until the best moments present themself
not really, but it mostly depends on how many fights you get between long rests
Dammit i miss having dnd sessions
Quick question, what's the power level of each DnD level? Like how much damage does a PC output on average, and on high bursts? I'm running a homebrew campaign, so I'm not sure how much damage a PC and an enemy should output, and what is too weak/strong at their level.
depends on class and how the people play (high vs low opt)
also often what makes a party/ certain classes "strong" is not necessarily dpr, but control of the battlefield
you can deal as much damage as you want if your enemey cannot move anymore and u just have to wait for them to die to AOE or if they just cant hit you, ever
also theres a bunch of rules stuff that e.g. lets u onehit whatever you want at lvl 1 with the right combination RAW
i'm planning on having them start at level 5, but i'm not sure how much damage enemies should be able to deal in 1 round, without any cheese.
Like is an enemy dealing 2d10 dmg with a spammable attack (once per round) bad?
This is always a kind of complicated question because it depends on a lot of things. A monster’s challenge rating is supposed to help you figure that out but it’s very finnicky
^ they're starting at level 5
What kind of attack?
Spell/ forced ST? Martial attack?
there are 4-5 PCs too, so I'm kinda in a dilemma
My friend's Paladin's way of healing is via Magic Initiate Healing Word
I can already imagine the chaos over the party members each begging the Paladin to use his one Cleric spell slot to heal them
it's a martial attack, technically. It's a Glaive one of the mini-bosses uses.
If its a boss just utilise lair actions
...Paladin has Lay on Hands
I know
That's one way to describe touch spells
Wait a minute, Magic Initiate also lets you learn Eldritch Blast?
That's the Warlock version
Oh wait you're talking about Paladin's non-spell ability, right?
That still is quite strong
Even without Invocations, that's very strong. Only really countered by a nova type of campaign
2014 only iirc but yes
Eldritch Blast isn't that good. It's definitely strong, but most of the value of it comes from the great support EIs give it. On it's own, it's good but not game breaking
Eldritch blast is goated wym
Whew, survived the fight against a lich and a dracolich.
I literally can't pick Eldritch Blast, only Cleric spells
and then surviving against another fight with vampire dragon
Scary ngl
Then you get to fight a dragon god
Vampire Dragon? The White dragon was a vampire?
Nah, Malzeno is
Oh, we're still in the middle of that one.
I think the worst enemy my DM has ever made me fight is a red Pyrohydra with an Ogrillon warlord warlock mounted on it.
and his army and shi
Does anyone know of any beginner oneshots?
Matt Colvile's Delian Tomb
Could a Dwarf Monk work?
All species work with all classes. So yes.
How do I find a server to play d&d
Visit #find-a-game for everything you need to start your search, including:
- Instructions for finding a game here on the server (including how to post in our #looking-for channels).
- Suggestions for finding a game outside of this server.
- Basic advice to help you in your hunt.
My idea was that he stopped enjoying alcohol and became a monk
A dwarf who doesn't enjoy alcohol?
He drank for 70 years
Ahh epic session today at the shop, 7 pc deaths
sorry how many?!
7 pc deaths, but ... not a tpk?
Thats gotta be either a TPK or a double tap
Bravo, sir!
Remind them why they should fear the dice!
Vengeance Paladin is a Berserker Barbarian in a holy trench coat
5 players, 7 deaths, not a tpk
damn, two people got double tapped?
How do you guys feel about vulnerabilities/resistances as a system? I was thinking about giving the party an “Armorslayer Rondel” type dagger that allowed them to deal more damage to foes wearing armor.
Does it get a boost on rolls to hit?
I’m trying to implement how it does more damage. I could give it extra dice, a bigger dice size, advantage, or treat targets as vulnerable. But overall I’m curious about your guys opinions
I like the system ngl
I find it weird how there are so few vulnerabilities
I do prefer subtraction as the main form of damage reduction like in 3e, but its implementation there was confusing and a nuisance to manage. 5e's system is much less of a headache.
What if there was a resistance system that scaled with pb? Would that be better than just a flat 50%?
Like reduce (element) by 3xpb
pb?
Proficiency Bonus
Sounds like too much math for a hobby that is comprised of people that are bad at math
Dice size reduction would be cool but grindy.
I figure if you want more ways to avoid and negate damage, you should just start applying Damage Threshhold to more than objects
Negligible damage goes away, so monsters would survive longer
Or use an entirely different injury system like WoD 20th edition or daggerheart
That feels like far more trouble than is worth
My main point is if you're going to start trying to emulate other systems, perhaps just use those other systems. 5e isn't the only system that exists.
Are u sure abt dat mate?
cuz that's not just a dice, u start whit one and end up whit 200 of different themes, colors and for different points in the session
😔🙏
had an idea for a house rule, wanting opinions on it
Leveled spells can be cast even when completely out of spell slots, but at risk of taking levels of exhaustion - casters have to make a Con save to avoid the exhaustion, with the DC starting at 14, and going up by one for each spell level above first
Funny because I just got my first dice set yesterday
I'm gonna get a treasure chest and fill it with dice
I mean, casters are already pretty strong and balanced by limited resource of spell slots, what's the goal you're hoping to meet with this rule?
Also #homebrew is likely more appropriate place to ask
i wouldnt, if i had that id just take resilience con asap and bam, easy con saves
or theres just starting in a class with con proficiency already and doing the rest in wizard
mayhaps have it so that the exhaustion incurred is equal to the spell level?
i would be much more sever, i'd probably say casters could do it but they automatically incur a level of exhaustion equal to to the spell level, it should really reaaaaalllly be for emergencies only and sometimes that emergency is a shield spell or a misty step, and it limits them from using higher level spells to do so
so no roll, just exhaustion immediately
yep. desperate measures.
Oh damn, no wonder why everyone hates Drows. they are freaky af
I had never stopped to read the lore of the Drow before
Drow 'lore' is filled with propaganda
Wym
Ba dum tss
A lot of 'lore' is told from an in-universe perspective and isn't the 100% definitive truth about any given thing.
That'd be specifically Lolthite Drow usually from Menzoberranzen.
That damn name sounds so badass idk why, Menzoberranzen
Meh, i don't like any type of elves anyway
I would never take any lore that's published as anything more than a story being told. It's possible it contains some truth, but it's unlikely entirely true.
Every dnd species that aren't humans are just humans wearing elaborate costumes.
what abt kobolds or hog goblins?
Seeing as the game is made by humans that only have the perspective of being humans and of human history to refer to.
I'm not talking about humanoids. I'm saying everything is just a human.
Coolest race in dnd?
Because that's the only point of reference the designers actually have lol
Tieflings
Solid
And tressyms ofc
I like Ogrillions
Anyone know where you can find the Legend of Drizzt Dark Elf Trilogy in paperback for cheap? I’d prefer used. My library only has 1 ebook copy available.
the Race of Eight Winds in Sharn is pretty cool 😛
My favorite species is Warforged due to their super cool Eberron writing.
#mygargoyle
hi
Pretty bloody solid
Good taste ngl. I didn't even know those races existed.
Changelings
Gingerbread men are constructs, so
also Flesh golems.
I've seen a calzone statted out as a construct, too.
flesh golems are constructs so...
Ahh, Good Ol' Flesh Golems, love em
Do you know...The Muffin Man?
You don’t know me but I know you
Nice to meet you all. Long time player new DM.
If you are a Tabaxi monk how do the cat claws still use your strength modifier??
Yes
Alright 👍
Wolverine Claws
Thanks for that
Most things that allow you to attack with apart of your body isn’t counted as an unarmed strike since it’s a “natural weapon”
Is there a frog species in DnD you can play as
The grung
Can you punch someone with your tongue hard enough they die
I just didn’t know if it would technically be converted to a “monk weapon” as the first line states “you can use your claws and to make unarmed strikes” and unarmed strikes are literally the monk thing
My dm just told me that i can't be a warlock highland cow in the next session. I'm devastated
Thinking about that time we attacked a bush, then moved on, only to be ambushed by enemies from bushes (we punched the only bush that didn't have an enemy in it)
Those darn Treants and their shenanigans
😔🙏
I mean anybody can unarmed strike it’s just monks can use there dex and marital arts dice instead of flat strength
These people killing my creativity.
What is that
A cow?
like the strange cow in bg3, the one that talks and shi
How would you speak common
Oh I know that but I was just curious on the the wording with the tabaxi claws thing that’s all. I am looking at joining a second table on the off weeks of my standard campaign so looking at characters to make and yea idk I am just flinging ideas in my head at the moment
Moooooo
Tabaxi cat claws are Unarmed Strikes so they would be affected by the Monk's Martial Arts feature
untill someone casts speek to animals
Tasha said no
Yeah but then you’d be a “beast” and that’s a whole other can of worms
Also giving the DM a harder job to make a custom species for you to play as so close to the campaign
😔
I’m thinking of volo’s probably
You could play a Minotaur, that's sort of like a cow
I told him we could use the minotaur stats and shi, like. ye
...
I suppose you could somehow, be the child of a Cow Headed Minotaur and a Cow Legged Centaur and be a biological cow
YEAHHHH
people can say whatever
And have a sister that's just a regular human
I mean, if you use that argument, you might be able to convince him
But Tasha is smart
smart people can say whatever as well
Idk 🤷♂️ Tasha wrote a whole book
I still hate that dnd removed the term natural weapons
Why not a centaur? Run centaur stats, it absolutely can roll as a "cow".
Nah what Natural Weapons were an absolute headache to figure out
It’s any attack that uses the body for a monster
That was the idea
It was pretty simple
That sounds fine then.
Hey all not sure what channel to ask in. What are people's thoughts on Blackrazor? Just received it but while im attuned i no longer heal from short or long rests
a warlock cow, how can that be any more peak?
I'd let someone roll a centaur as a sentient cow if they wanted to. But it'd be harder doing almost anything adventurey.
Seems like its useless with the houserule
My only question is what is this cows patron
I feel like an Archfey would absolutely take in a sentient cow. That sounds like such a fey thing to do.
a fiend (Minotaur)
That’s extremely detrimental
It’s fine I was just brainstorming anyway it’s not a big deal I was just curious if I went with tabaxi for a monk if it would work with the martial die and rather than using strength mod I could use Dex mod and that cause then I would have bludgeoning and slashing damage in just unarmed strikes.
But I cannot do that so it’s all Gucci
No wait, Archfey, Fiend, and something else are all fighting for this cow's patronage
🤣 Everyone wants a piece of this cow
Cerunnos would make sense
No you probably can
Yum
I’m so lazy some days
And the cow ends up with shared custody between patrons.
Thats what I was thinking. Unfortunately just gonna go back to my +2 greataxe
But the black razor weapon is very powerful through
Wrapping ur mind around the fantasy of a Natural Weapon wasn't the hard part. It only makes sense that stuff like sharp teeth or claws or talons would give you a weapon. The confusing bit is... literally every other interaction with it. "Does it work with Divine Smite? Does it count as an Unarmed Strike?" were only answered in SAC. How the system interacted with Natural Weapons was always super questionable.
Yes it does work with divine smite since it’s well a wepaon
I think 5e is stronger for having gotten rid of Natural Weapons
Sage advice confirmed this in 2014
I feel like you missed the forest for the trees
Y'all I think my Westmarch staff are purposefully spiting me at this point.
I bought Exploring Eberron, I've expressed interest in using things in it and I wanted it approved. They said it shouldn't be too long.
It's been two weeks and they just announced a totally different book that no one was using or asking to use anything in it just got approved.
Also yes some natural weapons were unarmed strikes while others weren’t
Chat, I have a question, in Avernus all food created there is said to taste bad, but would it ring true if you cooked a Minotaur or Kobold to death there?
Yeah any and all food taste bad unless stated otherwise
Well any and all food that was created IN Avernus tastes bad
So
A cow that is the offspring of a cow-headed centaur and a minotaur. who is also a warlock, with shared custody between Patrons because What patron wouldn't want a cow as his warlock?.
I guess if someone tries to eat it, it'd just taste bad. Yeah. I don't think you can loophole it.
I’m assuming if you bring in food it also taste bad as well
But if they were born out of Avernus, would they still technically be "created" In Avernus
By cooking the food, you're "making" food.
I think I'm missing something
Create food and water is indeed a spell
When I'm cooking a steak over a fire. I'm making myself a steak.
So if you reheat a soup, are you making soup?
No, rations brought in from outside tastes the same iirc
We're talking about cooking something fresh (a minotaur for example). That's making food.
Alright then, what if you eat the Minotaur without cooking it
all food and drink typically becomes foul, tasting like ash or rot
Decent into avernus 5e
Through you can still eat it
If the wording itself says 'making food', then I'd say eating it raw wouldn't taste bad (if you originally like raw minotaur).
It depends entirely on the wording and dm interpretation
The food doesn’t lose its nutritional properties it only taste like ash now
Well, gotta cast Calm Emotions whenever I eat now
I think purify food and water would work better
We don't have a cleric
You went to hell without a cleric?
Cows can't eat meat right?
Ever seen a cow eat a snake?
I would say bless your soul but
We had two, both quit
One quit because of the language barrier, the other one thought we were gonna be playing evil characters and left
THEY DO THAT?
Most herbivores do actually occasionally eat meat, believe it or not
I need to update my knowledge about cows
Plants make up most of their diet, but it still happens
Animals aren't picky on food
Parrots are.
Yup, I've seen a video of a deer eating a dead bird
Have you ever tried to get a budgie to eat pellets after they've been fed seeds all their life?
Koalas
They don't like their schedule being messed up
Respectfully don't, I hate Koalas with all of my life
Alpacas have lips that allow them to pick out the "nice hay" from the crappy hay.
They are kinda scary innit?. Those claws
The same goes for sloths.
They aren't scary, they're disgusting
Whyyyy
You’ll see
Explain
You need to update your animal knowledge, holy moly
ye kinda
Just look it up before we delve into more out of topic things
According to Challenge rating a dozen Shadows are considered a smaller threat compared to one Hippo.
Not how CR works
If you think Koalas are scary wait til you hear about Dropbears
Its based on being a solo monster for one thing
My DM wanted to put the Sword Of Summoning Ducks in the loot pool of this run, if ma cow gets that it's gonna be peak
(Ye cows have no arms but the mouth can hold a sword right??)
This is why cr is stupid
It does exactly what it says it does quite well
You just get a lot of situations like this where people want it to/think it does something different
A level party with no magic items should be able to take on said creature
Oh god...
With somewhat of a challenge
A party of 4 taking on a single monster of a CR equivalent to their level should have an easy-medium (aka no risk of death) encounter
And CR does do that
I never thought about this, do ducks even exist in dnd?
No
Just again ^
Actually kinda
FR????
There’s a duck with 3 heads stat block
Expecting CR = level to be any sort of meaningful challenge is another common misconception
They exist in many settings yes
They just don't have a specific statblock iirc
How are players supposed to take on cr 21-30
Not sure what that has to do with the thing I said?
I need to check my bestiary ASAP.
The maximum player level is 20 correct
And?
We have giant space hamsters, but no ducks?
A party of 4 taking on a single monster of an equal CR will have a mathematically easy encounter which in practice generally means, an encounter that will be over in 20 seconds
It doesnt make this any less true.
A monster of a CR over party level will be more difficult
So does that mean most if all further cr will be harder and it deadly
Players at all levels can take on creatures of a slightly higher CR than their levels in single combat. The higher level they get, the further ahead in CR they can take on
I ran a game for some level 16s who took on a CR 23 and a CR 26 with significant difficulty, but ultimately won
What
Anyway yea. CR does exactly what it says it does. People just want it to do something different
I dont know what happened there but i was just gonna explain what elephant is saying
Players can take on a higher CR than they have in levels.
CR is a guideline anyways, it provides a general estimation of difficulty but isn’t itself anything remotely resembling a rule
Or rather, if you use it as a strict rule you’re using it wrong
Mhm. Its a guideline that does what it says.
I’m still wondering what dnd was smoking when they decided to make Szass a cr 30
Well, thats AL so its not really an official thing
It was printed and made by wizards
And yet
The creators took a canonically strong character, and made a canonically strong stat block
He’s meant to be a challenge for level 20s
Yet vecna got shafted..
AL stuff is designed for the extremely non standard (to the rules) style of play of AL
Made by different people what can I say
There's a reason a lot of RAW stuff is straight up changed in the AL ruleset
AL is also a different offshoot of DnD too yeah
(That being its not the official rules. It is its own thing)
They did give Tiamat a similar ability
It’s not official published adventure material
Also the death of Szass gave us the Demi lich and death knights as well
Death Knights and Demiliches are both printed in at the very least the 2014 monster manual
And I imagine they were around long before then
I meant a 5e conversation
2014 is 5e
I know
They existed in 5e prior to death of Szass Tam
I think I prefer the variants but those were introduce in TOA
wait so is CR additive or multiplicative? like I could see a CR 3 monster being twice as tough as a CR 2 monster, but how’s that work for like CR 21?
It’s closer to additive but it’s not quite either. It’s a vibe check, not a rule
makes sense
so how many fairly optimized level 20 players would you reasonably expect to need against a CR 30 monster?
Lots and lots of magic items
so im doing a DND campaign as we speak and my character has a special ability called "Schizophrenic Advice" where the DM rolls a number and if its above a 10 he gives me good advice and if its below a 10 he gives me bad advice but he dosent tell me what i rolled, This is because my character is basicly a nuts former mayor whos town was destroyed and the townspeople still talk to him in his ruined mind. Were on a pirate ship and the DM told me to "check the cannons" for treasure.
Like four
goddamn
That sounds fun
Like a fairly balanced "Divine Intervention"
is that a testament to how broken lvl 20 characters are, how unbalanced CR 30 is, or how broken CR is as a whole?
yeah but imagine its more akin to having spirits haunt you except these spirits are caused by your fractured mind
Holy crap... (I say as my party is planning to kill Bahamut, The Demon Lord)
Mostly the third point but also yeah DnD is designed for roughly 3-5 players, so of course the hardest challenges in the game are gonna pretty well match the average number of max level players
fairly optimized? Or unfairly optimized.
Well I mean, I guess I can see how we can kill Bahamut
Cr 100, just imagine it
Let me be clear high CR creatures are incredibly achievable battles for high level players
how long does a campaign actually need to start? my group has mostly finished their characters (4/6 finished) and my dm is gonna start working on the campaign after the characters are all done. pirate story if that matters
like, strong without intentionally trying to break systems
the CR just kind of falls off tbh
-# I'm planning to turn into a Lich
A CR 3 creatures against level 1s is more dangerous than a CR 30 against level 20 characters imo
Infinitely moreso
so how many 0 prep time goblins would be a challenge for a first level party?
how hard of a challenge
By the numbers its like 6-8. I’d shoot for more in the 4-6 range of things depending on players
Maybe like 12, Goblins have low bonuses on their "to hit"
Like, if you have a party of 3 paladins, and then two clerics as level 1s, then maybe more
+4 isn’t that bad, right?
+4 is bad
Whenever I DM I roll really bad.
okay 3 paladins changes things
Uh is this thing homebrew? It looks homebrew.
+4 is very bad
The 17 AC Paladin getting healed by their other Paladin friend and clerics
the group I’m in did a 6v6 and no one even got downed so it felt rlly one-sided
with cr 1/4 goblins? yeah that'll happen
yea, we are saying for around 4 people
dang
Three Paladins and 1 Cleric is still a tough party for goblins to even hit
for 6 players I'd aim for 8-10 goblins but in actually I'd go for 4 goblins and a goblin warrior, or maybe a wolf of some kind
so like, 2 goblins per person in a 6 person party that isn’t a rlly strong anti-goblin comp?
There's no "anti goblin comp" But, maybe
I was mostly thinking of all high AC classes, but true
it's not a maths equation where goblins = players x 2, it's just a rough estimation that you'll get better at
I'm just saying, if the party has two or three martials, with decent support, those goblins need help
fair enough
goblins will always suffer against high AC classes because that +4 is real bad
guys im at 5 hitpoints what happens when i die
Roll Death Saving Throws
how would you make goblins threatening without just putting a crap ton in a room?
well u die
When you go to 0hp, you go unconscious and start rolling death saves on each of your turns. If you get three failed death saves, then you die
Some things:
- Run slightly higher CR goblins which are more of a threat
- Put traps in the way
- Goblins are ambushers - give them cover and high ground, make it a challenge to get to them
- Goblins aren't durable. Throw a durable enemy at the players as a tank
Up to you but usually it's 3/4 cover
sacred flame save me
i mean yeah that's the idea
lowkey you could make a sick fight with this
That changes things, what type of traps
I don’t know what types of traps goblins are capable of
Well yeah - most of the fun of a combat isn't the enemies - or rather, you need something more engaging than just enemies to run fun combat
(That's why I think if you as a DM wanna improve your combat, spend some time finding better battlemaps or making your own. That alone is a huge start)
this makes me wanna make a campaign with dark souls 2 enemy design so bad now
if an aarakokra fell into a pit, how long would they fall before they realize they’re falling and stop their fall by flying?
yea true, I’ve dealt with unique enemy combos before, but it’s rare for me to go up against like, extremely intentionally designed combat areas
Aarakocra can fly at level 1.
If they fell into their pit, it'd be because their speed is 0 - so they stop falling once their speed is no longer 0. (Conditions like grappled might be reducing that speed, so it would end once they're no longer grappled, for example). Generally, you fall about 400ft each round, so if you fell into a pit because you were knocked prone, you'd fall 400ft, and then on your turn be able to "stand up", ending the falling and resuming flying.
My party is a monk, a paladin, a wizard (me), and a fighter. We are super tanky.
wtf that’s so much more feet than I was thinking, I was moreso imagining the floor just going away, like the trapped floor in return of the Jedi, so they’re not prone, they just weren’t expecting the ground to go away
I have 19AC and 39 hitpoints at level 5 as a wizard
how have you got a 19ac?
mage armor probably
Nope
Which is kinda silly. Even an elderly aarakocra with low Dex would realistically be able to stop their falling with their wings.
Just a lot of consistution, starting artificer for a shield, scale armor and taking warforged as a race.
the thing I’m wondering is how far you’d have to fall before you realize you’re falling
ah that'd do it
with or without spikes?
I still think it’s crazy that pugilist can just choose to max out a damage of an attack instead of rolling
That's before Shield the spell btw
tempted to run a giant and dragon war campaign
All fun and games till your DM starts using saving throws
Free my homie he ain’t do nun the homie in question:
Didn't you just start recruiting for like a sixth campaign
Oh that's right I add my dex modifier to my AC
shhhhh
anyways hell yeah run war campaigns they're sick settings
my campaign I run is getting into a war plotline
i mean you can use replicate for common half plate
We're playing in a feywilds campaign, there's a lot of wisdom saves for nasty conditions. I took the Lucky feat specifically for that: the 2014 one which is 3 rolls with advantage per long rest.
My wisdom saving throw is +3, not very good...
... Touché
Your about to have lots of fun
....Good luck with that
I got charmed in the first encounter because I had no idea what the saving throw was for. 💀
Hug the paladin once you hit level 6
Strength is always my dump stat
I mean the charmed conditions isn’t too strong
charmed is fine unless it's a solo monster
It's not thankfully. Neither is frightened to me. I can still do what I need to do.
charming the fighter in a solo fight is rough but hey it happens
yeah ig it wouldn’t be that far, but if you take the average human reaction time and put that against the 400 ft fallen in 6 seconds from DnD, a great trap would have you falling almost 20 feet before you notice it
It’s a mild announce until the enemy can start commanding you to do stuff
those are different spells which are either weakish or much higher level
I'm just as annoying for my DM. I basically paralyzed his Night Hag with Phantasmal Force.
No there’s a few fey that give you the charmed condo ruin along with being able to give you commands
I'm not super familiar with fey, any in particular you're thinking of?
The charmed condition is just a primer to the main ability
How do you even paralyze someone with that spell?
I remember the Dryad has an ability like that
I'm about to have max int and start building wis.
ive used it once to put a zombie beholder in a boiling closed cauldron. That worked but also the beholder was too stupid to make the check
are you about to hit lvl 8?
A few hags but that’s a bit broad
The DM is letting us take two levels for some reason. 🐟
wait what
So level 7.
oh cool
He's doing 2 instead of 1 levels
Which I'm just like "bro are you sure? that's REALLY generous."
you’re going from level 7 to 9, or 6 to 8?
5 to 7
ohh, wait so you max out int next level
Yes I'm at 19
sick
Max is 20 right?
gonna take a feat or just asi?
yea
Uh idk I have to check my progression guide and see what it recommends
yup
which feats you got so far?
You wanted to increase your wisdom right? What's that at? And also what's your con at?
There are a few things that allow you to get passed 20 but it’s only magic items and boons
BOOBS
SHHH
i sure do love my magic items and boobs. only thing keeping me going, some days
My wisdom is at 10 but I have a saving throw of +3 somehow...
That'd be proficiency in wisdom saves
I would take a feat to increase your int - fey touched would be a good choice, I think war caster also increases your int by +1?
What class are you?
that'd be from your class
I think I'm taking warcaster or a subclass feat
subclass feat?
not sure what subclass feats are but war caster is great
you get subclass features automatically as part of your level progression
Warcaster is good for the concentration BUT I don't get the benefits from not requiring somatic components because my DM doesn't really gaf about those rules
war caster is for protecting concentration
Yeeeee
war caster is the safest option, but it might be better to increase wisdom from war caster instead of int
Don’t forget about the opportunity attack spells
I'm totally forgetting about those when I play
Nothing will run from me because they will die if they get close
Or they will never get close at all.
what class are you playing again?
Subclass?
no, class
Class
Arti1/wiz4
wizard
Ah
The subclass kinda changes things
ah dang, the touched feats are a bit worse when you’re playing the class that learns everything
you mean multiclass?
No.
what even is your subclass
Chronurgist.
subclass refers to the specialization you get at a certain level. not your other class when you take more than one
Ig thats a school not a subclass but
It do change things.
for a wizard, their school is their subclass
Assuming you mean Chronurgist, School is just the wizard name for subclass
thats literally just the name for their subclasses.
Oh
Chronurgy is the school, chronurgist is the class
yknow what, take telekinetic
The somatic components thing is already quite irrelevant for wizards anyway. War caster is a great pick!
Telekinetic is also fun
Resilient Con is a lil boring but very effective for holding concentration and being better at con saves
wizards have so much bs but they don’t use their bonus action a ton, so telekinetic is something you could absolutely try and abuse
Dont abuse
it one-shot a clown using contagion holy shit
What warlock patron best represents voodoo
I’m glad to see the stick figure is alive and kicking
fiend, goo, and archfey imo
i should use a cr 20 greaser
the menaces are ready. Shake them to their core
I accept full responsibility for the pain that is to come
turns out the fiend in the bag was a greaseer
You could borrow the original concept and also let him cast chain lightning/lightning bolt/call lightning at will. You'd have greased lightning.
i feel like if im using the greaser, it has to b flammable grease
"for his action, he will cast: Flammable Grease.
then as a bonus action, he will light a torch on fire.
Genuinely the greaser having a multiattack that is effectively, the greaser casts grease and then firebolt would be very funny for a low CR enemy
Grease is a decently annoying spell
play a dhampir, reflavour a club/greatataff/maybe even warhammer or maul
Yeah but I want the same weaknesses as a vampire through even through they just might be reduced to roll play trait ig. Avoiding sunlight
ah yeah not a lot of ways to get those as a PC
talk to your DM i guess but no official content gives them iirc
I mean there is one thing but it’s very niche
Also, it's just detrimental for your party as well
-# ptsd to someone complaining about their homebrew vampire race
Aka being slain by a vampires bite attack
That doesn't make you play a vampire. That means your corpse becomes a vampire enemy to the party
I don’t think vampire should be a race
its not
It makes you a vampire spawn
its a lineage
Vampires AREN'T a "race"
even that is Dhampir which is vampire esque
Vampires are a type of undead that can be any species, as are most undead
Your not a “corpse” since you some your aliment changes as well
Under the vampire's control, so you don't play as it
You lose control of the character, roll up a new character
Spell casting vampire spawn
Vampires are still corpses
Undead have a lack of a Soul in D&D typically.
You may be living dead, but you aren't you anymore
It doesn't keep the original traits - it just becomes a vampire spawn stat block
vampire spawn isn't a species, it's a stat block.
Player Characters as Vampires
[–]
The game statistics of a player character transformed into a vampire spawn and then a vampire don't change, except that the character's Strength, Dexterity, and Constitution scores become 18 if they aren't higher. In addition, the character gains the vampire's damage resistances, darkvision, traits, and actions. Attack and damage rolls for the vampire's attacks are based on Strength.
oh, the optional dm facing thing in the 2014 mm
That's an optional rule, doesn't even exist in the 2024 rules, and not every DM will use it.
Pretty sure there’s a vampire stat block with spells
So how do I say , hello? Ig
there are - but again, stat block, not a player character sheet
yeah, a cr 15 variant of the vampire
Granted only humanoids can become vampires via bite attack
Not sure if dnd beyond changed that
Strahd
wotc didn't change it no
They’ve done a lot of questionable things in the new rules despite how decent they are
I don't know of too many questionable changes in the new rules, compared to the wealth of imo pretty great changes
Not that there's no weird changes but most are pretty good across the board
Could a creature become a lich via true polymorph
no
Liches are too high of a CR to transform into
I mean the lichen lich
Well technically yes.
cr 21-22. players only go to level 20
It’s only cr 18
They didn't ask if a player can. They asked if a creature can.
dude, its a free server, we're not obligated to answer yer question
no need to be rude
Yeah thats a big yikes
I’m asking about the lichen lich
Is that a Vaild way of becoming a lich
telling people to finish their convo later is not the best way to get your question answered
Lets just block and move on
lichen lich is what? ravnica?
There’s also the Eldritch lich
Candle keep
New type of Druid Lich
Forgotten Realms
its not in the fr books, that much i know
Candle keep mysterious?
It shows up in Candle Keep
hey
I don't see anything that says it's impossible
I was wondering if it’s possible to achieve lichdom via turning into that lich
We got spam, time for mods
oh perfect, spam, the mods will love that
My man quit spamming
I don't think anyone's gonna answer you with how you're acting lol
I would suggest asking in #dm-discussion, or maybe #dnd-newcomers, rather than here
It just sounds like people don't have what you're looking for idk what to say
no need to be unpleasant about it
Then why do you have the jack of all trades all
thats considered spam
Can someone ping a mod holy
If youre not getting a response, clearly no one has an answer
thanks mods
He’s gone
there goes that guy
Back to becoming a lich
Which class feels strongest after the 2024 update
Wait how do I use sleet storm on a group of enemies if all of my party is martials and they are super angry badgers?
monk
Wizard
I've been really enjoying 2024 monk
Monk absolutely slaughters in early game and keeps its momentum pretty well
collaborate with the martials and try to get the enemies in a place where the martials can reach while not inside it
Barbarian has always slaughtered early game and it's marginally better too
Barbarian…
Sorcerer probably
incredibly mobility, damage is very competitive now, and loads of utility
Did zealot get nerfed or
Because now it has metamagic and a ton of spells at the same time
I'm In a Waterdeep party with
A Rogue, Monk and Barbarian
The Sorcerer and I (The Cleric) are also pretty tough, but those three SLAP lol
Zealot got altered. It's level 14 isn't quite as good but the class is still great
@fossil hollow @knotty vine @limber trail Do you think Monk is finally on par with fighters and rogues and which subclass would youall pick
And con save proficency as well.
Yes and No
monk is probably the best martial of 2024
Monk definitely out paces most other maritals
Oh I could use creative placement couldn't I?
Yeah Monk still has the issue of their customization isn't great. But their class is much stronger and consistent now.
True
Zealot Barbarians can't be revived for free anymore but have a pool of self-healing and their support abilities have more uses per long rest I believe
Monk is for sure on par. Subclass is up to you with what you want. I've been enjoying kensei, I think it could use some tweaks to update it to 2024. Open hand is pretty nice, I recently played with a mercy monk that seemed to be a lot of fun too.
Monk builds aren't as wide and expansive as things like Rogue and Fighter.
your monk subclass isn't all that definitive though
I mean there level 3 ability was a little class dependent so it makes sense
Like fighter and rogue have way more control now with cunning strikes and weapon masteries.
as for subclass, im a sucker for astral self monk, redundant as it is. otherwise, im picking mercy
Aka they had to be level 5 to get any use out of it
Ohhh okay thats a big statement I did not expect Monk to climb that high honestly
I like how theres so many holy or radiant subclasses lol
I would've gone for astral self if not for the fact that it was redundant and I didn't have the right stat setup for it
It’s uh something alright
people love putting the fear of the gods into their enemies
The players are meant to be heroes so makes sense.
Is it mostly because of the new focus mechanics and scaling or does it just feel smoother to play overall and which subclass do you think benefits the most from the 2024 update?
My favorite subclasses are:
Mercy Monk
Bladesinger Wizard
War Cleric
Great Old One Warlock
Wildfire Druid
Thief Rogue
And
Berserker Barbarian :>
Definitely monk
yes and yes
Monk had the biggest glow up of 2024
Monk has a buttery smooth gameplay loop, tons of combat options, and it's way more powerful now that it has better damage
Especially considering it’s subclasses
I had a Minotaur Berserker Barbarian once upon a time and he commonly smashed through solid stone walls if he thought they were in his way lol
oh aright well now I am curious what makes it definitely Monk for you Is it the mobility the damage scaling or just how smooth it feels now in 2024
Dosent warlock have one too?
Monk is also extremely hard to put down permanently
All three of those things are factors
He actually collapsed a building on himself once..
But he was fine lol
Monk can play around with feats more than 2014 now too. Since backgrounds give feats, and all feats (except origin feats) give an ASI.
by the way how long have you been playing?
They buffed monks defense so much
Since 2e
Oh yeah Deflect Missiles got updated the Deflect Attack
Thats actually wild considering how people used to complain about Monk before
I’ve made so many monk characters my friend called me a “crazed fister”
yeah wotc did a lot of work improving it in 2024
Monk honestly was never the worst class, it just had a really weak early game
yeah
True
you had to wait for level 14 for a decent base clas feature
Monks could always beat the breaks off of someone, but starting off with a d4 was just... blehh...
omg thats insane by the way what was dnd like back then compared to now?
Yeah Monk has always been good. All of D&D’s classes are good.
hii
I still refuse to believe that gloom stalker came from the same book as sun soul
is this the right channel to ask everyone their favorite campaign settings
Pretty sure because it didn’t
trying to familiarize myself w/ the worlds of d&d before dipping my toes into actual gameplay haha
They both came from Xanther’s guide
Haha yeah I can see that so whats one thing from 2e you wish they kept in the current edition?
Sun Soul was from a different book then reprinted in Xanathar’s
technically mtg, but theros. otherwise its dragonlance
That doesn't mean they were from the same book lol
Storm Sorcerer, Sun Soul, Bladesinger, and I think Swashbuckler are all from SCAG.
Oh, I misread, I thought you said they came before Xanathars
