#dnd-discussion
1 messages Ā· Page 210 of 1
man i'm having a real hard time picking what level 2 spell to get
1 for damage, 1 for utility
i'm choosing a singular spell
do you have damage covered by level 1 spells?
well for damage i have thunderwave (level 1) and then fire bolt (cantrip)
and utility options? crowd control options?
do you just want the list of my spells and cantrips?
message fire bolt spare the dying blade ward minor illusion
cure wounds healing word silvery barbs thunderwave
nothing really for cc in that bag
thunderwave
Yk ive always liked being a bit of mix with martial and spellcasters, i think valor bard will fit me fine
Web, Misty Step, Flaming Sphere, Scorching Ray, Shatter, and Suggestion are all at least decent
is aganazzar's scorcher good
shatter is kinda meh though, but it's an aoe at second level so 
it's fine 
flaming sphere stops moving when you bump someone 
they really don't like printing good AoE/durration damage spells at 2nd level XD
What class?
sorcerer IIRC
Oh
sorcerer divine soul 2014 rules
so should i go for flaming sphere?
Scorcher or sphere, sphere is nice because it gives you something to do with your bonus action, and has at least a small AoE on it
yeah i guess i'll go for that then, thank you!
Web, Phantasmal Force or Suggestion
Is this 2024 too btw?
true ,Phantasmal Force can be pretty nice 
2014 rules
the one time so far my GOOlock has cast it, it ate a legendary resistance 
Nvm Suggestion then
yeah but my only damage spells are thunderwave and firebolt
aah, 14, you gotta specify that 
i did, twice
I didnt see q_q
so still go for flaming sphere?
yeah, phantasmal force is bad in 2014 sadly, but flaming sphere didn't change all that much
hey ppl
hi
yo
probably because you build them good?
They're about to meet their fate
@clear trellis Eyyyy š
Nah hes not used yet
No depression for meeee
you have a table to play the tortle?
I'm playimg a Tortle Knowledge Cleric in Dragon Heist
Our Orc Monk and Tabaxi Barbarian don't know how to read
He's offered to teach them but they won't let him lol
So
3 of our 5 party members are literate.. which isn't bad, but it's a bit silly
Is taking levels in any caster classes ever good as a barbarian?
Hello š
Not really
Just take a magic initiate feat if you wanna do a bit of magic
But, you know, Rage is actively Antimagic
So no wild magic barbarian and will magic sorcerer in the same character?
Probably not, I'd just go full either unless you really want to juggle Magic and Rage
It's definitely not something I'd suggest.
If you don't pick fighting spells, you're golden. Folk overestimate how long barbarians actually spend enraged. A bit to give you some utility can be great fun.
You can, but it's just not very good. You can't rage and cast. So rather than being a barbarian and a sorcerer, you are a barbarian during some turns, and a sorcerer during other turns.
Both of them being weaker than they would be if you were single classed
I personally don't like Multiclassing
Not because it's weaker, but because I'm a solo-classer all the way lol
I'm the opposite, single classes are boring c:
I might do a Druid or Fighter dip for my ranger at some point, though
Just because we're going to level 20 and I think their capstone sucks
Gets you a 6th level spell slot, iirc?
idk
Though, I wouldn't mind an Extra Fighting style either
Dueling would be nice since I'm Either using a Longbow or a Scimitar
I might do the dip after level 5 if he survives that long just to get It out of the way
2 levels of Fighter gets you nice things.
Action surge, tactical mind, a fighting style
and of course 2nd wind.
I might do Druid because his wife is a Druid
I once tried to use Vecna as a bbeg and only one of my players recognised who he was
It was hilarious to hear him freak out
The Whispered One himself.
Some people know of the Maimed King, but nice seeing Jack Vance appear in games.
dnd group i dmed exploded before today's session
I only like multiclassing if I canāt get the character idea from just one subclass
Giblets everywhere. Quite the mess.
Anything from 2014 D&D that wasn't republished in 2024, like Echo Knight, can be used in a 2024 game. But ultimately, you'll need to check with your table to be sure!
You might also need to rework a few things to work with 2024 rules, but you rarely need to do so
Generally only an issue with things that get their subclasses before level 3
Yeah
You can write homebrew from scratch on a napkin and it will work with dnd, officaly published options all work fine togeather
How do y'all like narrowing subclasses? Whitelisting or Blacklisting
Book by book greenlights, my current slew of games has phb plus xanathars tashas and the new forgotten realmsbooks greenlit
Silly idea, Skeletons should resist piercing damage due to lack of insides.
Ever since read Daggerheart I've decided I'm not blocking any content. Instead I go for recommending content with a sentence explaining why it fits in the campaign.
Also, I heard that making shared characters (characters whose backstories are tied together) is usually more fun and engaging by some, anyone have any experience on this?
I haven't had any experience with it, but it could be pretty neat. It'd certainly help to bind a group together.
I love doing that. You (that is, your PC) can feel at ease from jump rather than needing to build trust or develop affection for your party. And you get to build a history together during the actual quest, even if it's just fluff.
Hm. I've never heard of that and pretty sure I wouldn't want my background shared with another PC
I'm not big on backgrounds anyway. The 2024 Background is all I care for.
People talk about that in here every second day
It avoids the usual ache of "how did those people get together and why do they keep tolerating each other", it's generally a plus
Any regular here has heard of making characters together
Its gospel
Havent done it myself yet but id like to
I need help writing a Shar themed manifesto to rally our small towns army
Or the peasants at least
Or like just bullet notes
Like the sort of thing the cult of Shar would write?
Manifestos are not their usual thing, secrecy tends to be the name of the game with them. It's a mystery cult
"Embrace pain and starvation. Having nothing is good. Worship me instead. The totally right deity for you sucker"
Yeah but we run a lil town and my sharran character somehow became religious head
Go for stoic philosophy. Freedom from pain through control of the self.
Well, the aesthetics of stoic philosophy
"Embrace the pain of your loss and let it empower you. Strike with hate, strike with fear but strike true."
As previously, she's hard to make inspiring.
Yeah her emo ahh isn't very inspiring š
Essentially, it would be about freedom from desire. Expectations are the root of pain, stop expecting, train yourself to accept and find warmth in the darkness
Find your true self in the silence and in the dark.
Then you can go for the whole "our great mother in darkness" thing
The cult of Shar is inherently socially disruptive. Those are not people who want society outside of the church to function correctly.
Bit of Sith or Darksisters, perhaps?
So push a political agenda.
I have freed myself from Star Wars long ago thanks to the teachings of Shar.
She taught me that expecting Star Wars to be good was the root of my pain. I accepted that Star Wars was, is and always will be a bad franchise.
Watched the sequels, huh? /hj
Please, I've hated the franchise since the prequels
Anyway, anything useful so far?
"If you die, you're bad at living, so don't die.. or whatever."
It's okay, you can say Ass here
"False hope sucks but go ahead... not like i care if you get hurt"
The fact that fits my character so hard too š
Add a "Baka" at the end and you're solid for a Tsundere or whatever lol
... what did i walk into
Hi Ti
Suffering.
Weāre all Shar-ing our inner pains
roll me 3d6 Wendigo
Oh hi i guess....
Always gonna be an ilmater supporter, shar can suck it
you too Haise, i need 3d6
Nuh uh
I got 3 4s
ā¦13?
12 total
STR 13... DEX 12...
rerolling my new body's stats...
9 strength. You can lift 270lbs.
Yeah I as going to say 9 isn't weak
just below average
shar is literally the goddess of Ls
The average person cannot not lift 270lbs
the dnd average is 10
DND universe works on completely different physics
It's still pounds
Maybe all D&D settings have slightly lower gravity >.>
or people are just stronger in general.
Or the extremes are really high
the average person in DND can lift 300 pounds. i dont know what the average is irl but its probably half that
DND is supposed to be a fun SIM like
what>
not a accurate physics simulation
i just view it the same way i view people doing magic tbh
its not a physics sim, yeah
yeah its not garry's mod
I use variant encumbrance often, it's rarely a problem
give players bags of holding of they really complain
Would make sense if most dnd charaters got some muscle. Out adventuring all day and stuff
Salutations
based on dnd rules i have a strength of like. 4
seeing how anyone who is a STR build generally gets 16 STR, yeah
Those fellas carry 40 bricks in their pockets daily i swear
beats my 2. and I have been carrying heavy things all day, you'd think that'd earn an ASI
plate armour is VERY heavy. i can easily see someone getting tons of muscle purely from walking around in it all day
Full plate armor was surprisingly agile, far from the restrictive, heavy, and clunky myth often depicted in movies. A well-made 15th-century suit was a masterpiece of articulation, designed to allow the wearer to run, jump, climb, and perform acrobatics like cartwheels and somersaults
i dont really do lifting exercises so i dont actually know my maximum tbh
Ah but weight distributed across the body is a bit different to trying to carry it on certain points.
what is your source for that? not saying you're wrong but everything ive read about plate armour says its very heavy
Probably the most tiring part of field plate would be the grieves and sabatons. Your lower legs are designed to uphold weight rather than drag it up.
Average full plate armor with padding is like 25-30 kg
Not to sound like some big nerd, just sayin
yeah but walking around carrying 30 kg all day is different from lifting 30 kg temporarily
but i could be wrong
Hows everyone doing?
Eh no idea your still training with it for sure
yeah and keep in mind that your clothes probably dont even weigh 1 kg
dnd plate armor is 65 lbs
I know that my reenactment uniform makes me an extra 10 kg
Eh.I was hoping there was a bot that converted kg to lbs and back
But thats 18th century
NERD! /jks
Also keep in mind quite a few people carry extra body weight close to that. It can certainly tire you out more overall, but it's different when disperesed and carried properly rather than concentrated.
From what I know since plate armor is carried by the entire body, it doesnāt feel as heavy as something like a modern military kit which weighs about the same since thereās a lot of weight carried by the torso
That being said d&d characters usually have big backpacks
This is where I would jokingly say "have you ever wore plate armor"
guud
Lol like homer simpson, NEEEEEERD
i only lift lumber unfortunately, not armor
You probably read all the lord of the ring books
Yeah, I'm also thining mainly of like, 17th century plate armour. It probably differed depending on the century and the country
I wish
Also we're all nerds here and i have academically studied Medieval literature so im all for nerding out
real geeks skip the hobbit
Ayyyy
real geeks know that the hobbit is the best one
I watch a lot of Dequitem on youtube and got a lot of ren faires and such. I know it's not a solid source lol but people who immerse themselves
We?
Hobbit>lotr sorry not sorry
I like grittier fantasy, even though lotr has plot armour like no bodies business
Yeah, I was mainly thinking of my Gothic literature professor talking about plate armour and how heavy and cumbersome it was. That being said, she was specifically talking about a book set in the 16th century? so thats a bit different
hobits good for a children's book though
Bilbo is just too annoying of a character
LOTR has its issues but its still an iconic series
Wait no wrong one
you mean frodo?
I have a question
i prefer the hobbit though because its simpler and more like a fun adventure
Not a nerd, so there is no "we're"
Yes frodo, im tired sorry
Both are quite clunky to get through
idk i find the hobbit very easy to read
i like the old conan stories tbh
I have a question involving morals
Frodo is annoying, no offense to his actor
yeah Bilbo is way better
lotr would have been better if there took 4 hobbits for redundancy
idk i like frodo and sam a lot
and they died a lot
Alignment is meant to solve those mostly
sam is the real hero of lotr
Thatās the problem
they are likable, sure, but that doesn't mean they should both likely live š„²
in general though i find it obnoxious when people dismiss criticisms of trends in the fantasy genre with "bUt tOlkEIn dId It"
Literally carried frodo
Sam also is the one who actually destroyed the ring if i remember correctly
I think so? Been a while since i saw the movies
Might be getting a wee bit off topic folk
would have been cool if Sam tried to save Frodo from the spider, the others dying long ago. and Sam fails Frodo dies and tells Sam that he is just as capable of any other at destroying the ring
Iām glad people noticed. I just rewatched in theaters and without Sam, Frodo wouldāve failed
What's the actual question?
actually it's gollum
Hello all
I created a BBG who they set up was that they were a barbarian who whenever they raged they had split personality disorder, and depending on what side of a coin landed, they would their alignment would shift the problem is my players think thatās unfair because it basically allows me to do something that wouldnāt be necessarily even character for the BBG when they are raging and the entire problem with that is that heās chaotic neutral but what I would like to do is kill the NPC and throw the cleric of diamond and have my BBEG say āagainā and I donāt want to do it if it would be too out of character for my BBG, but if you think I could do it when heās raging then that would be really helpful to know should I do it? Should I not and should I just tell my players to suck it up and deal with it
hi
hai
Actually actually it's Sauron, but that's getting deeper in than this channel should.
Iāll discuss this with you further in off topic if youād like
everyone played their key parts in the victory over evil
Okay Iām moving to off topic
Is it āout of characterā if itās literally your own character
What's the flavour of this character's rage? Are they calculating, merciless, sadistic or a simple berserker?
Barbarians are pretty cool
Sadistic
But I am frail and I made the mistake of going into mathematics so Iām more of a weezard
Thatās what Iām trying to figure out
Do the players know this character has a mental issue?
Guys I need your opinion on something
Go on
So I am a hexblade warlock
Thereās the problem
-# kidding I love hexblade
Me and the party were talking to a gnome who seemed kind at first but he tricked us and took our things and tied us up in his evil tower
and?
Turns out he was actually doing evil experiments trying to resurrect a tarrasque, which he did resurrect and we fought
We are fighting the tarrasque and the gnome
And the party monk tells me not to kill the gnome
A gnome in my wm server got eaten by a giant frog in today's session. I tried to save him but alas my character isn't a good swimmer
But my character is a headstrong noble Drow who is not only vain but also prejudiced against everyone who isn't a drow. So yeah I killed the gnome.
Thing is I just really wanted to use my specter of the blade feature as it was my first time using it
So itās a āmy character would do itā moment?
Is the monk telling you not to do this for a practical reason or do they have some kind of pacifism oath?
He doesn't like killing people because he is good. He also told me not to kill him because he could help shut the mechanism down.
So itās half and half
Well, the monk disliking murder only matters if the narrative is fully the monks in that moment, and should not dictate your actions
The practical purpose of stopping a larger fight is however a reason to spare someone, especially if no one else in the party wants to engage in that battle
The monk never kills
Anyway, what it seems like is this character is being presented in an inconsistent way to the players. They don't know why he's doing what he does, they can't follow his behaviour or motivations. Ideally you set this up beforehand, do some foreshadowing, but you might get away with a bit of hammy dialogue in the moment.
Also (just IMO) this guy sounds a bit like the Batman villain Two-Face.
Hello folks
The tarrasque was already resurrected
It was shot with a large beam and came to life Frankenstein style
So it was purely the monk not wanting you to murder someone because their character dislikes killing?
This is a melee attack, right?
I also turned him into a specter and he disliked that too
I think the DM brutally failed to scout the player characters morals
Yes
Your character and his character cant work together from where im sitting in any game with an ounce of immersion
You are an evil racist necromancer and he is a pacifist nondrow
Thereās nothing necessary wrong with characters having opposing morals as long as they can work together despite them, and have a more important common goal
Itās if the players are arguing morals thatās the issue
Which here isnt the case
Dang.
When you would reduce a creature to 0 Hit Points with a melee attack, you can instead reduce the creature to 1 Hit Point and give it the Unconscious condition.
Yeah like our sorcerer is evil and just wants money but we still work well
My character is evil, VERY evil, and all the rest are good. Not only is she evil but a horrible person personality-wise. She is selfish, vain, and controlling.
Either players lied to the DM about their morals or the DM dropped the ball
makes me wonder how they ended up in the party
Yeah thatās definitely not a good idea
Maybe you can get a retcon on the deathblow, I dunno.
That sounds very bad for the party of citizens
She's always been like that. I told the DM my character's alignment and backstory before we ever started and if me being evil was an issue he should've told me.
She is using them. She has a mission given to her by her patron and is taking advantage of the party.
Yes I think
Fresh DMs often underestimate the trouble moral alignment can bring, imagining it to be an awesome deep complex story
You also should have told the rest of the party? If I were playing a super evil bad person id tell the other players to see if weāre all super evil or if I should tone it down a lot
Overestimating their own power over it
We need to name out city its in the desert and we are REALLY anti slave
Then this is between you (player) and the other people (also players) who want to play together.
No offense, but I hope your DM allows them fair opportunity to catch and defeat you. Heard lot of stories about dm showing favor and basically letting them TPK
Y'all need a Conversation about how you can all play together with this mix of characters.
And if you want to
Also both the monk and the cleric hate the specter of the blade thing I did. The cleric's goddess hates necromancy, and the monk later after the fight approached me and scolded me saying that I can't do whatever I want because we're a team and also necromancy is illegal. I didn't know it was.
Do you need the rejection of slavery to be overtly put in the name? Any town should be against slavery so its not really relevant for naming
You absolutely can play an evil character in a party of good ones, you just need lots of communication and a very good reason for working together
So far you donāt seem to have either
Necromancy illegal?! How was I supposed to know desecrating the dead was a crime?
Anti-Slavehera
Freesand
āIām evil but Iām willing to put that aside to work with this group because our goals are alignedā characters are fun
Is it actually though
-# I was being sarcastic
I think that the next thing my character would do is that she would try and explain her actions by lying about her patron and making her party pity her or at least understand her
Like, I wouldn't roll into a Deathwatch squad of a Black Templar and Blood Angel and say hey, it's me, ya loyalist Son of Horus and expect that to just work. We'd have to talk it out first!
I think many fantasy settings are more open to necromancy than wed think is my point. I know you were sarcastic
thats how you end up being a splat on the wall
Alyssis (Greek for chain)
Oh, I see
With the vilification of things like Lich, vampire and undead, Iād assume most fantasy would see necromancy as eeevvviiilll
Also the original phrasing was a little off, sorry
I mean it's still in character for my character because despite being in the surface she still operates by the laws of the underdark.
Azura for the beautiful open blue sky of the desert
Also sky represents freedom
Yeah I mean look at me I literally have a Morrowind profile picture
But you're hearing me, right? You have to hash this out as players, not characters.
Yup
You have to consider what your character would do, and what will actually work for the game
And its very possible the others dont want to be used and pied to by your character
Might have to make a new less problematic character
The party voted for Goontopia šš
Though that pacifist monk stuff will cause trouble for even goodaligned people i think
Why was that an option?!
Are we so deadass šš
BECAUSE WE ARE DEMOCRATIC
Enjoy your circus show
what the hell is going on
Yk not even mad this isn't a very serious campaign to begin with
And here i was so proud of my name pitch
So what you're saying is no one should ever play an evil character?
Explain to me one thing, cause I havenāt understood this since I started dnd.
Why do you want to be on the opposite side of your party? "Hey a group of heroes, imma be some edge lord who doesnāt fit in and make everyone else on edge and uncomfortable."
It was a really good pitch šš
It was the one I put in the poll
Just that it needs to be discussed and okayed by the other players because dnd is usually cooperative
And that some players wont let you
Loki Marvel is an evil character Loki in Loki. Is an evil character working with a neutral/good align party well.
Well I guess I should have made it less obvious. I am supposed to be using them but I'm not exactly subtle about it.
Evil is a subjective term. Even the craziest of evil bad wizards can find some way to justify casting BIG SHADOW EVIL DOME over an entire city.
That's how Loki has always been, even in the myths
"The candlemakers will worship my name!"
Imagine this from their perspective please
You are a player in a team
You are not told about being used by a selfish character who is your fellow player
Would you like finding out another player got to walk all over you for weeks?
It needs to be discussed out of character first
Hmmm, when is it appropriate to be evil?
When my allies are Grimskull the barbarian and clawgore the cleric of Tiamat
Or if Iām with leafheart the Druid and Harry the Just, a holy paladin?
"It's not that bad, you just have to dig under the dome to leave the city now."
Personally id feel humiliated and antagonised if someone secretly used my character for their characters hidden evil hostile goal
But if discussed, we are equals
Evil is not subjective. It is very much obvious
Wow... yeah I really am stupid
Tbf, intriguing plot twist.
I can then choose to play the fool in character
For one player maybe, the rest likely all feel embarrassed and betrayed
Plot twists are seldom good when thrown at you at the expense of equality
I had designed that character a year ago and really wanted to play her
Fair.
I dont sit at a dnd table to be trumped
Which is alright, but you canāt shove the same character into every single situation
Fair x2
Consent of the whole table >>>>>>>>>>>> Any one PC concept ever.
But really this all wouldnt be a problem if the table agreed to it
Or if youve played together enough to be sure they wont mind
The DM dropped the ball by not checking with the party or saying no
I absolutely love playing a paladin, but if I were playing with a supremely evil group, Iād not be saying things like āwe must help the populous!ā Or āfoul undead must be smote!ā
Id bring a different character
Here's the thing: we are playing remotely. We didn't create our characters together, each one discussed it with the DM separately. We had no knowledge of eachother's characters before the first session.
Yeah thatās a mistake on the DMs part
Even as a Hexblade main I usually use some redemption arc where im trying to help ppl instead of being chaotic
Oof. Group character creation for the win!
You do now so you can fix it now
"Foul undead must be smote!" Catches the burning gazes of his team... "...If they're not under our command."
Yea, a session 0 will help even if it's during the campaign
Also this is his first ever game as DM
Poor guy, ive been there kinda
Thatās part of why I love Paladin! You have a large number of āGoodā options, and things like Crown and Oathbreaker for evil scenarios
Conquest my goat
Which is understandable. The Concept of Session Zero made it into a First party official core book for the first time last year.
But it's also never too late to have another one! Call it Session 4.5 or whatever haha.
Oh God it was 2 years ago
Eh
-# Beach episode.
-# yeah quit reminding the years are passing and im turning grey
"Heck of a year, huh?"
"But Lord Kas, it is February."
Demiplane with a beach and youre all in bikinis and discuss this over juice
Sanguinia, Iād probably revisit your backstory and see if you can reach a more morally neutral if not morally good conclusion
Even the Plasmoid?
Especially the plasmoid.
wait, 2024 was two years ago?!
He's doing really good considering this is his first ever time. He's a really good lore writer and I can tell that. But I'm guessing there's many things he doesn't know. Oh yeah he also uses AI images for everything.
Oh God
Oof
The plasmoid just has the bikini floating inside the body loosely
Weāre a year close to 2050 than 2000
Lmao imagine remembering the year 2000
Ohhh that hurts
-# im now suffering post traumatic old man syndrome
Just remember
Grey hair is cool
Until you see it on yourself
So glad I donāt have grey hair yet, I donāt wanna be cool
I-I can be a Trailblazer? Or a Proxy?
Glad for ya lol
ew
Eh. Back on topic, what are signs of aging for dragonborn?
-# *Can be
A DM used AI generated Images? I have lost another 34 seconds of my life.
Grey scales?
flaking
Droopy eyes and slowed speech with a cool long mustash
Bruh I feel like every day I come in here and someone is complaining about their DM using AI images.
I'm sort of glad my dnd party exploded today because I used this time to build a table from scratch and now I have a nice table
It always is, the rest of you may not be though. Hairline, loose skin, spots, health issues, joints etc
But grey hair? Cool
They begin seeking dark places and hoarding shiny objects
Shoulder pain can also be common
-# š
Also here's another related thing: as a refresher, my character is an evil hexblade warlock with an evil lich as her patron. So far I haven't told the other characters that I'm a warlock or who my patron is, to not break their trust. But then, my patron started showing himself in the dreams of the other characters trying to recruit them... despite him being a drow with very traditional values like my character. Is he stupid?
But wouldnt you have a table anyway even while playing?
Ai images aren't as bad as making AI write the entire campaign. Though both are bad.
BRB making my bg3 characters in dolldivine (itās better than AI)
For my West Marches I turned to my co-dms as the lead and said. "If you do this knowingly, more than one time you are gone."
Whatās that?
Yes, but I poured 7 hours into this table and now I have a much better table to play DnD on
like in avatar?!
Hoo boy you don't even know. He generated AI images of all our characters without asking and uses them as our tokens.
Bruh.
one of the best episodes
Iām beginning to think your dm might be the problem
Mai my girl
You really shouldāve led with this Sanguinia
I give credence to those who are ignorant. But there are so many better options for NPCs. I use DMHeroes.com
That's me. I change my profile picture a lot. Yeah I'm indecisive.
I liked all their backstories š„¹
Website for paper doll programs (you can customise a virtual paper doll)
To be fair, if itās his first game. Hes people pleasing letting yall go crazy and using AI. I say yall should talk to the dm instead of complaining. Communication is key both ways.
Oooooh
Well it's his first time
Youāre definitely not the only person who does (not calling anyone out: I totally feel for all of you)
Why out him then defend him next sentence? Just help the guy.
The first time is the prime time to be firm
Thousands of others had their first times as a dm and didnāt resort to ai, no?
Yeah he needs to be told that this isnāt acceptable
Changing picture a lot isnt something you need to feel for
Where is the harm
I meant the AI bit
I did. Not only does he disagree with me, the whole party does. They all love AI. They think that it's the future and they said I'm resisting progress.
Ah yes, the AI morals and witch hunt discussion in #dnd-discussion again.
-# Ew-
no offense but thats like the biggest red flag going imo
No I meant the bad writing, the AI is entirely on him
If they all enjoy it and youāre the only one with an issue then maybe it just isnāt the right table for you
But they've been my friends for years now
DnD is littered with creatives, you canāt go a day without this popping up
To quote a famous YouTuber, āno DnD is better than bad DnDā
It's not a witch hunt for players to say they don't want it in their games.
Yeah, if you're pro AI, maybe it sounds anti- to you, but it's very specifically not about you and your preferences. It's about the people the conversation is directly about.
I would love for AI art to disappear and never have to talk about it again tbh
Friendship doesnāt immediately equate to a good table relationship
Friends dont have to play dnd together
Or stay friends, but thats just a sidenote
Irrelevant.
Better to turn Good DnD Players into Good Friends, than turn Good Friends into Good DnD Players.
I'm sorry if this sounds stupid to you but I'm not going to quit an otherwise good D&D campaign with people who are my friends because the DM uses AI. My values are strong, but not strong enough to start a fight with my DM and potentially leave the whole campaign like I'm protesting.
then youāre agreeing to the table rules. Whats the issue
I wasnāt advising you to do anything, just making sure you were aware
Yeah I'm just telling yall what my DM does because I disagree with it but that's as far I'm going to take it really
Hey that is your right.
The maxim of a Good DnD table is silence is consent. If a DM or other players wish to construe what silence should mean, they must infer that everything is alright. Not that it is a problem.
But it does seem to me that your characters donāt mesh well, that your dm does things against your consent, and has policy you disagree with
All are generally considered big issues on their own, let alone put in one campaign
Yea a mismatach on that many levels would lead to me going to the player and gracefully saying it is not working out.
Sounds like a horror story in the making imo
Iād rather peacefully bow out than have the game go horrible and ruin the friendship anyway
If they leave a friendship over dnd they wasnāt a good friend anyways
Abd then there's this (the way my patron acts which the DM is controlling)
You donāt need to explain why you donāt want to play, just say it wasnāt for you and avoid the conflict if youāre concerned
Iām not your keeper, Iām just an internet fellow who likes the same game as you advising you on the situation
So your advice is for me to quit the game?
I have become desensitized to most horror stories.
After reading a few where the OP acknowledges the issues could have been solved ambically if they had just spoken up about their discomfort earlier but didn't because they were nervous.
Ignoring Confrontation has never and will never make the problem go away.
There do seem to be an overwhelming number of issues piling up
For one day could i not hear about ai art man
FYI my previous campaign was also a horror story and I think it was entirely my fault I don't want this knd to turn that way too
If I was the player in this scenario. I would have left.
The best way to survive a haunted house is to turn around and leave before you even get in
Yeah, it's my fault. I shouldn't have played such a blatantly evil character, and even if I did I should have been less obvious about it.
Blame is rarely a soloable endeavour in DnD
Suggestion, maybe give him a token with your character and ask for it to be switched? Then ask for redemption arc where you cross your patron or something. Remaining evil in a good aligned party youāre going to end up sour, or one of them will.
If youāre not willing to leave, then thatās probably your best option
Blame aside (personally I don't think assigning blame is all that helpful in a situation like this), it sounds like you get some reasonable feedback on how things are going from outsiders looking in.
I'm personally of the mind that this can be "fixed" - by which I mean, your group can talk about it and maybe even do soft or hard resets where needed.
Did this help? Or do you still have some things you wanted to talk about in more detail?
Oh well... I guess D&D isn't for me. At all.
Literally none of us said that
Sounds like an inability to confront and offer compromise
There's a lot of details I could offer but I don't know what would be considered useful
Well my character would never do that. But I would.
I think if you feel confident in your next steps, you probably gave all of the details you needed to. āļø
If you don't feel confident, you can totally get more into the weeds of it all. Maybe just kind of restate the issue you're looking for help with?
@minor cargo can I dm you for some advice?
Generally I prefer to keep things out in the open, but if it's sensitive, yeah, go for it! āļø
I'm confused. At this point I don't even know what the problem is. Is my character's existence the problem? Is her very straightforward nature the problem? I am willing to discuss the issues with rest of the party but to be honest I don't want my character to become good. Then it wouldn't be her anymore. I like playing a cartoonishly evil character.
Should I explain why she is evil?
Nah, not sensitive just trying to have reference for later.
For dungeon mastering is there any good vtt/ cs for mobile ? Mostly everything im finding is for pc
Maybe the problem to focus on is to figure out the root of it all? Talk to your group openly and honestly - and with as much empathy as you can muster! - and see if y'all can't work on making the experience as enjoyable as possible for each other. āļø
I think Owlbear Rodeo works for mobile. I don't think any VTT is optimized for mobile, though, so far as I'm aware.
" Is her very straightforward nature the problem" --> this is probably the problem. If your character lacks social skills, the other characters aren't going to get along with them very well.
I wish I'd seen the beginning of this conversation.
Thank you. I was going to do that anyway based on what everyone has said.
I havenāt gotten hip to owlbear, Iāll have to check them out! Tysm
Thanks guys. I will talk about it with the rest of the group.
For mobile, in my experience, most don't do well on mobile. To iamrazorwing's point, I've also heard Owlbear Rodeo is okay on mobile but there might be some snags.
Roll20 specifically works pretty poorly on mobile phones/tablets.
For our one mobile player, we've had to go the route of everyone on a laptop/PC on the VTT (Roll20) and sending screenshots every so often. Workable, but not ideal.
She does have social skills, she is just vain and selfish and isn't trying to hide it... yeah that's the problem. But we've already played several sessions and it would be weird for her personality to suddenly change.
Is she willing to cooperate with the party?
Is the rest of the party evil? Cause if not, that's the core problem.
This^
It's challenging to do evil with other alignments.
oof yeah I tried roll20 app and it was awful. I guess owlbear it is!
Yes. To be fair, the mistake that started it all was caused by me really wanting to use one of my abilities which made me disagree with the monk.
She doesnāt seem a good fit for the table from how I see it. Plus remember: āthatās what my character would doā is as good as you can add to the game.
They aren't. And there was no session 0 so none of us knew what each player's alignment was before the game properly started.
That's on the DM.
It's his first time
Checks out
How do I improve as a player? I'm not very good.
Read the rules.
What do you feel like you struggle with?
You can know all the rules and still struggle being a player
Uh.
Just never been in a campaign that lasts. I don't feel very good as a DM or a player.
Hmā¦
My best guess from the heavily limited perspective i have is communication or immersion
I must also point out though that a player should never bring an evil, or pacifist character to a game if there was no checking if its okay with other players
Its not only on the DM
That is true. The responsibility is two way
I have an evil character in my game, and the party didn't even know until a few weeks ago. We've been playing for a year.
Bringing any character that may cause conflict gives you the responsibility to check
As long as the character continues to behave in a manner that they can tolerate, there won't be a problem.
Irresponsible but lucky that it worked
Well if you dont act evil thats different
Well out of session communication can be a problem. I try and be available and communicative though.
I can pinpoint what went wrong In particular sessions but I'm unsure of why things tend to go wrong.
I made it clear that the group was to be "heroic", so it was on the evil character / player to find a way to "get along" with the heroic objectives. I think the character is "evil" in the sense that they have no empathy or desire to help others.
But they're motivated to participte in the group becuase ... treasure!
It might. We're about to finish our third adventure module.
Yeah your fellow players are chill with it
I suspect that the character is evil so that they can take the Assassin PRC (3.5).
Thats the important thing
If you dont know they will be though, thats still irresponsible
But its a game, stuff happens
Noones getting flogged for taking a risk in a game
And that's how you generally want to play an evil character in a good campaign 
You may not agree with the rest of the party, but your goals allign for the most part, so you tag along to further your own ends
The evil charcter also despises undead, so that helps.
Plenty of common ground with the half-celestial NPC there. š
We talking about evil characters in good campaigns?
Yes, we are.
Yeah
The one thing I've learned from it all is keep the party safe from your stuff. Otherwise be as morally abhorrent as you desire
I made an evilish char once who saw the people as his subjects so he helped because he felt responsible for them
As a player:
-
Celebrate everyone else's wins. We all want our PC to be a little bit of the star of their story. This is true for all players. So when another PC does something Cool, Be enthusiastic about it.
-
Know how your character works.
-
Take Notes of Proper Nouns your DM gives out, People, places, things, etc.
-
Pay Attention to the best of your ability.
-
Show appreciation to the DM
-
Make a character that fits the narrative being sold to you. Many players have dozens of alts and premades. Toss those out and make a bespoke character for each campaign.
Do just these things and you will become your DM's favorite player.
my tuesday game burnt and I'm pretty sure my thursday game is bruning as well q_q
one of the ones on sunday are on a short hiatus too
down to 2 sunday games and 1 monday game 
I can't even find a game. 3.5 woes.
My character is isn't always vain and evil. She's actually very caring and supportive to other drows. Thing is, most people in this setting aren't driws.
Yeah, you're DM messed up letting that character into the party.
I think most of the time a party doesn't have to get along in-character so long as the DM does a good job establishing why they have to keep this uneasy alliance going
Reminds me of a half elf I had who was racist to all other elves. Somehow he ended up essentially sacrificing himself to save one
My half-dragon was very mean to the dragonborn that called him scalefriend, but is warming up to him. This process did not ruin the party despite his awful remarks.
I don't know what the DM has jn mind but I'm guessing they'll eventually have to fight her when she achieves her goal and frees her master
I go the route of having a premade but one with a very easy to fit into setting backstory (except her species makes that very difficult in a lot of cases q_q) That has plenty of potential hooks and a possible little mini adventure baked in around early tier 3 play if the DM wants to pull on that particular thread c:
Yeah makes sense. I'm just going to try being attentive. See where I can help.
Oh, I have an elf-supremist character. She despises all other races. But.. she's not stupid enough to say so. She just has an air of disdain.
And she's not evil, so that helps.
Any resource suggestions (videos/classes/websites) I want to get serious about becoming a DM? I have been playing for a little less than a year.
see, now that's character growth XD
Does anyone know if theres ever been any officially supported items that interact with Paladinās Lay on Hands? Similar to Amulet of the Devout or something
That's also technically character assassination at the same time
She is evil
The joke was it wasn't even intentional. He just happened to die the same night he rescued one
I'm just a stupid player ššš no other explanation
He just wanted to interrogate the prisoner when they had to escape a mansion full of orcs that was on fire
might want to ttry in #dm-discussion
Sly Flourish, Ginny D, How To Be A Great DM, Five Room Dungeon.
Not in a kicking puppies kind of way. I have her down as TN. It works with the evil party she's in.
The elf side of him kicked in as his other half watched on in horror
Despising every sentient being not of your own race is one of the most evil things i can imagine, but no she doesnt kick puppies
It's more a superiority thing than hate. Like a Vulcan.
But yes, it is pretty evil.
Matt Colville's "Running the Game" YouTube Series, the Alexandrian (and his So You Want to Be a Game Master? book), the Angry GM, Sly Flourish's blog/books, and Johnn Four's Roleplaying Tips. That should be plenty.
From my exposure to star trek, i can say without a doubt that vulcans do not despise other kin just for not being them
Vulcans are 100% sure of their superiority. It's wonderfully displayed in the baseball episode of DS9.
Pride is definitely one of the Vulcans' primary flaws yeup
It varies, but is it here?
Well yeah and usually they are superior hehe
As a DM out of game:
-
Prep. Don't shy away from it unless your games are more beer and pretzel affairs than epic fantasy.
-
Take notes of your ideas for prep and when your players have you an absolute crazy theory that could be true. Change your plans sometimes. They love being right.
-
Don't memorize the rules for players. Get into the habit of players learning their own stuff.
-
Be open to criticism. Your Game's narrative nor style should ever be so important to you that challenging it should cause you undue stress.
-
Learn Conflict Resolution the IRL Skill. But also understand you aren't your player's employer, their parent, nor their out of Game arbitrator.
"We had our wars, admiral, just as humans did. Our planet was devastated, our civilization nearly destroyed. Logic saved us. But it took almost 1500 years for us to rebuild our world and travel to the stars. You humans did the same in less than a century. There are those on the High Command who wonder what humans would achieve in the century to come. And they don't like the answer."
Change vulcans to elves, perhaps?
Thanks, I appreciate it.
I'm going to dig in my garden now. Bye!
Ill be honest. I think this trope of humans outperforming elves vulcans and other supersmart disciplined enlightened races is a bit silly
Yesss molemaxx my friend (silly)
Its a fun little powerfantasy to me but not what i think would happen
I disagree. I think it's a fun way to set humans apart in a universe full of aliens. We're not overly strong or overly smart, but we've got grit and tenacity
And they dont?
It's about the perception of time. Humans feel there isn't any, elves think things last forever.
I am back
They do, it's just always emphasized that humans have more of it compared to other races
I think its selfloving nonsense
But considering its fiction, i cant prove its wrong
If the author wants humans to have more grit than the rest, noone can stop that
I have spoken to my DM and my fellow players and they said that they actually like my character and her evil antics
I would more so think elves think that they can take as much time as they need to get what they want
Plot thickens
It comes from a place of hope and 'the indomitable human spirit', it's a way of allowing humans to be unique in the universe.
Acting like we'd have zero specialities is pessimistic nonsense imo
Most of these stories are written by Young people. Young people are more passionate, driving forces.
The Elves and long lived races represent older people in those young people's lives who have long forgotten in their maturity that they were once just has brash and just as hasty.
Most humans do too
The monk's player said that although his character doesn't like my character he likes her and her loud, boastful personality
Thatās good
All problems can be resolved through good communication
Right but an elf lives essentially 10x the time a human does
something that a human might want to get done in 1 year an elf might be okay with taking 10 years to get
The DM even said that she as an evil character can create interesting plot hooks
True, but chaotic evil usually is the only alignment that doesn't work very well
I think its a core element to making humans interesting in fiction
Imagine a friend who goes off the grid for 6 months and then shows up like nothing has changed.
For an Elf friend to a human, that 6 months is 20 years.
I understand that part
I just dont think its realistic
What is realistic for you then?
I think he's thinking of getting her a redemption arc and making her good and he can go for it. But this just my speculation. I really want to see where he's going to take her.
I think what makes humans interesting in fiction over other races are their emotions and how they would likely be much more ambitious than other races
If individually compared, id literally just consider a human less capable
Bro... goated profile
Worldbuilding can impact that through things like birthrates though
Thanks
But going by individual, a sentient being without fantastical talents will just be worse than those with them
But obviously that isnt what people want
Seems like humans just have heightened population a lot of times.
Indeed, you see this in things like LOTR where the main factor for why humans are much important and the third and fourth age are because there are way more of them
Elves in LotR are essentially living in the post-apocalypse.
in DND this isn't the case though, because each race is pretty much treated as equal outside of their racial features. So a dwarf could be better than a human but a human may be better than another fantastical race
I think you're having a hard time identifying human 's fantastical talents because we are the only REAL ones to compare fantasy races to.
Of course elves and dwarves seem better because they aren't actually real and thus given a praetornatural skill at magical things.
This is why I like DND humans imo because they're given a certain ingenuity build, I like that.
In the Forgotten Realms Humans have the benefit of being native to Toril. Where as the ancestors to Elves, and Dwarves aren't.
I find it strange to suggest that elves or dwarves would not develop things such as community, ambition, science etc
Dwarves are especially known for their close knit clan structures in FR...
So the talents humans have, i think the others would have too
They do develop those things. But like humans, they are wary of outsiders.
which i think is reasonable
While they have specifically granted things humans are supposed to not have and dont irl
Humans are great because they can be whatever you want them to be and don't have a trope attached
So to me it seems like theyd just be humans with a buff
And the homes of Dwarves and Elves are generally not as hospitable to Humans.
My personal take is that humans got those things from dwarves, dragons, giants, and elves. Theyre a hodgepodge of those "elder" cultures
I don't think that's what's being said here.
Star trek does it best imo, a hopeful look on humanity expanding and exploring the stars with a true hunger for knowledge and curiosity.
Idk again I think any fantasy setting where humans are the dirt species feels unnecessarily pessimistic
Living in a cave 100% of the time with no sun light would objectively suck for a human. Living in a society where change occurs at a rate once in your life is untenable for most humans.
For example, if a full-elf was raised by only humans
Like I get it, and I don't think they should be BETTER, just that they have a trait they're known for
In this case, the indomitable human spirit
I was always curious why Barbs get Con and Dex for Unarmored instead of Str and Con
Would that elf not develop grit and ambition too?
While still having the natural fantasy gifts
That Elf would. But exceptions aren't Rules.
Seems a little strange to try and invest in a stat that rarely benefits Barb that much
incidentally, you are stumbling along the exact reasons that species lost fixed ASIs
Something being possible does not mean it would automatically be wide spread.
To me this just feels like an invention made so humans arent just the less cool thing
Reasonable to include in a fantasy
But not true
Dexterity does benefit barbarians because they get Advantage on Initiative Rolls and also on Dex saves from effects they can see
Humans get the pity power of "nah id win"
Higher Dex means better saves and initiative
this reminds me of the "humans are space orcs" concept, mostly because thats a space where people have tried to actually dive into "humans vs other sapients" thing
Not always though. Sometimes there are very good reasons and more fantastical things making humans unique and relevant
What if all dexterity and no intelligence
Bro humans are like my least favorite species but I can acknowledge that they are special in their own right
This is a matter of opinion and obviously there's no changing either of ours, which is fine, but I think we just have two extremely different outlooks on this conversation.
dex fighter build
Hey lord Kas i have a question
As a note i love humans
Thta was a short trip.
Humans specialty is that theyāre incredibly adaptable and live a medium life
Second fav species
Are you not a human?
In fiction you derp
so in stranger things there was a character mentioned named Kas so i now wonder whos Kas
Nah uh, you are
it makes sence that its connected to vecna
Crazy considering our stances on this topic LMAO
Like I hate the Avatar movies because humans are in them and the alien designs were made to look extra human so people could relate to them. But I stand by the fact that we are unique even in a universe full of other sapients dammit!! (Lighthearted)
Anyways watch me avoid playing a normal human character at all costs
once you gain a level, you aint a normal humie
I have a question, if i were to play a skeleton ranger. And my forearm gets broken should it just be like. The hand is unmovable like the bones were acting like muscle or would it just be broken?
I love leaning into humans being the scary underdog overtaking all
I just cant help but question it as i shout my battlecry
that would be homebrew and something to ask your DM
This is where magic solves all your problems
In general, flavoured stuff is rationalised in a way that follows normal rules
Humans represent change in a setting. Most other baseline species represent some kind of constant humans. Don't do that
I dont think broken limbs are official rules?
Nope
Especially, when you consider that how much of this world that we all inhabit has changed in the last 200 years
There's some niche interactions that involve limbs but it's usually the head, and it being cut off
Oh wow can you like take away heads?
If an elf from the Forgotten Realms lived his entire life on Earth. And died of old age today. He was born before the fall of Constantinople
Vorpal Weapons
I love removed heads
If you crit with them, they decapitate the target if they can
I cast remove head
Elves should live in trees not houses
Dwarves shouldnāt value gold but iron
Etc, tiny changes to make them less human variant
(said the barbarian)
If the creature only has one head or no heads left and isn't a Legendary creature it dies instantly
Roll performance
One of my fav world setups is that humans are an invasive species (The Witcher). 
Weāre they go?
We already have human variants theyāre called variant humans!
His father if subjected to the same rules would have watched Julius Caesar, Rise to power
14
Ye that's why 2024 human had variant human funneled in
So humans represent an upsetting of balance in most fantasy settings in the Forgotten Realms. They're one of the original races, though of that original sect. They were still the newest.
The extra origin feat is what can make humans different from each other
Nice arc, clean cut, bit lacking on the blood spatter angle though and you didnt catch it so now theres dirt sigh
If he lived 1000 years he would've been alive before the normans conquered england
Haha
Even though they were one of the Creator races, in the Forgotten Realms when humans started being movers and shakers, it wasn't long before the rest of them started dying off
Some humans are more resilient than others (Tough), some are more talented (Skilled) some have naturally good reflexes (Alert)
Is Blood Hunter an official class
And some can fart fire out their ass (Magic Initiate) /joke
No
Fair, but everyone can say that for any other race
no
The only official classes are the ones in the player's handbook and eberron Forge of the artificer
which you can get from background
No, but it is a class you can use on dnd beyond
Indeed
Its a third party class but made by a very popular and published group
Ask your dm first before you do
I really hate the āhumans come and all the other races start dyingā trope, it worked mostly for Tolkien because he wanted the world to be dead already, it wonāt work if youāre having your decaying world and high magic
Humans are capable of a lot, especially in D&D
Do you know how many high power mages in the lore are Humans?
Humans sit in an area a lot of species don't
A lot of species are either long lived or extremely short lived
Humans being overpowered in media isn't exactly uncommon
So they have the ambition and drive of a short lived species but more time than a majority of other short lived species
Also we spread like rabbits
Well that's just how it was in the Realms at the very beginning. Those Creator races didn't just disappear. They turned into other things. The fae became all of the small little fey, and spirits that wander the world. The aarae, became all of the avaian reasoning creatures like the arakocra, and kenku. The batrachi, became the amphibious ones, the kua toa, bullywugs, locathah. And the sarruhk, became all of reptilian species, like yuan-ti
Humans are like Hydra heads
Humans, became other types of humans
is it possible to just keep your character and stats and move from campaign to campaign
What you're looking for is official play like Legends of grayhawk or adventurers League
Not typically
Its better to create a new character for each campaign
You throw a human in Icewind Dale and their skin just goes "nah I'd adapt"
Oh that is true tho
You can keep a general character idea but itās important that the character fit the campaign
Theoretically you could have a decaying world that is decaying because more magic is getting introduced into the world and the main race are the ones who use lots of magic where as others don't and so are dying out because of too much magic
What I love about icewind Dale is, It's not even the most further north humans are in Faerƻn
Icewind dale is so great
"Magic emissions are not a thing! They never were!"
Ye humans can just adapt
There are humans who live in places where that Dale would be considered warm
Human adaptation, and spreading like rabbits are why we're OP in fantasy worlds
Coupled with a 80 to 100 year lifespan
That would be a fun version of the trope
Like an inverse of the spellplague
When's the next "update" I suppose for DND with new creatures and PCs and stuff?
Nothing yet
Probably not for awhile
You have the humans of the great glacier, which on the most recent map. Looks like there's nothing there but there are seas, Giants, and several different ethnic groups of humans who all live there.
Then there are the Sossrim, a squat and short people who live on the edge of Yal Tengri.
And then there are the Jarnsaxa, an Amazonian tribe, that lives on the Northern side of the Great Ice Sea
Aw ok
WotC hasn't said anything about new content confirmed since Eberron/FR
Theyāre adding little stuff all the time, but hopefully 6th edition doesnāt come anytime soon I just got into 5E
Oh ok
Could anyone recommend a site for char sheets?
Whenever they add new adventures that are fleshed out like descent into avernus or waterdeep
dnd beyond
I need one that has astral elf and self astral monk
For the elf you will need spell jammer adventures in space
And how much is thatāš»āš»
It's one of the more expensive options because it's one of those three book bundles
1 billion
Ain't paying allat
Then its officially joever for you
Nope
A remarkable amount of content is made officially free by Wizards of the Coast. People deserve to be paid for their work when it comes to new content
PDF character sheets are very nice to fill in how you see fit.
You can play the base stuff they give you without paying money but you ain't gonna get an astral monk or astral elf
Manually edit a sheet for hours
There used to be a way, however, it's been about a year and a half now since Wizards of the Coast turned off a la carte purchasing on D&D Beyond.
and you can find those here c: https://www.dndbeyond.com/resources/1779-d-d-character-sheets#OfficialCharacterSheets
Not many have spelljammer or allow it either anyways
Astral Elf would probably be a compromise tho since it's just an Elf
That to be fair it was one of the weaker lineup items for the entire Edition which was sad getting how much hype it had behind it
I explictly have the hardcover so I can run plasmoid without complaints 
I shall never get over, ship combat rules. Basically boiling down to don't do it
I mean idc it's my first session, it sounds cool, I want to play it
I'll js pirate it
Unfortunately, what sounds cool is mostly irrelevant unless your DM has okayed it
yeah, the digital version of the AAG is in a 3 book bundle for $70 
I literally just need one page out of the book, it's kinda ridiculous that I can't just buy the player portion but need to buy the adventure and the monster manual as well
Piracy is bad. Don't do it.
Most of the Astral Adventurers Guide is ship statblocks then ship combat
Number 1: Don't
Number 2: Have fun not doing it
Indeed...
āš»
You'll get removed from this discord for doing that, probably, most likely. As a fair warning.
Yeah, coming into a company's official space and then saying that you're going to actively steal their work is largely a Galaxy brain move
Indeed
You could always swich to 3rd edition...
I really looked up the the book with dhampir, first thing that popped up
nope c:
would rather go play pathfinder at that point
Y'all playing 3rd edition? Im still on 1st edition rules
The books are on Archive.org.
haven't upgraded yet
Exactly what I used
I'm still on chainmail despite it being 30 years before my time /j
To run ships I use homebrew lol. I make the ship magical to be moved with a command word then use a token players can 'mount'. It's pretty much a creature.
Does anyone know if they are gonna release the unearthed arcana playtest material on ddb?
they dont
There are many things about the Wizards of the Coast production pipeline that confound me.
I loved the spelljammer novel. That came out a couple of years ago, I thought it was great but that was still a couple years after the source book. And now it's been a couple years since then. And that's all we got.
They dont really have the time to put playtest content of all things in the character creator
Aw man
They built this hype up about this new team of characters for the new novels. The fallbacks who have now been in two novels and a comic book series. They're even mentioned in the lore glossary of the core books.
And then they weren't really mentioned at all in the two forgotten Realms books where they could have had a lot of art about them
Wotc production:
- make a banger idea
- Never follow up on it
- Repeat
I just have noticed a lot of strange lack of synergy going on here. I can't help myself sometimes being from marketing and all that
Someoneās casting mass modify memory on them repeatedly
But like there was some effort to acknowledge them because they put the villain from one of the novels on the cover of one of the books.
Probably corporate issues leaking into development
Im mostly waiting for an update to old species
Elminster keeps popping in and distracting them whenever an idea would mess Faerun up
also more subclasses
The fact they haven't confirmed anything for this year yet makes me a tad nervous.
Yeah yeah. I'm still riding the high of when they unveiled the year of Drizzt.
Announced reprints of all the books with a new cover style. Revealed two new dark Elven civilizations never before seen. Had an a-list Hollywood actor narrated animated short form of the characters origin story.
And then never talked about any of that ever again and then actively deleted that video
They forgot about him because he was a ranger
Somebody hasn't been keeping up with the novels. He's a monk now
Wait really?
Can someone recommend how I do this without homebrew:
Next campaign I'll be playing a warforged artificer (artillery ) but our dM has allowed variants for PCs (e.g. being a Chinese or Welsh dragon-type dragonborne) so I want to do a sort of living Lego type thing but unsure of it
That's why I said was
I mean he still has his swords. But yeah, he went to the monastery of the yellow rose and trained under Grand Master Kane. Who was still alive somehow?
dont monks have extended lifespans
Just make Minsc a barbarian or something at this point
Kane is also one of those Damaran characters Salvatore likes
It feels like WotC can't really commit to anything big
Nah. If you consider Minsc where is from, he's a small boy.
And I'm like 95% sure it's Hasbro
The runt of a litter probably
Any time they reveal something big and it doesn't result in 1 DnDillion books sold Hasbro just shuts it down.
āIf we never commit to anything then nobody will ever get mad at usā
I totally understood that going into 5th edition to be honest though. The 4E World State and novel line changes were capital s stupid.
I stopped reading at The Ghost King.
I think the ghost King now officially means you're halfway through
Hasbro's stock has been in the toilet. Only Wotc (D&D) has been it's sole lifeline.
Yeah, I don't need to read anymore. The world will forever be 3.5. š
Ye and Hasbro has been strangling them for awhile
I don't mind rolling with the punches like with the spell plague. I thought that event was going to be really cool to play in.
I was already thinking of how characters could be affected by this. When the news dropped about the spell plague.
What was dumb Was the 100-year time Skip
I⦠think this might be misleading. MTG alone makes more money than D&D.
Iām at the gym and canāt check but Iām very, very confident about that.
I imagine the new design team wanted to do Dark Sun 5e and the Hasbro reps had a heart attack and that's why we haven't gotten any confirmed products for the year
Yeah MtG is what keeps Hasbro and DnD running
You know it was bothering me and I actually went back and did some research going back past 5-6 years. Most of the yearly announcements didn't come until early March.
wasnt there a lawsuit against hasbro recently because MtG was Hasbro's cash cow?
MTG is a giant cash cow yeah
Itās probably the main reason WOTC still exists to begin with
Ah well, still. Hasbro reps def got hit with the petrification condition when the new design team was like "Hey we wanna bring back the world where you kill evil slavers and strike down evil mages turned god-like beings"
I just want Psion tbh idc if itās in dark sun or not
I don't know what MTG is, I just know D&D made them close to $1 billion in sales, but Hasbro as an entity was still something like $1.4 billion in the red
Tbf, I kinda wish MtG stuck to its own lore and game rather than taking parts of other media /hot take
Magic the Gathering
Magic the Gathering
MTG makes a little less than what DND makes per year
It's a card game
DND definitely makes a lot of money too though
So naturally it brings it bank
DND made 1.1 billion in 2024
But MTG might be cheaper to make since itās just cards
im seeing 1.08 B, but not sure how much i trust that number
That's a fair comparison, but the prices for cards might also be cheaper
Eh
They both make tons of money regardless
Card games get really expensive
regardless i think magic the gathering probably trades better in terms of profits but makes slightly less money than dnd per year
Especially due to the scalping pandemic that's been going on for quite a few years
https://investor.hasbro.com/magic-gathering
Total MAGIC revenue was $1.08 billion across all expressions (tabletop and digital) FY 2024.
I am in somewhat agreement with this, but I think they should cut down on collabs in general
Ye I don't want the CoD collab yet
A cod collab wouldnāt even make sense
Where we get a statblock for Frank Woods
4 attacks with M16A1 for 5d12 damage a attack
MTG and DND Collabs i wish was more common. But nooo mtg gets TMNT, Spiderman, and Marvel before touchign Strixhaven again
DND and things ljke that makes sense
youd be surprised with what they (MTG) collabed with already
It's not about the sense, it's about the money
Sadly correct
I dont like the TMNT, Spiderman or marvel collaboration tbh, I liked MtG as a Fantasy Card game
If CoD came to Hasbro and said 5 mil to put a Drizzt skin in Black Ops you'd see Drizzt wall bouncing and shotgunning people
Only reason i dont hyperobsess over it. The crossovers ruin it
Okay Iād play rhat
Can you share your source on that? Hereās the Q3 2025 earnings report by Hasbro.
Obviously youāre quoting the yearly amount (and this doc goes through more specific metrics) - but if D&D was so big, Iād at least expect it to make the āhighlightā slide (MTG is there).
https://investor.hasbro.com/static-files/5836500f-a833-4850-aab5-78abca721257
Ye DnD ain't reliably making money
Especially with how much they put money into new stuff just to scrap it
Sora whats your profile banner from, looks familiar
It makes money but itās not a cash cow like MTG is
Chainsaw Man
Aaaah i knew it was a show i still want to watch
Yea, I come from a Yugioh background, but main thing there is the stupid price for low $$ prizes
Is this server less active nowadays?
Oh thats hilarious, DnD isnt mentioned at all
Thank you, back to dnd
Yeah DnD is just something Hasbro has cause they don't want anyone else having it
Peppa Pig, Monopoly, and Transformers are mentioned more lmao
The plausible future is Lord Mercer arises to his new form as God-King and devours Hasbro under Darrington Press
DND is the biggest franchise in the TTRPG niche so it has a loyal fan base
It was a cnbc source but i think it was WOTC as whole going from 700 mill in 2019 to 1.1 bill in 2024 instead of it being dnd making that much
Yeah but most of the large fan base are people who won't spend serious money on dnd
merchandise
True a lot of dnd stuff isnāt bought
You can choose to spend nothing on playing DND. That whould be much harder to do with mtg.
Proxying exists
Anyways Iām glad MTG makes billions so DND can still exist
although that does cost money in terms of printer stuff
It's why DnD as a franchise just can't work imo
Cause it as a franchise relies on products that it's casual playerbase will buy/consume being good enough for them to buy and consume it
I actually think D&D financially is a very interesting product - and we have numbers we can look at, even beyond financials (like google searches, which you see spike during Stranger Thingsā premiere).
In addition, itās consumed differently than most entertainment products.
Like if Warlock ends up being a Dark Alliance '21 level flop, they're (Hasbro) probably gonna shut down the other game projects
If this is the wrong place please point me to the right one. Iām trying to dm, i havenāt played a bunch of dnd just with a few friends. I was looking into dming (I know Iāll mess up) but some people mentioned doing sessions with more combat and then have some where you focus on the narrative with some combat as youāll want something to do. Any opinions?
I am curious about warlock
- In Dungeons & Dragons, one person serves as the Dungeon Master, the gameās lead storyteller and referee. The DM runs the adventure for the players, who navigate its hazards and decide which paths to explore.
- Learn how to be a Dungeon Master with this YouTube video or D&D Beyond article.
- The D&D Free Rules are available at no cost and cover everything you need to know to play.
- Decide what kind of campaign you want to run. Hereās a few good options for new DMs.
- Get advice from your fellow Dungeon Masters in #dm-discussion and #dm-world-building.
man, Dyno hates me
I would say there is a not insignificant portion of the D&D playerbase that has never spent money on a WotC product
I'd argue it's over half but not over 3/4ths
Yeah
67% (heh)
Around 60-65% would be my guess
Seems a little high to me tbh. I was figuring closer to 25%
im gonna walk to oncoming traffic now
Yeah that their EBITDA. It's something companies release periodically to show their investors how well (or bad) they are doing. learned this in Graduate school and worked on one for our store when I was a Co-manager for Krogers years ago
šæ
Timothy, you scorn me.
I think people who spend serious money on DnD are definitely in the minority
look what you have all done to me, the corruption has spread
But spent money on at least the PHB? Probably at least half
WE???
Nah, brother it's you.
whose the one spamming avrae for 67
Horizon, Knome, Toyota.
and you
Serious money? Yeah. But most people have probably bought a book or two
I didn't do it the last few times they did!
Maybe one yeah
you were still there for the first few times
Mmm hmm. And thatās getting more and more common in terms of consumption. For example, a lot of Marvel ācustomersā also donāt spend money on it (stream a movie, play Rivals without premiums, etc.).
But whereas Disney and Marvel have large swathes of experts to try to engineer ways to convert that into āvalueā, D&D/WOTC donāt. Itās one of the few hobbies where I think the consumers also do a lot to drive brand value (through APs and other media) that does also get consumed - and often generated separate revenue streams!
Like, Iāve bought two D&D books in my life, CoS physical and FR:HoF digital, and Iāve had the 2014 core rule books, plus the 2014 starter set, bought physical for me as a gift
I bought most of my content back when la carte was still a thing
most of it was just player stuff though
Wish Ć la carte was still around
Yeah, DnD is something that can get so expensive as a hobby that you need to be passionate about it to buy a lot of content for a lot of people.
Meanwhile Marvel like you mentioned has Rivals that's just f2p and gives all content besides cosmetics for free
I only did to get the Gloomstalker class
Hasbro CEO needs more money
Iād be shocked if that move netted them money
Probably saved them person hours on support tickets. š©
(I also miss it. I thought it was a great feature.)
Hey this is random and maybe not an appropriate question for the channel Iām in not entirely sure which one this falls under, but did the wizards of the coast group this discord is about make the werewolf and vampire books there was another one I forget the name of I looked it up and they make stuff for the game if Iām correct or maybe confused idk
Maybe, most dnd players aren't dms so the individual stuff you could buy was meant for players...it likely either put off players from dnd or forced them to buy entire books
But they are wonderful to have around
If youāre referring to Vampire the Masquarade, rhats a completely different company
there are vampire roleplaying games like Vampire: The Masquerade which I believe is White Wolf or Renegade..
Yeah, but the discussion was about how Hasbro wants DnD to be some kinda infinite money printer franchise, when the minority of its fanbase will likely spend more than 200 bucks on products.
Most of my players spend about 100 bucks a month on tickets to my games
This is just me ranting but 2024 knowledge cleric confuses me. They're already super good, but they for some reason get an extra spell at every level compared to the amount other clerics get
Cause that's their thing
Knowledge cleric is good now?
Does this group make handbooks? And also thank u I was talking about that
And on top of that, despite having nothing to do with psionics, they get a better version of telepathy that other classes and subclasses don't get
White Wolf has a crapload of VtM books alone
Iām assuming werewolf is the same as the vampire one
Nope
Ohh
The WoD systems are in the same universe but their focuses are very different
Werewolf the Apocalypse is also made by White Wolf but is a different product line
Like, why does the psionic aberrant mind sorcerer get a crappier version of telepathy, but the knowledge cleric gets better telepathy and a saving throw proficiency?
It's so hard to find games since I can't talk š
On public transportation? >_>
A monthly bus pass on RTD costs 80, how bad is traveling over there?
I gotchu
Like VtM is about doing evil messed up stuff in the shadows and not getting caught
so another question is there a book on the systems?
But Mage, another system in the same universe by white wolf is about not blowing yourself into chunks trying to cast a firebolt
I didnāt realize you gave a portion of your profits to WotC
WTA is action focused
Less than 1%
Nope, my sessions cost 25$ to play
Youāre paying $80 a month on a bus pass??? What???