#dnd-discussion
1 messages · Page 193 of 1
Mistakes
No u
Well they’re feathered quadrupeds so they’re the opposite of men
Well. Tressym were an unintentional byproduct of a wizards experiment.
So they kinda were mistakes.
happy little accidents, in the words of bob ross
Tressyms represent happy accidents in scientific discovery
owlbears, on the other hand...
Owlbears represent how no matter how weird a creature is, the baby version will always be cute
owlbears in general are cute, it's just a shame they'd flatline me if i tried to cuddle it
tbh you're right and you should say it. owlbears are weirdly cute
just kill the mother
although bears in general are cute
owls are cute and bears are cute, so mathematically it works out
you could also just let a bunch of goblins do it and then swoop in and save the baby
very true
i also think intellect devourers are cute so i think i just have no survival instincts
almost killed some people in my waterdeep game with it
if only animal handling was CHA, then it'd be easier to domesticate them
can you domesticate owlbears?
Aasimar with 3 levels in wild heart barbarian actually makes a kryptonian way easier than I was thinking it'd be.
not without a lot of meat and missing limbs
They say you should put some of yourself into your characters. I do this by making them all the type of person who would see a displacer beast and go "pspspspspspspspsps"
giving my party's paladin markoheshkir-but-sword because i'm frustrated with the lack of damage
Evren pleaseee, let us suffer the consequences of our actions
you'll suffer alright
okay time to get Water Walk
as much as i like to see playrs succeed, there needs to be some amount of harm done to them
I love flavor, give me a break
every action has an opposite consequence
but my level 2 character did nearly beat my level 8 character (the character I'm playing in the campaign) in a damage race
the singular bat that bit the barbarian once before dying beat your lv7 bard in the damage race
LISTEN I would've dealt more damage if you let me kill the intern
honestly, I only beat it because of Spirit Guardian's sure hit
. . . This is a sentence of all time
man... finding a game is getting really frustrating, i apply, i have experience and stuff, but i just get ignored, its feeling impossible to find a game
the wait will be worth it to find the perfect DnD party
I stand by what i said
I was just looking at Water Walk, and although it does allow you to walk across Lava, you still take heat damage
in 2024 anyway
I know that, I also know that it wont be that hot to the point my character will take critical damage
iirc, its a bit more then fireball damage every turn
- we have a paladin with lay on hands, a light cleric, and I have some pretty good healing
i dont even want a pefect one, i just want a party, know?
though, I'm afraid of what will happen to the fighter...
i feel like id need to be a dm to bne able to play
I've been with a lot of parties now, and I'm telling you, no DnD is better than bad DnD
man,o i just wanna play though
Lava is (per the Improvising Damage table) 10d10 fire damage if you're wading through it and 18d10 if you are submerged in it.
like i have experience, i can rp and be chill
I was just saying because you said you could walk across it as if it were harmless ground. #dnd-discussion message
if you don't turn him into an ape i think he'll be ok
I put a note a little later after that
if he walks on lava with his full clad armor I feel like he'll be deep fried
id love to try playing cthulhu and stuff cause ive watched so much cthulhu content but... i dont think im ever going to find people to play with idk
I don't know why he's armored when his dex is high enough to give him the same ac while naked
because it's badass
true...
I'm definitely the squishiest of the group with 59 HP and 13 AC
Laughs in having spent like two year at around 11 AC becauze Wizard
Didn't stop me from getting in melee and litteraly biting people though.
I’ve been taking the tough feat a lot when building characters. I’m used too a bunch of HP
never had a spellcaster under 16ac
Honestly amazing, I'm just not a frontliner
DM wanted me to make some level 4 semi-npcs with player rules. I had to reroll ones hp because no way a level 4 with +4 con and tough should have 56 HP
I don't know how to play a paladin yet, I just poke enemies and cast divine smite
thou must play bladesinger sorcahexadin
Also I’m playing a level 6 rogue with 61. The NPCs are my rogue’s adult children so I assume being really tough is a familial trait
being lv13 with only lv3 spells is worth it trust (no)
I could just play an eldritch knight for that
yeah.
I'm just gonna play an Echo Knight fighter next (after the sorcerer)
first campaign i played swash buckler rogue... such a broken class
got a little boring tbh, its just too good
oh wow it's really just eldritch knight with lv5 spell slots, shadowblade, bladesinging, metamagic etc. instead of action surge and triple attack
totally not because of the name
homebrewing you a bat race so you can be sonar
wheres moist critikal
it doesn't seem all that bad anymore ngl
If you homebrew that thing for me, I will meet one of them and use a changeling
true..
mm... Changeling Echo Knight... Changeling Druid... Changeling everything!
all fun and games until i start abusing planar binding
Can Changeling Rogue change his parents into existence?
That is just, exactly my Changeling Rogue's backstory
another orphan to add to the pile
They got adopted, family died, now they're using the face of their dead "brother".
daring today aren't we
oh you little
reminds me, we gotta do our late session 0 soon
it's 5 days
oh god I haven't written anything
🫵 go brainstorm
I'm gonna write an entire novel for you
you'll do fine
Oh I will
i wonder if it has 26 chapters?
Oh you'll see
me excited
What’s a great first time campaign to run with all new players me included (im dm)
Hey gang not sure if im in a right channel but was wondeirng if i could draw someones characters trying to improve my portfolio a bit
Dragons of Stormwreck Isle imo
i taugh its for like commissions
Yeah advertisements is for paid, though do you mean for free? if so I'm taking you up on that offer lol
yee its for free i just wanna improve my portfolio
Ah alright, then let's move to DMs to not anger the mods!
im watching a video on it only thing is the premade character sheets are they needed for the story or can my players just make there own
they can use their own!
you are the DM after all, and it's up to you, not me
Yo
Hello
hi
I have a question, is it reasonable as a player to not want to be the only female in a party and to ask what the gender balance is when playing with a new party?
it's unusual but not taboo, you're free to ask that, i think
so bit of a random question
does the deck of many things have ties to any devil, god, or magical being?
It has many connections to powerful extraplanar
The Book of Many Things describes the history and individuals associated with the deck
I was unaware there was a book, I've just heard about the deck a bunch in passing
thanks
to give a little context, I've had an idea for a wild magic sorcerer who has ties to the thing that created the deck of many things for a while
Yeah that seems reasonable tbh wanting to feel comfortable at the table isn’t weird right?
It was made by a Goddess of Fate but kinda does its own thing
There are notably tons of copies in the multiverse, because it’s a legendary item and not an Artifact
But there is supposedly one that does exist (just not in 5e) as the True Deck of Many Things
The Book of Many Things even has a bigger deck with even more cards, if memory serves.
65ish card total with the normal deck
65? ah damn it! now I gotta rebrew my homebrew
I forgot the Book of Many Things is kind of annoying with it's new magic items, spread out over the chapters instead of all in one table.
Oh, theres 66 total
... is there another one
with 67 (shut up) being the start of the reroll for the d100
HAH!
The Deck of Many More Things is the bigger version.
... yes? The BoMT also gives alternative effects for certain cards
technically speaking, you can have a deck with any combination of cards
nope, meant was there another card to make the leap from 66 to 67
i know i shuffle and draw a 22 card deck every campaign
well, it goes 1-66, with one number for a card. 67-00 is just roll again
gotta homebrew my deck now so it has a 45:21 good to bad card ratio now rather than 15:7
which I guess is just the same thing really
i dunno the ratio of good to bad cards for the DoMMTs
Don't need it, what I do need is 44 more greek gods and 14 more greek heroes
should be easy. Although i think for the heroes, you might wanna start looking more into Poseidon's kids. His black book is insane
FINEE I guess I'll try Polyphemus
I look forward to the day I get to draw from the deck
... 600 men...
... 600 deaths under my command.
:D
Deck of many things is so great
speak of the devil. At this point Urizt i think you gotta make your own Card with how much you use it
what's the best thing your PCs have gotten from it?
The DM card
Something that isn't just a milkshake and a brain aneurism
Instant irreversible death
... that's the best?
Yep, allways makes for an unforgettable moment
then you'll say "Yeah, because it was instant, unlike the others."
believe me, its a mercy
why did they draw from it?
Ok what exactly is willing? Like is impulsivity a way to be willing?
GAMBLING
Let me give context,
Theoretically if I genie domain warlock and rage baiting the enemy into fighting me can I drag him into the domain cause he's "willing"
Void, donjon
that would be up to the DM
Turn up the volume! because this is a funeral for the living!
(I find it funny to domain expansion ;-; then you cloud of daggers or magic missles or smth)
Just because they're willing to fight you doesn't mean they're willing to go into your lamp
is that a JJK reference
I mean willing to join me in a 1v1 therefore willing to enter? (Stretching a bit)
It might or might not be...
Again, willingness to fight you isn't williness to fight you anywhere.
That's an incredible stretch
DM’s discretion, but I’d rule towards unwilling
Okay, that's just Rokujushi Miyo's domain
So id have to convince them to join me in a 1v1 in the domain :/
If someone wants a fistfight in the parking lot that's chill but I'm not going to a confined metaphysical secondary location.
Will you fistfight me in a parking lot? ♥ /joking
x3
Speak for yourself. That sounds dope.
But yeah, to the original question, I think this is easiestly done by asking "Is your character willing?" That should be a clear answer.
Why of course I will, since you asked so nicely
You do have to bare in mind that even a low level PC is usually still noticeably better than a random guy. I don't think some stiff at the bar is going to want to tangle with weird magic.
My Warforged Forge Druid when he Smacks the human outta you
maybe :3
That'd be funny af :3 imagine dragging someone into a domain and genuinely rocking them ( or maybe if you wanna be usefull drag the enemy away from a village or smth...)
Now ain’t that a tempting offer
You guys all seem to want to fight me in a parking lot
I feel loved
I love how 3 seperate people now wanna fight u in a parking lot tokii
Welp, DM makes me pass DC19 Arcana check each time i try to cast my favorite spell
i think its a subtle way of telling me to not cast it
Time for the Waffle House Parking Lot Tournament. :3
I'll take you all on!
RAGHHH
lets goooo
only melee classes allowed
No spike growths, no webs and ESPECIALLY no fireballs
"Maybe I'd like that"
-Bard
I don't know if that's subtle. What spell is it? x3
I want a clean, fair fight xD
Jokes on you.
I'M A BARBARIAN!!!!
<rages>
Summon Greater Demon
Ahh, that'll do it.
Summon it
I did
But is it because your DM doesn't want to deal with summons or doesn't want to deal with demons? Equal chance of both.
Free XP amirite? hehe
Dm described how the entire world seems to "take notice" of the Demon
also he said i screwed up a big time
So... i think he is subtly telling me something
Speaking of summons, I wonder if they're going to overhaul shepard considering they seem to like emanations more now.
Telling you you screwed up big time is anything but subtle
I mena imo the spell has enough limitations already, yeah its free xp, but theres a good chance of it breaking free
So... Summon more Demons?
lmao
or is he telling me to switch over to summoning Devils?
Yes
yeah, you've already screwed up big time. you can't screw up big time twice
Summon both, to cover the bases.
I can't wait to play more of Artanza tonight, my silly old man Tortle Knowledge Cleric
Actually, summon Baphomet too
can't summon anything higher than CR6 for now
You had me at Summon Baphomet
Invite everyone from all of the hells.
I mean technically it could escape your control every 6 seconds
oh yea i know, but i have a brilliant strategy to counteract it
I see you on the brink of death
I see you drawwwwww your final breathhh
Oh yeah... the great baphomet... 😊 . . . BECAUSE HE'S MY ENEMY!
You see each time a Demon get out of my control, i end the spell and summon another Demon to fight the previous one
That is... GENIUS
Flawless
what happens when u run out of spell slots?
This can only go well.
There's this neat spell called invisibility...
Than its our party Paladins problem
- now u have two demons to deal with
With the right team setup you could be making the Paladin's day here though.
Summon a devil to deal with the demons
ah I see xD
Actually make it 3, i have Rod of Pactkeeper
mhh warlock then, gotcha
Are you sure you aren't the BBEG and the perspective just hasn't switched yet?
I mean one way or another, youll have to deal with a demon thats running lose, or even 2
I dont really get why the spell gets even more limited by your dm, its okay, but not THAT big of a deal
nah, too weak
Apparently its because we are on a good aligned plane
Planes made of alignment were always a strange concept to me.
I mean its a valid concept in certain settings
basically different "afterlives" if you want e.g.
I guess it's more wrapping my head around the idea of like.
talk about burying the lede
"Everyone here thinks like that. Everyone, comprehensively."
I mean thats not what it means
its more a "only those with the rough outline of core principles and behaviour even get to come here"
well if my DM really wants i can always switch over to using Devils if he doesn't like Demons
though Infernal Calling has even more holes than Summon Greater Demon
like, cool, you like to kill people for sport or would even consider to do that? fine you are now not on this plane
its in Brux
but what about the redemption arcccc
it's not heaven, its beastlands
well the beastlands are a kind of heaven
what are the beastlands from?
Welp, if i will feel like its to hard to play this character due to this restriction i will just ask DM to kill it off of use it as they please while i make a new one
theyre an outer plane of existense
Can they do nothing but summon demons? Surely there's another approach.
are you there for a long time?
gotcha
or just visiting?
long time, hook says we are just visiting but I do not believe we are going to leave this plane
ah okay yeah then its a problem
especially if your character was built around the spell
They are made for that
I summon a Demon and have multiple ways to stall out the fight
I wonder why your DM even let you use something like that in the first place if it was so built around a place it would be hampered.
i even lowered my Charisma to increase the chance of them breaking out of control
Did they tell you this beforehand?
Well not the DC19 thing but they might have mentioned something about good aligned plane
I feel like to a degree that is on you, but also I think instead of the high DC the DM should just tell you no if they don't want you to do this.
I feel like they hoped for me to use it and than latch on to that with the story
and they did, they did latch onto that part so i will first see where that goes
feels like mismatched expectations
Oh well, worst case scenario i will just kill this character off
i dumped Dex on it
won't be hard to kill it
I think talking to the players is a better approach than making impassible walls and hoping they get the point.
Played with this Dm for over 4 years, they have my trust and my axe
they also didn't let me summon Demodragon from Stranger Things with my Summon Greater Demon, it is kind of sad i know
D&D's Demogorgon is way cooler than that little rat
I dunno... i think Aameul is a lot cooler specifically
I don't know, i just want to summon Demons
Hethradiah kinda sucks
Im here for a good time not for a long time
Is it bad if I’m annoyed at another of my PCs for being too thorough? Like I remember last session there were times when everyone had come to a conclusion but the one guy had to triple and quadruple check, and at a point where the dm said we’d wrap up in 30 minutes, spent like 10 of that trying to identify a magic item because he felt the single effect it had couldn’t be all of it
Like I know the guy kind of doesn’t really understand socially when to stop talking but it’s harder to get them to finish up during session time when the rest of us are ready to move scene
yeah, not a fan of other players who are too cautious
Having some caution isn't bad but there's a limit.
as a martial main, i just sit there and just see them try their hardest to avoid everything thats bad. Its to the point where i just do the reckless thing to move it forward
It's great so long other players specifically do not listen to you
Also I remember personally being a little annoyed since this session was supposed to be one where I had some spotlight (which I haven’t got much of) and we never got to that part partially because of a lot of side things we do
You need one planner at the table, and you need one "we ballin" player as a foil to them
This can happen but is rarely intentional, sometimes the DM just gets sidetracked. I'd talk to them about it.
it's giving "i, garland, will knock you all down!"
Weirdly they can be both. During the same session they just ran into something while we were discussing what to do with a seemingly empty boat we found, got into trouble
They also said like 5 minutes later “I would have told you I was going in before I did” when during session they did very much not
But I really am not gonna hold it against the guy, I just wasn’t sure how to politely tell them to wrap up what they were doing
I do have a mantra of "trust but verify" i do know DM won't try to push me off the cliff, but i still have feather fall spell on me
But yea if planning phase is going for too long you need someone to Leroy Jenkins into the room
random question, what happens if a vampire tries to turn a werewolf?
Nothing, werewolf is not a humanoid
lemme clarify, a werewolf that is not presently transformed
still doesn't matter, they are still Monstrosity
i guess off table too. During our break I was quickly writing an important email at the table (just me and him there) and he was kinda nonstop talking about something d&d related but thats an issue of my needing to build the courage to say "I'm kind of busy at the moment could i please focus?"
A Humanoid reduced to 0 Hit Points by this damage and then buried rises the following sunset as a Vampire Spawn under the vampire’s control.
in both 2014 and 2024, All werecreatures were Monstrosities regardless if they were in humanoid form or not
Monstrosity can't be turned
Undead can't be infected with Lycanthropy
bonus point, both are immune to the Mindflayer brain eating
Now I'm just reminded of the Werepyres from AdventureQuest.
Werepyres? so they are ash now?
Nah, they're a bigger monsterous combination of both. Huge with fur and bat wings but a wolf's head.
it's a pun
Werepyres
Were Pyres
there were dracowerepyres in the oldest game
Ahh, whoops. Went over my head. x3
warehouses?
God, I forgot about that. Madness.
why is Malzeno here
So you see a Gazebo
i attack the gazebo
The gazebo curses u as it dies
i curse the gazebo back
There is now a gazebo with an arrow sticking out of it.
casting fireball
I, Tokii, will slime you all out!!!
Good'ol relayable
in the past i was harsh on circle of the sea but the druid who was accidentally subclassless until lv 6 picked it up, and by god its good to have someone cast lightning bolt
The sorcerer and warlock are seemingly not using elemental damage spells (or at least the warlock prefers using shatter to minimize friendly fire) so we've been lacking in fireball based damage
we are just a generally low damage party, since I'm the only martial
usually my complaint about sea is that it makes you too close for comfort but in this scenario id prefer to have someone in melee with me besides the sorcerer for some reason
Is there any benefits to Lightning Bolt over Fireball? I feel like enemies being grouped together are far more likely than being lined up
fireball is a pretty big radius
Less resisted damage type, else nah not really. Apart from being cool as heck
At least I think fire is more resisted
a lot of scenarios ive been in, fireball can grab most people in the fight for better or worse
Yeah, having a smaller AOE can help prevent friendly fire
yeah, circles tend to trump lines except in hallways
Fireball is generally considered the better spell, yeah. But I take whichever is more fitting for my character usually
the scenario with lightning bolt, the druid was in a really good space to hit both a mummy lord and a skeleton for the kill, just asking me (whose turn was right before) to just move a smidge over
I remember there being a lot of negativity about circle of the sea but don't quite remember what the issue was.
in that scenario just something like a scorching ray wouldve done the fire vulnerable mummy over
The subclass was based around pushing, right?
pushing, proning, cc in general
Lightning not having any utility is a big missed opportunity to me. Fireball at least set stuff on fire, Lightning Bolt has less damage on average and no side effects 😭
pretty much, all but your swim speed is only active when your wrath of the sea is up, but you gotta be 5 feet (10 ft at level 6) to your enemy to even activate the attack. And while the damage is really good early on, wis bonus d6 is just gonna get less and less useful
Isn’t it the same as fireball for damage?
The idea of using water to push someone into a coral reef Spike Growth is so cool. :O
Both are 8d6 no?
Also
“The lightning ignites flammable objects in the area that aren't being worn or carried.”
also oceanic gift just isnt that amazing. You gotta give it to a melee character who doesnt already have a thing to spend their bonus action on, otherwise its just a fly spell mixed with some resistances
In 2014…
i take it a line has less chance to hit more targets, thus lower DPR
Cmon wizards, why’d you get rid of that?!
Reread, it is the same lol
Yeah, really dumb to me
To be fair it seemed like spreading fire very rarely got remembered let alone used.
I should mention, capstone for Sea druid upsets me, it should be smth you can do from the get go
Tbh it’s probably for the better. Don’t gotta worry about wildfires
id prefer if seas druid just had more stuff you didnt need to spend yout wildshape to do
Now it that they added a keyword for it and removed it from several things makes it even more ironic.
Elemental adept is a heck of a feat
Mhm
@digital geyser I was recommended to communicate
with you by a player you DM for.
Wrong channel sorry
I’ve got a draconic sorcerer lined up for our next campaign, but I’m thinking of doing ice or lightning and just using transmute to change fireball to ice damage lmao
it's ok we all make mistakes sometimes in our lives...
and im sure as hell that aint you /j
sobbing and crying into my pink sequin pillow
Wow, how could you 
Well we know why it ain't you now /j
i think thats a different type of prince-
I’m just a passenger princess here, along for the ride
Hi just a passenger princess here, I’m Nugget
what
Hello nugget, just glad to be here 
A little curious about something
Why was Ranger a half spellcaster, but not given extra prepared spells with the spell casting modifier?
Because Ranger has to have blatant issues or everything falls into chaos.
Like if there are any unhealthy portions of Character classes that they would be easier to balance without
(In* your opinions)
I'm still not over the time I tried to look up why they wouldn't just remove concentration from Hunter's Mark to make it a little better and the counter argument was that if they did this Ranger would somehow become a 2014 Hexblade level dip.
If it was through a Ranger class feature, that argument falls apart
I still think ranger should be a pet class
The thing is that concentration-free Hunter's Mark still wouldn't be that good because it doesn't scale, but it'd be better than nothing.
Like instead of the rly late "can't lose concentration on HM", it becomes non concentration, no one is going to that level of multiclassing just for it.
(Frankly I think it should scale too but that's another argument.)
And yet they gave DRUID THE PET FEATURE
Ranger doesn't have a real identity, rework to make them a beast master class would be great,
I just think it's a little weird how they've given Artificer more love and clarity of purpose than Ranger so far.
And I'm very happy with it 
I love Artificer, don't get me wrong, but in my mind it's always going to be more of a DLC class if that makes sense. The base ones should be focused on first.
I was talking Abt this the other day, not gonna reignite myself, but I was saying that Ranger deserves a viable Niche
ranger should be a martial druid subclass; strip the hunters mark stuff and just give extra attack and cool exploration/mobility features c:
Ranger is homeless in terms of identity
Why is ranger even a thing low-key, it's just fighter but nature-ey. It has kind of a lack of identity.
Each time I suggest the beast master identity in getting buried
It's at its core imo a Hunter. Not a Nature lover, a Hunter, a part of that side of nature and not trying to just coexist with it like Druid.
A fighter with a bow is more of a ranger than a ranger a lot of the time.
what does scale mean to you? Your concentration lasts longer depending the spell slots used
Still a fun class, I like the little Fae swarm and whatnot you can do with it.
What is a skull?
Scale in terms of damage, duration doesn't matter for it like it does Hex
Well no, I meant like it shouldn't need concentration and also it should go up in damage with spell slots. Even all that help won't make it great but it will make it noticable.
I don't understand the Skull emoji
re-read the post you replied to
"I'm dead", finding smth humorous in nature
It means "I'm dead" or "this is so funny, I'm dead."
yeah phb24 ranger's chassis mostly annoys me because it just does not get enough unique, fun features that really give it a unique thing
like, paladins and artificers both get a pretty game changing level 6 feature, while rangers get, 10 extra move speed? i could just take the speedy feat and get most of the important stuff for that
(I don't mean it rudely usually, btw, I hope you don't take it that way)
Each subclass could have a thematic pet with customizable features
That would be really neat, but also kind of gimmicky. I think they need to re-establish an identity with Rangers.
It's in a weird spot because I actually love the better movement speed, climbing/swim speed stuff rangers get. I just wish their damage could keep up.
I don't hate this idea, but don't see it as a class defining feature. I would agree it could be a great minor iconic feature
I imagine them as a martial version of a warlock in terms of customisation with a subclass themed pet
Martial Warlock is kinda Fighter. Loosely
i think damage is, okay. I don't love that its main unique thing in combat is just an extra d6 from a spell, and usually like one extra d4 from their subclass but I guess its something at least
Fighter is rigid
martial warlock is also warlock
bladelock exists
i think id prefer if ranger level 6 gave them like, difficult terrain immunity or something like that
This may be a wild take but I think rangers shouldn't be spellcasters.
I do enjoy how you can bladelock and do other things regardless of subclass with how blade pact works now.
Greetings.
No . . . ? Two extra feats and the new emphasis on Weapon Masteries make you decently customizable
thats not a crazy hot take. People have pondered that, since really their class flavor isnt that neccessary to be tied to casting spells
Even if it's caused them to have an identity crisis trying to put the Hexblade subclass back in.
then they'd basically be rogue 
If we think of a ranger, the first original inspiration that comes to mind is something like Legolas from LOTR. I think making the class more similar to fighter with lots of combat utility but FROM FAR AWAY would be a really cool way to push the class.
What identity is the problem, I know pet is a gimic but a class needs one of those, if you spend enough power budget on a per it can be awesome tool
aragorn*
I want them to reprint Eldritch Adept already because RAW Paladins and Bards can use it to great effect in 2024.
I need to know more Abt Aragorn because I hear so much when this comes up
the ranger is explicitly aragorn. He's the survivalist, he knows medicinal herbs, he can track people
legolas just got a bow. He's a fighter
In e3 dnd rangers have spells iirc
But like what identity is even aragorn? He is a swordsman with nature and herbalist kit proficiency
they really don't like giving good scaling pet options though
pact of the chain for example falls off hard, even if you take all the supporting invocations
Idk about other editions, i haven't played e5 in years
Elves in that world are Flat Earthers right? Oversimplified ik. What other skills does he have? Or is simply martial survivalist well and true?
Well... at least I got my answer. Not a good one, but an answer
They need to add eldritch adept and fighting initiate as origin feats 
It's still really funny to me that biologically they just ignore the curvature of the planet.
I think the concept of a wilderness explorer and nature expert is a class identity that could probably fit as its own class, i think just when it comes to "what does it do when fighting stuff thats different from a fighter or rogue" the question becomes a little divided
It falls of because it's based on low cr statblock that doesn't scale, make a fully customizable statblock like summon beast but with like 9 features 3 per level milestone
As an outsider to the lore, extremely.
Thematic features unique to a subclass would mold your pet
Like it definitely is still curved, they can just choose not to care and that's why they can see so much further than everyone.
I'd say play into the fact that there's no characteristic ranged non-magical class, and maybe give the ranger some utility from far away.
i mean the thing is that the familiar was never a combat pet. it's a utility tool
ok but ranger is not the ranged weapon user class. Fighters and rogues can do that good too
Even outside of combat, it needs mechanics that aren't skill checks because them Rogue and even 2024e Fighter with Tactical Mind are better than them at it
Fighter has Arcane Archer but you get so few shots it's basically never taken.
but they have an entire invocation line built around making it a combat pet and it fails miserably at it 
And I haven't seen enough ideas for things like that when I ask Abt them . . .
Artificer has Artillerist but I'm a little surprised that the only non-magic gunslingers we have are 3rd party.
For example a pet with unique features...
investment of the chain master could probably serve to give it more utility function, like increasing the range which you can see through its eyes
Point aside can we please make artificer alchemist good it's such a cool class idea
The one that released recently has some weird design choices too. You get new guns to use but they're explicetly designed to be nerfed by the class if you use them.
But if you just use a crossbow it's stronger than using the new guns. It gets a boost at the class level the new guns stop being nerfed.
i dont think we need a gun class/subclass. Guns can just be a type of weapon
I could be tempted to add this to my homebrew, wanna talk Abt it in #homebrew ?
there isnt a sword master subclass
New one isn't that bad.
and that's on top of them axing barding q_q
Okay, so i get their point about Ranger being versatile enough to do a little bit of everything
But is it normal to feel like this results in doing everything a little poorly?
A dedicated archer would become a gun class by proxy because of this, though.
Still worse than the other ones by a considerable amount
maybe a gunslinging fighting style or something? like archery already exists but its kind of a misnomer if youre using guns with it
i dont think we need a dedicated archer class either
Have you looked at the 3rd party Exploring Ebberron book? Artificers get variant capstones and theirs is two busted potions that give you either multiple potion effects or a ton of healing
There is a Gun slinger class in Pf2e
I don't see the harm in specialization classes for martials, they seem to have run out of ideas for making them better in other ways.
I'll take a look, thanks for the ref
i just think I like the versatility of fighters being a class than can do equally well in melee and ranged combat
Fighters are just so versatile ATM
which is a good thing
fighters being able to spec into both ranged and melee combat (not even both really, just one or the other) is not an issue
They're still missing something though, every time new content releases people want to be the new bard or the new warlock. The fighter in the new Faerun book especially went over like a lead balloon.
Smth they rly don't want to alienate with specialized subclasses, which I don't agree with just because we have unconventional subclasses like Blade singer and Swashbuckler that turn classes on their head already
I'd say arguably the biggest issue with ranger is that apart from flavour reasons there's no reason to pick it over fighter or druid
im fine with there being subclasses that are better suited to melee or ranged
Yeah, a first level spell anyone can get easily being your gimmick will do that . . .
(srry, done being pessimistic)
that seems like an unrelated issue. PDK sucking as a subclass is kind of a constant
Like I'm sorry but stacking every subclass feature on Hunter's Mark is terrible design but they won't let it go.
Poor rangers, always getting the short end of the stick
Tbf, almost everything feels meh in comparison to battle master
There was a brief period where people seemed to think the UA of the Frost Walker was overpowered but I can't imagine why, it's not that different from release.
I mean, Winter Walker did it okay, but it definitely gets grating when they leave it to subclasses to fix a core class issue
Id say disagree. Like I agree battlemaster stuff probably wouldve been cool to be base class stuff, but I think mechanics wise most subs can justify their existence
i always thought that sub seemed pretty bad
I think it's because it's the only one that seemingly made HM integration actually somewhat well integrated. People weren't used to synergy.
like, when have you fought a monster that wasnt a CR 1/2 goblin use the disengage action?
Question do rouges have to use bonas action to attack with both daggers
Even then it's not that good at it, is the thing. The bar is in hell(s).
You can justify them, but they are arguably weaker than a battle master
Same, I think most Fighters subs hold their ground
I always considered eldritch knight to be king
no, not really.
like, battlemaster is fun, but its not the strongest fighter subclass
Stuff like shield, mirror image etc. on a fighter are cool
The bard subclass in Exploring Eberron feels like it's more what PDK wanted to be. It feels like it could have been a martial easily.
I mean, from an optimization stand point probably not, but battle masters can do almost every pillar of play very well if they want
can they? 4 times a short rest, get a d8 to some skill checks? that's just a bard
and like, every fighter has tactical mind now
2014 Purple Dragon, if you steal the 2024 7th level feature, is unironically stronger because it's not MAD and it scales better on the 2024 chassis 😭
Does the rouge use bonas action to attack with both daggers
That’s also on a frontline character who has more hp, better ac and a good way to break concentration
No, just one, and if player has Nick Mastery it doesn't spend the BA.
i mean yeah but my point was just because you can spend resources to get a die bonus to d20 tests doesnt make you OP
That's a lot of qualifiers though, and technically you're not supposed to use the 2014 subclasses on the 2024 chassis if it's been reprinted. :P
@potent vector thx
Is wild mage still a 2024 subclass?
I meant relative to other subclasses, they’re all cool but some are much more meh in comparison to battle master
Yeah, I used it until it got reprinted, which annoys me more because the older one is better at low level
Sorcerer or Bard?
Sorcerer
And by bard I mean Barbarian, whoops.
Didn’t even know bard was on the table
also you only get three maneuvers at the start, if youre taking the skill maneuvers you lose out on the very strong combat maneuvers so theres a give and take
Every fighter subclass is still an extension of fighter, so they’re all gonna be at least good
Arguably Spirits is a Wild Magic Bard but yeah, I meant Barbarian.
Light properties.
Just kind of wish the battle master got rolled into the base class instead
also just as a subclass battlemaster doesnt really get new features besides upgrades to what it already has.
Champion gets like, infinite heroic inspiration while battle master just gets a higher die on its thing
Speaking of that, the 2024 Human has a nice Inspiration loop with the new Carouser background and Musician.
@jovial shadow thx
Sadly you can’t stack it, but it is a reroll every turn which is much better than 2014 champion
If your team works together right you get a lot of inspiration.
well yeah but one every single turn is gonna be good
For sure, I just want bm to roll into the main class instead
It would make more sense
Oh yeah no, not arguing that. It just reminded me.
and another point against bm is that your maneuvers list is the same for all 20 levels
normally, at level 3 youd pick the best ones and when you level up you just get to choose the stuff you already passed over (arcane archer has the same problem to a worse extent)
i was more responding to aether anyway, but youre fine
Because Carouser gives you Tireless Reveller which causes you to get inspiration if you see someone use it but you don't have it. If you have Musician you can give it to your teammates to use, which will cause you to see it.
i do wanna restate I like BM, it's very fun. I just dont think it invalidates other fighter subs by existing
A point in favor is that you get a guaranteed roll every turn at level 15 of one of your manuveurs
I’d say the opposite, I kind of wish it almost didn’t exist and they’d buff the other subclasses instead
The option to take BM options with Fighting Style is still viable btw, no?
So you can have a little BM on every Fighter
Iirc when I used the 2024 builder it let me at least.
You can yeah, feels meh to take a whole feat for it though
You can get it with your Fighting Style at 2
I think what makes bm really good is the versatility, which you can’t really do with 1-2 options tops
Eh, defense, dual wielder or one handed are still better overall I’d think
I'd say realistically, eldritch knight is probably still more versatile
at least at the higher levels
Another gripe I have is that the weapon recall is a bonus action
Like why doesn’t it just auto return?
But you’re probably right, it’s a toss up between ek and bm for me but spellcasting is generally better
Commanding Strike, Evasive Footwork, Disarming Strike, Rally, and Riposte all have their niches tbh
Yeah with Eldritch Knigh at 18th level you can cast both a Cantrip and a Spell (1st and 2nd only) at the same time
Seems fine (war magic is the real reason to play an ek if we’re being honest)
Why is it so hard to find campaigns on Tuesdays or Thursdays 😭
What’s a great first time campaign to run with all new players me included (im dm)
here before someone said
Lost Mines of Phandover (its included in starting set)
Wild beyond the witch light is also a good one
whats one that goes far like highish levels ike around 8 or 9
Wild Beyond the Torch Light is very good ye.
Second option if everyone plays into the darker themes is Strahd, but that's more dependant on if your players will enjoy the setting
Oh, oh, Strahd goes up to around 12-13 ish, iirc
also Mines are simply easier to DM for a newbie
Yeah, but giving them options is nice (I will note I agree with it tho)
i think ill check out wild beyond it gives a errie vibe and i like that
It’s less combat heavy and encourages players to learn how to solve interactions using other means which is fun
nice argument, unfortunately Turn the Faithless.
Lmfao, true.
i kinda want to have a bit of fights you think id be bettter with something else
oh they will be there
can't have DnD without em
You can still fight, it just won’t be multiple times a session ( unless you really mess up lol)
okay actually i like that
Level 10
yea that **Turn the Faithless **really came to bite em
LOL
So CoS doesn’t even make it to Tier 3
That’s so true
Depends, my dm wants us to go to 12-13 for our CoS
there was a reddit post about speedrunning CoS where they ended at level 4 or something, it was a nice read
Mine went a little further, guess that was just my DM lol
Mine disolved at level 3...
I had a rly funny way to end it but I couldn't make the last session . . .
Yeah so unless you really stretch it out CoS is a game that stops at level 10
I still want to choke this DM each time i think about that game
Kinda like LMoP at level 5.
Imagine banning healing and using critical fumble with system shock rules
I sure love Fighter breaking their arm in the first encounter
Paladin losing 2 AC from a Perception Roll
and Bard healing word simply fizzling out while still consuming a spell slot
Holy hell, system shock needs to stay buried why did you bring that up 
oh and quest failing because we took a long rest
No, people deserve to know
Cease
Counterspell
Don't you power word me
you use this spellcasting focus to cast to your mother?
Because early 2014 design was hit or miss, mostly miss.
but yea i have burning haterate for critical fumble
I’m so glad other people despise it
And as for 2024 edition, because I assume they wanted Throwing Weapon shenangins to still be limited to select subclasses. Or because they copy pasted and didn't care. Take your pick.
The barb throwing class has their weapon auto return
you don't say... Changeling Barbarian here we go
path of the giants i believe, not an updated subclass unfortunately
Yeah, it’s the giant subclass from Bigbys lol
I’m sure you can run it with “updates” if you want
Ykw, just for the funni, Critical Fumbles should be a subclass feature. Some kind of Misfortune Wizard. What Spell School are most Luck based spells again?
Smth to do with making people make constant mistakes lol
wild magic sorc
Yeah all you'd need to do is use baseline barbarian 2024 and drop in the subclass, it's very easy
I love critfails and critical hits (And Crits on skills), My DM always makes sure the Critfails are either funny, or dramatic, and don't devolve into "You lose, get shrekt."
Even if they did update, it didn’t seem like it needed much to improve upon
hi good question here. I got a charlatan eloquence bard/ rouge changeling. He going to level to level up and get a rouge subclass but I am unsure which one to do. He uses mage hand and magical arcana already of the trickster already with his bard ability. any suggestion of what subclass I should go for?
I was just reviewing the AD&D original version of Strahd vs the 5e 2014 version of him. And they are interesting. The AD&D version has less hit point, higher AC and does less damage, but a single hit from him does Energy Drain, which drains 2 levels per hit. No save.
Crit fails can be funny, but should never be worse in impact than you would have been with what you were trying to do
Cutting an arm off is probably more damage than you would have done in that attack you Crit failed for example (for an extreme example)
well first and last dm that used it on me broke our paladins armor because he crit failed a perception roll
I wish i remembered the name of this DM so i can avoid them for the rest of my life
I critfailed a 'subtle' Investgation check on a place, while disguised as a Horrible Chicken Thing (Chicken Owlin, that previously menaced a farm), rolled a nat 1 and it turned into a Scooby Doo chase through the place I was investigating.
See, now that level of impact seems fitting. You revealed yourself when you were trying to reveal smth. Equivalent exchange
also should be noted that ad&d's damage and hit point scaling is wayy lower. An adult dragon in ad&d has like, 80 hit points? and most attacks with weapons won't be hitting above 15 damage until you involve lategame magic items
but yeah, energy drain is scarier than death to many players . At least if you die, you just get to start from scratch
Bigger damage numbers allows for more precise control, so long as it doesn’t go overboard
Meanwhile I did nearly 300 damage in a single round a couple sessions ago. (Two crits + smite against an undead.)
which is very true. for ad&d it was a feature, not a bug. combat back then was very much swingy. At level 1 most attacks are gonna have a decent chance to just kill you, since you have anywhere from 1 to like 8 hit points and most simple attacks would be like 1d6 damage
thats also why d20s are used for attack rolls. If they decided to use 3d6 or something like that you'd be more likely to roll along an average
hello
Quick question for those more experienced than me after how long do you guys give level ups to your players
My DM does Milestones and runs off of "When it feels apropriate."
Every 2.5 sessions on average
After every session up to 4th level then every three sessions after that.
Ok yeah thats what i was thinking as well, thanks
That too well id personally go for 5th
I also really like exp tracking
My campaign had our first session of the semester today it was so fun!!
1 session at 1-5, 4 sessions at 6 to 10, 2 sessions at 11 to 20
that's how you would do it if you use xp
My local library had a dnd program today but nobody showed up ;-;
Aww
My parties barbarian, who has 5 intelligence, HAD A THOUGHT today
An actual thought
be nicer to your friends
I'm not trying to be mean genuinely
I love our barbarian he's great
The dude playing him is super chill and I'm friends with him
the dm made me roll a d20 for ability points yall
i got a 19 in int and a 3 in wisdom
This dude all campaign has been known for not really thinking things through and just acting on instinct without using much thought and planning, so when he actually thought about something it was like awesome and funny we all laughed and thought it was great, the dude playing the barbarian included
im a paladin... i might be cooked yall
i rolled again and got a 9 and asked the dm if i can use the 9 instead of a 3... heres hoping
The only reason he was able to have the thought was cause nat 20 history check. Still had a -3 modifier
modifiers are cancelled on nat 20s tho, no?
Yeah they are
Nope
Not for ability checks
i could of sworn they were
Only for attack rolls
ohhh im dumb
In which it’s an auto success
RAW crits are only on attack rolls, but many DM's roll with Crits on skills too.
cuz bg3 does it like that
It was a thing long before bg3.
Ick. No criticals on skill checks. Boo!
typically, 20s on skill checks are good enough to pass most dc's on skill checks tbh, but def don't do crit skill checks, that's silly
And if they can’t pass it with a nat 20, don’t let them roll
Or let them roll and have the result determine the severity the failure, depends on the situation a bit
That actually is built into some 3.5 skills.
Would it be a good idea to try and replicate JJK into DnD by a ton of homebrewing and duct tape
It would definitely be v messy that's for sure
tbh, the only time people want crit skill checks is on some ridiculous nonsense with charisma checks anyway
they want a 5% chance of just doing whatever they want without consequence
Yeah and in that situation a nat 20 should be "the dragon you're trying to seduce take it as a joke and doesn't try to burn you to a crisp"
Or the king laughs off you trying to take his throne as a joke amongst adventurers
Remember: Persuasion isn't mind control!
You can certainly convince people of some silly things, but that's the extent of what it should be used for
What do you think the dc was for donkey to seduce that dragon in the shrek movie was
it wasn't a roll it was roleplaying
35, but donkey clearly has a plus 15 to persuasion
30
Yeah it definitely had to be up there
Donkey is also rolling with advantage
I feel like he had the lucky feat
perhaps the real lesson is "seduction" isn't really something you'd be rolling for
Is it a good idea to make a kobolt a wizard
afternoon
To quote EPIC "There are other ways of persuasion"
yes
Sleepy, I don’t see why not. Sometimes I even think about making a kobold monk
Ok thanks
Shadow Monk + Pact Tactics variant. . . Oh yeah, it's all coming together. . .
Figured out the classes and dragonmarks in the Eberron group imma be in
Sentinel Druid (Forge) Me!
Healing Wizard (Abjuration)
Shadow Bard (Dirge)
Passage Artificer (Armorer, Battlesmith or Forge Adept)
I'm pretty hyped for this
this is a wild setup (dirge bard looks cool)
Abjuration Mark of Healing is pretty smart since Healing spells are Abjuration spells in 2024
So when he Casts a Healing spell with a slot he can also refuel his shield
I chose Mark of Sentinel because Forge Druid is pretty tanky, but also I'm gonna pick up the Warforged Juggernaut feat later to basically give myself and my wildshapes crit negation (since feats still work in wildshape)
that's actually awesome
I wanna do an eberron playthrough so bad
Play a Warforged
Take the Juggernaut feat when you can
Built in adamantine armor pretty much
Excellent for Barbarians and other tanky folk
I really want to play a watchers paladin in eberron
Makes sense
Whats the best common or uncommon magic item for wizards
Lvl 9 if it makes a difference
One of the best uncommon for Wzard is an Arcane Grimoire as it gives a +1 to all your attack roll spells and Saving throw spells
cuuuurse you tokiiii
"ah yes, I remember. The tree that washington chopped was indeed not a cherry tree."
oh, I want to take the sentinel dragonmark too
just gotta stand against whatever nonsense is happening
Gotta homebrew a LOT of JJK things for my first actual "real" campaign
There's not really a best common magic item because they're basically all flavor things with little to no impact on day to day gameplay.
There's something in the dungeon we're exploring for the campaign I'm in that is so evil and powerful that the Oracle of our campaign is scared of it and we accidentally caught the things attention today-😅 🤣
She refused to say what it was or anything about it cause that would just get it's attention more
This is fun
Been thinking about DnD while I work. I don't understand how Ranger is supposed to function well
They're supposed to be a versatile class borrowing something from a lot of things, but the more I think about it, the more I feel like they just do all of them somewhat poorly
Are we talking Pre-tasha's ranger, post Tasha's ranger, or 2024 Ranger (Which is jsut Tasha's ranger but with a weird hyperfixation on Hunter's mark.)
hi again i asked from advice from before didn't get an answer, my charlantan eloquence bard/rouge is going to be leveling up soon and gonna be able to grab a rouge subclass for them. I am not sure which one to go for. Any advice? or ideas that would benefit him?
Post
They're skill monkies post Tasha's, and are kind like more damaging, less casty Bards in that regard.
Have you been having trouble getting your sneak attack off given your party composition, or have you had very few issues with it?
I mean, here's what I mean
Ranged damage is pretty nice, but tends to be either very meh damage or requires party support if you're trying to use Sharpshooter often
Rangers need not be Ranged.
And it especially doesn't stack up too well when other spellcasters and Paladin can just get crap tons of damage just from a small amount of spellcasting
They're perefectly capable of melee combat.
horizon walker with rapier and shield is very fun
Amd this is true. I've used shortsword combat as well and didn't do too bad. But they also have relatively meh damage here too
Last combat, for context, I hit all 3 shortsword attacks first turn and did about 27 damage
Druid then decided to cast Call Lightning and not only do considerably higher damage, but this was also from just about everyone passing the save
Well they're half-casters so what do you expect, they're not Wizard, Nor Sorceror. And much of their kit revolves around either battlefield control, or supporting the more niche sides of exploration.
been having not alot of issues, the eloquence bard thing is just mostly for his changeling side. Our monk and wizard gets better luck on damage on the opponent easier/faster than I.
I use the eloquence bard skills to pretty much get away with thieving easily
What about arcane trickster to poach wizard spells? And the fancy version of Mage Hand they get
And this leads into the other problem. They are not just known spellcasters, meaning they can rarely change out their spells
But they also get no spellcasting modifer to the spells you can bring with you. On top of only being a half spellcaster
So despite being level 5 and the other spellcasters learning 7-10 spells to swap out every day, i only can have 4 and need to level up to swap out one
Because their spellcasting is a side benefit.
Hey, y'all remember when PETA made DnD subclasses
Everything about them is a side bene-
You have my full attention
It's so funny that to optimize these you want to put animals in danger
I was debating on that, but i already have mage hand. The main problem is he won't have alot of spells level up till late in the game. We are going to end the session before he even gets to that point.
I personally think that they are in a very tricky situation where they fall into either mediocrity
Or relying on chemistry too much. Not every class needs to be independent, but I feel like Ranger requires too much for too little
Shrugs
(I forgor, were you here during my rant Abt Ranger's not having a viable Niche)
I dont' particuarly care if it's underpowered, as long as it nails flavor
Yes, I was
Consider Mastermind. The Master of Intrigue feature especially is nice if you like messing around with Deception.
Yeah, my issue is them lacking the flavor in the base class too. They literally gave the "traveler and his trusty pet" feature to Druid 😭
This is by a considerable margin, though
Heck, I wanted to try my class being a bounty hunter in the shadows by being a Gloomstalker Assassin Combo. It isnt terrible so far, but definitely requires your team to at least help you out with stealth by not blowing everyone's cover
It's almost like this is a team based game or something...
So Ranger is far from unusable and can be really fun when done well
But I think the proper phrase is "The whole is not worth the sum of it's parts"
oh, hmm...I do like that.... and he already has have high deception, plus he has silvery tounge which turns any lower persua, or deception into a 10 if lower
I've been playing a drake warden ranger for at least a year now.. she consistently does respectable damage. Has sharpshooter as well.
I dont need to rely on team synergy to make ss work.
I also celebrate when my teammates do more damage. Do it. Thats awesome. They failed the save? Heck yeah full damage.
You are a team every hit counts. Every person helps.
If you dont enjoy a ranger, ask to switch to a caster so you can zap things and feel more fulfilled.
Its okay if the class doesn't work for you.. but its not terribly behind other classes and is plenty of fun imo
A stealth based gameplay loop does require everyone else to be on board with being stealthy.
You can still be hidden even if the others fail stealth. Unless you are always in a big clump.
As long as you roll well to hide
Group checks aside I should say
We see it the same way, then. Just kind of sucks that they aren't exactly well off in terms of keeping up with everyone
Also... I wouldn't have exactly cheered with the Call Lightning bit. Something I left out is that 75% of that damage was friendly fire
My point was more that "It's hard to be sneaky when everyone else is either a raging barbarian, or paladin clanking around in heavy armor, and the DM absolutely doesn't want your sneaky fellow to wander farther then ten feet from the group."
I will mention Ranger seems to be second best at everything in a party, which isn't something I think anyone wants, but with the flavor, I do realize at this point that some people are fine with
I just personally got tired of it
I asked my party to at least put out lights as we explore since I can benefit from Skulker while everyone else is relatively unhindered from dark vision
Sounds like your decision is made. Update your sheet and lock it in!
I really don't think we see it the same way at all. You seem to drag on your teammates for not hitting enough or correctly.
Bad aoe placement can happen. They could be more careful but so can your team learn to position themselves unless they are all melee which I dont think they are outside of the paladin?
Totally fair. 
i ahve a +3 to hit on spells because of a cursed wand
Noice
but i take 1d8 damage for any spell no exceptions
Not noice
There is one thing Ranger is definitely the best at however. (Well, one Subclass), Fey Wanderer is the best at Charisma skill checks.
Ranger needs to have their Hunter's Mark be an utterly unique class feature, vs a poachable spell that makes them sacrifice a potential healing spell or Pass without Trace in the future.
It's all about opportunity cost, people!
Some homebrews or alt Rangers do this
(Unfortunately, Tasha's ranger doesn't do it)
i mean post 2024, it's not poachable
At the beginning of the fight, we were all very close by due to being in carriages. But it didn't stop druid from choosing to cast it anyways
As for dragging them on, the main frustration was that friendly fire bit
But if we're going to point fingers, the old adage rings true because I myself COMPLETELY forgot I had Absorb Elements
It has competition with eloquence bard
Please, no more fixation on Hunter's mark, I hate it.
Like most people, my brain is entrenched in the legacy code of 2014
Druid spell list has it too
I don't want everything about ranger to be tied to a stupid level 1 combat spell.
Welp
Like I said, it's not terrible, but definitely needs a lot of party planning
Oh, found the original, so, basically, Ranger is a decent backup for most things. If one party member goes down, you can easily fill in their place if they were a Frontliner, skill monkey, or Druid in a pinch.
They're just the worst half caster on the docket and that's that I guess lol
I wasn’t replying to you, though granted, it doesn’t need THAT much
Some party cooperation, sure
Which is true, but parties are often 4-5 or even more. It rarely is 2 or 3 without just saying "not enough people, no dnd today"
But the reason you’re experiencing it so much is because you’re doing a shadow sniper build
Party cooperation should be the assumed default tbh, but unfortunately that's not the case for some reason...?
Likely cuz he’s asking them to shape themselves around him, even if it’s not by a lot
If you want a shadow sniper, go enjoy a Skyrim stealth archer run /j
Yeah, again, why I hate that role
dm gonna be piss at me for this, 🤣
I"m pretty sure it's because they consistently come off of "Please orient yourselves around my playstyle so that I can be as effective as I like.". Or at least that how it seems to me.
ranger has always been an interesting case to me because it shows how so much of the (public) dnd sphere wants to have their character identity around being the best at something, and aren't interested in being a fluid generalist. Ranger is a great generalist, so many just don't wanna be a generalist
Also, again, subclasses shouldn't have to fix a core class problem
Wizard is mostly detached outside of the campaign, but pretty chill overall
Paladin is very misguided and often is way too cautious (they're an Aasimar, Druid is CotS with unicorn totem, and we have a life domain cleric, albeit rarely, but she wants to avoid using Bless because she wants to save spell slots for divine smite and emergency healing)
And Druid... they tend to be very quick tempered, calling any collaboration "forcing optimization"
But to be perfectly clear, the pros outweigh the cons for now
Counterpoint: Rogue is a solid generalist. They also have a good glob of "my attacks deal extra damage" slapped on, and Ranger's version of the same is either conditional (Favored Prey) or finite (Hunter's Mark)
rogue is a solid generalist, and a lot of people have issues with rogue, especially in this server
Because it's the favorite martial in a system with a bias in favor of casters
For the Druid, even just asking to travel at night (everyone has night vision and Light cantrip) was like pulling teeth, and I eventually settled for traveling during the day, but asking the team to keep an eye out for ways to make dim light as much as possible
This sounds like a fun table dynamic to play at
Not the dream party, but definitely not too bad for chilling on a Saturday afternoon
Asking the entire party to change to night travel is a fairly big change, no?
Unless you're a vampire that dies in daylight, I'm not doing all of that tbh
He is
This
This explains many things
Yeah... about that.. vampire spawn
But no one else is that
This again
Yes, unfortunately
Bruh you really need to dip from this group lol
Wow you uh. Could have led with the fact they're a vampire spawn
You’re clearly not enjoying the game
I don't wanna become a Minecraft Skeleton when Lady Luck decides to toss me around again
I’m popping in and out of the convo, thought he already mentioned it
Is bad DnD better than no DnD? Vote now on your phones!
Dont you have phones?
My apologies. This is during my break, so I often have to type fast
All good
My hot take: while groups definitely shouldn’t cater to one individual only, it really seems like (for whatever reason) your group is actively not taking your abilities/strengths/weaknesses into account. You might be better off just leaving ajd finding a better group
It definitely isn't, but I also could use some time to learn what is bad dnd, as well as when you can sort out problems vs running away from them
I feel like that's something the adage never talks about
Anyways, back to work I go
The fact that they chose to be a vampire spawn during character creation, a character choice requiring an accommodation that the rest of the party presumably didn't know about on a meta level during session 0... it's telling.
Yeah. Leave the table.
They’re also a gloomstalker
Not character creation, they died and was given the choice
My theory is that bloodline has backseated, micromanaged and overthought through each session so even reasonable suggestions now fall on deaf ears of players who just dont want to bother anymore
This^
That is also true since they were talking about that earlier. It sucks for them but I still think they might be better off leaving and not micromanaging in their next group
The other players just don’t have a great view on you, I think. At least the Druid (considering you bad mouthed them here).
I assume at least one of the players are on this server?
Anyone watch legend of vox machina?
Not yet
Also you really shouldn’t be trash talking your fellow players in a public server with over 200k members
I’m addicted to it
Crit Crab and his channel's consequences have been a disaster to the hobby
I don’t even know who that is lol. I’m such a noob to 5e
I have nothing against him personally
I watched that campaign 3 times, and mighty nein 2 times
everybody is obsessed with the idea of handling their out-of-game issues in-game. i don't get it
Someone else will explain who CritCrab is, I'll let them do so.
Go on. You know you wanna. You've been waiting for this moment.
Never heard of them
Been playing for 2 years
I often run into people who say critrole has ruined tons of dnd players
I have yet to run into a critrole player who is like that though
Unless critcrab is something else?
Critical Role and CritCrab are not the same
Ah i see
Yeah I haven’t watched critical role but they seem very chill
Mat Mercer Effect is a different problem
critcrab is his own youtuber, and IIRC his most popular format is "reading dnd disaster stories from reddit"
Ooooh
Mercer effect i have yet to actually see anywhere
So people get obsessed with spilling tea on their fellow players
I see memes and complaints but i never witnessed it being real
Bingo! Thank you sinanis, please collect your prize
(it's a single steamed crab leg)
same here, i've seen it more talked about as a hypothetical concept rather than actually seeing it in play
and also sometimes people say "the matt mercer effect" and it's just... being sensitive and aware of your players wants and needs?
I just have enough brainpower to see the differences between my homegame and a tv show
What is this "mercer effect" y'all talking about? I know who Matt Mercer is and I've seen some clips on YT, but what impact did he do?
I've had a disruptive over-talkative player, and an someone who had Their Special Original Character with several pages of backstory sent my way, with zero adaptation into my campaign premise before I actively prompted them to do some.
It's there.
Some claim he set false expectations for ppl in homegames
People who got into DnD via critical role like to demand their DM to act like Matt Mercer
it refers to his style of DMing and gameplay, and the so-called "matt mercer effect" says that now new players to the hobby that learned from critical role expects all dnd to be like that
And yeah I experienced it a few times
And also makes DMs act like pretentious demigod directors who do too much monologueing etc
With my very first group in fact.
I havent met either
I have yet to experience it, cuz I don’t think any of my players have watched critical role
this type of player existed long before matt mercer was even alive
Yep. That's the deal - it's player at a hobbyist table expecting the same player experience as a table full of seasoned, professional improv actors/comedians who do it as a job.
What does that have to do with cr
Yeah that’s not even unique to tabletop roleplaying. That happens in forum style roleplaying all the time
My most consistent and my primary campaign I'm in works well because we do most of the talker than our DM. A few sessions already our in-characters had discussions over a plan for a problem presented, and it turned into in-character arguments for at least 10 straight minutes. My DM kept sending "eating popcorn" memes in our Discord chat while we were going at it 😂
I've never seen it either
I can understand this one but again i have yet to meet someone who is dense enough to expect this
Well I’m a bad reference
Matt Mercer, not willingly might I add, did increase how often that happens. Probably.
People wanna mimic what they see on TV, and certain types aim to do so without knowing how the sausage is made.
Don Draper voice I don’t even know who you are
stop.
Night! Sleep well
Wait were they joking
Oh ignore him, he is just being sour
My bad lol
Lactic acid is indeed sour, by definition
ssame
What if you make a BBEG who is secretly allergic to like, peanuts or something.
Don't be gross.
Down bad for a dnd figurine
I’m really confused
The server rules are not optional folks
how old are you guys perhaps would you like to say?
Im surprised there was no ban yet considering every message posted so far
Server rules, can’t say nor ask
Please follow them, keep things appropriate, and keep on topic
You'll learn when you're older, don't worry about it for now
Anyway, who here likes Artificer?
Can someone tell me how to post on the looking for players channel?
whats your age ?
They’re aight
you lied via checkmark!
Have you read through #find-a-game
Read #find-a-game carefully as it explains the bot commands you need to use
maybe it did, but i don't think it was increased a significant amount just due to him, at least not enough to constitute the effect being named after him.
think of it like oil and water. if the majority of dnd players are water taking up 99 percent of a jar, then 1 percent of the problem players (oil) rise to the top as the ones that are seen most. so if the population doubles (IE, more people getting into DnD circa the 2010), it seems like a big jump that the oil doubled in volume, when it's still actually only one percent of players
in other words, yeah the number of those players probably increased when critical role got popular. but that's just cause all types of players increased too, since that's just when the hobby got popular
Type /looking-for players
I like it, but then all the cheese people do with them puts me off playing one
Chat, do I play a Ranger or a Monk next?
Monk
Me.
indeed who reads anything, like even the person you're responding to's name
Beautiful
Monk, 100%.
Not hating on Ranger I just really like monk
Now more oil!
smh dnd players don’t read
Correct!
Can I attack more than 2 times as a monk?!
DnD players never read its a part of the game experience
You can attack 5
yooooo
At level 10 in 2024
No need to reply directly to folks already discussing things in the channel
A DM can always just ban the class if they utterly hate the idea of cheese
Don’t read anything. Just watch critical role and use that as your PHB
That I'll agree with you on. Increased perception on the issue doesn't nessecarily mean increased actual numbers within the issue.
welp... i feel like my character is going to die
Yeah but I feel there’s an expectation that if you play Artificer genuinely, your party might expect you to do stuff like making guns and if you don’t then it’s sort of disappointing
If an Artificer is press ganged into being a non-participant making Cool Stuff for everyone else, that's a table dynamic issue
Well that happened, but I'll definitely give monk a try. I think my saturday campaign is sadly getting cancelled indefinitely due to many people leaving all of a sudden, leaving only 2 of us 😭
Second this
So I gotta go search for another one so in case.
In Minecraft, right?
I do know my friend, who is the DM in my main campaign atm, invited me to his saturday one. It's seems a huge step up in complexity as there's an entire 16 page Google document for it because the DM wanted to comebine both 2014 and 2024 rules in a homebrew setting, that I got to read and understand 💀
Don't worry about it
it's deleted, don't worry about it
So... yeah, that'll be a fun adventure and a new challenge for me
Lol yeah I was reading that then it went away lol
For a soul knife rogue, what’s the benefit of using both soul knives as opposed to the first d6 soul knife with another short sword?
having your hands free
You look really cool
Idk I think you’d just get maximum use of your soul knives until you find a sword that’s good enough to sacrifice your subclass’s passive for
No. Frankly I wouldn't allow any image posting of any kind if I had a discord of more than 100 people, let alone 64,000+
The Psychic blades also do Psychic damage, which is rarely resisted
The embarrassment of finding out my 2 most recent 15th level rangers are both wild heart barbarian beast master multiclasses... at the very least their level splits are reversed. 6 ranger levels for the elf with the helmet, 9 ranger levels for the superman reference. Their builds are more different than similar luckily, but it was disheartening since I try not to do the same mixes over and over. I suppose the superman reference could be a hunter instead of a beast master, but there's a polar bear in the reference image I used...
You apparently have access to gifs but since you can’t post images I’d assume gifs fall under the same category
Well it'll depend if it can embed.
any idea on how to make my party feel like an encounter is impossible and run instead of facing the monster while still not spelling it out for them
#dm-discussion would help you there
thank you, have a good day
make the mission a save an npc mission
We have a dragon, Themberchaud, that feeds on them. Don’t feed the dragon, he’ll get fat
Yeah. We like our dragons starving to death so they don't have the energy to fight back.
It’s like the Gremlins
Throw an obviously large and insurmountable creature at them if they're lower levels. If they're high enough level. "I can take them." Syndrome applies.
He gets fed from time to time already. We respect Themberchaud here
Ah, fair.
Thumberchaud gets fed very well from what I’ve seen
any good 1st level spell for wizard? i just leveled up to lv2 and can have 2 more
have already
Tenser's Floating Disk & Alarm
find familiar (never prepare, always cast as ritual)
firebolt, ray of frost and Chromatic Orb
Me when my Chromatic Orb doesn't bounce:
fyi the first 2 are cantrips!
False Life and Magic Missile are good
Shield, Magic Missile and Chromatic Orb
But still Firebolt and Ray of Frost as cantrips
mind sliver and frostbite are really good
it's counterplay for spikes, rather than some kind of all encompassing super spell
If shield can prevent the same hit, I will use shield
What spells in DnD conjure up a separate entity that you can command? and no, not the summon demons thing
Call and Summon Diety is goated.
Nope... just very weak fodder summons
xD
Shield lasts until the start of your next turn, I believe
conjure fey is weakish
or practically any reanimate spell