#dnd-discussion
1 messages · Page 154 of 1
digitally, yes, it is safe to buy on d&dbeyond
physical books don't ship to the UK if you buy them on d&dbeyond as it's an american retailer
Damn okay
you could check amazon or see if a local game store has it in stock?
I have a question.
I have answer
to my knowledge only the core & big 3 expanded rules are available on the wotc international store https://dndstore.wizards.com/uk
Well the pictures are in #dnd-arts-and-crafts
It's about some of the sword designs
i believe so but double check it contains what you want first
Is it the one with the gambit thing in it?
i don't own crooked moon so i really couldn't tell you, i only know how the international stuff works because i've had my own headaches in the past trying to find older dnd books that ship to the UK
Just ordered a 2024 dm screen on Amazon
The one i found is in bath
the contents of this look to line up with the full bundle on d&dbeyond, so yeah the subclasses are included
says in the little contents dropdown
Nice might get it then
So I made character art for one of my players and one of my other players said that’s something only bad DM’s do. Should I not have done that?
The races tho look bad
you should always ask permission as some players are particularly protective over their characters/OCs but it's not a bad thing to do
Alright can someone explain me how combat works in basic terms?
(Forget movement like the 30ft range thing cuz my dm doesn't really care about that we removed that to make it less complicated)
Side note; I am a new first time player, playing with 3 other new first time players and 1 new first time dm.
We have only had 1 session, that was a lot of fun, but i think we didn't do combat the right way,...
I’m an artist, and they asked me to do so.
i don't think you can get the subclasses without the races included. by 'full bundle' i meant it combines the DM and player parts, so unless you're DMing you'll not really need half of the book
then no lol it's a kind and perfectly normal thing to do
I know just they just look bad but still get it. I do like playing dhampir tho
fairs lol
I’m super new to dnd n wanna learn how to play
does the new astarion's book of hungers not have a dhampir race?
#dnd-newcomers may be best if you're looking for help
I am using the other dhampir one it has a vampire at the front
Does anyone have any recommendations for solo story books to play between games?
there are solo books?
Head to the DM's Guild. Most of the solo game books there are pretty good in my opinion
Van Richten's Guide to Ravenloft
Does anyone know what the stylized Kopis and Falchion swords fall under in #dnd-arts-and-crafts ? I was thinking maybe scimitar. But I'm honestly unsure.
definitely scimitar. kopis, falchions and scimitars are all curved swords so it makes sense to link them together
Anyone want to play rn? I'm bored. (must be 18+)
shortsword could also be a contender but scimitar makes more sense
Factions and kopis are functionally closer to axes than scimitars
They are very forward-weighted, even though they are curved
i think it wouldm ake more sense to more people ifthey were kept within some kind of category of sword
Except the thing about Falchions is that they have two different types. Classic and clip point.
omg yay!!!! im gonna be a tiefling!!!!!
The clip point falchions tend to have somewhat thinner blades than classic falchions
you seem to know more about swords than me but i'd still say scimitar just for simplicity's sake
A kopis is more of a ritualistic item and wasn't the standard blade of Greek soldiers.
That would be the Xiphos which is essentially a short sword.
I know what a Xiphos is. Trust me. It's honestly my favorite type of sword, if I had to pick one. Quick, light, and incredibly deadly
Plus the Xiphos is wielded by some of my favorite characters from Greek mythology, Achilles, Perseus. Also it's the sword wielded by one of my favorite book characters that's tied to Greek mythology - Percy Jackson
never ask dnd chat what their favorite polearm is I almost died
Halberd is nice, i like the style of it
I never realized how divisive the definition of polearm truly was
isnt like, polearm just weapons and a stick?
Spears, halberds, lances , trident
You'd think wouldnt you
quaterstaff too
this long axe with a point of spear too
A Maul would be too depending of how long is the stick of it
When I think of polearms, I think of spears, javelins, pikes, glaives, halberds, trident, naginatas or however you spell it
or what im missing?
I'm not engaging ive been there
bro... isnt that serious chill
I joking but like not actually lol
now i have teh curiosity....
theres whole polearm discourse among weapon enjoyers
im not well versed enough in it
Glaives are some of the best polearms in my opinion
I like Partisans
Those are cool
I find halberds like,
You have an axe and spear in the same thing with both good worlds
the only thing missing is that can grow up figs and i would be hooked up like crazy
I always gravitate towards glaives when im playing fighters
I love how the Glaive is designed offensively and defensively. Because of the hooks on the spine of the blade as well as underneath the ricasso.
Real question, Whip, its worth?
There just smth Abt them to me that screams "I know what I'm doing"
no but by god is it funny
When humblewood vol 2's wrangler monk comes out it might be worth it but rn? no
I used to like whip when i could use booming blade and green flame blade on it from 10ft
For monks sometimes.
For Rogue's who for some reason don't want to use ranged weapons, it can be if the main enemies you fight only have 5 ft of reach.
Cunning action not needed for Disengage action is just rly nice
When its that Time when you being a monk, when your hands are literally nukes wrapped with napalm (exaggeration)
You need to use a whip?
Would indiana jones be a monk be fr
I thought monks would use something like quarterstaff or bo staff. Maybe something like the dao
Monks can use a lot of weapons
he used guns, a fighter better said
exactly
Quarterstaff is one of the options for monk weapons, ye, irrc
Kensi monk can even use guns
Monk weapon was always a dubious definition
and 1d4, unless you use it to apply spells or smt like that i feel it.... weird
especially when new weapon types outside core get introduced
We NEED an updated Kensei (before I snap and make a top busted one myself)
I'm also talking irl
or idk, your dm let you use it for disarm some enemies or apply them disadvantage but even in that is... with maestry you apply slow (-10ft of movement)
I still think monks should get weapon mastery
in 2024 It's hard to beat nick mastery as far as weapon using goes
I dispute that only because Nick exists
topple would be amazing on monk
Their entire thing is unarmed fighting, I wouldn’t say so. For Kensei for sure tho
would give a reason to have a monk weapon
Taking a dip for it is def on the table if you want Masteries, but Monk is already rly strong
I like taking a single level in ranger if I wanna use weapons
Else monoclass monk alll the wayyy
2024 nerfing all the dip options by pushing subclasses back to 3rd level is kind of a drag too
for the best
multiclassing was never meant to be a core rule anyway
Multiclassing is just so versatile in terms of character expression
I would have been fine with it if they changed smth Abt multiclassing to make it more varied . . . But then it just stayed the same . . .
heard pathfinder fixes this without needing to multiclass
I couldn't live without it unless the subclass was exactly what i wanted and thats usually not the case
if it's not meant to be a core rule they you shouldn't change your base rules to compensate?
apparently you dont have to choose between stat boots and a new feat, you get stat boots regardless
Couldn't a monk use a scimitar in dnd?
Yup!
I can never take "pathfinder fixes this" seriously anymore lmao
lol
Ye, but we saw how they gave in to Dark Sun and Psion for things they said they'd never do in the older team, I'm hoping they address it eventually at least.
dragonbane fixes this
but yeah mutliclassing is about as necessary as it was in old 5e it's just now you do it but don't get a subclass
i just saw a headline that was like "i tried D&D's most famous alternative!"
and I was like "pathfinder?" but it turned out to be some third party system i've literally never heard of before
ah yes, d&d's most famous alternative, "downstairs dungeon Halloween"
Kids on bikes fixes this (by not having rules)
multiclassing was never a core rule in 2014. it was an optional rule
I think it'd be better if we had more feats and multiclassing was done via feats rather than the current method
Everything in Pathfinder is a feat too, "subclass" features included (so it feels more like a skill tree).
Fits with irl. They sometimes use the Dao, which is very similar to the classic falchion and Persian scimitar.
Survive This fixes this by having survival points instead of luck points and that's really it
did someone say luck points?! as in the lucky feat? rawugh row ruf ruff
This is the method Pathfinder does lmao
Survive This is actually fun it's just a pain to balance with 5e bc everyone in Survive This is weak af
2e at least
Pathfinder has some cool aspects to it; i haven't played much of it though.
(haven't played the other lol)
me showing up to the table with my frankensteins monster of a module scrapped together from 5e, Survive This, Mork Borg & Vampire the Masquerade
with a healthy dose of YouTuber homebrew
My current TTRPG of choice has the same method for multiclassing and it seems to work a lot better
Ishanekon: World Shapers
Wait, is this the one where you don't know what your powers are until you start?
it's got tons of character build options
im googling
apparently they just released a Stormlight Archives TTRPG and I am hype about it
Nope; your powers are picked by you
has anyone played the Oz RPG?
TTRPGs are such an insanely cool genre i'm so upset nobody introduced me to them sooner, i only found out about D&D basically a year ago today
Yeah TTRPG's are great and finally gave me that fantasy roleplay aspect to games i'd been looking for when i first started
they're fun!!!!
also honestly they are hard.
the improv skills of a regular dnd player is very impressive to me
dm too
i love them they're just confusing as hell and none of my friends like DMing so i'm usually stuck as a dm
this is the way.
always a breath of fresh air when i get to play
you are the lightbringer
Hey, I’m new to D&D
i was the one who showed my friends dnd and thankfully one of our friends has recently gotten into DMing but i was pretty much the forever DM for years
Oh, they're the ones that did that? Reminds me I should check that out lol
Welcome!
Hi could someone send me the monster sheet of Herrerasaurus 5e please?
i genuinely think i can count the number of sessions i've been a player on one hand
i dont actually know who made it
Thank you, I’ve made my character already from a website called Roll20
DandD website keeps timing out on my connection :/
i love roll20
sadly i do not have it
It’s so easy to make characters
Okay loaded up! 😄
https://www.dandwiki.com/wiki/Herrerasaurus_(5e_Creature)
epic
I'm not in a dnd campaign currently but been thinking about looking for another one... last one kind of fizzled out
Wanna see my character sheet if so dm me
been there
do u wanna dm or be a player?
Player; i'm DMing a different system currently
thankfully i've been invited to a game this weekend but i'm the only non-newbie amongst them (which is usually quite fun)
That has been my entire experience playing dnd over the past 10 years. Longest it lasted was 1year thankfully, so I got to experience a proper game, but yea its hard to find a dedicated group + life gets in the way a lot
I'm now looking into DMing and working on a campaign lol
Hardest part of D&D is when it just stops randomly on a Tuesday
what hurts more - a breakup or a d&d campaign fizzling out
Seeing a D&D campaign fizzle out because of break up
fortunately we keep romance out of our groups (everyone but me is a straight male)
PBP campaign I was just in just fizzled out sadly
pbp?
Post by post, it's like D&D but in text form
Campaigns fizzle out regularly and can be replaced with ease and less emotional risk and pain than a breakup I would say
ohhh i've heard of those
That's how the 1 year campaign ended lol everyone was basically doing each other casually and it left a few sour notes and people stopped showing up
Basically the DM asked a player to be in a relationship, player turned them down, then the campaign started getting less and less active, then the DM just left the discord an hour ago
Ouch
D&D relationships truly anger me, but I still have hope there's good ones
Oh that’s…uh. Unfortunate
Guh..
i never understand people who fall for each other like that over d&d, because surely the majority of what you experience of the person you fall for is just the character they portray ingame?
Relationships ruin a lot of things 😂
Rightfully there was character on character flirting, but maybe the DM took it outside of the game?
Only thing I’ll say is they should have waited til the campaign finished before confessing if they had that much investment and risk of rejection response
Lines blur, people fall for fictional characters on Television shows, we are not a rational species.
But hey, atleast im currently in three different campaigns
Depends, for some the campaign could be their only ever opportunity getting to know someone, incels, insecurities, general bad behaviour
I make good characters but my personal greed takes me over, it's hard to deny good loot
and you know rose tinted glasses too "Oh, they're hot cause they play this game that I also like to play"
I feel like most of my DM's never give my characters any loot
that's actualyl a really logical answer lol
A good person can still be greedy, lol
i try to make at least one custom tailored magic item per plot arc
Im playing paladin and the rich ship were on is sinking so im like "Let's go loot the stuff before it's gone", then someone said "Shoulden't we save people first?"
even if it's small it makes my players feel pretty cool
I think the most i've ever gotten that wasn't crafted by me was an opal of the ild rune at the end of a quest
I recently convinced my new DM to let my character collect 10 swords corresponding to the damage types
saintsworn
Although I gotta finish my backstory, all the homebrew items in the next... 2 days?
it's a similar thing in a game my friends play where you get a special set of abilities if you collect each elemental sword. pretty cool stuff
i've got an entire battlemap to make by tomorrow morning lol
Oh lord, what program do you use
my hands, i'm trying out physical maps for the first time
i've gotten through about 3/4 of the minis and maps in the last 12 h ours
Never played offline before, I do wonder how DM's add secret rooms without yk, exposing them
I think part of the problem is I tend to obliterate encounters without magic items so people don't want to add any more power to my PC's
i usually just theatre-of-mind secret rooms, or have a detachable segment
we used lego previously for setpiece fights but ran out so i'm using cardboard, paper and foam now
If my players are doing good, I usually just give them a "this is neat" sort of magic item that dosen't do alot combat wise
I usually draw the room on a separate piece of paper and set it on the map if they find it (as someone who uses 2D maps)
imo PCs should ideally be swimming in magic items
I just want some good armor and some spell storing items
FR is a magical setting. there is magic everywhere. they should be getting them like candy
Agreed. Magic items make every encounter x10 more fun
i only give out magic items i personally find funny. a +1 sword is good but not fun
I remember one time I had this tier 4 PC who just wanted to buy alot of magical items [60,000+ Gold in his pocket alone], and the DM said they were pretty rare so I woulden't be able to find much?
whereas a wand of wonder makes any fight infinitely more exciting
though i do give out mechanically good magic items at higher levels or at the end of side quests
it makes sense that the PC would have to travel to find specific magic items, but i read that as your DM shut the whole idea because 'they'd be hard to find'?
hi
I'm cool with the less number-driven items too. One of the best encounters for one of my PC's involved me using a folding boat to create cover
You should look into the bag of withholding
Yes. [DM's Cousin had an artifact tier weapon btw]
nepotism in d&d lol
Exists in alot of games, even if they aren't related
I genuinely despise it when I join a game and everyone is bring up stuff I don't know about
Like the campaign just started, why wasn't this in session 0 😭
how are you guys
That’s just sorcerers
i live
Counterspell
Sorcadins have extreme nepotism energy
nepo baby AND a sugar daddy is a wild matchup
average sorlock?
Paladin 6/divine soul sorcerer x is pretty potent
My Warlock got three magic items in one session once
He purchased Elven Chain armor for better defense
We were gifted a ring of mind-shielding and the group decided to give it to him because he was holding a piece of the Rod of Seven Parts because he's the most trusted party member
And
He got a Staff of Power because the dm felt bad for basically bullying him in a combat lol
I got a wand of magic missiles last session
I see this combo a lot but then they go for STR 19 / cha 13. if your CHA isn't at least 16 you're not a sugar daddy anymore, you're splenda father.
We did get a Ring of Evasion, that could be good for you
id like it pleeeze
this is why wizards are the best casters
Oop, who pinged me? Looks like it was deleted
Debating on giving it to the barbarian but I don’t know if the barbarian can be trusted enough to not snap it in half, you’d have to see them in play to really get it
It wasn’t me Dave I swear
It was an announcment that you won D&D and you now own the copyright, but you missed it
Cool. Wish it hadn't happened during a meeting but that's life
Perfect. My AC needed drip
as a former barbarian, never give them anything that isn't tightly reinforced or it will be split into pieces
If you guys actually won the copyright to D&D, what would you do with it?
this is more than i get in a campaign
??
I feel better about not doing it now lol
wizards are cool bc they aren’t nepo babies 😤
you'd love me as a DM, i gave out wwayyy too many magic items during my tyranny of dragons campaign. players ended up planting a beanstalk IN a giant's castle, and then blowing a horn of valhalla
at i think 8th level
that was when i was cool, i'm really stingey about magic items now
Sovis Cova, that darned ol Drow Warlock o' mine?
He's got
Boots of Elvenkind, a Ring of Necrotic Resistance, a Staff of Power, a Ring of Mind Shielding, Elven Chain, a Staff of Power and he's the current one entrusted to hold onto the Two pieces of the Rod of Seven pieces that we have so far lol
I'm usually rationing my gold pieces because I can only cast find familiar 5 times before my supply runs out
wheremst my Ring of Evasion
You'll have to ask Lily for it
oh, lily has it? Then im chill for now
had a DM get so upset at my idea to fabricate armor and sell it that he kicked me out of a campaign once
She wanted to give it to someone, silly
oh
I wonder how annoying it must be to sleep for tielfings when they have horns
Probably not that annoying tbh
shame on you for having a creative solution
Like if you got some real curved horns going backwards
Vro, that is literally one of the most intended ways to use a spell possible vro 💔
My locks got a rod of the Pactkeeper +1, wand of magic missiles, and a special +2 revolver with repeating shot infusion
Atleast laying on your back
Sleep om your stomach smh.
10 magic rings
Nah that aint comfy
I’ve thought about that before and I think they’d just make a pillow or something that would have space for the horns
Sleeping on your stomach superiority
I sleep on my stomach/side with one arm behind my back
I can only sleep on the side
Pactkeeper rod only needing one level of Warlock to give you a free 9th level spell slot in 2024e is never not funny to me
there's a species of boar that has tusks that, if the boar lives long enough, grow into its skull and kill it. now imagine being a tiefling with THOSE horns
Especially since with the 2024 magic item crafting rule you can cycle them 💀
Does make me wonder if their horns actually grow like that
The most powerful magic items one of the characters have is the Tome of Historia (Homebrew Artifact)
It gives him
30 Intelligence, Expertise in All Intelligence Skilks, Counts all spells he Casts as one level higher up to level 9, and has 9 charges he can expend to cast ANY spell so long as charges spent are equal to the level
probably depends on the type of Tiefling
It belongs to my Harengon Bladesinger lol
hehehehe
I love tieflings
it's those damn theater kids
Current lock is also a tiefling
I’m not a theatre kid I just love tieflings
invading my old school trad dnd
I'm kinda meh on Tieflings, I think too many people care about making Hot Tieflings instead of monstrous fiendfolk smh.
you said the same thing twice ?
are they not the same thing?
What?
Thats because tieflings are hot
I wonder what this new player picked? Tiefling Warlock
i love tieflings but i honestly think one of the most common first characters people make is a tiefling rogue. i've seen so many tiefling rogues
You heard me.
My tiefling is the nicest guy in the group, to the point where my celestial warlock patrons actually making me less and less tiefling like as the campaign has gone on
I didn't say the same thing twice?
you say that like hot and monstrous arent the same thing /hj
I don’t know what I’ll turn into
Ah....
I see.
wait really 😭 I have a Tiefling rogue although he looks like a goat or something he’s not like a normal dude eith horns
elf wizard dwarf cleric human fighter halfling rogue thief
a real 'john dungeon' cast
I thought the stereotypical new player character was a Tiefling warlock
No, no, I mean like.. Sexy "Poh, hot fantasy man"
I find monsterous men hot, yes.
But people want their Tiefling characters to be "traditionally" hot
Same
Lady dimitrescu
Ahh okay I gotcha. I was partially joking but yeah, I like monstrously hot tieflings
her monstrous features is just tall and claws, not really what im saying though
Purple and pink are my fav for tieflings
You forgot the gnome illusionist and half orc barbarian
and half elf Ranger
John dnd, level 20 human fighter with a 9-5 backstory
My Tiefling fellow, Karkas
Was scarred along most of his body, had cloven hooves. Rams horns, goats eyes and was blue-skinned like that of a strangled or drowned corpse
But he was still a lovely lad
im different
im not like other dnd pcs
champion subclass, soldier background
Sword and shield
lawful good but the guy playing him doesn’t seem to understand what lawful good means
Brown hair, clean beard
I feel like Blonde Haired hero would be more cliche
John dnd vs John BG3
Instantly clocked LMAO
Hes just the same but level 12
What class would Balduran be now that I think about it
John BG3 is an oath of vengeance a Paladin who romanced selunite Shadowheart and stakes astarion every playthrough. he also loudly announces that he staked astarion every playthrough on Reddit
It can't be Fighter can it
I think Ranger is most likely actually
Pov average oath of vengeance paladin
Baldurans as in people from Baldur's Gate?
No as in the founder of Baldur's Gate
Me playing an oath of vengeance Paladin who romanced Astarion 😎
How did the Warlock got bullied
ranger, fighter, or some kind of lawful good rogue
... remind me, is he related to the god of the same name?
Baldur my bae
Now thats cool. I still havent romanced him maybe i should
he’s def not a rogue. I’m guessing Ranger since it sees to fit the whole “wandering seafarer” thing more
norse mythology and baldur's gate unfortunately have no corellation:(
But im more oath of devotion
It’s great! You see more of his not-so-evil side
We literally have Tyr from Norse mythology in Faerun though
As long as you dont ascend him atleast
its not too out of line to think its Baldur the god
Balduran has nothing to do with Baldur the god
baldur's gate is named after balduran, a really rich guy who did some cool stuff and founded a city
another case of DMs punishing players for using a spell as intended
Well yeah true
Bg3 gets scary when you let the companions go off on the deep end
Also you can get balduran’s old gear in BG1 I believe and it’s all stuff for fighters/rangers
i asked the same question when getting into BG3/DND for the first time and was told yes it was named after baldur from norse mythology lol. was incredibly confused when all the dragons and mind flayers showed up
You can also buy them in BG2
Greatest RPG of all time
it’s def up there
I’d love to play the other Baldur’s Gate games one day
The greatest rpg of all time is <REDACTED> and I will die on this hill
Woah woah dude you can't say that
I hope they make another, but maybe in another city. I think Baldur’s Gate has faced enough peril
Ngl doing an evil run in bg3 sucks so hard. I can usually murderhobo eith no problem but like raiding the grove is just awful
Clearly it's Fallout 1
oh I said it alright
In all seriousness I really love Planescape Torment if anyone has played that
I'll die on this hill
Fallout Tactics my beloved
The same devs made sister games for Icewind Dale and Neverwinter. They also made Planescape too.
Aghhh it hurts raiding the grove
Thank you. I must now search for them
I can’t betray Zevlor man 😭
#baldurs-gate-3-spoilers for BG talk
Good call, Ti
yo
Yo
Yo
im new to DND
Icewind Dale is not a story game. It's 90% combat.
Planescape: Torment is a story game. It's 10% combat.
Baldur's Gate 1 & 2 are the "balanced" games when it comes to this, which is why they're more popular.
Neverwinter Nights is built for multiplayer and is genuinely the best online D&D experience you can ever have.
There’s also Baldurs gate dark alliance which is mostly combat
ok
Baldur's Gate: Dark Alliance is not a D&D game lol
Looks like I’m staying in Baldur’s Gate. But I’ll check out the others
…Yes it is?
It's an action RPG brother, it's far from D&D as a system
What version of dnd does Neverwinter Nights go off on
I mean it’s set in the DND “universe” but fair
The pillars of eternity games are pretty solid, although I would only say it’s DnD-esque
can someone play DND RN?
You should check out Neverwinter Nights. It has a single player mode, but it's mostly popular for the multiplayer.
Neverwinter nights has some great mods too
3e, but most online servers move it to 3.5e. It's not that different though.
Nwn2 was a great game
Blood & Magic is an RTS set in the Forgotten Realms, but I wouldn't call that D&D lol
I skipped nwn2 because I heard it was bad. I might check it out though
Graphics are utterly horrid. Plenty of bugs too. It's okay, but it's not better than NWN1. If you want to play it, grab the original (not the Enhanced Edition). NWN2:EE is somehow more buggy than the original lmao
Oh yeah the graphics were somehow worse than rhe first game
one d&d-adjacent piece of media i've never seen anyone really mention is the d&d exhibits in two point museum lol. half the reason i bought the game was the fantasy/dnd stuff
What if DND but every character was a captain in the same army controlling regiments?
The has to a table top rp game like that right?
might be better to look at other TTRPGs for mass combat
Check out Warhammer 40,000: Only War. Hack it into a fantasy setting and voila.
Has anyone here played any of the pre-Baldurs Gate dnd games
It's not bad at all!
Graphics are shaky, but the base campaign is fun. Its main story flaw is that the companions are a bit... Bland.
Come Mask of the Betrayer, the main writer is also the main writer of KOTOR 2, Planescape Torment, Fallout New Vegas among other things. And NWN2: Mask of the Betrayer is one of the finest stories ever told in D&D video game
oh god, im running
Yeah, I played all the Gold Box games. They're... something alright. Pretty fun, but very, very different.
Oh I didn’t know that. I LOVE KOTOR 2, Planescape, and new Vegas. I’ll check it out now
You will play Planescape Torment before the end of 2026 or I will inflict every agony ever seen upon you.
The only one I was able to play all the way through was eye of the beholder
Everyone should play Planescape torment
There's a little rule: If an RPG is renowned for its story and how deep and symbolic that story gets, he had a hand in it.
sweating I-I will, dont worry! Ill surely have time before then!
-# does spending 5 minutes count?
I played Strahd's Domain, which was a very, very good game. Stone Prophet was much the same, also fun, but the dungeons are the most mind-numbingly insane things to ever exist.
You will at least reach Ravel's Maze
... I dont know what that is, and i fear if i ask, the answer will be to play the game
You can carry over your character from Strahd's Domain to Stone Prophet.
I’ve also played Neverwinter. It’s alright
Am I so predictable?
I suppose it's not a spoiler to say that Ravel's maze is the climax of act II and that Planescape Torment is a four acts story
you kill and slaughter spend enough time with fiends you start to get a handle on them :3
Neverwinter MMO is a terrible joke answer to the statement of "4e D&D is literally an MMO". They did turn it into an MMO, and it's still terrible.
At least Neverwinter is honest about what it is 🤣
I wouldn't expect anything good from an awful name like that
It was like the only dnd game where you could be a tiefling before bg3 though
Neverwinter is a renowned city and the seat of power for the Neverembers, and I will not have you sully its noble name.
Neverwinter > Waterdeep > Baldurs gate > Amn
Dungeons & Dragons Online (very strange MMO game using 3.5e) lets you play a tiefling.
and icewind dale >>>>>>>>>>> everyone
Why is that city missing a season, are they stupid?
Oh ty. Any good?
Neverwinter slander shall not stand
As a Canadian, theyre lucky
One day I really wanna run a Neverwinter campaign centred around stopping Auril from trying to bring winter to Neverwinter
I'm Finnish so same :)
Neverwinter Nights is right 💤 💤 💤
Sounds fun. Probably has been done before but
It's something lmao. Is it fun? Definitely, but I wouldn't pretend to understand how the game works. It's an action MMO that fully implements 3.5e rules, and you can imagine how that works.
They do have all of the supplements for 3.5e though. Even lets you play as a Warforged, which I'm pretty sure is the only game to let you do that.
As a Canadian, same
(i love neverwinter btw)
Sounds like it’s better than Neverwinter
might be a hot take, but ill take Phandalin or Moonshar isles over any of the city states
Not a very high bar.
What about chult
Is Neverwinter similar to winterfell
I'd play a 4e survival game set in Dark Sun, which is a terrible time, and it'd still be more engaging than Neverwinter.
What IS it about Neverwinter that makes it so mid? Is it the lack of class options? The cheap 2010s Korean mmo graphics? Idk
I will not fall for rage bait
All I know is I’m glad I can just make a tiefling in bg3 now
what is ddo like
i like dinos, but I dont think i can survive the hot weather there. My filipino genes for heat tolerance have been replaced with cold resistance
I prefer the Cold Crown Coast
-# My homebrew region in Faerun. >:) /j
Darksun is badass
is it still being supported
like is new content still being made for ddo
Sorta? Illuskans are as evil as the White Walkers, so sort of.
Isn't that the place in Pokemon Sword and Shield's dlc
I couldn't live in Neverwinter. I like snow too much
Same
we cannot be friends any longer
Hence why icewind dale >>>>>>>>>>>>
Yes and yes. It still has a very active playerbase.
DDO is eberron btw
Icewind Dale would be the choice
Spongebob me boy, I hope you like inventory management
Assuming post-Icewind Dale module
No, they added Faerun and Ravenloft as well.
man, I feel like after trying 5 levels of barbarian (3 through seven), I am kinda convinced I'll never enjoy one as much as a caster in dnd
Oh interesting
There's Cormyr and Barovia now.
DDO having Vancian magic in an action MMO will never not be funny to me though
Nothing more peak than inventory management
it's almost like martials are boring and given an afterthought in class design
Nah they're fun and not an afterthought
It's just not everyone will like everything
I've always thought barbarian was the least fun of the martials, maybe that's why.
This is only because WotC is cowardly and will never dare to port the Book of Nine Swords to 5e.
Tome of Battle my GOAT
Me spending hours as a 7 year old rearranging my inventory in Neverwinter nights to make it aesthetically pleasing
I feel barbarian might have the least amount of options in both gameplay and roleplay
What would be the best ranger pet to get, so you can sleep on then Totoro style
people will complain it's too anime
Im doing one inventory system in my in person game where you get 9 inventory slots in a card and you fill those slots with card you draw yourself
I’m gonna make a barbarian who isn’t stupid
its been fighters for me. But ive enjoyed a lot of fighter subclasses
impossible
Barbarian doesn't have limited roleplay, people just have limited imagination imo
Here we go again
Top Ti Martials (that i had fun with):
- Monk
- Rogue
- Barbarian
- Fighter
Kinda like Conan
people i think lean into class too much for roleplay when background i think is just as important, if not more when it comes to your character's... well, character
being a fighter doesn't say much about your character than being a farmer does, imo
Every class in the game is fine, it’s just personal preference, nothing objective
If you’ve ever been in a game where one class dominates, you’ve had a bad DM.
Yeah, played with a bugbear giant barbarian, him being a farmer who was just slaughtering an avatar of lolth stood out more than him being big
my barbarian goes as far as being an investigator, but precisely due to being a barbarian, the party doesn't take him seriously, and any arc that involves him getting info about the cult we're facing has to almost be shoehorned into the campaign
to be fair, fighter is alot more general than like warlock
Or you're just a terrible player. It's one or the other.
basically was just getting rid of the pest
Sing it, sister
despite that, he went as far as (probably) learning the nature of the curse imposed by the entity worshipped by the cultists
I love my dnd chat with sweeping generalizations more of those please
Ah dw it happens a lot
There's a lot of the community that only acts off of class stereotypes
@the entire bard class
Classes shouldnt even be boxes that restrict your character
Bards have a terrible stereotype, and terrible players keep playing into that stereotype.
It's aggravating to play a Bard around the "general playerbase" because it's always "oh no he's gonna sedwuce!"
Or all Barbs are Grog from CR
Exactly. A class should give you ideas on what to do for your character and their story, not limit you
Singing sea shanties as my personality, Bard edition
But without Grogs moments of intelligence that made his character special
And his moments of heart
Bard who only plays classical music
honestly cr probably is what made both of those stereotypes popular
I think its a good practice too look at what the class and subclass does not what the class actually is. A boxer would be a good monk but not actually be a monk you know?
A boxer would be a Monk
I can see fighter too
Imo subclass is just as important as class
overall the dm is fine with me being the investigator and has fueled some info to my character, but so far, the moments my party enjoyed to see were, as always, the stereotype
I’ve played a Monk who’s a boxer before
That is true, actually. Both work very well
Yeah keeping the Scanlan seducer stereotype but ignoring the part where he wasn't truly happy being that way and other serious parts of his character
and when it comes to combat, my role is often limited to going forward to take damage
Such is the life of barbarian
specially against cultists, who are all ranged, against a giant barbarian who ain't exactly able to be subtle
You could have a sorcerer multiclassed into warlock but never actually BE a warlock if that doesn't align with your story
My paladin and the Barb in a campaign I’m in are like, best friends, both at the front, the shields of the party, the ones to take the beating together
And past a certain point it just sucks to run in first, I thought I was tough shit as an Ancestral Barb until I rushed in first, got focus fired, and was left with 20% hp...
So I spent the rest of the fight throwing javelins instead, life is not good
I mean, if all I can do in combat is to take 3 rounds of damage and fall, I'd rather just play anything else, really
And that’s valid. Not every class suits every person
my party doesn't have a healer or someone who can support me into doing that, and it's not like 16 AC does much to protect me
I would rather die than play a wizard again, and that’s okay. We all have our different ways we want to play
optimizing barbarian gameplay also leans on something that isn't really the fantasy of a barbarian
Oof, yeah not having a healer would hurt
Any time I wanna play something else, a paladin character appears in my mind
The call to paladin is one hard to resist
neither a healer or a proper buffer, since the one buff they give me is enlarge, so the large barbarian becomes huge
Tho the character I currently have in mind might be better suited as a fighter
I think bard aligns with my playstyle moreso than my actual "main" but druids are so versatile
it takes 2-3 rounds at most, even distributing damage
dnd combat is assuming 3 rounds of combat on average
Shout out to the time my paladin and the Barb shared drinks mid combat
our combats often go way longer than 3 rounds
i did say average
They're a duel wielder so the BA economy is gonna be a tad rough, but I think it'll be more fun as a paladin
midway into level 8, that ceased to be interesting, since I don't even have that big of a damage potential anymore
Yeah, it happens a lot. But it’s alright, it seems like second or back line classes would suit you more
I've had an oneshot as a level 3 wizard
being able to interact with the world without an invisible ruler at my neck
I will never play a wizard again. So fragile… /lh
yeah, got hit once and half my hp was gone
but even then, I put the fear of god through my strikes while also being able to interact with the environment
I really wanted to up my wisdom and charisma because that’s the character I was playing, but I just had to put a few more points into dex and con, I felt so vulnerable
shoutout to my monk who survived more damage than our paladin through being a dodge tank
and do my roleplay without having this ruler telling me "you gotta punch someone's throat, you're a barbarian after all"
I think I could play a barbarian in a different table
you don’t have to play barbarian
If you don’t want to
The way of the Barb is not for everyone.
I'll see how the end of this questline goes. if it doesn't work, I'll swap into some defensive wizard
some people expect clerics to act like anime healer girls -_-
funnily enough, out of the three wizards ive played.
The one i liked the most is the gish bladesinger one i got
clearly theyve never seen war priests. FOR SPARTA
The urge to bonk is eternal
EXACTLY.
Shout out to the time a party member whined at my drow war domain cleric for not healing them 24/7
the thing I like about wizard is that you can be this erudite who has means to analyze everything, but when push comes to shove, you can just scream FIREBAAAAAALLLLL from the top of your lungs
"You can get your healing when you can show me youre not going to get hurt as often. You need to build character."
Ending combat sooner made up for it
imagine a 70 something y.o. diviner who warned young wizards about the importance of a good sleep schedule
“Why waste time fixing you when we can just break the enemy first?”
deciding to singlehandedly deal half of a rogue's life in damage through two rounds
FOR THE EMPEROR!
Its either anime healer girl or bootleg beyblade after level 5 
how the hell is SG beyblade
I’ll take bootleg beyblade
Only wizard I would would be enchanter to be that manipulating witch
the best way to heal damage is kill everything before they can hurt you
Diviner wizards, my bae
I liked diviner, which was my variant of elderly wizard
Do people like enchanters? I like enchanting
was considering abjurer next
-# Isn’t that what I said /lh
to become the lord of no
Diviner wizard is the only thing that makes me want to play wizard again
which honestly would be helpful to our party
Abjuration is so funny
reemphasizing for impact
It's the goat of non combat power
Someone gets it!!!
diviner was insanely good for roleplay
"Damage now is less damage later."
- JoCrap
Works for me. Let’s do this
I've been banned from playing clerics in 3.5e because my friends tell me I get a god complex lmao
the wizard coven gave us some shady magical item, which we wouldn't know what it was about, then I spent 10 mins studying it through identify, to determine it was a special kind of trap
It's probably true for most cleric players.
You deserve it
I had an illusionist I worked with as the dm to pull of some really stupid shenanigans
but we all play cleric to have a god complex
play a canine kobold cleric, just to say you'll play with a dog complex
“The power of life and death… in my hands…”
Play Druid instead
”I do not control who stays alive, I am the one that controls who dies…”
"you die when i say so"
I’ve only played cleric 3 times, and honestly the three clerics I’ve played cannot be more different
so, my dms confirmed that the wizard and barbarian campaigns happen within the same universe
I could play some more diviner wizard, give my nostradamus inkyquill a second run
(inkyquill comes from being a scribe)
that's like naming a barb bloodysword /j
well yes, I like those stereotypical names from dnd
dip cleric or get magic initiate for thaumaturgy and you could scam the whole world with divinations
kinda unfortunate imagining them as a child and having their entire lifeplan already set for them, like how all xaviers grow up to be skateboarders
3 level dip into giant barbarian for thaumaturgy
You 
he could have been the first of his name. 50 years of being a scribe would've done that
family dynasty of scribes
then, at the height of his life (72 years old), he decides to get back into adventuring and becomes a wizard
Shout out to my character named Eclipse Moonvarr… who hated the moon
robert robertson the third ahh
i could imagine why
Well, I went looking into becoming a dm for my college and now there's a chance I might end up on their esports staff because of it lol
Power
get that dub bro, congrats
I mean, once when playing solasta, I've named my would be paladin "john solasta" and had the wildest stat spread ever right after (6 flat d20s, lowest roll was 13)
Now I can be officially sponsored to traumatize PC's lol
I had a werewolf char that doesn't believe in the moon
atleast give them a chance by leaving a holy hand grenade
I'm not sure how they're going to handle campaigns if they've got stuff prepared or if they're letting DM's improvise
the holy hand grenade would be thrown at themselves, to ensure their souls depart to the right place
Eh, I feel i'd get a flesh wound trying to claim it for a monster in one of my dungeons
would make sure to not hit the white rabbit otherwise it might wait for me in the afterlife
it would stop you in the road to the afterlife
you'd see the scales that decide where your soul departs. a feather in one side, your heart in the other. As you think your heart is lighter than the feather, the rabbit jumps in, tipping the scales. You wake up on tiamat's lap
and she ain't friendly about it
this is what happens to venger every time he dies
might ask me the airspeed velocity of an unladen swallow before i can pass the pearly gates
After dying in the most metal ways, like having flames take on his shape and colours
That does remind me, I do wonder what they're planning with him
planning? dudes just an icon
Wotc mentioned he was either going to be in or having his own module at some point
I wanted to do a custom campaign with him as a villain so im excited to see how they characterize him
0_0 thief created!!!!! level 1 and max level is 12 (first edition rule book)
Can I create a campaign to share the books I've bought if I don't have D&D beyond premium or whatever it's called?
i think content sharing requires premium
i feel like 3.5e was easy making a character... not sure about 5e, 2e, 4e
4e mentioned
I feel like 2e would be the easiest, then 5e. I'm not really sure about 4e, but it is still probably easier than 3.5.
gentle reminder that it's also against the terms of service to share content outside of games 🙂
it took me about 3 to 4 hours on my thief for first editon... on a PDF file.
2e is p easy imo
How do you mean?
sharing content just to share content is against TOS. It's assumed that the people in your campaign are people you're going to be playing D&D with.
Salespeople when you own a physical book and show it to a friend
So sharing with people in your campaign is fine?
Yeah. To put it more simply:
✅ sharing content with people you're going to play a game with
🚫 saying to the world wide internet: "i own all the content on DDB; here is a campaign code for anyone who wants to use them to join and make characters"
So 1e is the hardest then?
Ah yeah, I was aware of that. Was asking with the intention to share to players.
gotcha! sorry for misinterpreting. then yeah, you'd need to be a master tier subscriber to do that.
like roll20 and foundry?
They're warning you in advance so you have time to prepare haha
You can all export your character sheets and switch to paper for a session
Any class or character can work on a plain text sheet, and basically every service has a dice bot you can use, heck if you're completely techless just use the Google dice roller and cast your screen in discord
You can always download your character sheet as a pdf as well
Also you don't have to switch to paper, if your group can handle a better solution then try importing to roll20 just for that one session
Or another third party compatible manager
Just make sure you do your prep in advance, DDB has given you and your group plenty of warning
So, how's everyone tonight?
Who wants to see how many level 1 bards with nothing but vicious mockery it takes to kill strahd
i want to see him suffer again
Where can I find server rules and policies and stuff? I found the FAQ but that wasn't very helpful.
Thanks. I had the channel disabled for some reason so I couldn't see it.
Anybody can join you 😅
They just shouldn't use DDB to create their character, or if they do they need to make an export.
That being said all this is stuff your DM probably needs to worry about more then you as they'll be hosting the game for everyone
They can just use the free sheet and fill it out
I exclusively play with manual sheets and a new player could do that, then transcribe it over to ddb later
i have a weird topic of discussion for yall
do yall think interplayer friendships and ties is something that can truly be built in a oneshot, or things of minimal episodes?
a single one shot between prior strangers? not really normally
To clarify you mean "player" as the people at your game table? Or do you mean the player characters? the answer would be yes for either, I think.
PCs
But in my games prefer to have players build their characters together at Session 0 and create shared history together in their backstories, so they know each other before the game starts.
oh if you mean the characters then yea. I've done that plenty of times in character
So PCs can start out as friends.
characters can absolutely get friendly in a oneshot
usually its gonna be in a bit of a comedic "i love this guy" or "yas queen" kinda way
nothing too deep, just hype
i'm glad i didn't do wizard or sorrceror at this time... or any other magic classes... it might of took me another 4 more hours T_T
yeah it can take a while but if its just a oneshot you can just look up popular spells and bring them for the session
if youre low level that is. if youre high level, it would take some time for sure
D&D like video games vs pen and papper is a big difference.
Indeed
now i truly understand why you don't want to die x'D
Once you break down spell options it usually just comes back down to a selective few super good ones as your foundation
And a few other spells that are whatever depending on the campaign itself
pick intaglio 100% of the time I promise it will be good
I think my head might expload from reading dungeon masters guide
no it's the first edition from the 1977
imagine me that my DM had sent me the Ryoko guide book to read for a campaign in march
that is some sort of DnD but around asian folklore or smt like that
dang
Fortunately i understand some stuff already but it have a whole combo thing that you can do with your allies and more stuff
Anyone's dnd beyond not working on pc
Ok everyone: hit me with your distinction between acrobatics and athletics
Gymnastics vs Long Jumping
acrobatics: balancing (narrow passages, treacherous ground)
athletics: traversal (climbing, swimming, running)
oh, athletics is also good for lifting and pushing etc when needed
(but both are part of parkour)
okay. but the climbing, jumping, and traversal parts of parkour are athletics, balancing on narrow bits is acrobatics
people who do parkour are in fact both acrobatic and athletic yes
I don't know why that's a "but" lol
Interesting. So you'd never allow acrobatics to climb something at your table?
i would, if a player explained their reasoning
I can see someone gymnasting their way up
A player can always explain their reasoning to interchange the two though it's pretty easy.
That's why DMs need to distinguish them to punish dumping one
I would in most situations. Sometimes I think athletics or acrobatics can work for a situation.
See this is the problem, at most tables you only need one 😅
I always ask a player “how” they use the stat to do it and if they can justify it, I let them use it
Does wonders for player creativity
i do the same with requests for another stat with that same skill
e.g., someone wants to do Intelligence/Strength (Indimitation)
Investigation/Perception is also tricky
I mean climbing is literally using your strength to pull you up a surface
eh. Investigation is using clues to piece together what happened. Perception is just. What you physically see
strength literally only has one skill attached, and everyone who wants to dumpstat it just pretends acrobatics covers it
If I am searching for something you'd say roll perception?
yes
So when would I roll investigation?
investigation is not piecing clues together. that's insight
Insight is reading someone else
It's both
I wouldn't allow acrobatics for climbing. or, conversely, if they absolutely had to, I'd make them make a strength: acrobatics roll. you can't do it without strength though.
but even then, athletics covers the skills used for climbing
Wisdom (Insight) allows you to discern a person’s mood and intentions.
Intelligence (Investigation) allows you to find obscure information in books, or deduce how something works.
Wisdom (Perception) allows you to use a combination of senses to notice something that’s easy to miss.
That's a good way to do it.
that's why climbing is listed in athletics.
acrobatics could be not falling off if you've managed to get to a narrow ledge or something
Insight is for people
as seen here
... dammit, im getting 504s now
I use the passive skills like so if it makes it easier for anyone to understand: Investigation is left brain, Insight is right brain and perception is in between
perception is your back lobe :x
I flavor them as so in my descriptions
(im being literal here lol, iirc, perception is the back of your brain)
if you can acrobatics to climb or swim or jump, then you can athletics to perceive
Investigation or insight will get you more if you use them appropriately and perception is the safe option, getting less but lower DC
sighs i love chaotic evil
Said the hellbeast
punch the npc to 0 health then let the healer heal them... then keep punching the guy until they give us answers
cool fantasy
Okay good not just me
oh right i thought DND beyond is updating
might be honestly I don't keep up with it enough
maintenance isnt set until next week.
cant do it, most of kingdoms have rules for that
I can get into the character creation and that it's just the books I'm having issues with
don't worry it'll be in the sewers where no one will find them.
im seeing the same issues here. (the mods and team should be aware of it by now, lots of peeps in #ddb-support popped in)
And there's the acknowledgement. Glad to see they're on top of it
ah ok...
Damn officer, you don't gotta do em like that
toturing a poor soul is chaotic evil and still make them live.
death yoyoing an NPC for answers is certainly a choice
if i told the DM that i was trying to get fastest xp to my character... I wonder what they would say.
it sounds like the kind of thing that weird 15 year old kid who wrecks up his sister's dolls would do before being asked to leave a campaign
unhinged behaviour, kid needs to re evaluate what they're doing playing a heroic fantasy game
lol x'D
"we use milestone"
imagine having the entirety of the D&D rules to do any kind of cool stuff and you just sit there devising tortures
So from this I would suggest searching for something should be investigation.
Edgelords want attention, best thing you can do is ignore them tbh
what
Does anybody know what the update is?
Is it routine maintenance or will they finally implement 2024 content properly?
I read it was just performance updates for high traffic volume.
Fair enough
just think of killing vecna resotring his 1-4 hp and killing him just to get more xp out of him before leaving a session
anyway, there's so many things you can do in D&D, torture for the fun of it sounds like a quick way to be invited to leave my table lol
not how XP works
true.
Also you're probably already level 20 if you're fighting Vecna.
yeah you might be right.
I will say I have played in one evil campaign and it was a lot of fun, but that was back when I was younger and we were all a bunch of rable rousers.
There literally cannot be cheese in D&D you have a human there who enforces the system
We essentially were a gang of Nagas reigning terror under the ocean.
Evil campaigns need a lot of ground rules to work, the big one being why are the players even working together? Completely selfish and backstabbing characters generally are not fun to play with in D&D at all
I mean, evil organizations and such do exist in media and in real life.
And most players who want to play evil characters aren't mature enough to play them in a way that's fun for the table.
yeah. if you have someone giggling about torturing folks it's probably going to wear thin real quick
Yeah I can agree with that. Though the game I was in we were all content just following orders from a evil queen and devising ruthless plans.
That game didn't last too long though.
I think that's what other players in my campaign try to do, my poor human ranger has to be the one taking the eldritch blasts for old ladies
Your character deserves it for being human /joking
maybe i should try be more true neutrual than chaotic evil
He's just a man ba dun tiss🥁
maybe you'll find a table that matches your freak
Come to the light side.
i'm now 100% convinced
I think I'm too far into the light, I am lawful good
The bar is in hell
I have to semi-evil characters of my own, both take themselves and their goals quite seriously
Try lawful good for 100 hours first
One is an Alchemist Artificer who wants to make an exploitative medical system and find a way to bend elementals to his will
And the Other is a Berserker Barbarian who wants to conquer hell in the name of Bane
evil characters can work just fine
so a paladin?
evil-stupid is where it gets bad
Meh, ignore Alignment and write a solid Personality.
Nah class and alignment are unrelated assuming you're playing 5e
Ophid is the true wisdom here
I much prefer using PBIF (Personality, Bonds, Ideals, Flaws) to Alignment anyway.
I always thought alignment was personality well at least part of it.
I love that system but I also get why they removed it... It only works at a specific type of game and the amount of time I saw it being used improperly was rough
Officially it's not even a part of your character. It just describes your past decisions and actions.
True it makes you immune to the book of vile darkness and book of exalted deeds
oh dang.... i guess i thought of it all wrong...
If you play 2024 they brought it back in a small way
At least more back than 2014
Alignment?
?? 2024 like scrapped alignment what
No, it didn't.
2024 doesn't use PBIF (Personality, Bonds, Ideals, Flaws)
I don’t remember reading anything about it then
Yeah, in 2014 it was an afterthought, based on your more extensive bonds flaws etc.
Now alignment is a whole step of character creation, you actually pick one for your character and there's rules in the glossary for when and how it can change
Alignment is very alive and well in 2024 but PBIF is a more nuanced and honestly more accurate way to reflect a characters "self".
And they have a bigger description of each alignment and examples of creatures
The framework was great, the explanation not so much. PBIF works great when applied like so:
**Personality **- The default emotional “stance” of your character or their standing animation at the character select screen, if you will. This is how your character generally behaves when nothing else is going on.
**Bonds **- The people, places, and things that are important to your character, either good or bad. These are the connection points between your character and the game world, very important for integrating the character and the plot.
**Ideals **- These are your character’s ethics. This is where you state how your character believes people should behave.
**Flaws **- These are your character’s blind spots or things that plague your character in a way that drives the story forward and makes the plot more interesting, a built-in conflict generator. Usually they will be a kind of weakness in your mindset, but it can be anything else that consistently obstructs your character’s life.
Oh it's a great system and super clever, something out of a different RPG almost, when you read the DMG and realise it's also supposed to apply to NPCs and stuff it's real brilliance unfolds
Wtf ive gone insane i just found it
It's explained badly but it's basically a whole system for character interaction
Radiant Citadel uses it for NPCs and it's just awesome how much better it works than alignment for actually running NPCs.
It's just, many tables couldn't or didn't want to make use of it and it took up a lot of space on the character sheet 🤔
When they were poorly written out or an afterthought to players I actually think it did more harm than good at least when I look back at my own games
It's a mechanic for a specific type of game and table and I think that's why they moved away from it for 5e2 to a more general "just think of a personality" system
I'm still salty about that.
I like using the d4 personality traits from the alignments & ability scores
I was at the time but I've come around by realising how little I actually miss it when I play 😅
Also random hot take but flaw never worked. It was too big of a component (one of the 4 pillars of a characters personality) that had too many players half assing it and then having to roleplay something unfun for themselves or others
Like the amount of either alcoholic or "I don't notice others feelings" players I had to play with in 5e that wouldn't have made that type of character otherwise is staggering
I find that people limited themselves only to personal mental or social flaws when it could be so much more.
I think a couple paragraphs in the right place of the PHB could've worked better than trying to make bonds/flaws part of a character sheet
I actually love these haha
3 traits for how you look and 4 traits for who you are
And the point of all of these were to make thing more interesting and fun for everyone at the table. Once you establish that mindset it gets better. Which is also why I really preferred people to make characters at Session 0 instead of before.
It's more bare bones but I actually think it sometimes inspires more creativity, I always roll them for my characters and try to them weave them into my more nuanced descriptions
Yeah perhaps they could've been relegated to advice or an optional rule rather than scorched earth in 2024.
I do think basically having no nuanced social mechanics in 2024 is one of its major failings
Honestly I have so much equal praise and criticism for the PTIBF system haha
Looking at it after a few years of really investing in 2024 I do think it probably did more harm than good at my tables.
But when you go and actually read the rules it's like arcane knowledge, the book starts to glow as you read it, it's so simple yet deep
Mostly because it's a self written guide to your own character rather than an externally imposed 9x9 grid of vague and useless descriptors.
You write your own guidelines and then you change them as the game goes on, giving you a record of all your character changes from the game.
The ability to take on new bonds was always awesome, it really felt like a major story moment to be like "this is part of my characters motivation now"
Ideal was your alignment, just with better nuance
hmmm I wonder what people favorite D&D module
Humblewood is so peak
im only here for a very niche/specific question if anyone can answer?
what is the campaign mike wheeler is playing in the ||last scene of stranger things||
ok I think it was with eddie right?
nope last scene of the show
so season 5
it's was i think called the Hunt for the Thessalhydra
in what scenario would a pipe of smoking monsters be useful
idk
I just wanted to say im playing D&D and am on my 5th game over the spand of two months and I love it
what how?
i mean my 5th session
oh dang...
i do... but not on pen or pencil yet... i did play dungeons and dragons online.... but i noticed some of the modules on dungeon and dragons online are first editions. so at least some of them kind of are.
do you think online is better than a practical game?
like i bet its better for attention span🤷♂️
I don't know never joined a party of people before on a dice roll D&D....
soooo you never played D&D with people
nope
u only played a "simulator"?
i did learn one thing though... no one likes chatoic evil
well dungeon and dragons online is a video game.... I never went table top before.
ngl its hard to find people to play with and meetups are a lil hard to do bc everyone has different lives etc
ohhh Baldurs Gate 3?
ive geard great things about it!
i did play that... but my friends refunded it becuase it was too punishing.... and i never touched that ever again.
i did play pathfinder but it was single player so >.>
yeah but my friends decided to do something else.. and they never came back to me... because they don't like those turn base games.
I do want to become a DM... but i might have second thoughts on it.
DM sounds like a lot of work/planning 😅
Hello everyone I’m new to the dnd community I just created my level 1 character on dnd beyond and I’m excited to start this adventure I’m currently trying to find a dm online cuz unfortunately I can’t find anyone to play near me is it possible to be in campaigns via online or discord?
well... i been a writer since 2017
Its more like people think chaotic evil means murder hobo and such most of them are. Mostly nobody likes murder hobos. Ofcorse chaotic evil is not a alignment most would like either way.
What is the spell called where your soul occupies an enemy's body and theirs is trapped a gem?
Soul jar
Thank you!
Magic Jar, but you just about got it. I kept searching for Gem and Vessel and just couldn't find it.
Ah my b. Glad i was close enough
It's such an OP spell if you can do it to a powerful opponent.
It is realy good for shure. Imagine being a caster casualy stealing one of the vast amount of solder bodies everytime their previous corpse dies
Average stat becomes like 16+
normal average should be around 12 btw
Magic Jar is the spell and it’s generally not applicable in practical cases to posses most massively strong hosts
Magic jar, i should have looked it up before posting. Thats what i remembered it as on top of my head
The combo is... cast magic jar and then catapult the gem... the target is guaranteed to die so long as they fail the save against magic jar.
And risk killing yourself at the same time?
oh magic jar is a 5th level spells for magic users
There is no risk since your soul just goes back to your original body.
5th edition 6lvl spell
oh dang... that's rough
Ah sorry it’s a verbose spell I mixed up conditions. Anyways possessing random soldiers is pretty mediocre
Magic Jar comes with a big restriction though, it only works on humanoids.
Trap the soul is a 8th level spell (first edition)
It’s roundabout but that can be bypassed
The best use is to cast it, trap the opponent's soul, and them remove the gem over 100 feet from the enemy's body, and then release the spell (no action required). They automatically die.
Since I’m quite new and just had my very first session I need to know, how often do people see someone gets a Nat 1 (-1) = 0 on a DC roll? Cos that’s what’s just happened to my friend and the party could not stop laughing😂
If your body is whitin 100ft i think
That’s a lot of work to kill someone. Anyone strong has legendary actions. Also you lock yourself out of doing anything until someone else gets the gem close
About 5% of the time they roll a d20 and they have a -1 modifier
yeah i'm reading trap the soul i think that's the spell you were looking for...
You can stand 60 feet away casting the spell, so the enemy's soul is already 60 feet from the original body... then just one more bit is required to move it another 40+ feet... you can even action surge, run over, throw the gem manually, and THEN release the spell. It's really not a big stretch to kill someone in a single turn. But again, you have to manage to get them to fail the save, and it only works on humanoids. BIG restriction.
Spell had a one minute cast time just so you know
Also legendary resistance will apply on anything actually dangerously strong enough to warrant this
I wonder if dragons are 10th level creatures
ah...
Monsters' strength is very roughly measured with CR (challenge rating), but CR is a very poor approximation. There is no consistent and reliable actual measurement. Though you'll usually find that CR is usually roughly equivalent to a highly optimized player character build that's maybe 1 or 2 levels higher than the CR.
I was just reading monster summoning VII level 8 monster... shrugs I think it was 9th level spell.
If I’m playing 2024 rules, and I want to make a luchador character would Monk or Barbarian be best?
That sounds like a spell from an older edition, this server mainly discusses Fifth Edition.
yeap. sounds about right...
I was thinking monk Drunken Master
there ain't no water druid subclass yet?
Hello
There’s the Circle of the Sea in the 2024 PHB
As Nugget mentioned, there's Circle of the Sea, but there's also Circle of the Land if you concentrate on Coast.
Ahh, Coast isn't in 2024.
could work ig if you wanna roleplay steve austin, but not exactly a luchador
iirc way of the elements gets flight
could be good to crossbody a few goblins
Monk is very strong since you can use dex for grapples and can then dump strength, although it does require wisdom. BUT open hand also has some awesome moves knocking things prone.
On the other hand, if you want to make a strength based Luchador that carries a shield, you can grab shield master to both attack AND knock things prone or shove as part of one attack per turn (quite strong), so there's a lot of ways to go.
cool
I was also looking at barbarian as well
flavor the shield as a steel chair
Hahaha, totally works, flavor is free!
I’ve just seen a 3 Barb 3 bard combo for expertise so you can grapple and shove enemies into permanent advantages for your team
make beowulf but in dnd
Are you thinking 2024 rules or 2014?
barb would actually fit for him
Cuz in 2024, the only part of grappling that uses skill checks is escaping a grapple.
Ah
You unarmed strike (grapple).
The enemy makes a strength or dex save (their choice) to try to prevent it.
They have to beat your escape dc: 8 + proficiency + strength modifier (there's exceptions to the strength modifier, monk uses dex, astral monk uses wisdom).
DnD makes me happy because it’s so simple compared to war hammer
I'm very excited for an upcoming campaign I'm in
My Barbarian is in the Zhentarim and The Fighter was in the Flaming Fist
Two groups that hate eachother VERY much..
I can't wait to see how much they argue or how badly they want to kill eachother lmao
Ive not played dnd in agess
Like I can read dnd lore and be like "yeah good, let’s go"
I love reading Lore.
Just lore in general
One day I hope to be a loremaster /joking
Wait so do unarmed strike grapple do damage or its making an unarmed strike to see if they are grappled
I pull out a war hammer book and cross reference from 4 other novels to get an understanding of something needlessly complex and I’m like "wow, I need another 8 of these novels. This is so amazing, I love the gameplay." I don’t even play the game that much. DnD I play
I mean, it's your player's responsibility to have a reason to be in the party, "playing nice", unless you allow people to be antagonistic within the party, but that's usually not advisable.
So you could make them half or somewhat aware of "if antagonistic dynamics or conflicting interests arise, you'll need to prioritize the intra-party alliance. Your character needs to have a reason to do so."