#dnd-discussion
1 messages · Page 124 of 1
The lack of literacy is amusing to see.
I'm not illiterate, just lazy 
Don't worry, being illiterate isn't bad, DnD players don't read anyway
Mummy lord succeeds, mummy lord immediately gets killed by a time dragon, inevitable or some other guardian of the space time continuum that then turns towards the PCs and says "You should have called us as soon as you learned he was trying to do time magic, there was really no need for you to get involved"
Me!
I'm the D&D player that reads!
Always.
And the Mummy Lord respawns
Oh yeah an Ancient dragons collapsing planes in the DMG
I... really don't see anything about that on the statblock itself, i guess must be some side book
I'm the D&D player that reads so my dms don't have to explain every 4 seconds what something does for me
Praise me! For I have basic sense and consideration!!!!
Then in 2014 we got Sphinxes who can also manipulate time as well
Usually by chucking other people through time when they are annoyed
So.many players read things and get them wrong too, I much prefer when players ask me something at the table rather than try to look it up
Nealen is not referring to abilities on the statblock. Nealen is referring to suggested plans for those monsters. Things that are not on the statblock because the monster can't do it on their own.
They require a ritual, or magic items... Plot magic, you get the idea
I think it should be, read first, ask later when you're gonna use it
Though by this standard, any character who learns how to do this plot magic is a danger to the world regardless of what their actual statblock can do. Even a PC can, after all, try to do plot magic
Like for instance, if I could, I'd mix the mechanics of Undead and Undying.
Form of Dread from Undead instead of Among The Dead from Undying.
Grave Touched from Undead instead of Defy Death from Undying.
Instead of Necrotic Husk from Undead, I'd want Undying Nature from Undying.
And instead of Spirit Projection from Undead, I'd want Indestructible Life from Undying.
As is, I'm split between which to go with 
The Undeadening homebrew
can i get a link to the statblock?
The Eternal Undead Warlock 😎
Why am I being summoned here again? /jk
Would anyone be willing to help me out?
My and my DM are trying to come up with a compromise:
I play a character that is a prepared caster, so I unlock all my spells at once.
He wants the spells I find to be found in the world itself before hand, like a wizard.
Im trying to find a middle ground.
Target practice. Roll initiative.
||/s||
I heard someone was dissing bards. I hope those people realise that diss tracks are a thing. You've been warned.
as a player who hasn't played before but really wants to (played a lot of bg3) where should I go to find a newbie game?
In this case this discussion would be pointless because any monster can be involved in a plot with time travel
Elder Brain Dragon is a force to be recon with because of its stat block, not because there once was a story about them attempting to do something
now whats up with there being more tarrasques after it dies because i can't find that one
Hmmm...
Bards stink, I hate them :3
ok i found it
"Whenever the tarrasque is defeated, another tarrasque awakes somewhere else on the Material Plane." Fair enough
its honestly surprise Material Plane is still standing, though i guess there is only so much destruction a single easly manipulated unit can do
Some lore is creature specific and consistent
...... I Wish Tarrasques are extinct? 
But yes one being involved in one plot that did something is not grounds for saying its what they do
What would happen if you did wish that?
its outside the scope of a spell, roll 1d6, get 5 tiers of exhaustion and you can never cast wish again
Theyd disappear
Probably nothing good. 
No it works i think
The thing is someone will eventually revert that wish and get them back
No no, it's only outside the scope of known spells 
hallooo, this probably should in #dnd-newcomers , but whats a good mobile app to play dnd? either with a group or just random online multiplayer? i could also go on desktop but that wouldnt allow me to play most of the time
"I wish all currently held knowledge of goblins didn't exist."
existing goblins forget everything about goblins
I wish goblins didn't exist
Let's wish away Ao 
This guy, he gets wished out of existance for this crime. Gobbo life. I wish Echo was True Polymorphed into a goblin.
well yea but "oh one Mummy Lord we have no statblock for is the strongest monster in monster manual because there is some plot specific thing somewhere in module" is a little much
Well I mean, I can actually turn into a goblin
I said pretty much that in the next sentence
You ARE a goblin.
I'm a changeling
No, you're a Goblin
yeah, I'm a mind goblin
But yea i still believe Elder Brain Dragon is much bigger problem than Tarrasque will ever be
(Don't let people know you're a Changeling! That's Changling 101!)
Hi a changeling, I’m Nugget
I THOUGHT YOU WEREN'T HERE
No wait, you're nugget, who's you weren't here?
If I was playing a Changeling I wouldn't even let my party know I was one until it became relevant lol
You mind gobblin'? Ahue hue hue hue hue.
every enemy that can technically summon endless hoard of enemies is a threat
it just so happens Elder Brain Dragon is both fast, and doesn't consume resources while doing so
You did that wrong. “Weren’t” is were not.
So, it would be “No wait, you’re Nugget, who’s Not Here?”
honestly a single unit would ovethrow a pretty big kingdom in like a week
I failed you once more, master.
you called? whats up?
Oh my god there's two of them
I will keep singing praises of Elder Brain Dragon because it's the most terrifying of dragons... if you exclude the powerful dragons from the lore
Saw this show called chaotic good barbarian and just look at this guys bingo sheet
Oh wait u can’t send pictures
don't be surprised
The dude that ghosted me for my DnD commision replied saying "wait, here's a sneak peek" And then disappeared again, he didn't even send a picture 😭
did you pay them?
Not yet at least, thankfully
did you sign a contract?
No, I'm pretty sure they're fairly new to commisioning
than are you even sure he is working on your commision if no transaction and no agreement was reached?
...
honestly that one is self-inflicted
Yeah, but I'm too deep into loving my character
Sometimes.
-# Not really, but its worth shot
What spells should I get so I have a fighting chance against Devils and other monsters in the Underdark?
That's not really more tarrasques. There's really only one.
And "somewhere on the material plane"... The material plane is huge.
Tarrasque SCP confirmed 
And tarrasques can't fly.
well yes, there is very limited amount of damage a single unit, no matter how powerful can do
Yeah. And, you know, if it can happen anywhere on the material plane randomly, it's actually not that good for the tarrasque
sure he can stomp out a city, but its also bloody stupid and can be lead away if threatening
Most of the material plane is just empty void.
Dendar the Night Serpent would like to introduce herself and her ability to consume planets, stars, and gods. 
unfamiliar with it
Dendar, the thing that has been imprisoned for half a million years and, on records, has only ever eaten one star?
And never actually ate any planet?
She's sealed under that one dino land in the south
Dandar the Bum more like it
She's the whole reason that dino god is manifest in the Realm, to keep her prison sealed.
Dandar the Bum
Otherwise she'd go eat the sun again and then have some deities for the main course
I miss playing dnd
Ive been sick for so long now im not feeling up for DMing
And noone i know DMs
You could try and teach them
I mean, you say that, but the only reason we beat her is because she didn't read the Evil Overlord List. When we managed to (unknowingly) create a new sun after she ate the previous one (and almost all the gods), she made the critical mistake of trying to swallow an expanding energy field of stellar matter bigger than her own head and got her head incinerated.
We lost the pantheons, the world, and our sun.... but at least we took her down and made a new star 
Its not a lack of knowledge tbh, except one person
Hmmm maybe....
Protection from evil and good. Maybe anti-life shell at higher level
Some light spell to get out of darkness cheese
Well, not that any of us knew what the Machine would do, but we had literally nothing else to try at the end. It was either 'Push the button' or 'Game Over Forever For Everything'
Devils can just kill you in the dark without a fight
Guys I haven't played DnD in a year and my first drop of it is me at level 7,in the Underdark on a quest to kill a demon lord
Why Driftglobe is always useful
Rest in cosmic horror
My character is a con artist and now I'm in hell
Welcome home, you're here forever.
Alone?
Play paladin youll be fine and your party will love you
Whatcha playin?
For real, just pick like any paladin
... Bard
Half of our party are bards
Level 7 getting access to both auras. Yeah level 7 starting level is a great paladin pick. Especially against devils
Time to change professions
Sounds fun
Heavy metal rockers going to get devils to write their lyrics
Or you can start a band, call it AC/DC
Is it a coop dm or a dragyouthroughhell dm?
No we're there to kill the Minotaur Lord
If its a coop dm, dont worry about optimal setup
Bardadin, Oath of Holy Hands and Holy Hips 
The madman is actively showing us the map telling us how we're gonna suffer
Try to make the right calls and it works out
Ah well its that kind of dm
The plan is to end the campaign at level 20
People always say "the plan is to end the campaign at level 20", nobody ever says "the plan is to keep going once we reach level 20"
100% a player character is going to die
Also after a long rest you can change your prepared spells right?
Depends on the class
Lore Bard
Time to leave the railroad behind and head a direction he hasn't mapped 
I think thats always the case
He has an endless maze.
Spells are prepared daily
He planned every thing.
You can’t plan everything
Im gonna try to romance the shadows
Nope. Only when you level up
Guys what's a hellknight, he just said there will be a ton of them
Hi gonna try to romance the shadows, I’m Nugget
Bards are like sorcerers, you only learn spells or swap spells on level up
That's stupid, don't do that.
So plan out what spells you’ll want with your party members
Could be referring to devils. Or could be referring to the pathfinder concept. In the Golarion setting hellknights are a group of fanatic all about law and order. Think Judge Dread but even more authoritarian and brutal
I think he's referring to actual hell knights
Both things could be "actual hell knights"
Really? Could I just change spells before the campaign first starts 🤔
A devil can have knighthood. There are probably a lot of knightly orders in the nine hells
Sure, it’s not set in stone yet so your dm should be fine if you plan out your spells and swap them before the campaign starts
Okay he confirmed, actual hellknights and not devils that are knights
is it possible to play as someone with only 1 arm or something similar?
Quote "Conquest paladins serving archdevils"
Yeah, I mean you'll probably be at a disadvantage but sure
It’s possible, but I don’t recommend.
You can try to have it reflavoured tho
Metal arm, Finn style
Or, prosthetic
Go all in, no limb challenge
Prosthetics exist and are fairly cheap
As a bard im assuming you dumped strength. Go romancing a shadow and that'll be your quickest death
You predicted it
Okay so he's using the pathfinder concept.
I have 10 strength but 20 charisma
You'll prolly run into hellhounds as well
So, that's a yes on Protection against good and evil?
But if shadows are being thrown at you.... definitely retreat and take them out immediately
Yes definitely
are shadows smart enough to be Persuasion or are they Animal Handling?
They cannot be charmed, or so I've been told
Prolly a religion lol idk
Unfortunately I had wanted to charm one but hey, what can you do
They are not immune to the charmed condition.
Neither. They are not animals and they have no language. Neither persuasion nor animal handling can do anything
i mean you don't need to inflict Charmed you just gotta "no kil meeee 👉🥺👈"
They have lots and lots of immunities.. but charmed is not one of them
I think narratively a dm probably wouldnt let you persuade shadows
They have no language. Talking to them is useless
They dont seem very approachable
Id shut it down for sure
After all, skill checks always depend on the DMs gaging of DC
Oh well in that case
Yeah even a eloquence bard needs something that knows a language right?
Charm as in under spell effect though yeah that works
Yes^
Can I charm person a shadow?
Is it a humanoid?
Nope
Undead
You attempt to charm a humanoid you can see within range.
Think you answered yourself : P
Cool ideas for aquatic species?
Squid dolphin
At the very least I have mirror image so if they try to get me I have a chance of not getting got
Dm told me i have disadvantage. Guess my rolls
Two nat 1's
Do your mirror images have shadows?
No. That spell targets only humanoids. Find something that works on undead
Tasha's hideous laughter for the knights. I dont think shadows can go prone
Probably yeah?
Well no
They're an illusion, they don't have mass or anything to block light in order to create a shadow
That was my second guess
I hope shadows don't have truesight or blindsight
they are weave constructs...
Man oh come on, at least we have a light cleric
Lets just say my ranger was not happy about being spotted
You mean this cleric?
has cleric in jar
CLERIC NO
Anyway next campaign will go better maybe
Honestly what a great use of iron flask or whatever that item is.
hey question I’m making my first character, I picked monk and under core char traits i see hit point die = d8 per monk level what does that mean?
You start with 8 hp
Plus constitution modifier
Every level after 1st, you add 1d8+con modifier
bet thanks
1d8, not 8
Thats only on 1st level
im questioning why are you still so hung up on shadows
Wait, I was reading High jump and I am confused, so
High jump by rules = 3 + Strength Mod minimum of 0 Feet
A Cat has -4
An elephant has +6
So a Cat can jump 0 feet but an elephant can jump 9 feet?
A ELEPHANT CAN JUMP HIGHER THEN A CAT?!?!?!?!
its like old cat not having darkvision
Hold on yea tf
The DM sent a picture of a long hallway, dark, with skulls littering the floor and blood coagulated on the floor
I know, and i said shadows, not your DM
It's in case
if only they made it 3+dex mod =
Cat +2 = 5ft
Elephant -1 = 2ft
They're resistant to fire and the damage of torches is pathetic, so I would not recommend it
it does prevent them from hiding
I mostly meant the light
sunlight is a defined thing in D&D
actually, hold up. it was in 2014, I'm not sure for 2024
I think the best bet is to have our light cleric do the job, and then just help him with bardic inspirations
Asterion book from 2024 does have a feat that changes all light into daylight so it definitely still have day light
Why am I focusing on Shadows, we're starting in a town of drows
I'm just gonna try my best not to die session 1,but thanks for the advice
you are level 7
And haven't played DnD in a year
What’s everyone’s least favorite class to play
wizard
Wizard
Dang why not. I was thinking about building a wizard
It depends on the tone of the campaign, in my opinion. Mind giving a few options?
My least favorite class is Druid maybe
I don't like how weak wizard feels in low levels and it has an insane amount of support spells vs big boom cool spells.
If I ever want to play a wizard, I just make another kind of spellcaster.
But that's just me. I never got along with wizard.
Tbh hard to say
That being said, I have nothing against wizards. I've seen others play wizard and look really frickin cool but I'm not one of those people.
Skill issue/hj
The wizard is the least interesting mechanically, to me. Narratively, they can be fun, and they're certainly powerful. They just aren't interesting to me on a mechanics level.
You aren't wrong tbh
Ranger
I find the mix of spells tbh fun
Honestly I’m stuck playing sorcerers clerics and warlocks they’re just so much fun I wanna branch out but I just keep building them
Pathfinder fixes this
Tho the rituals don’t come up in some cases, if you have speed runner party
And I mean ritual casting the spell, not using the spell normally
Do you think the D&D magic item cards would be a good idea to trade around like the greedy merchants we are.
Periapt of wound closure remarkable recovery.
Deck of many things merchant put the cards into every child’s room
Yes... plenty of other systems do things better than d&d. Not entirely sure the point you're making.
Doublet of dramatic demise.
Wait this sound like a fun one shot
hi guys im new to dnd and it sounds fun can anyone give me advice on how to start
Read up on the first few chapters of the free basic rules on #learn-to-play , and feel free to ask any questions you might have. Then, make a practice character and get it reviewed in #character-discussion .
Once you’re ready and got the fundamentals down, you can check out #find-a-game for information on how to find a group online. To make a post, type the appropriate command in any chat channel.
hi everyone i thought of some cool campaign ideas based on existing media that i think i wanted to share with some of you so
- a space marine/warhammer themed campaign set in the far future.
- a legend of zelda themed campaign (my cousin is actually doing this right now with a partner! not sure where though)
- a binding of isaac themed campaign set in a much more open world version of the titular basement.
- a detroit become human campaign set in the near future.
- a resident evil campaign set in the near future or up to 30 years ago.
- a dst themed campaign that focuses on survival
- a darkwood themed campaign focusing on survival and horror instead of a pre-set goal
those are my ideas!!! hope i can help someone out with these
In order
- Don't use D&D for that, use Wrath & Glory or Deathwatch
- That's actually a cool idea, yeah.
- There's probably an indie TTRPG that can do this better
- Use Cyberpunk, not D&D
- Again, D&D is unsuited for resident evil. Try using the storyteller system or the fate system
hey not trying to spam with questions but i’m making my first character and have a few question if anyone is willing to help
I would say: D&D is good at being D&D. To do stuff other than D&D, use other games
I suggest either #dnd-newcomers or #character-discussion
oh alright, thanks for the feedback
people keep trying to make 5e a one size fits all system, and it simply isn't.
for most people, dnd is synonymous with tabletop roleplaying
Just read the stat block for the marut that things MEAN
well, it isn't ¯_(ツ)_/¯
there's plenty of other things that exist
and do what they are made for better than 5e does
so it's less them trying to make 5e a one size fits all system and more so that they don't even know about other TTRPGs and assume it's all just dnd
For all the people who say they wouldn't want to live in 40k, I wouldn't want to live in the forgotten realms
I wouldn't want to live in either.
There's a 15 year gap between apocalyptic events
instead of just... always being apocalyptic like 40k?
40k is a meme, but you can live on a vacation world there
The forgotten realms can see you get randomly teleported into literal hell while you're buying milk
it's kinda like how everyone calls all robot vacuum cleaners roombas
Getting banished to hell for living in fantasy Chicago
"jeez, 7 gold for milk? these prices a-"
imp grabs my leg and pulls me into a recently opened portal to gehenna
i plead and scream and beg for mercy but nothing matters
Or a red wizard decides you'd make a lovely jester since you can't cast spells
or you have a normal discussion with who you THINK is your best friend except they're actually a bloodthirsty doppelganger at level 20
actually that would more accurately be a doppelganger
You get into a bar fight with some guy who collects birds and now you're cursed by the patriarch of the draconic pantheon
Papageno!
you walk into the wrong side of town and get your internal organs stolen by thieves
Or your thieves die to internal organs
yo me and my friend are looking to have somebody play with us and be dm or anything u want we're new playing so dm me or @micahsobased if u wanna join
You work sewer maintenance and suddenly you're having to flee from zombies because a necromancer likes to dig through trash
i am that necromancer by the way 👀
Are they infectious? Depends on the necromancer
i've been reading adnd and the new OSRIC book. i never really understood why strongholds were a fighter feature as if anyone who has a shitton of gold couldn't also buy land and property and attract followers regardless of class
well here's the thing about my necromancer
help would be much appreciated!
they're homebrewed and stuff
ohh thank you i didnt see that
thank you so much
i would say probably not? but i'm not sure
You just gotta put needles and tubes leading from poison vials to the jaws
like, being able to buy land and attract followers is something innate to the Fighter and not a result of having, you know, a higher social standing?
we cant speak in that channel tho
because they're a morally ambiguous lich
Go to #find-a-game
That's where you'll type the command
40k warpstorm can happen pretty much anywhere at any time i think, so can daemons. Youre not safer from that on vacation planets than while buying milk in dnd
Fighters have higher social standing because nobility
ohh
Or if you want an alternative, go to #looking-for-players
I disagree, because you're protected by the inquisition 🤣
Yeah, and if you have to make whole new mechanics for dnd then it not dnd
occultism is a natural part of being a fighter /j
Or atleast light in homebrew
so all Fighters are essentially nobility or the like?
in adnd
What's that meme? "I hate to break it to you kid, but we're all well versed in esoteric lore"
Yeah that doesn’t add up
Square/rectangle
i see
Tbh being a noble is boring
A fair amount of nobility is fighters but not all fighters are nobles
Firmly disagree, it just depends on the campaign
All of my characters have always been Modest
One of my favorite nobleman moves is the debt spiral
Mostly the upbringing and how some act awful in media, kinda made my perception of it not favorable
where do i find games in need of players?
Agreed, like for example, One Piece's Celestial Dragons
I beg to differ, a friend of mine plays a noble character VERY well
Constantly flashing his degree of pedigree, constantly mentioning he's a noble and his noble heritage, frivolously spending money on baths. Genuinely one of my favorite characters I've played with
"forward this to my treasurer"
"But sir, you don't have any money"
"He doesn't need to know that"
Or they stop playing outside, get back to your studies
Meh
It's all in how you use it. I've read a few treatises on European nobility and they're really funny
Maybe it more so the arrogant and dull studies type of noble I find boring
Your eyes are Clouded.... You lack The Vision.....
I think it's fun when the rest of the party are commoners and find this noble lifestyle completely alien and vice versa
Like the character isn't even a jerk he's just out of touch
I enjoy my noble character
Though the best ones are the nobles who ask questions, so many questions. I've never seen a harbor from a commoner's eyes and I need to find out what they know
And not a brat
You become a stranger in your native lands
Yes exactly that
Ok
Bratty nobles are a caustic trope
Kinda like negatively sarcastic/kinda toxic I think
A caustic trope is one that erodes the quality of the story by the inclusion of the trope
Ah
Nevermind they have the Truest Definition...
Mostly the ones that go “you should kiss my foot and bark like a dog for I am royalty”
I definitely prefer the homeschooler type nobles that just don't know how the world works than Oh Kill The Peasant they Sneezed Near Me!!! Nobles
As an example
Like the hurr durr barbarian or the weepy orphan rogue
I like tagging bodyguards to noble PCs
I played a noble rogue once
Very 'living out my batman fantasy' and doing it poorly type character
"this guy's been with you your whole life because you're kind of an idiot and someone needs to watch your pockets on crowded streets"
I don’t think I met the weepy orphan rogue
I've seen this only once and the player controlled both their character and the bodyguard
Really fun dynamic between the two
Nope, full dmpc and it's usually a soft rp and survival aid
DMPCs must never be used without the players calling for the help directly
Yeah that's what I'd expect from most games
This one was a weird fringe case
Same game as one guy who refused to play the game at all
Like he was there , he did . Nothing. He had a character, and the DM was pulling teeth trying to get him to use it
Clerics or bards, things that empower the players work best usually. Whichever there's not
Acidic Characters Tropes truly the bane of story telling
I'll just empty the seat
im trying to be a dm and how do dms make all their sheets and stuff?
Here's the neat part: you don't
What confuses me is why??? Play the game at all?? Like from the player's side 😭
Acidic tropes exist everywhere, not just with characters
You use the stat block from the book
The tracking sheets from the new dmg are really good to use, but most of what I write is just in a notebook
Like every villain should be sympathetic
i tried that and my campaign was dogshit
Nah, some of them are just evil
Sometimes a guy who wants to stomp on puppies is just actually evil
I agree
You don’t
Not mutually exclusive
Actually what if it a puppy that steps on people?/hj
Making a sheet is the player’s agency and responsibility
i made my villian condesending 😄
Then it is a good dog
I absolutely help players prepare their charicter sheets
Whether or not someone sympathizes with the villain depends almost entirely on the person. You can make it easier or harder but they'll decide for themselves
By the transitive property of being a dog, it is an excellent creature
Suddenly it speaks: “good human, you will not be step on, well except your bard friend”
Yeah, but the problem comes in when the writer decides that the villain deserves sympathy and pity
More like forcing it
The arm waving "hey, maybe you're the bad guy for hurting them" trope is cancer
I had a dm try to make the villan all sympathetic, the final challenge was ment to be solved with a friendly duel, and I tried to disintegrate him instead
I feel like this isn't explored enough when you're making your first evil PC. Don't be afraid to make them a VILE person. Vile people can work in a group, they just push the boundaries just below the breaking point
I have not seen such a thing I admit.
I will not tolerate the forces of evil
Blahhh I have an idea I’d love to run by a DM but I have no DM and I got wicked presentation anxiety coz what if my ideas are stupid and I’m stupid actually
I like profoundly pathetic villains that continue to be evil even when shown pity
Tbh if I were the character in that story I be saying “tough luck buddy, but you do realize you could have not hurt people, be a better person, and not sacrifice random civilians to make your better world right? Oh wait my sword is draw and already at your throat”
It's why I call the "tragic villain" trope caustic
You call it caustic because I haven't seen it?
Or things like cruella where they turn a dog killing psycho into a likeable character
Don’t forget because Dalmatians killed her grandmom
DND is built on communication: even if you feel like your presentation isn't appealing, a (good) DM will appreciate your communication rather than not acting on the ideas you have. If you have a specific idea you want for a campaign I say don't be afraid to run it by SEVERAL DMs and wait til you find one that's ok with it
You can always run it by us for some advice- but ultimately each DM is different and allows stuff a lot of the more vocal people in this server usually don't lmao
I typed out a different message and forgot to remove the reply
Social skills are skills, and we don't tolerate people shirking development. Git gud, make friends, grow your community, and be a positive force in the world
Make some societal gainz
That makes no sense, Disney is truly grasping at straws now
Hi stupid actually, I’m Nugget! Happy to have ya here
Hurt people hurt people
Yeah, I definitely am aware of this! And I’m always open to discussion, it’s just I find myself getting excited and all these big ideas and I have to temper my expectations before I actually talk to someone who knows a little more lore. there’s also the issue of finding DMs, like it’s almost like hunting unicorns LOL.
I would love to run some ideas by, I have one that’s inspired by a couple different stories I’ve enjoyed and think it would make for a really interesting driving force for a game
No, no they don't. That's an excuse that was originally created by abusers to excuse their behavior
I’ll give it my all!
By hugging them to death so they can never escape, and become fleshy plushies
Who said anything about it being an excuse?
Well there are a fair few DM’s in #dm-discussion , soooo.
If you wanna run it by them try there!
Bruh I am so sorry this server is a maze to me 😅
It's a tacit excuse for hurting others on the basis of trauma
YOU'RE FINE there's a lot of hidden channels if you don't select literally all categories in the channel manager
Not really
Though if handled as an absolute, it falsely claims all victims turn perp
They do, though! I don’t think there’s anything wrong with acknowledging that, an exploring it narratively, some of my favorite villains are ones that have acted out of grief-madness or a desire for vengeance
Yes, and if applied thoroughly it posits that the fault is on the victims
Oh yeah here another thing, redemption for villains is earned not given
There also is an event horizon to consider, where certain actions put you in a place where you cannot go back or earn redemption, IMO
There are things for which the only redemption lies in death
Like stealing someone’s identity
Can’t go back pal
I'm curious how you apply this to evil PCs in a campaign
I haven't actually played an evil PC yet and I kinda want some opinions on how far you really GO with it
Pff 
No
As I often say: Redemption is a religious concept. Take it out of its original context and it loses meaning
^ saying this as someone that wants a truly vile character but has trouble allowing myself to do that with people who don't know me too well yet LOL
That’s fair, after all the notion of karma in any iteration is linked to cosmology that cares about the world
When in reality, the universe is a vast, empty void
I haven’t either, if I did one it be a morally ambiguous campaign, or make them at least functional as a party member, like “I am just using these people to disguise my true identity”
Sorry to interrupt the current conversation, but I have a question.,.,,,.
I just got to level 9 with my phantom rogue, so I get Soul Trinkets
But I was wondering if there was a limit on how many I can make, and if I'm able to give the trinkets to others for them to use
Anyone know ??
I like how My name is Earl handles karma
... Goofily
It boils down to whether you can shed your ignominy
Its genuinely really hard to put an evil character in a normal good aligned campaign. Not impossible, I just tend to find that it causes group contention.
Something something about redeeming yourself in the eyes of those you care about after doing wrong to them is also a thing. Redemption can be more than just caring about others opinions as well, could redeem yourself in your own eyes too.
Yeah I'm kinda there with my character, he's Lawful Evil so he's not blatantly nasty to people he meets at first unless he knows he has power over them, and even then he burns bridges carefully
"You can have a maximum number of soul trinkets equal to your proficiency bonus, and you can't create one while at your maximum."
And only you can use them
Awh shucks, okay
Thank you !!
Just use the UA version so you can carry infinite amounts mwahaha
Exactlyyy lmao
I got put in jail for bad words gang I forgot 😔
Truueee yeah
Something about the challenge kind of appeals to me though.... I like the idea of a group of do-gooders thinking their friend is -ok- until he does something truly vile
Naughty naughty
Forgiveness is not. And whether you call it forgiveness or redemption, there are lines you cannot hope to come back from once they've been crossed
Yo what's up people
We're talking about Evil Characters!!
Personally, I’m soft testing a “villainous” PC with the idea I’m playing with? I’m not going so far as making him vile or reprehensible, just selfish, deceptive and cold, even though he was the opposite before the inciting incident
Depends. Whose forgiveness?
Evil is better when you don't try to claim moral grey
I love to swear what can I say
Naruto would beg to differ.
The society to which you belong to start
Tsk tsk
That's a Steven Universe take right there
"he said he's sorry"
Is it really?? I love exploring moral grays in fiction, I love figuring out what makes an antagonist tick.
Don’t get me wrong, I also love an unabashed do-badder, and they exist a-plenty irl, but variety is the spice of life as they say
Ooooh I like that
Yeah kinda the way I wanna go with my guy, though he's always been a bit of a selfish jerk it's just gotten worse and worse over the years
He feels he's Owed by everyone else and Deserves their subservience.
Idk why the jerma quote "Leonardo davinci, Picasso they're all DEAD! I REMAIN!!" Came to me here
I detest moral grey as justification
Ofc you must forgive them. Don't ya know, villains never lie?
Clearly
What do you count as justification?
THIS!!
Exactly what I want from my evil PC. Lying little shite
Get out the pitchforks
Sounds chaotic neutral to me
Any attempt to mitigate or excuse something when talking about evil. At least in this specific context
"They cut off the hands of everyone in the village"
"But they were bullied by the villagers as a child" type beat
Howso.... Keep the above in mind about basically wanting to rule a small cult
Hii guys!!!
Thats still evil, morally grey would be like.. sacrificing people to save others or something.
Blue eye samurai does this fairly well.
Sure, but I don think acknowledging why someone is the way they are is justifying anything. If you said “oh, they were bullied so it’s okay”, yeah, but “it makes sense that someone would turn to villainy as a result of mistreatment, but we can’t let it stand” is not
And of course acknowledge that there is always a choice to be better and not worse
There's also a difference between acknowledging factors and justification
Chaotic neutral. Lying, ruling a cult, it all can fall under chaotic neutral. Chaotic neutral is basically "what I want, consequences or rewards be danged."
Evil is, you see a puppy on a street, you kick it. Chaotic neutral is, you kick or step over it, depending on what gets you to your destination quicker.
Cut off their hands?
Nah, murder their parents and bully them for not having parents afterwards /joking
Good lord, that must be where all the rogues came from /j
What about... Trick them into eating their own parents?
Guys what are yalls thoughts on a tabaxi oc?
Do I look like Eric Cartman to you?!
Is Cartman evil? Or is he just a tragic villain?
Eric Is evil.
100%.
This is a false dichotomy. Tragic villains can be evil.
He's done things I can't even mention here lmao
The Chili
Eric Cartman is unabashadly evil.
this is an interesting discourse tonight
what it was a tabaxi?
Have you seen the skyrim bit?
Eric takes pride in being a shitty person
Chaotic Evil specifically
That's the point, they're still evil. There's nothing that could excuse their evil
And thats why we love him.
eric is what people who make alignment meme charts think chaotic evil is
Their cat people pretty much lol
Eric Cartman is part and parcel of the Sweeney Todd discussion
Yep. They may have a tragic backstory, but that doesn’t excuse the consciously evil decisions they’ve made since then.
na, i hate him completely.
If i could put him in any campaign to just kick him in the nuts every time i would
I'd argue this is where Lawful Evil comes into play, as Lawful Evil views playing the system to get what they want- lying and cheating to get to the top
For example my guy DOES in fact fear consequences terribly. I could definitely see someone that approaches it recklessly would fall under chaotic.
I can kind of see your argument for neutral BUT I counterargue again with the 'Lawful' side dictating they don't kick that puppy in the middle of a busy street because people are watching, but if no one was around? Absolutely kick that damn dog
ooooohhh, okey okey. Welp, i guess they are okey
What?
You can sympathize with their backstory, but they still had the decision to not do bad things.
Are the people who ate the pies in the wrong for cannibalism?
Tragic villains if you think about it lean towards neutral. True evil villains like Jack from The Last Wish or Aku from Samurai Jack show what evil is on the spectrum.
Of course not. They bought pies, and ate them.
That was exactly my point
Of course not. Unknowingly eating something that happened to be people is not their fault.
So children without parents are able to become orphans.
And you can be the cause of the death of the parents.
And… you can kill them by turning them into a item such as a sweet-roll
Yeah, the trope I take umbrage with is when the story tries to use the moral grey card by showing a tragic backstory for the villain
Lawful Evil is just as evil as every other type of evil. The difference is your evil hides under the excuse of the law. You will instead of kicking the puppy, make a law where every citizen must kick the puppy once a day.
I had a Chaotic Evil Moon Druid
He didn't just randomly kill people or do bad things for the sake of bad things.
His goal just didn't benefit anyone except for his own need for revenge.. the reason he was "Chaotic" is because he didn't fare about socialtle structure and wanted to disassemble it
Lawful evil = Baron Zemo
Nuetral evil = taskmaster
Chaotic evil = Carnage
That's not true. Think about one of the great tragic villains from classic literature: Count Dracula. When they put a stake through his heart, there's a look of relief on his face
... interesting interpretation 😂
Again, Chaotic Evil isn't always murder for the sake of murder
Carnage would 100% be considered chaotic evil tho
Alright this has now degenerated into an alignment discussion. Take a shot.
Chaotic Evil is doing bad things and just not caring who it affects because it brings you some sort of pleasure or whatever of the sort.
Violence for the sake of Violence is just an example and still shouldn't be the root of Chaotic Evil
Take Frankenstein, he's a wiltering man-child who gets bested by his own creation
The joker? Chaotic evil but I do feel like the joker has a code
Dracula is the purest form of neutral. He doesn't even kill out of pure enjoyment. Its for survival, depending on what type of literature we're talking about.
NO!!!! Damn it!!! It always happens!!!
I'm talking about the novel. You know, the one where he is sadistic, kills babies, and is a thinly veiled allegory for sexual violence.
Also, Bhaal is the Deity of MURDER and he's Neutral Evil.
Not all murderers are Chaotic Evil.
Yeah its been a while since I've reading the classic.
Vlad the Impaler?
I cant believe that 2/3 times i have been here it has turned into a alignment discussion
Chaotic Evil is just being violent because of their own whims. Uncaring about laws or others at all.
this still confuses me ngl
Its doing evil acts just because they feel like they wanna do things on a whim
Because, while murder is considered an Evil action by most, some people don't want to kill when they do so, such as in self-defense or fear.
But it does mention hatred and bloodlust being what spurs said whims so
Take a shot anytime the following appear
- Alignment
- Rangers
- AI
- 2024 subclass oddities
- Any mention of how religion in D&D works.
If you follow these simple steps, you'll have cirrhosis of the liver by Tuesday
I feel like lawful evil there is reasoning behind it. There is a agenda and a line they won't cross. Nuetral can be swayed to both side but I still fill like theres a line they won't cross. Chaotic just feels like evil without purpose.
OK so let's go with the usual Incubus definition.
A character is lawful if that character is likely to compromise their principles, do things they do not want to do, for the sake of social order, codes and tradition.
A character is chaotic if that character is likely to go against social order, codes and tradition for the sake of their own principles or wants.
A character is good if that character is likely to sacrifice their comfort and health in order to prevent the suffering of others and defend their dignity.
A character is evil if that character is likely to cause the suffering of others and attack their dignity.
dont forget multiclassing
THIS ^^
Notice what those definitions do not say? Whether or not a character is a serial killer or not
Im just going off of the book definition
Chaotic Evil (CE). Chaotic Evil creatures act with arbitrary violence, spurred by their hatred or bloodlust. A villain pursuing schemes of vengeance and havoc is probably Chaotic Evil
Which is a poor example of it imho.
Multi classing and the obligatory "looking for DM/Players" post in the wrong channel
Really good summary honestly
or "i havent played in 1000000 years what should i do first?"
Guys im watching this to learn more about dnd & to help w my game play cs my first campaign i think i did pretty bad, had anyone else seen this? thoughts?
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLeImKFecYFCzND2l_ZhAwI9WGNIzELt5g&si=Zze21c7pYDXqdk1o
It cant be a poor example if that is the definition of it in the rules lol.
You just dont agree with it at all.
So I’m playing a chaotic neutral 2024 ranger (who I’ve generated an image for) who multi classes into cleric so I’m wondering about what gods would do well for their like following and I’m curious about some finicky stuff with their alignment and subclass exactly 
Siri, what is the definition of irony
My Chaotic Evil Moon Druid didn't seek to just kill people, but he wanted people to live and suffer just as the beast "beneath them" have, so he wanted to destroy the foundations of society and didn't CARE if his actions killed anyone even if it wasn't his goal to do so.
For example: If a character is the executioner, and knows the person about to be executed is innocent, but that person was declared guilty and therefore kills them anyways despite the fact that they don't want to kill that person, that executioner is lawful. Whether or not they're good or evil is a bit irrelevant.
And we can take the rest of the week off after someone gets struck by a mod
Different groups play different ways. So just make shure the game fits the players and the dm simultaneously
It's stinky, bad and makes people think it's all Chaotic Evil is about
Okok thank uu, i’ll keep that in mind! Im working on what kinda oc imma create rn😭
Alignment is a mess which should be taken out back and hit with a hammer
That is violence, because violence isnt just killing, and is spurred on by the hatred of people who treated beasts badly and how society has essentially enslaved said beasts.
ngl "what alignment is this character" discourse is one of the most annoying things in fandoms
Notice: The way I define chaotic and evil is as negative alignments, in the sense that they are defined by their opposite. Lawful and good are easy to define, but chaotic and evil can only be defined in contrast. A character who is chaotic is a character who is very "not-lawful". A character who is evil is very "not-good".
You basically exactly went with the guidelines of chaotic evil haha
Ultimately, and I always say this about alignment: Alignment is a very shallow very shorthand way of describing your character's personality in an extremely simplified way
And should not reflect the character's personality throughout the whole campaign
i think as long as the planes that are tied to alignment exist it's going to stick around in some form, but 5e's traits bonds ideals flaws are so nice by comparison to just using alignment for characterization
Better yet: Don't even think about alignment until the moment you come across a magical effect that requires defining your character's alignment.
Shush with the alignment talk, chat needs to not loose its mind again
For me a lawful evil doesnt sacrifice for social queues. Instead, they use the law as it is to constrict and hinder their enemies, while they slip through every loophole. A politician is a lawful evil.
A chaotic evil leans more impusively. They can have plans, but winging it in a disorderly and unorthodox method is how they do it best.
A neutral evil mixes in between the 2. Someone like Aku, from Samurai Jack, is my idea of a neutral evil.
Better yet, Align yourself with Whimsy.
I hope you're ready to learn about zoning laws
Was just gonna say this
Frfr
Too late...
I'm gonna give a take here.
Player characters shouldn't stick to an alignment because ideals should be ever shifting and evolving tge further they progress into a campaign.
An Evil character who's evil just for Evil can still possibly learn and change
Maybe the Lawful Good guy sees that sometimes laws must be broken to do some good
Alignments can't stay static because even as people our beliefs aren't always a static thing.
The issue lies in the fact that one can grow and change without changing alignments
There's also the issue that if you're facing Baby Eater No#26 you're probably not gonna have a change of heart and start eating babies
I mean, yeah, but Alignment is stupid and should be left to the Extraplanar creatures that truly care about it.
Alignment is important when used correctly
hey im sure someone has given up baby eating at some point in time
Lawful good doesnt mean following every law, it means doing the right thing as best you can according to societal standards.
i think alignment is just a baseline, if a character deviates from their alignment for proper reason i dont think that is a flaw, it makes for good story telling. either way, i do think alignement is outdated for complicated characters but it acts as a useful framework to think of characters
I think the new alignment descriptions in 2024 are vague enough to be followed as a guideline for sure. None of them are so specific and restricting.
i love this so much
This take assumes the (Insert alignment) Stupid approach
No Alignment is stupid!
Just the people who take Alignment at surface value.
i mean lbr alignment is a relic of the 1960s sword and sorcery genre where everything was defined based on (the author's definition of) good and evil. not saying we should eldritch blast it out of existance but its not like alignment is a scientific or real-world thing
As in Lawful Stupid, the guy who turns in the rogue for doing something dubious
alignment should have stayed in planescape with tieflings
as much as i love tieflings, i can appreciate that there is a time and a place and most settings are not suitable for them
same as alignment, most games people run can be a lot more complicated than the boxes alignment pushes you into
Alignment is there to provide a guidelines for how one can expect a character to act. The DM knows generally that someone who puts "LG" on their alignment section is gonna mesh better in an environment where there's strict codes of law and can reasonably expect that player to try to stop the victimization of others
Some people like to paint alignment as a box or a fetter, but it's a tool of communication
It hasn't been a fetter or box for at least two editions
i think alignment is useful, but just as a shorthand for the personality traits or backstory, if your dm relies on just your alignment to determine what kind of character you are, or worse, the player does that, thats the whole alignment stupid thing i feel
Though I'd count 2014 as a quarter or half edition
its a useful shorthand to know at a glance, but thats about all it is to me
My Tortle Knowledge Cleric
Follows laws as best as he can but doesn't agree with every law.
When his companions break the laws, he doesn't report them, but he does try to give them good advice, he's willing and capable to break a few laws himself so long as his companions make it to the end of the day.
He's the most GOOD person in the party, but he's definitely not really trying to force his party to do any better
what settings are tieflings not suitable in? jw
One could say Neutral Good
I just call him a person living every day in waterdeep.
Lawful/neutral good. Breaking one or two laws doesn't instantly make you chaotic
I didn't say he was Chaotic lol
Especially if you're in an area with draconian laws that punish the dumbest of things
i think theyre fine in most, but a lot of dms dont make worlds with tieflings in mind so when a player is a tiefling theyre often the only one which can be weird, but i think its definitely possible to include them in most settings, just a thing where the dm and players should talk about what setting they have imo
He thinks Waterdeep is flawed in law, but he knows that he's really just too old to truly care or do anything about it himself lol
I'm inclined to say lawful since the character does their best to abide by the societal norms
lawful neutral
lawful neutral
but i think alignment isnt the kind of thing to apply to real life
Paladins used to get penalties for doing evil or chaotic things
I think the average person is neutral.
Because you're supposed to be a force of good in the world and you can't be doing unspeakable stuff to others
oh sure yeah, idk though, i dont think ive known enough people on the level to know if i would cool them good or evil, when i see all the people around me in a city i dont implicity think of them as good or bad people, just neutral on average, but is following laws just because you will be punished the cornerstone of a lawfu person or is it the choice to?
that is a very biblical question i think lol, free will and stuff
btw is dex paladin viable?
Yes.
Almost all paladin builds are viable if you can use a smite
yeah why wouldn't it be
thanks, is it more or less viable than just the other kinds or is it just the same
Aura of absolutely mogging the forces of evil
So, my players are about to board a train and I wanted to introduce a couple npcs to them. I was thinking of a couple "wtf didnt expect that" npcs. I got a Yuan-ti painter but I wanna add a camping enthusiast. Any race suggestions?
idk, never thought about it until recently, all paladins ive made were strength so i just never considered it until last night
hexadin might be better idr
Thri-Kreen
gnome!!!
Thri-kreen are underrated
wood elf maybee
Uses a magic mirror to record product reviews for broadcast to scrying mirrors
i don't remember how well 1 hexblade/x paladin translates to the tabletop dnd
Also, Giff, old posh British Hippo man who loves the outdoors
what was the alternative, is that like a baldurs gate build?
And now you have a Thri-Kreen survival influencer
I love the ideas
if it is viable it would be so perfect for the character im making rn
i have a lot more experience building stuff in bg3 than in actual tabletop dnd, yeah
i have heard tabletop players scream their lungs out about 1 level hexblade dips though, so i'm assuming it's still good here
I have a Giff Pugilist just waiting to be played
His name?
Reginald Archibald Montigue Esquire 🧐
Might use the thri kreen. Feels goofy
He has a Headband of intellect flavored as a Monocle
i think multiclassing rules prevent you from running a 8/16/14/8/10/20 paladin but that's about it
Bad news
okay thanks, maybe ill check it out, i think i heard someone yesterday saying multiclassing in 2024 wasnt that useful as it was before but who knows
You gotta get to lvl 3 for your pact
hexblade outright doesn't exist in 2024 yet, no?
Characters with either Incredibly Long or one word names are the greatest icl
i have no idea
and even if it did, subclasses are all lv3 now which i think is silly
Welcome to the club
You're in the minority on that opinion
I really don't care
Reginald is a Gunslinger and Brawler with gentlemanly charm, he owned a small spelljammer had a crew and had an Adopted Plasmoid son named Santiago
He went by Cap'n Reggie lmao
I feel like there's a reference in here somewhere
Sounds like quite the fellow
My long name char is Ramone Van Jenkins Fernandez De Calderon (the 7th)
Nealens been dying for me to play him in Eve of Ruin, he's gonna need to kill my Warlock eventually lmao
Warlock: Pact Magic and Pact of the Blade are tempting, but there’s some nuance to consider. Pact Magic spell slots can be used for Divine Smite, and since they recharge on a Short Rest, they provide a more steady supply for Divine Smite than your normal spellcasting progression. But at the same time, putting those levels into Paladin or Sorcerer will get you more and higher-level spell slots, which is more impactful unless you’re also benefiting from other Warlock features.
Pact of the Blade lets you use Charisma for attack and damage with your pact weapon, but feats which make you better with weapons grant increases to Strength or Dexterity. Focusing on Charisma reduces the Paladin’s MAD issues, but at the cost of making your best feat options unappealing.
Circle casting smite
He managed to scandal his way into bureaucracy one session with the assistance of the party (two monks who like to drink)
We keep joking like:
"If Reginald was here, he wouldn't have let this happened"
Or
"If Reginald was here he would've taken out all of these bad guys"
my character is just called Korgoth
Had a dwarf named Chiggis Khan, shockingly devastating in a fight. Don't underestimate throwing mundane items
I had an Idea with Reginald that when he introduced himself to NPCs his name would get just a bit longer, but I haven't played him to try it out yet lol
DoT will kill a shockingly large amount of very otherwise tough foes
I had a bit with Ramone where whenever he introduced himself, he would say “Son of”and repeat his family line until he was stopped
My first dnd character was named by the party lmao
I nearly got to the third Ramone once
"My name is Reginald Archibald Montigue Esquire Bartholomew Jenkins The Third of the Fifith generation of The Fourth Grandfather of my family!"
The greatest game of how long can you talk until your dm throws something at you
Then it keeps getting more ridiculous
I can't tell you how much fun it is to play a dwarf artificer with a jillion illegitimate children
Unironically have a character with a stupidly long name that I genuinely misspell every time I spell it because it's that dumb
it's purposeful alphabet vomit
Reginald actually would've been a pretty serious fellow because at this point, the party understands the Multiverse is endangered by Vecna
My DM is frothing at the mouth for session 6 (session 1 hasn't started)
"I'm an outcast"
"Why?"
"Because I was a wild youth and left many here with youths of their own"
I was expecting "you killed my father, prepare to die" somewhere in this line.
Sounds like you weren't much of an outcast in the beginning
It would've come up as part of the name
Child support starts to get expensive around the 60th child
That's why I'm a changeling, personally
Only two of my characters have children, but said children are of different species and adopted lmao
I spent from 50 to 70 in a lot of different forges, if you catch my meaning
I had a Kenku Warlock who had a budding relationship with a Drow lady and adopted her son after she died
And Reginald the Giff with his adopted Plasmoid son Santiago
"anyway, that's why I'm here killing dragons. Court has a diviner watching me until I pay all the back child support"
One of my characters HAD a child but he lowkey blew up
"Ah not again! That's the fifth child this week!"
It's so much fun getting to roleplay the return to the dwarven settlement you're not supposed to be in
Worse part was he got his soul stolen so he couldn’t be brought back
Rest in many pieces
Hate when that happens
OH
My Drow Druid and his Owlin husband have a "Child"
My Druid slain a Roc that was killing travelers and found out that it was a mother and hauled the egg all the way back to his husband lmao
"I'm devastated. But I'll make another one"
I'm sorry what
Stolen? You could've sold it!
No characters with children yet, not dnd characters anyways. Actually the only characters I have with children ended up having 8 in one go.
And the wife too
Shame that one
To shreds you say
Not because his Husband is a bird person, but truly because his husband was a great individual and was the only person willing to deal with it
To shreds.
eight?
I've yet to name 7 of them .
His wife is a dragon and he himself is a bug mutant so it kind of makes sense. But they were also both human originally so their children are human also .
Magic yippee !!!
Oh!
My Dwarf Wizard had an adopted Goliath son as well lmao
Tokii's characters pulling forgotten kids out of their sleeves left and right
Well "adopted" he helped raise the boy when his father passed and the Goliath viewed him as a Father
guys i forgot the exotic languages, can someone gimme a hand
dnd beyond presents exotic languages in the character creator iirc
My characters that are Dads are good dads because I never git to meet my dad but I was told he was a good person that genuinely loved me, so-
i can't open browser rn, unfortunately
there is an official dndbeyond app
how can i dowload an app if i can't even open google '-'
uuuh draconic, sylvan, demonic, infernal, uuuuh
I dont know your situation man!! Anyways
Abyssal
Celestial
Deep Speech
Druidic
Infernal
Primordial
Sylvan
Thieves’ Cant
Undercommon
ngl did not know druidic was a language
thanks
can a player choose a specific primordial dialect? IE fire elemental shenanigans
All of them are extremely situational but undercommon, sylvan and thieves' cant might be the most likely to come up depending on the campaign
"why you know how to talk celestial?"
"i thought that the god i talked while playing was my imaginary friend, so he showed me his language while we played"
My only character who was going to be an actual biological father was a Goolock.
A human, believe it or not
The idea was he made a pact with an Otherworldly being, the cost.. his child whenever he had one.
He didn't know he'd ever become a dad so he made the deal.
Few years later, he has a son and after a week..
The child was whisked away by Eldritch forces..
He had everything he wanted but lost what was most important
Cliche, but fun
Celestial is insanely relevant to a campagin im playing rn and nobody in my party knows it 😩
If you know primordial, you can communicate with every elemental that speaks any dialect of it. However you may flavour that your character is better adept at Ignan and has an Ignan accent
oh I LOVE that
is it too mean to require a player to know how to read a specific primordial dialect? i want them to remember they can ask help to their dao friendo
or the wizzard can just comprehend languages
Fun fact: My first 5e character had a similar backstory except for the fact that his warlock pact of the archfey happened when he went to get his son back from the fey. Then some Rip Van Winkle shenanigans ensued
The worst part is that his wife didn't believe him and left him due to thinking he was ill and a danger to her.
I'm not sure I understand the question
He wants to find his son, but the whole point of his story is that he never would.
He's just alone forever now.
Because, he had a son.
He wanted HIS son
He wanted HIS wife.
He would've searched the Multiverse (Eve of Ruin) and realized that no matter how indomitable human will is, inevitability is stronger.
I may be a mean DM but I would make the son reappear as some sort of star spawn, warped by the Great Old One. And only after the death of that emissary would your character notice that the emissary carried the same necklace his son had
we have an aarakokra native to the air plane who knows primordial
they are trying to read dao literature, aka earth dialect for primordial
they know a dao NPC they can ask to do that, and the wizard can Comprehend Languages
is it mean to say the aarakokra cannot read that cuz he never even met the specific dialect form the earth plane?
I think it's more cruel giving the character hope then the slow realization that it wouldn't have happened any way ever.
I'd say yes. Let the Aarakokra read it, with difficulties
give the aarakocra the text with a bunch of incomprehensible words
He's forced to live with not knowing and the consequences of his past really did catch up with him
if they can figure out the blanks on their own, sure
oh wait that's actually not a bad idea
something like
"I am eating a bswfw right frunc"
Its a dialect. Its like reading portuguese as spanish person
if example sentence is i am eating an apple right now
Its just gonna be tricky and slow
Primordial is the base language of all elementals.
Make some words clear, but Earth elemental specific words don't make sense.
Just because they understand the base doesn't mean they'll understand the dialecs.
It's like The Chinese language in a way, there are multiple versions (from my understanding, don't quote me here)
we speak portuguese in this campaign (mainly, we chose french to elvish and german to dwarvish cuz the dwarv player and i speak german, same thing for me and the half elv player)
i can give him a text in plain old latin. Practically portuguese, you can understand most of the thing, but some niche words are messed up
If i can read half of norwegian, swedish, danish, old english and old germanic, and my french lets me read spanish and italian to get an inkling
I assume the 4 elemental dialects are semidecipherable
Make an int check and give info on how well they rolled
I can understand 90% of azerbaijani but some words baffle me
high mutual intelligibility is like that, you get most of it and the gist of it overall but then a word happens and suddenly you have no idea what this sentence is about
this is hilarious btw, i highly reccomend yall to try this someday
If only I spoke any of those languages 🔥
French elvish reminds me of FFXIV where the elves are french for some reason
the half elf family talk to him only in elvish, so he literally have to translate stuff from french to portuguese
I took latin in my last 2 years of highschool and I remember nothing of it 🥲
Lmao
I'm so sad I can't speak more than one language, this sounds so cool to do
Latin is probably the hardest to keep
i despise english
ngl I took french for two and I've already forgot
I do too, and it's the only language I know lol
Because its not spoken ofc
So unless you actively pursue it, youll lose a lot unless talented or really into it back then
I like english, why despise it
English has a lot of silly rules, that it barely follows
Its letting us all talk right now and is great for casual talk
yes
I can still use the language I know how to communicate with, while critiquing it and not necessarily enjoying aspects of it
it's kinda boring to speak, and it is so random sometimes
If none of us knew English, it'd be harder for us to talk to eachother without translating the page constantly lmao.
It's definitely a flawed language though
I like it because it's my primary, but ngl it would be interesting to learn stuff like Japanese and Spanish
I love english
For writing though, I do like english
Funny, my usual thing is to use Tolkien languages, with a bit of greek for elvish, and a bit of arabic for dwarves. For infernal, I go with latin. For celestial, I use Tagalog. For abyssal, I use Nahuatl.
yeah, lets not build another tower to the heavens, we dont want another "incident" again
I think it mastered a nonchalant elegance that lets you express anything without ever seeming out of place
Hey, Incubus!
We're gonna play in a campaign together soon 👀
French is good at that too though
I actually sort of dislike european languages in general because Oh God Why Does Everything Have Gender that needs to be Memorized
that sounds fun
Baulders Gate with Ti :0
french is weird for me, i commonly speak spanish and god... french is painful
ngl it would be a cool idea to have a campaign with the regulars here
The key is male. My language doesn't even have gendered pronouns and you're asking me to remember the gender of every object ever.
Except most of the time there's no rule, it's just... memorization.
Your name is Evil dm, im scared of getting of you in a campaing just for that, still give you the chance
Its actually not that hard or arbitrary
It has to do with the sound of words
I used to be proficient in it, but that was a long time ago. I never needed to use it and I thus forgot everything about it
(and then there's a million exceptions)
You just need to observe and will usually be correct when applying what you observe
don't worry, it's usually the wholesome bards who get traumatized first
so what you're saying is we need to be devious and traumatize you
So there's three bards in my party... and I'm one of them
my party already does that
this applies a lot more often for italian than say, for like german
I'm waiting for a day when I can finally play with you 🧐
Not really
Its not many, and most exceptions then have a direct relation with actual irl gender so they change the linguistic gender to match it
french or spanish? i can talk some french but my lack of practice make me be more rusty than a monk with 0 feet of movement
I'd join a campaign if you ran one for us Mr Alaster
German is very consistent
i've got my hands full already with 4
Its just not as easy as a vs o at the end
4?!
I'm in 7 campaigns :3
Indeed. I still have not decided which of the three character concepts I have been thinking about I will choose
i will be in theory, in 4 too, almost 5
playing in 7 is far different than dm'ing 4
I just make it work, I'm built differently
The scheduling must be a nightmare
I know lol
The server says my Fiancé‘s name violates the guidelines. Her name is "Amaya"
But again its fair to question yet another rule to learn!
Im just saying its not random and follows rules you can learn
a lot of them I do are bi-weekly
I don't think we refer to the same thing when we use the word "consistent"
Actually, a good majority of those games are with one dm lol
no wait,
Harood, fighter
Verso, ranger
Dante, wizard
Harood, fighter (ancestor)
New campaign
yeah, 5
Twice a week for all of them? Wow!
that's wild actually
My monday and thursday ones are, my friday is every week
Your dm must love back breaking work lmao
My characters have weird names
Jiddurn
Artanza
Sovis
Hilsuthiti..
Dude I was just poking fun at the English language what the hell
Where does it say amaya violates guidelines?
What do you mean you manage to do that
Thats what Im saying 💀
The server tells her that upon the login process
mines have names that you can get easily, i made harood mixing Hard Wood and liked it a lot, verso in reference to Expedition 33 and dante is common name
That'd be for #moderator-support
What login?
Must have been the font you were using
Hello Kinger
You dont log in
Yes it must be font
Hello Sonar
Hey DM... I'm scared of what you've been boiling for us...
I had moons in my user. Like, dang a girl can't even have moons and a cool font
Jiddurn is a Centaur fellow
Artanza is a tortle
Sovis is a Drow
And
Hilsuthiti is a Yuan-Ti
No
You. I'm boiling you.
though with this being a new year, I'll need new ways to traumatize PC's
Oh my god that emote 😭
Hi, I’m new. I want to get some. Can anyone help me find a way to get into a campaign? I just need a character I don’t know what to do next.
Harood is a half orc, ancestor of him is a human
Dante is a human
Verso is a half elf
I cast... damn I don't have any good defensive spells
if your players can say those names then i'll get mad
Oh!
Bucket
And
Lockpick
are names for two of my characters as well
nobody in my party could attempt to say kyzaghan, so my wizard was quickly nicknamed kazoo
Id quit i guess
Bucket is a Ysoki (Ratfolk) in a Starfinder campaign
Lockpick is a Tabaxi thief Rogue
Evren, I technically can turn into a kobold, yes? their tails and snouts don't count as extra limbs, and they're humanoid
yeah sure you can
Yeah so I'm joining the Kobold in the bucket of water.
hi there, in #dnd-newcomers you will get lots more of help than here, when you find a group in #find-a-game , you can use the character you make or make one for that campaign. For being new i would recommend doing oneshots (one session stories) so you get used to the stuff
oh great now we have eldritch blast in a bucket and insults in a bucket
Yep
Well, the bucket might actually make it easier to boil us
No, it runs on nether water cauldron logic so you're safe
After seeing the idea of making a Cowboy warlock with pact of the blade flavored into a cursed//pact revolver that you can use for cast eldritch blast, i cant get it out of my head
Stop saying Bucket
You Guys'll summon him 😔/j
w-who
My Ratfolk, Bucket lmao
he could join the kobolds in their buckets
now you have me imagining a cowboy fiendlock with flames around their coat and hat
Kobold Stew
Hes got a Robot named S.A.K.R (Super Ass-Kicking Robot)
It would've been S.K.A.R (Super Kick-Ass Robot) but I thought Skar sounded too edgy for a genuinely chill Robot
i have like 4 more magic items to think up for the first session damn
Yep, flavoring this armor that only throw fumes or smoke out of it, pure decoration. Into a cool jacket that have like embers and the symbol of the entity who he made the pact is in the shoulder
for the party or for you like a player?
S.A.K.R's profile picture art is of that one Robot that goes
"Congratulations, You're being saved! Do not resist."
The cowboys in Thunder Junction would be good inspo for it
are there DMs in here that would be willing to teach newcomers?
Will we absolutely need it...
i'm the dm, these guys are all supposed to get an infernal weapon from the guy that's about to hire them
Solution, kill the party
Boomerang that is a razor, Dex check to avoid losing fingers on return 😎
that does make me think, it'd be hilarious if we got a Thunder Junction book
something thematic, cool and class-specific
BUT WE HAVE THREE BARDS
Our quest is to kill a demon Lord.
....Any wholesome?....
Hey now! we have a warlock swords bard, a glamour Bard, and ME a lore bard
should've told them to not be three bards /half-joking
the three of you don't have 25 intelligence when summed together
But we do have SIXTY CHARISMA
y-yeah...
Solution: Kill the Bards.
I'll even join as a once around villain to kill them myself!
first response to this message is how i kill one of the bards next session (it's ok they will get an easy res for the first time)
Don't kill em yet, that spoils the fun
Wait a minute I have 12 Intelligence, THE OTHER TWO DON'T HAVE ENOUGH TO MAKE 13?
Decapitation.
Put their heads on a stake.
Why such a easy death?
one of them's starting the campaign digging in a blood-soaked pit of bones, and there's a massive hungry giant approaching
Old age.
It's not about the challenge, it's about sending a message.
Oh...welp, if you need ideas there some
A demonic bow that make fire arrows//force arrows
An axe that can cut through materials easily heating up like heat metal and make the user immune to fire
A sword that lower enemy resistances in general and give it disadvantage, lower their fts 5 and can be applied many times
A maul that lower enemy AC by 2 and can be applied for a max of 3 times, last for 5 rounds
Watch him add a chronomancer that amplifies the speed in which things deteriorate.
Should thow not suffer pain worst then death in order beg for it. Then and only then shall they be granted death.
I cast time ravage with the twinned spell metamagic
not the same braincell moment...
Counterspell
Oh trust theres better ways to send a message
Kill the Bards and make instruments out of their body parts.
i like void ravage spell, sound so violent and epic for me
There's easier ways to send a threatening message.
or dark star too, many wizard spells are dope for me
when did this escalate to the server planning to kill the bards lol
i think it's quite based
Tokii discriminates against bards
Why waste power on a lowly bard when you can just beat them to death with your bare hands?
Imagine needing to get up close and personal in order to deal damage
I mean I do too but that's because I have a legacy around bard trauma. I didn't think we'd escalate to bard murder
I sort of wanted to give the swords bard a cool bow to use with the flourishes but they get their extra attack from thirsting blade so that idea flopped
I've only had two bard characters
They were fun to play as characters but I hated them mechanically
the bardlock has a giant approaching his location at very high speed (Tarrasque-level threat confined to a very narrow corpse pit)
I might prepare an extra character sheet just in case
Just make the bard commit genocide, then let them do the rest for you
Yes.
Kill them.
if you played funger i'm literally ripping off nash'rah's giant
Evren, will permanent character death be plausible during session 1? 😨
Mountain Giant?
Mountain lion!
My Genies Paladin died in the second session of his campaign, but him dying helped the party escape a lich and the shadowfell
Mountain tiger
i don't want to be that PC murder-y, so there's a safety net npc who can cast true resurrection as easy as breathing. but i don't think you guys will need him?
i'm reserving him to avoid a tpk
Tiger Mountain.
Okay, phew
hello all!
A mountain made of tigers
i have a lot of plans and work put into it so if you fail you will fail at the final stretch after enjoying everything i made for it
ngl I read that as a mountain made of fingers at first
A tiger made of mountain.
I'd definitely be super PC murder-y as a dm, that's why I don't dm lmao
Imagine a grave revenant that was just the size of a mountain
i will let them die, but they will be able to reasonably resurrect people on their own
I'm much nicer as a player, especially because I don't mind being the person saddled with healing others lmak
You should also know that Tokii is a big fan of the demon Lord that the quest wants us to kill
what in the Baphomet
So Echo's party is to be employed by a minotaur fiendlock, actually
To kill lord Baphomet?!
damn, one hell of a twist
If your party kills Baphomet, I'm the next boss fight >->
that minotaur's patron basically removed all of baphomet's influence from that guy's head and said "if you want to keep your sentience go free your entire race and kill my rival"
I love how my character was just a con artist and now they're on a quest in hell to kill a demon lord
BLASPHEMY
the best sort of warlock is a serial blasphemer, anyway
I will have that man EXECUTED
Kill kill for Mogis
Mogis and Baphomet are the two I love most! And to see them fight?!
Makes my heart weep! /satire
What's Mogis
The god of slaughter
Mogis is a Theros God
ah ok
He's literally Baphomet but if he was a God instead of a Demon
well, i have some faith in the bards' ability to kill a demon lord
that's triple the countercharm to be never used
Hey so, in the description here it says
“Minotaurs are barrel-chested humanoids with heads resembling those of bulls”
Could I turn into a minotaur
Eh
yes but it won't improve your sense of direction
Interesting... very interesting
I hope you all get lost in Baphomets Maze and starve :3
Mogis is just sort of a crackhead
Wait is that what the endless maze of suffering for
if they're any smart they'll use a spell to drop right on top of his lyktion
Who said bards suck? I just one shot the BG3 ||Farslayer|| as a College of Swords Bard using Mobile Flourish 😄
Isn't the whole point that you can't just use magic to get directly to Baphomet?
swords bard archer is one of the more broken builds
Archer? Meh. I like SWAWRDS!
I admit I have always preferred Pathfinder's take on Baphomet. In it, the backstory is that he once tried to steal Asmodeus' ruby rod, but got locked up in the maze where Asmodeus usually imprisons his foes. He did not escape the maze, he stole it. In the sense that he took it from the nine hells to the abyss and made it the seat of his power