#dnd-discussion
1 messages · Page 111 of 1
I know right
Prestidigitation is amazing, what are you talking about?!
Prestidigitation is just the “wizard waves their hand and thing appears” spell
Well you can write a message in the sky, so it is useful for a couple reasons
I affectionately call it Level 0 wish. 
Rock Gnome Prestidigition can be used with Raging Barbarian's & Druid's Wild Shape.
my favorite chaos moment was when we were parlaying and it wasn't going well so I said "look over there!" and handed my DM a piece of paper
Skywrite is also not loser level, it has a very specific niche, in which it is really good
the piece of paper was cartoon cloud lettering that said "The oldest trick in the book"
prestidigitation is by far the best spell in the game
adventurer life would be absolutely miserable without it
For trinkets that doesn't last for a minute
Tbh i've only used it to shut an NPC up that kept repeating "Tickets please"
people use it in my games all the time, mostly to clean clothes but for other stuff too
like flavoring food, heating clothes up or cooling stuff down etc
i personally like thaumaturgy better, but i like being a face character and it lends itself a little better to that
I was willing to waste a higher level spell slot to cast Disintegrate on it (it was an illusion the entire time and it was just a corpse past the illusion)
"I can cast a swarm of meteors to befall you!"
"Oh yeah? I can manifest a red rubber ball using my mind, and they dont even have a rubber industry in this prime material!"
If we're grading spells based on mechanical effectiveness, i would think the roleplay spells be at the bottom
But if its the rp potential then ig its high up there
I mean roleplay also has an influence on your success in a campaign
so you cant really disregard the spells supporting it just because it doesnt inflict a condition or does damage
lighting a fire or warming up your clothes can have tangible impact on the course of events in a game
as do the trinkets you can conjure
"yeah so that shirt you warmth up with magic? yeah it's a mimic and it didn't appreciate that"
Power in Creativity
if I learned anything about DnD, suspect everything as a mimic
Its pretty much depends on the DM, they could either just make it not work at all or they do work with a catch
ur a mimic 
i guess there might be some anti-fun DMs out there
my character is a changeling
Thaumaturgy is good for giggling Gelatinous Cubes
(am not saying to use the spell outside of RAW btw)
The tavern of mimic entities
Once played a one shot where the "haunted house" we were investigating was a massive mimic. That whole session was comedy too.
Wait it works?
i dont think ive ever once thrown a mimic at my party. i plan to change that soon though lol
The chair, the mug, the tables! Even the ale in the mimic barrels is just a type of Ooze!
☠️ The tavern of jiggly wiggly Gelatinous Cubes, waiting to warm you up for the night with their soft, squishy slimegirl embrace
Treat everything as mimics, treat all magic items as cursed and treat dungeons as mega trapped lol
An ultra paranoid character sounds fun to play
You forgot the bit about treating the DM as a sadistic party-killing maniac 
my phone is a mimic
Best if they're a Cleric or Druid
You need high wisdom for perception and insight checks to help out the paranoia
A neat upside to this character is that they are super extra prepared
No no, low Perception and Insight are the best things for paranoia, because then they can't even trust their own senses to show them the truth. It's lies, ALL LIES, all the way down! 
of course. Presti has mechanical impact. it can create light sources, counteract cold environments, give you the right object to solve a riddle etc.
Good point
Actually skywrite is plenty useful in very specific situations. Useless in combat, sure, but it can pass messages to a large amount of people immediately.
Probably have a scroll with it.
Wouldn't telepathic link be better for it?
I read that as massages and I was very confused
Better than preparing it
Oh god that would be a force divider lol
Not at all. Telepathic bond is for a limited number of people, all within 30 feet at the time of casting, and for just an hour
Part of the reason skywrite is neat is because of its mechanics
But also its best use case is on prep casters
Its usefulness depends entirely on the narrative
I have a quick question since I’ve not played before. The game room I plan to go to has one offs instead of campaigns,
Do you typically make a new toon for each one off or take same character through multiple one offs and if that’s the case are you always starting at level 1 or can you carry your level?
I mean in general because I’m sure different dungeon masters have different rules
Thanks
depends on the dungeon master yes, and I think it's your choice if you want to reuse the same character sheet
Cool ty
experienced DnD players, how did you react when you had your first ever PC death?
Relief. Daunhar's death was so releasing for me in a weird way.
I was free to do something new.
I think I wanna be a vampire Rakshasa. That'd be super cool. Vampire demons have got to be cool. Is that what's hip with the kids these days? Vampire demons? Maybe undead vampire demon fiends?
Dungeon Masters are just Eldritch Evils from beyond the Far Realms moving mortal pawns around for their amusement. Change my mind. 
what about a vampire mimic?
Remember even though the DM might be powerful in game, you can always beat them out of game. This is true metagaming
One of my first ever characters got hit by a very high level spell. The DM hadn't meant for us to get into a location or certainly all the way to the bosses room of that location.. so it was way too high a level for us and we didnt know (most of us were new players). Cloud of daggers was 3 damage away from doubling my characters hp which would have outright killed her.
I remember just feeling so shocked because it was so unexpected.
She didnt die but it was so close.
The one time a character did die was because a party member after a battle Royale type scenario decided to roll a set of magical dice we had won in an earlier fight.. right as we were taking a long rest.
Each roll had an effect with two 6s being the best reward and two 1s being an instant tpk.
He rolled 1 die... it was a one. He then looked up at the table, someone said "dont you dare" but he said "ive already started, I have to finish". Second die was a 1.
All dead. End of night. End of characters.
I was so frustrated I got up and started sorting hundreds of unsorted Pokémon cards that we had. My favorite character at the time. Tpk'd in a long rest because of curiosity
First time i died was in a oneshot. I got poisoned and did not recover
kinda anticlimatic
If I wanted to ask something about Roll20 where would be the best place to ask? Im trying to add my Int Mod to all my Wisdom Skills. Kind of like Fey Wander Ranger
i'm meant to be running a new campaign in a few months, but i've yet to read like most of the book.. how do y'all find the motivation to read campaign books?
Tbh, I don't. I almost never prep anything in advance - maybe a chapter or encounter at most. I've just gotten very good at winging it 
that's- fair I guess, doesn't really answer the question but I do get what you're saying
I don't think this server has specific virtual tabletop channels. You could try the off topic channel maybe? But you might have better luck with roll20 support or their forums
Roll20 also has a discord.
I guess it's more of a, "you don't necessarily need to read the entire campaign book in advance" answer. If you feel you need to do that to run it properly, then maybe do some amount on a set schedule - like a chapter a week. Otherwise, I'd recommend figuring out which parts you need in advance and focus on those
personally I'd atleast prefer to finish reading the campaign book before running it you know? to avoid complications
Hello all im a dnd kinda greenhorn ive been in a couple campaigns and was looking for ppl to talk to abt dnd nd maybe find some ppl to start a campaign
i crack them open at the table and do it live in session
the so powerful "who read this is X" would be so funny
i have ran curse of strahd 3 times and there are still parts of it i have not read
#find-a-game there, be happy
Newer folks can feel free to ask questions over in #dnd-newcomers
#find-a-game gives you the instructions on how to use the commands for our looking for channels which can be a place to find games.
I don’t think I like that attitude but alas thank you good sir
Wataaaaa thank you very much kind soul
Sorry if that isnt for your liking, didnt expected to be taken like Rude.
ehhh yuck
not something I could do, personally, i'd panic too much over it
You are very okay sir I was just jesting I very much appreciate the help
Good good, remember, dont mix 2 potions never
more power to you though
It helps that I use them more as improv aids and less as a strict thing I need to run
It's worked great for me, I have ran every 5e campaign book
I’m just a chaotic little bard that sounds very fun 
fair, I like reading through and taking guidline notes
The consequences to mixing 2 potions together can have good benefits
But they can also have bad consequences too
depend mostly of the ingredients
When I'm running from a book I don't usually make any notes
Until I write the recap of the session
thats fair, and- impressive
me personally, I use every campaign i run as an excuse to get a new notebook
If both potions are made with same ingredients it might just heal double or have more chances of permanent effects
If not, an ingredient can lead to the potion effect to change or worse, permanent debuff
me too, for initative tracking and such, i run all my games on paper
My notes are very sparse if they ever exist at all. And its mostly just player stuff
im a terrible notetaker when it comes to dming, so i make a bullet list during the session and then write a more extensive recap after. I like making my players recap the last session at the start of each new one just in case i forgot anything, which usually i did
I usually remember most of the thing anyway
i mostly forget like, one-off character names i forgot to write down and stuff like that
same, or in last scenario i would take some notes at least of names and stuff
for now in the campaigns im in there isnt tooooo much stuff going on, just a few things but beside some names.
I remember most stuff
my head is 50% "What gears need to shift for the major next plot point"
the other half is "Did I say something one offf that could wrench something" or various small bits
i still kinda roleplay some stuff, getting that much hits and damage must gave me some consequences, being knocked out too
Wat
yeah, when fighting and you get KO, people can tend to forgot the last minute of stuff that happened
The amounts of hits i get isnt low so that too, my character isnt giga smart too so... that too
and if i need to remember something, i would use the Keen mind feat for asking the dm to remind me what happened last month
I don't get how that relates to what I said but kek
might make me a little cabin in a forest, beside a river for fishing
Ok now you're just saying stuff so imma mosey along
I will just be looking for D&D one shots.
yep, a little bit 
How dare this fiendish villain leave two chests lying around EMPTY just to try and drop rocks on me. 
They would do that
They could at least leave some loot in them for my trouble
Like Vecna's Hand, or Meridia's Beacon 
A NEW HAND-
A new hand touches the beacon
Give the party an Artifact Level magic item that's an Orb, and it's sentient, but it only helps them of gives them guidance when it feels like it
I'm a genius
You're something
You're smelly, begone, Bone man! /joking
Kek
Cursed Returning Orb of Vicious Mockery. Like a cursed doll, keeps appearing whenever you try to dispose of it. When you're sleeping, wakes you with Vicious Mockeries.
I'm thinking about making an elf character that was adopted by dwarves and grew up hating elves
Dwarves and Elves in 5e don't actually hate eachother lol
racial hatred is such a shallow and over done trope, think harder
Human and Human
How about goblins, everyone hates goblins
As a matter of fact, due to where Dwarves and Elves live, they don't interact much
Goblins aren't a race, they're a nuisance 
Fantasy Racism isn't great, like, at all.
how about Racial hatred is overdone no matter what races you are looking at
Hey any Curse Of Strahd DMs here)??
Racism is bad!!!!
i have a teammate goblin, i tell her "hey little companion" and stuff like that
Thanks Tokii, I totally didn't know that
There is no racism if everyone's a species
Love your Goblin friends and Gnomish brothers
Speciesm
Kids, don't be speciest
did dwarves and elves ever hate each other in dnd?
Two species that hate eachother are Kobolds and Gnomes, but it's not for racist reasons, it's because a Gnome Deity trapped a Kobold king (who later became a god) in an infinite maze.
Sure, you first. Go hug that
in friendship.
I think it was moreso from other sources of media that portrayed dwarves and elves as enemies
Never have
Oh my god did I fall for Dwarf vs Elf propaganda
yeah ik. but in dnd specifically as far as I recall they don’t have any animosity towards each other aside from exceptions like the drow and the duergar
Yes.
Dwarves and Elves have literally no reason to hate eachother in D&D anyway lol
Dwarves just kinda mind their own buisness
yeah and elves just kind of view themselves as better than everyone
Dwarves hate Goblins and Orcs way more than they hate Elves
DvE is more of a wider fantasy thing anyway, and its a bit meh now
treating any race like a monolith is not only bad writing/worldbuilding its just kinda lazy
No true at all, actually
Mountain Dwarves have a bloody history with Goblins after all
That was the whole point of creating Evermeet, where 'filthy non-elves' aren't allowed.
Drow might, but most elves don't view themselves as greater than others
That sounds like a High Elf issue to me
Characters with blindsight usually use echolocation to see, right? I think that's what someone told me here
New Year’s resolutions
They use something, RAW nothing is actually established on a general level
Thanks for reminding me, I have accomplished 0 of my new year's resolutions
😭 sorry
So you can have someone blinded and deafened and they'd still be able to see fine
Also, Crown Wars 1-5. All due to elven arrogance. 
New Year, New ME!
I'm slightly worse ...
Okay well, I think I'll make that instead, a fighter who is blind using the blind fighting style, if that exists
yeah elves arent like, actively racist but they definitely have some degree of arrogance esp high elves
well except drow but that’s a different can of worms
Blind fighting style exists. Again nothing is actually established on how they see while blind so do what you want
Yeah I think I want my character to need to constantly shout to fight enemies
Elves are indeed arrogant, but I think
Yeah, they outlive everyone.. it's kinda earned!
Hello Tokii the catdog/jk
Don't bring me back to my childhood, miscreant!
yeah that’s what I meant. they dont have animosity towards other races, they just think they’re better because they’re immortal
I am always living my childhood
Elves aren't immortal, they have a finite lifespan, it's just longer than everyone else's (apart from dragons and other creatures of the sort)
Nah, I say they only earned a cupcake
Elves typically live up to 750 years in D&D
Dont they technically not “die” but go off to a different plane or something?
Nope
or am I mixing up dnd and lotr again
Tbh elves out living people sound pretty sad, for their non elves pals won’t be around long
My brain is trying to understand
That’s pretty much the entire overarching plot of Frieren lol
Doing an Elden ring dnd campaign with my friends, I’m having fun as a barbarian
Thank you Lonfi
the Frieren dilemma
omg I didn’t even see this comment
That’s also part of the reason a lot of fantasy settings have elves stick with elves
More like immortality with humanity dilemma
I mean it makes sense in term of elf lifespan elves would have more bonds with other elves since they live as long as them
For an elf, ten years isn't nearly enough time to know someone
Elves in D&D are definitely more friendly than Elves in most other media, I'll say
"Elves tended to make strong and uplifting friends. Most elves loved simple joys such as dancing, singing, footraces, or contests of skill. They had a natural aversion to that which they saw as uninteresting tasks and were fun-loving by nature. However, despite how unpleasant some things such as war could be, elves became grimly serious if a threat to their friends, family, or livelihood made such actions necessary."
I used to think that but... We've all outlived our first pets. I've outlived a lot of dogs and cats and mice. I still have new pets
this is actually a really good point
Also the brain can only store so much memories
Yet those memories are still their, and when those fade it will hurt
Idk how I feel about comparing friends and family to pets, but I know some people really treat their pets like other people
Immortality it a lot of hellos, and goodbyes to a point
Sure, I've forgotten just about everything about my first few dogs, but it's really not a big deal
I consider my pets my friends but a different type of friend if that makes sense
Honestly, my current cat is more important to me than everyone in my family
I like the idea of immortals still being alive is also scary. Especially when they are a warrior. They have been alive for 200+ years and are stil alive
Because you form a bond with them
I like the idea of the 30 year old level 10 human laughing at the 300 year old level 10 elf
Give a man mortality he will pray for more time, give a man immortality he will pray for death
I’m just saying comparing the dynamic between two humanoids to that of a human and their pet feels a little… weird to me
Yeah but also how in the WItcher universe, no witcher has ever died to old age
Tbh is it logical to compare an elf to a human?
So seeing a 100 year old + witcher is crazy because that means they have survived that long
Maybe it not the immortality, but how long and if it natural or supernatural
I'm looking more into Elves in D&D and, honestly, I don't get how you people are like "they're snooty"
They're literally the most chill and free fellas I've read about species wise
It's definitely other media's clouding perception of them
depends on the elf
Drow are TOTALLY friendly.
Maybe they should open Evermeet, then
drow are just funny little guys
drow are just chilling down there below the ground, no problems
drow just really, really, really like spiders
What about high elves?
If that was true, no one would have a problem with them. But they don't stay down there and keep coming up to bother everyone else.
"Elves did not distinguish between males and females and so did not discriminate based on gender. Males and females were treated equally in all areas, neither was excluded from anything, and they achieved power and fame in equal measure, apart from a tendency for more women in positions of authority, with a historically greater number of queens than kings. Unlike some other societies, they understood the value and potential of women"
Holy BASED
High elf lore is so confusing tbh
I’m guaranteeing that wood elves are most friendly
Hence why I am a forever Elf stan
Menzoberranzan? Sounds like a great place for a vacation!
iunno man, sounds like something a THIRD SON would say
I like playing humans sometimes because it's fun being a 30 year old guy with a sword facing down magical people
Fun in the sun!
Wait a damn moment...
THAT'S a pit to hell!!!
they certainly have the aura
How about being a playdough(reflavoured Plasmoid) pummeling elder brains with your goo
Humans are the superior race. If we weren’t why would we get the free feat?
Okay, I read more
Dwarves and Elves, while, in D&D, have no hatred for eachother, they have a hard time understanding eachother due to lifestyles, but can put differences aside
Dwelves anyone
V Humans be eatin good
"Dwarves and elves generally had a different problem in forming relationships. Dwarves favored hard work whereas elves generally enjoyed relaxation. Dwarves enjoyed carving homes from the rock and engineering unswerving straight lines, while elves preferred more natural, flowing shapes. Dwarves and elves could form strong bonds of friendship, but only when both agreed to overlook each other's differences."
Thats a funny way to spell "Humans"
arent dwarves a type of elf in elder scrolls
I feel like that’s fake news buddy
Let me introduce:
Elarf's
The bald things that have long beards?
Everything is an elf in elder scrolls
what about elnomes
Gnelves?
yes
Gnoves!
ngl I love the elder scrolls version of elves because they look so weird
How about Tabigons?
"a dwelf is a combination of a dwarf and an elf's worst qualities"
So, arrogant and aggresive? Yeah buddy that's humans
Orcs are elves in the elder scrolls
they are yeah
Orcs are orcs? 🤨
Yeah, if it’s not a Nord, Breton, Khajiit, Argonian, or Redguard, it’s some variation of elf in ES
Lmao
In D&D lore, elves regard humans with fear and respect 💀 😭
What would a tiefling elf hybrid look like
orcs being a kind of elf wasn’t invented by elder scrolls though but I don’t recall who did it first
I think Kahjit and Agonian are the only non human non elf thing
Tiefling dominant genes
correct. they are beastmen
I mean, Tieflings can be any species now.
Anyone can be plane touched.
tbh I assume that tieflings can be any species and it’s the demonic heritage that is the most important
How about a mimic?
I mean, that’s true even in LOTR. Orcs in LOTR originated from elves who were corrupted by Morgoth
RIGHT thank you
Plane Touched is more in reference/regards to humanoid creatures from my understanding
How about Aasimar Tiefling
I think something like tat exists, but I forgot the name lol
I thought tieflings, originally, were humanoids who were either plane touched or the children of plane touched people?
We do have Zariel, a Fallen Celestial become Fiend, so...
Is there something in DnD that's similar to Koh, The Face Stealer from Avatar?
Yes, In D&D Humanoid is a general term for Human-like species
yeah ik
So, Fey and other creatures of the sort most likely can't or haven't been seen as plane touched individuals
Elves are on that fine line of being humanoid enough to be effected
I believe elves are humanoids, but they have fey ancestry or something
Hmm, just realized I can become a Killer Whale. Now I regret not taking Levitate.
Fly -> Killer Whale -> SPLAT under 6.6 - 8.8 tons of fish
AHA!
I found something that may interest you!
@stoic obsidian
Fey'ri are the Offspring of Elves and Half Fiends!
I think Dyno is on a lunch break
Now to see if there's anything born under the union of celestials and Fiends in D&D lore 🤔
No, apparently they cannot reproduce with one another
And even then, Khajit still has some controversy since certain khajit breeds look pretty darn similar to wood elves and even their religion says elves are just sadder khajits 
Makes sense imo. They’re the physical embodiment of two diametrically opposed planes/types of energy
Argonians definitely have no connection tho.
I feel bad for Argonians
None of the things that happened to them were deserved at all 😭
Just a gentle reminder that mods are gonna come bring the hammer down if we talk just about ES
There was a monster in 3.5's monster manual 3 or 4 that had that backstory
As playable? Yes. But outside of playable things, the list of intelligent species that are neither men nor mer is longer than the list of mer and men
Eh, Argonians are eating pretty good. They ransacked Morrowind. Made Daedra run back into their portals during the oblivion crisis and they have full control of their providence.
Imagine the Daedra discovering Avernus and making Blood War 2
Are necromancers viable early levels?
Aren't Daedra like... way stronger than the Archdevils?
Wouldn’t they theoretically just be joining an ongoing war? Cuz the Blood War has (thankfully) never ended
The Daedric Princes? A few
Tiamat and Asmodeus would shrug them off most likely
Sometimes a war is called the second despite the fact that the first one has not technically ended yet. It can happen.
The lesser Daedra, like, the real low wrung dudes are at base, truly immortal. Kill 1, they poof back into oblivion
Except for maybe Sheogorath. He could give Asmodeus a run for his money.
That’s Chaos vs Law right there
Sheo my goat
Sheogoatrath
Do you mean just focusing on necromancy spells? Because yeah, totally works - but some variety will go a long way!
If you want to summon things, animate dead is the lowest level one - so double check that spell.
I heard animate dead only gets good when it starts to summon Thralls
It’s also worth remembering that it’s viable if you’re not playing in a campaign that’s loaded with undead
“A new hand touches the beacon”
unfortunately that hand was Zariel
And undead is iirc one of the biggest monster categories in the game. Might be second only to monstrosities.
The daedric princes weren't dreadfully powerful
Yeah there is so much undead in DnD
Do we think in the Realms the Daedra might gain more followers? 🤔
Given that they're pretty limited to their own planes of Oblivion
Last I checked they were able to manipulate multiverses
The ones that they die in
Alduin ending numerous planes of reality and timelines for them is a thing after all.
He eats them too
I believe Alduin would destroy Tiamat, personally
Nah Alduin hasn’t faced full powered Tiamat
I'm biased, I love him
Alduin got killed by a mortal. Tiamat can’t be
Well he wasn’t killed by a mortal. Just delayed again.
Alduin's not actually all that strong, he's just effectively immortal, so he can rampage endlessly til everything's gone.
Alduin wasn't killed, and none of the people involved in Skyrim's last boss fight were mortals
Yeah, Alduin isn't DEAD when you beat him lol
Main issue is Alduin is just a big fish in a small pond
Tiamat is in a lake with a LOT of big fishes.
That Is true
This is also true
She has proven to kill beings equal or even stronger than herself, and she was one of those who helped make the Infinite space of the Material Plane
Before it was shattered into new settings.
The Dragonborn isn't "just some mortal"
Yes, the realms are infinitely large and the favors of the daedric princes are very useful.
Also biggest advantage for Tiamat, she has Legendary resistances and Alduin does not.
The worldeater will always be my goat
argonians or dragonborn?
Argonians are more comparable to Lizardfolk
true
Skyrim is kind of shite combat wise so characters like Alduin kinda look weaker then they really should be lol
Also true
The fight against Alduin really should've shook sovereingaurd to its core.
Yeah Skyrim’s presentation doesn’t show the wacky power scale
tbf, tiamat is a goddess and as far as im aware alduin is just a very powerful dragon
Alduin is a dragon with Multiversal feats lol
Really, Alduin should be like Darkeater Midir from Dark Souls 3 or (insert random Monster Hunter flagship dragon)
Tiamat is too
Of course
Alduin is the son of a God.
But Alduin isn't merely just " A Strong Dragon"
She actively created the Material plane (with Bahamut) and its settings (Eberron, Dark Sun, etc) are after gods broke it
I can imagine Bahamut and Parthanaax having tea while Alduin and Tiamat plot lol
i havent played skyrim in a while
While Alduin has the power to eventually end a plane of reality, Tiamat has the power to just make one.
You guys are comparing apples and oranges. Tiamat and Alduin can't fight because one is a computer program and the other a character sheet.
Screw making Alduin fight Tiamat, let's have them work together
They would totally not get along
Alduin can't roll dice, Tiamat can't play Skyrim.
In my imagination
Both of their Egos is too high.
im pretty sure tiamat is still more powerful than alduin in universe, however i do agree that the alduin fight is pretty underwhelming lol (although skyrim doesnt have great combat to begin with)
Plus he would end the Material plane and Tiamat is actively protective of the Material plane
Like there is a module where this happens with Tiamat helping heroes because the Material plane is in danger.
If a character like Alduin appeared in a published DnD setting he would be a lot like Melauthaur and Gauwervyndhal
bahamut and parthanaax would be more likely to team up
Tiamat would actively oppose someone like Alduin
Hot take: I think Morrowind has better combat. You could jump and attack, hold attacks, hold attacks in different directions and actually strafe.
Of course Tiamat is stronger most definitely
Team up? Maybe, maybe not.
Paarthunax would likely take orders from Bahamut.
But I will not stand for Alduin slander, he's still pretty powerful
honestly? you're correct. morrowind's combat is more annoying but considering the limitations of the time theres more too it than skyrim combat
Yeah neither of them are good team players
but i prefer morrowind anyways
Non dnd take. Paarthunax is too dangerous to be left alive. Delphine is right.
Dangerous to whom? Not to me
i disagree strongly but i will respect your opinion
so.. just heard a rumor a new edition is coming. Fact Check?
She's right, but the way she goes about trying to compel you to do it is entirely wrong
Honestly, thats what gets my goat. Theres a decent sandbox to build on and Bethasda simply....doesn't.
Cause they don't need to
If we start killing people because of the potential danger they might pose if something, we're not stopping until we kill every living being
Honestly it’s fair. Just because he is safe now doesn’t mean the future. And there is no promise of a dragon born in the future being able to stop him.
Just release skyrim again.
10 skymillion more dollars
If paarthunax is only peaceful through great effort and he must resist day in and day out to not be like how he was. He is just a ticking time bomb.
He even says “he is always on the brink of turning to his old ways”
Especially with other dragons under him.
Skyrim is a fun game especially to revisit in this modern era of AAA studios just not even trying but i agree that its underwhelming. morrowind and daggerfall are the best elder scrolls games
anyways we should probably go back to dnd
Sorry I don’t think I follow. What do you mean by thrall?
The spell itself creates an undead that’s under your command for 24 hours.
Personally, I think we should copy the mutant registration act from X-Men and apply that to all magically inclined people. 
Free campaign idea 💡
Everyone is a ticking time bomb. Everyone risks going crazy and start murdering people.
You deal with things when they happen, not in anticipation
You leave my sweet prince alone >:[
Also paarthunax hasn't been punished for his crimes he DID commit in the past.
Yeah, but there's a difference between anger most people let go, and an innate will to dominate life that's constantly pushing you to action.
The main thing is, the only thing that can ever prevent him from coming back is the Last Dragonborn. Who is, well, the Last one.
fr leave my dragon voiced by mario alone
So like. Being lonely ain't a punishment for being a general to a world ender
Paarthunax committed no crime, he was obeying his king, then his goddess. And punishment is for children, not for adults and certainly not for dragons
He very much committed a lot of crimes
But Paarthunax also regrets his crimes and actively aids the dragonborn in fighting Alduin
Everything he did was perfectly legal.
He even says he committed the evils himself in game
"I was only following orders." Ain't the defense you think it is
Evils and crimes are not the same thing.
I see him as an old man on his last leg who regrets helping create a monster
i mean this is the classic debate of "can someone be redeemed for previous evil acts by doing good deeds in the present"
What gets me about this is Delphin threatening to cut access to the blades to the DRAGONBORN. No, Delphine, I'm YOUR boss and will cut YOU out.
Like if you tell him about the order to kill him Paarth says “no that’s is an understandable response.”
Who cares about redemption or what he did before? He's not doing it now, that's good enough
its not as simple as "I was just following orders", he actively regrets his actions and wants to help the dragonborn
Telling me to choice between Paarth or the blades. Delphine can piss off is my answer.
Paarthunaax has also lived the equivalent of multiple human lifetimes of regret and solitude as well
The concept of crimes only exists under a legal definition. Which system of law are we talking about? Who wrote those laws? Who gets to enforce them? What is the procedure? Under whose legislation?
Man I can’t wait for the holidays to be over so I can get my D&D group started again
Also, yeah, Dragons aren't persecutable under mankind, the only individual who has a right to judge Paarthunaax is the Dragonborn
Yeah. Morality ain't black and white. Paarthunax is an example DMs should use in their games as sell very tough questions. Paarthunax, exists as a moral dilemma if evils can go unpunished because a villain simply repents, evil can and will flourish. But who values the sincerity of that attonment.
You should threaten them with fruit cake.
lol do people even eat fruit cake anymore? ive never seen one irl
He's the sweetest old man
See, I disagree with the part about "if evils can go unpunished because a villain simply repents, evil can and will flourish". I do not believe that is true. Punishment serves no purpose except a performance.
Oh my god Morality is brought up again
All yours, Incubus
Chadcubus at it again 😎
Interesting
All of human history has proven this: Punishment is nothing but a childish performance that serves no purpose save some primitive need to spread more harm in response to harm
See, us having this discussion is a good example of Bethasda actually having good writing once in a while.
Melkor of the Lord of the rings likes this take. He feins repentance and then destroys that which is sacred.
Me meming aside, I think all the writing involving Paarth is really quality.
So what do you think should happen to those who do commit evil?
His punishment isn't performative.
Depends on the circumstance.
honestly thats one of the reasons i like paarthurnax so much. there arent a lot of well written characters in skyrim but hes one of the major exceptions
Let's say, Mass Murder
Depends on the circumstance.
Killing Paarthunaax doesn't SOLVE any issues though, it's not a punishment, it's just DEATH
Was done solely for the intent of terror and making their name known
Containment, therapy, exile.
I made a DnD spell combos guide. Hope you enjoy it!
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1L1FXzQa7JVqDt797DjNINdS5T2mQMrVh/view?usp=sharing
Right, and what if this action results in outrage by families of those killed by the man?
Their problem
There are actually tons of studies that have proven that rehabilitation and reintegration are more effective than punishment
So do you believe in redemption, even when you were evil?
It was originally written in Portuguese. As a non-native English speaker, I would appreciate it if you could let me know if any part of the text sounds unnatural.
I believe Paarthunaax's deeds of helping the dragonborn definitely is part of his rehabilitation efforts
I’d recommend posting this in #dnd-advertisements
I don't believe in redemption because redemption is a religious concept. I do not believe those who have done bad are "tainted" by it in some way. As far as I care "not doing it again" is good enough for me
Also Paarthunax directly compares himself as a worthy successor to Alduin after the MQ. Wishing for other Dovah to come to bow before him and his Way of the Voice.
Well yeah, that's good. More dragons following the way of the voice means less dragons rampaging around
I somewhat agree, but as you said, depends on the circumstances
As long as Paarthunax wants to stay good, it'll work.
But if he wants to dominate mankind again, all he's gotta do is wait until LD is dead.
I do not trust most people who have committed a certain type of crime that I will not say so I do not get warned by mods
Well. Not just the way. His way.
"They will come to know the rightness of my Thu'um. By willing ear or no they will come. Fare thee well Dovahkiin."
Cause while mortals can take a dragon out of commission, they don't have Dragonrend like the ancient mortals did.
And Dragons in-world aren't all gonna be idiots who come down and let themselves die.
Well yeah, his Thu'um does have rightness and they will come to know it. He's the one who has survived the longest, the one with the most knowledge and greatest mastery.
coughs #non-dnd-topics
Yeah, this has gone a bit too off-topic
To get back to D&D, I find things explicitely designed to be moral dilemmas to be a bad idea generally
Because they come from the idea that the characters absolutely want to do the "right thing". But characters are motivated by plenty of things outside morality
I'm assuming this is mostly in reference to "gotcha" moral dilemmas?
Yes. The greatest and most tasteless classic of that genre being the baby orc dilemma
Makes sense, yeah. I'm fond of moral dilemmas, but not very fond of "hehe, you look bad and failed either way, and you should feel bad" ones.
Moreover, I don't think a DM should try to create moral dilemmas, I think a DM should simply create the situations that are the logical continuation of the previous events. Moral dilemmas are often extremely artificial in nature
Though, I don't necessarily think the baby orc one (assuming we're thinking of the same thing) is an "actual" moral dilemma because it's so far removed from immediate impact.
It's moral dilemmas like the ones presented in Planescape Torment that do it for me. Not gotcha ones. But ones that don't have clear answers.
The baby orc dilemma is a dilemma where the PCs, after slaughtering orcs, find a baby orc. It is often presented as such:
Killing the baby is evil
Letting the baby be to grow up to be evil is also evil
Often people have tried to find a third solution, called "Give the baby orc to a good church", but I find that to be the worst option due to how it reflects the history of children of colonized people being forced to grow up removed from their culture in church-run schools where they were starved and beaten half to death at best.
That… huh, that’s different than what I thought you meant by the “orc baby” problem. Hmm.
What did you think I meant?
“There an orc baby. As a group, we decide to not kill the baby.”
I had no idea there were people who consider the “if we let the baby live, it’ll be evil” option. That’s like… barely logical.
Mostly from the days where in DND orcs were biologically and ontologically mostly evil
The orc baby dilemma is also specifically set after you’ve destroyed their entire tribe I believe
Sadly the orc baby dilemma was a real thing, meant and calculated to be a gotcha for the paladin
Yeah must be. But that’s pretty far removed from my current and recent experiences. Hence my confusion. But yeah. Go on. I’m on the same page now.
And yes, the dominating wisdom of the time was "give the baby to a church" which I find honestly worse than just killing the baby. At least when you kill the baby, you know what you're doing.
"I'll raise it myself!"
Does it make sense for the Raven Queen to want a reborn warlock to sacrifice himself if the rest of the party is in danger? Since he already lived his fate but they haven’t?
Why would it not make sense?
I mean, if the person who is literally in charge of keeping track of your fate says time’s up, who are you to argue?
I actually think my life would be tangibly better if shortswords had nick and scimitars had vex.
Only in very rare instances does arguing with Divine beings work out for the not divine being.
Also, having your only developed good religion be 1400’s Catholicism is so incredibly boring to me. Can we not come up with anything better?
I’m joining a DnD club at school when I got back to school
Flavor is free!
i get the whole problematic aspect of doing this, but once you are in the situation, I really dont see how killing is more moral than giving the baby a shot at a life.
assuming there are no friendly orc tribes around
Yeah, but I like slashing damage far more than piercing
The only way I could potentially spin it is if you see the future where the Orc living objectively has a bad outcome. Good for books not so good for DnD.
They're both a d6 weapon, to be completely blunt, I dunno why it'd be better one way or another lol
So how do I promote my dnd server?
Even Slasher appeals to me more as a feat than piercer
A shot at life is one thing. A life under the brutality of a church that will punish the child just for existing or babbling a word in its native language, at the mercy of priests, considering the history with priests and children, and the cultural destruction and genocidal mechanics implied by the action?
Oh how it would feel to be in a school with actual clubs and extra curriculars, alas I am in a country with a 0.001% of the population knowing about DnD, which isn't an exaggeration
okay but that does assume that the church will act the same as many IRL historical churches
It's the ignorance implied by the act that I find revolting.
Check out #find-a-game on how to use our looking for x channels. We have #looking-for-community specifically for servers
👍
Yeah, to be fair, D&D doesn't have to reflect real life atrocities
Ty
i mean, it would depend on the setting, but i would also be wary of giving a baby of a stereotypically "evil" race to a church based on real life events. that being said it depends on how based on real life religions the church in this setting is
This is implying that all churches in a D&D campaign following the often problematic patterns that many real world organizations did. On the other hand, you have things like the Air Temple where Aang was raised in Avatar, where he ultimately had a happy life.
Hmm. On a similar moral dilemma, one thing I liked from one game was early on there was a choice were you could help someone who was certainly going to die horribly, after someone else had tied them up and left them in retribution.
If you don't free them- they will be eaten alive. Horribly.
If you do... they go on to kill and rob someone else for their boots and belongings.
But in the moment, without knowing that- was it immoral to save them?
That is a problem with those people being unable to separate their Lived experiences with fantasy. Tbh
Whhoo folk
you got a ton of choice
Lets not get into discussing real life religions
I mean no, there's no way you could have known they'd commit those atrocities
Was gonna say we are getting awfully close to discussions about real life religions which is against server rules
alright thats fair
Sorry about that
We get it, there is def elements in the game, but we'd rather not get into heated discussions about thing very personal to very real people.
Which would be fine. If the baby orc was an air nomad. People have the right to grow up in their own culture. Giving a child to a different culture to be raised "the right way" is one of the mechanics of cultural genocide
I thought is was only if we discuss the religions itself? like how are we supposed to talk about DnD faiths if we cant mention their inspiration?
I think it’s safe to say that the way a game portrays religion says a bit about how the DM views religion. Which is kind of a nothing burger lol because of course they do!
But yeah. I don’t think it’s a far reach that some players would assume some churches have some good hearted people.
Right! So, yes, replaying again it feels like 'Oh man, I should let you die' but at the same time- that's the wrong choice in that moment
Whether or not they're good hearted does not matter. It is still cultural genocide, whether it's done by good or evil people.
if you dont know they were gonna kill someone after you free them, then the moral choice is easy. hindsight cant count
I will say, unlike our world. At least with planescape and forgotten realms. Gods do have a tangible reach and voice. Its factual people get power from the gods. So it would be pretty safe to assume good aligned churches are on average good places.
Especially if the church is dedicated to a good god. Players are more likely to hand an orphan over to the clergy of Pelor than to those of Asmodeus (assuming the party isn’t evil themselves)
right, but you cant save the culture in the scenario. they are already dead.
This is the tough element, but if getting into a discussion of why giving a child to a church might be bad and then naming specific faiths that's... a tough discussion. Certainly one can look into- and an important one to!. But could very easily derail in to what specific faiths should and shouldn't do and debates over doctrine, so on.
So, going back to that question of giving a Orc baby to a church. In the context of most DnD settings where good aligned godd do have a presence. Yeah, I would totally say giving a baby to a church is a good idea lol.
If you slaughtered every other orc in the camp... (First off, why? Was it a war camp? Why did they bring children to the war camp?), then you get the child and you give it back to other orcs
I guess I didnt see it as people saying: X religion treated these people horrible and more like: the institutions of X religion treated these people horribly.
You are adding waaaaay to many layers to the hypothetical friendo
Every situation is different and is built upon the context of the specific instances and the comfort levels of the actual players at the table.
Though yeah, it's true, depends on too many things
if there are friendly orc groups around, 100% give the child to them. the scenario assumes the orcs in the camp were indeed evil individuals, for what its worth
I guess overall the dilemma boils down to if you've come across a child of a sapient people you've killed the parents off (giants, dragons, kobolds, bandits, so on)... That's a heavy moment.
I dunno, man. Like… you’re making an assumption that they wouldn’t try to help bring this baby closer to their own people and customs? Like during the Vietnam war, refugees in Canada were tried to be placed with other Vietnamese refugees. They shared a little culture but I don’t think it’s fair or even honest to call this cultural genocide. The genocide was happening BEFORE this - and it wasn’t just cultural.
If I can try to tamp this back down, earlier you said this in a different context - but I think it’s relevant.
Depends on the context.
I guess baby stew is out of the question.
I'd say you give it back to the orcs even if they are evil.
Ah, hello Diogenes, I was wondering where you were when Plato and Socrates were here discussing this dilemma
Alternatively, try to communicate with the Orcs and help them resolve their issues and try to do more good
It's true. I was referring to the usual version of the orc baby dilemma I have seen, but there are variables
I also think it depends on how homogenous orcs are in your setting. If we assume this group of orcs is the same as every other then it’s different than a world where orcs can be really different
Yeah, this all kinda leads back to the greater issue in D&D (and the fantasy genre as a whole) of monolithic races
It also reminds me of the also very... HMMMM, lore in older editions where Crystal Dragons would steal eggs of white dragons in order to 'raise them right'.
IDK, I get that culture is important to preserve but I wouldnt want to give a child to bunch of bandits and murderers
wait WHAT I don’t remember that. which edition was this?
It also depends on many other things that are setting dependant. Are they just a people. Or are they fixed into a box. Neither option is more correct than the other one.
I may be wrong (and I sure hope I am), but I think that’s still true as of Fizban’s
Hey guys im working on a Roll20 character sheet and im just trying to figure out how to add my Int Modifier to my Wisdom skills, is there an easy way to do that or do I need to do it manually?
like, if one orc group is evil enough to justify killing them, which is not actually easy to justify, even though killing is pretty casual in dnd since its a violence simulator, then I dont think one can justify giving an innocent child to a group with similar issues
Fraid so. True since 2e.
Which version of the sheet are you using? The new one or the old one?
If you’re using the 5E sheet that’s built in, I believe you can go to the attributes (gear icon) and force the sheet to change it.
I assume the old one, it will not let me add 2024 spells. I am not the DM.
Well, I would argue that personally I did not kill the orc because they were evil, I did not know nor care about the orc's alignment. I killed them because there were plot reaasons to kill them
I greatly dislike the idea of needing a race in fantasy race that exists purely to be an evil entity you can kill without having to think. Any species smart enough to put on clothes and make tools/weapons is smart enough to be treated as a species of individuals. If you slaughter a camp of Orc Raiders, it should be because they're Raiders, not because they're Orcs, and if they have orcs there who are hostages, those orcs should be treated as a separate group from their captors
It's at least not implied to be intentionally to raise them right or to steal them. Just that they will raise them.
right, and if your setting has that kind of nuance, there are usually non-raider groups around that can take care of a child
Yes, and I would agree with that in a current setting, but I think in the context of this scenario all orcs are monolithically evil
Thank you that got me where I needed to go, much appricated it. Now to wait for my dm to see if they can update the sheet itself so I can add the 2024 version of spells
IDK, I rarely play characters who just go in an kill because of the plot. There usually tends to be a justification of some kind, or assumptions (which sometimes turn out to be wrong)
Hey guys I’m new to DnD
Yes there is a justification, that justification is part of the plot, that's what I mean
right, its not much of a dilemma if there are friendly orcs around
But that justification is not "they're evil". There are plenty of evil things, you don't kill them all
Man I wish Paladins could Range smite, I wanna make a Paladin/Ranger
I mean the day only has 24 hours
gotta do other stuff sometimes. can be killing evil beings all the time
And moreover, again, there are no more ways to detect alignment in 5e so you don't actually know
Yeah, I thought it was at least a plot hook that mentioned a crystal dragon who was raising a white dragon wyrmling or something. But it wasn’t explicitly stating that crystal dragons abduct white dragon wyrmlings or eggs to raise them “the right way”.
When it comes to PC options I am big on them not being monolithic. But when it is a monster only thing in a specific setting. Like Gnolls in the Realms. Those are objectively evil creatures. I care less about it.
But the Gnolls of the Realms are wholly different than say Gnolls of Eberron. I am willing to take a setting over the general rule.
They can do thrown smites in 2024 rules
pretty sure the orc baby dilemma doesnt work in 5e period.
They can? Because its a spell and says weapon attack instead of melee?
because it doesnt assume orcs are generally evil anymore
Indeed. And to be completely fair it didn't work back then either
Because it says it’s a weapon attack with a melee weapon, instead of a weapon melee attack
Interesting Paladin throwing handaxes sound kinda cool
Crystal dragons' connection to the radiant forces of the Positive Plane fosters a nurturing, optimistic attitude in most of these dragons. They sometimes adopt the abandoned eggs or hatchlings of other dragons; many a white wyrmling has been raised in the caring environment of a crystal dragon's lair.
-Fizban's 5e
White dragons and crystal dragons sometimes come into conflict. Crystal dragons have been known to make off with white dragon eggs, possibly to foster the white wyrmlings and help them grow into friendlier dragons than they would otherwise become.
-Monster Manual II 3.5
However, a rare crystal dragon will adopt a young white dragon, to teach it to be friendly.
Monstrous Manual AD&D 2e
More explicit in 3.5. 5e makes it sound a bit more like they're so friendly they'll raise even white dragons (who often share the same territory). Which is.. a bit better than 'Raise them right'.
The concept of a monolithically evil race is what I take issue with. The shortcut it provides is a shortcut that shouldn't be necessary for reasonable people. You can say the guys in the villain uniforms are villains just as easy as saying a given race in your world is the "villain race" and at this point in our real world it's an intentional, and I'll say very odd, choice to hold on to the specific fantasy of having a monolithic species/race you can exterminate without needing to look at the context of the situation.
well yes and no. it works if you give some room for nuture beating nature, but you are right. if orcs are inherently evil, then killing the orc child is morally correct. (which is a good indicator that orcs being inherently evil is stupid)
It's just as easy to say "bandits hijacked the train" as it is to say "goblins hijacked the train" and even if it's important that these bandits are goblins it's icky to have all the goblins in your world be bandits
I think it's fine having a monolithic thing as long as the intention is that they're not people and it's not some irl comparison thing.
Hi, I realized I roleplay druids as clerics because I don't like the vage nature worship.
I truly don't get the druid flavor
I am sometimes surprised how often I see 3e lore and very early 5e lore regressing on things in 2e lore.
Like I either like them as nature clerics or as nature witches
Goblins are evil. Nothing icky there except their existence.
Druids in 5e are a too vage concept.
sigh
Which you can do in your games. Make them malevolent spirits, manifestations of cruel mischief rather than say.... people.
Yeah, if all your wolves are blood thirsty instinct driven sheep killers then have savage wolves, wolves aren't people, but if you have bipedal wolf people who can talk and wear clothes and you treat them narratively as if they exist exclusively to be deer hunting monsters, it's a weird way to be about your fantasies.
I think this only works with beings who dont have children. like demons and devils appear fully formed
Which they are in D&D lore. People with free will, culture, differences, so on.
I'd go a bit further: Even malevolent spirits are people. Even malevolent spirits have culture, individuality and desires.
"Drow in the realms are bad because they follow lolth."
"Gnolls in the realms are literally the spawn of a Demon lord. And exists solely to satiate his hunger."
These are different
I love monster goblins and also human like goblins. I think both are fine. Like I feel it's nice to have actual mosnters that look humanoid sometimes. Like the demons from Frieren
And I'm not even against mischievous spirits that spawn in from negativity and just so happen to be vaguely adult man shaped. Anything that reproduces and gets dressed in the morning is effectively a human though
I'm more so talking a Frieren demon sort of situation where something is a predator that evolved to be able to look and mimic people behavior in order to hunt its prey efficiently.
Yeah, you need to make them actual spirits and manifestations of concepts/ideas. Bit more fairytale, and mind how they appear.
Want evil mischief goblins? Make them like manifestations of the local people's ill intentions. Think too many bad things about your neighbour? A goblin will manifest and start messing with their cows.
That's a fun idea
Sounds like something out of folklore
which is something I actually struggled with for a while. Why is it okay to have some inherently good/evil beings in some scenarios but not others.
And I think childhood is kinda key. Its a period of time where one can be formed, moulded by their outside influences. But if you are spawned fully formed as the embodyment of a concept, then you dont need enough individuality to break from your alignment
Folklore can be good for inspiration.
Yeah but then the demons of Frieren are not "evil". The reason demons and other people kill each other has nothing to do with morals, it's a simple prey-predator relationship. Wolves don't do anything wrong when they kill sheep, deers don't do anything wrong when they manage to kill wolves
It's just nature. That's kind of above morality
I like the fieren type monsters like magic beasts that evolved to have humanoid form but developed no humanity. Also the concept creatures that where created by evil gods or wizards as biological weapons designed to have no empathy.
It'd be more accurate to say Hyenas
okay sure but in this situation, these demons are more of a force of nature than individuals making choices, so its also right to kill them, at least in self defense
In Frieren they certainly are individuals making choices
okay so then they are evil and not above morality
Yes they are. Those are not mutually exclusive things.
And yeah, even then, you can go the way of Dragon Age and even in D&D where these beings can still change what concept they embody. Wisdom can become pride, celestials can fall.
Even with freiren though, you get a lot of weird people who misinterpret why demons are the kind of evil they are, and as good as the anime is, there are muddy things with how demons come into being. If they crumble to black dust when they die I don't feel like they should need to be born through reproduction. The "this monster is a predator that mimics behavior to trick people" thing isn't my issue, but there's a certain section of people that seem too eager to have functionally human monsters that they can treat like embodiments of evil because of a few poorly done lines in the lore, and it grosses me out.
I disagree. Either you chose to be evil or you are just following your nature.
Most of the time it ain't that deep
-# Most of the time it doesn’t matter
Because it's fiction, and monsters disguising as humans is a tale as old as monster tales.
What? Everyone follows their nature. I cannot choose not to breathe. I will eventually give in and take a breath
In Frieren even if the demons want to be good they simply can because they don't understand the relationship between being helping humans and not killing them. They have a distortion on how cause and efect works so they can't even follow actual logic a lot of times.
That happens in the manga, like the demons who try to be good or help humans or become more like human are actually more apocalyptic.
that is not what is meant with "following your nature"
like basic bodily functions
IIRC, the younger ones are basically LLMs, they just make sounds shaped by thousands of years of evolution to hopefully be more likely to land them a meal
and the older ones can develop a sort of personality/cunning but still very much see humans as food and anything said or done to the contrary is just pacifying the livestock
Yeah, same way I see chicken as food.
No
starts to shake in fear
Because you probably still have some range off affection or pity or literally anything when handling animals
With chicken? Not really.
you make the choice to eat meat. you can just not do it. and there are people who would say that you doing so is some form of evil
I see 2024 changed Goblins to Chaotic Neutral, from Neutral Evil. Hobgoblins are still evil though. That's odd.
Might be getting a little too into discussing Frieren. Useful example, but a little bit too focused.
whereas they have absolutely nothing, except the expectation that holding off on eating can get them more food if they're patient
Monster alignment debate?
sort of, but not exactly XD
More or less 🤷🏿♂️ monolithic races in D&D/fiction is what I'm talking about more than the alignment system specifically
I like demons in frieren because they are not just alien to human emotions but also logical reasoning despite them seen themselves as more rational, they just act beast like. Like a wild animal in captivity but much more erratic, so they often screw themselves despite their perfected acting.
What is Frieren? I've never heard of that. Is that a different setting or some place in the FR?
Frieren is an anime
It's an anime, so we might be getting a bit on a tangent here.
Ahh
One would be surprised on how the Realms has been a trailblazer in the idea of not having monolithic species bucking from trends as early 1990
In fact The Forgotten Realms was one of the first settings to introduce a more nuanced take on the orcs.
To be honest, Frieren being somewhat on topic here is the only thing helping me comprehend these philosophical monsters
Personally I don’t like the idea of monolithic monster species because
A.It just brings up some really weird implications.
B.I don’t feel like it counts as evil if it’s some ontological thing. If an Orc is fundamentally incapable of thinking about the evil consequences of its actions, it’s as evil as a bear is.
And drow
incredibly good fantasy anime
(I will argue that drow were nuanced even in Greyhawk in their first debut. They had different faiths, the Vault was just one cultural example, and not all of them were evil in the module (Hello Nilonim!))
"One of" 😉
Well to be fair, Orc as a monster, is no longer in the Monster Manual. It's replaced by the general term of "Toughs". So they can be any alignment.
yeah some stuff actually regressed in nuance in later editions
The drows' more recent issues are more culture/governance/faith based than anything Inherent
They Drow had varying cultures long before Salvatore coined Aevendrow and Lorendrow
I actually think Salvatore is kinda to blame for the "all drow are evil, except this one guy" problem
I feel like some of it came from players who enjoyed the first modules but mostly remembered 'Those crazy evil lolth cultists' and not the random NPCs they could miss.
So when writing their own stuff later, focused in on that.
Which is sad. Because that is mostly because his books are popular. He has multiple good aligned Drow. In his own books
I like the idea of an entire species being metaphysically evil because its so different from reality
I dislike that its seen as the opposite
Have you heard of the token minority trope?
its still incredible rare afaik. didnt he kinda ignore elistraee?
"Oh you like evil races? You must think like that irl" but its specifically because its different from what i know
"One of the good ones". By introducing an exception, you actually reinforce the rule that the general state of the group you're trying to demonize is lower.
Fantasy
I think my big thing is that most D&D folks aren't actual creatives in the way that someone like Tolkien or Frieren's author or any major work are. So they feel like they can just say whatever and it not really matter, but for most instances of monolithic races that I encounter around the game, it seems mostly to be either full blown racism, or laziness that doesn't care to work against the underlying racism and ends up playing into it instead, even if unintentionally.
I'd argue it's far more interesting, even if you want to do a monolithically evil race, to have a demon explicitly say "yeah, I could help those orphans and be a role model to this community for the next 600 years, but I'd much rather burn them all right now because I like being evil" or any other example where the villain is bad because they want to be rather than being like "demon bad because horns, eradicate on sight" it's played out if nothing else, and even if you have ignorant npcs who feel that way to justify the discrimination your quirky tiefling character faces, it's odd for that to be te explicitly heroic perspective of the story's heroes.
Thing is, I have other reasons to dislike the concept of a group being ontologically or metaphysically evil. It's because I just dislike the concept of evil in general.
Like Lolth cultists using tentacle whips? Misremembered from the original modules (Drow cultists of Elemental Elder God uses them (tentacles!), but were the shadowy enemy and so most players remembered 'Lolth worshippers' more).
Yes. But he featured her in the new trilogy.
Also his stories are centered on Menzobarrenzan.
Extrapolation of a Species by one city. Is kinda on the reader tbh
Let's be fair
Saying
"Oh, that Orc is one of the good ones!"
Just sounds kinda icky lol
I get why it's soficult to make humanoid shaped mosnters since people subconsciously tend to portray their biases. And also get why many people avoid the subject entirely since many times it was used for racism and stereotyping.
But I don't think irredimable human shaped species of sentient monsters are bad by default.
Bad? No. Lazy, unnuanced and childish, yes.
PC Orc slowly backs away....
So rude
I just don't think you can have 'all evil' and 'people' in the same concept without some world building flaws.
6th edition is anounced holy crap!
It's as deep as you want them to be like in frieren, where the subject gets explored maybe too deeply. Also having simple tools in world building is not necessarily bad.
sure it is
Lies!
I say as I shut myself away in my box
I think it sort of works with 40k Orks, barely
Because Drizzt wasn't even the only book series about non evil Drow from the same setting. Rip Starlight Shadows trilogy
Yeah, it's weird to say "this is one of the good ones" but if you're doing your setting right there should be so many of everything that you don't have to say that because there are tons of "good ones" and "bad ones" of every group.
The subject is not explored deeply in Frieren. The impact of it on people is what is explored. But demons themselves, with one exception, are generally the least interesting part of Frieren. Which is fine for the kind of story Frieren wants to be
2027 and Luke Gygax is in on it.
Apparently they are basing it on 2nd edition like 5th was on 1st.
is luke gygax the cringe one or the decent one?
decent one
You are thinking of Ernie
5e wasnt based on first edition
Ah. Then not D&D.
I want 2nd editon again because modularity was the best damn part of 2nd
People are going to play monsters or creatures how they want to, either by the Monster Manual or by their own way. Drows were considered evil in AD&D 1e, so they were played as evil. They are no longer irredeemably evil in 5e 2024, so there is no need to label them all as evil. But if a DM chose to do so, then it becomes a fact in their world.
The decent one. Ernest Gygax is dead
oh 6th edition is happening?
yup
cool
The prophecy is true..
one person arrived and said that.. so take news with grain of salt.
I was wondering as we've not heard anything. People making their own system based on D&D is not uncommmon. OSR is that.
seems a bit fast but oh well
Wanna see the info i got on it?
They're interesting because they subert the aptrophocentrism on the charaters and the reader.
GUYS THEYRE MAKING 7th EDITION RN
guys theyre making 8th edition!!
SOUND THE ALARM, TELL EVERYONE
Sure in 10 years
Nah, it's fine :3
Guys you won’t believe it 9th edition tn
for anyone curious
Gross
They wanted to skip a few to subvert expectations
Dungeons and Discourse is like negative reliable
Paladin gets BUFFED
I just chalk this up with a lot of anti-social folks being drawn into these kind of stories. Toiken and other creators are very worldly, witty people and those are traits needed to make works that resonate with so many. Being drawn into those stories doesn't mean one is capable of that storytelling.
oh? poop
Yeah
sorry guys
Call me when 5e releases
bro whats what the comment section on that video
Misinformation is easy to spread.
You lied! /j
It's okay, friend, you didn't know
yeah lol I looked up 6th edition and the only sources where D&Discourse and some small OSR channel with AI images
Internet folks are cruel
Which ranger subclass has more aura for ranger. Gloomstalker or monster hunter
sorry everyone sorry
Hollow Warden, but it's still UA
I was just joking around lmao you’re not in trouble. But the bot did yell at me rq
gloomstalker easy
Did you know you can merge multiple peasants into a rail-gun shaped chimera capable of destroying the lady of pain?!
did you know that mystra died AGAIN
What subclass has the most aura in general and why is it echo knight
Garlic bread domain cleric
gotta be some Paladin subclass for obvious reasons
That one doesn't count to much aura
Mystra's cat, both dead and alive!
I say this as a Wizard appreciator, probably one of the Monk subclasses
I like to punch up at WotC my fair share but Dungeons and Discourse isn't doing it for legitimate criticism of a mega corp. But because they got an agenda of their own.
That agenda being getting people changed with their content makes them money.
curls up in a ball and hides I feel like a butt...
Conquest def
did you know your DM can say "no" 
Like half the silly rules abuse stuff forgets the DM can nix it because it's turbo dumb
oh yeah conquest is a good pick
Says you, if they gave me fresh baked garlic bread that’s aura farming
"All I am surrounded by is Fear, and dead men"
Something something Dark Sun, something something.
it's fine.. it's exciting to think you are the first one to convey good news. The chat has already moved on, so don't worry about it
Clerics of the coast
Ohh dark sun is good yes.
Ah, not the only one- heard news you thought was exciting, but unless from official sources always take some 'news' with a grain of salt.
You did nothing wrong, friend, you were misinformed, got excited and wanted to share with your community, we thank you for bringing it to our attention anyway so we can avoid misinformation
it doesn't help 2027 is also a super hype year for me already either
My grandma said they’re making a new class 😮
It's true my grandma said it too
Grandmas of the coast
We should get more Grandma's into DnD.
They’re gonna make Wizards two, electric boogaloo.
They all keep buffing full casters because they want there grandchildren to stay far away from danger in the back line
Martial class
does her happy dance that 2027 already has a big announcement still at least.
NOOOOOOOOO
Introducing the BLUE MOVIE (red)
My mother plays D&D and she's a grandma. She likes playing barbarians.
Shout out your mom
I think an easier way of getting it done is not to think in frames of good or evil because then personal biases show up.
I feel the concept of amoral creatures being alien to logic and how humans feel more easier to develop and less morally charged than try them to be evil.
A lot of times fey are portrayed like that in dnd tbh, like you ask to be 2 times smarter and they give you 2 heads ans then you die because of that.
WotC hates martials they keep dangling actually good subclasses like it's a gateway to being good and then they release some stupid thing like 2024 baneret
I know the psion is still in UA, but I kind of hope they can make it work
My mom loves rangers lol
Tell me about it, just let martials have strong abilities
Yeah martials should be allowed to be cool. Even I feel bad at this point
Make barbarians stronger, I need to suplex more people
Stuff like echo knight, rune knight, zealot barbarians, gloomstalker was taking it in the right direction
I loved playing those subclasses
I love arcane archer
I’m a big fan of paladins going in strange directions too
Ever since they made conquest subclass, I love the idea of a more evil oath
The genie paladin doesn’t make sense on the surface, but it allows for a lot more depth with paladins if they push oaths in different directions
I wouldn’t even say evil, moreso just that paladins don’t have to be fantasy cops
ngl, I hate everything about the genie paladin
My controversial hill to die on is that martials do the fantasy of being a sword guy very well, but what makes swords cool is flavor that can't really be represented mechanically half as well as learning how to describe the specifics of why your sword guy is cool.
I love it, it’s probably one of the cooler ones flavor wise, alongside ancients and watchers
Giving them chromatic orb rubbed me the wrong way. Paladins aren't supposed to have range
Nah, let paladins use bows I say
Any paladin can swear they oat to a God or whatever.
That's a strange take lol?
So it's not that much of a new concept
Anyone can use ranged combat
Idk it's just me tho
I mean yeah, but ideals can exist outside of following certain gods
Could you swear an oath of crown to a drow society?
Why can’t I add holy magic to an arrow
I like the idea of an archer paladin.
Of course
Unfortunately that was nerfed
Let me tell you about eberron
Is it Investigation that took over for the Search skill?
I agree eith this. The fun with martials is thinking about how your character has a unique spin on the “sword guy”
The church of the silver flame makes extensive use of archer clerics and paladins
Apparently because they felt like that'd be "stepping on the ranger's toes" really bugged me when they said that...
Idk why we don't have playable holly archers
Counterpoint they could just make all spells do a set amount of damage dice with no description. Would that be narratively compelling? Or is it good, actually, to combine narrative and mechanical bonuses together to make something that feels part of the game world
For one thing, rangers got screwed over anyway with the new changes, and paladins can only smite once a turn functionally anyway
Removes the randomness of DND
What removes it? Removing descriptions?
Doing a set amount of damage
Yeah, for my money there's plenty of variety in mechanical moves you can make with a weapon attack, but if you only ever say "I hit him with my sword" it's going to feel flat immediately. The spells have their spectacle built in, fireball tells you why it looks cool, but you can do more with a sword than just throw it at a crowd, so you gotta work a little harder to explain how cool the thing you're doing with it is.
But if it's superior for martials to just have basic attacks and they have to narrate for differences, why not do that with spells?
Why do martials have to work harder to do less, than casters who have to work less to do more?
Admittedly rhats one reason I love arcane archer so much: a lot of the fun is in the unique subclass
The spells only really do anything based on the narrative that's handed over. Fireball says where it hits and how and if you took that away the word fireball could mean the same thing as fire bolt or burning hands.
Also I just like archers
I don't get why the nature clerics exist if there's already druids ans druid can get their power from a nature God.
I wonder why people fine rituals to take too long, when it usually 10 minutes
the concept is that one subclass might take a bit from another class. we got druidy clerics, clericy sorcerers, wizardy fighters etc
To be a Cleric main with a few Druid Spells under their belt
Some people are very impatient to a fault
They don't wanna lose the 10 irl seconds it takes to ritual cast
sometimes you dont have 10 minutes
I agree tbh
Since druid is basically a cleric subclass made a class, so I guess that's why we don't have a druid with a cleric subclass. I feel it would be too overly redundant.
That what it feels like
There are minimum 9 ways to strike with any weapon you hold. But at the end of the day if you describe them mechanically they sound like they do less because the variety comes from how you're wielding them. If WotC told me that all my sword guys had to use fools guard and strike with the same attack animations I would have a much bigger problem than if they said "you hit a guy, and occasionally it can push him backwards"
Good thing I can use a spell slot to cast the spell normally as a wizard
yeah I dont think there is much more design space to explore between druid and cleric. nature cleric covers the last little gap
sometimes the DM creates a narrative where the party doesnt have enough time. happens quite often in my experience
And it kinda bad because it like, what even the point of ritual casting at this point
I remember a guy who left a game I was in cause we kept wanting to take short rests cause "it takes too long"
you want to be able to ritual cast all the time?
I like that one is able to do it sometimes, and sometimes not
No
My issue os that I feel nature cleric makes people think the only way of being a nature god cleric is being a nature cleric when druid is like an entire class dedicated to that. They're basically clerics to nature or a nature God.
A druid ain't a cleric tho and vice versa
do people actually think that? I have seen some druids who focus a decent amount on the nature gods
I guess they can be played as nature witches but nature witches are kinda like people who worship nature stuff too.
One DM I had established that the religious practice of druidism shunned gods and afterlives, druids refused to worship and in fact knew a special magic that would make sure that, once they died, there would be no afterlife
But could a Druid ask for a Divine Intervention?
They draw their power basically from a domain.
They draw their power from nature itself
Nature itself is a domain.
Yes but Druidic magic isn't Divine Magic.
It can come from a divine source sure, but not always
Actually, they're both Divine Magic
I mean it feels like people complain about it taking a lot of time, but in the situation we were in, it would have been fine, like traveling to another place with phantom steed that would have taken a couple days, like what the heck, or using Rory telepathic bond to keep communication up while our fire genasi goes up the mountain because we only had fire resistance, almost like people don’t think we can’t just say 10 minutes pass
Actually 5e did not establish a difference between types of magic
all druids are cleric but not all cleric are druid is always my rule of thumb
But in previous editions, yes, druids were divine spellcasters
Its in the '24 DMG
Divine magic—which includes the spells cast by Clerics, Druids, Paladins, and Rangers—is mediated through beings and forces that are categorized as divine.
So yeah I sound like I want to ritual casting all the time sorry
I really should read it completely one of those days
Huh thought druidic magic was different
Divine is not necesario holy. Nature itself is a form of divinity, the cicle of life creation and destruction, it's a sort law created by the creator deities of the setting.
Then there's the issue of when there are no deities remaining
But I guess maybe you got magic from their corpse
Druidic magic has, in the history of dnd, fluctuated between being Divine magic or a separate type called Primal magic
Reason its been Divine (and is currently categorized as such) is because Divine magic, contrary to popular belief, does not require gods
(Incidentally, thats the same reason that clerics and paladins dont need gods either)
Ye cause in world's like Athas, gods don't exist anymore, only remnants of divine energy
Which is what the last circle has
I see
Depends off the setting, in some setting the gods are all dead but their corpses keep the world functioning until they run off power and then I guess they just suffer from entropy and chaos if that happens, but many god corpses can remain for almost unlimited time.
Worshiping thei concepts of corpses also fuels them even if they're permanently dead.
Wizard, Sorcerer, and Warlock (& maybe Artificer?) is Arcane Magic.
That just leaves Bard with... Bardic Arts.
Alright I understand.
Druids are Druids tho
Bards are arcane, generally speaking
Tho werent Druids originally a subclass of cleric or something or am I mistaking that
Originally in which edition?
"idk old" is crazy lol
Druids were derived from clerics originally yes
Similar to how bard was from rogue
In2e, everything was a Fighter, thief, cleric or Mage, but that was less modern classes and more roles
Before Wild West Wizards of the Coast made a billion classes and subclasses (3.x)
The first druids were indeed a cleric kit, if I remember correctly
Bards though, were a mix of druid and rogue
(Bard actually involved picking up druid things)
more classes are good actually. hot take apparently
Beat me to it lol
Too context dependent to be a hot take IMO
I think there is easily enough design space for around 20 classes without feeling too repetitive (but also some overlap is fine)
I think Primordial magic is magic that comes from raw elemental chaos, divine is magic that comes from the direct intervention of creator gods laws and apear as result of dominating concepts, and arcane magic is a tertiary type of magic often creates by a god of magic, meant to facilitate mortals acquisition of power and understanding of the world.
I am right?
Hello right, I’m Nugget
-# and idk
Not particularly tbh
Even outside of the variation of settings
What I'm wrong about?
AFAIK in a lot of official settings, arcane magic isn’t created by a god, it’s monitored and guarded by them
i'm a lesbian with dead parents???
No wait, wrong arcane
Generally applicable to D&D too though.
Divine Magic doesnt need gods, nor is it inherently created by them. Arcane Magic is in a similar boat.
"Primordial Magic" isnt really a thing. Assuming you meant Primal Magic, it is usually either a thing that just means "nature" or just a type of divine magic (as mentioned before)
Well sometimes a god makes it sometimes mortals. But I think it always require an arcane web to operate and produce natural phenomena or even reshape certain aspects of reality.
Like magic in general exists regardless of whether the gods do or don’t. In the Forgotten Realms, Mystra is the goddess of magic in the sense that she monitors the Weave, who may or may not have access to it, and how much access they have to it. But the Weave exists (though both particularly stable) whether Mystra’s there or not.
Just using Forgotten Realms as an example, it’s the same pool where magic comes from, just different ways to interact with it.
Arcane spellcasters like wizards or sorcerers tap into it through study or innate talent, whereas clerics, paladins, or warlocks are conduits for it, channeled with the help of their patrons or deities.
In the case of the FR, the Weave is also the source of all magic, not just arcane
Actually it was Fighter, Cleric, Thief, and Magic User
(And notably the Weave isnt a thing in all settings either)
I'm sitting here pretending to understand and nodding
*fighting-man, Magic-user, and cleric
Thief came later
God-fangirl
guys
That's how I usually call clerics
I know divine magic doesn't need Gods, but in all setting creator Gods of their corpses usually are what create the basic laws of the world and divine magic usually withdraw power from them even if the Gods are dead or something. But some mortlas have divine sparks in them so they draw the power just from themselves.
should i make a spellbook irl ?
(2e did change the names. Wizard in 2e was split into Mage and Specialist Wizards. Clerics were priests 😛 )
but people gonna think im a lunatic lol
It makes bookkeeping easier
Do it,
whats that
How else are we going to teach kids how to spell?
no not that kind of spell..
Just having your Spells learned in your book and Spells prepared outside your book
so i should?
Just to make it extra confusing and fun for ;Well Ackshully' battles 
Thats... not true though?
In the forgoten realms arcane magic doesn't work whiouth the web of magic and the web is created and maintained by a god, the time the previus godess of magic died the net was destroyed and all acane casters died by implosion.
Dead god corpses are generally... less than related
This discussion is waaaay out of my league
haha welcome to D&D
Again, the Weave was not created by a god. That’s why it still exists even when the presiding god of magic isn’t around.
It’s dangerously unstable, but it’s still there.
I'm here for the memes and also magik
The god of magic in FR isn’t the creator, they’re its gatekeeper.
no but Clerics dont need a god for magic? or do they need a fallen god of some kind atleast
The weave s just "background magic field"
No god or any association with any kind of god, dead or alive
cool
I Interpreted all arcane casters dying a it being destroyed.
so they dont
Correct, they do not need one generically
Nope. It’s just so unstable that it’s dangerous.
dont they just need faith?
Pretty much
like the god doesent have to exist it can be imaginary
They just need to believe in something strong enough that their belief empowers them
btw guys i made a wizard but idk
That’s why Clerics exist who worship philosophical ideas instead of an individual god or a deity.
also i wanna make some kind of scavanger or something
Like you can be a cleric of peace without being associated with a god of peace
true
So technically speaking, if there were enough followers there could be a nugget god?
They need a gods for some abilities to work (eg Divine Intervention).
There’s actually even an official NPC in Wild Beyond the Witchlight who canonically doesn’t serve a god, but rather serves an ideal.
They need an existing concept to draw power from and usually all concepts are related are domains. Like a doman can exist whiouth a God if enough people belive in them. Depends of the setting but a lot of domains are God created or have a gods as administrators of it.
Kuo-toa done it
I wish finding campaigns was easier :/ I haven't played in so long I'm pretty much back to factory setting
Even a pickle god?
I need to start a pickle cult, guys who wants to become a pickle cleric with me?
If enough people imagine the God exist sometimes a god appears.
One word: Santa Claus
i belive in his rudolph
A mortal can also become a god.
Just his Rudolph
When you realize children are just Santa Claus clerics
Is it explained why no new Gods are born in everyone?
yes
Nothing else. Somewhere out there in the wild there is rain deer with a shiny red nose
I feel it's weird
If anything the parents are the Santa Claus clerics, cuz they’re the ones spreading the word about him to his “common worshippers”
yes!
Yeah but they don't BELIEVE in him, just spread the word and get others to believe
Theyr more like preachers
As the once wise man said there isnt a god without its belivers
Theoretically, but as of yet there are no game mechanics to make it so.
maybe a prophet?
I wish I could unlock more races in DND beyond without having to paaaaay I want to make a satyr
Santa claus: Christmas domain. Gifting domain. Hot chocolate Domain.
I'm in love with those little guys
I wanna be the gingerbread domain cleric
yea 😭 i wanted and artificer but when i had to pay i said nuh uh
Generically no
Even in settings with Gods associated with domains they didnt necessarily create those domains. The domains are just concepts. Most gods dont create the concepts. If anything in most cases its the other way around
I once had a few things unlocked on another account that I cannot for the life of me remember the password to and I had a Tabaxi Artificer and it was GLORIOUS
I also had a Ranger Satyr on that account 💔
lol i once played Tabaxi fighter
I have a friend who's sharing all his dnd books
When yo do your dive intervention a giant Santa appears and says: "HoHoHo what's your wish kid?"
I'm eating good
More gingerbread?
I gifted them strixhaven for Christmas
Bone apple teeth
guys anyone have any ideas how my spell book should look?
Cool
well yes but the design
