#dnd-discussion
1 messages · Page 97 of 1
Yeah if a character dies, just make a new one.
Like trying to melee a Lich at level 11
That's literally what I did when Nealen killed my Genies Paladin
It was sad, but hey, new guy
And new guy is interesting because I took time to figure out how to make the character semi-relevant as a person
A Death can be an opportunity is just as true in a game as it is in nature đ§
I'm on character #3 in one of ti's games lol
I did make a conversation with them similar to that the other day. I was reaching out to both the DM and the party about what was done and why
It may be best to talk about this in dms
Only three of my PCs have died.
One was revived
My Earth Gebasi Genies Paladin died "holding off a lich"
And my Aarokocra Divine Soul Sorc heckin' magic nuked a Liches entire castle, going down with it
Hey guys
Two of my characters have technically died to liches, though the first (Sorc) died of his own accord while fighting one
Its kind of an unsolvable issue anyways, a Ranger can't reach full power without their team kind of playing along too
I'm about to go to sleep, but I just think you need to think about this as if it's not as big of a deal as it seems like it is. All in all, it's a game people play to enjoy their time, so if you approach D&D as a problem to solve (and you don't enjoy that), that behavior can be offputting if you think the importance of the circumstance is an 8 and someone else thinks it's a 3.
So the whole thing is unsolvable from the start, there's no best Ranger build to hard carry a team without the team also playing along with it
Replace ranger with character
It's a team game.
Ranger especially I reckon, the best Ranger builds all rely on PWT
I'll try my best
No character can reach their full power without a parties help
But if PWT is practically banned there's no best Ranger build
In that case may as well just go with the flow
You folks stealth?
Stealthing is fun
I dunno why a table would ban that spell honestly
Oh uh I used it metaphorically
I know the ranger I'd play (Leonin fellow) absolutely wouldn't stealth.. he's a STRanger!!! >:]
I don't mean for this to be rude or destructive criticism, but I legitimately wouldn't want to play with someone who was talking about the rest of the group like this in a Discord if I knew about it. Not only would it feel like a really one-sided representation of the situation, but if they kept bringing it up in said Discord instead of talking with the group, it would give the impression that the person isn't able to communicate those issues with the people who need to be communicated with.
The idea is that Bloodline wants PWT, but hates the idea of buffing his own team cuz they'd be dependent on him
STR-based Ranger + Tavern Brawler + Unarmed Fighting Style.
And is actively convincing himself for the last hour that PWT actually ain't it
That's kind of how a team game works, teammates are DEPENDANT on eachother
So at that point it may as well be a (self imposed) ban
It's almost like..
You're an adventuring PARTY :0 /teasing
I have talked with both DM and party about. Explaining the results is another can of worms
This is why I continually tell people not to ask here about their table issues. They should talk to the people they are playing with.
Trust me we wouldn't want to hear about it either 
This convo has gone in circles for so long
If the results are a can of worms, I think it's honestly in your best interest to look for another group.
Over many days, it circles.
Still i recommend always being able to do the important stuff. Call it range attacks or nature/medicine checks
Preach, our glorious Tamms
It isn't inherently bad. Just that some people here would not like it either
Maybe Ranger discourse is secretly like the sun-moon cycle 
The red flags keep rising
I can't word things that well sometimes, apologies
THE SPANISH ARE ATTACKING AGAIN?!
You know what?
I'll solve the Ranger debacle by playing a ranger and giving my IMPORTANT opinion /joking
I played for one session, felt nice
There is truly a certain point where being unable to solve a problem and bashing your head against it in a fruitless effort to solve the unsolvable makes the person bashing their head the problem. This isn't just an ethos used for D&D, it's literally one of the "commandments" of my workplace to avoid stress about things that can't be controlled.
I'm more of a Druid guy. Personally
Ranger hunter, dealing around 15 damage per round
Have you tried unorthodox Rangers?
Guess I'll work towards learning that better, then
Me when I eat my teammates
For now im playing a fighter and Will play more ranger and a Wizard
More of a more disjointed ability score distribution
I'm playing
A Wizard, An Artificer, A Cleric, A Mechanic (Starfinder), A Fighter, A Warlock and A Barbarian (soon)
In my current games :>
My wizard was a slave 
I may have.. too many games.
Yep
1 per day....
That's not to say you have to "enjoy" the situation, but you really are left with two possible solves.
- Deal with it.
- Leave the group.
Here's even a flowchart, if it links properly: https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/751531495956676668/1452442627327787059/image0.jpg?ex=694f1a1b&is=694dc89b&hm=1163b04ba26201ba39da2c89e345c88c734e023461823dc575a6b017a69ec791&=&format=webp&width=1577&height=986
I've had one against his will.
He was cursed
Vaskhir, my Dark Elf Wildfire Druid
The flowchart is basically the end-all-be-all of resolving problems. It's meme-y, but it's 100% truthful.
It really depends. Since they're one of the expert classes, its easier to use disjointed ability scores. If dumping WIS, use Spells that don't use Spell Save DC, Longstrider for example.
Its unorthodox so I understand the sentiment
I'm playing two Evil-ish characters finally
My Yuan-Ti Alchemist Artificer, Hilsuthiti Zhoska (exploitation for selfish gain, makes people beg for healing because he's a narcissist and plans to manipulate Elemental spirits to do as he pleases)
And
Jiddurn Moonschorched, My Centaur Barbarian (Zhentarim Psychopath)
Morder
There are two types of villains
"I have complex goals beyond your understanding!"
And
"I dunno, I just kinda hate everyone!"
I suppose i will wait and see what Saturday holds
Bwomp
For the record you can have fun just fine with monoclassing Ranger too
I like running Circle of Stars Druid
Ranger isn't so bad that everyone is outperforming you unless you multiclass
Yup
For now im trying only one class per character, too understand how much is capable off
Laaaater i might try mĂșlti or not, who knows 
That's a good approach
I need to figure out a way to play dnd again
Me to
Been trying to find a dm for 3 months now.
Be the DM
I was actually thinking should I, but I have no experience and zero clue of what I would be doing.
Plus I had like 3 or 5 months of experience in like my high schools dnd club as a player in 2022/2023. So it been awhile sense I even played. At least I finally got my PHB in the mail yesterday.
It should help me catch up on the new rules and stuff.
we dont know how đ
Learn
Iâve done it and dont mind doing it i just need a table to dm for
you could post in looking-for-players
i feel like id be a bad dm tho
all it takes is good storytelling, imagination, and improv
That is a good idea i just need yo figure out if i want to even try dnd beyond or go analog
In order to be good at The Thingâą you have to do The Thingâą
i have the perfect gif rn but im scared of the dragon đ
Themberchaud ought not to be fed
Starve the dragon
I FED HIM MB
YE FEED ma boi
We all gotta start somewhere!
You fool, his gluttony shall consume us all
His and mine!
mmm
I started dnd as a DM, for sakes sake. I was terrified.
I believe in ya, you actually know the rules (even to a mild degree at minimum)
meh
Should i use dnd beyond or go analog?
Analog?
paper*
Ah
âYesâ or âbothâ are fitting answers
Fair nuff
Today (technically yesterday) I learned one of my siblings play D&D.
I'm afraid to let them know how much I know.
Hehehehe. Show them the depths of your knowledge
Open the gates
Release the Kraken!!
I was completely stunned, I forgot to ask'm more about it without geeking out
We ended up just playing Nintendo World and Wii Sports
Make random but informed references throughout your day
âYou seemâŠinspired todayâ
âHah! Sneak attack!â
I'm only visiting for the holidays. And my boy loves hanging out with his little uncle. It all started with conversations of Stranger Things.
HmmâŠ
Then Iâm with Echo, release the gates
Flood the city with quoteds
Has anyone here beat a Tarrasque in a campaign
Naur
why did dnd buff the ghost
Same reason the chicken crossed the road
Hello everyone
why did the chicken cross the road
Same reason D&D buffed the ghost.
Hewo :3
im gonna destory you
ah gottem ggs
What are the things you guys do before a session in DnD?
Prep
I am kinda new to dnd, any tips on character creation? Possibly even walking me through stuff if thatâs not difficult
I can help you if you want, do you have specific problems or just struggle overall with the process ?
Visit #learn-to-play for everything you need to get started!
- [What is D&D?](#learn-to-play message)
- [How does it work?](#learn-to-play message)
- [Where do I join?](#learn-to-play message)
- [Frequently Asked Questions](#learn-to-play message)
I just donât know stuff in general
I know some races and classes, thatâs it
I cant rly vc, do you mind proceeding by txt ?
Would love to, canât vc either
Dms are open
i have a question
Wassup
Fall to the ground prone
I think
Does anyone know a warlock subclasses that uses wis and a cleric that uses char
They are stunned
In 2024 that doesnât even make them fall I donât think
I donât know of any, and it wouldnât really make sense why theyâd do that. Closest I can think of is celestial warlock being a âclericâ that uses charisma
not possible in dnd 5e
unless you ask your dm for homebrew
Not like as their spellcasting ability, just they use the stat for an ability
again not possible cause most class features you will get from said class will only use there preset spellcasting ability
thats not a spell caster
only thing where it kinda does and doesnt make sense is with a spell caster monk
I donât think there is, just to memory
there is
Hello
No, I mean for the clerics and warlocks thing
Hey
oh yeah no thats just flat out not possbile
Not RAW, no donât think so
Hallo!
How y'all doing ?
Pretty gud
Jolly
Me alive
making a new encounter to show the might of the dead 3
Waiting for session 1
My next session will sadly be next year
Same for me
oh my god, 2026 is less than a week away đ
hopefully session 1 will be this year but with scheduling conflicts it doesn't look good
when the spell has the name of its caster you know its gonna be fun
Oh great, how your day going ?
that's treading into non-dnd-topics category but I'm doing well
What would yall give your dnd character for Christmas
Nothing, they would throw whatever I gave them into the trash can
a gold piece
A scroll of True Resurrection.
or a Mistletoe
Scheduling is the biggest challenge in all of DnD
Oh okay sorry, glad to heard it
Something to increase their AC
im surpised that dnd doesnt talk about lord AO anymore
Right?
I see Aoâs name being thrown around from time to time on this server
he is like the overgod of dnd
Who?
person from 3e tho it feels like they dont talk about most godlike beings
Ao is thr Overgod.
Ao the God of Leaving to Buy Milk?
is he like, "The One Above All" of DnD?
No thats the Luminous Being
then theres IO
Eru iluvatar type
And Lady of Pain
how many omni gods does DnD have
twoish
in lore AO created IO and IO created the forgotten realms and everything else
*established rules concerning the management of the divine.[25] For instance:
No two gods in the same pantheon could have identical portfolios.
When two gods clashed, one of three results occurred:
One god faded from the Realms.
Both gods merged.
One (or both) god(s) altered their portfolio(s) sufficiently that both could remain in or join the Faerûnian pantheon.*
Kinda.
hes the reason why there cannot be two gods of any given thing IE two gods of death
Pretty sure Ao created Selune and Shar, not Io, but I could be mistaken
hes powers are also just his own he doesnt need the help of mortals to be strong
So there can't be 2 gods of the same thing. But who are AO and IO?
Ao is the Overgod, he's the first god to exist.
Io is, from all I could tell, an aspect of Ao.
The Overgod? Felt like a missed opportunity to call him OG
Hi everyone
He doesn't seem to have a wiki page and I could hardly find anything about hom.
gods are based on tiers is why
Shar and Selune were created by Ao, and iirc they breathed life into everything.
herwise referred to as Asgorath, is the greater deity and primordial of all dragonkind as well balance and peace, creating all dragons in his image and is responsible for the destiny of each and every dragon in the multiverse.
Experienced DnD Players, is it true that the bard always finds some otherwordly creature that against all odds, they seduce?
granted IO splits into his children Tiamat and bahumat later on
is the creature immune to being charmed
let's say the DM let the bard roll for fun
yeah but thats a little different than what you were saying before which is that Io created everything else
"the creature may be immune to charm but the dm isnt" -one of my players
True tho
I'm willing to bet a bard, through roleplaying, has actually charmed their DM
i love how theres Intermediate gods in dnd
like your not qutie weak but your not all that strong either
the average god could eviscerate a country with very little effort
well determining a god isnt just based of strength alone as well
its how many followers you have
you would know, wouldn't ya, Marika of the Golden Order đ (cackles at terrible joke)
i will use the rune of death against you
x3
-# eats popcorn đż
i still wont forget when a dm used the crit Lingering Injury table against me and didnt even roll he said you lost an eye
Was the attack described as hitting the head specifically before the crit as chosen?
nope he just said oh the enemy crit
and suddenly my most* ranged cleric was at a huge disadvantage
maybe he didn't like ranged clerics đ
maybe
Crit tables in 5e has been one of the things that never really have felt at home
still insane that i got nerfed instead of the guy who can do 8d6 in one turn cause of home brew
I do give additional effects on crits sometimes, but only for PC crits
If their crit description is rlly good
the rule of cool can always apply
did you ask the DM about an explanation of it?
he just had an item that could double all of his damage dice thats all i got told
I was thinking about why he chose the loosing an eye on you especially
i did he legit just said i think you needed a nerf and then he was all of a sudden shocked when my char refused to go further in the dungeon
My dm had crit cards for us. A legit deck of cards that had affects
so he falls into the category of a bad DM then
Is this online?
the crit card decks do exsist as third party
oh yeah that was at the start of the me entering the dungeon btw
also not to mention he put me in a one of those npc encounters where if i didnt agree to something my PC would just die off
I assume you no longer are part of his game?
haha no
I never quite understand DM's who openly favor one player and punishes others, it just never makes sense
haven't really had any bad DM's myself, one had two campaigns fall apart due to his own fault, but also some real life stuff happening in the second campaign that made him burnt out as DM and leaving the hobby alltogether
What was the nerf out of curiousity? he was okay with double damage, what of your features/abiliteis did they nerf?
just disadvantage on all ranged attacks
Any reason for that or just DIS if you ever wanted to use a ranged attack?
Was it only if you ranged, everyone one else was fine, so weird
just dis
Weird.
So he can basically do a fireball every single turn?
bingo
People keep saying stuff like that but there's really nothing in the game that can support an affirmation like that
The statblocks of the gods in 3rd edition don't seem capable of "eviscerating countries"
well if you compare a stat block like the aspect of bahamut and put them in a town village of country they would most likely destroy it
Unless that town village somehow got independance and became its own state, that's not destroying a country
Eviscerating a small village doesnt have quite the same ring to it
Is there anything that can give you eldritch blast as a wizard spell?
I'm trying to make a build to squeeze the most possible damage out of eldritch blast and I'd realistically need to get it as a wizard spell for an extra +5
Is it actually fireball or hes able to do that much damage every turn? God, how long do bosses survive?!
Idk, tiamat's statblock could probably destroy a major city, immunity to most spells, massive AOE damage, flight, and most cities don't really have anyone who has magic weapons to get around resistances
most stat blocks were only really designed with consideration to fight players generally speaking.
Yeah and her statblock is designed for a party of level 20 players, who are designed to be legends at that point
Which is fine, I just more meant that 'the active capacity to destroy a city/nation was not intentionally built into the statblock'
Even the Terrasque, eater of all, isn't technically designed to easily destroy civilizations but thats exactly what their lore is
I mean yeah, but a lot of those statblocks do have that because of how powerful they are at the end of the day and how people can't do anything about it
The damn thing doesnt even count as a Seige Monster
We have those?
The only creature that comes to mind that has that feature (x2 damage to objects) is the Goristro demon
pretty much we were at 5th level and what he could do is since he was the spell caster rogue subclass he could cast true strike (1d6 at 5th level) then sneak attack which is 3d6 and plus his rapier which is 1d8 and then he could somehow double all of his dice which did 8d6 + 2d8
this was an uncommon magic item btw
landing a critical hit is generally the only way to 'somehow double all his dice'
it was some kinda stupid homebrew item
ah homebrew. that was the first mistake cuz all the rest of that was legal
ah yeah but my 4d6 guiding bolt is too strong time to rip out my eye
i just got up so im missing context but yea im just hearing red flags
i will show you the difference between fire resistant and fire immune
The people that complain one character is going too much is often the one actually doing too much
At least make the magical item like assainate DM! đ
My guess, the magical item causes sneak attacks to become criticals.
didnt sound that way
If it was 1/day double your dice I could almost understand it but I donât mess with homebrew 99% of the time on principal alone
how crazy would it be to reflavor a centaur a spider person instead
is that just not a drider?
yeah but there not a playable race
Flavor is free and encouraged by the game itself though the racial traits of centaur very much clash with how a Drider should be
i dont know any other rices that would make good "drider" except for like a dhampir but granted that can be almost any race with a climb speed
The game also heavily opposes the idea of âlargeâ size playable races which doesnât really work well. Medium centaurs is already kinda goofy
there's third party stat blocks for them as a playable species, https://www.dmsguild.com/en/product/320538/more-ancestries-cultures might have them it looks like
as usual, Homebrew and third party content generally requires DM approval
But the Tarrasque is a siege monster
I FINALLY GOT THE PLAYERS HANDBOOK LET'S GOOOOO
Weird. I looked directly at that stat block twice before saying that
about how long would the lost mines of phandelver module take? someone said its a great module for starter dms
Can somehow explain to me the "Mercer effect" and how to avoid it? Ive heard horror stories about it, but I am also interested in watching Critical Role
Just donât expect your games to play the way Critical Role plays and donât try to DM exactly like Matt thatâs it
Glad I haven't had it but everyone knows we're in discord so it won't be at a table and even then irl sure I might have a few min figs to place but it won't be full on sets and stuff
Online always plays differently than in person as well
going to run a game through tabletop simulator, very excited
Goomorng peeps
Morning
Runaway expectations causing folks to have a bad time.
The flip side of the mercer effect tho is that I have a job doing this with how much the game has grown because of critical roll, so credit where credit is due
I've been considering something regarding the direction the lore took in 5e... Considering the lore established in Fizban's, Tiamat's desire to enter the material plane can be seen not as an invasion but as an attempt to return home.
It's the other gods that are from the outer planes, the dragon gods originate from the material. Or the material originates from them, same thing.
It kind of recontextualizes the conflict, giving it a tone not too dissimilar from some part of the lore of the Elder Scrolls series
So your saying that the pantheon are squatters that pushed out the original owners?
Technically yes
I love that, thats getting added to my tyrrany of Dragons game
Though I do have to say that squaters' rights are a thing that exists for a reason.
A reason that the cult of the dragon does not recognize the authority within
Well yeah
If we take the lore of Fizban's as canon, Tiamat's ultimate aim is the same as Bahamut though their methods diverge. Restore the material plane to its original condition, unified into one world.
And other changes to the lore also showcase that the "outer" divinities, meaning gods from the outer planes, have harmed the inner planes. Maglubyiet, a god from Acheron, entered the feywilds, massacred the gods of the goblins, hobgoblins and bugbears and enslaved the people.
If you had a mystic character from the cult of the dragons, someone trained in occult lore, that character could argue that restoring the world to what it was would free the people of the inner planes from what the gods have inflicted, and would likely argue that all the great evils in history are the product of the invasion of the inner planes by the other gods.
Cool, you just prepped my villan monologs
I really like what Fizbanâs First World myth does for making Tiamat more complex of a character than just âevil dragon goddess who wants to take over the worldâ
Cuz with the First World myth, you can see why someone would look at Bahamut and think heâs a âtraitor to dragonkindâ and would side with Tiamat instead. Especially after the death of Sardior.
Hello.
Here, let me give you a little more, to improvise something: "The worst thing that has ever happened to the Sword Coast was the fall of Myth Drannor. A bastion of tolerance, where magical studies were furthered more than ever before, fallen. And why? Because a group of Yugoloths were able to find orcs and goblins to serve as their armies. And why? Because orcs were able to exist in another world, far from ours, where their god taught their ancestors nothing but brutality and fanaticism and then some idiots pulled them into our world. Because goblins were turned into war machines by their god. All is connected, and it all stretches back to the original sin, the horror the gods have inflicted upon all mortals. The shattering of the first world. They divided us to better conquer us. She brings restoration, She brings unification, She brings freedom."
Gonna make a kenku eventually named Isolda because i think its funny thats she chose her name upon hearing someone say Is Older
im guessing your a fan of legend of avantris?
Iâm aware of it but unsure how its related
Is it just me or dose it seem thst every rpg is heavily influenced by dnd
rpg games can be traced back to the original tabletop rpgs
Does anyone have suggestions on how to find a dnd group in your rule town?
which those games were DnD or other long time ones
Especially if youâre in hs
Just look around
School clubs can be a great option!
maybe school has one, library
one of the player did a joke like that once and it took another player a good minute to get the joke, look up D&D Animated: When You Don't Get the Joke it will explain it better than i can
One of the best parts is that if youâre an official club, you can apply for a budget. đž
No, thereâs no school dnd stuff
Keep in mind a lot of people who play dnd are adults who generally want only adults in their games so you might have to consider online games if you cant find one irl
just to be clear thats the shorts title
Do you think a teacher might be interested in running it after school? I know a few friends who had a teacher who did this - and they loved it!
Iâd have to ask around
Just remember if all else fails, online is always an option.
Thanks
Itâs role playing with someone to guide the adventure and math
Uhuh
And how do I do that-
The dm, dungeon master, leads your adventure and you play a character acting like they would
You role dice to see how successful you are
You read the basic rules on DnD beyond then find a beginner friendly group
Even better; make up your own rules and when the DM objects just go "nuh uh"
No, don't do that.
Nuh uh
The dm should control the game but a fun one will do new rules and try new stuff
#dnd-newcomers #learn-to-play Lots of resources here for you to look into how to play DnD.
It's fun though. It's like organized RP through a story your DM organizes with a system for combat.
Ok, is playing online with people hard?
I wish I started with DnD when I was playing Minecraft Roleplay and arguing about what is and isn't possible when Combat RP happened. đ€Ł
Any% table ban speedrun đ€Ł
Not really. Once you find the right group, you're set. You get more confident with time. It's going to be new and a bit overwhelming at first for some people, but as you learn, it's a LOT of fun.
And a good group will help you learn, as a new dnd player.
Is there any issues i should think about that come with playing online that I wouldnât have to think about otherwise
General online safety stuff, id say.
It can be challenging to do on a mobile device... depending on the VTT used.
What Steve said. But also just keeping an eye out for red flags. If something feels wrong, it probably is. I personally would have preferred starting with a Westmarch when I was beginning DnD because that taught me a lot about the game itself and what to watch out for, with no real ties to anything (so I could play some days, not play others.)
That or a real life group is a great way to learn what DnD really is. What it feels like. You get to get some dice and a mini, and it's a lot of fun.
Maybe the real dragons and dungeons were the friends we made along the way
I mean in a way
check their profile creation date as well as the join date in the server, also take a bit of time to question the player a bit beforehand since you never know what kind of bullcrap they can make up
Last question I think any free apps orwebsites suggestions that I should use? Like map making stuff or something?
And always have a session 0. Feel the vibe of the group.
I like dungeonfog
maps arent a 100% necessity you can use theatre of the mind if needed(im also saying this becaues i dont know either)
There are lots!
For token making, I prefer heroictoken.
For platforms, I like roll20 (with DnDBeyond extension so I can roll from my sheet, or using a roll20 sheet), and Owlbear (for groups that use Avrae and stuff, Owlbear isn't bad).
Maps, I actually usually just yoink maps online. I'm too lazy to make my own and I like having battle maps for games.
I donât have one sadly so i need itđą
Some DMs don't use maps at all (even for combat), and just use what they call ToTM or Theater of the Mind. Which generally means the DM will be narrating what's around you and all you're looking at is your character sheet.
I'm not a fan but I can see the appeal to some extent. I use ToTM when I'm narrating a scene outside of combat (and sometimes I use a picture for the players to look at).
And I use maps for combat because I know people like to strategize and get proper positioning and stuff.
I have minds eye blindnessđ
I have not used a map in about a year
Oh I see
Combat without maps nerfs many features. How do you plan the optimal position for your spell if you cani't see exactly where all the opponents are? How do you set up flanking, avoid (or create) AOOs....
But it can also buff many features due to the DM often just picking enemies that are affected by it
That's what I prefer. I'm fine with TOTM when it comes to roleplay scenes but I feel so terrible with combat because I can't properly position myself or cast a good fireball or anything. Flanking is silly. Etc etc.
Although flanking will absolutely be neglected
Imo, it throws strategy out the window and feels bland.
Flanking leads to nerfing class abiliites like sneak attack.
Yes! Throws strategy out the window and makes all the features seem pointless.
And if there's a DM who doesn't use maps at all, ever, even throughout combat, I leave.
Actually you can still sneak attack enemies next to allies
Well thatâs valid. We all have our preferences
I play 3.5. I'm not sure how the mechanic works in Fifth.
Ohhhh I see.
idk i feel like maps add to that adventurer feeling so its more fun to have a map to look at during the game
You seem like the type of person that infuriates a dm by using niche rules lol
saying this as a player and aspiring dm
Iâm talking about 5e
I play 3.5 because I like the rules.
That too. Full TOTM is not immersive to me, even with the best narrator in the world.
Not necessarily
What are "niche rules"?
Hey thatâs alright, there is no right answer here, itâs all up to preference
i read a lot so i dont get bothered by totm but its cooler to have a map before me either way
At the very least for combat.
Some dms can ruin their games by letting people do whatever they want
Again, if it's a roleplay session, I really don't mind TOTM.
I see pros and cons for both ways of playing
i like to strategize and use my surroundings so a map can mean a lot yeah
Rules that are there but not very many people pay attention to them or know about them, i think i used the right word
yes you have
Alright thanks
I had a hit and run monk and it was absolutely horrible trying to use it in TOTM.
"Uh I... Run in and hit an enemy. Probably the one closest to me, I guess? And then I run away. As far as I can. Away from any enemy."
đ€Ł
I won't do TotM personally, for combat anyway
Totm is perfectly fine however I dont enjoy having to remember where I am, my party of 3+ others are, where the terrain is, where the multiple enemies which can be anywhere from 1-20 and then constantly update where they are in relation to me anytime anything takes a turn or god forbid they take flight and I have to remember where they are in a three dimensional plane
Hey, this isnât a situation where someone is right or wrong, this is a preference thing
I guess it's a good thing I'm the DM. đ I play 3.5 because I like the rules as they are.
I'm definitely not saying TOTM is wrong or bad. I just don't enjoy it in combat scenes.
And thatâs a valid opinion
Totm is fine if its a 1v1
Youâd definitely be the one that makes the dm do the sigh of defeat lol
But once the variables become too high its painful
We donât need to throw stuff like that here
I'm not, usually. But I can see why you might think that.
Just like PBP. Do I like them? No. Are they a valid form of DND that some people prefer because they're shy or physically cannot do VC? Yes!
Exactly
Thereâs nothing wrong with an overpowered character
? I didnât say anything related to that
I wonder why thereâs no non-PBP text based games
Wha?
Iâm involved in two
Then what did this mean?
That is how I learned to play. D&D on mIRC. We used ascii maps.
Text-based chat only.
You donât need to throw insults at people such as âyouâre the type of person to make the DM sighâ in this situation
I still play with some of the folks I met and played with on mIRC 25+ years ago.
We don't play on mIRC anymore, though.
It wasnât an insult thereâs nothing wrong with that
It means the players are creative
Alright then, problem solved
I usually make my DM sigh for making less-than-optimal character choices.
Like a rogue with no ranks in Open Lock or Disable Device.
When my players make me sigh itâs almost always not good
Thankfully Iâve only done it like, three times
what are those
What do they do?
3.5e thing (Iâm assuming)
ranks?
Skills in 3.5 that allow you to... open locks and disable traps.
Itâs a long story
I think it's like being proficient in them? Except, you can get to be very, very proficient in them.
I don't actually know how fifth edition works, so I'm not sure how to explain it to you in terms you'll understand.
Ah itâs alright, you explained it well
In fact Iâm curious to try 3.5e one day
It's challenging to find openings. I had to start running a game in order to get to play.
My family invited some people over for Christmas because they were alone and it turned out that they like dnd and they had really old books like 1987 or something
ok i have a dumb question as someone who wants to dm: if a character has an ac of lets say 10 and i roll for the monster action and it rolls 9 or 8, does that mean it doesnt hit?
did i formulate that right
Yep. Only hits that roll equal or higher than AC hit.
Don't forget to add the attack bonus to those rolls though!
The attack bonus is always written into the monster statblock as well, so simply add that.
i see
so for a wolf its +4 by the 2014 monster manual
yep, you got it
just watched honour among thieves and it was awful
yeah I really didn't like it, it was such a weird hodgepodge of a movie that just annoyed me all the way through
also the villain really sucks
like genuinly I found the lord of neverwinter to be a more threatening villain than her because she has only like 2 scenes where she's cool
Me and a DM who's a friend of mine are making our campaigns part of the same universe; he runs my campaigns and I run his. In the campaign I'm running, there's a secondary villain they captured, and they're using her to guide them to the main villain, Considering that this player's character, who is also a DM, is probably just going to hand her over to be imprisoned in some dungeon as soon as this is over, But now I'm really wanting to use this character as a player in some campaign, lol, how would you introduce them as a DM considering this shared universe context?
That's the Goblin Jester I drew and posted in the art chat the other day; I made her build as a bard.
you should post questions like these in #dm-world-building
when taking the blessed warrior with paladin are you allowed to change these cantrips or are they fixed for ever ??
do all the gods live in the astral plane? or do only some of them live there
Only some
Question: DMâed my first one shot and loved it. Looking for a group in West Ashley, Charleston, SC to play in person on a semi regular basis. I donât really like the in game store format and prefer a group where everyone gets to know each other. Not sure this is where I post but any help is appreciated. Looking as a player.
You can change one when you gain a Paladin level
where do they mainly live?
The Gods mostly live in the Outer Planes, like the Beastlands and Ysgard and The Nine Hells
assuming vecna would still be around, where would he be?
depends on the gods' values and alignment. A Good god doesn't live in The Abyss, yknow
I'd honestly have him make his own demiplane to live in
I see. I was going to have the veil of shadows be his demiplane but I reconsidered, maybe he has his rotted tower in some weird dimension only he can access?
I don't think Vecna is the type of person to want to leave tracks behind, and having a headquarters in one or more planes is certain to leave behind evidence.
There are gods in every plane
oh right, I thought the material plane and so on were only for mortals
Nah, there's even Gods in the Material Plane in some settings
oh I see. Do any gods live in Faerun?
In the Forgotten Realms, I can name a few gods who are known to live in specific places in Faerûn. Including one that you might actually casually meet on the road
Like Moander, God of Rot in the FR, is literally just sitting out in the wilderness after having been "killed"
what's the difference between a lesser god and a greater god?
Depends on the edition
what's the difference in 5.5?
Thatâs not an edition
it could still be different
In 5e its related to Divine Rank. A God with higher Divine Rank is a Greater God, and a God with a lower Divine Rank is a Lesser God (or Demigod, if its low enough).
Lolth is the example given as a Lesser God
Now, thing is, that's not really meaningful information
In theory a greater god is one that rules over something "big" and who has considerably more influence, making them more powerful
Itâs still 5e
right, I only ask this because I have a campaign cooking that depends on what a lesser god can/can't do
Usually the Greater Gods are your Zeus-types, who have great dominion over many aspects of life. Amaunator is the God of the Sun in the Forgotten Realms, and he is a Greater God for that reason. Mystra is the God of Magic, so she's a Greater God. Azuth is the god of something smaller (Wizards), so he is a Lesser God.
The limit on the powers of the gods vary depending on the setting and the edition and the god.
isn't lathander the god of the sun?
Lathander is God of the Dawn
oh so the sun but not really
No, Lathander is a god of vitality, youth and spring. Not even of the dawn
Its the difference between Apollo and Helio
The dawn is just a symbol used by Lathander because it's the best way to represent what he is about
oh I see, and spring's basically the dawn of life after winter
He is the god of the pulsion of life. The desire to renew, to grow, to do more.
"Lathander, God of Dawn and Renewal" is what the new FR books are saying
speaking of gods, how come vecna became god of secrets?
Oh? Well, that's new. Back in the days it was explicit that he was not actually a god of the dawn
By amassing power, followers and magical rituals to ascend and be accepted by other gods.
When the folk of Faerûn gaze at the pastel hues of the morning sky, they thank Lathander. He is a god of dawn and the potential that comes with new beginnings. Spring, birth, youth, creativity, and renewal fall under his domain.
This is his paragraph opener as well
yeah I know how you become a god, but why is he god of secrets in particular? why not the god of liches or god of evil magic?
Yeah, that's a change. Back in the older FR products, I remember some paragraphs explicitely saying that "morninglord" was a symbolic title, that he was the god of renewal and youth and all that, but had no actual power over the sun
I don't think he does have power over the sun, he might just have power over the dawn specifically
Because his magic works on secrets. Not all his magic, of course, but his most broken stuff that breaks the normal rules of magic works by accumulating secrets and using them as fuel
oh right, the book of vile darkness does have forbidden spells and stuff right?
Yeah, or its supposed to at least
Yes. Not exactly "forbidden", but very dark magic.
my homebrew rules for the book of vile darkness is that anyone who is NOT undead, a lich or vecna himself will die upon seeing the magic in the BOVD
The actual real life book of vile darkness that was published for third edition contains quite a bit of evil stuff
that or something like 4d10 necrotic damage
You know, that could just be "anyone not undead". Vecna is a lich and all liches are undead
Maybe thats what their Spooky UA is for. A 5e BoVD
Could be. Hopefully it lacks some of the... Less than well thought out passages of the original
or maybe vecna placed a curse on the BOVD that anyone who views it will die upon seeing the words contained in the BOVD
What would be the point of such a rule narratively exactly?
It essentially prevents your players from being corrupted by interaction with that book and prevents your bad guys from using the power of that book to further their own ends
May as well not have the book
maybe instead of dying it simply damages them to read the book? idk
Let the book fulfill its narrative purpose.
The book also already can hurt you
The book of vile darkness is here to serve as a McGuffin, the thing the bad guy seeks that contains what they need to do their plan. The thing that, once the PCs get their hands on, tries to corrupt them into taking the easy path.
yeah I probably won't implement these rules into my games I'm just theorising what would happen should the players get their hands on the book
in actuality I'll probably make it vecna's spellbook that he used in his past life
if it isn't already, that is
2 Major Detrimental Properties can get you hurt upon attuning to it, and also if you aren't a Fiend or Undead creature type, you have to succeed a Charisma save or get turned into a Larva (this can only be undone by Wish).
It is indeed his spellbook. And it is a lot of other things
It already comes with some bad news, you don't need to add more
you know how acererak was taught by vecna or something like that?
has he ever used the BOVD?
Yes Acererak was supposedly one of Vecna's apprentices, but he was instrumental in Vecna's defeat
This is unknown but it would not be surprising
In my personal headcanon, there are more than one copy of chunks of the book. Like I think Acererak had a copy of the "Bad Magic Rituals" section, but maybe not a copy of the "Crazy Horrible Monsters" section.
I'd think Acererak committed everything he learned from Vecna to memory
have any other people trained under vecna?
A lot
did vlakkith train under him or is she just a lich?
speaking of, how powerful is vlakkith? is she stronger then a regular lich?
Yes, Vlaakith is supposed to be among the most powerful non-divine entities of the setting
She is a Lich that is also Psion and a Fighter pretty much
Kas is probably the most notable one, but I've always assumed Vecna had an entourage of Mummy Lords and Death Knights and Liches and Vampires
Around cr24 I think.
In lore, picture her as a level 20 fighter, level 20 wizard and level 20 psion
Vlaakith? Ewww..
kas being the paladin who cut out his hand and eye right?
Less trained Under Vecna and more trained With Vecna
Kas being the Champion fighter of the duo
how powerful would vlakkith be compared to vecna?
A lot weaker
Less due to the fact that he is a god and a better wizard.
Dude who actually got god hood vs lady cosplaying as a god
Vlaakith is dope, but Vecna is Himothy
But she has more versatile tools in her belt. Remove godhood and Vlaakith has a good chance
vlakkith also has most githyanki under her control too so she has an entire army to throw at him
Considering before he became a God, Vecna has the same challenge rating as Orcus Iâd give Vecna an edge.
Bear in mind: No individual githyanki is allowed to become powerful. She eats their souls and their skills as soon as they get anywhere near the high level range
Jeez thats a good way to put ut
yeah but judging by baldur's gate 3 the average githyanki is at least level 5
Pre godhood, Vecna was on par with the Demon Lord of Undeath
Also Vecnaâs lost a hand and eye before becoming a god. And those became Artifacts
does him missing his eye and hand make him less powerful?
Lower ceiling, higher floor
Idk doesnât seem to
I see
Doesn't seem to affect him truth be told
He still sees just fine and he still hands just fine
Two limbs that have small pieces of his power can give people the power to cast Wish.
I think he is above Vlaakith
He had those replaced, but he might become slightly more powerful if he attunes back to them, due to the fact that they're, well, artefacts.
before he became a god
So yes he is weaker, in the sense that a character without the ring of winter is weaker than the same character with it
yeah because in the campaign I'm making vecna has the villain archetype of 'big bad evil guy who is only kept away by these magical items and everyone would be doomed if he was bought back'
Vecna also trained another very powerful Lich under his wing as well, IIRC
I got to use the new Vecna stat block in a level 20 one shot. Players decided to run
He killed half the party
Yeah Acererak. But thatâs unfair
I can't spell that liches name, Acererak?
Ah, yes, thanks Nealen đ§
Acererak is the âdo you have any idea how much weaker Iâd be if I became a god?â
do we have an idea of how powerful the dark powers of ravenloft might be?
A lot. Itâs basically a sentient multiverse
yeah, his ideal is literally 'why be a god when I can be a creator of gods'
he shares a lot of his ambition with vecna now that I think abt it lol
Define "powerful". Clearly their abilities are more limited than many people. They have no bodies.
Kas is also the most powerful domain of Dread lord IIRC???
he's the only one who can willingly leave
Vecna getting yoinked by an evil sentient multiverse to torture and kill people in a time loop happening twice is funny.
Bro has two nickels
Stat block wise yes and currently
except with the second one he can leave and doesn't want to because it's funny
The Dark Powers is just Gaslighting Kas into thinking Vecna and his swords are still in the Domains of Dread
I've always imagined them to be basically as strong as like... fate is. Like to me, they are among the strongest things in the multiverse
Not "willingly".
did any darklord willingly go to ravenloft?
And the thing is, I feel like Vecna could just leave the Entities game whenever the hell he wanted, yeah? đ
Iâm sure if Kas wanted to he would force his way out like Lord Soth and Vecna did but he really is being gaslight
Have you guys ever done takebacks when you misspeak in a way thatâs inappropriate for your character?
Yes that is part of the lore
Like if you accidentally say bar instead of tavern or if you say phone
he can and he doesn't want to because he wants to study the realm to harness it's power
He is just hanging out in Dead by Daylight because he feels like it
pretty sure bars are a thing in dnd, taverns serve food too and have rooms
That magic seal in DBD ainât doing anything realistically to stop Vecna from dipping
Yeah, a Tavern is literally just a Bar, but of course, Taverns often have places to stay
tavern is the old word for inn, and inn is an old word for hotel
So bar is fine to say? If youâre looking for whisky
I'm aware lol
yeah if your character just wants to go drinking
Yeah, DnD isn't necessarily "Medieval"
I thought it was. FR anyway
medieval is the 12-1300s too, and iirc the forgotten realms is same technology as the 1500s
The D&D-verse is pretty technologically advanced all things considered, whatnot with the Constructs that exist and other inventions
D&D takes place in the year yes
But, you as a player don't have to adhere to a specific type of lingo when talking in character unless you REALLY wanted to.
You don't have to speak like Ye Olden Gentleman
Also,A lot of "Modern" things have a somewhat magical equivalent in the realms one way or another
Considering forgotten realms has actual sentient robot securities in several cities and dragon lairs I think they are pretty advance
oh yeah steel watch exists
Nah those guys are so much less compared to the rest of the worldâs tech
No wonder they explode when they fall apart
Yeah, not to even mention Gnomish, Elvish and Dwarvish societies all being pretty big innovators
Depends on the place and the culture of both the realm and the part of the real world you're talking about. Waterdeep is one thing, Menzoberranzan is another, the Many-Arrows keep is yet another
DnD has people in space
Like, who in the 1500s are we talking about? The Italian city-states, the northern end of Scotland or the Andes?
Calimshanâs Nimblewrights are neat
I think it just varies depending on where you are yeah
If you're in Lantan and you go most anywhere else you might be like 'wtf'
Then again there is also the plane that is all robots.
looks at Mechanus
You know, I was just thinking about Gnomes even deeper just now, but, I find it how Garl Glittergold, the Gnome All-Father trapped the Kobold God in an infinite maze
He wasn't yet a god then
If we're talking about the Forgotten Realms version of the story, Kurtulmak was just the king of the first kobolds
Garl is just so mean to little kobolds
Kobolds and Gnomes hating eachother is honestly.. hilarious
And if we're still talking about the Forgotten Realms version of that story, Garl was not "mean". The kobolds were mining the souls of the first gnomes
That's the smallest feud I've ever seen
Why do I dislike my dm allowing my wizard to learn any spell
Here, we had that conversation some time ago: #dnd-discussion message
when Kurtulmak became a Deity, his "Holy Symbol" was literally a Gnome Skull and that had me cackling
I remember what you did, GARL!!!!
My very first DnD character was a dragonborn raised by kobolds to be their hero so he believed he was a kobold
I have a Dragonborn, who's Boyfriend is a Kobold PC in the group, they're totally the swag gay men messiahs
my first character was just some human sorcerer lmao
Most of my characters are Human + <Class>
My first character was a Shifter Monk
He was a "Weredeer"
my next character is gonna be a halfling fighter, or a race from MOTM, I wanna test it out
Sourcerer who before every kill goes "Erm, citation needed đ"
Halfling pairs well with Fighter
I'll probably play a cleric next or something that's casting focused, I've played paladin and ranger so far which are kind of there but not entirely
evil ass cleric who worships vecna would be a fun character
I love Vecna but I think I was leaning towards something weird like Ilsensine, the mindflayer god, I dunno yet though I just have the class idea for the most part in stone
there's an illithid god?
Yea Ilsensine, idk how much they actually care for that god but its their creator deity
considering a vast majority are controlled by elder brains then idk
Yeah I dunno how it works but I assume he just kind of worms into every mindflayer, he comes to you as more like a thought than a traditional deity's holy symbols or churches
Because it outshines those who are specialized in certain spells. Like just allowing a wizard to learn healing spells for free kinda just makes healers almost redundant. The wizard can do anything. It's also not RAW.
I think the only exception to this that I would accept is the Dragon Mark feats in the new 2024 Artificer book. That's fair to me.
i hate roll20 map setting with all my hate
play games physically like a true sigma then
Bear in mind, Ilsensine is often called a "god-brain". It's a bit ambiguous if it created the illithids or if they created it, or if it's an elder brain who reached godhood
no dnd stuff in my country, no people to play with and also really expensive gear
ah right
Yeah, and it feels overwhelming
Wizards could have allways able to take Magic initiate cleric
Yeah and that gives them 1 spell from the list of first level spells (and two cantrips).
That doesn't allow them to take any cleric spell they want.
Nope, but with healing Word they can go real far
Sure but the Cleric still has their spell list, especially the higher level spells that are super cool. It's not taking their whole vibe.
The Mark of Healing would honestly take them further than Magic Initiate.
Yet it cost a feat
I just dislike it giving me too many options
And making my character too strong
Like imagine getting greater steed, smites, conjure celestial, ectra
Oh yeah or the really exclusive spells of classes
Chances are that your DM will be able to cook something up to still provide a challenge if combat is a focus
Does anybody have any idea on why rules like 'Lingering Injuries' were removed from the 2024 DMG? i actually somewhat liked them, since I kinda more gritty/lethal combat. I sometimes play GURPS 4e, and in that system you can target individual limbs in order to cripple them... the most popular being the arm/hand that the opponent is holding their weapon on.
Iirc they said if it isn't in the 2024 book you can grab it from 2014
Say that to a wizard
yo im new to dnd can anyone help me out
Alright
Your right Iâm wrong
I know this is a pretty well debated question but whatâs the easiest DnD class for a new player? I want to get my friend into DnD
Fighter
What subclass
Champion
Iâve personally always felt sunsoul monk was the easiest
Simply being a Monk is more complicated than fighter
It was my first class, but fair point
Monk has to worry about bonus actions, keeping track of focus points, positioning, etc
Ok cool so champion fighter I can work with that
Barbarian
Yeah champion is by design the easiest class/subclass in the game
OK yeah, champion fighter. Then barbarian
Iâd agree champion is the easiest since itâs the most generic âjust hit stuff really hard with your swordâ
I will say, the new barbarian is a little more involved than it used to be. Specifically in the areas of how to keep Rage active and the fact that you can use Rage for other ability checks. But still not as complex as a monk or a caster
Berserker barbarian
Berserker is definitely the simplest barbarian subclass. Extra damage when rage, extra bonuses when rage, done
My first two classes were monk and wizard
Damn, respect
And honestly really depends on how fast you can get game mechanics
Still playing them, but man
I think my first was ranger
Can learn any spell thing introduced by dm for wizard is making my head spin
I playing bladesinger wizard and I already got so many options for combat that it not even funny
You mean cast high level spell while having high ac?
And I can play up close or far away, because mirror images, misty step, and having hop as a harregon
hexblade warlock
Plus cme with contingency
With spells or without?
Yup, playing a former performing arts teacher and actor
With spells wizard (variety and can adapt)
Without Fighter (Easy to understand, variety of equipment and good survival)
Whats the hardest class + subclass
It like playing the improv game
Shadow Magic Sorcerer
Rogue Mastermind
I find rogue easy tbh
I think the answer may vary from person to person, this one
Same
same but I donât find Wizard hard at all
Wizard isnât mechanically, but it is hard spell list wise
In D&D there's a lore... are there any iconic characters in the D&D lore that you consider your favorite?
I find it difficult to play well but thatâs because I play tanks
I consider none essential
I recently played asimar wild heart barbarian it was fun
But is there one that's a favorite?
Tasha
good
I love her. She is such a queen
Iâll second tasha
Who else can live in hades for a time and then be married to the demon prince of lust?
Heâs not dumb, just I know dnd can be intimidating to learn
How about a cleric?
Because there may be multiple people who are new playing
There are no classes that are so complex that a beginner canât learn them. But generally speaking the more magic a class has the more complex it is.
okay I will draw her.
Usually, but that depends if you go spell variety
yep but at the same time, you can adapt with that big list of spells
Heals, support, offensive, etc. etc.
While in other casters you have more rules, like sorc and the meta magic or warlock and the whole patron//Invocations//pacts at first level
Iâd say itâs typically almost any sorcerer, you canât swap spells every day, so you kind of have to plan your spell list out ahead of time and decide your role. Otherwise your pc might struggle
Wizard have his subclass at third like many others, meaning you can learn the class through those first levels
I found druid and cleric to be much easier than wizard myself.
Heals is more limited unless you took a Druid or Cleric magic inniate feat
and, honestly, Int >> Charisma in skills and other many stuff
Cleric yes, some druids can be difficult to learn
yep, but at least you have some instead of none. Like a backup plan
or in other part, temporal health work in some battles
Eh, int is only good for like puzzles
Their also wither and bloom
False Life
Wis skills can do a lot of heavy lifting, and clerics can cover some of the int skills anyway
yep, umbral tendrils help like Damage and T.hp too
What?
Although I will admit Twilight Cleric was hard to learn. Life and War have been a cakewalk.
Is umbral tendril third party?
In what regard
No class suits me
oh, idk, i used it in DND beyond so, i guessed its a normal spell
I could assuredly never play a nature related character
I tried Wizard and I was absolute garbage.
Agreed. Thatâs where âthis class is badâ comes from
Like I donât want to talk to animals or trees
Well I feel it's fine playing PC's that are not likre you IRL it's roleplaying after all. And fantasy escapism sometimes
For I am too hungry for a bit of everything
Because people confuse subjective with objective
Yeah, playing such classes make you realize you must take covers, be positioned properly and other many stuff
Or in other stances, know where you can be protected by your allies and know where to land your spells more properly
Iâm not the most charismatic, but I do enjoy cha casters
But I do not want to play a nature based ranger
Iâve said this monologue before but when people say âthis class is badâ they mean âthis class does not allow me to do what I wantâ because no class is âbadâ, people just want to do different things
And people say spellcasters arenât squishy, and I say that ainât true tbh
I will forever love the new draconic sorcerer, itâs very easy to make them not squishy lol
Yeah I ran a sorcerer better than a wizard, as a newbie.
I would never say âwizard is a bad classâ because I know thatâs not true, I just prefer being a tank
I think you might make it more dificult for yourself playing something that is a little more challenging for you to RP. But if people are comitted to try I say let them try
They are, sometimes. They have protective skills tho
The thing is, we are comparing a wizard with what? a paladin that can use heavy armor and have one of the highest hp pools?
It's very player-based.
Until they get blasted by spells, saves, ectra
yep, depend of the player. But in a general is that
I mean, you likely have resistance to one type of damage, and youâre not exactly bad at saving throws
Fighter
I do have the opinion you can make "wrong" choices with how you make your PC sometimes. Like when you activly make choices that like weirdly doesn't function with the mechanics of the game
And you think you are invincible?
same, martials in general have higher hp pools for a reason
No class is invincible, they all have strengths and weaknesses
Actually everyone is squishy
I mean, the point is that you can mitigate being squishy lol, nobody is invincible
and some get higher AC naturally, for a reason. That being, frontlines, tanks, etc.
Mitigate not remove
Yes? Again thatâs the point
True. Or dumpstating your main stat because "It's my charachter" but that just makes combat harder for everyone in the party
I do feel people forget DnD is a team game and you also have to make a PC that works with a team
For spellcasters who generally have low ac and low health pools (specifically the cha and int casters) you can certainly work around their weakness
With your party
Obviously, you can change it in lot of ways, but you will always have to choose and cant have everything.
Deal more damage or tank a bit more?
Move better or being able to hold a concentration better?
You can do it by yourself too, thereâs tools to manage hp, ac and saving throws
Then you have bladesinger that get better movement, concentration, and ac
Like solo?
When I make PC's I focus on what are they in a group than just them as an individual. Like if they were part of like fantastic 4, or other groups. Not the main character
but then you arent taking others options that upgrade your spells or give you other features
Team play > one character
Yep, but i wont deny that sometimes having a solo moment feel epic. Call it 1 vs 1 some strong creature
or 1 vs 50 (being a wizard casting without stopping)
True, tho you can play them like a regular wizard funnily enough
I do have the opinion that some classes depending on lvls get more love than others. So it's ok to talk with your DM about like something you can get to mitigate that
I play a 2014 monk atm, So it was really awesome to get the dragonhide belt.
They have adressed that sorta with some of the options to classes and subclasses in 2024
But DnD is not like a "balanced" game
But I do sometimes get annoyed when what my PC is good at can never be used
Yeah we have a term for it. Called shoot the monk
Hello Iâm new to dnd and nobody in my country generally plays the game
playing a PC who get stuff back at short rests and we only long rest...
which country?
I once played an eloquence bard and once my DM at the time realized I had like a minimum 20 to my social skills they decided to increase all the social DCs đ«
We have a eloquence bard in our party ATM. It has made persuasions checks pointless haa
But also that also comes down to a problem where you don't need to roll for everything
You try to talk to a guard to do x? Then it's great. But when you are talking with the king about your quest don't roll for it
Yeah like I invested specifically to succeed at social encounters please donât nullify my whole build đ
Oh yeah for sure it which is why it was a surprise when it happened
Facts, this is the same as low INT PC rolling INT checks
Also hard for a DM to know what an elqouence bard can do if they are not familiar
I play a dump stat int half orc. I talk all the time because it's funny
The wonders of boiling down the human and inhuman experience into 6 categorical statistics
also you shouldn't metagame social interactions. If your group has a dynamic that is x person is the talker then ofc they can talk first. But a PC shouldn't go "oh sorry I have low charisma so i don't do conversations with npcs"
Thatâs why travis plays grog so well, he doesnât play him as a idiot thatâs why it works
sometimes it's fine to split the party
fun way to make pcs do social interactions with low charisma
I mean they are trained for certain situations
My philosophy is that splitting the party is something everyone should agree on, since by default it means there's some moments where you'll take a backseat
My PCs misunderstood he was bribing the guards for entry and later told their leader he bribed the guards
Just try to avoid doing it when there's an hour-long combat on the horizon for one side and the others are head-down in another activity.
I've always wondered about trying out a method of including backseat players more in those roleplay situations, especially if it's not a vital NPC
Give out a note card like "you're the shopkeep, here's your quick primer"
I think it also depends on how big of a group you havve
It was Travis's first time making a character and playing a tabletop game, so it makes sense he went for a broader archetype
My PC is dumb but because he is based on paddington so he just trusts people and is good hearted
A little hopeful naivety is a really fun trait to add to a character, especially depending the setting of the campaign
Can't let EVERYONE be doomers in Curse of Strahd 
He is just really good. He trusts everyone. Never kills he is a monk so he just knocks people out
I recently made a Heart of Gold character for a new campaign after seeing the rest of my party members take a very morally dubious route with their characters 
Honestly it's really fun to play. Because all the others players have tragic backstories. My PCs has a loving family
"I dunno. Family is tricky. Right guys?"
And only your character shakes their head no lol
It's fun being like "superman" sometimes
Just be a good person, because it seems right thing to do
Hi
Also staying good in oposition to tragedy is also fun
Donât mind my morally dubious character stealing from hags
The worst is when the DM is an edgelord and specifically targets your heart of gold character to fulfill their edgy power fantasy
Honestly other thing happens at our party. Because by PC is so good, my DM never punishes him, because he doesn't feel it's fair
More like I watched it happen to another player and I felt SO bad for them đ
"Why did you help me, I tried to kill you" "You asked"
Ooohhhh fancy
It was a three session campaign with strangers so we all privately decided to bite our tongues till it was over
This honestly, forgiveness can be a hard thing and rewarding in its own way
I had the opposite of this happen to me once. I made a morally gray character that remind my DM of someone they knew IRL, so they targeted me and tried to make my character suffer as much as possible
I don't like bullies but I won't kill them
Especially with random strangers lol
The problem is though if you face like the obidmennt of evil. Then yeah it's ok to like kill it haha
I don't think I can convince asmoedus to stop being evil
talk no jutsu has it's limits
Yet another thing I always bring up in session zeros. How far does the party want to go with interparty conflict?
Especially between characters with conflicting worldviews
Honestly often the conquest paladin kills the people I knock out
I would say you donât have to forgive everyone, but like people gotta learn that not every criminal is a bad person lol
But thats their journey
Dealing with players who are strangers and don't like each other irl is crazy to deal with
That honestly sounds like a really fun dynamic to play with in a good group, 2 characters treading the line between trust and mistrust and seeing how they operate
Trust being rewarded, trust being punished, mistrust being misguided or justified
Yeah, people tend to be weird about stuff like that, idk why
Currently playing a cleric, but heâs pretty honest and is ok with morally grey things so long as theyâre not downright evil acts
Random story: I was playing with a friend of mine and I asked the DM if I could spread a rumour cause there is a rumour spreading part in the DMG and it took 14 in game sessions to spread a rumour that hamsters were running the world and the government was a shadow government of robots powered by hamsters
I love seeing an edgy character watch a heart of gold character get their trust broken, and then they're like "why don't I wanna rub it in their face? Why don't I wanna say I told you so? Why do I feel bad?"
Not having this understanding is what a lot of problem players miss. You're with the party thru common interest or goals.
Yeah I feel like that gets overlooked a lot in session 0, I personally think party conflict to a certain degree can be fun and interesting for showing a dichotomy between the characters and how each person would handle something. I don't really condone PVP but even that can be done fun for both sides, provided someone's not getting outright killed
Uh ohhhh, edgy character accidently cares about the partyyyy, many such cases
Just because you're evil doesn't mean you screw over the party every minute or so.
PvP can be pretty messy if you don't do it right and if the pvpers don't have the right mindset for it.
Like I personally don't have the right mindset for PvP.
My philosophy is that PvP is done best if you don't look at it from the perspective of trying to win. You gotta look at it like trying to tell a good story collectively
I don't mind PVP in the sense of like, small fights over important things or big deals, and it has to be done without a 'i want to win' mentality
anyone need an extra player or kkow where i can find a group to play with, new to the server but ive played d and d before
It's rare that I've seen a PvP situation go well for the players.
#looking-for-players is probably your best bet!
It is rare, it takes a lot of sportsmanship and both sides not playing to 'win' DND
And I don't think DnD as a platform is built for it
Two party party mates were fighting so I did a up casted banishment as timeout for both. 
Yeah, DND doesn't really have many support tools for PvP besides just lowering each other's HP. Any other methods the party has to bring in themselves
Pakistan
Apocalypse World had a neat system where your interactions with each other affected certain rolls to aid each other, but could also lower your rolls if there's party discontent
So, let's not be hasty. Sometimes people fighting for stupid reasons is actually very good writing
What defines good and bad writing is not the events of the plot themselves but how they are presented
Don't worry about winning or losing in PVP. Spontaneous PVP happens because of story and if the other guy REALLY wants you dead without a good reason. PVP is the least of your worries.
Am I able to play DND under 18?
There's what, 330 mil people in Pakistan, I promise you some of them play :p
Its just a game. The real question is that if you're comfortable with the company you're playing with.
Is there campaigns that are text
There are, though they don't look like traditional DND. Look up Play by Post and/or Westmarches
Ok
I don't think they need to realize it's something stupid, because sometimes the story is better if there is no healing nor peace and with the harboring resentment
It's easier than you might think to just ask a player "hey I think it'd be a great scene for my character to try to fight you over this, what do you think?"
Cant find any đđđ
People here barely play uno
do people dont want minors in there party?
Well once PvP happens you are no longer a team.
I think it depends on what's bringing you together to begin with, you can have an infighting but still begrudgingly stick together if there is a world ending sort of threat or common goal
I fail to see how asking ahead of time is an unfortunate thing 
Be the change you want to see. Convince people to play.
yeah but im looking for games and none are for my age
Oh my bad I misunderstood, I thought you were implying that having to ask ahead of time isnt a good or healthy thing to do
Trying to, convinced my cousins but i barely know how can theyđđ„č
If you have something like a local university you could always put fliers up, but I'd wager if you're near a big city there will be SOMEWHERE that hosts games.
"This person I've been traveling with for months was part of a opposing army in the past?! Welp, better drop everything, including our friendship and the world ending event to murder this person!"
"You squeezed the hand of a PC I hyperfixate on a bit too much?! I better pull out my knife and threaten murder!"
One time a party member tried to have me burned as a witch
Guys one doubt from this feat Poisoner he says "Potent Poison. When you make a damage roll that deals Poison damage, it ignores Resistance to Poison damage." this ignore resistance can be used in magic too or only poison from melee attacks?
if i cast a spell or cantrip can ignore resistance too
thx
What did you do to them? Lol
Is there any new podcasts out using the 2024 rules?
Good transition for a topic I wanted to talk about. I feel folks can kinda miss how multifaceted characters are and forget they can roleplay other emotions rather then the ones the backstory informs.
That sounds hilarious, lol. I wanna do that now, as a distraction.
Is there a feat that I can take that allows my abilities and spells alike to ignore fire resistance?
Trying to find something that works with the Artillarist flamethrower cannon if at all possible.
The Elemental Adept specifies only spells.
The cannon uses spell slots, would it count as a spell?
I was told it doesn't technically count by both players here and also my DM because "it" is not casting a spell by attacking.
So I'm trying to find any work around but I haven't been successful at it.
Right, but if you cast necrotic gaurdian spirits as a death cleric, when they do damage every turn it'll ignore necrotic resistance.
you're not casting it every time it does damage.
That's specifically because it's a subclass feature, though
đ€· That's what they told me unfortunately.
Elemental Adept specifically states when yoy CAST a spell.
dang
It doesn't work with natural damages or elemental damage from anything else besides a spell.
Hey, Iâm looking for some Expert critique on a backstory
Even if it's created by a spell slot
hey is there a mod I can talk to in DMs? not sure how things work here.
Your best bet is to use Force Balistas if something is resistant to fire damage tbh
It's one of those niche cases where you can't really overcome the resistance with any feats because it's not anything under a feat
Which is dumb!
They should fix that >:/
Dnd and it's amazing ability to word things properly.
It sucks because I like the force ballista and all but it's a character concept to use mainly fire. And fire, of course, is one of the most resisted elements in the game. If not the most.
Beholders are really easy to kill unless the DM modifies them.
Basing a character around an element type is fun, but so damn annoying when you don't really have any ways to overcome it
Luckily I do have at least the force ballista and backup spells but it does suck making the choice to not do your characters' whole deal.
I'm, frankly, so glad our Draconic sorcerer isn't basing himself around fire because we're gonna play Descent Into Avernus soon, but he's a pretty seasoned player so, I'm sure he knew anyway lol
He's doing... Lightning Damage? I think?
I'm playing a Berserker Or Zealot Barbarian
what type of dragon ancestry is he doing
Oh nice. My artificer is a bit of a pyromaniac Tiefling and I thought it'd be entertaining.
I forgot which he mentioned, but it's definitely one of the Lightning ones
I mean, cold or lightning is the way to go if youâre playing into fiends
But again, I have backup spells, so it's not a biggie.
I do have a fire draconic sorcerer basically ready to go though, but I def wouldnât play it in a dragon or devil themed campaign lol
hey there, I was hoping to get some confirmation. I wanna post my server in the looking for community tabs because I wanna discuss ttrpgs and dnd with people in my server but we arent exactly a full o. dedicated dmd server nor do I immediately plan to host games. is it still okay to make a post?
I'm thinking a Zealot over a Berserker because my Barbarian is in the Zhentarim and I know that, currently, within the their ranks, there's a lot of Bane Worshippers
Tbh, Iâve got a sorcerer for every subclass ready to go, itâs my favorite spell caster
Zealot is always cool lmao
My favorite Sorcerer Subclass is Aberrant lol
2024 Zealot isn't that bad either and it offers decent support too, hmm
I just wish Zealot could use their healing pool to heal others cause that'd be sick
