#dnd-discussion
1 messages · Page 5 of 1
true
Unless 2014 rules
yea if they choose to intervene they'll roll initiative and be put into it in the round they enter on, i just need to know if anything mechanically explodes if a monster does something to another, like a red dragon burning a legendary resistance against a baby red dragon or any of the monsters with infant variants
In the lore it would be a fallen general that failed its assault against the capital and failed. His god gave him a second chance and now hes a necromancer
It’s a lineage allowing you to play a skeleton or a ghoul, you’re literally a walking corpse, it’s from ravenloft.
oh cool
i haven't played a plasmoid yet now that i think about it
Ok thanks and it can go with a paladin?
How's the new lorwyn supplement for dnd? I hear the new elf is pretty busted
there's a fun tech with Mage Armor where you can cast it on a plasmoid and they can still traverse through impossibly small spaces without sacrificing it
Any race, it’s a lineage, only condition is that it has to be from a humanoid race which is near all of them.
nevermind i found owlfolk i'm gonna remake my first character
Stealth ranger rogue, I’d guess.
lol go for it
Last question: and in public spaces? What does he do?
he was stealth rogue that like a certain bird, preferred the air
he did shoot a hobgoblin in the head with a crossbow and nailed him to a wall one time too
owlfolk sentry: whooo goes there
Can a beastmaster ranger be sneaky?
Yep
i mean rangers are dex-wis so all of them are a little sneaky
Alrighty!
whether he sneaky sneaky is up to you i guess
dex-wis is fun because you can play a nature accurate human, very quiet and very good at following
you always got pass without trace if you need it
You could get Pass Without Trace for you and your companion
what about a hoot ninja that suddenly hits you in the head with a crossbow bolt
that's a rogue
right they do have pass wIthout trace
Fun fact that is a Ranger in the book series “The Legend of Drizzt”
Right, that actually could be very great! Perhaps we'll even be able to do stealth together then, as our fighter has good dex but wears heavy armour
He actually taught Drizzt how to be a Ranger too.
Except it was a bow instead of a Crossbow
Deathless nature and knowledge from a past life, it’s part of the lineage, he doesn’t have race feats but it’s replaced by the lineage.
Doesn’t eat sleep or breath, long rest is a necrotic trance in which he’s aware, resistance to decease and poison and decreases, and can rember things from a past life acting like guidance 1d6 only as many times daily as the players proficiency.
What he does in public spaces? Telling the guards he ain’t a threat to the city and not really undead like a regular monster, so making clear he ain’t a monster.
Reborn classifies as a humanoid, not undead, this is done so he can get healed, and importantly control undead doesn’t work on him.
Is there any benefits to running dagger over scimitar?
you can hide a dagger i guess
Piercing, throwable
Is piercing better?
also easier to conceal
daggers seem more like hold out weps
It's for dual wielding so probably won't make too big a difference as my other weapon is shortsword
i mean it depends on what you're hunting
idc how good you are you're not hiding that scimitar undee your clothes
I'm hunting everything that looks fun to hunt
oh, daggers are lore accurate in terms of dual wielding
"i just have a very prominent spine"
lol
Yeah, i also like the flavour of that one more i think
people never really wielded two equal-length weapons, they had a regular combat arm like a sword and something small and defensive, like a buckler or parrying dagger
i feel like i have a funny idea to introduce my owlfolk
every rogue typically is brooding in the corner but i'm just gonna brood in the rafters because i can people watch and i just like high places
Have you heard of the mighty daggler?
Sitting on the ceiling and eating a sandwich
not even once, but most manuals say "fight with a defensive and offensive option, offense-defense twice isn't super viable"
bonus pts if not brooding but just really like people watching
i mean in terms of dual wielding there is another classic that's a bit more modern: sword and gun
"parry this you filthy casual"
not a musket or a rifle, something short like a revolver or a pistol, get their eyes on the sword and then shoot them
what if he just looked like it because he was just having a nap in actuality
even better
ofc if your game doesn't have guns then sword and dagger is the most likely
what about hand crossbows
need two hands to reload, people didn't really use those much
could i get away with being a mafioso rat
Daggler is actually pretty op except deployment issues
if you need more than one shot you likely are in trouble already
I'm not giving my silly mushroom a gun sadly, not yet
oh do you mean dagger + buckler?
getting sidetracked i need a character to viably replace my hilariously strong current one
idk mafioso ratfolk? he is literally a rat tho would he be trusted lol
rat mafia
i like it
yea you can absolutely reflavor a shield into a buckler-dagger with one handle, or a dagger the same way
but i'm handling my owl first
Hello.
Yup!
I watch too much sellsword arts
What are some prominent underdark animals except spiders and drow?
i watch them too, i got the reference once you mentioned "deployment issues" lol
flail snails
Lol
What are those?
snails with flails
oh my
K thanks!
How does it hold it
very carefully
with its slime
but also burrowing creatures would be fairly common, your worms, bullettes, beholders. . .
would it be funny if my owlfolk just had a ghillie suit (nature's mantle)
spectators too then, yeah?
sure
Beholder as the beastmasters beast
whatever the diet beholder is called
Spectator
Does the animal companion of beast master die often?
depends on how you play it and how evil your DM is
if your DM is evil they're killing that dog immediately
my campaign has deck of many things shenanigens involved
if i get the moon card how stupid should i make my wish
My dm isn't very evil but i want to fight pretty agressively. I'm just deciding if i want my animal companion to be like a "friend" to my character or just a mushroom zombie
how attached to everything are you
cause i had the idea of getting the ability of being able to nonmagically make myself invisible for however long i feel like
Looks cute, incredibly dangerous.
"make all old people look 10 years older"
then it depends on how evil your character is
They grew up in the underdark, but they're trying their best
you wanna know the worst part of the deck being in the campaign is
if they are evil that little mushbaby is going to war
i'm the scamp that has it
Oof
for now.
Yeah, I'm just deciding if it's a sentient thing or just a zombie myconids make for protection
tbh yeah it is for now it all depends on if i get unlucky
Donjon.
Because if it's zombie, more fun fighting, but if it's not, more fun characterwise
I just reached level 3 as a hexblade warlock. I’m on the fence about becoming melee focused but my party needs a melee attacker. Should I do it?
You're not a real hexblade if you aren't fighting it out at the frontline
i've had a lot of void shenanigens but none of the players in my party have got donjon what does that do necessarily
lol
Should I focus on buff spells just for me like armor of Agathys and Blur or do more debuff stuff like hex or hold person?
laughs evilly
a bunch of characters got voided we had to fight hades
Whichever fits the situation
Jojo reference?
no don't think so
you get spirited away. roll a new guy if your dm don't want a whole other side campaign finding and getting them back
Make the new character so agrovating but only to the dm so they have to bring your character back
that is def not the approach to take
It's not a good idea, no
i thought that it was putting you in a dungeon or something where you either had to fight your way out or get helped out
it does. but you are helpless
short of Wish and even that could backfire, finding you is nearly impossible
if it didn't make me helpless then there would be problems
it is a very nasty card.
because my current character's specialty is running hands and he needs no weapons to do it
Hi guys, off topic rn but I'm creating a list of "Who is most likely to" but DnD version, does anyone have any question suggestion?
If i ever get deck of many thing's, should i use it if I don't want certain death?
i am looking at the official description for what it does i can see that the effect you said is what it does
it is RNG incarnate
Well, I'm playing a wild magic sorcerer so it's thematic ig
i would rather lose all magic items etc than draw donjon
What's that?
and idk if that is even the worst card
but there are some cool cards that might be worth the risk
cough cough moon cough cough
Donjon is you go to jail. do not pass Go. Do not collect 200 dollars.
Dam, that's rough
I'm gonna give my players a Deck of Many Cards
it magic jail too so you can't bust yourself out. wherever you are.
i highly suggest studying every card before you do that.
i really do.
if they pull Sun, Star or Moon, things will be heavily derailed.
I'm pretty sure i know every deck in a deck of cards
donjon is basically 'roll a new character'
so is Void, your point being?
point being don't give out the deck on a whim
Isn't that like a campaign-ending type thing
It's not the Deck of Many Things as they'll think it is. It's a Deck of Many Cards
lol okay in that case
It's a deck of cards with a lot of cards
that silly
Balatro type of campaign then
Whenever my players draw one I'll say "as far as you can see nothing happens" and variations of that
yeah they'll think it's fool
Ngl goated, might make all cards uno cards, my players love uno for the most part
That'd be cool, it has unlimited cards in so you can just keep drawing.
They'll break the economy
Tanking the price of paper
i like the idea the deck has so many cards because they all from different card games
All 11 versions of uno
the horror
also the occasional tarot that does nothing but be a tarot.
maybe some hanafuda
I might also make like 1 in 20-30 cards does something
of course. first time that happens it'll surprise them
Nothing too bad or too good
Also make every number of cards needed to draw for magic to happen after that random (whenever i think the campaign is getting too calm)
the only really magical thing about it other than that is they always find it in their posessions even if they get rid of it
hinting at something more
but maybe a trickster god just wants to see what they'll do lol
Actually yeah. I'll need to make a set of actions which if they follow in some way, will end up with the god rewarding them
i think that could be cool
i can't help but feel that's a reference to koumei in warframe
What's warframe?
i dunno but i do like warframe. do not remember koumei tho
gambling frame
so many frames it easy to miss one
and warframe is robo ninja stuff that lets you flip around
mmo. very fun, Tenno
Hi guys, I'm creating a list of "Who is most likely to" but DnD version, does anyone have any question suggestion to implement? Sorry for asking again but my message got lost in the chat lol
"who is the most likely to try and taste a phone"
most likely to burn the tavern down in session 1.
Most likely to befriend a myconid
most likely to be the first one to seduce anything
Isn't that just barb?
nah that is low hanging fruit
one of the party is literaly a mushroom boy lol
I did not typo
i mean one of the bards in my first campaign seduced a lock
you heard me right a lock
Most likely to accidentally kill an important NPC
I'm hoping to soon play a mushroom boy too!
did it spread its mechanisms open?
Mist likely to be the lone wolf character
Most likely to try to seduce the dragon
Most likely to succeed seducing the dragon
Most likely to touch the obviously cursed object
Most likely to split the party
HAHAHHAHAHA
if i decide to roll my human samurai i might just try do a funny with a fey
We will never let the seducing the dragon meme die apparently
well you can thank donkey for that
Most likely to be sent into the Lady of Pain’s maze
my d20 prob
you should worry about seducing it successfully
you are smol. dragon lorge.
at best you're part of its hoard now.
When are we getting a playable giant race
why ask me
You seem like a smart and knowledgeable person
not that smart lol. thanks tho?
- Dragons are not romantically interested in you
- You are at best a pet or entertaining child to them
- Dragons can shapeshift
Already there. Goliath
They were made more giant-like in 2024
Some people would like the 2nd point
They're not 30ft tall sadly
And to answer the question: there will likely never be a playable giant race. PCs are either medium or small size. Wotc is pretty committed to that
Take what you can get
sure they can shapeshift. doesn't mean they will
Ah well
I'll take it
Having a Large PC species would be wild if you kept track of hunger and hydration. Large creatures eat and drink 4× as much as Medium and Small
You'd blow through rations incredibly quickly
Thank you goodberries
Problem solved
Also small enemies (which includes a lot of the iconic enemies, cough cough goblin) can’t grapple you and generally be far less of a threat to the large PC
Do goodberries replace hydration too?
Problem unsolved
Also Large PCs can exploit the Oversized Weapons ruling if the campaign has that feature
What's the topic?
Currently, how a large player species would affect the game
So yeah. No large playable races and that is for the best.
Agreed
No, those rules are for monsters not PCs
Having large PCs would be fun.
Honestly I still think many currently playable options should just not be available to PCs
Oooh. Large player species would be hard to do because most campaigns are designed around the player being medium or below.
hence why i said if the campaign has that feature (could've worded it better tho in all fairness)
Looking at you oathbreaker.
It having the feature is irrelevant? Its something always on in every campaign by default. Its how monsters work.
oh one of the PCs in my party is a dirty oathbreaker cause he tried bisecting one of the other members
There are many ways to be temporarily large. That’s enough for me
And the rest of the party did not decapitate him and feed his corpse to the dogs?
as in if players could have the same feature
oh no we were on a huge staircase and he got "accidentally" kicked off of it for trying to ride the wildshaped druid
Then I don't get your question? Thats saying you asked "can they use the feature if they can use the feature"?
One way to get rid of the troublemaker I suppose.
Seriously, normalize killing PCs who misbehave
And I'm talking inglorious deaths.
That can be taken as targetting and easily cause IRL issues IMO. Not worth the risk
that's why i'm contemplating giving my Warforged character sheet to my DM when he does later campaigns just to weed out murderhobos
I do that loads
That’s for monster design not an actual rule
my warforged is an unfun-sized jumping in one package cause he's an echo knight and punches people harder than monks do
I once dealt with a PC who sabotaged my ship in order to have me under control by cutting off her leg and leaving her in the middle of the desert.
Another way to deal with troublesome players is to read the guidance in the DMG 2024
Anyway I believe large creature PCs are avoided mainly because they don’t fit in a lot of dungeon maps and they have to take in 4x more food and water a day, and I think there’s some stuff involving armor too
So what is everyone's favorite class/sub class to play? I'm still finding mine
A large PC simply would not be able to follow the party in DotMM
The food and water aspect isn't something that's really considered much.
Ranger and maaaybe Fey Wanderer
Kensei, hexblade, bladesinger, tempest cleric.
Yeah food and water, isn't really a thing unless it's what that DM was going to do anyway, or is always part of their adventures/campaigns
it's the only thing i know for real anyway
It can be very important in many campaigns
Monks, rangers, druids, and clerics tend to be my favorite classes.
Subs... a lot harder
i like fighter
Oath of vengeance paladin
i think i can see your favourite race and subclass too
Can pretty definitively tell you my least favorite class is wizard though. Still have never played one in 5e. Just so immensely boring
Now the classes I dislike the most? Barbarian, rogue and sorcerer
Those three can go to hell.
My favourites /notsarc
i feel like fighter is marred by the basic "Fighter-Man" stereotypes
human fighter is the cheerios of dnd characters
A fighter can be so much more
I could maybe handle playing one for a oneshot but. Man I could not handle one in a campaign. Dreadfully boring
And cheerios are just fine
Is it helpful?
Cheerios is healthy
Fighter is amazing. I love roleplaying someone strong enough to just crush stuff with their bare hands and stuff. Sadly most DMs try and keep fighters on the 'realistic' side.
I like wizards because they have out-of-combat gameplay. Collecting spells for your spellbook can be involved and fun
If your DM is up to it.
It is for me.
Every other class also has out of combat gameplay and isn't boring about it to me
Had a Dhampir Fighter once that just punched through the thin wall of a house and drag the dude behind it due to her high Strength
they'll hate my warforged because all he does is punch things into the dirt with his echo helping with the jumping
i think fighter is conceptually fine
yes it's a bit plain and generic but that is kind of the point, to provide a generic chassis for "guy who fights good" characters
Realistic in what way?
Gotta be more creative to do stuff as a Fighter out of combat. Don't got a canned ability to use.
I feel like every class in dnd has it’s worth and is fun (except wizard to me)
It’s just people mistaking their subjective opinion as objective
i think the bearded scarred veteran appearance for fighters that seems to be the norm would be so much better if they were just like jetstream sam or something
In the sense that you can't really do fantastical things unless you're 'magical' or use spells.
I cant even comment cause I havent tried all the classes. I gravitate towards a few usually.
My philosophy teacher used to say "Objectivity is just the name we give to subjective opinions when they're held by the dominant people"
Your teacher must've hated the existence of gravity
While I personally do not enjoy playing wizard, I know that many many people do. I do not consider it a bad class, it is not a bad class. It’s just that I don’t like playing it
Yeah, I guess that's true. Makes sense to me, tho.
But that doesn’t make it bad.
Actually she was quite passionate about physics too. And she would probably have explained that it's something different.
I wouldn't say wizard is a bad class, cause its not (no class is). Its just dreadfully boring
Thus the issue of 'fighters are boring' :P
Most fighters aren't being allowed to do fun stuff without magick
Really? Why do you say that?
Well that’s something we agree on
mostly primarily? its class features. Or more accurately - the lack thereof
I don't quite find wizard boring to be honest. By all accounts, I think it's less boring than sorcerer, rogue, barbarian, fighter...
But I don’t think it’s objectively boring, it is just that I as a person am not the kind of player that enjoys it
But you are right about the fact that it's one of those classes where the class is poor and the subclasses make the difference
I guess. I just like spellslinging.
There is an aspect of me that dislikes wizard for the whole ""wizard is objectively the best class!!!!!!" thing that gets thrown around (especially in more recent years) but wizard has always been my least favorite even before that (and technically speaking, not the fault of the class)
The only time I find wizards boring is when Wizard players pick the same spells every time coughcoughfireball. But that’s not an issue with the class itself.
If I wanna be a spellslinger thats what I have sorc or warlock for
I find wizard and cleric to be my least favorite classes in terms of play
The trick is every class can be used creatively, but casters get significantly easier access to mechanically supported non combat contributions
I mean. . . It's fireball tho
I always found the sorcerer to be the wizard but worse in every way to be honest
Champion fighter healer
Yeah while I encourage people to speak more subjectively and be mindful about others’ opinions, I also don’t feel too bad about wizard slander sometimes because a lot of wizard players are very annoying
Worse spell list, worse mechanics... More creative subclasses perhaps?
I always found it to be the wizard but more fun in every way.
Mechanically the ""gap"" is minuscule in actual play and also the gap is fake and the class itself has such better flavor and actual mechanics that its not even a contest to compare wizard and sorc. Sorc wins handily every time
monk, barb, fighter, and sorcerer are my favorite classes
Metamagic and wild magic sorcery. 2024 sorcerer is goated
i think sorc has more evocative and distinct fantasies personally, compared to wizard who's just "hey i took a different major in college"
I love metamagic
the only thing that makes wizards "good" is "spells" - and if you entire class is quite literally just "spells" - thats bad and boring
Every time I play a full caster that’s not sorcerer I just miss it
In flavour? How exactly can you compare flavour?
Yes but by which standards?
Yessss I love sorcerer
Class is a bucket of features. Character is what you make of it.
My standards. These are in fact my opinions?
You find it better than wizard
Also sorcerer subclasses have so much aura
Of course. I am asking what your standards are
Some people would prefer learning magic from nothing way cooler than just being born with it
Yes that is the framing of everything I have been saying since the start, no need to reiterate it on every single message
So we got Werebears.
Wonder what a WereOwlBear looks like
Doesn’t change what I said. Fireball is overrated imo
I like it if I like it - its really not deep
And even if it wasn’t overrated, it’s boring seeing everybody who has access to it pick it
Garou Crinos with a beak.
So... like Hootsie from Legends of Avantris then? (once upon a witchlight specifically)
What are the damage alternatives for 3rd level spells?
Lightning bolt
Lightning Bolt for one - upcasting other spells among others
Is it better?
Lightning bolt. Upcast any 2nd or 1st level spell
It's fun.
Its so extremely comparable
any spell is situational
Is lightning bolt saving throw or attack roll?
Same damage, line instead of sphere, doesn't set fire to the building
You don't need to make "the best" choice for every aspect of a character to have a good character - not even a great character
I find that they’re more useful depending on positioning of enemies and resistances
Lightning Bolt’s biggest issue is that it relies much more on positioning than Fireball does, but it deals the same amount of damage and of a damage type that’s resisted less frequently than Fireball.
Alrighty
but nothing beats 8d6 in a 20 foot radius JUST FIREBALL-
And let's not forget: Lightning bolt does not set the surroundings on fire. That is its biggest advantage
i imagine it'd be great for a narrow hallway if your party is out of the way
before you ask my last message was a jocat reference
meteor swarm says, sit down young man
Yeah. Different spells will do better than others in different scenarios
thunder step storm sorc my beloved ❤️
There's also upcast scorching ray depending on number of targets, or if you can get advantage on it
Or actually no, it's just worse
In any case, fireball is best against, like, a horde of goblins. Upcast scorching ray is better against fewer big targets
Fireball just rolls a lot of dice in a massive area. It is very good at killing things for its level.
It doesn't upcast well. But when you first get access to it, it solves many of life's problems that do not involve collateral damage.
Although my personal favorite fireball alternative is Erupting Earth
Scorching ray is 8d6 damage total though iirc, so if the fireball hits even 2 targets it'll be much better
my interpretation: use Fireball like a grenade
Incidentally, a reason I love druids so much
always has been a grenade
Who's spell list is it on
open a door, throw a fireball into the room, close the door, listen to the screams of your victims
non-con difficult terrain my beloved
oh wait i just remembered my warforged can do all of this you guys are saying
or a rocket. big bada boom
druid sorc and wizard
Grenades only have a 5ft kill radious. Fireball is more like an artillery round
Ah, nice. Ngl explosion from below the earth sounds fire
yeah but this one also sets things on fire, so it's more like a napalm strike
stop giving me ideas i'm gonna have to double my efforts on rolling up my owlfolk if i wanna avoid committing war crimes with my warforged tomorrow
The fact that it even does as much damage as it does is purely due to legacy too, so it’s basically a meme that WOTC can’t hold onto. And again, that damage isn’t so high when you stop and realize just how many official monsters in D&D are resistant or immune to fire anyways.
an underrated alternative to fireball - or perhaps more accurately: a more precision aim version of fireball that I really enjoy is snowball swarm
It’s a good crowd/minion clearer, but it’s not that great of a spell imo
2nd level, 3d6, 5ft radius sphere
Can't find it
Erupting Earth is from Xans
Ah ok
all this is cool but i have two words for this
That's how I feel about it tbh. You get it on 5 when you're still fighting a sizable number of things it CAN one shot, it's god tier, and then it's pretty irrelevant shortly after.
In many situations, I feel that erupting earth is better
Is dual wielding good?
Difficult terrain is incredibly useful if you know how to exploit it
The feet
I like binding ice but that's more because I like ice magic in general
Fireball's damage increase in slots
Binding Ice is also great
Average. One more attack for less damage, but no free hand, no shield.
Ice knife good?
I mean the feat
Yes Dualw wielding is good. Any extra attack is good
Oh. Yeah the feat is good
i mean dual wielding can be good
There are better spells to cast with those limited higher level slots
2024 made duel wielding pretty dang good
that is good then
Alrighty. Which weapon is it best to use with?
Binding Ice was of an era of spells where they were doing a lot of new "to end this after they fail they need to use a full action" spells - for related reasons this is also why I love Caustic Brew
all this is cool and all but just shoot them in the head with a heavy crossbow what's the big idea
It is rather rare that a damage spell is actually worth upcasting
unless you have the feats to compensate it best to use weapons that won't make you miss all the time for dw.
Scorching Ray upcasting with new Sorc can go pretty crazy
To be fair, I used to play PF1 where the consensus was that damage spells were almost a waste of spell slots
The only time I typically do is when I’m out of slots of the minimum required level
How so?
I don’t upcast a 3rd level damage spell because I think it’s a good idea, I do it because I’m out of 3rd level slots.
Innate sorcery gives you advantage on all attack rolls and each ray is an individual attack roll
Spells don't have to always one shot things. They can just dwindle their HP enough for the Melee characters to finish them.
Unless I know for a fact that what I’m fighting against is vulnerable to the damage type, in which case I might increase the casting level
Isn't it only 8d6 single target damage?
And honestly I still think it's true. Sure, casters can and should use their spell slots to quickly clear the lesser enemies, but for the big foes, their spells are better used on utility and debuffs and the likes
Or split into 2d6 between different targets
2d6 per ray
So does anyone wanna review my phase 1 of my homebrew Monster I made?
You choose how many rays hit each target within range
each ray is an attack so not always targetring the same dude
3 reys +1 from upcasting. Fireball does 8d6 in a 20ft area
or you can just go brrr on one.
Fireball also can't crit and enemies can be good at dex saves/magic saves
That's true ig
haiii
Hi
henlo
It's a matter of estimating your foe. Some foes have evasion and a high dex save, or magic resistance. For those, scorching ray is better
question
It's a chance you take. You can't prepare for everything
How stuff scales has a matter in it too
what is the benefit of sorcerer vs wizard
AC doesn't scale as hard vs saves when it comes to monsters
Metamagic vs more spells and different subclasses
so like which is better
one is innate the other studies. mechanically tho idk
Right. Ig that makes sense. Also warlock multiclass for hex
whats innate
In 2014, Wizard is better.
In 2024 they're pretty even.
wizards learn/study magic
sorcerers just have their magic
probs depends on what role you want your char to accomplish?
oh
mechanically... you'd have to look at the two to compare
ok
there is no one right answer
Both worse then ranger
they have their pros and cons
Wizars pros: Better spell list, more versatility in the sense that you can have every spell in your book eventually
Wizard cons: Require more tactics and ability to anticipate when preparing your spells
Sorcerer pros: Metamagic, weird subclasses
Sorcerer cons: Worse spell list
I wouldn’t say the sorcerer spell list is worse, but they’re definitely more limited.
maybe? try char discussion
Head to #character-discussion
o okkk
And iirc they can’t change/prep spells as frequently as wizards, so once you choose a spell to prep, you’re stuck with it for longer than a wizard would be.
they might be able to help there
it definitely is, but that's the wizards identity. They have the biggest and probably best spell list in the game. At the very least, best out of the arcane 3 (warlock wiz sorc)
Hi
hullo
Sorcerers get less spells but can use Metamagic to change the rules of the spells.
Wizards just get a lot more spells.
Can you be an oathbreaker paladin without losing your paladin powers
I met someone who wanted that
yes
isn't oathbreakwr just a diff kind of paladin now
That might be up to the DM
A subclass I think
The edgy paladin
Oathbreaker is a paladin subclass. You very much do not lose your powers
lol
You don't lose anything as a Cleric or Paladin in 2024
you get the powers of an oathbreaker but probs not the subclass you did have? idk
At least per the 2024 rules, characters who are gifted abilities can’t lose them. For example, divine magic isn’t borrowed, it’s given, and even the gods can’t take back what they’ve bestowed on others.
ahh that's cool
I thought being an oath breaker would make it so you lose a lot of your privileges
Nope
In older editions
If that were the case, you wouldn’t have an entire subclass to play
older editions you lost it all straight up
guess maybe with a chance of atonement? dunno for sure there
It’s also worth remembering that Oathbreaker is a bit of a misnomer. They’re not just a Paladin who broke their oaths, they’re a Paladin who broke their original oaths and swore new ones in explicit pursuit of evil.
true
Depending on the class. Some classes you were just banned from taking more levels in it
yeah
That’s kinda how I rule it myself. If you’re a warlock who is directly disobeying your patron’s orders or acting against their interests, the warlock isn’t going to give you more powers.
Not in the 5e material
They’re not gonna take away what they’ve taught/given, but they’re not gonna teach/give you more. That said, this is just a DM choice/house rule, not a written rule.
Oh
So basically there's no actually incentive to not become an oath breaker
Well you can lose privileges. In the sense that you may be banned from whatever order you were part of
Besides your subclass
Yeah, but that’s not the same as losing your mechanics
sometimes it is
Maybe in the case of like… using Renown, sure
True.
So it's essentially saying you lose your privileges but not really
You may lose your privileges narratively, but not mechanically.
well 5e paladins work differently to begin with
Eh. Non-mechanical consequences depend on how mean a DM feels like being
I've seen one PC have to spend their life thwarting assassination attempts by the churches and holy orders of Helm. I've seen another be basically ignored
I did that with a Warlock PC I DM’d for lol
That feels kind of dull
If you don't actually lose them then that feels I like the game doesn't really support its own narrative
They verbally stated they wouldn’t serve their patron anymore. So the patron made a pact with an NPC and sent the new Warlock after the PC to “tie up loose ends”.
Well, as I stated earlier, powers gifted are not powers borrowed.
@narrow moss new PFP looks great
Deities and other powerful entities don’t lend abilities to people, they give it to them. Can’t take back something that’s no longer yours.
It's a bit like exalted. You get to become a chosen of the sun god for heroism, but if you turn into a raging murderous psycho, the sun god still can't take it back
Yep. It happens when the game moves former god centered classes away from them. Although the Cleric still depends on a god/pantheon for a few of their class abilities, but that's as far as it goes. They won't be denied. Of course some people might want to role play their Cleric/Paladin as deity dependent
Also notice that archdevils and demon lords can't cast eldritch blast. They create warlocks but it's not their power
In fairness, archdevils and demon lords have much stronger things they can do than cast EB
Of course but you understand what I mean
That depends, because Asmodeus is a Lesser god and previous Deities and Demigod books gave gods powers not listed in their descriptions
Asmodeus has a stat block in 5e and I did not see that in it
Asmodeus is not lesser
I don't recall 2024 listing gods as lesser or greater. But I skimmed through that part
Divine ranks in DMG 2024 is Greater, Lesser and Quasi deities
Honestly, D&D would be better off abandoning this whole scaling of divine power nonsense.
Yeah, but I don’t recall the 2024 DMG listing deities (aside from the Greyhawk primer), let alone what their divine rankings are.
I will check the DMG I suppose.
Just did, it does not
Sam to the rescue
thank
Thank you
I'll look into it more
Asmodeus is called greater in BGDiA, though, on page 4
Archdevil, greater god, and Lord of the Nine Hells
Time to turn the nine hells into a republic!
Down with the devil aristocracy! Equal wrongs for all devilkind!
Also I don't know if it's just me but a lot of classes feel like they're really unlimited inter potential of what kind of direction they go to (nature, cosmic, war, holy...) but the truth feels very limited to nature
I know it's probably intentional but it does feel a little weird compared to the other classes
Huh?
page 205 of the DMG. I found it in less than 1 sec
I'm sorry I just don't understand what you are trying to say
The thing about me is that im young but I wanna play D&D. Yet most players of D&D are adults..
Anyone know something I could do?
find a game with people that aren't averse to someone younger
Was there a spell that greatead a image of yourself that copied actions you did?
Some adult tables allow young people but you might be uncomfortable. Have you considered checking if your school or local game store has people who might be interested?
How may I find one?
Simulacrum is probably not what you want but it's the only thing I can think of
I do see the part where it mentions his power scaling now, but earlier I was talking about them listing deities, which they don’t
I mean, my school has A DND club. But its every month
Once a month? Ridiculous
The same way you would find a regular game, just filtered. This server has the #find-a-game channel/category for a reason
Also since we have the week off next week im getting postponed again. (THE WEEK IM SUPLOSED TO COMD BACK)
Basically I can see a nature a themed paladin, warrior or most other classes
But I can't really see a holy (like church) themed druid
No I said that they grouped Gods into divine ranks. Not that they have them all listed.
Well, go there, meet the people, see if some are interested in making something a bit more regular
You think people would let a young person like me play?
I have once, and I was so happy. Its waiting every month that kills me about it
Dan friend burnt down the forest and now we're wanted by the cops
I've played in groups when I was younger, and my current group has had a younger player.
Asmodeus is the supreme ruler of all devils and wields the power of a lesser god.
Doesn’t say he actually is a lesser deity, and given that the most recent sources list him as one, I would still say he’s greater
One way to find out is to find a group to join
Thank you everyone, ill try and find a group willing!
By the way, since im just starting DND. If I join a group will I need to make a character sheet before or after
ideally before
typically characters are created for a campaign. You can't always predict every DM's character creation rule preferences, allowed homebrews, or other content.
Ah! Good point
making character sheets as practice to figure out how things work is perfectly valid however
I was so worried when I first went to a meeting in D&D club that my skeleton chatacter wasn't playable
yeahhhh stuff like that is the reason
But Skelek rises
Ah I see. Well, sometimes D&D players group supernatural powers into the following categories:
Arcane (wizards, bards, sorcerers, warlocks)
Divine (clerics)
Primal (Druids, rangers)
Spiritual (monk)
Then subclasses to the non-listed classes also link them to one of those things. But only for the non-listed classes
Ironic considering he's undead//
highly possible that a DM might want official content only, no homebrew. They might have their own homebrew options, maybe one of those clicks with you so much that upends what character you want to play
My DM did say that there was a race that could make my skeleton character work, but I can't find my sheet to remember who it was
Reborn?
Oh yeah that
monks are technically psionic no? or is this my 4e brain talking
They are not psionic
ah oki
I knew a player that just played human but as a skeleton
Its funny that my class is a monk. And im playing as a skeleton.
There is no biology there.
that just makes me think of a human being cursed to look like a skeleton, illusory
monk doesn't require biology. even Warforged and Autognomes can be monks
Oh dang that's cool! (I legit know almost nothing about D&D tbh I just wanna stab at goblins )
Dnd is soooooo fun to play!
Me and my idiot friends origin in our first game was we were going to the kingdom of Wisconsin. (Yes wisconsin) and our horses died of heat stroke
Well, if you wanna dive in, take a read through the basic rules and ask any further questions about them in #dnd-newcomers for help
Okay last thing I have on this topic: Asmodeus being described this way isn’t new. MM14 says:
Asmodeus is the supreme ruler of all devils, and the only creature in the Nine Hells with the powers of a lesser god. Worshiped as such in the Material Plane, Asmodeus inspires the evil humanoid cults that take his name.
i've always wanted to play a monk who's bodily enhancement is done through temporary elixirs and boosters. take a swig of a stim and u can flurry your blows
Amazing
Like he was banished by his monestary and resorted to drinking away his sorrows
drunken master monk is right there for a reason lol
^^^^^^^^^^^^
"The Drunken Druid." Goes hard tho
look if you got enough magic or curse to walk around as a skelly then you can hit as hard as you want
pathfinder fixes this check out the playtest drunken master monk subclass
sounds like a recipe for disaster if its given to the wrong type of player
"no you don't understand, i HAVE to play him as an unlikeable belligerent drunk or it's not realistic"
that kinda what their lvl6 feature does
People like you is why I love dnd
I love that i made a colony in a videogame and it spanned into a whole TV show where a mad scientist creates magic and finds a way to tell the future.
lol yer fine
I am young after all. And I dont have a computer for gods sake and I want steam so bad you dont know how much TF2 is calling me
i like the idea of a scientist going 'fine if magic doesn't exist i'll do it myself'
The funniest thing is, he didn't intend it to be magic. His friends found out it could be used as magic and used it for themselves
But he's so fed up with them he didn't even care
well... magic is just science that has yet to be explained
Well, speaking of:
whatever the quote was.
I can't post photos nvm lol
If you've ever heard of utility fog that's what it is
Feel like i shouldn't be tlking about it on a DND place tho (I got a bit off tracl)
Does anyone know a good place I can share my TV show idea?
hm. the non dnd topics channel?
If it's not-D&D than #non-dnd-topics is the best channel
On the other hand: You can play a belligerent unlikable drunk and still make a great character
yep
Some of the best characters in fiction are unlikeable belligerent drunk
maybe he is belligerent to anyone not paying his tab aka the party are his new besties
oh absolutely, but my point is that a "narritavely great" character doesn't always equate to a fun character to play alongside. it's a balance that's case-by-case across different tables
Oh no. You can make a great character who doesn't get along with the party. The PCs don't need to be friends, sometimes a more fun dynamic for the table is teeth clenched teamwork
Of course it takes skill.
But just because something is difficult to do does not mean you should not try
i feel like we're saying the exact same things but taking 2 different approaches to it lol
I was starting to consider it too yes
probs are
ultimately it is down to the players and talking about what you want the char to do
communication, i know.
Anyways what I mean is that there is no such thing as a problem character. Play an evil PC, play a fanatic, play a guy who hates the party, play a stickler for the rules, play anything. As long as you're not a problem player, you can make it work
exactamundo
Obviously some concepts are much harder to play well than others.
"it's what my character would do" is as excusable as making said character in the first place, for better or worse
Thing is... You should not have to say "it's what my character would do". If you played your character well up to that point the other players should say "yep, it's what his character would do"
When you have to explain what your character is doing, it means you have failed at conveying your character to the other players. You have been playing them for yourself as your own audience rather than collaborate
The difference between a Lawful Evil person and Lawful Good, is the Lawful Good would say "we should do something to help these poor starving people". The Law Evil would say, "They wouldn't be poor and hungry, if they pulled themselves up by their boot straps."
would love to see a dm turn it around when questioned why the guards are locking him up tho.
"It's what my characters would do."
I wanna play a dnd themed phantom of the opera game so badly
Also accept the consequences: When you play a thief, you accept that the law might catch you.
that would be peak
"alright the guard is going to attack you now."
"nah."
"i'm sorry?"
"nah i don't agree. that doesn't sound like something he'd do at all."
that too.
okay so what you are saying is you do nothing to defend yourself. roll for damage.
just unionize against the GM lol
Some time ago we had a conversation about the distort value spell. It's the same. Use that spell to scam merchants, expect to be arrested and put on trial. Depending on the laws, it could be the death penalty
if you are caught
Obviously
always should have risk. more fun that way
and who says you thought of this first?
i imagine the entire merchant's guild got fed up with scams etc.
yay world building lol
Personally I like taking inspiration from history when it comes to laws. Did you know that stealing goods worth more than a shilling carried the death penalty in England, Wales and Scotland under the Bloody Code?
Sounds to me that if you gotta steal more than a shilling you might as well go big and take a LOT of stuff
Might as well!
Because either way the punishment is the same
(Actually there weren't that many executions during that time, despite the fact that more than 200 crimes were punished by death. Often the courts sent the offenders to Australia for slave labour. Which was seen as a clemency. It is possible that the laws were made to make that slave labour acceptable in comparison to the death penalty that the offenders were threatened with)
Lae’zel put it best: “Killing is good - it culls the weak. But theft would be paid for painfully, a thousand times over.” /j
Also yeah! That is also a thing to take into account when worldbuilding a legal system: If there is an incentive to enslave people, lands requiring labour, the law is likely to criminalize misdemeanours more harshly to justify slavery.
Countries that do not practice slavery prefer exile, fines and executions to imprisonment.
What's the difference between dnd's different editions?
Lore, Mechanics, Classes...
different rules on how the game works, and different content available
Too complicated to explain on Discord. Matthew Colville, I think, has a video about the history of the editions
they're all D&D, but they all often look like different games
game rules mostly.
obviously like "release year" is different too, but thats not what ur asking
Yeah if you wanted a dungeon crawl you'd likely want AD&D, if you want mechanics that are busted with way too many customization options there is 3.5e, if you want an actually balanced game you go 4e, if you want a game with a lot of cool lore that is 2e, if you want a bit of all then that is the current edition.
Simply put:
1st edition: Rather bare. Made for dungeon crawling.
2nd edition: Gets more intricate
3rd edition: First one to really fix the features that will become D&D standards. Rather complex.
4th edition: The strange one. Streamlined to the extreme. Not as well received as it deserved
5th edition: Current one. Probably best said to be an extremely streamlined 3rd edition
also remember that the vast majority of players will play the most updated and current edition, which is 5th edition
in case you're wondering about searching for tables out in the wild
So my first time playing DnD might be the worst thing ever.
AD&D 1e and 2e, as well as Basic, are more your typical dungeon crawler fantasy RPGs
3e/3.5e was kind of the shift where D&D started taking on a more heroic fantasy tone
Were you forced to marry a kobold, had to roll a save not to puke on a party member during your wedding feast, lose the cleric because he fell down the stairs, and have the DM punish you for asking about a basic rule he fundamentally misunderstood?
Because that was my first time
that's rough
forced to marry a kobold?!!
my first time consisted of a table lying to me about teaching DnD so they could have another player for their Pathfinder table
Person playing a changeling bard with the express purpose of getting handsy and romantic
ew
D&D whilst drunk must be an experience
i wanna kiss boy kobolds :3c
Yep. He took some glee in describing my character reluctantly going to the bedchamber.
Yeah, adult themes should only be explored amongst consenting adults.
bro wtf
lol
ERP with friends is weird to me
Trust me the marriage was far harder for the kobold.
(Joke to lighten the mood.)
that’s a thing?
thats not even ERP thats just illegal
yeah ive met some weird dudes that really wanted to ERP
that's why we do session 0 now!
man, that should be private stuff.. wait, he wanted to do it with you?!
i was the dm lol
what am i missing, Enterprise Resource Planning?
Ok I don't think this topic is one that should be dived into here.
fair
yeah, kids as young as 13 could be on this server
Hello, Friends
Too much to mention. The way AC is calculated, as well as how attacking AC works. How rounds work or the number seconds in a round. The lethality of spells, not as much now in 5e or 2024. Initiative rolls etc.
session 0 is the best
being under 13 breaks discords terms of service though..
that's why i said "as young as"
Being younger than 15 breaks D&D's
Let's return to discussion of d&d please..
Disclosing or requesting exact ages is against our server rules fyi
rip
Oh it gets worse.
I've been having trouble naming my Harengon Wizards new dragon daughter
I drew the dragon card, got a Spirit/Song Dragon and Now I'm pondering the orb. because
- My Harengon is now that father of a little dragon lass
And - I'm bad at naming things
We're calling her "Slate" as a nickname as she was just born last session and is new to the world, I, personally thought of Nicknaming her Canvas because it sounds a little more feminine to me lmao
Mana
The way she described it, she will quite literally be encouraged by you pushing her away.
So in other words, I have to deal with this.
Pnévma
What the hell.
And my ONLY option will be ignoring her
Exactly.
in game and in real life
God I wish I had the option to make my character blind just to ruin her idea
Hey guys whats that map thingy
its a thing with locations marked on it
but thats not important right now
Ill consider 3.5e then, since I'm not exactly enjoying 5e so far and want to try more things.
Alternatively, leave the table or talk to the dm about the problem
No D&D is better than Bad D&D, but having the problem resolved can be equally as good
^
3.5e is very bloated so good luck
Isn't this basically harassment..? talk to the dm about this
Did i like
Walk into smth
idk
what about 5e do you not enjoy
Bloated but ultimately fine imo. It does handle some content better than 5e. I'll never like that 5e lacks Lore: (Subject) skills.
dumps a list on you, but i still play it anyway.
The issue with leaving is this is a school club.
And a thing I'm in requires me to be in a club.
that stills seem radically inaporipriate behavior
Exactly.
and should be dealt with by an adult supivisor
And of course don’t be afraid to check out other systems. Pathfinder, Draw Steel, and Daggerheart are all similar to D&D in their own ways
chain of command baby
Talk to the principle about the harassment or an equally as responsible adult
So I'll try talking to the DM about it.
He can tell her no, and I'll HOPEFULLY be able to get it settled.
It just doesn't seem like my type of game, but ill find out more when i try more rpgs. I'm currently on a quest to explore different rpgs with my players
Cast Command "flee" on her. and then run in the other diection
if the dm does nothing, go thr next step up in authority
I think that its even worse in a school setting.
That's like, straight up weirdo shit
well, what is your type of game then
Meaning the club sponsor
Then principal
One person's "character concept" does not trump the entire tables comfort levels or the wishes of another person's character.
Definitely a good time to have an earnest out of character player talk and loop in the DM
yep
Oh, don't worry, i am. I'm trying out different rpgs (and systems) to see what me and my players enjoy the most
It gets worse though!
Cause her list includes skeletons summoned by our warlock.
WHat.
Sir, thats a normal tuesday in most schools (young people being weird.)
Yup!
That girl needs to GO!
no excuse for it if it makes people uncomfortable, butits an issue that needs an adult to handle
I uhhh
I think I'm gonna talk to the DM about her AND her friend.
no
Just because I don't feel comfortable with either of them at all in the party.
do not talk to her friend, talk to whomever is supervising the whole thing
imho it doesn't matter how well you might roll, a player gets a choice for that sorta thing
Not talking to her hand
maybe you need to find a different club
the Girl and her Friend.
The DM is a seperate person
None of the other clubs would fit in schedule at all.
they're gonna talk to the dm about those two problem people
my point is to NOT talk to a friend of a person whos being weird. talk to the dm sure
talk to a supervisor, sure
if asking that person already didnt work, don't involve their friend. go to the authorities
To clarify, I don't believe they were talking about talking to those two.
I already told the problem that I would not like it, so next will be DM
I didn't
Her friend just seems like she's uncomfortable too
if that char tried anything with me i would just be 'well bless your heart'
That would work
...if not for the fact that she wrote her character as a masochist.
she can enjoy being dead then
i honestly don't get making a character like that unless the other players or dm are comfortable
Our warlock would probably revive for some reason.
then do it again.
It's basically like stepping on a landmine, esp with strangers imo.
Good idea
not encouraging btw but yeah. if you at that point...
That, or kill the warlock, THEN the bard(s)
do try to resolve out of game tho
In all seriousness, talk to the dm, don't be toxic in game to try and make a point because that's never the best thing to do.
At this point
I'm just gonna tell the sponsor of the club(teacher)
might be best
Next time DND rolls around
I'm telling her straight up.
And if nothing happens then
How about the principal?
That's great, hope it works out for you since DND is tough with players that make the experience miserable, i hope you get to enjoy it soon, it's worth the experience
"i bash their face in with my fiddle, cast Mending... then do it again"
just be like, hey 'this other person is making me uncomfortable with [insert thing here], can you please discuss it with her?"
god if i had reddit
this would instantly go into rpg horror stories
ok i have now made my owlfolk able to shoot explosive crossbow bolts at people's faces
Sick
Also explain
Question:
Has D&D moved away from using the "Xth-level" notation for both class and spell levels? I've been DMing for years and am realizing that it has changed somewhat.
yeah if you feel unsafe enough just go to the teach yeah
also can anyone recommend any dnd (or generally just ttrpg) youtubers, cause i want ti improve and have something to listen to while i draw
Keep in mind this was session 0
And the DM wasn't even here.
Like, horror stories? Campaigns? Anything?
so the owlfolk just has a heavy crossbow, and one of his feats lets him copy some of the homework from the Arcane Archer subclass so he can shoot exploding crossbow bolts
What.
Ok that's sick
been binging all things dnd lol
Yeah
I may be dropping DnD after session 0
Why wasn't the dm there for session 0? 😭
General dnd content (Sorta like pointy hat) But anything works
ok anyway what the hell is happening here with this DnD thing Dexeroch here is dealing with
but those are more stories that actual stuff to learn other than 'do not do this creepy thing'
He had to leave early
Creepy ass problem player.
Don't let one person ruin your entire experince with D&D
thats not a session 0
you sure?
I can explain everything related to this problem player in 2 words.
weird creepy harassy player (and player character)
Changeling Bard
That's it.
i feel like dnd youtube is some of the worst places you could ever pick to learn D&D from
dnd youtube is
incredibly
opinionated
send them to rpgbot!
imma play a bard and am def not gonna do the weird crap ppl seems to think bard entitles them to
"Charisma" is not a free pass to the bedroom
consent is beautiful baby
That reminds me.
How heavy is a piano.
It has not
very heavy.
depends on the piano
is it a grand piano? even heavier
I take it with a grain of salt because i run my sessions differently anyway
is it a solid gold steinway?
it can be
200 to 1200+ lbs
without freedom units it's 90 to 550+ kg
piano made out of neutronium?
in other words it will likely kill anyone it falls on
osmium next question
Cause I wanna make a bard fighter multi class that just lugs a piano around, just to bring the sweet tunes to everyone
uh, and how exactly are you going to constantly rp having to fit that through doorways?
lol idk about that one but... might be smaller toy pianos idk
Charades and a cardboard box
Just do a magic keyboard
it dnd go wild as long as dm okie with it.
how about a squeezy chest organ thing i cant recall the name of...
Barbarian that only throws pianos at people
the fun fact is bards aren't wholly restricted to music they can express it through words or paintings
but if you wanna do the piano thing then you can just do the asdfmovie bit with the piano
bagpipes?
Accordion?
accordian
accordian too yeah
Really? I thought it had at least a little since pretty much every spellcaster uses that format now in its Spellcasting trait. Excerpt from Wizard:
Prepared Spells of Level 1+. You prepare the list of level 1+ spells that are available for you to cast with this feature. To do so, choose four spells from your spellbook. The chosen spells must be of a level for which you have spell slots.
The number of spells on your list increases as you gain Wizard levels, as shown in the Prepared Spells column of the Wizard Features table. Whenever that number increases, choose additional Wizard spells until the number of spells on your list matches the number in the table. The chosen spells must be of a level for which you have spell slots. For example, if you’re a level 3 Wizard, your list of prepared spells can include six spells of levels 1 and 2 in any combination, chosen from your spellbook.
If it is just a partial departure, do you mind telling me what contexts it would be proper to write it in the older format? Like I said, I'm experienced with 5e, but I'd like my homebrew to match with newer books stylistically.
or a accordion?accordian? - bagpipe - trombone - harmonica - electric guitar hybrid?
lol a literal one man band.
See, it'd just reflavor a Maul as a Keyboard and use it as the weapon
Just hold a piano to me via ropes, climb the walls of the BBEG's lair
Drop it right after the monologue ends. I'm stupid, not impatient
the bard in my first dnd party was a chore to put up with tbh cause when we were in the middle of a fight all he did was run in playing thunderstruck
Isn't that like... his job?
What terrain was it.
I again, go back to my many times mentioned comment of "adventueres should be ADVENTUERS" not slapstick gimmicks
why not both
My only two Bards were an Actor and a Dancer lmao
they never used instruments whatsoever
Maybe check out the other classes for reference, but I didn't realize it was for specifically asking about the style, I thought you were asking if they'd moved away from spell slots sorry
Monty, Lord Of The Pythons
lol
no as in he didn't do it to do anything related to the combat it was all he did cause it was the end after i shot the bandits in the face some 200 times
and his nemesis Saint Patrick
it was normal as all hell terrain
Druid?
Nah, you're good. Seems like this may not be the time to ask this here anyways. I'll check in #homebrew to see about how they do it over there.
I don't like bards as a class because of this
shame
He should have played Darude Sandstorm
Monty the Yaun-ti
anyway here's Wonderwall
imo we should bring back prestige classes, or at least the idea of it
we go back to having the standard 4 base classes: fighter, thief, priest, and mage, and have the other classes become specializations of those base classes
this will fix dnd i think
90% of bards and their players are are 'charismam make me rizzzzzzz' types.
And I despise them.
lol
That's not really a reason to dislike a class. You should be more critical on the players not the class, race, etc. Otherwise you end up in a situation where you dislike 7 classes and races and other things because people gave you bad experiences and you blamed what they played as and not what they as a person did.
Well, that's a pain. Misunderstood, sorry. Thought he was using the song to cast a spell, but no, uselessness.
I dislike Bards
Here's my problem with this
Bard
not gonna like my satyr then
Where does it go.
Is it because the class is bad or because the people you've met who've played them were bad?
oh btw the owlfolk i made and mentioned earlier was specifically to avoid using my current one which is a warforged
I have met ONE bard in all my years of DnD (and its been a while, ) that wasn't a complete lunatic that thought charisma was just a path into peoples pants, or monsters nests or whatever.
And I've seen to many Warlocks doing the same
Sick.
Exactly. Bad players not clas.
well i won't play like that. that just dumb
bad class (mechanics)
Hard disagree. You're letting personal bias affect your opinion.
bard was historically a mix of fighter, thief, and druid, but nowadays they're under the "rogue" group of classes, so a bard would just be a thief prestige class
you dont see fighters running around en mass trying to seduce things... i wonder why
if he has to force you to have a good time... it isn't a good time.
I'd make one just to be a rogue multiclass
Bard to entice people in for games and tricks
And rogue to steal the money.
My frist bard was a Changeling in a homebrew setting Changelings were classified as Monstroisities/Aberrations of sorts and He used his acting skills and ability to transform to keep the truth of what he was while trying to find out the mystery of a strange town that was very silent hill-esque lmao
You mean I'm letting the statsitical evidence influence my opinion?
Poor reasoning.
It's not though. It's just bad experiences.
20 years.
they tend to be bland as white bread human champion fighters that rp as well as an upside down desk fan
upside down desk fan?
if my mother was a bycle she'd have wheels?"
If she's a changeling bard and she (I am not allowed to say this in this server), then I'm telling the DM.
do it anyway before it happens
i think a lot of the bard (charisma) problem also comes from bad DMs
i make dumb analogies to prove a point sometimes
like if someone's being dumb i'll call them something like a potato or anything else like that
let them know 'this might happen i am very uncomf'
"why did this extra boulder appear in my backpack?"
Players and DMs can both be the problem and often are. Miscommunication or lack thereof is the poison of dnd.
The only time seduction rolls are allowed is if you seduce non-living objects.
Just start making out with a tree I dunno
I have a homie who would actually do this
the bard that played thunderstruck did end up seducing a lock once
reminds me of Superstar.
He's a real one.
its DMs that think Charisma is just "oh, they rolled a nat 20, they seduce the Queen and the king watches happily," as opposed to "oh, they rolled a nat 20, well, the queen is flattered, and the king is turning beet red and motioning to his guards."
...explain.
How did that happen
and bard players that think that they can get away with stuff like that....
nat 20's dont apply to skill checks btw
nope
If a guy rolls a 20 in seduction on a dragon, the dragon instantly picks the bard up and places him in the hoard
he just seduced the lock
meanwhile i was kicking the same door and lockpicking it cause i was a rogue at the time
TWENTY YEARS OF DMs....
some of them just dont know
nope
He is
pfft. . . I totally knew that 😅
lol
see, this is my favorite thing, they get to seduce the dragon, the dragon still eats everyone else, and they get to roll a new character sheet, because now they are permanently caged, in a gilded gold magic cage of imrpisonment, in the dragon's lair.
great!
it is a common misconception dw
Yeah
That or they instantly die.
i think most DMs do crit success for skill checks, I can't recall any DM i've had that didnt
still some of them are it depends, types.
it's gonna need like a lot more than a 20 to do something like what donkey did in shrek too
i am a fan of 'getting what you want but not the way you want it'
monkey's paw type of thing
I usually like to have a gradient. Like a 20 may get me to be more specific about what you know. Feels more real to me, but I thought that was a rule.
Monkey's Pawl*
the gilded cage is awesome.
Who's to say you seduced them romantically
You could have seduced them as a fresh meal, and you instantly get smoked alive by flames
"You had to seduce a dragon to have a dragon child? I just drew a card from a deck. less work for me!"
-My silly harengon lad
One of my current DM's introduced a Wing of three Wishes as a litterally Monkey's Paw .... no one has touched it...
"Hey nat 20!"
"Ooh...looks like the dragon views you as amazing. You get smoked alive by incinerating flames."
then you are not yet desperate enough to consider using it.
I imagine babysitting fees, school tuition, and meals in general, are going to be EXPENSIVE.
...Beware the consequences.
Oh, and by the way, speaking of cards (decks of)
Deck of Wonders is broken, extremely, broken.
20 and multiple modifiers
She's a wyrmling right now, we're a 13th level party, she'll have a decent college tuition at the end of the campaign, trust me
wait which rogue subclass is best for just sniping something with a heavy crossbow
I was gonna say "Have the BBEG killed" but then either he'd come back as an undead, he'd be killed by a bigger threat, or everyone dies
Donkeh had rizz tho
that sounds tame for my DM, but on brand
gloom stalker
Hell, I don't even need to send her to school, my wizard has 30 Inteligence
and hey guarding a lone princess all that time? a girl gets lonely
Killed by bigger threat
A La Godzilla Vs Kong
ain't that a ranger subclass
semantics
Shrek would have ended if the dragon was a lesbian, and that's the least surprising part.
<- the ranger - rogue multiclasser (and some fighter)
yep
wait i have a question, do homebrew systems where dnd and another system are combined exist? Asking for a friend.
shrek would have ended if the donkey wasn't Eddie Murphy.
Lesbian dragons, ending fantasy adventurers since 1996
I might offer a spinoff for my friends with dnd, and another very interesting rpg.
Fiona would have had a surprisingly chill life.