#dnd-lore
1 messages · Page 54 of 1
They're neither.
i see
Lolth, being a goddess, tends to not bother with Abyssal politics.
Do you you think that drow exiles might venerate Mishka considering his spider like countenance?
It's not likely
Drows don't venerate spiders because they're spiders, but because their connection to Lolth
They don't venerate everything spider-like
For example, driders
Driders do have a specofic connotation ir meaning to their existence though, but yeah, just because its semi related to spiders doesnt mean they worship it
Driders aren't venerated though, they're shunned
Aye, thats what i meant by specific connotation to their existence, shouldve clarified, sorry
I know what Ti-Moth means.
Drow in earlier lore are described as venerating spiders in general, but driders are different because of their specific cultural connotations (Failing the trials). Mishka being a spidery, but a rival demon and male might means he gains some respect but not veneration or allegiance.
Do you guys think that your typical cleric of Asmodeus would sell their soul in order to become a cleric of Asmodeus.
not really, it would be entirely unnecessary
Asmodeus doesn't need them to pledge their soul to him directly. He gets them anyway in most cases:
Unlike the other Lords of the Nine, Asmodeus has no quota of souls to fill. Any soul recruited by any denizen of the Nine Hells is also pledged in his name, and a cult dedicated to any other devil is also dedicated to him.
especially if they worship him as their main deity like most clerics do with the gods they serve
so selling their soul to their god just to serve them, kind of would be a case of "a hat on a hat" i believe the expression is?
i mean to my knowledge there is nothing stopping them from doing so stated in the lore, but i can't think of a reason one would even think to do something so unnecessary
I guess this is a better place to ask than #dnd-rules . So, what do changelings look like in DND until they hit puberty and discover their shapeshifting abilities? Is it the assumed form of their birth parent? Does this change between the two books outlining them?
I did read over ebberon, but I don't have full access to the monsters of the multiverse book. just stat stuff I could find.
The changelings in Mot MM are Fey rather than Humanoid creature type. The playable races in MotMM are setting agnostic so there's little to no lore associated with them.
ah, I see. so it is wholly at the player/GM discretion?
For MotMM, yes.
excellent, thanks! :)
Please tell me someone has lore on Beshaba, the god of misfortune
She is so f-ing cool but she doesn’t exist in the lore
oh, sorry.
Thanks
She does officially and categorically exist in lore. Even if she doesn't have a lot of lore in 5E.
Yeah, but I’ve searched around and found like nothing. Just how she was created and that’s it. So I have to create her myself which is fun but I mean I want inspiration from some sort of source
plenty more to her than just her creation myth/origin
or if videos are more you means of learning and retaining information, this might help too https://youtu.be/ZtKs5RUW8A4?si=_ex-ZDCwnNzl2T1k&t=213
but one way to sum up her worship is very old testiment style, like auril, another evil goddess, it is basically "worship me or else!"
granted you could make your own version of her, but to say that she has nothing detailing her at all beyond her creations is factually incorrect, granted she has less info than other major gods, but she still has lore, personality, history, ect...
Yeah, there's plenty of info out there, you just might need to do a deeper dive
or look in the correct places
some lore may be obscure or harder to find, but it still exists
Kinda what I meant about needing to do a deeper dive, but yeah
The wiki entry cites the original source books that has more details.
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Beshaba#References
I'd like to shore up my pitch over changelings, so I got a question. Is there any creature that is effectively a hybrid between 2 other creatures? Not talking about things like half-orcs, too different from both humans and orcs. I mean, a 2-armed 2-legged creature that literally has mismatched/mixed body parts?
Only one that exists in 5e I can recall is simic hybrid.
And that's from an mtg setting
Ah, that will do nicely! Thank you.
Trying to make the case that I could mix or match body parts. Would rarely be used, but I do utilise that in the backstory (changing just their hand to a changeling one). The wording of changeling is vague, saying you can mimic races, but never saying anything about swapping those parts around.
Changeling is specific to a playable race. They have a default natural look.
I know I discussed it earlier, but I realised, the rules say nearly nothing about it
Rules =/= lore.
I know, I came here because I needed lore-help to find the creature. My issue dances that tightrope. :P
None of the lore for changeling allows them to mix and match, even if mongrelfolk exist in their setting
Nor do the mechanics allow it whatsoever
The illustrations for changelings show their natural form.
https://www.dndbeyond.com/avatars/thumbnails/25746/819/420/618/637880558260966353.png
https://dnd4.fandom.com/wiki/Changeling
I've asked in the rule channel again, I may not have explained myself the first time properly. Thanks for the help :)
there is in 5e at least not so much a race but a lineage that is kind of slim on lore but would likely be somewhat within line of what you are thinking of since one could basically make them a sort of Frankenstein's monster esc being, else technically you'd be looking towards a flesh golem
In drakkenheim maybe?
Not an official setting
though honestly, lineages are kind of weird especially when trying to factor them into the lore, but such beings do exist and are used an npc in at least one story so they are part of the lore, even if is a rather unclear or messy place where they are in the character of Elise from "Van Richten’s Guide to Ravenloft"
Drakkenheim, is 3rd party, that is why it is under the partnered content on dnd beyond
Does anyone have an idea how the Concordant express in Automata might work when arriving to another plane?
I mean , in the sense that there are stations in every plane.
pretty much would likely be a multiversal vehicle for the public as we know that the beings of the planes are known to go to sigil for various reasons, the adventure it is part of might have details, but is pretty easy that there would be stations in every plane, as structures can be built there
though i don't own the book it is from that contains that adventure so i can't really say for sure on that specifically, but there being stations on the various planes for it to go to would be the least complex part of the whole thing
it is briefly mentioned in the 5e planescape materials for the gate town, which seems to actually give a bit of an answer if you are not looking for something in ultra detail to partial quote "the Concordant Express, an interplanar train dutifully operated by modrons. The clockwork behemoth chugs along the planes, leveraging a network of portals to which the train functions as a key to deliver its cargo and passengers across the multiverse on a tight schedule. " end quote
True dragons also include the other non-chromatic/metallic/gem dragons with six limbs that were re/introduced in Fizbans, right? Like Moon and Purple?
true dragons don't historically have anything to do with their limbs, but most true dragons to my knowledge do have 6 limbs
I was referencing the number of limbs to narrow down the search
to my knowledge fizban's does not use the term "true dragons" but yes, several of the ones it reintroduced or introduced are true dragons
Gotcha, thanks once again Scarlet! Always a boon!
according to the forgotten realms wiki, such dragons are indeed still true dragons, just are part of certain i guess you could say subtypes or families https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Moon_dragon#Connections
It doesn't use the term true dragon but it does classify using the definition
Although it extends true dragon a bit
yeah like 5e dragon turtle kind of blurs the line between true and lesser dragons, though makes for a sort of interesting sort of missing link to the big ol' family tree of dragons in the 5e continuity one could argue
Most of this book is concerned with the chromatic and metallic dragons described in the Monster Manual, as well as the gem dragons introduced in this book. These three families of dragons share a deeply magical nature tied to the mythic history of the Material Plane. A few other Dragons share many similar characteristics, and several of them are presented alongside the chromatic, metallic, and gem dragons in chapter 5. These include dragon turtles and faerie dragons, as well as the deep dragon and moonstone dragon introduced in chapter 6.
It should be clear throughout this book whether we're discussing a specific kind of dragon, the members of the three great dragon families, or all creatures with the Dragon type. But if you see the word "dragon" (not capitalized) and you're not sure, assume we mean chromatic, gem, and metallic dragons
But primarily there's Dragon (type) dragon (three families, true dragons)
How exactly stuff like turtles are included is a bit wishy washy, but they are at least acknowledged as being similar to true dragons
To quote fizban
I know I didn't make dragon turtles, and Tiamat swears she didn't, so where did they come from? More importantly, why?
clearly Fizban retains any sense of humor the king of good dragon's has, as in addition to being a bit silly, bits like that do give me a bit of a laugh or at least a chuckle
Right, keep forgetting hes Bahamut
well, an aspect of an aspect if memory serves
Nope, he's just straight up Bahamut
I would hypothesize that dragon turtles would be related lung dragaons (aka oriental/Chinese dragons) because Gygax based them on Chinese mythological dragon turtle (lung gui)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dragon_turtle
Yeah, dragon turtles are a thing in RL. They look more lion tho
And an aspect of Bahamut/Tiamat are more closely described as a clone instead of an aspect
Those would be li lung
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Li_lung
as for who made dragon turtles, possible candidate could maybe be Sardior, since we know he existed in the 5e continuity now, would have to have been before his death
Deep dragons are explicitly called out as cousins of chromatic as well
Oh. I was looking at the longgui
yeah one of the things i am vaguely aware of is in eastern cultures either china or japan, forget which, a dragon turtle is a sort of deity, then again all dragons in japan last i checked are typically mythologized as some sort of god like beings
(Which is in line with them being considered as such in previous editions under the name of purple dragon)
The dragons in Asian mythology are often celestial beings
I wish we get Lungs one day
At least in 5e
Agree, I was very disappointed Fizban's didn't reintroduced lung.
Such a missed oppurtunity
Dragons appear in most real world cultures. Chinese/oriental dragons are treated very differently the European ones, who are treated more as monsters whereas the former are respected/revered as servants of heaven.
Closest to lung is the Bakunawa, but only because its from a significantly closer region of the world irl
well kara-tur do to the time it came out of is a bit touchy, they understandably are nervous of getting too into stuff from that setting, but maybe one day, via other materials, be they 3rd party/partner, charity, ect... we have gotten some serpentine dragons in more recent years
Bukanawa is from the Philippines iirc
Yep
Fizban should have introduced more dragon types like the linnorn. The book was a bit of a let down...
Gem dragons are cool, but i need moar
but i imagine that the otther reason why we did not get them in fizban's was likely limited space, as far as i know often they have a limit of both pages and artwork that they are allowed to have in the book and that is why some things get cut sometimes
Physically it is closer to a lung but like I said that's more a symptom of its irl proximity
Aye. I keep confusing Chinese and Japanese dragons still... 😅
They're essentially the same -- Japanese and Korean cultures were heavily influenced by the Chinese.
Oooh, I want to look more into the bukanawa because my campaign is a pirate/sea based one.
by the way, if we wanna try to narrow down who did make dragon turtles, technically there are other members of the draconic pantheon https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Draconic_pantheon#Members
though i feel is safe to assume Garyx did not make them, would be way off brand for him, being the draconic god of "fire, destruction, and renewal."
honestly, most likely i feel is Io
though if it was one of the other dragon gods, seems odd that he would not have named them and just made a remark of uncertainty
Fun fact, it eats moons, and is the myth for why we have eclipses
sounds like a great hook for story potential, given we have moon/lunar dragons
who literally live on moons
God, dragon lore is amazing
yeah, in and out of universe
probably why they are almost universally, especially in dnd are one of the most powerful and awseome creatures, i mean they clearly earned being in the name of the game
I found someone's homebrew of a bukanawa and it does have a "Moon Eater" reaction! (it negates radiant damage attacks)
Perfect!
Speaking of cultural drahons though, i know Jormungrandr/World Serpent is in DnD, but do we have Nidhogg?
yes
in the forgotten realms it is literally one of the names used to reffer to tendar the night serpent
and i know they existed, probably as a seperate entity in other/older more norse/viking centric stuff
Ic ic. Back to the dragon rabbit hole i go! Thanks for the fun convo guys!
also, far as i know is the other way around, i know dnd has nidhogg, but never heard if it had Jormungander, far as i know it and the world serpent are not the same thing at least in dnd
Yggrasil makes an appearence in the 3.5E campaign adventure, "Expedition to the Demonweb Pits"
Oh, interesting. Didnt realize they may have made them different things
Are there any other important mages like Mordenkainen, Elminster, Bigby, etc. that are less powerful?
yeah in "Champion of Ruins" it says "The ancient Rus called her Nidhogg, and believed that she would gnaw the roots of the world tree that connects all things, until it could no longer survive."
well all i know is i have not heard of Jormengander being mentioned in dnd, let alone in the world serpent https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/World_Serpent
so at least the world serpent i am aware of from dnd has no connection, at least none that i am aware of or have heard ever being
Ahhh, they gave Ouroboros to the World Serpent
seems the midgard serpent might be a thing, at least if this source is credible, but the world serpent in relation to him is a title done in addition to his name, and is not simply reffer to as just "the world serpent" https://dungeonsdragons.fandom.com/wiki/Jormungandr
The Citadel/Circle of Eight were powerful archmages of Oerth. The group included Otiluke and Tenser.
https://greyhawkonline.com/greyhawkwiki/Circle_of_Eight
Aren’t they all dead? I’m looking for one that’s still living, probably should’ve clarified that lol
Thanks though, I’ll give that a read
depends how you definite powerful, Volo technically qualifies XD
like Elminster is from the forgotten realms, as is Volo
Volo is like a level 5 wizard but a Chosen of Mystra...
still counts
Isnt he also a bard?
he is important for a reason he is not aware of
only in terms of his personality, ie his love for the theatrical, and probably if you ask certain people, the way he dresses
Volo is I guess technically a wizard
Nope. 5th level wizard in 2E but level 1 wizard in 5E...
but to my knowledge volo is not a proper bard, he has been known to sing, but is not really that good and does not use it to channel magic
Ic Ic. I just faintly remem- oh, nvm, it was his MtG card that called him a bard
mtg, making a common mistake, is funny cuz many people often mistake him for a bard if they are not familiar with his character, let alone what he actually is
Yea, would not have realized otherwise XD
like if you never looked into his character or stats, you could play dnd for years and odds are you'd still mistake him for a bard for one reason or another
Bardn’t
you could say that Volo is a wizard with the heart of bard XD as he definitely acts like it
always has been, to my knowledge at least, as far as publication history goes
but far as i know from ed greenwood's dedicate video on him, seems he was never conceived as a bard, so i think many assume so just cuz of his love of the theatrical and probably more likely just the way he dresses, as such cloving in general media and pop culture are heavily associated with bards and play writes and what not, though honestly i'd take that stereotype over the other one associated with bards any day of the week
I said technically because he’s not a very good one lol
you don't have to be a good at something for it to be your line of work, just ask Volo's fellow sages, especially Mordenkainen XD
Speaking of which, i hear they be popping up again :3
Volo or Mordenkainen?
Mordy
ah, yeah, as i recall him and a couple other popular, famous, powerful archmages are gunna be
I just found information of the adventure.
Did not knew it was in Keys from the golden vault.
Thanks for the information
Volo and Elminster are from Toril.
Mordenkaine, Bigby, and other famous archmages are from Oerth.
Guns have been in since 1e. Ray guns too.
In Greyhawk Murlynd is a Cowboy Paladin who travels dimesions and allows guns and gunpowder to be used on Greyhawk but only when near him. (Otherwise gunpower does not work in Greyhawk).
Ray guns can be found in crashed spaceships (which Greyhawk has at least two of I know, and hinted at a third).
Faerun has some gunslingers too since around 2e I want to say?
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Firearm
huh fun
yeah contrary to what many assume, firearms and things like technology are not as out of place as people think
also funnily one setting one might expect to have firearms, Eberron, canonically does not
at least in the past that was the case, now that i think about it, this might not be true anymore given rising from the last war and what it says about artificers and proficiency with firearms in that book
It is still true
The proficiency is both not a setting thing (its mechanics) and also specifically says it's for settings with them
Because they are not presented as a class just for eberron
yeah, was largely going off memory
Sooo is SCAG the only recent depiction of faerun at large?
As a sourcebook, yes, but there have been 5E campaign books that have taken place in Faerun as well.
ooooh ok tyty!
any of them worth picking up for ocean content I want nasty aliens fron under the sea to attack the world c:
Icewind Dale: Rime of the Frostmaiden, Baldur's Gate: Descent into Avernus, the two Waterdeep books, Tomb of Annihilation, Phandelver Below, etc.
Personally if you want a more robust sourcebook on Faerun lore I would recommend the 3E Forgotten Realms Campaign Book.
Oh is the lore pretty static for the setting since then?
Well, some lore got superceded with new lore in 4E and 5E.
But the 3E Forgotten Realms Campaign Book is thicc and covers more stuff than any of the 4E and 5E FR related settting books.
The 4E and 5E FR books tends to cover only the Sword Coast with the 3E FR books covers all of Faerun, covering the various nations, peoples, politics, religions, etc.
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Forgotten_Realms_Campaign_Setting_3rd_edition
oooooooh okay okay, yeah Scag has SOME stuff on other places but its like a paragraph per country/region and its a huge slog to get through
SCAG is a book I personally wouldn't recommend.
I found it took thin (159 pages) compared to the 3E FR book (320 pages)
yeah I know what you mean its so sparse on the good stuff it feels kinda hollow? if that makes sense?
Thanks a ton for the help though I will look into the 3e book and maybe some of those adventures
I also highly recommend follow Ed Greenwood on Youtube, Twitter, and his Discord server if you want to know more about Forgotten Realms lore (technically it's not official as he's not working for WotC any more).
Also take a look on DMsGUILD Ed has contributed to whole source books on lands like Rashemen, Mulhorand, and Thay
Copyright issues
Ya that's what I figured
"small people" have existed in a huge variety of mythological canons
Tolkien doesn't get credit
But he did contribute to the current popular image of them
(Although yes, Halfling were heavily based on hobbits, to the point of being called hobbits in the earliest editions)
Early in D&D's days Gygax used "hobbit" and then the Tolkien estate sued so he changed it to "halfling" (much like he changed things to ent to treant and mithril to mithral).
At this point now though, they have become more of their own thing and different to the Tolkien hobbits. But earlier edition rules (Such as being better at stealth or being good at throwing rocks, was 100% percent based on tolkien hobbits)
So if you take a halfling from the forgotten realms and a hobbit from Middle earth, what sets them apart?
Lots of lore
The B/X and 1E AD&D halfings were depicted to be barefoot with hairy feet.
Hin from FR don't have the furry feet, or other traits of hobbits. (I missed what channel we were in
)
They're just both short peoples.
Oerth halflings and Mystaran hin do have furred feet, I believe, or at least some subspecies do.
Halflings were depicted early on to be more like hobbits in that they like to live in peaceful vales and good food (their gods reflected this).
Hin is such a better name than halfling Blessed be Hin
Athasian halflings are quite distinct from Tolkienesque hobbits, however. They are psions and illusionists that have a habit of killing and eating outsiders.
I do like Hin as being a name you can see themselves using.
There's of course cultural traits, but those would differ even within the same setting.
On a trait and physiology basis, they're both short but certain halflings in D&D have changed in mechanics and depiction as folk have mentioned.
Some settings do still have them be furry footed (Greyhawk at points).
And the different 'subraces' of halflings in D&D are based on the Tolkien hobbit ethnicities still.
and of course, Eberron Halflings spend their time riding dinosaurs
Love eberron halflings
It's so interesting looking through their forgotten realms wiki page and seeing how their pictures have changed throughout the editions.
Tolkien having harfoots, stoors and fallohides and Greyhawk having hairfoots (Lightfoots), stouts, tallfellows.
So I went down a bit of a rabbit hole with this trying to figure out if an npc should be a gnome or Hin (definitely going to call them that now) and i'm not sure if i'm over thinking this or there is a clear reason to use one over the other.
(he is a traveling merchant. Son of a rising merchant family that the players can befriend)
That might be more of a #character-discussion topic.
Lore wise gnomes and halflings are very different. The only similarities are both being short. But that's like saying elf or human, because they're similar heights.
Or goliaths and firbolgs, because theyre giantkin and tall
Gotcha
Oh I know they are different. I'm just not sure if they are different enough to matter in this NPC's case since the profession of traveling merchant isn't exactly exclusive to one group of people.
Are all campaigns canon to the original Dungeons and Dragons story? What I mean by that, is every world connected in a single universe or multi-verse?
If so, does this mean anyone could contribute to the lore of Dungeons and Dragons as a whole?
No.
What would be considered canon to the actual storyline of D&D?
You make the lore at your own table.
This channel is only to discuss the official lore of official campaign settings.
Oh! Sorry! I didn't know
Canon is what's published by TSR/WotC.
Okay, 😄
Taps channel's sign:
Discuss WotC-published game settings, and the events and characters that shaped them. Wherever possible, please indicate which setting you're discussing: [Forgotten Realms]/[FR], [Eberron], [Dragonlance], etc.
dnd doesnt really have a "storyline". it has a multiverse containing different settings and planes of existence.
Canon often changes between each edition (and sometimes even during editions).
Okay
You don't need to apologize for not knowing things, but you should probably use the resources at your disposal (the internet) to do your own research and then ask clarifications later if you're still confused.
Interesting!
Okay, thank you
What were some legendary dragon fights that happened in toril
Not a Lore question.
Discuss WotC-published game settings, and the events and characters that shaped them. Wherever possible, please indicate which setting you're discussing: [Forgotten Realms]/[FR], [Eberron], [Dragonlance], etc.
(That's the purpose of this channel)
What race is Bigby in DnD 5e?
Currently, a... Halfling?
Gnome
Source on that? I thought he was a Human lol.
Bigbys glory to the giant say hes a gnome doesnt it?
Yeah I'm asking where in the book it says that.
Ik he died, then Mordy changed him. Lemme see my copy
Oh nevermind I found references to it in the Book.
Yep, formerly a Human, reincarnated as a Gnome.
originally he was, but, it was either get reincarnated or remain like this https://media.dndbeyond.com/compendium-images/gotg/YGa7uVZhrRWLTUnV/01-001.bigby-squish.jpg
is in the first chapter or 2 of his book
I know, I just said I found it.
well i was already typing and only hit enter shortly after you mentioned finding it, sorry i am not a faster typer
not so sure on that, i know he became a gnome do to the spell used to revive him being reincarnate, but far as i know it was not mordenkainen who cast it, could be wrong though, and sadly seems bigby's wiki page on forgotten realms is not up to date
Are there any notable genies in toril
well, not strictly toril necessarily at least not all of them are, but the forgotten realms as a whole, there is ones for Djinn, Marids, Janni, and Qorrashi https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Djinni#Notable_Djinn
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Marid#Notable_Marids
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Janni#Notable_Janni
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Qorrashi#Notable_Qorrash
though they seem most heavily associated with Zakhara specifically in regards to any particular part of toril
What about the ifreeti and dao
Efreet, and there are no notable ones listed at least in the same manner as the others
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Genie
if you wanna check for youself
Can disguise self be used as a way to change clothes?
I am thinking of a character that is constantly changing their appearence. Especially their clothing.
How dependable is this spell and what are some of its limitations?
From flavor to combat
This is not a lore question - you want #dnd-rules
Ah thanks!
Can someone help me out with plasmoid lore?
😊
anything not contradicted by their 5e lore from 2e is still considered valid until contradicted if that also helps
According to the EEPC, some genies are able to adopt mortal guise when traveling to the material plane. Are Efreet included?
It says "some genies" without mentioning specific elemental alignments. So given Efreeti are genies, the answer would most likely be "some can"
That's pretty much what I figured. I just wanted to make sure that it didn't exclude any certain type of genie, since the wording is a bit vague
The jann look almost indistinguishable from humans or half-elves by default, and the markeen’s whole gimmick is looking exactly like a specific human.
So there are some instances of genies that naturally appear human, but others have had the magical ability to disguise themselves in the past.
I wish the jann appeared in 5E.
Jann?
They're genies composed of all four elements rather one specific element. They're the weakest of the genie types. They often reside on the Material Plane than in the elemental planes.
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Janni
ooh
is possible that they do exist in the 5e continuity still, but to what extent we don't know as they are referenced in bg3 so they are at least apart of one version of the 5e forgotten realms continuity, so potential baby steps if we do get them later on in more detail/properly
BG3 is its own continuity (I'm grateful that Larian are D&D lore nerds to include them).
As mentioned before, unless 5E lore says otherwise past edition stuff "still exist." I'm not contesting that but rather I want to see an official update.
same
Besides overthrowing/ killing another god or gaining more followers, are there any other ways for a deity to increase their power? This is for the Forgotten Realms gods.
Ao has final say on promotions/demotions.
at least in forgotten realms
Gaining followers is the main way to increase a god's divine power/rank. Taking over another god's portfolio also increases their powers.
Isn't BG3 an official update?
No, it's not part of core D&D lore. BG3 is isolated unto itself.
deities can gain followers and a presence in other settings too
Because it's Larian.
cuz it is a specific medium
The D&D movies, comic books, and video games are separate (however, back in 2E/3E the novels and comics were official canon).
They also took liberties with some things
there is no 1 continuity, there are MULTIPLE continuities in dnd, 5e is no different
It's like the MCU movies are separate (but related to) the Marvel Comic comics' continuity.
even though is ment to exist along side it, another universe, at least that was the original plan in that case
but either way it all comes back to this https://dnd.wizards.com/news/dnd-canon
the stuff in bg3 is not confirmed canon to the published continuity of 5e until it is refferences in official materials
such as adventures, lore books, ect...
Same reason novels are their own isolated canons/"timelines" within the larger universe
until then it is just one continuity onto itself and anything it says it specifically is within the same continuity of
A story that makes for exciting tabletop play isn't necessarily the same story that makes for exciting novels, and you don't really want to just mush all of thesse continuities together
TSR/WotC got out of hand with "canon" that were published a lot of questionable quality comics and novels in the 1990s and 2000s. With 5E, WotC wanted to limit what was considered "canon."
For example, the only way to know what happened with the Time of Troubles cataclysm that occured between 1E and 2E was to read the novels instead actually playing modules for your PCs to experience the major event first hand.
the adventures would at best be one timeline of what could have been
the published continuity is basically that of what one could arguably call the main timeline when referring to a specific setting's history
They also dont have a true canon because every table's campaigns end differently
and this is also why from one edition or another there are major differences in some cases for creatures, such as kobolds, phoenixes, ect...
It has always been the case for decades that each table has their own canon.
closest thing is what they agree on for the sake of consistancy in their own products
Each edition changes monster lore, sometimes even during an edition (I'm looking at you, 3E Book of Vile Darkness!).
technically even wizards of the coast's version of the realms is different from what some might call the OG realms, the one Ed Greenwood himself uses and works on daily
5E reverted/retconned a lot of FR lore that occurred in 4E.
yeah, which from my knowledge is largely so different cuz 4e kind of just did not even bother to check older editions, they just kind of did their own thing
4E FR lore wanted to be subverted -- WotC wanted to reduce the number of deities so a lot of them were either killed or merged with greater gods. Entire nations disappeared or were submerged (only to reappear in 5E as if nothing happened).
some writers from what i know, knew it was more or less gunna flop, so made plans to more easily fix it when they eventually came and told them to restore the previous status quo more or less, like R.A. Salvadore
I finally solved a lore contradiction that puzzled me!
I kept seeing weird informations about the Spawning Stone and the Slaad, but it turns out that it's because the lore was changed basically every edition
In 5e, the current lore is that Primus created the Spawning Stone to tame limbo and the Slaad were a side effect. While previously it was either an inherent feature of limbo, or a mystery
quick question for FR dragon anatomy, is it possible for a dragon to be more human in movement (sitting/standing like one albeit slightly hunched and for a short period of time standing, moving its arms like a human can) or are they restricted to more quadrupedal movements?
How long do rations and waterskins with water last? Do rations eventually go bad? I imagine the water is fine for a while though?
Their arms are arms, they've been shown sitting like that as well. It's moreso that stuff often doesn't accommodate them like that.
ah
I just want to know lorewise if rations ever expire.
it really depends on what specifically is in the rations and under what conditions. Dry foods can stay edible for years if stored properly, but if exposed to too much moisture they can spoil.
There's not that much "lore" on this to my knowledge, beyond just looking at how food spoilage works in real life.
I see. I am just trying to research if they could eat rations that have been in metal containers for years.
It might smelll a bit stale but should probably still be good.
Thats not a thing covered by lore
closest thing i could find https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Ration#Description
though honestly the wording makes it less than clear if the two weeks is talking about the rations or the partchments and strings and such
and given the various examples of what kind of foods typically are rations, likely varies depending on what that food is, like i could be wrong but i have never heard of things like nuts or hardtack going bad
they mainly walk quadrupedally cuz most dragons in dnd, is not just forgotten realms technically far as i am aware, because their anatomy does not allow for them to do so easily or comfortably for prolonged periods of time, most artwork i am aware of that shows this is that of gold dragons https://static.wikia.nocookie.net/forgottenrealms/images/c/c8/Gold_Dragon.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20070303115341
https://static.wikia.nocookie.net/forgottenrealms/images/0/0a/Valamaradace.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20220704122239
you arguably even see this with the one depicted in the recently revealed cover art for the revised phb
i believe if you want specific details you may have to check the 3.5e draconomicon as i recall that detailed dragon anatomy in great detail, and from what i can recall fizban's did not really touch on such details
but honestly if a dragon wanted to move more human like, especially a metallic of sufficent age, they likely would just shapechange into a humanoid form
If dragonborns are the fertile offspring of dragons and humans, are humans and dragons biologically speaking the same species in dnd?
That's not what dragonborn are in most settings
And biology doesn't work like that in dnd, or fantasy in general often
You're maybe thinking of half-dragons, which are sometimes the children of a humanoid and a dragon _who has shapechanged into a humanoid"
It has absolutely nothing to do with biology and speciation
It's pure magic
In the forgotten realms a dragon magically impregnated a human woman and thus created a dragonborn or am i wrong about that?
I have no recollection of that, but even by your own words, magic was involved
Also ease off on the bio-speak, you can just use server appropriate, non-creepy language
"Had a child with" works fine
In the Forgotten Realms, dragonborn are a species crafted by dragons using magic
That'd be a half-dragon. No Dragonborn origin story has them be offspring of humanoids and dragons
How close is Damaran to the Sword Coast? Also, is there a specified accent that those originating from there have?
Accents aren't really a noted thing in lore, given how they're kinda difficult to describe without referencing real world accents
Right. I was just curious since I'm imagining my character with an "American" accent and was wondering if that would be realistic in the Damara area
I can't seem to find much information on distance, especially given that the Sword Coast is a large region so working out how far something is takes a little bit of work
Gotcha
Damaran was in the Ulou language group, the language group to which Netherese belonged. Damaran was also closely related to Easting, another Chard language which was spoken in the Vast and Impiltur in addition to Damaran. Damaran had been strongly influenced by Common and had a relationship to Aglarondan as well.
Damaran is based on Baltic Languages.
Dragon Annual 1999 #4 Page 28, Speaking in Tongues by Thomas Costa
Common is a belongs to the Thorass Group. According to Faerûnian linguists, Common developed directly from Thorass, or "Old Common", which was itself a pidgin variant of the Jhaamdathan language ("Old Chondathan") and Alzhedo. Among living languages, Common was most closely related to Chondathan. Which was basedon Italic Languages and Latin style grammer. Much of how English uses the Latin Alphabet but is a pigdin of germanic words borrowed and stolen from central Europe. Common is a hodgepodge tongue and was little more than a trade language; that is, it was not useful for complicated topics. It was simple and not very expressive as a language.
5e's simplification of tongues does remove some of this nuance but it is essentially inferred that common is no one's first language including those born in trade hubs such as the Sword Coast. Infact to many people of West Faerun the Chondathan language is their native tongue.
As for distance. According to the Forgotten Realms Interactive Atlas, the distance between Helagabl, to Waterdeep is 1848 Miles in a straight line.
closest connection dragonborn in the realms have to dragons in the myth that they were born from the blood of Io Spilled when he was cleaved in two, which also birthed Tiamat and Bahamut
at least far as i am aware and have ever heard or read
at least none in published materials
Which is the lore we're discussing. "Discuss WotC-published game settings, and the events and characters that shaped them."
If it doesn't exist in published material, I don't see how it can be lore?
i am not saying it is
Okay, then what were you trying to say?
Saying
At least none in X
Implies that there may be some outside of X
But in this case, lore cannot exist outside of published material
Has there been any lore updates on Vhaeraun and Eilistraee since Mordenkainen's?
No, not really
basically that odds are that robertkl was likely either confusing the dragonborn and half dragons or was thinking someone's homebrew was official, supporting what Elgate was pointing out
sorry if my chiming in and the way i did made it confusing
If you want some Eilistraee. Ed Greenwood recently did a deep dive on one of her cities in the realms on his Youtube Channel. It was literally uploaded yesterday. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=70lCG3pUycM
and if memory serves he talks about her brother a little bit too
Also the new Drizzt novels had Paladin of Eilistraee.
Shame that that aspect was shown as “secret city” while main Forgotten Realms had them established in Sword Coast with their main presence being in Waterdeep.
Lore developing areas away from the Sword Coast is good, actually
you are thinking of one specific order https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Church_of_Eilistraee#Protectors_of_the_Song
not sure what you mean by "secret city" though
and the temple that is in waterdeep is simply their main center of worship in faerun and her Eilistraee's most sacred temple https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Promenade_of_the_Dark_Maiden
not sure that is the same as it being their main presence as it is not even in waterdeep, is under it
I meant Callidae.
@undone geyser
Many gods have dominions in the Astral Sea. These locations typically take the form of floating islands or cities of fantastic proportions. Astral travelers might visit these dominions as they would any other ports of call, though a dominion's divine ruler always knows when visitors have arrived and what their intentions are. Because these dominions are part of the Astral Sea, they are timeless; nothing ages there, and creatures can survive there indefinitely without food or drink.
Thats what the Astral Dominion sidebar says about em
OK so NOT an outer plane.
I not see most gods having an Astral Dominion.
Probably not no
The Astral Plane/Sea is a transitionary plane between the Material Plane and the Outer Planes, where most gods reside.
The corpses of dead gods float in the Astral Plane/Sea though.
I have Wildspace(s) where the Primary generates a pychic wind that keeps the Astral Sea from entering the Wildspace. Similar to the real life Heliopause. My unique world has its own Outer Plane but no astral access to them ... I created another Transitionary Plane.
Yea, the corpses of dead gods is actually the second part of the sidebar about astral dominions
#dm-world-building would be a better place to discuss this then. This channel is only about official campaign settings' lore.
though for gods, depsite the terms, corpses and dead, is more akin to a comma than death in the traditional sense
I am currently running a campaign set within a Recently A Dead Goddess. Gotcha another board. Sigh
#dnd-elder-editions would be for older edition stuff.
After reading through more of the domains of dread. It made me realize something. Do the dark powers in the domains of dread have a physical form/avatar or are they more formless beings using the mists as an influence
No one knows who/what they are (other than a plot device).
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Dark_Powers
iirc they have some sort of association with the Amber Sarcophagi, but as far as taking the form of wisps of smoky darkness in those sarcophagi, nobody’s 100% what their original physical forms look like.
you refer to the ||Vestiges of the Amber Temple||, which are commonly confused with the Dark Powers but are entirely different and unrelated entities.
I gotta crack open my Ravenloft book again, it’s been a while
to my knowledge, no, at least none are known, and at least in 5e this is what we are told about them in the part covering the idea of drak gifts "The Dark Powers influence many who struggle within their clutches, tempting both the innocent and ambitious with whispered promises. These sinister bargains are rarely spoken, coming in dreams or mysterious visions, but their terms are always clear and their prices terrible." so seems to indicate that are likely gunna hear them or more likely get a message via a dream or vision, seems to establish they don't manifest physically even when they do interact with others, so between that and what is recorded on the wiki, they got no history of having ever having to take a physical form so they likely don't need to or simply choose not to
is in curse of strahd, not van richton's the side bar about the amber sarcophagi makes it clear to me that they are not related to the dark powers, and technically van richton's does not technically say the dark powers are the only ones that can grant dark gifts, so i feel that might have only enhanced the reasons people may confuse the two
plus if they were related, they would have at least mentioned the dark powers, which to my knowledge is what the dark powers are consistently referred to as, and usually when they introduce an alias for an entity or force, they also make it clear by revealing the name they are more commonly known by
I think we've beat this dead horse and might be filling this channel with a few too many borderline Curse of Strahd spoilers.
closest thing we get to any sort of possible depiction physically of the dark powers is MAYBE in the artwork for van richton's before it goes into details on the dark gifts right after they talked about the dark powers, but even then is less than clear if those are ment to be the dark powers as the caption included under it simply reads "SINISTER FORCES LURK IN THE SHADOWS, ENTICING THE UNWARY WITH DARK GIFTS."
so even the closest thing we get, might not even be them
then again the dark powers have always been ultra vague beings in dnd lore, at least to my knowledge, so seems perfectly on brand and consistent
The Amber Temple was built in Barovia before it was taken into the Mists by the Dark Powers.
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Barovia#Notable_Locations
Remember that Ravenloft, the 1E original module, existed before Ravenloft the campaign setting appeared in 2E. The mysterious Dark Powers was a creation of the setting as a plot device to have various and diverse Domains.
good point and they are known to take entire chunks with their will be victims/dark lords, lot of people getting caught in the cross fire so to speak, so they easily could have taken various unrelated parts of those settings, seems clear that if you look at everything even just in 5e materials, the similarities between the two things are just coincidences
and we know that with vecna's history with the domains of dread, weaker gods and similar beings were just as vulnerable to being trapped there too, so is not like the dark powers were the only evil powers on the block, just the ones in charge
I've played the original 1E Ravenloft module and was a fan of the 2E Ravenloft campaign setting (I have many boxed sets of it).
Some things are best left mysterious and unknown. They lose their appeal when you know something/everything about them. Again, the Dark Powers are primarily a plot device used as an excuse to draw villains and whole lands into the Mists.
especially given that in 5e the domains of dread are heavily centered around different kinds of horror, hard to be scared of something if you know it inside and out
Well, this isn't the channel for me to express my opinion of 5E Ravenloft...
and we know they will just kick out a darklord, like with lord soth, if they can't get any suffering out of them, so makes sense they would leave themselves vague as possible
Lord Soth and Vecna managed to escape pre-5E.
i know, at least vecna's was, was not sure when soth got kicked out
i don't call it escaping in his case, cuz they, at least from what i am aware, literally just let him go cuz he became so desensitized they couldn't get any suffering out of him, which is their main goal by making someone a dark lord and sucking them into the domains of dread
but vecna, legit broke out, no matter how you look at it i can't see it being seen as anything other than an escape
Can the concordant express travel to Eberron?
seeing as you can't go from toril to eberron with plane shift, I would say no
In that case , I need a way to fit a kalashtar outside of Eberron.
dream of the blue veil
Thanks.
or
Second, there was a way through the Demonweb Pits. Starting from Toril, a cave south of the town of Eveningstar, Cormyr, contained a portal to a part of the Demonweb Pits near the Rift Between Worlds, which linked to the Spinner's Prison in Khyber, Eberron's counterpart to the Underdark. From there, one could take a passage leading to the Harbor of Stormreach, a city on Eberron. One could return the same way and afterward teleport to speed the journey. This was only possible after the Spinner's death in 1479 DR.
Makes sense.
Other than Succubus, are there any other "Weak" monsters that also effect dreams? I am not sure if this is the place to ask this.
Well... I'm not a DM
There's the quori from Eberron.
https://eberron.fandom.com/wiki/Quori
When it comes to familiars, I always assumed the lore was that you're forming a magical contract with an extant animal from somewhere else or another plane, but some people I've talked to lately suggest that they're meant to essentially be animal-shaped extensions of your own soul/consciousness. I'm curious, what is the actual lore there?
There isn't really lore. It's a magical process to bond a spellcaster with a creature (usually not from the Material Plane).
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Familiar
there are 2 types of familiars
spirits summoned into a particular form, or bonding/contracting with an actual creature
Ahh, I see. Thank you for the info!
Night Hag is only 1 CR higher than succubus and their description says they haunt people’s dreams.
Can the subclasses of firbolgs subtypes (the cowlike and the normal large giant men) be worked into a story to explain the difference?
There are no "subclasses" of a species.
The cosmetic change of filbolgs was an art direction change in 5E.
I simply mean i am in a campaighn were there a two firbolgs and there character desighns are wildly different, so a way to explain this for roleplay reasons would be good :,>
This is something you should talk to your DM about on how filbolgs look in their setting.
CR is not an "in world" thing, and the CR of a given stat block doesn't represent the in-world capability of all of that particular creature
For example, just because a vampire has a certain CR, that doesn't mean all vampires are that strong, some are stronger and some are weaker
CR is what is called "non-diegetic", like hit points or levels
For the purpose of lore it means literally nothing
The question was asking about in general, so I think the CR is a necessary detail
I was explaining how bringing CR into a lore discussion isn't necessary because it's meaningless in this context
I was just using it as a way of comparing to the creature mentioned, since a “weak” creature was sought. (I’m pretty new myself so never faced a night hag or succubus myself, yet)
Again, lore wise it's meaningless
There might be night hags that could wipe the floor with a succubus, or succubi that could defeat a night hag in their sleep
If you want to discuss monsters in the context of CR and abilities, that's a discussion for #dm-discussion , not here
My players are in Waterdeep and an NPC died. They are heading out of the undermountain to look for someone to cast either raise the dead, or Gentle Repose on the NPC. Would these services be offered at any of the temples? If not which NPCs on Waterdeep should I consider bringing out of the woodwork
if there's a city on Toril that can offer those services, it's Waterdeep. I'm not sure on specific NPCs, though. You may just make up a high priest of whatever temple they choose to take the NPC's body to.
you could use the temple of Lathander (Spires of the Morning in the Castle Ward) as the default place to go.
Thanks a bunch!
Why is it that whenever i get into a hobby, I have to make sense of the lore first
I have like.... 5 questions that should help me get a grip on DnD cosmology.
What is the relationship between the 'Astral Plane'/'Astral Sea' and 'Wildspace'?
What is the relationship between the 'Astral Plane'/'Astral Sea' and the 'Phlogiston'/'Rainbow Ocean'/'Flow'?
What is the relationship between the 'Ethereal Plane' and 'Wildspace'?
What is the relationship between the 'Ethereal Plane' and the 'Phlogiston'/'Rainbow Ocean'/'Flow'?```
The Astral Plane/Sea and Etheral Plane are both transitionary planes. The Astral Plane/Sea connects the Material Plane to the Outer Planes while the Ethereal Plane connects the Material Plane to the Inner Planes.
Wildspace is vacuum in the star systems in the Material Plane (aka "outer space"). The Astral Plane/Sea has nothing to do with Wildspace other than spelljammers.
The Phlogiston was the space between star systems in the Material Plane. 5E Spelljammer removed it.
There is no relationship between Wildspace or the Phlogistan and the Ethereal Plane (see answers above).
Ok, thank you.
So, the Prime material plane, Shadowfell, and the Feywild are surrounded by the Ethereal Plane and the Elemental Chaos simultaneously?
In any case, it seems that the Astral Plane and the Ethereal Plane are the space in-between dimensions. (Astral Plane for higher/outer dimensions, Ethereal Plane for lower/inner), while Wildspace is interplanetary space, and the Phlogiston is interstellar space.
Yes to all that.
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Great_Wheel_cosmology
The planes are all metaphysical
They're not actually next to each other like that.
Each plane is an universe onto itself.
....I don't think i like the conflation of the Elemental Chaos as the equal of the Astral Sea in the Great Axis. I think that's where the majority of my confusion came from.
In Eberron if someone was using an eldritch machine to scramble and close the planes linked to individual manifest zones... What kinds of disasters would this cause?
The Elemental Chaos was something introduced in 4E. It's basically the elemental planes of the Inner Planes now. (Much of 4E's lore was retconned/ignored with 5E).
The channel doesn't really deal with "what if" questions. Lore deals with what has happened in official campaign settings. Better to ask in #dnd-discussion
Theu are ni more related than the shadowfell and the elemental planes.
The Underdark is a subterran system of caverns, caves and tunnels.
The feywild is the homeplane of the fey.
Underdark is the subterranean region beneath Faerun.
Feywild is the plane of the faerie, which an echo of the Material plane.
They're not connected.
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Underdark
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Feywild
Phb
Oh it is below faerun
The Shadowfell is the other plane that's an echo of the Material Plane.
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Shadowfell
There is such thing as the Feydark and Shadowdark, which are the Underdark for those specific realms
Yeah underdark is just the name of the giant cave underground in Faerun.
It’s a place, rather than a different reality.
Howdy. I know part of it is up to the DM, but we're playing a campaign in Deepwater in the year 1491 soon and I noticed this might not work with my backstory. I initially wanted to go with former broken bones or black claws members in a new society and how they dealt with the aftermath of Deepwater , but that was in 1200.
Are there still orcs around who might have tried to attack Deepwater and failed between around 1400? Because during the short lifespans orcs have, it would be the fifth generation since all that happened and since the clan has broken apart, I'm not sure if the orcs with ancestors from back then would still know about or be mad about this
Are you referring to the city of Waterdeep?
Not in 4e or 5e lore, no. But you might ask your DM if you can invent an orc horde that attacked the city (which is called Waterdeep, by the way) within the last century.
Incidentally, Neverwinter was threatened by the Many-Arrows orcs quite recently in the 1480's, so maybe you can find a connection there.
Yeah, there is no historical attack of Waterdeep in the late 15th century DR.
clan many arrows certainly had a lot ups and down in the recent FR timeline and they arent doing so hot
maybe your guy or his ancestors left the clan during one of its many civil wars
Work with your DM on their table's canon of the FR timeline.
Otherwise, there's no official lore on recent attacks on Waterdeep by orcs.
the most recent conflict involving orcs in the North was the War of the Silver Marches.
This is moving to #character-discussion territory.
All good. Thanks guys. I'm speaking to the DM in around 90 minutes. I'll bring up many arrows and see if I use that. And yeah.. Waterdeep, not Deepwater.. I gotta remember that 😅
So has there ever been a chromatic dragon and metalic dragon that fell in love in the lore
what setting
from what I recall its happened in the FR at least a few times. And in eberron due to the nature of dragons there
FR specifically Fearûn or some where in the forgotten realms
Any where but eberron
Basically I'm looking to see if good and evil dragon falling in love has happened before and how it ended
well 2e draconomicon contained details for cross breeding between chromatics and metallics, which are needless to say rare but very volatile from what i recall, but far as i know specific named individuals for examples are not given, but i could be wrong though
chromatic wyrmlings are sometimes raised by metallic dragons i think
though that is very different from what sephiroth was asking i believe, as such mentorship only lasts so long from what i am aware, once they are old enough to know how to survive on their own, they will kick them out and treat them as any other threat to their own territory and power
but it means that often even if orphaned a dragon will learn the basics it needs from another dragon, regardless of type, least from what i am aware on that subject
Council of wyrms might have something, but that was a particular setting
AJ Pickett's lore video on the subject, which he even mentioned what ed greenwood has shared on the subject for the forgotten realms https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nMIPpNLXQPA&t=1s could be useful resource if you don't have access to the 2e draconomicon
well not all dragons breed for love to begin with, so there is that
plus to my knowledge, seems rarely do they ever detail the parents of a dragon or if you do you only learn of one of their parents
Ya but I didnt ask about breeding just lo e life
well usually they don't pair with others beyond that, and again, to my knowledge no real examples are given from what i am aware, and even more rarely is it noted as being in love
often their natures would likely keep this from happening, be it on one side of it or both
romances of dragons are not really something explored in published materials far as i know except for maybe major myths, legends, ect...
like if you want such a thing you'll likely have to go digging yourself, unless someone else has already done so themselves and knows it off the top of their head
honestly closest thing i am aware of is the crossbreed stuff from 2e i mentioned earlier, cuz all the ones i found or could think of were pairings of the same dragon type
Metallic Dragons have been known to mate with Chromatic Dragons, its rare, but it happens. Look at the Vesperins dragons of DRAGON FALLS AND RUINS>
yeah but he is apparently more so wanting love life, not just mating, even though the closest thing we usually get is mating to my knowledge in regards to dragons and their love life
Is the Changing race and Circle of the Moon in Forgotten Realms or Eberon thingy?
Changeling exist in multiple settings, including both the FR and Eberron
The circle of the moon is unrelated to changelings, and is related to druids, and also exists in both of those settings
I’m assuming iggwilv can shapeshift, so is Tasha ugly like a hag in her true form? Or is her bewitching appearance her true form
What do you mean by "is Tasha ugly like a hag in her true form"? What basis do you have for assuming the art of Tasha isn't her true form or that she has more forms?
... Tasha's a human
Oh, that I didn't know.
To her page I go!
Ok, her page says this:
The exact appearance of Iggwilv was unknown to many. Some described her as a ravishing beauty, while others claimed she was a bald and hideous crone.[2] In fact Iggwilv was quite beautiful in her youth with raven hair that eventually went stark white.[19] Even after becoming an archfey, she still retained a human-like appearance.
None, which is why I added the last bit asking if her human form is her true form, but i should clarify that I’m asking if she has a true form at all and what it is if we know
She's a human at some points and a fey at others
Her appearance is as it's portrayed in the art, most recently as part of the Wizards Three in Eve of Ruin
She masks her appearance from time to time, as do many powerful beings
That's not what I said
She is human/fey depending on when/where in her complex, multiversal timeline you encounter her
However, her appearance is fairly consistent with exception of general changes over time any being experiences
She is also capable of magically disguising herself, leading to reports of her other various appearances
Tasha was born a human at some point later in her life she is a fey for reasons that are a spoiler for an adventure. In Vecna Eve of Ruin, the Tasha we see is an eariler tasha than the Fey. So human tasha. Her relation to hags mainly comes from Baba Yaga who is Tasha's adoptive mother. She has no known blood relation to other hags.
Her phyiscal description as a blad crone comes from one known source. Return of the Eight (1998) By Roger Moore. It was one sentence and was only in reference to descriptions of her. Even the art of her on that page is a beautiful powerful witch.
yeah seems they may have gotten that idea of her being a shapeshifter from overlooking the adoptive part of her relation to the hag baba yaga
Kinda wanna roll Tasha up as a hexblood now tbh
What books of V5 are good introduction to the general lore?
What setting?
Forgotten Realms and Magic the Gathering
For FR for 5e there is SCAG
MtG isnt really covered here
for the MTG settings in 5e there are setting books for Ravnica, Theros and Strixhaven the latter being pretty lore light.
You can also always look to the official MtG lore wiki
Thanks
A better introduction to FR Lore is Jrophdan's vidoes on Youtube.
It is, as long as it's a published setting (Strixhaven, Ravnica, and Theros)
And much like how the FR wiki is a permissible source of info on Forgotten Realms, the MtG Wiki is an equally acceptable source of lore for the purpose of discussion here
The caveat is not straying too far from those published settings, even when the lore becomes more cross-planar
I am writting a homebrew with the return of Orcus, am i correct in my research that Tasha & Iggwilv are the same person and was in league with Orcus?
Yes to the first, not to sure about them being in league with orcus
Tasha/Iggwilv definitely was an on and off ally of Grazz't though
Iggwilv was never in league with Orcus.
Ok so they were the same person but allied with the other demon lord
The demonlords she interacted with were Grazz't and Frab something something stupid lord of illusions
Iggwilv and Tasha are the same person, it's just different names she uses.
I read that Orcus and Tasha teamed up to overthrow the other prince demons or something like that
(Oh wait, theres also her adoptive brother, who I cant spell or pronounce)
Kind of... in the 3.5E Dungeon Magazine adventure patch, Savage Tide (which I'm currently DMing), Orcus and her does help the PCs to overthrow Demogorgon
Iuz, the god of deceit, pain, oppression, and evil
Ok so they could have a tenuous alliance but they each have their own goal
Oh, didnt know about that one during my binge read of demonlords
Yes, because demon lords are CE after all...
thanks
Sorry, Iuz is her son. (brain fart)
https://ghwiki.greyparticle.com/index.php/Iuz
though is funny cuz tasha being a name she has gone by in the realms is the same as another unrelated character, which is just a bit funny, almost makes me wonder if that was something she planned or just a happy coincidence for her
Who's the unrelated character?
i can't seem to find it anymore but i remember them being an npc in one of the earlier 5e adventures, else maybe i am mistaken and suffering from the mandala effect
Hi. I know I am a little late to the conversation, but does anyone know if there are plans to incorporate the Lore from MToF or VGtM's in any new products (or have been included in existing products)?
I realize that the studio has been trying to move away from the idea of "Official Canon" and make any Lore setting-agnostic, but I think that the snippets of those Lore sections I have seen can be really helpful when you are trying to bring depth to roleplaying (either for players backstories or DMs fleshing out major NPCs); texture that you don't always get from the Monster Manual or even the larger published Adventures.
What do you think the mark of death did?
While it wasn't given a specific answer (intentionally), it has been said by Keith that, due to the nature of dragonmarks it was a "positive" (rather than destructive) effect. So things like raising/controlling undead, speaking with/putting to rest the dead, etc. That's the best answer that can be given with lore
Yeah that makes sense
Maybe a resurgent vol could be like undead human resources
could a member the blood of Vol become immortal
That's pure speculation which is outside the scope of this channel. The blood of vol contains many who become forms of undead however
Like, could one become a god?
Like I said, it is outside the scope of this channel to speculate
Clerics of the blood of vol do exist
https://eberron.fandom.com/wiki/Mark_of_Death
is all theredical, is by design, even in keith baker's continuity
but the most closely associated character with it is https://eberron.fandom.com/wiki/Erandis_Vol
||but is unable to use it|| do to their undead nature presumably
the people that basically murdered the line of Vol certainly thought so, killing them all to try to prevent this possibility, regardless if they were correct, fear moves one to do drastic things
Erandis Vol is the last member of the Line of Vol, which was the line of those who bore the Dragonmark of death. She was a half dragon killed because of many groups being scared as to what the power of an individual who was both draconic and being the mark of death would be.
Dragonmarks only function for the living, so as a result of her being made into an unwilling lich by (iirc) her parents, Erandis cannot utilize her mark.
The blood of vol is, technically, unrelated
though she opperates under an alias
It's a religion
she does manipulate some of the blood of Vol though as her wiki page notes https://eberron.fandom.com/wiki/Blood_of_Vol and the order of the emerald claw https://eberron.fandom.com/wiki/Order_of_the_Emerald_Claw
yes, but the religion itself and how it functions is by and large unrelated to the dragonmark of death
Yeah
true, though likely a coincidence, would not be surprised if the name originally had some connection to the line
the name comes from the stories told about the line
Do you think the blood of vol could become gods?
the tldr is "the line of vol was eliminated for trying to become gods" and the mythology of the blood of vol religion started from there and the idea that "you can become divine" via the divinity within
as i said before, thats speculation outside the scope of the channel
the undead, no, least from what i recall, the living that they advise on their philosophy, in theory, but i am not sure if anyone has actually done it in the lore, the gods of eberron are far less concrete as other settings, thus divine magic is powered by the faith of the caster
there are many myths in eberron as to what the gods are
for example the dragons generally believe they were dragons, and that any dragon may be able to become the next
the whole concept of the gods in eberron is that the setting is designed around them not being "a sure thing". there is no definitive proof in setting of their existence. and the setting is designed to function the same regardless of whether or not the dm running the setting chooses to have them "be real"
yeah but what i meant is the established gods that are worshiped are not confirmed beings and are more in line to a philosophy than the typical dnd deity
and nobody knowing if they are real or not
unlike the forgotten realms for example where it is a known fact
what channel do I go on for this
#dm-discussion or #dnd-discussion probably
What exactly is a plane? I described them to my brother who was interested as being like planets but I’m wondering if that was entirely correct
A plane is a dimension / universe.
https://www.dndbeyond.com/sources/basic-rules/appendix-d-the-planes-of-existence
The Material Plane is basically our universe with countless star systems and planets.
The Outer Planes is the afterlife with "heaven" (Celestia) and "hell" (the Nine Hells and the Abyss).
That makes more sense, thanks so much!
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/789051798631088149/1242534285550813314/DND_Material_Plane.png?ex=664e2fba&is=664cde3a&hm=485eb262757805a4c4b47b169c842e3f90efee343c47aa9f85c2977297fda10d&
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/789051798631088149/1242534285987156132/DND_Shadowfell.png?ex=664e2fba&is=664cde3a&hm=a095f28335c1d3581d4af08643205e5abc5eb8efb139c1e79197bcb976da1c87&
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/789051798631088149/1242534286456787085/DND_Feywild.png?ex=664e2fbb&is=664cde3b&hm=ae6a2d5b8309717db2741dfdac7f4eb72ad8c8cc555c5ab8db95e6739e9fb689&
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/789051798631088149/1242534287249506364/DND_Elemental_Plane.png?ex=664e2fbb&is=664cde3b&hm=f914986140e0848881ca3aa82f200b6403fce7615ee6936401e8bce6a2ee0426&
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/789051798631088149/1242534288944140308/DND_Astral_Plane.png?ex=664e2fbb&is=664cde3b&hm=b299416cb3cf1e7c6a3fceaa73c66e04a12a4234f12a528d24be600ae1356a80&
I was working on a little thing in the background, but since you asked, this might help
The Outer Planes' planes are each associated with the nine alignments and the gradients inbetween from Celestia's LG to the Abyss' CE.
This would better represent the Inner Planes than what you have there.
I might be misinterpreting this sentence, but is there something wrong with the Outer Planes being portrayed alongside a reinterpretation of the alignment chart?
This is the official lore channel. You can do whatever you want with your own cosmology but since 1E, the Outer Planes are aligned (pun intended) with the alignment graph.
This is uh sorta abstract but: do you feel any of the planes (outer, inner, etc) resemble Plato's "Realm of the Forms"?
D&D has used three alignment systems:
- the nine from 1E to 3E, 5E
- Lawful, Neutral, Chaotic in BCEMI
- LG, Good, Unaligned, Evil, and CE in 4E.
Not with the Great Wheel or World Tree cosmologies
I wonder if I can work that inspiration into the semi-canonical "Ordial plane"
in a way, i suppose..... at it's most basic form, i could visualize connections...
Krynn has a different cosmology but I haven't looked at that campaign setting in decades. It's like a watered down Great Wheel... I guess, Little Wheel...
https://dragonlance.fandom.com/wiki/Cosmology
connections to where?
One of the players in my party is playing a platonist philosopher character so I wanted to work in a "realm of the forms" at some point
I never heard of the Ordial Plane
I think that's #dm-world-building territory...
That's the great thing about D&D cosmology is that there is no one "true" cosmology.
FR was using the World Tree cosmology until 5E. The handwaving excuse was that "Oh, philosophers think it's actually the Great Wheel cosmology!"
It could be one of those planes from old D&D, that we've forgotten about.
I played D&D since 1E and BCEMI. I would have remembered.
So you remember how in 2e we had the astral plane which connected the prime material to the outer, and the ethereal plane that connected the inner planes to the prime material?
The only google hit I found is that it appears to be fan created.
And in planescape there is the concept of the "rule of threes" and "unity of rings"?
Yes.
The transitional planes are highways to bigger places. They don't need to cross.
Sounds tangential. It probably does exist (And/or it has reason to exist), just not in D&D content atm.
The ethereal and astral planes are based on real world concepts though.
the lines of where the planes intersect and their boarders, since they are infinite in scale, i have heard them compared to a signal on a radio, is kind of like how DC comics uses vibrational frequencies to separate it's multiverse, honest is a bit weird cuz the outer planes are at their core metaphysical, the line between abstract and not abstract is near indistinguishable
and to my knowledge the travel via the ethereal and astral plane is based on thought, so is not like it needs to be a physical or linear path, as thinking of your destination is what gets you there, if i am not mistaken
I think it's only thought in the astral plane
to my knowledge it is both, which makes sense given their closeness and how they work
of which the point there is no consistent "distance" between any two locations via those planes and traveling through them, at least in the traditional sense like if you were traveling on the prime material plane by boat, mount, ect... as examples
When you use magic/spells to enter the Ethereal Plane you're "phasing" out of the Material Plane. This is why ghosts can go through solid objects.
With the Astral Projection spell you separate your astral self (aka soul) from your physical body to enter the Astral Plane/Sea (think Dr. Stranger when he does his astral projection in the first movie).
How they can Walk and not just fall into the center of the planet?
Magic
Not even being facetious, the whole of D&D is built on magic first, then something resembling our idea of physics second
Ethereal being can walk on walls but through walls because magic says that how it works
I got a weird question as I just go my hands on eve of ruin, regarding Vecna's depicted appearance in the art with the subtitle "A young Kas and Vecna muse about the destruction of Oerth"
As far as I could find lorewise in my reasearch, Kas had only met Vecna once Vecna was already a lich, presumably being much younger than Vecna
Yet the art depicts both of them as of equal or similar age
The lore has been changed
They have now met prior to Vecna's ascent to lichdom
Any lore prior to this book that says otherwise, within the context of D&D 5th edition, does not apply
Additionally, and a little weirder, Vecna's ethnicity seems to be different than previously depicted, the Ur-Flan, part of the Flan human group in Oerth seems to be inspired by native North American groups mixed with "vaguely ancient sumerians", usually with copper skin, dark hair and blue eyes. Now the Ur-Flan don't get a specific descriptor but its assumed to be similar to the Flan.
Yet Vecna appears as an European white, blonde with no discernable eye color. Is there any reason for this change?
I thought it was kinda cool to have a person of color represented as such a massively powerful figure in the universe, even if he was a (The) villain.
Again, it's just been changed
I get that, but do we get a why? I'm not trying to be one of those "oh back in the day it was much better" folks, just trying to understand the changes
Nope, no reason has been given
😦 that's a shame, we'll I can just pretend that art isn't canon for me
Not really a topic for this channel (nor how canon works), but chase your bliss
Oh my bad, I thought this was in topic as it related to lore
official lore. Homebrew lore would fall under #dm-discussion or maybe #dm-world-building
But if I want help with already established lore I'd come here right?
Question: is there a precedent for a cleric worshipping/being granted powers by more than one god, or being part of more than one gods church? Other than subordinate dieties, of course.
Clerics dedicate themselves to either no god, a singular deity, or a pantheon.
It's common for clerics to worship a "sphere of influence" or "domain". A sphere of influence is, in simple terms, a clubhouse. Each clubhouse is representative of a certain concept of the world. Each clubhouse's members are made up of gods that rule that concept.
Otherwise this is more of a gameplay thing unless you want to ask about a specific setting.
or multiple things
Fair enough, thanks for the answers, though if you'd indulge my curiosity, do you know of one such example from the forgotten realms?
I'm not sure that we actually have an example of an individual cleric in the Realms who did not serve a single deity, but the Sword Coast Adventurer's Guide does have this to say:
A typical cleric in Faerûn serves a single divine patron, but some individuals feel called to serve a group, such as the elemental gods Akadi, Grumbar, Kossuth, and Istishia, while others serve deities that are intertwined gods, such as the elves' Angharradh.
Note: Angharradh is the greater goddess who consists of the three goddesses Aerdrie Faenya, Hanali Celanil, and Sehanine Moonbow merged together.
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Angharradh
we also have a knightly order who serves both Mystra and Selûne, the Order of the Blue Moon. The order has some paladins as members, but it's unclear whether each individual paladin chooses to serve one of the goddesses or swears their oath to them both.
There are the Triad Knights, who are dedicated to the Triad (Tyr, Ilmater, and Torm).
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Triadic_knight
the reason is more so cuz each edition being it's own continuity allows for details of past events to change, be they minor or major, while some events will still have happened as it also sort of continues the timeline of the settings from the previous editions, usually, does not mean those details are gunna always be the same
Have there been any instances of killer mists in dnd lore?
Define "killer mists." Are you referring to a monster or a deadly environment?
closest to my knowledge would be either the cloud kill spell or the mists of the domains of dread
the question was not about that. They are wondering why the design team at WotC felt the need to make those changes to the lore of Vecna and who that character is.
A mist or fog that kills or otherwise incapacitates anyone or anything that enters it. either natural or artificially made but on a scale that could over continents.
that would be the mists in the domains of dread as scarletstream put it
though one could argue, the ones that do the killing, at least in the 5e continuity, the creatures known simply as "Unspeakable Horrors" detailed and far as i know introduced in "Van richton's guide to ravenloft", which very much live up to their name one could argue
Gotcha, from what I've skimmed it's a mist made to keep people in shadowfell. But I don't see much mention of the mist itself like who or what made it and how
You have to be more specific. Again, monster or environment.
that is not what it is
it keeps people within, with very few exceptions, the domains of dread, which in the 5e continuity is in a specific territory of the shadowfell
There hasn't been any thing large enough to cover an entire continent that's a mist.
Either or really. As long as it fits the mentioned criteria it could be a massive monster or some element of the environment.
I think this is more #dnd-discussion territory if you're trying to find a D&D monster to fit your criteria rather than lore.
The mists of Ravenloft is used by the Dark Lords to draw people and even entire nations into the Domains of Dread. It's not a creature nor a means of destruction. It's essentially a plot device.
Van richton's has a whole section in the first chapter dedicated to the mists and there is even a religion associated with them that provides which is somewhat intertwined with the nature of the mists, at least to some of this faith a god known as Ezra
cuz is not really something we are ment to know, and is more so up for the dm to decide, not everything is detailed down to a science in dnd, at best there are some things that one can speculate based on certain evidence or bits of info known, but that technically would still just be speculation
quick question in regards to the abyss. is the plane able to affect a persons senses with illusions or other methods of disorienting someone?
Not generally. If there are any such traits it would be on the individual layer.
Fraz-Urb'luu, the demon prince of deception, controls the 176th layer of the Abyss called Hollow's Heart. It doesn't seem to have any traits of illusions. https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Hollow's_Heart
and any other sort of weird environmental stuff is dependent on the demon lord who rules that layer and what they impose on it
so any given layer may or may not have such effects, Hollow's Heart is more or less just the most well known for that sort of thing
I'm running a highish level spelljammer campaign. I need to put the baddies lair somewhere, and I was thinking the sun. Players would have to get to the plane of earth, then the plane of fire and the city of brass, then the sun. How could they survive the sun though? I could homebrew magic items that give them fire immunity, I know the sun surpasses fire immunity, but whatever. But a lot of the natural baddies on the sun would be fire based, so I don't really like that idea. Suppose I could just make it immunity to environmental fire damage... Anyways, appreciate all your thoughts on this!
This isn't really a lore question but more for #dm-discussion. This channel doesn't deal really in game mechanics.
I see that now
Suns in star systems do have inhabitants such as fire elementals.
And Sun Dragons
Are vampires harmed by any sunlight in general, or direct sunlight specifically?
that is detailed in their mechanics
so not really something you need lore help for
but otherwise, yeah historically, in the forgotten realms at least https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Vampire#Weaknesses
but this can vary for specific kinds of vampires and vampire like creatures https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Vampire#Varieties
This channel doesn't really deal with the game mechanics side of the game.
some of which only really exist to specific editions and thus those continuities of dnd, outside of 3rd party/homebrew adaptations
Like, If sunlight were to get reflected off of snow, would it deal the same amount of damage, be reduced, or just not deal any? (Mainly for character lore)
That's a game mechanics so that's more #dm-discussion side of things.
All the statblock says is:
Sunlight Hypersensitivity. The vampire takes 20 radiant damage when it starts its turn in sunlight. While in sunlight, it has disadvantage on attack rolls and ability checks.
How direct is open to interpretation from the DM.
as described in the link to the forgotten realms wiki, at least in the realms if going strictly by the lore, it specifies direct, be it natural or magical not really being a factor
else, is more mechanics and dm dependent
So, what contains Wildspace? My understanding was that in previous versions they were contained by Crystal Spheres, but I don’t see any mention of that in Spelljammer. Has that been retconned in 5e? If so, is there a lore reason why they no longer exist?
Crystal spheres are no longer a thing as of 5E, no. Big reasons being that WOTC wanted to make spelljamming more like sailing in space. They even got rid of phlogiston.
That's sad. And do you know if it was a change that happened in-universe or were they retconned to have never existed?
I don’t think it was ever specified, but there is at least one Wildspace that’s described as being covered in a shattered crystal sphere.
Can I ask which one that is?
That’s an adventure spoiler I think
Ah okay
It is noted that the crystal sphere surrounding that wildspace system was something of an unexplained oddity
As such, it appears that crystal spheres were fully retconned out with that one mention being a reference to the former lore
Yeah I re-read that section and it appeared to me to be an entirely different thing than the old Crystal Sphere
Hello, maybe some of you can help me: I'm looking for the (or just a) pre-cataclysm Dragonlance setting timeline. But everything seems to be focused somehow on PC (pre-cataclysm) or AC (after cataclysm). One site I found mentions the Istarian Age system, but it doesn't start until 963 PC. Anyone have any ideas?
Do you mean timeline or date system?
I'm looking for a date system.
Okay, for a specific reason/purpose or just out of curiosity
Because it might likely be the case that the Istarian Age system is the only one that exists other than the PC/AC cataclysm
In fact, for a specific reason. A new character comes from the time before the Cataclysm and therefore has no knowledge of the terms PC and AC. I would like to give him something he can work with. I was hoping there might be something to go with it, but if not, I'll just have to come up with something myself.
So, is there a creature in dnd that resembles aeons from pathfinder? Something akin to cosmic balance, where their sole and only purpose is to preserve the order of the universe
Modrons sort of fit? https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Modron
Yes actually, if you don't take appearance into consideration, their concepts are pretty similar
to a degree, Rilmani, though more so within the plane known as the outlands, as of 5e planescape's "Morte's Planar Parade", i'd link their wiki page but it seems to not have been updated with their 5e info yet
to partially quote their description from the book "Rilmani protect the balance between the forces and philosophies of the multiverse. They seek to maintain planar equilibrium, assuring that good, evil, law, or chaos never grow too powerful or too weak. To the rilmani, each of these forces is fundamental to the multiverse’s existence. Whenever one threatens to tip the balance in its favor or a plane is on the verge of collapse, the rilmani act to even the odds." end quote
quick question, but has it ever been known in FR for fey to have relations with mortal beings?
yes. (glances at Tasha)
Tasha was mortal human who later became fey (she's the adopted daughter of Baba Yaga). She's also not from Toril but from Oerth.
oh right
Most of the "named" archmagi are from Greyhawk setting.
That's been a thing since 1E with dryads and nymphs...
not gonna lie I forgot those two were affiliated with mortals
Game mechanics-wise there was a half-fey template in 3.5E
There’s also the Hexblood in 5E, which can be associated with fey
and more
plus historically in past editions in the realms there is the fey based changelings from around the time of 3.5e which was detailed in a dragon magazine or maybe it was dungeon, one of the two
plus hags, though only on a technical level, since to my knowledge they reproduce by consuming a mortal baby, so not really a traditional relation
even if tasha was from the forgotten realms, she would not really qualify, as she is not fey, originally only at a certain point in her timeline does she achieve the status of archfey and become fey, and even then she was adopted by Baba Yaga, who to my knowledge has no mention of a partner, mortal or otherwise
Hey, does anyone know if the Ascension of the Dread Three of Jergals portfolio is before, after, or roughly coterminous with Karsus’ Folly?
Karsus' Folly -339 DR
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Karsus's_Folly
Jergal giving up his portfolio to Bane, Bhaal, and Myrkul -357 DR
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Myrkul#History
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Bane#Divine_Ascension
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Bhaal#Godhood
Thank you, so negative years, Jergal was depowered seneschal during the folly. And years before you can get back to with the obelisks. Good to know.
is not really negative years, the primary calendar in the forgotten realms uses DR as year 0 https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Marking_the_years#Dalereckoning_(DR)
BDR then, you get what I was saying
and is not so much depowered, as he gave up much of his power willingly, at least i would not call it "jergal being depowered"
cuz usually someone being depowered usually suggests or implies that it was involuntary
Downgraded then, no longer a greater deity during that time. Wonder if he planned it
Think of -X DR like Julian calendar's BCE.
357 BDR 339 BDR, Jergal first then Karsus.
eh, more so he acted on an opportunity when it presented itself conveniently https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Dead_Three#History https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Jergal#History
I was mostly thinking about the whole Ythryn thing, what Jergal and Vecna would be doing around then. I’m doing a meta-campaign plot
Also I read something about Jergal manipulating Netheril, specifically Bhaal(not his real name) and Karsus
cuz far as i know, Jergal did not set them down their path to covet his power, the dead 3 set on that goal all on their own
not really
I came across something that Jergal was alien, and an ascended Weaver
the divine spark is mentioned being from the being Maram https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Maram
Weaver/Spellweaver
Maram was also one of the 7 lost gods https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Seven_Lost_Gods
and at least from what i am seeing, Jergal has no connection to Maram in any way
and given how dutiful he is, i doubt Jergal planned it, even if he grew bored of the responsibilities he had at the time and thus desired a smaller and more simple role
so seems more likely that he simply acted on the opprotunity provided from the dark 3's hunger for power and their exploits towards gaining that power
“All according to plan” is what I’ve heard, some prophecy about him splitting his power among three gods that would die and be reborn, and secret knowledge spread among the body of Kyuss (worms?) and that absorbing it all he’d be on par or above Ao
Kyuss is an entirely unrelated entity
Anybody have a good place to start w dnd lore?
Which settting?
you are likely thinking of the bit of Kyuss' history regarding the time of troubles which is more indirect
dnd has multiple settings, some lore overlaps, others are specific to the setting, and then there is the matter of multiple continuities depending on edition and the media that is expressing the lore
so is not necessarily one singular "good place to start" for any and all cases
Also, each DM dictates what lore is used in their campaign setting. So the best way to ask your DM since they may not use any official D&D campaign settings.
Yeah, down in the Lore section, it starts going on about Jergal, during the Ssarukh empire
not seeing where you are getting that, i have looked up and down the entire page multiple times now and am not seeing any mention of the Ssarukh empire, let alone in relation to Jergal
Hmm, different page then?
Oh I see now, different fandom. Is this just fanfic lore I found?
Thats not the forgotten realms wiki, to say the least
My bad, I was just reading it and it was about Toril
So everything I said was wrong.
It was compelling though, and I might keep it.
Also the spellweavers being six-armed multi-planar empire via portals, I wonder if Aoskar in the Planescape book has anything to do with the Spellweavers. The picture of his body in the Spire rift looks multi-limbed and blank faced like the race
none that is documented on the forgotten realms wiki, also from what i can tell, there is nothing to suggest the being in the artwork you are thinking of has anything to do with Aoskar, let alone that being in the background being ment to be him
Anyone know if Mammon has a crest or symbol that his followers would wear?
Are there any 5e Books that contain a lot more information on the world of Greyhawk/Oerth (Similar to Shadows of the Dragon Queen for Dragonlance/Krynn) As a few things are not making sense with some of the adventures I've ran and what I've been reading in Vecna: Eve of Ruin
No. 5E has pretty much ignored the Greyhawk setting other than Ghost of Saltmarsh (the original modules were set in Greyhawk but the 5E book made them setting agnostic).
I have read through that but it wasn't very informative.
I figured it would be like a coin or gem, but sometimes they throw you curves
Greyhawk has pretty much fallen out of favour as a setting since 3E (it was the default setting from 1E to mid-3E).
I hear its gonna be the one for the new PHB though, but thats offtopic
As well as Dark Sun, and a few others. I just wish I could get a bit more information on it so I can....add in sub-quests/adventures/modules/etc while the party is realm hopping in Vecna Eve of Ruin.
You will need to go back to the books from the older editions to get lore for those settings.
5E is relatively lore light, even for FR lore.
But Ebberon got not 1 book but 2 regarding it's lore rolls eyes
¯_(ツ)_/¯
Oh well. Life is that which it is.
For 5e? Not officially
Is "Wayfinder's Guide to Eberron" not offically 5e / official?
It was.
Wayfinders A) wasn't a book, it was essentially just a small UA type document and B) is superceded by Rising
ahh okay
it was more so UA in the form of a living source, ie updating automatically
was basically the UA for the book we would actually get one could argue
Not just argue, it's what it was marketed as
Alright I get it. That makes a bit more sense.
i would say ask the creator of the setting for such info if not wanting to wait for wizards to put out some, but unfortunately gary gygax has long since passed away, so that is simply not an option that you have with other settings like Forgotten realms or Eberron
so best you can do, since they likely are hesitant to risk "ruining" it since is such an important part of dnd's history, is look up past published materials and simply use rational and logical thinking of how things may have changed over time, people who are fans of the setting could likely help you with that in #dm-world-building
There are still communities (including Youtubers) dedicated to the Greyhawk setting. If you want to know more than check them out.
especially the likes of AJ Pickett, just to name one, who are known for being rather credible, not just in regards to greyhawk, but the published lore they cover in general
I'll check them out and see if I can get an idea of things.
honestly, most important in regards to published lore might be anything included in the new vecna adventure as otherwise is likely a couple hundred years could have passed on Oerth
but that is assuming it has any info touching on the state of Oerth in it, idk cuz i don't own the adventure
Greyhawk hasn't really been updated (officially) since 3E.
and even then what we have gotten, mainly via certain adventures, i believe is specific points in time of the setting, not nessissarily it's most recent times
else you'd probably have to dig up and try to extrapolate from any off handed remarks the 2 main characters from that setting known to travel to others, even in 5e, Mordenkainen and Tasha/Iggwilv, who both had their own remakes and or notes in books for 5e, though some times these things are just quips more so than any sort of lore
5e saltmarsh is very much set in greyhawk. You can put it into any setting but it has a fair bit of Greyhawk stuff in it that you'd have to change up
is there a lot of info about the wider world? No.
but even then, it is as i understand it a 5e retelling of the original adventures, so at best just helps you figure out what it was like in that area of the setting at that point in time for the 5e continuity
I did say that but they downplayed the Greyhawk aspect to make it more setting agnostic.
and off the top of my head i don't even know when those events would even be set, cuz idk the setting's calander system, but i doubt they use DR
I remember when it was being promoted it was very much shot down that it was greyhawk at the time and that it was setting agnostic. Its obviously greyhawk but that was the messaging
Gygax wasn't really involved in Greyhawk beyond 1e tbf, and a lot of 1e Greyhawk was also different writers.
There were some 4e Greyhawk content in Dungeon and Dragon Magazine, but it was pretty sparse.
well to my knowledge the setting was still originally his creation, much like ed greenwood and keith baker with their respective settings
That's not really a lore question but more of a #character-discussion one.
Then are there examples of peaceful vengance paladins?
Again, that's not really a lore question. Lore deals with what has happened in official campaign settings.
Discuss WotC-published game settings, and the events and characters that shaped them. Wherever possible, please indicate which setting you're discussing: [Forgotten Realms]/[FR], [Eberron], [Dragonlance], etc.
Remember that classes are gameplay mechanics.
Greyhawk's an odd duck.
Gygax made the city and Dyvers, and some of the Flanaess, but when it came to making the setting he at first didn't actually understand why any DM would want another DM's setting. But they did, so Greyhawk was patched together from existing modules and with notes from other writers as well.
Lakofka wrote most of the pantheon and a lot of the history behind the ethnicities. Some of the articles in the boxset were lifted whole cloth from earlier dragon magazines written by fans (like weather in greyhawk). So yes it was spearheaded by Gygax and was 'his' setting, but Greyhawk as we have it in the boxset was never just written by Gygax. It was always multiple writers and patchwork by the time it reached players.
Gygax also left in 1e. After that Greyhawk was primarily spearheaded by Carl Sargent who wrote a fair amount of the world events and lore for other places, along with other writers.
Now TBF, most settings are multiple writers by the time they reach players, but I feel like FR and Eberron were more individually world build before being introduced to multiple writers, where as the Greyhawk we know was patchwork from the start and never just one person.
There are no oaths on lore?
#dnd-discussion or #character-discussion would be a better place to discuss about sub-classes.
The lore we have on the class would suggest no:
The tenets of the Oath of Vengeance vary by paladin, but all the tenets revolve around punishing wrongdoers **by any means necessary. Paladins who uphold these tenets are willing to sacrifice even their own righteousness to mete out justice upon those who do evil, **so the paladins are often neutral or lawful neutral in alignment.
surely there's a place here to discuss lore on classes and subclasses, which do in fact exist in the context of the game settings
Yeah, it’s kinda like asking if Batman can be peaceful. Not very likely.
e.g. the class entries in the Sword Coast Adventurer's Guide have lots of lore
Classes are game mechanics and not really diegetic to game lore. A character who's a ranger class may call themselves a warrior in game as would a fighter or barbarian.
Taps channel's sign:
Discuss WotC-published game settings, and the events and characters that shaped them. Wherever possible, please indicate which setting you're discussing: [Forgotten Realms]/[FR], [Eberron], [Dragonlance], etc.
side-eyes wizards who literally call themselves wizards
there's plenty of setting information that does present classes as actually existing under the same name in-world
That's more flavour to describe the sub-classes than actual lore (probably with the exception of the Purple Dragon Knights, who are a knightly order of Cormyr...)
Magic-user, mages, wizards... different names of the same official class throughout the editions.
There is lore on classes and there can be legitimate lore questions on classes and their mechanics. How does divine magic work, why are bards arcane, where do paladins get their powers from can be lore questions and have answers in the lore. There is flavour around the classes and that is lore.
But at times the game mechanics are simply mechanics and are game conveniences.
For this particular question the lore answer is 'We don't have a lot of examples of venegnce paladin characters in the lore to really say, but the flavour text for the class would suggest no.'
FWIW, I do think that a mod engaging in the convo instead of fully redirecting just goes to show that, to a degree, there is room for that discussion, but I’ll let Elgate speak for herself
Sure, and that's why I was trying to redirect them to a channel that would be more appropriate to explore that sub-class.
when she rephrased her question to ask about examples of peaceful vengeance paladins, that was pretty firmly a lore question, I think. Which Elgate has now answered. The original question is probably better for #character-discussion, I agree.
Which would be useful if she was asking about the mechanics or if it was possible to play this alignment or so on. The question can be answered with lore- it's just not a very long answer because there isn't much lore.
WotC gave us minimum flavour for the class/sub-classes because they want us not to beholden to any particular lore to it other than a foundation of what that class is and how it differentiates from other classes of similiar nature.
'How can I play a peaceful vegence paladin' would 100% be character discussion.
But in general I would advise against being too strict on dismissing questions about classes and game mechanics as 'Not lore'. As they can and do intersect. So you can try and give what answers lore does have as scant as that might be, and then direct to a channel that is better suited to exploring that concept outside the confines of what text we can actually quote from the books.
So yes, the vengeance paladin's flavour is based upon the tenets of its oath.
honestly, given it's tenets i find it hard for, maybe even impossible, for a paladin of vengeance, or avenger as they are sometimes called in the realms, to be a pacifist, assuming that was what they ment by peaceful, given the tenet about "by any means necessary" and not break their oath, and such behavior would be more in line with the tenets of the oaths of the ancients
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Avenger
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Paladin#Oath_of_the_Ancients
though honestly i doubt one dedicated to peace to the point of non violence would even train to become a paladin of any sort
I do wanna give the benefit of the doubt and say that the tenets presented in the subclasses are meant to be examples. The oath itself is supposed to be an individual thing for the Paladin, but WOTC wanted to provide some ideas.
That said, if we look at the example given for Vengeance, I wouldn’t say peace is a priority for them.
"Vengeance" isn't really synonymous with "peace"...
Yeah, kinda hard to defend the notion when their other monikers are “avengers” and “dark knights”.
Big comic book movie vibes there.
What exactly were the Dragon-Giant wars called again?
Thousand Year War
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Thousand_Year_War
Thank you OldMan!
quick question, has it ever been noted if Vecna was cappable of binding stronger extraplanar deities to his service?
He's not that powerful of a deity. I think he's only a lesser god.
He got his hand handed to him by the Lady of Pain when he successfully entered Sigil (all deities and powers of the Inner and Outer Planes are forbidden to enter the City of Doors).
Apparently (and don’t ask me for a source) there’s an earlier edition adventure where he promotes from lesser to greater. That said, he seems to definitely a “deity” who just can’t quite get that promotion right.
(I admittedly don’t have the quote or source for the adventure where he goes from lesser to greater deity, I’m just speaking from secondhand info.)
I don't know where he's a greater deity.
I think he’s considered greater in the Dawn War pantheon and in Exandria
Well... I have opinions on the validity of CR lore here...
Matt Mercer isn't WotC...
But Exandria officially is, like it or not
Anyway, I'll stop there.
But the sake of my knowledge of official lore I don't consider Vecna a greater god and I won't address him as such.
And even prior to Exandria, Vecna was listed as a Dawn War deity in the 5E DMG, so it’s not like he wasn’t intended to be significant.
How could he be around in the Dawn War since he was a mortal...
he is from the dawn war pantheon as of the 5e dmg
sigh;
"in the dawn war pantheon" isn't the same thing as being a part of the dawn war
Sigh as much as you’d like man, it is what it is
True he could be part of the pantheon without being in the actual Dawn War.
Feels like you might actually agree with the Exandria lore then tbh, where he wasn’t originally part of the pantheon but found his way in
"This pantheon draws in several nonhuman deities and establishes them as universal gods."
"Several of the gods are drawn from other pantheons, sometimes with new names for the gods. Bane comes from the Forgotten Realms. From Greyhawk come Kord, Pelor, Tharizdun, and Vecna."
Right, it's more of name of the pantheon than actual gods that were in the Dawn War.
And again, I constantly bring this up, it’s gonna be setting dependent.
I always like to remind people that in a handful of settings, Vecna is a god. In others, he’s still an archlich.
Right. Which the Exandria pantheon was based on
no, cuz despite his divinity from what i know, Vecna still conducts himself very much like a wizard would, also far as i know spells that could bind or expell gods are only a thing in high/epic magic, the sort of thing that takes a great many archmages working in unison, so i doubt he could bind another god into his service unless he was just more powerful than said deity as such alliances are formed for the sake of their own protection will sometimes ally under a stronger deity, my go to example of this is the Gods of Fury, which is led by Talos https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Gods_of_Fury
honestly, vecna being in exandria and repeating his story from greyhawk, even if mainly in the broader strokes, gives my own lore loving nerd brain a bit of a headache so i try to not think about Exandria in regards to how it relates to other published settings when possible ^^;
It leans into the headache that is WOTC trying (and struggling) to engage in a multiverse plot
I’m all for Vecna and/or other gods showing up in different settings, I just want to be explicitly advised as to what his role is in each setting.
and mainly hurts my head cuz to my knowledge they never addressed how it consolidates if at all with himself from the more proper published continuity of dnd by wizards of the coast
well is a lot easier cuz it makes sense when they are already gods, like the raven queen, vecna's time as a mortal on exandria specifically is what makes that version of him hard to think of as being able to work along side his other lore
Hopefully with the new 2024 books they’ll do a better job of understanding what the multiverse plan is. Admittedly, I’m not super convinced.
Remember that Exandria started off as a home game that used many of "default" D&D deities (most of whom are from Greyhawk). The grey issue is that CR had two books published by WotC despite keeping their own IP. Apparently they're moving away from those deities for legal reasons (I haven't watch Campaign 3 but that's what I read).
like if Exandria vecna was not at any point a mortal, it would make him appearing in the setting infinitely easier to consolidate
Doesn’t really matter too much what it started off as, only what WOTC published. Only what WOTC ultimately officially published.
Prior to what WOTC published, everything was effectively Homebrew.
or 3rd party
moving away from those deities for legal reasons
no, just names and titles. still the same deities as they've been
but when they put the setting out with wizards of the coast, that made it a lore lover headache more or less
Which is Homebrew with money enough to get attention
Well, same difference. Their self published CR books use the same deities but not the names.
They had one name they couldn’t use because it was PF. And it wasn’t Vecna
no more than any other lore "discrepancies" between settings. Especially with gods like Tiamat and takhisis
different origins, different lore, same god
yeah but again, the part that makes it a pain for me is exandrian vecna going from mortal to god, despite the vecna we know presumably already being a thing
Elgate would know but one book (I think it was a 2E or 3E one) that basically said the gods have echoes of themselves in each cosomology. So if Lolth is somehow killed in one campaign she's still around in another campaign. That's why gods are VERY hard to permanently kill.
(I've brought this up before and she did mention the book but I forgot the name)
but thats my point. from a lore perspective its no different than literally any other god who has different lore and origins between different settings
like i tried asking mercer via twitter, before it became X, to how if at all it consolidated with vecna from wizards of the coast's lore, but never got an answer
Hence my point about setting dependency. Which again, now that WOTC is doubling down on the multiverse stuff, isn’t easy. But when you look at the Echoes lore from Fizban’s, it makes it easier.
far as i know with like the whole tiamat and takhisis thing they were always gods or god like beings
like the part that confuses and makes my head about vecna hurt in that setting was their whole divine barrier and vecna being born as a mortal first on that world before he became a god
and they still have different origins
Not to spoil the newest adventure module or anything, but it encourages different worlds and timelines having different versions of the same character.
being mortal or not at one point in the history doesn't change anything
Especially when yknow. The non exandrian vecna was also a mortal at one point in history
yeah, but far as i know exandrian vecna came after og vecna already had been a god for some time
The Eve of Ruin Vecna is theoretically not a god, so it shouldn’t be that much of a mind blower
like if we had info confirming that it does not take place at that point and is before og vecna became a god, then i could accept that a bit easier
5E’s OG Vecna was already a god as of the DMG
which again, from a setting perspective, is no different than the same thing happening with any other gods. Having different (even conflicting) origins as well as potentially "existing" at different times
what are you talking about? he is a god in that adventure, they make that clear in the marketing, last i checked
heck, you don't even need to be a god for this to be the case
Powerful beings, such as dragons and ||archfey|| (eve of ruin spoilers) can have multiple versions of themselves running around at completely different points in time and completely different histories
(and this isn't a new thing for 5e either, as oldman mentioned earlier)
honestly i still feel it would help at least if they had come out with a statement or something regarding that detail, i know i would appreciate it, cuz far as i know that sort of thing normally isn't even implied with mortals much if at all
Dang, you’re right. All the more reason to consider the different gods from different settings
Again, I think when we start to look at the Fizban’s lore of different significant beings from different settings, it just starts to feel sloppy.
dragons
fizban's only cements it in regards to dragons
Still doesn’t change the fact that Vecna is not at the same level of godliness at every setting
No they don’t
and i'm not going to discuss the spoiler here
well divine power varies from setting to setting for multispherical powers in relation to their worship, that applies to all gods, not just vecna, and far as i know is nothing new
They have a sidebar that actively mentions significant NPCs and locations that have Echoes in different settings
Hence why the Tomb of Horrors can appear in any setting
it attributes that to the locations and powerful magical items, not the npcs themseslves
Fizban’s also suggest that even PCs can interact with or replace their Echoes
and even then it ties them to dragons and dragon slayers
I’d quote it out of the book, but I don’t wanna get in trouble for sharing paid content
not exactly, it says, regarding the tomb of horrors, to partialy quote "The Tomb of Horrors is one such site, crafted by the lich Acererak, whose uncountable evils included slaughtering metallic dragons for the magic of their blood." end quote
and even then it is not saying such locations just appear in any setting cuz of it
Again, not gonna share paid content at the risk of getting a mod smackdown, but I promise you there’s plenty in Fizban’s that suggests locations and magic items aren’t the only things that have Echoes
reading it in full myself just now, it seems more likely you are misinterpreting what is being described
closest thing i am aware of is the remarks of stuff revolving around the dunamancy stuff when the vids promoting wildemount was coming out, far s i know that outside of that setting, the idea of it applying to mortals has not appeared in any published lore i am aware of
granted there may be something in the new vecna adventure, but i don't own it yet so i can't check what it says specifically on such a thing
Do any adventures talk about the gods of D&D? Like a Avandra or anyone else?
Plenty. Which setting though?
Not sure about specific adventures, but I know that the Basic Rules has some information on Gods in the Forgotten Realms.
Theres a lot of adventures that feature or reference gods in them
Annamm, Lathander, Tiamat, Bahamut, the Lady of Pain, etc etc
Wait is avandra been renamed goddesss of change ?
Does she appear in 5e that isnt Critical Role stuff?
i think most of the stuff shes been in that isnt critical role is from 4e
Yes, you're correct. She's from the deities listed in 4E.
(Matt Mercer was influenced by 4E, I believe in many aspects)
So do the gods from 4e exists in 5e? I know that sounds silly but I just kinda started in 5e
Deities aren't limited to editions but rather the setting.
There are different pantheons in Forgotten Realms than Greyhawk or Dragonlance.
The Dark Sun setting has no deities at all.
So Descent into Avernus is like an Asmodeus kinda setting. 9 hells and stuff
Asmodeus is a greater god and the head archdevil of the Nine Hells.
Can someone recommend some forgotten fantasy realms books that may be good to read. Trying to get better at this lore thing
honestly the wiki is a really good source for deity information bc it has stuff from adventures, source books, novels, and other things that are counted as canon
Ok cool.
The Forgotten Realms has a lot of deities and that setting only covers the continent of Faerun.
you could start at the avatar crisis and just open tabs from there, it has a lot of important events and a lotttt of deities involved
That's quite the rabbit hole you just suggested!
lol if he's really interested it'll lead him anywhere he wants to go
I think it would be cool to live by codes and be a devout worshiper of a god and make choices based on the gods approval. Don’t know if the DM would love to have to incorporate that but still love that idea. Kinda like the idea of the gods actually making differences on adventures and stuff.
thats def how you should play paladin and a cleric but a non-divine caster doing that could be interesting
Gods are very hands off -- they have hundreds of thousands or millions of worshippers, so they let their proxies hand the "day-to-day" management of followers.
I’m trying to go to the correct wiki
Anyway, this is heading towards #character-discussion ...
There is not ONE pantheon of deities in the Forgotten Realms but probably dozen plus...
actually while we're on the topic of deities, do clerics have the ability to cast spells outside of crystal spheres (in wildspace) bc it would be outside the gods domain
Crystal Spheres no longer exist in 5e
No I don't think that answers your question but it's what I can offer to this discussion 🙂
oh there we go lol
