#overclocking
1 messages ยท Page 97 of 1
I've never had my 5700xt crash while oc'ing, since they artifact so damn early
Raising VCCPLL?
Oh VCCVTT
That one helps ring
yes everything else on auto haha
Raised VCCPLL is likely counter intuitive
oh well I'll remember that when I actually dial in CPU OC after these memory shenanigans end haha
Since VCCPLL heavily related to PCIe instability
did you mess with these VCC18 PCH or VCC1V8P settings... they say "this can be useful in certain overclocking configurations."
I was like "oh wow that might be useful... now what?" haha
Doubt it
I was able to get rid of the PCIe instability by messing with DRAM termination (previously mentioned) but occasionally it'll come back
Maybe if you are overclocking PCIe
Yeah it helps
hmm so you're saying the way to get POST on 1T (which will in turn allow higher frequencies) is to play with RttNom, Wr, & Park?
Can help
If you are having PCIe instability though, VCCPLL at 0.95~1 is a good idea
I got it with Rev.E above 4600
I think I've been looking for like "fix-all" type things that I need to accept just arent't out there
Oh but there is. It's called running single rank 
for the longest time I was taking shots in the dark with IO/SA combinations trying to POST 4400 but I just said to hell with it & went with 4000
that's on spreadsheet two of that thing I showed you
I haven't done a summer oc so... this says it all
nightmare
Wow
lookin a little loose there haha
xmp
hmm
Problem is in summer it's over 10C hotter so I really do have to adapt to it
maybe I'll put everything on auto except command rate/SA/IO/DRAM & set frequency at 5000
& keep dropping one level to see where 1T POSTs
๐ 5000
lol don't laugh at my dreams damn
okay let me back up & ask I stupid question I should know the answer to already
two 16gb sticks... that's dual rank?
chips on both sides is dual rank right?
lol
Not necessarily but in most cases yes
If it's a udimm and as more then 9 chips it's at least dual rank
Yes
I did it with a single patriot 4133 a2 stick
so it's not impossible for me, just highly improbable
And patriots pcb is just op
Pretty much impossible
and "op" means...? lol
over powered!
I did 4533 with the patriots on the z390 aorus pro
I don't have to say more
It's a t-top 4 layer
I think Discord is for people after my generation haha
What do you mean?
I'm too old to be down with lingo
nevermind
so 5000 ftw
(learned what ftw was on Discord btw)
when I got my EVGA GPU I'm like FTW3 that's cool
didn't click until later
good luck
no for real tho you think 4600 is a decent place to start coming down from?
5k is nonsense I know
4600 is high too for dr, though people have done it on other boards
4500?
I do like this board because my Z490 couldn't do 51x all core but this one could
still no idea why
my bin is pretty bad tho. I need 1.415 vCore to hit 51x, which is like 1.305v VRVOUT
Boot failure detected. No surprise there
do you set training voltage btw?
whew that's high voltage
I don't need to
ya... they say don't bother delid 10900K but I think mine could be exception
looking back on this sheet of crazy I was able to POST 4400 a few times
might have to retry those settings now that I know more about getting PCIe errors to go away
thanks again btw
No problem!
I think it'd help mine too
would be pretty crappy to destroy it by accident tho
wow
ya that makes mine look like straight trash haha
my 5900x is decent bin tho I think
hopefully that'll make Master Forks slightly happy haha
do SA/IO help with POSTing 1T?
is 1T a timing that scales with voltage...?
It's a 10850K too which is nuts
It can
I keep hearing how good that CPU is
this is what my cpu is reading at right now
with nothing going on
The clock speed for VRAM seems weird to me
Times it by 4 or 8 & then it's not so weird, unless you meant it's weirdly high.

So I have a motherboard that supports 4800mhz ram but I have 2 sticks of 6000mhz can I overclock my motherboard so it supports 6000mhz or do I have to underclock the ram
You cannot overclock your motherboard, you should be able to enable xmp, might need to adust some voltages to get it to work tho
Not great, not terrible, had 8L to burn off https://hwbot.org/submission/4894993_forks_geekbench3___multi_core_core_i9_9900k_52909_points
Ya beat buildzoid at least
Somebody teach me how to get DDR4-4800 stable on this 12700k before I blow away my last brain cell
1R S8B, 1.3V VCCSA, 1.6 vDIMM, 0.775 VTT
This errors after a couple minutes
1.6v on vdimm? You must have good airflow to keep that stable
open bench, Arctic P12 directly on the DIMMs
never go above 40C on the sensor
I loosed up all the secondaries and terts from this, bumped tCL to 18, and it will still error at least once within 5-10 minutes
I've tried 1.65V, doesn't make a difference
I tried RTTs a little bit. Previously, reducing them helped improve stability, but I had to increase RTTs with this BIOS for previously stable OCs. I didn't mess with the RTTs much yet because I don't really know what I'm doing with those
And if I loosen tCL to 19 or more, it just fails to POST
What kit is it? Very few retail kits can do 4800 reliably without binning, lol.
I know it's alder lake, but I'd think the ram still has to be up to the task.
Crucial disagrees :)
is 7-Zip not a benchmark anyone cares about on HWbot?
was all proud I got 5th & doesn't even show up on Wegg submissions. heck
FlareX 3200 14-14-14 bin
I know you need binning, but this kit was doing so well right up to 4600, it's heartbreaking to stop right there lol
Between bdie and the imc, probably not going to be able to be daily stable tbh
And z690 bioses being generally garbage across the board
Lol, true, I meant b-die
what can i overclock these to
3200cl16 maybe 3600cl18
cl=cas
ik
it says 3000mhz cl16
no
and can i do 3000mhz 14cl?
3200cl16 should work tho
lol noooooooooooooooo
oh
maybe tighter than xmp timings tho
16-18-18-36 is this one
you might be able to get 3200 16 17 17 36 stable but i doubt it
okay
then try 1 timing down 1 test again
testmem 5 is a ram stress test, extreme anta is the profile
you just download testmem 5, choose extreme anta profile and let it run
ok
I did 3466 14-14-14 on my 1700X + X370
you should be able to do 3000 14-14-14, if your memory is capable of it
Their memory likely won't be, it's a 3000 c16 oloy kit...
oof
Could probably do 3200c16 at least
Yep, 200MHz a lot easier than 16 to 14 cL lol
Any insight on how to tweak RTTs and ODTs (or other obscure settings) on Intel for high frequency (4500+)?
S8B 1R, Z690 Edge, 12700k
I know that on AM4, reducing ProcODT makes it a bit harder to train, but allows more aggressive timings. Curious if there are similar settings on Z690 and how to tweak those
At this point I'll settle for ycruncher stable (without maxmem)
Also running super low (<36) procODT with high vDIMM can degrade IMC apparently
Easiest quickest fix was actually just running Windows troubleshooter, actually worked
Took the wr gold from dual epyc. Can do wtrs 3, wtrl 6, cwl 12, and 4.3 core, but maybe with the rad out the window. https://hwbot.org/submission/4896644_forks_hwbot_x265_benchmark___4k_ryzen_threadripper_3990x_106.396_fps
Is this artifacting or just bad shadows
I'd guess artifacting although sometimes hard to tell
try changing shadow settings and/or AA settings
and texture settings
Never seen "normal" artifacting due to unstable OC look like that. Try time spy gt2
It kind of reminds me of effects on further away objects when the object LOD setting is turned down
What should i expect with rev e C9BJZ btw?
It's often brainless like that.
How do you know it's C9BJZ?
If you are using thaiphoon it's likely lying
Claims my 2x16 3200 rev.e kit is C9BJZ, which isn't correct
what die is 1 die?
thats all it says for me in thaiphoon
manufacturer is samsung
or is it just 1 die
Ahh okay i was using taiphoon, I'll try check the sticker
In my experience taiphoon is terrible at guessing Samsung dies especially, what kit do you have?
corsair vengeance lpx 3200
I can almost guarantee samsung c die but if you send me a picture of the label on the stick of ram i can tell you for sure
Sticker won't tell you either
Ver 4.32 supposed to be Samsung c die it seems
Ohh dam how am i supposed to know then?
You don't
Ahh well then
I got a potato cpu it can't OC past 1866mhz fclk
๐ I thought I got 1900mhz stable but it started getting wheas after 30mins of stress test
Any recommendations? I'm unsure what voltages work best, undervolting VDDP seemed to help it last longer without errors though
depends on a lot of factors other than just cpu tbh
my 5800x can do ~2000 with sr mem, 1900 with dr and 1866 with qr
I can boot with up to 2000 but it gets wheas like crazy
not from what I can see
Lower procodt to 40 ohms, then i can't tell exactly what youf soc vddp voltages are but try
Vsoc 1.125v
Cldo vddp 1.05
Vddg ccd 1.065
Vddg iod 1.065
Rn they are 1.2v, 1.1v, 0.94v, 1.1v
That's what I set in ryzen master at least xD
Change them to what i said, soc above 1.15 and 1.25v can have negative effects
Getting whea errors still :/
Ohh yeah, don't use ryzen master, delete it and use bios
I'm used to OCing an FX9370 relearning all this is oof
Thanks for the help
I thought in the last 9 years they Advanced enough that ryzen master could be used instead of bios xD
The software is useable but i don't see software ever becoming as good as bios
Fair enough
whats wrong with ryzen master? seems easy to use and fine for testing, right?
couldnt imaging having to restart your whole pc just to change a single thing in bios to test it
Ryzen master requires a reboot to adjust settings BUT if it was unstable or failed to boot you could easily disable the OC instead of resetting cmos every failed attempt
Which is why I did it
for every setting adjustment?
even so, me trying to help a friend through some absolutely dogs*** msi gui is pain.
i wish gui bioses would vanish from existence
so I want to oc my intel 11th gen laptop igpu but the only sensor I have is VID
stock is 1450mhz with VID 1.0v and I can run -20mV undervolt tested stable
so if I run this 1700mhz it shows VID 1.31v
You can change them to text only right?
is that +300mV offset applied after VID or to VID?
I briefly tested it before restarting and reverting because I was afraid it could be 1.61V
is it better to just stay safe and not oc if the only sensor available is VID?
Gui bios? Wdym by that
I mean you gotta restart every time and you can use a command to reboot to bios instead and put it in a bat file ยฏ_(ใ)_/ยฏ
1650MHz with +75mV offset had 1.088 VID
game crashed
1700mV with +150mV offset 1.16 VID
so yeah I think the VID includes the offset
anything that doesnt look like a bios from 2006
anything that doesnt look like this
is bad imo
Can you not use tab and arrow keys on most modern bios's too tho?
doesnt change the fact that the layouts are confusing as hell
i shouldn't have to use the tab key tf
Fair lol
Voltage adjustment in RM is cringe. You can't really adjust LLC and other things outside bios too.
i see
no memory either
and no presets that you can apply on startup
and their stress test is a joke
MSI bios is confusing at first, I do prefer Asus layout. But after you get through the confusing layout, I like it
LEGENDARY LOL
Wow
Well with only a few data points from that model of Intel graphics...
what happened there?
Sadly getting wheas at those voltage settings @sudden torrent ๐
Woops
Meant someone else, sorry
How is procodt adjusted in bios? I can't find it
Usually it's under some advanced memory overclock menu. If MSI, then you need to enable the advanced options first on the main overclock menu.
Wow that's like 1/3 of an r9 380 lol
As integrated xD
Also mobile for that matter
ran it on integrated graphics
For some reason my vSOC runs 0.03v lower than what I set it to
That's called droop, it's normal
You can reduce the droop by increasing your load line calibration setting
yeah, it's not even UHD 750, it's unnamed
not sure why
they could have named it UHD 755 or something lol
Possibly. It could also indicate a voltage is too high, making it unstable later in the test
More voltage = more heat
Not cpu temp so much as memory temp
I have fans on the ram, but true I will check the temps
Bottom of mem settings
Yee I figured it out ๐
Nice
Should vSOC go below 1 volt if I'm trying to overclock fclk?
My soc is at 1.025v with fclk at 1900. Ymmv, but more isn't always better
I was just as surprised tbh. But it actually got less stable above 1.1v
Interesting
It was the same with vddg. 1.05v was fine but any higher wouldn't pass. Currently at 0.95v
Ahh, according to memtesthelper on github, vddg should be at least 40mv over vsoc so i guess that makes sense
Yea I will try a bit higher then
I can only set vsoc in 0.01v increments
Is that normal?
Yes
Okay someone recommended starting at 1.125v lol
That's still technically a safe voltage
That gpu to CPU score ratio is hilarious.
yeah i'm not sure why the cpu score is lower than usual though i wonder if the igpu affects it somehow
exact same laptop
I've found that cpu/gpu effects eachother somewhat, and/or 3dmark isn't perfect for giving a score also. That cpu drop is nuts though. I've been doing a bunch of 3dmark for the big 3gen to 11gen change 
Could make sense, more heat from igpu
and peak cpu temp was 79C so no heat soak problems
maintained 4.6ghz all core for the whole run
Ahh gotcha
my power limit is set insanely high
so shouldn't be any issues with igpu stealing power budget
and that's evident by the cpu clock graph being completely flat
Any of you guys running x58? There's an ambient cooling comp. https://warp9-systems.proboards.com/thread/1693/official-x58-competition-warp9-systems
[Official] X58 60 day Competition | Warp9-systems January 1st through February 28th Prizes: Sub-Zero winner gets | triple channel Kings
I got legendary for this one. LOL https://www.3dmark.com/spy/25373329
lmao
3dmark vantage gpu score just got added as a bench https://hwbot.org/benchmark/3dmark_vantage_-_performance_(gpu)/rankings?cores=1#start=0#interval=20
Pick up some hardware points ๐
Knocked a bit of time off the ycruncher score, subbed for those season points, can't let seby keep the lead https://hwbot.org/submission/4901436_forks_y_cruncher___pi_1b_ryzen_threadripper_3990x_10sec_848ms
What gpu?
Download 3d mark on steam
And msi afterburner
Push gpu power all the way too the right, +core in 50's til ya crash, dial back 15 til stable
Then once you get core do mem or vice versa
Start with +500 on mem, +100 until unstable, dial back til stable,
Run timespy every time you make change (except the power)
run 3x timespy or like 10 mins in furmark/occt gpu mode to make sure final one is stable before switching for core to mem or mem to core
Thank
Welc
If this isn't pinned it should be
I mean the start values and + values aren't universal they were just rough ones ik would work on 3080 cuz that's what they got
Ah
Use a binary search approach for testing clocks - test an optimistic value, if that fails, test halfway between that and your low estimate, repeat.
Time spy graphics test 2 works well for core + mem, remember that you can see performance regression before instability, especially with memory.
can someone dig through my HWiNFO log and tell me what im missing. My pc keeps getting wonky when i run something Fullscreen for a while. I reset the clock ratios to default and nothing changed, i even set it to auto and nothing, so im not sure if its OC related but something fishy is going on.
Sure send a screenshot
For thermal pad replacement should i try find/buy a caliper to find thickness or do you think a ruler would be accurate enough?
You need a certain thickness for a specific purpose? I expect they are made in certain. Thicknesses and you can get a pretty good idea based on a scale ruler. But if you don't have a thickness gauge, it's useful to have from time to time.
Yes, if you replace thermal pads and thickness not right you'll either bend the pcb/metal if they're too big, or not make contact at all if too small
Harbor freight thickness scale I bought years ago for less than $20. It came with a nice wooden case and all. Not a bad investment.
and if it saves you just 1 PCB it pays for itself many times over
Well i don't neeed to do it so if it's not safe i just wont tbh
I'll have a look into one, not particularly looking forward to spending much money on something I'll probs use once maybe twice
You'll be surprised. I've found a use for it about once a year. But I bought it when I needed it for work regularly
thats the log file i started logging, ran furmark and it crashed as expected
I cannot check that , on phone
kk
Different brands of pads will compress differently, can't go 100% by manufacturer spec, just have to press the card to the cooler and test fit.
That's fair, ive found couple measurements online with varying degree but i might just leave for the moment and see how the repaste will help
A 3770K is a bit of a bottleneck.... https://www.3dmark.com/pr/1391420
I guess I should skip the I3-3240
anyone else getting free upgrades to their internet? Oo
Nice upload. No, just the usual 360Mbps DL on service labeled as 300. Although in the past there was a "free" upgrade from 75 to 100+.
ctc has set me no info on higher speeds. after my internet was down last week for a few hours, it came back up to the new higher speeds. I am supposed to be getting 250d/250u
Try speedtest or some other place. That's a huge difference, lol.
speeds are also just wacky from day to day
I sometimes get 400/100, sometimes 500/500, sometimes 500/100, sometimes 100/100, who knows
Looks like you basically have gigabit now almost for some reason, lol. Which router & modem are you using though?
modem/router combo comes from my isp, no numbers listed on the outside of the device at all. I had to find that info by logging in. but here it is since you asked. it looks like ps2 lol
I have the infamous arris sb6190 & still on my old r6400v2 netgear. Soon I'll have a modern wifi 6 router. Nice speed & ping you have though. Almost 3 times mine, plus typical sub-50mbit UL.
never dreamed i would ever be able to afford these speeds, never mind seeing them in the realworld for residential. eh
if it matters, its costing me around 95$us a month
Not bad. Promo ended so last I saw I pay $60ish, but might go back to 100mbit. Not much competition around here. DLing games faster isn't a big deal lately
also I had to get some upgraded ethernet cord that my friend just had laying around if you can believe it, my old ethernet cord was only letting me get 100mbps
Yikes, but possible. A short enough cat5e can do gigabit, so who knows
why do you say the arris is infamous
The 6190 has Intel puma 6 chipset, supposedly had latency issues or something. Been fine though. I've had it since 2018ish
Wow, quite a model. I've just done separate units for convenience.
If I did get another, probably the Motorola MB8611 I think it is, runs cooler at least but also more expensive than a certain comparable Arris model
according to the "internet" its called Calix 844G-1
I have cat 6 ethernet
something about certified to ansi/tia-568-c.2, tested to 600 mhz at 502 ft. Oo
talk about technical speak lol
That's common c.2 is like the connector ends and 600Mhz if true means it's quality. Example, my cat5e cord says 568-A & 350Mhz. My monoprice cat6 cables are c.2 ends & labeled 550Mhz. Basically cat5e is good for 10gig but not very far, cat6 is a lot better on average (for 10gig networking).
ok, ty for the quick info. I did not know that
I have the 3600c14 set on 5900x; a 2x16gb Bdie 4000c17-18-18-38@1.4 on 10900K; & 2x16gb DJR 4400c19-26-26-46@ 1.45 on 10700KF. I have tried OC on all three... I have to have some winning stuff somewhere if I can get it right
neither the 10700KF nor the 10900K seems willing to run anything north of 4000mhz tho & it's frustrating as hell
I want to see you take the #1 7zip on the 5900x
as soon as I finish getting Sharex I'll head over to BIOS
or that can wait will head to BIOS now
gonna start dropping sds now
nvm, thought you said scl
ah I was going in order of your earlier suggestions
do I need all three anta777 cycles or is one enough?
Depends if you're testing for daily stable or 7zip, if you just want to take #1, as long as you get the score, that's all that matters
I'll focus on getting number 1 then retune for daily later
damn sds at 5 won't POST
Do all timings scale with voltage on bdie?
ah okay thought you said 6/6 then keep dropping them
my mistake
are they better 1:1? I think I had them at 5/6
my bad for all the questions, I'm sure you don't like babysitting the noobs
last question (for real): where should the outer limits of fixed voltage be on 5900x for all-core?
I did - but no guarantees on what you'll find stable
No, 4/6 or 6/4 is common
I have not. Really only meta for max valid freq
You can tune it such that's it's decent for intel daily gaming oc, but kinda pointless other than the cool factor or 5000mhz daily
I dunno why but I can't get either intel CPU to POST over 4000. I might get 4200 to work for a little while but it'll go nuts with errors
I've tried so many SA/IO combinations it's nuts
Just start at 1.35/1.45 for benching
& now that I got a fairly decent mem OC, I can't get my 51 all-core CPU OC to hold anymore.
I tried copying Fritz's numbers since he had same CPU & motherboard but got nowhere
Those look like 11th gen daily oc numbers, hard to say
gotta be honest, not sure if that's a good or bad thing
on overclock.net, 11900K was putting up some pretty high frequencies but
still 11900K
I think I'm gonna have to take the FCLK/MCLK desync plunge
anyone know why my friend's i5-11600K is stuck at 3.8ghz? tried disabling everything related to turbo, setting manual core multiplier and fixed vcore, setting manual 4095W PL, tried all power plans, cpu temp is at 75C (prime95), vrm temp is at 57C
gigabyte z590 ud ac
yeah thanks I forwarded them but didn't fix
was about to get you not sideways pictures haha
suspecting the windows install he moved over from his 4770k
hmm I dunno if I missed anything... let me check again
cuz mine will run at 50x like I tell it to
is he setting a multiplier?
cuz if you leave it on auto it goes to 3.7ghz for me too
stuck at 3.8 regardless of set multiplier
and base clock is 3.9
he gets correct boost behavior in linux but not windows
so it's something about windows
it could be nothing or it could be the issue: disable memory integrity in Windows Security. My computer was acting all sorts of strange before I did
Windows Security>Security at a glance>Device security>Core isloation>Core isolation details>Memory integrity off
Why is it that when I raise the mem past a certain point, I get a lower time spy score despite it being stable?
define stable
I get similar effect when I bump voltage to 1.6+ & run flat 14s. My guess is even tho it runs, it's not very stable. Either that or the really high voltage is no good
I mean gpu mem
1hr kombuster stable
error correcting
Okay so thereโs an optimal value so just okay with it
the gpu tries to prevent itself from crashing but spends more time error correcting
so you lose perf
yes
np
I dunno why that memory integrity thing matters, but I wasn't even able to run 51x all-core with it on
if that doesn't work I'm out of ideas
lol
somehow I kinda got my mojo back with 51x... now I'm gonna play the LLC v. vCore game to find the sweet spot
party time, excellent
his cooler isn't good enough to realistically do an OC better than stock
Is it the save thing with core or just go as high as I can go
but since it wasn't boosting correctly i had him try setting an all core ratio to see if he could override it that way
it didn't work
just downclock when you see lower performance
use 3dmark or something
Yeahs thanks what I use
just keep adjusting it until you have the optimal score
if +1000 and +1100 score the same try +1050
for example
wait so you just want stock again? load optimized, write down settings or something, & load whatever (I assume memory OC?) from profile & fill settings in?
even at stock his pc is stuck at 3.8 on windows
works properly on linux
very strange.
How's 7 zip coming along?
So i was trying to do y cruncher as a quick mem stress test to do before bothering with tm5, and it said coefficient too large after like 45 seconds, what's up with that?
Was running pi -2.5b btw with c malloc() and auto for framework -taken from buildzoid vid
Worked fine the 2nd time ยฏ_(ใ)_/ยฏ
Instability often gives that error message.
Ahh that would make sense it crashed tm5
But yeah, might as well run ycruncher , IME 10b is extremely picky with finding instability, I had to run much, much lower memory OCs, though you might not have enough mem to run it.
I think we should have a newegg community 7zip ambient oc contest by core count.
5ghz limit for intel, unsure on clock limit for amd
<@&896784369820250114> thoughts?
sounds fun
Newegg community 7zip competition
Rules: Include a cpuz cpu, memory, and spd tab as well as an astc/zentimings window.
Rig pic optional, but plz include for the flex.
Must be a valid hwbot submission.
Scores:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1zCTURYZXw8eJweKLQeUjSbnLhnNCKAHCGFpphhSCe8M/edit?usp=sharing
Thoughts: maybe 7zip isn't the best candidate for this as it scales so much with raw core speed, maybe aida latency instead? or have everyone drop down to 6 cores at 4.2 ghz?
that'd give me a good reason to start messing with hardware again, ive pretty much been doing nothing the past few weeks lol
Do you have any x58? there's a warp9 comp for that going on now as well
Yea but I dont have any unlocked CPUs for that platform
I could do BCLK though? im not familiar with the rules for that competition
I'm pretty new to that platform as well, but sounds like 32nm xeons or i7 extremes are meta.
Yeah, bclk is very much a part of oc'ing those chips, most boards do up to ~200 bclk apparently
There's both an ambient and sub0 category
jeez really? i'll have to try it out then. I have a w3520 and a i7 940 i could try
My current best, still need to work on os effi/ wazza technique https://i.imgur.com/BpfOEGd.png
Top score is just under 7 mins with hypers
I got up to 4th place but I'm having trouble getting any higher
Sharex has same HDR problem
I'll give it another go tomorrow. I don't know if I can get much better on memory & I can't get 47.5x all-core stable long enough without more voltage so I might be stuck unless I go crazy & desync FCLK (tho I obviously don't know how high I can get memory frequency yet)
Spreadsheet is set up
will submit now
ah I gotta reload my OC profile from BIOS so ZenTimings make sense
wait no I don't that's already on HWbot
haven't slept much bear with me
wait no don't have zentimings... I'll just redo it
If someone wants to make a fancy looking competition background, that'd be great
I'll see what I can come up with. Not the most artistic haha
e.g. gskill made this for their last comp https://i.imgur.com/H0hQWD0.jpeg
as well as https://i.imgur.com/rrdlA9M.jpeg
damn that's bad ass
Yeah, most of the comp backgrounds are beautifully done
ya those are real hard to beat
speaking of hard to beat, this dude is gonna be hard to beat since he's willing to run his processor at 48.25 all-core at 1.45v. I was worried about running 1.3125v
Yeah, not worth degrading, lol at that max temp, pretty sure that's not pbo
I'm thinking of making a max all core clock for amd for the comp
Or just PBO only, idk
ya that would make it all about the memory OC instead of who's willing to throw their CPU in a furnace
That's the intention, not sure on the numbers yet.
ah okay then I won't put anything on the sheet yet
cuz I was using all-core not PBO
example screenshot done https://i.imgur.com/mrikf4X.png
my dumbass cut off part of a CPU-Z
You can use benchmate 10.8 unless you're on 12th gen
Another idea, everyone just drops their chip down to 6 cores or something and we leave out the valid hwbot link rule so we don't need core count categories
Interesting, 1t-2T only dropped <1k score
lol
just a quick test run
with discorn open and live plex transcode

watching anime when bench = based
Odd, 4400c14 with somewhat similar secondary/terts gets 72k compression scores vs 98k at 38c14
I'm finally getting around to binning my dr b-die, trying to decide a methodology
shoutout to seby for demolishing the fse single card record https://hwbot.org/submission/4904155_
I'll try 10b but 2.5b was good anyway
Iโm using a 2400g while waiting for a gpu. I was playing around with overclocking the graphics core. I got an additional 8-10 fps out of it, but my texts would drop significantly. Is this to be expected?
texts?
Textures sorry
So finally won a shuffle today have a gpu coming. Iโll be able to switch out that 2400g for my 5600x. Still new to all this tho. Does anybody have any good links to overclocking basics? Or should I just let software auto overclock?
Its in the pins
https://www.reddit.com/r/overclocking/wiki/index
r/overclocking: All things overclocking go here. Learn to overclock, ask experienced users your questions, boast your rock-stable, sky-high OC and โฆ
Lmao I was just going through the pins. Iโm a refer tech and seeing all the pics of the pcs with the refer systems on them is great! I actually felt like I knew something here!
There are some fun cooling systems on showcase in the pins
๐
Bro that was ages ago could you just send a screenshot instead?
I forgot and am basically always on mobile when talking lol
GT740 GDDR5 Hardmodding #2: 2Mods2Furious
https://www.twitch.tv/mickulty
3dmark score calculator
https://elmor.se/3dmark
Anyone got a non k cpu and z690 to test this out?
https://youtu.be/8diXDeTDCbo
Support me on Patreon:
https://www.patreon.com/der8auer
Save 10% on your iFixit purchase: DER8AUER10
https://eustore.ifixit.com/der8auer
Pro Tech Toolkit: http://bit.ly/2JOFD8f
Find my products at Caseking:
Delid Die Mate 2: htt...
If it's confirmed on more boards? 12700f at 330$ is looking really good
Iโm buying 12100
What board you gonna have it on?
z690 apex
for competitive overclocking purposes, then maybe later i'll put it in a daily system with b660 asus if that still supports bclk oc
The b660 tuf didn't unfortunately

only works on hero and up

yeah bro "CHANGES EVERYTHING"
imma head out buy a 12400 and a Z690 hero

game chaning
amd ded
sadge
look at this non-k overclocking, where you can save $30 on a cpu
limited to $500+ mobos
Still useful info for overclockers trying to set bench records. Odds are if you're the target audience you have a board with the requisite external clock generator already. The overclock wouldn't be worth it for daily use, you could just get a cheaper Z690 and K sku cpu for the same price.
12700K for me seems at least $380, so the one at $330 is looking mighty good, step way down to the 12400(F).
what does typical SA/IO look like to run 4500+ on memory for 10th gen intel?
I bench up to 1.45/1.55 ambient, haven't seen any degradation whatsoever in maybe 30 hours+ of combined ambient and ln2 benching hard, but you might not need that much. Try 1.35/1.5 to start, 1.4/1.5 should be totally safe for bench sessions.
thank you. I'm at 1.34/1.46 rn & I still can't get anything over 4200 to get into windows
What vdimm?
Also what board?
Also dual rank is tough, I couldn't get even 4000c12 2x16 to be useable
You're going to need fans on the dimms for dual rank over 1.45 volts or so, also try lowering vtt slightly. e.g. 1.6 vdimm .75-.8 vtt. Auto is 1/2
thank you sir
That's crazy xD
Congrats
I have a 80mm Noctua blowing down on the DIMMs but with anta777 or PCBDestroyer, I'm seeing 50c on DIMM temp sensors... not enough
Yeah, aim for < 40c lol
ya I think I might throw another 2 80mm fans or accept my fate & waterblock. I really don't wanna have some random 120mm hanging with zip ties, put one of those Corsair coolers on, or get some loud 70-80mm server fans
I'm gonna see if I can stay at 4200c15 with lower DRAM voltage
That's aggressive, aim for 42 c16 first maybe
Guessing you'll need 1.6 or so, depends on bin.
I got 4200c15 to POST at 1.57
but ya probably not happening much if at all lower than 1.57
I would try for 1.35 io, up to 1.5 sa daily.
Finally got my cpu to hit 5.0GHz! Took me a while to find what it likes
Laughs in rev e not worrying about temps 
daily yea
laughs in 14 rcdrd and rp ๐
only curve optimizer and +maximum frequency
Ah nice, was hoping you weren't going to reply with "yeah, 5.0 all core, just needed to run 1.45v llc6"
lolol
its 4.98GHz for 2 core
although it bounces quite a bit (4.9-4.98)
I've been looking to organize some kind of newegg overclocking competition, trying to decide what bench/set of rules make things both fair and interesting. The "beta" is in the pins, 7zip
Give it a try through benchmate
Sorry for bad pic but my 3200c16 rev e kit 
I'm not at pc arm
ah
Slightly older one
Except tras 27 and gdm off
Tcwl put it self to 14 for some reason too ยฏ_(ใ)_/ยฏ
Also pushed trfc back up to 590, 580 was causing stutteryness
12 can be pretty tight for cwl, I usually start at 14
I had 12 stable tho, then it jumped to 14 ยฏ_(ใ)_/ยฏ
What IC are those?
check the 042 code
Hynix MJR 16gb dies
Try 3800mhz instead your uclk is an ouch
i set A-XMP and forgot
I think dallas runs the same sticks and cpu so you should definitely flex on him with your overclocks 
it can boot 2k all, but gets whea
at stock voltages
i just need to spend time to find what voltages make it work
Those are some odd voltages. Nothing too worryingly high, but how'd you get to 1.1 vddp?
its auto idk ยฏ_(ใ)_/ยฏ
Usually soc-vddg's you start with 1.2 .9 1.05 1.1 or something
should i change them to that then?
Not sure if zentimings is reading correctly, never heard of vddp being auto'd that high
@short blade
1.1625vsoc? I'd try lower, it rolls over somewhere between 1.15 and 1.2vsoc btw
@tall pelican thoughts?
Hmm i mean 1.1v vddp is still safe
hello
i mean its auto so i hope it would be safe
i will try lowering it
& see if i go poof
what are teh recommended voltages?
What do you use to test mem? tm5 anta?
i havent yet, I set A-XMP and left everything on auto xP any recommendations
Id start with something like this
Vddg iod and ccd same
ive been using Cini R23 and Prime95 so far for cpu
Use something like 7zip or ycruncher 1B to test performance as you tune, will be fun to see the numbers improve
Cinebench doesn't scale with memory
I've seen 1.1 auto vddp before I think
on?
not really a concern
yea ik thats why i havent touch it yet hehe
These auto'd soc-vddg's #overclocking message
Why'd the mobo auto 1.1 vddp lol
Use testmem5 extreme anta profile
vddg iod seems high
For ram*
idk fam its an Asrock B550i Phantom Gaming
i got alot of airflow on the mobo though
also why are they in 2:1?
because it got whea at 1:1 so i just left it since i was testing Cinibench R23
i was using stock/auto voltages though so thats probably why it got whea
well yeah 2000if is going to whea, but then why neuter it to 1000if?
or not if, but uclk
automatically set to that when uncoupled
yeah, but just downclock mem
Thanks
I'll try it
Maybe I can get 1:1 then
figures I go shower when things get poppin in here
until mem is over ~4200-4400, then its better to stay low clocks with tighter timings that fast mem and 2:1
so i should try for 4200?
drivers and/or chipset
has to be drivers because its the same chipset as that one (both b550)
Sir Fitz... any chance you have a picture of your BIOS settings for this? long shot I know
my bad to ping you
no, I never take bios pics because they're a PITA
PITA?
But phone
I looked at your asrock timings but those don't have any of Gigabyte's random settings lol
I've gotten as low as 40.7ns on AIDA but nowhere close to your 35
I need to install AIDA on my benchmark SSD with Forks win10 build
might get that 5ns there
could try all-core 47.25 lol
Trying 1:1 @ 1933MHz fclk
sorry that's misleading
I'm on air though 
Yea
dunno how that would do tbh
No idea
Ranked 38, nice ๐
I mean if you turn off minimum test duration it only lasts a minute or so
unstable rip
yea i did that too ๐
if you run Prime95 Large FFTs & OCCT VRAM together, you can see if you can stabilize your FCLK
I can't get it to stop throwing WHEAs over 1900
its getting wheas at desktop
or ya know, if they ran at 1900/3800, it wouldnt get wheas
i get wheas at 1900
then tune your voltages until you dont
how low can i go before i need to reset cmos?
until it won't POST
do i just lower all voltages?
it's CPU specific... silicon lottery
here maybe mine can help
can also check pinned messages to see others' settings. They might help you
I think trial & error was how I got there unfortunately
might even be auto. I'd have to check BIOS
Use tm5 + anta777
what kind of fan(s) are y'all using to get enough airflow to keep memory cool?
I'd kinda rather avoid these but it's looking like they're my best bet
I was looking at the pipes running to CPU trying to figure out how I can rig something up to connect a fan to them with a pipe clamp or something
ziptie + normal fan = good memory cooling
they dont have bdie, 16gbit AJR from what I can tell
in your bdie performance predictions? oh damn I should've looked.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1NN3-m-mvqxoebSUO_22efkMrnGog2y1atWUgiZSZTOc/edit#gid=696788942 this has some people's zen timings
That's pinned in another Discord tho so dunno if it's against the rules or something to post here
lol kinda trying to avoid that tbh
if I do that, maybe I'll zip tie the fan to the PETG pipes so it's hiding behind GPU at least
40 seconds of TM5, DIMMs at 39C already
I have some 92x38mm Deltas... that would probably work & sound like an airplane
2:30 45C
Is there a way to increase the boost lock on evga x1?
The boost clock for the gpu, through precision X1?
The v/f curve is good for that, but it's very temperature dependent
Less voltage can mean less heat and more headroom for boosting
or waterblock
I've found that my modest +105ish OC pretty much doesn't effect the Vcore ๐ (msi ab of course). This is why for a while in-game, I just locked to 1v or w/e & certain speed
OC scanner gives a half decent starting point for further tuning, but shouldn't be used as a final result
You're losing out on a lot of performance and burning a lot of power for no reason locking to 1v 24/7
Was ingame only
. Lately run a straight +105 oc & it's often 1.06 peak & avg 1.03-1.04. Viewing the v/f curve is pretty neat. Anyone say if the full 120PL is required for a certain oc? I like when peak is below 220w vs 250w.
Unless I'm mistaken, v/f only applies to the highest performance profile, which is only loaded when needed and it down clocks to 300/600 otherwise?
yeah, it might, but was there no scaling over 1v?
Depends how you force voltage/clocks I think
As for whether or not a higher pl is helping - you can check hwinfo or gpuz for the PL flag
Yeah forks meant when i said locked to 1v, and you're right it sometimes didn't downclock/downvolt at idle correctly. I used to just switch profiles for a second
Gotcha. Heck, I'll try 115 or 110 PL w/o oc change & see if the boost is simply adjusted a bit or what. ๐
Support me on Patreon:
https://www.patreon.com/der8auer
Save 10% on your iFixit purchase: DER8AUER10
https://eustore.ifixit.com/der8auer
Pro Tech Toolkit: http://bit.ly/2JOFD8f
Find my products at Caseking:
Delid Die Mate 2: htt...
Uhh you're gonna want to run extreme anta profile btw
from my experience--albeit novice at best--PCBDestroyer config finds errors quicker & I dunno if it runs harder than anta777, but I believe it runs hotter. As long as mem OC takes, it's nice to find errors sooner... I do still use anta777 here & there as sort of a second opinion. It would be great if you tried it & gave me feedback. I could be entirely wrong. The reason I switched is I would have these strange instances where anta777 was not finding errors & TM5 was still counting time, but none of the little boxes under "Tests" would be changing color, like the program had stalled. I think it's obvious at that point that the OC was unstable, but sometimes I wouldn't notice for an hour or more since it appeared at a glace to still be running.
The first time I ran this was right after anta777 had stalled & it found errors within like 5-6 minutes... been using it ever since
@sudden torrent hope you're doing well. If you could try it out too, I'd appreciate it. I know you both way more knowledgeable than I am when it comes to these things lol
The box issue is sometimes tm5 not ran as admin just freezes, i recommend if you have spare ssd to use bench ssd for ram testing, i recommend using the forks iso as it is impossible not to run something as admin using it meaning tm5 basically never freezes
I'll give it a go on something ik is unstable sure
okay cool, I appreciate it
Np
checking that box runs it like as full admin?
that's probably a dumb question
but just making sure cuz it does the little pop up where I have to give it permission
That should do it to
The reason i like bench os is because you don't have to worry about corruption when mem testing
no that's definitely smart
I killed win11 about a month ago trying to OC DJR
I think I'm in the process of killing it again lol
I'm gonna swap C:\ for a new NVMe later today tho so I'm not all that worried about it
but I'm definitely gonna make a partition for Forks's build cuz benching on daily windows gets worse results
can it be on a partition or does it have to be an entirely different device?
Make sure to run the batfile in pins of #windows-ios often
just did dism & sfc lol
thank you tho
btw if you want, this runs both with right click & run as admin:
TM5 is broken for me. Fails to load with an error message.
did you try extracting the .rar again?
run it as not admin
you can run my file thats pinned in windows btw and you dont need to right click and run as admin
nah nah thats not the point
It won't even launch if I do that
Yes
Medium rare please
ill take medium well
medium well sounds lovely
might make bdie soup with a waterblock the way these DIMMs have been cooking on tm5
i always run it as admin but i've had that freeze show up on stable ocs
always just chalked it up to a tm5 bug
cold
Yeah
Free performance is free performance
yes
its useful 
depends on what game
and res
Minecraft 8k gaming 
Tried for
, but no luck. Guess I'll have to pick up an ocf and take it cold ๐
https://hwbot.org/submission/4908751_forks_3dmark___time_spy_extreme_radeon_rx_6900_xt_12423_marks
It's not exactly good for the gpu itself, but it is safe if done right.
Your temps are already pretty high so you wouldn't have much headroom for overclocking the core without undervolting as well to keep the temps down.
And that's going to affect how much you can safely overclock
You should still be able to do some, especially if you use msi afterburner to lower the core voltage a little bit so it's not so hot
Right, that's +0 which is the default. You can adjust the voltage/frequency curve to reduce the voltage.
Probably not a good idea to increase the power limit yet then
@modern walrus also if you have custom loop already, this is an actually reasonable way to cool your ram without making aesthetics bad
My old build
expensive tho...
looks really nice btw
I mean the Corsair look alright... waterblock is way better tho of course
what's the new build look like?
damn how come needs like 1/10th the amount of pipe I end up needing? lol
same case?
why'd you take it apart?
I needed the DDR4 alder lake board for fire strike #1 HOF lol
btw props on your HWbot scores
The DDR5 one is slightly slower
And ty :D
Same board lol
Also removed ram waterblock
jeez
don't think I'll ever get on LN2 level tbh
I'd need a garage or something
I might go EK on RAM waterblock like you did
it's just expensive
I think like $80 for block & $45 for spreaders
honestly the reason I haven't just gone ahead & done it is de-lidding DIMMs
Whoa there sir flex a lot. Lmao, semi kidding. That's awesome
wth is in the lower pcie slot?
That's interesting, very neat.
cablemod cables or... ?
I made all of my cables, custom length too
I also sleeved a lot of the stock usb cables and stuff
Hmm. I should consider water cooled memory too; the fractal torrent case isn't exactly good for memory airflow.
this look good for a 3060Ti?

Is that the auto overclock? +200 on memory is weak
decent gpu oc, but +200 on memory might as well be 0. Could probably do +400 or +500
Poor man's overclock, just do +115 core and +1000 memory with maxed power limit. 95% chance it works great.
hm ok
Kind of funny AB only allows +1K on mem, then also allows a nutty +1K on gpu, even though the latter* is probably an insta-crash if it actually was set.
Really? AB lets me do +1500 mem. Must be your vbios.
Probably, I might have the "quiet" bios anyways. Also, Vmem already started out at 11Gbps intead of 10
- not too worried about the overall mem speed.
so the scanner OC gave me an extra 216 points in Time Spy so at least it works lol
Yeah that'll be mostly from the core bump
how do I manually input those values you gave me?
Did you max out power too?
they go here?
Yep. And then the power limit slider all the way right.
?
alrighty
Power alone should give a huge bump in score
What program is that? From when I had +105 core/+200 mem. Disregarding my cpu being a bottleneck, this pic shows how the stock boosting is so good because w/ no actual oc setup I get 2050ish in 3dmark or games. 
Precision X1
^
I use that one too, it's the only way to control rgb on the FE 30 series
would a card sitting at 90 constantly be bad?
90 degrees C on the core? Yes
On the memory? No
generally don't worry about the temp limit setting also.
It's highly unlikely that it actually hits the temp limit
hopefully
got the FTW3 just so I could OC it :<
I knew my XC would just die lmao
Yeah you'll be fine then
my idle idle temp sucks rn
high temp limit to me is just so it doesnt throttle for no reason at a lower temp
from the OC or just recovering from benchmark?
Don't worry about idle, the fans stop if it's under 40C on most new cards
Can you show your voltage/frequency curve? (disregard 10 series to 20/30 series difference of course.)
im idle at 54 
It's load temp that matters
Set the fan curve then
ye I have it at aggressive
Funny, at least it's more of a literal curve. ๐
my fan curve is a joke because basically I've never seen over 40% fan speed even w/ furmark running at 4k.
(also sometimes I adjust it for no reason). Itching to see how much that gpu oc helps ya on TS.
+295 compared to scanner OC, +511 compared to stock
woooh buddy
GPU never broke its previous max temp either
i'm impressed tbh
@sudden torrent any way I can keep going?
You can try +130 core next. Go up in steps of 15 and run a time spy bench each step to see if it's stable.
Wdyt is the upper limit for my card in question?
Want to see my GTX 1080 OC 
heck yea
It varies. Could be +180 or you could be at the limit already.
+480 core +1000 (but I could run +1200) mem
so it's just silicon lottery at this point?
aight running 130+
The cpu difference is hilarious. Basically 7x as fast as mine. 2101 MhZ gave me a gpu score of 8370 btw. Total said 6593 on that one. Neat it's basically a 15% higher oc for 13.3% higher score, not a bad ratio. 2400 MHz is beast mode for sure. That was under water? Any chance have a pic of the V/F curve still?
I didnโt use the curve since my temperature was always negative
But yeah this card doesnโt OC as much as I wished lol
Cryo cooling?
Yeah, GPU ran at -192c fine
What the 
Do you run this long term?
No lol, i have 3090 on water for my daily
Lol I was gonna say
Negligible. Got +5 lmao
alright +145 breaks it lmao
Guess you know your limit now at least
ye so guess its 130
You might be able to do more on memory if you wanted to try that. Some can max out the slider to +1500. My 3080 ti tops out at +1280.
Yeah most modern gpu's basically go in steps of 15MHz, and remember it's more like a 400+ OC when you factor in that base clock is, or at least that's how I think of it sometimes.
You can do steps of 100 on memory. One thing to keep in mind is you might lose performance before you get to where it crashes.
Once you get to where you lose score or crash drop back 50 and try again
+7 from 1100 to 1200 lol
aka diminishing returns.
oh, curious of peak wattage and temp
peak temp was 77 for a microsecond lol
wattage idrk
ill have to do again with OCCT on the side
Usually I like 3dmark for gpu, it does 100% gpu & the varying peak wattage at various PL/clock settings is neat to see sometimes. For reference, at 120PL +105 core I saw 250ish watts (2101MHz average), +60 core 112PL means peak 225ish watts (2050MHz aveage).
ye I been using Time Spy to check these
Same. Partly thnx to being so far from temp limit, with no oc I'd see 2000ish MHz boost, and super steady anyways. Pic is current settings. OCing is fun, but the stock boosting is so good (except OC actually gives overall lower volts).
I didn't realize that 20 series was clocked lower, then 30 series is even lower. 2100? Those things boost a lot*
No I meant w/ the stock base clock of 3060 Ti, they seem to go up like 600 MHz. Pretty cool they boost up as high as 10 series even w/ the lower base clock. That's how good 30 series is.
it's pretty good. 10 series onward is quite a change from 900 series. Every gen varies a bit in some way though, it's interesting.
I see
alrighty now im gonna enter VR
i wanna see if I gained anything from this lol
alright so
