#halo-discussion
1 messages · Page 92 of 1
If you're looking for other Spartans to join you in battle, check out our LFGs:
#lfg-competitive – For ranked/competitive matchmaking
#lfg-social – For social/casual matchmaking
#lfg-campaign - For campaign co-op
#lfg-forge - For map/mode building and testing
#lfg-customs - For custom games
#lfg-other – For firefight, spartan ops, etc
#lfg-español – Para jugadores hispanohablantes en cualquier categoría de juego
#lfg-hcs-scrims-or-teams – To help you find a team or secure some scrims
Don't forget to check out #lfg-and-voice-chat to learn about the !lfg bot, how to use it, and how to create your own voice channels.
Was desync ever fixed?
hello guys
hello all
i have a question about halo the master chief collection, i see on steam he has a multiplayer mode, is the halo infinite or another multiplayer think in halo?
The Master Chief Collection and Halo Infinite are two different games.
They both have multiplayer.
exactly, but master chief collection has a multiplayer mode, what is it?
You can search for particular games and modes in matchmaking, play coop, and custom games.
MCC contains: Halo Reach, Halo Combat Evolved (and its anniversary overhaul), Halo 2 (and its anniversary overhaul), Halo 3, Halo 3: ODST, Halo 4. All are campaign and multiplayer 😄
As someone approaching 10,000 hours of playtime on Steam alone I'll admit my bias 🙂 But yes, its definitely worth the sale price tag it has right now.
i know its worth, but i want to play for more than 100h, without campaigns
thats why im asking
https://i.imgur.com/HERPB4u.jpeg In 4v4 alone you have Precision Slayer, Auto Slayer, Flag and Bomb, Zone Control, Asset Denial, Action Sack, Swat, Snipers, and the current rotational playlist is Fiesta. You can find games for 100 Hours no problem.
You can pick and choose whatever you want to play - the less you choose, the longer the potential wait.
and you beat bosses, waves or something like that?
What im describing here is PvP multiplayer, against other players. But there is 2 player and 4 player Firefight matchmaking against AI / covenant "bots"
Thats limited to Halo Reach and H3 ODST and has a variety of modes too (Sniper Fight, Rocket Fight, stuff like that) 🙂
No problem. If you have other questions dont hesitate to ask. Take care!
take care!
Btb infection needs to be re-added but as a permanent gamemode
and no "super" zombies that was just hard to control
boyfriend agreed to play ODST with me! initially he had no interest but he saw how much i was gushing about it so he decided hed play it. makes me happy cause its the one mainline halo game he never played.

im so hyped. cause honestly i prefer the ODST team dynamic over Reach, since the characters in ODST feel more alive. the casual banter to relieve the tension of the situation theyre in is honestly really nice, and makes the characters feel more real.
Man's about to play one of the top three Halo games.
Nathan Fillion is a great actor
you should watch The Rookie
great show
Firefly
oh yeah, and im really excited for him to experience it for the first time
Now that the next halo game is in the works, does anyone remember when 343i said that halo infinite would have a 10 year lifespan xD
What 343 said recently, was that they have additional teams working on new projects but they haven't specified exactly what those projects are just yet. Similar to what was said a few months, anything new like a game is quite a way off. Infinite is still being supported by a dedicated team, with content lined up for the rest of the year
https://youtu.be/9aV4pIIz2p8?t=3935
if the content thats lined up is anything like the update we just had it'll be a massive shame
Hes my fav, he was already my fav before I played ODST haha
Match Composer, EAC inclusion, Networking model fixes, Playlkist refreshes with new maps, there's other stuf but I can't remember exactly what's been announced
Plus other stuff they haven't revealed
People gotta stop being so greedy.
You'd burn through the new stuff in less than a week and end up wanting more like thr Destiny crew did back in the day
Im stuck at a loading screen when i just downloaded the game
it needs to compile shaders
give it a little bit
How much gb is that
my brother you have been brain washed, the game released with like 5 game modes, we are now 2 years deep and for a seasonal update we got a 20 tier battle pass and a shop update which was so absurdly priced it feels like daylight robbery.
If they could do it for the 1st five games, CE - Reach, I dont see why 343 cant atleast copy how bungie used to manage their games
What worked 20 years ago unfortunately just isn't sustainable now, the landscape of the world has changed, peoples wants have changed, economies and costs have drastically changed.
Making a game to the degree of 2007 quality is totally doable today. You just need a team dedicated to one vision of making the best game they can for the fans. BG3 is a testament to it.
When C-Suites run profits over player satisfaction, it's a loss for all but the whales.
I'm not saying infinite is a bad game by any means, I've played alot of it and enjoyed it, but at the end of the day it cant hold a candle to any of the original games
Dude Halo Infinite crashes when im installing Shaders
Please refer to the Halo Support site for additional information and/or to submit a ticket concerning any issues you may be experiencing.
Make sure and file a bug report for any crashes
huh i might try the Halo Reach Polished mod, looks freaken good
Total lie. It's sustainable, just not as profitable.
Same thing really. To be sustainable something must be profitable.
Even indie games suffer that
Game prices have only recently started to increase in price, they've largely stayed the same for years. People want and expect bigger and better games, which costs more to develop and maintain. Compared to 20 years ago, the market is absolutely saturated with games now, new releases happening so often you barely get 5 minutes with a game before the next big thing comes out. Companies are working to build engagement and keep you flowing back to their game over others. So no, the older models are not sustainable in today's market
To add to this, feel free to go ask the same question in the Xbox server and see if some of the staff there add their thoughts. Few of them and server regulars are also developers and will tell you the exact same thing
Gonna respectfully disagree. Generally assuming expectations from “people” in general is always a gamble. Costs and scope being unrealistically massive nowadays in AAA is partially a management problem (I’d say the biggest reason but no way of proving that so 🤷♂️).
Game prices were the same for years sure but the market has blown up exponentially. More people are buying games than ever before.
BG3 was in EA for years and, while i very much enjoy it, it has rough edges
Chieftain's Labryinth will go down in history as one of the scariest custom games ever
The games market is saturated today because we stopped having to be picky. We're on gamepass or free to play! I do understand that it's never going back, but gaming was better back then. Much higher concentration of quality, and set costs.
Fun fact: Kim Haines (lead multiplayer environment developer at 343) has a cameo in Illusion in the form of a ONI datapad-like object
OMG i love this so much LOL
Didn't they fire q bunch of the guys who made it too
that reminds me anyone do halo art? i need to talk to someone about doing ODST emotes >.>
like animations?
no like
still stickers for a twitch chat
ooooh
i havent gone affiliate yet over this ngl lol
been stuck in limbo for a year
wow
ya only people that msg me these days are art scam bots, heck i made a twitter yesterday asking this question to twitch support, got 20+ art scam follower LOL
haha
sigh the fun never ends
Social media be like
ikr
I feel like earnable credits would definitely keep a lot of engagement. Some daily and some weekly stuff maybe or something for sure
No. It's plainly bad for the player
That is a horrible idea.
Forgers would be REALLY angry at that too
Who is going to play a multiplayer shooter with an entry fee?
Definitely nobody I know
It plainly divides the community to have map packs too. And they get less played.
That's not true to say everyone. And halo isn't some adult exclusive thing at all. Neither it should be gatekeeped
All my points i've made are valid
The worst one was the forge paid DLC assets
I don't think you can begin to comprehend how bad it is for the people who make forge maps, especially the forgers who help make that rise into matchmaking
People under 18 have as well. And markets and behaviours change
Yeah new forge paid dlc assets are a horrible idea
Well it's also wrong to assume everyone will get it just because they're over 18
I know many forgers and the ammount of forgers who would probably be cringing at the mere tought of it... I can hear their voices in my head
Woah woah woah, £80?? 70 is contentious as it is imo
It’s never a guarantee corporations always take and take
It also won't have any players 
$60 for a full game is more than fair, it’s a corporate line saying that $70 or above is necessary now
Every year the AAA game industry reports higher percentage gains in revenue, it’s such a massive fib that we need games to be priced higher
Halo 3 also had much less content.. less demanding, lesser framerate, graphical things, polygons, resolutions, only a single platform instead of 2 xbox platforms and pc and a lot of other stuff
Ironically failed Live Service systems are the culprit of some of the biggest corporate losses
ODST was overpiced
i love to watch conversations.
right when Halo was starting to fall off from being the only FPS on the Xbox. There are many games competing for people's time these days, and Halo is pretty low on that list for most gamers.
What does this even mean? You’re saying H3 wasn’t pushing limits in 2007?
It had much less complexity to develop
Yeah it’s tough to compare things from 2007 to 2020. Things are always improving especially technology. It should be compared to games from its era
H3 frankly functions miles better than Infinite does currently for the record
I'm thinking of a response. do i say. That's a lie. Do I say, that's blatantly untrue. Do I say, faulty nostalgic memory. Do I bring up black screens and how it was 720p and 30fps. Too much stuff to say at once
For a game from 2007. It was quite a masterpiece
I mean you’re not totally wrong but blame whoever decided we needed to be unrealistically ambitious for Infinite’s open world campaign. They had to reinvent the game for that and it’s on them
Super laggy halo 3 campaign co-op network model
Linear or open world, the point would remain
Just a model itself is expected to be of higher quality than 2007
So you’re pondering whether or not you’re going to reframe the past in a way that isn’t really fair to gas up Infinite for… reasons?
It's all of MCC co-op too, it's the base code of the games that cause it
So you are being incredibly unfair. Nice to see I don’t have to take you seriously whatsoever
The ammount of work involved in both is different
You need a lot more work and tech to make the bottom.
It's more costly in monetary, technical and people resources to make modern assets as a base
It's more costly in monetary, technical and people resources to make a game multi-platform than a single platform you can optimize
For the time. Yeah. But the times have changed
It's not 2007 anymore. It's 17 years later.
This sounds like the horrible take asmongold had..
I’m not engaging with you. You’re comparing aspects of game dev at two different points in time to argue for more expensive games in an incredibly disingenuous way
Not caring abour the artists (developers) and all that involved
All that I have said is true and is one of the reasons why game development is more expensive.
You can't make halo infinite with the team you had to make halo CE.
Those arguments are not anywhere the same too
Game dev is more expensive but it’s because of metrics and scope that is engineered by management. Studios are blowing their scale and ambition to unrealistic heights, it’s not simply because “making higher fidelity assets = $70-$80 games now”
People also expect higher fidelity too
Honestly. Learn to care. That's what I can say about this.
I’m going to continue to care about consumers and less of the corporations bottom line ✌️
I didn't say about a corporation's bottom line
That’s what you’re arguing for though? Isn’t your point that games have to be more expensive because “higher fidelity assets are more costly?”
Higher fidelity assets are ONE thing that make video games more costly than in 2007
ONE thing out of many
And no. I'm talking about the development of games and the resources involved
That's not the same thing as executive's bottom line
I’m tired boss. All I’m gonna say is games don’t have to be more expensive. Companies are getting their checks, tired of getting nickel and dimed in so many AAA titles nowadays
Peace ✌️
That adage 'the costumer is always right' is just dumb, false, untrue, and a lot of other words I could use. It's good for people to not stay ignorant. Not only for game development but honestly for things in your life in general.
Yeah, I don't like a lot of monetization practices currently going on
You can argue for better while understanding the realities of game development
disgusting mentality
lol
because i needed a reminder about how wonderful the illustrious and infallible halo community is, the halo infinite steam forums are crying about bhm
Dude I love map packs
How could you say that, I love being seperated from the matchmaking and fragment even more of the game population
you're right, my dressup simulator needs to put what's important first; fReE cOsMeTiCs
the fps bit is secondary to my dressup game
Yeah true- what do you mean microtransactions are still going to be in a paid game? In this time of the year?
no no if they're labeled dlc, then it's wholesome ! especially if it negatively impacts the gameplay experience for anyone who doesn't buy it
also having gameplay content be paid on top of paying for the basegame means the content will be more gooder
why? well uhhh... IT JUST DOES OK????
lmao
Lol
free games don't exist in a market
and also chopping up the game benefits consumers
your point is divorced from reality
you want the gameplay content to be chopped up because you want free cosmetics
I'm sorry to tell you but having a paid game does not indicate that can be good or not can be beneficial for the user in the end, specially when stuff like Xbox gold still exist too
Paying 60€, then dlc, then microtransactions + battlepass, then xbox live gold (or whatever is called now)
the previous model you fall over yourself to defend relied on xbl gold being part of rhe calculation
Not saying that F2P are the best either but what you are saying it does not benefit the user either
this is incredibly tenuous logic
it relies on the assumption that they only look at mtx figures once and in the shallowest way possible
crunch
halo 2 says hi
Halo CE
nah, bungie wasted time and had to play catch up
Bungie didn't organize lol
deadlines need to be a thing otherwise you get nonsense like star citizen or other money blackholes
besides, bungie was probably involved in release date talks. the idea that sHaReHoLdErS decide minutiae like the release dates for individual games in a company as massive as mikerowsoft is funny
over half of the US is shareholders in various companies btw. either directly or by proxy
even privately owned companies like profits
generally speaking
A "complete" game is a fairly arbitrary metric. What makes a game complete and who decides.
Pretty much every game ever has had cut content, including every Halo title. Does that make them incomplete?
well i want some advice about something. Halo infinite is in sale and been thinking to buy it but the problem is i never played halo before. So will it affect the story or anything?
You don't necessarily need to play the other games for Infinite, but if you're someone who enjoys the story, you will get a ebtter uderstanding if you play the other games first.
I typically recommend going through the other games first
well for the story then, I guess i have to play from the start. Thanks for the help
yeah appreciated for the help.
Is it me, or does the zacharias helmet look like Linda’s mark iv helmet?
okay i will look into it and again thanks for the help
I’d love to but I’m not home rn
use the lfg channels to find players
If you're looking for other Spartans to join you in battle, check out our LFGs:
#lfg-competitive – For ranked/competitive matchmaking
#lfg-social – For social/casual matchmaking
#lfg-campaign - For campaign co-op
#lfg-forge - For map/mode building and testing
#lfg-customs - For custom games
#lfg-other – For firefight, spartan ops, etc
#lfg-español – Para jugadores hispanohablantes en cualquier categoría de juego
#lfg-hcs-scrims-or-teams – To help you find a team or secure some scrims
Don't forget to check out #lfg-and-voice-chat to learn about the !lfg bot, how to use it, and how to create your own voice channels.
just curious to know how is the campaign of infinite?
its alright
i had fun playing it
well then let see how it goes for me
It's pretty fun, the gadgets work well with the open world aspect, although I think the map should have accommodated the grappling hook a bit better
I replied pretty late lol
guys how do i report a cheater
Info is there on how to do it in-game on via the support site ^
Are servers going down? The game I was in everyone in the lobby got disconnected and said couldn't connect to the dedicated servers
nothings been posted about servers goin down
of what
?
what servers down
the halo ones for the person asking above
oh
do you know how to do MCC campaign 2 player
when people switch to the turret seat on the wraith to escape from a planted grenade is it a bug or a feature
i watched some dude get boarded and naded twice and both times they switched to the turret then hopped back in after it went off
kinda dumb
can you get out
i feel like they intentionally nerfed boarding but if you cant get out, you shouldnt be able to switch seat either
it's ok some nice moments, I generally enjoyed it. For some reason i haven't replayed it though, never got an itch to play a level again yet which is weird usually there's one or two levels I really like a lot and play again
got infinite yesterday, getting a feel for the game
what do i do once i've beaten all weekly challenges?
exp wise? you can still get exp from matches
cool cool, thanks
Hey crew - is there a way to buy the old operations? I’d love to get Tenrai 2 and 3. Just wasn’t around when those came out.
think so
i heard it was mentioned on the pre season stream but i missed that segment
Was it told that "system" would also bring back old ops?
oh wait, you're talking about the items
could be
Ya like the 20 piece battle pass or whatever. Sad that I can’t get it at this point. Love the look. I’d pay happily
have you already finished the available ops and the winter update pass?
Yep!
Just now realizing there were ops during previous seasons that I missed out on. As a completionist, I’d love the opportunity to complete those too.
Infinites store is one of the biggest live service disappointments ive ever seen. If you want to know what happens when you treat your players like a wallet you can look no further than destiny 2 and ask them how its going for them
sadly i'm gonna have to inform you its still goes pretty well for Bungie
what about all the season passes?
Then you haven't seen many stores live service games then
It really isn’t actually
I have
out of curiosity, what are you basing that off?
Sure
Previous years and over player sentiment
This doesn’t include the forum. That place isn’t always negative
so I assume you have access to financial streams, revenue and profit reports etc?
So by your logic you need access to all of it to base judgement and not the recent events or overall player engagement for the past 9 months or so
Not the recent discounts and overall more micro transaction store focused approach, no that doesn’t matter
Yes, by "my" logic (and logic everywhere, period) if you want to claim a company (in this case a video game developer) is losing money over time in comparison to a previous earning year/era you're gonna have to back it up with actual earning reports, revenue documents or basically anything written that proves they are actually losing money.
"Player sentiment" is the best guess you can come up with but we both know most people who talk badly about a game will most likely come back to pay for it at any given chance
basically, you're using your own thoughts and internet rents to base an objective claim; anyone with some common sense will tell you that's not how it works
I talk bad about the micro transactions. Its a short term investment and always has been. Ain’t talking about the gameplay. Both games have great gameplay. Fun as hell. As for bungie’s side we can all see what happens when players dont like the expansion. The news of that is already been told. Word of mouth is the most powerful ad tool.
I mean, that's cool and all lol
but it has nothing to do with that you're factually wrong when you tried to claim they're losing money
sometimes it's ok to admit you were wrong
Im not factually wrong but ok. They are losing profits. Not sure what you are talking about
Still waiting for that source on them losing profits
ok, can you prove they are?
I don't have a horse in this race, but if I think you're referencing their 45% missed projections thing, that doesn't mean a net loss of profits.
Also this^
seems like the source is "player sentiment"
which I assume is either twitter posts or reddit posts
Its a long term loss
Most likely which in the end of the day it does not indicate the whole data on it
No one knows the exact data on the store except, of course, Microsoft
And saying that is on par of like D2 monetization is just wrong at this point (even more when there are worse monetization games out there)
That is true. Microsoft usually doesn’t reveal that
depends on if you find "ahhhhhhhh bungie suck bungie bad bungie doodoo" as data I guess
They didnt die. Halo wont either.
It takes a lot to flatten a AAA game company.
kinda what i'm trying to explain to our bud here
Also; Destiny's monetizations worse because the stuff you can buy is laaammmee
Like, okay, cool.
I can make my Warlock look even more like he live sin a dumpster than he did before
Meanwhile in Halo;
(CE theme fires up as I aquire the MK V core)
So, from that angle, at least, the stuff your getting is better.
But that might be me just liking armored supersoldiers over...whatever weirdness Destiny has going on.
You can still maybe buy it with bright dust
Not anything worth it, at least when I was playing last.
But then, I was a Warlock main so my interests were in them.
And all their stuff is robes and coats and whatever.
I want to loook like a Space Marine librarian why is that so hard
I want to look like a medieval battle damaged knight
To each their own.
Im just saying $100 for all the armor in that store is ridiculous
It is. But whos buying all of it?
Everyone Ive talked too has one, at most two sets they like, and they buy that for 18 bucks and then...thats it.
There a guy in my friend group who will buy every single one
Okay.
So?
Its his money, you gonna tell him how to live his life?
I am allowed to criticize a poor financial decision like everyone else especially if its a guy ive known for years
weird, there is? I thought player sentiment is that people hate spending money of the game and its bleeding money left and right
Im sure the data is far skewed due to social media tunnelvision.
Its their money, let them make the call yeah?
Yeah lol
I absolutely despise people who try to criticize others for spending money on mtx.
Have faith that perhaps they ARENT buying it because they're compulsive consumers and they are, in fact, perhaps, actually interested in owning it for one reason or another?
it's my money, who are these people to tell me what to do with it?
maybe I work pretty hard for it and this is how I enjoy spending it?
Theres nothing wrong with listening to the criticism
No one has too.
You can say critisism, but expecting anyone to actively care is an entirely different thing.
Say your peice. Make peace with it. Move on.
when your criticism is "dont do that thing you like to do because I dont like when you do it" it's not critisicm, it's just being condescending
(Stealing that for reference)
Yeah that would be condescending but i don’t approach it that way.
telling people what to do with their money is pretty much condescending even if you don't "approach it that way"
I would say: “that might be really cool and all but do you really need it or is it more of a want”.
If you can’t understand that question idk what to tell ya
I definitely can based on your mindset, I just think it's incredibly out of place
(and again, condescending)
bottom line, just dont tell people what to do with their money.
think whatever you want about that all day long but keep these thoughts to yourself.
If they can afford and they want it, they are going to buy it
Next question
I think it’s obvious you and I think much differently. Nothing wrong with that. I dont think we getting anywhere so lets just agree to disagree
Probably for the best considering nothing we say is going to be taken into consideration by anyone higher.
Sadly this is true
I mean
considering you still havent managed to back up your previous claim it's probably for the best, yep.
The evidence is in usually in the store right in front of you
The financial reports I asked you for when you said Bungie is losing money over Destiny 2 is in the store in front of me? what?
ay low free
I was just asking about Tenrai III coming back lol but love the MTX discussion. Learning a lot of different perspectives
ah, Tenrai III wasn't that good tbh
I just want the gear
the best thing that it brought was the playlist
I do hope for you that they will bring past ops back, I missed many ops myself
You and i both know the actual numbers wont be released but with the news that many projects were cancelled on top of employee layoffs we can make only an assumption about it. The dumbest decision I’ve seen from them was the construction on a new building when they were all about the remote work
The sword one?
dude, you're just basing your claim on thoughts instead of facts
and yes, the one with infinite grapple and sword
That’s all I ask. 343 can recycle content in post-season pass era and make $10 off me for an old op
Was a decent playlist. Got boring after a bit tho
Im basing my claims on what was reported. Idk what thoughts we are talking about here
we have cyber showdown III and yappening II coming soon tbh
Those don’t interest me as much but im at least ready to buy and store for filler content passes to progress on
No Eagle strike love
Luv eag strike
ok, show me where it was reported that bungie are losing money over Destiny 2 cause less people are buying mtx
that's all I asked
Its actually the only core i like
eaglestrike is kinda lacking in good stuff rn sadly, cross-shoulders are a big life saver but i'm hoping for an op based around it soon
Ill admit, i do not convey messages from my brain to text properly. So i probably messed that up above. My bad
Of course we only know predictions made by the company and the failure of those as well but we can also tie in the cancellation of projects and layoffs as well as those are other ways to save money. https://www.forbes.com/sites/paultassi/2023/12/28/destiny-2-is-a-2023-steam-platinum-earner-while-missing-revenue-projections-by-45/?sh=45ac37733e00
We dropping Forbes articles in here wow. It’s like it is Monday morning and im looking for reasons why my options are dying on a vine
Eaglestrike does need love.
The key part here is that this is revenue and revenue projections, not profit/loss. As in, Destiny 2 brought in a lot of money, enough to put it in Steam’s top 12 (and no doubt high on console lists as well that aren’t public), and that’s alongside longrunning megahits like DOTA, Apex and PUBG, and 2023 monsters like Baldur’s Gate 3, Modern Warfare 3 and Hogwarts Legacy. However, Bungie projected much higher revenue than it had for the year, and it missed those numbers by 45%.
from your own example
which kinda means you proved the opposite of your claim 😂
Eaglestrike also fits the mood of husky raid
ikr? it's such a good looking core, a great base of a power-armor suit like look
Numbers
Yes I realized that conveyed my perspective incorrectly. Ill take the Loss
ggwp, you get a point for admitting when you're wrong.👊
yep, agreed
I wonder how long Halo 5 will stay up and running
LOL
That was me when somebody asked if Lockheed was still around in 2552
How often does this happen? https://imgur.com/a/rHvJQBu
ive never seen it happen
those are phantoms btw
ghosts are the ones that float on the ground
I saw someone comment on a youtube video that there's a marine called Dust N. Echoes in some Reach level, but I can find no results on this when I google. Does anyone have a clue?
I did find this image on Reddit, but no dice on what level this is. https://www.reddit.com/r/gaming/comments/e5py0l/noticed_this_while_playing_halo_reach_one_of_the/
or maybe marine names are randomly assigned?
is there a way to check which mcc multiplayer is the one most alive
select all of them and see which one you get first
HALO: Infinite just crashed my Xbox Series X.
Ever since the CU29 update dropped it slowed the performance & framerate onto my Xbox when I pressed the home button.
imagine if the ma5 came with a 60 shot mag
Which is the best mode for the most xp gain in infinite?
imo btb or firefight because I believe they both give more xp when you complete a game
also firefight is an easy way to farm multikills and killing sprees for challenges
Fair enough thankuu
firefights more consistent and consistency is key
Wait, multikills count in firefight? 😮
Do vehicle kills count too there?
Most likely I normally skip those
Yeesh I’m reading the fall of reqch right now and I can see how Halsey really feels guilty with what she did
I get it kinda was a necessary evil but she still definitely doesn’t seem happy of what she is doing
Looking forward to protecting keys in truth n reconcilliation and the library? :3
well i have all mcc achievements
ive done ce laso solo twice already
Dear god
the next challenge is to do every level twice in a row without dying
so far POA and halo are easy
I enjoy challenge in games, hell I beat doom eternal on UN! But I will NEVER… EVER.. Set foot in H2 laso
oh i think ce laso is harder than h2 but im the minority
only hard mission in H2 is gravrmind and thats only the first 10 min
gravemind*
you can argue the first mission is hard
actually no the first mission in h2 (cairo station) is really hard
its ridiculous the game slaps you in the face as soon as the game starts
Is Reach Infection like dead or something in MCC?
Or do I need like Xbox Live even on steam?
Cause I use Ethernet but can't find a single match
Almost anything that isn't team slayer in 3 is dying on MCC.
why tho?
People go where the queue times are shorter and when a MP population starts to slow down a bit, it has an avalanche effect leading to other playlists dying.
Is this referring to ranked? As someone who hasnt been playing Halo 3 as much recently im disappointed to hear this.
Infection in general is lower populated in the mornings EST. More of a night-time gametype, similar to high level ranked (in the playlists that are active, not H2/Invasion etc that shouldnt be ranked). Not to mention infection is one of the most stale playlists (with no restrictions)!
I really wish there was an option to vote to boot players in Firefight as I went through an entire match with a teammate who refused to revive anyone and would straight up tea bags on top of the respawn beacons just to troll people and from what I could see in the chat everyone hated him.
In firefight, I kept getting into queue with this dude who would just try to run you over
mfw the last alive player doesnt take cover and dies (we were at the final round)
last man standing and then he thinks he's mint blitz and gets killed by a jackal
bro died to a needler
bro died to a jackal melee attack
he is NOT hyper lethal
onyx players and only being able to use the wasp or power weapons in BTB to get kills
fr
they think theyre special
I wish they just removed the wasp from the game entirely, it has added nothing of value
One hydra clip and it's gone
Fun fact: The Banished is a non-Prophet organization.
Ok that’s pretty good
Thank you.
They should make that a grunt propaganda voice line
They really should.
finally got into a firefight map that was revealed in a trailer
is it just me or is the motion tracker in infinite absolutely useless?
and i dont mean the gadget one
i completed the event pass
what now?
hero grind
its gonna take me a while to get there
something to do til the next op
now you play for the sake of playing
more like not playing until the next operation comes
fr
i played this game for 3 days and i feel like ive experienced everything
done and dusted
That’s halo infinite for you
Even with the seasons, people would come back for short term and then leave. Not being able to garner mainstay attraction.
The only people who are here are people that stuck with the game since launch or so.
I miss the time when people played the game for the game and not for the prize ngl
i literally only play this game for timed events
i used to play it every single day like my life depends on it but not anymore
iv been playin alot over the past 2 weeks
was doin 10hr sessions in firefight everyday to grind career ranks
all it offers are battlepasses and a progression system (career ranks) that just has the good stuff at the very end
do u not forge or anything
curious what u made in forge
18 bucks for a sniper rifle model
i know lol they can make it $30 and people would still buy
that pack is nutty. crazy honeypot
And I paid all 18 bucks for it
this is crazy I love 343 but this has to stop, this is a full priced game
yeah but most fans bought the campain
which was 60 bucks, so for the full experience its paid
i played thru it on game pass
Which is still a very separate thing from the mp
The campaign being its own thing has nothing to do with it
that doesnt make this a free game when its a part of the package, you can buy a physical copy, its not exactly a free game, even still, theres more than enough content for a 100 tier battle pass and store stuff
the more i see of this update the more heartbroken i am
Bruh idk what you're yapping about ._.
If I can get it on its own for free it's a free game😂
There are lots of stuff related to monetization this game does badly
half the game is paid, why is this okay? If you buy your contributing
the campain is half the halo experience
The campaign is the campaign
The multiplayer is the multiplayer
They are separate things bud
Halo Infinite multiplayer is completely free to play, it's separate from the campaign. Buying campaign does not mean you are buying multiplayer
no but my point is calling halo infinite a free to play game isnt exactly acurate, plus 18 bucks for a sniper skin is robbery, ill take loot crates over this any day, if the community keeps buying 343 wont stop doing this
It is accurate
You don't have to buy anything, it's completely optional
You can spend nothing and still play and earn rewards
Top 10 reddit takes ngl
Lootboxes were BAD dude, idk what you're smoking😂
they sucked but this is a hundred percent worse, and halo infinite was marketed as a campain and multiplayer, so they are not seperate things
Paying for a random chance to get something you might like is better than being able to buy what you see in front of your eyes?
Is that the hill you're gonna die on?
They were advertised separately and together, but the mp was always delineated as free.
yeah cause it wasnt 18 dolars for a single weapon skin
You're right, it was way more for a single skin that you don't even know if you'd want
everything in halo 5 could theoreticaly be earned in game, i got everything i wanted and didnt buy any req packs
When Halo 5 came out it hasn't needed to compete with games like Fortnite, Apex Legends etc
How do you compete with f2p games? With a f2p game.
How do you sustain a game that cost nothing? With MTX.
yes micro transactions
the cost ofd the master chief collection is only a few bucks more than the stantion
And it rebukes what I said how..?
Also why are you moving goalposts almost every 2 messages?
id spend money if it was worth the price, halo 4 charged 3 bucks for 3 armour sets, given its technicaly free to play then id say 5 bucks for an armour set is much more reasonable, and ive not moved the goalpost, my point has always been that this is far to expencive, i dont have a problem with microtransactions there just a rediculous price for digital dress up
yes, and do you not see the problem with that?
Price worth is subjective
Halo 4 is even older than halo 5 and had to compete with less games
I said earlier that the prices could and should've been better, but it has nothing to do with the campaign costing money, lootboxes "being better" (which they aren't) or any other point you made up
Also I'm pretty sure I already had the "stop telling people what to do with their money" discussion yesterday
it costs 7 bucks to make my guns yellow like cmon do you not see the issue, if you could earn credits or if it was cheaper this wouldnt be as bad, and its not about compotition its about game companies being greedy
they should quadtruple prices i want to see how many addicts would still buy
theyd buy it because the industry is sick
Because that is irrelevant to playability.
Free to Play games are Free, to Play.
and what exact;ly are our macro transactions funding?
You can play it all day for free, cosmetics do not affect gameplay, ergo, it is free to play, pay to customize.
Continued support and development either to Infinite, to the sequel, to the company's overhead in general, and/or to HCS.
Technically wise, more content lol
So if anything you should be thankful for the whales😂
all our content updates seem to be just store updates
It's amusing that despite growing up in a recession, most gamers are horrible at understanding the process of transacting for goods and services.
Or perhaps that's because of growing up in a recession.
they def need more game content like vehicles and weapons, mostly it's been more cosmetics for shop sale. forge updates have been the best stuff so far but im starting to feel the lack of vehicles n guns, it's not interesting when the new stuff is cosmetic. returning modes are cool but ehhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
The natural cycle goes on
It's usually one, the other, or both.
i mean, wouldnt you rather buy a complete game than get a free game with a thousand dollars worth of cosmetics? Games sell more than they did in the 2000s, we cant let companies keep on screwing over the playerbase, especially cause we arent getting seasons
Well, you have games made by passion individual and games made by corporates
When you play a game made by corporates prep for corporate strategies
All the sales of free items don't matter, development isn't cheaper at certain scales, and upkeep costs more than it ever did.
You gotta calm down with the "rise up gamers" stuff for your own health bud, this is the market and it's going nowhere
im upset to see something that is sort of like one of the only sorces of comfort become a glorified shopping mall
Then don't play games made by corporates, play indie games
'Only sources of comfort' usually means you haven't looked for others.
Once a while there's a new lightning in a bottle that shakes things up
Funny thing is Fortnite made passes popular, but PUBG made BR games popular to the point where Fortnite was made
gaming may suck one day
For some it sucks rn, and it's fine
But ranting about it and telling people who are still having fun what to do with their money leads to nowhere
most things lead to nowhere lol let the folks rant it's good to have opinions out there
I'll spoiler it for you, even if somehow the entire playerbase of this game decide to stop paying for mtx it won't budge anything in the market
Maybe not when these opinions are "lootboxes were better" 💀
new universe plus no mobile games exist in this universe run
Opinions are relatively worthless if the group behind them is uninformed. Impassioned arguments that gravity is fake doesn't make it any less real, for example.
gravity is fake is a solid opinion it can lead to some interesting sci fi novels
Contrary to 'customer is always right' philosophy, you do need to have a broad and apt knowledge on things to provide meaningful criticism.
at least you could earn the stuff by playing, thats better than not being able to do it without spending a fortune. My opinion on lootoxes are that in halo 5 you could at least unlock what you wanted through grinding, id rather that than a 40 dolar set of aromour
But could you play 5 without paying any money?
i miss the amount of guns n vehicles in Halo 5 i had a lot of fun in warzone, if we had infinite forge in halo 5 wouldve been awesome
"The customer is always right" is such a bs claim, I swear
I've seen so many games fall only because the devs fell to the aggressive begging of players who knew nothing about anything
yall really think that these bundles are fairly priced?
How I feel about the pricing is irrelevant.
It doesn't change the game being free to play.
it really is, its some of the most disgustingly overpriced stuff ive ever seen
Why are you trying to tie up "are the prices good" with "is monetization model X better than model Y"?
i think they should increase prices x5 make people spend more i just wanna see how much people would spend on it lol
im not tho
You are tho
I don't play Infinite to play dress up via money; I play it because the game is fun to play. If you like to play dress up, that is a you problem.
i wanna see $1k / month Halo Infinite bill
It's typically malformed as a statement; The proper term refers strictly to taste.
I feel personally attacked😂
you know what, yall are right, i shouldnt tell you how to spend your money
my apologies for being so agressive
Yep, sadly so many devs aren't sure enough of their abilities so they take ideas from people who never wrote a single line of code in their lives
All these people on Twitter who cried about Infinite's UI and "came up with a better mock up" without knowing the difference between painting a UI mock up and actually putting it in there🤦
Maybe, although I have no problems with it
But it's also way damn better than I can pull
as i play the campaign, will the cosmetic, cores and other collectibles be on the map?
because in the missions i spend more time trying to look for them lol
oh i know that i meant will they be marked if i havent collected them yet?
so i can go get them after the doing the missions
pretty sure they do show up on the map if u have em discovered
the radio towers ul need a guide for
ah okay
Gonna say it’s just wild to me that people here will still argue about monetization and sustainability/viability when MS, the $3 trillion evaluated corporation has laid off hundreds of folks all from their games division in the past year alone. Just wild
It’s just the most counter-intuitive thing to put down people asking for better practices, but it’s just the norm because we love Halo so much here I guess
Ah yeah Microsoft, the company that does only Halo stuff
market cap != liquid assets
not to mention a good chunk of people asking for "better practices"
- don't remember past monetization models
- are asking for worse practices (eg bungie style map packs)
- think that a "paid game" wouldn't be monetized further (disproved by halo 2<->5
Yeah Microsoft, the company that laid off 343i employees despite “higher fidelity assets requiring more dev work”
i think the current pricing is too high but cosmetic mtx is better than gameplay/feature mtx, especially when it segregates playerbases like bungie xpacks did
also very happy to not deal with xbl gold
Ske7ch said that Mk V and monetization like it gives the necessary funding to continue Infinite development, but if the content is just more store bundles/cosmetic updates and forge updates then do you really think it’s worth it?
If i could ask for one minor thing, It'd be being able to see the "old games" people talk about. They are in the past for long enough they're just opinions now... and a damn good source of entertainment, still.
forge updates
sure
Maybe they weren't efficient? Maybe management was looking for something else? Idk and I'm not gonna praise them but I'm also not gonna think I know better, and I'm pretty sure you don't know either 🤷♂️
You can think I'm shilling for the corp, but I'm just not making a joke out of myself
Most if not all the guys that got laid off were extremely talented. 343i has no shortage of great devs. You can insinuate that I’m making a joke of myself all you want but at least I’m not suggesting that those devs weren’t good at what they did
What do you guys think the Prophet of Sobriety’s routines are?
So I guess you knew "most if not all" of them personally 🤔
I'm not instituting anything, I just don't know based on what you're criticizing Microsoft
Still haven’t answered this @velvet dirge
Idk what to answer about this because I'm not Microsoft, 343 or anyone that knows what they're working on and what they're not working on
Damn this sounds kinky
a fully paid game can be monetized further if youre actually getting your money's worth
Assuming and basing are two different things
So if all we get from Infinite in the future is modes, maps (most being forge), and forge toolset updates, that’s sufficient for people who are buying store items hoping for more content?
i will never understand the whole free to play multiplayer thing, its dumb no matter how i look at it
i love how the community flipflops about how 343 devs suck <-> acktually we love 343 devs depending on the situation
there is MANY examples of good paid content for games out there
Are you asking me or all the people?
It’s for publishers to justify MTX
Replied to you, no one else is really talking about this here
A free to play model means you can reach to more people, including kids and people with no sustainable income
lowered barrier to entry
making multiplayer f2p obviously meant the only way 343 would make money is from microtransactions
No, I mean you're talking with me but asking about "people"
For me it's sufficient, yes
xbl gold is dead as a strategy in Microsoft's book so
hardly, when vast majority of players would likely buy it for the campaign as well
Damn, fr? A business wanting to earn money
Absolutely revolutionary
Good for you then I guess 👍
that's certainly a statement
Lmao
divorced from reality, based only on vibes sure
but it's definitely a statement
thats not the issue, it goes without saying they need to make money, but theres good and bad ways of doing it
I don’t think anyone asked for a free to play halo game
same
But as you can see it comes as a consequence.
cosmetic mtx (no effect on gameplay, doesn't segregate the playerbase, doesn't lead to premiums for features)
seems good to me
i wanted halo without xbl gold
not when the base game is lacking in content, and f2p players get almost no customisation
If it were me I’d hope for some sandbox revamps, weapons, a vehicle or two, re-introduce achievement based unlocks for old free content, etc
Halo Custom Edition and Halo 2 Vista
And that's how I know you don't think about that from both sides, otherwise you'd see the business only cares about the "most profitable" way of doing it
people right now are literally playing for the free pass, and will ditch the game in a week after theyre done cause theres nothing else to grind for
ah yes, the side projects that ended at 2 after xbl gold turned our to be a huge cash cow
Think the biggest update to the game will literally be the MCC-like mode selector
and that is a core issue in the industry, all these devs are run by big corps who only know how to count money
i remember when games didn't need skinner box treadmills to keep people playing. modern gaming i guess
This is really gonna be unpopular here but I hate that mentality that you gotta have something to grind for to enjoy the game
nothing new under the sun
a sense of progression is a big driving force for many players
You can still play them, and they’re fun
It's not that you're wrong, obviously
more that it's not gonna change
People have lives and there are other games. No matter how good the game is if it eventually feels like wasting time people will stop playing
true, unfortunately
Grinding is exceedingly lame
ok
they weren't part of microsoft's core strategy considering they stopped after the profits from xbl gold became apparent
ok, so... just play the game for as long as you can and want? if anything, if that's your opinion you should support mine since games you can enjoy without caring for "the grind" are the best for these kinda of people
but its harder to justify 343 when theres examples in gaming of how to properly monetize while caring for the playerbase. look at cp2077, lots of continuous support for the base game, for free, and a paid but significant content expansion
What sucks about the free to play model is you have to wait for the devs to drop feed content and that’s exactly what happened since they could t even commit to the 3 month season cycle. While it’s cool that you can have forge for free, the rest of the multiplayer experience is severely lacking. Player customization is the one thing that bothers me and its the core of Halo, armor cores are really limiting although it’s cool that we get to play as whatever spartan model we want. I don’t like the color coating system at all
or warframe, where almost nothing is paywalled and even premium currency can be earned for free
i thought halo was an FPS
Why advertise you have a multi layer color coating system when it’s fully dependent on the devs to make it? You have no expression.
You remember how that game launched, yeah?
Bad launches can cripple games permanently
They were to appease to the PC market wdym
you say that as if infinite is any better lmao
why did h3 not get a port? odst? reach?
imo half the cores are a waste of time and resources
Literally just look at Jedi survivor, genuinely a good fun game but the launch was so awful most people tuned out
Halo infinite is one of them, had a huge trend when the game launched but after everyone saw the cracks of season 1 and 2, they all jumped ship
I agree, but I also personally want to enjoy Halo, with my friends and others. You can say I’m stuck in the 360 era, but the feeling of goofing off in Halo with friends online is what I miss most in multi, and how it is currently is just not appealing for that kind of fun.
Infinite was:
- playable
- didnt advertise itself as 10 times bigger than it actually was
- so one "fail" is good enough to justify the other?
I still remember when people were on that copium and thought the game at launch was gonna offer more content than the multiplayer beta
cyberpunk was also playable, unless you were running it on crap hardware
That progression system is about player retention, I’m sorry that people enjoy feeling rewarded for hitting certain milestones in the game
ok, that's legit -but what does it have to do with the grind?
because again you're giving a perfect example for why focusing on the grind is bad
which is honestly a publisher's fault more than anything, cause a game like that should have never made it to previous gen
They dropped the PC market because Microsoft killed their games for windows live feature since it was so bad. I’m ngl, it was cool seeing a PC equivalent of Xbox live but was handled horribly
yeahhh that's not true. Not at launch at least.
However I did manage to get achievements to Halo 2 Vista.
Because the progression system - not grind because a GRIND would be like hitting Hero - is what helps with player retention
its very much true, vast majority of issue reports were from previous gen consoles
also cyberpunk had the same dev and publisher
It’s PART of it but a crucial aspect of keeping players interested
same dev and publisher, but not the same people
Microsoft still published games for pc well past h2pc
Infinite also doesn’t really play well with the ‘goofing off mentality’ but that’s not a monetization conversation
i truly doubt modern gamers would be able to play old games without a billion achievement/progression belld and whistles going off every w5 seconds
has it ever played like that outside of custom games?
but you just said you want to just have fun with friends and people? I dont understand where you're coming from
But they stopped with posting Halo as an exclusive since the game got backlash for the GFWL feature, needing to pay gold (which took away that requirement in 2008) and the halo 2 port only working perfectly for vista which not many people had at the time
but still the same body lol
different departments maybe, but the same body
They couldn’t be bothered with putting their exclusives on the PC marker the same with gears of war after the first game
yea yea nitpick, point is theres different people calling the shots up top
my point is the same
it's funny seeing systems that used to be called out for what they were, cheap attemts,at inflating playercounts/hours, now be lauded as a core part of the gaming experience
Forge is awesome but it doesn’t feel like H3/R forge custom games, it’s missing that social element
vibes based comment
I mean yea? The game is just completely built with different goals and ideas now compared to before
I need the Ubisoft HUD so I can’t see the game at all or I can’t play
the shots up top people are those that were responsible for stuff like in game models literally having a temp placement error models?
dunno if i get what you mean lol
I liked the cores but the only ones I truly care about are the Halo Reach, MK VII, and Mark IV cores, the rest don’t look like Halo.
They look really ugly and out of place.
Let me make it as clear as I can.
Better progression systems = better player retention
Better player retention = people I PERSONALLY played with before would be more likely to play the game
= enjoy Halo how I used to
Is that understandable? I don’t like having to dumb down my points this way
lemme see if I understand you, wdym by "progression"? ranks or customization?
the people up top are ones who forced the devs to sink unholy amounts of resources into making the game compatible with previous gen consoles, something the initial design never intended. that was a huge waste of dev time and effort that should have been used towards finishing the game for pc/new consoles
It’s a dead horse at this point do I need to bring up the loss of social aspects of the game with Infinite?
I agree, halo infinite should’ve been a next gen exclusive
this is exactly my point, again an unfortunate waste of resources
achievement unlocked: took a step (+4000 xp)
achievement unlocked: looked at menu (+6859853545 xp)
RANK UP: ULTRA ONYX MEGA INHERITOR GENERAL 80TH PRESTIGE
now this is gaming
Eh, I thought it belonged in wolfenstein more than Halo
that's also true, but there were still tons of technical disasters; either way, it's not a good example for the point you were trying to pass
we're talking about 2077 but yea
modern gaming
Oh, that too yeah
At least they dropped it with phantom liberty
When my character get a quest marker for quest markers
Achievement based unlocks? Path to customization that isn’t a temporary event or getting Hero or paying for store items?
hayabusa doesn't belong in halo
That fit better than the samurai one in halo infinite
it is, the poor launch was never relevant to this. its still a great example of monetization and free continued support for the game
What’s blows my mind is that MCC had achievement based unlocks but TEMPORARY
Customization then
so you do enjoy the grind but from how you phrased yourself you want to play more casually
and still i'll argue games can be fun without worrying about customization, especially games like Halo
like before you begged was awesome and should’ve been permanent
Marathon armor too in Halo 3, it actually looked like it belonged in the universe
well, mostly because it's not a live service game nor a multiplayer game
different games from different genres
They butchered it with Halo Reach and beyond
nah, hayabusa is literally a design lifted from ninja gaiden. Yoroi was designed from scratch
halo reach is goated
What do you think a progression system means?? It doesn’t involve unlocking aspects of gameplay
and forever will be
reach's progression was awful
wdym it was literally the best system out of all games
The hayabusa complimented to art style really well, and didn’t look weird or out of place, the one in infinite strays too far into the samurai aspect
the style isnt the issue, issue is it doesnt look like power armor at all
Reach’s was good but I still prefer achievement based stuff, even H4 commendations
Team ninja also designed the hayabusa armor for halo 3 but they nailed it looking like halo still
rank-based? like the profile ranks in Infinite, idk
i'm curious, how does unlocking new customization parts influence the gameplay itself? especially since your main point was about people with limited time
which is an issue for a lot of the cores tbh
Right
it was intentionally stretched out and impossible to meaningfully progress offline
aka without paing for gold and such
I like halo reach, I just didn’t like the security helmet.
I’m not condensing my points for you again, just read my above replies to you
reach was a multiplayer game first and foremost
Hey, did anyone else get a 12gb patch for MCC?
That’s evident with the cross progression throughout the entire game
paying for gold is just the hard life of xbox lol
modern gaming moment
Paying for gold was/is crazy, another thing that never needed to exist
lmao we didnt realise how good we had it back then
simpler times
nah gold sucked
You can do challenges for offline I think
I mean, you're kinda contredicting yourself every 2nd comment
you say stuff like "the feeling of goofing off in Halo with friends online is what I miss most in multi, and how it is currently is just not appealing for that kind of fun." and say you need to unlock customization parts often to have that fun
It's mindblowing that Microsoft and Sony still require paid subscriptions to play online when a good chunk of the most played MP games are free. It just punishes traditionally monetised MP games even further.
do you know that multiplayer existed before gold
multiplayer existed before Microsoft (kinda)
One is what I as in ME PERSONALLY miss the most. The other is what facilitated that environment and what had people logging in all the time
considering how much money people spend nowdays in microtransactions, gold really wasnt that bad in retrospect
Imma keep it real 343 fellas, Infinite in its current stage is playable but it has a long way to come before it truely feels like a proper halo game
nooooo halo 2 invented multiplayer
Yes, your point?
not a reply to you
Multiplayer existed in CE. Just not matchmaking.
but I'm talking with you rn, not with "people"
I want your take
with that garbage campaign story, it never will feel like one
Oh sorry Siege.
Too bad that won’t happen, they abandoned the season model and started winding down
I know but you do gotta admit that firefight is pretty decent for what its worth
Explain to me how I can get that feeling of goofing off in Halo with friends if those friends don’t play the game
It felt like something that should’ve been told through a book, cause it leads to something greater you don’t see
likes reach
infinite story bad
@onyx latch we got a live one
Also the endless is just a cheap cop out to introduce a greater threat than the flood.
you find friends that don't care about unlocking new clothes every 10 min
you turn on the game
you invite them to the group
you launch a match
profit
I don’t like how they have to tell us that, they don’t show it at all. It’s so cheap. Compare to the flood reveal of Guilty Spark mission.
s'all good
I’m sorry but my friends aren’t my friends because they played Halo once upon a time
reach was a prequel, and a good one at that
ok? point still valid
infinite erazed halo 5 offscreen
reach and wars 1 correct?
It’s not a point but ok
reach was bungie being upset over TFoR, 10 years after the fact
bungie was uninvolved (and in fact, hostile+opposed) to hw1
wars 1 is kind of a prequel, but also a standalone so
what about the other spinoffs
not aimed at anyone or any message in particular, but we're sort of generally drifting towards uncivil debate a little bit folks.
lets try not to insult others or get heated over opinions please, thanks guys!
damn that makes me think of wars 2 ending which makes everything even worse
They had their own version of Halo that wasn’t articulated to the expanded media
As far that they were concerned, halo was their story, no one else’s
bungie signed away the rights to Microsoft so no
I'll sum it up - I find that the modern mentality of "I can't enjoy the game if I have nothing to grind for or a goal to strive for" is... pointless.
Some games can and are supposed to be enjoyable even if you're out of challeneges to complete to finished your pass
They did that since halo 1’s development but they had a vision
if bungie wanted full control they had that option
Not really, Microsoft bought them during halo 1’s development
i dont really understand why 343 felt the need to retcon/offscreen all of halo 5, the overarching story in halo 5 was good, just the weird chief hunt & not playing as chief was dumb
They also brought the rights to it too.
In order for bungir to break free from Microsoft, they had to sign off on a few more halo games.
But that’s the entire point of live service games. You think it’s stupid sure but they build game systems solely to monetize that desire
bungie agreed to the terms yet also seemed to not want to play by the terms they agreed to
really its two things that should go hand in hand
I thought halo 5 was really corny and not in a good way.
Felt like a MCU flick more than anything. Like Josh Wheaton wrote it
like i said, the chief hunt aspect was dumb af and served no purpose
I disgaree, it's a point but not the point
you can play 100 matches after completeing the op and still have fun even without the "you unlocked X" screen
TFoR got made because bungie failed to write a script for CE, so Microsofts writers were brought in in exchange for the book deal
Cause they didn’t want to be in the clutches of Microsoft which often demanded them a bit too much.
especially since if they were gonna ignore all that in infinite, may as well have made locke a proper bad guy in 5, at least wed get to see blue team fold him in half and ship him back to ONI, prime delivery
and despite Microsoft bailing out bungie, they were still hostile, for example not letting them view the game they had to write the script for. Truly petty stuff
It was just to promote Halo CE that’s it, there’s only a throwaway line to the book in the intro of the game and that’s it
hehehe its the clone wars all over again
Again, if Bungie wanted full control, they had that option in the form of not agreeing to the deal with Microsoft
Dude they took the deal since Halo 1’s development and they were backed in a corner during that time
Since they were a small software studio that produced a few small projects
I mean I don't like either story much so
But Microsoft was setting ambitious expectations on them that were sometimes unrealistic
i'm sure they could have found other options
However the Halo 2 crunch was entirely Bungie’s fault tho
since apparently bungie hates working with anyone
But Microsoft did want them to release the game originally in 2003 which was not enough time
Their former work culture was anti-suit
ok
it's not like Microsoft was an unknown variable
bungie knew what they were getting into
During their acquisition to Microsoft they were fearing that MS would get rid of their work culture, luckily they didn’t
And for that reason you can see why Halo 1-3 is the most consistent trilogy compared to 343 where they were stashed away in cubicles not having any talk with one another
Yeah, for sure but they didnt want to lose their identity as a studio, they had a vision for the halo franchise
they also had an agreement with Microsoft
which they, y'know
agreed to
if i didn't like the terms of a deal i would not accept it or try to negotiate
maybe they were blinded by the Microsoft money
Because they were allowed to be independent within their gaming division. The only issue is that Microsoft had huge expectations from them.
which is probably why they went and sold themselves to activision right after the Microsoft break-up 😂
and then to sony
Yeah, trading one villain for another
For a bunch of folks that dont like suits they sure love their pockets
Then when they finally got their independence, they got bought by Sony
Blame the upper management at bungie
That’s why most of the ex halo devs left or got fired
oh no, poor wholesome bungue viciously being not-forced into a voluntary agreement by snoy
Upper management had something to do with that, not the entire studio
They wanted to fill their pockets, money is too good
the upper management usually in charge of all the whoopses, generally
they're still the faces
wow the blacklist here is really strict
pretty much
they want the big megacorp money while playing the freewheeling smol indie dev role
They don’t reflect the rest of the studio who are the developers
they're part of the studios one way or another
Again it’s why a bunch of ex halo devs left to pursue other projects
so then why did the devs not leave after the Microsoft acquisition?
Microsoft was a known variable
Activision killed destiny’s original idea
Then Bungie broke with activision as well and decided to trash Destiny 2 themselves
Because they liked the studio they’ve been working with and were looking to form their own independence after Halo Reach, which was short lived because of activision
I thought its already known activision wasnt really the problem in that relationship
Question, unrelated to the current topic I apologize, is some items missing from selection/the store? Like Rockeye?
Again a decision made by the upper echelons of bungie, not the entire studio itself
like Jason Jones? aka one of the founders of tiny indie dev bungie? Jason Jones the guy who's still with bungie?
some items aren't available for now and are locked away, yeah
Yeah, he just loves money in his pocket now, he actually was done with working on halo after Halo 2.
Will they return at all?
That’s why he wasn’t involved with Halo 3, ODST, or Reach
sadly we do not know and we won't have the means to know
Fun. Is it a known issue they're working on?
ah no, it's not an issue
it's amm... their choice
Wait so Rockeye is just not in the store at all? They just got rid of it?
Marcus Lehto, Marty, Joseph Staten, Shi Kai Wang, Jamie Griessemer were the top dogs of why halo became what it is.
idk for sure on that particular item, I can just tell you that some stuff are currently vaulted until further notice
michael salvawho?
Okay... That's a bit disappointing. Thanks though for the quick answer
Ngl there's not really such a thing as genuinely good bungie pvp 👀
What a poor pedigree.
It’s called Halo 3
Halo CE to Destiny 2, I generally think they don't know how to do pvp as well as campaigns
Bait
bungie's pvp has always been "ok"
It literally started MLG
“it’s okay”
It literally became a competitive shooter without ever trying to be, that’s how good the system was. You can’t be competitive if you don’t have a good foundation for it to be.
Eh, competitive gaming tournaments existed long before MLG.
halo 2 mp is well known to be buggy af
But Halo popularized that with MLG, again without even trying to be because it always focused on the casual part of it.
no no just like multiplayer, halo 2 invented competitive gaming
MLG was also started before Halo 2's launch.
And still regarded as one of the best multiplayer shooters
You probably BXR combo’d
Doesn't mean it's actually all that good lmao
Bannable offense
Bungie is mostly relevant because of memes, like MLG 🗿
more for the novelty of matchmaking rather than gameplay quality
The amount of options for the multiplayer, the modes, the social aspect is what made it really good, only perfected by Halo 3.
Im not saying Bungie is bad ofc, its just that the transition from pve to pvp is like being on the peak of mount everest and then falling to the bottom
The gameplay quality was good that’s why it launched a competitive scene
Again Halo 3 was the amalgamation of that.
I guess its more that it was good before modern gaming was possible, though thats just me
I mean modern like within the last 7 or so years, definitely not the recent ones where everything sucks
If the gameplay wasn’t fun, or just okay, then there wouldn’t have been a competitive, casual, or custom games scenes out of it.
it was lucky and well saturated due to its massive ad campaign.
If you want to talk about crappy multiplayer look no further than MW2 2009, that is the most unfun multiplayer I’ve ever played and the most broken
Of course it was fun back whenever it was released, its just that I feel the campaign did much better at aging than the multiplayer
h2 was popular yet its popularity waned
Uh are we forgetting Halo CE? Halo CE thrusted Halo to popularity, 2/3 just cemented it with XBL.
I can still enjoy the campaigns, but mp feels empty and soulless by comparison
if you want truly lasting popularity, look at AoE2
Where by who? Probably from Halo Reach players and beyond
I respect your opinion
aoe2 is a game that still has an active community with many competitions
I’m not that good at halo multiplayer anymore but it’s multiplayer is a big foundation of why it became popular in the first place.
i think the ad campaigns, wide open market, and other factors were pretty significant
Even with Halo 1 which didn’t have online, was insanely popular due to the system link feature.
old halo would fail to compete in the modern market
If you’re saying halo only became popular because of those factors you’re smoking bud. Again halo has a good gameplay foundation that other gaming studios took notes from.
just look at MCC's ever-waning popularity
The campaign AI is engaging to fight and the levels are fun to tread through, while the multiplayer is addicting to play because of the gameplay, modes, and maps it offered not to mention the wide customization and flexibility it offered
compare it to AoE2's consistent numbers
Compare that to Minecraft's numbers. Check mate, acSiegemstrs.
Good social, but competition there was scarce. Doesn't make up for the games shortcomings now.
other games had multiple modes
To be fair it’s a collection of games that were popular and had higher player numbers a decade ago or so ago
They’re old games
Not a great comparison, it’s better to look at the original player numbers to see what I’m talking about
If they were released today with today graphics and stuff it would be great
aoe2 is more popular than the entire mcc
Of course, halo fans tend to ignore gaming history in favor of coping by pretending halo came up with every idea ever that relates to gaming.
aoe2 predates halo
What’s aoe2
Again why did Halo 2 popularize MLG? Halo 3 followed? You can’t have a mediocre gameplay system and form a competitive scene out of it, the gameplay systems have to be great in order for that to happen
Just say that you’re bad at multiplayer bro
Irrelevant to the FPS genre of gaming, which Halo competes in.
Actually you absolutely can
People love mediocre games all the time.
age of empires 2, a game that enjoys a far more active scene than halo ce<->4
Doesn’t list any examples lmao
Literally every NFL in FIFA game for the last decade at least
Didn’t come up with, it popularized.
Halo directly competes with cod who cranks out a game every year including 2 mw in 2 years
There's the other cop
That’s because it’s sports game, those are a different breed of players. They’ll buy the same game 5 times.
Age of Empires II: The Age of Kings is a real-time strategy video game developed by Ensemble Studios and published by Microsoft. Released in 1999 for Microsoft Windows and Macintosh in 2001, it is the second game in the Age of Empires series. The Age of Kings is set in the Middle Ages and contains thirteen playable civilizations. Players aim to ...
ensemble studios getting the last laugh from beyond the grave
You asked for examples, I gave you examples. You don't get to re-dictate just because you got disproven.
It’s almost like AOE2 had a longer PC community than Halo MCC did, the bigger community is on console.
Again Halo is a console shooter first and foremost.
mcc fell off the xbox top 50 years ago
Your examples came after their message. lol And those are sports games, not competitive shooters. Stay in the genre. lol
You gave a cheap example because sports games have the most brain dead consumers
Sports games fit the bill sorry man I don't make the rules
That’s not even a competitive shooter either
Ah yeah, NBA2k14 with a Glock.
List an actual mediocre competitive shooter
Again widely regarded as the pinnacle of competitive gaming
simple as. Bad balancing, broken input handling, etc
It became popular because of its quality and halo 2’s MP is fun
Again you can’t form a competitive scene if the gameplay is good enough, that’s just a fact.
literally rushed out the door without playtesting for balance
And yet people still played it well after Halo 3 launched
Again still beloved.
the gameplay was acceptable enough for the time and platform
It’s not my favorite by a long shot, but it’s a fun multiplayer in its own right and laid the stones for Halo going forward during that era. Again you can’t mention a fun multiplayer game without mentioning halo 2.
i can though
“Acceptable” lol
Age of Empires 2 for example. or Age of Mythology. Or WC3.
It is hilarious that I was asked for an example of a popular mediocre game series, provided one, and then got told I cannot use an apt example because it is "" too Cheap "". It is almost as though that is because it was a good example of a mediocre yet popular game franchise.
It’s almost like they were on a crunch or something and even then, they still managed to knock it out of the park.
halo 2 could not compete today
Again it formed competitive shooter scene that only became popular because of how good the multiplayer system was
Wouldn’t have happened if the multiplayer actually sucked.
It'd be like Quake Champions. It's just too antiqated in the shooter genre. Name recognition is "for boomers"
the competitive shooter scene*
*on xbox
You didn’t list a competitive shooter, just a sports game
it doesn't suck it's just not great
Kids are all about their Apex Legendeses and Fortnites.
(as bungie's halo is popular for)
In general, it influenced the likes of other games too.
h2, despite being the most accessible it's ever been, can't compete
Quake champions isn’t as talked about as III
III is still one of the best arena multiplayers shooters and it can’t be replicated
And it still has a player base
actually it can be replicated as evidenced by the 50000000 forks and clones of the game
None are remembered as quake 3.
it's always bothered me that halo never has had an engine clone done
I honestly can’t tell you a memorable arena shooter than quake 3 and unreal tournament
surely some of the billions of fans could make an engine clone
Some old games are good, but some are more like museums - fun to visit and see the history, too mind-numbingly boring to stay for most
It's kind of wild, yeah. Though all of the Halo fan games seem have to fizzled out. Guessing that's more on "oh, we have talent, we can just get jobs in industry and make money."
doom, quake, civ, etc all have a few clones floating around
Can’t say that about Halo tho
halo, despite its undeniably large fanbase, and 20+ years, has none
It can’t be cloned, it’s that unique.
lol no
Could probably point towards it not having a great PC history.
I would hard disagree
Halo is one of the examples of what Im talking about imo
You can literally hop on Halo CE right now and you can still play through it
I mean mp, the campaigns are fine
The controls and gameplay aged well, the level design did not tho
However it’s not like a DOOM 1 situation where if you weren’t alive to play it during the 90’s you would have no idea where to go since it’s a maze because fps shooters during that time where from a different era
Multiplayer is still being played via halo custom edition and the smaller Xbox scene.
Again halo multiplayer is casual to its core which makes it easy to get into
https://github.com/MissLavender-LQ/LibreQuake/
i'm fairly certain Microsoft's gcur would allow for a fan-clone
You asked for a mediocre game. I provided. you did not specify anything except "competitive". Also, while I will say I am not exceptional when it comes to competitive gaming, that does not preclude knowing the history of competitive games, nor does it preclude being knowledgeable on the subject. It is not like you need to be good at football to understand the sport or its history.
You didn’t list any competitive shooter, invalid
Okay nerd emoji 🤓
Saying big words to make yourself look like the wiz kid
Scared of big words? Booga Booga! Excelsior! Booga Booga!
Average discord nitro user moment. :/
Discord users are either terrified of two syllable words, or absolutely love them. There is no in between.
You could popularize MLG in FPS Chess if you really wanted to, Halo was just popular
@onyx latch https://libregamewiki.org/Potato_Killer
Potato Killer (also styled as PotatoKiller) is a single player swarm-based first-person shooter where the player uses throwing knives to fend off hoards of killer potatoes. The objective is to last long enough to set a new high score. It is part of Vitaliy "kuviman" Kudasov's Sampleman series of games.
goty 2kforever
Pale is right on most accounts here, a game cannot be a competitive shooter without it having a solid base for play, in compare to the other games on the market. If the game doesn't have a solid core where stuff isn't too random feeling, it cannot have a long lived comp scene. Counter Strike is huge for this, guns have predictable patterns to them, the networking is tight, and you know if you lost it's because you weren't better than the other people.
The alternative path there is CoD, which at its core is nonsense, fun, but nonsense. What it does have though, is the ability to be altered with custom game settings to make it more competitive, the same way Halo MLG was ran forever and HCS is today. MLG teams weren't playing base Halo, settings were all over the place to fit what that subset of players found more competitive. What's cool is Halo allowed this and the core gameplay that non-MLG players did have available in MP was generally consistent and fun, but it's also just what everyone else on Xbox was playing. Things shifted pretty rapidly with CoD 4 onward.
Halo 2 was the competitive shooter for consoles at the time, because it didn't have much to compete with. PC was another story. Halo 2 could absolutely not come out and compete today if left without updates and system changes. Too buggy, too janky, too slow for the modern Zoom Zoom gamer. "No jetpack? No slide? No sprint? Ugh."
I mean even if you had all that stuff that made it fit the modern zoom zoom gamer, it still wouldn't be considered that great
I think it would be called "wannabe titanfall"
Halo 5 had the zoom zoom stuff and people loved the multiplayer in that.
Right, they're in a funky spot with trying to bring in younger gamers to the series. What a lot of younger gamers want just isn't Halo.
Its a more modern game, Im just saying the old games had the benefit of being old
And as a result, people think 343 is actually worse than Bungie, when in reality they're just in a different time that requires more difficulty to develop
Because of its fun gameplay systems
.
Art aside, most people could probably recreate the Bungie halos with ease
OG Bungie was pretty GOATed with the sauce though. The tools they had at the time, to make what they made, pretty solid design and execution.
Yes, at the time they were absolutely awesome, it just hurts my nostalgia that it hasn't aged as well as I remembered
Bungie is still top of the line for lighting without ray tracing. Destiny 2 looks beautiful.
More like incompetent management, lack of any consistent direction, and for some reason over ambition and under delivering.
343ms trilogy feels really inconsistent
You wanna look at modern Bungie? They're even worse, arguably
Yeah I know that, which is why I refer to the old bungie.