#history
1 messages · Page 22 of 1
colorado mark 8 maybe
Mark 8 gun meaning Mark 5 shell?
mark 8 shell Jaba...
Mark 8 is the SHS
aka not Colorado
Mark 8 is also the chromium lined Colorado gun
the mark 5 ap shell of mark 8 gun
Which fired the Mark 5 AP
2-piece Type 91/1 APC with removable cap head + windscreen
[insert acr ap]

so the 8"?
nvm
you mean the 460
Any would do really
that would be beyond my current capability
Long term goal then
once I get a proper lathe
Was gonna ask if you were lathing these
I use a grinding wheel
to do the rough shape
then I put it in a drill and use a small triangular file to put in all the details
A drill huh
I wonder if you could kill someone by dropping it onto their head
from enough height sure
we call that a mortar
French apc size compared to my pen
I suppose the question is, what shells would be the most unique in exterior shape 
richie's shell is up there
and the russian SAP
maybe one of those antisub shells? I wonder how they look
Something flat nosed, yeah
hmm
I feel like this anti sub shell would be a bit boring
I'll look for another
heh
Johnson cap USN APC

honestly jaba, finding an interesting underwater shell will be hard so I'll just do the one I showed above

the USN doesn't have any real stand outs aside from that wacky 16" HE stuff
or the johnson cap AP
blyat
Russian shell for an Austro-Hungarian gun
Russian:
AA mod 1928: 4.98 calibers
HE mod 1915: 5.05 calibers
HE mod 1928: 5.22 calibers
Russian:
AA mod 1928: 2.95 lbs. (1.34 kg)
HE mod 1915: 4.34 lbs. (1.97 kg)
HE mod 1928: 2.73 lbs. (1.24 kg)
I wonder why they reduced the burster

Tashkent evacuating civilians from Sevastopol 
Oi, stop censoring me
I'm pretty sure you know of the german 5.4 cal HE shell used in Langer max (ex-wurtemberg/sachsen guns)
At least you didn't go Germ*n because of gendering issues
G fluid
Germyn
Gerwoman 
tbh
when looking at Bayern's shell I can't help but notice it's literally a french APC shell with a tiny windscreen on top
I wonder how that came to be
hmm

convergent evolution?
In all seriousness it would be interesting to find more info on earlier german APC caps

Ballistic test with 3 projectile
1° without cap (ommitted in my test)
2° with pointed cap (see image below)
3° with stump nose cap (see image below)
Results against carboard plate at 45° V0 ~ 20 mps (see images below)
for pointed cap projectile: long "track" with oblong hole at the end
for stump cap projectile: very short "track" with round hole at the end, noticeably higher exit velocity
Conclusion: even at lower velocity, having a cap edge (like on the stump cap) achieves the same effect as the high velocity tests against steel!
Okay but when do we get a BB grade wadcutter?
wadcutter against sloped cardboard would do the same as the stump cap shell but with less jagged edges around the hole
some HE shells are basically wadcutters with a thin ballistic cap
so against lightly armoured targets you could even use such HE instead of say
sap
eg.
literally this with a ballistic cap
#MareAperto 2022:
Questa è la #MarinaMilitare
#NoiSiamolaMarina
#ProfessionistidelMare @MinisteroDifesa @SM_Difesa
@somber knoll
Poggies.
btw, what were those rim-like cutaways at the back of the shell?
rebated boat tail

you mean this part?
yeh
yeah it's a rebated boat tail
like this
actually more like this
but same principle
Hm, I've seen the boat tail on smaller bullets but never saw a rebated one. tyty.
Italian Prime Minister Marshal Pietro Badoglio and his government fled the German occupation of Rome back in September and have set up their headquarters in the port city of Brindisi, right on the heel of the Italian boot.
Badoglio proclaims: “Italians! There will not be peace in Italy as long as a single German remains on Italian soil… Shoulder to shoulder we must march forward with our friends of the United Nations, of Great Britain, of Russia and of all the other United Nations.” Tomorrow, Italy will also declare war on Japan.
Badoglio sends a note to General Dwight D. Eisenhower informing the Allied commander-in-chief in the Mediterranean that his country’s forces are now in service of the Allies. “By this act, all ties with the dreadful past are broken and my Government will be proud to be able to march with you on to the inevitable victory.”
In response, President Franklin D. Roosevelt, Prime Minister Winston Churchill, and Premier Joseph Stalin issue a joint statement that their governments “accept the active cooperation of the Italian nation and armed forces as a co-belligerent in the war against Germany.”
Picture: Marshal Pietro Badoglio reads the declaration of war. Next to him sits US Brigadier General Maxwell D. Taylor. Brindisi, Italy, 13 October 1943
Source: Unknown.```
should've crammed an eight road wheel on without lengthening the hull somehow
If you ever see flow or pressure map behind a bullet it makes a lot more sense
Besson MB 411 loading in Surcouf
Something I am curious about: When it came to WW1 and WW2 maps. When it came to Japan. Why did maps prefer to use the military flags as opposed to the nation flag?
Red circle on white rectangle while (somehow) unique, is not distinctive
@spring briar saw hit talking about WWI ships in another server and when he mentioned the Anglo-French I became curious about something, should the French Navy be put in a Jutland like position against the German Navy how would they fare?
I mean the French in WWI had like what
4-8 dreadnought battleships tops?
the Germans had like 17 on the outbreak of war?
plus the 4-5 battlecruisers iirc
it's more even with regard to predreads
but the French don't seem particularly well off to fight large fleet engagements alone versus the Germans
the hilarious 12 degree maximum elevation for French battleship turrets is a total hinderance to fighting at range in a sea engagement
absolute maximum engagement range of a whopping 15,860 yards
atleast the Germans attempted to boost their elevation to like 16 degrees during the war
Yeah it wouldn’t go very well


just saw out the top of the gun window so it can elevate more

The soviets got a lot of kills with those in WW2
No joke
The AG-2 aerial mine lobbed by the DAG-10 launcher
`A section of the United States Declaration of Independence listing the colonies' grievances against the King explicitly notes:
He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation: For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us.`
The M1A2 SEP TUSK will join!
Tato will be happy 
with improved thermal optics and add-on armor designed to increase protection in urban fighting environments
Weirded me too
Wonder if US relied on those machine gunners for balcony attacks
it's the tusk without the turret armor
The US tends to use Infantry to prevent roof attacks on tanks
meanwhile the russian stream mentioned Hungary as possible sub tree for Italy
cant wait to see T-55s and T-72M1s in the italian tree /s

Ye refit was needed to be more special than hyuga
who tf asked for a second helgoland
The Kaiser, at one point
He did more than ask, I'm sure
sent a whole damn plan to the navy and got called as "unfloatable" 
He was a special child
https://i.imgur.com/16uhSfx.jpg perfect timing too, given a certain game's release of something
I was literally wondering who would make this joke
I did not expect you do be the one doing it phoe
"Say The line TurretJack"
"Today's GUN-a be a good day!"
"Haha! I love this little guy!"
seems the kaiser was a fan of the MN
To defeat the enemy, you must become the enemy
therefore, ask five different companies to each build a pre-dreadnought and see which one is best!
they trialled one

I really expect Bismarck before MN
yeah that's a certainty no?
no MN ships in that initial leak
The really ironic part is that the prints for French ships isn't exactly hard to get either
stares at the whole archive of drawings
like, all the way from 1884 to 1967
do the funny, please, WG or WT
maintain the ratio but only up to a certain point
in 1939 they are essentially the same tonnage
Yes, Italy was closing that gap fast
In 1940, considering only major ships in service or under construction, Italy counted 280 ships for 700,722 tons compared to 240 ships for 827,972 tons for France, and the tonnage ratio had reached 0.85:1 compared to 0.63:1 in 1931 (401,318 tons compared to 638,660 tons) and 0.64:1 in 1919.
Mostly based on this.
As in, France had many under construction?
i find different numbers around, like Phoenix has 600k vs 594k in 1939
we should both have put some of that sweet navy money into our air forces and tank forces and you know it lol
I have a entire Finnish tree and a new abrams to grind
hurrah
China also got Tor 
man if its a abrams that can pull off the T-80BVMs side ERA bullshit I'll take it
ARAT isn't publicized and is probably going to get given non-KE ERA values despite the hilariously beefy flyer plates
She also has gen 2
They also modeled the ARAT wrong
👁️ tho Swedish T-80U as well
Meanwhile Italy 
Given the new Churchill Crocodile has a flame thrower
Wonder if Gaijin will stay serious on adding them
Since they do nothing but hurt enemy's fps
along with a Leopard 2A6
Yeah it would be equal to giving a bomber napalm only option
Glad to see her as well
god damn
This is the strongest Skyraider right. Or is it AD-7
And uhh F2 Early for reasons 
i dont give a fuck about planes ngl
I like how they gave Sweden 2 more MBTs but not a Sherman or Panther to give them a single normal fucking tank in that general range
Because the funny TD and weird shit memes are great and all
But sometimes you just really need a tank to fight an objective
is OF40 in WT?
France got another Mistral
3 of them

Considering the ranges in WT's forced urban maps
Flamethrowers setting people's shit on fire could absolutely be worth something
SANTAL
Especially if it's able to bypass cover at all
Centauro mains:
Yeah fire can be useful for wheels
It's a Churchill
M67 let's go
Nah speaking of future fire boys
M67 wouldn't be added

For the same reason the L3 flame and the T-34 flame wouldn't be added
No main armament
Sherman Zippo on the other hand could be added
M67 would be completely useless
Because it has a coax 75mm flamethrower setup
Which could result in really stupid close range memes with dumping a 75mm smoke round into someone's face
And then lighting them on fire
Wasn't that KV1 aka KV-8?
OT-34-85: created from the T-34-85, had an internally mounted flamethrower ATO-42 replacing the hull machine gun
double fun when the smoke particles are mixed enough with the air to create an aerosol mixture
which would be ignited by the flamethrower
to cause an airburst basically

is this what people mean when they say air fryer


No
wonder if they'll add the finnish coastal defence ships before the MN

god it would've been hilarious if the Soviets attempted a breaktrough via the gulf of Finland only to be ambushed by two tiny BB's hiding behind a forrested island shooting 254's at them at a rate that would make a Brooklyn blush (paraphrasing here)
very fun

👁️I still think Italy should get a Spain sub tree


With such a short parallel bearing surface
mediterranean sub tree 
Outranging Soviet guns more than a decade younger
Through the power of funny shell
idk with sweden getting Finnish 2a6 for no reason other than "muh nordic nations" i dont see italy getting the spanish Leo 2E as that weird
very much reminded me of French 155 mm shells from the LP guns

(WW1)
~1917 -
long windscreen energy
feel free to send more shells
WG has failed us....
Imagine being unable to fit Quad 406s in front when you clearly can with room to spare.... /s
that's not how ships work
"room to spare" is not the only thing you need on a ship
I jest
and that thing is already top heavy af for obvious reasons
Yet this is wg we are talking about
I mean WG thinks the Citadel is a giant empty box
So surely having massively top heavy ships are fine because you know...what the heck is balance
🌎 Get Exclusive NordVPN deal here ➡️ https://nordvpn.com/OpsRoom. It's risk-free with Nord's 30-day money-back guarantee! ☝️
Having come ashore and secured the southern airfield on Iwo Jima, focus turns to the extinct volcano on the south west of the island. Japanese guns on Mt Suribachi continue to fire on the landing beach, disrupting men, ...
Japanese Kamikaze pilots were tasked to fly themselves into enemy warships, and achieved some success in the closing year of the Pacific Campaign. But who were these pilots? And could they be stopped?
@spiral cedar 8” type 91
need to paint
Time to hit some magazines
I wonder, were the Type 1s painted differently
different symbol
and the tip wasn't colored
just being white
oh wait the orange is a 20.3 cm common
so I assume the type 91 was still white

still a fairly pretty shell
will do 46 cm shell fairly soon

In this video I ask the curator of the Tank Museum at Bovington David Willey what he thinks is the most underrated Soviet Tank of the Second World War.
Disclaimer: I was invited by the Tank Museum at Bovington in 2022.
https://www.youtube.com/c/thetankmuseum/
https://tankmuseum.org/
Cover design by vonKickass.
»» GET OUR BOOKS ««
» Stukabook...
T-44 is bold
it makes you based
I think the choice of pfp makes you a weeb :p
heh
though i kind of think its hard to call a T-44 like
underrated
and more just obscure
because they didnt really get deployed
Salt Lake City
like yeah it's literally 1:1 better than a panther in nearly every aspect while being lighter but also they just never really used it so most dont know its a thing
Oh it was Salt Lake City
salt lake based
talk to me about su-100s
I adore the Pensacolas
They are adorable
Very beautiful
Very powerful
disregard armor acquire m a s t
And then they got rid of them
Gangut 
they ran out of miscellaneous AA guns to slap on
so they just installed this guy too
Bigger
beast killer my beloved
Tiger 2 fans when eating a 152mm
he gang toot if you up
what is it now
JB deck pen by mas
oh god is it the usual MAGAZINES BAD AAAAAAAAAAAAA

Nah just someone asking if she really is as bad as one of their friends says she is
the crippling design flaw of being shot at while stationary from absolutely absurd ranges by the best deck punching battleship in the world under a nominal ally's construction
and even then i think she needed to list slightly into it to make it stick

well that's a surprise
immune from the BMP-2 and 3s 30 MM

Because the extra side protection?
yeah CV-90 and the BMP-2M won't be able to pen it
Neat
plus if its as trolly as the T-80BVMs side armor
it can likely just eat shots it has no business eating
Sweden tree is also looking interesting
its getting a much tougher top tier lineup for what was already a insane top tier line up
STRV-122s A & B + Leopard 2A6 + T-80U
for... a couple seconds
you say that
but the amount of times the T-80BVM has sustained constant 40 MM fire from my CV-90 to the side
skill issue
These unsubstantiated reports, and others, were seized on by those who had long warned about the German threat. The Atlanta Journal reported that Carl Vinson, chairman of the House’s naval committee, was “confident that the attacking planes and ships were Japanese in name only.” The Democratic chair of the Senate Finance Committee, Walter F. George, was quoted by the same paper as saying that many Germans planes “have been overhauled and flown to Japan… and there can be no question that the attack [on Pearl Harbor] was arranged and engineered, as to time, by the Germans.”
ever just see a vehicle so stupid in concept
that god orders its only prototype destroyed
the prototype ended up being destroyed in a fire
The Vickers Mk.11 Viper is an unusual vehicle. It is referred as a border patrol vehicle or long-range patrol vehicle. Basically it is a fire support vehicle, capable of carrying infantry squad of dismounted troops.
cringe 6 wheels
105 MM gun on a vehicle with 7 dismounts
so they basically mashed a tank and an ifv together
Despite the 7 dismounts it still held 42 rounds for the 105
This uh, is a terror on WGRD
One of the only good vehicles the Aussies get
I hate that it could be so much better
they could of moved it out of the vehicle tab
and made it a actual aussie IFV
vickers Mk11 with Commando 90 dismounts
what we could of had
tho I never bothered looking into the actual vehicle and how stupid it was until now
"yeah so we made this for Southern African countries that want a vehicle with the firepower and ammo capacity of a tank and able to deploy 7 dismounts"
Nah we bought it from the poles )))
@manic latch turns out this is not a 16" training shell for Soyuz
this is a 12" SAPC shell from Bofors for the Espana class battleships of Spain
the dude standing next to it is just really small

But doesn't the training shell look different anyway
A single piece without cap
I mean this one
Yep
you can't see that anyways
Ah
you can only see the windscreen in either shells
What being bankrupt does to a mf
last 74 gun third rate and they scuttle her anyway 
the real NSFW is sawing the barrels off

French already show EMBT shut

True
According to reports, the next-generation main battle tank will have two crews instead of the three currently used for the Type 99



Going forward #history will be going public much like how #al-lore did. Those evicted will be allowed back in. The rules will continue as they have, and threads will be activated here for general questions or places for you all to store/present research and other cool things you guys have found.
The following rules apply in history:
-#rules still applies to this channel.
-Discussion can be real history or alt history if its grounded. Discussions on video game and or media representation of war machines is also allowed as long as it is also grounded in history.
-Please do not spam chat with large texts or images if they are not apart of the current conversation, or if they were not asked for in any point of time by a user in the channel. If you feel it will lead to a proper conversation and discussion, or should other members currently active in the channel agreed that a large text message or image spam is non-disruptive and instead beneficial to the discussions currently being held, this rule could be ignored.
-Refrain from having political conversations.
-Keep discussions civil and do not argue in bad faith. Do not at any point insult users while discussing topics, such as but not limited to, insulting or bringing up race, nationality, creed. This will treated as trolling and enforced heavy handedly.
-Refrain from letting your irl bias cloud your discussions and conversations. Keep things rational.
-This channel is a place of learning, please attempt to uses sources when discussing in order inform and teach others what you know, especially if a question is asked and you know something about the topic. Each of us has had to go through the “huh, maybe I don’t actually know everything” phase at some point in order to start learning at a deeper-than-surface level. So please understand that and do not be a contrarian just for the sake of it, or present information in a manner that makes others believe you are an asshole.
These rules were made with the input of several club members. If you feel there is any change needed to keep a friendly club environment please inform a mod and we will take care of it with your input and assistance.
@drifting patio How bout no
Going great already I see

Well then.
Something something yamato good iowa bad
Hi
But at what cost
I don't know
The horde draweth near
I've already ruined D&D night
The calamity of Bismarck wankers, wehrbs, and the like
My mind is a mush after the last night
May the lord and saints preserve us.
The horrid masses will be entering
Latias and Tea just told me wehrbs is a big nono in General
But Ikeaboo and stuff is fine? 
🥴
we have a horrible time ahead
Sirene, you and your diesel bias does not belong here
You're hereby sentenced to the shadow realm.
Oh yeah?
Hnm, that’s an idea. Abandon #history and abscond into a lifeboat (a thread)
Didn’t the band go down with the ship though
(Please don't. Tell me more about it, because I'm genuinely curious)
The people running behind him
we’re truly going down the history channel pathway
This part of the rules has been there since Berci was banned
anyway who wants to prepare copypastas about ancient aliens
Chaos!
Let's see if this channel will sink faster than Hood's deck penetration and magazine explosion
3 minutes?
With 1415 deaths, yes.
odd thought mr I am totally not a argie left on his own accord
What's this for?
I'll claim that at least 70% of the frequent posters in this channel have bias, and have it show (me included)
An alternative M-class design
He got banned from help for his bias making him effectively a troll
Then he continued in history and lore
I don’t know how one man can hate the British isles so much
Britain bad
Maybe his brother died of cordite poisoning
his parents were killed in British Alley by a pair of Englishmen
Actually, I'm not going to lie
You'd think that a person who actually hates Britain would use a justifiable reason instead of making shit up
"Britain bad" was apparently a criticism towards Master and Commander The Far Side of the World
Hey, at least the British didn't have sacrificial auxiliary machinery in their TDS
"It depicts the French and British empire in the Napoleonic Wars, empires are bad, it therefore is a bad movie"

Like anything remotely British he hated without reason
Thank you, twitter
I swore he had to either be a troll or Argentinian
wait did they really remove the powangry emote
Because there are many justifiable reasons
And yet.
It was underused IIRC
Didn’t he have a meltdown on the ECTL discord when vanguard dropped
Didn't know Berci's parent's names are Vocabulary and Grammar.
on an alt account or something
I thought I would never see someone else with a history channel emote lmao 
They also removed the Sirius emote
🇭
I have many upon many emotes I never use
Unforgivable
(I went out of my way to cap the icon from the all-WW2-all-the-time era as well)
You know what, it's surprisingly quiet so far
or is this just the calm before the storm
Anyway since I can ask here now
“call in the twenty million questions on Bismarck”
Do any of you have recommendations on literature about British radar during the war, or info about the RDF 262, 282-285 programs?
Nop, something I’ve wanted to find more about myself but haven’t had the time to search
Straight to business, Sang
Yeah well
There's so much I have discovered and more questions I have
I found Max Staal's memoires.
Meanwhile Renown is giving me a meltdown with her 3000 different portholes
And although it doesn't contain much, save for a few hilarious British incidents, it does tell something weird about radar.
all located differently 
Silver 
Also feel free to use threads
Sure Richy and Jaba can use those for there Ballistics and shell posting
Hmmm shells
No
Was this just added
threads, yuck
dagga dagga dagga
Here it comes
just made public, was a club
No, it’s been around for a while, just as a club
infidel
Oh
embrace the cult of the turbine
Why go with a turbine, if I can have a Diesel?
Maybe you’re a synthetic oil industry lobbyist
is it truly a magnum opus if it isn't a book about weaponry with the blueprints of a jar of mayonaise on the cover
Answer whatever you want, I'm deaf already, ears bleeding from the noise levels in the motor room
me dumb, cannot write book, only see funni different things on different bote
I also sniff paint thinner, a very bad habit of mine, I know
We all have our hobies

Post pancakes
Some of us have shells, some smell diesel fumes, some sniff paint thinner
Alright, back to serious question. Usually for steam turbines, one problem is that if pipe lines break from shell hits, superheated steam basically badly wounds everyone.
And me, I eat blueprints.
hypothetically could I run an abrams on nothing but canola oil
What's the equivalent for that for diesel stuff?
I don't think the engine would like that.
but it would be doable right
is she at the bottom of the sea?
I guess BLEVE is a thing too, but I'm not familiar enough with machinery
Also, do riddled uptakes impact engine performance in maritime diesel propulsion to a similar or lesser degree compared to steam turbines?
She...likely isn't at the bottom anymore.
Due to illegal salvaging.
Good bye, sweet prince.
Diesels don't have such lines, but it does have the issue that they can only operate until a certain tilt or else lubrication pumps can no longer work properly
anyway do I have a question for the AFV nerds, I need a source for Abrams production numbers by variant, and which older tanks they were rebuilt from. Secondly I need some sources for technical specs on M1 CATTB & Thumper
Tilt including ship list/heel or some other kind of tilt?
Only case where I know it occurred was when Lützow took a list after a torpedo hit
And the motors had to be stopped until she returned to 10° or less
Obviously it has to be a prolonged list, this wasn't noted during heavy seas
(the mil balance from any year I check is not helpful)
That sounds quite non ideal
I recall Hornet and Yorktown listing by more than that after their initial 2 aerial torpedo hits
hmm
I don't know how much effort is needed to fix that, or if it is fixable on a system that scale to begin with
The two strokes I worked with you could rotate however you want and they'd keep running
So, it's actually very hard to get concrete numbers... because of so many rebuilds and mods.
I need rough estimates
Actually I should see if Lützow had some machinery running when she got Tallboy'd in 1945, she had like 50° of list after that near miss but managed to correct it
I don't need to count any variants that come out post 2000
Well I mean, there hasn't been a new build since the late '90s anyhow
We built so many everything since has been chop shop modding
M1 Abrams - 746
M1IP Abrams - 894
M1A1 Abrams - 4974
M1A2 Abrams - 1000
so far this is my rough estimate since I only need to figure out the numbers for like 2000/2001 (I'm subtracting the variants that got converted into newer tanks)
yeah we will be in hell
Independence had an initial 12 deg list but that quickly reverted to a 7 deg list, so she would’ve been fine under similar circumstances. Denver by contrast had an initial 7 deg list but that grew to 12 deg from progressive flooding, so probably a dozen or so minutes before the list is reduced to under 10 deg (1 hr total to remove the list)
RAN not real, fite me
Lützow was able to correct the list herself, just without her main machinery running. Auxiliaries were doing fine
Yeh
Independence and Denver diesel generators also worked fine
Maybe only the big ones had the issue?
"A total of 3,273 M1 tanks were produced for the US Army, 4,796 M1A1 tanks were built for the US Army, 221 for the US Marines and 880 co-produced with Egypt."
M1 numbers include the M1IP
Also let me go open up honey-cut
The big ones required external machinery to run, they had separate lubrication and pump motors, with former being the ones causing trouble
I don't need to count production for foreign clients
Oh yeah
Because yes, I have all of the hunnicutt works
Look what I found this week
I just need Army/Marine Corps numbers
Baby Goalkeeper
So according to R.P. Honeybutt
"Production of the basic M1 continued at both plants for a total run of 2374 tanks"
(this is M1 vanilla, not IP)
(my main issue is determining the number of M1A2s and how many M1 basics got converted into them)
and or how many M1 basics got converted into bridge layers and other vehicles
"The first IPM1 was delivered in October 1984 and production continued until May 1986 with a total run of 894 tanks."
Where-ever you got your IP number, it quoted hunnicutt
who is the god of these affairs
wikipedia includes the IP production under the basic M1 production numbers
which is kinda funny
anyway what does he say for the M1A1 and M1A2?
Actually Irish
American Irish
that explains it
He joined ECTL with an alt and had the pic of an IRA guy
so newest M1A2 variant I need to count is the M1A2SEP
I don't need to care about any other SEP variant
Next gen Chinese tank will have 2 crew, atgm jammer, stealth
So I expect a light tankish with a 125mm gun or even more and a soft kill system
2 crewmembers sounds like hell
doesn't the type 99 still lack a stabilizer
The book came out when M1A1 production was still at full volume and the M1A2 was still "block II Abrams" so he doesn't.
shame
But the source I first quoted seems to be using accurate numbers
I seem to remember parade videos where people pointed out some gun wobble, I'll see if I can't find it
wonder if any of the newer mil balances will give actual numbers on the variant
Just slap a anti thermal camo on it
Dunno PUMA has similar stuff on top smh
I had the military balance 2022 sitting around...
Ah, 2021 my bad
Still have it
I've been looking at the mil balance 2001, and 1991 since there roughly in the era I need the numbers for
Which barely works against gen 1 tows
If even
The newer ones get way more detailed though tato
good
Dunno it's till more than Abrams X
Did AbramsX had any soft or hardkill on her model
Don't think so
she has trophy
Huh
yes
????
so
Ooooh
I just need to figure out production numbers for the M1A2 SEP
Also, AbramsX is a sad joke but hey GDLS everyone
none of the M1A1s were conversions from the standard M1 right?
Nah I need that thing so people don't cry about Armata in War Thunder
"
In lieu of new production, the Army is upgrading approximately 1,000 older M1 tanks to the M1A2 configuration. The Army also initiated a modification program for the M1A2 to enhance its digital command and control capabilities and to add the second generation forward looking infrared (FLIR) sights to improve the tank's fightability and lethality during limited visibility. This system enhancement program will be fielded in the 2000 time frame concurrently with the M2A3 Bradley and other advanced digital systems. The initial M1A2 fielding to the First Calvary Division, Ft. Hood, TX, is underway. The Army will continue to field M1A2s to the CONUS contingency corps and other first to fight units into the next decade."
ok
I'm just gonna subtract 1,000 from the standard M1s for the M1A2 standard and M1A2 SEP numbers
and call it good
I don't need to account for the M104 wolverine yet
good start
I enjoy this decision by the staff
man
wait this isn't essex
anyway now that I'm done with the dumbest list of tanks I've done for a scenario
Yeah - M1A1s were all new builds with the exception of like a handful of special demos
now I just need the specs for M1 CATTB, tho I think I know where to find those

can't wait for more people to come along proudly declaring "x pr ship is not actually fake, here is a 1910 picture of her"
Edgar is not fake, here's a picture of her.
oh god why
at least sang is back
undy posting murm in 3... 2... 1...
THE EDGAR, THE EDGAR IS REAL
Yes, hi.
Smol
Nowhere.
Because the Fokker aircraft where A) from the army and B) The KNIL got M10Bs instead and C) The order never arrived because US was stingy
I live in your walls
you rang?

those including the dud torps?
Three aerial from Japanese B5Ns, four from USS Mustin (four explosions reported out of eight launched), six from USS Anderson (six of eight), four total from Makigumo and Akigumo (probably two each)
Big ships sink slowly unless they explode or suddenly roll over
it's over!
It’s not over yet 


Guys list me some UR worthy ships from WW1 and WW2 that are not yet added to azur lane
Too much list if you also count blueprints
There is shitton
Midway sisters
lets see
Alaska sisters
Uss Missori maybe
Maybe not all ships of same class are to be UR tho
that'd be pretty stupid
Maaaaaaaaaaaaaybe SoDak 1920 if it isn't yeeted into PR?
us ones is pretty simple, midway, des moines, worcester, alaska, gearing and sumner, porter and somers are all ur worthy, but won't necessarily be ur in game (some us dds with 16 torpedo tubes are in fact commons and other ships that would easily be golds like fletchers or colorados are way lower rarities)
For the Eagle Union:
Iowa class-Iowa, Wisconsin, Missouri
Alaska class-Alaska, Guam
Des Moines class-Des Moines, Salem, Newport News
Worcester Class-Worcester, Roanoke
Midway class-Midway, Franklin D Roosevelt, Coral Sea
sodak 1920 was further along than multiple ships in game, she won't be pr yeah
she was literally further along than amagi
Kansas? PR
Normal one? construction
yeah but she's also eagle
Up to manjuu
making her pr would make 0 sense
god knows if they'll ever do paper
We do have FDG near Hutten however
What about royal navy UR
uhhhh]
Lion sisters
Minotaur class
Malta class
Audacious class (Hms Eagle later)
Blueprints excluded.
Rip
Sakura UR?
Maybe the haha funny postwar DDs?
🤨 Vanguard being a UR
De Zeven Provinciën-clas 
Makes me think what was the 4th yamato was going to be
Tho honestly
If Iowa was using Colorado guns. Wouldn't she still be UR?
Malta, or as Wargaming likes to call it, R-null
Iowa isn't tho
Vanguard is a fast battleship with WW1 armament
Kii, if you include Shinano. IIRC
I don't really think she'd make it as a UR
Same here
iowa was gonna use sodak 1920 guns, and she would still be ur as those guns make vanguard's guns look like pepper shakers
Ye I guess
Calling Vanguard's guns WW1 doesn't do them justice.
You think vangaurd should be elite at best?
plus the uh
Royal Navy
Lion Class-Lion, Temeraire, Conqueror (maybe), Thunderer (maybe)
Implacable class-Implacable, Indefatigable
Audacious class-Audacious, Ark Royal
Gold
gestures vaguely at iowa
there's prolly more
this part is better too
I'd say gold for Vanguard
I could see them doing implacable as a UR
Bro imagine they make Hms Tiger UR some reason
if any brit battleship deserves UR its Lion
Vanguard is heavier than Lion
SR Lion 
I never really thought about sodak 1920 being ur but she actually fits basically every requirement
why else would they shy away from them and make the colossus class gold
now imagine how heavy lion would actually be
12 406mm is sus ye
Maka stop simping of the standards. *throws a hot dog out of this conversation to distract*
last standard type bb, absolutely overwhelming firepower, etc

we said the same shit about Vanguard remember
4 × triple 16 in (406 mm) guns
16 × single 6 in (152 mm) guns
4 × 3 in (76 mm) DP guns
2 × 21 in (533 mm) torpedo tubes

Implacable is nicknamed Incapable in wows for how bad she is

Tho yeah I doubt she will be UR. Likely will go for smh bigger
all I'm saying is it depends on how far postwar they want to cast the net, and they seem to be avoiding heavy carriers for some reason
why would the Fargos be UR if the clevelands are purple
Monte is Gold
fargos are literally just clevelands with a redesigned superstructure
fargos would be golds logically
So much UR to be had 
I'm talking just in terms of royal navy
remember that partially builds count
Appropiate reaction
ulrich is ur with 800 tons laid down
That's why I like to suggest De Zeven Provinciën class
De Ruyter was even launched
tfw the 1920 Sodaks were further along in construction than the soyuz's
Less than Izmail sisters still 
>tfw all launched
Gold when
With the cancellation of the South Dakotas and the Lexington-class battlecruisers, the existing guns were transferred to the U.S. Army
The army trying to figure out what they're gonna do with a shit ton of 16" guns

I think you can cheese the daring class in btw
one daring class laid down date september 1945
just think it's a worthy ur candidate that they could absolutely cheese in considering other things they've done
I don't see the battles as ur worthy myself tbh
they do seem to have certain biases but it was ships that would probably be ur candidates, not if they'd treat the factions fairly enough to get them heh
common fletcher moment

I think her kan-sen looks very cool
and I like her personality too
I like her rigging
I dont really dislike any of the URs so far. Aside from UvH being rather modest in rigging.
and you can tell her VA had fun voicing her
tato are you being deadass
I haven't opened the game in months I just check history chat
yes vanguard became a ur
damn
yeah the lances are a little weird but like
lances are cool, the lion is cool, and another way of interpreting it is it looks clean
any weirder than champagne's giant hands?
sure, I wish they'd put in a bit more detail, but overall I have few complaints
I like uvh, I'm indifferent to shimikaze and feel shinano is treated weird in verse but that's it
Lion? Gouden Leeuw confirmed
musashi looks cool and has cool rigging but no thoughts head empty apparently
musashi's rigging is too over the top for me
its too big
while at the same time it pays zero attention to her guns
I think I'm one of the few people that just likes each part of uhv
literally felt like the designer made the rigging and then went "oh shit I forgot her guns"
hoping Alaska gets a baller design
wonder if they'll go the baltimore route with her rigging
I just dont feel a lot of energy emminating from her that I would expect for something with an UR title.
Please commit the equivalent of post ww1 german economy
Dont worry my finances already are.
Good
Triangle
Pasta UR, which ship?
My cock and balls
Idk ask manjuu
They messed everything up
Sparviero?
They are the only one that know
IB/NP moment
I wonder NP sub riggings will look like
You
Here
How

Look at where the chat is
And so things are about to get worse
I like her personality too, nice to have someone that is standoffish you both warm to then some weird tsundere thing that you're just supposed to go, oh she's nice, it was just a nice change of pace from the usual
it's something a lot of people had an opinion of is all
I just found her way more... realistic? personality wise than a lot of ships are so I liked it
Yes
However,
Discussions on video game and or media representation of war machines is also allowed as long as it is also grounded in history.
great
At this point in the battle, King George V reported that some shells of Rodney were passing through Bismarck and exploding on her port side. Rodney had been firing armor-piercing shells with a time delay so that the shell would detonate after penetration of armor. After receiving this report from King George V, Rodney resumed eight-gun broadside fire at 1003 with armor-piercing shells set for a non-delay, as number one gun of turret A had been out of action since 0952. Between 1008 and the cease-fire, Bismarck was the recipient of full gun salvoes from this battleship. The last twelve salvoes were fired at a range of 3,500 meters.
This…does explain a bit… 
we did drift a bit from what ur candidates would be to discussing opinions on vanguard then other kan-sen a bit I suppose
now instead of 1000 pages of battleship shell diagrams and discussions its just going to be weeb boat art shit
larf
is the former not history material?
Ain’t it great? Truly such foresight

it's a whole ass weeb server, isn't there a thousand other channels to talk about art in
But yeah real talk i don't fucking know, the copium is still for Regolo and Scipione Africano despite Pompeo's shafting.
Garibaldi and Pompeo are obvious choices for UR kais but after that we are out of non paper candidates.
This is for things Actually grounded in history, such as conversation about wows ships and other things. Not ship art and the like
media representations
My brother in christ, this whole conversation was between users that have been in this channel for months, I've seen like 2 new people and none recently or in this convo
Yes
I don't really care who it is
it's just weird to see it here when theres a thousand other channels for it
whatever I'm never usually here anyway
do your thing
exactly
is never here to see this happening literally all the time
complains anyway
goddamn right
Going over kansen personalities and art in a manner that isn't grounded in history more or less isn't allowed, please don't bring normal #al-lore conversations here






























