#help-42
1 messages · Page 181 of 1
now break log2(6)
into
log2(3) + log2(2)
which is 1 +log2(3)
you got log2(3) from the earlier equation
Hmm
I don't understand this part
Yeah
so x times loga(b) = x times 1/logb(a)?
Yeah
so 4 times log6(2) = 4 times 1 / log2(6) = 4/log2(6)
$x \log_a(b) = x \cdot \frac{1}{\log_b(a)}$
TheAstorPastor
$4\log_6(2)=4\cdot\frac{1}{\log_2(6)}=\frac{4}{\log_2(6)}$
TheAstorPastor
ok
-# || i use chatgpt to generate latex code 😭 ||
i am bad at latex
🥀
I will try to finish it
yeah sure
Thank u a lot btw💞
coz i encountered it in the blackbook
ah i see. you might want to check out this
quite great and (some easy) questions
this was question 9
Thank uu.
I will try them as well
Closed by @rancid sphinx
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
When I calculate y=t-x, can I just remove these parentheses as is or would I have to distribute the negative sign? I tried to figure it out on my own in the 2nd image by using a random example but I feel like I'm not getting anywhere...
in the first image if you wanted to distribute that out you have to distribute the negative to all terms, if that's what youre asking
Thanks! I wasn't sure
.close
Closed by @neat jacinth
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Wait do I have to distribute them?
if theres parentheses around it then yes
Thanks, I'm trying to figure out angle x in the image
.reopen
✅ Original question: #help-42 message
lemme just double check rq
quick mistake in your last step, y should equal x-t, not t-x
You're right, tysm!
if you take the second original equation, y+t=x then it should be x-t
of course!
Yep
did you have any other questions?
No, I appreciate it!
Closed by @limpid lagoon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is it just me or does this question have a problem? They didn't give an upper bound for X, so the way i interpret it is X \tilde U(a,\infty)
$a \leq x, y \leq b$
Ofc but X doesn't have an upper bound tho lmao
What?
The upper bound is literally b
$a \leq x \leq b$
Ultimator
is that not for Y?
Comma means it’s for x and y
$a \leq y \leq b$
x and y are both bounded by a and b
Ultimator
Alright I’m out 
Ah
hi 
Closed by @rancid cloud
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
yo I'm looking for someone who has some free time, knows the AP calc ced, and would like to help with AP calc ab math, I just finished a practice test and would like some review on the wrong questions. I'd really appreciate this, thank you!
It is better ask a specific question
no need for the formalisms! just post a specific question and someone can come along to help you
Alright maybe I'll do that, thanks.
Can someone help me with this?
-# this is an occupied channel please just check #❓how-to-get-help so u can open ur own channell!! it will only take a second!!
@wild prawn Has your question been resolved?
What have you tried?
Like wdym
What was your working?
Please do this in dexter's channel not in core's
if anyone knows how this works
It's done ! But ty
What?
Ah, I thought this was Dexter's channel.
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅ Original question: #help-42 message
why is D circled?
yeah, i'm asking why specifically you chose D
i tried finding when y = 0
okay
do you have any point where y=0, and have represented?
so you cannot really use y=0 then
that's not really how it works, you cant just remove things
you have to work with the data you have
Let's focus on a much smaller part of the set
now, that's a single data point
roughly, what slope does that circled line have?
of the slope?
yes
looks more to me
what about the one right above the circled one?
looks like the same slope
okay, so we can see that the higher we go, the lower the slope, correct?
yup
okay, we've seen what happens going up
what happens if i move right or left instead?
does it change?
so if it doesnt change to the left or the right, it doesnt care about x, correct?
okay, with this, so far, can we discard any of the avaliable options?
we currently know that going up in the positive side means less slope, and moving left and right doesnt change
we can remove b
I think
wait im kinda tweakin
a horizontal slope means
x = 0 right?
so can we actually remove b?
i want you to be able to justify it to me
it's more important that you understand the reasoning of WHY you answer, than the answer being correct
so if x = 0 for example it wouldnt matter for the function
so that means that on the right hand side there should be no x
since we've seen that the slope doesnt change depending on x
what do you mean on the right hand side?
you have four answers, of the form dy/dx=thing
yup
and since you've told me that the left does not change with x, x should not appear on the right
so the slope shouldnt have ANYTHING to do with x
why?
you dont have data on x=0
right
there's a difference between not having the data and the data being a value
you cant use data that you dont have
well uh
any number of x
will make the slope smaller
and we cant see that happening on the graph
*on the positive side
on the negative side it would make the slope greater
but that's immaterial here, the point is it would change
yup
and we've established it doesnt
so now we only have A and D avaliable. Obviously you know D is wrong, so now we're gonna see why
now, we're gonna focus on the positive side only (so y>0)
if you have 5/y, does it get bigger when y is bigger, or smaller when y is bigger?
when y is bigger slope gets smaller it seems
that's the graph, i'm asking specifically about 5/y
for example, is 5/1 bigger than 5/2?
yes
so when y is bigger, 5/y gets smaller, right?
yup
now let's go for the other one
5y
when y is bigger, does 5y get bigger or smaller?
why y gets bigger so does the slope
so which behavior goes with the graph, the one from 5/y, or the one from 5y?
as we go up
the y graph
we can see the slope becoming more horizontal
so we know that y affects the slope negatively
SO A!!
since you're dividing by the negative, so slope goes less slope, but still negative
and that's why the reasoning is more important than the yes/no
thank you so much, really helped
dont forget to close the channel if you're done
lf for explanation on this one if anyones available
okay i see that you've seen integrals
so, in terms of derivatives and/or integrals, what is the speed, with respect to the position?
the absolute value of v(t)
okay, my mistake. It is correct that the speed is the absolute value of the velocity. But what is the velocity, with respect to the position?
uhhh the derivative
wait gimmie 1 sec
parents
@wild prawn Has your question been resolved?
im back
velocity is the derivative of position
so in order to go backwards
we need to get the integral of velocity at t = 5
v(5) = 2?
you dont need it at t=5 only
you have the velocity as a function from 5 to 8
so the variation of poosition would be the integral of the velocity from 5 to 8
start by obtaining the velocity function from 5 to 8
i did using the area of triangle formula in the first photo
but I didnt know what to do next
basically the integral is = to -3
yes, that is correct
so your variation in position when going from t=5 to t=8 was -3
at t=8, you are at x=10
so if you started at a number, and substracting 3 from said number you get 10, where did you start?
so the distance between 5 and 8 is -3 and we know that t = 8 is x = 10, so to get t = 5 we have to remove something from 10 to equal -3 which is 13
idk im tryna visualize it but I cant grasp it tbh
feels weird
basically, if i call Z to where i start (t=5), then you have the following:
Z-3=10
which obviously means Z=13
i think you just fucked up where you started and finished, and thats why you got 7 as an answer instead
yeah this fucks with my head ngl
anyways thank you
.close
Closed by @wild prawn
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How can i book a help??
Oh i guess i did it.
A merchant sells two kinds of alloy rods: Type A and Type B.
Type A contains copper and zinc in the ratio 3:2.
Type B contains copper and zinc in the ratio 5:3.
The merchant melts some rods of both types together to create a new alloy containing exactly 41 kg of copper and 25 kg of zinc.
However, due to impurities:
10% of the copper from Type A is lost during melting.
20% of the zinc from Type B is lost during melting.
Find the mass (in kg) of Type A and Type B rods originally used.
Question
So does type A not lose any zinc?
The tricky part with word questions is always the same:
Define your variables.
It doesn't matter how you define them, but it's important to be precise about it
I think you know you'll need to solve a system here, so you'll need two unknowns. What do you want to use?
Pair of linear equation in two variable.
It’s good to meet you. Such a big fan
Right. How are we defining these two variables
yeah yeah , i'm bad at word problems but you can ask me physics , decay , number theory , real analysis btw
x and y??
What is x representing?
I did all those courses in all throughout HS. lol. I was just talking about your username. Lmao
mass of type A alloy??
and y = mass of type b aloy??
Perfect. That's exactly right
in kg's*
I'll actually use "a" and "b" instead
I know xd
np
Now let's say we know how much "a" and "b" we're melting. We will get an alloy. Is there anything we want to know about that alloy that can be represented by a single number?
We know the ratios so we find th compostion of each??
You're a little bit ahead of me. Think simpler
We want to know the amount of copper and the amount of zinc in the alloy, at least
Can we make an equation that takes a and b, and gives back the amount of copper?
Oh wait yeah!
as per ration copper =3/5 before loss its 3a/5??
and 10% is loss
so
90/10 * 3a/5
which gives
27a/50??
That's the amount of copper you get if you melt "a" kgs of type A! Well done. What about type B?
I'm calculating :3
5b/8?
alloy question
Perfect. Now, if you melt both type A and type B, how much copper is in the alloy?
27a/50 + 5b/8 = 41
I calculated zinc = 2a/5 + 3/10b =25
hi
I like that you noticed the "= 25" bit. I did forget to mention that's why we're looking for copper and zinc amounts.
It can be handy to look at the numbers you're given and try to find equations that equal them
Is this gif necessary?
We're past the "word problem" bit! Now it's just calculation
Of course!
so i just solve it by elimination method??
or substitution method what do you recommend?
Just tell the name of the method :3
Dang confident. Substitution?
I've mastered everything.
AIGHT BET
Just word problems..
b=32.95
a≈37.79
Type A alloy = 37.79 kg(around)
Type B alloy = 32.95 kg(around)
@civic dirge is it correct :3??
¯_(ツ)_/¯
@primal forge Has your question been resolved?
,w solve 27/50 x + 5/8 y = 41, 2/5 x + 3/10 y = 25
,calc 3325/88
Result:
37.784090909091
,calc 725/22
Result:
32.954545454545
Yeah that's looking pretty good!
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what is wrong here? I don't get the right result for the limit but my approximation seem fine and I can't see any mistakes in the rest of the work
Did you substitute x^2 in?
Why o(1)
Multiplying by (1/x⁴) num and denom should give you the correct answer
Also u have x²/2 but wrote x²/4 in the num
,w limit x approaches 0 of (1 - cos(x^2))/(xxsin(xx))
I did. I showed sinx^2 and cosx^2
since o(x^6) = o(1)
This doesn't help
that was it thank you
This is exactly it. The mistake starts in the Taylor series of cos(x²)
Well o(1) = 0 as x goes to 0
so that term disappears
Hmm
o(x⁴) disappears as x goes to 0.
o(1) does not!
how? o(1) represents f(x) s.t. lim x to 0 f(x)/ 1 = 0.
so when goes to 0 f(x) = o(1)
and this f(x) is such a f(x) where f(x)/1 = 0 as x goes to 0
Like the second line is 0/0 idk how u evaluate that
f(x)/1 = f(x) so f(x) = 0 as goes to 0
we even had an example here
so what did you do with o(x^2) and o(x^4)
f(x)=o(x^6) means f(x)/x^6 -> 0 so in particular we have f(x)/x^6 * x^4 = f(x)/x^2 -> 0
your expression doesnt lead to anything useful in the second last step
I don't see how this so o(x^2) = 0 as x to 0
because for o(1) I see that o(1) = 0 as x goes to 0
here o(1) as mentioned because you are dividing by x, taking an order away, similar how we divide by x⁴ taking away 4 orders
you instead just write o(1) which doesnt make sense here
you are neglecting the other terms
well if a function vanishes faster than x^2 it will vanishes faster than 1
yeah but you are making the expression indeterminate
how?
you lose information
for o(x^2). we have f(x) = o(x^2) as x to 0 means f(x)/x^2 = 0 as x to 0 . but then o(x^2) = 0 only if we have o(x^2)/x^2 which we don't
it's like saying x²/x=o(x)/x oh well o(1) goes also to 0 therefore o(1)/x
but that could then lead to something like sqrt(x)/x which doesnt go to 0 anymore
just because two things go to 0 doesnt mean you can swap them
he has done in this in the book where we have some higher terms and he sets it all equal to o(something of a lower degree)
ok but that doesn't tell me o(x^2) = 0 as x to 0
what
?
all o(x²) is a class of functions that behave smaller than x² near 0
yes
goes to 0 not is 0
I mean the limit of f(x)/x^2
regardless I still don't see how o(x^2) goes to 0 as x goes to 0
Ok
Let's make it concrete, let's say you'd replace o(x^6) with something specific like x^7 since x^7=o(x^6) then dividing by x^4 yields x^3 which still goes to 0, and for higher terms it's the same
The whole point is that we have an unknown remainder but that we can still deal with, because it has a certain behavior around 0
ok so your saying o(x^2) can be say x^3 or x^5 etc and all of their limits as x to 0 is 0
yes
is my understanding of o(1) correct?
what understandin
so f(x) = o(1) if lim x to 0 f(x)/1 = 0. so when x to 0 o(1) = f(x). and since f(x)/1 = f(x). then f(x) goes to 0 as x to 0
Ok regarding that the statement o(x^2) = o(1) is true right?
limit are basically sensitive to rates, like how fast something approaches something
any function that vanishes faster than x^2 near 0 will vanish faster than 1 near 0
no, f=o(1) doesnt imply f=o(x²), for example: x/1 -> 0 but x/x²=1/x doesnt
o(x²) is a subset of o(1)
im going to other way f= o(x^2) imply that f= o(1)
yes
ye so that was the sub I was making
so if this is true why can't we use this in the limit?
i showed an example
this does not mean =
example ^
ok so how can x^2 = o(x^2). as x to 0 the limit is 1
also is c supposed ot be a constant?
and ins't x^2 = o(1)?
oh yeah i made a typo
ok so the example is x^2/x. x^2 = o(1) implies o(1)/x. they both still go to 0 so we still have 0/0. so the sub did not help
I don't see the issue with the sub. This just shows an example where it was not helpful
ok i fixed the counter example
so the point is we introduce functions for which the limit doesnt work out necessarily
because you are removing constraints
your substitution doesnt guarantee to hold for the new functions of that class in o(1) you introduce for the limit to work out
how about here then? I remember when going through this the only way to achieve what he obtained was to set all the higher order terms = o(x^2)
ok I see. so o(1) has very few constraints and we can introduce many functions that will change the meaning of the limit
the thing here is that o(x²) (which lower) is already here, so the o(x⁴) is being absorbed
you are not introducing anything new
so your saying that if I have o(g(x)) and I have terms of higher degrees I can simply say all those terms = o(g(x)) since I already have o(g(x))
since the problem is meant to be understood with o(g((x))
you could technically keep the o(x⁴) but it wouldnt do a thing because o(x²) basically dominates
no but we also use that to remove terms that are not o
for example 1+0.001 approx 1
yes
one more thing how do we know what degree approximation is good enough for the limit
You've made this a lot harder for yourself by not using the Calc 1 technique of dividing by the lowest power of the polynomial. Multiplying by 1/x^4 in the numerator and denominator makes the algebra very clear.
Yeah that was mentioned
I would have hoped the problem should have been obvious by instead making a bad choice and dividing by a larger power than x^4 so that you have terms like 1/x^n in addition to the higher order terms
I would say until you can factor out the leading term, which here would be x⁴ around 0, because it grows the slowest to 0
thanks. .solved
@slender socket Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Help me find where did I go wrong?
the normal vector is not generally the normalised position vector
this holds for a circle sure
but it doesn't hold for all ellipses
also this is wrong
$\frac{1}{\sqrt{1+15\cos^2 t}}$ is not a constant with respect to $t$
Civil Service Pigeon
so computing $\dv{\mathbf{T}}{t}$ would require an annoying quotient rule
Civil Service Pigeon
I stopped reading at this point

Closed by @azure elbow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

.close
Closed by @rustic osprey
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
any tips on how to start
Apply the rules of logarithms: \\
$\log (x^n) = nlog(x)$ \\
$\log (ab) = \log a + \log b$ \\
$\log (a/b) = \log a - \log b$
Sarin
You'll also need this one: $\log_a b = \frac{1}{\log_b a}$
Sarin
Use the first one to get rid of the fourth roots, then the next two to get rid of the products ab, and the fractions a/b and b/a
@hybrid lagoon Has your question been resolved?
Click on the x
tysm sarin
No problem
you should convert 4th root into powers
then apply prop 1 of this
then take the common out
then try to group the terms in sqrt in the form of (a+b)^2
what r ur views on Nietzsche's will to power?
ok
bro nietzsche talk about all that stuff but he himself is a weak and pathetic man
he basically a really bad larper
i mean if ur gonna larp at least larp till the end
right
One is compelled to say that this is perhaps not a fitting conversation for a help channel in this server
!redir
This channel is only for on-topic discussion. Please take casual conversation to #discussion or #chill.
@hybrid lagoon Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im confused on asymptotes
like how to get em
well
for vertical ones
just look where the function isnt defined
in other words where the denominator is 0
cuz u cant divide by 0
how do i get it from f(x)= 2 +1/x+1
.
the steps in general
this
and now what
whats 1/0
0

undifined??
yeah
this is why i said
the function will have vertical asymptoites
at the points for which it is not defined
it's questions?
lmao
what anime character is that
*did
tears
.
from elfen lied
hm ok i will look into it
do you have more if test in an hour?
theres a lot more
i dont really like manga
gr9 at the moment
cool
Closed by @icy seal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I don’t quite understand how the answer sheet got 8pi instead of 5pi
Show the answer sheet
It just has the answer
For b specifically it’s circ1=0 flux1=8pi circ2=8pi flux2=0
How did you get your integrand in the "circulation =..." step
You left out some work
@azure elbow Has your question been resolved?
As shown above ds = |v|dt and T=v/|v| so circulation = integral of F dot product v dt
Which equals to sin^2t + 4 cos^2t
Sorry for the late reply I was commuting
@azure elbow Has your question been resolved?
This is wrong but because you've left your steps I can't find where your error is
Closed by @azure elbow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Basically I took x=-sint and y=cost thanks for having patience I was thinking for over an hour
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is for the pressure a is Pa=(62.4)(6)?
Then for pressure is Pb=(62.4)(8)
Is my understanding correct?
Where did 62.4 come
Yess yess
This is the whole given
Specific gravity
Ok
Water has 1 gm/cm^3 in metric by the way so it will be 2200/(33)^3 in lb/ft^3
You got that as 62.4 I guess
It needs a calculator. Its nowhere near 62.4
I know specific gravity
Did you check your calculations? @frosty hollow
@frosty hollow Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Calculate the center and radius of the circle x^2 − 8x + y^2 + 14y + 1 = 0.
How do I factor this?
you dont have to factor it
you want to complete the square, not factor
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
theres several help channels free
@glacial garden keep that in mind btw
its useful
sometimes saves time of factoring
radius not quite right
it is
root needs to extend over the c
also shouldn't blindly apply formulae
i derived it
by completing the square
but op shouldn't apply it without doing that themselves
you mean like help OP derive it?
yes
well would you like to take over?
depends if op is still here
tht thing imo can be remembered as a result
cuz of how useful it is in certain cases
I need to put it in canonical form
x^2 − 8x + y^2 + 14y + 1 = 0.
ight
How to factor the x’s?
you can write x and y terms individually and complete squares on both of them
like you can write -8x as -(2)(4)x right
Isn’t it -4?
,w (x-4)^2
make it into an algebraic identity by adding the 3rd term to both sides
??
Bruh it’s x^2 - 8x + 16
I don’t have 16
and do the same for y
^^
What should i do with this 1?
well
add 15 then
you can either add 16 rn and then subtract 1 from the number you will add to complete the square for y
both ways work
What should I begin with to do it professionally?
just subtract by 1
on both sides
and add the whole squares on both sides
So should I write (x-4)^2 + 16 + y^2 + 14y + 1 = 0 next?
no
here you added 32 to 1 side
so thats incorrect
Where’s 32?
should be (x-4)^2 -16 + y^2 + 14y + 1 = 0
because if you add 16, you need to subtract it too right?
you added another 16, which made it incorrect
we're basically completing this identity
twice
Bruh there’s +
And 4^2 is b^2
yes
That rule tells us that 16 should be positive
so since you wrote this term
it already told that you added 16
and then you wrote it that way
So it should be 16 instead of 0 then?
yess
because you want to add to both sides to equalize the equation
not only 1 side
left side is what was to be done and right side is what you did
see the difference?
But if I’m gonna do -16 then the answer is gonna change to =-16 if the OG was 0
@valid stratus
how will it be equal to -16
you are supposed to add 16 to both the sides
the initial statement you wrote is wrong, so -16 will only make it worse
the +16 on LHS shouldnt be there unless you add +32 on the RHS
thats the only way you can equalize the equation
@glacial garden you understanding what i mean?
if i have 2 = 2, i cant say 2 + 16 + 16 = 2, but i can say 2 + 16 = 2 + 16
@glacial garden Has your question been resolved?
man what part didnt u understand exactly
@glacial garden start from the very start
so you dont get confused
<@&268886789983436800>
i dint mess up right?
@glacial garden don't press ❌ without saying anything when a helper is trying to respond to you.
no no not at all, some scammer posted something here. it got deleted by a mod now
I’ll answer
@valid stratus ill take over if its alright
um sure
ight
@glacial garden
how long do i wait man
You jumped in and asked how long to wait?
?
ill take this 1
i can explain well from the scratch
if the OP responds
No one is going to steal the channel from you, relax.
that isnt my concern lol
they reacted with a cross but didnt say why
thats what i wanted to know
@glacial garden Has your question been resolved?
@glacial garden Why do you not reply?
thats what i meant man
how can you help when you dont even know the doubt
One more time then modping.
but they react with 
ight
?
if you want help please respond to the helpers, or close the channel and come back when you have time to actually learn
Ain't this shit been going on for the past 3 or so days
look at the chat above
prev helper explained in such detail
man is just not explaining whats the doubt
lmao
im genuinely feeling like this is a troll
Son 😭
technically this is a new channel, which is completely okay, but seems like they are never responding.
but you are right in that this is not the first time it's happened with OP
There are like 10 other channels
then please close the channel
if your doubts are cleared
100% troll
<@&268886789983436800> Some assistance? OP has consistently marked the bot with an ❌ yet refused to explain when prompted either why their issue isn't resolved or why they're unavailable...
You should explain what you're stuck on so people can actually help you.
Otherwise you are wasting channels and other people's time.
they prob wont reply to you aswell
lets give the op some time i guess
ight man if you say so
If they don't I can just smute em and let them explain in @raven nest
can modmail be used for a suggestion/idea
cuz i had 1
Yeah you can send suggestions to that inbox.
ight
Hmm this is at least the 2nd time this has happened with this user actually. I'll just smute and close the channel now.
.close
Closed by @dreamy lance
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Seems perfect
it wouldnt work for infinite collections of sets because the minimum might not exist?
i think
Youd be considering the infimum in that case
For infinite sets the infimum can be exactly zero so yeah
Closed by @cunning reef
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
intersect_n=1^\infty (-1/n, 1 +1/n) = [0, 1]
-# ps you have very pretty handwriting i love it
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can anyone help me with statistics derivation
please post the question
,rccw
You're a wizard harry
need to learn spells
So, is Mr. Harry Potter learning stats?
@umbral gorge u there?
They're in another help channel atm
@frail light Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
Hi
hi
Only use the ping ONCE per 15 minutes please. 😃
Have you thought about reductio ad absurdum
Never heard of that name tho
Basically
Well are you a real mathematician?
You have to hit the equation with a counter reductio
wtv are u talking about
Don’t waste my time please
I get maths in dutch
its just this course that is in english
holy
no need to be rude like that
If you are wasting time then do not need to stay here.
can we take away their role
I go to Harvard lol
cuz theyre not cool
I know what i’m doing
What do you think you would solve?
XE
Please stop threatening people, they were simply trying to help, not to mention that they go to a better school than you, so stay respectful, thank, you, Ma'am! 🙂
He should use reductio ad absurdum, lol.
Obviously only Ivy league students would know of this proof method anyway.
I am truly respectful, do not teach me what to do.
Drop that ego lol
What college do u go to
This is elementary level stuff anyways, I wouldn't call myself a mathematician if I have never even heard of reductio ad absurdum.
Exactly lol
!redir by the way.
This channel is only for on-topic discussion. Please take casual conversation to #discussion or #chill.
i get maths in another language
Even a toddler on the streets could tell you how to do reductio ad absurdum
like bro
Well, okay. They go to a better school than you, so they probably know more about this topic than you do, exit this channel and let the professionals handle it, thank you.
Yes but you’re wasting my time
you are not obligated to talk to me
Okay? Better school indicate better education? Sounds sacarstically credible enough.
Dude lol. I learned about reductio ad absurdum before I learned addition.
If you want help you should be prepared to learn
BECAUSE I GET MATHS IN ANOTHER LANGUAGE
Better school MEANS better education, lol.
Ok?
Then learn english math
I learned math in chinese, lol.
Can we not argue please or else ive to ping nods
so I probably have another name for it
She’s being mean to me
You're speaking english perfectly fine and math is a universal language. Please do not waste me and @shrewd magnet time with these petty excuses.
Doesnt mean we can argue
reductio ad absurdum: negate that something that is true/false (like lie), then keep making conclusions based on that until you find a contradiction
I feel so sorry for you. Well then, let these guys take over, I will not fight over these individuals.
<@&268886789983436800> can you mute the rude people, they are not here to help out, but just being rude to me
^
Thank you
@fair cargo I shall take you on as my discipline
I see potential
There's no need to be rude they were simply trying to help.
Anyways, what do you need help with?
Guys stop fighting pls
.close
Closed by @fair cargo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Hi
Reductio ad absurdum: negate that something that is true/false (like lie), then keep making conclusions based on that until you find a contradiction
So why did you make a math help ticket if you don't need help
Anyways i would recommend you go to the advanced mathematics section, you might find an answer there
I did need help
There's a lot of yap and not a lot of details about what's wrong.
@arachi
!nogpt
Please do not trust ChatGPT or similar AI tools for mathematical tasks, as they often generate output which "sounds correct" but has numerous factual or logical errors. Use of these AI tools to answer other people's help questions is strictly against server rules (see #rules).
The one with heart emoji name keeps saying they are good and say OP wasting their time
I would not recommend that
This guy here @shrewd magnet
@fair cargo Reductio ad absurdum: negate that something that is true/false (like lie), then keep making conclusions based on that until you find a contradiction
...So then what was the language issue about?
Try that, Im willing to help within my range
@fair cargo for your question, I was under the impression that this was the definition of a group generated by a set?
lets focus more on helping than arguin
They're giving me a hard time because I don't know the name of that evidentiary technique
yes
How do you prove a definition exactly?
sorry if anybody came off as being rude, nobody meant any harm.
sure bro
-# Reopen the channel btw
idk man I just want to know how to do it so I can move on
(this channel is closed not sure if you wanted to reopen it)
Anyways if you wanted to continue please do .reopen as this channel might close
✅ Original question: #help-42 message
I have a lot to do
I reopened just in case it was about to be locked
okay
If you don't want to use it, feel free to close it again. Also check with #groups-rings-fields
Can someone just tell me how to do it, not the solution
They can help you in there
I have to study a lot more of this course today and I wanna move on
Anyway, it might be useful to determine if your book uses a different definition for a group representation.
Since this feels like a definition, that doesn't sound like something to "prove" per se
heres the repository
Meaning that we need to know what definition is already provided for <X>
I think <X> is defined as the subgroup spanned by X
I mean, we need to know what definition this course is operating under
Yeah I think it's this
Let $G$ be a group and $X$ a non-empty subset of $G$.The \textbf{subgroup generated} by $X$ is the smallest subgroup of $G$ that contains $X$, that is $$\langle X\rangle = \bigcap{S:S\leq G,X\subseteq S}.$$
arachi
whats the question? OwO
okay so proving that <X> is equal to the set in the exercise amounts to showing that this intersection of sets is equal to that exercise set
the overall structure of the proof is showing the equality of two sets
you do this using a double inclusion argument i.e. to show that A = B, you show that A is a subset of B and B is a subset of A
let x be an element of \cap { S : S <= G, X <= S }, then ....
Here is how I would approach this problem.
Call the group G and let H be the subgroup of G generated by X. Call the group generated by the expression within the question K. Clearly H ≤ K (why?)
Can you prove also that K ≤ H?
and then vice versa