#help-27
1 messages · Page 340 of 1
@magic gust Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @magic gust
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help me with this problem? i forgot how to do this
A(x)
well you call the other side of the rectangle y
if you’d like
the long side
is that what you mean
yea because you can rewrite y in terms of x
we have a constraint
the perimeter is 160
not of the rectangle but of the fence
write an equation relating the perimeter (160) to y and x
ok so i know the perimeter of the three sides is 160
what does that mean, in terms of y and x
not really im gonna be honest
i mean, how would you write the perimeter of a rectangle with side lengths x and y
P = ..
i would write 2x+2y i think
great
but in our scenario one of the sides is missing
so what would it be now
(the y side is missing)
2x+y
so 160 = ..
ok i know thats for the perimeter but i have to find the area
ok
what does y =
y=2x-160
not quite
or 160-2x
so A = xy = x(160 - 2x)
it should
for b and c is there a correct way of doing it or can i trial and error it
all of these optimization problems come down to using your "constraint equation" which in this case is a fixed perimeter or amount of fence to then write the desired quantity (area in this case) in terms of one variable
because that constraint equation fixes a relationship between the two variables allowing you to solve for whichever in terms of the other
and thats what 160-2x is
derivative
this is calculus yea?
this is algebra 2
oh
at least my program is for algebra 2
ok well you have a parabola
vertex
you can use the vertex to get your answers for the next two parts
ok im going to watch videos for those
you know how to find the vertex right
i have to brush up on it
x(160 - 2x) = 160x - 2x^2
this is a concave down quadratic so it has a maximum at it’s vertex/turning point
vertex form was always my least favorite form
just complete the square to put it in vertex form
id factor out -2 first
-2(x^2 - 80x)
ok ima start writing this down
completing the square is quite simple if you remember the motivation
you’re using the fact that
$(x \pm a)^2 = x^2 \pm 2ax + a^2$
knief
so you’re basically manipulating the standard form to look like a perfect square
wait doesnt completing the square just find the solutions
completing the square puts it in vertex form where the vertex is easily identifiable
which we’re clearly interested in for this problem
ok so im at x^2-80x+160
x(x-80)+160
oh yeah
this is the square of a binomial
(x-40)^2
knief
so just distribute the -2
wait whered the -2 come from
well we factored that out from the start
^
so we are supposed to readd it?
so we can’t leave it behind
ok
it would change our area formula
we just did that for convenience
so what do you get after distributing
-2(x-40)^2+3200
is it 80 cuz we distribute
nope
oh wait its 40?
the idea is that the max/min occurs when the squared term is 0
knief
so since (x - h)^2 >= 0
if a > 0 then we will have a minimum because the left term can be at least 0
but if a < 0 then (x - h)^2 being nonzero means you’re really subtracting from k
since it will always be negative so long as (x - h)^2 ≠ 0
which means if we want a maximum then we want (x - h)^2 = 0
which occurs precisely when x = h
likewise for the minimum
and plugging in x = h leaves us just with k since a(h - h)^2 = 0
make sense?
i have to try and process what you just said
ok thank you for your help
area is 3200
you’re welcome
Closed by @scarlet aspen
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
a) are the columns of A linearly independent vectors?
b) are the columns of the augmented matrix A|b linearly independent vecors?
i said yes and yes but my teacher said b is not true
why isn't the augmented matrix linearly independent?
btw. the identity matrix is supposed to be A
The columns of A are linearly independent
yes
But b is a linear combination of the columns of A
yes
true
lol
they are dependent on the matrix
so like if 1 = 2 then 5 = 10
so its dependent
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
.close
Closed by @celest verge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I was wondering how to do these types of problems? I have somewhat of an idea for this problem in specific I thought it wanted the question in terms of Y so the for the function I made it ln(y) and took the pi * integral from 1 to 7 and I made sure to square R
Do you know about the washer method or shell method?
Your method looks correct.
uh yeah sort of
this is how I set up the integral
and I put in my answer as 35.384
🤔
im going to try using a ti 84 calculator, not rlly sure how that would change much tho...
same answer
yeah i got that one wrong
I think this wouldve been correct
It should give the same answer though
There may be a difference between integrating with respect to x and y that we’re missing
I thought it wanted it in terms of y
i just dunno
Ah, I think I see now, since where revolving around y=7 integrating with respect to y doesn’t work, since the radius that gets squared is not correct
It’s been a long time since I did one of these. I think that method is to integrate perpendicular to your axis of rotation when using the washer method.
ohh what math are you doing right now?
Multivariable calculus. It’s not much more advanced, just the next class up.
ah I see
ok I got another
question thats similar
since its rotating around y=1
this is the setup
not quite
the boundry of integration should've been (2-sqrt(x))^2, but apparently those result in the same answer
as the radius is defined by 1-f(x)
I did it using my method and I also got 8.377
can you show what you inputted in your calculator?
oh I see okay
very strange coincidence
yeah I agree
alr I got 3 more (2 of which I got wrong even tho I did it the way my teacher taught me)
This would be the washer method right? where you have
I'm not sure if our methods are somehow algebraically equivalent, but I'd rather you use my method, since I know for sure it works
yeah I will next time
wait no for this one they just give us the bounds right 0 and 2
yes, but since we are integrating revolving around the line y=-2, little r = 0
oh yeah
so would we want 2x^3 in terms of y
This is why I was confused by the previous question dealing with sqrt(x)-1
not quite. I'm not sure exactly what you mean, but we are integrating with respect to x, so imagine choping vertically down towards the x-axis to get you radius
uh
im still kind of confused
basically, we're integrating with respect to dx
yeah
so the radius would just be 2x^3 ?
not quite, 2x^3 would measure from the function f(x) to 0, but we don't stop at zero
we want to stop at 2 right
yes, the radius extends to y = -2
so -2+2x^3?
radius = absolute value of (the difference between functions)
yeah
I just noticed
355.449 would be the right answer
if we were rounding to the nearest thousandth
There's been so many strange coincidences. Having 1/pi of the correct answer when we integrated the completely wrong radius in question 1. Arriving at the same answer despite using two different methods. I feel like I'm in limbo
this is why I hate delta mathb
its never accurate
i swear
or like it feels random as hell
bounds would be 0 to 1.0986123
delta math's alright. I think you just got the unlucky (or maybe lucky) draw of questions
i guess so
well the bounds would be from 0 to ln(7).
since e^x is 7 when x = ln(7)
that part makes sense, logarithms create some strange looking irrational numbers sometimes
wait why 7?
we integrate from x = 0 to the x-value at which e^x = 7
since that is when y = f(x) = e^x intersects g(x) = 7
whoops
lol
my bad. These question got me tripping
1.0986123 = ln(3)
ur good
6-2e^x is the radius?
yes
you're welcome
Closed by @limber bison
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can i get some examples of integrable functions that are not continuous?
and please ping if u respond
yea theyre very common
and not too hard to construct
you should think of one as an exercise
I'd go as far to say
start here: can you give a function that is not continuous?
okay, now lets reign it in
can you think of one that has no asymptotes
but is still discontinuous
$\frac{x^2-9}{x-3}$
Flatus
sure! that's a great example
what is $\int _0 ^5 \frac{ (x+3)(x-3) }{ (x-3) } \dd x$
jan Niku
so even though it's discontinuous
you can still integrate it
because that one point
has 0 length
so it doesn't matter
right?
yea, its not especially important that were missing a point here either
you dont need to have holes in the domain to have a discontinuous function
how about $f(x) = \frac{1}{\ceil x}$
jan Niku
but its just fine to integrate this function all over the place
and its only missing a single point
it has tons of discontinuities
you can think of some other esoteric jumpy function
maybe $\frac{x}{|x|}$?
jan Niku
perfectly integrable
i've heard multiple different opinions on whether
$\int_{-1}^{2} \frac{1}{(2x-1)^2} \ dx$
Flatus
is integrable
because doesn't it cross an asymptote? but some people say the area converges
and it confuses me a lot
i always assumed if it crosses asymptote, it's not integrable
what method should we use
RCR or u-sub to integrate
lets just assume we can and see if problems come up
i like u sub yea
$\int _{x = -1} ^{x=2} \frac{1}{2u^2} \dd u$
seem good?
u^2
jan Niku
yea :D
$\frac 1 2 \int _{x = -1} ^{x=2} u^{-2} \dd u$
jan Niku
whats the anti deriv?
$\frac{1}{2} [-u^{-1}]_{x=-1}^{x=2}$
Flatus
sure lets go $\frac{-1}{2u}$ from $x=-1$ to $x=2$
jan Niku
i like the u so maybe we go into u world
2x-1 = u so x=-1 gives u = -3
2x-1 = u so x=2 gives u=3
$\frac{-1}{2u} \bigg \vert ^3 _{-3}$
jan Niku
anything jump out at you
negative area
ye
$f(u) = \frac{-1}{2u}$. does $f(-x) = - f(x)$?
jan Niku
yes :0
so is $\frac{1}{(2x-1)^2}$ integrable from -2 to 1?
jan Niku
wait brb
@misty crest lol
its okay we really have kind of blazed through this without any concern about discontinuity
or improper integrals and issues there
who cares tho
math is about the big picture 
how’s life
worse
what did i come back to
💀💀
i believe it isn’t
you know i kinda fucked up that explanation

i actually think youre right
i dont think it is either
just say it’s not bounded and call it a day
BUT
we can create functions like this that are
how about $\int _{-3} ^3 \frac{1}{x^3} \dd x$
jan Niku
abosolutely we can evaluate this
this is cauchy principal value
define evaluate
put a equals 0 and call it a day
if we’re being pedantic then unfortunately we can’t say anything
but we can use cauchy principal value like sane people
its not important
hey nothing wrong with being an engineer
when did i say there was?
it was implied
nope

how long should we hang out
did you have indoor plumbing
in kindergarten
rough first few years
didn’t you have like atari?
no
and nintendo games
consoles werent big back then
my backyard
sunlight
yea
u go to the local big area of grass wheneve u are bored
and all ur friends are there
e z
y’all would go to each others houses on bikes and ask if y’all can play
i assume kids still do this today
but i am in contact with no children
other than my neice
yes
when i was younger we would just call each others house phones or have our parents arrange shit
and ur friends mom would say we locked ourselves out of the house
can you crawl in through the doggie door
since ur a small child
do those really exist
yea
im in year 11
oops
whats up flatus
australia
i thought it was exclamation lol
sorry
unfortunate!
@trim pewter yea discontinuities are not the hugest deal in the world
dope accent though
is the big point im trying to make
differentiation, pretty big problem
integration, less of an issue
riemann integrable iff bounded
when do i close 😭
whenev ryou want
.close
Closed by @trim pewter
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
australian type gif
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Could someone guide me thorugh thi
As I'm doing it by hand, I'll only use the first two decimal places
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
I will
one minute
The table I got
so I have to use this fomrula
$f(x) = 1 +0.22 \binom{x/0.2}{1} + 0.05 \binom{x/0.2}{2}+ 0.01\binom{x/0.2}{3}$
feels sus
What a wonderful world !
@supple trench why teh cross
why only use 2dp?
you're given a table of fct val w/ more dp
yea, but computing by hand will be a pain, and we'll get simpler values in the exam
you're exposing yourself to the risk of truncation errors
What matters is I understand the method and am able to execute it
such truncation explains this
I graphed it, seems to match up
Anyway, I'll now do a problem on backward interpolation
.close
Closed by @lost laurel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why it says the dimension of an autospace is the Ker of all that stuff? And why on the next page it follows the same line suit, and why it says he uses the Theorem of Nullity and Rank but doesn't include Image
{X: AX=\lambda X} = {X: (A-\lambda I)X=0} but the second space is just the kernel of A-\lambda I
and you can rearrange in another way to get the other kernel
@unique cloud Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
No i didnt really understand—why, in the highlighted line of the second picture i sent, although the book uses the theorem of nullity and rank, it does not feature any Im L(A-Iλ)
Given that m(λ) should be dimension of Vλ(A) it says its equal to Ker but does not feature the Im
Does Ker, written in that way, embodies the Im as well?
@unique cloud Has your question been resolved?
@unique cloud Has your question been resolved?
@unique cloud Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Help please
I need video tutorial for these question please
Trying to study for final exam but forget this part
,tex .FTC2
riemann
use that to find g'(x)
@prisma elm Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have a question regarding finding the normal vector to a plane, and a line. It's an A level question, but i am starting to think there is some kind of error
tried using the dot product to prove perpendicularity, and that doesn't work
and used the vector product to find the normal vector, no luck there too
@mortal pagoda Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
<@&286206848099549185>
can you should exactly what you did and where exactly you think there's an error?
so it is just for the first part, finding the normal to the plane
I have attempted to find a second directional vector from the point P to the plane
used the vector product with this, and the position vector of the plane given
this doesn't give us -i + 5j + 3k
likewise if i tried just the position vector of that point P
along with the position vector of the plane
using the vector product, i still don't get it
and also the dot product for neither works.
@sand dove
@mortal pagoda Has your question been resolved?
Are you talking about P1?
If so what do you mean by "second directional vector"?
Just to be clear, just because P is on the plane
Doesn't mean that the position vector of P is a directional vector of the plane
Not at all
I'm also curious about which points do you use to get that second directional vector
@mortal pagoda Has your question been resolved?
I have assumed that the line L, is perpendicular to P which is on the plane
I haven't assumed that line L is on the plane
but if they are perpendicular, you should be able to use the vector product
or at the very least, use the dot product to prove they are perpendicular?
I used the directional vector for Line L
so the lamba ..... part
Again
L is perpendicular to the plane
so perpendicular to directional vectors of the plane
P is on the plane
OP, the directional vector of P
is not a directional vector of the plane
so how would you set you find the normal of the plane with the given information please?
You're given a line that's perpendicular to the plane
so the directional vector of the line
is normal to the plane
here's the equation of said line
thus we read (-i + 2j + 3k) as directional vector of that line
so normal to the plane
@mortal pagoda Has your question been resolved?
?
this is what they got
wait
ah yeah they f-ed up
they wrote 5j instead of 2j
mmmh
to try to be in par with the solution
suppose that in the question statement, equation of L is "r = 3i - 2k + t(-i+5j+3k)"
and continue from there
you're not to blame here, the solution is (or the question statement)
@mortal pagoda Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
A rectangular pen is to be built with 1200 m of fencing. Each side of the pen has to be at least 200m long. The pen is to be divided into three parts using two parallel partitions.
a) Find the maximum possible area of the pen
can someone help me with this
i know how to do it without the restriction of it being atleast 200 m
but how do i approach it with the restriction?
Do you have any work yet?
no
Did you try it on your own yet?
l = 1200-4w/2
Good and what is that?
length
A = (600 - 2W)(W)
No worries
Yes
Well, we have 600-4w = 0
Add 600 to both sides
We have 4 w = 600
Meaning w = 150
yeaa
So now we can find L
but the question says each side has to be atleast 200 m long
okay, so that means that l >= 200 and w >= 200
so 600 - 2w >= 200
I hope i didnt mess up the question did I ?
right
can you now try to solve for w?
w<=200
so it's actually really
wait how that even make sense
silly
wait
cause we have both $w \le 200$ AND $w \ge 200$
south
there's only one value
you needed brackets!
should be (1200 - 4w)/2 >= 200
nope
just roll with this cause that's what you obtained
why not ?
where does 266.67 come from?
oh 🤔
mb yea
so w can only be 200
so if I can explain what's going on with this weird question
you have 6 sides, and each side is 200 minimum
so the minimum total perimeter must be 1200
that means all the sides have to be 200
so length = 200 and width = 200
I think they messed up the wording here frankly
with the partitions
I think your teacher only wanted the pen to be divided into 2 parts
so you'd get 3w + 2l = 1200 instead and you'd have new equations
hmm i see
oh wait I see
no the question is correct but you should change 200 to 180
so it's still 4w + 2l = 1200
but now you have w >= 180 and 600 - 2w >= 180 instead
so that does give you -2w >= -420 or w <= 210
and then the vertex (a maximum) occurs at w = 300, and these w-values are before the maximum
so for the maximum area you just take the maximum value of w, 210
@steady creek Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, just need to confirm that the coordinate ring of an affine plane without a point is K[x, y] real quick
I calculated it using the sheaf condition as a ring pullback, not sure how to do it with elementary methods (I’m reading Harris’s 1st course)
It essentially reduces to calculating K[x, y, 1/x] \cap K[x, y, 1/y] inside K[x, y, 1/x, 1/y]
@steel wedge Has your question been resolved?
@steel wedge Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@steel wedge Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @steel wedge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
You have an equilateral triangle with a circle perfectly inscribed inside it (the incircle), and the circle's radius is 3.
You want to find the area of the triangle.
Closed by @young olive
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How big a subject calculus is?? I am about to get calculus 1 course. what else will I come across in calculus.? I heard there's is calculus 2 and 3 ... What are difference in these courses?? And are these hard to do??
And also whats are suggested textbooks should I get to support me doing calculus from beginning to advance?
That'll depend on a variety of factors unique to your situation - what year are you in, what country, what exam board you're taking (if you're in HS)...
Calculus is a very big and beautiful branch of mathematics the only downside is you're pretty much always playing with fire. If you're working with non-standard stuff you're basically fucked. It is fun tho.
#book-recommendations and or #calculus
So as there are several books written on calculus. I want to know if I try to read any calculus book then am I going to understand it?? I mean, how do I get to know my level of calculus knowledge so that I tend to know which books will I get to understand and which books are a little difficult? And how to start from beginning about calculus? @autumn girder
What do you mean when you say non- standard stuff?? Plz elaborate?
Someone posted a question on this server asking for integration of $x^{\sqrt x}$ and it doesn't have a standard integration. This monstrosity was what I got when I tried to push through anyways
@autumn girder
$$f(x) = x^{\sqrt{x}}\cdot\left(\frac{2x}{\ln\abs{x}}\right) + f(x) \cdot \left(\sum_{i = 1}^{\infty} (-1)^{i}\frac{d^i}{dx^i}\left(\frac{2x}{\ln\abs{x}}\right)\right) + c$$
@autumn girder
And yet you went ahead with that!?
Honestly that's pretty rad ngl mad props to you
For the record this isn't verifiable because this is just never gonna convergr
Nah I am just hard headed lol
Now TBVF you'll prolly never do this in any standard HS or even Grad math course, this is just me being an idiot. But this is just an example to show you what happens when you don't listen to calculus Gods and try to manufacture something they think shouldn't exist (which I feel is easier to do in Calc than it is in many other fields). They'll fuck you up. Keep in mind tho even as I say this, Calc is still beautiful. It is crazy but that's the beauty of it.
@topaz sparrow Has your question been resolved?
Do you mean calculus has no usage in any field? No application?
Kindly answer
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
OH FUCK NO I didn't mean to imply that
It is very useful
It's the heart of applied math
#calculus and/or #math-discussion please
.close
Closed by @topaz sparrow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is the horse right?
,calc cbrt(81)
Result:
4.3267487109222
,calc cbrt(5)
Result:
1.7099759466767
well it seems like it's correct if you count "rounded to the nearest 11 decimal places" as correct
ofc it can't be fully precise because there are an infinite number of decimals
in general the cube root (or any root) of an integer is either an integer or it's irrational
So eather irrational or natural
so since both of these are irrational there's no repeating decimal and we have to settle for a few decimal places
well you can have a negative cube root of a negative number
Ok
Ty
/close
@odd yacht Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @wheat pawn
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I got nerd sniped by a silly problem that showed up on a social media feed. I've attached the pic. The goal is to find the radius r. My mathematical background is your basic engineering curriculum (algebra, calculus, differential equations, some linear algebra). Yet these types of problems tend to keep me busy for what seems like way too long, often with me going in circles never actually finishing them.
In my work so far I've denoted the functions as f(x) = x^2 and g(x) = x^2 - 1/2. And I've denoted the points of intersection to the circle as (a, f(a)) = (a, a^2) and (b, g(b)) = (b, b^2 - 1/2). I also denoted the center of the circle as (c, 0).
From there I derived expressions for the radius using right triangles on those points of intersection with a and b. I set them equal to each other to get an equation for c in terms of a and b.
I also derived equations for the lines perpendicular to the points of intersection between the functions and the circle. They are f_p(x) = -x/(2a) + a^2 + 1/2 and g_p(x) = -x/(2b) + b^2. I then set these equal to each other, realizing that they intersect at (c, 0). This yielded a different equation for c in terms of a and b.
I could go on with all the things I've tried. But I've been slogging through algebra, looking for simplifications or substitutions that move the needle in some way. Instead I wind up with large power-4 polynomials of a and b. Maybe there's a key piece I'm missing? I even wondered if this is a valid construction. My rough intuition says yes, but I could be wrong of course.
Pythagoras theorem? equate hypotenuse to red and hypotenuse to blue?
not quite a great way
Should note that the tangent lines on the parabolas are skew. So yes, two different right triangles can be made with hypotenuse r. But equating those expressions gets messy.
(a,a^2) and then (b,b^2 - 1/2), and then (u,v) for the center of the circle is getting me
$-2au+a^2-2a^2v+a^4=-2bu+b^2-2b^2v+b^4-v+\frac{1}{4}+b^2$
Yeatte
a bit ew yeah
v would be zero in this scenario, yeah?
I didn't want to try generalizing it too soon since it's hard enough for me in the specific case here. But by all means go ahead if you can figure it out :p
$f_p(x)=\frac{-x}{2a}+a^2+\frac{1}{2}$
Jerry
$g_p(x)=\frac{-x}{2b}+b^2$
Jerry
yep
Why is my latex so huge? Sorry I'm new to this. Anyway those are the lines perpendicular to the intersection points of each function f and g to the circle.
Yeatte
I used a for the red one
Yeah that's the same, no? I moved everything to the rhs
yep
They intersect at the center of the circle.
But more algebra didn't really get me anywhere. Anyway I'm going to take a walk. I'll check back later.
$U=\frac{a^3-b^3+\frac{a}{2}}{a-b}$
Yeatte
$V=\frac{2ab^3-2ba^3-ab}{a-b}$
Yeatte
@dark warren Has your question been resolved?
,w solve ((a^3-b^3+a/2)/(a-b) - a)^2 + ((2ab^3-2ba^3-ab)/(a-b) -a^2)^2= ((a^3-b^3+a/2)/(a-b) - b)^2 + ((2ab^3-2ba^3-ab)/(a-b) -(b^2 -1/2))^2
its supposed to spit out a relationship between a and b, but instead wolfram gave an example of an answer along the line
so its not really what w'ere looking for
Oh duh
It ends up instead of being a polynomial of degree 4, it ends up being degree 6
which is not guaranteed to have a 'nice' root equation
Ah ok. I never got far enough to a degree 6 expression. Crazy that such a simple looking problem blows up into this mess.
with the 2ab^3 -2ba^3 its a 4th degree
but with the squaring, and the (a-b) on the bottom we would have a 8th deg on top and a 2nd deg on bottom
multiplying by the bottom to get rid of any a or b on the bottom, we would get 10 degree polynomial
but stuff cancels out so it ends up being back down to a 6th degree
tho if you try to solve for either a or b, it can be thought of as a 5th deg
still most likely not doable
that being said
if you instead took a circle between 2 ellipses
I ended up doing that math, and it ends up quite elegant
So I would recommend trying that instead
You mean instead of between two parabolas? That would be a different problem right?
yep
I think one of the problems was that the exponent of y and x didnt match each other
a lot more things wouldve cancelled out if they did
just like the U^2 and the V^2 terms are on both and cancelled each other out as well
What are you trying to determine precisely ?
$r=\frac{1}{54}\sqrt{189-78\sqrt{3}+12\sqrt{342\sqrt{3}-582}}$
Mqnic_
mm?
dja do the same thing I did or something different?
cuz for that (c,0) point we could find the 2 tangents to the circle, and then cuz of V = 0 there, it reduces to a 4th deg
of a in terms of b or vice versa
and then plug that into one of the circle eqs
@dark warren Has your question been resolved?
I uh, think so. @dense lynx can you elaborate on your solution?
This isn’t homework, I’m just trying to understand the solution.
@dark warren Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi I'm doing induction problems and I don't see how to go on further
can you show the original problem?
prove that
$1^3 + 2^3 + \cdots + n^3 = \left( \frac{n(n+1)}{2} \right)^2$
mia
my first instinct is to factor out (k + 1)^2 from both terms in the numerator
higher!
I'm lowkey dyslexic and struggle with moving numbers around when factoring so 🙈
hm, it does seem like you've made a mistake
namely, the k^2 factor in your first term has vanished 
take your time 
I thought I factored it out
you factored (k + 1)^2 out
remember that your original expression is k^2 (k + 1)^2 + 4(k + 1)^3
when you factor (k + 1)^2 out from both terms, you need to divide each term by (k + 1)^2
hm, first things first, that /4 extends to (k + 1)^3 too
oh yes pretend it does
secondly, your sum of terms has become a product after factoring (k + 1)^2 out of both terms
and (k + 1)^2 is nowhere to be seen 
is it possible you can write it out from your side? I like
Have trouble visualizing these kinds of factoring
😞
I'll give a different example 
Okay tysm
say we have $k^3 (k + 2)^2 + 7(k + 2)^3$
higher!
Yes
then we can factor $(k + 2)^2$ out of both terms to get $(k + 2)^2 (k^3 + 7(k + 2))$
higher!
this is just reversing the distrubutive law
I see where (k+2)^2 got factored out of the right term
But the left term it's like
Nothing ever got factored but rearranged?
Does that makes sense
I'm a bit confused 
let me write it out more explicitly
\begin{align*}
k^3 (k + 2)^2 + 7(k + 2)^3 & = (k + 2)^2 \left(\frac{k^3 (k + 2)^2}{(k + 2)^2} + \frac{7(k + 2)^3}{(k + 2^2)}\right) \
& = (k + 2)^2 (k^3 + 7(k + 2))
\end{align*}
higher!
To me this is what I saw from your display
Like I feel like the k^3 just gets moved a spot I don't see the actual factoring
here
the parentheses I used contain all that information
you might've noticed I added an additional pair
that was on purpose 
I'm starting to understand let me
Look at it longer
I understand everything, but I don't understand where you pulled
This from
Can anyone explain to me where the extra (k+1)^2 comes from
it's not really that it comes from anywhere
do you agree that $a(b + c) = ab + ac$?
higher!
this is the distributive law
Yes
then in our case, a = (k + 1)^2, b = k^2, and c = 4(k + 1)
Ohhh
Oh my gosh
I get it
I see it
Wow
And factoring is like simplifying it it's not getting rid of anything
Which is why the (k+1)^2 is still there
Sorry if that doesn't make sense that's just how I try to make sense out of it in my head but that helps a lot tysm
So by factoring out (k+1)^2 I essentially just took it out of the k^2 and the 4(k+1)^3
Correct?
yes
I think you just explained factoring to me 🤩
it never made sense to me
Omg
Thank god I had this epiphany before going into AP calc tysm
Closed by @scarlet fulcrum
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
for question 1, why do the answers say 3cm?
that formula you got for the box volume looks sus
why are you subtracting the area off?
yeah but that doesnt affect the volume
it affects the SURFACE AREA if you were writing that down
yea
but the volume is the same whether it's an open or a closed box
i mean, why include one endpoint but exclude the other
bc the area of the cardboard can’t be zero
oh but x can’t be zero either
for 2a, how the hell am i meant to get 7500
7500/pir^2
$h = \frac {7500}{\pi r^2}$
beluwuga
ooo it worked
@fallen harness Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @fallen harness
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
,rotate
Yes both of them are equivalent
!noping
Please do not ping individual helpers unprompted.
We friends chill
we are not friends.
and i do not appreciate being pinged like this.
😢
Closed by @raven plaza
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

