#help-26
1 messages · Page 205 of 1
yeah it's the ninth tetrahedral number plus the ninth pentatope number plus 1
11C3 + 12C4 + 1
I need to learn about these numbers then, but is there a way we can solve it without using these pyramidal numbers(tetrahedral) because i am pretty sure this is not in syllabus so there must be some other way to do it, i believe
hmmm
I also think it can be solved using stars and bars too but i don't get how
Could you elaborate pls
aha
if you want to
oh, we don't want to
it corresponds to 8877 too
I think i still don't get it, maybe it will take some time to dissolve what u just said
even though the four places are different, they're indistinguishable because they're represented by a canonical form, the sorted order
T T again a new term canonical form
the point is that every awesome number can be described as the amount of digits
one,two fives and seven
it matches one to one
one amount, one awesome number
so u mean that we just need to find every possible combination of digits since there is just 1 way to arrange it?
ah! I see but the only thing that i don't understand now is how are we going to state the stars and bars equation...like in this way x1+x2+x3+x4=?
ohh i see! I get it now!! i was thinking the opposite
this will count from 0000 to 9999
then you deal with 99 separately
i'll see if it matches the answer
okay I now understand the approach
Thankyou sooo much @pseudo horizon @long stirrup !!
.close
Closed by @umbral moth
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
yeah 661
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Could someone explain how we go from f(x) to this derivative?
When I plotted this in geogebra I got really intriguated
do you know the derivative of |x|
isn't it like |1|?
no
wait lemme look
oki
ohhhhhhh
yeh i get it now
so |x| = sqrt(x^2) that is = x^(1/2)
derivatif of this is 1/2 * x^(-1/2)
so 1/(2*sqrt(x))
correct?
sure but it’s x^2 inside so you need chain rule and you can’t just have x in the sqrt
you’re welcome sir
how do i close the thread again?
!done
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
Closed by @young saffron
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How did they get that coordinate
I tried setting this to 0
oh wait u take the negative of the modulus innot
wait but how dyu know ur supposed to do that
oh cuse it has neg gradient innit
.close
Closed by @lusty cedar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is my work correct?
assuming I have an initial amount x,
after n years you have x(1.0448)^n amount of money
then do percentage change formula
[(new - old) / old] * 100
which gives around 24.5% increase
idk if thats the right way of doing it tho
,calc (1.0448)^5
Result:
1.2449898754316
yeah, seems right
Closed by @jade knot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
Ok
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do i differentiate this
🙉
is it chain rule
even if it was chain rule
ahhhhh
idk man
thats what im thinking hahahaha
is it supposed to be $8\sin(\frac{1}{2}x)-3x+9$?
idek
dingus
maybe i should just check the mark scheme
I think its to the power
of
it looks like
but i have no clue what im meant to do with that
ofc
Closed by @lusty cedar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What is your question about this ?
I did this and I’m getting 0.12 instead of 0.2. Yet I cannot find an error in either method
What is B' ?
south
Maybe a typo and they meant P(A)
hey whats up guys can anyone help me solve some of the problems here I solved 1 a and 1 b already
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
?
this is not your channel
Wdym "?" ?
pls make a new one for yourself
thanks
@neon iron Has your question been resolved?
yeah they definitely should be using P(A) = 0.12 instead
then follow the same steps
Okay good
So I’m not wrong
This question demotivated me
Can you please explain what this question means?
I have trouble with the notation
Reply ping please
P(A' B') is same as Probability of A' and B' happening simultaneously i.e P(A' intersection B')
Oh???
Okay
That was what I was unsure about
Okay I got one more
- The assertion is false, right?
I cant assume that E1 and E2 are exclusive to prove a “then” statement
The assertion can be true, but you're lacking information. The probability of the union can be anywhere between 0.4 and 0.7
honestly, i would not accept any of the 4 options presented as correct
It can be. But I can’t conclude that it is. So I can’t say blah blah blah, then this is true. It just can’t
I’ve seen a lot of crappy solutions in this book today
you cant say it's false either
(a) is obviously wrong
(b) is not necessarily right, since A is not necessarily right
(c) is obviously wrong
and (d) is, again, not necessarily right, since A is not necessarily wrong
Also, the book answer starts by assuming they are mutually exclusive, which you were never told they were
I would write my own (e) option and contest it with the instructor when asked
@neon iron Has your question been resolved?
Yeah
Would what’s marked be the most appropriate answer considering everything?
as i said, *i* would not say either as correct
@neon iron Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, im struggling to understand what part b wants from me. my thought would be to get the area from -infinity to the intersection between f and g but the integral would be divergent. So what should the bounds be? the intersection between f and the x axis and the intersection between f and g?
My guess is that in reality, they are asking for you to figure the area that also "holds" the y axis in the middle.
The other option is obviously divergent
yeah, precisely.
Okay thank you very much
But I'm not the only who thinks the wording is strange right?
or am i missing something
it can be misinterpreted, yeah, but given that it says "Enclosed by the graph of f" you should figure that its fully bounded
if in doubt just do both, lol
true, although not sure how much my markers will appreciate that
but thank you
.close
Closed by @crimson lagoon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello,
If I have a joint pdf such that 0<x<y<1, to get the marginal density of x I should integrate y over [0,1] or [x,1]. I know that for y it's x over [0,y]. In addition once i get the marginal densities to get E(X) and E(Y), I just integrate the respective marginal pdf * (x or y) over [0,1] for both?
@finite glacier Has your question been resolved?
@finite glacier Has your question been resolved?
It should be done over [x,1]
You can only do the latter if you define the marginal distribution of e.g. y to return zero if y < x
Otherwise you should again integrate over [x,1] since this is what is defined as the "probability space" of y
Closed by @finite glacier
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
do i need to use trigo here or..
ohh let me try
thank youu found it but how do we tell when to use trig exactly
look up a table of common integrals
Closed by @twilit hemlock
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Help me solve using the method of variation of constants:
(1 + x^2)y'' +2xy' = 12x^3
uguu~ba
so far i have only noticed about the left side
uguu~ba
Maybe try the substitution z = y'
@left tree Has your question been resolved?
nah
what next?
$$y_p=\phi_1(x)\arctan{x}+\phi_2(x)$$
If you used the substitution life would be more abelian
uguu~ba
for example?
i dont tried sub.
so, i also didn't look at their intermediate results
If $u = y'$ then $u' = y''$ so consider now
[ (1+x^2)u' + 2xu = 12x^3 ] and bring that into the form
[ u' + a(x) \cdot u = s(x) ] so that you can use variations of constants.
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
You can first get the homogeneous solution and then based on that find the particular so you get u = u_h + u_p in the end
@left tree Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
im correct i think
wth
im sure i sended some already
so i need particular y
i found it already
then variation of parameters
??
just dont help if you have no idea instead of sending chat gpt stuff
yeah
lol
I solved so much problem
and just now, I need to send fast
so I used chatgpt
but that way is true
real
so u want entire solution?
i need help on exact method
this may be the complete solution but i'm sure i've already reached half of it
ofc
i need calm down
and stop be toxic
sorry 😔
i just dreamed that here would help me and solve equations for me
maybe i'm behaving wrongly, but only you and one other person really helped me in these two days
maybe this server is not meant for this
but i almost don't see anyone here
If you finish the first half and send me a screenshot, I'll finish it for you.
@left tree are u there?
yeah
solved?
What is method of variation of constants? I have a method to solve this, but osk if it follows that
Integrate this to get
(1+x^2)y'=3x^4+C
for why?
From here you can derive if $s(x)$ = 0 the homogenous solution $u_h = Ce^{-A(x)}.\$
Then the particular solution is $u_p = C(x)e^{-A(x)}.\$
You would next calculate $u'_p$ and plug in both into the differential equation to solve for $C(x).\$ Then you get the solution $u = u_h+u_p = y'$ and you can integrate simply to get $y$.
yeah
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
You can integrate (3x^4+C)/(1+x^2) to get y?
but i already have check
chatgpt
why don't use matlab?
okay man
as u know, i am a programmer
and i have to work
now, for a few hours, I don't work because of u
unfortunately is not reason why im ask here
what?
i sincerely don't want to distract anyone, forgive me
i think that if this coincides, then there will be other non busy people
@left tree that is incorrect?
this is method
hm...
now u want me to solve your problem entirely.
that is bad.
😳
I literally sent a blue print and y'all still keep philosophizing about this
idk
Literally this
maybe uguu doesn't want hints and just wants the answer
maybe
isnt this right method?
if so
I already forgot 1/a(x)
because before the highest derivative I have a(x)=1+x^2
if you're going to send GPT screenshots you are not able to explain it's honestly best that you don't reply at all.
Please do not trust ChatGPT or similar AI tools for mathematical tasks, as they often generate output which "sounds correct" but has numerous factual or logical errors. Use of these AI tools to answer other people's help questions is strictly against server rules (see #rules).
kidding me?
i only use that i am so busy
if u dont know about me, dont say so!
@empty spoke when u r a kid, I solved those
I don't care. If anyone can go and do the same then it adds nothing to the convo
but not too busy to copy paste questions and answers into/from chatgpt
this seems to be variation of parameters in the general case. After doing a change of coordinates as in #help-26 message it reduces to applying variation of parameters for a linear first order equation
it is
as i said, that is incorrect
u make me so disappointed
@left tree perhaps, I will remove u
gl!
Are you kidding ??? What the **** are you talking about man ? You are a biggest looser i ever seen in my life ! You was doing PIPI in your pampers when i was beating players much more stronger then you!
omg
lol
perhaps, u r a faker!
so am even worse
anyway, in here, let's stop such that
cant solve ez things myself
if u have any words, dm me
i need close this sorry
.close
Closed by @lean pebble
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Do you know vieta?
nope
yes
2(x1x2+x1x3+x2x3) right?
yes
The expansion of this is
3(xxx-(x1+x2+x3)xx+(x1x2+x1x3+x2x3)x-x1x2x3)
Right?
yes, but is there also not a quicker way to solve this by a formula?
like i thought were a formula for finding product of roots
That is what I am doing?
So we want 2/3 times the coefficient of x, right?
i thouht vieta was just taking the 3rd term and dividing by the 1st term
yes
Any term divided by first term
Closed by @wicked mist
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Calculate the limit in the sense of distributions of:
[ T_n = \sqrt{n} \delta_n ]
jandro0103
Hint?
@sharp chasm Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
perhaps you'll find help more quickly in #advanced-analysis? 
also what is delta_n
Dirac delta function
if you know fourier transforms, you could try to find the fourier transform of the product then inverse fourier transform of the convolution
https://math.stackexchange.com/a/4117943 for fourier transform of the sqrt(n)
but whats the n doing
Yes i know the FT
!original
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
But it's a very long text, I don't understand where to look exactly
I doubt that delta_n is the dirac delta function, cause then they would have just written delta and T_n would obviously not converge
Yes it is the Dirac delta concentrated in n
jandro0103
<@&286206848099549185>
jandro0103
Then it's not the delta function!
Do this
But in reality this problem was written in pen, I'm sending a similar one but clearer
jandro0103
Maybe the previous one was written badly, but I would need a hint here too
This one was definitely well written
@sweet shard
@sweet shard $\delta_n$ converges in distribution to the dirac delta. Maybe it's arbitrary? Idk. But canonically, something like $\delta_n(x)=ne^{-(nx)^2}$ works. I can't work through this rn bc I'm busy, but the suggestion for Fourier transform is what I'd go through as well if that's the sequence we're working with
kirby
But like has been discussed here, post the original problem and any relevant context because we don't know what the question has you assume or not @sharp chasm
Are you here @sharp chasm
I think this is the exercise now
@sharp chasm Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Apart from the typo where they changed the question to write the solution
Isn’t the solution incorrect
They opened absolute sign with zero respect to what values of x we can have
According to which we should make cases
@neon iron Has your question been resolved?
Do you mean an absolute value in the original expression?
Or one that would appear later in the algebra
When they were evaluating LHS. from 2 to 3 step. There should be absolute sign
Later I think
From the radical signs?
If you have a question about signs of things, cos2theta is something between -1 and 1
So 1 + cos2theta & 1 - cos2theta are necessarily >= 0
@neon iron Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
There is this question given $2x+3y=14$ solve for min of $8/x+3/y$, and the values of x and y when min occurs.
The solution as of in attached image shows only the ineq is right but provides no information of infimum. All I could find was this identity https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/2267660/supremum-and-the-cauchy-schwarz-inequality but neither $\sqrt{2x}$, $\sqrt{3y}$, $\sqrt{\frac{8}{x}}$, $\sqrt{\frac{3}{y}}$ is bounded everywhere.
So what are the prerequisites of using Cauchy ineq to determine the infimum here?
Cro
@tired terrace Has your question been resolved?
assuming x and y are positive
we could do this
but this is not neccessarily true
this has no infimum
ot minimum
hmm let me check
uhm with calculus i find x=4 or 28
take x = -0.0000001
By taking y=(14-2x)/3 and solve for d/dx(8/x+3/((14-2x)/3))=0
oh right
so first x>0 y>0
I think I get it.
.close
Closed by @tired terrace
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
integration by parts
If I'd continue this, I would have to do another integration by parts right?
+1 -1
the integral after integration by parts is supposed to be $\int\limits_{0}^{1}\frac{x^{3}}{3(x^{2}+1)}dx$ not what you wrote
如月あやみ Kisaragi Ayami
afterwards do long division
you can also just differentiate the x^2 and integrate the arctan
or just sub x^2 + 1
and you get something that can be done by u sub
was just looking through all you guys' answers
but this isnt possible right? substitution for u = x^2 +1
the integral of arctan is $x\arctan x-\frac{1}{2}\ln(x^{2}+1)$ so im not sure how that helps actually
如月あやみ Kisaragi Ayami
becasue then you get du = 2xdx
here I meant
yeah
then +1-1 yea
but where do we find 2x in the function
write x^3 as x*x^2
\begin{align*}
\int\limits_{0}^{1}\frac{x^3}{x^{2}+1}dx&=\frac{1}{2}\int\limits_{0}^{1}\frac{x^{2}}{x^{2}+1}d(x^{2})\&=\frac{1}{2}\int\limits_{0}^{1}\left(1-\frac{1}{x^{2}+1}\right)d(x^{2})\end{align*}
如月あやみ Kisaragi Ayami
Hi, could someone help me understand Taylor’s theorem, especially the Taylor polynomial, please?
oay
i understand what u are trying to say
but now i get this
open a different help channel
lol
yeah
now integrate by parts again?
yep
you never added the initial integration by parts part
for real? but arctan(0) = 0
and 1/3 * 0^3
is also 0
so if ud fill in x = 1 or x=0 one of them would be 0
im stupid
nvm
i understand
graph of arctan looks like this
rest should be pretty straightforward
theres still something wrong
(u-1)/6u
my final answer is
is just 1/6 - 1/6u
pi/12 -1/3 + ln(3)
yeah lmao
tysm
and i think things work from there
finally
allg
np
Closed by @narrow pivot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
The grid below represents part of a nautical chart. The squares are equal and the scale used on the map indicates that each 1 cm corresponds to 1000 m. A cargo ship leaving A traveled along the route ABCD.
Knowing that 1 nautical mile is equivalent to 1,852 meters, we can say that on this route, from point A to D, the ship traveled in nautical miles approximately:
sqrt(2) = 1,41
sqrt(5) = 2,23
Yes, and what exactly are you stuck on?
i don't know how to start
i THINK we can do a Pythagorean theorem
yep
sqrt(2) is the digonal of a square, sqrt(5) is the diagonal of a 2x1 rectangle
this is just pythagoras
so you count how many of each diagonal the path is and multiply
keep everything to meters for now and then convert it at the end
you need to find how much the cargo ship travelled
if you know how many "squares" the cargo travelled, you can convert it to meters, to miles, to nautical miles, to anything
so
i still unsure about the BC line
what does pythagora say
ohhhh
tall 2 squares and long 4 squares
ignore the bottom
dw
so
the image is a little bit confunsing
but
i think you can understand
its root 20
but yes
you also need to find the other lenghts of the other 2 segments ab and cd
same process
and you sum all of the distances at the end
to get the total distance travelled
and those would be your cms travelled
then you can convert it into anything
wait, so AB = 2^3?
nope
you know that AB^2 = 4^2 + 4^2
so AB^2 = 16 + 16
AB^2 = 32
you take the root
AB = root32
32 can also be rewritten as 2^5
which can also be rewritten as 2^4 * 2
you can take the 2^4 out of the root
and it becomes 4root2
not sure if you have to do this part
depends if the teacher asks you
it's not my homework or something like that
but
@worn bison Has your question been resolved?
its all under the root
Sqrt(2^5)
yes
So
You remove 2 powers of 2, isn’t it?
yes imagine i only had 2^4
(which is technically 16)
taking the square root is the same as elevating to the power of 1/2
by applying the power of a power rule
2^(4 * 1/2) gives 2^2
.
that
apparently
have
5+0,5
of height
ok
i solved
thank you guys i love you all
,close
Closed by @worn bison
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I know now that I chose the wrong terms for u and dv, but is there another reason why I got the problem wrong?
always choose u as ln
will get you something easier in the second integral of the ibp
but is there another reason why I got the problem wrong?
choosing the wrong variable on its own shouldn't make it wrong right?
Your uv term on line 2 is incorrect
oh thx
@reef hatch Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I’ve been stuck on this question for a while can’t seem to find out the issue, i calculated the domain using the denominator and where it’s undefined then tested each set but it’s partially correct
There's only one x value where the function is undefined
the first one is wrong as -7/2 (-3.5) is within that interval
@leaden phoenix Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
prove that there is no integer n such that $3^n \equiv 99 \pmod{100}$
Dork9399
@grim sable Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help out here? chatgpt can’t help with an actual proof and we’re stuck
the partial sums series is not n=1^inf it just says it goes from n=1 to inf, same for a_n sequence
translations a bit off but that’s about it
@noble pier Has your question been resolved?
s_n is sum of a_n from 1 to n?
@noble pier Has your question been resolved?
yes
i know the statement is true, but i don’t know how to write the proof for it
<@&286206848099549185>
I think maybe try to prove the sequence is monotone
And bounded(?)
Then apply monotone convergence theorem
I believe monotone is not so hard to prove
Closed by @noble pier
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi,
PI_1 : 5x-2y-z=-2
I wanted to understand why i cannot find the normal to pi_2 by doing the cross product of
(1 4 -3) x (5 -2 -1)
i thought that the line of intersection is paralllel to the normal of the two normals of the planes
@agile shell Has your question been resolved?
- What do u know about the relationship between normal vectors of the two planes and the intersecting line.
- Using the points, can u find the normal vector of one of the two planes?
1, well i know the line of intersection of parallel to the normal of the two normals of the planes, ie :
if the line is: r = a + tb
then b = n1 x n2
2, i know how to do the question using the two given points, use (1,1,1) and (0,0,2) to get a direction vector on PI_2 then cross that direction vector with (1 4 -3) to get n_2
Im just confused on why (1 4 -3) x (5 -2 -1) doesnt give me a correct normal vector
@agile shell Has your question been resolved?
as you know one point on the intersection line, and as you know the direction vector of the intersection line, you know all (=infinite) points of the intersection line. so you know enough points of the plane.
(0,0,0) on the plane -> 2c = d
(1,1,1) on the plane -> ...
take another point of the intersection line -> ....
yes yes i know how to solve the question using that method
my main question is this
whats you result?
if i do (1 4 -3) x (5 -2 -1)
i get
(5 7 11)
if i use (1,1,1) i get the equation 5x + 7y + 11z = 23
if i use (0,02) i get 5x + 7y + 11z = 22
why should this calculation should help you to solve the question?
my reasoning is that
the intersection of the planes
that lines direction vector is perpendicular to both n1 and n2
right?
the intersetion line is in both planes.
yes
im saying its perpendicular to the NORMALS of the plane
so if the line is perpendicular to the normals
then if i find the perpendicular of the line and one of the normals
should i not get the other normal ?
PL_1 isnt given in your exxample, but i am pretty sure that your equation for PL_1 is wrong (and therefore your normal vector for PL_1 is wrong).
PI_1 is right
the cross product is normal to both vectors, so if you take the cross product of the normals of two planes you get the direction vector of the intersection line. so far, so ok.
you wanna calulate the cross product of a normal to a plane and the direction vector of the intersection line. yes, this vector would be normal to the direction vector of the line, but why do you expect that the normals from the planes should be normal to each other?
what you are calculating is a vector which is normal to the intersection line (yes, ok) and it is normal to the normal of plane 1, so it is in plane 1
are perpendoicular
right?
but if they arent it wont
cause n1 and n2 arent perpendicualr
makes sense
you could take the direction vector of the intersection line (is in the plane) and the vector between the two given points (is in the plane) - if they hopefully are not parallel. so you can get the normal of plane 2.
type .close
Closed by @agile shell
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
What about the others?
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Introducing with the set $\mathbb P$ a prime number is rigorous ?
Aquamy
what?
I don't know if this set is common for English people, in France, it's known.
you can write "Let $\mathbb{P}$ be the set of prime numbers" and that'll suffice
artemetra
There is no prime numbers set
what?
But not $\forall p \in \mathbb P$ ?
Aquamy
Automatically
yea but then you'll have to say that p is a prime number
ahah
sometimes using a couple words instead of symbols makes the text clearer
So it's useless
Ça dépend ce que tu veux faire
Pour une phrase quantifié comme ça on peut s'en passer
Par contre si tu veux calculer un produit/somme de termes avec un p qui se balade dans l'ensemble des nombre premiers la c'est beaucoup plus utile de marquer p in P
@coral night Has your question been resolved?
Ok je vois
mrc
Closed by @coral night
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Completely lost here
I don't even know if it wants AB as a length or A*B
Cause it doesn't have that little line above it
you can easily try both no?
I don't know how to get A and B
ah ok
😭😭
well you have a line
with 3 equations
and a plane
in which you can plug in 2 of the 3 to find what value x or y or z has to be for the intersection point
so
take the plane 2x + 3y - z = -13
you can plug in 1 - z into it
to get rid of z
for example
(x - 2) / 3 = 1 - z
so then the plane equation becomes
2x + 3y + (x - 2) / 3 = -12
using (x- 2) / 3 = (y + 1) / 2
you can find either x or y
and plug it into this
this one
to find the other
etc
and the same for the other plane
to get A and B
@neon iron Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello
i checked 2 helpers before this one and i didn't even get a respond
so here it is without further ado
translate it if you don't speak french.
it is rather simple
i am somehow supposed to use the mean value theorem or rolle theorem
qu'as-tu essayé?
j'ai posé l'ensemble A des pts ou f s'annule
j'ai supposé par l'absurde que f ne s'annule pas sur cette ensemble
autrement dit , je veux trouver un c dans A ou f'(c)=0
puisque A est infini et f ne s'annule pas sur A
je voudrais discuter si f s'annule un nombre fini de fois sur I
ceci peut aider à trouver un voisinage entre deux reels ou f s'annule mais ou elle est strictement monotone
on est supposé à utiliser le TAF mais je n'arrive point
je peux aussi facilement trouver un c ou f=f' et un c ou f'=0
il existe une infinite ou f=0
ce qui est delicat s'agit de quoi poser ou faire intervenir pour qu'on obtienne les 3 egalites
est-ce que tu peux montrer que pour tout epsilon il existe x tel que f(x) = 0, y tel que f'(y) = 0 tels que |x-y| < epsilon?
le théorème de Rolle va beaucoup t'aider pour montrer l'affirmation ci dessus
(premier indice : ||A possède une suite convergente (pourquoi ?)||)
A est bornée
theoreme de bolzano -weiestrass
il existe une sous-suite a elements dans A tq cette sous suite converge
il existe yn dans cette intervalle tque f'(yn)=0
yn est comprise entre xn et xn+1
donc yn tend vers l aussi
donc cette limite l est celle qu'on cherche
@jolly root Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do you do this?
@quiet flume Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why is this not -91
ok so here's how you solve it
- find g(x)
- find f(x)
- find g inverse (x)
- find f . g inverse (x)
Dont even need to try that much
that's how I solved it 😢
I reversed that function
You are given like a minute to solve it so
can you translate the original question 😭
Well you let 2x = 13 which is wrong
but f(13) gets in
does it ask for f-1(13)
asks for (fog-1)-1 so I did (gof-1)
I will show you a quick tech to find the inverse fastly
yeah
To solve a + 3 = a + b you add -a to left side of a right,
But notice function composition is NOT commutative. We say an operator * is commutative if
ab = ba
To find inverse of f, on each side with composition operation so f^{-1} • f = I
Where I is the identity function I(x) = x
So you quickly get f^{-1}(3x+4) = 2x
a better idea would be
turn fog into a new function
j(x)
it should make things easier
Then let 3x+4 = 13 to find f^{-1} (13)
-7?
isnt it -33
Did you get the fast tech
I got the same answer
fast tech?
technique
You will have 1 min in YKS so might as well learn the fast way too
oh yeah
wait a minute you know YKS?
Yeah, if it wasnt trivial enough, i am a turk as well
f(x)=3x+4/2
g(x) = 7 - 4x
fog = f(g(x))=
k = 3(7-4x)+4/2
2k = 3(7-4x)+4
2k = 21-12x + 4
2k = 25-12x
k = 25-12x/2
What is your answer?
Options dont have to be correct all the time , yknow
y = (37 - 3x) / 8
x = (37 - 3y) / 8
8x = 37 - 3y
3y = 37 - 8x
y = (37 - 8x) / 3
(fog^-1)^-1(x) = (37 - 8x) / 3
wait now I found it 1?
OMG its 3
so if f(2x) = 3x + 4 and it asks for f(13)
x should be 13/2
and f-1(x) is (x-4)/3
f-1(13) = 3/2
x+2 = 3/2 x = 1/2
then 5 - 4 x 1/2
which is 3
did I do it right?
I believe its -11 tho
Nope its 6
Why calc f(13)
this part
Wanna save yourself all the work?
started with f-(13)
And some energy