#help-26

1 messages · Page 205 of 1

neon iron
#

I did try it but my answer was much larger than the correct answer so i think maybe my logic had some flaws

pseudo horizon
#

yeah it's the ninth tetrahedral number plus the ninth pentatope number plus 1

#

11C3 + 12C4 + 1

neon iron
#

I need to learn about these numbers then, but is there a way we can solve it without using these pyramidal numbers(tetrahedral) because i am pretty sure this is not in syllabus so there must be some other way to do it, i believe

pseudo horizon
#

hmmm

long stirrup
#

it's stars and bars

#

you have 10 bins and you distribute 4 digits

neon iron
#

I also think it can be solved using stars and bars too but i don't get how

#

Could you elaborate pls

pseudo horizon
#

aha

long stirrup
#

like "two 8s and two 7s"

#

means the number is 7788

pseudo horizon
#

doesn't that overcount?

#

doesn't that count numbers with decreasing digits too?

long stirrup
#

if you want to

pseudo horizon
#

oh, we don't want to

long stirrup
#

it corresponds to 8877 too

pseudo horizon
#

ohhh

#

hmm

#

oh 10 bins and 4 digits... i was thinking the opposite

stable onyx
#

hello

#

is there person good at math

#

help me

pseudo horizon
#

just ask a question in one of the available rooms such as #help-4

neon iron
#

I think i still don't get it, maybe it will take some time to dissolve what u just said

pseudo horizon
#

even though the four places are different, they're indistinguishable because they're represented by a canonical form, the sorted order

neon iron
#

T T again a new term canonical form

pseudo horizon
#

i don't really get it either

#

combinatorics is hard

long stirrup
#

the point is that every awesome number can be described as the amount of digits

#

one,two fives and seven

#

it matches one to one

#

one amount, one awesome number

neon iron
#

so u mean that we just need to find every possible combination of digits since there is just 1 way to arrange it?

long stirrup
#

and that's what stars and bars is for

#

yes

neon iron
#

ah! I see but the only thing that i don't understand now is how are we going to state the stars and bars equation...like in this way x1+x2+x3+x4=?

long stirrup
#

x1 to x10

#

=4

#

or x0 to x9

neon iron
#

ohh i see! I get it now!! i was thinking the opposite

long stirrup
#

this will count from 0000 to 9999

#

then you deal with 99 separately

#

i'll see if it matches the answer

neon iron
#

okay I now understand the approach

#

Thankyou sooo much @pseudo horizon @long stirrup !!

#

.close

topaz sinewBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @umbral moth

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

long stirrup
#

yeah 661

topaz sinewBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

young saffron
topaz sinewBOT
young saffron
#

Could someone explain how we go from f(x) to this derivative?

#

When I plotted this in geogebra I got really intriguated

agile harness
#

do you know the derivative of |x|

young saffron
#

isn't it like |1|?

agile harness
#

no

young saffron
#

wait lemme look

agile harness
#

that would just be 1

#

no don’t look it up

#

i’ll give you a hint

#

|x| = sqrt(x^2)

young saffron
#

oki

#

ohhhhhhh

#

yeh i get it now

#

so |x| = sqrt(x^2) that is = x^(1/2)

#

derivatif of this is 1/2 * x^(-1/2)

#

so 1/(2*sqrt(x))

#

correct?

agile harness
#

sure but it’s x^2 inside so you need chain rule and you can’t just have x in the sqrt

young saffron
#

oh right i forgot x is x^2 inside

#

lemme note this on paper

#

also THANK YOU

agile harness
#

you’re welcome sir

young saffron
#

how do i close the thread again?

agile harness
#

!done

topaz sinewBOT
#

If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close

young saffron
#

found it

#

.close

topaz sinewBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @young saffron

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

topaz sinewBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

lusty cedar
topaz sinewBOT
lusty cedar
#

How did they get that coordinate

#

I tried setting this to 0

#

oh wait u take the negative of the modulus innot

#

wait but how dyu know ur supposed to do that

#

oh cuse it has neg gradient innit

#

.close

topaz sinewBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @lusty cedar

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

topaz sinewBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

jade knot
#

is my work correct?

topaz sinewBOT
jade knot
#

assuming I have an initial amount x,

#

after n years you have x(1.0448)^n amount of money

#

then do percentage change formula

#

[(new - old) / old] * 100

#

which gives around 24.5% increase

#

idk if thats the right way of doing it tho

wooden moon
#

,calc (1.0448)^5

thorny flameBOT
#

Result:

1.2449898754316
wooden moon
#

yeah, seems right

jade knot
#

ok thank you!

#

.close

topaz sinewBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @jade knot

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

topaz sinewBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

#

Please don't occupy multiple help channels.

serene lion
#

Ok

topaz sinewBOT
#
Channel closed

Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

lusty cedar
topaz sinewBOT
lusty cedar
#

How do i differentiate this

#

🙉

#

is it chain rule

#

even if it was chain rule

#

ahhhhh

#

idk man

celest charm
#

wtf is that

#

what is the argument of the sin lol

lusty cedar
celest charm
#

is it supposed to be $8\sin(\frac{1}{2}x)-3x+9$?

lusty cedar
#

idek

thorny flameBOT
#

dingus

lusty cedar
#

maybe i should just check the mark scheme

#

I think its to the power

#

of

#

it looks like

#

but i have no clue what im meant to do with that

celest charm
#

it's incorrectly written i know that much

#

just don't know what they want it to be

lusty cedar
#

ok ig imma check

#

so

lusty cedar
#

thanks

celest charm
#

ofc

lusty cedar
#

got me so lost haha

#

.close

topaz sinewBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @lusty cedar

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

topaz sinewBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

neon iron
topaz sinewBOT
cedar wagon
#

What is your question about this ?

neon iron
#

I did this and I’m getting 0.12 instead of 0.2. Yet I cannot find an error in either method

cedar wagon
#

What is B' ?

smoky sparrow
#

oh what the hell is going on in the question

#

$P(\frac{A}{B})$???

thorny flameBOT
cedar wagon
#

Probably A|B

#

Also this is very sus

smoky sparrow
#

yeah then how did they come up with P(A) = 0.4 then

#

bruh

#

solution is wrong

cedar wagon
#

Maybe a typo and they meant P(A)

timid flicker
#

hey whats up guys can anyone help me solve some of the problems here I solved 1 a and 1 b already

topaz sinewBOT
timid flicker
timid flicker
smoky sparrow
cedar wagon
#

Wdym "?" ?

smoky sparrow
#

pls make a new one for yourself

timid flicker
#

sorry i just joined

#

wich channel should i go to

#

?

smoky sparrow
#

just ask there

timid flicker
#

thanks

topaz sinewBOT
#

@neon iron Has your question been resolved?

neon iron
#

Where?

smoky sparrow
#

yeah they definitely should be using P(A) = 0.12 instead

#

then follow the same steps

neon iron
#

Okay good

#

So I’m not wrong

#

This question demotivated me

#

Can you please explain what this question means?

#

I have trouble with the notation

#

Reply ping please

clear lodge
#

what is P(A' B') supposed to mean?

#

@neon iron

neon iron
#

P(A' B') is same as Probability of A' and B' happening simultaneously i.e P(A' intersection B')

neon iron
#

Okay I got one more

#
  1. The assertion is false, right?
#

I cant assume that E1 and E2 are exclusive to prove a “then” statement

clear lodge
#

The assertion can be true, but you're lacking information. The probability of the union can be anywhere between 0.4 and 0.7

#

honestly, i would not accept any of the 4 options presented as correct

neon iron
#

It can be. But I can’t conclude that it is. So I can’t say blah blah blah, then this is true. It just can’t

neon iron
clear lodge
#

(a) is obviously wrong

#

(b) is not necessarily right, since A is not necessarily right

#

(c) is obviously wrong

#

and (d) is, again, not necessarily right, since A is not necessarily wrong

#

Also, the book answer starts by assuming they are mutually exclusive, which you were never told they were

#

I would write my own (e) option and contest it with the instructor when asked

topaz sinewBOT
#

@neon iron Has your question been resolved?

neon iron
#

Yeah

neon iron
clear lodge
#

as i said, *i* would not say either as correct

topaz sinewBOT
#

@neon iron Has your question been resolved?

topaz sinewBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

crimson lagoon
#

Hi, im struggling to understand what part b wants from me. my thought would be to get the area from -infinity to the intersection between f and g but the integral would be divergent. So what should the bounds be? the intersection between f and the x axis and the intersection between f and g?

torpid shard
torpid shard
crimson lagoon
#

But I'm not the only who thinks the wording is strange right?

#

or am i missing something

torpid shard
#

it can be misinterpreted, yeah, but given that it says "Enclosed by the graph of f" you should figure that its fully bounded

#

if in doubt just do both, lol

crimson lagoon
#

but thank you

#

.close

topaz sinewBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @crimson lagoon

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

finite glacier
#

Hello,

If I have a joint pdf such that 0<x<y<1, to get the marginal density of x I should integrate y over [0,1] or [x,1]. I know that for y it's x over [0,y]. In addition once i get the marginal densities to get E(X) and E(Y), I just integrate the respective marginal pdf * (x or y) over [0,1] for both?

topaz sinewBOT
#

@finite glacier Has your question been resolved?

topaz sinewBOT
#

@finite glacier Has your question been resolved?

little ginkgo
#

Otherwise you should again integrate over [x,1] since this is what is defined as the "probability space" of y

finite glacier
#

ok thanks

#

/closed

#

.close

topaz sinewBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @finite glacier

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

topaz sinewBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

twilit hemlock
#

do i need to use trigo here or..

topaz sinewBOT
restive inlet
#

no trig needed

#

you can approach with partial fractions

twilit hemlock
#

ohh let me try

twilit hemlock
restive inlet
#

look up a table of common integrals

twilit hemlock
#

okk

#

.close

topaz sinewBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @twilit hemlock

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

topaz sinewBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

left tree
#

Help me solve using the method of variation of constants:
(1 + x^2)y'' +2xy' = 12x^3

thorny flameBOT
#

uguu~ba

left tree
#

so far i have only noticed about the left side

thorny flameBOT
#

uguu~ba

golden blade
topaz sinewBOT
#

@left tree Has your question been resolved?

left tree
#

what next?

#

$$y_p=\phi_1(x)\arctan{x}+\phi_2(x)$$

golden blade
#

If you used the substitution life would be more abelian

thorny flameBOT
#

uguu~ba

left tree
#

i dont tried sub.

left tree
golden blade
# left tree for example?

If $u = y'$ then $u' = y''$ so consider now
[ (1+x^2)u' + 2xu = 12x^3 ] and bring that into the form
[ u' + a(x) \cdot u = s(x) ] so that you can use variations of constants.

thorny flameBOT
#

𝔸dωn𝓲²s

golden blade
#

You can first get the homogeneous solution and then based on that find the particular so you get u = u_h + u_p in the end

left tree
#

i don't understand

#

can you send full

topaz sinewBOT
#

@left tree Has your question been resolved?

left tree
#

<@&286206848099549185>

neon iron
#

I am here

#

@left tree

left tree
#

is it 12x^3

#

?

neon iron
#

let me see

#

nononoon

#

you r incorrect

left tree
#

im correct i think

neon iron
#

look this.

left tree
#

wth

left tree
#

way faster isnt it?

neon iron
#

please understand that pic

#

and solve

left tree
#

im sure i sended some already

#

so i need particular y

#

i found it already

#

then variation of parameters

neon iron
#

??

golden blade
# neon iron ??

just dont help if you have no idea instead of sending chat gpt stuff

left tree
#

yeah

neon iron
#

I solved so much problem

#

and just now, I need to send fast

#

so I used chatgpt

#

but that way is true

golden blade
#

real

neon iron
#

I learned so

#

Do you know about differential and partial differential equations?

left tree
#

i need find phi 1 derivative

#

and phi 2 derivative

#

then phi 1 and phi 2

neon iron
#

so u want entire solution?

left tree
#

i need help on exact method

#

this may be the complete solution but i'm sure i've already reached half of it

neon iron
#

ofc

left tree
#

i need calm down

#

and stop be toxic

#

sorry 😔

#

i just dreamed that here would help me and solve equations for me

#

maybe i'm behaving wrongly, but only you and one other person really helped me in these two days

#

maybe this server is not meant for this

#

but i almost don't see anyone here

neon iron
#

If you finish the first half and send me a screenshot, I'll finish it for you.

#

@left tree are u there?

left tree
#

yeah

neon iron
#

solved?

mystic jay
#

What is method of variation of constants? I have a method to solve this, but osk if it follows that

mystic jay
neon iron
left tree
golden blade
# thorny flame **𝔸dωn𝓲²s**

From here you can derive if $s(x)$ = 0 the homogenous solution $u_h = Ce^{-A(x)}.\$
Then the particular solution is $u_p = C(x)e^{-A(x)}.\$
You would next calculate $u'_p$ and plug in both into the differential equation to solve for $C(x).\$ Then you get the solution $u = u_h+u_p = y'$ and you can integrate simply to get $y$.

left tree
#

yeah

thorny flameBOT
#

𝔸dωn𝓲²s

mystic jay
#

You can integrate (3x^4+C)/(1+x^2) to get y?

left tree
#

but i already have check

left tree
mystic jay
#

Why did you equate it to 0?

#

(Second step)

neon iron
left tree
#

yeah

#

but i sended it earlier

#

lol

neon iron
left tree
#

chatgpt

neon iron
#

why don't use matlab?

neon iron
#

but that way is true

left tree
#

okay man

neon iron
#

as u know, i am a programmer

#

and i have to work

#

now, for a few hours, I don't work because of u

left tree
#

unfortunately is not reason why im ask here

neon iron
#

what?

left tree
#

i sincerely don't want to distract anyone, forgive me

neon iron
#

np

#

dw

left tree
#

i think that if this coincides, then there will be other non busy people

mystic jay
left tree
#

this is method

neon iron
#

hm...

left tree
#

from ru wiki

neon iron
#

this is solution?

#

lol

sweet shard
neon iron
#

nnoo

#

that is so complex

left tree
#

not just f(x)

neon iron
#

now u want me to solve your problem entirely.
that is bad.

left tree
#

😳

golden blade
left tree
#

idk

golden blade
sweet shard
#

maybe uguu doesn't want hints and just wants the answer

golden blade
#

maybe

left tree
#

if so

#

I already forgot 1/a(x)

#

because before the highest derivative I have a(x)=1+x^2

empty spoke
topaz sinewBOT
#

Please do not trust ChatGPT or similar AI tools for mathematical tasks, as they often generate output which "sounds correct" but has numerous factual or logical errors. Use of these AI tools to answer other people's help questions is strictly against server rules (see #rules).

neon iron
#

i only use that i am so busy

#

if u dont know about me, dont say so!

#

@empty spoke when u r a kid, I solved those

empty spoke
sweet shard
#

but not too busy to copy paste questions and answers into/from chatgpt

empty spoke
# left tree

this seems to be variation of parameters in the general case. After doing a change of coordinates as in #help-26 message it reduces to applying variation of parameters for a linear first order equation

left tree
#

yeah

#

integration by parts, sec

#

or no idk

left tree
neon iron
#

as i said, that is incorrect

#

u make me so disappointed

#

@left tree perhaps, I will remove u

#

gl!

lean pebble
left tree
#

omg

left tree
neon iron
left tree
left tree
#

i need close this sorry

neon iron
#

okay

#

.close

lean pebble
#

.close

topaz sinewBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @lean pebble

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

wicked mist
topaz sinewBOT
mystic jay
#

Do you know vieta?

wicked mist
#

nope

mystic jay
#

So this is of the form

#

3(x-x1)(x-x2)(x-x3) right?

#

And we want

wicked mist
#

yes

mystic jay
#

2(x1x2+x1x3+x2x3) right?

wicked mist
#

yes

mystic jay
#

Right?

wicked mist
#

yes, but is there also not a quicker way to solve this by a formula?

mystic jay
#

Wdym?

#

This is quick?

wicked mist
#

like i thought were a formula for finding product of roots

mystic jay
#

There is

#

Vieta

wicked mist
#

could you not use that to find surface area?

#

ohh

#

thats what vieta is

mystic jay
#

That is what I am doing?

mystic jay
wicked mist
#

i thouht vieta was just taking the 3rd term and dividing by the 1st term

mystic jay
wicked mist
#

o

#

.close

topaz sinewBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @wicked mist

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

topaz sinewBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

sharp chasm
#

Calculate the limit in the sense of distributions of:
[ T_n = \sqrt{n} \delta_n ]

thorny flameBOT
#

jandro0103

sharp chasm
#

Hint?

topaz sinewBOT
#

@sharp chasm Has your question been resolved?

sharp chasm
#

<@&286206848099549185>

pseudo sonnet
odd pagoda
#

also what is delta_n

sharp chasm
sweet shard
odd pagoda
#

but whats the n doing

odd pagoda
#

!original

topaz sinewBOT
#

Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.

sharp chasm
odd pagoda
#

I doubt that delta_n is the dirac delta function, cause then they would have just written delta and T_n would obviously not converge

sharp chasm
thorny flameBOT
#

jandro0103

sharp chasm
#

<@&286206848099549185>

thorny flameBOT
#

jandro0103

sweet shard
sharp chasm
#

But in reality this problem was written in pen, I'm sending a similar one but clearer

thorny flameBOT
#

jandro0103

sharp chasm
#

Maybe the previous one was written badly, but I would need a hint here too

#

This one was definitely well written

#

@sweet shard

noble lily
#

@sweet shard $\delta_n$ converges in distribution to the dirac delta. Maybe it's arbitrary? Idk. But canonically, something like $\delta_n(x)=ne^{-(nx)^2}$ works. I can't work through this rn bc I'm busy, but the suggestion for Fourier transform is what I'd go through as well if that's the sequence we're working with

thorny flameBOT
noble lily
#

But like has been discussed here, post the original problem and any relevant context because we don't know what the question has you assume or not @sharp chasm

icy rapids
#

Are you here @sharp chasm

patent light
topaz sinewBOT
#

@sharp chasm Has your question been resolved?

topaz sinewBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

neon iron
topaz sinewBOT
neon iron
#

Apart from the typo where they changed the question to write the solution

#

Isn’t the solution incorrect

#

They opened absolute sign with zero respect to what values of x we can have

#

According to which we should make cases

topaz sinewBOT
#

@neon iron Has your question been resolved?

burnt badger
#

Or one that would appear later in the algebra

neon iron
#

When they were evaluating LHS. from 2 to 3 step. There should be absolute sign

neon iron
burnt badger
#

From the radical signs?

#

If you have a question about signs of things, cos2theta is something between -1 and 1

#

So 1 + cos2theta & 1 - cos2theta are necessarily >= 0

topaz sinewBOT
#

@neon iron Has your question been resolved?

topaz sinewBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

topaz sinewBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

tired terrace
#

There is this question given $2x+3y=14$ solve for min of $8/x+3/y$, and the values of x and y when min occurs.

The solution as of in attached image shows only the ineq is right but provides no information of infimum. All I could find was this identity https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/2267660/supremum-and-the-cauchy-schwarz-inequality but neither $\sqrt{2x}$, $\sqrt{3y}$, $\sqrt{\frac{8}{x}}$, $\sqrt{\frac{3}{y}}$ is bounded everywhere.

So what are the prerequisites of using Cauchy ineq to determine the infimum here?

thorny flameBOT
topaz sinewBOT
#

@tired terrace Has your question been resolved?

mystic jay
#

assuming x and y are positive

#

we could do this

#

but this is not neccessarily true

#

this has no infimum

#

ot minimum

tired terrace
#

hmm let me check

tired terrace
mystic jay
#

take x = -0.0000001

tired terrace
#

By taking y=(14-2x)/3 and solve for d/dx(8/x+3/((14-2x)/3))=0

#

oh right

#

so first x>0 y>0

#

I think I get it.

#

.close

topaz sinewBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @tired terrace

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

topaz sinewBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

neon iron
topaz sinewBOT
slender musk
#

integration by parts

neon iron
#

If I'd continue this, I would have to do another integration by parts right?

desert atlas
#

+1 -1

slender musk
#

the integral after integration by parts is supposed to be $\int\limits_{0}^{1}\frac{x^{3}}{3(x^{2}+1)}dx$ not what you wrote

thorny flameBOT
#

如月あやみ Kisaragi Ayami

neon iron
#

wow

#

stupid mistake

#

thx

slender musk
#

afterwards do long division

cinder sequoia
#

you can also just differentiate the x^2 and integrate the arctan

ionic oar
#

or just sub x^2 + 1

cinder sequoia
#

and you get something that can be done by u sub

neon iron
#

but this isnt possible right? substitution for u = x^2 +1

slender musk
#

the integral of arctan is $x\arctan x-\frac{1}{2}\ln(x^{2}+1)$ so im not sure how that helps actually

thorny flameBOT
#

如月あやみ Kisaragi Ayami

neon iron
#

becasue then you get du = 2xdx

ionic oar
ionic oar
slender musk
#

then +1-1 yea

neon iron
ionic oar
#

write x^3 as x*x^2

slender musk
#

\begin{align*}
\int\limits_{0}^{1}\frac{x^3}{x^{2}+1}dx&=\frac{1}{2}\int\limits_{0}^{1}\frac{x^{2}}{x^{2}+1}d(x^{2})\&=\frac{1}{2}\int\limits_{0}^{1}\left(1-\frac{1}{x^{2}+1}\right)d(x^{2})\end{align*}

thorny flameBOT
#

如月あやみ Kisaragi Ayami

lapis badger
#

Hi, could someone help me understand Taylor’s theorem, especially the Taylor polynomial, please?

neon iron
#

i understand what u are trying to say

#

but now i get this

neon iron
#

.rotate

#

,rotate

thorny flameBOT
neon iron
#

oh wait

#

i have to substitute x^2

#

lemme see how i do that

#

OHHHHH

ionic oar
#

lol

neon iron
#

,rotate

thorny flameBOT
ionic oar
#

yeah

neon iron
#

now integrate by parts again?

ionic oar
#

nah just split the fraction

#

1/6 - 1/(6u)

neon iron
#

ahh partial fraction decomposititon

#

oh

#

nvm

#

thats it 😂

ionic oar
#

yep

neon iron
#

,rotate

thorny flameBOT
neon iron
#

answer should be this

ionic oar
#

you never added the initial integration by parts part

neon iron
#

yeah cause its 0

#

wait lemme send

#

,rotate

thorny flameBOT
ionic oar
#

pi/12 I think

pallid hinge
#

arctan1 is not 0

#

,w arctan1

neon iron
#

for real? but arctan(0) = 0

neon iron
#

and 1/3 * 0^3

#

is also 0

#

so if ud fill in x = 1 or x=0 one of them would be 0

#

im stupid

#

nvm

#

i understand

pallid hinge
#

graph of arctan looks like this

neon iron
#

1/12pi indeed

#

yeah ty

pallid hinge
neon iron
pallid hinge
#

(u-1)/6u

neon iron
#

my final answer is

pallid hinge
#

is just 1/6 - 1/6u

neon iron
#

pi/12 -1/3 + ln(3)

neon iron
#

here

pallid hinge
#

isnt upper bound 2

#

for u

neon iron
#

bruh

#

ur correct

pallid hinge
#

yeah lmao

neon iron
#

tysm

pallid hinge
#

and i think things work from there

neon iron
#

finally

pallid hinge
#

allg

neon iron
#

i got it 😭

#

tysm for all your help

#

.close

pallid hinge
#

np

topaz sinewBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @narrow pivot

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

worn bison
#

The grid below represents part of a nautical chart. The squares are equal and the scale used on the map indicates that each 1 cm corresponds to 1000 m. A cargo ship leaving A traveled along the route ABCD.

worn bison
#

Knowing that 1 nautical mile is equivalent to 1,852 meters, we can say that on this route, from point A to D, the ship traveled in nautical miles approximately:

#

sqrt(2) = 1,41
sqrt(5) = 2,23

fervent ferry
#

Yes, and what exactly are you stuck on?

worn bison
#

i THINK we can do a Pythagorean theorem

pallid hinge
#

yep

fervent ferry
#

sqrt(2) is the digonal of a square, sqrt(5) is the diagonal of a 2x1 rectangle

#

this is just pythagoras

#

so you count how many of each diagonal the path is and multiply

pallid hinge
worn bison
#

thanks all you guys

#

i will try now

pallid hinge
worn bison
#

so

#

wait

pallid hinge
#

if you know how many "squares" the cargo travelled, you can convert it to meters, to miles, to nautical miles, to anything

worn bison
#

i still unsure about the BC line

pallid hinge
#

what does pythagora say

pallid hinge
#

consider this triangle

worn bison
pallid hinge
#

tall 2 squares and long 4 squares

worn bison
pallid hinge
#

dw

worn bison
#

the image is a little bit confunsing

#

but

#

i think you can understand

pallid hinge
#

but yes

#

you also need to find the other lenghts of the other 2 segments ab and cd

#

same process

#

and you sum all of the distances at the end

#

to get the total distance travelled

#

and those would be your cms travelled

#

then you can convert it into anything

worn bison
#

wait, so AB = 2^3?

pallid hinge
#

nope

#

you know that AB^2 = 4^2 + 4^2

#

so AB^2 = 16 + 16

#

AB^2 = 32

#

you take the root

#

AB = root32

#

32 can also be rewritten as 2^5

#

which can also be rewritten as 2^4 * 2

#

you can take the 2^4 out of the root

#

and it becomes 4root2

#

not sure if you have to do this part

#

depends if the teacher asks you

worn bison
#

but

worn bison
#

okok

#

thanks

worn bison
#

its basically 32⋅1,41?

pallid hinge
#

no

#

its 4 * 1.41

topaz sinewBOT
#

@worn bison Has your question been resolved?

worn bison
#

It wasn’t 2^5?

pallid hinge
worn bison
#

Sqrt(2^5)

pallid hinge
#

yes

worn bison
#

So

pallid hinge
#

$sqrt(2^5)$

#

sad

worn bison
#

You remove 2 powers of 2, isn’t it?

pallid hinge
#

yes imagine i only had 2^4

#

(which is technically 16)

#

taking the square root is the same as elevating to the power of 1/2

#

by applying the power of a power rule

#

2^(4 * 1/2) gives 2^2

worn bison
#

Ok so

#

it gives me AB value of 5,64

#

so

#

now

#

we have this weird CD

worn bison
#

that

#

apparently

#

have

#

5+0,5

#

of height

#

ok

#

i solved

#

thank you guys i love you all

#

,close

worn bison
#

.close

topaz sinewBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @worn bison

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

reef hatch
#

I know now that I chose the wrong terms for u and dv, but is there another reason why I got the problem wrong?

cedar wagon
#

will get you something easier in the second integral of the ibp

reef hatch
#

but is there another reason why I got the problem wrong?
choosing the wrong variable on its own shouldn't make it wrong right?

sweet shard
reef hatch
#

oh thx

topaz sinewBOT
#

@reef hatch Has your question been resolved?

topaz sinewBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

leaden phoenix
topaz sinewBOT
leaden phoenix
#

I’ve been stuck on this question for a while can’t seem to find out the issue, i calculated the domain using the denominator and where it’s undefined then tested each set but it’s partially correct

sweet shard
#

There's only one x value where the function is undefined

visual sparrow
topaz sinewBOT
#

@leaden phoenix Has your question been resolved?

topaz sinewBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

topaz sinewBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

grim sable
#

prove that there is no integer n such that $3^n \equiv 99 \pmod{100}$

thorny flameBOT
#

Dork9399

topaz sinewBOT
#

@grim sable Has your question been resolved?

topaz sinewBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

noble pier
#

can someone help out here? chatgpt can’t help with an actual proof and we’re stuck

noble pier
#

the partial sums series is not n=1^inf it just says it goes from n=1 to inf, same for a_n sequence

#

translations a bit off but that’s about it

topaz sinewBOT
#

@noble pier Has your question been resolved?

lean pilot
#

s_n is sum of a_n from 1 to n?

topaz sinewBOT
#

@noble pier Has your question been resolved?

noble pier
#

i know the statement is true, but i don’t know how to write the proof for it

#

<@&286206848099549185>

lean pilot
#

I think maybe try to prove the sequence is monotone

#

And bounded(?)

#

Then apply monotone convergence theorem

#

I believe monotone is not so hard to prove

noble pier
#

yea i think that works thanks

#

.close

topaz sinewBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @noble pier

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

topaz sinewBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

agile shell
#

Hi,
PI_1 : 5x-2y-z=-2

I wanted to understand why i cannot find the normal to pi_2 by doing the cross product of
(1 4 -3) x (5 -2 -1)

agile shell
#

i thought that the line of intersection is paralllel to the normal of the two normals of the planes

topaz sinewBOT
#

@agile shell Has your question been resolved?

finite storm
#
  1. What do u know about the relationship between normal vectors of the two planes and the intersecting line.
  2. Using the points, can u find the normal vector of one of the two planes?
agile shell
agile shell
#

Im just confused on why (1 4 -3) x (5 -2 -1) doesnt give me a correct normal vector

topaz sinewBOT
#

@agile shell Has your question been resolved?

sonic escarp
#

(0,0,0) on the plane -> 2c = d
(1,1,1) on the plane -> ...
take another point of the intersection line -> ....

agile shell
#

yes yes i know how to solve the question using that method

sonic escarp
#

whats you result?

agile shell
#

if i do (1 4 -3) x (5 -2 -1)

#

i get

#

(5 7 11)

#

if i use (1,1,1) i get the equation 5x + 7y + 11z = 23

#

if i use (0,02) i get 5x + 7y + 11z = 22

sonic escarp
agile shell
#

the intersection of the planes

#

that lines direction vector is perpendicular to both n1 and n2

#

right?

sonic escarp
#

the intersetion line is in both planes.

agile shell
#

yes

#

im saying its perpendicular to the NORMALS of the plane

#

so if the line is perpendicular to the normals

#

then if i find the perpendicular of the line and one of the normals

#

should i not get the other normal ?

sonic escarp
#

PL_1 isnt given in your exxample, but i am pretty sure that your equation for PL_1 is wrong (and therefore your normal vector for PL_1 is wrong).

sonic escarp
#

the cross product is normal to both vectors, so if you take the cross product of the normals of two planes you get the direction vector of the intersection line. so far, so ok.

#

you wanna calulate the cross product of a normal to a plane and the direction vector of the intersection line. yes, this vector would be normal to the direction vector of the line, but why do you expect that the normals from the planes should be normal to each other?

agile shell
#

ur right

#

this would work if

#

PI_1 and PI_2

sonic escarp
#

what you are calculating is a vector which is normal to the intersection line (yes, ok) and it is normal to the normal of plane 1, so it is in plane 1

agile shell
#

are perpendoicular

#

right?

#

but if they arent it wont

#

cause n1 and n2 arent perpendicualr

#

makes sense

sonic escarp
#

you could take the direction vector of the intersection line (is in the plane) and the vector between the two given points (is in the plane) - if they hopefully are not parallel. so you can get the normal of plane 2.

agile shell
#

yep makes sense

#

thanks!

#

how do i close it?

sonic escarp
#

type .close

agile shell
#

ok thank u

#

.close

topaz sinewBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @agile shell

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

leaden phoenix
topaz sinewBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

coral night
#

Introducing with the set $\mathbb P$ a prime number is rigorous ?

thorny flameBOT
#

Aquamy

chilly walrus
#

what?

coral night
chilly walrus
#

you can write "Let $\mathbb{P}$ be the set of prime numbers" and that'll suffice

thorny flameBOT
#

artemetra

humble schooner
chilly walrus
coral night
thorny flameBOT
#

Aquamy

coral night
#

Automatically

chilly walrus
#

yea but then you'll have to say that p is a prime number

#

ahah

#

sometimes using a couple words instead of symbols makes the text clearer

coral night
#

So it's useless

cedar wagon
#

Ça dépend ce que tu veux faire

cedar wagon
#

Par contre si tu veux calculer un produit/somme de termes avec un p qui se balade dans l'ensemble des nombre premiers la c'est beaucoup plus utile de marquer p in P

topaz sinewBOT
#

@coral night Has your question been resolved?

topaz sinewBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @coral night

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

neon iron
topaz sinewBOT
neon iron
#

Completely lost here

tough nest
#

AB is i think the length

#

of the segment between A and B

neon iron
#

I don't even know if it wants AB as a length or A*B

#

Cause it doesn't have that little line above it

tough nest
#

you can easily try both no?

neon iron
#

I don't know how to get A and B

tough nest
#

ah ok

neon iron
#

😭😭

tough nest
#

well you have a line

#

with 3 equations

#

and a plane

#

in which you can plug in 2 of the 3 to find what value x or y or z has to be for the intersection point

#

so

#

take the plane 2x + 3y - z = -13

#

you can plug in 1 - z into it

#

to get rid of z

#

for example

#

(x - 2) / 3 = 1 - z

#

so then the plane equation becomes

#

2x + 3y + (x - 2) / 3 = -12

#

using (x- 2) / 3 = (y + 1) / 2

#

you can find either x or y

#

and plug it into this

tough nest
#

to find the other

#

etc

#

and the same for the other plane

#

to get A and B

neon iron
#

Ahhhhhhhhh

#

Ty ty 🙏🙏🙏

topaz sinewBOT
#

@neon iron Has your question been resolved?

topaz sinewBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

jolly root
#

hello

topaz sinewBOT
jolly root
#

i checked 2 helpers before this one and i didn't even get a respond

#

so here it is without further ado

#

translate it if you don't speak french.
it is rather simple

#

i am somehow supposed to use the mean value theorem or rolle theorem

opal vault
#

qu'as-tu essayé?

jolly root
#

j'ai posé l'ensemble A des pts ou f s'annule
j'ai supposé par l'absurde que f ne s'annule pas sur cette ensemble

#

autrement dit , je veux trouver un c dans A ou f'(c)=0

#

puisque A est infini et f ne s'annule pas sur A
je voudrais discuter si f s'annule un nombre fini de fois sur I
ceci peut aider à trouver un voisinage entre deux reels ou f s'annule mais ou elle est strictement monotone

#

on est supposé à utiliser le TAF mais je n'arrive point

#

je peux aussi facilement trouver un c ou f=f' et un c ou f'=0

#

il existe une infinite ou f=0

#

ce qui est delicat s'agit de quoi poser ou faire intervenir pour qu'on obtienne les 3 egalites

opal vault
#

est-ce que tu peux montrer que pour tout epsilon il existe x tel que f(x) = 0, y tel que f'(y) = 0 tels que |x-y| < epsilon?

#

le théorème de Rolle va beaucoup t'aider pour montrer l'affirmation ci dessus

#

(premier indice : ||A possède une suite convergente (pourquoi ?)||)

jolly root
#

A est bornée

#

theoreme de bolzano -weiestrass

#

il existe une sous-suite a elements dans A tq cette sous suite converge

opal vault
#

ok

#

notons cette suite x_n

#

(d'ailleurs que peut-on dire de la limite de x_n?)

jolly root
#

la limite de xn est un element de A

#

cad f(l)=0

#

notons l la limite

opal vault
#

ok

#

maintenant

#

TAF

#

sur [x_n,x_n+1]

jolly root
#

il existe yn dans cette intervalle tque f'(yn)=0

#

yn est comprise entre xn et xn+1
donc yn tend vers l aussi

#

donc cette limite l est celle qu'on cherche

topaz sinewBOT
#

@jolly root Has your question been resolved?

topaz sinewBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

quiet flume
topaz sinewBOT
quiet flume
#

how do you do this?

topaz sinewBOT
#

@quiet flume Has your question been resolved?

topaz sinewBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

tawny axle
#

Why is this not -91

topaz sinewBOT
neon iron
#

ok so here's how you solve it

#
  1. find g(x)
#
  1. find f(x)
#
  1. find g inverse (x)
#
  1. find f . g inverse (x)
storm hearth
#

Dont even need to try that much

neon iron
tawny axle
#

I reversed that function

storm hearth
#

You are given like a minute to solve it so

tawny axle
#

but still

#

It became g(f-1(13))

autumn geode
storm hearth
#

Well you let 2x = 13 which is wrong

tawny axle
#

but f(13) gets in

storm hearth
#

Question doesnt really need a translation

#

Just says, given that find g()

autumn geode
#

does it ask for f-1(13)

tawny axle
#

asks for (fog-1)-1 so I did (gof-1)

storm hearth
tawny axle
#

No

autumn geode
#

isn't fog = f(g(x))

tawny axle
#

yeah

storm hearth
#

To solve a + 3 = a + b you add -a to left side of a right,

But notice function composition is NOT commutative. We say an operator * is commutative if
ab = ba

autumn geode
#

simplify

#

f(x) = 3x+4/2

#

g(x) = 5 - 4x - 2

storm hearth
#

To find inverse of f, on each side with composition operation so f^{-1} • f = I
Where I is the identity function I(x) = x

autumn geode
#

find fog first

#

then inverse of fog

#

then inverse again

storm hearth
#

So you quickly get f^{-1}(3x+4) = 2x

autumn geode
#

a better idea would be

#

turn fog into a new function

#

j(x)

#

it should make things easier

storm hearth
#

Then let 3x+4 = 13 to find f^{-1} (13)

neon iron
#

The answer I got

#

doesn't seem to match the options here :(

tawny axle
#

so f-1(x) is (x-4)/3 right?

#

then I need to find g(9)

autumn geode
tawny axle
#

isnt it -33

storm hearth
neon iron
tawny axle
neon iron
#

technique

storm hearth
#

You will have 1 min in YKS so might as well learn the fast way too

tawny axle
#

oh yeah

tawny axle
storm hearth
#

Yeah, if it wasnt trivial enough, i am a turk as well

tawny axle
#

lol

#

still wondering why is it not -33

autumn geode
storm hearth
#

Options dont have to be correct all the time , yknow

autumn geode
#

y = (37 - 3x) / 8
x = (37 - 3y) / 8
8x = 37 - 3y
3y = 37 - 8x
y = (37 - 8x) / 3
(fog^-1)^-1(x) = (37 - 8x) / 3

tawny axle
#

wait now I found it 1?

autumn geode
#

that's my answer

#

wait

autumn geode
#

wbu

#

-22.33

tawny axle
#

OMG its 3

#

so if f(2x) = 3x + 4 and it asks for f(13)

#

x should be 13/2

#

and f-1(x) is (x-4)/3

#

f-1(13) = 3/2

#

x+2 = 3/2 x = 1/2

#

then 5 - 4 x 1/2

#

which is 3

#

did I do it right?

storm hearth
#

I believe its -11 tho

storm hearth
storm hearth
tawny axle
#

cuz its reversed

#

so I should start with f

#

and I calculated f-1 there

#

mb

tawny axle
storm hearth
#

Wanna save yourself all the work?

tawny axle
#

started with f-(13)

storm hearth
#

And some energy