#help-13
428200 messages · Page 481 of 429
if you look into the algorithm, nothing changes if you change which one is p and which one is q, so it doesn't matter at all
Closed by @astral shard
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, I've been stuck on this question from a real analysis book for a bit. It's question b from the following picture, I've already taken a bit off and have now come back to it but I still don't see it. Next to my question for a hint about how to continue the question, do you have any advice of how to continue these type of questions when stuck? I'll also show 2 things I've tried, I tried more then what I showed here but didn't see anything that could come of those attempts.
hmm not sure it's readable
in the first attempt I tried to substitute but got stuck when I have
||a|-|b| | <= |a| + |b|
the 2nd part fell flat quite fast, as I thought I could maybe prove it for different relationships between a and b seperately
but with a,b both being smaller then 0 I saw that didn't work either
@bold compass Has your question been resolved?
@bold compass Has your question been resolved?
For a) write |a-b| as |a+(-b)| and use triangle inequality
For b) square both sides and work on that or split up in cases;
|a|-|b|<=|a-b| and |b|-|a|<=|a-b|
the squaring one makes sense
how did you get the split up cases?
ooooh nvm
absolute value
ofcourse
completely forgot to use that :I
as for any general tips, I don't know if you have anything, but I feel like I'm getting stuck a lot , is there anything you do when stuck on a proof to maybe think in another direction? Or is it purely just something that comes with time and practice after seeing enough proofs being done similar to the one you are trying to proof? As I feel like I don't know how to come up with the direction of where to go when trying to solve something like this sometimes.
Mostly just practice, but a lot of proofs is just unpacking definitions. Like for b) I either got rid of the annoying abs value by squaring or by using definition
Closed by @bold compass
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed due to the original message being deleted
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how would i solve this?
i know that the median must be 90
but i have no idea about the mean
and answer said 97 but idk how tto get to it
@sick sparrow You know how to find the mean, yes?
in general, not necessarily for this problem
@sick sparrow Has your question been resolved?
yes
add all the data then divide by the number of data points
ok, so what happens if you add the data but also add 200 to the last point?
so instead of your data being $x_1,x_2,x_3,...,x_{100}$ it's $x_1,x_2,x_3,....,(x_{100}+200)$
Zybikron
but whats the sum all all the data points?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
9,000+200 / 100?
9500+200/100*
off i see now
9700/100
97
thank you so much
.close
Closed by @sick sparrow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
so this math is rlly easy for yall prob but im kinda stupid
$3c-5x+6$
macharicky
it has the parentheses in it though
its like some thing u gotta do
its sum algebra thing
@hidden magnet Has your question been resolved?
..
Closed by @hidden magnet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi I should show if A is strict subset of B then f(A) is strict subset of f(B) for arbitrary f
But I don't think this is true since f is not injective
We can have x in A \ B such that f(x) = f(y) for some y in the intersection of A and B
this property is obviously wrong as any constant function is a good counter example
then if A is not empty, f(A) = f(B) is not a strict subset
Closed by @slate burrow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I done it trial and error
How would i prove this algrebraicly?
what was your trial and error method?
I just picked values
But the hits in black
At the bottom
It just happened to be it was my first pick
lucky
anyway, you should follow pluton's advice
We cant thi
We just know
Car goes X mph
on a 240 mile road
How should we know how fast it went
It couldve went in 20 hours or 5
you have a nice relationship between the time of the lorry and the car
if you can express these times in terms of x you are done
You dont even have to. Just calculate time it takes lorry , then time it takes car , then cars speed
It says use an algebraic method tho
in terms of x right?
$$t = \frac{s}{v}$$
Pluton
but v is in terms of x
$$v = \frac{s}{t}$$
Pluton
Its x : x+12
well, would've been way easier
Yes i was incorrect you write it in terms of x
The regular x goes one hour slower
I hate solving physics with math. (Aka using variables x , y , z)
If you are doing physics use v
Can you show or?
have you considered this yet?
wdym
yeah, these speed problems are getting a bit boring now
fun how it's "oh wow when trying to work with rates for time you use harmonic mean" (or smth like that) the first time, then you get bored of it
Idk blad
I just feel this question has too many ways to solve
I cant think of the best/easiest one
hmm?
I mean maybe its just my mind doing same steps just in different order
But i found 1 solution that has a 3 , 3 variable equations
When you do this type of questions having a pen and paper is much easier
yup
My guys
icekxrmaa do not open this until you have solved
this is the one variable way kekw
you could open it but that would ruin the fun
Comment : ||i mean ye thats probably one of the better solutions just define t in terms of x||
Just show me the obvious way
I havent got time for all these new methods
I have an exam tommorow
Physics or math?
yeah, but i feel like defining new variables when only using them once is a bit redundant
ok so
you know the distance (240 miles), a relation between the two speeds (one of 12 mph faster than the other) and a relation between the times (one finished 1 hour earlier than the other)
Yes
can you turn these relations into equations with x?
I mean other way would probably be ||define speed in terms of time||
X:x+12 = x: x-1
Everything else is just complicating this 2 ways
what is this notation?
oh
: means dividing by
but no brackets
Isnt it a ratio?
what have you done here?
Im saying the car is 12 mph higher
and please fix your brackets
And the time is 1 hour less
solution dont open
||
t_1
t_2 = t_1 + 1
v_1 = 240/t_1
v_2 = 240/(t_1 + 1)
240/t_1 = 240/(t_1 + 1) + 12
||
I am reading this as \[ \frac xx+12 = \frac xx - 1 \]
Should be a valid solution too
Lance
yup that works too
all the same though :P
Defining time in term of speed is probably better
This doesnt even explain anything
How does this show what x is?
of course it doesn't to you
Why is there a physics question in math in the first place
that too
bruh
Im a bit
it is an equation in terms of x from the givens
Im getting cancer from tryna get all these questions down
i just didn't explain how i got here
Im so confident when i solve math questions but when i solve physics questions my confidence falls so much
Its gonna be morning until this happens
I have many other questions and my exam is tommorow cant waste time like this
what i did here is take the time relation and turn the two given times in terms of x
Well giving you solution is same as not doing anything
yeah ;-;
If looking at solutions actually help i would just look at all IMO solutions and see ya there in 2022
Im just doing competitive math lately. And making a mistake in basic math just kills me
i know the feeling
messing up multiple choice q's in the early rounds of MOs sucks
or short answer
Wait some MO have multiple choice q's
yeah
the netherlands has these
also amc (usa)
the netherlands just for the first round tho
and it's mixed in with short answer
i guess multiple choice is easy to check :)
Probably
Well gl
I litteraly failed on addition on my last test
rip
Costed me 3 points
out of?
6 that you can get from that question
huh
That question litterally screamed free points
just 456-555 on a math test??
Divided by some other thing
ah
Its only first round and first question
Well dont give up just like that
Sum from 456 to 555 not subtraction
I mean only thing that is actually supposed to be hard is that they dont teach the formula
$$\frac{(n_e - n_s + 1)(n_e + n_s)}{2}$$
Pluton
Ik the formula and still failed
:(
was it like last 3 digits or smth
calculating the entire product sounds hard
(for a first q)
uwuw sum from 456 to 555
,w calc 25*1011
alright that's not too much
,calc 25*1101
Result:
27525
Result:
50550
nice
But i failed in addition of 555 and 456
Ye
I mean first one was so easy
Second one will be easy too but you actually need to be better than other people xD
Dvije cijevi napune bazen za 4 sata. Samo jedna od tih cijevi napuni bazen za 5 sati i
15 minuta. Koliko vremena treba da se bazen napuni samo drugom cijevi?
well i can't read croatian
i'll use google translate
Ye that one was so easy
Two pipes fill the pool in 4 hours. Only one of these pipes fills the pool in 5 hours and
15 minutes. How long does it take to fill the pool with just another pipe?
LOL
IT'S ANOTHER RATE QUESTION
Those hour questions are really just everywhere
ikr
And this one was easy as every other before
uwuw 1/(1/4-1/5.5)
right
I gurantee that wasnt the answer
oh
uh
two pipes A and B
A and B -> 4 hours
A -> 5.5 hours
B -> ? hours
that's the question right
Ye
this?
Nope

$$4(a + b) = 1$$
$$a = \frac{1}{5.25}$$
Pluton
Then just solve for b
and then take the reciprocal right (since you're working with rates now)
Ye
uwuw {1/b, 4(a+b)=1, a=1/5.25}
huh
Huh
It should be 6
Oh i guess it is 16
:/
Well whatever i got it right xD
Nah i didnt
I just thought it was 6 probably from some other question that has litteraly same things
ah
Determine all natural numbers 𝑛 for which the fraction 35 / (2n-5) is an integer.
That one was also easy just put 2n - 5 = 1 , 35 , 7 , 5
oh yeah
the translator converted it into a dull divisibility problem
there really isn't much to say except +/-(1, 5, 7, 35)
then check if you get a valid n
Yes but some of them arent natural
Nope
I mean where is it?
idk
You can really just ask that and they will tell you
Lol
maybe move to #competition-math? seems empty
@tender moss Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm drawing a graph of resistance against distance from light source for a Light Dependent Resistor. My teacher has asked us to try and draw a linear graph, but I don't know what would go on the $x$ axis and the $y$ axis for the graph since Resistance and distance from light source do not have a linear relationship. The only equation I know that could be applied is $$I_l = \frac{P}{A}$$ where $I_l$ is light intensity, $P$ is power and $A$ is cross sectional area, and i broke that equation down into $$I_l = \frac{I^2 \cdot R}{4\pi \cdot r^2}$$ where (as far as i know) $I$ is current, $R$ is resistance and $r$ is distance from the light source. I know this is basically physics but I'm completely stuck as to which 2 variables would have a linear relationship (bearing in mind my dependent variable is Resistance, $R$ and independent variable is distance from light source, $r$).
I can't believe you've done this
the problem that I have is that changing $r$ would change both $I_l$ and $R$ which means that the graph would not be a straight line since the gradient would not be constant. The only other useful information which i think i can get from that equation is $$I_l \alpha \frac{1}{r^2}$$ (sorry about the spacing). Any help would be very much appreciated.
I can't believe you've done this
@patent flame Has your question been resolved?
@patent flame Has your question been resolved?
if R is dependent on r then it would be good to have a formula showing how R depends on r (same for I_i)
also what is A the cross sectional area of?
if it's of the resistor then r cannot be the distance to the light source
and if it's the percentage of light rays that hit the resistor, it makes no sense for that to increase as r increases
@patent flame Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Dont know if anyone can help for this one since its about physics but.
Why do Hollow objects take a longer time to fall rather then dense objects?
Lemme find a gif real quick
This ones about roations but mines about falling
Im guessing its similar
From what i know its because its hollow and has a bigger surface
They're not falling, they're rolling
I knkw
But thats not the experiment
I csnt find a gif for it
This one gives an ides though
And the "resistance to rolling" is called the second moment of inertia
I just know it takes a greater force for it to be able to get dragged down
The wider hollow sphere is harder to rotate than the little red one.
Note the GIF is kinda hiding that fact, that the radius does matter
Because the mass is only concentrated on the outside axis?
Yeah, since there's more further away, it gains "rolling resistance"
Verus dense object where its the same everywhere
But you were saying that the other experiment had no rolling in it?
No
No rolling
Just dropping
It still has to do with the center of gravity right?
So all objects fall at the same rate until you bring air resistance into the problem
All the objects fell at the same time exept the hollow ball
Really light, buoyant objects like paper will catch the air and "hover"
I just need to find the correct why
Perhaps the ball was that light?
Yeah thats the surface
I mean probably
But that shouldnt have much impact
It is a pretty big ball for it to be that light though
Does that make a difference?
It has at least double of the surface of the other balls
But it weights half of them
Say palm size
A crazy video I remember learning a lot from was from an Apollo mission, where they dropped a hammer and feather while on the moon. They both drop at the exact same speed and hit the ground together
For srs, mass really doesn't matter
Yeah i know that part
Difference is the energy
Is it energy?
Eh
How strong the impact at the end will be
Yeah that's a good thing to notice, even on the moon, the hammer will put a bigger dent
So hollow ball..
Without seeing the video, the only thing I can think of is air resistance, haha. Sorry if I seem off the mark
Closed by @lone kettle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I really feel like I am missing something. I am also not sure how to expand (lnx)^2.
I see a quadratic inequality.
yeah, that is one way to solve
They factored the quadratic, yes.
oh my goodness, i see it now
Theoretically, is there a specific way to figure out/ expand (Ln x)^2?
i don't think so
.close
Closed by @torn hare
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey uhh
I’m confused
on my math problem
It asks what’s 100 to the 29th
but I don’t know what it means by that
it’s not very specific
as in 100 to the power of 29?
ohhh
but that’s it
sorry
@void kiln Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hey
Express vector x=(-11,7) as a linear combination of vector y=( -3, 1 ) and vector z =(-1, 2 ).
can anyone help me on this
i have no idea where to start
you know what they mean by linear combination right?
so make a guess for a and b such that
x = ay + bz
@polar pasture Has your question been resolved?
yeah ik that's how that works
i just dk how tf do to it lmfao
oh fr?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
@polar pasture Has your question been resolved?
what's wrong?
wait
yea i just got the answer ty
Closed by @polar pasture
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
sorry
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is anybody here that could help answer some questions?
@winter ingot Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what is this
why does this function look like that
it's because the equation is too complex for desmos to plot in a reasonable time
so it spits out the equation plotted at a lower resolution
try tan(x*y!)=13, and scroll out a bit, every few moments the graph shifts, it's just something desmos and other graphing softwares can't handle i guess
yeah its also making chrome lag
anyways thanks, this seemed interesting
.close
Closed by @timid ice
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello. How would you go about turning:
a( sin⁴(t)cos²(t) + cos⁴(t)sin²(t) )
Into:
asin²(t)cos²(t)
Factoring the inside
sin²t + cos²t = 1
let's ignore the a for right now
what is the highest term that can be factored from the sum?
sin²(t)cos²(t)?
sin²(t)cos²(t) . [sin²t + cos²t]
Alright thanks people
.close
Closed by @sonic field
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi I just wanted to make sure, is my logic correct?
@deep flicker Has your question been resolved?
@deep flicker Has your question been resolved?
@deep flicker Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
Closed by @deep flicker
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Solve Simultaneously
a=b+c=0, a-b+c=-4, 3a-3b-c=-1
With substitiution method btw
since a=b+c
sub a into second equation
find c
then sub a and c into third equation
find b
then u can find
a
$\qed$
The Fractalogist
@empty smelt Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what is b here?
Im learning this and for things like f(x) = x^2 i like inputting x to get the y values
but because of b
i dont know how to try this one out
b is the basis to your function so for example b could be 5 then f would f(x) = 5^x
then you see that b > 1 (first graph) and take a look at the first pic
x is the input you enter and you get a result
so am i supposed to do anything with b?
b doesn't change right?
if b is 5, i can try x = 0, 1, 2, 3, -1, -2, -3 etc?
if your function is f(x) = 5^x then f(2) would be 5^2 so 25
right so once i designate b, it doesn't change right?
yes
i try different x values for that b?
okay thanks but why is it > 1?
why does it have to b > 1?
it doesnt, the first and second graph show how you how it would look when b is > 1 and < 1
Closed by @gentle matrix
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
manee idk for a
what is C / {0}
the set of non-zero compelx numbers?
oh
complex number without zeros
hmm
without zero*
:(
yep
do i gotta quadraticize this
Hi
@tropic oxide
i uh got solutions for w
w = (z +- sqrt(z^2 - 4)) / 2
i dunno what significance that is supposed to have though
technically you did more than what was asked for... but yes
that's fine
as long as you know that any complex number can be square-rooted
im pretty sure you can
wait what
i remeber working out the square root of a+bi a few years ago for fun
but how do i know that that cant be 0
cus z is not zero
I didnt understand the solution for that
??
How do i prove that those solutions dont make z = 0
just exclude zero from your solution?
if you have a soluton that works for all number including zero it aslo works for all number excluding zero
you cant devide by zero, we found what w equals and z = w + 1/w so w cant be 0
yes w cant be zero
why not?
doesnt the equation show that they literally can be 0?
the part that i highlighted
so z can be rewritten to the form w + 1/w as as long as
w^2 -zw + 1 = 0
but if we take w = 0
then
0^2 -z*0 + 1 = 0
0 - 0 + 1 = 0
1 = 0
if w = 0 then out rule is violated.
leading to the conclusion that
z cannot be re written as 0+1/0 which makes sense
though thew question seems to be oddly written
cause while w cant equal 0, z can
unless im missing something
@honest bobcat Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Compute the equation of the tangent to y = x^2 in the points (1/2, 1/4) and (0,0)
Given graph
You take the derivative
Yup
2 * 0.5 = 1
like this?
Is this all DLP
I plugged it in and after that?
The output is the y
yeah 1
The input is the x
So know y=f'(a)(x-a) +f(a)
I dont understand this
It might not pass through the point you want
no wait it doesnt
it doesnt pass at 0,0
I'm talking about tangent
it passes through x = 0 but not y - 0
yeah the line
Like the linear function f'(a) *x
Where f'(a) is the tangent
Now we want this function to pass through the desired point
Are you understanding
I follow what you mean
But
You mean the red line?
i dont see it come near 0 , 0
That's the function we want to reach
yeah
I want you to understand how we got it
but youre saying it goes through 0 ,0 i dont quite get that
how is it going through 0, 0 if it is not near it
This one?
No
so which one there are only 2
Okay like that okay
So the function is y=f'(a) *x right
yeah right
We want it to pass through the point you want
yeah
The line will either be below the point or above it or goes through it
If it is above it or below it we fix that by adding the distance or removing the distance so that it passes through it
okay..
okay
That's like saying if the function is above it then lower it, if it is below it make it go up
Are you following
bit hard but i am following it
That's it
We have that distance that we want to fix the function with
We then simply add it to the original function
That is y=f'(a) *x
okay
So it becomes y= f'(a) *x + f(a) - f'(a)
And that's it
You now have the function of the tangent that passes through that point
It will be one answer
really because the answer sheet shows 2 answers
There can be other lines that pass through the point but their slope won't be the derivative at that point
No
y = x - 1/4
No
i am lost than
Wait I got confused, sorry I thought the question was the equation of the line that passes through 2,4
no
the equation is already given
it was: Compute the equation of the tangent to y = x^2 in the points (1/2, 1/4) and (0,0)
Oh
Replace a with the input
No you don't change the x and you only use one input at once
so how do you choose what to input
1/4x +1/4-1/2
= f'(a) *x + f(a) - f'(a)
Yup
so the f'(a) are x and the f(a) are y
f'(a) is the derivative evaluated at a
No
f evaluated at x is y
could you explain it a bit simpler
A function is a set of instructions to output a number
f applied at x is equal to y
So now you input the x
yeah thats 1/2 and not 1/4
you used 1/4
And you get 1/4
okay
so why the 1/2
The 1/4 is f(1/2)
Yes
so how does that beome y = x- 1/4
The second one
No that's wrong
wait
f'(1/2)=1
first you have
f(x) = x^2 > dy/dx = 1/2 > f'(x)= 2x > f'(1/2) = 2 * 1/2 = 1
are these steps correct
no dy/dx = 1/2
1/4-0 / 1/2- 0 = 1/2
dy/dx=2x
i dont quite get it how you got that
dy/dx=f'(x)
The derivative will be 2x
2x or 2?
2x
where does the x come from
.
so this is the first one
and second you just use 0 as a input and that gives you y = 0
is that correct?
Yes
Closed by @amber cipher
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello! Can someone teach me how to solve this?
<@&286206848099549185>
Draw a diagram
FE=2FA, perimeter is FA+AC+FE+CE, FA=AC so perimeter is just 6FA
yea draw a diagram and then its straightforward
Just dont give away answers
yes
Closed by @buoyant veldt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
when trying to inverse this matrix
i am getting two solutions
one is right
which is this one
but here if i instead do C2=C2-3[C1]
i am getting 10 below and 1 above as answer
lol
is that operation illegal ?
i dont see the issue this is correct
wdym by "here" can you send me how you did it and got a wrong answer
so like in this image i reached till first thing
then instead of what he did i did this
THIS
the answer that comes
10 is below
instead the computers answer..

where 10 is above
thats because you are using both row and column operations
HUH
im pretty sure you have to stick to 1 while getting the inverse
but it works in determinant calculation
thats a different situation
and i can dive into the theory of it but that might be a bit too confusing rn
you mean graphical representation
so the other things like "multiply row 2 by K both sides" also have to be done in row or column only ?? whichever we choose to do
like if we do C2=C2+2C3
we cant do R3=K (R3) next
and we can do C3=K (C3)
no you missunderstood me
im saying while using this method to find the inverse of a matrix
you cant interchange using column and row operations
you have to stick to 1
but i can multiply any row or coulm with K
as long as k is not 0
you'll learn them eventually 
but wont i learn higher things like use of matrix later
rather than deeper things like proofs and intuitions
learning the intuition and proofs is part of learning how to use them
Closed by @candid seal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey I'm struggling a bit with my first steps into the world of equation system solving and I'm unsure what it is I'm being actually asked by exercises in my textbook
show the original question
this format is vague
equations are enough. you should translate
ok this is the section I have issues with
so I already starting putting my Ax = b form down and attempted to use Gaussian elimination on it
but I'm unsure if
a) I'm even using Gaussian elimination right here
b) what the exercise is asking me concretely when asking for which values of k and t I have
infinite solutions, a fixed solution or no solution
wait
my Gaussian thing is flawed apologies
ok I think I have something better
which is to to the same thing I did
eliminate the first collumn 2nd row 2
but have the 2nd column 2nd row be k - 4
which means my output system should be
This right?
but still unsure how from there I'm supposed to find the number of solutions?
@cobalt ether Has your question been resolved?
@cobalt ether Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
trying to prove this statement, not really sure where to go with it. tried a few approaches.
given that: a, b >= 2, gcd(a,b) = 1, and ab = (x+y)^n, prove that x+y is not prime
(where a,b are natural numbers, x,y are any integer)
what does gcd(a,b) = 1 say about the prime factorization of a and b?
they share no common prime factors
so why can x+y not be prime?
hmm, still not sure
i have no idea why it's x+y so let's call x+y = z for simplicity
if z were prime, then the prime factorization is ab = z^n for a prime z
do you see why this gives problems with gcd(a,b) = 1?
if z is prime then its a contradiction because either a = 1 or b = 1 or a divides b or b divides a non of which are true
yeah that
say ab = p^n then a = p^r and b = p^s where r + s = n but then the gcd(a,b) = p^min(s,r) or one of a,b = 1 which is a contradiction since the gcd(a,b) = 1 and a,b > 1
if ab = z^n with z prime then the prime factorizations of a and b can only have z (and so have at least one by a,b >= 1), but they also cannot share any prime factors
ah i see. i think i just got the same with FTA (?); a and b having disjoint prime decompositions means that p would have a factor other than itself and 1
though idk, mine seems poorly worded even if it is true
if you ever get a question about proofs thats prove something isnt this then you can probably just do it easily with contradiction by saying it is and showing why thats wrong
so just prove it by contradiction thats probably the easiest way
@lethal knoll Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can somebody help give me a clearer explanation of SOH CAH TOA? Im not confused on the hypotenuse part but telling where the adjacent and opposite parts are isn’t making sense
Opposite is the side opposite of the angle, so the side that the angle is not touching
Ignore my bad drawing
This is how it is on the review
Do you understand adjacent?
Not at all
adjacent is the one that is not opposite or hypotenuse 😆
Hypotenuse is across from the 90 degree angle but I’m still not getting how that opposite works
hypotenuse is easy, it's the longest side and the one that does not touch the right angle
Would it change where your adjacent and opposite are placed depending if it’s SOH, CAH, or TOA?
no, the placement of opposite and adjacent only depends on which angle you are considering
On here for Cos S it’s 16/34 and wouldn’t 16 be opposite? and tan S is 30/16 but wouldn’t that mean the 30 is adjacent?
this is why "soh cah toa" exists, to help you remember
