#help-13
428200 messages · Page 441 of 429
You mean the domain?
Yes see the problem with this then?
But u told me that i can put anything in the co domain
As long as it fits the definition of a function yes
What would you put?
?
First of all answer this question
No
What does f(-1) map to for example?
You can obviously define functions functions like f : R{0} - - - -> (1,3), but f(x)=1/x cannot have domains like this. If x=1/4, the output is not in the codomain (1,3) anymore.
You already gave a codomain that works earlier
Well then R must be a subset of B.
But don't get range and codomain mixed up. The range is B=R\0.
.close
Closed by @silver fable
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
The range is the set of outputs
Right?
The set of the outputs of all the inputs (which are elements of the domain).
Closed by @silver fable
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i am asking again because the previous one was closed due to timeout
pls help me with this question
@cosmic temple Has your question been resolved?
Are you asking to solve this non linear equation in x?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
yes
<@&286206848099549185>
I can see a simple root, that is x = 0
I dont know about the complete resolution, I would solve it graphically or by Newton method
i want to do it algebraically, because i can't make graphs in exams 🙂
@cosmic temple Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
yes
oh thanks 🙂 , i didn't know this identity.
yeah, its solved for me 🙂
Oh, thats nice to hear... lemme have a look at the other problem you posted
Closed by @cosmic temple
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Find the Length of AC. Then round two decimal places
@agile pumice what is your level
my level?
Yeah I mean your Maths level
or do u mean grade?
Kind of
umm im not rlly good at math but i am in 10th grade
Ohkay I got it
ya
yes
yes exactly that!
Closed by @agile pumice
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can anyone tell me infinite sum of a HP ?
feel free to tag while replying
@regal oak Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
There is no formula for finding the sum of infinite terms of a harmonic progression. But if you want to find the sum then write the general term of the series and split the general term in such a way that if you put the term it will go on deleting automatically and the terms which get left will be your required sum.
.close
Closed by @dire nexus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
cant figure out how to do c
i thought maybe where dy/dx not equal to 0
for that i got where lambda is not equal to -tanx but i have no clue what that actually means lmao
oh wait does that mean -1 to 1
because range of tanhx is 1 to -1???
@crimson sedge Has your question been resolved?
@crimson sedge Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
I think it means that lambda is NOT -1 < lambda < 1
So you have no real solutions
@crimson sedge Has your question been resolved?
is not between -1 and 1? for no real?
i thought it means
if between -1 and 1, there is no real so answer to q is between -1 and 1
is that right or no?
wait nvm you're right
1/lambda is not in -1 to 1
@crimson sedge Has your question been resolved?
turning point is just local max and min right
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi @sterile skiff
@sterile skiff Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do I go about proving that the difference of the absolute value of two numbers stays within the range of the two numbers? For example, the question I'm trying to figure out states: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5..., 100 are written on a chalkboard. We are to replace two of the numbers with the difference of the absolute value. It asked me to show that if we were to repeat the procedure until there is 1 number left, it will be between 1 and 99
It looks rather obvious, but how do I go about proving it?
1 - 100 <= x <= 100 - 1
99 - 100 <= x <= 100 - 99
This are the extrema
and also how do I generalize it for two numbers, x and y?
that's an acceptable enough proof? I do not need to show that repeating the procedure will give the same result?
When you will show it for [a, b] then you can try it with this:
(a - b) <= x <= (b - a)
((b - a) - b) <= x <= (b - (b - a))
- a <= x <= a
But I can't tell you if this is enough
@lost kindle Has your question been resolved?
Wait, can you explain that a little bit more? I don't understand where you got the (b-a)-b
Let a = 1 and B = 100
((100 - 1) - 100) <= x <= (100 - (100 - 1))
(99 - 100) <= x <= (100 - 100 + 1)
-1 <= x <= 1
and because you will use the abs, a must be the lower bound: |a| = |-a| and when a >= 0 then |a| = a
And now you can argue that, when a is the lower bound, b - a must be the upper bound so, the range for the difference must be in [a, b - a]
For all a >= 0 and b >= a
ok, how would you show that for repeated procedure, that the lower bound is always a and upper bound is b-a?
That should be enough because every difference must be in this bounds
ok so no proof is necessary?
You could assume that there is an d with |a - b| > |b - a|
can you also guide me through this problem?
Don't ask in an occupied channel
Read #❓how-to-get-help
There is literally a section that says "Math help (available)"
Use one of the channels under there
Draw a circle with r = 1
When ABP is 90°, then from point P must be a line of 45° into the circle
does the graph look like this?
when the angle is 45° we can form a square in the circle so we get PA' = PM + MA'
with pythagoras we get (PA')² = (PM)² + (MA')² <==> (PA')² = 1² + 1² <==> PA' = sqrt(1² + 1²)
So AB must be: (AB)² = (PA')² + (PB')²
Yeah, this should be the thing
wdym by 45 degrees
because 90° / 2 = 45°
the center?
yes
Sorry I'm a bit confused, wouldn't that also be a 90 degree angle?
wait I think I get what you are tring to say
I mean the angle between A and M with P as point
Yeah sorry, my english is not so good
You see, AB must be 2r in this case
yep
the answer is 2 really?
Should be
wouldnt it be the square root of 2?
assuming m to p is 1 and its from the center of the circle to the edge then m to a is 1 since its the radius
that would make p to a the hypotenuse
Pythagorean theorem a^2+b^2=c^2
so c = the square root of a^2 + b^2
a and b are both 1
so the square root of 2?
AB = M1P + M2P
np, I'd first read it false also
@lost kindle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello
could you check the problem i posted earlier?
^
Yes that one
Your level of Mathematics is?
Oh, I'm a senior HS student, but hopefully I can solve it for you
We're finding relations
Yes
Yes
Well
Muhammad Hussaini
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
ZxZ
So well
See if its reflexive
Means, does it agree on every ordered pair (x,x)
Muhammad Hussaini
ZxZ
For symmetry
We know
|y|=|x|, so (y,x) would belong to Z x Z
And would belong to the relation R1
i see
Muhammad Hussaini
This shows an equivalence relation exists
i see
For R2, its defined on the set N,
You start N from 0 or 1
because some books start from 1, and some from 0
so all equivalence relations are reflexive then
See, the rule is:
If a relation is symmetric, reflexive and transitive, then it is an equivalence relation
So the converse is obviously true
ah ok
All three conditions must be met for a relation to be equivalence
Similarly, find for R2, R3
x has the same number of prime factors as x, so it is reflexive
If x has same number of prime factors as y, then y should have same number of prime factors as x, or not
Answer.
but how would you tell that x = y for R2
Well take two numbers
Who have the same number of prime factors
Give me such two numbers
3 and 5
sure, 3 and 5
Hmm, if (3,5) exists in the relation, such that 3 and 5 have same number of prime factors, i.e. one.
Then can (5,3) exist such that 5 and 3 have same number of prime factors
?
So, is it symmetric or not?
Muhammad Hussaini
Well, 2 has how many prime factors?
1
How many prime factors does 5 have
1
then...?
so (x,y) all x prime factors have to be in y
and to be symmetric, it has to be vice versa with (y, x)?
If (2,5) exists in the relation.... then (5,2) also exists... thats what is symmetric
YEAH
okok
I said, "if" the first one i.e (x,y) exists... and the second one (y,x) "also" exists
ahh
Then the relation is symmetric
If (x,y) doesnt exist in the first place, like take 4 and 18
4 has 1 prime factor
and 18 has 2 prime factors i.e (2,3)
So the ordered pair (4,18) does not exist for Relation 2
Could you please
also it would not be true for r3 Sym.
well it can be true
since theres a chance they could have the same number of prime factors
Well, the R3 thing is a bit different.
See
I'll show you this way
It says, ordered pairs
$(x,y) $
such that no. of prime factors of x < no. of prime factors of y
Okay?
well wouldnt it be =<
Muhammad Hussaini
got it
The definition of symmetry was
equivalent if switched
ah right
The relation is reflexive
that makes sense
what case would that not work?
Reflexive says
That every element is in relation to each other
For example
If I said
The number of prime factors of x is Less than the number of prime factors of y
Then I cant say equal
So I couldnt make a reflexive relation
I couldnt say that n(x) = n(x) so (x,x) is in R, or xRx exists
You have to see casewise
ah i see
Each relation is different
understood
Now transitive
yes
wait can you explain the "n"
ohh okay
It isnt a definition
n of something usually means number of elements in a set
Now I just used it for no. of prime factors
To ease out the work
ya makes sense
yes
oh
If (x1, x2) and (x2, x3) exist, then (x1, x3) also exist, then relation is a transitive relation
couldnt u also do the same but replace less than or equal to with greater than or equal to
The relation says the no of prime factors of x is not more than the prime factors of y
ah okay
If I use greater or equal to, then we cant put them in this relation
oh right bc its specific to each relation
yay
Okay tell me now,
R3 is reflexive and transitive, but its not symmetric,
Is it equivalence?
Yeah
so its not equivalence
I could show u this stuff on a VC too
Well, finally we're done
I sent the question again so that i dont need to scroll my way up
Now wait, I need a little help from @obsidian coral for R1.
okok
Wait... R2... its equivalence na?
I don't know this stuff
but r2 wouldnt be transitive right?
Why you wrote No
accident
So don't ping me
Are you sure that R3 is reflexive
R2 is transitive...
Because it says not more.
So can be equal
Which satisfies reflexive nature
Can be but not necessarily
R2 is reflexive, symmetric and transitive
Symmetric because its an equality there
but it does now work for every case
if n(x1)=n(x2)... that also means n(x2)=n(x1) so
(x2, x1) also exists
The question doesnt say not equal to, it says not more than, which means can be equal or less than
but can't there be a case where x has less prime factors than y
Yeah
im dumb
Well
for r2
Imma show you in a Voice channel if you dont mind
Come over to mathematics
S : {(x, y) ∈ Z×Z ∣ |a| = |b|
(a,b) ∈ Z x Z, implies that |a|=|b|,,
Also then |b|=|a|, so (b,a) ∈ S
So relation is symmetric
For all (a,a), we can say that |a| = |a|
So (a,a) ∈ S
And S is a reflexive relation
For all a, b, c ∈ Z×Z
@sterile skiff Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @sterile skiff
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What is 69 + 69
<@&286206848099549185>
69+69=69×1+69×1=69(1+1)=69×2
2*70-2
Result:
138
@haughty python done ?
@haughty python Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Euclid31415
aye
that was proven earlier in my textbook
while i did see some similarities, i have no idea how to reconcile that sum into this problem
Euclid31415
hmm
i can see some resemblance, but i am not sure exactly what is being connected
for example, why do they require that i subtract one sum from another?
Euclid31415
Yes the left side
Why?
well, my reasoning is that the sum u posted starts at n+1, and it increases by 1. so (2(n+1) - 1) + (2(n+2) -1) +....
Does it look the same as the sum they wrote?
its not the same for 1.10 bcs the series alternates by odd numbers. like (2n+3) + (2n +5)+ ...
thats what i think
(2(n+1)-1)+(2(n+2)-1)+...=(2n+1)+(2n+3)+...
omg
haha ur right
i just completely forgot abt DL lol
okay this makes sense
but i have no idea how to use this fact
the textbook generally showed that if a + b + c + ... + n = d(n), where a, b, c are arbitrary numbers in N, and d is some function of n,
then we can prove P(n+1) as a + b + c + ... + n + (n+1) = d(n+1)
subtracting n+1 from boths RHS and LHS should agree with our induction hypothesis
but i only know this trick and thats that
Euclid31415
oooo
that's a very neat trick
its v analogous to addition of integrals with a common boundary
Euclid31415
Ah, that is a beautiful result
so, i assume the question is asking me to use mathematical induction
nvm i think i got it
thanks @leaden otter
.close
Closed by @modest vapor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help me with this ?
Translation:
Let x be a positive real
Prove that
Can you please translate your question...
i did
What is the first equation then?
this
Yeah what it is?
it's in the image i seent
wdym ?
I mean what its for in the question?
we use the 1st equation to prove for the second one
Oh I got it
i tried solving it by moving root(5) to the left and making dominator root(x) but and then remove it after having 0 on right, but that gives me 2 solutions
Could you send your answer
okay hold on
ok i will try
but how do i solve it, we haven't studied the quadratic formula yet
this lesson is about operations and order in R btw
<@&286206848099549185> been >20mn
ok
@glass crypt Has your question been resolved?
yes ?
yes but i won't be able to talk
No prob
yes okay
ok tysm
Join mathematics
which vc channel
hi
ok tysm
wait
yes i can
yes
-x or x
but it's x bcs x>0
ah yess
okay
yes i see
yes :D
y^2 + 2 + 1/y^2
=5
(a-b)^2
?
-4
on both sides
omg yess
i see now tysm
now replace y with root(x)
tysm <33333 for help i ve been stuck for 2 days lol
lol
yes <3
tysm again have a great day
.close
Closed by @glass crypt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need to find x - y
Dont know where to start
Extend line AC to the right and create a new right triangle ABD with a new point D
D's already a point..
E then
i dont rlly understand, can you please draw it out?
well you can get 2 equations for x and y
whats the equation
one is from the line segment AC, one is from the fact BD is common
BD = h
h²+x²
h²+(10-x)²
10-x is y ?
Yes
okay... then whats next
Substract two equation from each other, so h² will disapeear and only x will remain with somenumber
but why subtract
There are 2 unknowns, there we cant solve the equations
h²+x²=121
h²+100-20x+x²=81
h and x are both unknown
But if its only x, we can find the value x
oooh
Or you can just say 121+100-20x = 81
so x = 7?
y = AC - x
y = 10 - 7
y = 3?
x - y
= 7 - 3
= 4
wah finally solved it
thx 
.close
Closed by @woeful marten
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello
<@&286206848099549185>
@real bluff Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello
I need help
I need to solve a 2x2 equation system using the replacement method
And i did it
But then i verified it and i dont understand what i did wrong
<@&286206848099549185>
@muted shell Has your question been resolved?
@muted shell Has your question been resolved?
@muted shell Has your question been resolved?
you need to isolate x
here you have 4x=10-3y
and when you substituted in for x in 7x-2y=30 as 7(10-3y)-2y=30
you really substituted in 4x
not x
@muted shell Has your question been resolved?
Ok, ill try doing it that way, thanks
.close
Closed by @muted shell
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
For $u_n$, I got $u_n = 3^{n-1} + 2\sum_{r=1}^{n} 3^{r-1}(n-r+1)$
azeem321
I believe this expands out correctly, but it isn't correct according to the textbook...
Unless the summation can be written as a function of $n$ which I don't know how to
azeem321
.close
Closed by @sand ether
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
convert the polar equation to rectangular form and identify the graph r=-3 cos θ - 2 sin θ
how to begin
Rectangular form means in terms of $x,y$. $x^2+y^2 = r^2$ and $\sin(\theta) = \frac{y}{r}$ and $\cos(\theta) = \frac{x}{r}$
what
azeem321
only x,y
help
$r^2 = -3r\cos(\theta) - 2r\sin(\theta)$.
azeem321
Do you see how now?
ok but what does this do for me
Try and see if you can rearrange the equations i gave you earlier to get rid of r and the trig functions
Yeh, now just get rid of the r^2
@crimson sedge Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Prove that for every variable x, A = x^4 - 8x^2 -x + sqrt(3x^2 - 6x + 9) + 15 is a non-negative number. Find x when A = 0 (algebra only)
@jade cargo Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
what problems have u encountered?
FInd the minimum value of A = x^4 - 8x^2 - x + sqrt(3x^2 - 6x + 9) + 2019
this was the original one
U can just find x right? and prove that there are no negative numbers?
it's given when A=0
so what are the x's
im lost, other than trial and error
I don't recall how to give proof lol, I thought it was just like given x's, therefore <x<
what does <=> mean? If?
if and only if
umm
approximately 2013,44
this one
ok
this happens
i mean
for this, minA = 2004 <=> A = 2
for this, A = 0<=> x = 2
these 2 are tecnically the same
i just subtracted 2004
minA = 2004 if a=2?
x = 2 not a
why are there 2 equations
that means a=0 what ever the x is the minimum so that's right then
Prove that for every variable x, A = x^4 - 8x^2 -x + sqrt(3x^2 - 6x + 9) + 15 is a non-negative number. Find x when A = 0 (algebra only)
ditch this
FInd the minimum value of A = x^4 - 8x^2 - x + sqrt(3x^2 - 6x + 9) + 2019
take this one
yeah so this
then find if there are x's above a=0 that are negative, i doubt there is
I meant
a that are negative
all x that are above the a=0,
i doubt there are real numbers greater than x <=> a = 0
what happens to 3?
x=3?
I mean did you check MinA=0?
cause the question was when A=0, what is x
it's the same thing as this one, but subtracted by 2004
that's why i get A = 0
ye and when u plug in A = 0 you get x=2, in that ditched eqaution
so when u use A=0 in the "2019" equation,
what's the x?
it's also 2
and isn't it the minA
it's all the same thing but subtracted by 2004
so minA = 0 <=> x = 2?
yes
so all real numbers above x = 2, is A positive?
unless there are negative answers, I doubt it
A is always positive and greater or equal to 2004
if x = 2 then A has the value of 2004
for every other x, A > 2004
in any x's?
yes
ok so that's the proof then
that's proof then
i need the analysis of the thing
A = x^4 - 8x^2 - x + sqrt(3x^2 - 6x + 9) + 2019
this thing
simplify it so that we can prove that minA = 2004
u got the picture?
I think so,
I think you can proive it by trial and error
i honestly don't know how to prove it other than trial and error which is vague
but wsince u said every other x is a>2004
then u did trial and error or smth
i tried simplifying it
i get this
sqrt(3(x-1)^2 + 6) + (x^2 - 4)^2 - (x-2003)
at this point i'm stuck
that's the simplified form
I think
OH WAIT
that's the "15" equation
you can simplify it by making A=0, then squaring everything except the 3x^2 equation
wdym by the"15" eq?
Yeah, I solved that before u told me
forget about that pic
this was the 15
i can take out 2004 from the A and from that simplify the 15 one
yeah sure jsut add a 2004^2
i mean
u simplify the 15 eq
and prove that it's non-negative
from there my problem is finished
yeah iguess, u can add the simplified equation then prove A>2004 with all real numbers of x
@jade cargo Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
2x+3(4)=27
how do i do this using samdeb
2x+3-3(4)=27-3
2x4=24
2x4/4=24/4
2x=6
2x/2=6/2
x=3
is this correct
no
i have no idea what samdeb is, but you just need to isolate x
its bedmas backwords
im in grade 8
,calc 3 * 4
Result:
12
still just need to isolate x
so $2x + 12 = 27$
IVMC Gaming CH
find x
It's $$2x + 3 \cdot 4 = 27$$
dldh06
You can simplify the 3(4) first
huh
.close
Closed by @golden atlas
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
why is this wrong
its 0
it says what i said
i meant the question
i the point (2,4)
what does it say in english
i told you already
lright
then what you found is the slope of the tangent
now you need to use point slope form to find the equation
but y' is the equation of the tangent
no it’s not
y' is the slope of the tangent
it’s the slope of the tangent
so what do i do
.
take the point they gave you
and the slope when x = 2
and find an equation in the form y = f(x)
y = f’(a)(x-a)+f(a) is the equation of the tangent line to f(x) at (a,f(a))
what
what don’t you understand
like everything
you found y'(x)
i thought the derivative = tangent
which is the slope of the tangent line to y at some value of x
it is the slope of the tangent
if we plug in 2, you get that y'(2) = 0
and we're using x=2 since we're finding the equation of the tangent to the point (2, 4)
so now we can use point slope form to find the equation of the line:
y - 4 = 0 * (x - 2)
y - 4 = 0
y = 4
i dont get it
which part
every part
all this time i have been taught by the book that tangent = derivative
we draw tangents to get derivatives ..
i can't speak as to what the book says
but what's important is that derivative = slope of tangent
mhm
this isnt helpful at all
so what does y =?
i dont know
what's 0 * (x-2)?
0
4
so your line is y = 4
the equation for the tangent line for y = x + 4/x at (2,4) is y=4
i am lost again
which part
you calculated y'(1) incorrectly
How
what's 1^(-1/2)
1
and 1 * 1/2?
1/2
and 1 + 1/2?
1,5
then y'(1) = 1.5
I dont know how calculating y’ helps me get the equation
it's the slope of the line
you can now use 1.5 in point slope form:
y - y1 = m(x - x1)
so
y - 2 = 1.5(x - 1)
and solve for y
looks good
@sand kayak Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @sand kayak
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
how do i write 2^56 in basic power form
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is e a constant?
Is this correctly derived?
I need to calculated the speed at t=125 and i am getting the wrong answer
I get 0,03 or 0,16
,rotate
What's the speed tho
@sand kayak Has your question been resolved?
0,031
In a nutrient-rich lake, aquatic plants can quickly cover the surface. One year, 250 m2 in a lake is covered by aquatic plants. 8 years later, 375 m2 is covered.
Assume that the increase is exponential and calculate
a) how many m2 are covered after 15 years.
Round to the nearest integer.
i got 1,05
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
✅
Show the question instead
i did
For this
i solved it so there is no need
Ok
why is 1,05 wrong
Ok ill check the other
So we have $P(1)e^{7r} = P(8)$ So $e^{7r} = \frac{P(8)}{P(1)} = \frac{375}{250}$\
Now $P(15) = P(1)e^{14r} = P(1) \frac{375²}{250²} = \frac{375²}{250}$
it's Sam
what is that
That's how exponential increase work
its a^8
You have to find 250 a¹⁴
See in 1 year it is 250 and in 8 year it's 375
So in 7 years it increased by 250a⁷
i dont get it
8 years - 1 year = 7 years
but a^1 wouldnt change anything
Why not
a^1 is change in one year
If initial value is p then after one year it's pa
In two year it's pa²
And so on
Here at 1 year the amount is 250
And at 8 year it is 375
So it increased from 250 to 375 in 7 years
That's why 250 a⁷ = 375
okay
And we want to find what happens after 15 years
So it will be equal to 250a¹⁴
And a⁷ = 375/250
i got a= 1,05
No need to find a
We get this right
And we want to find 250a¹⁴
So we get 250(375/250)²
Which is 375²/250
,w 375²/250