#serious-discussion
1 messages · Page 53 of 1
Hurb can we not have this sort of discussion on this server its just immature
Hey guys, would I be able to show off a program I wrote to generate consecutive integer sums? I'm really happy with how it's turned out, but I don't really have anyone to show it to.
That's alright, it's not really about the attention. I've just been obsessing over it recently and wanted to show someone it.
It's just a thingo where if you give it a number, it finds all the consecutive integer sums which add to it.
So the number 100 for example, could be written as 18 + 19 + 20 + 21 + 22 or 9 + 10 + 11 + 12 + 13 + 14 + 15 + 16.
Thank you :)
That sounds interesting. Could you give an example?
That's cool. I imagine it's one of those things where once you write it in its general form it becomes obvious why it works.
Yep, it is.
did you come up with it yourself?
neat man. i always have trouble being creative like that when learning to program
with exercises
I first read about it in Things To Make And Do In The Fourth Dimension by Matt Parker.
There's a puzzle in the book about finding the numbers which cannot be made by consecutive integer sums.
And I just got really interested in why certain numbers have the amount of unique sums that they do and I started looking into how you could generate them.
Turns out that highly composite odd numbers are what have the most amount of unique sums.
does anyone know how to use java? I have an urgent problem
Yeah tell me mate
how to make "return true" in bool not actually write "true" when executing the program?
sorry mate i am also a beginner in java
you're printing the return value of isAvailable somewhere
also don't return Boolean
use the primitive type boolean instead
ok
But I still don't get how to make the word "false" or "true" not appear in the window below
did you read what I said
yes
your issue isn't the function itself
it's wherever you're using it
somewhere you're printing the result
is computer science worth it
depends on what you want to do
maths or maybe data science
i don't liek amking websites
i am more into making kernels , programming languages and stuff
then sounds like CS is for you
kernel engineering and compiler engineering is a thing and ofc there's always ongoing research in those areas
if you want to go the academia route
I know someone who does kernel work at Google
and then also maybe not specifically kernel but low level systems work is everywhere
what's the "not very ppl" role?
for people who don't like their role colour
they can switch to a slightly off-white colour
lebesgue
lebesgueric
oh btw congrats on being an honorable
thank you!!
You're welcome!
My friend is a kernel engineer at Apple so yes
wow that's cool
I still have a looong way to go.
i am learning C and Rust rn
if I hadn't read this I wouldn't have known it looked any different 
kernel engineers when image and cokernel engineers walk in
kernel when integral kernel walks in
cofe when fe walks in
I guess it's more computer engineering?
are you grad student and what are you researching?
Ok, apparently that is uni dependent
how do i do
A quarter is 25 cents. US have 1,5,10 valued coons less than 25.
x+5y+10z=25
Count the number of solutions
a way to make this more systematic is to sum coefficients degree 25 terms of (1+x+x^2+…)(1+y^5+y^10+…)(1+z^10+z^20+…)
That's much better than the dynamic programming solution I had in mind
idk actually getting an answer out of the generating function is not really that easy
although I wouldn't write the generating function that way either
just do all x, it's really the exponents that are making the equation
Yeah counting big is the easiest
usually the problem becomes unruly when the sum of the components is less than half the goal
like this $$f(w)=\sum_{x=0}^{25}\sum_{y=0}^5\sum_{z=0}^2 w^{x+5y+10z}$$
Merosity
oh thats cool way to write it
using all x makes more sense too
i dont know when using distinct variables makes more sense
also going by big cases seems to be the easiest way
not really a math hw question but
me and my friends trying to figure out how much we can fail our midterm by
and
I came up with this
it makes sense right
yea i think so
the grade after the midterm will be 0.9C + 0.1N?
so yes algebra checks out
yep ^^
i feel so smart after writing that im like woah
taking 3 years of calc paying off so i can fail chem 😭
loll 😭

Probability, functional analysis, applications to finance
have I already asked you if you'd encountered multifractals VMM
I believe so
You can apply functional analysis to finance?
I don't know much about functional analysis OR finance, but that sounds right
As far as I'm aware half of finance is throwing buzzwords at people until they buy your stocks or whatever
So if you know enough big functional analysis words you can probably use them in finance
excellent
That's not what finance academics do
Eg. Delbaen and Schahermayer
There is finance academia?
Yes lol
why are you surprised that money has nerds
Wait then why does economics exist
because of nerds
Finance academia sounds like it would be superior in every way
So can I think of economics vs finance as pure math vs applied math?
Not really lol
At risk of offending VMM, I'll compare it to Physics and Engineering without specifying which is which
cool
im currently sending in my grad apps
i am decided. if feb 1st hits and im rejected from more than 4 out of 6 schools then I will spend the rest of my time preparing to be a quant trader or analyst
im not really sure how to prep properly for this though
how can I get access to the math help (hidden) section? what's the point of it?
thanks
Im in phisics class rn
My commiserations
Wym?
Uh
I don't understand the reactions
Nvm

Wth does
mean
To me, it's like a softer 
That one is the satirical version of 😔
I kinda see that

Sleep! 
Sleep is very important.
You could technically do a lot of things
Doesn't mean you'd wanna do them
so i wanna just not sleep 
i think i'm there way too often
Guys got a math exam tomorrow (linear algebra) I am wondering if you guys got any tips on not making stupid mistakes.
gets lots of sleep
Lol except that
wassup
Good morning DarQ!
Sleep or else I'll bully DarQ
wassup
in who's sleep is slurp bullying ppl
Good morning slurp!
I just took a nap for the first time ever


Why
?
@deep mango sorry for the ping, but what are your thoughts on Evan's text for PDEs (I'm guessing you've definitely heard of it)? It's something my tutor and I are going through but I wanted to know if there's anything less dense available... should probably ask in #book-recommendations but I thought you might know about it
Umm, it's definitely the standard resource for advanced undergrad / early grad level PDEs. I don't know about less dense, there's not a lot out there that covers PDEs at the same level of rigor while being more readable.
It's a good book
There's a tone shift from ch 1-4 to ch 5-end
what would the prerequisites be to have a relatively okay time going through the book? I've only skimmed through it so far
ch 1-4 is more classical PDEs, focused on the important kinds of equations and classical techniques for understanding them. this section is dense but more understandable for an undergrad with real analysis and linear algebra done
and multivariable calculus
so real analysis, multivariable calc, linear algebra are realistically the prerequisites?
ch 5-end are when it introduces more modern methods (ch 5 is all about sobolev spaces, ch 8 talks about calculus of variations, etc). here it's more important to have basic functional analysis + measure theory
you can kind of learn it as you go
it's not super advanced stuff. just here and there things you need
L^p spaces are the important thing
gotcha thanks ryc
oh btw
what's your opinion of international students applying for less competitive programs to top universities and then switching after they get in
Taking your time with ch 2-4 is totally fine. that's really important material and he definitely moves through it swiftly.
for graduate school?
even undergrad tbh
Well, for graduate school switching programs is pretty rare. For undergrads, it's more common
But I definitely am not the person to give any advice about how that looks for international students
Yes
when you applied for undergrad
I'm international which makes applying to berkeley 2 times harder
a ton of places are actually putting in measures against that rn tho
And I went to berkeley, where everyone is admitted without a major. there was no benefit to saying one thing or the other
(except for with engineering I guess)
the acceptance rate is like 8 percent
vs 16% for cali students
probably lower for international
I was out of state to berkeley, so I also had a pretty low admissions rate. But higher than international I assume
I don't know
cost to attend university of california is expensive as hell if ur international tho
their math program is so fucking cool
discussion-2 > discussion
If discussion 2 is so good why don't they rename discussion to discussion 2
seems cranky af
something about time and blackholes
yeah that will end well 
sorry can i know what language your friend uses?
C probably
Ruby was always their preferred language iirc but they're proficient in several languages including c, basic, and java @neat lintel
Im only now properly appreciating the content of one of my courses but it’s so satisfying
I love when it all just comes together 😌
what course?
Which course? And how come?
Don't leave us hanging 
Lie algebras
Whole course is basically one big proof which can be weird to follow until you’ve finished it and can put the train of thought together
@fringe needle how would you explain lie algebras in one sentence?
I wouldn’t lmao
At least not in one sentence
Im not sure I can really motivate them since we’ve really looked at them in a completely closed setting, so without reference to Lie groups
But ig here’s a sort of motivation: the prototypical sort of associative algebra which doesn’t commute is an algebra of matrices. One way to measure the failure of two matrices to commute is to investigate the commutator operator [x,y] = xy-yx. It turns out if you investigate algebraic structures closed under this operation (lie algebras) you get a very nice representation theory which allows you to understand a decent bit of their structure. In particular we have a full classification of finite dimensional such algebras over algebraically closed fields which can be formed by taking a direct sum of simpler parts.
Ig this is the closed approach to a motivation
The wider point of view with Lie groups is more interesting but someone else could explain that far better than me
But basically the idea if I understand correctly is that when you have a group which is also a manifold, the tangent spaces of this group come with a natural Lie algebra structure. If you look at the tangent space at the identity the idea is that elements of this Lie algebra represent « infinitesimal » elements of your group. For example if you take GL_n(C), the invertible matrices, and linearize at the identity you get a space of « infinitesimal invertible transformations ». This is the Lie algebra gl_n(C) which happens to coincide with the standard algebra of matrices M_n(C). I haven’t really ever touched on this part of lie theory so I’m not exactly sure how the correspondence goes but it’s something to do with derivations and the exponential map
Someone else can cut in and explain that
He wasn't writing it for you.
1415926535897932384626433832795
Pi?
I forgot the 1000 digits I knew
It's funny how now for me it's hard to even remember the 5th figure
!help
Please read #❓how-to-get-help
Tangent space of the identity
Algebra satisfying jacobi
so what is the main theorem
hey yall
me and a bunch of friends are writing a paper for this competition: https://hlma.hanglung.com/en/
any tips for writing research papers in secondary school? (or in general maybe)
also thoughts on our topic shortlist
- Solving chaldani patterns for shapes other than rectangles, see https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/90021/theory-behind-patterns-formed-on-chladni-plates
- Distribution of roots on complex plane like https://mathoverflow.net/questions/182412/why-do-roots-of-polynomials-tend-to-have-absolute-value-close-to-1
- Fractional Derivative: we have g(x,a)=D^a f(x) (where D is the diffintegral and a is real/complex), then analyse if g is continuous/differential/analytic. Might replace D with F (for Fourier Transform)
Read papers to see what the style of writing is
Have a professor who can proofread and be honest with your writing
sure i'll discuss with my IMO trainers then
p sure that none of the teachers in my school are professors (why would they be?)
Not like it’s the inky theorem of the theory but this course was pretty much centered around showing the classification of finite dimensional semisimple Lie algebras over an algebraically closed field
when you don't know what the words mean it sounds almost as scary as classification of finitely generated modules over principial ideal domains
It’s scarier
It’s quite a bit harder to prove but it’s in the same kind of spirit: semisimple Lie algebras are those which can be written as a direct sum of simple components: Lie algebras that do not have any ideals (ie that can only map onto themselves or 0). There’s a really rich classification which associated these algebras with this geometric structure called a root system, and these are much easier to classify
this is a nice proof 
root systems are mindblowing 🤯
lets you concretely work with abstract shit :)
Root systems themselves I don’t find insanely interesting but getting the correspondence between semsimple algebras and root systems is very neat
Speaking of root systems, what’s with the weird correspondence between H₄ and E₈?
3.14159265358979323846264338327950288419716939937510
71828182846
can you say more?
Regarding their root subsystems
H4 is the Coxeter diagram with 4 vertices and one edge of weight 5 right?
H₄ has A₂A₂, H₂H₂, A₄, A₁H₃, and D₄ as maximal subsystems.
E₈ has A₄A₄, A₂E₆, A₈, A₁E₇, and D₈ as maximal subsystems.
Yes, among others.
Ahh interesting I see what you mean now
Huh that’s weird
Interesting lol I've not thought about this
Does anyone know of a material that has a good classification or list of real functions?

R^R has literally all of them
In the definition given by my teacher, an H-group is an homotopy associative H-space which has an homotopy inverse map but only along the right hand-side of the multiplication map. Is it also a "left inverse"? Or is it the case if and only if the space is contractible?
try asking in #groups-rings-fields
ty, I hesitated because I already posted it in #point-set-topology
I can't imagine there's a good classification
Right?
Or at least not one that lists out functions like "all functions of the form f(x) = ..."
Yes
yes
Hello guys can you tell me why this statement is true please
bézout's lemma
nG do you have any ideas?
Thx
its divison algorithm
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bézout's_identity
The proof isn't too hard to understand tbh
most humble mathematics enjoyer ^^
I mean tbf this is easy by many people's standards and hard by others
If it’s not a concrete math question it doesn’t belong in that channel
Mentioning philosophy of maths makes me doubt that it’s appropriate there
copi?
like copium?
tysm im not familir with this type of study
my only understanding of syntax/semantics are the uses in casual speaking
so does self referentially incoherent mean that statements about the theory of types written in the theory of types arent coherent? I dont know definition for coherent
this is true right
but golly
doesnt this devolve into ‘how do we know what is truth’ type questions?
i dont see how any meaningful remedy could be made to this contradiction
Lmao tera
So is there a formula for prime numbers out there that gives you a lot of numbers that all end in 7, except for the first one which is 5?
I think the 28th number in the sequence is over 40 million digits
wait-that's the Fermat sequence; nvm only 5 of those are prime
why is this sound so yucky
does it have anything to do with mechanical resonance?
if your good at financial mathmatics let me know
I am trying to teach a group on kids in 7 grade basic set theory and I have no idea how to explain Cantor’s theorem without confusing them
so If anyone has an intuitive or fun way it could be explained I would like to hear 🙂
are you talking about the diagonalization one?
theres also cantor schroder bernstein
the one with the power sets
For any set X, the power set of X (i.e., the set of subsets of X), is larger (has a greater cardinality) than X.
just do examples for small |X|
I want to teach them the proof
not a proof
THAT WAS LIKE 5 MONTHS AGO
Also that was on my bday look at that
Because you have eerily good memory? Idk
My memory isn't even that good 
Obv it is
Fr? 
No you're not dw
@arctic grove you remember slurp telling us his bday was in July, right?
hello
I wasn't precise (and my english sucks)
I want to show them why it works for infinite sets
idk if its called a proof but you could use a function to show why its true but I doubt they would understand
yeah for 7th graders i think its best to stick to small finite sets
i think so yeah
Solve for gf 😔
LMAO got too real
Oh if I changed 9 for 2 I could find an article talking about what I wanted
Chatgpt math 🙃
The extent of what people do not to do their homework
hi
so cauchy goursat is just greens theorem and cauchy riemann equations. and greens theorem is just change of variables twice
but what about integrating complex valued functions in multiple variables on things homeomorphic to S^n
what would be the the generalization for cauchy goursat and what are some cool use cases
Technically nullary is the best base
- the prime factorization of 0 is 0 and every prime number, hence from a theoretical standpoint, all numbers should have a finite decimal expansion
- appropriately, in any base, any place without a written digit has an implied 0. Thus, all unwritten decimals are equal to 0*0^-n, aka 0/0, which could equal any number in the limit of some function.
- In addition to any irrational number, I'm pretty sure that includes imaginary and complex numbers, so they can written just as easily as the real numbers
- Don't have any digits in nullary anyways, so in a sense the number was always there and thus never needs to be calculated, instead pre-existent within the universe itself.
Of course, it does unfortunately suffer from the impractical issue of all numbers being the exact same, but since when did we let silly things like that get in the way of some good math?
Excuse my lack of proofreading
"greens theorem is just change of variables twice" is a mighty statement
You know what, i changed my mind
It's not that mighty
lol didn’t know they had the sticker
Best sticker 
anyone have good resources for knot theory (beyond the wiki page
Wanna hear my theory
I do knot.
pickles
joreggelt kivánok
Which book
Who said I'm in NS
i guessed
Besides, I gotten it earlier in the year lmao
Hey you can always catch a different strain
Im gonna guess u caught it from another conscript
Due to the complete neglect of any sort of safe management by the conscription authorities
That's assuming im in NS lmao
and thus by extension the government
watch as I get disappeared
Prove by assumption 
axiom1: you are conscripted
No I decided to read the other one, it's more straight. I am not cut out for philosophy
😭
I HATE philosophy yohan I hate it I hate it I hate it
I am NOT obsessed with programming
Also wtf is 22/05
is traumatized incorrect
I'm a 22 out of 5 on the hotness scale?
It's not tho
I'm a summer babe
You were never my friend, you were merely a plaything
Dude looks like a lady
friends are for inferior, lesser beings

slurp refuses to think
I hate philosophy too
Mikey is based. Get fucked
get well soon
DOMS moment
Thank you


Haha jockman. Noodle brain. Rock brain. Stupid. Lolol
!!
Hello guys can you tell me please why the gcd of (a,b) * lcm of [a,b]=a*b . Thx
if a and b have no common factors other than 1, say like 2 and 3, then their lcm has to be their product, 6
Do you know about unique prime factorisation?
Youre strad, aren't you?
I can just smell it
what
But how would strad get nitro 
who is strad
I said Slurp smells because he is emanating an odour known only to the most vile of animals
im not strad hello
Slurp smells, that's how
However?
There's no casual relationship
@lament peak @sleek wing @zealous girder might hang here. might sleep idk
hiiiii
i want to
die
no i don’t
guys we are the
highbrow
group of people
at. aparty
we are the "sociables"
i love listening to ppl talk abt their recent hyperfixations its awesome
except if theyre NERDS and talk like robots
dude
the like
ruled guy
99% sure he is an actual ai
being tested by chat-gpt
hi guys
no don’t worry i’m just excessively high
im not a music person so like 95% of this went over my head
and maybe thats why its refreshing compared to whats in discuss
but ye u made it out in one piece u did well honey
i feel like im losing common sense talking to these ppl
need to literally touch grass
and connect with my fellow man..
Baseddddd
actually
it’s like
insaaaaaaaaa
Why's discussion invaded by white names?
Johnny appleseed
the abstract concept
@neat frost come and keep me company!
coincidence that most antiwar ppl have never been in war..?
에옹 난 집에있을거야
What does kyuukurarin mean doe?
So True

I see 
i will pause my chopin scherzi to listen to your song
listen to urself
but i dont have headphones in so it had better not be a screamer
i can't say im surprised
how whimsical
do u speak the language
I don't know enough japanese to understand the lyrics 
It sounds cute tho!
I love the visuals
조 바이던
Good morning DarQ!
Hello!
no.
no
no.
Waaaaa
at least he didn't just say no
Nothing
It's all boring
I was looking forward to my algo course because all of my lectures have been BUTT BORING but the man fucking cancelled two hours before it was supposed to happen
i have a ques6ion which i feel like isnt worth opening a doubt channel
where do i ask
it's never not worth it to open a help channel
okay ty :))
turn this off on settings so it doesn't automatically convert to emoji
thanks lol
How come physics server has maths section and maths server doesnt have a physics section. rude
because physics is applied math
🍑
Sadge
because math is physics
Though maybe after my tests I'll continue Royden
But I also want to continue doing TeX and I have such shitty time management so I bet I'll end up doing neither
For example I should be studying rn
All my finals for this semester
How long till then?
In set theory, physics can be thought of as a subset of mathematics, where a subset is a collection of elements that belong to a larger set. In this case, the larger set would be mathematics and the subset would be physics. This means that all physics concepts are a part of mathematics, but not all mathematical concepts are a part of physics. Therefore, it makes sense for a physics server to have a mathematics channel, as mathematics is an integral part of physics. On the other hand, not all mathematical concepts are related to physics, so it may not be necessary for a mathematics server to have a physics channel.
I bet youll get stuck
I probably will
Oh
?
Usually you'd go "fuck you ryc!!!! i bet im gonna know analysis better than you by the time im done with royden!!!!"
I'm not that arrogant
You can't control getting stuck beforehand
I respect that people have put in more time to learn a subject than I have, and I wouldn't belittle their efforts like that
Personal pet peeve of mine
Oh
That's not very far away

I wonder if I'll be done with the algebra i wanna do by that time 
Nice
I have a test one day then another test the next
finals now?
In one week?
finals before winter break >> finals after
Like
It's the end of the semester
finals after winter break should be illegal
Winter break was like a month ago 🥱
break is better when you don't have to do anything
Yep
How in one week
I dunno
No sense
You just do it
Anyway I need to study
Well obv
:))}
I hate my uni :)))
You missed a du
I love it
Kiss it
Stroke it
Rub its back
Wait
Wait
Not what I meant
Wait
Don't sully that
I didn't mean it that way
No I meant stroke their face or their back or whatever
nice kink
Me 2 tbh
This algo hw is dumb af
I haven't had a lecture in like 3 weeks I don't remember anything
I need to do your mom
Oh
Nice kink
seychassssss
@neat frost what were the courses you were taking this semester again?
uhh.. algorithms... computer architecture... image processing... uhhhh
I wrote a triangle solving Android app. Does anyone know if there is a channel or server to get feedback for what I wrote? It's free and doesn't have adverts, so I'm not looking to make money, just see if it helps students with solving triangles.
Ofc you only remember the CS courses
What ryc said + group theory and calc3, and postmodern Jewish philosophy
only two math courses?
Cringe
DarQ I do also have HS to deal with
ofc i knew about jewish philosophy...
My time is limited
Also there weren't really any other math courses I could've taken
I'm taking 3 next semester though
And possibly 2 Jewish courses

I feel it like your mom
Uh it's fine
My courses this semester are for the most part quite dull
Group theory and algos are the interesting ones
Image processing was dull?
No it's okay but I suspect it's only because I only do recordings so I can do it at 2x speed
I used do too much in that sentence
i do your mom
"i used the word 'do' too many times in that sentence"
It's okay but I only watch the recordings at 2x speed, so I suspect that's why I'm not dying of boredom
Oh
Wait
You meant that sentence
Meh
Idfc
Fuck this
Lol
How's group theory interesting tho?

We've roughly done the same stuff and for me it was just a big pile of definitions
Sure there are a few definitions, but not that many
The only "interesting" thing about group theory I've seen is how Lagrange easily proves Fermat's little theorem
And Fermat's little theorem is number theory
And i don't give a shit about that so
Idk like I said my other courses are dull
Yes...
Relatively group theory is quite good
Lmao
That's the most interesting thing?
Actually I see your point
group theory is awesome and darq should grow up
I can tell this concept can be interesting
I feel like that sort of stuff like burnside's lemma, polya's counting thm, orbit stabilizer, etc are cool I just never really use them
But i don't know why yet
maybe if I did more combinatorics
I forget what the lemma which isn't Burnside's is
But we talked about it a lot
Hmm is it like
The number of orbits is the sum of the number of fixed points?
Maybe i will once i do aluffi chapter 4

Tbh chapter 4 made no sense to me the first time
the number of orbits is an average over the sets fixed by elements of the group
DarQ does like aluffi chapter 20-25 but not chapter 4
Oh yeah right you have to divide it
I need to upload my latest lecture notes ;-n
I'm actually still at chapter 3
And calc3 is soo fucking boring rn
;-;
Not because the material is bad
Like it is
But the professor is getting gradually worse and worse
I'm telling you
We should just do spivak on manifolds

Probability of DarQ not being a nerd 0
I wanna do probability stuff too
I'm tired
Your loss
Okay fr I need to study now
Is it?
Yeah mostly the prof's fault though
3:30
I am serious
My friend is all like "I don't study after midnight" and I made fun of him for it
If you need to study study
Idk
You can't be studying optimally
Feelingless
I haven't been studying at all I do like a question then am like "I wonder if DarQ has sent me another stupid message"
Have you ever heard of the close button?
You click it
And BAM
Discord is closed
You should try it sometime
Slurp left me alone again ;-;
Hey
darq needy arc
You mentioned Spivak
Calculus on Manifolds
I've not read spivak
But i like Calculus and manifolds
Yayyyyy!
yay!!!! probability reading group!
I don't know what book one should use
Easy
measure theory
Hi rice boi
LETS DO IT
hello grass
I also need probability and measure theory
Wanna do folland?
(just to spite the royden fanboys)
booo
what do you suggest ryc
let me check it out
Lol
i liked reading folland
Why boo then?
cause it's not probability!
Whatever
It's a prereq!
You can kind of do a concise run at measure theory for probability, but it's healthier to learn measure theory properly
but if ryc suggests it and bloe liked it, then surely it's good
after folland u can read fremlins many books with me
folland's perspective is probably best for someone with your interests, his "sequel" book is abstract harmonic analysis after all (which has a lot of algebra and rep theory)
det told me i could learn both at the same time
So like
i'll probably be taking harmonic analysis sometime so this would be good preparation
The two would compliment each other or w/e lel
sort of
depends on the book
the book i used was Varadhan, which would probably be a lot to use without a good picture of measure theory
but that's a hard book
I just don't know what other measure theoretic probability books are popular

I kinda don't want my next book to be hard
I've had a run with hard books lmao
I should prolly break that habit
books don't seem to get any easier
But i seem to have been choosing the notoriously hardest text whenever i wanna read about a certain topic
fair
i kinda just feel my way around until I find something that feels the most comfortable to read
and it definitely helps to have a mentor or someone to guide you when reading
i think halmos measure theory is the notorious one
folland is also nice because it ties things into basic functional analysis
And papa rudin?
But that's not measure theory focuses tho, right?
halmos is actually like, a bible
it's measure theoretic real and complex analysis
omg nuclear throne is so hype
it's been so long
ic
One more reason to do folland when I get around to it
Btw, ryc, do you think I should be focusing on a single book at a time?
Coz i don't think that's what most students do
But that's what I've been doing since I started doing math lmfao
I'm interested in this opinion
That's fine
2 at a time might be good too just so that you can go somewhere else when you get stuck
it's not like you "should" do that though. whatever helps you to internalize the material is fine
I see 
I would've asked you about your study routine but i really need to sleep now ;-;
or at least try 
Well I don't need to sleep yet
Ryc how do you study
And how have you in the past
What are some things you tried that didn't work out for you
took classes
took classes
read books
lmao
In what ways did it not work out
Reading books is so much more fun than listening to people talking 
boring

even math books?? 
Books are actually one of the better ways for me to learn historically
In fact, the trick in the past has been to go to a class, and ignore the lecture while I read an unrelated textbook
Is there any difference, typically, between discussion-1 and discussion-2?
Discussion 2 is kinda like overflow
Discussy gets hectic
Or occupied with one too many trails of conversation already
I actually muted #discussion for the past year or so because it's bad, but recently unmuted it the other day
now I will be remuting the channel
Good decision
Because you just witnessed the 0/0 debacle?
it's basically the entry point for all the riff raff and is just people talking over each other because of it, impossible to have any quality convo there
no, but the fact that it was something else bad doesn't surprise me
I mean I just learned the definition of condensed set in discussion 1
oh what's the definition
sheaf on the pro-etale site of spec(k) for k algebraically closed
Which part?
what's the difference between etale and pro-etale
That's the first thing I asked!
oh
He only explained what it means for the affine setting
namely you take filtered limits of etale morphisms Spec(A_i)-->Spec(B) in Sch/Spec(B)
well you can always ask him again in #algebraic-geometry or wherever else later if you wanna talk more
that's a response to that but with considerable delay
nonmath books are far better than math books...
And the functor of points formalism tells us that you only need to know the value of h_X on the affines
i like fiction
So the affine version should be sufficient for our needs
math is enjoyable when i'm talking with people about it or trying to solve problems. not when i'm reading encyclopedia entries about dubiously motivated objects
yeah, sounds reasonable to me
I've yet to see a dubiously motivated object
In the literature, at least
you and i very clearly have different definitions of dubiously motivated
you're into category theory / alg geo after all
i have very concrete mathematical tastes
ofc i respect other styles, but books have never been for me
explain why your favorite projective variety isn't dubiously motivated ||and don't talk about fermat's last theorem please||
so you're more of a lecture guy than a book guy. Perfect opportunity for a course-recommendations channel
Define concrete?
if we have to define it, we're already too far gone 🥹
dubious "in a way that arouses suspicion, distrust, or uncertainty."
Does this encapsulate what you're meaning?
I like things I can pretend I'm able to visualize
yes, it's an exaggeration but there are elements of distrust to it
moer than?
as far as i understand, that was being discussed
are abelian categories too esoteric for you(r tastes)? @deep mango
anyway, yes, i'm definitely more of a lecture guy than a books guy (and more than either a 1-1 conversation guy)
or small group convos person
like, reading groups make books palatable to me
i want to talk about misunderstandings or examples and work them out along the way with people
Yes
like 10000000000 dimensional things?
The problem with that many dimensions is you have to give me a reason to care about that specific number of dimensions but sure
You can pretend to visualise things that are that high dimensional hmmmm
I usually think more between 4-8
can you pretend to visualise 808,017,424,794,512,875,886,459,904,961,710,757,005,754,368,000,000,000 dimensional things
im pretending rn
I'm done
holy shit
That was cool
wow its big in my mind thats for sure
did you see the monster in there?
I've never seen a millionfold rotation before
i only see polynomials
did the monster give you some specially brewed moonshine?
im seeing a decently better approximation of sine in there than x
cool
Truer words have never been uttered
Also, learning the basics of stuff that look cool is kinda fun
learning + human interaction ftw


