#help-0

1 messages · Page 785 of 1

small trellis
#

Looks like 77 to me

#

I can't tell exactly

full dome
#

77 and?

#

I can't read graphs very well.

small trellis
#

2018

#

That's your two axis

#

Your years, and your exchange

full dome
#

So that's a valid coordinate set?

small trellis
#

Depends what's considered valid

#

I don't know

fiery berry
#

Anderson is bored in physics class. His favorite numbers are $1, 7$, and $33$. He writes $0.$, and randomly appends one of his favorite numbers to the end of the decimal he has already written. Since physics class is infinitely long, Anderson writes an infinitely long decimal number. (An example of such a number is $0.1337173377133733 \ldots$) If the expected value of the number Anderson wrote down is of the form $\frac{a}{b}$, where $a$ and $b$ are relatively prime positive integers, find $a + b$.

full dome
#

Can you possibly help for a few more minutes?

#

I have some more questions, I really want to sleep y'see.

small trellis
#

To find the slope you do change in y over change in x

#

Find two coordinates and subtract the y coordinate and divide that number by the change in the X coordinates

full dome
#

Can we move to dms rq?

small trellis
#

Ok

ocean sealBOT
#

Initializationvector

gritty cave
#

Is this just using trigonometric ratios, is there another way to do this?

jolly stone
#

x = 1/3 * (case1) + 1/3 * (case2) + 1/3 * (case3)

#

case 1 is writing 0.1 followed by the same procedure

#

the rest is trivial and is left as an exercise for readers

alpine sable
#

you find inverse function first

elfin talon
#

Is the ratio gonna be the average of these 3 numbers over 100 + the average over 1000… which is approximately 0.15(185)recursing

#

@fiery berry

small cypress
#

How do u do this

#

I don’t understand the second part

thorny patio
#

There's an answer for both:
Log x = .2

And log x = -.2

#

If you do absolute value both of those numbers satisfy the equation

small cypress
#

huh how do u get that?

thorny patio
#

| log x | = .2

#

You have calculator on the exam?

small cypress
#

Yep

#

This is int maths

#

Not normal

thorny patio
#

Ok so do 10 ^ .2

#

This is the x so log x = .2

#

That's one of the answers

small cypress
#

i got atound 1.59

thorny patio
#

Sounds right maybe xD

#

As long as you entered it correctly

#

There's another value for -.2

#

Do 10 ^ -.2

small cypress
#

wait so .2 bcs u wanna get 1.5 on the y axis?

thorny patio
#

You said pt 2 right

small cypress
#

ye

#

ii)

thorny patio
#

So no need even to look at the graph actually

#

Just the equation

#

| log x | = 0.2

small cypress
#

oh so it can be 0.2 or -.0.2

thorny patio
#

This equation works when either

A. log x = 0.2

or

B. log x = -0.2

small cypress
#

right?

thorny patio
#

Yea

#

Exactly

small cypress
#

oh crap im dum

#

so for b would it b the same

#

the bar indicates that it can be both - and + right?

thorny patio
#

Yes but that one is a little trickier i think for b

#

The | |

#

Is called absolute value usually

#

There are other names for this idea

#

It means give me the "size" or magnitude of a number

#

Size is always positive

#

So it gives you a non negative answer always

#

| - 2 | = 2

#

2 units away from zero, the size is 2 etc etc

small cypress
#

yep

thorny patio
#

Different ways you can think of it

small cypress
#

it doesnt mean sqaure root right just absolute o?

thorny patio
#

Yes correct

#

Square root has another symbol

#

The radical symbol

#

(You can use exponents to express roots too though)

small cypress
#

so for b would it be 1-x/4 or 1+x/4?

#

the x values

thorny patio
#

You have a calculator?

small cypress
#

ye

thorny patio
#

They are ok with decimals

#

?

#

I'd use that lmao

#

That's a hard one to solve algebraicaly

small cypress
#

how do u change it into decimal?

thorny patio
#

The calculator most likely would give you a decimal

#

If you have a graphing calculator

#

I might just be tired but I'm not sure how to solve that one easily

devout sigil
#

For b, log x=1-(x/4) or (x/4)-1

small cypress
#

ahhh

small cypress
#

i thought there r 2 diff signs

#
  • and -
devout sigil
#

-(1-(x/4))≠ 1+(x/4)

thorny patio
#

Solving it is the hard part though

#

The negative sign distributes through the whole expression

#

When you get the 2 branches

#

From the absolute value

devout sigil
small cypress
#

what abt 1-x/4 n 1+x/4

devout sigil
#

1+(x/4) is wrong

solid sage
solid sage
devout sigil
solid sage
#

@devout sigil Ok

restive prism
#

Given that point E lies on the line BC such that BE=4CE , find the coordinate of E.

#

Anyone know how to solve this ?

restive prism
#

the concept i got is BE/CE=4/1

#

but i dont know how to slove it

#

nope

#

no diagram

#

and umm

#

B is (1, 14.4)

#

C is (7,7)

#

and e is (x , y)

restive prism
#

my teacher

#

cropped it ot

#

out

cerulean vine
restive prism
#

ummm

#

BCE is a line

#

its

#

BC=4CE

#

its ratio theorem

wary valley
#

How would u do 1 c ?

vapid oak
#

An average rate of change means the gradient of the line that joins the two points on the graph of the function

#

A bit confusing when worded like that but you take the two points (x1, y1) and (x2, y2) and work out the gradient of the line which joins them

#

so at t=0 the first point is (0, 300)

#

Try and work out the second point

solid sage
thorny patio
#

@wary valley

Just do

(Final value - start value)/(distance)

#

Plug in (Q(2) - Q(0))/2

rich basin
#

Can someone go through the steps in how to solve this?

vale wigeon
#

have you solved absolute value equations before?

rich basin
#

Yeah

#

This is just revision but i forgotten

vale wigeon
#

right, so you're familiar with things like breaking down into cases?

rich basin
#

Yeah

vale wigeon
#

cause this ineq can be done with that pretty easily

#

just consider x > 0 vs. x < 0

rich basin
#

wouldn't it be x>= 0?

#

why is 0 undefined in sbsolute values?

vale wigeon
#

oh i mean you can do x ≥ 0 too

#

it's just that 0 itself is very clearly a non-solution

rich basin
#

so when i do x < 0

#

only the absolute values would be negative?

vale wigeon
#

if you're talking about the fact that the equation |x| + 3x > 1 would become -x + 3x > 1 and not -x - 3x > 1, yes

rich basin
#

how about solving a problem like (x+1)/||x-3| > 3

#

what would we do>

#

$\frac{x+1}{\left|x-3\right|}>3$ @vale wigeon

ocean sealBOT
#

BorutoEyePower

rich basin
#

I managed to get 2 < x < 3 or 3 < x < 5

#

so it would be 2 < x < 5 but cannot equal 3

#

but why on desmos it does not get rid of the 3

vale wigeon
#

kinda busy sorry

vapid oak
#

well if you just put in 2<x<5 you havent specified anything to do with 3

#

if you want it to exclude 3 you should put together, 2<x<3, 3<x<5

rich basin
#

@vapid oak But then why does desmos get rid of it?

#

when you put in that equation up there

vapid oak
#

because why would desmos know what you want?

#

if you write 2<x<5 they will depict that region because that inequality doesnt mention 3 at all

#

if you want desmos to exclude 3 you have to specify it

rich basin
#

Okay, manage to get it out on wolfram

placid zinc
#

They've given you that:
a + b = -m
ab = n

#

What's the roots of nx^2 + (2n - m)x + n?

#

In terms of n and m

rich basin
#

@placid zinc no idea

placid zinc
#

I think you'll know that one, haha

rich basin
#

I don't know what to do next after finding the roots for the first equation

#

what should i do next find the roots for the other one?

#

@placid zinc So i made it alpha = 1/ beta

#

and then did (-2n-m^2)/n = 1/B + B

#

but what would i do next?

alpine sable
#

Sorry for bad handwriting
Does it make sense?

#

Nvm I am typing it

rich basin
#

what handwriting?

alpine sable
#

Here typing takes too much time

alpine sable
rich basin
#

no

alpine sable
#

Ah well

#

Wait

rich basin
#

i have osmething in my eye be back

#

back

fierce frigate
#

yo i found this questionaire on th internet,
x2 + 14x + 24 = 0
this is
x= 3 and x= -7 right ?

#

bvs they answer key is
x=-3 and x = -7

#

both negative

#

but using the quadratic formula

#

that fals

sacred vortex
fierce frigate
#

oop i missscalc

loud grove
#

how do i do this?

fierce frigate
#

i havent vn caalculated it ahahah

#

i forgot

#

idk why i said that number

#

dont even know how i got there

rich basin
dim acorn
#

hlo i need help

alpine sable
#

can anyone help with this problem

#

-5/4 = t+3/-4

#

I got that from the numbers and putting it into slope equation

#

then I multiply both sides by -4 and get 5=t+3 -> t=2

#

where did I go wrong?

spare fern
#

$m_1 × m_2=-1$

ocean sealBOT
#

The Godfather

spare fern
#

$\frac{t+3}{-2-2} × \frac{5}{4}=-1$

ocean sealBOT
#

The Godfather

alpine sable
#

ok let me try that

#

why can we solve for t using -5/4 = t+3/-4

#

@spare fern

spare fern
#

Wdym

You have made an error

#

It's not -5/4 on the LHS

#

It's -4/5

alpine sable
#

ohhh

#

I'm such a retard

#

ok ty

spare fern
dull onyx
#

The sum of the length and width of a rectangle is 200 meters. If its length is x meters:

  1. Prove that the area of ​​the rectangle as a function of x is E (x) = -x ^ 2 + 200x
#

i dont rly understand this :c

glass lichen
dull onyx
#

yes

glass lichen
#

so given length is denoted as x, what's width=?

dull onyx
#

200/x no?

glass lichen
#

no

dull onyx
#

ok wIt

#

wait

glass lichen
#

length and width are being added, not multiplied

dull onyx
#

oh

#

200-x

glass lichen
#

yes

#

so length=x and width=200-x, what's the area of a rectangle?

dull onyx
#

now we multiply

glass lichen
#

yes

dull onyx
#

200-x * x

#

ok

glass lichen
#

x(200-x)

dull onyx
#

yes

#

sorry

#

im just not sure how to write it down

fresh bolt
#

thats a scary profile pic

dull onyx
#

whose

fresh bolt
#

yours

dull onyx
#

man

simple hamlet
simple hamlet
alpine sable
#

<@&268886789983436800> we got a troll

#

sorry for the ping

sly mantle
#

i don't really see it as trolling, but @simple hamlet pls don't answer leading questions meant for others

sacred rock
#

not exactly a math related question, but i was wondering if anyone had an idea of how much i should charge if i tutor 7th graders as a highschooler without any diplomas, etc. i really want to earn some money on the side by tutoring since english is my strongest subject.

any other advice from experienced tutors would also be appreciated : )
<@&286206848099549185>

night geyser
#

prices vary regionally, maybe search some listings on facebook and compare

#

i charged $25 cad/hr (roughly $20 usd) as a high schooler in a relatively affluent part of a medium-sized canadian city

#

that was like a decade ago though

#

also, at least from my experience, english tutors are less in demand than math/physics/chem ones

vale wigeon
sacred rock
#

@night geyser yea, my personal tutors charge around 40/hr but they're pretty specialised plus they teach math, piano, etc which i feel is in higher demand, so i was thinking maybe 20/hr or a lil less would be good to begin with?

topaz scaffold
vale wigeon
#

25 usd/hr is my current rate

#

i now wield a bachelor's degree though

topaz scaffold
#

Ah nice nice

sacred rock
vale wigeon
#

private

sacred rock
#

ah, i should definitely change under 20$ then for groups haha

vale wigeon
#

well thats the thing maybe i am undercharging

#

i dont know tho

#

like, i'll keep my current rate for now unless something major enough happens that may warrant me adjusting it in either direction

topaz scaffold
#

Private lessons for instruments like piano are a lot more expensive...

#

How do you find people to tutor btw?

vale wigeon
#

i cast my net here occasionally

#

well

#

metaphorically

#

every now and then someone comes along whos in need of math tutoring

topaz scaffold
#

You do it online?

#

Tutoring I mean

vale wigeon
#

yes

arctic steeple
#

At what level of maths do you Tutor?

#

I’d also consider changing the rates based on how advanced the stuff is

vale wigeon
#

highschool / early uni, mostly

arctic steeple
#

Tutors for uni stuff can charge more than tutors for HS stuff

topaz scaffold
#

Which sucks cause uni students are more broke than hs students

sacred rock
#

im pretty inexperienced so im starting with ms, so probably around 15$/hr, or is that too expensive?

arctic steeple
#

Since the more advanced it becomes there are less people who can teach it reliably

#

Less supply you could say I guess

#

Hence higher rates

arctic steeple
#

It all depends on what you’re teaching, who you’re teaching etc

#

Know your worth sittin

night geyser
#

honestly dont listen to random discord speculation and compare your prices to local listings

sacred rock
#

hehe, i js wanna have clients to begin with first since this is my first tutoring gigs, but i don't wanna be broke T-T

night geyser
#

theyre not hard to find on facebook/whatever

sacred rock
#

okie okie

#

tysm everyone

unique tiger
#

can someone explain to me how to differentiate from this given

oak chasm
#

@unique tiger @unique tiger Differentiate cos(x) repeatedly until you get what you started with. Figure out how many times you differentiated to get back to where you started.

#

@unique tiger Did you find out how many times you need to differentiate cos(x) to get back to cos(x)?

oak chasm
#

OK, what's the derivative of cos(x)?

unique tiger
#

sin x?

oak chasm
#

Almost.

unique tiger
#

-sinx

oak chasm
#

Right.

#

What's the derivative of -sin(x)?

unique tiger
#
  • cos x?
oak chasm
#

What's the derivative of -cos(x)?

unique tiger
#

sin x

oak chasm
#

What's the derivative of sin(x)?

unique tiger
#

cos x

oak chasm
#

So, we have:
cos(x)
-sin(x)
-cos(x)
sin(x)
cos(x)

#

Every 4, it repeats.

#

Now you have 86.

#

In your problem.

#

So, do you remember dividing and getting a quotient and remainder from elementary school?

unique tiger
#

yeah

oak chasm
#

OK, what's the quotient and remainder when you divide 86 by 4?

unique tiger
#

21.2

oak chasm
#

OK, so 86 = 4 · 21 + 2.

#

Now those 21 fours all go back to cosine.

#

It goes to 4, cosine. It goes to the next 4, cosine.

#

It does that 21 times.

#

Then it does 2 more derivatives.

#

Does that make sense so far?

unique tiger
#

so it repeats 21 times since it repeats every 4 times

oak chasm
#

Right.

rich basin
oak chasm
#

@rich basin Sorry, channel is busy.

#

@unique tiger So, on the 84th time (21 · 4), it's back to cos(x).

#

Then it does two more derivatives of it.

#

Now we got all the derivatives.

#

0: cos(x)
1: -sin(x)
2: -cos(x)
3: sin(x)

#

From before.

#

So, what's two more derivatives after cos(x)?

unique tiger
#
  • cos?
oak chasm
#

Right.

#

So, the remainder after you divide by the cycle length (how many times until it repeats) is how many times to differentiate.

#

So we differentiate twice since our remainder was 2.

#

And we get -cos(x).

#

Does that make sense?

naive musk
#

what will be the answer to this given that a is constant

unique tiger
#

so our final answer will be - cos x=2?

oak chasm
#

Nope, just -cos(x).

#

When you differentiate an expression, you don't get an equation.

unique tiger
#

ohh the two is just for indication of 2 more derivative

oak chasm
#

Right!

unique tiger
#

ohh okay .. I get now thank you

oak chasm
#

You're welcome.

unique tiger
#

can I ask 1 more question

oak chasm
#

Sure.

unique tiger
oak chasm
#

Do you use d(...) or (...)' for what's left to differentiate?

unique tiger
#

with prime

oak chasm
#

OK, so:

a⁴ - t⁴ = 3a²t
(a⁴ - t⁴)' = (3a²t)'

#

So we use the sum rule on the left.

#

And the constant multiple rule on the right.

#

(a⁴)' - (t⁴)' = 3(a²t)'

#

See how I simplified what's left to be differentiated?

unique tiger
#

yes you seperated the variables.. as I understand

oak chasm
#

OK, so what's (a⁴)'?

unique tiger
#

4a3

oak chasm
#

Right. You can use ^ for powers, like 4a^3.

#

What's (t⁴)'?

unique tiger
#

4a^3-4t^3? right?

oak chasm
#

Almost.

#

So, you want dt on the bottom, right?

#

The question asks for that.

#

So, with (t⁴)', you get 4t³.

#

With (a⁴)', you use the chain rule to get 4a³·a'.

#

You really do the same thing to both.

#

(t⁴)' → 4t³t'
(a⁴)' → 4a³a'

#

Do you understand why I got those?

unique tiger
#

how?

oak chasm
#

OK, do you know how the chain rule works?

halcyon matrix
#

The answer is:
da/dt = (4a^3-6at)/(3a^2+4t^3)

oak chasm
#

@halcyon matrix Please see the rules at #❓how-to-get-help. One of them is to not just give the answer.

unique tiger
oak chasm
#

The chain rule works like this:

tawny lion
# unique tiger how?

you essentially take a' when you differentiate implicitly, if it were dt/da you'd do the same thing for t

oak chasm
#

(a²)²

#

You have squaring on the outside, right?

unique tiger
#

yeah

oak chasm
#

So, what you do is you pretend the inside (a²) is a variable.

#

And you get 2(a²).

#

Then you multiply by the derivative of the inside.

unique tiger
#

so 2(2a)?

oak chasm
#

Right.

#

Now we're going to do that here:

#

a⁴

#

You pretend a is a variable.

#

You get 3a⁴.

#

Then you multiply by the derivative of the inside.

#

3a⁴a'

#

See how I followed the chain rule?

unique tiger
#

ohh okay a^4 is pretend variable

oak chasm
#

No, you have like (a)⁴

#

You get the derivative, pretending that the parentheses are a variable.

#

4a³

#

Then you multiply by the derivative of the parentheses.

#

4a³a'

#

Like before.

#

(a²)²

#

2(a²)

#

2(a²)(2a)

unique tiger
#

2a^2a

oak chasm
#

You get the derivative as if the parentheses are a variable.

#

Then you multiply by the derivative of the parentheses.

#

So you get 4a³.

#

(a²)²
2(a²)(2a)
4a³

#

Does that make sense?

unique tiger
#

yeah

oak chasm
#

OK, now you want da/dt, right?

#

Usually, you're doing dy/dx.

#

And when you have x as your variable, you don't need to do the extra step I'll show.

#

So, x² → 2x. No extra steps.

#

What if you're doing y²?

#

Well, y isn't the variable in the bottom of dy/dx.

#

So you have to do an extra step.

#

y² → 2yy'

#

That's because of the chain rule.

unique tiger
#

okay, then

oak chasm
#

x² = (x)² → 2(x)(x') = 2x x'
y² = (y)² → 2(y)(y') = 2y y'

#

Now x' = 1, so it goes away.

#

2x

#

y' doesn't equal 1 necessarily., so it doesn't go away.

#

2y y'

#

Like if y = 25x², then y' will be 50x.

#

It's not always 1.

#

But x' is always 1.

#

Does that make sense?

unique tiger
#

yes

oak chasm
#

OK, so back to the problem.

#

(a⁴)' - (t⁴)' = 3(a²t)'

#

4a³a' - 4t³ = 3(a²t)'

#

Does it make sense why I got that?

unique tiger
#

yes

oak chasm
#

OK, now on the right, we have a product left to be differentiated.

#

Do you know the product rule?

unique tiger
#

yes

oak chasm
#

OK, so:
(a²t)'
(a²)'t + a²(t)'

unique tiger
#

right

oak chasm
#

So, what's (a²)'?

#

4a³a' - 4t³ = 3((a²)'t + a²(t)')

unique tiger
oak chasm
#

Almost.

unique tiger
#

2

oak chasm
#

Don't forget the chain rule.

unique tiger
#

is t gonna be 0?

oak chasm
#

No, hold on.

#

We're not done with (a²)'

#

Remember to use the chain rule.

#

(a)² → what?

unique tiger
#

2a a'

oak chasm
#

Right.

#

Now (t)'.

#

What's that?

unique tiger
#

1?

oak chasm
#

Right.

#

4a³a' - 4t³ = 3((a²)'t + a²(t)')
4a³a' - 4t³ = 3(2aa't + a²)

unique tiger
#

okay

oak chasm
#

Now, a' is another way of writing da/dt.

#

And that's what they want us to find.

#

So solve that equation for a'.

unique tiger
#

is it 1?

oak chasm
#

Nope.

#

t' is because it's da/dt and t is on the bottom.

#

a' isn't.

#

Pretend a' is a separate variable.

#

So you have three variables, a, a', and t.

#

Solve for a' using algebra.

unique tiger
#

from 2aa't?

oak chasm
#

No, with solving, you solve an equation.

#

From 4a³a' - 4t³ = 3(2aa't + a²).

unique tiger
#

i dont get it....

oak chasm
#

How would you solve 4a³x - 4t³ = 3(2axt + a²) for x?

unique tiger
#

divie by x?

oak chasm
#

No.

unique tiger
#

3a(2at+a) ?

oak chasm
#

No.

#

First, you expand on the right.

#

What do you get?

unique tiger
#

6axt +3a^2

#

is it?

oak chasm
#

4a³a' - 4t³ = 3(2aa't + a²)
4a³a' - 4t³ = 6aa't + 3a²

#

Now get all of the terms with a' in it to one side and all of the other terms to the other side.

unique tiger
#

4a²a'- 6aa't =4t³+ 3a²

#

then?

oak chasm
#

Good.

#

Now factor out the a' on the left.

unique tiger
#

2a'(2a-3at)=4t³+ 3a²

oak chasm
#

Sorry, I made an error above copying a line.

#

We have 4a³a' - 6aa't = 4t³ + 3a² (I had 4a²a' by mistake).

#

Now we want to factor out just the a', not 2a'.

#

@rough acorn Sorry, channel is busy.

rough acorn
#

oops sorry posted before looking if it was active

unique tiger
oak chasm
#

Right.

#

Now, divide both sides by the part in parentheses.

#

That will get us a' = something without a'.

#

What do you get?

unique tiger
#

a'=4t³ + 3a²/4a³ - 6at

oak chasm
#

Yes, except when you write it in chat, you should surround the top and bottom of a fraction with parentheses.

#

Otherwise it looks like 4t³ + 3(a²/4)a³ - 6at because of PEMDAS.

#

So, that's your answer.

unique tiger
#

a'=(4t³ + 3a²)/(4a³ - 6at)

oak chasm
#

Right, so:
da/dt = (4t³ + 3a²)/(4a³ - 6at)

#

Since a' is da/dt.

unique tiger
#

ohh

oak chasm
#

Does it make sense how we got this?

unique tiger
#

yeah

oak chasm
#

It has some video lessons and practice problems on solving.

unique tiger
#

it was very helpful

oak chasm
#

You're welcome.

unique tiger
#

is it same process if x and y are fractions

oak chasm
#

You mean the implicit differentiation or the algebra solving?

unique tiger
#

implicit differentiation

oak chasm
#

You might have to use the quotient rule, but it's the same sort of thing.

#

(a/b)' → (a'b - ab')/(b²)

#

That's the quotient rule.

unique tiger
#

quotient rule is first step then find x or y right? like a' in our problem

oak chasm
#

No, it's like the product rule.

#

(ab)' → ab' + a'b

#

You don't have to find anything.

#

(x⁸y⁷)' → x⁸(y⁷)' + (x⁸)'y⁷.

#

I didn't find anything, just wrote the parts where they go according to:
(ab)' = ab' + a'b

#

I copied a over to both places where it appears in the product rule.

#

I copied b over to both places where it appears in the product rule.

#

(ab)' → ab' + a'b
(x⁸y⁷)' → x⁸(y⁷)' + (x⁸)'y⁷

#

Does it make sense how I just copied the things that were multiplied together over to their places on the other side?

unique tiger
#

like in this example

oak chasm
#

Right, so let's do that.

#

5/y + 35/x = 1
(5/y + 35/x)' = 1'
(5/y)' + (35/x)' = 0

#

Does it make sense what I've done so far?

alpine sable
#

its an easy process, why not google it

unique tiger
oak chasm
#

Now we do (5/y)'

#

(a/b)' → (a'b - ab')/(b²)

#

(5/y)' → (5'y - 5y')/(y²)

#

Does it make sense how I filled in the top for a and the bottom for b in the quotient rule?

unique tiger
#

yes

oak chasm
#

OK, so, what's (35/x)'?

unique tiger
#

(35/x)'→ (35'x-35x')/(x^2)

oak chasm
#

5/y + 35/x = 1
(5/y + 35/x)' = 1'
(5/y)' + (35/x)' = 0
(5'y - 5y')/(y²) + (35'x - 35x')/(x²) = 0

#

So now we have this.

unique tiger
oak chasm
#

Yes, that's right.

#

Now, what's 5'?

unique tiger
#

0?

oak chasm
#

Right. What's 35'?

unique tiger
#

0

oak chasm
#

Right. What's x'?

unique tiger
#

is it 1 ?

oak chasm
#

Right. It's dy/dx we're finding, so x is on the bottom, so x' = 1.

#

5/y + 35/x = 1
(5/y + 35/x)' = 1'
(5/y)' + (35/x)' = 0
(5'y - 5y')/(y²) + (35'x - 35x')/(x²) = 0
(-5y')/(y²) - 35/(x²) = 0

#

See how I got the last line after filling in 5', 35', and x'?

unique tiger
#

yeah

oak chasm
#

OK, now everything is differentiated.

#

Now we solve for y'.

alpine sable
#

how the fuck do you do 6th to 0 power

oak chasm
#

@alpine sable Sorry, channel is busy.

unique tiger
#

is the chain rule in application to y'?

oak chasm
#

Not this time.

#

We got y' just through the quotient rule.

#

No need for the chain rule.

alpine sable
oak chasm
#

@alpine sable There are other channels.

alpine sable
oak chasm
#

@unique tiger So, solve for y' in (-5y')/(y²) - 35/(x²) = 0.

unique tiger
#

y'(-5)/(y^2)- 35/(x²)= 0.

oak chasm
#

OK, now what?

unique tiger
#

can we cancel y' to y or just move all non y' to the other side?

oak chasm
#

First, you move all the y' terms to one side and the other terms to the other side.

unique tiger
#

y'(-5)/(y^2)=35/(x²)

oak chasm
#

Good.

#

Now you factor out y', which is already done.

#

Then you divide both sides by what's multiplied by y'.

#

What did you get?

unique tiger
#

(-5)/(y^2)=35y'/(x²)

oak chasm
#

No.

unique tiger
#

i dont know if it is rgiht

oak chasm
#

What's multiplied by y' in y'(-5)/(y²)?

unique tiger
#

-5

oak chasm
#

No, (-5)/(y²) is.

unique tiger
#

okay

oak chasm
#

So, you divide both sides by (-5)/(y²).

unique tiger
#

y'=((35/(x²))/(-5)/(y²)

ocean sealBOT
#

Chai T. Rex

oak chasm
#

OK, so how do you simplify the right side?

unique tiger
#

rationalize?

oak chasm
#

How?

unique tiger
#

(35/x^2)x(y^2/-5)

oak chasm
#

Right.

#

So, what do you get for that?

unique tiger
#

(35y^2)/(-5x^2)

copper kite
#

i skipped a grade so I have no clue about the problems. Can anyone please explain how to do these?

oak chasm
#

Good, now how can you simplify that?

#

@copper kite Sorry, channel is busy.

copper kite
#

thanks

unique tiger
#

-7x^2y^2

oak chasm
#

Not quite.

#

How did the x² get into the numerator?

unique tiger
#

so it stays in the deno?

oak chasm
#

Yes.

unique tiger
#

(-7y^2)/x^2

oak chasm
#

Yes, and to make it look a bit nicer, the - can come in front of the fraction.

ocean sealBOT
#

Chai T. Rex

oak chasm
#

But with fractions, you can cancel common factors, but you can't really move something to the other side.

#

So,
y' = -(7y²)/(x²)
dy/dx = -(7y²)/(x²)

unique tiger
#

ohh okay nice

oak chasm
#

There's also a trick.

#

(5/y)'

#

You can do quotient rule.

alpine sable
oak chasm
#

Or you can convert to powers.

#

(5/y)' = (5y⁻¹)'

#

Do you see how 5/y is also 5y⁻¹?

#

@unique tiger

unique tiger
#

yeah if you put power to numerator from denominator it changes sign

oak chasm
#

(5/y)' → (5'y - 5y')/(y²) = (-5y')/(y²)
(5y⁻¹)' → -5y⁻²y' = (-5y')/(y²)

#

One is done with the quotient rule.

#

One is done with the power rule and the chain rule.

#

They both get the same answer.

unique tiger
#

ohh nice

oak chasm
#

So that's how you can skip the quotient rule if the power rule applies.

#

But you should learn the quotient rule because the power rule doesn't always apply.

unique tiger
#

i got last 2 questions if you can help me 🥺

oak chasm
#

OK.

unique tiger
alpine sable
#

can i interrupt a bit

oak chasm
#

y = 5x³ + x - 6

So the inverse will be:

x = 5y³ + y - 6

#

Do you remember that method of getting the inverse from algebra?

unique tiger
#

ye s

oak chasm
#

Now it wants you to use the formula dy/dx = 1/(dx/dy).

#

So we get dx/dy.

#

So, implicitly differentiate x = 5y³ + y - 6.

#

What do you get after the first step?

unique tiger
#

5y^2y' right?

oak chasm
#

Not quite.

safe flume
#

Hey, can i ask a question here?

oak chasm
#

The first step is this:
(x)' = (5y³ + y - 6)'

#

@safe flume Sorry, this channel is busy, but it looks like #help-4 is open.

runic flower
#

hey please , answer me
does anyone know the symbol ll f ll oo in calculus ?

oak chasm
#

@runic flower Sorry, channel is busy.

runic flower
#

what

oak chasm
#

@unique tiger The next step is the sum rule:
x' = (5y³)' + (y)' + (6)'

runic flower
#

so you mean you work only in one question here ?

oak chasm
#

@runic flower Yes, that's right. See the rules and tips for getting help in #❓how-to-get-help.

unique tiger
runic flower
#

ohh ok thx

oak chasm
#

So, now do the terms one by one.

#

What's (5y³)'?

unique tiger
#

sooo. 15y^2+0+0 ?

oak chasm
#

Nope.

#

What's (y)'?

unique tiger
oak chasm
#

No, slow down.

#

What's (5y³)'?

#

Right.

#

Well, 15y²y'

#

What's y'?

unique tiger
oak chasm
#

No.

unique tiger
#

1

oak chasm
#

Right, because we're doing dx/dy and y is on the bottom.

#

So, (5y³)' + (y)' + (6)' = 15y² + 1 + 0.

unique tiger
#

okay///

oak chasm
#

So,
x' = (5y³)' + (y)' + (6)'
x' = 15y² + 1
dx/dy = 15y² + 1

unique tiger
#

ohh okay ....what is the difference of f prime of 1 and of f prime of -1

#

when seen in a question

oak chasm
#

It's not f'(-1).

#

It's (f⁻¹(x))'

#

f⁻¹(x) is the inverse function of f(x).

#

Now, they said to find dy/dx by using dy/dx = 1/(dx/dy).

#

We have dx/dy, so what's dy/dx?

#

Sorry?

unique tiger
#

inverse of dx/dy

oak chasm
#

No.

#

What did we get for dx/dy?

unique tiger
#

15y² + 1?

oak chasm
#

Now use dy/dx = 1/(dx/dy) to get dy/dx.

unique tiger
#

(dx/dy)x(dy/dx)=1

oak chasm
#

I didn't say to get what (dx/dy)(dy/dx) was.

#

I said to get dy/dx.

dapper cedar
oak chasm
#

@dapper cedar Sorry, channel is busy.

dapper cedar
#

ok

unique tiger
oak chasm
#

Right.

#

You got (dy/dx)(dx/dy) = 1.

#

That's not what dy/dx is.

#

That's what (dy/dx)(dx/dy) is.

unique tiger
#

ohh i get it

#

dy/dx=1/( 15y² + 1)

oak chasm
#

Right.

unique tiger
#

that's it?

oak chasm
#

Yes.

unique tiger
#

thanks for teaching me it was my first time chatting in the server ... Ill answer the others by myself

oak chasm
#

You're welcome.

#

It wants you to check by differentiating implicitly.

unique tiger
#

it differs from what i am used to so I struggle

oak chasm
#

That can be done like this:
x = 5y³ + y + 6
1 = 15y²y' + y' + 0
1 = 15y²y' + y'
Fill in the y' you got (y' is dy/dx).

#

Make sure the sides are equal after you do the math.

#

Does the checking make sense?

unique tiger
#

yes just substitute

oak chasm
#

Yes, that's right.

oak chasm
unique tiger
#

okay thank you again

oak chasm
#

You're welcome.

teal epoch
#

Hello
I think the given that the two of its roots gives the product of 6 is wrong
If it is true, then -2 should be a root to the function, but it gives f(-2)=-72 instead which it just contradicts the statement
So is the question wrong or something?

oak chasm
#

@teal epoch What is the degree of the polynomial?

oak chasm
#

OK, so there are 3 roots (zeroes).

#

Do you know Vieta's formulas?

teal epoch
oak chasm
#

OK, what is the product of the roots from Vieta's formulas?

oak chasm
#

Right.

#

So, they say the two zeroes' product is 12.

#

Since there are three zeroes (it's degree 3), one of the zeroes must be repeated.

#

So, ab = 6.

#

Where a and b are the two zeroes.

#

One of the zeroes is repeated.

#

aab = -12.

#

a²b = -12

#

What's a?

teal epoch
oak chasm
#

Right, and you tried f(-2) and it didn't give 0.

#

So, they must be wrong.

alpine sable
#

i don’t get it

oak chasm
#

@alpine sable Sorry, channel is busy.

alpine sable
#

i do care

oak chasm
#

<@&268886789983436800>

alpine sable
#

okay i will go

oak chasm
#

,w roots of x³ - 9x² + 20x + 12

ocean sealBOT
sly mantle
alpine sable
oak chasm
# ocean seal

@teal epoch As you can see, the roots are very complicated.

alpine sable
#

oh

oak chasm
#

No pair of the roots will multiply to 6, as the other root would then be -2, but none of the roots are -2.

#

Does that make sense?

teal epoch
#

yes sir/ma'am

alpine sable
#

One endpoint of a line segment is (8, −1).
The point (5, −2) is one-third of the way
from that endpoint to the other endpoint.
Find the other endpoint.
I don't even know where to begin

#

Let's name them

#

how

#

well

#

A=(8,-1)

#

b= (5, −2)

#

c = (x, y)

crystal ivy
#

In a triangle ABC, on AB and BC the points P and Q are located respectively, so that m <BPQ = m <BCA. If AB = 15 cm, BQ = 5 cm and AC = 21 cm; determine the measure of PQ.

alpine sable
#

right

#

you can draw it too

#

do u want me to draw it

#

?

#

Sure in a graph so that (AB) is 1/3 of (AC)

#

I'm pretty sure you can then just read coordinates, you can also find it without drawing it

#

ok so how do I find it without drawing

#

The only thing you know is the distance between A and B is 1/3 of the distance between A and C

#

yes

#

and it's a line

#

ok

#

So find the distance (AB) and *3

#

Then you have the distance (AC) and you have the coordinates of A so you can find C

hidden veldt
#

two hundred five thousand thirty eight what six digit number does that translate to

#

im having a brain fart and need the numbers

alpine sable
#

Then you have the distance (AC) and you have the coordinates of A so you can find C

#

what do u mean

#

what is the distance (AC) in coordinates

wary stream
alpine sable
#

I don't know

#

I got 3.16 for the distance of ab

alpine sable
#

@alpine sable

#

I got 3.16

#

now what

#

x3= 9.4

#

if we multiply by 3 that becomes 9.4

#

then what

#

No you need to think in coordinates

#

So find the distance (AB) and *3

#

yes how am I supposed to get the coordinates

#

To go from (8,-1) to (5,-2) how do you do

#

how do I do?

#

what

#

yeah

#

how do I do what?

#

I can do lots of things

hidden veldt
alpine sable
#

You're in (8,-1) and you want to go to (5,-2)

#

What is the "movement" you need to do

#

drop the x by 3 and drop y by -1?

#

exactly

#

ok so what do I do with that

#

So now you're in B right?

#

yes

#

But what you want is actually going from A to C

#

ok

#

which is the same as A to B 3 times

#

Ok so what am I supposed to do

#

I get this

#

@alpine sable

#

yes

#

Well you multiply by 3 the movement you did

#

Then you go from the coordinates of A and you go from A to C so you end up in C

alpine sable
#

tell me

alpine sable
# alpine sable

coordinate of point that devides line segment at ratio m:n

#

zamarus that doesn't get to the answer

#

in your case, 3:1

#

yes it does

#

(5,-2)

#

becomes 14, -5

#

right?

#

It's the movement A-)C so you go from A(8,-1)-(9,3)

#

oh

#

C is (-1,-4)

#

it does work

sage swift
#

Guys im doing exponential functions right now but i dont think im doing my work correctly can anyone help me please

alpine sable
#

lozano I still have questions to ask zamarus

#

@alpine sable why do you have to multiply by 3

sage swift
#

My bad sorry

alpine sable
#

no prob

#

Well you multiply by 3 the movement you did
Then you go from the coordinates of A and you go from A to C so you end up in C

#

I don't get this

#

because you said yourself that B is at 1/3 of the segment [AC]

#

So [AC]=3*[AB]

#

oh right

#

ok

#

you're in A you do the move to get from A to C so you're in C

#

I see

#

ok ty

#

np

knotty hedge
#

hi

#

hi

alpine sable
#

Where are you stuck

knotty hedge
#

no idea what to do

wary stream
knotty hedge
#

WHAT

alpine sable
#

It says expand the bracket

knotty hedge
#

IK

#

BUT I SUCK AT MATH LOL

alpine sable
#

So expand it

wary stream
#

First, outer, inner, last

gritty surge
#

hi

wary stream
gritty surge
#

does anyone know engineering mechanics 68ab0554d29cd8295e557a02473c4df4

knotty hedge
#

no

wary stream
#

That will help

knotty hedge
#

ye maybe later

wary stream
#

You asked for help, there's the help

#

FOIL is an important concept

knotty hedge
#

bruuuuuuuuuuh

alpine sable
#

We can't help with you learning the method

wary stream
knotty hedge
alpine sable
#

initial is for t=0

#

i think

wary stream
#

It means find the roots of the equation

alpine sable
#

initial velocity is the constant after first differentiation

#

Yeah it says the coefficient of t

#

Make sens

wary stream
#

So use layman terms

alpine sable
wary stream
alpine sable
#

just wondering, if x^2 is x squared, and x^3 is cubed, then would it make sense to say x^4 is x tesseracted? and x^5 is x penteracted?

alpine sable
knotty hedge
#

bruh

#

so smart

signal rampart
#

Could somebody explain this to me? Appreciate it

alpine sable
#

impressive

knotty hedge
#

ikr

signal rampart
#

Im quite young and I struggle with math, im in 8th grade

knotty hedge
#

omg so your 12 :000000000000000000000000

#

13

signal rampart
#

no?

knotty hedge
#

14

#

?

alpine sable
#

$4^{2}\times 2\times \dfrac{1}{3}+2,4$

signal rampart
#

14

ocean sealBOT
#

Zamarus

knotty hedge
alpine sable
#

$\begin{aligned}4^{2}\times 2\times \dfrac{1}{3}+2,4\ 4\times 4\times \dfrac{2}{3}+2,4\ 16\times \dfrac{2}{3}+2,4\end{aligned}
$

alpine sable
signal rampart
alpine sable
ocean sealBOT
#

Zamarus

alpine sable
signal rampart
alpine sable
#

$\begin{aligned}\dfrac{32}{3}+2,4\ \dfrac{3\times 10+2}{3}+2,4\end{aligned}$

ocean sealBOT
#

Zamarus

alpine sable
#

=12,4+2/3

wary stream
alpine sable
#

Well i'm retarded then

wary stream
#

That's a mixed fraction

carmine girder
#

please

wary stream
#

Just find x

carmine girder
#

what is it help

alpine sable
#

for real

wary stream
#

Also, weird placement for the negative signs

#

Use area of triangle equation

carmine girder
wary stream
wary stream
wary stream
alpine sable
#

lmao

carmine girder
alpine sable
#

Hey, currently learning analytic geometry and was wondering how can you find the rectangle points when all you know is the x and y values of only 2 points?

night geyser
#

those 2 points are opposite corners of the rectangle

wary stream
alpine sable
alpine sable
night geyser
#

if you assume its grid-ailgned you can fill out the rest.

#

note that the "new" points take their x coordinate from 1 point, and their y coordinate from the other point

fringe depot
#

help

#

😥

wary stream
#

Don't spam

night geyser
#

dont spam and dont interrupt.

alpine sable
#

true

night geyser
#

indeed, thats why i said "assuming its grid aligned"

alpine sable
wary stream
night geyser
#

techniaclly there are infinitely many rectangles for any pair of points

#

just 2 points isnt enough info

#

if youre ONLY given 2 points, you will not be able to uniquely determine a rectangle.

alpine sable
alpine sable
#

why do generating functions work?

#

From what I know, the x^n term is just a placeholder and we almost never compute it, the sequence goes like that but why does it work I still don't get it

#

I know why we use generating functions, basically because functions are easier to deal with than sequences, and also that power series is not the only way to do it. But I still think I am confused.

#

Probably something which is easy to grasp is what I need right now

#

u need to know what functions are

#

Task "come up with an inequality, that its solutions would be [2;+∞)"
so -2+x>=0 is a valid answer?
Task "come up with an inequality, that its solutions would be (-∞;-3)"
so -x-3>0 is a valid answer?

novel siren
#

yes and yes @alpine sable

alpine sable
#

[-5;5]

#

what would be the inequality

#

?

#

cant come up with it

#

<@&286206848099549185>

ionic jewel
#

$-5 \leq x \leq 5$

ocean sealBOT
ionic jewel
#

or

#

$x^2 \leq 25$

ocean sealBOT
alpine sable
#

thank you

sleek quest
#

It's probably very stupid but shouldn't
(x^2+2x+4)(x^2-2x+4) equal x^4 - (2x+4)^2?

#

It isn't and I don't understand

alpine sable
#

-(2x+4) = -2x-4

sleek quest
#

Does the sign affect the entire expression here

#

I need to expand the special product first no?

alpine sable
#

the sign affects the whole term, that's why
you can't apply it to formula (a+b)(a-b)=a^2-b^2

sleek quest
#

So I can't apply the formula in that case?

#

I have to multiply each term?

alpine sable
#

(x^2+2x+4)(x^2-2x+4) ≠ x^4 - (2x+4)^2
(x^2+2x+4)(x^2-2x-4) = x^4 - (2x+4)^2

sleek quest
#

Ohh

#

Got it thanks

quiet folio
#

how do i solve this

tall kayak
quiet folio
#

it turned out to be a@tall kayak

#

but it took lots of time

#

and the 2nd one is ez B

tall kayak
#

oh

#

ye

#

sorry

#

A

#

silly me

frank cairn
#

Can anyone help me solve?

sleek quest
#

@quiet folio can you explain how you reached 8 I am curious

#

Curious but stooped

frank cairn
#

The power in a circuit with a current of 1.25x10-⁶ and a resistance of 4.8x10⁵ ohms is given (1.25x10-⁶)² x (4.8x10) w.

#

What is the power in the circuit?

alpine sable
#

ops misread

sleek quest
#

Got it

#

Thanks

quiet folio
#

I hope u can understand my hand writing kinda trash

sleek quest
#

It's ok, no worries

quiet folio
#

No problem m8 btw
Are these questions harder than the math sat

sleek quest
#

No idea, not from the US

#

LMAO