#help-0
1 messages · Page 567 of 1
in the context of composition functions
the notation they used represents:
g( g(x))
a(ax + b)+ b
mhm
and now you have an order 1 term and an order 0 term
no
simplify*
you expand it into a new polynomial of the form cx + d
which should be equal to 4x - 15
this will give you two equations
d= -15 and c = 4
but d and c are functions of a and b
so you solve for a and b from those 2 equations
||a(ax + b)+ b = 4x + 15||
thanks!
@alpine sable Almost.
im
re
Just see which of the intervals it holds for. Do you know how to read quantifiers?
boxer, please try an empty channel
recon, no. you can immediately see that the a will be squared
meaning two values satisfy the equation in general
i got
2 for a
and -5 for b
what about the other value for a
a^2 = 4 and ab + b = -15 are the equations
there are two values of a for which a^2 = 4
-a and a?
mhm
so -2 is also a valid solution
and that means there's also another value of b that works
i don't know what you mean by add in a negative
uhmm
Chai T. Rex
$a^2x + ba + b = 4x - 15$
recon
@lethal vortex So now you have two values for a. Solve b for the first value of a. Solve b for the second value of a.
@oak chasm about this
if u have a variable squared
and if u want to move it
u need the
$+-$
recon
thing?
what is "move it"?
so the +- thing is neccesary
yes
if you're seeing function composition, you have already learned thus
edddddddddddddddddd
hi anyone, if anyone has a good geometrical representation of a vector parametrisation of a circle please send it my way i would really love to have it thank you
imagine a clock
imagine its hand spinning counterclockwise starting from pointing exactly to the right
yeah thats your geometric representation
oh
hmm
maybe
im looking for
cos(t)i + sin(t)j
why that represents a circle of radius 1
a circle of radius 1 centered at the origin
yes***
try calculating the length of cos(t)i + sin(t)j
and observe that it is always equal to 1 no matter the value of t
oh waiwiaiwiwaiwi
and when u graph cos and sin
fucking with t
it describes all the points of a circle
i think
hey need help with this
A,B matrices nxn
need to prove that if A^2 = AB and B^2= I+BA then A=0
what have you tried?
no clue where to begin with this honestly
i know i cant just say B=A because it isnt given that they are invertible
i dont see anything useful i can do with the given
i feel like it should be something i prove by contradiction
where i assume A is not 0
but as far as i know that gives me no info about B
Can someone explain how to go from the second to the third step when calculating implicit derivatives?
they differentiated again
Yes but i dont understand where the last term comes from
When i calculate it i get 2 + 2y'² = 0
product rule
Aaaaah thanks!
A^3=ABA=A(B^2-I)=AB^2-A
and with some manipulation from here you can end up with A^3=A^3-A@manic glade
recon
the answer sheet:
recon
anyone know why?
^{-1}
use the diagram to help you calculate a and b
sick, thanks
hihi!! could i please get help for question 10 a? im having a bit of trouble getting the answer please ping!!
@civic radish , what exactly is the problem here? Just switch y and x, and then solve for y.
do you mind looking at my working out?
Not at all, just post it.
,w solve x = 3y - 10 for y
ooooooooooo
Well, assuming x = 3y - 10 is a correct step, you're right.
No problem.
hello how would one go about solving such DE
PBj4FPxrZF7ovZ
i assume you have to do a sub like this
PBj4FPxrZF7ovZ
but i'm lost after that
i dunno where to proceed from there it gets messy or i'm not seeing smth
nvm in retarded, this made everything clear
Inheritanc-e ♦
How u do this?
$=\frac{x^2}{x-y}-\frac{y^2}{x-y}$
Wheeler
take an LCM lol
$=\frac{x^2-y^2}{x-y}$
Wheeler
=x+y
PBj4FPxrZF7ovZ
5pi/12 = pi/12 + 4pi/12
that won’t help cuz i. dont have pi/12
yes you do...?
4pi/12 = pi/3
moshill1
The sketch below shows triangle ABC and triangle DEF. The two triangles are equal.
The length ratio between the two triangles is 1: 3.
How big is the area of triangle DEF if the area of triangle ABC is 10?
you can always do
?
A^2
I'm confused what you mean
10^2 = 100
@lapis harness right?
and volume 10^3
nvm im blind
???
if you reorder 2nd eq.
PBj4FPxrZF7ovZ
idk what you're trying to say, lol
I need to find cos(x-y), i already have cosx. but i'm having trouble plugging in cosy into cos(x-y), as i don't know if the negative in cos(x-y) will cancel out the negative of cosy= -4/5
@night sinew Just use the formula cos(x-y) = cos(x)cos(y) + sin(x)sin(y)
you have sin(x) = -1/4, but think of it as sin(x) = 1/4, make a right angled triangle, find the missing side and from there, you can find cos(x)
yeah that's what i'm supposed to do and what i'm doing BUT
for cos(x-y), if i plug in cosy = -4/5
will the -y turn into a positive?
since -(-4/5)
Don't think of it that way
you have sin(x) = -1/4, can you find cos(x)?
and you have cos(y) = -4/5, can you find sin(y)?
already got em. cos(x) and sin(y)
cosx is square root 15 / 4
sin(y) is 3/5
yes, since its in quadrant III-
sin and cos are negative.
yes
ok now just plug them in cos(x-y) = cos(x)cos(y) + sin(x)sin(y)
we get cos(x-y) = -sqrt(15)/4 + (-1/4)(-3/5)
and simplify now
yes
we are done
ok
i wasnt done lol but go ahead
no its good, go ahead
thanks
AG = d, <HED = beta, <A = 2alpha, ABCD is a deltoid, CO = m, and <C = 90.
I need to find the area of triangle AFH in terms of alpha, beta and d.
(That's only part 1 of the question, and in part 2 I need to use m aswell so I think m isn't related to part 1)
do ask if u have any more questions
btw my question is in trig
@tawny condor i think try #geometry-and-trigonometry
but thats not for questions
why not?
Idk
it is
this is more of a questions place
this isn't restricted to any field
asking here is fine
i think he meant you to try in that channel, so that you have a higher chance of getting the question answered since its more related to the topic
wouldnt -4/5 , -1/4 and -3/5 all turn positive?
yes
alr
you get sqrt(15)/4 * (4/5) + (1/4)(3/5)
alright, i got -sqrt(15)/20
but can i ask about this?
is it STILL ok to do it like how I said it?
for cos(x-y), if i plug in cosy = -4/5
will the -y turn into a positive?
since -(-4/5)
what is it called when it's not flat
positive and negative
curvature
sorry
i interrupted
no its ok
what's the problem, maybe i can help
the whole problem is already answered but it's just one thing that's bothering me
alright
i normally just try to convert it to a form that makes it clear
but you could also follow certain rules by looking at coefficients
you can find more here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conic_section
In mathematics, a conic section (or simply conic) is a curve obtained as the intersection of the surface of a cone with a plane. The three types of conic section are the hyperbola, the parabola, and the ellipse; the circle is a special case of the ellipse, though historically it was sometimes called a fourth type. The ancient Greek mathematician...
Ok so I stumbled on a something and I wanted help understanding it.
I have a rule to generate a triangle of numbers. The first few rows look like this:
1
1, 1
1, 3, 1
1, 7, 6, 1
1, 15, 25, 10, 1
If k_n is the nth number of the kth row, the the rule is (k+1)_n = n*k_n + k_(n-1) and (k+1)_(k+1) = 1. In other words, you generate the next list by multiplying each element of the current list by its position in the current list, then adding the previous element in the list. Finally, you append an extra 1 to the end of the list.
It seems like adding up the numbers in the rows of this triangle gets you the Bell numbers (albeit missing B_0). I really don't know anything about this area of maths, so could anyone explain why partitions would come up here, or what property of the Bell numbers makes this happen?
$(k+1)n = n*k_n + k{n-1}$
Katharine
$(k+1)_{n+1} = 1$
Katharine
i have a feeling that this notation is going to get very bad very quickly
Q and R dont have the same cardinality.
But how would I come to that conclusion?
I'd have to try every single function Q to R and R to Q in math and check that none is bijective?
I think the standard way would be to show that Q is countable by writing it in that big matrix, then show that R is uncountable using diagonalization. That should imply that they have different cardinality, right?
Quick question, how would I go about following this? I would really like some help on the steps involved
At first, I would convert the units such that they fit.
Because "mi^2" means square miles, I presume, and km^2 square kilometres.
Yes, km^2 is square kilometers
Once you have converted, you multiply density by area.
Guys is dy/dx a fraction?
Jaytron, don't start a war.
While technically you can treat it as one, it isn't a fraction.
So I convert them all into the same unit first, right?
Yes.
But how not, dy is supposed to equal the infinitely small difference in terms of the function
and dx is supposed to equal the infinitely small difference in terms of simple units or time [physics]
So to find the average rate of change
you divide the two
But since we can't do that
we put dy/dx
that's how I think of it
Yes, and dy/dx can be seen as the very small change in y divided by an incredibly small change in x
so how wouldn't that be a fraction..?
Not saying it's a third grade regular fraction
but it has to be some type of special case fraction
because infinity.
what math is this
Calculus
Okay so, so I convert and multiply the density by the area with both County A & B?
Yes, @ebon quest .
And from there, that’s it? Correct? I’m just making sure bc it seems easier than I thought lol
Jaytron, your idea is an intuitive handwavy way to develop this stuff and intuition doesn’t really belong here
@ebon quest , yes, that's all.
Cool! Thanks!
Then where?
Intuitive ideas about infinity and infinitely small thing can create absurd results
Well like always, I blame the ones who came up with the idea to place dy and dx as a fraction
Those people were quite helpful in the development of calculus actually
They are but that idea confuses me, I'll put some more research into it and ty
Because it happens to be the case that if you treat them as fractions, you usually won’t run into problems
Then lemme ask you this
But that requires proof
What makes something a fraction?
Differential forms are what you are interested in if you want to research this
Ohh alright
Ty
Well you’ll probably have to specify “a fraction of real numbers”
But it’s probably clear what is
An “infinitely small change in a variable” is not a real number so dy/dx is not a fraction of real numbers that we can automatically assume follows all the usual algebra rules for the real numbers
Is that the correct antiderivative of that expression=
?
can anyone help me with this one, i cant think >.<
if two typists type two pages in two minutes, that means a typist types one page a minute
wait what's your actual answer tho?
mine is 3, friend is 6
yours is right
my logic is that
2 typists = 2 pages / min
so 1 typist = 1 page / min
so 1 typist + 1min = 1 page
so 6 min + 1 typist = 6 pages
so 3 typists
yes that's exactly right
looks like s/he somehow got 1 typist types half a page in a minute
6 typists for 6 minutes would make 36 pages yes
wait a second
i think i read it wrong too
lmao
your friend is right lol
you simplify the first part to "one typist can type one page in two minutes"
@random latch
haha yeah i got confused too, nw
Hey guys, I don’t really understand how I’m supposed to do 22 and 23, since they seem to have the same logic
For 22, I’m able to solve the 1st part and I’m not able to solve the second part. For 23 I can’t solve both parts
how did you do 22 part 1?
$x^2-\frac{1}{x^2}$ is difference of squares if you did i
moshill1
what is 420x69
Yo nvm nvm, I found part 2 by finding part 1
It’s just the 23 one
looks like the opposite of 22
what is 420x69
But I put the expression to the power of two, subtracted 2 from both sides. And got the part two answer using that.
Fuck You.
https://i.imgur.com/icuWXOf.png how do i find the second t value? you use the y=5sin2t and make it equal to 4.2
so therefore 2t=arcsin4.2/5 but how do you get the 2nd t value
nvm worked it out
can someone expand how this expands
read it as (a+b)c=ac+bc
Quick question: Does the trace of a linear transformation (from R^n to R^n) represent anything specific to the transformation itself?
The determinant represents the proportionality of the areas (I think) from the input space to the output space. I'm looking to see if the trace characterizes something about the transform itself rather than just being the sum of the eigenvalues
it doesn't have a geometric interpretation as common and important as a determinant
but there are some ways to interpret it
Cool, thanks!
I have been stuck at this problem for a while
I just dont understand how sum of infinite gp and be the common ratio itself
I think the question wants to say this : let a be a real number and suppose there exists two different real numbers r1,r2 such that the infinite series a + ar1 + ar1² + ... sums to r1 and the infinite series a+ar2+ar2²+... sums to r2. Then determine r1+r2 in terms of a
Its numerical
The ans is 1 somehow
ah yeah
$+\infty$
moshill1

yeah the question is very 
to write "+ infinity" like that ? yeah idk what was in the writer's head when they did that
XD
$\frac{a}{1-r_1}=r_1 \ \frac{a}{1-r_2}=r_2$
assuming i have the formula right, might be a minus?
moshill1
$r_1+r_2=a\left(\frac{1}{1-r_1}+\frac{1}{1-r_2}\right)$
moshill1
$a = (1-r_1)r_1 \ , a = (1-r_2)r_2$
O ne amk
Ken G
Ooo
Got it
Tnx everyone
hiiii
i feel dumb rn but is anybody good with probabilities? i have some homework questions and idk how to do em
the two i need help with are
“Find the probability of rolling two dice and getting a sum of at least 10.”
“Find the probability of flipping a coin 9 times and getting at most 3 heads, rounded to the nearest percent.”
There are 36 ways to rolls two dice, each way with equal probability
How many of them result in a sum of at least 10?
A={(5,5), (6,4),(4,6), (6,5),(5,6),(6,6)}
Dunno if 1 (5,5) or 2
Either way it's 4/36 or 3/36
Just 1, and you’re missing a case
At least 10 so it can be bigger than 10
How about (6,6)
It's easiest to make an addition table
Ummm
thank you guys i got em down!!! also @alpine sable i love your pfp
I was asking Ezra the question
also i have one more question but it’s discrete math
Not asking for help with it
And lol thanks
Do u understand how I got the answer?
i think so yeah, i found a similar answer online using different numbers and that broke it down too
Okie
this ones weird i should’ve paid attention in class i don’t think it’s something ppl typically learn idk
#36
also @alpine sable i love ur pfp
You can look up NNA if you have not seen it and easily determine that the answer is b
And thanks (again) lol
oh wait did i already say it 💀💀 this math is literally frying my brain
Yes
LMAO
oops
i’ve been doing homework all day i think i should take a break
alright well that’s all i needed thanks guys :))
<@&286206848099549185>
i keep getting 17b as 1
but apparently it's 23 according to the markscheme
wait 15 minutes, read the rules
oh sorry
whats the problem
nvm i misread the question
if a series is absolutely convergent, can it have all negative terms?"
or are all the terms positive?
Matejp1
ok so another question
when doing the limit comparison test
can both a_n and b_n be negative?
or does it work when both of them are positive?
this...idk what im doing wrong
i must use substitution to solve this integral
i think you just have to plug t=1-x in the end
and dont forget the +C coz its indefinite
yes i know
you said t = 1 - x
see we solve it like this
after solving it, you have to sub it back in
its not working this time idk why
i know
but my problem is in the answer i shouldnt get the -
when integrating the answers can differ by a constant
your answer is correct
you can check by opening up the brackets and integrating each term and youll still get a negative answer
try to differentiate your answer and the formal solution
and see which one is correct
wait
normally the test is stated as requiring all terms of a_n to be non-negative and all terms of b_n to be positive
but...
if they are both negative, you can essentially still use the test
thank you!
dw it happens to the best of us
the only trouble will be if either of the series have some negative and some positive terms
i know that a_n is absolutely convergent and that b_n is a multiple of a_n
and they are both the same sign
a series $\sum_{n=1}^\infty a_n$ converges if and only if -$\sum_{n=1}^\infty a_n$ converges
Botnuke
if $a_n \geq 0$ and $b_n > 0$, and $\lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{a_n}{b_n} = L < \infty \neq 0$, then both of the series either converge or diverge
TheGoner
we only did root, ratio, integral and raabes test
does this limit comparison test allow us to show convergence in cases when the other 4 tests fail?
or is it weaker?
if you're getting an extra constant thats absolutely fine. That's why there is +C, because they can differ by a constant.
it can work if those won't be helpful
oh-
LCT is usually done on polynomial limits
oh thanks i'll look into it a bit more
limit comparison test might not be a good idea
what's the problem?
wait, couldn't you then just factor the number it's multiplied by out?
and if a_n is convergent, so is b_n
∑a_n being absolutely convergent does not mean a_n ≥ 0 for all n
$a_n \neq 0, \forall n \geq 1$, and $b_n = c * a_n$, where $c > 0$, prove that $b_n$ is absolutely convergent
i'm not an expert but i'd try to prove that by definition
the sum starts from n = 1 to infinity
TheGoner
do you also know ∑a_n is absolutely convergent?
yes
I also agree with proving this from the definition
it follows readily from limit and sum properties
ugh my latex skills
yes limit of partial sums of a_n exists iff limit of partial sums of b_n exists
@oak chasm , if I may ask again, is there a fancy Mathematica way to get the Fibonacci numbers smaller than 4 000 000?
Or is looping and checking if they are less than 4 000 000 the only way?
@manic quail Something like ```
TakeWhile[Map[Fibonacci, Range[1, 4000000 + 1]], # < 4000000 &]
I just did it the classic way for now, thanks though.
No problem.
pretty confused on where to start
$$
1800 \cdot 1.02^n = 1800 \cdot 2\newline
\Leftrightarrow 1.02^n = 2\newline
= e^{\ln (1.02^n)} = e^{n\cdot\ln (1.02)} = e^{\ln (2)}\
\Leftrightarrow n\cdot \ln (1.02) = \ln(2)\newline
\Leftrightarrow n = \frac{\ln(2)}{\ln(1.02)} = 35.00278879...
$$
𝔸𝕟𝕕𝕣𝕖𝕒𝕤
$a\b$
(R / I) / (J / I)ttgenstein
double backslash
𝔸𝕟𝕕𝕣𝕖𝕒𝕤
Did you use a double backslash? \\
Are you trying to write $\begin{bmatrix}a\b\end{bmatrix}$?
(R / I) / (J / I)ttgenstein
I'm on this one now sorry
$$
1800 \cdot 1.02^n = 1800 \cdot 2\
\Leftrightarrow 1.02^n = 2\
= e^{\ln (1.02^n)} = e^{n\cdot\ln (1.02)} = e^{\ln (2)}
\Leftrightarrow n\cdot \ln (1.02) = \ln(2)\
\Leftrightarrow n = \frac{\ln(2)}{\ln(1.02)} = 35.00278879...
$$
(R / I) / (J / I)ttgenstein
Discord renders only one backslash because backslashes are used in the chat window as command syntax themselves
or was it forward slashes
anyway yeah it's an issue with Discord
$1+1\=2\=3-1$
(R / I) / (J / I)ttgenstein
Dammit
$
1800 \cdot 1.02^n = 1800 \cdot 2\
\Leftrightarrow 1.02^n = 2\
= e^{\ln (1.02^n)} = e^{n\cdot\ln (1.02)} = e^{\ln (2)}\
\Leftrightarrow n\cdot \ln (1.02) = \ln(2)\
\Leftrightarrow n = \frac{\ln(2)}{\ln(1.02)} = 35.00278879...
$
That doesn't even render 
lmao
Well if you wanna mess around with the LaTeX typesetter, feel free to do that in #bots
𝔸𝕟𝕕𝕣𝕖𝕒𝕤
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
Thales theorem?
Why not?
And also with a triangle
Your radius is 4
Form a new triangle
Like this
Let me draw it
ok
With hypothenuse length 4 and one side length 2
Find the height
And then find x with pythagoren theorem
ok I see, thank you!
No problem
ok so my college uses http://mymathlab.com for homework
This is a screenshot from there
I also use symbolab.com to check my results sometimes
This is the symbolab result at the bottom
Is www.symbolab.com making mistakes or the homework website? 
You missed a factor of 2
OHHH waitt
🙂
I am dumb
XDD
Thanks
Np we all have those moments
Can someone tell me what this is?
Like what is that in calculus when two constants are on the top and bottom side of the right side of a variable?
one is an exponent one is a subscript?
y_1 is just a variable name
just like y is a variable name
or x
or x_5
Oh
So what does that example mean?
.
Botnuke
Yeah
oh, so it's not an exponent here, actually
y_1 is the variable name though
y'(x) is the first derivative of y(x)
or, $y'(x) = \frac{dy}{dx}$
Ah
Botnuke
and $y''(x)$ is the second derivative
Botnuke
well that's just a naming convention they are using
they named the function $y_1$ rather than $y$
Botnuke
maybe they will introduce another function named $y_2$ later
Botnuke
and maybe y_3 and y_4
OHHHHHH
OMG
Tysm!!!!!
I actually understand what they're doing
Is this the calculus help group?
these question channels don't have any particular guidelines
math content guidelines I mean
@silent vapor do you think this is true?
how can you check if a function is equal to its maclaurin series?
Hello, I have a problem I need to solve for a software Im working on that only allows sum, substraction, multiplication and division
How can I get the absolute value ?
actual problem is, I need the sign of X, meaning I need +1 or -1 depending on the sign of X
I can do this if I had abs, I would do: x/abs(x)
but I dont have that operation
just use an if statement that returns -1 or 1 depending if x is less than 0 or not
no, I dont have conditionals
it only allows sum, substraction, multiplication and division
thats what the software can parse
$\frac{x}{\frac{x^2}{x}}$
TheGoner
hmmm, let me process that
wait
nvm
that doesnt work
are you able to take powers?
or just those 4 operations?
you can type xx for x^2
yeah
yeah doesnt work, that will always be +1
im stumped on this problem
The end of each blade of a ceiling fan is two feet from the center of the fan and makes three full rotations per second. Given that there are 5280 feet in a mile, what is the speed, in miles per hour, of the end of one of the blades? Express your answer as a decimal to the nearest tenth.
Is the problem calculating the velocity, or the unit conversion?
idrk cause im doing this cause my sister doesnt know im in 9th grade and my sister is in 6th but she has this elective where it gives her homework on algebra 2 and stuff
i think its calculatin the velocity
calculating*
idek the formula i havent even learned this yet im learning algebra this algebra 2
speed = distance/time
oki
althought since it says rotations, I think u have to use a diff formula
???
anyone here???
ig not
@dapper umbra is the topic of this problem linear speed and angular velocity
anyone
Speed is distance/time
If the fan makes 3 rotations each second, the distance it covers in that time is 3 times the circumference of the circular path it's following.
We are given that this circular path has radius 2 feet, so the circumference of the path is 2*pi*r = 4pi feet. 3 times that gives us 12 feet per second. The rest of the question is a matter of converting to miles per hour.
ok
@wispy elm sorry for wasting ur time i wouldnt have helped my sister but she made me a offer where she gave me all her money
so i have learned this yet cause im in 9th grade so im learning algebra
Everything you do on discord is a waste of time in a way, so it's no issue.
true i spend approx 10 hours on dc so
,iam talks
Gave you the Talks selfrole.
Can someone pls help with 20
I’m not getting 4
I let the roots be alpha alpha and beta
Pls help
think I got it
we have $\alpha^2\beta = 18$, and a substitution into $\alpha^2+2\alpha\beta = -3$ leads to $\alpha^3+3\alpha+36=0$. Then $\alpha = -3$ by some machinery which may not be allowed. Back to $\alpha^2\beta = 18$, we then have $\beta = 2$. And finally $2\alpha + \beta = -m$ implies $m=4$
Botnuke
Um I got what u got but idk how to work out alpha lol
this is probably not what the book intended
but hmmm I don't see a way to get around it
My first thought process is the rational root theorem where a_0 = -18 and a_n = 1. Thus, the rational roots must be in +/- {1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 18}
Yeah...pain
I guess as soon as you got -3 you could role with it and assume there is only one m based on how the problem is written
but to show m = 4 is the only solution you'd have to do all 12 divisions lol
actually you don't need to do divisions
Somewhat true. You don't have to test all 12 divisions, but you do have to test all 12 numbers to see how the polynomial would equal 0.
yea
Big brain mode
Yh I don’t get it lol
have you heard of rational root theorem before?
Yes but how is that suppose to help in this situation
actually I don't think that will work because we don't know m yet
we have to do rational root theorem on $\alpha^3+3\alpha+36=0$
Botnuke
Oh yh to do long division?
no scratch that idea
the only possibilities for α are divisors of 36
-3
yes
So m is 4
you could go through all the rest of them if you wanted to show m = 4 is the only possibility
no, computer algebra can give you all 3 roots of $\alpha^3+3\alpha+36=0$, and $\alpha = -3$ is the only rational one
Botnuke
but to do it by hand, yes, exhaustion by rational root theorem is probably your best bet
cubics are not very nice things
yepp thank you😊
Ohh
that's how I would do it lol
Sorry could I ask u another similar question
sure
I approached it like this
So if two roots is 0 then I let alpha be the other root
meaning alpha + 0 = 1/3?
yes
then how to do I work out the other roots?
factor out $x-\frac{1}{3}$
Botnuke
then you'll have a quadratic which is easier
hmm yea you probably can
How would I do that lolol
name the roots $\alpha$, $\beta$, and $\gamma$ and suppose $\alpha = -\beta$
Botnuke
we know $\gamma = \frac{1}{3}$
Botnuke
wait how is alpha equal to -beta
we also have... $-\beta^2 - \frac{1}{3}\beta + \frac{1}{3}\beta = -\frac{1}{3}$?
Botnuke
Um
from $\alpha\beta+\alpha\gamma+\beta\gamma=\frac{c}{a}$
How did u get that sorry
Botnuke
check it though, I'm not being very careful
How did u get beta squared
α = -β
so if that's right we have $\beta = \frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}$, which implies $\alpha = -\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}$
Botnuke
and then we are done
So ur saying the other root is?
these are the other 2 roots if my other relation is correct
The roots in the answer is 1/3, plus or minus 1/2
This is confusing lol
oh haha it's because 3/12 is 1/4, not 1/3
so what we really have is $-\beta^2 - \frac{1}{3}\beta + \frac{1}{3}\beta = -\frac{1}{4}$
Botnuke
which implies $\beta = \sqrt{\frac{1}{4}}=\frac{1}{2}$
Botnuke
and so $\alpha = -\frac{1}{2}$
Botnuke
do I need to explain it again?
no problem
If the channel is open, I would like help with the following:
Need help with the following problem: Find the laplace transform of the function f(t) = (2-t)(h(t-2)-h(t-6)) ? I have tried simplifying the second quantity, which then gives me (2-t)(4h), then I distributed that, and used e^(-st) with each piece when doing the integration portion. I get something like -8h-4ht as my final answer, however this is not correct. Where am I going wrong? Also, "s" is assumed as non-zero
<@&286206848099549185> Please see the preceding and help if able. If my question is not clear please let me know
if 5 of X is £2
how much would 2000 of X be?
that doesnt sound right
,calc 2000(2/5)
Result:
800
If i have the volume x and want to distribute it to a volume of ratio 1:1:6
how do i calculate the w x l x h in terms of x
prove for any 3d convex polyhedron that any vertex has a minimum of 3 edges
nitro + nitro?
helppppp
im unsure how to answer this question, could anyone help?
@alpine sable is there a particular one among these 18 subproblems which confuses you?
or are you just confused n general
DeadPhysicist
bad tex
Beginner
$\sin(93^\circ) = \sin(90^\circ + 3^\circ) = \cos(3^\circ)$
How do we put the degrees?
Ann
Ou
Perhaps they're away
posting a question in #help-0 and then disappearing is a surefire way to get it buried
dnd still makes ping icons show up does it not
I dont understand how to answer a
in all of these problems you'll need to make use of symmetries of the trig functions
if you want i can write out all the relevant ones in a list
How do I solve for theta when $\tan ^2 \theta = \frac{1}{3}$
Jeed_for
Take the square root of both sides and then the inverse tangent
I only know how to do it if it were an angle I knew like sin^2(2theta) = 1
ohhhhhhh
I completely forgot about inverse functions
So $\tan{\theta} = \frac{\sqrt{3}}{3}$
visual of Petter's ascendance
wait but these questions are technology free
hi i have problem in rational numbers
I am not able to do rational numbers
Well you cant do an inverse tangent by hand can you? We aren't allowed to use calculators for these questions
I dont really know how the inverse functions work, the only time we ever did it was with basic trig a couple years ago
$tan(\theta) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}$
Well
Inverse functions are kind weird
±sqrt(3)/3.
DeadPhysicist
U could solve it more mathematically by remembering that tan theta = sin theta / cos theta
unless you want to miss a whole swath of solutions you will need to solve both $\tan(\theta) = 1/\sqrt{3}$ and $\tan(\theta) = -1/\sqrt{3}$
Ann
also, "more mathematically"? there is absolutely nothing "not mathematical" about going from tan^2(θ) = 1/3 to tan(θ) = ±1/sqrt(3).
Yeah idk why I said that
Cause im not sure if we are meant to use inverse fuctions, the other questions are pretty simple, like $\sin ^2 2 \theta = 1$ where I just knew $2x^2$ had to equal 90 and solved it algebraically
For theta being an acute angle, we can take the positive value if I'm not mistaken
What I meant was avoiding using a calculator to find inverse tangent of plus minus 1/sqrt 3
Jeed_for
2x^2?
why are you squaring theta?
im saying that was how I worked out previous questions which didn't require inverse functions
the question for that example was $\sin ^2 2 \theta = 1$
Jeed_for
you're claiming that $\sin^2(2\theta) = 1$ can somehow be transformed into $2\theta^2 = \frac{\pi}{4}$, which as-is sounds like complete bogus to me
Ann
pi/2*
I'm interested to see how it could...
even replacing the pi/4 with pi/2 won't change the bogus-ness of this transformation
why on earth is THETA getting SQUARED all of a sudden???
Bc squares are fun
I think you've misunderstood what I was saying, sin^2(2theta) = 1, 2theta^2 must equal pi/2
as sine(pi/2) is 1
why 2θ**^2**????
why are you squaring theta!!!
i can see it loud and clear, you're saying $2\theta^2 = \frac{\pi}{2}$!
because the original question squares the answer to sine(2theta)
Ann
this would make $\theta = \pm\frac{\sqrt{\pi}}{2}$
Ann
which is the answer I got
I think the confusion is that the whole function is being squared not specifically theta
im solving for theta
Result:
0.95988249738426
not 1.
how would we do it then
well you could turn $\sin^2(2\theta) = 1$ into $\sin(2\theta) = \pm 1$
Ann
? how
the same way you would turn $z^2 = 49$ into $z = \pm 7$?
Ann
ohh ofc, right
by taking the square root of both sides
±π/4 are just two out of an infinite family of solutions
yeah it says $\theta \epsilon [0, 2\pi]$ so I guess thats right
Jeed_for
$\theta \in [0,2\pi]$
Ann
there are other solutions in [0, 2pi] though
and -pi/4 isn't even there
if you want to restrict yourself to [0,2pi] there are four solutions:
pi/4, 3pi/4, 5pi/4, 7pi/4
May I know your current qualifications? @vale wigeon
It's fine if you don't wish to share, just curious
is that what you wanted
Oh yes I'm pretty sure that's what I wished to know
Thanks
Posting here as someone kind of decided not to abide by the rules and post right next to my question -
DeadPhysicist
i have a feeling you've overcomplicated this somewhat
Oh maybe, any other approach?
especially this part
Well, I posted my question, i.e. this question, in #help-1 but someone decided to post another question before anyone responded so I posted it here, hope that's fine
Perhaps
Oh so did you figure out anything?
im trying to mess around with it but as of now i haven't arrived at anything different from you
Oh alright, I thought of trying more numbers through trial and error but that'd be more or less of a waste of effort I think
it's weird
i really don't feel like wading through a forest of algebra
it feels as if a really clever solution is just around the corner but i can't grasp it
True, it's kind of tricky, I think there might've been a different approach but my approach does not seem wrong either
Being stuck at this for like a month by now
a month? jeez
Asked 4 teachers in total including a professor but well, no luck
oh
I'll be offline, if you don't mind, dm me if you figure out anything anytime, even if it's like a week or more later @vale wigeon
36 * 36 * 36 *36 * 36 *36 *36 *10 *8
my thinking is that there 7 slots in which there are 36 possibilities (26 letters + 10 digits), the remaining slot has to be a digit (10), but we also have to multiply by 8 because the digit slot can be anywhere of the 8 characters.
I could be wrong, but its my honest attempt.
my classmates lives off redbull and cigarettes. Schools messes people up.
best of luck.
You might have missed the condition where the first character needs to be a letter
I did forget about that
26 * 36 * 36 *36 * 36 *36 *36 *10 *7
Does this sound right?
Not sure, but for an answer I got 26*36^7 - 26^8
Which is: the number of passwords satisfying the first 3 conditions minus the number of passwords which are all letters
looks reasonable

can someone teach me how to solve euqiaotns using matrices
Can you give an example
take a photo?
it just says use the matrix algorithm to solve:
2x + 1y = 5
3x + 2y = 8
so the area of MBC is 8cm2 and I need to find the rest, how do I calculate it?
i thought that considering the fact that M is the midpoint, that means that AD and BC are the same lenght as AM
So if i Multiply AM by 2 I could find the AB therefore letting me calculate the entire area
but i dont know the lenght of AD neither BC
Can you show the whole question?