#battlefield-labs-discussion
1 messages · Page 87 of 1
4-6pm

đ€Ș
Are they still doing the 2042 class system without weapon lock
I don't see any specialists so ...
No they doing the bf 3/4 class system without wep lock
Actually also not entirely true
Without weapon lock, aight bet not worth looking into 6 yet
because invincible medic snipers /s
guys... don't tell them about the universal class weapons in 3 and 4...
Like I wouldn't know about that jfc lmao
so what's exactly the difference between that and unlocked weapons
Radio spawn beacons with assault rifles.
Medics with belt fed lmg's
Medics with sniper rifles
Support at the edge of the map with mortar, supply crate, aps and a sniper rifle going to be peak gameplay /s
BC2... medics with LMGs
recons in BF4 had carbines
LMGs are the signature weapon for support AKA medic in 6
not a big deal, they would contribute nothing to the team anyways
Crazy that you do not see the problem with "hurr durr you can use anything but a recon can hold his breath 10% longer than the rest haha!"
it's really not that big of a deal, the lines were blurred by univeral weapons in 3 and 4
it's not a problem in 2042
2042 is a problem
not because of the weapon system
It's a major contributing factor
not at all
You take away the essence of the original games
no it's not, the game plays fine and like most BF games do
bad maps and a sterile atmosphere kill the vibe
Wrong on so many levels, but I'll vote with my wallet and remain on 4
More sniper examples!!!
so there's no actual objective analysis here? just vibes based arguments
the average battlefield player really is a dimwit
it's always the BF4 dads with heaps of the 'tism that complain about class locked weapons and can never make an actual argument
like we get it, it's the only BF you have really played but then try to tell everyone what is and isn't BF
The examples are always completely hypothetical because the things they say aren't issues in the game where its already possible
Good on ya mate, played every single one (except hardline) up until 2042.
Every single one had class based weapons locks.
cool, it's 2025, not 2013 things change and evolve
Exactly, go compare the precious titles to your current piece of hot garbage
want me to make the argument that being able to pick any weapon "isn't BF" because 1942 every class was locked to 1 primary
Go ahead, being purposely obtuse is all you can manage
nope, using you're own logic
Your*
And no
because something existed before this, that is what makes it "Battlefield"
no changes, ever
It's fine that you don't get it.
No I get it, continue being like the rest of BF4 'tists
Objectively speaking 2042s none class locked guns was the least of what made the game garbage
you're is right
it's not
oh missed the using đ
everything from 2042 is actually bad
that game had NO good ideas
I wonder when washed up older millenials will understand video games aren't designed around their decade old+ taste anymore
Lol
(Your is posessive, you're is you are)
Some reasons why no class locked guns might be good.
- More Player Freedom
Letting players equip any gun with any class gives them full control over their loadouts.
It caters to different playstyles â e.g., a Recon player who prefers SMGs over sniper rifles can still fulfill the spotting role without being forced into long-range combat.
â 2. Supports More Flexible Gameplay
Not being locked to class-specific weapons allows players to adapt to different situations.
Example: If your team lacks close-quarters presence but youâre playing Engineer, you could still run a shotgun or SMG to help push objectives.
This is especially useful in large-scale modes like Conquest where the battlefield constantly changes.
â 3. Reduces Frustration
Some players find it frustrating to be locked into a gun they donât enjoy just because of their class.
Removing class locks removes that friction, making the game more enjoyable for casual players.
â 4. Encourages Experimentation
Players can experiment with combinations that wouldnât be possible under class locks.
Example: Using a long-range DMR with a Support role, or pairing high-skill weapons with underused gadgets.
This can lead to creative, fun, or even niche playstyles.
â 6. Doesn't Necessarily Kill Team Play
Even without class-locked guns, gadgets and abilities can still maintain role identity.
A medic is still a medic if theyâre reviving and healing â regardless of whether they use an SMG or an AR.
Teamwork isnât just about guns â itâs about objectives, communication, and gadgets.
ironically 2042's scoreboard turned out to be the best
Your gay (meaning you are being possessed by gay)
Jk 
imo, 2042 battlepass wasn't bad. Missions to level it up where way better than the BFV weekly assignments
I like how the progression was transparent
cosmetic shop was good (except Sundance/Mckay getting like 80% of the skins)
Nice opinion did chatgpt give it to you 
Not chatgpt
I like the class gadgets
I typed that up, its a copy and paste I did awhile ago.
... That's not even correct
They'd possess a gay
crazy in the older games you can just around with no gadgets đ
some of the specialist gadgets were good additions to the game
blasco etc
ScheiĂe
I'm surprised we're not getting something similar in 6
Also its not black and white.
There are pro and cons to no class locked guns
i'm pretty sure there is a jammer, at least one was datamined I think
Just as the same as class locked
In my opinion I dont care if there is class locked or not. Both have pros and cons
All your points are invalid.
1.Recons weren't range locked due to being able to use the universal weapons like carbines or shotguns
-
Again engineers could use cqb weapons like shotguns
-
Literally nobody complained about that.
-
You could already use a dmr as support.
????
Ok then what do you complain about
So you're saying open weapons don't cause problems?
Battlefield 4s class locked was so tiny
Every class has carbines lmao.
Considering how battlefield 4 all classes had carbines not really.
Zeethos has trouble grasping this but having certain weapon types locked to a class has always been part of the battlefield identity
And objectively speaking carbines and Assualt rifles are better for general use then LMG, DMR, Snipers, and pdws
replying to Orca, because he's determined to argue against his own point
Oh, im tweaking.
Give a recon an ak5c, no problem.
Give that same recon an aek, different animal
and how "class locked" weapons is just hurr durr vibes based because the thought of a medic using a sniper ruins their immersion or some shit
Ok but battlefield 4 had a minimal one and yet you dont complain.
Having no class locked isnt much of a difference
đ
even though in their favorite game the medic could just use a DMR
Aek isnt much different from ak5c.
Holy shit lmao
Aek has high rpm, lower stablity and accuracyđđđ
That ends the entire argument right here. You have not played 3 or 4
Its a glorified carbine really. Faster firing gun for closer encountersđ
Yes I have
Pressing X
I mean a recon can't self sustain as hard as an assault so whatever
Goodbye lmao this is as always, useless
You realize carbines are just ars but mostly every stat is just a little lower right?
also the AEK sucks outside of cqc
defeated male leaves the chat
Recon with an smg tugs, c4 and sensor balls is an absolute menace in cqb
By his logic it wouldn't be worth it to use any other class just because the aek is so OP
Head held high, wouldn't worry about some kids
Woah, almost as if that problem is present in a lot of the games!!
Majority choosing assualt for objectively the best guns in the game!!!!
unc in the chat đ đ„
Differing beleifs/opinionsâ kids
The fact you are labeling us as such just over different game opinions is wild work.
17 year old spotted
Bros been using discord since 2017, I doubt they are a kid đ
nope
Having totally no restrictions on who can use what wrapons just makes it a bit harder to balance everything and also creates more overlap between classes which can be a good thing but also a bad thing
.
Imo it should go back to HL's style
Class + Faction locked weapons with nearly every class having some sort of an AR-adjacent gun
Idrc too much tho. Class locked guns are far less important than fixing the terrible class balancing and abysmal spotting
When is next pc/uk playtest?
vince zampella'a entire portfolio is call of duty and things that look a lot like contemporary cod games once you scratch off the paint, temper your expectations accordingly
Personally, I donât like The new UI in the new leaks, looks like call of duty with soldiers sitting on boxes and shit and that test range is lame as hell, hopefully thats a place holder cause wtfff happened to open test range with vehicles to practice with and different moving targets etc
the game have gun...look like call of duty .... Yucky ...
it wont happen if people just leak it all the time, so they move the date 
I wonder if DICE is rotating the invitations, so that if you've already received one for playtest, then you won't receive another one (unless you are part of the initial inner circle)
That would certainly be fair of course.
If you already received one you won't receive another.
Nah didnât you know Apex Legends is just CoD
Another BFdad dying in the fields of valor (discord)
i thought they revoke it ?
that was for the Stress Test
mabye change your playtest preferences on the EA page somewhere
There is no way to change if youve already been invited
You can give me that access 
Gotcha Thank you
lol I have a ps5, just wanted to try it on pc đ
Well, i think you wont be able to play it tho 
you wish đ€Ł
Buddy, you broke the NDA and i bet you are that smart, that you use the same Username on the PS as on Discord/Twitch
Xbox version still hasn't been updated yet
Bro, how do these people always get selected 
have u guys get the email?
NDA buddy
im sure you can talk of labs existence, not everyone in here has signed it or agreed either 
This tbh
BF4 class system: đ€ź
BF1-V class system: đ„°
#NoUniversals
Relevance doesn't matter a lot of the time. Apex Legends released mid BR hype and became one of EAs top performing games ever, with a consistent and high player base. It also absolutely took players from other BRs like PUBG and Fortnite. The same way WZ took players from all of these when it released a year later.
BRs were new and exciting when those games came out, now people just roll their eyes when they see a BR announcement even when that BR is actually kinda interesting, happened with Splitgate 2, it's the most interesting BR to come out in years with it's map design and respawn system imo but not sure if it became that successful
People will play a good, free BR.
BF1 and BFV had rigid class locked weapons with no universals, only assault could use assault DMRs, only recon could use recon DMRs which had different damage models, only medic could use SMGs etc.
They will go back to Apex or Warzone whenever those games gets updates though and bring stuff they asked for, people still plays those games due to time and money investment they've made already, kinda like how you can't dethrone WoW or FF14 in MMO space, people already spent their time and money on those games for so long so you can't really convince them to drop their game in favor of new game even if that game is really good
not entirely true
Gauntlet mode could become successful though if they are still doing that imo. There is only one alternative in that game style and that alternative has lost so many of it's players due to inaccessibility. BF can make it more accessible and could add a nice competitive aspect to BF which wasn't done before.
Cuz there were like 4 weapons
There are like 70 weapons in them now
pls share some info about bf6, we are starving
Canât or youâll get a chat time out
It has guns and vehicles đ€Ż
Is it too late to sign up?
Nope, you can still sign up. Participation is not guaranteed though. https://www.ea.com/games/battlefield/battlefield-labs
Alright thank ya kindly
Well, more like "not guaranteed" it's forbidden for South American people. 

Is there any plan to expand bflabs the inner circle one?
We're adding more people at every play test. It's still going to be a closed test for the time being though, as we have a lot of parameters that we're testing, including server stability, that we can't do by just opening it up to the public.
Yall need to drop the nda, mostly everything has been leaked and every single playtest is leaked đ
Now imagine how bad that'd be if there wasn't a NDA.
Yeah it'd be worse but every time there's leaks
Now the data mining even without nda isnt allowed yes. But the gameplay leaks always happen lol
Please add spread to the game, like BF3/4 spread đ
Yep, that's the risk of doing these tests. We are getting good data and feedback, so they're worth it for now.
Remove suppression, remove recoil, add spread đ
I never got bfl since it staredđ
Can't speak for others but I appreciate your efforts. Tks.
What's the thought behind adding BR again after the first time it didn't work out? Genuine question, no snark.
Were there separate tests/polls?
Hello everyone
Please make sure that you're not discussing any unreleased and not announced topics as facts. There have been no announcements made and anything online is just speculation. Thanks.
My bad, I didn't know. Multiple gaming sources are reporting it so I assumed it was out somewhere and official. Sorry!
Because a free BR is a great way to bring people into an fps franchise in this day and age and despite what people in here think, tons of people play them and they print money.
Firestorm was a good BR locked behind a paywall (BFV) when all of its competitors were f2p
Fair, I forgot about the free aspect. Thanks for the perspective!
I signed up for labs last week, do I get an invite? I got an Xbox and lâm testing it at home by the way.
No email invite = no Labs testing
Invites are sent out from a random pool of individuals who expressed interest in Labs testing
When the PUBG went F2P
We're not getting a reveal in June are we. This is so unusual. July would be a weird time to reveal a game. COD had August reveals so maybe we'll get the reveal very late like those.
@severe anvil Xbox version still hasn't been updated yet,what's the matter?
As anything with the Battlfield Labs test, I have no information in the public Discord. đ
Probably asked a million times already but Iâve been able to play the last two playtests on the same invite is that normal ? Ps5 if that matters
Is it true that people selected for the stress test last month arenât eligible for future tests
Correct. If you've not been invited to the full Labs test you did only get to participate in the stress test.
Yâall need to stop overthinking this
Read the fucking email man
And thousands of other testers have gotten the email and havenât had a problem

Only the sharpest of minds selected, as per usual
The playtest is under NDA. Please make sure to read the instructions you received thoroughly. Discussing Labs test on the public Discord is a violation of the NDA you signed.
Another one bites the ban
Was asking about the code mate. Not discussing gameplay or anything am I lol
And Battlefield Lahs is under NDA. So you discussing how you acquire something that has to do with getting in is a violation of the NDA. As is stated in the email you got. You also do not get support on this Discord, as all info is outlined in the onboarding process.
I really wonder if they need to remind themselves to breathe
Whatever man jeez. People leaking vids on YouTube and your going off on me about asking about how the code is distributed haha
We're "going off" on those people too, that's what the NDA is for. đ
You really are asking to be banned from labs lol
You are acting like its a random guy being mean or anything towards you breaking the NDA.
He is part of the EA Community Team and knows what is allowed and what not.
My bet is that we will get news around Gamescom Time
Teaser a few days before it happens and Trailer during Gamescom Opening Night
Sorry for the boring question would having dyslexia limit my chumps of getting an invites
No, everyone has the same chance
@mild girder thanks đ
Please no.
Spread is essential for BF tbh. The fact that I can beam someone from 60+ meters with the PP29 is ridiculous lol. We need better engagement distances again
If there isn't huge initial spread I'm with you. Bursting should be possible for distance.
Yeah just from the leaks alone the test range is similar to call of duty very linear and indoors what happened to open test range? Along with that the main menu UI is horrendous, soldiers sitting on ammo crates like this is Warzone or some shit. Gunplay is still way too laser beamish, there needs to be spread, in bf4 if my automatic fire is constant spread is worse which forces you to burst fire at ranges for better accuracy, they removed these elements and itâs gayyyyyyyyyy
Leading your target due to bullet velocity and bullet drop seems almost gone too
Build better maps. Not these open field simulators with 400m sightlines in every direction
Why are you complaining about the UI when that shit goes through like 100 different iterations in the course of a year
Gulf of Oman, caspian border, operation firestorm and many more maps are beautifully mapped out 2042 map design was pretty horrible for how open and vast it is
Caspian and firestorm fucking suck
Because itâs updated from last playtest so itâs still an option that could be in game Iâm giving feedback on the similarities of it trying to indetify close to cod really simple if you think about it
Whatever you say bro đ
Bf4 map scales were perfection
Hate me for telling the truth, theyâre boring as shit maps with uninteresting gameplay
Literally the dumbest thing Iâve heard in awhile
Youâre not telling the truth thatâs for damn sure you just have shitty ass opinionsđđ
Unless you make every map like Metro or Redacted you can't limit engagement distances without spread
Karkand?
Karkand was a map with lots of sightlines too
Plenty of great maps that have sections of the maps for varying engagement distances
You still need spread to limit engagement distances
And you could easily stay out of those sight lines with alt routes
The devs are cod devs so no wonder why everything looks like cod after bfv
You just seem like you enjoy linear repetitive boring gameplay more than gameplay that can offer different possibilities and play styles
Also damage fall off is a very useful stat
If Karkand was in 2042 you would still have same issues with engagement distances, Noshahr Canals is in 2042 and plays awful
Yeah I understand that which is the most stupidest shit dice has ever done in the existence of battlefield other than saying 2042 was a love letter to fans lol
I have zero expectations for battlefield anymore after BF1 it went downhill
The fact you need devs from your competitors company to help you create the game that made you unique and different from other fps, to help make it more like the competitors fps instead of its past titles is fucking goofy and pathetic and whoever made that decision deserves to have their position revoked đđŻ
đ€š
Wait until you learn that developers switch studios all the time and itâs nothing new
true đ„Č
Best way to limit engagement distances is spread, recoil won't matter since consoles already gets less recoil by default with overpowered RAA so it will only hinder PC players to have high recoil. Spread is equal for everyone regardless of console or PC. You just won't be able to full auto someone from 100 meters.
Oh Iâm aware of that you act like I barley got into gaming doesnât mean you need to try and copy and paste a whole different game into an already unique authentic experience to make it more like the generic fps game there is just no excusing that
BF1 being a dogshit mobile game mechanically with the production quality of a AAA game is the âdownhillâ
yeah the most popular battlefield is dogshit according the minority of people like you
So zeethos if you hate every battlefield what battlefield do you really like? Youâre just a bot bro
next thing you gonna say is Bad company 2 is dogshit too
These folks are trolls and will argue with anyone who doesnât like 2042 or call of duty lol theyâve done it since labs started and are on here ALLLL DAY youâre most likely arguing with jobless individuals or children
BF has never had overpowered AA/RAA and aggressive damage fall off does a better job of keeping engagement distances between weapon type relevant than bullet hose random spread
he hates every popular and most successful battlefield lol,everyone here is children and teenagers
Justin Bieber mustâve been the greatest male vocalist of the late 2000s 
2042's AA is OP, just less OP than contemporaries
Crazy what happens when games have good marketing and work at launch
Exactly, thereâs a few others too on here that team up and will try and shame people itâs pathetic
I only get beamed by console players in 2042, across 100 meters
Straight loser mentality đđđ€Ł
they are the typical unemployed final bosses
When have I ever hated BC2/BF3?
Theyre the minority when it comes to how the next battlefield should be so they team up and try to be the loudest
I didn't say you hated,i said next thing you gonna do is call BC2 dogshit too
yep
Then they also try to twist your words to keep you engaged and arguing donât fall for it theyâre miserable đ
Classy, youâre genuinely one of the most illiterate people on here? You canât make a point without then defeating your own point.
And that panda guy is literally just a BF1 glazer because any game that doesnât hold his hand across the finish line is the series âgoing downhillâ
right đ
You donât owe any of these guys an explanation! Weâre here to give dice feedback! Not argue with jobless 16 year oldsđ
Apparently liking games is glazing now
Why would I? BC2 was great. I use it as an example all the time to counter the dumbest shit takes most of you make
Let them say what they want theyâre just trying to get under your skin
Im wrong for liking the most successful battelfield
how can they invite me on Friday 19th at 9pm to the play test
yeah waste of time
They ask endless questions like theyâre the devs and are gonna change the game no need to argue with these suckers
i hate this stupid ass line because now with vince zampella directing, all the people who spout it are going to be right by total accident
last time i suggested that they should go for a mix of BC2 movement with BF1 and you guys came along with the other unemployed people like Enders and hated me
Theyâre a major waste of time thatâs why theyâre on here everyday with nothing better to do then try to get the next battlefield to be like cod and argue with people over and over and over
Seems like they did some construction in here
Very obvious echo now 
Ya why would people want movement from a game 15 years old and didnât have prone? It was great for its day, doesnât translate now
bro you haven't see nothing yet,you can literally see the same people with the same names on youtube comments,tiktok and reddit too
Low life ass mfsđđđđ€Łđ€Ł
So you guys are asking for BF3 and BF4 movement which both of them are 10+ year old
Youâre in here all the time, spewing the dumbest shitâŠ. Something something kettles and pots are black
but when it comes to Bad company 2 its a problem to you and you are using the excuse that the game is 15 years old, that is so hypocritical
Think battlefield2025 is the only one that has you beat with dumb shit being said
And he owes people money 
TRUEEEEE
classy check your dm for a minute
hey man, maybe dice needs to fail after 8 years of irrelevance and total lack of direction
I might actually agree with you! Theyâll reap what they sow
You keep acting like BF has been irrelevant when BFV has sold ~15 mil copies
BF1 kept selling straight for 3 years unlike BFV
well something went horribly wrong because even dice's battlefront 2 left a better impression on people
you know, the one that got loot boxes banned in some countries
You mean the game that had years of fan service content released for it to a fanbase of the biggest IPs in the worldâŠ
Compared to the game that after its best content drop was abandoned (while again still selling well and has maintained a healthy player count since support ended almost 5 years ago)
Been trying to get in contact with someone from the EA Community Team without luck (their DMs seem to be closed). Is there a way to get in contact with them besides writing in the chat channels in here?
Pretty sure you and like 500 other people demand to privately DM developers every day which most likely won't happen and you'll have to fill out a form on the EA website like most normal customers who read and write.
Chill, not making any demands, just had a question that can't be asked here because of NDA.
Why is this chat still in slow mode? 
Because it's not about age it's about design. Quake is extremely old but a lot of its movement mechanics are still used today.
No its not about the design,you guys here pick what you like from specific battlefields and base it as a whole opinion
"It's not about design"
"Why do you guys pick and choose aspects of design you like?"
Cause that's how a lot of people form opinions?
It's common to pick and choose aspects of what you like when you're making an argument about a new version. It's better than just choosing one version to base your opinion on and ignoring its faults
Yeah so its my opinion too that i pick and choose aspects of design i like from bc2
Ah. I just read back and yeah, I agree to a point
BC2 + BF1 would be an interesting combination movement-wise. I don't think it'd match a modern game like BF6, but it could work for a older themed game
yeah i said a mix between these too with some adjustments would be cherry on the top in my opinion,and i think it would fit a modern game cause bc2 is set in a modern era too
BC2 movement would not suit modern fps era. Unless you mean how heavy/slow it felt.
I mean how heavy and slow it felt
of course it could work with some adjustments cause both games are modern shooters
Eh. It wouldn't suit a modern theme, but it'd be fine for an older theme like cold war
This game will have movement since EA wants Fortnite/Apex/Warzone kids' mom's credit card 
and wants it to be fun
Bruh. You don't need fast movement to have fun
Fast movement can be fun, but you don't need it to have fun
no further comment
I don't want to start another long discussion it was just an off handed comment
See, I feel it's the opposite they want that BF1 audience. Two failures? Go back to the casual stuff that worked.
Considering the fact that BF1 is currently the most popular BF (Based on steam), I wouldn't doubt this
WZ/Apex movement only works and is tolerated to the extent it is, is entirely because of the high rotational aim assist values.
Could you imagine how much CoD players would cry for movement nerfs if holding left stick wasn't sufficient?
They should replace aim assist with Insurgency's aim dampening 
having no offensive movement makes corner camping very powerful and that's just boring if you're trying to actively play the game
There's other ways to counter corner camping
For example, if the map is designed well, you can throw a grenade and force them to move
sadly dice's idea of stalemate breaking is explosive spam
the way to counter it is just cheking every spot sequentially, and if it becomes too textbook-y I just tend to not enjoy it, it feels less dynamic and more like you are repeating the same steps each time
it's why I don't play cs. A little bit of movement just adds a little more spice
(For anyone who doesn't play, Insurgency just reduces aim sensitivity when you're aiming near an enemy)
in cs go it doesn't matter who will camp better,ive seen pros destroying campers with better reflexes and aim
Yeah, CS just doesn't feel as enjoyable when every engagement is just crosshair placement/click timing and at best your options are jiggle peek or wide swing.
And even then those movement options are more based on enemy kit than just equally viable options
when getting better is practising maps that show you common spots and you run through them checking each one, that just isn't too fun
throwing explosives down a hallway is almost as neuron deactivating as holding a corner for 10 minutes
If you're just throwing the explosives and waiting, yeah. That's why, when you are clearing a camper, you should be pushing to where you think they're going to be running out from so you can catch them off guard
using utility is fun, but there are only so many nades and loads of spots on this big maps
that's still purely positioning, you're barely interacting with the gameplay at all
Especially doesn't help when said utility in battlefield doesn't really have effective counters. Like when the best play against smoke C5 spam is just back up constantly it means you can't contest
tactics aren't gameplay? This is the first time I've heard that
positioning is half of all gameplay
Even a lot of movement tech is done to be in a better position than your opponent
there's very little opportunity to outplay someone if you get caught out in a positioning only game, it makes things very one note and just boring after a while
idk how people sit down and play bf1 or siege every day
siege used to be a lot faster and allowed for individual players to excel i guess
siege is better in this sense because there is far more variance with gadgets and destruction, it's the only tac shooter I can bear playing
If you get caught out of position, that's your fault so you get rightfully punished. If you play the game correctly, you should almost never get caught out of position
Because people have preferences just like how you like fast paced games,others tend to like slow paced
Eh. Imo siege is nowhere close to being a purely positioning game. It's more about good aim, gadget placement/use, and figuring out where the enemy is
ok but imagine the high of saving your own ass by being a way better aimer than the other guy or juking the shit out of him
you know, learnable skills, something to aspire to
⊠that does exist in siege. A good amount of gunfights are won by having better aim and leaning
something other than just taking safe routes and the rare flank with bf1 style handicapped guns and waddling speed
I feel like thatâs more to do with bad map design than anything
Thereâs games like insurgency that have the same (if not worse) movement as 1 that donât have that issue simply because their maps are designed better
insurgency has guns that can push ranges past spitting distance, even on maps like prise de tahure bf1 is pure brain rot
no offensive option besides full body peek waddling around a corner or explosive spamming
bf has historically been pretty arcadey compared to others games of its time, wish we could keep it instead of succumbing to whatever this is
A game lacking the ability to strafe left or right, or prone would not go over well in a modern game heh
Again, that's just poor map or gun design. It could be fixed by balancing the guns around the map or the map around the guns
The movement isn't the overall issue
bf1 has small maps to fit the range compressed guns and the gameplay doesnt change aside from less sweet spot deaths
if they could push ranges like bf4 it would be even more miserable
give me a single outplay option, please god i will sell my soul for bf4 air strafing back
I'm honestly not too against that
I'd be perfectly fine with it if they removed crossplay
i dont think "jump and hold left stick" is asking that much of people but sure
I agree it isn't
I just don't like crossplay in general. PC and Console move, aim, and react differently. It's stupid that console people are basically forced to play with PC (Which has a large advantage with K&M)
I dunno why people want BF to be a tactical shooter, I mean I returned back to BF after I played 2K hours of Siege because I wanted something more casual and relaxed đ€·
A lot of the people who think BF used to be a tactical shooter are Console players whose experiences were legitimately closer to tactical than PC
I honestly think that people would be happy if they heavily limited crossplay and mainly listened to PC players about movement since 90% of Console players don't do any of the movement tech that PC does
Or design console around not having a garbage bin FOV
it'd be cool if we could bring console players into the mid 2010s and show them that gyro really isn't that scary
unfortunately, microsoft
(and aim assist)
FOV is nowhere near being the problem. It's the whole control scheme
Aiming is either 10x slower or 10x more uncontrollable
and Movement is harder to use in general because you normally have to double press the movement stick to sprint and it's harder to press a bunch of buttons at once
And I played bf3 on console due to friends in HS not having PCs. Never thought the game was tactical at all
I don't play BF with roller but I tried BO6 with roller and it was fine, I'm an MNK player too and I was getting way more kills đ
You can buttslide all you want as long as you use tactical control scheme that binds crouch to R3
fov doesnt matter theres tons of good players with low fovs and good players with high fov's
because you have autorotational aim assist and you dont even use your own aim in cod
Tbf, a lot of people think slow means tactical
Imo BF is less tactical than they believe but more tactical than the average PC player thinks
issue is is that this "tactical" gameplay comes from console players who sit on their couch and eat doritos
they are oblivious to pure tactical games and to what run and gun games are
Yeah. I'd agree that that's the main reason. They see it's slightly more tactical than cod (largely because of bigger maps and vehicles) and think it's a tactical game
they crouch walk around random corners, get jump peeked and complain about it
Bf3 on console and PC are completely different games. In the same way 2042 is completely different from ps4 to pc.
Yea. The main issue though is that that used to be a rare occurrence. With crossplay, they're having it happen to them every 5 minutes because PC players naturally use movement tech more
Even without the player count differences, they play really differently
idk no one really moves in 2042
just sitting in a group waiting to get fragged
2042 is it's own phenomenon
Idk what's going on in the heads of those 2042 players
nothing
the entire game is just get behind kill 20 people and die to an spf launcher that some dude from 3 spawns away ran around with
rinse and repeat
I always played it as a run and gun shooter on console. Most people who think the game is tactical at all are like the absolute dregs on your team
SPF is so annoying, I hope BF6 won't have anything like that
People who fire SPF are immune to it's damage too, so you can't even suicide bomb them if you are stuck with it
SPF?
Sticky grenade launcher
some sticky grenade that sticks to your body
Ah
Yeah, I understand how that'd suck lol
some players shoot you with it on complete accident
Itâs the assault gadget in 2042

Still cooking, we are close don't worry
did bf3 or 4 have a grenade launcher that shout a literal hand grenade out that would bounce around before exploding or am i going crazy?
This is 100% true and it's kind of insane that people are not focusing on this more. It dramatically lowers the skill ceiling when it comes to longer ranges. It also doesn't just make it harder to track targets at longer ranges, it makes it physically impossible to do it consistently because the reticle bounce is completely random per shot and the time between shots for full auto weapons is less than the human reaction reaction time
I don't get why they are adding mechanics that essentially "obscure" gunplay. I don't think anyone complained about the aim point being centered to the screen
Guy just made stuff up and you're agreeing with it
What not getting an invite/not being able to play the game does to a persons mind
I have complained about this before he made that post
What makes you think I haven't played labs?
Whats your username
Lol I'm not giving that away. You can check my messages on this server from during the stress test weekend
Ah, so just blatant NDA breaking then, is it?
I never said that
You just did
I just asked you what makes you think I haven't played the game. I never confirmed or denied if I ever played labs
Sure dude, whatever. Just making shit up anyway
If you have people like Enders and Ghost not making videos on these things, they legit are not issues lol
Lmao yeah you believe that lil bro. It's not like there are leaks where you can verify what I said about the reticle being decentered
Fact you wont even share your player name speaks volumes
The same issue is present in labs
Posts video of different game.
Proving my point. Looking to force drama on mechanics where there is none
Again, why would I do this and risk getting banned?
lmao, so you ARE breaking your NDA then
You are welcome to look at leaks and see for yourself if the reticle is centered or not. It's pretty easy to do lol
Im good
in which dimension will we get this update "on classes in the near future"?
Lol so you refuse to engage with evidence. Keep glazing dice lil bro. Hope they give you a free copy
whenever its ready. good things cant be rushed
lol, blocks anyone who disagree with them. Clearly im speaking with an adult
Who did I block?
Me
Uhhhhhh no I didn't
I cant react with your comments, so that shows you blocked me
either that or discord be trippin
I can't react to bsod either. Idk why
but i cannot react
I can, just not with you. Discord knows!
I didn't block you though. You can still see my messages and reply to them and I can do the same with you. Idk why we can't react to each other
Discord being discord I guess, my bad. Ill take the L on that assumption
Anyway, this issue really needs to be fixed for gunplay to be rewarding.
I guess "issue" and "fixed" are poor choice of words on my part
Remains to be seen if anything needs fixing.
I mean... sure. But that can be said about literally anything lol
I feel like if this was a massive glaring issue. enders would have covered it again by now. IYKYK
Are you on his discord? He has made a video in the past why it was bad in BFV and the issue still exists.
I talk to them semi-regularly off their discord.
Ask him for his opinion on aim point being decentered. He has a lot to say about that. He mentioned to me in his discord that he wasn't expecting dice to change this mechanic since it was in bf5 and bf2042
Spoken lots on the new game and its never been raised as an issue TBH
Id tag them for more context, but its like 4am for them now
Ask him how he feels about it. He will basically repeat the BFV video points. That being said, I can see why he wouldn't talk about it since it's hard to judge how much of an effect it has on gameplay without actually playing (Enders doesn't have labs access)
Does he not use he/him? Also you can tag him lol. He won't wake up because of a discord notification
Its good etiquette to not tag people when you know its 4am for them
tf is going on here lol
ÂŻ_(ă)_/ÂŻ
You sure about that?
And i can already see you go like: "Well i was just asking because i wanted to know". That shit wont work, you were invited and couldnt read a simple email instruction lol you kept asking shit about the Stress Test
#battlefield-labs-discussion message
We also have this lol you cant make it more obvious
Lol I forgot about that one. Anyway, that issue is an issue in 2042 when you try to use a Tartarus instead of a normal keyboard.
It might be in labs as well idk
Idc, you broke the NDA like an idiot
đ€Ł
Allegedly
đ Bro we have the messages in chat
Do I ever say that I've been invited? Anyway, I don't see how whether or not I broke the NDA is relevant to the point about aim point being decentered
You talked about how to fix an issue with YOU shooting without doing anything
which was an issue during the Playtest for some. so why tf u keep acting like you didnt break the nda
For an issue that exists in 2042
Yea sure, whatever you say đ
Imagine asking that in a LABS DISCUSSION chat DURING the Playtest Session
Happy coincidences
Its not like there is a 2042 Chat or something like that, would be really helpful 
If youre going to allude to you playing Labs, then break your NDA to try "win" a discussion...then completely back off when someone raises that as an issue...dont bother doing it in the first place
Ah I guess I didn't see that. Thank you for sharing with me
i really hope EA will find ur Username on EA App and ban you for all future playtests lol
I mean hypothetically what would you expect who implicitly broke the NDA to do lol? Come out and say it (not that I did)
I really don't see why you guys are stuck on this point lmao. Unless you're on Dice's legal team you have no incentive to enforce the NDA
I dont care one way or the other, just have some backbone. If youre gonna say something to try win a discussion or prove a point, dont immediately back down and deny...or just dont say anything and break your NDA (again)
i just like pointing out how dumb people are regarding the NDA
My discord and EA account are not linked at all so I really don't see then finding out my EA account.
I found you already from past messages, its not all that hard lol
Congratulations.
And another one lol
Contact any emails you may see in your invite. Discussion of invites, or labs info pertaining to them is not allowed here
Gotcha, Iâll delete. Apologies
People really cant read emails these days

We can read them. It's just there's no real risk if you don't list your EA account on discord. Idk why you're so passionate about enforcing a company's NDA when you don't even work there
Oh trust me, people are careless and they fuck up someday and leak their shit
and respecting an NDA has nothing to do with working for them or not lol
Fwiw, thereâs no email to contact in that rsvp email đ€·đ»ââïž reading the email is great n all but if it doesnât contain the information you need itâs difficult to attain the information from the email đ€Ł
Doesnt apply in this specific case though.
Trust me, there is...
Who cares? You're acting as if they're breaking a contact with you or something
Wanna repeat what you just said to me: Who cares? Let me enforce the NDA Policy on others, why you care so much about it lol
It's like complaining about people sharing Netflix accounts with people other than their family
Like sure you agree not to do it but why would you care about it unless you're a Netflix shareholder or something
I guess EA is publicly traded so you could own stocks
This dude is still going at it đ I hope this is ragebait
My brother in Christ, you're the one trying to enforce a company's NDA for free
Obey rules of the server > Enforcing companies NDA
It's somehow even more pathetic than being a reddit mod
This guy 
Yall can continue to do this. I gotta go to bed now. Hope you're able to find my username and get me banned đ
Nope, maybe theyâve changed it since you had one? Only have the generic playtesting email it was sent from. No other emails my dude. If you know the email then please let me know đđ€·đ»ââïž
They emailed you from an address
READ the email CAREFULLY 
Before I go I'll just reiterate this in case someone else wants to engage with my point about gunplay
No thanks, were good
no one cares, go offline now
"Let me glaze the billion dollar company a bit more"
Yea, he is ragebaiting, he cant be real
Hope you two get a free copy for your service đ«Ą
"let me break nda to win an argument" what is this? warthunder?
Helping people not break the rules of this server is not glazing, its what gets you a trusted regulars role here đ
fr đ
Lmao I was right. This is even sadder than being a reddit mod.
Oh no...wanting to have a nice friendly community!!! how dare I!!!!!!!!
I kinda wish the factions were map locked but eh, I guess itâs better than having shit skins
For all we know, they are
For all thatâs leaked, they donât seem that way :p
But! If itâs just a placeholder thing, good
Iâd much rather have them map locked than as an aspect of customization
Plus DICE is just so silly, if they want money, the more you have locked the better
You want to sell skins? The more factions the better cuz then peopleâll want a couple of skins per character in that faction
Dont even try to bring another micro-pay sh..
Another? Itâs literally the main one

No, youre not. This was confirmed as not true by mods here
You defo ragebaiting I respect the commitment tbf. Because itâs not in the email đ that or youâre hallucinating
What a weirdly aggressive discord server this is
Rules of the programe forbid any discussion of a users involvement
it states so in the tos unless the one from the server stress test is different from the normal play tests
Not my words, thats what mods and admins have told us. I raised it as a contradiction in the user agreement, so no clue if it has since been amended
End of the day im just trying to make people aware so they dont break a rule that may get them warned/muted.
understandable, probably to kinda prevent some situations
So many people fail to read the information they are given that if nobody told them anything theyâd get banned from the tests and be sad
We donât want sad people
They can do more than just ban you from the play test. But i agree with having the discord rule of dont disclose anything even if the tos says that you can say that you're part of it bc thats too much nuance already for most people
Is there still the thing that they drop infos / teaser on Tuesday, and since we haven't had anything yesterday, we will not have anything at least until next Tuesday ?
There is no real validity to the Tuesday thing. Blogs and update posts have released on random days.
I don't understand what is happening with ea right now
There is 0 official infos since early February, total radio silence from dev / marketing
But we have seen like half of the maps + concept art, the whole set of weapons, every modes seems to have leaked, how the game handle, factions... like a really really big portion of the game is everywhere on Internet, but we are not allow to talk about it and they don't show it
Is the game even set to release this year like they said previously ? What about the transparency with the community they sell us during the lab reveal ? This situation is so confusing đ
I hope I am wrong and the reveal is something huge, but if there is nothing new from all the leaks, it will be a disappointment
I just got a positive play warning?? What did i say here that is so toxic that it warrents a warning?
Probably the statement on being allowed to say youre part of labs. that comment was deleted
They should update the rules than bc its not in there
Perhaps something you can suggest in #discord-server-feedback
Oh yea good idea
I recommend going thru different admin/community manager posts in this channel to see what they have to say about when people disregard the nda and talk about it here
Wait how do i make the sugestion without saying it again and getting another warning...
They had a blog post that had a lot of community feedback last month...
"Please consider amending the #rules to include what players can or cannot talk about in respect to the Battlefield Labs program.
Users are being warned or given positive play warnings, when there is no clear rule they are breaking and/or in violation of"
They add 1 community post about destruction (which is a basic thing for battlefield, so not even considering it) and 1 post about weapons not being locked, not so much info in 4 months
In 4 months we have less official infos than any other bf games, but already seen more than any other bf games through leaks...
Its not the best idea to make a bunch of official posts about things that are more than likely going to be changed before launch anyways
There are a lot of stuff that should be already done and over (like any other bf games trailer in late May, early June, they show final stuff)
If everything can't be showed or can change, that means the game will not be launched by the end of fiscal year like they said
they say this like the Labs program doesnt also exist for info and feedback.
Bro will probably be the first to call an undercooked game ass...but then want it to release fast and early
Let them take all the time they need
I feel like this is too vague tho because its kind of a weird case and i genuinely want there to be a clear rule on it even if its just for this discord specifically. Ill try to think of something or maybe see if i can contact a mod about it?(boubtful)
Wanting some official info about the game that suppose to be release this year is wanting to have "undercooked game" ?
You probably have access to pre alpha / alpha and official info from lab server, but for the majority it is so uncommon to have nothing at this point đ«€
There is no set release date, hope this helps
You already have plenty of info in #1335997362258186292
Have they not said end of the fiscal year (before March 2026) + no near gta6 (so not early 2026) ?
No, EA CEO said a rough estimate of FY 26, but things change for all games and developers
GTA6 was expected to release FY 26 also. But it too has moved to FY 27 as they need more time
im not lol you just cant read the email at all
btw, this still is not a release date. If something happens with the development and they NEED to delay, they will do it (but since they didnt with 2042, they will 100% not delay)
Plenty of info :
movement -> "we want good movements"
Recoil -> "we adjust recoil so each gun have good recoil"
Destruction -> "we have destruction"
Class -> "we have no lock weapons"
Except for the class part which is new in the bf franchise, everything is so generic and means nothing, like we add recoil to guns, yes like every game in every franchise, this is not plenty of info...
I thought it was set to be the end of the year, but the way it is (not) announced + the fact that ceo call is not trustable, I doubt to have anything this fall :/
I mean, this is a lie. there is far more information in those posts than you are aluding tho
Ill just mark you as ignore, as you clearly have no interest in being objective
No need to reply to me
Read them and tell what more about guns they say unless "we have recoil so each guns feels different" like any other bf game ? What about movements they say ? What about destruction unless we can destruct walls ?
I want to discuss, and if I miss information I am ready to ear them, but I found it very vague what they said
No thanks, you are just reacting, not actually talking
What ? XD how is that possible that I ask official informations because I found the official post to vague, and the only response is "you can leave I don't want to discuss" đ
"At this stage of testing within Battlefield Labs, our main focus points are:
Understanding which environments can or cannot be destroyed and which type of firepower is required for different material types
The impact of collateral damage from debris and destructible elements
Tactical use of destruction to create new pathing or persistent environments
Balancing the ecosystem of damage through firepower and destruction"
Seems like a lot more than "You can destroy walls"
The Class System is defined by two main components: Customizable and class-defining.
The customizable components empower players to explore and push the boundaries of their roles within their chosen class while also still adhering to the expectations of the class.
The class-defining components are designed to enhance "pick-up-and-go" playability and reinforce the expectations of your class identity.
CUSTOMIZABLE:
-
Weapon Loadouts: Fully customizable weapon loadouts allow you the freedom to play the way you want. Play to the strengths of your class by using your signature weapons, or easily switch to any other weapon to meet the needs of your squad.
-
Class Gadgets: You'll have the option to carry two gadgets onto the battlefield, tailored to each class and its specific role. Recon aficionados specialize in intelligence and counterintelligence, with class gadgets including Deploy Beacons, Anti-Personnel Mines, and Laser Designators.
-
Training: Our philosophy with Training is to offer a series of traits that can be unlocked during play to enhance your ability to perform your role. As you engage more in a match, you'll gradually earn flat-stat bonuses and more to support the effectiveness of your role further.
-
Throwables: Our approach to throwables prioritizes enabling each class to effectively fulfill its role by providing tailored throwables.
CLASS-DEFINING
- Signature Weapon: Each class has a Signature Weapon category tied to their class identity, which, when used, enhances their role on the battlefield.
For example, using our same ongoing test subject, the Recon class, if you select a weapon from the Sniper Rifle category, you will benefit from increased breath-holding duration. In contrast, an Assault player choosing from the same category will not receive this bonus.
DMRs, Carbines, and Shotguns remain viable options, no matter your class, but donât benefit from any Signature Weapon bonus.
-
Signature Trait: Each class features a unique Signature Trait, providing passive bonuses tailored to optimize your role on the battlefield. For instance, a Recon player automatically spots enemies while aiming down sights, encouraging the use of weapons that complement this specialization.
-
Signature Gadget: These gadgets are unique and singular to each class with an aim for you to always have access to a tool that fulfills the role of that class.Separate from what you may choose as gadgets within your loadout.
-
Default Weapon Packages: The default weapon package is a pre-set combination of attachments and visual customization for each class to be combat ready, with the option for further progression and personalization.
Whatâs Next
The Class System and its individual components will be available for testing within Battlefield Labs in the coming weeks. Participants will be able to go hands-on with these features, discuss, and provide feedback.
Following further play sessions, we'll be back with another Community Update to unpack class components in more detail, and share learnings based on participant feedback.
Get Involved
Sign up for Battlefield Labs now if youâre interested in helping us validate the future of Battlefield. Read our FAQ if youâd like to learn more, and join the discussion on Battlefield Discord.
As a reminder, Battlefield Labs is a closed environment, and attendance is limited, but weâll make sure to share to keep everyone updated!
Thank you for joining the discussion. We look forward to connecting again soon - see you on the battlefield!
This announcement is related to content in development through Battlefield Labs, and may change as we listen to community feedback and continue developing the next Battlefield title and beyond. We will always strive to keep our community as informed as possible.
Super vague indeed /s

-
different kind of Firepower needed to destruct different materials : have we not already this system ? Like guns can destroy small stuff, rpg does medium damage to walls, and tanks can do top damages ?
-
impact of collateral damage from debris : have not already that when Wall fall apart on soldiers?
-Tactical use to create new pathing : kinda new, but pretty sure some maps already have them in bf3
- balancing ecosystem : generic term
This is what I mean : nothing really new for a battlefield game, and I can be wrong, but what have been announced here is in battlefield franchise from the beginning right ?
You took this long for all that?! đ
This is what I said it was new, the class system, yes
Kinda slow đ but we have all our time here
Its a game vision presentation, which will then be tested and itterated upon by people with Labs access. They arent going to, and shouldnt do as they did with past games. And make promises they cant keep...or just act like yes men and say the game is one thing, then release and be completely different.
So we are kinda agree that there are not so many micro info about the game itself, but more a vision about going through a classic battlefield game
And my point was : not so much info for a game that launch this year
But since it may be not, it change everything
Weapons should be locked to classes, otherwise the players will not fullfill the class objective
Giving micro info is pointless at this stage. As they will change the game constantly based on feedback
It will not be pointless if it was realising this year, as stuff barely change between trailer / teaser in early year and final product in fall
Not really true. Engineers will still fight vehicles and repair regardless of what weapons they have available.
Make a better argument
You are working under the assumption that BF Labs is not being used to test and change the game based on feedback from those tests.
The game is not finished, it doesn't even have a name yet. This mindset should be changed.
So how do you justify playing a medic with a sniper rifle?
Always the same boogeyman
I won't. I'll use a weapon that's appropriate to how I want to play. Which will probably be an AR or LMG for Frontline combat, healing and reviving
Freedom of choice is the best way to go. Not some guy playing medic because the gun thats meta is locked to it and they won't revive me 80% of the time. Classes should be based on gadget. The old days of that idea are gone. Let's focus on real game mechanics like movement, gun play and vehicle balance.
tbf both approaches have their pros and cons that match each other in severity
I can't see a game without class restricted weapons as a Battlefield game
I definitely can, class restricted weapons are terrible in my honest opinion.
did you like 2042
Hardline is proof they should not do locked weapon classes.
Players didn't like that game, so clearly it should not happen again.
kek
I love my support and battle rifle simulator battlefield hardline but ironically with its mix of all kit weapons it probably stands as one of the better balanced games.
Relatively. Its ttk was insanely quick.
But i dont really care for this shit. I'll be maining assault... with assault rifles. Like the rest. And the game will be as meta driven.
I wouldnât really call HL a fully weapon locked game. All primaries were locked to a certain class, but every class had access to an off branch of ARs (besides for recon iirc)
So people who like ars could run ars on nearly every class but the general populous used the intended guns for the classes
(Also, ik youâre most likely joking but Hl didnât fail because of locked weapons. It failed because they made a cops vs crims game in a military franchise)
This was me using the same logic the comment above mines was using, to justify weapon unlocking or not.
except the game was amazing
one of the best BF games, people were just being cry babies about the fact it wasn't war themed and was police vs robbers instead
Sorry, failed game, disliked by BF core audience. Everything from it should not be used moving forward.
I wish they'd do Hardline 2 because it's peak BF
This is why no one should value your opinion
I know it won't happen but oh well, we don't deserve nice things in this dumb community
Hardline is fine, but it is objectively not peak BF.
Ah. Fair
Yeah. Itâs an amazing game and my personal favorite Bf, but itâs not a peak bf game
It doesnât have any tanks, planes, or really any armored vehicle with actual weapons
Will sadly probably never happen because the studio that made it doesnât exist anymore
Good morning and thanks for the invite. Looking forward to being friends.
This is not the Battlefield Labs Discord, please ensure that you read the email instructions properly and do not post about Battlefield Labs in public spaces like these, as this breaks the NDA you signed.
Every 5 minutes
I swear, this happens every 5 minutes
Can yâall invite more people with the ability to read?
It's a fraction of people invited that get confused. I know it's annoying but not much you can do as a user. It's going to happen. đ€·ââïž
Whoopsies
It has some good maps. But I really didnt enjoy the gunplay/weapon balance. It was like BF4 balance on drugs.
Is this not # battlefield-labs-discussion?
Channel topic: Discussion the PUBLIC information available around Battlefield Labs. For further information see #battlefield-labs-news, or visit battlefield.com/labs
I thought the gunplay was the best one up until that point
like it's been forever since I played but as far as I can remember, the bullets actually register unlike bf4
Hit detection and gunplay arent the same thing. Related, but not the same
I honestly cant remember a single weapon in that game outside of a few ARs. I just remember everything else being useless
I remember one of the bolt actions being and feeling great also, but not much else. Maybe the R700?
No
Cosplaying as a mod
oh look mrBattlefield is back
if i have a question about labs where i can get an answer without breaking NDA?
If you've been invited you received instructions via email, follow these.
can i send you a quick dm just to clarify somethings without sending an email?
I don't have any insight on the invitation process or can get you in. You will have to follow the instructions in the email and that will provide you with all you need to join Labs if you've been invited.
im already invited, i will send anyway an email
That'd be best then, yes.
"no discussing playtest in public" is there some playtester only discord or something?
Yep, there's a tester environment to discuss Labs and provide feedback and bug reports on the tests.
how can i get in it?
If you are selected for the playtest you receive instructions what to do, where to go, and how to play. Non-testers cannot join that environment.
well i did get invited and all i have is the email and the date for the upcoming playtest
i didnt see anything in the email on instructions to get in
I would definitely advise to fully read all emails you get and follow the instructions.
Check spam folders as well in case your email provider filtered any mails.
Patience is also a virtue. Judging by past peoples experiences...emails with info pertaining to these things can take a while to arrive. But they will arrive.
i checked my emails andi dont have a server only tester
this is my first time doing a playtest for battlefield and the only email i got was about needing to complete a quick survey to get in which i did complete and it says im approved
Be patient dude. As they already said...this isnt the place to talk about this
Youll get everything you need in due time
i hope so, i got the email one month ago
Did you get an email about the 72 hour stress test? That's not Battlefield Labs testing, that was a one off special test.
isnt still a labs test?
Nope, players for Labs have different access and playtests. The 72 hour stress test was specifically set up to test the servers for that specific date only.
thats why i wanted to ask something cause i send an email from the instruction i got, and he did not answer my question and got an answer that i didnt need or i already know
If you received instructions a month+ ago, it's likely you weren't invited to the actual Battlefield Labs playtesting. If you do think there was an error, feel free to reach out to playtesting@ea.com again. If they do not resolve your issue it's likely that you haven't been selected for testing and you will have to wait and see if you get selected in the future. Not everybody who signs up for Labs will be invited.
âïž
DICE is flip flopping for no reason:
BF1 = Aim tied to screen center
BFV = Decoupled from screen center
2042 = Tied to screen center
BF6 = Decoupled from screen center
I want class locked weapons because I don't want every class to use 3BTK ARs with headshot multiplying bullets 
Yeah, only the class you play!!!!
#OpinionIgnored
I don't want SMG assault either, we don't need a repeat of Mackay PP29 meta
Honestly that's more of a general ttk problem instead of a class problem
I shouldâve signed up for labs lol many of yall takes are just outta thin air đ especially dude named phreek
Battlefield 6 isnt 2042 though, there isnt any grapple hooks
Idk how bout we just use the formula that wasnât absolutely lambasted on like idk.
In comparison
Just my hot take I guess
PP Mackay was OP because of strafe speed too
Mackay would be OP even without grapple hook
faster strafes is not as powerful as Zain's passive or Sundance's passive 
I hardly see Mackay in 128 tbh
Give us an example of something @tropic tulip has said
No I just wanted to respond
Did you read my message fully when you asked? 
Im scared bro đ
Please make sure you follow the full instructions sent to you via email if you were selected for a playtest. This Discord is not for discussions that are under NDA. đ
That's the thing idk if this counts as breaking NDA.. but thank you I was gonna delete that đđđ
My apolocheese
I was taking a look at this new Battlefield and it reminds me of CoD. Should I be worried?
Not that I wanted it to be a MILSIM, but the movement is fine...
Fast?
If you want to be, sure. I'd wait until you get a chance to play.
Well, by then, I've already spent money on the game. What can I do, my friend? Games aren't like they were 10 years ago. Today, the market has changed and the focus is on profit. Quality and fun games? Bah...
So delusional?
I say this as a consumer.
Games 10 years ago werenât focused on a profit?
BF4 was literally a cash grab pushed out as fast as possible off the success of BF3
So excited to play tbh â€ïž canât wait for hands on, hopefully I get a chance to playtest
No, it's just point of view and perception.
But with a hint of concern.
But I'm not the one who decides to boycott a game. The entire community will evaluate it, as they did with 2042.
If what the leaked videos have shown reminds you of actual modern CoD, you need to either go play CoD or rewatch the leaks
Same
And bf4 was awesome tho
I've played CoD, and I know what I'm talking about. But like I said: point of view.
BF4 was a game that barely worked for 12-18 months and was getting railed by class action lawsuits because it launched so miserably
Mainly Warzone.
Theres your problem. Warzone is đ©
This isnt warzone
Yes, but what I meant was that 10 years ago, there was a quality that games don't have today. Where almost everything is bland and without proper polish. There are few shooting games that really entertain you like the old days. It has literally become a "fast-food" of games. This is noticeable if you came from PS2, X360.
Well, I said I've played. I don't play Warzone.
Is my problem giving my point of view?
Idk what to tell you man there are plenty of great games today even if the fps market the past few years has been in a rut. The rose colored glass are lying to you
Isnt it enough to just be excited? Like you said, 10 yrs ago games made me excited. The footage ive seen of this bf has genuinely brought that excited kid I once was back out.
the majority of games from the ps2/360 era were total profit driven slop off the coattails of the big games
If you are from the x360 generation, you will understand my point. I don't want to dwell on this, as it is not a formal debate.
I havnt been this excited since my mum told me I needed to get a paper route if I wanted bf4 đ€Ł guess what? I got that route, and my first cheque was spent on bf4
I agree with this too. Bfv and bf2042 didn't make me excited at all as much as did bf2bc2, bf3, bf4 and bf1. But the new one makes me genuinely excited
Peak
Traumas of 2042.
Iâve been playing games since the Dreamcast man. Youâre remembering all the good games from that era and not all the garbage slop
I did come from that era, and I kinda get what you mean. It felt like games back then were made with soul and passion but now they're formulaic
I sound like a damn boomer by saying that
the game looks fast?
leaked gameplay shows the game to be slower than bf4 lmaooooo
Have you played recently? I dowloaded it cause why not, its $5 on steam and ive sunk some good hrs into it this last week
Its why the indie scene pops off because its all unique ideas and full of passion, like clair obscur for example
But new bf looks very very good
đ
Its actually kinda fun. Even if super annoying
I'm being bombarded.
Slower atm but thereâs more opportunity for movement tech and shit people will find

Maybe one day dice will recreate the sound design of Black from the og Xbox. I remember playing that on those xrocker chairs
i hope so, i ain't trynna play battlefront (2015) clone, BF1, again lol
Just tryna hype you đ€Ł I too am concerned. But just be excited, lifes too short
If I'm under an NDA, am I allowed to say I'm under NDA.. or is that..breaking NDA..
I played it when it was released and I've been playing it again recently. It doesn't excite me. If I said it did, I'd be lying. Man, even BFV can be more fun.
The last shooter game I LOVED was Insugency Sandstorm. I literally LOVED it.
I still play it on ps5. It's so amazing
Waiting for ready or not on console too
Play portal with a full squad of mates. Genuine fun
I've (sadly) done every COD camo grind since OG MW..
Nothing hits like realistic shooters
Hell Let Loose and WW1 trillogy.
I always play as a machine gunner. Using an MG-42 is so much fun in that shit.
Damn you got me wanting to play insurgency.. firing it up lol
SAME nothing better than gunning a treeline hoping to nail stragglers or a team
I walk in my lunch break in some forests around me and I see those familiar layouts of roads with hedges alongside the edge and out of habit I walk close to the outside edge because of HLL đđđđ
Yes. That's the essence of the game. Paranoia and PTSD.
But as I said, I was a little worried about the leaked gameplay. Although I was also excited, because I found the environment very interesting. But let's wait for the release to draw our conclusions.
It just looks like bf3/4 with some new movements tbh đŻ đ
People who played the game told me it plays like MW22, and honestly they are right tbh...
Lol dude just stop. You're making a fool of yourself
We'll see when it's open beta, I bet we will see tons of people saying the same thing, ''you guys just remade MW19, 22,23 in Frostbite engine'' đ
By default a Battlefield game will be nothing like those titles. It has vehicles, destruction, class systems. What a silly thing to say.
I get where they're coming from, my takeaway is it follows a lot of similar design philosophies (movement disjointing reticle from screen centre on top of reduced movement/ADS penalties, etc) it isn't to say it's a duplicate of MW22 but it's gutting skill gaps to appeal to the same audience.
Again, a ridiculous thing to day. People really are suffering from not having access to test versions đđ€Ł
So far we've seen those aspects on top of a much faster TTK, so unless the game starts changing a significant amount of things prior to release I'd agree that it seems like a much more casual entry.
It's not ridiculous when you can literally see those aspects in the leaked footage.
Feels like it rotting some of y'alls brains. Over analyzing leaked videos into an inch of your lives.
you arend under nda i believe
unnlless you signed something
and even if u did leak anything they wouldnt do anything
its about what the nda requiress
if the nda doesnt alllow you to say you are under the nda then you can get sue'd
No, man. It's just that no one wants to break their face and have to migrate to games from 7 years ago because a game doesn't meet the qualities and "perfection" that you would demand.
What does this even mean?
It's not fair that you have to play a game from 2008-2019 because a recent game can't entertain you enough to make you angry. It's a simple thing to understand.
But either way, it's irrelevant to argue about it.
The last BF game was shit, but all before it are pretty good games.
It doesn't look like they are making the mistakes of V or 2042 to me.
7 years ago, I was 20. 7 years ago, I didnt have kids, 7 years ago I had time to play. things have changed, games now are still good, bo6 is fun on a casual level if weâre talking about recent games. Id play bo6 over mw3 any day. But am I going back to bo1 or bo2? No. Iâll play bo6 cause Iâm having fun NOW
Why did I choose to play 2042 over the last week instead of bf4? Because bf4 is old now and less fun today than the countless hrs I played back then. You crawl back to older titles for nostalgia. I pray this is a good bf game coming up.
I agree, actually I enjoyed V aswell
lol
and I'm the server's 42 biggest hater
I'd say it if I did not
Its by no means a good game đ€Ł but its fun atm
I genuinely hope it satisfies @delicate frigate
Bf6 anyways
By mistakes of those games. I mean 2042s horrid launch and disastrous gutting of all things that make Battlefield...Battlefield.
And Vs terrible marketing, launch, live service that basically fell flat on its face, and constant ttk changes.
Obviously some of those things are unknown in respect to the next game. But BF Labs itself existing as a post launch CTE will likely (hopefully) stop bad patches/changes from reaching the live game.
i need to enjoy 2042
Hop in đ€Ł portal is great
There are some points that I have to disagree with, but I'm tired of having to argue about something that hasn't even been released yet. Well, if you at least understood my point of view, I would feel honored. Because at the end of it all, I just want the best of the franchise and to come home tired from work and go play and say: Wow, this is really good.
Let's wait for the release of the new battlefield.
I agree with you. I realky hope it brings that excitement back
Hope to see you on the battlefield đ€Ł
Bare in mind that lots play BF4 on console. Which means to this day they are playing 900p 60 FPS. BF4 aged a lot better on pc where better hardware actually allowed the game to feel better to play.
i pay it 100⏠so i need to enjoy every single second of it
At least your money will get you more than just multi-player with the next game. Hopefully the campaign is also good.
i get the platinum on BF4 hardline and V so i hope is good
My condolences (on being 27, congrats on the kids tho!)
đ€Ł
Turned a rather competitive gamer into a casual has been real quick tbh đ€Ł
Grateful tho, theyâre the best! Thanks dude
Can you put in a good word for me so I can get an invite? đ„șđ„șđ„ș
I want to play this new battlefield so bad, it looks incredible!
Feeling the drought now
this is probably the second slowest movement modern battlefield
I can't tell if it's too slow or I just didn't know how to toggle sprint and it felt slower. I guess I'll find out
Objectively speaking we "Crawl back" to older titles becuase they are better then 2042 đ
toggle sprint?
I had to hold down the left stick to sprint, couldn't figure out how to toggle that
Idk why they act like old immediately means worse
There's a ton of "old" games that are really fun to play regardless of their age or nostalgia
I can't wait to decimate an entire platoon with an A-10. That "BRRRRRRRTTTTTTTTTTTTTT" is enough to scare anyone.
I hate to be the bearer of bad news but the A-10 is not in the game
For now?
Remember, it's labs. As far as I know, not all vehicles have been added yet.
the F-16 takes it place
F-22 or F-35?
Damn. I'm gonna miss the A-10 and Frogfoot (I will never think about these again after today)
F-22 is the NATO stealth fighter
Yes, but will they still use the F-35 or will they replace it with the F-22?
Because it is unlikely that there will be only 1 plane in the game. For each team, there could be 3 helicopters and 2 fighters.
yeah it's replacing the F-35
which is weird considering it's not just the US but whatever
Well...
also it's kinda lame Pax is using Su-57s...
Speaking of, have we seen Battlefield2025 guy?
Bruh stop glazing đđ
i know one day thats gonna be me, and im gonna teach my kids how to be the best players in the world
Already on it đ my 3 year old daughter loves trying to play already
Its the cutest thing tbh
Lovely!
I can imagine đ i do hope one day they'll surpass me in gaming skill (but that won't happen teehee)
I really want kids..
Ever see that meme where the kids are getting destroyed and the ons friend goes âits timeâŠâ then they call their dads to take over
I hope thatll be me one day đ€Ł
LMAOO it will be, im sure ya daughter will ask you for help
Hope so, and I hope one day you do have kids and the same happens too you. Iâll never stop gaming regardless, although it is harder to do so for now with them so young. 3yrs and my boy is 7months -absolutely loves trying to grab the controller
Hoping labs lives up to how I felt playing 3/4, eveb if the gunplay already looks closest to 2042 (mostly why Iâm playing 2042 @minor linden )
haha ho boy!! was on trip, back home yesterday! Saw a email about playtest so i was ooooooo... already too late to rsvp đ đ€Ł fckkkk loll
Thats so sad tbh đ
yep lol like 4h too late
Just wait for another email or can I download it from some where?
If u find out, plz let me know đ
Glazing? That dude owes me money lol
in theory today you should receive an email with download instructions, let's wait...
@static fable đ
yea he said something yesterday
man, I just saw a commentor on a video perfectly describe why I think open-weapons are bad. I can't belive I haven't thought of this because this is a common quote. They said "can't eat your cake and have it too". That is exactly why I think weapons NEED to be locked. I'm just saying this in the hopes some dice employee sees this and reconsiders this class system, just do something like BF3, this was one of the reasons why I hated 2042... the classes just feel so watered down from open waepons.
when you want gadgets there should be certain trade offs, having both a sniper and a rocket launcher just is dumb
I feel like i have to bring this up so dice still knows there is people wanting weapons to be locked
Word salad.
Unlocked weapons 4 lyfe 
I hope weapons are not locked, itâs just shit.
omg what the hell happened
unlcoked weapons are shit
all polls had most people in faovr of locking waepons when they happened
i dont wanna see another 2042
I HATED THIS IN 2042
I WILL NOT HAVE THIS AGAIN
no i specicially dont like this in 2042
man yall just wanna see battlefield crash and burn :(
Bro went off the rails at the first hurdle.
No theyâre not having Unlocked weapons means more creativity and freedom for the players
i feel like im going crazy seeing three people with this wackass opinion
no it means you can just run around with whatever
Your opinion is just weak.
and there isnt any tradeoffs
your opinion is wrong
i just gotta let dice know atleast i am not okay with this
i know there has to be others
He just wants attention
"Can't have their cake and eat it to" doesn't apply to video games where you can do anything you choose to do.
Bro they know some people want locked weapons. You aren't the main character
thank you, atleast you have decent points
He was talking to you
just i havent seen much recently
oh
f*CK
I was talking to you professor dumbass

my first was bf1, your first was 2042
You can state an opinion without all caps and essentially crashing out. They read everything. But making unhinged reasoning for wanting something is just gonna make anyone reading ignore you.
It's fine to have opinions, it's not fine to attack other's opinions. Please make sure you follow the #rules and be civil with each other. Thanks. đ
im sorry just im tired of dealing with people that want open weapons, the reasons are all the same things
Ok now I understand youâre a casual
???
My first was BC2 BTW. Not 2042.
doubt that
my dad has been playing since 1942 and even he says that weapons are a part of classes
You will not convince anybody by attacking them. It's also fine to think open weapons is the way to go, as well as locked weapons. You do not need to convince every Discord member. You said your piece, that's good! All you can do.
i started with bf3
Unlocked weapons 4 lyfe 
bait
they just never listen
And that's their right. Nobody has to listen to your opinion if they don't want to.
i dont want to see this battlefield be ruined by dumb things like open weapons :(
nope
unlocked weapons won't hurt the gameplay loop as many might imagine
im not taking any more bait
startin now
It's not your job to make someone else listen. This isn't TrexTeddy server
Nah your dad probably played battlefield since BF1
then whyd you reply to me, huh?
you engage in an argument and wont listen to any points
i can load up 1942 right now
his computer has it
Cos I chill and talk in this channel often. As I have interest in the next game?
Again, it's not my job to listen to or agree with your "points". I just said your argument was weak.
You literally crashed out in all caps bro
not bait
Give me reasons why locked weapons are more important/better than unlocked weapons
using medic/ammo sniper is not a valid reason, it actually is less useful than a recon sniper lol
I also don't mind of they do locked or unlocked. I'll enjoy the game regardless. As long as it has good combat, gameplay, maps and modes.
And after you said that your first battlefield game was BF1 I canât take you seriously
Why
i played 4 after i liked 1
and bf1 is almost 10 years old
its not too new
heck i even got 3 installed
feels are not a valid reason
give me actual gameplay reasons why it's not a good thing
this is all opinions here
i cant put my finger on it, but claseses feel like gadget select instead of calsses
and at that point
just remove classes
Drama queen đ€Ł

theres no point in classes if its like half class
He just said thereâs no point of classesâŠ

that wasnt my point
i want weapons locked
this is just trollling with comments like that
even hear of hyperbole
It's like something a stereotype GF in a bad romcom would say.
"if I can't have all of you, I don't want any"
Gunsmithing and unlocked weapons
Why even have gunsmithing when weapons are unlocked?
my point was, water-down classes just feel like gadget select
but clearly yall are so dense you take statements at face value
You've made your point, you're not changing anyone's mind with your opinion. It's not a unique thought. Let's just move on.
ok
Everyone will use same ARs or SMGs with same meta setup if weapons are unlocked. No one will use LMGs with fast mags, no one will use SMGs with long barrels. Carbines are entirely useless since they are just worse ARs. It will lead to every class using same 2-3 weapon types with same setup.
Didn't happen in 2042, wouldn't happen in New game
Except it literally did
pp29
Show me proof, I can show you proof it didn't
after playing 1942 DC extended, why is it rare to see things about having mroe than 4 classes, i feel like the classes were definiately not perfect but having 5 or 6 classes maybe could be better. medic as it's own class would probably work
4 classes should be the norm, no more than that.
Is 1942 relevant today?
There are weapons that perform better, and are better than others in 2042. But it's a lie to say that players only use 3/4 weapons. The truth is that players use a wide variety of weapons
2042 didn't had gunsmithing
Happens in every CoD with gunsmithing, people uses same 2-3 weapons
I wish we had numbers on what guns is the most played in the game, unfortunately all I could show you is idk youtubers videos with everyone running around with the pp29 but youâll probably go ânon-conclusive.â Or some shit
Record a full game or multiple with full killfeed active and send me the video. I'll tally all the weapons used and relay that data back to everyone here in spreadsheet form
I 100% guarantee there will be more than 20 different weapons used in each round.
BC2 had 5 classes i think so its not just 1942 without 4
It begin when?
This is not the place to discuss Battlefield Labs playtesting. Please make sure you read the NDA if you've been invited. đ
Iâve been playing since 1942 too, I want unlocked weapons
Lmao itâs always the BF1 tourists
Comparing this âgunsmithingâ (which is still WIP) to CoDâs is a leap
Mine was BC2 and I still refuse to call anything that has an open weapon pool a BF game
Itâs just not right, said it before, itâs like if they released chess 2 but every piece could move like the queen
BF is less chess and more checkers anyway 
Congrats youâre being overzealous over one ingredient in the BF âcakeâ being changed and ignoring all the other ingredients that still make it a cake
Ok, you order a cheese cake and they give you a cookie cake then
Except weâve never ordered a cake. Weâve always been given the cake of the day
Thatâs how video games work
And art in general
Make sure you read the instructions again, especially on the general access to the playtest, as well as other steps to do. This Discord is only linked at places where you signup for Battlefield Labs, not when you're invited to it.
Thatâs how video games went to shit and started losing their charm yes
does anyone have any idea how it works?
Why does everyone keep breaking the NDA my god
No, video games have always been the vision of the developers (cook) and not designed by committee (aka their dumbass community)
because I do not have any files downloaded and working during the day
You require use of patience.
No, video games USED to be the vision of developers that wanted to make a good game, now they just want to make some cash grab
Keep telling yourself that bud
I will cuz itâs the truth
Most games back then were profit driven slop too
Nah
Youâre just remembering the games you liked
Kojima watches you
Profit driven sure, slop? No
Kojima is still based
Makes whatever the fuck he wants
Iâm remembering the good ones
Even made war with konami and discredit him from upcoming mgs delta đ
I have not, but info from others tells me you will receive new info before anything you're scheduled to be part of starts.
Keep an eye on email, spam folder, and in the case of Gmail, the updates folder.
Ya so go look at game lists from any year and look at how many low effort slop was coming out as well, purely chasing profit
Alright, thank you so much
And Iâm gonna hit you with some hard reality, all those games you loved, most were made to make money first and foremost
No shit people make something for money? Who couldâve guessed
