#ip_rights_violations
1 messages ยท Page 62 of 1
although from what I've seen most US military related pdfs seem to look like this so 
the Arma 3 End user License Agreement states that
basically Bi is saying 'you can use this for that, that and that, but not taht and that
That surprises me
it's international law;
as a player you buy a license to use the game, and that license states that you're only allowed to use for anything other than games (they don't have the military part anymore, used to be in there).
https://www.bohemia.net/community/licenses/arma3-end-user-license
What is Bohemiaโs reasoning for that
Because it sounds like a good way of free advertising
they decided that
protecting their property, just like any other publisher protects their property
so they would decide if they want to grant usage for free or not, not a third party
and I wouldn't be surprised if they have an agreement with BISim regarding military contracts
So from what Iโm getting here is that arma said: Hey, companies, private or not, you cannot use my game, or even screenshots of it in presentations, training, or anything like that
What is Bohemia gonna do? Sue?
You are not allowed to use Arma, in any way, to make money. And I'm sure they would/could sue for that, although not worth it and usually solved before it even comes that far
you react like it's the only company to do that ๐
have a read ๐
https://community.bistudio.com/wiki/Intellectual_Property
Rgr
I think I understand
Where does it say that companies canโt use arma 3 user generated media
Nobody claimed that...
although see the EULA, point 1.B.iv
I think that's common sense
common sense doesn't (always) apply to laws ๐
and would it be common, we wouldn't need laws to begin with ๐
Yeah, but if it is a company, it probably monetizes stuff, and monetization with content that doesn't belong to you is always bad
Well unless that stuff is open source and/or you have the right licenses of course
So we are inferring the company presenting the presentation is monetizing from it, which is against EULA
Yes
What would there punishment be for violating EULA
Well that's up to BI's lawyers, czech law, and the judge
Also the BI Tools (which is the tool that was used to make the game and mods) EULA says "(iv) Commercially exploit or allow a 3rd party commercially exploit game content you created using the Software, including but not limited to use by military organizations for computer aided training or commercially released game content; "
Yeah, Bohemia interactive is based in Czechia
Makes sense, just sounds weird because not many companies are based in there
Well, what did you think the Bohemia in Bohemia Interactive stood for ๐
Lmao
I guess I just thought it was a name for a brand, I know Bohemia is a place, just never really thought about why itโs named that
Actually its only called Bohemia Interactive if it comes from the czech region of bohemia. Otherwise its just sparkling walking-simulator
Or get flung 100km by chicken-wire simulator
czech space programm.
there are quite few czech game companies I believe and many more all over the europe
game making is not America exclusive
(hopefully!)
actually...
The earliest known publicly demonstrated electronic game was created in 1950. Bertie the Brain was an arcade game of tic-tac-toe, built by Josef Kates for the 1950 Canadian National Exhibition
Selling a military use product is subject to a WHOLE load of different restrictions, compared to a game.
So to legally be on the safe side, its easier to forbid it..
Not even thinking about the fact that military solution is what BI's sister company Bohemia Interactive Simulation's whole business is.
Yes, wouldn't be the first time for military illegally using Arma 3.
"they don't have the military part anymore"
Well they kinda do:
Use the Program for anything other than entertainment and recreation purposes, including but not limited to using the Program for training, educational, occupational or vocational purposes.
And if you try to argue that a company, trying to sell services to the military using Arma screenshots to promote themselves is using Arma for "entertainment and recreation purposes" then I don't know what to think about you.
Ever heard of "Euro Truck Simulator" ? ๐
feel free to think what you want; but I never tried to argue that...
only pointed out that I thought it was explicitly mentioned before
Why are you being offensive? Didn't try to argue that
I also think it was there once.
But if you read it, its basically still there just in different wording
you reply to me with "if you ... I don't know what to think about you", so yes, I took that as something pointed to me
than I apologize for reading that incorrect
with "you" I meant the person that said "So we are inferring the company presenting the presentation is monetizing from it, which is against EULA"
Which.. considering its a company trying to sell stuff to the military using the screenshot in the presentation as promotional material... is a weird question to ask, because that should be obvious.
Or I confused it with Namalsk? ๐ค
Pretty Sure Namalsk is fine, there are several Versions on the Workshop, Since its mainly used by Exile and the map Text reads 'made by Sumrak and Exile Team, ported by (Person i forgot the Name of)' and again its been around for ages, even has a ATS Patch so its probably Not Namalsk
Yes Sumrak is very open. One guy in my unit also got permission from him to modify/port namalsk to A3. Though he never did so
Yea i figured, also His meme in the Tunnel is pretty suggestive of that
Namalsk is probably my favorite map
Im currently getting into map making and i'mma try and Create a map a little Bigger with a simmular Spoopy Dead Forrest vibe
Namalsk is the only map with this black, Dead Grass and area
And its very small
Which is kinda sad
Since its the Most fun to Play on in ravage
But it sucks beeing abled to Drive from Sebjan to brensk in under 10 min
Can a BI person here confirm that Kickass stuff is bad and has stolen stuff? A bunch of people in my groups are adamant that it is simple heresay and just want proof.
The name is familiar to me, but I can't remember it hearing in combination with ripped content.
But I'm sure someone knows more about it (doesn't have to be a BI employee, but is possible)
He also has this posted on a few of his other mods
I apologize for this MOD have been removed by BIS in the previous period , thanks for yours understanding, and sorry for any inconvenience .
This is the last update , unfortunately , due to this MOD may be deleted at any time by BIS ...... again .
So please subscribe this MOD and backup the files to the local ( X:\Steam\steamapps\common\Arma 3!Workshop@Complementary Special Weapons ) .
Thank you for your guys' s support all the time . And ...... goodbye ! (หโฝห)
I'm not disagreeing with the decision to remove it, it is just that some people in my unit don't believe that it is a bad idea to add a mod that has been repeatedly taken down from the workshop to our modset, all in the name of getting a barely-functional taser. 
Ho yeah that guy takes what he wants no matter the rights, I've seen some Battlefield 4 and Black ops 2 stuff and most recently a katana from killing floor 2 (I think Dedmen was the one who found that one)
I wouldn't use it anyway... higher quality content is available elsewhere, without the ripping
When he first apperead he had descriptions on his mods where the guns were from, Hitman, Crysis, Battlefields etc
High doubt can be put into him making any of them himself
The problem is that they're asking for proof and apparently this isn't enough https://web.archive.org/web/20171012054217/http://steamcommunity.com:80/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=922374496
just say no and be done with it...
@tropic hatch despite saying you were going to clear up your uploads on the 5th I seem to have found more of my stuff in your uploads. https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2305038502
My LVCP mk5 together with lots of other people's content
we're still in the middle of transferring files from that package yes
i apologize, i was taking my weekend to spend time with my family
it really does feel like you are taking the piss. Looking back ive DMCA'd "Manticore" packs atleast 5 times that i can see in my links.
its simple remove the download.
create a collection and stop uploading other people's content. its really not that hard.
You've done it for lots of other addon packs...
i don't have any ill-will or reason to inherently steal from creators
yet you are giving our rights away
yes, i listed all the mod we used in our packages because i want to ensure people know who's mods we were using
so why not just add them to the collection rather than re-upload them?
well, as i said, i'm in the process of doing that
all of our missions have dependencies built from those files, and we're cutting content from those files because half the reason of those packages is to save our commandline
mark it as private for the duration then
we use armahosts, and we have to make sure our command line is 1:1 with mods
we can't just simply delete the mods
collections do that
sorry boss, but it isn't that simple for us
again, i don't intend to mishandle or abuse your services in any way, that wasn't my intention with the packages
It really simple for me
are you actually going to take legal action against someone who is just trying to save themselves the stress over simple ensuring their server doesn't crash?
again, i apologize for making the packages in the first place
and again, i don't have any ill will with the packages
but disposing of them takes time for us
Its shite like this that really make s me think twice about releasing anything again. You've been warned , you were told what you needed to do previously and looking at my records this isn't even the first time you've re-uploaded content and been DMCA'd so its not like its ignorance.
because our commandline and open-ended creation process isn't simply just setting it up once and letting it rip, the packages were in place so in case changes needed to be made, we didn't have to worry about rewriting the commandline
otherwise, our headless client rejects the mod order if it isn't 1:1, and our server won't run anymore
Doesnt seem to be an issue for others.
again, i don't mean for this to be an attack on you or some slight of hand trick with my apologies
It takes 5 minutes to make a collection with the same mods which are currently in the pack, remove the mod from the workshop and you're done.
For members; they just have to get the collection and download them
And rewriting the command line also takes 10 minutes...
Tbf... that these guys gave you the weekend to resolve it is already nice, I usually DMCA directly ๐คทโโ๏ธ
i don't see why you guys need to be so brutal about this, i'm trying my best
i only just got our maintainer to delete the old mods on friday, and i wanted to spend time with my family over the weekend
we aren't making money off the packages, most of them have been disposed of so far, and we weren't using these in an attempt to steal your work
i don't know what a dmca means or entails but
i'm not going to court over this, it's just a server of like 15 guys
we just want to play arma, and we have issues that required us to organize this way
again, i apologize sincerly
i understand the work you guys put in, this wasn't an affront against your efforts though
i just wanted to save myself some time and effort, same for my friends who wanted to make missions as well
you don't need to beat me over the head for this, i just need time to continue breaking these packages down and figuring out what can and should be cut
None of this is flying with me. You already made a collection. yet you chose to re-upload some stuff.
All of the reasons why you should not do this have already been explained.
from my perspective, we could have 100 mods that need to be sorted out in the command line, or we could have 20
if one of those mods are wrong in the commandline then it all comes crashing down for us, which is why it takes me time
i didn't know of these reasons until the end of last week when i came in here to apologize to the mod creators i unknowingly may have hurt by making those packages
so what are you going to do if i take time for myself? sue me?
i just want time to think about how i'm going to do this and ensure my missions are working after the mods are cut
i was just doing this for my friends, not to harm you
Keep going, you are just making it worse
i'm not trying to fight you mate
You were told what you need to do, you committed to do it. The legal reasons why you shouldn't do it were explained to you. You said you understood
i'm still just trying to make things right
now you are getting arsey because youve been called on it again
Delete the re-uploads
or wait on the DMCA results
Use a script for it like any sane person
again man, i'm trying my best
i just wanted to spend the weekend for my personal time, my last worry was over a video game that i play co-op missions with friends on
you have to understand i didn't mean for these packages to be an attack or total theft from you
i didn't intend to use them for any nefarious reasons, it was made so i can keep things simple for me and my friends
and i'm only halfway through the process of disposing of those packages
give me at least two more days before i can confirm it's all gone
we haven't even gotten to organizing out the vehicles package that you linked
i don't know what that even means
Well, he can't now that the DMCA is up
and again, i'm not going to fight you over this
yeah @tropic hatch just start redoing the dependencies, the mod is going down now and there isn't anything you can do about it
man i'm just trying to play a game with my group of friends
same here, and never had any issues ๐คทโโ๏ธ
i don't intend to get sued over it, but i don't intend to treat this like a career either
you aren't getting sued, you're just having your mod get taken down
okay, that's fine
as long as you don't try to counterclaim thats as bad as it will get
i don't intend to counterclaim no
but yeah you can't touch that mod upload anymore, can't even remove it. It is frozen until it is processed by Steam.
again i sincerely apologize, i was just trying to save myself some effort and i didn't realize these packages could be harmful to you folks until recently when i joined to get an understanding of how i could fix this
the packages weren't made in an attempt to steal or claim from you guys
well i'm glad to understand you guys aren't sending me to prison over this, i thought that was what was going on here honestly
i don't intend to counterclaim, and i understand the files need to be removed
they are being removed, and so far we've gotten stuff like the quality of life package, which had most of the mods, out of the way
btw... just checked the SW page of RKSL content, which has a link to the license which has in capital letters:
DO NOT UPLOAD TO STEAM WORKSHOP: It is forbidden to distribute the content of this package by itself, or as part of another distribution, using the Steam Workshop by anyone other than RKSL Studios. You may not upload to Steam Workshop or any other service that reassigns rights over RKSL Studios Intellectual Property to 3rd Parties.
Similar applies to most other mods in the list...
So no idea how anyone ever though about doing it anyway ๐คฆโโ๏ธ
the credits will continue to stay up so you guys may track what was in those packages here: https://steamcommunity.com/workshop/filedetails/?id=2219747783
i didn't really read any of that tbh
i didn't understand what it meant, and i didn't think doing this for my small gaggle of friends would have ever been such an issue
Not to mention the Workshop EULA which you need to agree on when submitting to the workshop, which states that you must OWN what you upload...
so my eyes naturally glazed over it
well, the fact that you don't read doesn't mean that it's allowed and people should leave you some slack...
of course not, it's not about how we came to this point my friend
it's about how we can fix it, which i'm fully intent on doing ๐
again, me coming into apologize and understanding how to fix this wasn't some lie through my teeth, as you can see most of the packages made by our maintainer and i are gone, deleted by us
i just needed some time due to the scope of what we were doing
or rather, what we've been tasked to do
i would have never guessed compiling a few mods to save myself a bit of trouble could go this far, but i thank you guys for not sending the entirety of the fbi or something on me as i'm sure some of you have the power to do haha ๐
anyways, dmca or not, this will not happen again
my violations, anyways
i don't know how much my word means on that, but i will do my best to ensure i pass this ideal along
not just to my guys, but any other unit i'm in that may have done this or considered it
and i apologize if it seemed like i was fighting you on this @chilly silo i was just trying to explain where i was in the process and why it seemed like i was lying to you about removing the mod
Ngl, looks like the guy made a mistake, he's apologised profusely for it and is taking things down. He's clearly apologetic about it so I'm confused why people rip into him, mans doing his best ๐คทโโ๏ธ
Maybe i've missed something, but thats the vibe I get.
His "best" would have been deleting the re-uploads days ago when first asked. ๐
problably didnt understand the siuation
Well My IP Rights > than his convenience.
if some guys were telling me "take it down take it down!" in wouldnt have a clue whats going on
Ye, I get that. Though you could've just told him to delete it or DMCA and be done with it. But once again ๐คทโโ๏ธ
I did
he made excuses
and that was 3 days ago
so when i find another re-upload i think im within my rights to be pissed enough to call him on it ๐
I understand that it looks pretty hard, but the problem is; if one person does it, everyone thinks they can do it as well. Which will result in the same problems as other workshop games (just look at how much ripped content there is for GMod etc.)
Some mod devs don't care, some do care but give out a warning first, while others just put down a DMCA directly.
In the end; it's not my problem if people don't read, even when they don't know copyright laws (which in most countries is well known)
Calling out is one thing, then theres just arguing. Should've just gone to DMCA tbh but eh.
I get ya Grez, totally agree - give people an inch they'll take a mile. I'm not defending him either, but at least he is communicative and from what I see attempting to fix his wrongs.
Anyways, cheers for the chat - hope it gets sorted soon. Have a good day / evening โ๏ธ
Ive spent 4 hours in the last 3 days doing Warnings and DMCAs. And god knows how long explaining why re-uploading content is bad. i believe in educate first then DMCA. I gave him 3 days to remove it. He didnt.
If you want to jump in and 2nd guess without doing the research before commenting i cant stop you. But before you get involved atleast take the time to get the facts.
That's kinda rude tbh. Was just giving my own opinion lol.
So is joining in without knowing what actually happened
Well the big old rant you provided seemed like enough lol
Yes he apologised. He did that 3 days ago too
All the best ๐
Show me where i ranted? I called him on his BS.
Points were made , DMCA issued,letโs move on, no point to keep going around in circles. Or take this chat to off topic IP
LMAO, its was a done issue until "opinions" were lofted over the wall ๐
!ban @tropic hatch 0 IP infringements - Steam reuploads. When you are done removing them, dm me (@manic laurel) to be unbanned from the official Arma Discord.
*fires them railguns at @tropic hatch* ร_ร
@blissful veldt thanks for the heads up. I'm probably going to let them leave it up since I have no plans to port it. But I appreciate you having my back.
Although they seem to be using pictures from a different guy's Miroslavl terrain. I'll make sure they're using mine though.
No problem!
Speaking of which, would one be allowed then to modify the terrains to finish them?
Was and still am a huge fan of the project, even though it seems to be unfortunately dead
correct
That wasn't his own mod though, that was his contribution to a different mod who's team let him on as a contributor (probably not the best choice to let a known ripper who openly states he doesn't care about it, onto your team ๐)
Your responsibility is not to slowly sort things out and update your packs.
Your responsibility is to take down the ILLEGAL uploads to the workshop, by deleting them IMMEDIATELY.
๐
He's not here anymore ยฏ_(ใ)_/ยฏ
"Sorry that I stole your car, but I still need it tomorrow to go shopping so you won't get it back yet"
Are you serious? Take it down NOW or it will be solved with DMCA's and a Ban for your unit.
If you don't have time to fix it properly, just delete it and then fix it later.
he - has - been - removed
@tropic hatch I'm starting to loose my patience too.
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2279653304
This contains mods that say on their main workshop page
For your Steam accounts safety, do not reupload it to the workshop as it violates Steam Subscriber Agreement section 6B.
Copyright 2019 diwako. This item is not authorized for posting on Steam, except under the Steam account named diwako
@burnt oak ^
@soft egret โโ Pandacg has been removed from this chat โโ
๐
banned - permanently - from the whole server
wowy
Okey I arrived at the bottom now
no, u the bottom

kinda sad i cannot see what he wrote now, oh well
no messages were removed
he was not purgebanned
aaaah, just blind as usual, got it
I am a huge proponent of FOSS and GPL, but man, if someone has spent endless hours of their free time you could at least have the decency to respect their work by not ripping it
if he knew how to read he would have spent all the free time with his family without being yeeted out from the community
I guess a lot of A3 community members lack of thing called "minimal responsibility"
not just this community but yes, mostly l*fers and anzusers
anzusers?
players of anzus stuff, which is a collection of illegal/hacked models and so on
if a4 could have proprietary workshop that'd be great ๐
revoking Arma license from poopy reuploads, hell yeah โ
Thats something that was mentioned in karels slide about the enfusion engine ๐
So who knows, it might happen
wasn't that presentation cancelled? or maybe I'm thinking about another one
the first date got cancelled but he held it digitally at the GDS conference two weeks or so ago
Not sure if I'm the biggest fan, but I'm gonna trust BI on that I guess
like you have a choice ๐งโโ๏ธ ๐
It'd of course be better if steam just improved their workshop, but I dont really have any reason to believe that thats happening any time soon
and would allow for not being a Steam-exclusive, too
โฆjust thought of Arma 4 on Epic Games ๐
Sounds like a good reason to not buy that Arma 4 
!purgedan @rapid cypress 0 betrayal!!1!

@manic laurel You missed the !
(oh, thanks!)

@rapid cypress Yeah Steam Workshop is... something. But I like the openness, well, apart from the guys stealing stuff
I don't really like monopolies, but then again Steam Workshop already is a monopoly
soon we will have a Bohemia Launcher!! \o'/
The Workshop is IMHO a great system for game devs to have proper mod support, but I think we can all agree that it's open for improvement.
And having different half-working systems for each game, which only costs extra money and resources for the game devs, and in the end just annoys players...
Hope the moddability of Enfusion will also bring waaaaaaaaaay better tools
Especially terrain tools
Btw I think this would be something better suited to #general_chat_arma , since we're way off topic
Oh yeah right
noban plox kthxbai
The only Thing i steal is hearts, but the Thing with this is... Uhh idk, is this illegal?: https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1487260770 If Not totally Fine, but seeing as Marvel falls under Disney im Just Not Sure :/
You are aware you can report the content on the workshop, or send an email to Disney/Marvel. Because there is nothing we can do about it (legally).
Regarding that mod; I would say that it's ok-ish, since the only thing which links to Marvel is the name (and perhaps logo, didn't check the content itself). Changing those to W.I.E.L.D. and it's a parody.
But I'm not a lawyer and it's up to Disney/Marvel to take action if they think it's needed.
Hello I'm the Project Lead. in regards to Disney we have communicated with them during development of the project over the past 3 years or so regarding usage of S.H.I.E.L.D.'s likeness. if you have any concern regarding my/our mods in the future feel free to reach out and ask we are happy to answer questions regarding this topic.
@earnest mirage
Disney, the IP rights holder EXPLICITLY PROHIBIT the use of its IP outside of its designated license holders. As such, its related IP are prohibited in Arma and on its Forums/Discords.
Please direct reports to us via one of the following methods:
Email: tips@disneyantipiracy.com```
In the 18+ years that I've been a member of this community, **Disney has never granted consent for use of its IP for this purpose**. When the Disney legal team was spoken to, their answer was (to paraphrase) "If you see someone saying otherwise, kill it with fire".
and @hot horizon โ
maybe if you provide evidence that would be great to settle the issue ๐
question, in terms of the SCP foundation, what is the status on usage in Arma 3 Missions
last time I heard about it, since these are internet creepy pasta, nobody copyrighted them - except for the obvious already existing games ofc, which you cannot reverse-engineer
thats what I thought, just wanted to make sure, thank you comrade!
don't take my word for it and look it up by yourself, but it seems to be that way. Good luck! o7
@small minnow you can find the licensing guide here http://www.scpwiki.com/licensing-guide
Might be worth adding to the bi wiki page
absolutely!
though, do we have more resources or is it about as much as we are getting?
Itโs what Iโm aware of
They do give the email of their licensing team though
done! thanks
btw: server monetisation expires on 2021-01-31!
https://www.bohemia.net/monetization
For the love of Cthulhu, end monetisation.
hey @midnight crystal thank you so so much! Appreciations!
Imo it shouldnt be ended, but restricted to reputable communities
Maybe monetization per request, and the community has to share information on their income
Like who paid what, what amount and what did they get
Otherwise, yeah, end monetization
it costs a lot of money to keep tabs on things like that
so BI would need a cut to cover the costs most likely
thats what I thought, just wanted to make sure, thank you comrade!
@small minnow hey there, i am assuming you found my Mod (SCP- EXPUNGED) to say the least, As far as i know the SCP Franchise is Uncopyrighted (atleast in Most countries (apart from russia.. thats still very Gray) and there for there should Not be any legal Issues, cheers
I added SCP links to the IP page
https://community.bistudio.com/wiki/Intellectual_Property#Other_Intellectual_Properties
if you have more sources, I gladly take them!
Oki, No problem
How about to add S.T.A.L.K.E.R. to the IP article? Was really a special case IIRC
Moderator "Don Reba" said it was "ok", based on a supposedly old IRC conversation he'd had with one of the developers. This was subsequently posted in 2011 (before the rights battle over STALKER IP). For me, its not the kind of proof I'd use as evidence.
The IP rights holders have not stated publicly that its "OK" in any way.
In a sense, it would be like me saying that "BI are OK with "x". I have no authority or legal standing to say so. As such it would be null and void.
OH! Thank you so much! Yep just wanted to make sure, thank you so much!
@small minnow @earnest mirage
"not imposing additional legal restrictions through EULAs or equivalent user forms, and not attempting to impede any alternate distribution sources so long as those sources in turn follow the terms of the license."
using SCP in Arma would restrict its license, which is forbidden
So, in essence, no Arma
Intellectual_Property wiki page to be updated
sorry about SCP-based Arma content, and thanks for you to amend! ๐
Keep it mind that some of SCP had another rules individually! (eg SCP-173)
Im gonna contact the Moderators of the SCP Wiki, and See If we can get Something sorted, my Mod dosen't contain any SCPs, Just Retextures and Custom Crates
We'd use Drongo's spooks and anomalies
Since we all know of what SCPs are Copyrighted and What Not, er didn't even really start on anomalies (we'd Just write our own)
https://community.bistudio.com/wiki/Intellectual_Property updated - as seen, this page can list misinformation and/or not be up-to-date. as recommended, always check by yourself - contact the IP owner if needed.
I am going to do that, i know one of them
if you can manage to get an Arma-wide exception, I am sure you will make many people happy ๐ ๐
Its Worth a try, lol
Wouldn'it it be fine if you were to distribute it outside of Steam? Or does it have to do with usage of the Arma Tools?
both actually
anything that went through BI Tools cannot be sold without prior agreement with Bohemia Interactive a.s
Well were not selling anything, were doing it for free
it is still subjected to EULA - and CC-BY-SA says "you can do everything you want, even sell it, without adding new restrictions"
new restrictions added are BI Tools EULA
Thats why you dont use uncommon/special licenses for public works ๐ bc theres a good chance you ll get license conflicts
Stumbled across this on the workshop...
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1374411073
Looks like there are quite a few different ones on his page
email the links to infringements@bistudio.com
I was like... looks like someone just did the same as CUP, importing Arma 2 objects...
and then I saw for which game the content is ๐คฆโโ๏ธ
I was looking for that email :P
Thanks
Lmao totally missed that
lol anyone look at the armed suv with the low polys lol
Hey not sure if this is relevant but I've just seen some guy bragging about porting this to his GTA 5 server
is that allowed?
i might be being special here but that looks straight from CUP which Im pretty sure in itself is from A2
i've just remade it and its all from CUP
then clearly not allowed, and clearly nukeable โข๏ธ
If its bohemia content, the mail in channel description.
If its CUP content, not sure if they or Bohemia would handle that?
I'd send it to cup, they can props judge better who should handle it
@dull moon, customer for ya?
I'll forward it. Not at home for quite some time
HAH! you're Santa, I knew it!
No, the grinch
It is originally from there, so not sure if CUP can strike it
Ah fair enough I thought it was an A2 port as I haven't played it in years. Don't mind me I was just curious
Cheers guys
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2307375575
This is dodgy as hell, pretty sure its got rips of @heady frigate 's stuff and a lot of other A2 and A3 mods. some VSM and others.
Although toadie doesn't really approve ripping her stuff, she's not into enforcing DMCAs on her stuff iirc.
Kill it with fire. Though I expect the "new guard" to say "stop, or I'll say stop again" (repeated ad nauseam)
Although toadie doesn't really approve ripping her stuff, she's not into enforcing DMCAs on her stuff iirc.
Which is her prerogative. But doesn't mean we should tolerate ripping. Her stuff is only a part of the ripped stuff in there. I'm told there lots of content from various games and other community authors I couldn't identify.
If someoen else want to take a look and see if they can identify its origin...
โฆthanks for your faith?
I always flag this kind of content, repacks etc.
It wasn't in reference to the Moderators.
nope. report to the email in the channel description
Ok thanks
So obviously Star Wars is a no by default, but is there any additional framework around IP and donations? I know the OPTRE team have a hard "no" policy on donations so they are not seen to be profiting off the Halo IP. I ask because I noticed the newest Star Wars mod on the workshop talks about paypal donations, and it made me wonder what the go with that is. https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2323185592
Asking for donations is completely fine, as long as it's to reward the developer for his hard work and not monetize the content.
If a dev team decides to not allow donations it's up to them, but other than the monetization rules there is no rule/law/whatever against asking for donations.
Pretty sure the donation can be seen as a simple "gift", as long as its not marketed towards paying for the content or anything like that then its okay
tbh Its up to the IP holder to decide how they interpret the term "donation". It varies.
Some of them might not look favourable even donations. Very dangerous to just assume its OK.
The consequences can be severe too.
Any receipt of money on an IP that you are using, but do not have explicit (legally binding) consent to use (and specifically addresses donations) can lead to EXTREMELY severe penalties.
Well I've already had severe backlash advising the mod creator that this Star Wars mod may be taken down in the near future, so I don't like my chances of also adding on top the fact that he should probably avoid donations... Might just let this one play itself out lol, if he digs his own hole deeper then that's on him.
yes well SW makers pretty much are aware of the possbile problems
they just ignore it
Unless it's a particular SW modding group, that ban people from using the mod and charge them to have their steamid removed from the code as a hard ban...
We don't Talk about those "People"... They are equally hated by EVERYONE including Most other Star wars Creators, be it in Arma, Battlefront or what not
If I remember correctly the first iteration of that ban caused a memory leak as well - they got clapped over it pretty swiftly.
@earnest mirage Hate is a strong word. They are looked upon with disdain for violating IP rights / laws.
fair enough, but no one would want any of their modders in their unit or anything
modders...lol
ouch, yea
Calling them "modders" is an insult to modders. Most of our "modders" are artists.
now that, is true
honestly.. these light saber animations look like fun and are well done ^^... i dont think all are hated that much only cause of any SW mod
We're talking about a different Mod ||SWOP|| they mainly ripped
TIL: copyright infrigment is a felony in the U.S. (same as murder, child pornography, burglary and many more)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Felony
and since disney is U.S. based, and the law of the country where a case is filed must be upheld, SW dudes need to dress warm if disney rolls out the big guns...
you might want to add this juicy piece of information to the Intellectual Property BIKI site @manic laurel
A felony is traditionally considered a crime of high seriousness, whereas a misdemeanor is regarded as less serious. The term felony originated from English common law (from the French medieval word "fรฉlonie"), to describe an offense that resulted in the confiscation of a convicted person's land and goods, to which additional punishments includi...
Honestly the light sabers and force mod can just change its name and remove the SW inspired screenshots. Call it laser swords and magic, boom, done.
And remove any reference to SW and lore elements
light-pokers and throwy-wind 
I don't get why it's such a huge problem. Same thing could happen to, lets say, all the usmc mods since usmc is a trademark on its own. That's just a mod and as long as nobody profits off of it there should be no problem at all imo
Because you are entitled to your IP and you're entitled to dictate how it's used. Do I agree with Disney's stance? No, but it's their right, and I gotta respect that. Just like I don't want ppl stealing my mods.
As for the USMC, I'm sure they don't mind, since it probably helps their recruiting lol
I don't mean it for the ripped assets, it's just the naming. And yes, they do have every right to do whatever they want with their IP but a bit of tolerance wouldn't cause any damage to anyone. I remember an apc mod almost getting sued by the company that makes those apcs irl. Like why? Just because they can?
Ye, because they can. It is what it is...
@urban nexus the thing is, anyone using the IP would need to ask for if its OK first before publishing anything.
Not just assume they can "just because they want to"
I don't get why it's such a huge problem. Same thing could happen to, lets say, all the usmc mods since usmc is a trademark on its own. That's just a mod and as long as nobody profits off of it there should be no problem at all imo
nope, not entirely true.
the name itself is Public Domain, just the logo from the USMC is a Trademark (iirc).
if you want to educate yourself on that matter, here some links:
Radio Arma Podcast about that matter:
https://soundcloud.com/armahosts-llc/ep-37-intellectual-property
Practical Guide To IP in Arma (by RKSL Rock):
https://arma3practicalipguide.blogspot.com/
BIKI Page:
https://community.bistudio.com/wiki/Intellectual_Property
DOD Trademark Licensing Guide:
https://www.defense.gov/Resources/Trademarks/DOD-Trademark-Licensing-Guide/
Afaik trademark holders NEED to defend their rights?
Yes
still illegal ยฏ_(ใ)_/ยฏ
IIRC the Blue Harvest mod for Arma 3 was sent a cease-and-desist by Disney before it was even released any further than a single demo character model. That was many years before SWOP and any other SW mod appeared, and all original content rather than stuff ripped from EA's SW titles
hence the standing position of moderators to keep all SW content away from official community channels - they know it attracts problems
I'm sure SWOP got a C&D as well, but Russia...
I'm just surprised that Steam isn't doing anything about it (or other platforms)
Blue harvest stopped since Disney prohibited the IP use. No CnD was issued I believe
They did not want to risk it
They have and they still do.
Thatโs why Iโm all for complying with Disney. Not complying may lead to a sh!tstorm of IP troubles across the board. Would rather let sleeping dogs lay and have it not be an issue.
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2332762061 - its has @vivid wave plp stuff in and full JSRS mod + bunch of cars of unknown source.
Uh, poolpunk's?
ah sorry wrong tag I guess
Doubt he's here. He has both BIF and Twitter account so should work there
lifers...
Pretty sure copyright infringement can be prosecuted as both a felony or misdemeanor, depending on severity, like say for instance, theft.
comparing it to child pornography is... well I don't even know... a little obtuse to say the least?
just trying to add a civil discussion to this where it seems many seem to get somewhat emotional.

What the hell happened here
@tawny mesa I can only recommend you watch your words. You have been warned and your post removed.
pretty sure no one here has a standing since the Nintendo case in the us back in 1998
also the "good faith" defense limits the case to a misdemeanor at best
honestly if anyone ever gets shit for a DMCA or harassed incessantly, don't give in. Lawyer up and throw libel counter suits if you need to.
Its disgusting reading everything thats said in here. You aren't a child molester, a murderer, or a domestic abuser. Its a game from seven years ago that you want to make content for. I suggest everyone study at least a little law to know where your rights end and somebody elses begin. Honestly all this third-party pseudo-lawyeresse helps no one at all.
No one at all ever got exorbitant prison time for anything like this; and to say that someone is on par with the worst of the worst scum is awful
That's because a DMCA is a step before any lawyer gets involved, and when they do it usually results in a deal or worst case a huge sum of money.
If you can't/won't pay than it will result in prison time
And yes, I have seen the moment that someone got arrested for not paying up!
Arrested and tried? Or was it an out of court settlement?
Bond or bail?
and what was the case?
Look, I'm not trying to say it was wrong or anything, I'm saying that the general person should know their right and where they end.
Case: stealing code from a company (copyright case).
DMCA got ignored, lawyers couldn't agree, judge ruling in our favor.
He didn't want to pay, and got arrested to either pay or sit in jail
thats...
That's how the law works in case of copyright infringement
And if you don't agree I don't care, but don't cry afterwards when you sit in jail or have to pay the rest of your life
That last part is moral turpitude
to maliciously try to bankrupt someone in a case like that would be illegal in and of itself
While I believe we can all agree that comparing a copyright abuse to child molesting / murder / domestic abuse is over-the-top, it still seems to be the actual case in regard of the US law, of which Steam depends. That's unfortunate and it is what it is, but there is not much we can do about that.
Still, copyright abuse is at least fraud, if not blatant theft and/or deception. Our job here is to protect creators (who get discouraged when l*fers get money out of their creation) and to protect Bohemia Interactive (that could be caught in the crossfire).
Simple rule: don't misuse a copyright - otherwise, you will indeed have a community against you. Condone copyright abuse, and you get removed from here. (I say "you" as a general addressing here)
Okay so what you're saying in your simple rule is that if you, and I will stress this because what this amounts to is a witch-hunt that opens you yourself to a slander suit in america at the very least, ALLEGEDLY misuse a copyright or condone copyright abuse, you (the general addressee) will be removed from the public forum in which it might be issued, am I wrong?
What this does is throw things to a court of public opinion, in which any number of things may happen to the general addressee, no the least of which harassment in and of itself.
To throw that particularity into the wind is disgusting.
tl;dr it just throw a community at someone because they ALLEGEDLY violated copyright is wrong
It's basic international law... And that is pretty clear...
But its not.
It really isn't.
Fair Use/Transformitive law is a fucking mess
i hate working with it.
In most cases I#ve seen here, its usually a pretty clear case that someone infringed on someone elses rights (like repacking their mod with permission) 
And "fair use" does not apply to "copy & paste"...
thats not what im getting at at all
what I'm saying is that everyone here can be fudging sued for the misrepresentation of a DMCA
i just want people to be safe
No one gets sued here... Especially when they don't do anything wrong...
And if they do, it's explained why, and if they still intentionally break the law, it's up to the dev to go into legal steps...
I did not mean "having a community against you" as in "releasing the krakken" - more like "don't expect to receive any support" and to get told off, clearly
look at guys @ RHS, or CUP, or anyone
then their model is ripped, sold, the thieves get money and the mod group gets complaints that that specific model was not updated in agesโฆ nope, let's protect that creation spree
sir to be fair no one expects anyone to be with them or against them besides the prosecution in any court case.
and we don't enforce "ban on possible and potential doubt"
if it is a clear breach of e.g Disney's IP (Star Wars, Marvel) we enforce,
if it is a clear reupload, we enforce,
if it is "ah, this weapon looks like the prototype one in COD if you remove this and that"โฆ nah, differences
before any court, the intent and action of (obvious) copyright breach speaks for yourself
a.k.a stealing work and/or credit. that's about it ๐คทโโ๏ธ if it goes to court, I assume enough evidences have been brought up
they tend to be more discreet - and they also lose their reupload, and potentially their Steam account.
inaction of Bohemia's representatives / politics would not be well accepted, don't you think? it would be like holding the door to them - the message is sent that: nope
There's a simple trick when it comes to DMCAs. Just don't reupload stuff that isn't yours. Boom problem solved
But its not the reuploading thing I have issue with as well, morals not withstanding.
So what is your issue? Because I don't get it...
The biggest issue, to me is transformative works, such as things from star wars and star trek and all that fun jazz
I dont see much of a case for DMCA, if no assets were ripped, and only the world and lore of the work is used
I personally don't agree with Disney's stance on that, but they legally have the right to prevent anyone from using their IP, e.g to make sure potential customers will buy their next Star Wars game.
Its closer to a parody, protected under the Fair Use clauses, rather than a derivative work, which doesn ot
I think I share your point of view regarding "nothing has been ripped, no one pays for anything"
but still.
We (us of the modding/Arma community) do not have the legal or moral standing to decide whether or not they are worthy of a DMCA
And that's where you're wrong... "Close to a parody" doesn'tean it IS a parody, and therefore NOT fair use...
nothing has been ripped, no one pays for anything
Well that doesnt go for the SWOP 'mod'
correct
I'm not naming names.
but We (responsible community members) also get to protect BI for it not to be caught in crossfire when Disney bulldozer arrives
And no one in this community is able to DMCA content we don't own...
So if something got filed it has to be done by Disney (or legal entity)
I'm saying that what we as a community should do is just send letters/emails/what have you to people who do have the actual authority to DMCA and follow up.
a report to Steam is good enough? ๐คทโโ๏ธ
Well enough, I suppose, but I more meant the copy-right holder.
Steam is not the holder, nor the accused.
Rather, a third-party middleman.
we are like steam, in that case.
third party.
and it is in their EULA that you should not upload illegal stuff nor reupload stuffโฆ so their EULA is breached as well
Who is hosting the possible illegal content, and therefore IS responsible
The question is whether or not it is illegal.
therein lies the roundabout nature of copyright
it is.
yes. let's close the topic now.
Breaking copyright laws = illegal
wow.
https://community.bistudio.com/wiki/Intellectual_Property#Other_Intellectual_Properties for those who are still interested in the original topic.
why, thank you! โบ๏ธ
Didn't realize we had so many legal professionals in the Arma 3 Community. Glad you guys work so hard for us.
Also for those who are interested in law, though I know I might have this comment removed. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lewis_Galoob_Toys,_Inc._v._Nintendo_of_America,_Inc.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derivative_work#The_fair_use_defense_in_derivative_work_cases
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_turpitude
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berne_three-step_test
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_law_of_the_United_States#Copyright_limitations,_exceptions,_and_defenses
Know your rights.
nope, we welcome information
I'm glad.
Some people have been in the industry long enough to know how it works
Especially when it comes to differences in different countries and different types of content.
lets close the topic now
we welcome information

information
not really an open debate here
@rustic copper I'm not really supposed to debate here now but I am interested in knowing copyright laws on a country to country basis, hmu?
"are we judge, jury and executioner" no, we simply don't take the risk of trying to pass a situation that has been seen 100s of times before and where it always ended badly
something that "looks like" is not a copyright breach, using an IP without permission is theft, period - unless you can prove me wrong?
I'm, again, not supposed to say anything, sorry.
well, do you have a counter information?
What is "counter information" here?
I'm not trying to be contrary, despite what you may skew from it.
let's not make any mistake - I just don't want anyone here taking defense of obvious thieves. is an obvious unauthorised IP usage theft in regard to the US law, yes - so yes, end of the discussion no? ๐คทโโ๏ธ
Sir, i've already had my discussion ended 5 minutes ago, you've said it yourself.
perfect then
Yep
.
.
๐ฎ
๐ค
Bazinga
agnizaB
What thieves have been defended specifically...?
it was discussion about IP rights in general I thought
But if there are any Copyright and/or IP lawyers on this discord, feel free to contact Lou to get some factual information on the wili
lol
wiki* ๐ฌ
how freudian
actual lawyers have better things to do than play internet sheriff with you guys, I'm afraid. Peace.
Moderators also have better things to do, and still Lou is here
that's absolutely why Bohemia Interactive has a legal department that went and validated everything listed there
https://community.bistudio.com/wiki/Intellectual_Property
Looks like a whole hour of billable time, holy smokes.
it was a general statement - if one come to me and say "yeah but Arma Star Wars mods are Fair Use", they are not
https://community.bistudio.com/wiki/Intellectual_Property#Fair_Use
only works for research/educational purpose as a personal right, and (apparently) on parody count.
and so far mods are not parodies.
they can be
Purdue uni's got a cool tool for copyright exceptions based on previous court cases.
that's interesting, thanks for sharing
Also most of that BI wiki is about defending BI's own property, so of course they'd have their legal team comb that page and that part is obviously clearly defined. the rest is defensibly speculative.
the rest is indeed not taking risks on others' EULA (hence why no green light is used, too)
Hey all, can I do anything about someone locally uploading my pbos without my permission? PBOs that have been removed from the steam workshop
I do completly respect other's IP and I did a lot to get my modification to be a legal stuff.. I had to contact EA and I had to get by Bohemia Interactive a official statment about modifications and their usage (Nillers knows about what im talking and Lou also). At least, I dont want to have any troubles with EA, and also no troubles with BI and also I dont want to make any troubles for BI, and that is for me important. If people think they can just go with "Fair Use", I dont know..
One can always contact the respective IP holder to get solid permission/understanding on what they allow and don't allow. like what Sentry did with his mod. Or consult a proper IP lawyer when thinking of using someone else's IP for whatever. Knowing ones rights is good but assuming one knows what you can do by few wiki articles and such can be risky.
@sonic moss what kind of a license was attached to the mod and where are they uploaded to?
No real license. The PBOs were part of the There is Only War mod and have been removed from the steam workshop by my request in the recent update because I will upload these files in my own mod. An arma 3 unit apparently had a backup of these files and uploaded them to their own website which is being dowloaded by hundreds of people with out my permission
https://git.mls5.uk/w/700th/installing_local_mod_s/ to this webiste
@faint nacelle
Ah. Well if no license, then strictest possible rules apply. You can request their service provider to remove them.
I assume they are not open for civil discussion about that?
They have not even asked me about reuploading my files
And they're the type of people to come up with some legal jargon to cover their asses, anyways i'm gonna go deal with that then
thanks alot

Mod maker makes nice stuff to play with => "community" pays back by throwing flaming poop bags at the mod maker because "I just want to"
In the end, people just want more shit to play with, they don't care where it comes from
sad
isnt the 700th Rimmys Group?
Nope
ah yeah. hes the Cadian XXth. 700th is a different group.
This is what I have to spend my time with, god damnit I just wanna mod
It were some vehicles and character models I have made for the There is Only War mod which I am no longer part of. The issue has been resolved, I have talked with them.

@ember lintel mods are not covered by "fair use" (commentary, search engines, criticism, parody, news reporting, research, and scholarship)
well I suppose you could make a parody mod
but so far none of the mods using established IP are not doing that
yes, but no one has done so. So Id advice not claiming "fair use" makes IP use legit.
๐
as already stated by HG here, Fair Use is not just stating "Fair Use!" and you're magically good (of course).
Fair Use is covered on the IP wiki page and states its limits (like personal use) :slight_smile:
don't worry (although reading that first message made me go "huh?!"), I did read your later message so no problem here.
This last message of mine is a recap for visitors of this channel
But its not. Fair use only applies when its small parts of protected works for personal use. In the context of Arma mods, Fair use is almost impossible to apply. And it ceases to be applicable when it leaves your own hard drive.
What part is "huh"?
we cleared that up some messages ago I suppose ^^
huh, no
https://community.bistudio.com/wiki/Intellectual_Property#Fair_Use
"Fair Use" is very often called as the ideal line of defense regarding copyright infringement.
Alas for its subscribers, Fair Use most likely means allowed for research and educational purpose, under which gaming/modding does not fall. It is also a personal, non-commercial "default license" that cannot cover a mod team nor Steam distribution of such work.
yep, parody
but parody has to be justified, and is not applicable to a modset ๐
if you see a Benny Hill mod making fun of the game, sure
releasing a fully-functional mod, noppity nope
so Fair Use cannot be used as a "cover" for a mod, only a mod dedicated as a parody
you said it in a way that could be understood as "anyone could use Fair Use for anything", which is not the case, obviously
Works of fair use can be distributed publicly
yet this โ sounded otherwise, so we better clarify all this well
tru
okay well, please refrain from taking bits of sentence out of context to try and make Fair Use look like it's the answer to everything. It is not.
I don't debunk you particularly, I want to have a clear rule around here. That's it.
which
People can indeed "just go" with fair use, it's protected use and is legal.
and
Works of fair use can be distributed publicly
were NOT saying
unlike
claiming fair use doesnt indicate fair use, so yeah, obviously.
I wasnt at all advocating people to falsely claim fair use.
Since we agree to agree, can we then stop? for the channel clarity and sanity, thanks
I could presume that's what you hoped for
yeah, I feed on bans. you got me ๐ bye
Wait so i can make a pokemon/simpsons/familyguy mod for arma3 and they can't say anything because its a parody?
You are missing the context too. Fair use cannot be used in isolation either. It is weighed as part of the a larger context. If you release a (lets say Star Wars) mod into a game that competes with an already established Licensed game ie mod for Arma vs Star Wars Battlefront, Fair use cannot apply. As in the case of Star Wars the IP holder already reserves all rights. But you release a mod - fair use or not - that uses their IP (The star wars universe is probably the most legally protected story in history) and undermines one of their licenses. You don't really have a legal leg to stand on.
As Lou has repeatedly said. There is no support or defence under fair use the moment you release anything that impacts on their business. Either financially or just in terms of reputation.
Fair use was not written into law to be an excuse. Just a possible defence. Even the Parody clause wouldn't hold up if you release anything that impacts on their finances even if you make the Storm-troopers pink and yell "owie" when they die. Context is everything in Fair Use and in this context none of the Fair use justifications would be considered.
exactly NOT.
see, @ember lintel? that's precisely why I want clear sentences.
nothing personal against you or anything, just clear sentences so people don't think they can circumvent laws then get in trouble.
Nope.
Unless you can prove that it is just a parody and not an attempt to subvert or other wise impact on their business. Which i'm going to suggest is almost impossible to do. As they also licence their IP for computer games
So how do other mod devs get away with it?
they ask for permission to the IP holder.
Like the 40k, star wars and the countless other mods baised on movies and books.
I really can't see games workshop giving thier ip to a compitent dev.
But thanks for clearing this up for me.
Either too small for the IP holder to notice or the IP holder has weighed the cost/benefit as not being worth it.
I was talking to a guy that works for Games Workshop last week. He said, if a mod were to get a following large enough for the office to notice it, they would shut it down. or if a License holder complained they would start legal action but honestly most of the time they simply are not aware of the mod so don't know to take action.
Buy from the legit sources no issue. ๐
Buy from the rip-off makers in China, you are only hurting Games workshop and if you are a fan, then potentially jeopardising the future of the company. I know that sounds extreme but small issues mount up and eventually can be what breaks a company.
Lmao i have NO loyalilty to games workshop after they raised the prices of models in my area. But none the less thank you both for you advices.
People don't tend to pay attention, or only pay attention to find the thing they are looking for.
They will search exactly for, and will find your statement saying that "fair use can be applied" and say "I'll apply fair use, I read on the official Arma discord that it's a thing i can do"
Keep in mind that "Fair Use" only applies to copyright, NOT to Intellectual Property, Trademarks, Patents, or anything else.
And a parody falls under Fair Use, correct, whoever just saying it's a parody does not cut it... It must be clear that it is not related in any way to the original content; so names must be different, it must look different, etc. but may sound/look similar enough for people to understand what the parody is about.
eg. if I would make yellow blocky units in Arma it could fall under a parody of Lego. If I make them look exactly like Lego figures, call them Lego figures (or any other official term) and promote it as a Lego mod, it's not a parody anymore and simply a breach of all kind of laws...
!purgeban 495425973898969088 0 spreading falsehoods in #ip_rights_violations
*fires them railguns at @ember lintel* ร_ร
cooox#2181 now has 2 infractions.
๐ค huh?
nothing, carry on!
but... my popcorn...?
sad crunching noise
I wonder how long the ban list is at this point
seems like this stuff just repeats itself once or twice a week, and always ends the same way
yep
let's make things clear for the next ones:
trying to find a potential eventual maybe loophole to justify breaking the law ("""Fair Use""" claim included) will end up in a ban.
Please refer to https://community.bistudio.com/wiki/Intellectual_Property for actual definitions.
Please, mind that this does not prevent you from asking details/information/direction to the community.
I wonder how long the ban list is at this point
seems like this stuff just repeats itself once or twice a week, and always ends the same way
@crystal talon It is quite long. Idiots without a clue think they can drop a few keywords that they learned on Google 10 minutes prior to excuse their illicit behaviour. They frequently omit specific details like "personal use only". Or sadly, more frequently, claim that their project is specifically for personal use only, then say that its for use in public servers. As they say, you can't cure stupid.
@echo orchid You might want to have a look at https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2328046812
showed a bunch of RHS path files when I was looking around for CUP reuploads
Is that not just because it contains RHS patches? @crystal talon
nevermind it has rhs itself lol
cheers will have a looky
@echo orchid https://www.cgtrader.com/3d-models/military/armor/three-ops-core-fast-ballistic-helmets Isn't that the rhs ops core?
@urban nexus yes, mirrored
Don't know is this the right place, but isit legal to unbinarize arma 3 animation .rtms and edit them?
the right place it is, and no is the answer
(unless specifically allowed by BI ofc)
What's the legality of me buying a P3D made with arma toolbox? (technically not using BI Tools right?)
It uses, so illegal
Just being curious, what BI Tool does it use?
Object Builder
I'm not trying to get around anything btw, just want to have more knowledge on this
or O2 as it used to be called (which you need to set a path to in ArmaToolbox)
ahh makes sense now
Basically buy/sell Arma ready thing is completely illegal, as you already know
thought it was a completely independent app
yep yep
would arma ready be only it being a p3d or would selling an "arma ready" fbx/obj/blend file also be illegal
"arma ready" is completely fine, since it doesn't require any BI Tools to make
so the moment it's in a format by BI (.p3d, .paa, etc) it's not allowed anymore
little grey area since it needs arma tools to check it works
*has never been allowed
@rustic copper
so just to be clear, selling a blend file with all the config, model.cfg and textures in png and simply having the other person use obj/arma toolbox to import would be legal right
I'm just having a discussion with some developer friends
It should. Bohemians can't throw you into a jail because of it I'm sure
Unless they update the EULA
Alrighty that clears a lot of things up, thanks
Is there no issues with taking a game mode and adding my name to list of credits for creators? For example i have the BMR master files and add a ton of new features and new maps to play on also new factions to play as and versus. I would of course still leave the original credits in the file too as its not my game mode.
i new to mission creation/editing so want to make sure ill be fine ๐
You would need to ask the original authors for editing permission ๐
@manic laurel is there any issue with for ex, making a seperate version of that gamemode, in for example RHS, if its a vanilla mode like Escape altis
?
My wording isnt the bes
best*
let me rephrase that
Is ist ok, if i take a vanilla gamemode like escape altis
and rework it to be with for example RHS
using BI scripts and configs should be fine
So yeah, modifying the BI Escape missions to use RHS, or porting them to different terrains, should all be fine.
Does anyone know if Fallout New Vegas IP is allowed to be used in Arma? https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1285636607
Isn't mentioned on https://community.bistudio.com/wiki/Intellectual_Property
no issue at all indeed for a vanilla game mode
thx
@crystal talon no.
Are you assuming by default, or have you dug into it?
Want to clarify it on the IP page
to be fair, it is no by default until proven otherwise ๐ (but I got your question don't worry)
Bethesda license prohibits it
Or we'll the use of the assets at least, which that mod does
Can't remember exactly where it was, but zenimax and Bethesda got licence faq type pages
I guess part 3, Limited License to Use covers that.
You may not (a) distribute, publicly perform or display, sell, transmit, publish, edit, reproduce, sublicense, rent, lease, loan or otherwise transfer any Game, Software, and/or Content, including without limitation any access keys; (b) modify, adapt, reverse engineer or decompile the Software, or otherwise attempt to derive source code from the Software; (c) create any derivative works based upon any Services; (d) otherwise access, receive, play or use any Services except as expressly provided in these Terms of Service; (e) copy or download any Software or Content unless the Content is a Game Mod available for download from a ZeniMax website or is Downloadable Content (other than Virtual Currency) or You are otherwise expressly authorized to do so in writing by ZeniMax; and/or (f) remove, obscure, or alter copyright, patent, trademark, or other proprietary rights notices affixed to any Services. Any commercial use or play of a Service (including but not limited to eSports and multiplayer video game competitions) is prohibited absent written permission by an authorized representative of ZeniMax.
someone correct me on that
Ye that's the one I was thinking of
It forbids all use of material as far as I can understand
Which is the typical approach of most developers
my alphabetical order! :U
Fixed it 
pretty sure fnv isnt made by bethesda its made by obisdian
yeah, but whose license is that?
dont know if thats how it works, is it not down to the developer to decide which of their own assets created by them can be used
zenimax owns both
and Im quite certain youll find the same clauses in all of their licenses
bethesda owns fallout franchise as far as I know
dunno if microsofts deal for Bethesda is yet done
game developer โ prevents from using assets
license owner โ prevents from using the world/environment
from Fallout 4 EULA on Steam
Id wager same applies to older titles as its is quite common
another problem rises from the fact that the mod team is making money from the project
sure not a lot
but its more than 0
ah MS bought zenimax
and bethesda is part of zenimax
so zenimax license should apply
MS -> Zenimax -> Bethesda -> fallout 3+
@atomic shuttle if you got any better info please do share
does that mean fo4 mods (for fo4) aren't allowed?
mods have separate paragraph if I recall right
as in game mods for fallout games
and how the content can be used in that
but taking the content out of the game and putting it into another game I dont believe is allowed
which should be quite clear and reasonable
as well as how the modding works
do read the zenimax eula if you want clear text
Im not a legal counsel
@faint nacelle On the Microsoft / ZeniMax thing.
The actual deal isn't being signed off in full until July this year, iirc.
So ZeniMax's current rules still apply, as opposed to Microsoft's, in so far as what you can / can't do with the property.
Which is obviously irrelevant when it comes down to individual assets, and is more to do with how you create content that draws from said IP.
that we gladly invite you to click, fill and submit
Is SWOP okay or not okay?
not okay
doesn't make it right tho
Definitely. 2017 and itโs still up? Noice
then you can click it and file the report to steam, thank you for your patience
If you would like to report Disney IP rights violations (for users that aren't present here), please do so by contacting Disney directly: tips@disneyantipiracy.com or chris.holm@lucasfilm.com
Looks like those are the emails for send those to, to report them
That is not a mod, just a composition using the already existing mods. Not sure if one can report a composition.
probs not
I see, they got the SWOP Mod now on ModDB ๐ค
Life rippers boldly advertising on the forums now https://forums.bohemia.net/forums/topic/232401-road-gta-5-map-to-arma-3-4k-4096-x-2160/
#ARMGTA ะญัะพ ะผะพะดะธัะธะบะฐัะธั ะดะปั arma 3 This is a modification to the game arma 3 All news on the transfer of the map from GTA5 to Arma 3 here Part 20 Road GTA 5 map to Arma 3 4k 4096 x 2160
wtf ๐
Interesting. Until now I've only seen RHS assets being ripped and ported to GTA, not the other way around
There was a guy recently that ported some police clothes iirc
but honestly, he did it well detailed and no roadway bugs ^^
yeah this will be horrible ofcourse. but getting this driveable all together, adding all geometries, adding different sounds where you walk etc.. in some way, he did a great job. just to port if from GTA V isnt a good option ^^
I think the only reason SWOP is still up is because of their disclaimer
# DISCLAMER:
This mod is an unofficial resource and is in no way linked to Lucasfilm ltd, the Walt Disney company, Electronic Arts inc. or Twentieth Century Fox. The "Star Wars" brand and all the intellectual content of this mod is based on the property of "The Walt Disney Company" and the use of which is exclusive for non-profit purpose.
Star Wars copyright 1977 Twentieth Century Fox film corporation. All rights reserved. tm & copyright 1977 Lucasfilm ltd. Star Wars logo and all related characters, names and indicts are trademarks of & copyright 2012 Lucasfilm ltd. All rights reserved., or their respective trademark and copyright holders.
All the computer programs and software are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. We make no warranties, express or implied, that they are free of error, or are consistent with any particular standard of merchantability, or that they will meet your requirements for any particular application. They should not be relied on for solving a problem whose incorrect solution could result in injury to a person or loss of property. If you do use them in such a manner, it is at your own risk. The author and publisher disclaim all liability for direct, indirect, or consequential damages resulting from your use of the programs.
that holds no legal value
^
Yet it's working
Or Disney just hasnt gotten around to them 
not thanks to useless fancy words that don't mean anything
it's like stealing a car and saying "this vehicle is provided 'as is' and is in no way related to the Ford Sales department - use at your own risk"
cool story bro, but you are still coming with us

Yes but in this case he's been driving the car from the Ford Sales dept for 2 years and the cops just can't catch up
๐
that's most likely the case, it's not the text that is protecting them ๐
Welp guess we just gotta hope that the cops can get a new car and speed up at some point 
I gotta ask, i SWOP the only one by taking their assets or is all starwars related content for Arma disallowed?
All
stealing assets is another bad thing on top of the ip violation
Disney doesn't allow groups to use their themes, models, characters, imagery, etc for the Star Wars universe, even in not-for-profit gaming. With that said, it seems like the bigger "star-sims" make a ton of profit. I recall last year seeing one of their Patreons being ~$1000 / month.
In all likelihood, Disney just doesn't care enough to enforce it against these groups (they're a tiny blip in the world of IP infringement as far as Disney is concerned), but that doesn't make it any less illegal.
BI and Steam typically don't enforce the IP of others (like Disney) unless the "others" dispute it. If that were the case, more than half the A3 Steam Workshop could be taken down ๐
Every IP infringement is equally dangerous for the IP holders rights as far as I know. But it is indeed up to Disney to clean up. What we don't do is endorse it.
Give it time. Historically LucasArts Disney has left the Licensees (eg EA and others) to police their own areas of IP. But now Disney is clawing back all the PC and Console franchise licences under their own Lucasfilm Games brand. So Disney will now be solely responsible for policing their own IP again. With that I expect there will be a lot less tolerance.
can't wait when I'll be 70 years old to be able to play star wars mods on other games
You can now. Just buy a license ๐คฃ
This channel should be changed to star wars ip violations
if they keep going, yes!
not our fault if SW IP violators just keep going
if they can do it, why can't we?
and not only by LifeRP and SW communities...
Hello everyone, recently i have realise a "mate" who have benn uploading mods (pbo files), which already exist to the workshop and changing the author. Iยดm not sure if this is the correct site to report this, but someone told me that so there it goes
this would be it yeah
Ok so the person who iยดm talking about, has taken lots of mods like all the CUPยดs, RHSยดs, FFAA, by mention only a few. And he has reupload then by puting himself as the author.
Moreover he told everyone his the responsible of most of the modยดs developement, and also he use this mods to attract people to his clan.
These mods are on the workshop but are only visible to the clanยดs members
Anyway these mods are parallel versions to the oficial ones and the author of these versions is changed
Youยดll cant see it cause is hiden visivility
only added people (members of the clan) can see
This is the account which upload the mods
https://steamcommunity.com/id/lafraya/<--- and this is the man behind the last account
Thank and sorry for inconvenience
I forget mention it before but he change the author from all the workshop missions that we use to play every weekends, and the maps that we used to use, too
can you provide screenshots w/ URL in them?
Yes, if you want i can share my screen and show you the worckshop folder with all the PBOs
and itยดs workshop page
anyway, i've a video where i show all de mods they have upload parallel to the official ones. I also show how those mods have the same pbo files than the oficials and the mod.cpp file, where they have put another author insted of the real ones.
to who i have to send it to?
/where
i have the screenshots were you can see the mod's page with the url, but i can not send any image. Dont know why, but i do not have the option
you can paste a link to an image hoster
(sorry, I cannot deal with it as of right now; most likely tomorrow if someone else didn't before)
you can flag all his reuploads (by clicking the little flag icon) and tell Steam it's a reupload, and paste the original's URL
Thank you very much, this is very usefull
Did this guy just stole a bunch of stuff from other creators?
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2371904793
thats a GB of stuff
have you seen what's inside?
No, thats why I am asking
checked with the workshop crawler but it doesn't seem to be working rn
Contributors:
(โฆ)
RHS - "Ex Navy SEAL dudes"
I mean..
If/When this mod gets taken down reupload it bois. They can't DMCA everyone lol..
can someone check the files please no access to pc for the next 2 days
and yes i can dmca everyone
only he doubted that ๐
"I am a "Banner Contributor" on the Official Arma 3 Sub-Reddit so a lot of my work is featured on there. "
Textures for Mk17 and MP7 magazines from RHSUSF mixed in with VSM JPCs and AVS vests.
It's mostly VSM stuff mixed in with RHS and a few other mods.
Sabre's SOTG uniforms in there too.
โฅโฅโฅโฅ Gold squadron, โฅโฅโฅโฅ USP, โฅโฅโฅโฅ RHS, โฅโฅโฅโฅ โฅโฅโฅโฅโฅโฅโฅโฅโฅโฅ studios, โฅโฅโฅโฅ PUFU. Spineless creatures.
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2208357150
Description from their other mod
this someone whos been dmcad recently?
though the salt will keep roads open in this winter time nicely
thanks
lol, yeah will rekt cheers
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1301056474
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1271605975
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1519704902
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1916280048
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1301081115
Ah good old Garry's Mod, where IP/Copyright/.. apparently dont exist
lmao
Or Garry's Mod, aka the black hole of infringements 
Please make sure to send them to the E-Mail
flagged'em all
TFL vests reuploaded. Love how they think it was us that DMCA'd them, but maybe we'll dig around a bit and see if there's a reason we can. Assuming someone else doesn't get to it first. https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2374166937
Is TFL the one with drama a few months ago?
also these sort of groups cannot grasp the simple fact that property exists, and ripping and using ripped content is theft
that's like saying it's not theft if I let someone use my car, and they never returned it
LOL you talk about ethics then say crap like that ๐
you are permitted to download and use mods according to the licences attached to them
Mate, either you've got some seriously skewed world views or you're too young to know better, I also don't understand how taking something that someone else has made and claiming it your own is ethical
Because you claim it is by uploading to Steam
if it goes against the license it comes with then it is
the maker is the victim
you are not the maker, you dont get to make a call
I guess we wont see you for long here anymore then
Law is what matters here
if you support stealing then those people usually do get shown the door
well I get the feeling you dont want to either
you "just want to do what you want to do"
"No officer, I was Travelling"
no you think only of yourself
ok so if you really want to know, by uploading something to Steam workshop you claim ownership of the thing you upload
which in this case is therft of intellectial property
I don't see how using a mod in a pack without claiming the mod was made by me would be theft of any kind.
That's just using a product you were allowed to get for free.
Like how you can usually do whatever you like with programs you download.
if the license prohibits redistribution outside the authors channels of choice, it's illegal. period.
If you made something, and started giving it away for free, would you like if someone came, took half of your stock and started giving it away himself? It doesn't matter if it's free that's just being rude
you cant go inventing your own rules in a sosiecty
you are doing that on your own mate.
You're getting yourself there
then you dont have to be part of this one
And that's what we do on the steam workshop, we could be uploading to armaholic or modb where there is no restriction, but instead we're using Steam where we are claiming to have made it ourselves and don't want other people using it
@elder scroll
get educated
https://soundcloud.com/armahosts-llc/ep-37-intellectual-property
kthxbye
You can't even follow simple licences
If you don't want to follow the laws here, I hear that there are some un-inhabited islands you can live on where you are free to dictate what's right and wrong
No u, I don't follow laws without thought lol
I actually think for myself.
as a person that works in an industry that is tightly related to IP and copyright for many years now, i can say: you are full of ๐ฉ
To the nuthouse?
do i hear the sound of a rail gun warming up?
Perhaps not, but you certainly believe you're entitled to something someone else made, which last I checked had a licence which states what you can and can't do. But what do I know.. I just read the readme
Comes naturally for some
no, your grave
Thats all good then. We believe in something else. Theres no point in continuing, the man has stated his views and he wont budge on them.
God I want to insert the risitas laugh gif here right now ๐คฃ
No, just you. We tried to educate you and you refused it
Did I say convert?
so what? rules are rules, licenses have a meaning, and opinions don't overthrow that
So you know what you can and can't do and what is legal
But it's ok, you can think what you like, doesn't make it right
you'd we a perfect candidate for "the purge"
See how those "ethics" work for you in the real world
mine work fine
cool beans
all you fight is your keyboard
it does... thats the definition of it
"Tyrannical Practices" aka, making sure that the bloke who made the mod is protected to distribute as he wants and doesn't get dicked by everyone
Oh no, someone stood up to me and my crappy ethics, look i'm being oppressed, this is so tyrannical. Sound familiar?
You made yourself one
Many things
cool
Say hi to the jailcell for me when you decide to take that car that's just there unlocked, I mean, laws don't apply to you
Seriously that is the most dense comeback I've ever heard for that
so... a keyboardwarrior aftrer all then?
like a real KW
think
just a bit
you'll get it
You need to get a grip on what you think standing up to someone is
I mean, it kind of is, Standing up for yourself is planting your position and trying to change someone's decision on something
No way did you just quote "free dictionary" LMAO
ROFL
anyway.... i got more productive and valuable things to do... like filing DMCAs or so...
bye
Hahahahahahahahahahaha nooooo f in way
you are indeed
all i hear is you nagging... exactly what a karen does
Not my fault I fit in
uhm... did you just forget the last 10ish minutes?
lol
Wrong again bucko, resources were posted to educate you
lying about what?
lol
I can't ๐ I'm off
whatever... i'm hungry and want some Leberkรคssemmeln
i won't cry for you
Gimme gimme gimme
nope, all mine ๐
At no point have I been offended
leberkรคs is holy
That can be arranged ๐
gimme a minute... need to eat my leberkรคs first ๐
ok, leberkรคs is eaten... what was it about cold dead hands again?
I hate you now
I'll go get some weisswurst and not share
Valid
but only with a good brezel and senf ofc!
Senf has to be super spicy though
not for weisswurst. it must be the sweet senf
It should but I don't like it sweet ๐
Perhaps, or maybe I'm just weird, either way I don't care I'll eat it however I damn well please ๐คฃ
oh, so you are not a keyboard worrier, but a food worrier... got a strong opinion, huh?
not really, i just know what I like. Sweet stuff is meh, take it or leave it
LOL Call it British entitlement ๐คฃ
so you're standing up for those who can not fight for themselves to eat pickles and nutella? ๐
damn... gotta stop that now before i get dragged too far into trolling ๐
Who does that? Are they out in public? Do I need to get a knoife licence?
Later
yeah, I know it could have been more, but technically he didn't do it
what did i miss...
nothing worth it really. just a "free soul" deciding "laws don't apply to him", "thinks by himself", "teach controversy", "flowers in the hair" nah sorry not that last one
ahh, there are quite a bunch of people that have that sort of mentality
envy on gmod and other games where this sort of sheet goes
Would be a wonderful sight if EA and/or disney were to strike everything there
it isnโt just about that anymore. several years ago people were using ripped content from various other games, available on the now defunct facepunch or similar
